Abstract
Ischemia–reperfusion injury impairs the efficacy of reperfusion therapy after ischemic stroke. Cyclophilin D (CypD)-mediated openings of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) and subsequent monocyte-mediated inflammation are considered as major mechanisms of reperfusion injury. However, no medical therapies are currently available. Therefore, we have tested a hypothesis that simultaneous targeting of mPTP and inflammation confers substantial neuroprotection after cerebral ischemia–reperfusion. To address this point, we prepared CypD knockout mice, C–C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) knockout mice and CypD/CCR2 double knockout mice. These mice were subjected to 60 min transient cerebral ischemia by occluding middle cerebral arteries. Neurological deficits evaluated 3 days after reperfusion were significantly attenuated in CypD/CCR2 double knockout mice as compared to wild-type mice and other single knockout mice. Then, we have prepared polymeric nanoparticles containing cyclosporine A (CsA-NPs) and pitavastatin (Pitava-NPs), targeting mPTP opening and inflammation, respectively. Simultaneous administration of CsA-NP and Pitava-NP at the time of reperfusion also decreased infarct size and attenuated neurological deficits as compared to control nanoparticles and single administration of CsA-NPs or Pitava-NPs. These results indicate that simultaneous targeting of the mPTP opening and monocyte-mediated inflammation could be a novel strategy for better neurological outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.
Subject terms: Drug development, Preclinical research, Translational research, Cell death and immune response, Inflammation
Introduction
Innovative therapeutic strategies for protecting the brain from ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury are necessary to decrease infarct volume and improve clinical outcomes after reperfusion therapy for the treatment of ischemic stroke1.Within several minutes after reperfusion, opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) triggers cell deaths in tissues exposed to IR injury2. Inflammatory monocytes, Ly6ChighCCR2+ in mice or CD14highCD16− in humans, accumulate to the cerebral tissue as early as several hours after reperfusion and also trigger cell death3–8.
Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a widely used drug after organ transplantation which binds to cyclophilin A and inhibits calcineurin activities in T cells, and thus exerts immunosuppressive effects. CsA also binds to cyclophilin D (CypD), which results in inhibition of mPTP opening and subsequent cell deaths9. In experimental animals, intravenous administered CsA decreases infarct size10. In clinical trials, however, intravenously administered CsA (2.0 mg/kg) failed to improve neurological outcomes after ischemic stroke11.This discrepancy raises at least two possibilities. First, monotherapy targeting only mPTP was insufficient in humans. Second, drug delivery to target organ was insufficient. In this study, we prepared mice lacking both CypD and CCR2 to elucidate whether targeting two mechanisms, i.e. mPTP opening and inflammation, confers substantial neuroprotection as evidenced by marked reduction in infarct size and recovery of neurological deficit after cerebral IR. To overcome the second possibility, we developed a drug delivery system (DDS) composed of poly-lactic/glycolic acid nanoparticles (PLGA-NPs) and incorporated CsA (CsA-NP)12–16. Nano-sized materials accumulate to sites with increased vascular permeability such as tissues/organs after IR17,18. Furthermore, PLGA-NPs are taken up by circulating monocytes and phagocytic cells in reticuloendothelial organs after intravenous administration19–21. HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A) reductase inhibitor, statin, has inhibitory effects on monocyte-mediated inflammation independent of its lipid-lowering effect. We have developed PLGA-NPs incorporating pitavastatin (Pitava-NPs) and demonstrated their therapeutic effects in various cardiovascular diseases12–16.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to elucidate the simultaneous blockade of mPTP opening and monocyte-mediated inflammation could be an effective strategy for the treatment of cerebral IR injury. Recently, the revascularization after cerebral infarction is becoming a common procedure. This progress raises a possibility that drugs which could not show their efficacy in past clinical trials exert their therapeutic effects in the current era of early reperfusion therapy by combining with appropriate DDS. Hence, we have performed transient occlusion of middle cerebral artery to simulate cerebral ischemia and early reperfusion. In this model, we have tested an efficacy of simultaneous administration of CsA-NP and Pitava-NP on infarct size and neurological outcomes after cerebral IR.
Results
Double knockout of CypD and CCR2 ameliorated cerebral IR injury compared to CypD- or CCR2-single knockout in mice
Double-mutant mice that lack both CypD and CCR2 (double-knockout; DKO) were prepared to examine the effect of CypD-mediated mPTP opening and CCR2-mediated inflammation. As shown in Fig. 1A, deletion of CypD or CCR2 decreased the infarct size on day 1 and day 3, and double deletion of CCR2 and CypD further decreased the infarct size compared to CypD- or CCR2-single-knockout mice. The neurological deficit score was significantly reduced both in CypD-KO and DKO mice at day 1; however, a significant reduction of the score was observed only in DKO mice at day 3 (Fig. 1B), which suggests that the blockade of either CypD or CCR2 is insufficient, and simultaneous targeting of both CypD and CCR2, i.e. both mPTP opening and inflammation, is necessary to improve neurological outcomes after cerebral IR injury.
Deletion of CypD inhibited the leakage of cytochrome c to the cytosol at early phase after cerebral IR injury
Cytochrome c is released from the mitochondria as a result of mPTP opening after cerebral IR injury. Hence, we quantified cytochrome c released to the cytosol after cerebral IR injury. As shown in Fig. 1C, cytochrome c in the cytosol increased in the brain tissue exposed to IR injury, but not in the non-ischemic brain, at 30 min after reperfusion, and this induction lasted for 6 h after reperfusion. In the CypD-KO mice, the concentration of cytochrome c in the cytosol of the ischemic brain was not significantly increased at 30 min after reperfusion. At 3 h after reperfusion, the cytochrome c concentration was also increased in the CypD-KO mice, however, its concentration of cytochrome c was significantly lower compared to that in the wild-type (WT) mice (Fig. 1C). These results indicate that the leakage of cytochrome c from the mitochondria is mainly regulated by CypD in the super acute phase after IR injury (30 min). In contrast, relative contribution of CypD decreased in a time-dependent manner.
Deletion of CypD did not inhibit inflammation after cerebral IR injury
To clarify the role of CypD-mediated mPTP opening in inflammation after cerebral IR injury, accumulation of inflammatory cells was evaluated by flow cytometry after transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO). In the CD45+ leukocytes isolated from the infarcted hemisphere that was exposed to IR injury, the number of microglia did not increase between day 1 and day 3 and gradually increased from day 3 to day 7. The number of neutrophils rapidly increased on day 1 and decreased from day 3 to day 7. Monocytes increased in the ischemic hemisphere from day 1 and reached their peak on day 3. The percentages of Ly6Chigh monocytes were 67.5% (day 1), 50.2% (day 3) and 15.2% (day 7) (Fig. 2A). The number of microglia, neutrophils, total monocytes or Ly6Chigh monocytes in the cerebral tissue was comparable between CypD-KO mice and WT mice after IR injury, despite the decrease in infarct size (Fig. 2B). On the other hand, the number of microglia and neutrophils was comparable in the CCR2-KO mice, but the deletion of CCR2 abrogated the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes on day 1 and day 3 (Fig. 2B).
Furthermore, the protein levels of inflammatory cytokines including monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) were increased in the homogenized brain tissues obtained from the CypD-KO mice (Fig. 3A). In contrast, siRNA-mediated knockdown of CypD in RAW264.7 cells demonstrated no significant effects on expression of MCP-1 and IL-6 mRNA (Supplemental Fig. 1). Fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) imaging using ProSense-680 demonstrated increased protease activities around the TTC (2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride)-negative infarcted area, showing enhanced inflammatory milieu in the penumbra. Consistent with flow cytometric analysis, the protease activities were significantly decreased in the CCR2-KO mice but not in the CypD-KO mice (Fig. 3B), indicating that the inhibition of CypD does not ameliorate acute inflammation after cerebral IR injury, and inflammation could be a distinct therapeutic target in addition to CypD-mediated mPTP opening, and that simultaneous targeting of both mPTP opening and inflammation could be an effective combination therapy against cerebral IR injury.
In vivo distribution of PLGA-NPs after cerebral IR injury
To investigate the in vivo distribution of nanoparticles after cerebral IR injury, fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC) solution or FITC-NPs were intravenously injected at the time of reperfusion, and fluorescent signals were observed 6 h later. FITC signals were exclusively detected in the infarct area of the FITC-NP group, whereas faint FITC signals were observed in the brain from the FITC-solution and saline groups (Fig. 4A). The fluorescent intensity was less in the non-infarct area compared to the infarct area (Fig. 4A). Transmission electron microscopy revealed that PLGA-NPs were located in the extracellular matrix, phagocytes and endothelial cells of the capillaries in the ischemic brain parenchyma 6 h after reperfusion (Fig. 4B, Supplemental Fig. 2).
We examined CsA pharmacokinetics in mice after transient MCAO. CsA solution or CsA-NPs were intravenously injected at the time of reperfusion, and tissue concentration was measured. In the cerebral tissues exposed to IR injury, the tissue concentration of CsA was higher in the CsA-NP group than the CsA-solution group at 30 min after administration, which lasted for 6 h. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the tissue concentration of CsA between the CsA-NP group and the CsA-solution group in the nonischemic brain tissues (Fig. 4C). Nanoparticles are taken up by circulating monocytes and phagocytic cells in reticuloendothelial organs after intravenous administration; therefore, we examined FITC signals in the leukocytes of the brain, blood and spleen 24 h after reperfusion by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4D, fluorescent signals were detected in the microglia, neutrophils and monocytes that were isolated from the brain after IR injury. Among leukocytes isolated from the peripheral blood and spleen, fluorescent signals were also detected in neutrophils and monocytes. These data indicate that PLGA-NPs were delivered to the ischemic brain parenchyma where the blood brain barrier (BBB) was disrupted in the early phase after cerebral IR and to leukocytes, especially monocytes, in the peripheral blood, spleen and the brain.
CsA-NP reduced infarct size after cerebral IR injury by blocking mPTP opening
The results of in vivo trace experiments prompted us to examine the therapeutic effect of CsA-incorporating nanoparticles on the infarct size after cerebral IR injury. In mice, after transient MCAO, intravenous administration of CsA solution at the time of reperfusion reduced the infarct size, but the reduction was only observed when a high dose (25 mg/kg) CsA was administered (Fig. 5A). In contrast, CsA-NP containing 2.5 mg/kg CsA reduced the infarct size. Further reduction of the infarct size, however, was not observed in mice treated with CsA-NP containing 10 mg/kg CsA (Fig. 5A). In terms of neurological outcome, CsA-NP did not significantly decrease the neurological deficit score compared to FITC-NPs (Fig. 5A). We examined the effects of CsA and CsA-NP on the cytochrome c leakage. CsA at 2.5 mg/kg did not decrease the cytochrome c concentration in the cytosol, whereas 2.5 mg/kg CsA-NP, which decreased the infarct size, attenuated the cytochrome c leakage (Fig. 5B), suggesting that the primary mechanism that underlies CsA-NP-induced neuroprotection against IR injury is mediated through the inhibition of mPTP opening.
Pitava-NP reduced infarct size after cerebral IR injury by blocking CCR2-mediated inflammation
Accumulating data indicate beneficial effects of statins on inflammation, which are independent of their lipid-lowering effect28,29. We previously reported that Pitava-NP inhibited recruitment of Ly6Chigh monocytes to the heart after IR injury or permanent occlusion of the coronary artery in mice14,19. In atherosclerotic plaques, Pitava-NP decreased the accumulation of macrophages within the plaque18. Therefore, we decided to use Pitava-NP to suppress inflammation after cerebral IR injury. In mice subjected to 60 min of MCAO and 24 h of reperfusion, intravenously administration of pitavastatin (30 mg/kg) at the time of reperfusion decreased the infarct size. Similarly, Pitava-NP containing 3.0 mg/kg pitavastatin decreased the infarct size after IR. (Fig. 5C). In contrast, Pitava-NP did not improve the neurological symptoms. (Fig. 5C) To determine the detailed molecular mechanisms, we examined the therapeutic effects of Pitava-NP containing 3.0 mg/kg pitavastatin in CCR2-KO mice. As shown in Fig. 5D, Pitava-NP did not decrease the infarct size in CCR2-KO mice, suggesting that Pitava-NP exerted its therapeutic efficacy via CCR2-mediated inflammation.
Combination of CsA-NP and Pitava-NP enhanced neuroprotection
The infarct size and neurological deficit score were evaluated in mice treated with FITC-NP (used as a control for nanoparticles), CsA-NP (2.5 mg/kg), Pitava-NP (3.0 mg/kg) or a cocktail containing CsA-NP (2.5 mg/kg) and Pitava-NP (3.0 mg/kg) at the time of reperfusion. CsA-NP and Pitava-NP showed a significant reduction of infarct size at 24 h after reperfusion compared to saline and FITC-NP (Fig. 6A). Importantly, simultaneous administration of CsA-NP and Pitava-NP further reduced the infarct size and ameliorated the neurological deficit score compared to single administration of CsA-NP or Pitava-NP (Fig. 6A). To elucidate the effects of Pitava-NP on inflammation after cerebral IR injury, we performed flow cytometric analysis and found that Pitava-NP decreased the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes to the ischemic brain, whereas CsA-NP did not (Fig. 6B). Similarly, the protein levels of MCP-1 and IL-6 in the infarcted hemisphere were significantly reduced by Pitava-NP and but not by CsA-NP, compared to that in the saline group (Fig. 6C).
Discussion
Opening of mPTP and inflammation are two major mechanisms of IR injury. CypD regulates the opening of mPTP, which induces neuronal cell death immediately after reperfusion22,23. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), calcium overload and rapid pH correction, any of which are observed after cerebral IR, induce the opening of mPTP, and cytochrome c released from the mitochondrial matrix induces cell death2. However, the role of mPTP opening in the subacute phase, when inflammatory cells accumulate, has not been clarified. Therefore, we prepared double-mutant mice that lack both CypD and CCR2 to examine relative importance of mPTP opening and inflammation in the disease progress.
The quantitative data of cytosol cytochrome c suggests that the CypD-mediated mPTP opening triggers neuronal cell death only in the early phase after reperfusion. In the present study, on the other hand, deletion of CypD did not suppress inflammation in cerebral tissues after IR despite the reduction of infarct size. One possible reason of this discrepancy is that the deletion of CypD decreased neural cell deaths, and survived cells exacerbated inflammation by releasing inflammatory cytokines. Another possible reason is explained by Signal Transducers and Activator of Transcription-3 (STAT3). STAT3 in the mitochondrial matrix binds to CypD and inhibits mitochondrial ROS production32. In CypD-KO mice, this inhibitory effect of STAT3 on ROS production might be abrogated by the absence of CypD. In addition, there is a possibility that deletion of CypD suppressed mPTP opening and subsequent cell death in monocytes/macrophages, which in turn caused prolonged inflammation accompanied with increased cytokine expressions. Nonetheless, in vivo results suggest that it is insufficient to target only CypD during the early phase after IR injury.
The role of CCR2-mediated inflammation after cerebral IR injury has been demonstrated in experimental animals3,24; however, contradicting results that a selective CCR2 antagonist exacerbated the IR injury have been also reported25. Resent reports have shown that CCR2-dependent recruitment of monocytes/macrophages is a double-edge sword; they exacerbate acute brain injury but, on the other hand, promote the recovery of neurological functions because inflammatory macrophages recruited by a CCR2-dependent mechanism differentiate into reparative macrophages in the later phase after IR injury26. In this study, deletion of CCR2 decreased the infarct size 24 and 72 h after reperfusion accompanied with decreased accumulation of inflammatory monocytes in the injured brain. Furthermore, the additional knockdown of CCR2 in CypD single knockout, i.e. double knockout of CypD and CCR2, decreased the infarct size and improved neurological deficit score at 24 and 72 h after IR, suggesting that inflammation is a distinct therapeutic target in addition to CypD-mediated mPTP opening, which may contribute to neurological outcome. We could not completely exclude a possibility that the collateral blood flow in CypD-KO and CCR2-KO mice may be better than that of WT mice because infarct volumes, as assessed by TTC staining, were significantly smaller in these KO mice in as early as 24 h; however, there were no significant differences in cerebral blood flow during transient MCAO between WT mice and these KO mice. In addition, the significant reduction of infarct size in CCR2-KO mice before the peak of monocyte/macrophage accumulation, raises a possibility that the genetic manipulation may also influence the ischemic tolerance of neural cells27.
We used cyclophilin inhibitor CsA to inhibit cell death induced by mPTP opening and prepared polymeric nanoparticles incorporating CsA to enhance the drug delivery to the ischemic cerebral tissues. In vivo trace experiments indicated enhanced drug delivery to the ischemic cerebral tissues by PLGA-NPs. Fluorescent signals emitted by FITC-NP were mainly observed in the infarct lesion, suggesting that the nanoparticles were delivered to the lesion where BBB was disrupted. The tissue concentration of CsA, as demonstrated in Fig. 4C, also indicates the selective delivery of CsA to the ischemic cerebral tissues. This point is an advantage of PLGA-NPs because undesired adverse effects that may occur in intact cerebral tissues could be avoided.
To inhibit inflammation, we have selected an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, pitavastatin. Pitavastatin has several advantages when considering clinical application. First, it is already clinically available. Second, it exhibits strong anti-inflammatory and vasoprotective effects compared to other statins28. We have previously reported that Pitava-NP suppresses MCP-1-induced macrophage chemotaxis (in vitro)15 and macrophage accumulation in hearts exposed to IR (in vivo)16. Thus, we have selected pitavastatin among several statins in this study. The combined administration of CsA-NPs and Pitava-NPs demonstrates that simultaneous targeting of mPTP opening and inflammation is an effective and favorable combination that covers two major mechanisms of IR injury. Accumulating evidence, however, indicates that accumulation of macrophages to infarct tissues are important for clearance of myelin debris and functional recovery after cerebral infarction29,30. Therefore, further research is needed to elucidate the effects of Pitava-NPs on accumulation and function of reparative macrophages in later phase after reperfusion. In addition, optimization of the administration protocol of Pitava-NP is important for clinical translation. It is important to suppress acute phase inflammation, while accumulation of reparative macrophages should not be too much suppressed.
Nanotechnology-based DDS (nano-DDS) is a promising tool for effective delivery of drugs, and various forms of DDS have been developed, some of which are already clinically available or tested in clinical trials. The advantages of our nano-DDS using PLGA-NPs include the fact that PLGA has been already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) and the Japanese regulatory agency (PMDA) for clinical use. We have already completed clinical trials that tested the safety and efficacy of Pitava-NPs: a phase I/IIa clinical trial (UMIN000008011) in patients with critical limb ischemia (intramuscular injection) and a phase I clinical trial that tested the safety of intravenously administered Pitava-NPs (UMIN000014940, UMIN000019189)(single and repeated injections)31. In addition, a phase II clinical trial in patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension is ongoing (UMIN000032531). In either of these clinical trials, no adverse events have been reported that have causal relationships with Pitava-NP. Furthermore, CsA has been used for many years as an immunosuppressant in patients after organ transplantation. These points indicate that our strategy of using CsA-NP and Pitava-NP has an advantage that clinical application is feasible and could be achieved in a relatively short time compared with de novo synthesized drugs.
In conclusion, simultaneous targeting of mPTP and monocyte mediated-inflammation can be an effective and appropriate strategy for protection of the brain from IR injury. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of CsA and pitavastatin to the cerebral tissue could be a novel and clinically feasible therapy for protecting the brain from IR injury, a major clinical problem with no medical solutions.
Methods
Experimental animals
All animal experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments, Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine, and conducted in accordance with the American Physiological Society guidelines. Male wild-type (WT) mice (C57Bl/6 J background) were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, JAPAN), and CypD-knockout (KO) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Stock#: 009,071, Bar Harbor, ME). CCR2-KO mice (C57Bl/6 J and 129/svjae hybrids, provided by Dr. Charo)32,33 backcrossed with C57Bl/6 J mice at least 10 times were used for experiments. The animals were maintained under a 12-h light–dark cycle with free access to normal chow and water.
Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion
Male mice aged 8–12 weeks and weighing 20–30 g were used for experiments. Mice were anesthetized using isoflurane (1.5%) during surgery, and body temperatures were maintained at 35–37 °C with a surface heating pad during the entire procedure. Transient brain ischemia was induced as described previously34. A midline incision of the neck skin was performed to expose the right common carotid artery. Next, a silicone-coated 6–0 monofilament (Doccol Corp, Redlands, CA) was inserted from the right external carotid artery to the origin of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). After 60 min of occlusion of MCA (MCAO), the cerebral blood flow was restored by removing the filament. The regional cerebral blood flow was monitored using laser Doppler flowmetry (OMEGAWAVE, INC., Tokyo, Japan), and mice were included only when the blood flow was reduced to less than 20% compared to the preischemic baseline level during ischemia and was restored to 80% or more compared to the preischemic level within 10 min after reperfusion. For the sham group, surgical procedures except monofilament insertion were conducted.
Neurobehavioral evaluation
The neurological performances were evaluated and graded using a modified Bederson score35,36. Each grading scale (0–4) indicates following conditions: 0, no neurological deficit (normal); 1, forelimb flexion (mild); 2, decreased resistance to lateral push towards the paretic side without circling (mild to moderate); 3, circling (moderate); 4, no spontaneous movement (severe).
Assessment of infarct size
The brain was excised and sliced into 7 sequential cross-sections with 1.0 mm thickness. The sections were incubated with 2% 2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (TTC, Sigma Aldrich) in saline for 20 min at 37 °C, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 24 h, and photographed with a stereomicroscope (HC-2500, Nikon). To avoid the influence of cerebral edema, the ImageJ software (version 1.46) was used to calculate the percent infarct size as [VC − VL/VC] × 100, where VC is the sum of all areas of control hemisphere and VL is the sum of noninfarct areas in the lesion ipsilateral hemisphere. We have reused the same control mice in Fig. 5A,C and Fig. 6A, the same mice with CsA-NP 2.5 mg/kg in Fig. 5A and Fig. 6A and the same mice with Pitava-NP 3.0 mg/kg in Fig. 5C and Fig. 6A.
Preparation of PLGA nanoparticles
PLGA with an average molecular weight of 20,000 Da and a copolymer ratio of lactide to glycolide of 75:25 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) was used as a matrix of nanoparticles, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-403; Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) was used as a dispersing agent. PLGA-NPs incorporating the fluorescent marker fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC; Dojin Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) (FITC-NP), CsA (Sigma Aldrich, MO) (CsA-NP) or pitavastatin (Kowa Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) (Pitava-NP) were prepared by the emulsion solvent diffusion method in purified water, as previously described12,13. FITC-NP contained 4.05% (wt/vol) FITC, the CsA-NP contained 2.45% (wt/vol) CsA, and the Pitava-NP contained 12.0% (wt/vol) pitavastatin. The average diameters of FITC-NP, CsA-NP and Pitava-NP were 223 nm, 188 nm and 159 nm, respectively. The surface charge (zeta potential) was also analyzed using a Zetasizer Nano system (Sysmex, Hyogo, Japan), which revealed that the nanoparticles were anionic [−24.8 mV (FITC-NP), −16.5 mV (CsA-NP) and −4.1 mV (Pitava-NP)].
Transmission electron microscopy
The animals were intravenously injected with FITC-NPs at the time of reperfusion and euthanized 6 h later by intravenous injection of 100 mg/kg pentobarbital. Next, the mice were perfused with 30 mL of saline and 30 mL of 50% Karnofsky buffer. The brain samples were obtained from the ischemic hemisphere, and the sliced samples were fixed overnight. These small blocks of brain samples were dehydrated using a graded ethanol series. Next, ultrathin sections with 80 nm thickness were prepared with a diamond knife on an ultramicrotome (LEICA EM UC7, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were collected on 150 mesh copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The specimens were observed using an H-7500 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with 80 kV accelerating voltage.
Measurement of cyclosporine concentrations in plasma and tissues
The mice were subjected to 60 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion and were intravenously injected with 10 mg/kg CsA or CsA-NPs containing 10 mg/kg CsA at the time of reperfusion. Blood samples were collected in tubes with EDTA-2 K (Sigma-Aldrich). The brain samples were harvested at the indicated time points. Each sample was weighed and homogenized after separating into ischemic and nonischemic hemispheres. The CsA concentrations in the whole blood and cerebral tissue homogenates were measured by electro chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), which highly correlates with a validated HPLC method.
Distribution of FITC-NP
The distribution of FITC-NP in the brain, peripheral blood leukocytes and spleen was examined. After cerebral IR, the animals were euthanized, and peripheral blood was drawn by cardiac puncture, with EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) serving as an anticoagulant. The red blood cells were lysed with VersaLyse Lysing Solution (Becton Dickinson Bioscience, Inc., CA). The spleen was harvested and triturated in HBSS (Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution) on ice and filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer. The distribution of FITC-NPs in the peripheral blood and spleen was analyzed with a Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc, CA).
Mitochondria isolation
The mouse brain mitochondria were isolated using a mitochondria isolation kit (Abcam, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the brain was quickly excised, minced on ice, resuspended in 1 mL of washing buffer, and homogenized using a glass Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000 × g and 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was recentrifuged at 12,000×g for 15 min to pellet the mitochondria, and the resultant supernatant was used as the supernatant fraction. The pellet was washed twice with isolation buffer.
Flow cytometry
Peripheral blood was drawn by cardiac puncture, and the red blood cells were lysed with VersaLyse Lysing Solution (Becton Dickinson Bioscience, Inc., CA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature. The brains were excised and digested with a cocktail of 125 U/ml collagenase type IV, 60 U/ml DNAase I and 60 U/ml hyaluronidase (all enzymes were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS containing 20 mM HEPES at 37 °C for 30 min in a shaker. Mononuclear cells were isolated by 37/70% Percoll (GE Healthcare) density gradient centrifugation. The spleen was harvested and triturated in HBSS (Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution) on ice and filtered through a 70 µm cell strainer. After blocking the Fc receptor with an anti-CD16/32 monoclonal antibody (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) for 5 min at 4 °C, cell suspensions were incubated with a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies against leukocytes (CD45-PE-Cy7, 30-F11), myeloid cells (CD11b-APC or APC-Cy7, M1/70) and monocyte subsets (Ly6C-FITC or PerCP-Cy5.5, AL-21) for 1 h at 4 °C. A cocktail of monoclonal antibodies against T cells (CD90-PE, 53–2.1), B cells (B220-PE, RA3-6B2), natural killer (NK) cells (CD49b-PE, DX5 and NK1.1-PE, PK136) and granulocytes (Ly6G-PE, 1A8) was used as a lineage (Lin) marker. All leukocytes were subsequently analyzed with a Gallios Flow Cytometer. The microglia were identified as CD45intermediateCD11bintermediateLinlowLy6Clow cells. The monocytes and neutrophils were identified as CD45highCD11bhighLinlowLy6Chigh/low and CD45highCD11bhighLinhigh cells, respectively. The lymphocytes were identified as CD45highCD11blowLinhigh cells. (Supplemental Fig. 3).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The brain was excised, minced on ice, and homogenized using a glass Dounce homogenizer with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 10 mM Na4P2O7, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, and protease inhibitor cocktail). The lysates were centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min, and the supernatants were collected. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) concentrations were measured with commercially available ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) and fluorescence reflectance imaging (FRI)
The near-infrared fluorescence imaging probe ProSense 680 (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA) was used for the visualization of protease activities including cathepsin B, L, S and plasmin. In the mouse IR model, 5 nmol of ProSense 680 (Ex/Em = 680/700 nm) was intravenously administered 48 h after reperfusion. Mice were anesthetized 72 h later with isoflurane (1.5%) inhalation and scanned with the FMT-2000 system (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA). Next, the mice were euthanized, and the brains were harvested. The excised brains were cut into sequential cross sections of 2.0 mm thickness, stained with TTC and imaged by FRI by using the planar imaging capability of FMT-2000.
Cell culture
RAW264.7 cells were cultured with RPMI 1,640 medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in an incubator set to 37 °C and 5% CO2. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma‐Aldrich) and mouse interferon-γ (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) were used for stimulations. For loss-of function experiments, CypD siRNA (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) or control non-targeting siRNA was transfected with SilenceMag (OZ Biosciences, Marseille, France). Culture supernatant was exchanged 24 h later and used for experiments.
RNA extraction and semi-quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was extracted with illustra RNAspin Mini Kit (GE Healthcare Bioscience, Pittsburgh, PA) according to the manufacture’s instruction. cDNA was prepared with PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit (TAKARA BIO INC, Shiga, Japan). Semi-quantitative real-time PCR was performed with SYBR Premix DimerEraser (TAKARA BIO Inc.) and a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA). The primer sequences are as follows: CypD-Fw 5′-CGACTTCACCAACCACAATG-3′ and CypD-Rv 5′-ACATCCATGCCCTCTTTGAC-3′, Il1-b-Fw 5′-GCCCATCCTCTGTGACTCAT-3′, and Il-1b-Rv 5′-AGGCCACAGGTATTTTGTCG-3′, Mcp-1-Fw 5′-AGGTCCCTGTCATGCTTCTG-3′ and Mcp-1-Rv 5′-TCTGGACCCATTCCTTCTTG-3′, TNF-α-Fw 5′-AGCCCCCAGTCTGTATCCTT-3′ and TNF-α-Rv 5′- CTCCCTTTGCAGAACTCAGG-3′, iNos-Fw 5′-TGAGGCTGAAATCCCAGCAG-3′ and iNos-Rv 5′-CTCTGAGGGCTGACACAAGG-3′, Il-6-Fw 5′-CCACTTCACAAGTCGGAGGC-3′ and Il-6-Rv 5′-GCAAGTGCATCATCGTTGTTCATAC-3′, β-actin-Fw 5′-CCTGAGCGCAAGTACTCTGTGT-3′ and β-actin-Rv 5′-GCTGATCCACATCTGCTGGAA-3′. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method and expressed in arbitrary units that were normalized by β-actin.
Statistical analyses
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses of the differences between two groups were performed using the unpaired t-test. Analyses of the differences among three or more groups were performed using one-way or two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s or Dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparison tests. Analysis of the neurological deficits score was performed by the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc multiple comparison tests. All statistical analyses were performed with the Prism software version 6.0 (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, California, USA), and P values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Kozue Nakamura, Eiko Iwata and Satomi Abe for their excellent technical assistance.
Author contributions
A.O., J.K., T.M., G.I. and K.E. designed the study. A.O., J.K. and G.I. acquired and analyzed experimental data. A.O., M.F. and M.T. performed flow cytometry. K.N. prepared nanoparticles. A.O., J.K., M.T., T.A., T.K., H.T. and K.E. interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from Kowa Life Science Foundation (to AO), the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Tokyo, Japan (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 19K08518 to JK, 17K09590 to TM, and 25293185 to KE) and intractable diseases overcome research project from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (to KE).
Competing interests
Kensuke Egashira holds a patent on the results reported in the present study. The remaining authors report no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-71326-x.
References
- 1.Kalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, Korthuis RJ. Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2012;298:229–317. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394309-5.00006-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Brenner C. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87:99–163. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dimitrijevic OB, Stamatovic SM, Keep RF, Andjelkovic AV. Absence of the chemokine receptor CCR2 protects against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Stroke. 2007;38:1345–1353. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259709.16654.8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hu X, De Silva TM, Chen J, Faraci FM. Cerebral vascular disease and neurovascular injury in ischemic stroke. Circ. Res. 2017;120:449–471. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hughes PM, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 deficiency is protective in a murine stroke model. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:308–317. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200203000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ito M, et al. Bruton's tyrosine kinase is essential for NLRP3 inflammasome activation and contributes to ischaemic brain injury. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7360. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kumai Y, et al. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy protects against focal brain ischemia in hypertensive rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:1359–1368. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000143534.76388.3C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shichita T, et al. Peroxiredoxin family proteins are key initiators of post-ischemic inflammation in the brain. Nat. Med. 2012;18:911–917. doi: 10.1038/nm.2749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Colombo D, Ammirati E. Cyclosporine in transplantation: a history of converging timelines. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost Agents. 2011;25:493–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nighoghossian N, Ovize M, Mewton N, Ong E, Cho TH. Cyclosporine A, a potential therapy of ischemic reperfusion injury: a common history for heart and brain. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2016;42:309–318. doi: 10.1159/000446850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nighoghossian N, et al. Cyclosporine in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2015;84:2216–2223. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ikeda G, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated targeting of cyclosporine A enhances cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury through inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:20467. doi: 10.1038/srep20467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nagaoka K, et al. A new therapeutic modality for acute myocardial infarction: nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Pitavastatin induces cardioprotection from ischemia-reperfusion injury via activation of PI3K/Akt pathway and anti-inflammation in a rat model. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0132451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ichimura K, et al. A translational study of a new therapeutic approach for acute myocardial infarction: nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Pitavastatin into reperfused myocardium reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in a preclinical porcine model. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Katsuki S, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of pitavastatin inhibits atherosclerotic plaque destabilization/rupture in mice by regulating the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes. Circulation. 2014;129:896–906. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mao Y, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of pitavastatin to monocytes/macrophages inhibits left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction by inhibiting monocyte-mediated inflammation. Int. Heart J. 2017;58:615–623. doi: 10.1536/ihj.16-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dauber IM, et al. Functional coronary microvascular injury evident as increased permeability due to brief ischemia and reperfusion. Circ. Res. 1990;66:986–998. doi: 10.1161/01.res.66.4.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jin BY, Lin AJ, Golan DE, Michel T. MARCKS protein mediates hydrogen peroxide regulation of endothelial permeability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:14864–14869. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204974109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Acharya S, Sahoo SK. PLGA nanoparticles containing various anticancer agents and tumour delivery by EPR effect. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011;63:170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leuschner F, et al. Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory monocytes in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:1005–1010. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nakano Y, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of irbesartan induces cardioprotection from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by antagonizing monocyte-mediated inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:29601. doi: 10.1038/srep29601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nakagawa T, et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005;434:652–658. doi: 10.1038/nature03317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schinzel AC, et al. Cyclophilin D is a component of mitochondrial permeability transition and mediates neuronal cell death after focal cerebral ischemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:12005–12010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505294102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chu HX, et al. Role of CCR2 in inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:1425–1429. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chu HX, et al. Evidence that Ly6C(hi) monocytes are protective in acute ischemic stroke by promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Stroke. 2015;46:1929–1937. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fang W, et al. CCR2-dependent monocytes/macrophages exacerbate acute brain injury but promote functional recovery after ischemic stroke in mice. Theranostics. 2018;8:3530–3543. doi: 10.7150/thno.24475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hirayama Y, et al. Astrocyte-mediated ischemic tolerance. J. Neurosci. 2015;35:3794–3805. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nakagomi A, et al. Differential effects of atorvastatin and pitavastatin on inflammation, insulin resistance, and the carotid intima-media thickness in patients with dyslipidemia. J. Atheroscler Thromb. 2015;22:1158–1171. doi: 10.5551/jat.29520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lloyd AF, Davies CL, Miron VE. Microglia: origins, homeostasis, and roles in myelin repair. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017;47:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rolfe AJ, Bosco DB, Broussard EN, Ren Y. In vitro phagocytosis of myelin debris by bone marrow-derived macrophages. J. Vis. Exp. 2017 doi: 10.3791/56322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakano K, et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of NK-104-NP. Int. Heart J. 2018;59:1015–1025. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ishibashi M, et al. Critical role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 receptor CCR2 on monocytes in hypertension-induced vascular inflammation and remodeling. Circ. Res. 2004;94:1203–1210. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000126924.23467.A3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Boring L, Gosling J, Cleary M, Charo IF. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2-/- mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature. 1998;394:894–897. doi: 10.1038/29788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nishimura A, et al. Detrimental role of pericyte Nox4 in the acute phase of brain ischemia. J. Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36:1143–1154. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15606456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bederson JB, et al. Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation of the model and development of a neurologic examination. Stroke. 1986;17:472–476. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.3.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goebel S, et al. The GPVI-Fc fusion protein Revacept improves cerebral infarct volume and functional outcome in stroke. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.