Assessing the diversity and distribution of potential intermediate hosts snails for urogenital schistosomiasis: Bulinus spp. (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) of Lake Victoria

Abstract

Background

The Lake Victoria basin is one of the most persistent hotspots of schistosomiasis in Africa, the intestinal form of the disease being studied more often than the urogenital form. Most schistosomiasis studies have been directed to Schistosoma mansoni and their corresponding intermediate snail hosts of the genus Biomphalaria, while neglecting S. haematobium and their intermediate snail hosts of the genus Bulinus. In the present study, we used DNA sequences from part of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region to investigate Bulinus populations obtained from a longitudinal survey in Lake Victoria and neighbouring systems during 2010–2019.

Methods

Sequences were obtained to (i) determine specimen identities, diversity and phylogenetic positions, (ii) reconstruct phylogeographical affinities, and (iii) determine the population structure to discuss the results and their implications for the transmission and epidemiology of urogenital schistosomiasis in Lake Victoria.

Results

Phylogenies, species delimitation methods (SDMs) and statistical parsimony networks revealed the presence of two main groups of Bulinus species occurring in Lake Victoria; B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex with three species (B. truncatus, B. tropicus and Bulinus sp. 1), dominating the lake proper, and a B. africanus group, prevalent in banks and marshes. Although a total of 47 cox1 haplotypes, were detected within and outside Lake Victoria, there was limited haplotype sharing (only Haplotype 6 was shared between populations from Lake Victoria open waters and neighbouring aquatic systems) – an indication that haplotypes are specific to habitats.

Conclusions

The Bulinus fauna of Lake Victoria consists of at least B. truncatus, B. tropicus, Bulinus sp. 1 (B. trigonus?) and B. ugandae. The occurrence and wide distribution of Bulinus species in Lake Victoria potentially implies the occurrence of urogenital schistosomiasis in communities living along the shores and on islands of the lake who depend solely on the lake for their livelihood. More in-depth studies are needed to obtain a better picture of the extent of the disease in the Lake Victoria basin.

Background

Schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease caused by digenean trematodes of the genus Schistosoma and is a socio-notable disease in tropical and subtropical regions. It is prevalent in more than 78 countries and territories infecting more than 250 million people worldwide, most of whom inhabit sub-Saharan Africa [1, 2]. Although more than 20 Schistosoma species are recognised, only Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium are ubiquitously known in sub-Saharan Africa due to their capability to cause intestinal and urogenital schistosomiasis, respectively [1, 3, 4]. The highest infections and disease burdens are frequently found in school-aged children, particularly in settings with poor hygiene and sanitary facilities [5]. Human hosts infected with these Schistosoma species experience acute hyperaemia, abnormal growth, internal haemorrhaging, fibrosis and tissue thickening [6]. As a result, infection with S. mansoni culminates with liver fibrosis, portal hypertension and ascites, while bladder cancer is the final stage of a S. haematobium infection [7]. Furthermore, genital schistosomiasis complications associated with S. haematobium infections include hypertrophic and ulcerative lesions of the female genital tract [8]. Schistosoma species, like other digenean trematodes, utilise pulmonate snails to complete their two-host life-cycles; i.e. Biomphalaria spp. for S. mansoni and Bulinus spp. for S. haematobium [1, 3, 4].

The Lake Victoria ecoregion of the East African Rift System, is characterized by a wealth of extraordinary freshwater biodiversity that has accumulated throughout the Quaternary, including almost 700 species of cichlid fishes [9, 10]. Major geological and climatological changes occurred in this region during this period. These changes are linked to the development of the East African Rift. More recently, anthropogenic pressures in the Lake Victoria ecoregion have grown exponentially due to multifactorial stressors such as habitat degradation, pollution, exploitation, the introduction of invasive species, ecosystem modifications and climate change [11, 12]. Insights into the consequences of recent and historic environmental changes in the region are crucial to understanding the diversification dynamics of freshwater biota. Effects of ecosystem changes on the community composition and demography of benthic organisms remain poorly assessed since few studies have been conducted apart from cichlid fishes and the schistosome intermediate host snail genus Biomphalaria [13].

Lake Victoria is endowed with a remarkable mollusc fauna, although it is less diverse than in lakes Malawi and Tanganyika, perhaps due to its younger age and relative shallowness [10, 14]. Despite its young age of about 400,000 years, Lake Victoria has experienced three major desiccation events within the last 100,000 years [15, 16]. The current water body arose about 14,600 years ago [15, 16], which is relatively shorter for snail species radiation [10, 17]. Nevertheless, Brown et al. [17] listed 28 gastropod species in Lake Victoria, of which six are medically significant species within genera Bulinus (4 species) and Biomphalaria (2 species). Lake Victoria, which is shared between Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya, therefore plays a significant role in the persistence of schistosomiasis in these surrounding countries [18–20]. Despite the increasing efforts to control schistosomiasis with praziquantel through mass drug administration (MDA) programmes, East African countries are still among the hotspots for this parasitic disease. Herein, the majority of schistosomiasis cases are reported from fishing communities and particularly in school-aged children surrounding Lake Victoria [21–24]. The vast majority of studies focusing on Schistosoma and their intermediate hosts in Lake Victoria and neighbouring aquatic systems have mainly focused on S. mansoni and Biomphalaria spp. [13, 18, 25] while overlooking Bulinus spp. and their potential role in the urogenital schistosomiasis transmission (i.e. S. haematobium). However, identifying these potential Bulinus hosts is an initial step in estimating the extent and relevance of urogenital schistosomiasis in the given area [26, 27].

The genus Bulinus consists of 37 species occurring mainly in Africa, the Middle East and in the Mediterranean Area [17]. The recognized Bulinus species fall into four groups, namely the Bulinus africanus, B. reticulatus, and B. forskalii species groups, and the B. truncatus/B. tropicus species complex. Many species within these groups except, for example, B. tropicus and B. ugandae are involved in the transmission of S. haematobium [28, 29]. Moreover, B. africanus group species play an important role in the transmission of S. haematobium and S. bovis in Central East Africa [17]. However, precise species identification of snails of the genus Bulinus is often difficult because of strong morphological similarities and overlap among species, the coexistence of different forms and groups in a narrow area and the lack of well-defined criteria by which to distinguish species [17, 29]. Additionally, some studies have also reported the existence of cryptic species in some localities [30, 31], which further exacerbates the taxonomic uncertainties within genus Bulinus.

The knowledge of the number of Bulinus species occurring within or nearby Lake Victoria is obscure. For instance, Mandahl-Barth [29] recognised B. trigonus and B. transversalis as independent species, but Brown [17] viewed them as lacustrine morphs of B. tropicus and B. truncatus or synonyms of unnamed Bulinus species (Bulinus sp.). Moreover, there is a scarcity of information on the geographical distribution patterns of Bulinus species in the lake. Bulinus trigonus and B. transversalis have their type-localities in the Tanzanian side of Lake Victoria, while B. ugandae was first found in Jinja Bay, Uganda [17]. Surveys by Mwambungu [32] reported the occurrence of B. ugandae in the Speke Gulf of the lake in Tanzania, Ngupula & Kayanda [33] found B. ugandae and B. transversalis in Uganda and Opisa et al. [34] and Nyakaana et al. [35] reported the existence of B. globosus in the lake shores in Kenya and Uganda. Although the separation of B. ugandae from B. globosus is dubious and the overall taxonomy of Bulinus spp. in Lake Victoria is uncertain [17], it is not clear if all the four Bulinus groups are represented in the lake. Moreover, knowledge of how the four groups may be spatially distributed remains questionable. Moreover, Bulinus species such as B. ugandae and B. trigonus, whose type-materials come from Lake Victoria, are not endemic to the lake, similar morphs have been recorded in lakes Mutanda and Edward as well [17].

In many biological cases where conventional analyses have failed to identify species, molecular techniques, particularly phylogenetic approaches using DNA sequence data, have proven successful. For example, the application of markers, such as cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and nuclear genes such as the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, 28S and 18S, have facilitated species identification of Bulinus spp. [31, 36, 37]. In the present study we, therefore, used two more variable genetic markers, cox1 and ITS2, to investigate the phylogeography of Bulinus species occurring in Lake Victoria. This information is invaluable in improving our understanding of Bulinus species identities and phylogenetic relationships, as well as the epidemiology of the potential urogenital schistosomiasis.

Therefore, we combine mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA (nDNA) markers to investigate Bulinus populations obtained from a longitudinal survey in Lake Victoria and neighbouring aquatic systems to (i) determine the identity, diversity and phylogenetic position of the species, (ii) reconstruct phylogeographical affinities and (iii) determine the population structures of the species. We discuss the results and their implications for the potential transmission and epidemiology of urogenital schistosomiasis in Lake Victoria.

Methods

Source of material for genomic DNA

Pulmonate snails of the genus Bulinus were collected from 20 locations around Lake Victoria and (for comparative purposes) from an additional four locations in the neighbouring aquatic systems of the River Nile and Lake Mburo-Nakivale (Fig. 1, Table 1). Sampling was carried out in open waters, on shoreline banks, around islands and in bordering marsh habitats where water was either stagnant or relatively calm. Specimens were hand-picked off water plants, rocks, stones or the floor bottom where they were more easily accessible or collected with strainers, long handheld scoops and dredges in more challenging situations (e.g. deeper waters). Dredging was carried out repeatedly per site in depths from 2 m down to approximately 25 m in the Kenyan and Ugandan part of the lake. In most of the sites, sampling was carried out close to active anthropogenic activities (e.g. fish landing sites or ferry docks) and for at least 30–60 min. All specimens were collected during various field trips from 2010–2019 and snails identified as Bulinus spp. were preserved in 80% ethanol.

Fig. 1.

Study area map of East African countries that share Lake Victoria and the sampling sites for this study are shown

Table 1.

Locality, voucher, sequence and haplotype information for the Bulinus spp. from Lake Victoria studied

Species	Locality	Country	Latitude	Longitude	Voucher No.	Sequence ID	Habitat	Haplotype ID	GenBank ID
									cox1	ITS2
B. truncatus	Igabiro	Tanzania	− 1.17769	31.87792	UGSB 22907	Bkt26885	Stone and rocks	BKT1	MT707360	MT707212
B. truncatus	Igabiro	Tanzania	− 1.17769	31.87792	UGSB 22908	BKt26886	Stone and rocks	BKT2	MT707361
B. truncatus	Kemondo	Tanzania	− 1.47796	31.7498	UGSB 22909	Ket26887	Stone and rocks	KET1	MT707362	MT707222
B. truncatus	Kemondo	Tanzania	− 1.47796	31.7498	UGSB 22910	Ket26888	Stone and rocks	KET2	MT707363
Bulinus sp. 2	Bumbire Island	Tanzania	− 1.61476	31.85625	UGSB 22911	Bit26889	Island	BIT1	MT707364
Bulinus sp. 2	Bumbire Island	Tanzania	− 1.61476	31.85625	UGSB 22912	Bit26890	Island	BIT2	MT707365	MT707234
Bulinus sp. 2	Bumbire Island	Tanzania	− 1.61476	31.85625	UGSB 22946	Bit26924	Island	BIT3	MT707366
Bulinus sp. 2	Bumbire Island	Tanzania	− 1.61476	31.85625	UGSB 23464	Bit27073	Island	BIT4	MT707367
Bulinus sp. 2	Bumbire Island	Tanzania	− 1.61476	31.85625	UGSB 23465	Bit27074	Island	BIT5	MT707368
Bulinus sp. 2	Kabunyorwa	Tanzania	− 2.06018	31.61382	UGSB 22913	Kbt26891	Papyrus	KBT1	MT707369
Bulinus sp. 2	Kabunyorwa	Tanzania	− 2.06018	31.61382	UGSB 22914	Kbt26892	Papyrus	KBT2	MT707370	MT707235
B. truncatus	Muganza	Tanzania	− 2.33702	31.75166	UGSB 22915	Mut26893	Open water	MUT1	MT707371
B. truncatus	Muganza	Tanzania	− 2.33702	31.75166	UGSB 22916	Mut26894	Open water	MUT2	MT707372	MT707220
Bulinus sp. 2	Muganza	Tanzania	− 2.33702	31.75166	UGSB 22940	Mut26918	Water Hyasin	MUT3	MT707373	MT707236
Bulinus sp. 2	Muganza	Tanzania	− 2.33702	31.75166	UGSB 22941	Mut26919	Water Hyasin	MUT4	MT707374
B. truncatus	Muganza	Tanzania	-2.33702	31.75166	UGSB 22945	Mut26923	Open water	MUT5	MT707375
Bulinus sp. 2	Chato	Tanzania	− 2.63292	31.76368	UGSB 23463	Cht27072	Papyrus	CHT1	MT707376
Bulinus sp. 2	Nungwe	Tanzania	− 2.77446	32.0136	UGSB 22919	Nut26897	Papyrus	NUT1	MT707377
Bulinus sp. 2	Nungwe	Tanzania	− 2.77446	32.0136	UGSB 22920	Nut26898	Papyrus	NUT2	MT707378	MT707233
Bulinus sp. 2	Nungwi	Tanzania	− 2.77446	32.0136	UGSB 23466	Nut27075	Papyrus	NUT3	MT707379
B. tropicus	Nzera	Tanzania	− 2.51209	32.09845	UGSB 22921	Nzt26899	Sand beach	NZT1	MT707380
B. tropicus	Nzera	Tanzania	− 2.51209	32.09845	UGSB 22922	Nzt26900	Sand beach	NZT2	MT707381	MT707229
B. truncatus	Nyakalilo	Tanzania	− 2.43669	32.41158	UGSB 22923	Nyt26901	Stone beach	NYT1	MT707382	MT707221
Bulinus sp. 2	Nyakalilo	Tanzania	− 2.43669	32.41158	UGSB 22924	Nyt26902	Papyrus	NYT2	MT707383	MT707237
Bulinus sp. 2	Busisi	Tanzania	− 2.72626	32.87034	UGSB 22925	But26903	Water Hyasin	BUT1	MT707384	MT707230
Bulinus sp. 2	Busisi	Tanzania	− 2.72626	32.87034	UGSB 22926	But26904	Water Hyasin	BUT2	MT707385
Bulinus sp. 2	Nyegezi A	Tanzania	− 2.585	32.88541	UGSB 22927	Sat26905	Water Hyasin	SAT1	MT707386	MT707238
B. truncatus	Nyegezi A	Tanzania	− 2.585	32.88541	UGSB 22928	Sat26906	Stone and rocks	SAT2	MT707387	MT707223
B. truncatus	Nyegezi B	Tanzania	− 2.58434	32.88331	UGSB 22929	Sbt26907	Stone and rocks	SBT1	MT707387	MT707216
B. truncatus	Nyegezi B	Tanzania	− 2.58434	32.88331	UGSB 22930	Sbt26908	Stone and rocks	SBT2	MT707387
B. tropicus	Nyegezi C	Tanzania	− 2.58388	33.51714	UGSB 22942	Sct26920	Sand beach	SCT1	MT707390	MT707228
Bulinus sp. 1	Nyegezi C	Tanzania	− 2.58388	33.51714	UGSB 22943	Sct26921	Sand beach	SCT2	MT707391
Bulinus sp. 1	Nyegezi C	Tanzania	− 2.58388	33.51714	UGSB 22944	Sct26922	Sand beach	SCT3	MT707392	MT707226
Bulinus sp. 2	Nyanguge	Tanzania	− 2.51911	33.20884	UGSB 22933	Ngt26911	Marshes/papyrus	NGT1	MT707393
Bulinus sp. 2	Nyanguge	Tanzania	− 2.51911	33.20884	UGSB 22934	Ngt26912	Marshes/papyrus	NGT2	MT707394	MT707232
Bulinus sp. 2	Nyanguge	Tanzania	− 2.51911	33.20884	UGSB 23467	Ngt27076	Marshes/papyrus	NGT3	MT707395
Bulinus sp. 2	Mwamanyiri	Tanzania	− 2.43022	33.5424	UGSB 22935	Mwt26913	Marshes/papyrus	MWT1	MT707396	MT707231
Bulinus sp. 2	Mwamanyiri	Tanzania	− 2.43022	33.5424	UGSB 22936	Mwt26914	Marshes/papyrus	MWT2	MT707397
Bulinus sp. 2	Mwamanyiri	Tanzania	− 2.43022	33.5424	UGSB 23468	Mwt27077	Marshes/papyrus	MWT3	MT707398
Bulinus sp. 2	Lamadi	Tanzania	− 2.23738	33.84236	UGSB 22937	Lat26915	Marshes/papyrus	LAT1	MT707399
Bulinus sp. 2	Lamadi	Tanzania	− 2.23738	33.84236	UGSB 22938	Lat26916	Marshes/papyrus	LAT2	MT707400	MT707240
Bulinus sp. 2	Lamadi	Tanzania	− 2.23738	33.84236	UGSB 23469	Lat27078	Marshes/papyrus	LAT4	MT707401
Bulinus sp. 2	Kisumu	Kenya	− 0.12739	34.74232	UGSB 23446	Kik27055	Water Hyasin	KIK1	MT707402
Bulinus sp. 2	Kisumu	Kenya	− 0.12739	34.74232	UGSB 23447	Kik27056	Water Hyasin	KIK2	MT707403	MT707239
Bulinus sp. 2	Kisumu	Kenya	− 0.12739	34.74232	UGSB 23448	kik27057	Water Hyasin	KIK3	MT707406
B. truncatus	Nile	Uganda	0.42084	33.19639	UGSB 23452	Niu27061	Open water	JIU1	MT707407	MT707214
B. truncatus	Mayuge	Uganda	0.14067	33.60258	UGSB 16758	Myu22513	Open water	MYU1	MT707404
B. truncatus	Mayuge	Uganda	0.14067	33.60258	UGSB 16757	Myu22514	Open water	MYU2	MT707405
B. truncatus	Mayuge	Uganda	0.14067	33.60258	UGSB 23453	Myu27062	Open water	MYU3	MT707408
B. truncatus	Mayuge	Uganda	0.14067	33.60258	UGSB 23454	Myu27063	Open water	MYU4	MT707409
B. truncatus	Mayuge	Uganda	0.14067	33.60258	UGSB 23603	Myu27108	Open water	MYU5	MT707411
B. truncatus	Mayuge	Uganda	0.14067	33.60258	UGSB 23604	Myu27109	Open water	MYU6	MT707410	MT707218
B. truncatus	Masindi	Uganda	2.12852	32.32919	UGSB 23457	Msu27066	Nile river	MSU1	MT707412
B. truncatus	Masindi	Uganda	2.12852	32.32919	UGSB 23458	Msu27067	Nile river	MSU2	MT707413
B. truncatus	Masindi	Uganda	2.12852	32.32919	UGSB 23459	Msu27068	Nile river	MSU3	MT707414
B. truncatus	Masindi	Uganda	2.12852	32.32919	UGSB 23460	Msu27069	Nile river	MSU4	MT707415	MT707217
B. truncatus	Masindi	Uganda	2.12852	32.32919	UGSB 23607	Msu27112	Nile river	MSU5	MT707416
B. truncatus	Masindi Port	Uganda	1.69249	32.09664	UGSB 16759	Mpu22515	Nile river	MPU1	MT707417
B. truncatus	Masindi Port	Uganda	1.69249	32.09664	UGSB 16760	Mpu22516	Nile river	MPU2	MT707418
B. truncatus	Masindi Port	Uganda	1.69249	32.09664	UGSB 23610	Mpu27115	Nile river	MPU3	MT707419	MT707219
Bulinus sp. 2	Masaka	Uganda	− 0.27263	32.02691	UGSB 23461	Mku27070	Water Hyasin	MKU1	MT707420
Bulinus sp. 2	Kampala	Uganda	− 0.27263	32.02691	UGSB 23596	Kau27101	Water Hyasin	KAU1	MT707421	MT707241
B. truncatus	Kampala	Uganda	− 0.27263	32.02691	UGSB 23598	Kau27103	Open water	KAU2	MT707422	MT707215
Bulinus sp. 2	Kampala	Uganda	− 0.27263	32.02691	UGSB 23599	Kau27104	Water Hyasin	KAU3	MT707423
Bulinus sp. 2	Amotar	Uganda	1.55822	32.88828	UGSB 23613	Amu27118	Marshes/papyrus	AMU1	MT707424
B. truncatus	Kalangala	Uganda	0.30371	32.28927	UGSB 16774	Klu22530	Open water	KLU1	MT707425
B. truncatus	Kalangala	Uganda	0.30371	32.28927	UGSB 23616	Klu27121	Open water	KLU2	MT707426	MT707213
B. truncatus	Lake Mburo	Uganda	− 0.638	30.9528	UG3	BspJDUG3		MNU1	MT707427
B. truncatus	River Rwizi	Uganda	− 0.6863	30.8856	UG19	BspJUG19		MNU2	MT707428
B. truncatus	River Rwizi	Uganda	− 0.6863	30.8856	UG22	BspJUG22		MNU3	MT707429
B. truncatus	Lake Mburo	Uganda	− 0.6951	30.8514	UG27	BspJUG27		MNU4	MT707430
B. truncatus	Lake Nakivale	Uganda	− 0.8205	30.8559	UG7	BspJDUG7		MNU5	MT707431
Bulinus sp. 2	Lake Nakivale	Uganda	− 0.8205	30.8559	UG98	BspJUG98		MNU6	MT707432
B. forskalii	Lake Nakivale	Uganda	− 0.8205	30.8559	UG76	BspJUG76		MNU7	MT707403
B. truncatus	Lake Albert	Uganda			A1	HQ121558		LAU1	HQ121558
B. truncatus	Lake Albert	Uganda			A2	HQ121559		LAU2	HQ121559
B. truncatus	Lake Albert	Uganda			A3	HQ121560		LAU3	HQ121560
B. truncatus	Katosho swamp	Tanzania			T1	HQ121562		KST1	HQ121562
B. truncatus	Lake Albert	Uganda			BO (Booma)	GU176747		LAU4	GU176747
B. truncatus	Lake Albert	Uganda			1PD (Piida)	GU176748		LAU5	GU176748
B. truncatus	Lake Albert	Uganda			TO (Toonya)	GU176749		LAU6	GU176749
B. truncatus	Nyanguge	Tanzania			Nyanguge	AM286313		NGT	AM286313
Bulinus sp. 2	Kisumu	Kenya			ADC farm	AM286297		AFK1	AM286297
B. truncatus	Lake Sagara	Tanzania			T04em43A	AM286298		LST	AM286298

Abbreviation: UGSB, University of Giessen Systematics and Biodiversity collection

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using the CTAB method [38] from 2–5 specimens per locality for a total of 74 specimens. A 655-bp target fragment of the mtDNA cox1 gene was amplified using primers and PCR conditions given by Folmer et al. [39]. In a few cases, the region was amplified using the primers LCO1490 [39] and COR722B [40] and PCR conditions as detailed by Kane et al. [37]. Primers LT1 and ITS2-RIXO and PRC conditions stated by Almeyda-Artigas et al. [41] and Bargues et al. [42] were used to amplify the rDNA ITS2 region. Sanger sequencing was performed by LGC Genomics GmbH (Berlin, Germany).

Phylogenetic analyses

Chromatograms were assembled and inspected using Geneious version 8.0.6 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand; Kearse et al. [43]). Multiple alignments were generated for each marker, with the ClustalW tool [44] implemented in BioEdit version 7.0.5.3 [45]. Newly generated sequences from 74 specimens were combined with 57 additional available sequence data from GenBank to expand our datasets (Additional file 1: Table S1). The online program MAFFT [46], was used to align the ITS2 partition. The phylogenetic trees of the concatenated datasets of 620 bp cox1 and ITS2 were estimated using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses. The cox1 and ITS2 partitions were concatenated using Sequences Matrix version 1.2.8 [47]. In both cases, Indoplanorbis exustus was used as the outgroup. The best sequence evolutionary model to each partition was evaluated with jModelTest version 2.1.4 [48]. Based on the Akaikeʼs information criterion (AIC), HYK + G and GTR+G were selected as the best evolutionary models for cox1 and ITS2 datasets, respectively. ML analysis was conducted using Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML version 7.0.4; [49]) with a bootstrap of 1000 replicates. Bayesian inference analysis, to obtain an ultrametric tree for the General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) model of species delimitation [50], was carried out using BEAST version 1.8.4 [51]. Runs consisted of 5,000,000 MCMC generations, sampling every 500th tree. Validation of convergence and mixing was assessed in Tracer 1.5 [52] to ensure that all effective sample size (ESS) values were > 200. We used TreeAnnotator 1.8.4 (BEAST package) to identify the maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree by discarding 50% of the trees as ‘burn-in’.

We applied two DNA-based species delimitation methods (SDMs) with single and multiple delimiting thresholds to resolve the species boundaries in Bulinus specimens incorporated. These were the Poisson Tree Process (PTP [53]) and the GMYC method as mentioned above. Both mPTP (maximum likelihood, PTP and Bayesian, bPTP) and GMYC analyses were carried out with the web-based service at https://species.h-its.org/.

Phylogeographical and population analyses

Phylogeographical analyses were performed for the novel cox1 sequences of the Bulinus specimens from Lake Victoria and the neighbouring systems (i.e. Lake Mburo-Nakivale and the River Nile). The dataset consisted of the 74 sequences generated herein. The relationships between haplotypes were identified through a statistical parsimony network constructed in TCS version 1.21 [54] with 95% confidence.

For genetic diversity, differentiation and population expansion or shrinkage cox1 sequences belonging to the Bulinus specimens from Lake Victoria basin were split into two groups representing B. truncatus and Bulinus sp. 2. Bulinus truncatus sequences were divided into three subpopulations based on habitat, namely, lentic sand substrate, lentic stones and rock substrates and lotic habitats. The sequences forming the Bulinus sp. 2 group were also divided into three subpopulations based on lentic habitats; islands, papyrus swamps and marshes (water hyacinth). We estimated haplotype diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (π) [55] using DnaSP version 6.12.03 [56]. Moreover, we performed analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA), to examine the amount of genetic variability within and between populations, using Arlequin version 3.5.2.2 [57].

The mitochondrial DNA sequence data were also tested for deviation from neutral expectations (e.g. population expansion events). Genetic equilibrium was assessed using Arlequin version 3.5.2.2 [57] by calculating Tajima’s D [58] and Fu’s Fs [59]. Under the assumption of selective neutrality, Arlequin version 3.5.2.2 was also used for mismatch distribution analysis of pairwise differences within and between populations. The relative population sizes (θ₀ and θ₁) and relative time since population expansion (τ) were estimated also using Arlequin version 3.5.2.2. The estimated τ value was used to estimate time since expansion using the formula τ= 2 µt, where µ is the mutation rate per site per generation and τ is the time since population expansion [60]. In the present study, the substitution rate of 1.22 ± 0.27% per million years was applied for the mtDNA (cox1) region [61]. Additionally, a Mantel test for matrix correspondence between genetic and geographical distances was performed using GenAlEx version 6.5. [62] to test the isolation by distance (IBD). The input matrices for genetic distance were constructed in Mega X [63].

Results

Species identification and phylogenetic relationships

Both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses of concatenated genes (cox1 and ITS2) generated strongly supported phylogenies that revealed the presence of two main Bulinus groups in Lake Victoria (Fig. 2). Clade I comprised of B. truncatus/tropicus complex and Clade II contained the B. africanus group Moreover, Clade I exhibited a complex structure that corresponded to Bulinus specimens that inhabited open waters and sandy beaches of Lake Victoria. For instance, specimen labelled Sct26922, collected from Nyegezi on the Tanzanian side of the lake, was found in shallow waters near sandy beaches coexisting with a physid species. Both species delimitation methods (SDMs), PTP and GMYC, categorised the specimen as a unique molecular operational taxonomic unit (MOTU; Bulinus sp. 1.). Clade I also contained Bulinus samples collected outside the lake albeit within the lake basin i.e. the Lake Mburo-Nakivale and Nile River ecosystems, denoting that these species are not endemic to Lake Victoria. Moreover, combined phylogenetic and SDMs analyses revealed the presence of B. truncatus and B. tropicus in Lake Victoria, although B. truncatus are more widely distributed than B. tropicus.

Fig. 2.

The BI phylogenetic tree of Bulinus species with bars, on the right, denoting different species delimitation results, based on the dataset of concatenated cox1 and ITS2 sequences. Within the phylogeny, nodes supported and shared between BI and ML methods are marked with stars where support equates to 90–100% (ML) and 0.95–1 (BI). Names in bold are for specimens collected in the present study and the rest have been retrieved from GenBank: B. truncatus (a); B. tropicus (b); Bulinus sp. 1 (c); Bulinus sp. 2 (d). Locality details are provided in Table 1. Abbreviations: CLI, Clade I; CLII, Clade II; SCI, Subclade I; SCII, Subclade II. The three-letter abbreviation for countries is also given. Notes: the blue colour represents different species, while green stands for the same species according to species delimitation methods. The three-letter abbreviations represent countries: NIG, Nigeria; SAF, South Africa; UGA, Uganda; MLW, Malawi; TZA, Tanzania; CAM, Cameroon; SEN, Senegal; ZNZ, Zanzibar; KEN, Kenya; ANG, Angola. The information for sequences retrieved from the GenBank is presented in Additional file 1: Table S1

Novel sequences forming subclade I (SCI, Fig. 2) were isolated from Bulinus specimens collected from the banks and marshes surrounding the lake and small islands, particularly Bumbire in Tanzania and Mayuge in Uganda. Although these Bulinus specimens formed a well-defined and supported clade in both analyses (ML = 100% and BI = 1.0), they did not intermingle with other species within the clade; they formed a definite group of their own (Bulinus sp. 2). As shown in Fig. 2, despite the complexity or the presence of cryptic species in GenBank sequences designated as B. globosus, SDMs treated Bulinus specimens from the banks and surrounding marshes, regardless of the location they were collected, as one species (MOTU). The specimens from the banks matched only with Bulinus sp. T04em43A (GenBank: AM286298) from Lake Sagara in Tanzania, and accordingly, SDMs placed them under the same MOTU. The phylogeny and SDMs from cox1 also identified Bulinus nasutus productus and B. forskalii collected from Lake Mburo-Nakivale system within the Lake Victoria basin. Similar results are shown for cox1 analyses (Additional file 2: Figure S1)

Phylogeographical and population analyses

Although the phylogeographical analysis of the present study did not acquire sufficient samples from the Kenyan side and small islands, in particular, TCS networks supported the phylogenies (Fig. 3) that Lake Victoria is dominated by two distinct clades of Bulinus species; species occurring in the lake proper and those inhabiting the banks and surrounding marshes. However, at the confidence limit of 0.95, the dataset comprising specimens from the banks and marshes represented B. africanus group species (A in Fig. 3) while those from the open water (lake proper) revealed three separate networks: B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex, i.e. B. truncatus (B in Fig. 3), B. tropicus (C in Fig. 3) and an undefined species Bulinus sp. 1 (D in Fig. 3). Bulinus nasutus productus and B. forskalii from Lakes Mburo-Nakivale systems formed separate networks (E and F in Fig. 3, respectively). Similar to phylogeny and SDMs, TCS analysis revealed a Bulinus specimen collected from Nyegezi in Tanzania (Haplotype 47) as a distinct species (D in Fig. 3). Generally, the TCS analysis showed that Bulinus species had shared haplotypes distributed throughout Lake Victoria, indicating that these species are not localised in the lake (Fig. 4). Moreover, the TCS analysis corroborated phylogenies and SDMs that specimens sampled from the banks and surrounding marshes of Lake Victoria relate to potentially undescribed bulinid species, Bulinus sp. T04em43A (GenBank: AM286298) from Lake Sagara, Tanzania and Bulinus sp. K3.03 (GenBank: AM286297) from Lake Victoria in Kisumu, Kenya.

Fig. 3.

Statistical parsimony network of cox1 sequences (connecting limit: 95%) of Bulinus species from Lake Victoria; Bulinus sp. 2 (a), B. truncatus (b), B. tropicus (c), Bulinus sp. 1 (d), B. nasutus (e) and B. forskalii (f). The size of the circles corresponds to the number of individuals belonging to the respective haplotype. Mutational steps for the missing haplotypes are presented as small circles, and numbers correspond to the number of individuals with a given haplotype. Green stands for GenBank material

Fig. 4.

A map of Lake Victoria showing Bulinus species haplotypes distribution. Specimen details are provided in Table 1

The mtDNA loci showed high overall haplotype (h) and nucleotide (π) diversity among populations (0.984 and 0.071). The population analysis of B. truncatus revealed 22 haplotypes, out of which 2 haplotypes were shared between sand beaches and river systems (Table 2). On the other hand, Bulinus sp. 2 (Clade II) population consisted of 17 haplotypes and a least one haplotype was shared between two habitats i.e. islands, papyrus and water hyacinths. Nevertheless, no haplotype was shared among the three habitats; an indication that haplotypes are specific to habitats. Nucleotide and haplotype diversities were also high within each habitat (Table 2).

Table 2.

Results of genetic diversities, AMOVAs and mismatch distribution for populations of Bulinus spp. in Lake Victoria

	Bulinus truncatus				Bulinus sp. 2
	Mean (n = 29)	Lentic sand substrate (n = 14)	Lentic stone & rocks substrate (n = 8)	River systems (n = 7)	Mean (n = 31)	Islands (n = 5)	Swamp papyrus (n = 15)	Marshes water hyacinth (n = 11)
Haplotype (h)	22	11	8	5	17	4	10	7
Haplotype diversity (h)	0.978 ± 0.005	0.956 ± 0.0156	1.000 ± 0.022	0.905 ± 0.040	0.940 ± 0.005	0.900 ± 0.016	0.895 ± 0.022	0.909 ± 0.041
Nucleotide diversity (π)	0.01067	0.01134	0.01014	0.08387	0.00753	0.005	0.010	0.084
FST (P-value)	0.034 (0.045)	0.014 (0.297)	0.048 (0.072)	0.047 (0.027)	0.064 (0.020)	0.077 (0.081)	− 0.016 (0.432)	0.080 (0.000)
Tajima’s D (P-value)	− 0.126 (0.484)	− 1.092 (0.144)	0.096 (0.575)	0.618 (0.733)	− 1.158 (0.112)	− 1.162 (0.058)	− 0.606 (0.279)	− 0.317 (0.414)
Fu’s FS (P-value)	− 1.735 (0.237)	− 2.549 (0.097)	− 3.273 (0.022)	0.617 (0.585)	− 5.439 (0.014)	− 0.445 (0.277)	− 2.088 (0.149)	0.644 (0.312)

Note: The ordering of specimens was based on the habitats they were found

The inbreeding coefficients (F_ST), defined from the AMOVA, for B. truncatus and Bulinus sp. 2 populations were 0.034 (P = 0.045) and 0.064 (P = 0.020) respectively. These F_ST values demonstrate an apparently low genetic differentiation between habitats. Table 2 summarises the genetic variations of the Bulinus in these groups occurring in Lake Victoria. Generally, F_ST values (0.021–0.023) between and within habitats groups were low (Table 2) indicating that the gene flow among Bulinus species populations and subpopulations within the Lake Victoria is high. The AMOVA concurs with the haplotype network, in which there was no clear demarcation between the localities where a given specimen was collected and its genetic affiliation with other haplotypes (Figs. 3, 4).

The estimates of Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs test of Bulinus populations from Lake Victoria (i.e. within the lake, banks and surrounding marshes) were negative and statistically significant (Table 2), which denotes that the Bulinus species in the lake have undergone a recent population expansion. With a 95% confidence interval (CI), estimates of θ₀ and θ₁ for Bulinus species indicated that populations expanded, both demographically and spatially, from a compact to a considerable size (Table 3). Using the tau values (τ) of 3.787 and 4 for the B. truncatus in the open water and Bulinus sp. 2 occurring in the banks and marshes of Lake Victoria, we roughly estimate the starting time for Bulinus rapid population expansion to be between 207,694 (± 107,823) and 464,678 (± 278,312) years ago (Table 3).

Table 3.

Results of the mismatch distribution analyses for the demographic and spatial expansions of the Bulinus species from Lake Victoria populations and time since expansion

	Bulinus truncatus						Bulinus sp. 2
	Demographic expansion			Spatial expansion			Demographic expansion			Spatial expansion
	Lentic sand substrate	Lentic stones & rock substrates	Lotic habitats	Lentic sand substrate	Lentic stones & rock substrates	Lotic habitats	Islands	Swamp papyrus	Marshesa	Islands	Swamp papyrus	Marshesa
SSD (P-value)	0.095 (0.280)	0.079 (< 0.0001)	0.024 (0.160)	0.095 (0.430)	0.069 (0.040)	0.020 (0.600)	0.023 (0.130)	0.087 (0.010)	0.069 (0.170)	0.021 (0.370)	0.059 (0.100)	0.063 (0.410)
RI (P-value)	0.310 (0.280)	0.219 (< 0.0001)	0.073 (0.280)	0.310 (0.510)	0.219 (0.110)	0.073 (0.640)	0.032 (0.450)	0.092 (0.580)	0.213 (0.200)	0.032 (0.680)	0.092 (0.430)	0.213 (0.390)
Theta0/Theta	0.000	1.900	0.000	0.05589	0.001	0.001	0.000	5.500	1.622	0.010	0.010	1.180
Theta1	16.211	3414.978	34.961				46.951	3414.978	49.882
τ (Cl)	3.469 (2.258-6.211)	4.000 (2.822–7.725)	5.556 (2.994–7.803)	3.233 (1.555-6.146)	5.811 (2.309–7.509)	5.363 (2.788–7.639)	6.277 (3.646–8.352)	5.000 (3.555–13.682)	5.438 (3.344–10.984)	6.121 (3.805–7.578)	7.234 (2.901–8.282)	5.453 (2.619–10.173)
T in years	222,824	256,951	356,946	207,694	373,288	344,497	403,243	321,188	349,293	393,184	464,678	350,287
ΔT in years	± 77,788	± 75,655	± 164,610	± 107,823	± 224,936	± 165,400	± 169,000	± 92,843	± 134,498	± 148,784	± 278,312	± 182,033

Abbreviations: SSD, sum of squared deviations; RI, raggedness index; CI, 95% confidence interval; τ, population parameter Tau; T, time since expansion

^aWater hyacinth

There was no significant correlation between genetic and geographical distances within the Bulinus population (B. truncatus) inhabiting the proper lake (r² = 0.018, P > 0.05) or those (Bulinus sp. 2) from the banks, islands and marshes (r² = 0.0038, P > 0.05). Overall all Bulinus samples from Lake Victoria did not exhibit any correlation between genetic variations and distance (r² = 0.0175, P > 0.05), indicating the variation in genetic distance is mainly due to taxonomic differences as already shown by both phylogeny and parsimony networks.

Discussion

Identity of Bulinus in Lake Victoria and their phylogenetic affinities

The present study, to our knowledge, is the first to apply molecular techniques on the longitudinally surveyed Bulinus species occurring in Lake Victoria. A majority of studies on molluscs in Lake Victoria have been conducted on Biomphalaria species for their role in the spread of intestinal schistosomiasis [13, 18, 25]. The present study provides molecular-based evidence on the presence of two Bulinus groups in the lake; B. truncatus/B. tropicus occupying the open waters, covering sand beaches, stones and submerged rocks, while B. africanus group dominates the banks, small islands and surrounding marshes. Although the number of species determined by PTP and GMYC was slightly indecisive, the present study supports previous findings [27, 31, 35–37] that molecular methods could delineate the monophyletic subclade comprising of B. truncatus and its sibling B. tropicus (Fig. 2), which are morphologically difficult to distinguish [17].

From Mandahl-Barth [64] to present, the taxonomy of Bulinus species in Lake Victoria is in scrutiny. According to Brown [17], four species of Bulinus occur in Lake Victoria and the most common are the coexisting diploid and tetraploid populations forming the B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex that lack an apparent taxonomic boundary. Other Bulinus material was classified as B. trigonus and B. transversalis [64], though Brown [17] suggested that they might be lacustrine morphs of B. tropicus and B. truncatus. However, the present molecular analysis of material from Bumbire Island, the type-locality for B. transversalis [17], grouped the material with Bulinus sp. 2, which is regarded by the present study as B. ugandae. Nonetheless, the specimens from the island were smaller than those collected from the banks and marshes elsewhere. Although potentially topotypic material was collected and a single species only occurred there, we cannot conclude that Bulinus sp. 2 is, in fact, B. transversalis. Morphological characteristics of the snails studied here suggest that nowadays the waters around the island are rather inhabited by B. ugandae.

Phylogenetic analysis accompanied by SDMs also revealed a unique MOTU of Bulinus, Bulinus sp. 2, in Lake Victoria (Fig. 2, Clade II/Subclade I), which was strongly supported as sister to B. globosus in the B. africanus group. Although our phylogenetic analyses did not find sequences of Bulinus from Lake Victoria in the GenBank database to compare with, our sampling is reasonable to relate the Bulinus sp. 2 to B. ugandae. In our perusal of the literature regarding genus Bulinus in Lake Victoria, only B. ugandae shares similar features to the present material. Both Mandahl-Barth [29] and Brown [17] while scrutinising the morphological characters of B. ugandae, they questioned its taxonomic position in relation to B. globosus. Loker et al. [65] also acknowledged the challenging task of separating accurately B. globosus and B. ugandae from the Lake Victoria region. Moreover, Mwambungu [32] encountered B. ugandae in the Speke Gulf of the lake on the Tanzanian side and Ngupula & Kayanda [33] found B. ugandae and B. transversalis in Uganda. A study Opisa et al. [34] also found B. globosus distributed along the shores of Lake Victoria in Kisumu, Kenya. The close relatedness of the present specimen and Bulinus sp. (GenBank: AM286297) from Kisumu in Kenya [26] further shows a wide distribution of B. ugandae in Lake Victoria. While the separation of B. ugandae from B. globosus morphologically is paradoxical [17, 29], most workers used the names interchangeably.

In this analysis, we also found a unique MOTU of Bulinus (Bulinus sp. 1) which were collected in the southern part of Lake Victoria at Sweya beach in Nyegezi, Mwanza. The strong phylogenetic support for Bulinus sp. 1 (BS = 100%, PP = 1.00; Fig. 2) within the B. truncatus/B. tropicus clade and the separation of B. truncatus and B. tropicus haplotypic networks (Fig. 3), is a clear indication that Bulinus sp. 1 is a different species. The closest match to the cox1 sequences of Bulinus sp. 1 was 97.22% with B. tropicus (GenBank: KJ157492) from Cameroon [36]. Morphologically, Bulinus sp. 1 were similar to other members of the B. truncatus/B. tropicus species complex except that they were found co-existing with B. tropicus and physids in much shallower water on the mud-covered sand beach. Given that this species is neither B. truncatus nor B. tropicus nor B. transversalis (see above), we remain with B. trigonus as the sole known member of the B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex for Lake Victoria. More research is, however, needed to decide whether Bulinus sp. 1 indeed represents B. trigonus.

It is noteworthy that the shallow lake systems west of Lake Victoria harbour at least two different Bulinus species (i.e. B. nasutus productus and B. forskalii; see Figs. 2, 3, 4). Summarizing the current Bulinus diversity (Table 4), the Lake Victoria fauna consists of at least four species: B. truncatus; B. tropicus; Bulinus sp. 1 (B. trigonus?); and B. ugandae (Bulinus sp. 2).

Table 4.

Species diversity of the genus Bulinus in the Lake Victoria basin

Species	Occurrence	Role as host	Reference	Present study
B. africanus	Near LV in Kenya, Mwanza, Tanzania	Main host in South Africa, NW Tanzania	Brown [17]	Not found
B. globosus	Mwanza, LV, Kisumu	Southern Africa, Main host in NW Tanzania	Loker et al [65]; Opisa et al [34]	Not found
B. forskalii	LV	not confirmed	Brown [17]	B. forskalii (not found in lake proper)
B. nasutus productus	Eastern shore LV	Main host in NW Tanzania	Brown [17] Mandahl-Barth [14]	B. nasutus productus (not found in lake proper)
B. tropicus	Not mentioned before	Not known		B. tropicus
B. reticulatus	Near Kisumu and Mwanza	Not known	Brown [17]; Loker et al [65]	Not found
B. trigonus	LV and Lake Edward	B. truncatus: main host in NE, W and N Africa	Brown [17]	B. trigonus?
B. transversalis	LV and Victoria Nile	Not known	Brown [17]; Mandahl-Barth [14]	Not found
B. ugandae	LV, NW Tanzania	Not known	Brown [17]; Mandahl-Barth [14]	B. ugandae

Notes: Taxa mentioned in the literature, their distribution, assumed or proven roles as intermediate hosts for S. haematobium are provided. Where possible, findings from the recent study are compared to the previous information

Abbreviation: LV, Lake Victoria

Genetic population analysis

The genetic variation, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and isolation by distance showed Bulinus species populations in Lake Victoria to be panmictic. The overall F_ST value (0.034) in cox1 was significantly low, which may be explained by high gene flow rates among Bulinus populations in Lake Victoria to favour the evolution of phenotypic plasticity within species [66]. Also, AMOVA produced F_ST values within populations ranging from 0.00–0.080, meaning Bulinus species in Lake Victoria consist of overlapping populations. However, the ranges of genetic differentiation between populations (0.00–0.08) are comparable to previous studies on Bulinus species [67–69], who attributed the variations to self-fertilization within the populations. Given the size of the lake and high gene flow observed, it can be hypothesized that Bulinus species in Lake Victoria could be both cross and self-fertilizers. The cross-fertilization and pathogenesis in the banks and surrounding marshes may be increased due to intrusion of water weeds water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), which are implicated in creating new habitats for snails [70, 71]. Moreover, our findings corroborate Standley et al. [13] who argued about the impossibility of sudden demographical events that would influence the genetic diversity and population structure of snail populations in Lake Victoria.

Studies in Lake Victoria have shown that, despite its large size, it is one of the youngest large lakes in the African Rift and has existed only 400,000 years ago with three complete desiccations in between, and the current water body was refilled about 14,600 years ago [15]. In contrast, our findings showed the Bulinus populations in Lake Victoria began spatial and demographic expansion about 99,700–743,000 years before the present. The explanation may be twofold, (i) the snails colonized the lake from neighbouring aquatic systems during the last refilling and (ii) the lake did not completely dry to reflect the 100,000 years of Milankovitch climate forcing cycles [10, 15]. Both scenarios could be associated with the low levels of genetic variation and population structure indices at the intrapopulation level within the Bulinus species in Lake Victoria [29]. Our results, however, support the scenario that the current biota in Lake Victoria recolonized the refilling lake from refugia as argued by Nalugwa et al. [72] given that about 100,000 years ago Lake Victoria probably collected its waters from regions near Lake Tanganyika [10]. The occurrence of Bulinus species in Lake Sagara in the Ugalla-Malagarasi drainage system in western Tanzania [37] and B. truncatus in Lakes Kivu and Tanganyika (Katosho swamp) [73], respectively, similar to those found in Lake Victoria, further supports the invasion theory.

Ecological aspects

Lake Victoria experienced tremendous ecological perturbations in the Anthropocene, and human activities nowadays might contribute significantly to the mixing of populations across the lake and adjacent aquatic ecosystems [74]. Even though we found no indication of such human effects for the Bulinus populations studied, future studies employing more sensitive markers should focus on these potentially confounding factors affecting population structures across the lake. Differential impacts of human disturbances on snail existence and abundances have been demonstrated in the Kenyan part of Lake Victoria [75]. Whereas some species might disappear, others, including intermediate host snails, i.e. pulmonates generally, might be even favoured by eutrophication processes and as such might increase the risks of transmission [75, 76]. The general abundance of pulmonate snails is high throughout the lake and marsh systems (FC and CA, personal observations). This in concert with reduced predator pressure from molluscivorous fishes might account for the comparatively high biomasses of certain gastropod species including some of the Bulinus spp. There is evidence for the roles of habitats in shaping (eco-)morphotypes in the less diverse Biomphalaria in Lake Victoria [77]. Such effects remain to be studied in detail for Bulinus, although our results so far indicated a link between habitat types and genetic diversity.

Parasitological implications of Bulinus species in Lake Victoria

Lake Victoria is one of the most well-known hotspots of schistosomiasis worldwide with fishing communities and school-aged children reported to be the most infected demographic groups in the surrounding countries of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda [18–20, 23, 24]. However, a vast majority of reports on schistosomiasis in the lake and banks have focused on Biomphalaria species and their consequential S. mansoni [13, 18, 25]. There are two specific or subspecific forms of Biomphalaria species that preserve transmission of schistosomiasis in the lake: (i) B. sudanica, mainly found along the shores and surrounding marshes and swamps; and (ii) B. choanomphala, a more in-depth water inhabitant of Lake Victoria (Stanley et al. [18], but see Zhang et al. [25] for a discussion on species identified). The present findings showed that two dominant taxa of Bulinus occur in the lake: (i) B. ugandae (Bulinus sp. 2), mainly found along the banks and surrounding marshes and swamps in the mainland and islands; and (ii) members of B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex, which are found in open water habitats.

Although the present study did not test the collected snails for patent and prepatent infections with Schistosoma spp. or other digenean trematodes, the presence of certain Bulinus species in Lake Victoria potentially implies the presence of S. haematobium. Both B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex, B. africanus and B. forskalii group members have already been implicated in the transmission of S. haematobium elsewhere in Africa [17, 31, 78]. Bulinus nasutus productus has been known to occur around the eastern shore of the lake [33] and was now also found in the west. This species has been shown to be involved in S. haematobium transmission [12]. Even if B. tropicus is not known to be an intermediate host for Schistosoma species [17], the present findings are particularly important because hitherto the morphological distinction within B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex is challenging [17]. Bulinus truncatus is not yet known to be a host in equatorial Africa; however, there is potential [17] since it is the main host in the regions up the Nile river (Nile Province of South Sudan) where high prevalences of S. haematobium infections have been reported [79]. Bulinus ugandae is apparently not known to host S. haematobium but screening for B. globosus should continue in and around Lake Victoria. Given that B. africanus group members are found close by (B. nasustus and B. forskalii in satellite lakes that are hydrologically connected to Lake Victoria), there is a hidden risk for the prevalence of S. haematobium. Therefore, the occurrence and wide distribution of Bulinus species in Lake Victoria potentially threaten the health of communities living along the shores and on islands of the lake who depend on the lake for their livelihood. This situation is even triggered by the increasing pollution of the lake, which has recently been demonstrated to worsen the infection risks [80], this is yet another factor complicating the combat of schistosomiasis in this hotspot [24]. Future studies should undertake more experimental approaches to snail transmission. Another promising tool in predicting and identifying transmission potential (contamination and exposure) is the environmental DNA approach [81]. This has very recently been successfully used for environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis [82].

Previous studies on the prevalence of S. mansoni and S. haematobium showed the species were partitioned according to distance from the lake, i.e. S. mansoni occurred close to the lake and S. haematobium further on the hinterland [83]. Additionally, the spatial distribution of S. haematobium was in line with the presence of streams and ponds [79]. These observations imply that intermediate host species of Biomphalaria and Bulinus, the respective intermediate hosts for S. mansoni and S. haematobium, likely occur inside and outside the lake, respectively [18]. Our results, on the other hand, corroborate the previous observations that arrange of Bulinus species are present in the lake and are confirmed here to be widespread, but their role in S. haematobium transmission remains uncertain. A widely neglected aspect relates to schistosomiasis as a disease of veterinary concern [27]. Bulinus tropicus and B. ugandae are a well-known host for S. bovis, a parasite extensively infecting livestock [81]. Zoonotic schistosomiasis is currently largely underestimated [84] but could be studied in the setting of Lake Victoria in the future. Zoonotic schistosomiasis could be of high concern for both livestock and also wildlife existing in the adjacent world-famous national parks.

Conclusions

This study has reported two major Bulinus groups and at least four species occurring in Lake Victoria, B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex and B. africanus inhabiting vegetation-free sand and stone beaches, and banks and surrounding marshes/papyrus beds on the mainland and islands. These findings reflect previous findings on Biomphalaria species. Since in this study, we did not trace how far deep B. truncatus/B. tropicus complex can occur, we recommend a depth abundance relationship analysis for Bulinus species be carried out. Our findings also conclude that the assumed B. ugandae dominates the banks and surrounding marshes. Bulinus trigonus might indeed be a separate species whereas the B. transversalis remains to be studied genetically. Following our findings, a parasitological examination of Bulinus species around the lake is paramount to understanding their role in the epidemiology of urogenital schistosomiasis and its subsequential control. It is also recommended to study in parallel patterns in co-occurring Biomphalaria spp. throughout seasonal cycles and along environmental gradients.

Abbreviations

SDMs

Species delimitation methods

PTP

Poisson tree processes

GMYC

Generalized mixed Yule coalescent

AMOVA

Analysis of molecular variance

ML

Maximum likelihood

BI

Bayesian inference

NCBI

The National Center for Biotechnology Information

Authors’ contributions

FC and CA conceived the study. FC carried out the sampling in the Tanzanian side of Lake Victoria. FC also produced the sequences and performed data analyses, with the help of AM, IT and AFS. IT and CA collected part of the material from Kenyan and Ugandan sides, and all authors were involved in data interpretation. Figures were produced by FC. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

FC was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellowship for postdoctoral researchers. CA gratefully acknowledges support from the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed in the course of this study are included in the article, its additional files or have been deposited in the University of Giessen Systematics and Biodiversity (UGSB) repository, which are available upon request. Additionally, newly generated sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MT707360-MT707433 (cox1) and MT707212-MT707241 (ITS2).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13071-020-04281-1.