Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2020 Feb 6;445:120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.01.039

Peripheral Somatosensory Neuron Dysfunction: Emerging Roles in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Lauren L Orefice 1
PMCID: PMC7415509  NIHMSID: NIHMS1568937  PMID: 32035119

Abstract

Alterations in somatosensory (touch and pain) behaviors are highly prevalent among people with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). However, the neural mechanisms underlying abnormal touch and pain-related behaviors in ASDs and how altered somatosensory reactivity might contribute to ASD pathogenesis has not been well studied. Here, we provide a brief review of somatosensory alterations observed in people with ASDs and recent evidence from animal models that implicates peripheral neurons as a locus of dysfunction for somatosensory abnormalities in ASDs. Lastly, we describe current efforts to understand how altered peripheral sensory neuron dysfunction may impact brain development and complex behaviors in ASD models, and whether targeting peripheral somatosensory neurons to improve their function might also improve related ASD phenotypes.

I. Mammalian Somatosensory Circuits

The sense of touch allows us to navigate our physical world. It endows us with the remarkable ability to feel a soft breeze or a gentle embrace. The first step in tactile processing involves the activation of a diverse set of sensory neurons with highly specialized axonal endings innervating the skin surface. Two main types of sensory neurons transmit signals from mammalian skin and they generally respond to either innocuous, light touch information or painful, noxious stimuli. Painful signals are conveyed by a range of nociceptor neurons that preferentially respond to noxious mechanical, thermal and/or chemical stimuli. Noxious mechanical stimuli include sensations such as high pressure or stretching, and a thermal pain stimulus would be extreme heat or cold (Markus, 2006). High-threshold mechanoreceptor neurons (HTMRs) encode harmful mechanical stimuli, while low-threshold mechanoreceptor neurons (LTMRs) respond to innocuous mechanical stimuli. LTMRs are further classified based on functional properties, molecular expression profiles and their responsivity to specific types of light touch stimuli (Abraira and Ginty, 2013). For example, Aβ Field-LTMRs are strongly activated during skin stroking (Bai et al., 2015), while Aδ-LTMRs preferentially respond to hair follicle deflection (Rutlin et al., 2014) and slowly conducting C-fiber LTMRs are proposed to convey information about social touch (Vrontou et al., 2013). This diverse set of LTMRs mediate perception of object shape, texture, skin stroking, skin indentation, hair movement, and vibration (Abraira and Ginty, 2013). Through this diverse group of highly specialized and complex peripheral somatosensory neuron subtypes, information about the physical word is conveyed to the central nervous system (CNS).

As with all mammalian somatosensory neurons, cutaneous LTMRs and nociceptors are pseudo-unipolar neurons with one peripheral axonal branch that innervates the skin and another branch that innervates the spinal cord dorsal horn (Zimmerman et al., 2014). Activation of sensory neuron endings in the periphery leads to signals propagated through their axons, up to their cell bodies, which are located in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) or cranial sensory ganglia just outside the spinal cord (Jenkins and Lumpkin, 2017). Sensory neuron central projections terminate in a somatotopic manner within the spinal cord dorsal horn, forming synaptic contacts onto both postsynaptic dorsal column projection neurons and local interneurons (Koch et al., 2018). A large subset of myelinated LTMRs also send an axonal branch via the dorsal column that terminates in the dorsal column nuclei of the brainstem (Abraira and Ginty, 2013). Thus, the spinal cord dorsal horn and dorsal column nuclei are initial sites of integration and processing of somatosensory information that is then conveyed to thalamus, followed by the primary somatosensory cortex and additional brain regions. Furthermore, primary somatosensory cortex has strong efferent and afferent connectivity with many other brain regions, including prefrontal cortex, superior colliculus, striatum, other sensory cortices, and many other regions that are thought to be critical for a wide range of emotional and social behaviors (Aronoff et al., 2010; Bedwell et al., 2014; Zakiewicz et al., 2014).

II. Touch is Critical for Normal Development

Somatosensory perception is a critical component of early human development, with tactile sensory responses beginning in humans as early as 8 weeks in utero (Montagu, 1984). Indeed, touch is a primary mode of communication between young children and their caregivers, as infants use touch to relay emotions such as distress (Ferber et al., 2008). Abnormalities in tactile processing or tactile experiences are strongly associated with early life emotional and social distress (Mikkelsen et al., 2018). In both human and rodent studies, a lack of parental touch leads to impaired somatosensory development, increased stereotyped behaviors, as well as deficits in social behavior and cognitive abilities (Hertenstein et al., 2006; Main and Stadtman, 1981). Indeed, human, non-human primate, and rodent tactile deprivation studies showed that early life experiences and developmental tactile stimulation are essential for proper brain development, cognition and adult social behaviors. Tactile sensations in juveniles enable refinement of motor skills, visual coordination, and postural responses (Corbetta and Snapp-Childs, 2009), and early tactile experiences are also crucial for the acquisition of normal social behavior and communication skills (Hertenstein et al., 2006).

In line with this, children who experienced institutional rearing with low caregiver investment and physical handling exhibited deficits in cognitive function, delayed or impaired language acquisition and social interactions, and an increased incidence of anxiety and psychiatric disorders (Frank et al., 1996; Sheridan et al., 2012). In addition, rodents reared in the absence of physical interactions with other rodents, including those that experienced maternal deprivation, exhibited alterations in neuroanatomical development, as evidenced by decreased dendritic arbor complexity and spine number in cortical areas as well as aberrant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis development and increased anxiety-like behaviors (Pascual and Zamora-Leon, 2007; Schmidt et al., 2002). Despite the profound implications of early tactile input for brain development and cognitive function, the mechanisms that govern somatosensory circuit development and function are not fully understood.

Together, these studies indicate that tactile experiences are necessary for normal brain and behavioral development in mammals and that altered somatosensory-related experiences during development can negatively impact brain function and social behaviors. Could somatosensory circuits be altered in individuals with ASD and lead to altered touch behaviors, which ultimately impacts behavior and brain function in ASD? Evidence for a causal role of altered touch circuitry in the genesis of some ASD-related phenotypes in mice is discussed below.

III. Sensory Impairments are a Hallmark of ASD

ASDs are a highly prevalent class of neurodevelopmental disorders, characterized by impairments in social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication deficits, as well as restrictive, repetitive behaviors (DSM-V, 2013). While ASDs are heterogeneous in etiology and severity, the vast majority of individuals with ASD also exhibit a complicated array of co-morbid symptoms, including aberrant reactivity to sensory stimuli (Rogers and Ozonoff, 2005; Tomchek and Dunn, 2007) which dramatically affects the quality of life for both ASD patients and their caregivers. Sensory processing abnormalities are among the most common behavioral concerns for parents of children with ASD, with an estimated 95% of parents indicating that their child experiences at least some differences in sensory processing (Rogers and Ozonoff, 2005). Aberrant sensory processing is increasingly recognized as a critical component of ASD, and altered sensory reactivity is now a criterion for ASD diagnosis (DSM-V, 2013). While the focus of this review is on alterations in somatosensory circuits and related behaviors, it is important to note that sensory abnormalities may also impact visual, auditory, olfactory and gustatory processes in ASD (Rogers et al., 2003; Rogers and Ozonoff, 2005; Tomchek and Dunn, 2007).

Strikingly, a majority of individuals with ASD have altered tactile reactivity in both glabrous (smooth) and hairy skin, and these symptoms are present in both children and adults with ASD (Cascio et al., 2016b; Foss-Feig et al., 2012; Tavassoli et al., 2014). An earlier study reported that 60.9% of patients with ASD exhibit tactile sensitivity abnormalities (Tomchek and Dunn, 2007). Adults with ASD have been shown to exhibit lower thresholds for the tactile perception of vibro-tactile stimuli, suggesting a specific hypersensitivity in Aβ-rapidly adapting II (RAII) LTMRs/Pacinian corpuscle pathways (Blakemore et al., 2006). In concordance with this finding, Cascio and colleagues found that adults with ASD display increased sensitivity to both vibration and thermal pain (Cascio et al., 2008). A second group described a negative correlation between the presence of autistic traits in human subjects and neural responses to C-LTMR-targeted affective touch stimuli, indicating that people with greater numbers of autistic traits have impaired processing of affective touch (Voos et al., 2013). Because young children with ASD are often reported to be highly averse to specific types of light touch, caregivers may provide less nurturing touch and this lack of tactile input may have a profound impact on behavior and development (Cascio, 2010). Indeed, some evidence indicates that behavioral interventions such as additional tactile stimulation or massage may improve developmental outcomes including caregiver-child interactions, sensorimotor behaviors and verbal communication (Cascio, 2010; Casler, 1965; Underdown et al., 2006).

Several studies have indicated that there is a negative correlation between the presence of ASD traits in human subjects and their neural responses to affective touch (Scheele et al., 2014; Voos et al., 2013). Thus, individuals with ASD exhibiting the greatest expression of archetypal ASD traits have the highest degree of impairment in neural processing of affective touch (Voos et al., 2013). In line with this, regression analyses indicate that sensory over-reactivity predicts the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and the severity of ASD core symptoms in subjects with ASD (Mazurek et al., 2013). A recent study also identified significant correlations between tactile over-reactivity and social impairments in children with ASD, as well as an inverse relationship between pleasantness ratings to touch stimuli and impaired communication (Cascio et al., 2016a).

In addition to altered light touch sensitivity, altered responsivity to pain has also been observed in ASD subjects. While testing methodologies and patient/caregiver reports vary across studies, a number of studies identified that people with ASD exhibit under-reactivity to painful stimuli including hypo-responsivity to mechanical pain as well as hot and cold temperatures (Klintwall et al., 2011; Militerni et al., 2000). Yet, there are still a number of other studies that suggest hyper-responsivity to painful stimuli or no significant changes in people with ASD compared to control subjects (Moore, 2015), highlighting a need to better understand the heterogeneity of sensory symptoms among subjects with ASD and potential differences in sensitivity across tactile modalities.

Recent work on ASD has focused on identifying the origins and development of ASD, in which the heritability of ASD was estimated to be approximately 80% (Bai et al., 2019). Genetic influences on ASD are highly complex, which include single gene, copy number variations (including both deletions and duplications) and single nucleotide variations that are each identified as significant factors in ASD etiology (Rylaarsdam and Guemez-Gamboa, 2019). Previous studies have been successful in identifying genes, such as Mecp2, Gabrb3, Fmr1 and Shank3, which are implicated in both syndromic and non-syndromic forms of ASD (Silverman et al., 2010). As with idiopathic or non-syndromic ASD, pervasive developmental disorders that cause syndromic forms of ASD are also associated with altered somatosensation (Tomchek and Dunn, 2007). For example, abnormal somatosensory responses for both light touch and painful stimuli are common among patients with Rett syndrome, which is caused by mutations in the X-linked methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (Mecp2) gene (Amir et al., 1999). Rett syndrome is characterized by reduced lifespan, intellectual disabilities, motor impairments, seizures, breathing abnormalities, and stereotyped behaviors, as well as communication and social interaction deficits (Mount et al., 2003; Wulffaert et al., 2009). Indeed, ‘giant’ amplitude somatosensory evoked potentials and altered spinothalamic connectivity are observed across multiple studies of females with Rett syndrome (Guerrini et al., 1998; Yoshikawa et al., 1991).

Similarly, abnormalities in tactile perception are typically observed in patients with fragile X syndrome and Tuberous sclerosis, disorders that are highly associated with ASD and caused by mutations in Fmr1 and Tsc1 or Tsc2, respectively (Battaglia, 2011; Braat and Kooy, 2015; Miller et al., 1999). In a study investigating sensory abnormalities in children with ASD and fragile X syndrome, investigators found that children with fragile X syndrome or ASDs exhibited higher tactile sensitivity compared to typically developing children. Furthermore, while no association was identified between abnormal sensory reactivity and developmental level or IQ, abnormal touch reactivity correlated significantly with the presence of adaptive behaviors and social impairments (Rogers et al., 2003).

Taken together, these studies indicate that individuals with ASD display abnormalities in tactile modalities and that these impairments correlate with deficits in social behavior and additional ASD-related phenotypes. Although tactile impairments are commonly reported in ASD, the neural mechanisms underlying somatosensory processing deficits in ASD remain poorly understood. A major goal of ASD research is to understand how these co-morbid ASD symptoms including altered sensory reactivity arise and whether they are causally linked to the core features by which ASD is traditionally diagnosed (social impairments and restricted, repetitive behaviors). While it is feasible that these numerous and seemingly disparate symptoms associated with ASD arise independently of each other, it may perhaps be more likely that the defining ASD features and co-morbid symptoms share a mechanistic link.

IV. Somatosensory Dysfunction: A Translatable Symptom to Study in Mice

Given the genetic contributions to ASD, there is a tremendous need to investigate the role of known ASD gene mutations in sensory circuit development and behavioral outcomes. A major area of emphasis has been on generating mouse genetic models that recapitulate core ASD phenotypes, such as anxiety-like behaviors and social interaction deficits (Silverman et al., 2010). These models with known ASD monogenic mutations are useful for understanding the pathophysiological basis of ASD. Recent findings suggest that both tactile reactivity abnormalities and social behavior deficits are present in mouse models of both syndromic and non-syndromic forms of ASD, highlighting the value of these mouse models for investigation of the etiological basis of ASD traits (Crawley, 2012).

While these genetic models provide valuable tools to study the underlying biology of ASD, it is unknown where in the nervous system their functions are disrupted. Therefore, a key question in ASD research is identifying a neural locus of dysfunction with regards to specific ASD phenotypes, in order to enable the development of effective treatments. When considering somatosensory alterations and tactile dysfunction, it is critical to consider that somatosensory processing begins with a stimulus impinging on the skin and activation of peripheral somatosensory neurons that transmit these signals from the skin to the CNS. As discussed above, somatosensory information is processed, transformed and propagated through a diverse group of spinal cord interneurons and projection neurons, and this information is further conveyed to the brainstem, thalamus and onward to primary somatosensory cortex. Therefore, abnormal development or dysfunction along any of these steps of the somatosensory circuitry could result in abnormal sensory processing and altered tactile behaviors.

The great majority of ASD research has focused on brain-specific mechanisms and circuits, with less attention to the contributions of the peripheral nervous system and spinal cord to ASD phenotypes. In the following portion of this review, we will describe recent studies that implicate peripheral somatosensory neurons as a major locus of dysfunction that cause abnormal somatosensory reactivity across a range of mouse models for ASD. We will review recent evidence that links peripheral somatosensory neuron dysfunction to aberrant brain development and the genesis of related ASD behaviors including anxiety-like behaviors and social impairments. Lastly, the possibility of targeting peripheral somatosensory neurons to improve select ASD features will be explored.

V. Mouse Models for ASD: Evidence for Peripheral Somatosensory Neuron Dysfunction

V.1: Gabrb3

Human mutations in the GABAA receptor subunit β3 (Gabrb3) gene are a known cause of ASD, and individuals with these mutations display hypersensitivities to tactile stimuli (Tavassoli et al., 2012). Male mice that are heterozygous for Gabrb3 exhibit phenotypes relevant to ASD, including hypersensitivity to both thermal and mechanical stimuli, sensorimotor impairments and social behavior deficits (DeLorey et al., 2011). In line with this, selective loss of Gabrb3 in nociceptive neurons causes hypersensitivity to both mechanical and thermal pain but no apparent alterations in cold pain sensitivity (Chen et al., 2014). Furthermore, deletion of Gabrb3 in all peripheral somatosensory neurons also causes abnormalities in light touch sensitivity, including hairy skin over-reactivity, mechanical hypersensitivity in hind paw glabrous skin and texture discrimination deficits (Orefice et al., 2016; Zimmerman et al., 2019). Electrophysiological experiments determined that loss of Gabrb3 in peripheral sensory neurons leads to a significant reduction in GABAA receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition of peripheral sensory neuron inputs to the spinal cord (Orefice et al., 2016). This deficit in presynaptic inhibition led to increased flow of sensory information to the CNS and ultimately somatosensory over-reactivity (Orefice et al., 2016).

V.2: Mecp2

In addition, mice lacking one copy of Mecp2 also exhibit phenotypes relevant to ASDs and Rett syndrome, including impaired social behaviors, abnormal ultrasonic vocalizations, stereotyped behaviors and sensory integration deficits (Gogolla et al., 2014; Silverman et al., 2010). Recent studies have also demonstrated that Mecp2 mutant mice and rats exhibit somatosensory alterations consistent with patient observations, including mechanical/light touch hypersensitivity in both glabrous and hairy skin, as well as increased responsivity to noxious cold stimuli but decreased thermal sensitivity (Bhattacherjee et al., 2017; Orefice et al., 2016). In both mice and rats, loss of Mecp2 specifically in DRG neurons leads to mechanical hypersensitivity (Bhattacherjee et al., 2017; Orefice et al., 2016). Using conditional mouse genetics, selective deletion of Mecp2 in all peripheral sensory neurons led to mechanosensory neuron dysfunction through loss of GABAA receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition of inputs to the CNS (Orefice et al., 2016). Additional pathophysiological mechanisms of dysfunction leading to somatosensory alterations were observed in rat models of Rett syndrome: lentiviral knockdown of Mecp2 in foot-pad innervating DRG neurons led to a hyperinnervation of the cutaneous nerves to the skin and a concomitant increase in mechanical sensitivity measured by Von Frey fibers (Bhattacherjee et al., 2017). In line with these rodent studies, a recent paper investigated potential abnormalities in peripheral somatosensory neuron innervation of the skin in patients with Rett syndrome. Skin biopsies from subjects with Rett syndrome exhibited an increased number of total epidermal sensory neuron fiber density as well as increased density of peptidergic, calcitonin gene-related peptide-positive fibers (Symons et al., 2019). Lastly, hyperexcitability of trigeminal neurons that innervate the jaw and facial muscles has also been observed in Mecp2 knockout mice, which was linked to alterations in sodium and potassium channel function (Oginsky et al., 2017). Together, these studies indicate there are a range of potential pathophysiological mechanisms of peripheral somatosensory neuron dysfunction that may contribute to altered somatosensory behaviors in mouse models for, and potentially patients with, Rett syndrome.

V.3: Shank3

SHANK3 is a synaptic scaffolding protein located at excitatory glutamatergic synapses (Sheng and Kim, 2000). Shank3 is commonly implicated in ASDs, with Shank3 mutations identified in ~2% of ASD cases (Moessner et al., 2007). Genetic deletion of the Shank3 gene is also observed in patients with 22q13 deletion syndrome, also known as Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome often exhibit enhanced sensitivity to light touch stimuli and tactile defensiveness and, paradoxically, reduced responsivity to certain painful stimuli (Phelan and McDermid, 2012; Philippe et al., 2008; Sarasua et al., 2014). While studies of Shank3 function have primarily focused on its expression at postsynaptic densities of excitatory glutamatergic synapses in the brain, Shank3 is also expressed in the presynaptic terminals of peripheral somatosensory neurons including nociceptor neurons and LTMRs in the spinal cord dorsal horn (Han et al., 2016; Orefice et al., 2019). Shank3 function is necessary in peripheral somatosensory neurons for normal light touch and thermal pain-related behaviors. Sensory neuron-specific loss of Shank3 leads to deficits in thermal heat sensitivity, inflammation-induced heat hyperalgesia, as well as capsaicin-evoked pain responses in the hind paw of mice (Han et al., 2016). Furthermore, loss of Shank3 in peripheral somatosensory neurons also leads to over-reactivity to light touch stimuli in hairy skin, as well as deficits in texture discrimination via glabrous skin on the paws of mice (Orefice et al., 2019). Interestingly, the physiological deficits underlying impaired heat transmission and light touch over-reactivity are distinct: loss of Shank3 in nociceptive neurons leads to a reduction in TRPV1 expression which impairs pain signaling, while Shank3 mutations in LTMRs causes deficits in HCN channel function and ultimately increased excitability of this neuronal population (Han et al., 2016; Orefice et al., 2019).

V.4: Fmr1

Fmr1 mutant mice exhibit many fragile X syndrome and ASD-related phenotypes including decreased thermal pain sensitivity and self-injurious behaviors, but also increased light touch sensitivity (Orefice et al., 2016; Price et al., 2007; Spencer et al., 2011; Symons et al., 2003). Fmr1 mRNA is expressed in all peripheral somatosensory neurons (Zheng et al., 2019). The protein product produced by the Fmr1 gene, fragile x mental retardation protein (FMRP), has been found to localize to the axons of nociceptor neurons as well as neurons within the spinal cord dorsal horn (Price et al., 2006). Evidence for peripheral somatosensory neuron dysfunction comes from pharmacological studies in which intraplantar injection of a peripherally-restricted mGluR1/5 agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) produces thermal hyperalgesia in wildtype mice through sensitization of TRPV1 on peripheral terminals of DRG neurons (Kim et al., 2009; Price et al., 2007). However, administration of DHPG in Fmr1 knockout mice failed to produce a thermal hyperalgesia phenotype (Price et al., 2007). In line with this, spared nerve injury causes neuropathic allodynia (painful response to a stimulus that does not normally cause pain) in wildtype mice, within five days of the surgery. However, Fmr1 knockout mice did not exhibit mechanical allodynia behaviors until three weeks after the spared nerve injury surgery (Price et al., 2007). These findings indicate there is a lack of peripheral neuron sensitization in response to mGluR1/5 stimulation in the periphery of Fmr1 knockout mice, which may contribute to altered pain sensitivity and possibly self-injurious behaviors in these animals.

V.5: Cntnap2

Humans with homozygous, loss-of-function mutations in the Cntnap2 gene, which encodes for contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), exhibit developmental delays and a number of core ASD features in addition to somatosensory abnormalities, pain hypersensitivity and peripheral neuron hyperexcitability (Masood and Sitammagari, 2019; Strauss et al., 2006). Mice with mutations in Cntnap2 demonstrate ASD-like behaviors including abnormal social interactions, reduced vocal communication as well as restrictive, repetitive behaviors (Penagarikano et al., 2011). Importantly, Cntnap2 knockout mice exhibit over-reactivity to both mechanical Von Frey fiber stimulation to the hind paw, as well as increased sensitivity to painful pin-prick stimuli and enhanced nocifensive responses to intraplantar injections of either capsaicin or formalin (Dawes et al., 2018). In line with this, DRG neurons from Cntnap2 knockout mice are hyper-responsive to both mechanical and chemical stimuli, due to a loss of potassium channel Kv1.2 membrane expression and increased excitability (Dawes et al., 2018). Finally, injection of patient-derived, peripherally-restricted CASPR2 autoantibodies into wildtype mice lead to decreased CASPR2 and Kv1 channel expression on DRG neurons but not inflammation or DRG nerve damage (Dawes et al., 2018). Mice treated with peripherally-restricted CASPR2 autoantibodies exhibited mechanical hypersensitivity compared to mice injected with IgG-treated control mice (Dawes et al., 2018). Taken together, these experiments indicate that immune or genetic disruption of CASPR2 causes DRG neuron hyperexcitability and alterations in somatosensory behaviors.

V.6: Non-genetic models for ASD

In addition to a wide range of genetic models used to study ASD, environmental models have also been developed and are useful for understanding the complex etiologies for ASD. For example, studies over the past four decades have indicated that maternal use of valproic acid (VPA) during pregnancy is associated with significantly increased risk of ASD in offspring (Christensen et al., 2013; Roullet et al., 2013). Animals exposed to VPA in utero have been successful in recapitulating many anatomical, functional and behavioral alterations observed in ASD, including altered cortical circuit properties, social impairments and restricted, repetitive behaviors (Mabunga et al., 2015). In line with this, rats exposed to VPA on embryonic day 12.5 exhibit hypersensitivity to light touch stimuli but decreased sensitivity to painful stimuli when assessed for behavioral alterations in adolescence and adulthood (Schneider and Przewlocki, 2005). In vitro application of VPA to DRG neurons inhibited the collapse of sensory neuron growth cones, increased growth cone area and increased total neurite outgrowth (Shaltiel et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2002). Furthermore, embryonic treatment with VPA leads to alterations in DRG neuron anatomy, including abnormal branching patterns in vivo (Bold et al., 2018). While additional experiments are needed to ascertain whether VPA-induced changes in DRG neurons cause somatosensory alterations in mammals, these studies indicate that non-genetic models for ASD also exhibit abnormalities in somatosensory behaviors and alterations in DRG neuron properties.

Similarly, recent studies have suggested that viral infection during pregnancy correlates with increased risk of ASD in the offspring (Atladottir et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2015). A rodent model of maternal immune activation (MIA) has been developed, in which pregnant mice are injected intraperitoneally with synthetic double-stranded RNA [polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, ‘poly(I:C)’] that mimics viral infection (Shi et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2007). Pregnant mothers injected with poly(I:C) on embryonic day 12.5 leads to elevated IL-17Ra mRNA expression and abnormal neural circuit development in the offspring (Choi et al., 2016). The offspring also exhibit ASD-related behavioral symptoms including social impairments and repetitive behaviors (Malkova et al., 2012; Shi et al., 2003). Furthermore, MIA-affected offspring exhibit anatomical and functional abnormalities in the dysgranular zone of the primary somatosensory cortex (Shin Yim et al., 2017), as well as tactile over-reactivity (Orefice et al., 2019). Future studies are necessary to determine whether peripheral somatosensory neuron dysfunction contributes to these phenotypes observed in MIA-affected offspring.

V.7: Animal Models for ASD, Conclusions

Somatosensory alterations in ASD models can therefore arise from a range of distinct cellautonomous, pathophysiological mechanisms that affect peripheral somatosensory neuron function. Tactile over-reactivity may result from loss of GABAA receptor signaling and presynaptic inhibition of somatosensory neuron inputs to the spinal cord, as is the case for Mecp2 and Gabrb3 mutants (Chen et al., 2014; Orefice et al., 2019; Orefice et al., 2016; Zimmerman et al., 2019). Conversely, loss of K channel function may lead to somatosensory neuron hyper-excitability, as seen in Shank3 and Cntnap2 mutants (Dawes et al., 2018; Han et al., 2016; Orefice et al., 2019). Furthermore, alterations in activity-dependent protein translation and downstream signaling cascades observed in Fmr1 knockout mice (Price et al., 2007) may also contribute to abnormalities in somatosensory behaviors. The observation of HCN channel dysfunction in peripheral somatosensory neurons is consistent with prior work indicating that alterations in HCN channel function lead to hippocampal neuron hyperexcitability (Crozier et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2000; Yi et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2013). Whether loss of ASD-related genes in peripheral sensory neurons also affects other ion channels, receptors and regulators of excitability is not known and would be interesting to evaluate in future studies. It is noteworthy that mutations in ASD-associated genes may differentially affect sensitivity of LTMRs and small diameter nociceptive neurons (Han et al., 2016; Orefice et al., 2016). For example, reduced sensitivity to painful thermal and chemical stimuli is observed in mice with conditional deletion of Shank3 in nociceptive neurons and this nociceptive dysfunction is due to alterations in TRPV1 expression (Han et al., 2016; Orefice et al., 2016). Mutations in Shank3 also contribute to reduced excitability of small-diameter nociceptive neurons, but increased excitability of LTMRs (Orefice et al., 2019). These studies may help to explain the seemingly paradoxical findings that many subjects with ASD can exhibit both hypersensitivity and aversion to light touch but also decreased responsiveness to noxious stimuli (Downs et al., 2010; Tomchek and Dunn, 2007).

VI. Peripheral Sensory Neuron Dysfunction Contributes to the Genesis of Some Other ASD Phenotypes in Mice

Could altered somatosensation contribute to social impairments and anxiety observed in patients with ASDs? The parallel anxiety-like behavior and social interaction deficits in ASD models and in animals reared in the absence of normal developmental tactile experiences led us to speculate the existence of a common mechanistic link between these two conditions. Consistent with this idea, young children with ASD are typically averse to tactile stimuli and an aversion to nurturing touch has been suggested to impact their development and behavior (Cascio, 2010). On the other hand, environmental enrichment such as increased maternal licking and grooming in mice during early postnatal periods can improve behavioral outcomes in ASD models (Lonetti et al., 2010). Increased tactile stimulation of young rodent pups, prior to weaning, also leads to greater dendritic complexity and spine density in cortical areas, as well as enhanced performance on cognitive/memory tests and reduced anxiety-like behaviors in adulthood (Richards et al., 2012).

Recent studies found that developmental loss of either Mecp2, Gabrb3 or Shank3 only in peripheral somatosensory neurons that causes tactile over-reactivity, is sufficient to cause increased anxiety-like behaviors and social impairments in adult mice (Orefice et al., 2019; Orefice et al., 2016). Ablation of each of these ASD-associated genes in peripheral somatosensory neurons at four weeks of age also leads to tactile over-reactivity, but anxiety-like behaviors are not observed in adult mice and social impairments are milder than with embryonic deletions (Orefice et al., 2016; Orefice et al., 2019; Zimmerman et al., 2019). These studies suggest that there is a developmental requirement for normal touch reactivity for the acquisition of normal brain development as well as cognitive and social behaviors. In line with this, several studies have shown that proper sensory input is critical for the development of the brain (Lacoste et al., 2014), and the absence of normal sensory inputs in children negatively affects brain development and results in cognitive and social deficits in adulthood (Casanova et al., 2002; Frank et al., 1996; Gogolla et al., 2009; Just et al., 2007; Markram and Markram, 2010; Sheridan et al., 2012; Yizhar et al., 2011).

Indeed, development loss of either Shank3 or Mecp2 only in peripheral somatosensory neurons, led to anatomical and functional changes in primary somatosensory cortex of adult mice. Mice with conditional deletion of either Mecp2 or Shank3 in peripheral somatosensory neurons exhibited alterations in parvalbumin-positive inhibitory interneuron density in primary somatosensory cortex in adulthood, compared to control littermates (Orefice et al., 2019). The investigators also used whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology to assess the function of cortical microcircuits in these conditional mutant mice compared to control littermates. Loss of either Mecp2 or Shank3 in peripheral somatosensory neurons led to a shift in the excitation/inhibition balance towards increased inhibition of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in trunk primary somatosensory cortex, but not primary visual cortex, from transverse brain slices taken from 8 to 10-week-old conditional mutant mice (Orefice et al., 2019). These results are consistent with a recent study (Antoine et al., 2019), which suggested that changes in sensory cortex excitation/inhibition balance observed in ASD models may reflect adaptations to altered sensory input from the periphery. It is therefore possible that alterations in cortical inhibitory neuron density or cortical microcircuit function reflect homeostatic mechanisms for increasing inhibitory neuron response rates under conditions of enhanced sensory drive to the cortex. Together, these findings indicate that developmental loss of ASD-associated genes in peripheral mechanosensory neurons leads to region-specific brain abnormalities, revealing links between developmental somatosensory over-reactivity and the genesis of aberrant behaviors.

While peripheral somatosensory neuron dysfunction may contribute to several ASD-related phenotypes, there are many other key loci of dysfunction including critical brain regions, that are significantly implicated in ASD etiology. For example, loss of Mecp2 or Shank3 in peripheral sensory neurons does not recapitulate all ASD behavioral phenotypes observed in the germline mutation models, including memory impairments and overgrooming behaviors observed in Shank3 mutants. In addition, Mecp2 mutant mice exhibit motor deficits, early lethality, memory impairments and respiratory dysfunction that is unrelated to somatosensory circuit dysfunction (Orefice et al., 2019; Orefice et al., 2016). These studies indicate that these ASD-associated genes also function in additional cell types and neural circuits to cause other ASD-related phenotypes. In summary, peripheral sensory neuron dysfunction may contribute to a subset of ASD-related phenotypes in mice, including somatosensory behavior disruptions, altered brain development, social impairments and anxiety-like behaviors. Future studies are needed to understand the mechanisms through which peripheral sensory neuron dysfunction leads to changes in brain development and complex behaviors.

VII. Peripheral Sensory Neurons: A Potential Therapeutic Target for ASDs?

Tactile hypersensitivity is commonly reported by patients with ASD, and the degree of somatosensory impairments strongly correlates with increased anxiety behaviors as well as impairments in social behaviors (Voos et al., 2013). Suppressing tactile hypersensitivity is therefore a large unmet need for patients with ASD. As predicted by recent rodent studies (Orefice et al., 2019; Orefice et al., 2016; Zimmerman et al., 2019), this strategy may also improve core ASD phenotypes such as social impairments. In line with this hypothesis, acute treatment with a peripherally restricted GABAA receptor agonist, isoguvacine, acts directly on mechanosensory neurons to reduce their excitability, and isoguvacine treatment attenuates tactile over-reactivity that is observed in six distinct ASD mouse models (Orefice et al., 2019). Furthermore. chronic treatment of Mecp2 and Shank3 mutant mice beginning neonatally improves body condition, cortical abnormalities, anxiety-like behaviors, and some social impairments (Orefice et al., 2019). Thus, a peripherally restricted pharmacological approach to suppress tactile over-reactivity during early postnatal development has the potential to improve some behavioral abnormalities associated with ASD.

Other new treatment strategies that show promise for ASD may also work, at least in part, through affecting peripheral nerve function. A recent study reported that intraperitoneal administration of bumetanide from P0-P10 significantly improves functional abnormalities in the somatosensory cortex of Fmr1 knockout mice (He et al., 2018). However, systemic administration of bumetanide leads to extremely low brain concentrations (Romermann et al., 2017), likely below those needed to inhibit the bumetanide target NKCC1. It is possible that bumetanide, akin to isoguvacine, exerts some of its effects outside of the brain. Perhaps bumetanide acts directly on peripheral somatosensory neurons, which express high levels of NKCC1 into adulthood, to affect tactile sensitivity during development. These studies also suggest that a significant benefit of peripheral restriction of drug action may be that it enables effective peripheral target engagement and optimal dosing, without the complications of brain actions and adverse effects on brain development.

VIII. Summary

Abnormal sensory reactivity is now regarded as a diagnostic feature of ASDs. The present review describes a growing body of work demonstrating that peripheral somatosensory neurons are dysfunctional and contribute to behavioral phenotypes in a wide range of genetic models for ASD, including Mecp2, Gabrb3, Shank3, Cntnap2, and Fmr1 mutant mice as well as environmental models for ASD. These findings, together with evidence of impaired peripheral sensory neuron function in humans with both syndromic and non-syndromic forms of ASD (Bader et al., 1989; Boyle and Kaufmann, 2010; Brandt and Rosen, 1998; Haas and Love, 1988; Hagerman et al., 2007; Jellinger et al., 1988; Khalfa et al., 2001; Torres et al., 2013) suggest that targeting peripheral sensory neurons may provide an opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Future studies are necessary to understand the mechanisms through which altered peripheral sensory neuron function ultimately impacts brain function and the development of complex behaviors. Furthermore, determining whether peripheral sensory neuron dysfunction contributes to alterations in other sensory circuits such as vision or audition will be of great interest. Together, these findings support a neuro-constructivist model, in which genetic and/or environmental perturbations that alter peripheral sensory neuron functions impact brain development and contribute to altered behaviors associated with ASD.

Highlights.

  • Somatosensory alterations are highly prevalent among people with ASD.

  • The mechanisms underlying abnormal somatosensation in ASD are not fully understood.

  • Peripheral sensory neuron dysfunction causes altered somatosensation in ASD models.

  • Peripheral somatosensory neuron dysfunction affects brain development and behavior.

  • Therapies that target peripheral sensory neurons may improve some features of ASD.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by an NIH grant (R00 NS101057), a Klingenstein-Simons Fellowship Award in Neuroscience, and a Smith Family Award for Excellence in Biomedical Research sponsored by the Nancy Lurie Marks Foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Abraira VE, and Ginty DD (2013). The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron 79, 618–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antoine MW, Langberg T, Schnepel P, and Feldman DE (2019). Increased Excitation-Inhibition Ratio Stabilizes Synapse and Circuit Excitability in Four Autism Mouse Models. Neuron 101, 648–661 e644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aronoff R, Matyas F, Mateo C, Ciron C, Schneider B, and Petersen CC (2010). Long-range connectivity of mouse primary somatosensory barrel cortex. Eur J Neurosci 31, 2221–2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atladottir HO, Thorsen P, Ostergaard L, Schendel DE, Lemcke S, Abdallah M, and Parner ET (2010). Maternal infection requiring hospitalization during pregnancy and autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 1423–1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bader GG, Witt-Engerstrom I, and Hagberg B (1989). Neurophysiological findings in the Rett syndrome, I: EMG, conduction velocity, EEG and somatosensory-evoked potential studies. Brain Dev 11, 102–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai D, Yip BHK, Windham GC, Sourander A, Francis R, Yoffe R, Glasson E, Mahjani B, Suominen A, Leonard H, et al. (2019). Association of Genetic and Environmental Factors With Autism in a 5-Country Cohort. JAMA Psychiatry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bai L, Lehnert BP, Liu J, Neubarth NL, Dickendesher TL, Nwe PH, Cassidy C, Woodbury CJ, and Ginty DD (2015). Genetic Identification of an Expansive Mechanoreceptor Sensitive to Skin Stroking. Cell 163, 1783–1795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Battaglia A (2011). Sensory impairment in mental retardation: a potential role for NGF. Archives italiennes de biologie 149, 193–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bedwell SA, Billett EE, Crofts JJ, and Tinsley CJ (2014). The topology of connections between rat prefrontal, motor and sensory cortices. Front Syst Neurosci 8, 177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhattacherjee A, Mu Y, Winter MK, Knapp JR, Eggimann LS, Gunewardena SS, Kobayashi K, Kato S, Krizsan-Agbas D, and Smith PG (2017). Neuronal cytoskeletal gene dysregulation and mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of Rett syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, E6952–E6961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blakemore SJ, Tavassoli T, Calo S, Thomas RM, Catmur C, Frith U, and Haggard P (2006). Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome. Brain and cognition 61, 5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bold J, Sakata-Haga H, and Fukui Y (2018). Spinal nerve defects in mouse embryos prenatally exposed to valproic acid. Anat Sci Int 93, 35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boyle L, and Kaufmann WE (2010). The behavioral phenotype of FMR1 mutations. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C, 469–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Braat S, and Kooy RF (2015). The GABAA Receptor as a Therapeutic Target for Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Neuron 86, 1119–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brandt BR, and Rosen I (1998). Impaired peripheral somatosensory function in children with Prader-Willi syndrome. Neuropediatrics 29, 124–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden DP, Switala AE, and Roy E (2002). Asperger’s syndrome and cortical neuropathology. J Child Neurol 17, 142–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cascio C, McGlone F, Folger S, Tannan V, Baranek G, Pelphrey KA, and Essick G (2008). Tactile perception in adults with autism: a multidimensional psychophysical study. J Autism Dev Disord 38, 127–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cascio CJ (2010). Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders 2, 62–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cascio CJ, Lorenzi J, and Baranek GT (2016a). Self-reported Pleasantness Ratings and Examiner-Coded Defensiveness in Response to Touch in Children with ASD: Effects of Stimulus Material and Bodily Location. J Autism Dev Disord 46, 1528–1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cascio CJ, Woynaroski T, Baranek GT, and Wallace MT (2016b). Toward an interdisciplinary approach to understanding sensory function in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 9, 920–925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Casler L (1965). The Effects of Extra Tactile Stimulation on a Group of Institutionalized Infants. Genet Psychol Monogr 71, 137–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen JT, Guo D, Campanelli D, Frattini F, Mayer F, Zhou L, Kuner R, Heppenstall PA, Knipper M, and Hu J (2014). Presynaptic GABAergic inhibition regulated by BDNF contributes to neuropathic pain induction. Nature communications 5, 5331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Choi GB, Yim YS, Wong H, Kim S, Kim H, Kim SV, Hoeffer CA, Littman DR, and Huh JR (2016). The maternal interleukin-17a pathway in mice promotes autism-like phenotypes in offspring. Science 351, 933–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Christensen J, Gronborg TK, Sorensen MJ, Schendel D, Parner ET, Pedersen LH, and Vestergaard M (2013). Prenatal valproate exposure and risk of autism spectrum disorders and childhood autism. JAMA 309, 1696–1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Corbetta D, and Snapp-Childs W (2009). Seeing and touching: the role of sensory-motor experience on the development of infant reaching. Infant behavior & development 32, 44–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Crawley JN (2012). Translational animal models of autism and neurodevelopmental disorders. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience 14, 293–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Crozier RA, Ajit SK, Kaftan EJ, and Pausch MH (2007). MrgD activation inhibits KCNQ/M-currents and contributes to enhanced neuronal excitability. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 4492–4496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dawes JM, Weir GA, Middleton SJ, Patel R, Chisholm KI, Pettingill P, Peck LJ, Sheridan J, Shakir A, Jacobson L, et al. (2018). Immune or Genetic-Mediated Disruption of CASPR2 Causes Pain Hypersensitivity Due to Enhanced Primary Afferent Excitability. Neuron 97, 806–822 e810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. DeLorey TM, Sahbaie P, Hashemi E, Li WW, Salehi A, and Clark DJ (2011). Somatosensory and sensorimotor consequences associated with the heterozygous disruption of the autism candidate gene, Gabrb3. Behavioural brain research 216, 36–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Downs J, Geranton SM, Bebbington A, Jacoby P, Bahi-Buisson N, Ravine D, and Leonard H (2010). Linking MECP2 and pain sensitivity: the example of Rett syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 152A, 1197–1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. DSM-V (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5 (Fifth edition. Arlington, VA: : American Psychiatric Publishing.). [Google Scholar]
  32. Ferber SG, Feldman R, and Makhoul IR (2008). The development of maternal touch across the first year of life. Early Hum Dev 84, 363–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Foss-Feig JH, Heacock JL, and Cascio CJ (2012). Tactile Responsiveness Patterns and Their Association with Core Features in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord 6, 337344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Frank DA, Klass PE, Earls F, and Eisenberg L (1996). Infants and young children in orphanages: one view from pediatrics and child psychiatry. Pediatrics 97, 569–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gogolla N, Leblanc JJ, Quast KB, Sudhof TC, Fagiolini M, and Hensch TK (2009). Common circuit defect of excitatory-inhibitory balance in mouse models of autism. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders 1, 172–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gogolla N, Takesian AE, Feng G, Fagiolini M, and Hensch TK (2014). Sensory Integration in Mouse Insular Cortex Reflects GABA Circuit Maturation. Neuron 83, 894–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Guerrini R, Bonanni P, Parmeggiani L, Santucci M, Parmeggiani A, and Sartucci F (1998). Cortical reflex myoclonus in Rett syndrome. Ann Neurol 43, 472–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Haas RH, and Love S (1988). Peripheral nerve findings in Rett syndrome. J Child Neurol 3 Suppl, S25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hagerman RJ, Coffey SM, Maselli R, Soontarapornchai K, Brunberg JA, Leehey MA, Zhang L, Gane LW, Fenton-Farrell G, Tassone F, et al. (2007). Neuropathy as a presenting feature in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 143A, 2256–2260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Han Q, Kim YH, Wang X, Liu D, Zhang Z-J, Bey AL, Lay M, Chang W, Berta T, Zhang Y, et al. (2016). SHANK3 Deficiency Impairs Heat Hyperalgesia and TRPV1 Signaling in Primary Sensory Neurons. Neuron 92, 1279–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. He Q, Arroyo ED, Smukowski SN, Xu J, Piochon C, Savas JN, Portera-Cailliau C, and Contractor A (2018). Critical period inhibition of NKCC1 rectifies synapse plasticity in the somatosensory cortex and restores adult tactile response maps in fragile X mice. Mol Psychiatry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hertenstein MJ, Verkamp JM, Kerestes AM, and Holmes RM (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, non-human primates, and rats: a review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs 132, 5–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jellinger K, Armstrong D, Zoghbi HY, and Percy AK (1988). Neuropathology of Rett syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 76, 142–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jenkins BA, and Lumpkin EA (2017). Developing a sense of touch. Development 144, 40784090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Just MA, Cherkassky VL, Keller TA, Kana RK, and Minshew NJ (2007). Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: evidence from an FMRI study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry. Cereb Cortex 17, 951–961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Khalfa S, Bruneau N, Roge B, Georgieff N, Veuillet E, Adrien JL, Barthelemy C, and Collet L (2001). Peripheral auditory asymmetry in infantile autism. Eur J Neurosci 13, 628–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim YH, Park CK, Back SK, Lee CJ, Hwang SJ, Bae YC, Na HS, Kim JS, Jung SJ, and Oh SB (2009). Membrane-delimited coupling of TRPV1 and mGluR5 on presynaptic terminals of nociceptive neurons. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 29, 10000–10009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Klintwall L, Holm A, Eriksson M, Carlsson LH, Olsson MB, Hedvall A, Gillberg C, and Fernell E (2011). Sensory abnormalities in autism. A brief report. Res Dev Disabil 32, 795–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Koch SC, Acton D, and Goulding M (2018). Spinal Circuits for Touch, Pain, and Itch. Annu Rev Physiol 80, 189–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lacoste B, Comin CH, Ben-Zvi A, Kaeser PS, Xu X, Costa Lda F, and Gu C (2014). Sensory-related neural activity regulates the structure of vascular networks in the cerebral cortex. Neuron 83, 1117–1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee BK, Magnusson C, Gardner RM, Blomstrom A, Newschaffer CJ, Burstyn I, Karlsson H, and Dalman C (2015). Maternal hospitalization with infection during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav Immun 44, 100–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lonetti G, Angelucci A, Morando L, Boggio EM, Giustetto M, and Pizzorusso T (2010). Early environmental enrichment moderates the behavioral and synaptic phenotype of MeCP2 null mice. Biological psychiatry 67, 657–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mabunga DF, Gonzales EL, Kim JW, Kim KC, and Shin CY (2015). Exploring the Validity of Valproic Acid Animal Model of Autism. Exp Neurobiol 24, 285–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Main M, and Stadtman J (1981). Infant response to rejection of physical contact by the mother: aggression, avoidance, and conflict. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 20, 292–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Malkova NV, Yu CZ, Hsiao EY, Moore MJ, and Patterson PH (2012). Maternal immune activation yields offspring displaying mouse versions of the three core symptoms of autism. Brain Behav Immun 26, 607–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Markram K, and Markram H (2010). The intense world theory - a unifying theory of the neurobiology of autism. Front Hum Neurosci 4, 224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Markus A (2006). Specifying nociceptors. Nature neuroscience 9, 162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Masood W, and Sitammagari KK (2019). Morvan Syndrome (Morvan Fibrillary Chorea, MFC). In StatPearls; (Treasure Island (FL: )). [Google Scholar]
  59. Mazurek MO, Vasa RA, Kalb LG, Kanne SM, Rosenberg D, Keefer A, Murray DS, Freedman B, and Lowery LA (2013). Anxiety, sensory over-responsivity, and gastrointestinal problems in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Abnorm Child Psychol 41, 165–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mikkelsen M, Wodka EL, Mostofsky SH, and Puts NAJ (2018). Autism spectrum disorder in the scope of tactile processing. Dev Cogn Neurosci 29, 140–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Militerni R, Bravaccio C, Falco C, Puglisi-Allegra S, Pascucci T, and Fico C (2000). Pain reactivity in children with autistic disorder. The Journal of Headache and Pain 1, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  62. Miller LJ, McIntosh DN, McGrath J, Shyu V, Lampe M, Taylor AK, Tassone F, Neitzel K, Stackhouse T, and Hagerman RJ (1999). Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: a preliminary report. American journal of medical genetics 83, 268–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Moessner R, Marshall CR, Sutcliffe JS, Skaug J, Pinto D, Vincent J, Zwaigenbaum L, Fernandez B, Roberts W, Szatmari P, et al. (2007). Contribution of SHANK3 mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet 81, 1289–1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Montagu A (1984). The skin, touch, and human development. Clin Dermatol 2, 17–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Moore DJ (2015). Acute pain experience in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a review. Autism : the international journal of research and practice 19, 387–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mount RH, Charman T, Hastings RP, Reilly S, and Cass H (2003). Features of autism in Rett syndrome and severe mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord 33, 435–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Oginsky MF, Cui N, Zhong W, Johnson CM, and Jiang C (2017). Hyperexcitability of Mesencephalic Trigeminal Neurons and Reorganization of Ion Channel Expression in a Rett Syndrome Model. J Cell Physiol 232, 1151–1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Orefice LL, Mosko JR, Morency DT, Wells MF, Tasnim A, Mozeika SM, Ye M, Chirila AM, Emanuel AJ, Rankin G, et al. (2019). Targeting Peripheral Somatosensory Neurons to Improve Tactile-Related Phenotypes in ASD Models. Cell 178, 867–886.e824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Orefice LL, Zimmerman AL, Chirila AM, Sleboda SJ, Head JP, and Ginty DD (2016). Peripheral Mechanosensory Neuron Dysfunction Underlies Tactile and Behavioral Deficits in Mouse Models of ASDs. Cell 166, 299–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pascual R, and Zamora-Leon SP (2007). Effects of neonatal maternal deprivation and postweaning environmental complexity on dendritic morphology of prefrontal pyramidal neurons in the rat. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis 67, 471–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Penagarikano O, Abrahams BS, Herman EI, Winden KD, Gdalyahu A, Dong H, Sonnenblick LI, Gruver R, Almajano J, Bragin A, et al. (2011). Absence of CNTNAP2 leads to epilepsy, neuronal migration abnormalities, and core autism-related deficits. Cell 147, 235–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Phelan K, and McDermid HE (2012). The 22q13.3 Deletion Syndrome (Phelan-McDermid Syndrome). Mol Syndromol 2, 186–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Philippe A, Boddaert N, Vaivre-Douret L, Robel L, Danon-Boileau L, Malan V, de Blois MC, Heron D, Colleaux L, Golse B, et al. (2008). Neurobehavioral profile and brain imaging study of the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome in childhood. Pediatrics 122, e376–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Price TJ, Flores CM, Cervero F, and Hargreaves KM (2006). The RNA binding and transport proteins staufen and fragile X mental retardation protein are expressed by rat primary afferent neurons and localize to peripheral and central axons. Neuroscience 141, 2107–2116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Price TJ, Rashid MH, Millecamps M, Sanoja R, Entrena JM, and Cervero F (2007). Decreased nociceptive sensitization in mice lacking the fragile X mental retardation protein: role of mGluR1/5 and mTOR. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 13958–13967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Richards S, Mychasiuk R, Kolb B, and Gibb R (2012). Tactile stimulation during development alters behaviour and neuroanatomical organization of normal rats. Behavioural brain research 231, 86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rogers SJ, Hepburn S, and Wehner E (2003). Parent reports of sensory symptoms in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 33, 631–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rogers SJ, and Ozonoff S (2005). Annotation: what do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism? A critical review of the empirical evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 46, 1255–1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Romermann K, Fedrowitz M, Hampel P, Kaczmarek E, Tollner K, Erker T, Sweet DH, and Loscher W (2017). Multiple blood-brain barrier transport mechanisms limit bumetanide accumulation, and therapeutic potential, in the mammalian brain. Neuropharmacology 117, 182–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Roullet FI, Lai JK, and Foster JA (2013). In utero exposure to valproic acid and autism--a current review of clinical and animal studies. Neurotoxicol Teratol 36, 47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rutlin M, Ho CY, Abraira VE, Cassidy C, Bai L, Woodbury CJ, and Ginty DD (2014). The cellular and molecular basis of direction selectivity of Adelta-LTMRs. Cell 159, 1640–1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rylaarsdam L, and Guemez-Gamboa A (2019). Genetic Causes and Modifiers of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front Cell Neurosci 13, 385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sarasua SM, Boccuto L, Sharp JL, Dwivedi A, Chen CF, Rollins JD, Rogers RC, Phelan K, and DuPont BR (2014). Clinical and genomic evaluation of 201 patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Hum Genet 133, 847–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Scheele D, Kendrick KM, Khouri C, Kretzer E, Schlapfer TE, Stoffel-Wagner B, Gunturkun O, Maier W, and Hurlemann R (2014). An oxytocin-induced facilitation of neural and emotional responses to social touch correlates inversely with autism traits. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 2078–2085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Schmidt MV, Oitzl MS, Levine S, and de Kloet ER (2002). The HPA system during the postnatal development of CD1 mice and the effects of maternal deprivation. Brain research Developmental brain research 139, 39–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Schneider T, and Przewlocki R (2005). Behavioral alterations in rats prenatally exposed to valproic acid: animal model of autism. Neuropsychopharmacology 30, 80–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Shaltiel G, Dalton EC, Belmaker RH, Harwood AJ, and Agam G (2007). Specificity of mood stabilizer action on neuronal growth cones. Bipolar Disord 9, 281–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sheng M, and Kim E (2000). The Shank family of scaffold proteins. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 11), 18511856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sheridan MA, Fox NA, Zeanah CH, McLaughlin KA, and Nelson CA 3rd (2012). Variation in neural development as a result of exposure to institutionalization early in childhood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 12927–12932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Shi L, Fatemi SH, Sidwell RW, and Patterson PH (2003). Maternal influenza infection causes marked behavioral and pharmacological changes in the offspring. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 23, 297–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Shin Yim Y, Park A, Berrios J, Lafourcade M, Pascual LM, Soares N, Yeon Kim J, Kim S, Kim H, Waisman A, et al. (2017). Reversing behavioural abnormalities in mice exposed to maternal inflammation. Nature 549, 482–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Silverman JL, Yang M, Lord C, and Crawley JN (2010). Behavioural phenotyping assays for mouse models of autism. Nat Rev Neurosci 11, 490–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Smith SE, Li J, Garbett K, Mirnics K, and Patterson PH (2007). Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 10695–10702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Spencer CM, Alekseyenko O, Hamilton SM, Thomas AM, Serysheva E, Yuva-Paylor LA, and Paylor R (2011). Modifying behavioral phenotypes in Fmr1KO mice: genetic background differences reveal autistic-like responses. Autism Res 4, 40–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Strauss KA, Puffenberger EG, Huentelman MJ, Gottlieb S, Dobrin SE, Parod JM, Stephan DA, and Morton DH (2006). Recessive symptomatic focal epilepsy and mutant contactin-associated protein-like 2. N Engl J Med 354, 1370–1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Symons FJ, Barney CC, Byiers BJ, McAdams BD, Foster S, Feyma TJ, WendelschaferCrabb G, and Kennedy WR (2019). A clinical case-control comparison of epidermal innervation density in Rett syndrome. Brain Behav 9, e01285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Symons FJ, Clark RD, Hatton DD, Skinner M, and Bailey DB Jr. (2003). Self-injurious behavior in young boys with fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 118A, 115–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tavassoli T, Auyeung B, Murphy LC, Baron-Cohen S, and Chakrabarti B (2012). Variation in the autism candidate gene GABRB3 modulates tactile sensitivity in typically developing children. Molecular autism 3, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Tavassoli T, Miller LJ, Schoen SA, Nielsen DM, and Baron-Cohen S (2014). Sensory overresponsivity in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism : the international journal of research and practice 18, 428–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Tomchek SD, and Dunn W (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther 61, 190–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Torres EB, Brincker M, Isenhower RW, Yanovich P, Stigler KA, Nurnberger JI, Metaxas DN, and Jose JV (2013). Autism: the micro-movement perspective. Front Integr Neurosci 7, 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Underdown A, Barlow J, Chung V, and Stewart-Brown S (2006). Massage intervention for promoting mental and physical health in infants aged under six months. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD005038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Voos AC, Pelphrey KA, and Kaiser MD (2013). Autistic traits are associated with diminished neural response to affective touch. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8, 378–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Vrontou S, Wong AM, Rau KK, Koerber HR, and Anderson DJ (2013). Genetic identification of C fibres that detect massage-like stroking of hairy skin in vivo. Nature 493, 669–673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Watanabe H, Nagata E, Kosakai A, Nakamura M, Yokoyama M, Tanaka K, and Sasai H (2000). Disruption of the epilepsy KCNQ2 gene results in neural hyperexcitability. J Neurochem 75, 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Williams RS, Cheng L, Mudge AW, and Harwood AJ (2002). A common mechanism of action for three mood-stabilizing drugs. Nature 417, 292–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Wulffaert J, Van Berckelaer-Onnes IA, and Scholte EM (2009). Autistic disorder symptoms in Rett syndrome. Autism : the international journal of research and practice 13, 567–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Yi F, Danko T, Botelho SC, Patzke C, Pak C, Wernig M, and Sudhof TC (2016). Autismassociated SHANK3 haploinsufficiency causes Ih channelopathy in human neurons. Science 352, aaf2669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Yizhar O, Fenno LE, Prigge M, Schneider F, Davidson TJ, O’Shea DJ, Sohal VS, Goshen I, Finkelstein J, Paz JT, et al. (2011). Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction. Nature 477, 171–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Yoshikawa H, Kaga M, Suzuki H, Sakuragawa N, and Arima M (1991). Giant somatosensory evoked potentials in the Rett syndrome. Brain Dev 13, 36–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Zakiewicz IM, Bjaalie JG, and Leergaard TB (2014). Brain-wide map of efferent projections from rat barrel cortex. Front Neuroinform 8, 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zheng Q, Fang D, Liu M, Cai J, Wan Y, Han JS, and Xing GG (2013). Suppression of KCNQ/M (Kv7) potassium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons contributes to the development of bone cancer pain in a rat model. Pain 154, 434–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zheng Y, Liu P, Bai L, Trimmer JS, Bean BP, and Ginty DD (2019). Deep Sequencing of Somatosensory Neurons Reveals Molecular Determinants of Intrinsic Physiological Properties. Neuron 103, 598–616 e597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zimmerman A, Bai L, and Ginty DD (2014). The gentle touch receptors of mammalian skin. Science 346, 950–954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Zimmerman AL, Kovatsis EM, Pozsgai RY, Tasnim A, Zhang Q, and Ginty DD (2019). Distinct Modes of Presynaptic Inhibition of Cutaneous Afferents and Their Functions in Behavior. Neuron 102, 420–434.e428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES