Abstract
Background
Craniofacial anomalies are among the most frequent birth defects worldwide, and are thought to be caused by gene‐environment interactions. Genetically manipulated zebrafish simulate human diseases and provide great advantages for investigating the etiology and pathology of craniofacial anomalies. Although substantial advances have been made in understanding genetic factors causing craniofacial disorders, limited information about the etiology by which environmental factors, such as teratogens, induce craniofacial anomalies is available in zebrafish.
Results
Zebrafish embryos displayed craniofacial malformations after teratogen treatments. Further observations revealed characteristic disruption of chondrocyte number, shape and stacking. These findings suggested aberrant development of cranial neural crest (CNC) cells, which was confirmed by gene expression analysis of the CNC. Notably, these observations suggested conserved etiological pathways between zebrafish and mammals including human. Furthermore, several of these chemicals caused malformations of the eyes, otic vesicle, and/or heart, representing a phenocopy of neurocristopathy, and these chemicals altered the expression levels of the responsible genes.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that chemical‐induced craniofacial malformation is caused by aberrant development of neural crest. This study indicates that zebrafish provide a platform for investigating contributions of environmental factors as causative agents of craniofacial anomalies and neurocristopathy.
Keywords: disease model, environmental factors, neural crest cells, neurocristopathy, teratogen, zebrafish
1. INTRODUCTION
Craniofacial anomalies represent a diverse group of deformities related to the differentiation and growth of the head and facial bones, and comprise over one‐third of all congenital birth defects. 1 According to the OMIM database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim), over 700 disorders are associated with craniofacial features. The most frequent craniofacial anomalies comprise orofacial clefts, cleft lip, and/or cleft palate. 2 In addition, craniosynostosis, hemifacial microsomia, and holoprosencephaly are other common symptoms. These malformations are closely linked to neural crest (NC) cell development, with defects in the formation, migration, and differentiation of NC cells, which are a cell population formed in vertebrates during embryogenesis. 3 , 4 These cells are destined to differentiate into various cell types, such as neurons, glia, chondrocytes, melanocytes, and smooth muscle myocytes. 5 , 6 , 7 Thus, the disruption of NC cell development leads to diverse clinical pathologies, collectively termed neurocristopathy. 8 , 9 , 10 These malformations are thought to be caused by genetic mutations in specific genes. Several clinical syndromes involving neurocristopathy, including Treacher Collins syndrome (OMIM: #154500), CHARGE syndrome (OMIM: #214800), Pierre Robin sequence (OMIN: #261800), Branchio‐oculo‐facial syndrome (OMIN: #113620), and Waardenburg syndrome (OMIM: #193500), are well characterized phenotypically and genetically. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 In addition to genetic mutations, environmental factors such as alcohol, folic acid deficiency, maternal diabetes, infection, and pharmaceutical agents have been reported to be involved in craniofacial anomalies. 15 , 16 , 17 Therefore, these abnormalities are believed to be induced by genetic and environmental factors. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 As an example of gene‐environment interaction, there is an increased risk of the development of orofacial clefts in carriers of a specific genotype if their mothers smoke cigarettes during pregnancy. 22 However, the causal relationship between environmental and genetic factors in craniofacial malformations induced by pharmaceuticals and chemical agents remains generally unknown, despite the existence of such a relationship being widely accepted. Furthermore, while identifying environmental factors that cause chemical‐induced malformations and their degree of risk has advanced as a major goal for preventing congenital birth defects, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood due to the lack of suitable model systems.
As one model system, zebrafish (Danio rerio) have been used to examine the etiology of human craniofacial anomalies. 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 Zebrafish have a simple craniofacial structure, and facial morphogenesis is easily observed due to the embryo's transparency after external fertilization. Several responsible genes whose malfunction induces craniofacial malformations have been identified and are conserved between human and zebrafish, including Tcof1 and Polr1 (Treacher Collins syndrome), Chd7 (CHARGE syndrome), Sox9 (Pierre Robin sequence), Tfap2a (Branchio‐Oculo‐Facial syndrome), and Sox10 (Waardenburg syndrome). 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 In addition, genetic modifications of the disease‐related genes in zebrafish simulate the clinical phenotypes found in humans. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 This evidence supports the hypothesis that zebrafish provide a novel platform for analyzing gene‐environment interactions that affect craniofacial malformations. Some knowledge has been accumulated regarding the association between genotypes and phenotypes in human craniofacial anomalies by utilizing the zebrafish model. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a well‐known example of gene environment interaction and zebrafish FASD model is a powerful model for analyzing prenatal exposure of alcohol. 34 , 35 , 36 There are only a few reports except reports using the FASD model that have focused on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying chemical‐induced craniofacial malformations.
In short, there are two questions to be addressed: (a) Do teratogens which induce craniofacial anomalies in mammals cause the same anomalies in zebrafish? (b) Do teratogens target CNC development to induce craniofacial anomalies in zebrafish?
In the present study, zebrafish embryos were treated with 12 chemicals (retinoic acid, methotrexate, salicylic acid, valproic acid, caffeine, warfarin, hydroxyurea, dexamethasone, phenytoin, imatinib, boric acid, and thalidomide) which are recognized to be teratogens in mammals. Prominent morphological defects were found in the craniofacial region and heart, which strongly suggested aberrant development of NC cells. The craniofacial morphology of the teratogen‐treated embryos was examined by whole‐mount cartilage staining. All of these zebrafish displayed malformations of the neurocranium and viscerocranium, which are composed of NC‐derived chondrocytes. In particular, a smaller lower jaw (micrognathia) and anterior neurocranial defects appeared to be due to a decreased number of chondrocytes and defects related to the morphologies of chondrocytes. Next, the expression levels of genes regulating cranial neural crest (CNC) development were examined. These gene expression levels were found to be decreased, further suggesting the disruption of CNC development. Our results indicated that CNC development is a target biological pathway whose dysregulation underlies chemical‐induced craniofacial malformation. Interestingly, the expression levels of genes responsible for specific neurocristopathies also decreased, suggesting that the zebrafish phenotype resembles neurocristopathy phenotypically.
Taken together, our findings suggest that chemical‐induced craniofacial malformation is caused by a defect of CNC development, which is the same etiology as that of various clinical symptoms resulting from genetic mutations. Our results also indicate that zebrafish would be a novel platform to identify and examine the contribution of environmental factors to craniofacial malformation.
2. RESULTS
2.1. Teratogen exposure induced abnormal craniofacial development in zebrafish
To investigate the effects of teratogens on zebrafish craniofacial development, embryos were exposed to the 12 teratogens listed in Table 1. These teratogens are known to induce craniofacial defects such as cleft palate, micrognathia, ear anomalies and eye defects in mammals. Morphological changes of the embryos at 96 hours post fertilization (hpf) were examined in the head, eyes and otic vesicles (Figure 1). Although embryos treated with five chemicals (RA, MTX, SA, CAF, and HU) displayed gross morphological defects, embryos treated with the other chemicals showed only minor phenotypes due to the embryos' transparency (Figure 1B–O). Therefore, for better visualization of the cranial structure and its phenotype, cartilage staining with Alcian blue was performed (Figure 2). The cartilaginous head skeleton was clearly visualized at 96 hpf and consisted of two prominent subdivisions, which were the neurocranium composed of the ethmoid plate, trabeculae and parachordal, and the viscerocranium composed of the pharyngeal skeleton, such as Meckel's cartilage, palatoquadrate, ceratobranchial, and ceratohyal (Figure 2A). No phenotypic differences were detected between E3 control and DMSO as vehicle control (Figure 2B,C). Specific defects in the viscerocranium and the neurocranium were clearly detected in embryos treated with each of the teratogens tested (Figure 2D–O). RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, and VPA‐treated embryos displayed severe defects in the neurocranium and the viscerocranium (Figure 2D–G). In these embryos, deformities of the craniofacial skeleton were marked by the absence or shortening of the skeletal elements in the viscerocranium and malformation of the ethmoid plate, which consisted of a fused (RA treatment) or separated (MTX, SA, and VPA treatment) ethmoid plate (Figure 2D–G). CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, and DEX‐treated embryos showed moderate phenotypes, such as shortening of Meckel's cartilage and a separate or short ethmoid plate (Figure 2H–K). PHT‐, IM‐, BA‐, and THA‐treated embryos showed slight changes in both the neurocranium and the viscerocranium (Figure 2L–O). In these embryos, the anteroposterior length of the ethmoid plate and trabeculae and the width of the parachordal were shorter than those in the control group. Clear differences in palatoquadrate, hyosymplectic, ceratohyal, and ceratobranchial cartilages were not detected; however, shortened Meckel's cartilage was observed in these embryos (Figure 2L–O). These morphological defects were quantified and summarized in Figure 2P. The dimensions of the morphological changes found in the head structure were greater than those of the changes in overall size of the embryos (Figure 2Q).
TABLE 1.
Category | Test compound | Abbreviation | CAS no. | Supplier | Solvent | Concentration range (μM) | Craniofacial defects in mammals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antineoplastic agents, immunomodulating agents | Hydroxyurea | HU | 127‐07‐1 | Sigma‐Aldrich | Distilled water | 1–1,000 | Craniofacial dysgenesis, micrognathia, cleft palate, and eye defects 37 , 38 , 39 |
Imatinib | IM | 152 459‐95‐5 | Tokyo Chemical Industry | DMSO | 1–250 a | Micrognathia, cleft palate, misshapen snouts, eye defects 40 , 41 | |
Methotrexate | MTX | 59‐05‐2 | Wako | DMSO | 0.1–200 b | Micrognathia, cleft lip and palate, prominent eyes, low‐set ears, and microphthalmia 42 , 43 , 44 | |
Thalidomide | THA | 50‐35‐1 | Tocris Bioscience | DMSO | 1–400 a | Micrognathia, retrognathia and cleft palate, mild low set ears, and eye deformities 45 , 46 | |
Cardiovascular agents antithrombotic agents, anticoagulants | Warfarin | WAF | 129‐06‐6 | Wako | DMSO | 0.1–60 b | Microcephaly, short palpebral fissures, maxillary hypoplasia, micrognathia, and cleft palate 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 |
Antiepileptic agents, anticonvulsants | Phenytoin | PHT | 57‐41‐0 | Wako | DMSO | 1–200 a | Micrognathia, agnathia, and cleft palate 51 , 52 , 53 |
Valproic acid | VPA | 99‐66‐1 | Wako | Distilled water | 0.1–30 b | Micrognathia, cleft palate, flattened nasal bridge, eye and ear abnormalitie 54 , 55 , 56 | |
Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs | Salicylic acid | SA | 54‐21‐7 | Wako | Distilled water | 1–400 b | Micrognathia, cleft palate, and microcephaly 57 , 58 , 59 |
Corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents | Dexamethasone | DEX | 59‐05‐2 | Wako | DMSO | 1–200 a | Micrognathia and cleft palate 60 , 61 |
Ophthalmic agents, insecticide | Boric acid | BA | 10043‐35‐3 | Wako | Distilled water | 1–1,000 | Micrognathia and low‐set ears 62 , 63 |
Psychostimulants, agents used for ADHD | Caffeine | CAF | 58‐08‐2 | Wako | Distilled water | 1–500 b | Micrognathia, agnathia, cleft lip and palate 64 , 65 , 66 |
Vitamin A, topical use in acne | Retinoic acid | RA | 302‐79‐4 | Tokyo Chemical Industry | DMSO | 1 × 10−3 to 5 × 10−2 a | Micrognathia, agnathia, cleft lip and palate, ear and eye defects 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 |
Highest soluble concentration.
Highest viable concentration.
Based on these observations, we speculated that the ethmoid plate and trabeculae in the neurocranium and Meckel's cartilage in the viscerocranium had sensitive responses to the teratogens. To test this, we then performed quantitative analysis of both the neurocranium cartilages and Meckel's cartilage (Figure 3). For the neurocranium analyses, the anteroposterior length of the ethmoid plate and trabeculae were measured and the width was measured from one side of the parachordal to the other (Figure 3A). The average neurocranium length in the teratogen‐treated embryos was significantly decreased compared to that in control embryos except DEX, IM, BA and THA (Figure 3B). Also, the average width of the neurocranium in the teratogen‐treated embryos was significantly decreased (Figure 3C). These analyses suggested that all of these teratogens affected neurocranium morphogenesis, resulting in smaller neurocranium phenotypes. Likewise, the length and width of the Meckel's cartilage in the viscerocranium were quantified (Figure 3D–F). The length was measured from the anterior edge of the Meckel's cartilage midline to the tip of the retroarticular, and the width was defined as the distance between the opposing retroarticulars (Figure 3D). The average length of the Meckel's cartilage was significantly decreased by treatment with each of the teratogens except CAF, HU, PHT IM, BA, and THA (Figure 3E). The average width of the Meckel's cartilage was decreased significantly by treatment with each of the teratogens (Figure 3F).
Thus, the sizes of the neurocranium and viscerocranium were significantly decreased by treatment with the teratogens. All of the teratogens induced small jaw (micrognathia) and small head (microcephaly), and large jaw or head or hyperplasia of the craniofacial skeleton was not observed. Together, our data suggested that the teratogens affected the craniofacial development, leading to craniofacial malformation. The ethmoid plate, trabeculae and Meckel's cartilage consist of chondrocytes, which originate from NC cells, 25 , 71 and therefore our findings suggest that the development of NC cells was disrupted by these teratogens.
2.2. Teratogen‐induced craniofacial malformations were caused by decreased chondrocyte number, and by disturbed chondrocyte shape and stacking
We next examined at the cellular level how the malformation of the ethmoid plate and Meckel's cartilage was induced by teratogen treatment. Morphogenesis of the ethmoid plate and Meckel's cartilage is mediated by the convergence and integration of facial prominences, followed by elongation with cell proliferation. 72 , 73 In addition to cell proliferation, chondrocyte shaping and stacking are required for proper formation and function of the craniofacial cartilage. We analyzed which of these steps were influenced by teratogen treatment, focusing on the morphology of the ethmoid plate and Meckel's cartilage, and the number of chondrocytes and their morphology (Figures 4 and 5).
The morphology of the ethmoid plate was disturbed by teratogen treatment (Figures 3B,C and 4C–N). RA‐treated embryos displayed an ethmoid plate with a rod‐like shape (Figure 4C). MTX‐, SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, DEX‐, PHT‐, IM‐, and THA‐treated embryos showed a clefting or rough edge of the anterior ethmoid plate (Figure 4D–L,N). A prominent morphological defect in the ethmoid plate was not observed in BA‐treated embryos (Figure 4M). Mature chondrocytes showed an elongated shape and stacking on each other to form linear columns at 96 hpf in control embryos (Figure 4A′,B′). In teratogen‐treated embryos, chondrocytes showed atypical morphology and lost the stacked structure (Figure 4C′–N′). Rounded chondrocytes were observed in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, DEX‐, and THA‐treated embryos (Figure 4C′–E′,J′,N′). In VPA‐, CAF‐, and IM‐treated embryos, chondrocytes showed decreased size (Figure 4F,F′,G,G′,L,L′). In WAF‐treated embryos, chondrocytes showed increased size compared to the control group (Figure 4H′). HU‐, PHT‐, and BA‐treated embryos exhibited smaller chondrocytes with rounded morphology (Figure 4I,I′,K,K′,M,M′).
To obtain quantitative results, the number of chondrocytes in the anterior half of the neurocranium (the ethmoid plate and the trabeculae) was counted and the length/width ratio and the orientation of each chondrocyte in the ethmoid plate were measured (Figure 4O–R). The number of chondrocytes was significantly decreased by all of the teratogen treatments except HU, PHT, and THA treatment (Figure 4P). In order to quantify the disturbance of chondrocyte morphology, the length/width ratio and the orientation of the longest cell axis were measured (Figure 4Q,R). The average ratio was greater than 2 in the control and vehicle control, while the average ratio in all teratogen‐treated groups was significantly decreased (Figure 4Q). The chondrocyte stacking was also significantly disturbed by all of the teratogen treatments (Figure 4R). Thus, the morphological anomalies of the neurocranium induced by teratogen treatment were caused by both a decreased number of chondrocytes and a morphological defect of the chondrocytes.
The same analyses were performed for the Meckel's cartilage in the viscerocranium (Figure 5). The Meckel's cartilage had an inverse U shape in control and vehicle control (Figure 5A,B). After teratogen treatment, the morphology of the Meckel's cartilage was changed and its size was decreased (Figures 3E,F and 5C–N). Mature chondrocytes were elongated and stacked on each other to form a columnar structure at 96 hpf in control and vehicle control (Figure 5A′,B′). Rounded chondrocytes and a lack of stacked structure were observed in the teratogen‐treated embryos (Figure 5C′–N′). In order to obtain quantitative results, the number of chondrocytes in half of the Meckel's cartilage was counted and the length/width ratio and the orientation of the chondrocytes was measured (Figure 5O–R). The number of chondrocytes in the Meckel's cartilage was significantly decreased in all treatment groups; however, no significant difference was observed between the control and the vehicle control groups (Figure 5P). The average length/width ratio was greater than 4 in the control and vehicle control (Figure 5Q). The average length/width ratio was significantly decreased in all treatment groups (Figure 5Q). The chondrocyte stacking in the Meckel's cartilage was also disturbed significantly by all of the teratogen treatments (Figure 5R). Thus, morphological anomalies of the viscerocranium induced by the teratogens were caused by both a decreased number of chondrocytes and morphological defects of the chondrocytes.
Taken together, these results suggested that craniofacial malformation induced by the teratogens was due to defects of not only chondrocyte number but also chondrocyte shape and stacking. These results also led us to speculate that the development of the CNC cell was directly or indirectly perturbed by teratogen treatment.
2.3. The expression of CNC‐related genes was perturbed in chemical‐induced craniofacial malformation
We next investigated whether the observed phenotypes of craniofacial structures and chondrocytes were due to the disruption of CNC development. The expression of CNC‐related genes was analyzed by RT‐qPCR. For this, we selected seven genes that are known to be involved in CNC development and one gene that is a marker of a type of progeny of CNC: tfap2a, zic2a, pax3a and dlx5a, sox9a, sox10, snail2a and col2a1a (Figure 6). All of these genes are also implicated in human birth defects. 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 After teratogen treatment, samples were collected at 48 hpf to examine the effect on the CNC development. The expression level of tfap2a was significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, VPA‐, WAF‐, HU‐, DEX‐, IM‐, and BA‐treated embryos (Figure 6A). Other genes, pax3a, zic2a, and dlx5a, also showed similar effects as tfap2a. The expression level of zic2a was significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, DEX‐, IM‐, and THA‐treated embryos (Figure 6B). The expression level of pax3a was significantly decreased in SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, and PHT‐treated embryos, whereas it was increased 1.8‐fold in RA‐treated embryos (Figure 6C). The expression of dlx5a was significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, DEX‐, PHT‐, and BA‐treated embryos (Figure 6D). We also examined the expression levels of sox9a, and sox10 and snail2a (Figure 6E–G). The expression level of sox9a was decreased significantly by treatment with all teratogens except PHT and THA (Figure 6E). The expression level of sox10 was also decreased significantly in SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, and PHT‐treated embryos, whereas it was increased significantly in RA‐ and MTX‐treated embryos (Figure 6F). The expression level of snail2a was significantly decreased in all teratogen‐treated embryos (Figure 6G). The expression of col2a1a a chondrocyte differentiation marker, was significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, HU‐, DEX‐, PHT‐, IM‐, and BA‐treated embryos (Figure 6H). In THA‐treated embryos, the expression level of col2a1a was not significantly decreased, although a tendency to decrease was observed. The strength of the effect on the expression levels of the CNC genes observed corresponded to the severity of the phenotypic defect. RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, and VPA‐treated embryos exhibited absence of cranial structures (Figure 2D–G). In contrast, PHT‐, IM‐, BA‐, and THA‐treated embryos showed minor phenotypes of the ethmoid plate and the Meckel's cartilage, and weaker disturbances of the gene expression levels (Figure 2H–K).
2.4. Craniofacial structures such as eyes, otic vesicles, and the heart displayed morphological defects caused by teratogen treatment
The expression levels of CNC‐related genes such as tfap2a, pax3a, sox9a, sox10, and snail2a were significantly decreased (Figure 6A,C,E–G). These genes have also been reported to be genes responsible for neurocristopathy, a diverse class of disorders such as craniofacial anomalies, ocular defects, hearing disorders and cardiac defects. Our results showed that teratogen‐exposed embryos exhibited malformations in the eyes, otic vesicles, and heart (Figure 1).
Thus, we next performed quantification of the severity of defects in the eyes, otic vesicles, and heart (Figures 7 and 8). To assess the degree of eye defects, the length and area of the eye were measured at 96 hpf (Figure 7A). In control and vehicle control, the average length of the eye was greater than 300 μm and the average area of the eye was greater than 6.0 × 104 μm; however, the average length and area were significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, and PHT‐treated embryos (Figure 7B,C).
The degree of the otic vesicle anomaly was assessed by measuring the length and area of the otic vesicle (Figure 7D). In control and vehicle control, the average length of the otic vesicle was greater than 200 μm, and the average area of the otic vesicle was greater than 3.0 × 104 μm; however, the average length and area were significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, WAF‐, DEX‐, PHT‐, and THA‐treated embryos (Figure 7E,F). Teratogen‐treated embryos also showed morphological defects in otoliths, but the number of otoliths was not affected (data not shown).
To investigate heart abnormalities, the heart morphology and movement were examined at 72 hpf (Figure 8 and [Link], [Link]). The zebrafish heart consists of an atrium and a ventricle. After teratogen treatment, morphological defects in the atrium and ventricle were observed (Figure 8A). The heart size, which is the size of the atrium plus the ventricle, was measured (Figure 8B). Hyperplasia of the atrium and the ventricle were observed in MTX‐, SA‐, and VPA‐treated embryos (Figure 8A,B and [Link], [Link]). Although a significant difference was not observed in CAF‐, DEX‐, PHT‐, or BA‐treated embryos, a tendency of hyperplasia was observed (Figure 9B and [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link]). Hypoplasia of the atrium and the ventricle were observed in RA‐ and HU‐treated embryos (Figure 8A,B and [Link], [Link]). To examine the relationship between the morphological changes of the heart and its function, the heartbeat rate was measured (Figure 8C and [Link], [Link]). In accord with the heart morphological defects, the heartbeat rate was significantly decreased in RA‐, MTX‐, SA‐, VPA‐, CAF‐, HU‐, PHT‐, and BA‐treated embryos (Figure 8C and [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link]). A significant morphological difference was not observed in CAF‐ or WAF‐treated embryos; however, a functional heart defect was observed in these embryos (Figure 8B,C). The dimensions of the morphological changes found in eye, ear, and heart were also greater than those of the changes in overall size of the embryos (Figure 2Q).
Taken together, our results indicated that there were specific teratogen‐induced craniofacial defects as well as heart defects, suggesting that these individuals were a phenocopy of neurocristopathy.
3. DISCUSSION
In this present study, we addressed two questions as follows: (a) Do teratogens which induce craniofacial anomalies in mammals cause the same anomalies in zebrafish? (b) Do teratogens target the development of CNC cells, leading to craniofacial anomalies in zebrafish? Our findings provided three novel messages. (a) Twelve teratogens that cause craniofacial abnormalities in mammals were also found to disturb craniofacial development in zebrafish. (b) The craniofacial anomalies occurred due to a decrease in the number of chondrocytes and to disturbing the chondrocyte size and stacking, as well as affecting CNC numbers. (c) Our results showed an association between craniofacial defects induced by teratogens and neurocristopathy, and indicated that zebrafish is a suitable model animal for studying environmental risk factors for neurocristopathy.
3.1. Teratogens act as environmental factors that disrupt the development of NC cells and chondrocyte differentiation and maturation, leading to craniofacial malformation
Craniofacial morphogenesis involves a complex series of developmental events that ultimately create diverse facial morphologies in vertebrates. Despite the differences of vertebrates' craniofacial structures, the NC cell and its roles in craniofacial development are conserved across vertebrates. 3 , 84 , 85 The etiology of craniofacial anomalies involves the interplay between genetic factors and environmental factors. 2 Extensive knowledge about various teratogens that induce craniofacial defects in mammals, including humans, has been reported (Table 1). The teratogens used in our experiments are well known to induce multiple craniofacial disorders, such as micrognathia, cleft palate, microcephaly, eye defects, and ear abnormalities based on epidemiological data and experiments in mammals. 39 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 86 , 87 However, there is limited information about the cellular and molecular mechanisms of craniofacial malformations caused by teratogens.
Here, we exposed zebrafish embryos to specific teratogens. In accord with reports of studies in mammals, our results showed that the teratogens tested here clearly induced malformation of the neurocranium and viscerocranium (Figures 2 and 3). These results led us to speculate that CNC development in zebrafish is severely impaired by these chemicals. In accord with this possibility, RA, MTX, VPA, CAF, and DEX have been reported to affect CNC development in mammals and other vertebrates. 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 The other chemicals that we tested, namely SA, WAF, HU, PHT, IM, BA, and THA, have been reported to induce craniofacial malformations in mammals, but there have been no reports about the cellular and molecular mechanisms of these malformations. 39 , 41 , 45 , 47 , 59 , 63 , 94
In the present study, we showed that all of these teratogens affected craniofacial morphogenesis as well as CNC development at the cellular level. Our large‐scale analysis of numerous teratogens revealed that they caused aberrant CNC development and led to craniofacial malformation. Thus, zebrafish and mammals share similar responses to various chemicals regarding the chemically induced craniofacial anomalies. We showed that 12 chemicals impaired CNC development in zebrafish; however, whether these chemicals affect CNC development directly or indirectly needs to be examined in future studies.
Furthermore, we found that the teratogens also targeted chondrocyte number, shape and stacking. During the process of chondrocyte differentiation and maturation, the cellular features of chondrocytes progressively change within the growth plate in craniofacial cartilage. Small, round chondrocytes need to undergo proliferation and elongation to give rise to long, flattened chondrocytes, and finally become stacked in longitudinal columns in mammals. 95 Zebrafish cartilage formation occurs through the same process, which is thought to be evolutionally conserved among vertebrates. 96 Most of the craniofacial cartilage elements are formed by 96 hpf in zebrafish, and the chondrocytes of the neurocranium and viscerocranium, such as those in the ethmoid plate and Meckel's cartilage, show characteristic stacking and organization of thin, elongated chondrocytes that are assembled on their respective cartilage element. 97 , 98 Craniofacial malformation can also be caused by genetic mutations in NC‐derived chondrocytes in mammals and zebrafish. 99 , 100 Round‐shaped chondrocytes and loss of columnar structure are typical phenotypes caused by such mutations. 98 , 101 , 102
Intriguingly, the defects caused by genetic mutations were phenocopied by teratogen treatments in our experiments (Figures 4 and 5). We focused on the ethmoid plate and Meckel's cartilage because these two structures are derived from the CNC population, as proven by lineage tracing experiments. 25 , 71 , 103 , 104 As we expected, the number of cartilage cells in the ethmoid plate and Meckel's cartilage was decreased by the teratogen treatment. This suggests that chondrocytes in both of these cranial structures probably cease proliferation or undergo increased apoptosis. Such a defect was confirmed by the decreased expression level of col2a1a, a differentiation marker of chondrocytes (Figure 6H). Therefore, our results indicate that the teratogens tested here directly or indirectly block the development of CNC cells and chondrocytes, leading to craniofacial malformation.
Our results support the possibility that various chemical‐induced craniofacial abnormalities share similar cellular mechanisms via aberrant development of CNC in zebrafish and mammals. Our results demonstrate a similar response to the teratogens at the cellular levels; however, the key signaling pathways and detailed mechanism disrupted by these teratogens will need to be elucidated to clarify the basis of our findings.
3.2. Zebrafish is a powerful model for investigating gene‐environment interactions causing craniofacial malformation
It has been thought that gene‐environment interactions increase the risk of craniofacial anomalies. 2 However, there are relatively few reports about the detailed mechanisms of interaction between genetic variations and environmental factors due to limited animal models. Here, we showed that zebrafish share conserved responses to teratogens with mammals, suggesting that zebrafish is an appropriate model for investigating the contribution of an environmental factor to craniofacial disorders. Neurocristopathies are human diseases associated with abnormal development of NC cells. These diseases are thought to be consequences of defects in NC cell specification, migration, proliferation and/or differentiation. The genes responsible for neurocristopathies have been identified in the cases of several clinical abnormalities, as follows: tfap2a (Branchio‐oculo‐facial syndrome), zic2a1 (holoprosencephaly), pax3, sox10, and snail2 (Waardenburg syndrome and Hirschsprung's disease), and sox9 (Pierre Robin sequence). 74 , 75 , 80 , 81 , 83 , 105 Mutations in tfap2a result in Branchio‐oculo‐facial syndrome, characterized by cleft palate‐craniofacial disorder. 80 In zebrafish, the tfap2a mutant lockjaw shows severe defects in the cartilage of both the neurocranium and viscerocranium. 106 Pax3 is required for the development of multiple NC lineages and is implicated in NC disorders observed in humans, including Waardenburg syndrome, which results in hearing defects and craniofacial anomalies. 107 , 108 Mutations in sox9 are reported in Pierre Robin sequence, which is characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate. 74 , 79 Similar symptoms are also observed in zebrafish sox9 mutants. 109 These reports indicate that mutations of the genes responsible for neurocristopathy cause similar phenotypes, such as micrognathia, microcephaly, eye defects, abnormal ears, and heart defects, in fish and humans.
The NC development is also disrupted by environmental factors such as alcohol and cigarette smoking, which are thought to lead to neurocristopathies. 10 However, few environmental factors have been proven to disrupt NC development. The mechanism of such disruption by various chemicals needs to be examined. 10 Interestingly, zebrafish with mutations of genes responsible for human neurocristopathy mimic the phenotypes in humans, such as micrognathia, microcephaly, eye defects, abnormal ears, and heart defects. Here, our results showed disturbed expression levels of the responsible genes, tfap2a, pax3, sox9, sox10, and snail2 after specific teratogen treatments (Figure 6A,C,E–G). Furthermore, besides craniofacial malformation, these teratogen‐treated animals displayed eye and ear defects and heart malformations (Figures 7 and 8). These results demonstrate that chemical‐induced craniofacial malformation resembles neurocristopathy in zebrafish even though the teratogens do not alter the genomic sequence. Besides the responsible genes for neurocristopathy, it is known that mutations in dlx5a cause split‐hand/ft malformation 1 with sensorineural hearing loss (SHFM1D) and mutations in col2a cause Kniest dysplasia and Stickler syndrome. 78 , 82 Teratogen‐treated zebrafish also partly displayed the similar phenotypes to those found in patients with SHFM1D, Kniest dysplasia and Stickler syndrome. The expression level of the responsible genes was decreased (Figure 6D,H). This evidence leads us to speculate that teratogen‐induced alteration of the transcription of responsible genes also leads to craniofacial anomalies. Thus, zebrafish provide a new platform for investigating gene‐environment interactions. We can create in zebrafish heterozygous mutations of disease‐related genes or genes identified from patients and expose the mutant zebrafish to chemicals to analyze the mechanisms of gene‐environment interactions. Furthermore, our results indicate that certain teratogens that are prescription medicines have the potential to increase neurocristopathies, in addition to demonstrating the usefulness of zebrafish as a craniofacial disease model.
Our results also suggest the vulnerability or sensitivity of CNCs to teratogens. Ribosome biogenesis is thought to have an essential role in skeletal development and the pathogenesis of congenital skeletal anomalies. 110 Dixon et al showed that ribosome biogenesis has a pivotal role in CNC formation and craniofacial abnormalities. 28 Also, alcohol was reported to target ribosome biogenesis and lead to craniofacial defects. 111 Although the molecular nature of CNC vulnerability could conceivably be ribosome biogenesis in CNCs, further research will be needed to examine the molecular target(s) of each teratogen to clarify the basis of the vulnerability of CNCs to teratogens.
4. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
4.1. Zebrafish strain and maintenance
Wild‐type zebrafish, D. rerio, with the RIKEN WT genetic background were maintained with a 14‐hours light/10‐hours dark cycle. Water temperature was controlled at 28 (±1)°C, and water quality conditions were maintained according to The Zebrafish Book 112 and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, eighth edition. 113
4.2. Test chemicals
The test chemicals used in this study are listed in Table 1. Before embryo exposure experiments, a dose range‐finding study was performed according to Figure 9. Four different concentrations, 1, 10, 100, and 1 mM, of each chemical were used in the dose range‐finding study. The highest soluble concentration was determined as the highest concentration at which precipitation did not occur. After the dose range‐finding study, the exposure concentration was determined with a common dilution ratio of the highest concentration into E3 medium of 2 or 3. The exposure concentration was determined as the concentration at which embryos were 100% viable and displayed the most severe and frequent phenotype. The exposure concentrations used in the exposure experiments were as follows: retinoic acid (5 nM), methotrexate (200 μM), salicylic acid (400 μM), valproic acid (30 μM), caffeine (500 μM), warfarin (60 μM), hydroxyurea (1 mM), dexamethasone (200 μM), phenytoin (200 μM), imatinib (250 μM), boric acid (1 mM), and thalidomide (400 μM). Other publications regarding zebrafish toxicity tests were also referred to in order to determine the appropriate exposure concentrations. 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122
4.3. Egg production and embryo exposure
Adult male and female zebrafish were housed separately prior to spawning and placed together in a breeding tank equipped with a mesh tray the day before spawning. Spawning was stimulated in the morning when the light was turned on, and fertilized eggs were collected within 1 hour after the light stimulation (Figure 9A). Before the exposure experiments, the fertilized eggs were rinsed with E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4) and incubated with E3 medium containing 1 mg/mL Protease type XIV (Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) for 10 minutes at room temperature for dechorionation (Figure 9B). Embryos were washed several times with E3 medium to remove the chorions; then, the dechorinated embryos were incubated in E3 medium for 1 to 2 hours until exposure experiments. Embryos were exposed to a test chemical solution at the concentrations listed in Table 1 in E3 medium at 4 hpf according to the conditions reported by Kimmel et al and incubated until 96 hpf 123 (Figure 9C). The test chemical solution was replaced daily and samples were collected at 96 hpf, when basic craniofacial morphology is formed (Figure 9D). All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and at least 30 embryos were investigated per treatment.
4.4. Morphological observation and quantification
Morphological changes in the eyes, otic vesicle, and heart were observed under a stereomicroscope at 96 hpf. To quantify the size of the eyes and otic vesicle, images were captured with a Leica M80 equipped with a DFC450C (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Then, images were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA). For heart size measurement, the maximum ventricular diastole and the atrium diastole were captured using movies and analyzed. Heart rate was analyzed using movies made with bright‐field microscopy, and the number of heart beats in a 10‐seconds window were recorded.
4.5. Cartilage staining
Zebrafish embryos were fixed at 96 hpf with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate‐buffered saline for 2 hours. After the samples were washed with 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5), they were treated with 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5) containing 25 mM MgCl2 for 30 minutes. Then, samples were transferred into a 0.05% Alcian blue (MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) dissolved in 80% ethanol (EtOH), 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5), and 25 mM MgCl2 overnight. Next, the stained samples were placed in 80% EtOH containing 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and 25 mM MgCl2 and then gradually rehydrated by incubating with 50% and 25% EtOH in 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5) for 30 minutes per step. Samples were washed with potassium hydroxide (KOH) for 30 minutes and processed to remove pigmentation by bleaching in 3% hydrogen peroxide and 0.1% KOH for 30 minutes. Then, samples were rinsed with 35% saturated sodium borate decahydrate (NaBO4) for 30 minutes. For clearing, the samples were treated with 1% trypsin (Wako, Osaka, Japan) dissolved in 35% saturated NaBO4 for 30 minutes and then washed with 0.5% KOH overnight. All procedures were performed at room temperature.
4.6. Chondrocyte measurement
After cartilage staining, samples were transferred into 100% glycerol. The craniofacial structure was disassembled into the neurocranium and viscerocranium using fine forceps. Each structure was mounted on a glass slide, and the mounted samples were covered with glass coverslips and pressed to prepare flat‐mount samples. For preparation of flat‐mounted samples, the stained samples were placed on a glass slide and were slowly covered with a cover slip placed by using forceps to minimize the generation of air bubbles. Glycerol was added to fill the space between the coverslip and the glass slide. Photographs were then taken using a BZ‐710 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The number of chondrocytes in the ethmoid plate of the neurocranium and Meckel's cartilage of the viscerocranium was counted. Chondrocyte stacking analysis was performed as previously described. 102 , 124 The angle between the anteroposterior axis and the longest cell axis was measured and plotted as a rose plot. For statistical analysis, Watson's U2 tests were performed using RStudio (RStudio Inc., MA, USA). For length and width measurement and stacking measurement, more than 60 chondrocytes were measured using ImageJ. All measurements were performed in triplicate.
4.7. Real‐time quantitative RT‐qPCR analysis
Thirty zebrafish embryos at 48 hpf were homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Total RNA was purified with an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The purified RNA with an absorbance ratio of 1.8 to 2.0 at A260/280 was used for further analysis. Total RNA (1.5 μg) was used for reverse transcription using the SuperScript III first‐strand synthesis system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). RT‐qPCR was performed with five‐fold diluted complementary DNA, Taqman Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), TaqMan probes, and gene‐specific primers (Bio‐Rad, CA, USA) using the 7500 Fast Real‐Time PCR System. The housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control. The gene‐specific primers were as follows: tfap2a, zic2a, pax3a, dlx5a, sox9a, sox10, snail2a, and col2a1a primers. The expression levels of target genes were normalized by the GAPDH expression level, and the normalized relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative Ct (2−ΔΔCt) method. All reactions were performed in triplicate.
4.8. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad prism version 8 for Windows (La Jolla, CA, USA), and boxplot and rose plot graphs were made using RStudio (RStudio Inc., MA, USA). P‐values were calculated with one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison tests. P‐values <.05 were considered statistically significant. All data are presented as the mean ± SD unless otherwise specified.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Shujie Liu: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; validation; visualization; writing‐original draft; writing‐review and editing. Rika Narumi: Data curation; methodology; validation; visualization; writing‐original draft; writing‐review and editing. Naohiro Ikeda: Writing‐original draft. Osamu Morita: Writing‐original draft. Junichi Tasaki: Conceptualization; data curation; methodology; project administration; supervision; validation; writing‐original draft; writing‐review and editing.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to the National BioResource Project for providing RIKEN WT strain. We thank Dr Elizabeth Nakajima for critical reading of the manuscript, as well as Dr Shinichi Meguro for helpful discussions and zebrafish support.
Liu S, Narumi R, Ikeda N, Morita O, Tasaki J. Chemical‐induced craniofacial anomalies caused by disruption of neural crest cell development in a zebrafish model. Developmental Dynamics. 2020;249:794–815. 10.1002/dvdy.179
REFERENCES
- 1. Twigg SR, Wilkie AO. New insights into craniofacial malformations. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:R50‐R59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:167‐178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bronner ME, Le Douarin NM. Development and evolution of the neural crest: an overview. Dev Biol. 2012;366:2‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hall BK. The Neural Crest and Neural Crest Cells in Vertebrate Development and Evolution. New York: Springer; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Etchevers HC, Dupin E, Le Douarin NM. The diverse neural crest: from embryology to human pathology. Development. 2019;146:dev169821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Green SA, Simoes‐Costa M, Bronner ME. Evolution of vertebrates as viewed from the crest. Nature. 2015;520:474‐482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Le Douarin N, Kalcheim C. The Neural Crest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bolande R. Letter: congenital mesoblastic nephroma. Arch Pathol. 1974;98:357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Trainor PA. Neural Crest Cells Evolution, Development and Disease. London: Academic Press; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vega‐Lopez GA, Cerrizuela S, Tribulo C, Aybar MJ. Neurocristopathies: new insights 150 years after the neural crest discovery. Dev Biol. 2018;444(Suppl 1):S110‐S143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Milunsky JM, Maher TM, Zhao G, et al. Genotype‐phenotype analysis of the branchio‐oculo‐facial syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:22‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pingault V, Ente D, Dastot‐Le Moal F, Goossens M, Marlin S, Bondurand N. Review and update of mutations causing Waardenburg syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:391‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sanlaville D, Verloes A. CHARGE syndrome: an update. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:389‐399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Trainor PA. Craniofacial birth defects: the role of neural crest cells in the etiology and pathogenesis of Treacher Collins syndrome and the potential for prevention. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:2984‐2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Brent RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician's role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics. 2004;113:957‐968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ewart‐Toland A, Yankowitz J, Winder A, et al. Oculoauriculovertebral abnormalities in children of diabetic mothers. Am J Med Genet. 2000;90:303‐309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wang R, Martinez‐Frias ML, Graham JM Jr. Infants of diabetic mothers are at increased risk for the oculo‐auriculo‐vertebral sequence: a case‐based and case‐control approach. J Pediatr. 2002;141:611‐617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Beaty TH, Marazita ML, Leslie EJ. Genetic factors influencing risk to orofacial clefts: today's challenges and tomorrow's opportunities. F1000Res. 2016;5:2800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Edison R, Muenke M. The interplay of genetic and environmental factors in craniofacial morphogenesis: holoprosencephaly and the role of cholesterol. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2003;43:1‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Poswillo D. The aetiology and pathogenesis of craniofacial deformity. Development. 1988;103(suppl):207‐212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yoon AJ, Pham BN, Dipple KM. Genetic screening in patients with craniofacial malformations. J Pediatr Genet. 2016;5:220‐224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shaw GM, Wasserman CR, Lammer EJ, et al. Orofacial clefts, parental cigarette smoking, and transforming growth factor‐alpha gene variants. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:551‐561. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Duncan KM, Mukherjee K, Cornell RA, Liao EC. Zebrafish models of orofacial clefts. Dev Dyn. 2017;246:897‐914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Manocha S, Farokhnia N, Khosropanah S, Bertol JW, Santiago JJ, Fakhouri WD. Systematic review of hormonal and genetic factors involved in the nonsyndromic disorders of the lower jaw. Dev Dyn. 2019;248:162‐172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mork L, Crump G. Zebrafish craniofacial development: a window into early patterning. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;115:235‐269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rocha M, Singh N, Ahsan K, Beiriger A, Prince VE. Neural crest development: insights from the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2020;249:88‐111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Weinberg SM, Cornell R, Leslie EJ. Craniofacial genetics: where have we been and where are we going? PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Dixon J, Jones NC, Sandell LL, et al. Tcof1/treacle is required for neural crest cell formation and proliferation deficiencies that cause craniofacial abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13403‐13408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dutton K, Abbas L, Spencer J, et al. A zebrafish model for Waardenburg syndrome type IV reveals diverse roles for Sox10 in the otic vesicle. Dis Model Mech. 2009;2:68‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gestri G, Osborne RJ, Wyatt AW, et al. Reduced TFAP2A function causes variable optic fissure closure and retinal defects and sensitizes eye development to mutations in other morphogenetic regulators. Hum Genet. 2009;126:791‐803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gordon CT, Attanasio C, Bhatia S, et al. Identification of novel craniofacial regulatory domains located far upstream of SOX9 and disrupted in Pierre Robin sequence. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:1011‐1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Noack Watt KE, Achilleos A, Neben CL, Merrill AE, Trainor PA. The roles of RNA polymerase I and III subunits Polr1c and Polr1d in craniofacial development and in zebrafish models of treacher collins syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Patten SA, Jacobs‐McDaniels NL, Zaouter C, Drapeau P, Albertson RC, Moldovan F. Role of Chd7 in zebrafish: a model for CHARGE syndrome. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lovely CB. Animal models of gene‐alcohol interactions. Birth Defects Res. 2020;112:367‐379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lovely CB, Fernandes Y, Eberhart JK. Fishing for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: zebrafish as a model for ethanol teratogenesis. Zebrafish. 2016;13:391‐398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. McCarthy HJ, Bierzynska A, Wherlock M, et al. Simultaneous sequencing of 24 genes associated with steroid‐resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:637‐648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Aliverti V, Bonanomi L, Giavini E. Hydroxyurea as a reference standard in teratological screening. Comparison of the embryotoxic and teratogenic effects following single intraperitoneal or repeated oral administrations to pregnant rats. Arch Toxicol Suppl. 1980;4:239‐247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Asano Y, Okaniwa A. In utero morphological effects of hydroxyurea on the fetal development in Sprague‐Dawley rats. Jikken Dobutsu. 1987;36:143‐149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Liebelt EL, Balk SJ, Faber W, et al. NTP‐CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of hydroxyurea. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2007;80:259‐366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pye SM, Cortes J, Ault P, et al. The effects of imatinib on pregnancy outcome. Blood. 2008;111:5505‐5508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. El Gendy MM, Kandil AM, Helal MA, Zahou FM. The teratogenic effects of imatinib mesylate on rat fetuses. Toxicol Rep. 2015;2:654‐663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lloyd ME, Carr M, McElhatton P, Hall GM, Hughes RA. The effects of methotrexate on pregnancy, fertility and lactation. QJM. 1999;92:551‐563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hyoun SC, Obican SG, Scialli AR. Teratogen update: methotrexate. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94:187‐207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Weber‐Schoendorfer C, Chambers C, Wacker E, et al. Pregnancy outcome after methotrexate treatment for rheumatic disease prior to or during early pregnancy: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1101‐1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Smithells RW, Newman CG. Recognition of thalidomide defects. J Med Genet. 1992;29:716‐723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Vargesson N. Thalidomide‐induced teratogenesis: history and mechanisms. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2015;105:140‐156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hill LM, Kleinberg F. Effects of drugs and chemicals on the fetus and newborn (1). Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:707‐716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hill LM, Kleinberg F. Effects of drugs and chemicals on the fetus and newborn (2). Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:755‐765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Howe AM, Webster WS. Exposure of the pregnant rat to warfarin and vitamin K1: an animal model of intraventricular hemorrhage in the fetus. Teratology. 1990;42:413‐420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Starling LD, Sinha A, Boyd D, Furck A. Fetal warfarin syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr2012007344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Goldman AS, Baker MK, Tomassini N, Hummeler K. Occurrence of cleft palate, micrognathia, and agnathia in selected strains of cortisone‐ and phenytoin‐treated mice. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1982;2:277‐284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Nulman I, Scolnik D, Chitayat D, Farkas LD, Koren G. Findings in children exposed in utero to phenytoin and carbamazepine monotherapy: independent effects of epilepsy and medications. Am J Med Genet. 1997;68:18‐24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Webster WS, Howe AM, Abela D, Oakes DJ. The relationship between cleft lip, maxillary hypoplasia, hypoxia and phenytoin. Curr Pharm des. 2006;12:1431‐1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Ardinger HH, Atkin JF, Blackston RD, et al. Verification of the fetal valproate syndrome phenotype. Am J Med Genet. 1988;29:171‐185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Vajda FJ, O'Brien TJ, Hitchcock A, et al. Critical relationship between sodium valproate dose and human teratogenicity: results of the Australian register of anti‐epileptic drugs in pregnancy. J Clin Neurosci. 2004;11:854‐858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Alsdorf R, Wyszynski DF. Teratogenicity of sodium valproate. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2005;4:345‐353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Fujii T, Nishimura H. Teratogenic actions of some methylated xanthines in mice. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1969;46:167‐175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Saxen I. Epidemiology of cleft lip and palate. An attempt to rule out chance correlations. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1975;29:103‐110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Habib Z. Factors determining occurrence of cleft lip and cleft palate. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;146:105‐110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Greene RM, Kochhar DM. Some aspects of corticosteroid‐induced cleft palate: a review. Teratology. 1975;11:47‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bermas BL, Hill JA. Effects of immunosuppressive drugs during pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1722‐1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Heindel JJ, Price CJ, Schwetz BA. The developmental toxicity of boric acid in mice, rats, and rabbits. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(suppl 7):107‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Price CJ, Marr MC, Myers CB, Seely JC, Heindel JJ, Schwetz BA. The developmental toxicity of boric acid in rabbits. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1996;34:176‐187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Fujii T, Sasaki H, Nishimura H. Teratogenicity of caffeine in mice related to its mode of administration. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1969;19:134‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Collier SA, Browne ML, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, National Birth Defects Prevention S . Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85:842‐849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Johansen AM, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT, Andersen LF, Drevon CA. Maternal consumption of coffee and caffeine‐containing beverages and oral clefts: a population‐based case‐control study in Norway. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:1216‐1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Lammer EJ, Chen DT, Hoar RM, et al. Retinoic acid embryopathy. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:837‐841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Padmanabhan R, Ahmed I. Retinoic acid‐induced asymmetric craniofacial growth and cleft palate in the TO mouse fetus. Reprod Toxicol. 1997;11:843‐860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Emmanouil‐Nikoloussi EN, Goret‐Nicaise M, Foroglou CH, et al. Craniofacial abnormalities induced by retinoic acid: a preliminary histological and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) study. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2000;52:445‐453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Okano J, Suzuki S, Shiota K. Involvement of apoptotic cell death and cell cycle perturbation in retinoic acid‐induced cleft palate in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;221:42‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Szabo‐Rogers HL, Smithers LE, Yakob W, Liu KJ. New directions in craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2010;341:84‐94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Dougherty M, Kamel G, Grimaldi M, et al. Distinct requirements for wnt9a and irf6 in extension and integration mechanisms during zebrafish palate morphogenesis. Development. 2013;140:76‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Kamel G, Hoyos T, Rochard L, et al. Requirement for frzb and fzd7a in cranial neural crest convergence and extension mechanisms during zebrafish palate and jaw morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2013;381:423‐433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Benko S, Fantes JA, Amiel J, et al. Highly conserved non‐coding elements on either side of SOX9 associated with Pierre Robin sequence. Nat Genet. 2009;41:359‐364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Bondurand N, Dastot‐Le Moal F, Stanchina L, et al. Deletions at the SOX10 gene locus cause Waardenburg syndrome types 2 and 4. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1169‐1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Brown KK, Reiss JA, Crow K, et al. Deletion of an enhancer near DLX5 and DLX6 in a family with hearing loss, craniofacial defects, and an inv(7)(q21.3q35). Hum Genet. 2010;127:19‐31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Brown SA, Warburton D, Brown LY, et al. Holoprosencephaly due to mutations in ZIC2, a homologue of Drosophila odd‐paired. Nat Genet. 1998;20:180‐183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Gurrieri F, Everman DB. Clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of split‐hand/foot malformation: an update. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A:2860‐2872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Jakobsen LP, Ullmann R, Christensen SB, et al. Pierre Robin sequence may be caused by dysregulation of SOX9 and KCNJ2. J Med Genet. 2007;44:381‐386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Milunsky JM, Maher TA, Zhao G, et al. TFAP2A mutations result in branchio‐oculo‐facial syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:1171‐1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sanchez‐Martin M, Rodriguez‐Garcia A, Perez‐Losada J, Sagrera A, Read AP, Sanchez‐Garcia I. SLUG (SNAI2) deletions in patients with Waardenburg disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:3231‐3236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Winterpacht A, Hilbert M, Schwarze U, Mundlos S, Spranger J, Zabel BU. Kniest and Stickler dysplasia phenotypes caused by collagen type II gene (COL2A1) defect. Nat Genet. 1993;3:323‐326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Zhang H, Chen H, Luo H, et al. Functional analysis of Waardenburg syndrome‐associated PAX3 and SOX10 mutations: report of a dominant‐negative SOX10 mutation in Waardenburg syndrome type II. Hum Genet. 2012;131:491‐503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Rada‐Iglesias A, Bajpai R, Prescott S, Brugmann SA, Swigut T, Wysocka J. Epigenomic annotation of enhancers predicts transcriptional regulators of human neural crest. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:633‐648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Simões‐Costa M, Bronner ME. Establishing neural crest identity: a gene regulatory recipe. Development. 2015;142:242‐257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Abbott BD, Harris MW, Birnbaum LS. Etiology of retinoic acid‐induced cleft palate varies with the embryonic stage. Teratology. 1989;40:533‐553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Jentink J, Loane MA, Dolk H, et al. Valproic acid monotherapy in pregnancy and major congenital malformations. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2185‐2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Berenguer M, Darnaudery M, Claverol S, Bonneu M, Lacombe D, Rooryck C. Prenatal retinoic acid exposure reveals candidate genes for craniofacial disorders. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Cheng X, Li H, Yan Y, et al. From the cover: usage of dexamethasone increases the risk of cranial neural crest dysplasia in the chick embryo. Toxicol Sci. 2017;158:36‐47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Li J, Shi Y, Sun J, Zhang Y, Mao B. Xenopus reduced folate carrier regulates neural crest development epigenetically. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ma ZL, Wang G, Cheng X, et al. Excess caffeine exposure impairs eye development during chick embryogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1134‐1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Rao A, LaBonne C. Histone deacetylase activity has an essential role in establishing and maintaining the vertebrate neural crest. Development. 2018;145:dev163386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Ruberte E, Dolle P, Chambon P, Morriss‐Kay G. Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding proteins. II. Their differential pattern of transcription during early morphogenesis in mouse embryos. Development. 1991;111:45‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Sullivan‐Jones P, Hansen DK, Sheehan DM, Holson RR. The effect of teratogens on maternal corticosterone levels and cleft incidence in A/J mice. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1992;12:183‐189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Kozhemyakina E, Lassar AB, Zelzer E. A pathway to bone: signaling molecules and transcription factors involved in chondrocyte development and maturation. Development. 2015;142:817‐831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Shwartz Y, Farkas Z, Stern T, Aszodi A, Zelzer E. Muscle contraction controls skeletal morphogenesis through regulation of chondrocyte convergent extension. Dev Biol. 2012;370:154‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Kruze G, et al. The shaping of pharyngeal cartilages during early development of the zebrafish. Dev Biol. 1998;203:245‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Sisson BE, Dale RM, Mui SR, Topczewska JM, Topczewski J. A role of glypican4 and wnt5b in chondrocyte stacking underlying craniofacial cartilage morphogenesis. Mech Dev. 2015;138(pt 3):279‐290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Clement A, Wiweger M, von der Hardt S, et al. Regulation of zebrafish skeletogenesis by ext2/dackel and papst1/pinscher. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Leung VY, Gao B, Leung KK, et al. SOX9 governs differentiation stage‐specific gene expression in growth plate chondrocytes via direct concomitant transactivation and repression. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Ling IT, Rochard L, Liao EC. Distinct requirements of wls, wnt9a, wnt5b and gpc4 in regulating chondrocyte maturation and timing of endochondral ossification. Dev Biol. 2017;421:219‐232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Rochard L, Monica SD, Ling IT, et al. Roles of Wnt pathway genes wls, wnt9a, wnt5b, frzb and gpc4 in regulating convergent‐extension during zebrafish palate morphogenesis. Development. 2016;143:2541‐2547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Mongera A, Singh AP, Levesque MP, Chen YY, Konstantinidis P, Nusslein‐Volhard C. Genetic lineage labeling in zebrafish uncovers novel neural crest contributions to the head, including gill pillar cells. Development. 2013;140:916‐925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Wada N, Javidan Y, Nelson S, Carney TJ, Kelsh RN, Schilling TF. Hedgehog signaling is required for cranial neural crest morphogenesis and chondrogenesis at the midline in the zebrafish skull. Development. 2005;132:3977‐3988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Lang D, Chen F, Milewski R, Li J, Lu MM, Epstein JA. Pax3 is required for enteric ganglia formation and functions with Sox10 to modulate expression of c‐ret. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:963‐971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Knight RD, Nair S, Nelson SS, et al. Lockjaw encodes a zebrafish tfap2a required for early neural crest development. Development. 2003;130:5755‐5768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Asher JH Jr, Harrison RW, Morell R, Carey ML, Friedman TB. Effects of Pax3 modifier genes on craniofacial morphology, pigmentation, and viability: a murine model of Waardenburg syndrome variation. Genomics. 1996;34:285‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Wu M, Li J, Engleka KA, et al. Persistent expression of Pax3 in the neural crest causes cleft palate and defective osteogenesis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2076‐2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Yan YL, Miller CT, Nissen RM, et al. A zebrafish sox9 gene required for cartilage morphogenesis. Development. 2002;129:5065‐5079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Trainor PA, Merrill AE. Ribosome biogenesis in skeletal development and the pathogenesis of skeletal disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842:769‐778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Berres ME, Garic A, Flentke GR, Smith SM. Transcriptome profiling identifies ribosome biogenesis as a target of alcohol teratogenicity and vulnerability during early embryogenesis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Eugene: University of Oregon Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 113. National Research Council . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 114. Cassar S, Beekhuijzen M, Beyer B, et al. A multi‐institutional study benchmarking the zebrafish developmental assay for prediction of embryotoxic plasma concentrations from rat embryo‐fetal development studies. Reprod Toxicol. 2019;86:33‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Hillegass JM, Villano CM, Cooper KR, White LA. Glucocorticoids alter craniofacial development and increase expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Toxicol Sci. 2008;102:413‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Inoue A, Nishimura Y, Matsumoto N, et al. Comparative study of the zebrafish embryonic toxicity test and mouse embryonic stem cell test to screen developmental toxicity of human pharmaceutical drugs. Fundamental. Toxicol Sci. 2016;3(2):79‐87. [Google Scholar]
- 117. Ito T, Handa H. Deciphering the mystery of thalidomide teratogenicity. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2012;52:1‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Lee MS, Bonner JR, Bernard DJ, et al. Disruption of the folate pathway in zebrafish causes developmental defects. BMC Dev Biol. 2012;12:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Martinez CS, Feas DA, Siri M, et al. In vivo study of teratogenic and anticonvulsant effects of antiepileptics drugs in zebrafish embryo and larvae. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2018;66:17‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Selderslaghs IW, Van Rompay AR, De Coen W, Witters HE. Development of a screening assay to identify teratogenic and embryotoxic chemicals using the zebrafish embryo. Reprod Toxicol. 2009;28:308‐320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Teixidó E, Pique E, Gomez‐Catalan J, Llobet JM. Assessment of developmental delay in the zebrafish embryo teratogenicity assay. Toxicol In Vitro. 2013;27:469‐478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Yamashita A, Inada H, Chihara K, Yamada T, Deguchi J, Funabashi H. Improvement of the evaluation method for teratogenicity using zebrafish embryos. J Toxicol Sci. 2014;39:453‐464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:253‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Le Pabic P, Ng C, Schilling TF. Fat‐Dachsous signaling coordinates cartilage differentiation and polarity during craniofacial development. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.