Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0236194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236194

Basic neonatal resuscitation skills of midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia are not well retained: An observational study

Yitagesu Sintayehu 1,*, Assefa Desalew 1, Biftu Geda 1, Getahun Tiruye 1, Haymanot Mezmur 1, Kasiye Shiferaw 1, Teshale Mulatu 1
Editor: Georg M Schmölzer2
PMCID: PMC7380629  PMID: 32706775

Abstract

Background

Neonatal resuscitation is a life-saving intervention for birth asphyxia, a leading cause of neonatal mortality. Worldwide, four million neonate deaths happen annually, and birth asphyxia accounts for one million deaths. Improving providers’ neonatal resuscitation skills is critical for delivering quality care and for morbidity and mortality reduction. However, retention of these skills has been challenging in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Hence, this study aimed to assess neonatal resuscitation skills retention and associated factors among midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a pre-tested, structured, observational checklist. A total of 427 midwives and nurses were included from 28 public health facilities by cluster sampling and simple random sampling methods. Data were collected on facility type, availability of essential resuscitation equipment, socio-demographic characteristics of participants, current working unit, years of professional experience, whether a nurse or midwife received refresher training, and skills and knowledge related to neonatal resuscitation. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse the association between neonatal resuscitation skill retention and independent variables.

Results

About 11.2% of nurses and midwives were found to have retention of neonatal resuscitation skills. Being a midwife (AOR, 7.39 [95% CI: 2.25, 24.24]), ever performing neonatal resuscitation (AOR, 3.33 [95% CI: 1.09, 10.15]), bachelor sciences degree or above (AOR, 4.21 [95% CI: 1.60, 11.00]), and good knowledge of neonatal resuscitation (AOR, 3.31 [95% CI: 1.41, 7.73]) were significantly associated with skill retention of midwives and nurses.

Conclusion

Basic neonatal resuscitation skills of midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia are not well retained. This could increase the death of neonates due to asphyxia. Being a midwife, Bachelor Sciences degree or above educational status, ever performing neonatal resuscitation, and good knowledge were associated with skill retention. Providers should be encouraged to upgrade their educational level to build their skill retention and expose themselves to NR. Further, understanding factors affecting how midwives and nurses gain and retain skills using high-level methodology are essential.

Introduction

Worldwide, 136 million babies are born annually. Ten million require some stimulation at birth to breathe, while six million require basic resuscitation with a bag and mask [1,2]. Evidence shows that one million neonatal deaths occur on the day of birth per year. Close to two million babies die in the first week of life and four million dies in the neonatal period [35], which accounts for 46% of under-five mortality [68]. This mortality is estimated to increase to 52% in 2030 [9,10], unless strategic interventions are implemented. Surprisingly, about 99% of neonatal deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries [1]. Unfortunately, four million neonates experience birth asphyxia and one million deaths are caused by birth asphyxia annually [1118], while resuscitation at birth can prevent a large proportion of mortality [11,19].

Neonatal resuscitation (NR) is a crucial intervention for birth asphyxia [20]. In low- income and middle-income countries, facility-based NR may avert 30% of intrapartum-related neonatal deaths [3,21]. NR training for health workers potentially prevents many neonatal deaths currently misclassified as still births [22]. NR with a bag and mask is a high-impact intervention that can reduce neonatal deaths in resource-limited countries [23].

The burden of neonatal death is particularly severe in sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia, which suffers from a current neonatal mortality rate of 29 deaths per 1000 live births annually [1,2,24,25]. To provide effective resuscitation, care providers should apply detailed information and employ their technical skills competently. Therefore, those who perform resuscitation, nurses and midwives are expected to be competent and have the required knowledge and skills. These skills should be learned through training during their academic courses. Despite the time, resources, and expenses allocated to such training, little is known about the outcomes of these educational programs and whether students’ educational needs are met.

Simulation-based assessment of NR skills to identify providers' strengths and weaknesses is a less costly and more practical alternative to direct observation of actual NR [23]. The delivery of effective, safe, and good quality health services is essential interventions to improving maternal, newborn, and child health. Skill retention has paramount importance to improving quality service delivery [26].

Moreover, to achieve sustainable development goals (SDG) in 2030, all countries should reduce neonatal mortality to 12 per 1,000 live births and under 5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births [27]. Retention of NR skills is of crucial importance, along with access to basic equipment to save the life of millions of newborns [23,28,29]. However, maintaining NR skills presents a different set of challenges, particularly in settings where providers attend few deliveries, infrequently resuscitate newborns, and have limited access to refresher training in resource-scarce settings, including Ethiopia. Available evidence indicates that the rapid loss of NR skills occurs after an initial training [21,28,3033].

Midwives and nurses are healthcare providers who are able to provide promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services at all levels of the health care system. Midwifery and nursing training in Ethiopia offered in both public and private per the ministry of science and higher education requirement: the diploma, post-basic, direct Bachelor of Sciences (BSc) degree, MSc degree, and PhD level in both qualifications. Since nursing professionals are assigned to all units of the health facility, their education focuses on all medical care. Even if midwives take all medical care education, lastly they focus on maternal and neonatal care. In addition to these, some midwives and nurses take in-service training that can help them to give quality care at where they are assigned. Therefore, both midwives and nurses have access to managing critically ill newborns, midwives in the labor and delivery ward and nurses in delivery, neonatology, and pediatric ward.

NR skills are a key component of efforts to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although appropriate neonatal care programs are a current issue in Ethiopia, evidence on NR skill retention among midwives and nurses is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the magnitude of NR skills retention and associated factors among midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study setting and period

The study was conducted in Eastern Ethiopia, specifically in health care facilities from the Harari regional state, the Dire Dawa administration, and the Eastern and Western Harerghe zones from the Oromia regional states. In the included locations, there were an estimated 6,565,406 total population and 14 hospitals and 221 health centers with a total of 521 midwives and 2735 nurses working in all public health facilities in Eastern Ethiopia in November 2018.

Study design and participants

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among midwives and nurses who were working in public health facilities and were employed for at least one year anywhere in the study area were included. A total of 437 midwives and nurses were expected to be included in the assessment. Of these, 10 midwives and nurses were not included because of different reasons (four participants refused the invitation and the remaining six participants were inaccessible because they were in annual leave at the time of the assessment. Therefore, the assessment was limited to 427 (97.7%) of midwives and nurses those completely addressed by the assessment team. The assessment team visited each facility for one to three days to collect data if the study participants were unavailable.

Sample size determination and sampling procedures

The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula (n=(Zα/2)2p(1p)d2 by considering the proportion of NR skill retention of healthcare providers (76.3%) [34], 95% confidence level z values of 1.96, a margin of error of 5%, and adding a 5% allowance for non-response. Since the study had two stages, we used a design effect of 1.5. The final sample size resulted in 437 study participants. We used a cluster-sampling method first, based on their geographic location and administration into the Dire Dawa Administration (desert/hot climate and urban), Harari regional state (urban and middle climate region), and East Hararghe and West Hararghe (rural with different geographic locations and administrations). Then, we selected a total of 10 hospitals and 18 health centers from those clusters using a simple random sampling method from the list of public health facilities. In addition, a simple random sampling (lottery) method and proportional allocation to size were used to enroll midwives and nurses from the selected facilities.

Data collection techniques

A structured questionnaire was adapted and modified from similar literatures. The knowledge questionnaire was based on model assessment forms in the Needs Assessment Toolkit (the Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program’s Needs Assessment toolkit) regarding steps providers should take during newborn resuscitation [23, 3538]. Each knowledge question was designed to elicit multiple responses (25 expected responses). The tool was pre-tested and modified to suit the local context. The data collection procedure was undertaken using the pre-tested face-to-face interview administered questionnaire using paper-printed English version language. First, we interviewed facility directors and the study subjects about facility characteristics like the type of facility (hospital or health center), availability of essential NR equipment, current participants working unit, years of professional experience, refresher training status, and knowledge questions. Then, experts observed participants performing NR on an anatomical model and used an observational checklist (38-item skills tools) to rate their skill level [23, 39, 40].

Measurement of knowledge and skills

Knowledge of midwives and nurses on neonatal resuscitation was determined using a set of 25 objective questions. Each correct answer was valued at one point, and incorrect answer scored zero points. Questions not answered were considered incorrect answers. Eventually, participants were then grouped into two categories based on their total score on the knowledge scale: good knowledge (score 80% or higher) and poor knowledge (score less than 80%), which have been used in different studies after the overall cumulative mean score and the cumulative mean percentage score were calculated [37, 4144].

Similar to knowledge measurement, the skill of midwives and nurses on neonatal resuscitation was determined using a set of 38 steps of the objective observational checklist. Each complete performed step was valued at one point, and an incomplete performed step/not performed steps was valued zero point. Eventually, participants were then grouped into two categories based on their total score on the skill scale, good retention of skill (score 80% or higher), and poor retention of skill (score less than 80%), after the overall cumulative mean score and the cumulative mean percentage score were calculated [41].

Data quality control and management

Three experts (midwifery department lecturers, one Master in neonatology and pediatrics, and two Master in maternity and neonatology) were trained for observation. Three interviewers (BSc degree in midwifery) and two Master of public health (MPH) supervisors received intensive training for three days about the purpose of the study, the sampling procedure, and observational skills. All were experienced service providers and had data collection experience in a maternal and neonatal related study. Before data collection, the principal investigators shared ethical issues and ways of addressing contingency management. The questionnaire was pre-tested on 5% (22 participants) of the sample size on a similar population other than the included facility (in one hospital and two health centers). Then, all completed questionnaires were checked for completeness and cleaned manually.

Data processing and analysis

The questionnaires were coded and entered into the EPI data version 3.1 statistical software and then exported to SPSS version 21 statistical software for analysis. Data were summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. The outcome variables were coded as “1” for having good retention whereas “0” for not having good retention. The association between the outcome variables (i.e., NR skill retention) and independent variables were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model. Covariates with a p-value<0.25 were retained and entered into the multivariable logistic regression analysis using a forward stepwise approach. The Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess whether the necessary assumptions were fulfilled. The results are presented as odds ratios OR with 95% confidence intervals. An association with a p-value<0.05 was considered significant.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Health Research Ethics Review Committee of Haramaya University in Ethiopia. Following the approval, an official letter of cooperation was given to the Region and City administration Health Bureaus, zonal and Woreda health offices, hospitals, and health center officials. Permission was obtained from each facility’s director prior to the study. The purpose and importance of the study were explained to the study participants and directors of the facilities. Overall, data were collected only after fully written informed consent was obtained from each participant. All findings were kept confidential. The names and addresses of the participants were not recorded in the questionnaire. Furthermore, all the basic principles of human research ethics (respect for persons, beneficence, voluntary participation, confidentiality, and justice) were respected.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants

A total of 427 study subjects participated, yielding a response rate of 97.7%. The mean (SD) age of participants was 28.4 (± 7.05). Two hundred fifty-eight (60.4%) were female and 245 (57.4%) were married. Two hundred (46.8%) were Orthodox Christian, 285 (66.7%) were nurses, and 292 (68.4%) had a bachelor sciences degree or above. Two hundred sixty-three (61.6) of them had 1–5 years of professional experience (Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants among midwives and nurses working in public health facilities in Eastern Ethiopia, November 2018 (n = 427).

Variables Frequency (N) Percent (%)
Age
15–24 116 27.2
25–34 253 59.3
35–49 42 9.8
50–61 16 3.7
Sex
Female 258 60.4
Male 169 39.6
Marital status
Never married 171 40.0
Married 245 57.4
Divorced/Separated 11 2.6
Religion
Orthodox Christian 200 46.8
Muslim 179 42.0
Protestant 48 11.2
Profession
Midwifery 142 33.3
Nurse 285 66.7
Professional education levels
Level IV diploma 135 31.6
BSc degree and above 292 68.4
Professional experience in years
1–5 263 61.6
6–10 114 26.7
≥11 50 11.7
Current working unit
Obstetrics & gynecology 290 67.9
Pediatrics & neonatal 137 32.1

Training and work-related exposure

One hundred seven (25.1%) participants had ever taken NR refresher training and 202 (47.3%) had ever performed NR. About half (50.1%) of study subjects ever worked in the delivery room (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Refresher training and work-related exposure of midwives and nurses working in public health facilities in Eastern Ethiopia, November 2018 [n = 427].

Fig 1

Health facilities characteristics

According to the study, 127 (29.7%), 107 (25.1%), 99 (23.2%) and 94 (22%) study participants were from Dire Dawa city administration, Harari regional state, and Eastern and Western Hararghe zone respectively. Furthermore, 97.4%, 63% and 85% of health facilities had neonatal resuscitation corners (NR area), adequate newborn resuscitation guidelines, and essential equipment for newborn resuscitation, respectively. Regarding health care provision facilities, 333 (78%) midwives and nurses were from hospitals and the remaining 94 (22%) were from health centers.

The magnitude of neonatal resuscitation skill retention

Among participants in this study, only 48 (11.2%) 95% CI (8–14%) had good skill retention.

Factors associated with the neonatal resuscitation skill retention

In multivariate logistic analyses, being a midwife, having a BSc degree or above, ever performing NR, and having good knowledge of NR were independently associated with skill retention. Midwives were seven times more likely to retain NR skills (AOR, 7.39 [95% CI: 2.25, 24.25]) as compared to nurses. Those with a BSc degree and above were four times more likely to retain skills (AOR, 4.21 [95% CI: 1.60, 11.00]). Furthermore, participants who ever performed NR were three times more likely to retain NR skill (AOR, 3.33 [95% CI: 1.09, 10.15]), and those with good knowledge in NR (AOR, 3.31 [95% CI: 1.41, 7.73]) were three times more likely to retain their NR skill when compared with those with poor knowledge (Table 2).

Table 2. Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation skill retention among midwives and nurses working in public health facilities in Eastern Ethiopia, November 2018 (n = 427).

Variables NR skill retention COR AOR p-value
Yes No
Religion
Orthodox Christian 27(13.5) 173(86.5) 1
Muslim 18(10.1) 161(89.9) 0.72(0.38, 1.35) 0.64(0.30, 1.34) 0.23
Protestant 3(6.2) 45(93.8) 0.43(0.12, 1.47) 0.44(0.11, 1.74) 0.24
Profession
Nurse 10(3.5) 275(96.5) 1
Midwifery 38(26.8) 104(73.2) 10.05(4.82, 20.89) 7.39(2.25, 24.24) 0.001*
Level of education
Diploma 6(4.4) 129(95.6) 1
Degree and above 42(14.4) 250(85.6) 3.61(1.49, 8.72) 4.21(1.60, 11.00) 0.003*
Ever received refresher NR training
No 23(7.2) 297(92.8) 1
Yes 25(23.4) 82(76.6) 3.94(2.12, 7.29) 2.72(0.81, 3.63) 0.15
Ever performed NR
No 6(2.7) 219(97.3) 1
Yes 42(20.8) 160(79.2) 9.58(3.97, 23.08) 3.33(1.09, 10.15) 0.03*
Ever worked in a delivery unit
No 9(4.2) 204(95.8) 1
Yes 39(18.2) 175(81.8) 5.05(2.38, 10.72) 0.52(0.15, 1.79) 0.30
Ever worked in a pediatrics unit
No 42(12.8) 286(87.2) 1
Yes 6(6.0) 93(94.0) 0.44(0.09, 0.77) 0.80(0.22, 2.76) 0.71
Level of knowledge about NR
Poor knowledge 31(8.1) 354(91.9) 1
Good knowledge 17(40.5) 25(59.5) 7.77(3.79, 15.90) 3.31(1.41, 7.73) 0.006*

*Statistically significant at p-value <0.05 in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Discussion

The present study showed that only 11.2% of midwives and nurses had retained the skills of NR. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, being a midwife, having a BSc degree and above educational status, ever performed NR, and having a good level of knowledge were independently associated with NR skill retention of midwives and nurses.

Eleven percent of our sample retained their NR skills. This was lower than studies conducted in India [45, 46], Afghanistan [23], Tanzania [47], and northern Ethiopia [44]. This is probably due to the fact that the other studies were conducted in a single facility and urban facilities, while this study incorporated a broad study setting that included rural facilities that had no access to many infrastructures, limited essential equipment, updated NR information and internet access. However, 11.2% reported in our study was greater than some other studies, for example, in Pune city, India (6.3%) [20]. This might be due to the impact of the current focus of neonatal care service in Ethiopia. In Ethiopia, to improve access to neonatal care, many neonatal intensive care unit were opened and midwives and nurses training were started. During this time, a quarter of the midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia received refresher training.

Regarding factors associated with NR skill retention, being a midwife was significantly associated with skill retention; midwives were 7.39 times more likely to retain NR skills as compared with nurses. This might be due to the fact that midwives were frequently exposed in the delivery room and received refresher training. This finding is in agreement with a finding in Afghanistan [23]. In addition, those who ever performed NR were 3.33 times more likely to retain their skill than those not exposed in NR. This finding is in line with studies in Nepal and Italy [4850].

Furthermore, having higher educational status was associated with better skill retention. Those with a BSc degree and above were 4.21 times more likely to retain their skill than a level IV diploma nurse or midwives. This might be due to the fact that in the curricula of degree learners, there was greater focus on maternal and child health and using evidence-based practice. Moreover, having a good knowledge was found to be significantly associated with the NR skill retention of nurses and midwives. Those with good knowledge about NR were 3.31 times more likely to retain their skill. It is clear that knowledgeable care providers can apply their knowledge to skill. Paradoxically, receiving NR refresher training was not associated with the multivariate logistic analysis of this study, but in many studies, NR training was found to be significantly associated with retention of NR skill [23,30,5055].

A limitation of this study was the use of anatomic model simulation and observations to assess NR skill. Most providers may not consider and give attention to the anatomical model as a human being. Furthermore, the skill was scored by a single expert, and no inter-rater variation test was conducted. The stress of testing, as well as the stress of clinical situations where NR are needed, may have contributed to the low outcome of skill retention. In addition, the study was undertaken at one-time point so it is not possible to establish cause-effect relationships.

Conclusion

NR skills among midwives and nurses are not well retained in public health care facilities in the Eastern part of Ethiopia, which might increase the death rate of neonates due to asphyxia. Being a midwife, having a BSc degree or above, ever performed NR, and having good knowledge in NR were independently associated with NR skills retention in this study setting. Providers should be encouraged to upgrade their educational level to build their skill retention and expose themselves to NR. Further, understanding factors affecting how midwives and nurses gain and retain skills using high-level methodology are essential.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. The dataset from which the results of the study were produced (SPSS file).

(SAV)

S1 File. The data collection tool (questionnaire and checklist) in English.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks CIRHT-Ethiopia for their constructive comments and Haramaya University College of Health and Medical Sciences for their constructive comments and ethical review, and all respective Health Bureau for their cooperation to write permission letters to their health facilities. We also thank the data collectors, participants of the study and Pre-Publication Support Service (PREPSS) supported the development of this manuscript by providing pre-publication peer-review and copy editing.

Abbreviations

NR

Neonatal Resuscitation

WHO

World Health Organization 31769

Data Availability

All related data are presented fully within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

CIRHT-Ethiopia provided support in the form of per diem for data collectors, supervisors and provided training for the team. No additional external funding was received for this study.

References

  • 1.Oza S, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-of-death estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries: 2000–2013. Bull World Health Organ [Internet]. 2015;93(1):19–28. 10.2471/BLT.14.139790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agravat N. mHealth and neonatal resuscitation. A Review of Interventions, Approaches, and Applications. 2013, pp. 1–40. Available from: healthenabled.org/wordpress/wp content/ uploads. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee AC, Cousens S, Wall SN, et al. Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 3):S12 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lawn JE. 4 Million Neonatal Deaths: an Analysis of Available Cause-of-Death Data and Systematic Country Estimates With a Focus on “Birth Asphyxia. Unpubl Work [Internet]. 2009;I:1–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.You Danzhen, Hug Lucia, Ejdemyr Simon, Jan Beise PI World. Child Mortality 2015 [Internet]. UNICEF WHO World Bank Group United Nations; New York; 2015. p. 74 Available from: www.childmortality.org [Google Scholar]
  • 6.UNICEF. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME), ‘Levels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015’, United Nations Children’s Fund, New York, 2015, available from <www.childmortality.org.
  • 7.Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD L, CE SA. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014; 384 (9947):957–79. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60497-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO. monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris [Google Scholar]
  • 9.UNICEF, WHO, World Bank U-DPD. Levels and trends in child mortality [Internet]. New York:; 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/.
  • 10.Bogale TN, Worku AG, Bikis GA, Kebede ZT. Why gone too soon? Examining social determinants of neonatal deaths in northwest Ethiopia using the three delay model approach. BMC Pediatr. 2017;2017(17):216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO. Guidelines on Basic Newborn Resuscitation [Internet]. World Health Organization. WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/.
  • 12.Aslam HM, Saleem S, Afzal R, Iqbal U, Saleem SM, Shaikh MW, et al. Risk factors of birth asphyxia. Italian journal of pediatrics. 2014. December 1;40(1):94 10.1186/s13052-014-0094-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bryce J, Boschi-pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE, Health C, Reference E. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71877-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stanton C, Lawn JE, Rahman H, Wilczynska-ketende K, Hill K. Stillbirth rates: delivering estimates in 190 countries. Lancet. 2006;367:1487–94. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68586-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Neonatal Survival 1 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bhutta ZA. Learn more about Perinatal Asphyxia Paediatrics in the Tropics. In: Jeremy Farrar, Peter J. Hotez… Nicholas J. White, editor. Manson’s Tropical Infectious Diseases [Internet].2014. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780702051012.
  • 17.Halloran DR, McClure E, Chakraborty H, Chomba E, Wright LL, Carlo WA. Birth asphyxia survivors in a developing country. Journal of Perinatology. 2009. March;29(3):243–9. 10.1038/jp.2008.192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Daripa M, Caldas HMG, Flores LPO, Waldvogel BC, Guinsburg R, de Almeida MFB. Perinatal asphyxia associated with early neonatal mortality: populational study of avoidable deaths. Rev Paul Pediatr [Internet]. 2013;31(1):37–45. 10.1590/s0103-05822013000100007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Antonucci R, Porcella A, Pilloni MD. Perinatal asphyxia in the term newborn. Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine (JPNIM). 2014. October 21;3(2):1–4, e030269. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Devi S. A study to assess the effectiveness of Neonatal resuscitation Programme, First Golden minute certified training Course on knowledge and skill set of Nurses working in selected Hospital of Pune city. Int J Sci Res [Internet]. 2015;4(2277):432–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wall SN, Lee AC, Niermeyer S, English M, Keenan WJ, Carlo W, et al. Neonatal resuscitation in low-resource settings: What, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up? Int J Gynaecol Obs. 2010;107(Suppl 1):S47–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: Improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(SUPPL. 1):1–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim Y, Ansari N, Kols A, Tappis H, Currie S, Zainullah P, et al. Assessing the capacity for newborn resuscitation and factors associated with providers’ knowledge and skills: a cross-sectional study in Afghanistan. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2013;13(1):140–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mekonnen, Biruk Tensou, Daniel S Telake TDand AB. Neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: trends and determinants. BMC Public Heal 2013,. 2013;13:471–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Central Statistical Agency (CSA)[Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicators Report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA. CSA and ICF. Available: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR328/FR328.pdf
  • 26.Cavagnero E, Daelmans B, Gupta N, Scherpbier R, Shankar a. Assessment of the health system and policy environment as critical complement to tracking interventions coverage for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008;371:1284–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60563-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.2015. https//sustainabledevelopment.un.org;
  • 28.Maynard KR, Causey L, Kawaza K, Dube Q, Lufesi N, Maria Oden Z, et al. New technologies for essential newborn care in under-resourced areas: what is needed and how to deliver it. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2015;35(3):192–205. 10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Berglund S, Norman M. Neonatal resuscitation assessment: documentation and early paging must be improved! Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed [Internet]. 2012;97(3):F204–8. 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tabangin ME, Josyula S, Taylor KK, Vasquez JC, Kamath-Rayne BD. Resuscitation skills after Helping Babies Breathe training: A comparison of varying practice frequency and impact on retention of skills in different types of providers. Int Health. 2018;10(3):163–71. 10.1093/inthealth/ihy017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benazeera SGU. Assessment of student’s knowledge on neonatal resuscitation. J Biomed Pharm Res. 2014;3(2):67–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Patel J, Posencheg M, Ades A. Proficiency and Retention of Neonatal Resuscitation Skills by Pediatric Residents. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):515–21. 10.1542/peds.2012-0149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Subbiah N, Sarin J, Jeeva S, Geetanjali. Effectiveness of educational intervention on neonatal resuscitation among nursing personnel. TT -. Heal Popul Perspect Issues [Internet]. 2012;35(1): 36–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Seid A. knowledge and practice of neonatal resuscitation and associated factors among health professionals at jugel and hiwot fana specialized university hospital harar, Eastern, Ethiopia. unpublished. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program (AMDD): Needs Assessmentof Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC): Facilitator’s Guide. NewYork: Averting Maternal Death and Disability; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Keyes E.B., Haile‐Mariam A., Belayneh N.T., Gobezie W.A., Pearson L., Abdullah M., et al. (2011), Ethiopia's assessment of emergency obstetric and newborn care: Setting the gold standard for national facility‐based assessments. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 115: 94–100. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abrha MW, Asresu TT, Araya AA, Woldearegay HG. Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge of Neonatal Resuscitation in Ethiopia: Analysis from 2016 National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Survey. Int J Pediatr. 2019. July 16; 2019:8571351 10.1155/2019/8571351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mirkuzie AH, Sisay MM, Reta AT, Bedane MM. Current evidence on basic emergency obstetric and newborn care services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; a cross sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014. December;14(1):354 10.1186/1471-2393-14-354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kinzie B, Gomez P. Basic maternal and newborn care. A guide for skilled provider. 2004. Available at: http://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/hnn-content/uploads/JHPIEGO_mnh.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Beck D, Ganges F, Goldman S, Long P. Saving Newborn Lives. Cuidados ao Recém-Nascido. Manual de Consulta Acedido a. 2004;18 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, et al. : Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (Reprint). Pediatrics 2015, 136 Suppl 2:S196–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Murila F, Obimbo MM, Musoke R. Assessment of knowledge on neonatal resuscitation amongst health care providers in Kenya. Pan African Medical Journal. 2012; 8688, pp.4–9. Available online at: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/11/78/full/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alhassan A, Fuseini AG, Osman W, Basour Adam A. Nurs Res Pract. Knowledge and Experience of Neonatal Resuscitation among Midwives in Tamale. Nursing research and practice, 2019. January 2; 2019:3652608 10.1155/2019/3652608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gebreegziabher E, Aregawi A, Getinet H. Knowledge and skills of neonatal resuscitation of health professionals at a university teaching hospital of Northwest Ethiopia. World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(3):196‐202. 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vijayan A. Effect of Structured Teaching Programmeon Knowledge and Skills on Neonatal Resuscitation. Int J Adv Res. 2015;3(7):1200–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bansal SC, Nimbalkar AS, Patel D V., Sethi AR, Phatak AG, Nimbalkar SM. Current Neonatal Resuscitation Practices among Paediatricians in Gujarat, India. Int J Pediatr [Internet]. 2014;2014:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Makene CL, Plotkin M, Currie S, Bishanga D, Ugwi P, Louis H, et al. Improvements in newborn care and newborn resuscitation following a quality improvement program at scale: results from a before and after study in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2014;14(1):381 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ashish KC, Wrammert J, Nelin V, Clark RB, Ewald U, Peterson S, et al. Evaluation of Helping Babies Breathe Quality Improvement Cycle (HBB-QIC) on retention of neonatal resuscitation skills six months after training in Nepal. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2017;17(1):103 10.1186/s12887-017-0853-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.De Bernardo G, Sordino D, Cavallin F, Mardegan V, Doglioni N, Tataranno ML, et al. Performances of low level hospital health caregivers after a neonatal resuscitation course. Ital J Pediatr [Internet]. 2016;42(1):100 10.1186/s13052-016-0313-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ameh C a., Kerr R, Madaj B, Mdegela M, Kana T, Jones S, et al. Knowledge and Skills of Healthcare Providers in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia before and after Competency-Based Training in Emergency Obstetric and Early Newborn Care. PLoS One. 2006;11(12): 10.1371/journal.pone.0167270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Eblovi D, Kelly P, Afua G, Agyapong S, Dante S, Pellerite M. Retention and use of newborn resuscitation skills following a series of helping babies breathe trainings for midwives in rural Ghana. Glob Health Action [Internet]. 2017;10(1):0–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Das M, Chaudhary C, Bisht S, Maria A, Jain A, Kaushal S, et al. Retention of knowledge and skill of birth attendants in newborn care and resuscitation after 1 Year in clinical practice: An experience from India. J Clin Neonatol. 2018;7(2):89–95. Available from: http://www.jcnonweb.com/text.asp?2018/7/2/89/229672. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Drake M, Bishanga DR, Temu A, Njozi M, Thomas E, Mponzi V, et al. Structured on-the-job training to improve retention of newborn resuscitation skills: A national cohort Helping Babies Breathe study in Tanzania. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):1–8. 10.1186/s12887-018-1376-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bookman L, Engmann C, Srofenyoh E, Enweronu-Laryea C, Owen M, Randolph G, et al. Educational impact of a hospital-based neonatal resuscitation program in Ghana. Resuscitation [Internet]. 2010;81(9):1180–2. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bang A, Patel A, Bellad R, Gisore P, Goudar SS, Esamai F, et al. Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) training: What happens to knowledge and skills over time? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2016;16(1):364 10.1186/s12884-016-1141-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Georg M Schmölzer

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

7 May 2020

PONE-D-20-09955

Basic neonatal resuscitation skills of midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia are not well retained: An observational study.

PLOS ONE

Dear Yitagesu Sintayehu Abebe,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by June 20 2020. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Thank you for your submission. Please find below my comments in addition to those from the reviewer.

Please make sure you upload the research checklist specific for your research methods with your revisions.

Could you please also upload the questionnaire you created, which might allow other researcher to use this in their settings.

Could you please also upload the observational checklist (38-item skills tools)?

Has this observational checklist (38-item skills tools) been validated or used in previous studies?

If available, could you please add the reference number from your ethics application.

I would suggest adding the Socio-demographic questionnaire as an appendix.

thank you

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1.    Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication, which needs to be addressed:

http://jmrh.mums.ac.ir/m/issue_548_669_Volume+3,+Issue+3,+July+2015%3Cspan+id=%22sp_ar_pages%22%3E,+Page+%3Cspan+dir=%22ltr%22%3E378-384%3C/span%3E%3C/article_4464.html?

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information. Please also include details of any pre-testing that took place, including the number of participants.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"The authors would like to thank CIRHT Ethiopia, for funding the study and technical

collaboration and Haramaya University, College of Health and Medical Science for unreserved

technical and non-financial support, all respective Health Bureau for their support and

collaborations."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study is important due to the high prevalence of neonatal deaths in Africa and the obvious need for adequate neonatal resuscitation skills among local health personnel involved with newborn babies. Some information is lacking, at best too scarce. 1) How was the neonatal resuscitation skills measured, objectively and/or subjectively, by whom and how many evaluated each participant. Interrater reliability? I appreciate the authors mentioning this as a limitation. What was the educational background of the three experts (midwifery department lecturers) that were trained for observation as well as the 3 interviewers/supervisors who received intensive training 2) What is defined as retained skills when a fraction of participants never had participated in training or theoretical background "25 percent had ever taken NR refresher training and 47.3% had ever performed NR. About half (50.1%) of study subjects ever worked in the delivery room". How was skill retention defined and quantified and what is meant by the expression of "good NR knowledge score" 3) What are the characteristics of the 4 health districts, any differences or similarities, in-hospital patients populations? 4) I would like to see the pre-tested, structured, observational checklist for evaluation of NR skills, as well as the adapted and modified structured questionnaire that was used and the scoring system. 5) Further, a better description of how cluster sampling and simple random sampling methods were performed 6) Explain the differences in education and daily exposure to critically ill newborns, midwifes vs nurses, 7) 427 participated in the study. How many were invited and how were the invitation posted. Anyone who rejected participation 8) Minors; Explain NR unit. Fig 2 may be deleted as information appears in the text. Is there an IRB approval number?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Britt Nakstad

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0236194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236194.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Jun 2020

Response to Reviewers’

Title: “Basic neonatal resuscitation skills of midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia are not well retained: an observational study." [Manuscript ID PONE-D-20-09955]

To: The editor-in-chief, PLOS ONE

From: Authors

Subject: Revision of the manuscript

Dear Sir/ Madam,

We hope everything is fine. We appreciate and thank to the academic editor and reviewers for investing their time and energy to review and make comments on our manuscript. It is with great pleasure to receive the invaluable and constructive comments for our manuscript.

As per your request for a separate cover letter, the comments with their point-by-point responses are put below here. In addition, the detailed changes made are highlighted in the “revised manuscript with track changes” by activating the “track changes” feature to easily identify the changes/ improvements. Moreover, the manuscript without track change is prepared. We accepted and tried to incorporate all of the comments provided. Therefore, we are kindly requesting you to review our revised manuscript; especially the “manuscript without track change”.

No Comments Responses

Editor

- Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Thank you for your submission. Please find below my comments in addition to those from the reviewer.

Please make sure you upload the research checklist specific to your research methods with your revisions. Thank you for the comment, the comment is accepted and all sections of the tools used in this study are uploaded as supporting information, this can be possible to upload with link during publication if possible, that might allow other researcher to use this in their settings.

- Could you please also upload the questionnaire you created, which might allow other researcher to use this in their settings. Thank you, the comment is accepted and all sections of the tools used in this study is uploaded as supporting information, this can be possible to upload with link during publication if possible, that might allow other researcher to use this in their settings.

- Could you please also upload the observational checklist (38-item skills tools)?

Has this observational checklist (38-item skills tools) been validated or used in previous studies? Thank you request. Since we extracted the tools from the different study for both knowledge assessment and skill observation, the detailed explanation and the studies used are listed under the “5. Review Comments to the Author” comment number 4 of reviewer #1.

If available, could you please add the reference number from your ethics application?

Our institution did not give IRB approval number since it is not online. The office notices the approval of the study by letter without approval number.

- I would suggest adding the Socio-demographic questionnaire as an appendix.

thank you Thank you, the comment is accepted. All sections of the tools used in this study is uploaded as supporting information, this can be possible to upload with link during publication if possible, that might allow other researcher to use this in their settings.

-

1. Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

The comment is accepted and corrected accordingly per PLOS ONE’s style.

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication, which needs to be addressed: http://jmrh.mums.ac.ir/m/issue_548_669_Volume+3,+Issue+3,+July+2015%3Cspan+id=%22sp_ar_pages%22%3E,+Page+%3Cspan+dir=%22ltr%22%3E378-384%3C/span%3E%3C/article_4464.html?

Thank you for the enquiry. We had gone throughout the linked document; we have tried to paraphrase the overlapped sentence accordingly. Even if the study title is one of the same professionals (midwives and nurses), our study is on in-service providers at health facility level, while their study is on students in skill laboratory. Additionally, their background, result, and discussion section is different in finding plus presentation style. Furthermore, we will try more, if there is any overlapped text are correct.

- In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your works) and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. , further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed. Thank you. The comment is accepted all sources are cited.

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information. Please also include details of any pre-testing that took place, including the number of participants The comment is accepted and a copy of the questionnaire is uploaded as supporting information. Since the participants’ working language is English, we have used only the English language version, and we didn’t have another language version. The questionnaire was pre-tested on 5% (22 participants) of the sample size on a similar population other than the included facility (in one hospital and two health centers). This one is incorporated in the manuscript.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"The authors would like to thank CIRHT Ethiopia, for funding the study and technical

collaboration and Haramaya University, College of Health and Medical Science for unreserved

technical and non-financial support, all respective Health Bureau for their support and

collaborations."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." The comment is accepted and the funding statement removed from the manuscript and corrected as, Acknowledgment:The authors would like to thank CIRHT-Ethiopia for their constructive comments and Haramaya University College of Health and Medical Sciences for their constructive comments and ethical review, and all respective Health Bureau for their cooperation to write permission letters to their health facilities. We also thank the data collectors, participants of the study and Pre-Publication Support Service (PREPSS) supported the development of this manuscript by providing pre-publication peer-review and copy editing.

There is funding statement change as,

Funding Statement: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Reviewer #1: Response

- This study is important due to the high prevalence of neonatal deaths in Africa and the obvious need for adequate neonatal resuscitation skills among local health personnel involved with newborn babies. Some information is lacking, at best too scarce. Thank you!

1) How was the neonatal resuscitation skills measured, objectively, and/or subjectively, by whom and how many evaluated each participant. Interrater reliability? I appreciate the authors mentioning this as a limitation. What was the educational background of the three experts (midwifery department lecturers) that were trained for observation as well as the 3 interviewers/supervisors who received intensive training Thank you, all the raised comments, measurements of both the skill and knowledge are objective assessment tool, Interrater reliability was raised as a limitation (single observer used), and the educational background of data collectors, observers (experts) included in the manuscript. All were experienced service providers and had data collection experience in the maternal and neonatal related study and this is addressed in the manuscript.

2) What is defined as retained skills when a fraction of participants never had participated in training or theoretical background "25 percent had ever taken NR refresher training and 47.3% had ever performed NR. About half (50.1%) of study subjects ever worked in the delivery room". How was skill retention defined and quantified and what is meant by the expression of "good NR knowledge score"

Thank you, for the first two-sentence comment of #2, both midwives and nurses had basic theoretical and skill background during their higher education before graduation. Refreshers training is the additional rehearsal activity, not basic training. Ever performing NR and working in the delivery room were the expected factors that we tested for skill association. As we stated under the section of knowledge and skill measurement, we stated good skill retention when the participates scored the measurement tool 80% or higher. “good NR knowledge score” rephrased as good knowledge in NR.

3) What are the characteristics of the 4 health districts, any differences or similarities, in-hospital patients populations? Thank you for your clarification question, first, Eastern part of Ethiopia in the area with high fertility rate. Dire Dawa administration and Harari region are the independent regional state, mostly urban residents. However, Eastern and Western Harerghe zones are mostly from the rural Oromia regional states. In addition to these differences Dire Dawa administration is with the different nation, nationality, and different religion follower populations, which is directly governed by the federal government, Harari region is the smallest regional state in Ethiopia with a similar population with Dire Dawa administration, but not governed the regional state. The two West and East Hararghe zones have an almost similar population, which is most of them are Muslim in religion and single nation (Oromo). With these difference, the four health districts influence the capacity and readiness of the facility to give care to those different populations.

Their similarity is all the health districts follow the same health management system of the federal government and the health care providers from a similar multi-disciplinary for all health districts accordingly.

4) I would like to see the pre-tested, structured, observational checklist for evaluation of NR skills, as well as the adapted and modified structured questionnaire that was used and the scoring system.

Thank you for the inquiry. The copy of all the tools we used in this study is uploaded as supporting information. Since the participants’ working language is English, we have used only the English language version, and we didn’t have other language version. Since we extracted the tools from the different studies, which were validated in different studies by different body for both knowledge assessment and skill observation. Further, it is possible to find the studies used for the tools here below.

For knowledge assessment tools:

1. Kim Y, Ansari N, Kols A, Tappis H, Currie S, Zainullah P, et al. Assessing the capacity for newborn resuscitation and factors associated with providers’ knowledge and skills: a cross-sectional study in Afghanistan. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2013;13(1):140–52.

2. Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program (AMDD): Needs Assessment of Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC): Facilitator’s Guide. NewYork: Averting Maternal Death and Disability; 2009.

3. Keyes, E.B., Haile‐Mariam, A., Belayneh, N.T., Gobezie, W.A., Pearson, L., Abdullah, M. and Kebede, H. (2011), Ethiopia's assessment of emergency obstetric and newborn care: Setting the gold standard for national facility‐based assessments. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 115: 94-100. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.009

4. Abrha MW, Asresu TT, Araya AA, Woldearegay HG. Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge of Neonatal Resuscitation in Ethiopia: Analysis from 2016 National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Survey. Int J Pediatr. 2019 Jul 16; 2019:8571351. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8571351

5. Mirkuzie AH, Sisay MM, Reta AT, Bedane MM. Current evidence on basic emergency obstetric and newborn care services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; a cross sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014 Dec;14(1):354. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-354

For skill assessment tools:

1. Kim Y, Ansari N, Kols A, Tappis H, Currie S, Zainullah P, et al. Assessing the capacity for newborn resuscitation and factors associated with providers’ knowledge and skills: a cross-sectional study in Afghanistan. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2013;13(1):140–52.

2. Kinzie B, Gomez P. Basic maternal and newborn care. A guide for the skilled provider. 2004. Available at: http://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/hnn-content/uploads/JHPIEGO_mnh.pdf.

3. Beck D, Ganges F, Goldman S, Long P. Saving Newborn Lives. Care of the Newborn Reference Manual. Washington, DC: Save the Children Federation. 2004;18. Available at: https://km.mohp.gov.np/sites/default/files/2018-07/Care_of_the_Newborn_Reference_Manual_2004.pdf

5) Further, a better description of how cluster sampling and simple random sampling methods were performed

Thank you. We used a cluster-sampling method first, based on their geographic location and administration into, Dire Dawa Administration (desert/hot climate and urban), Harari regional state (urban and middle climate region), East Hararghe and West Hararghe (rural part but, different in geographic location and administration). Then, we selected a total of 10 hospitals and 18 health centers from those clusters using a simple random sampling method from the list of public health facilities. Besides, a simple random sampling (lottery) method and proportional allocation to size were used to enroll midwives and nurses from the selected facilities. This description is incorporated into the manuscript.

6) Explain the differences in education and daily exposure to critically ill newborns, midwives vs nurses,

Thank you. Midwives and nurses are health care providers who can provide promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services at all levels of the health care system. Midwifery and nursing training in Ethiopia offered in both public and private per the ministry of science and higher education requirement: the diploma, post-basic, direct bachelor of sciences degree, MSc degree, and PhD level in both qualifications. Since nursing professionals are assigned to all units of the health facility, their education focuses on all medical care. Even if midwives takes all medical care education, lastly they focus on maternal and neonatal care. In addition to these, some midwives and nurses take in-service training that can help them to give quality care at where they assigned. Therefore, both midwives and nurses have access to managing critically ill newborns, midwives in labor and delivery ward and nurses in delivery, neonatology, and pediatric ward.

7) 427 participated in the study. How many were invited and how were the invitation posted. Anyone who rejected participation

.

A total of 437 midwives and nurses were expected to be included in the assessment. Of these, 10 midwives and nurses were not included due to different reasons (four participants refused the invitation and the remaining six participants were inaccessible because they were in annual leave at the time of the assessment. Therefore, the assessment was limited to 427 (97.7%) of midwives and nurses those completely addressed by the assessment team. The assessment team visited each facility for one to three days to collect data if the study participants are unavailable. This description also addresses in the manuscript under study design and participants

8) Minors; Explain the NR unit. Fig 2 may be deleted as information appears in the text. Is there an IRB approval number?

Thank you for your detailed evaluation. “Ever working in NR unit” is a typing error, now it updated to “ever performed NR”, which was correct on figure 1. This correction have dove throughout the document and Figure 2 is deleted. Our institution did not give IRB approval number since it is not online. The office notices the approval of the study by letter without approval number.

Thank you,

Authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Georg M Schmölzer

1 Jul 2020

Basic neonatal resuscitation skills of midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia are not well retained: an observational study.

PONE-D-20-09955R1

Dear Dr. Yitagesu Sintayehu Abebe,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Georg M Schmölzer

15 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-09955R1

Basic neonatal resuscitation skills of midwives and nurses in Eastern Ethiopia are not well retained: an observational study.

Dear Dr. Abebe:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Dataset. The dataset from which the results of the study were produced (SPSS file).

    (SAV)

    S1 File. The data collection tool (questionnaire and checklist) in English.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All related data are presented fully within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES