Skip to main content
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2020 Aug 7;10(17):9428–9443. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6631

DNA barcode assessment and population structure of aphidophagous hoverfly Sphaerophoria scripta: Implications for conservation biological control

Nemanja Gojković 1, Ljubinka Francuski 1,2, Jasmina Ludoški 1, Vesna Milankov 1,
PMCID: PMC7487226  PMID: 32953072

Abstract

With the advent of integrated pest management, the conservation of indigenous populations of natural enemies of pest species has become a relevant practice, necessitating the accurate identification of beneficial species and the inspection of evolutionary mechanisms affecting the long‐time persistence of their populations. The long hoverfly, Sphaerophoria scripta, represents one of the most potent aphidophagous control agents due to a worldwide distribution and a favorable constellation of biological traits. Therefore, we assessed five European S. scripta populations by combining molecular (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I‐ COI, internal transcribed spacer 2‐ ITS2, and allozyme loci) and morphological (wing size and shape) characters. COI sequences retrieved in this study were conjointly analyzed with BOLD/GenBank sequences of the other Sphaerophoria species to evaluate whether COI possessed a sufficient diagnostic value as a DNA barcode marker to consistently delimit allospecific individuals. Additionally, the aforementioned characters were used to inspect the population structure of S. scripta in Europe using methods based on individual‐ and population‐based genetic differences, as well as geometric morphometrics of wing traits. The results indicate numerous shared COI haplotypes among different Sphaerophoria species, thus disqualifying this marker from being an adequate barcoding region in this genus. Conversely, the analyses of population structuring revealed high population connectivity across Europe, therefore indicating strong tolerance of S. scripta to environmental heterogeneity. The results imply a multilocus approach as the next step in molecular identification of different Sphaerophoria species, while confirming the status of S. scripta as a powerful biocontrol agent of economically relevant aphid pests.

Keywords: integrated pest management, landscape genetics, wing geometric morphometrics


The study deals with the issue of population connectivity of an important aphidophagous hoverfly, Sphaerophoria scripta, based on the integrative approach—through the use of molecular and phenotypic markers, while also tackling the issue of distinguishing S. scripta from the congeneric species using DNA barcoding. The implications of the results are discussed in the light of pest management programs and the preservation of the ecosystem services of pest suppression and plant pollination, contributing to the growing body of knowledge concerning the protection of eco‐evolutionary interactions in times of global climate changes.

graphic file with name ECE3-10-9428-g011.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Modern agriculture heavily relies on systematic chemical (insecticide) and mechanical (intense soil tillage) treatments to yield high productivity, consequently affecting water quality and availability, the emission of greenhouse gases, and furthermore disrupting natural ecological and evolutionary processes by causing detrimental changes in the populations of natural pest enemies (Chabert & Sarthou, 2017). Therefore, the negative consequences of contemporary agricultural practices to environmental and human health call for science‐based practices aimed at biological control of insect pests by natural enemies in agro‐ and forest ecosystems (Le Hesran, Ras, Wajnberg, & Beukeboom, 2019). The field of crop pest control saw the rise of integrated pest management (IPM), an ecosystem approach to crop production and protection that utilizes various management practices to efficiently grow high‐quality crops while minimizing the use of chemical control agents and promoting their sustainable use (Gomez‐Polo et al., 2014). One of the IPM strategies involves conservation biological control (CBC), conservation of natural enemies through manipulation of the environment. Unlike classical biological control which introduces exotic control species as agents of pest management, CBC instead involves a collection of practices which protect and promote the presence of naturally present enemies of pest species in a targeted ecosystem (Eilenberg, Hajek, & Lomer, 2001). The main advantage of CBC programs is that the beneficial species providing pest suppression service are already adapted to the habitat and to the target pest, which increases the effectiveness of the insect pest control (Gomez‐Polo et al., 2014). On the other hand, for CBC approaches to be successful, a thorough fundamental knowledge of the biology and ecology of the pest control agent is necessary. Concerning the link between natural enemy diversity and pest control (Jonsson, Kaartinen, & Straub, 2017), effectiveness of conservation biological control depends on the abundance of pest predators as well as the proper taxonomic identity of species in a predator assemblage (Moreno, Lewins, & Barbosa, 2010; Snyder, 2019). Hence, deeper understanding of the link between natural enemy biodiversity and biocontrol enhances the efficacy of conservation biological control in the management of sustainable agricultural systems (Straub, Finke, & Snyder, 2008). Furthermore, in the recent years, molecular markers have also been extensively used to elucidate various aspects of biology and ecology of beneficial species involved in biological control (MacDonald & Loxdale, 2004). One such issue includes the phenomena of population structure, tightly woven to the evolutionary mechanism of gene flow and therefore informative about the species dispersal and migratory activities (Raymond, Plantegenest, & Vialatte, 2013). Indeed, to provide sustainable biological control in the local and regional habitat, understanding the landscape effect on population connectivity of biological enemies has essential input (Happe et al., 2019). In addition, in the context of pest suppression ecosystem service, population structure is relevant for preserving the genetic diversity of the biocontrol agents (Le Hesran et al., 2019), as well as for testing their tolerance to environmental variability (Liu, Xiaoqiang, et al., 2019).

Hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) have recently been brought into research focus due to their key role in maintaining ecosystem services (pest control, pollination) in a diverse set of environments (Gomez‐Polo et al., 2014; Jauker & Wolters, 2008; Klecka, Hadrava, Biella, & Akter, 2018). Among the phytophagous, zoophagous, and saprophagous immatures, syrphids can be polyphagous predators of diverse arthropods, including aphids (=aphidophagous) and other economically important pest species (Gomez‐Polo et al., 2014; Rotheray & Gilbert, 1999; Speight, 2017), thereby providing the service of biological pest control. In addition, among nonbee pollinators, syrphids represent the family of most frequent visitors of the 105 major animal‐pollinated crops, also displaying a wide range of interactions by visiting over half of them (Rader, Cuningham, Howlett, & Inouye, 2020). One of the important aphidophagous syrphid groups includes the members of the Holarctic genus Sphaerophoria Le Peletier et Serville, 1828, which comprise 33 Palearctic species (Barkalov, 2011), 27 of which are found in Europe (Speight, 2017). Regarding the ecosystem service benefits that the Sphaerophoria hoverflies provide, they are an especially interesting group since predation at the larval stage and pollination at the adult stage allow a potential synergy of ecosystem services (Rader et al., 2020). Within the genus, long hoverfly, S. scripta (Linnaeus, 1758; Speight, 2017; Figure 1), has received particular attention as a potent biocontrol agent since it is globally distributed, characterized by intense gene flow (Raymond et al., 2013), and an abundant aphid predator constituting hoverfly larva assemblages in lettuce crops and pepper greenhouses (e.g., Pineda & Marcos‐García, 2008), as well as in other herbaceous plants (Speight, 2017). Furthermore, by boasting high genetic diversity, great colonization ability, and probably high phenotypic plasticity, long hoverfly, along with Episyrphus balteatus (De Geer, 1776), is considered to possess an outstanding adaptive potential with no parallel in any known arthropod species providing the same ecosystem services in agroecosystems (Raymond et al., 2013). Given that the effectiveness of CBC programs depends on the biological characteristics of the species used to suppress pest taxa (Jonsson, Wratten, Landis, & Gurr, 2008), S. scripta represents a potentially powerful candidate agent due to its aforementioned traits.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Sphaerophoria scripta, the long hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae)

Over the years, several aspects of S. scripta traits were researched, including the following: the habitat, anatomy, and morphology of the larvae (Lal Bhatia, 1939), the abundance dynamics (Bokina, 2012; Khalil, Awadallah, & Mahmoud, 1979), the spatio‐temporal dynamics (Díaz, Legarrea, Marcos‐García, & Fereresa, 2009; Raymond et al., 2013), its parasitoids (Krawczyk, Hurej, & Jackowski, 2011), as well as the egg‐laying activities of females (Awadallah, Mahmoud, & Khalil, 1980). Additionally, the population structure of S. scripta was previously investigated in Europe using microsatellite loci, with the results showing no apparent stratification over a large geographic scale (Raymond et al., 2013). However, the sole use of microsatellite markers can fail to detect the existent population structure, which can be retrieved when a different marker class is used (Avise, 2000; Bernardo et al., 2019; Keeney, Heupel, Hueter, & Heist, 2005). Finally, the taxa of the hoverfly family are known to exhibit cryptic species diversity, which has been successfully revealed using DNA barcoding in several instances (Milankov, Ståhls, Stamenković, & Vujić, 2008; Ståhls et al., 2009; Šašić et al., 2016), but which has not been utilized in S. scripta characterization.

Since essential components of CBC involve fast and accurate identification of natural enemies, as well as the inspection of evolutionary mechanisms acting upon their populations and thereby affecting the quality of their biocontrol service, we addressed two issues of CBC in this paper: 1) the utility of DNA barcoding in the accurate identification of the taxa within the aphidophagous hoverfly genus, Sphaerophoria; and 2) the issue of population structure and population connectivity of polyphagous predator, S. scripta. We implemented several approaches using mitochondrial and nuclear genetic loci belonging to sequence and phenotypic molecular marker classes, as well as phenotypic morphological characters of adult wings.

Firstly, we used a DNA barcode approach (Hebert, Cywinska, Ball, & deWaard, 2003; Hebert, Ratnasingham, & deWaard, 2003) based on a combination of two markers frequently utilized together in insect cryptic diversity identification: a mitochondrial, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI mtDNA) and a nuclear, internal transcribed spacer 2 locus of the ribosomal DNA cluster (ITS2 rDNA). The DNA barcode approach relies on the existence of a barcode gap—the scenario when the greatest intraspecies haplotype divergence is lower than the least interspecies haplotype divergence (Hebert, Cywinska, et al., 2003; Hebert, Ratnasingham, et al., 2003; Puillandre, Lambert, Brouillet, & Achaz, 2011). An implicit premise to this approach, however, is that the DNA barcode method can indeed successfully distinguish between different Sphaerophoria species, which was also assessed by analyzing sequences belonging to 20 different Sphaerophoria species.

Secondly, we used clustering methods operating upon individual genetic differences to determine the most likely number of populations (=panmictic units) within the sample. Apart from COI mtDNA and ITS2 rDNA, allozyme loci were also included in these analyses, with algorithms deciphering the number of populations working in two setting modes—with and without incorporating the geographic origin of the sampled S. scripta individuals. Additionally, different geographical samples of S. scripta can be a priori defined as distinct populations and the differences among them can be tested using population‐based (=group‐based) methods. This goal was reached using all the aforementioned COI mtDNA, ITS2 rDNA, and allozyme loci, but also using the methodology of geometric morphometrics of adult traits (wing size and shape) as a complement to molecular markers. We opted to ascertain whether dispersal and migration of S. scripta individuals keep geographically remote sites genetically cohesive or whether there was a presence of population stratification, thereby affecting the co‐evolutionary dynamics of long hoverfly and the aphids it predates upon, and consequently the quality of biological pest control service it provides.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

2.1. Sampling and DNA barcode data set building

Sphaerophoria scripta specimens analyzed in this study were collected during 2010 and 2013 from five European localities: the Hague (the Netherlands; NLD), Berlin (Germany; DEU), Bled (Slovenia; SVN), Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina; BIH), and Araxos (Greece; GRC; Figure 2; leg. Milankov V, Francuski Lj, Lukač M, and Đurakić M). The adult flies were collected by hand netting while they were feeding or resting on flowers. They were subsequently stored at −20°C until the respective analyses. Prior to the analyses, the specimen identification was performed based on the morphological characters of the adults (Hippa, Nielsen, & van Steenis, 2001; det. Milankov V, Francuski Lj). In total, 154 individuals were used for geometric morphometric analyses, while a sample subset was used for the molecular analyses (Table 1). In particular, 94 S. scripta specimens were used in the analyses based on allozyme loci, 69 individuals for the analyses based on COI mtDNA, while 39 individuals were genotyped at ITS2 rDNA locus (Table 1).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The map of the sampled localities. 1‐ the Hague, the Netherlands, NLD (52.07 N, 4.30 E), 2‐ Berlin, Germany, DEU (52.52 N, 13.40 E), 3‐ Bled, Slovenia, SVN (46.37 N, 14.11 E), 4‐ Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, BIH (44.77 N, 17.19 E), 5‐ Araxos, Greece, GRC (38.17 N, 21.41 E). The decimal latitude and longitude geographic coordinates of the localities were retrieved from Google Earth

TABLE 1.

The sampling localities and sample sizes for different Sphaerophoria scripta analyses performed in this study

Population (abbreviation) Geometric morphometrics Allozymes COI mtDNA ITS2 rDNA
Female Male Total
the Netherlands, the Hague (NLD) 7 14 21 18 14 9
Germany, Berlin (DEU) 10 12 22 15 12 8
Slovenia, Bled (SVN) 5 17 22 21 13 7
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Banja Luka (BIH) 13 26 39 18 15 7
Greece, Araxos (GRC) 12 38 50 22 15 8
Total 47 107 154 94 69 39

Abbreviations: COI mtDNA, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene; ITS2 rDNA, ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 gene.

Additionally, for the analysis of the utility of the standard DNA barcode marker (5’ end of COI mtDNA) for the species delimitation within the genus Sphaerophoria, apart from S. scripta sequences obtained de novo in this study, sequences deposited in BOLD and GenBank databases were also included. The databases were searched for Sphaerophoria genus 5’ COI mtDNA sequences and only the sequences belonging to the taxa identified to the species level were included. The sequences were aligned with S. scripta COI mtDNA sequences from this paper in BioEdit 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999) to choose an overlapping fragment which would be used for the subsequent analysis of the barcode utility. After the exclusion of sequences whose length was too short and/or which contained ambiguous nucleotide positions, the total data set consisted of 278 COI mtDNA sequences (481 bp‐long): 215 originating from BOLD database, 6 sequences downloaded from GenBank database, and 57 S. scripta COI mtDNA sequences from this paper (Table S1). The sequences belonged to 20 Sphaerophoria species, with the majority of the sample belonging to S. scripta (77 individuals), S. philanthus Meigen, 1822 (73), S. contigua Macquart, 1847 (50), and S. novaeangliae Johnson, 1916 (40; Table S1). For a subset of these sequences (Table S2), the maximum possible length of the standard 5’ COI mtDNA barcode (658 bp) was used to check whether the use of a shorter fragment (481 bp) affected the resolution of DNA barcoding.

2.2. DNA extraction and sequence processing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from single legs of the specimens using NucleoSpin® Tissue DNA extraction kit (MACHEREY–NAGEL, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using an illustra PuReTaq Ready‐To‐Go PCR Beads kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) was used to amplify partial sequences of COI mtDNA and ITS2 rDNA genes. COI mtDNA sequence of 1,209 bp was obtained by overlapping amplified fragments from two separate PCR reactions: one using LCO‐1490 (5’‐GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTG‐3’; Folmer, Black, Hoeh, Lutz, & Vrijenhoek, 1994)/UEA8 (alias Inger; 5′‐AAAAATGTTGAGGGAAAAATGTTA‐3′; Lunt, Zhang, Szymura, & Hewitt, 1996) primer pair and the other one using C1‐J‐2183 (alias Jerry; 5’‐CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG‐3’)/TL2‐N‐3014 (alias Pat; 5’‐TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA‐3’) primer pair (Simon et al., 1994). ITS2 rDNA sequence of 426 bp was amplified using ITS2A (5’‐TGTGAACTGCAGGACACAT‐3’)/ITS2B (5’‐TATGCTTAAATTCAGGGGGT‐3’) primer pair (Beebe & Saul, 1995). The total PCR volume per a sample was 25 µl, with 19 µl of ultra‐pure water, 4 µl of DNA, and 1 µl of both respective forward and reverse primers. PCR conditions were identical for all three amplification reaction types: initial denaturation at 95°C (1 min); 30 cycles of DNA denaturation at 94°C (30 s), primer hybridization with the target region at 45°C (30 s), and strand elongation at 72°C (1 min); and a final elongation at 72°C (7 min). PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light to check whether the reactions were successful. The products were subsequently purified using ExoSAP‐IT™ PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania), and bidirectionally sequenced by Macrogen (the Netherlands) on ABI3730XL using the same sets of primers used for PCRs.

Chromatograms retrieved by sequencing COI mtDNA (1209‐bp long) and ITS2 rDNA (426‐bp long) loci of S. scripta were inspected in Chromas 2.6 (Tehnelysiumm Pty Ltd) for erroneously called bases and edited, and subsequently aligned in BioEdit. The sequences were uploaded to GenBank under the following accession numbers: MN908156–MN908221 (66 COI mtDNA sequences) and MN909154MN909155 (the two retrieved ITS2 rDNA alleles A and B; see Results below). For three samples, only the 5’ end of COI mtDNA was successfully amplified (Table 1; uploaded to GenBank as MN908643–MN908645). These sequences were included in the analyses of the utility of 5’ COI mtDNA as a DNA barcode, but not in the individual‐ and population‐based genetic analyses which only encompassed longer COI sequences (Table 1). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the ClustalW algorithm, after which the alignments were manually checked and edited when necessary. COI mtDNA sequences were checked for STOP codons in MEGA X 10.0.5 (Kumar, Stecher, Li, Knyaz, & Tamura, 2018) to inspect the presence of nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (NUMTs). The number of COI mtDNA haplotypes, ITS2 rDNA alleles, and variable positions was determined in DAMBE6 (Xia, 2017). Due to the lack of variability of ITS2 rDNA sequences (see Results below), this data set was excluded from the subsequent intended analyses.

2.3. Allozyme analysis

Allozyme loci of nDNA have been successfully used in hoverfly studies in a variety of subjects, including taxonomy (e.g., Milankov et al., 2008), population structure (e.g., Francuski, Ludoski, Lukac, & Milankov, 2020; Francuski & Milankov, 2015; Milankov, Ludoški, Francuski, Ståhls, & Vujić, 2013), and population genetics (e.g., Francuski et al., 2014). As a useful tool for investigating population connectivity and spatial distribution of genetic variation, the polymorphism of allozyme loci was studied by vertical polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at eight enzyme loci: aldehyde oxidase (1.2.3.1. AO; Ao), α‐glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.8 GPD; Gpd‐2), β‐hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.30 HBD; Hbd), hexokinase (2.7.1.1 HK; Hk‐2), isocitrate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.42 IDH; Idh‐1), malate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.37 MDH; Mdh‐2), malic enzyme (1.1.1.40 ME; Me), and superoxide dismutase (1.15.1.1 SOD; Sod‐1). A trisborate‐ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid buffer system (pH 8.9) was used to assay AO, HK, ME, and SOD, whereas a tris‐citrate buffer system (pH 7.1) was used for analysis of GPD, HBD, IDH, and MDH. The details of buffer systems and staining procedures are given in Munstermann (1979) and Pasteur, Pasteur, Bonhomme, Catalan, and Britton‐Davidian (1988). The electrophoretic runs at 90 mA (135–220 V) lasted for 3–4 hr. The alleles of the analyzed enzyme loci were marked in an alphabetical order, where the allele encoding the electrophoretically slowest allozyme was marked as a. Allele frequencies were calculated in Genepop 4.7.2 (Rousset, 2008).

2.4. COI mtDNA barcode analysis

To infer whether there was cryptic diversity within the S. scripta specimens identified using morphological characters, we implemented a DNA barcode approach. Since this method relies on the existence of a barcode gap, if certain haplotypes are shared between two or more species, the barcode gap is closed and the marker is deemed of insufficient diagnostic utility for the species identification. Therefore, median‐joining haplotype networks were firstly constructed in NETWORK 5.0.1.1 (Fluxus Technology Ltd) to inspect the issue of shared haplotypes. The first network was constructed using solely a longer fragment of COI mtDNA (1,209 bp‐long) retrieved de novo for S. scripta specimens sampled in this study, while the second network was constructed for the total data set of Sphaerophoria species 5’ COI mtDNA sequences (481 bp‐long). When the 1,209 bp‐ and 481 bp‐long COI mtDNA fragments were aligned against a complete mitochondrial sequence of Episyrphus balteatus (GenBank accession code: KU351241), they spanned the regions corresponding to positions 1638–2846 and 1612–2092, respectively. Finally, haplotype divergences, necessary to inspect the presence of the barcode gap, were expressed as uncorrected p distances, where p is the quotient of the total number of pairwise nucleotide differences and the total length of the selected barcode region, as calculated in MEGA X 10.0.5 (Kumar et al., 2018).

2.5. Individual‐based clustering analyses of Sphaerophoria scripta specimens

The number of populations within the sample was investigated using nonspatial and spatial Bayesian clustering approaches based on individual genetic differences and implemented on both allozyme and COI mtDNA data sets. The nonspatial approach was implemented in BAPS 6 (Corander & Tang, 2007). For the population mixture analysis, Clustering of individuals was selected for allozyme loci, while Clustering with linked loci and Codon linkage model was used for COI mtDNA. For both molecular marker types, BAPS was ran for values of K (the number of genetic clusters) ranging from one to five, performing ten replicates for each K. The optimal K was selected based on the number of clusters for which the log of marginal likelihood was maximal. Mixture analysis was followed by Admixture analysis using Admixture based on Mixture results option. The number of iterations was set to 100,000, the number of reference individuals per population to 200, and the number of iterations per reference individual to 20. Additionally, STRUCTURE 2.3.4 (Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, 2000) was used to evaluate the population genetic structure based on allozyme data using the admixture model with correlated allele frequencies among genetic clusters. Ten independent runs with K varying from one to five (corresponding to the five geographic samples) were performed with 10,000 generations of a burn‐in period followed by 100,000 MCMC iterations. The most probable value of K was retrieved from CLUMPAK 1.1 (Kopelman, Mayzel, Jakobsson, Rosenberg, & Mayrose, 2015) using both methods of Evano et al. (2005) and Pritchard et al. (2000), while mean population membership coefficients were obtained from STRUCTURE HARVESTER 0.6 (Earl & vonHoldt, 2012) as averaged values over ten runs for the selected value of K. To explicitly account for the sampling coordinates of the analyzed specimens, we used a spatial, individual‐based analysis in Geneland 4.0.8 (Guillot, Mortier, & Estoup, 2005; Guillot, Santos, & Estoup, 2008), as implemented in R language (v3.4.3; R Development Core Team, 2017. The number of genetic clusters was allowed to vary from one to five, with ten independent runs for each value. There were 100,000 iterations per each run, with chain thinning set to 100. Maximum rate of Poisson process was set to match the number of individuals in respective data sets (94 for allozymes, 66 for COI mtDNA), while maximum number of nuclei in the Poisson‐Voronoi tessellation was set to three times the number of individuals (282 for allozymes, 198 for COI mtDNA). No uncertainty of spatial coordinates was assumed under the correlated allele frequency model, while chain burn‐in was set to 250. Finally, to test whether a correlation between genetic and geographic distance of the sampled individuals existed, we performed Mantel's test in software Alleles in Space (AIS; Miller, 2005) using 10,000 iterations.

2.6. Population‐based molecular analyses of genetic differentiation

The analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier, Smouse, & Quattro, 1992) were performed in Arlequin 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010) for both COI mtDNA and allozyme loci using standard AMOVA. Genetic differentiation was assessed among (ΦST and F ST for COI mtDNA and allozymes, respectively) and between (pairwise ΦST and F ST) populations corresponding to the sampled geographical localities. To determine the statistical significance of the genetic differences, 10,000 permutations were used in permutation tests in the same software.

2.7. Wing geometric morphometric analysis

Permanent slides of both left and right wings of all 154 individuals (47 females and 107 males; Table 1) were prepared with Hoyer's medium. Right‐wing images were taken with a Leica DFC320 camera associated with a stereo microscope Leica MZ12.5 and then subjected to geometric morphometric analysis of wing size and shape. On each wing, a set of 16 landmarks were digitized using tpsDig2 ver. 2.31 (Rohlf, 2017; Figure 3). Raw landmark coordinates were superimposed using a full Procrustes fit procedure (Dryden & Mardia, 1998) and the set of shape variables (a matrix of Procrustes coordinates) and centroid size (CS; Bookstein, 1991) were extracted.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The positions of 16 landmarks used for wing size and shape geometric morphometric analysis of Sphaerophoria scripta

Geometric morphometric and statistical analyses were done using MorphoJ (Klingenberg, 2011) and PAST 3.26 (Hammer, Harper, & Ryan, 2001). To evaluate differences in wing size between groups (populations, sexes), we performed a permutational analysis of variance (ANOVA) on CS followed by a multiple comparison test (Tukey's pairwise post hoc test). The presence of allometry was estimated with multivariate regression of Procrustes coordinates against CS. The significance of the allometry was computed by a permutation test with 10,000 replicates. When statistically significant allometric effect was found, residuals from regression were used for the analysis of shape variation. Wing shape variation was analyzed using canonical variate analysis (CVA)/multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with 10,000 permutations, while discriminant analysis (DA) was employed to calculate the percentages of correct classification, cross‐validated by a leave‐one‐out (jackknifing) procedure.

3. RESULTS

Among 39 individuals of S. scripta from the five European localities, only two alleles of ITS2 rDNA were found; the majority of the sample was represented by an allele A (35 individuals), while an alternative allele B was registered in the remaining four individuals (Table S3). Due to the lack of variability, no further analyses on ITS2 rDNA data set were performed.

3.1. Allozyme variation

Out of the eight analyzed enzyme loci, four loci were polymorphic. Up to three alleles were registered per population for the loci Idh‐1, Mdh‐2, and Me, while up to four alleles were registered per population for the locus Ao (Table S4). All the sampled individuals were homozygous for all the analyzed enzyme loci.

3.2. COI mtDNA barcode assessment

The analysis of 66 COI mtDNA sequences (1,209 bp‐long) sampled from the five European localities retrieved 33 haplotypes (H1‐H33; Figure 4, Table S3), with 35 variable positions in total. The most common haplotype H1 (25/66 individuals) was present in all five geographic samples. The majority of the remaining haplotypes (H2‐H26) differed in up to three substitutions from the central haplotype H1, giving the star‐like topology to the overall haplotype network (Figure 4). BIH sample shared haplotype H3 with NLD sample, while it shared H4 and H5 with SVN sample. On the other hand, H2 was shared among NLD, SVN, and GRC, while DEU sample had no shared haplotypes with the other four countries apart from H1. Concerning the question of cryptic diversity within S. scripta, an additional divergent group of haplotypes originating from H27 (H28‐H33) was registered (termed the minor haplogroup as only seven haplotypes belonged to it, opposite the major haplogroup containing 26 haplotypes; Figure 4). The haplotypes within this mitochondrial haplogroup were registered in all the sampled localities, apart from Germany. The range of p distances was 0.08%–0.50% within the major haplogroup, 0.08%–0.33% for the minor haplogroup, and 0.33%–0.83% between the haplogroups (Table S1), therefore indicating the absence of the barcode gap since the upper range of p distances within the groups (0.50%) was greater than the lower range between the groups (0.33%). However, when the COI mtDNA sequences were aligned against a complete mitochondrial sequence of Episyrphus balteatus, the haplotypes of the minor haplogroup were characterized by a diagnostic combination of six substitutions: 1,783 T, 1,978 G, 2,495 G, 2,500 T, 2,734 C, and 2,761 G (Figure S1). Therefore, despite the absence of the distance‐based barcode gap between the haplogroups, the members of the minor haplogroup were consistently distinguished from the major haplogroup haplotypes by a specific combination of diagnostic nucleotide states (the six aforementioned substitutions). To further explore this issue and investigate whether the minor S. scripta haplogroup indeed could represent a distinct taxon, DNA barcode analysis was implemented on the total Sphaerophoria genus data set.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The median‐joining haplotype network of COI mtDNA haplotypes (1,209 bp‐long) constructed in Network. Each circle corresponds to a different haplotype, while its size is proportional to the number of individuals representing it. Dashes across lines connecting the circles indicate the number of pairwise nucleotide differences between the haplotypes, with each dash corresponding to a single nucleotide substitution. NLD—the Netherlands (the Hague), DEU—Germany (Berlin), SVN—Slovenia (Bled), BIH—Bosnia and Herzegovina (Banja Luka), GRC—Greece (Araxos)

The total data set analysis of 278 5’ COI mtDNA sequences (481 bp‐long) of 20 Sphaerophoria species retrieved 51 haplotypes (h1‐h51; Figure 5, Tables S3 and S5), with 58 variable positions. Concerning the haplotypes belonging to the minor S. scripta haplogroup (H27‐H33), they were positioned as a group of haplotypes oriented around haplotype h11: H31‐H33 corresponded to h11, H29 to h13, H30 to h14, and H28 to h15 (H27 was excluded from this analysis due to being too short at the 5’ end). Apart from these sequences, retrieved from our study, BOLD database sequences belonging to this haplogroup (h11–h15) were additionally retrieved from Greenland (h11 and h12) and Norway (h11). Therefore, the representatives of the minor S. scripta haplogroup were codistributed with the members of its major haplogroup, being present in Greenland and from Norway in the north to Greece in the south in Europe, spanning over the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. To conclude whether this set of haplotypes represented a putative distinct species depended on whether 5’ COI mtDNA represented a diagnostic DNA barcode marker for identification of different Sphaerophoria species. However, from the barcode utility standpoint, the partial sequence of the standard 5’ COI mtDNA marker failed to successfully delimit different Sphaerophoria species. In particular, there were eight haplotypes which were shared between two or more allospecific individuals: h8, h16, h17, h27, and h32 were common for two respective species, the most frequent haplotype h1 was shared among three species, h20 was retrieved from individuals belonging to four different species, while h18 was present in five different Sphaerophoria species (Table S5). Since the existence of barcode gaps depends on the condition of the greatest intraspecies divergence being lower than the smallest interspecies divergence, when two species share certain haplotypes (the lowest interspecies divergence: p = 0%; see Table S2), the barcode gap is sealed and the analyzed marker is deemed unsuccessful for the species delimitation. Speaking strictly for the four species which contributed to the majority of the sample, S. philanthus and S. contigua shared haplotypes h18 and h20, while S. philanthus and S. scripta shared haplotypes h1, h8, and h16. On the other hand, S. novaeangliae had no haplotypes in common with the other Sphaerophoria species, meaning that 5’ COI mtDNA possesses a limited diagnostic power for congeneric species identification, being successful in this case (Figure 5, Table S2).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The median‐joining haplotype network of 5’ COI mtDNA haplotypes (481 bp‐long) constructed in Network. Out of the 20 analyzed Sphaerophoria species (Tables S1 and S3), the four which mostly contributed to the sample size are distinctly colored, while the remaining species share the same color. Each circle corresponds to a different haplotype, while its size is proportional to the number of individuals representing it. Dashes across lines connecting the circles indicate the number of pairwise nucleotide differences between the haplotypes, with each dash corresponding to a single nucleotide substitution

Prior to definitively concluding about the suitability of 5’ COI mtDNA for the delimitation of different Sphaerophoria species, we considered whether the use of the shorter fragment significantly affected the outcome of species delimitation. Namely, for the subset of sequences representing the eight shared haplotypes (149 sequences, Table S2), we performed the alignment of their full‐length sequences to inspect whether possibly new diagnostic positions would arise that were previously omitted when the shorter fragment was used. Out of the 149 sequences, 73 sequences contained the entire 658 bp‐long barcode content, 58 contained at least 600 bp of the standard barcoding fragment, while the remaining 18 missed 120 bp at most. Within this data set, five additional variable positions were registered (Table S2), separating some of the previously identical sequences. However, apart from haplotype h8, the pattern of the lowest interspecies p divergence being 0% persisted, with even 658 bp‐long sequences of different Sphaerophoria species remaining identical. Specifically, h1 and h16 were shared between S. scripta and S. philanthus, h17 between S. scripta and S. rueppellii, h20 between S. philanthus and S. contigua, h27 between S. taeniata and S. interrupta, h32 between S. virgata and S. laurae, and finally—h18 being shared among S. philanthus, S. contigua, S. batarum, and S. asymmetrica (Table S2). Summarily, the resolution of 5’ COI mtDNA as a DNA barcode marker in Sphaerophoria genus was not significantly affected by the use of its shorter (481 bp) fragment and remained unsuitable. Therefore, it was not possible to unequivocally confirm or dismiss whether the members of the minor COI mtDNA haplogroup of S. scripta represented a distinct taxon using the DNA barcode approach (but see Discussion), and neither was it possible to use this DNA barcode marker to distinguish different Sphaerophoria genus species.

3.3. Individual‐based genetic clustering analyses

For S. scripta COI mtDNA data set, BAPS retrieved three as the most probable number of clusters. The majority of the haplotypes (19/33) were grouped together in cluster K1, while haplotypes H27‐H33, belonging to the minor COI mtDNA haplogroup, were recognized as a separate genetic cluster (K3). The remaining haplotypes were grouped together in a cluster K2 which included two separate subgroups—K2a, whose haplotypes (H5, H23, H24, H26) were grouped by having a common 2,761 G substitution, and K2b, whose haplotypes (H2, H19, H25) shared a 2,788 T substitution (Figure S1). The populations sampled in the Netherlands, Germany, and Slovenia had high average population membership probabilities to cluster K1 (>80%, Table S5). The remaining two populations had relatively lower average population membership probability to K1 (around 50%), with the remaining membership probabilities distributed between K2 and K3 (43% and 7% for Bosnia and Herzegovina, respectively, and 32% and 20% for Greece, respectively; Table S6). However, since there was no biological rationale for establishing separate clusters K1 and K2 within the major COI mtDNA haplogroup (see Discussion below), BAPS analysis solely confirmed the existence of the two separate haplogroups within the sample, with the sequences belonging to the major haplogroup being recognized as K1 and K2, while the sequences belonging to the minor haplogroup were clustered together in K3. Importantly, these two clusters were geographically codistributed (apart from Germany where K3 was absent) and the majority of the sample had negligible contribution of K3 to its structure, meaning that the five geographically distinct samples actually represented a homogenous genetic sample, predominantly being constituted from the members of the major COI mtDNA haplogroup (>80% for each sample when K1 and K2 are added together). This was also supported upon the incorporation of spatial data in Geneland, where a homogenous sample was found, without detecting any structuring (K = 1). Finally, Mantel's test, investigating the correlation between genetic and geographic distances, yielded statistically nonsignificant results (r = −.03, p = .69), showing no isolation by distance pattern. All three analyses—BAPS, Geneland, and Mantel's test, were repeated upon the exclusion of the members of K3 and the identical results were retrieved, meaning that the incorporation of K3 members did not obscure the pattern of no population structuring.

Concerning the allozyme loci, Bayesian clustering method implemented in BAPS retrieved five as the most probable number of clusters. However, neither of the geographic samples was particularly differentiated as belonging to any of the genetic clusters (the highest average membership probability to any of the clusters was lower than 45%; Table S6). Furthermore, STRUCTURE retrieved four and five as the most probable number of homogenous genetic groups within the total sample using the methods of Evano et al. (2005) and Pritchard et al. (2000), respectively (Figure 6). Once again, regardless of the value of K, neither of the geographic samples had significantly high mean population membership coefficient to the retrieved genetic clusters (threshold value is usually taken at 80%, but no locality had membership coefficient higher than 46%; Table S7). Therefore, all the geographic samples were genetically admixed. The inclusion of spatial data in Geneland indicated four as the most probable number of clusters, with Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Greece representing discrete samples, while the northernmost samples—the Netherlands and Germany, were grouped together. Finally, Mantel's test results showed no statistically relevant correlation between genetic and geographic distances (r = .03, p = .15).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Population genetic structure analysis of the five European Sphaerophoria scripta populations using STRUCTURE software on allozyme loci. The most probable number of clusters varied between the two methods‐ Evano et al. (2005) and Pritchard et al. (2000), corresponding to K = 4 and K = 5, respectively. Regardless of the most probable number of homogenous genetic groups within the sample, both scenarios indicate a pattern of high genetic admixture. NLD—the Netherlands (the Hague), DEU—Germany (Berlin), SVN—Slovenia (Bled), BIH—Bosnia and Herzegovina (Banja Luka), GRC—Greece (Araxos)

3.4. Population‐based molecular analyses of genetic differentiation

The analysis of molecular variance based on COI mtDNA found no significant ΦST value for the S. scripta geographic samples (p = .74; Table S8). Similarly, there were no statistically significant pairwise ΦST values, overall indicating no population structuring within the analyzed data set. The same results were obtained upon the repetition of the analyses without the sequences belonging to the minor COI mtDNA haplogroup (H27‐H33). Conversely, interpopulation differences were small yet significant when allozyme loci were analyzed, with F ST = 0.08 (p = .02; Table S8). Furthermore, pairwise F ST values were significant for Slovenia/Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia/Greece population pairs (p < .05; Table S9).

3.5. Wing geometric morphometrics

Prior to wing shape variation analysis, multivariate regression of shape variables on CS was performed for a total sample, as well as for each sex separately. In an overall sample, 7.2% (p < .0001) of shape variation was explained by size, while it was 4.0% (p = .05) in females and 10.2% (p < .0001) in males. Thus, due to the presence of allometry, regression residuals were used for further analysis of shape variation.

Two‐way ANOVA with dependent variables of size (CS) and independent variables of population and sex revealed a significant main effect of population (F (4, 144)=5.47; p < .0001) and interaction (F (4, 144) = −6.92; p = .03; Table 2; Figure 7). Two‐way MANOVA on regression residuals showed significant main effect of population (F (4, 144) = 1.51; p < .001) and sex (F (4, 144) = 49.52; p < .0001; Table 2). Additionally, DA revealed that males and females clearly separated along the discriminant axis (Procrustes distance = 0.0312; p < .0001) with 100% (98.7% jackknifed) of correct classification. Displacement of landmarks 9–14 being moved toward either distal or proximal part of wing in males and females, respectively, contributed to intersexual wing shape differences (Figure 8). Due to significant differences between genders, further wing size and shape variation analyses were done for each sex separately.

TABLE 2.

The results from two‐way ANOVA/MANOVA on wing size (centroid size, CS) and shape (residuals from multivariate regression) variables, respectively, representing variation of wing traits between and within populations of Sphaerophoria scripta

SS df MS F p
Two‐way ANOVA on CS
Population 237,070 4 59,267 5.47 <.0001
Sex 26,778 1 26,778 2.47 .07
Population × sex −299,770 4 −74,941 −6.92 .03
Within‐group 1,560,400 144 10,836
Total 1,524,500
Two‐way PERMANOVA on size‐corrected shape variables (regression residuals)
Population 0.003875 4 0.000969 1.51 <.001
Sex 0.031864 1 0.031864 49.52 <.0001
Population × sex −0.027084 4 −0.006771 −10.52 .77
Residual 0.092662 144 0.000644
Total 0.101322

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Wing size variation within and between populations of Sphaerophoria scripta. The whisker interval represents standard deviation of the mean. NLD—the Netherlands (the Hague), DEU—Germany (Berlin), SVN—Slovenia (Bled), BIH—Bosnia and Herzegovina (Banja Luka), GRC—Greece (Araxos)

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Wing shape differentiation between females (white bars) and males (gray bars) of Sphaerophoria scripta obtained with DA. Wing shape changes (black lines) from consensus configuration of landmarks (gray lines) along the discriminant axis are shown using the wireframe graphs (numbers refer to landmarks shown in Figure 2)

ANOVA performed on centroid size revealed significant interpopulation differences for males (F (4, 102) = 6.11, p < .001) but not for females (F (4, 42) = 2.19, p = .09). Tukey's post hoc test showed that males from GRC were significantly larger than males from NLD (p < .001) and BIH (p < .001; Figure 7).

Permutational MANOVA revealed that in females interpopulation differences in wing shape were not significant (F = 0.78, p = .84) despite populations being separated on CVA scatterplot (Figure 9). Moreover, pairwise Procrustes distances ranged from 0.0068 to 0.0110 and were nonsignificant (p > .05) for all population pairs (Table 3). Percentage of correct classification was 87.2% (10.6% jackknifed). Contrary to females, among males significant differences in wing shape were found (F = 2.11, p < .001). Procrustes distances ranged from 0.0072 to 0.0143 and were significant for five population pairs (Table 3). Furthermore, scatterplot obtained from CVA showed that along the first CV that accounting for 42.9% of total shape variation males from BIH partially separated from males from NLD, DEU, and GRC, while along CV2 (25.5%) males from NLD and GRC clustered with no overlap (Figure 9). Percentage of correct classification was 74.8% (29.0% jackknifed). Deformation grids showed that displacement of all landmarks contributed to shape differences between males of analyzed populations (Figure 10).

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Scatterplot of individual scores from the CVA showing wing shape differentiation between the Sphaerophoria scripta populations: (a) females, (b) males. The percentage of explained variance of each CV is in parentheses. NLD—the Netherlands (the Hague), DEU—Germany (Berlin), SVN—Slovenia (Bled), BIH—Bosnia and Herzegovina (Banja Luka), GRC—Greece (Araxos)

TABLE 3.

Pairwise Procrustes distances between females (below diagonal) and males (above diagonal) of five Sphaerophoria scripta populations

NLD DEU SVN BIH GRC
NLD ‐‐‐‐‐ 0.0143*** 0.0087 0.0110* 0.0083
DEU 0.0076 ‐‐‐‐‐ 0.0122* 0.0112* 0.0079
SVN 0.0110 0.0075 ‐‐‐‐‐ 0.0072 0.0083
BIH 0.0090 0.0068 0.0071 ‐‐‐‐‐ 0.0099**
GRC 0.0094 0.0083 0.0098 0.0094 ‐‐‐‐‐

Shaded boxes indicate significant pairwise comparison (***p < .001; **p < .01; and *p < .05).

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 10

The wireframe graphs represent male wing shape changes (black lines) from consensus configuration of landmarks (gray lines) along the first two CVs. Numbers in the deformation grids refer to landmarks shown in Figure 3

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. The utility of the COI mtDNA in delimiting Sphaerophoria species

In this study, a mitochondrial, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI mtDNA) was used to test its usefulness in determining the species borders within the Sphaerophoria genus of hoverflies. In particular, we utilized a partial, 481 bp‐long fragment of the standard, 658 bp‐long DNA barcoding marker (Folmer et al., 1994). The results of the analysis indicated that eight haplotypes (h1, h8, h16, h17, h18, h20, h27, and h32) were shared between two or more Sphaerophoria species (Table S5), with the consequent lowest interspecies p divergence of 0% rendering this barcode marker inadequate for the separation of different Sphaerophoria congeners. The inclusion of the longer fragments of the standard 5’ COI mtDNA (Table S2) did not improve the diagnostic value of 5’ COI mtDNA as a DNA barcode marker in Sphaerophoria genus. A similar conclusion was reached by Virgilio, Backeljau, Nevado, and De Meyer (2010), studying the barcode utility of different lengths and different regions of this marker across different insect orders, and finding that the applicability of the marker is not significantly affected by using its shorter fragments until the case of using 40 bp‐long mini‐barcodes. Apart from COI mtDNA used in this study, 18S rRNA gene was previously used to decipher the phylogenetic relationships within Syrphidae family (Mengual, Ståhls, & Rojo, 2008). Sphaerophoria scripta and S. philanthus could not be separated apart using this slowly evolving marker, and neither could S. contigua from S. macrogaster as they shared identical haplotypes. These species pairs could however be distinguished from S. rueppelii and S. loewi, albeit by up to two substitutions (Mengual et al., 2008). Therefore, the future delimitation of different species of Sphaerophoria genus should incorporate a multi‐character approach, possibly using faster‐evolving loci than barcodes due to the supposed recent divergence of the studied taxa, as evidenced in the lack of the barcode gap between them.

The lack of the utility of 5’ COI mtDNA to species delimitation in Sphaerophoria genus has important implications for the first goal of this study—recognizing whether there was cryptic diversity within S. scripta. Namely, we retrieved two distinct haplogroups when analyzing the longer, 1,209 bp‐long fragment of this gene. Although no barcode gap separated the members of the major and minor haplogroups (Table S1), the members of the minor haplogroup were distinguished by a specific combination of six substitutions. However, this does not represent a strong evidence of putative cryptic diversity within S. scripta given the disputed resolution of this marker. Furthermore, ITS2 rDNA alleles A and B were present among the members of both the major and minor haplogroups (Table S3). Therefore, rather than representing distinct taxa, the existence of two haplogroups oriented around two central haplotypes (H1 and H27) is indicative of the past population expansion from two previously separated sources (the dumbbell pattern of haplotype network, Avise, 2000). This is also evident in the geographical codistribution of the members of both haplogroups, and also in the fact that the less frequent ITS2 rDNA allele B was retained in the representatives of the central haplotypes. Furthermore, our results are compatible with the conclusion of Morgan‐Richards et al. (2017) that large mitochondrial gene variability can be maintained in large populations due to the mutation‐drift equilibrium: there is an increased potential for new haplotypes to arise, but they are slow to be lost via genetic drift due to the large effective size. This is indeed supported by the conclusion of Raymond et al. (2013), where a large genetic diversity was also observed in S. scripta based on microsatellite loci as nuclear markers. Summarily, we conclude that COI mtDNA is an inadequate barcoding marker for the Sphaerophoria genus.

4.2. Population structure of Sphaerophoria scripta in Europe

The remaining study goals included the inspection of the population's structure of S. scripta based on an integrative approach combining two classes of molecular markers (phenotypic‐allozymes; and sequence‐based COI mtDNA) and morphological phenotypic characters of adult wings. We found that Bayesian clustering methods (BAPS, STRUCTURE, Geneland) indicated high gene flow among the five European geographic samples we analyzed, either by recognizing a single panmictic population within the total sample or by showing a high degree of admixture of several clusters for each of the sampling localities. This scenario illustrates a long‐standing problem in population genetics of highly migratory insects where deciphering the exact population structure is often challenging due to weak genetic differentiation among the analyzed localities and the resolution provided by traditional methods (see Liu, Chen, et al., 2019), however with the advent of next‐generation sequencing, novel approaches such as double digest Restriction‐site Associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) might be robust enough to resolve this issue (Liu, Chen, et al., 2019). This approach to resolving interpopulation relationships on a finer scale should be tested in the future for S. scripta; however, the aforementioned pattern of high genetic admixture, combined with Mantel's test—testing isolation by distance pattern, being nonsignificant, points toward a homogenous genetic structure in S. scripta within the assessed geographic transect. This finding is concordant with the study of Raymond et al. (2013), where a single panmictic unit was recognized across 12 European populations using microsatellite loci. Furthermore, population‐based analyses of genetic structure (AMOVA, pairwise ΦST/F ST) also indicated high genetic connectedness of the assessed S. scripta populations, with ΦST being statistically nonsignificant in the case of COI mtDNA, while F ST amounted only to 0.08 in the case of allozymes. Finally, testing for the significant differences between geographic samples based on variability of wing traits (size and shape) showed opposite results regarding the two sexes. Namely, no statistically significant differences were detected in either trait for females, while significant interpopulation differences were detected both in wing size and shape for males. This could point toward female‐biased dispersal (as no genetic differentiation was registered in COI mtDNA, a marker which is transmitted through the maternal line only), but it could also be indicative of the differences in sample size we analyzed (47 females vs. 107 males). The differences among males originating from different geographic locations in two wing morphometric characters which differ in their heritability (Bitner‐Mathé & Klaczko, 1999) could, apart from differential selective regimes they experience, indeed be indicative of the restricted dispersal of male specimens. However, this factor ultimately does not significantly contribute to the establishment of differentiated genetic clusters, as the homogenizing effect of the total gene flow was evident across the genomic loci which we analyzed.

4.3. Implications for conservation biological control

In the light of the current global climate changes, as well as human‐mediated habitat fragmentation, hoverflies represent a particularly noteworthy group of pest management interest as they possess a favorable configuration of biological traits which enables them rapid responses to changes in resource availability (Rader et al., 2020). Given that conserving enemy biodiversity has a strong impact on pest abundance in agricultural ecosystems (Jonsson et al., 2017), a precise identification of natural predators was integrated in pest management programs (Gomez‐Polo et al., 2014; Happe et al., 2019). We observed a lack of diagnostic value of COI mtDNA as a barcoding fragment in delimitation of closely related species of the genus Sphaerophoria, which implies the need for an integrated approach in assessing the biocontrol communities. Given that the use of a single mitochondrial gene failed to successfully delimit different Sphaerophoria species, the future attempts at their molecular identification should incorporate information from several genomic regions. Since sustainable land use and ecosystem services depend on diversity, identification, and conservation of key predators (Happe et al., 2019), assessing species borders of beneficial insects such as aphidophagous hoverflies would provide a solid base for sustainable biological control and pest management in agroecosystems (Happe et al., 2019; Le Hesran et al., 2019; Weintraub et al., 2017).

Finally, by using a combination of several molecular and phenotypic markers we showed the absence of population structuring of the long hoverfly S. scripta across the five European localities. Our integrative study confirms a great dispersal capacity of this migratory species, which is compatible with the results from previous study (Raymond et al., 2013), where a different marker class was used (microsatellite loci). Hence, population connectivity observed for one of the main aphid biocontrol agents on cereal crops and orchards (e.g., Chabert & Sarthou, 2017) would significantly contribute to the pest management programs. In addition, by combining genetic‐morphological approach we assessed a great evolutionary potential of this natural enemy species, which is crucial for maintaining sustainable ecosystem services under environmental changes (Le Hesran et al., 2019; Rader et al., 2020). Finally, connectivity among conspecific populations of the aphidophagous hoverflies across Europe enhances biological control of herbivorous pest insects which further provides sustainable ecosystem services. Unlike many beneficial species which are negatively affected by environmental fluctuations caused by intense agricultural practices, S. scripta showcases low genetic structuring on the one hand and high genetic diversity on the other hand. These traits are associated with higher probability for survival by providing high levels of standing genetic variability, by indicating a high tolerance to environmental variability, and by increasing colonization ability of species, which are highly favorable traits in the current context of global climate change and habitat fragmentation in agroecosystems (Liu, Xiaoqiang, et al., 2019; Raymond et al., 2013). Therefore, due to the specific traits of S. scripta (worldwide distribution, great genetic diversity, high phenotypic plasticity, intense gene flow, and population connectivity), this taxon represents a powerful agent of biological control. In the light of conservation biological control, it would therefore be of essential importance to protect its microhabitats within agroecosystems and local habitats that provide natural nurseries for natural enemy biodiversity (Gontijo, 2019; Snyder, 2019). For instance, it has been suggested that ungrazed patches in grazed grassland are valuable shelters for aphidophagous hoverflies (Speight, Good, & Sarthou, 2000). Likewise, cattle grazing and overall nitrogen enrichment of the soil represent effective strategies which could enhance the predator potential of S. scripta as plants which benefit from nitrogen‐rich soil are particularly beneficial to aphids, therefore providing prey to the long hoverfly and bolstering its population connectivity by providing suitable patches between agroecosystems (Chabert & Sarthou, 2017; Happe et al., 2019).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Nemanja Gojković: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (lead); Software (lead); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Ljubinka Francuski: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Jasmina Ludoški: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Software (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Vesna Milankov: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (lead); Resources (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

Supporting information

Supplementary Material

Tables S1 and S2

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which improved the manuscript quality. The authors would like to thank Dr Marko Đurakić (University of Novi Sad, Serbia) and Milica Lukač (University of Banja Luka, Bosnia, and Herzegovina) for their great help in specimen sampling in Bosnia and Hercegovina and Greece. This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia (Grant No. 451‐03‐68‬/2020‐14‬/ 200125). This work is a part of doctoral thesis of Nemanja Gojković entitled “Molecular taxonomy and population structure of epidemiologically, ecosystematically, and conservationally relevant species of the families Culicidae, Syrphidae, Cerambycidae, and Lucanidae (Insecta).”‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Gojković N, Francuski L, Ludoški J, Milankov V. DNA barcode assessment and population structure of aphidophagous hoverfly Sphaerophoria scripta: Implications for conservation biological control. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:9428–9443. 10.1002/ece3.6631

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The DNA sequences analyzed in the manuscript have been archived in GenBank, while the other data supporting the results and conclusions were included in the additional files of the article.

REFERENCES

  1. Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography: The history and formation of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Awadallah, K. T. , Mahmoud, T. T. , & Khalil, F. M. (1980). Egg‐laying activities of the syrphid females, Metasyrphus corollae Fabr. and Sphaerophoria scripta L. (Syrphidae ‐ Diptera). Mesopotamia . Journal of Agriculture, 15(1), 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barkalov, A. V. (2011). New data on the nomenclature and fauna of the genus Sphaerophoria Le Peletier et Serville, 1828 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Siberia and adjacent territories. Entomological Review, 91(7), 898–907. 10.1134/S0013873811070104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beebe, N. W. , & Saul, A. (1995). Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 53, 478–481. 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernardo, P. H. , Sanchez‐Ramirez, S. , Álvarez‐Castañeda, S. J. , Aguilera‐Miller, E. F. , Melendez De La Cruz, F. R. , Sanchez‐Pacheco, S. J. , & Murphy, R. W. (2019). Extreme mito‐nuclear discordance in a peninsular lizard: The role of drift, selection, and climate. Heredity, 123, 359–370. 10.1038/s41437-019-0204-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bitner‐Mathé, B. C. , & Klaczko, L. B. (1999). Heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations of size and shape of Drosophila mediopunctata wings. Heredity, 83, 688–696. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00606.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bokina, I. G. (2012). Hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) in agrocenoses of the forest‐steppe of Western Siberia and the influence of agrotechnological practice on their abundance. Entomological Review, 92(9), 1068–1075. 10.1134/S001387381209014X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chabert, A. , & Sarthou, J.‐P. (2017). Practices of conservation agriculture prevail over cropping systems and landscape heterogeneity in understanding the ecosystem service of aphid biocontrol. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 249, 70–79. 10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corander, J. , & Tang, J. (2007). Bayesian analysis of population structure based on linked molecular information. Mathematical Biosciences, 205, 19–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Díaz, B. M. , Legarrea, S. , Marcos‐García, M. A. , & Fereresa, A. (2009). The spatio‐temporal relationships among aphids, the entomophthoran fungus, Pandora neoaphidis, and aphidophagous hoverflies in outdoor lettuce. BioControl, 53(3), 304–311. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dryden, I. L. , & Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  13. Earl, D. A. , & vonHoldt, B. M. (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4, 359–361. 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eilenberg, J. , Hajek, A. , & Lomer, C. (2001). Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. BioControl, 46, 387–400. [Google Scholar]
  15. Evano, G. , Regnaut, S. , & Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure : A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14(8), 2611–2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Excoffier, L. , & Lischer, H. E. L. (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10(3), 564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Excoffier, L. , Smouse, P. E. , & Quattro, J. M. (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131(2), 479–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Folmer, O. , Black, M. , Hoeh, W. , Lutz, R. , & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Francuski, L. J. , Djurakic, M. , Ludoški, J. , Hurtado, P. , Pérez‐Bañón, C. , Ståhls, G. , … Milankov, V. (2014). Shift in phenotypic variation coupled with rapid loss of genetic diversity in captive populations of the Drone fly Eristalis tenax: Consequences for rearing and potential commercial use. Journal of Economic Entomology, 12, 821–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Francuski, L. J. , Ludoski, J. , Lukac, M. , & Milankov, V. (2020). Fine scale population structure of of hoverfly pollinator, Eristalis arbustorum: Integrative study. Journal of Insect Conservation, 24, 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  21. Francuski, L. J. , & Milankov, V. (2015). Assessing the spatial population structure and heterogeneity in the dronefly. Journal of Zoology, 297, 286–300. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gomez‐Polo, P. , Traugott, M. , Alomar, O. , Castañé, C. , Rojo, S. , & Agustí, N. (2014). Identification of the most common predatory hoverflies of Mediterranean vegetable crops and their parasitism using multiplex PCR. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 371–378. 10.1007/s10340-013-0550-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gontijo, L. M. (2019). Engineering natural enemy shelters to enhance conservation biological control in field crops. Biolcontrol, 130, 155–163. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Guillot, G. , Mortier, F. , & Estoup, A. (2005). geneland: A computer package for landscape genetics. Molecular Ecological Notes, 5, 712–715. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01031.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guillot, G. , Santos, F. , & Estoup, A. (2008). Analysing georeferenced population genetics data with Geneland: A new algorithm to deal with null alleles and a friendly graphical user interface. Bioinformatics, 24, 1406–1407. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: A user‐friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hammer, Ø. , Harper, D. A. T. , & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Happe, A.‐K. , Alins, G. , Blüthgen, N. , Boreux, V. , Bosch, J. , García, D. , … Modya, K. (2019). Predatory arthropods in apple orchards across Europe: Responses to agricultural management, adjacent habitat, landscape composition and country. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 273, 141–150. 10.1016/j.agee.2018.12.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hebert, P. D. N. , Cywinska, A. , Ball, S. L. , & deWaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 270(1512), 313–321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hebert, P. D. N. , Ratnasingham, S. , & deWaard, J. R. (2003). Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 270(Suppl 1), S96–S99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hippa, H. , Nielsen, T. R. , & van Steenis, J. (2001). The West Palearctic species of the genus Eristalis Latreille (Diptera, Syrphidae). Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 48, 289–327. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jauker, F. , & Wolters, V. (2008). Hover flies are efficient pollinators of oilseed rape. Oecologia, 156, 819–823. 10.1007/s00442-008-1034-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jonsson, M. , Kaartinen, R. , & Straub, C. S. (2017). Relationships between natural enemy diversity and biological control. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 20, 1–6. 10.1016/j.cois.2017.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jonsson, M. , Wratten, S. D. , Landis, D. A. , & Gurr, G. M. (2008). Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropods. BioControl, 45(2), 172–175. [Google Scholar]
  35. Keeney, D. B. , Heupel, M. R. , Hueter, R. E. , & Heist, E. J. (2005). Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses of the genetic structure of blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) nurseries in the northwestern Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea. Molecular Ecology, 14(7), 1911–1923. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02549.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khalil, F. M. , Awadallah, K. T. , & Mahmoud, T. T. (1979). Seasonal abundance of natural enemies associated with alfalfa plants in Hammam Al‐Alil. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 26(4–5), 181–186. [Google Scholar]
  37. Klecka, J. , Hadrava, J. , Biella, P. , & Akter, A. (2018). Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant‐pollinator network. PeerJ, 6, e6025 10.7717/peerj.6025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Klingenberg, C. P. (2011). MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 353–357. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kopelman, N. M. , Mayzel, J. , Jakobsson, M. , Rosenberg, N. A. , & Mayrose, I. (2015). clumpak : A program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K . Molecular Ecology Resources, 15(5), 1179–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Krawczyk, A. , Hurej, M. , & Jackowski, J. (2011). Syrphids and their parasitoids from maize crop. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 51(1), 93–97. 10.2478/v10045-011-0017-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kumar, S. , Stecher, G. , Li, M. , Knyaz, C. , & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1547–1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lal Bhatia, M. (1939). Biology, morphology and anatomy of aphidophagous syrphid larvae. Parasitology, 31(1), 78–120. 10.1017/S0031182000012646 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Le Hesran, S. , Ras, E. , Wajnberg, E. , & Beukeboom, L. (2019). Next generation biological control – An introduction. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 167(7), 579–583. 10.1111/eea.12805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, M. , Xiaoqiang, W. , Ling, M. , Lijun, C. , Hongling, L. , Deqiang, P. , & Shujun, W. (2019). Genome‐wide developed microsatellites reveal a weak population differentiation in the hoverfly Eupeodes corollae (Diptera: Syrphidae) across China. PLoS One, 14(9), e0215888 10.1371/journal.pone.0215888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, Y. , Chen, L. , Duan, X.‐Z. , Zhao, D.‐S. , Sun, J.‐T. , & Hong, X.‐Y. (2019). Genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphisms are roubst in resolving fine‐scale population genetic structure of the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 112(5), 2362–2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lunt, D. H. , Zhang, D. X. , Szymura, J. M. , & Hewitt, G. M. (1996). The insect cytochrome oxidase I gene: Evolutionary patterns and conserved primers for phylogenetic studies. Insect Molecular Biology, 5(3), 153–165. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00049.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. MacDonald, C. , & Loxdale, H. (2004). Molecular markers to study population structure and dynamics in beneficial insects (predators and parasitoids). International Journal of Pest Management, 50(3), 215–224. 10.1080/09670870410001731952 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mengual, X. , Ståhls, G. , & Rojo, S. (2008). Molecular phylogeny of Allograpta (Diptera, Syrphidae) reveals diversity of lineages and non‐monophyly of phytophagous taxa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49, 715–727. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Milankov, V. , Ludoški, J. , Francuski, L. J. , Ståhls, G. , & Vujić, A. (2013). Genetic and phenotypic diversity patterns in Merodon albifrons (Diptera, Syrphidae): Evidence of intraspecific spatial and temporal structuring. Biological Journal of Linnean Society, 110, 257–280. [Google Scholar]
  50. Milankov, V. , Ståhls, G. , Stamenković, J. , & Vujić, A. (2008). Genetic diversity of populations of Merodon aureus and M. cinereus species complexes (Diptera, Syrphidae): Integrative taxonomy and implications for conservation priorities on the Balkan Peninsula. Conservation Genetics, 9, 1125–1137. 10.1007/s10592-007-9426-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Miller, M. P. (2005). Alleles in space (AIS): Computer software for the joint analysis of interindividual spatial and genetic information. Journal of Heredity, 96(6), 722–724. 10.1093/jhered/esi119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Morgan‐Richards, M. , Bulgarella, M. , Sivyer, L. , Dowle, E. J. , Hale, M. , McKean, N. E. , & Trewick, S. A. (2017). Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample. Royal Society Open Science, 4(11), 170730 10.1098/rsos.170730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Moreno, C. R. , Lewins, S. A. , & Barbosa, P. (2010). Influence of relative abundance andtaxonomic identity on the effectiveness of generalist predators as biologicalcontrol agents. Biological Control, 52, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  54. Munstermann, L. E. (1979). Isozymes of Aedes aegypti. Phenotypes, linkage, and use of genetic analysis of sympatric subspecies populations in East Africa. PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pasteur, N. , Pasteur, G. , Bonhomme, F. , Catalan, J. , & Britton‐Davidian, J. (1988). Practical isozyme genetics. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood Limited. [Google Scholar]
  56. Pineda, A. , & Marcos‐García, M. A. (2008). Use of selected flowering plants in greenhouses to enhance aphidophagous hoverfly populations (Diptera: Syrphidae). Annales de La Societe Entomologique de France, 44(4), 487–492. 10.1080/00379271.2008.10697584 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pritchard, J. K. , Stephens, M. , & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), 945–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Puillandre, N. , Lambert, A. , Brouillet, S. , & Achaz, G. (2011). ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1864–1877. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. R Development Core Team . (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rader, R. , Cuningham, S. A. , Howlett, B. G. , & Inouye, D. W. (2020). Non‐bee insects as visitors and pollinators of crops: Biology, ecology and management. Annual Review of Entomology, 65, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Raymond, L. , Plantegenest, M. , & Vialatte, A. (2013). Migration and dispersal may drive to high genetic variation and significant genetic mixing: The case of two agriculturally important, continental hoverflies (Episyrphus balteatus and Sphaerophoria scripta). Molecular Ecology, 22(21), 5329–5339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rohlf, F. J. (2017). TpsDig2, version 2.31. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. [Google Scholar]
  63. Rotheray, G. , & Gilbert, F. (1999). Phylogeny of Palaearctic Syrphidae (Diptera): Evidence from larval stages. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 127(1), 1–112. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1999.tb01305.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rousset, F. (2008). genepop’007: A complete re‐implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8(1), 103–106. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Šašić, L. J. , Ačanski, J. , Vujić, A. , Ståhls, G. , Radenković, S. , Milić, D. , … Đan, M. (2016). Molecular and morphological inference of three cryptic species within the Merodon aureus species group (Diptera: Syrphidae). PLoS One, 11(8), e0160001 10.1371/journal.pone.0160001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Simon, C. , Frati, F. , Beckenbach, A. , Crespi, B. , Liu, H. , & Flook, P. (1994). Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87(6), 651–701. 10.1093/aesa/87.6.651 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Snyder, W. E. (2019). Give predators a complement: Conserving natural enemy biodiversity to improve biocontrol. Biolcontrol, 135, 73–82. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.04.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Speight, M. C. D. (2017). Species accounts of European Syrphidae, 2017. Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae (Diptera). Dublin: Syrph the Net publications. [Google Scholar]
  69. Speight, M. C. D. , Good, J. A. , & Sarthou, J.‐P. (2000). Impact of farm management operations on European Syrphidae (Diptera): Species of the Atlantic, Continental & Northern Regions In Speight M. C. D., Castella E., Obrdlik P., & Ball S. (Eds.), Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae. Dublin, Ireland: Syrph the Net Publications. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ståhls, G. , Vujic, A. , Pérez‐Bañon, C. , Radenković, S. , Rojo, S. , & Petanidou, T. (2009). COI barcodes for identification of Merodon hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of Lesvos Island. Greece. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9(6), 1431–1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Straub, C. S. , Finke, D. L. , & Snyder, W. E. (2008). Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals?. Biological Control, 45(2) 225–237. [Google Scholar]
  72. Virgilio, M. , Backeljau, T. , Nevado, B. , & De Meyer, M. (2010). Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 206 10.1186/1471-2105-11-206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Weintraub, P. G. , Recht, E. , Mondaca, L. L. , Harari, A. R. , Diaz, B. M. , & Bennison, J. (2017). Arthropod pest management in organic vegetable greenhouses. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 8(1), 1–14. 10.1093/jipm/pmx021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Xia, X. (2017). DAMBE6: New tools for microbial genomics, phylogenetics, and molecular evolution. Journal of Heredity, 108, 431–437. 10.1093/jhered/esx033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Tables S1 and S2

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences analyzed in the manuscript have been archived in GenBank, while the other data supporting the results and conclusions were included in the additional files of the article.


Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES