Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2019 Oct 29;1(10):e000067. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000067

High-quality draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas monteilii DSM 14164T, Pseudomonas mosselii DSM 17497T, Pseudomonas plecoglossicida DSM 15088T, Pseudomonas taiwanensis DSM 21245T and Pseudomonas vranovensis DSM 16006T: taxonomic considerations

Arantxa Peña 1, Antonio Busquets 1, Margarita Gomila 1, Magdalena Mulet 1, Rosa M Gomila 2, Elena Garcia-Valdes 1,3, T B K Reddy 4, Marcel Huntemann 4, Neha Varghese 4, Natalia Ivanova 4, I-Min Chen 4, Markus Göker 5, Tanja Woyke 4, Hans-Peter Klenk 6, Nikos Kyrpides 4, Jorge Lalucat 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC7491935  PMID: 32974501

Abstract

Pseudomonas is the bacterial genus of Gram-negative bacteria with the highest number of recognized species. It is divided phylogenetically into three lineages and at least 11 groups of species. The Pseudomonas putida group of species is one of the most versatile and best studied. It comprises 15 species with validly published names. As a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea (GEBA) project, we present the genome sequences of the type strains of five species included in this group: Pseudomonas monteilii (DSM 14164T), Pseudomonas mosselii (DSM 17497T), Pseudomonas plecoglossicida (DSM 15088T), Pseudomonas taiwanensis (DSM 21245T) and Pseudomonas vranovensis (DSM 16006T). These strains represent species of environmental and also of clinical interest due to their pathogenic properties against humans and animals. Some strains of these species promote plant growth or act as plant pathogens. Their genome sizes are among the largest in the group, ranging from 5.3 to 6.3 Mbp. In addition, the genome sequences of the type strains in the Pseudomonas taxonomy were analysed via genome-wide taxonomic comparisons of ANIb, gANI and GGDC values among 130 Pseudomonas strains classified within the group. The results demonstrate that at least 36 genomic species can be delineated within the P. putida phylogenetic group of species.

Keywords: Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea (GEBA), Thousand Microbial Genomes Project (KMG I), P. monteilii, P. mosselii, P. plecoglossicida, P. taiwanensis, P. vranovensis, type strains, taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Pseudomonas is phylogenetically divided into three lineages and at least 19 groups and subgroups of species [1]. One of the most relevant is the Pseudomonas putida phylogenetic group of species, frequently called the P. putida species complex, because it is monophyletic and comprises 15 phenotypically closely related species [1–3]. Strains of species in this group are metabolically versatile and have attracted attention for their capability to use many different organic compounds, more recently for the presence of some species in clinical specimens [4, 5] and for their pathogenicity against animals (humans, fishes, insects) or plants. This group of species occupies many different ecological niches, such as soil, rhizosphere and water, as well as colonizing plants and animals [6]. The role of clinical and environmental strains of the P. putida phylogenetic group of species in the transfer of antimicrobial resistances has been recently studied by Peter et al. [7]. The difficulty in phenotypically identifying Pseudomonas species in clinical laboratories has been highlighted by Rebolledo and collaborators [8] and recently by Mulet and collaborators [9] for P. putida strains.

Previous publications based on three- or four-gene multilocus sequence analyses (MLSA) and phylogenomic analyses have demonstrated that the 15 recognized species within the P. putida phylogenetic group are monophyletic with high bootstrap support values at the branching nodes [2, 3, 10]. A phylogenetic tree based on the almost complete sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of the 15 type strains in the P. putida phylogenetic group, as well as a tree based on the concatenated sequences of the 16S rRNA, gyrB and rpoD partial gene sequences, has been published by Peña et al. [10]. ‘ Pseudomonas hunanensis ’ NCCB 100446 was also added to the present analysis because it was proposed as the type strain of a novel species [11], although its name has not yet been validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (Bacteriological Code).

Comparative genomics is a very precise tool for species differentiation that can help in elucidating the taxonomy within the P. putida group of species; therefore, the whole-genome sequences of all the type strains in the group are needed. With this aim and in the frame of the GEBA project (Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea, One Thousand Microbial Genomes Project=KMG I) [12, 13], we recently published the genome sequences of the Pseudomonas fulva , Pseudomonas parafulva and Pseudomonas cremoricolorata type strains [10]. In the present publication, we report the genome sequences of five additional type strains of species within the group: Pseudomonas monteilii , Pseudomonas mosselii , Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, Pseudomonas taiwanensis and Pseudomonas vranovensis . The first two strains have been isolated from clinical specimens, the third is a fish pathogen, and the last two are soil inhabitants [4, 5, 14–16]. We also discuss the affiliations of 130 strains that have been assigned taxonomically to P. putida or to other species within the group and whose complete genomes are publicly available. The type strains of the 15 recognized species within this group of species have been included in the analyses.

Methods

Organisms

The type strains of P. monteilii (DSM 14164T), P. mosselii (DSM 17497T), P. plecoglossicida (DSM 15088T), P. taiwanensis (DSM 21245T) and P. vranovensis (DSM 16006T) have been provided by DSMZ. P. monteilii DSM 14164T was isolated by Elomari et al. [5] from a human bronchial aspirate and was proposed as a representative type strain of a set of ten strains of the same species isolated from clinical specimens. Daboussi and collaborators studied 12 clinical strains received as Pseudomonas fluorescens , P. putida or Pseudomonas sp. that clustered together in a phenotypic numerical taxonomy study. The authors concluded in a polyphasic study that they represented a new species and proposed strain DSM 17497T as the type strain of P. mosselii [4]. In a taxonomic study of four fish-pathogenic bacteria associated with haemorrhagic ascites of ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis), Nishimori et al. [14] proposed the new species P. plecoglossicida with strain DSM 15088T as the type. P. taiwanensis DSM 21245T [15] was isolated in a screening for chitin-degrading bacteria in soil samples, and P. vranovensis DSM 16006T [16] was also isolated as a nitroaromatic compound degrader from a soil sample.

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Strains were cultured aerobically in Luria–Bertani broth, with shaking at 30 °C, to the early stationary phase. Genomic DNA was extracted and purified with a Promega Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and quantity were determined with a Nanodrop spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA).

Genome sequencing and assembly

Methods have been previously published [10] and are summarized below. Draft sequencing, initial gap closure and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state-of-the-art sequencing technology [17]. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Illumina sequencing and library artifacts were removed using Duk filtering (L. Mingkun, A. Copeland and H. J. Duk, unpublished data). Filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet (version 1.1.04) [18], simulated paired-end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim and simulated read pairs were reassembled using Allpaths-LG (version r42328) [19].

Genome annotation

Protein-coding genes were identified using Prodigal [20] as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [21]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation were performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform, which provides tools for analysing and reviewing the structural and functional annotations of genomes in a comparative context [22]. Genome annotation procedures are detailed in Chen et al. [23] and references therein. Briefly, the predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the NCBI nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFAMs, Pfam, KEGG, COG and InterPro databases. Transfer RNA genes were identified using the tRNAscan-SE tool, and other noncoding RNAs were found using INFERNAL. Ribosomal RNA genes were predicted using hmmsearch against the custom models generated for each type of rRNA.

Genome-wide comparative analysis

Whole-genome comparisons between pairs of genomes were calculated with three algorithms. Average nucleotide identity based on blast (ANIb) was calculated using the JSpecies software tool available at the webpage http://www.imedea.uib.es/jspecies [24, 25]. Genome-to-genome distance calculation (GGDC) was performed between genome pairs using the GGDC 2.0 update available via the web server http://ggdc.dsmz.de [26]. gANI was computed as pairwise bidirectional best nSimScan hits of genes having 70 % or more identity in at least 70 % coverage of the shorter gene [27]. The similarity matrix obtained with all pairwise genomic comparisons was used to generate a UPGMA dendrogram using the past software package version 3.20 [28].

Chemotaxonomy: main protein profiles (MALDI-TOF MS)

Mass spectrometry analysis of whole cells was performed as previously described with a Bruker Autoflex mass spectrometer [10].

Results and discussion

Genome sequences

The genome project information is depicted in Table 1, and the data have also been deposited in the Genomes on Line Database (GOLD) [29]. High-quality draft genome sequences were obtained at the DOE-JGI and are deposited in GenBank and in the Integrated Microbial Genomes database (IMG) [30]. The GenBank IDs are JHYV01000000 for P. monteilii DSM 14164T, JHYW01000000 for P. mosselii DSM 17497 T, JHYX01000000 for P. plecoglossicida DSM 15088T , AUEC01000000 for P. taiwanensis DSM 21245T and AUED01000000 for P. vranovensis DSM 16006T.

Table 1.

Project information and genome statistics for P. monteilii DSM 14164T, P. mosselii DSM 17497T, P. plecoglossicida DSM 15088T, P. taiwanensis DSM 21245T and P. vranovensis DSM 16006T. Data obtained from the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system [23]

P. monteilii

DSM 14164T

P. mosselii

DSM 17497T

P. plecoglossicida

DSM 15088T

P. taiwanensis

DSM 21245T

P. vranovensis

DSM 16006T

Property

Term

Term

Term

Term

Term

 Finishing quality

Permanent draft,

High-quality draft

Draft,

High-quality draft

Permanent draft,

High-quality draft

Permanent draft,

High-quality draft

Permanent draft,

High-quality draft

 Libraries used

Illumina Regular Fragment, 270 bp

Illumina Regular Fragment, 270 bp

Illumina Regular Fragment, 270 bp

Illumina Regular Fragment, 270 bp

Illumina Regular Fragment, 270 bp

 Sequencing platforms

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Illumina HiSeq 2000

lumina HiSeq 2000

lumina HiSeq 2000

 Average input read coverage used for the assembly

300X

300X

300X

122.2X

122.2X

 Sequencing depth coverage

353X

390X

433X

348X

489X

Genome size (bp)

6 310 792

6 262 860

5 349 493

5 416 882

5 703 346

G+C content (%)

61.50

64.00

63.00

61.90

61.50

DNA coding (bp)

5 646 648

5 610 495

4 791 738

4 843 312

5 162,587

DNA G+C (bp)

3 880 258

4 004 956

3 368 736

3 349 604

3,507,852

DNA scaffolds

86

56

59

68

37

Total genes

6107

5916

4976

5092

5366

Protein-coding genes

5953

5763

4847

4974

5242

RNA genes

154

153

129

118

124

Pseudo genes

0

0

0

0

0

Protein-coding genes with function prediction

4662

4511

3972

4053

4290

Protein-coding genes with COGs

4007

3960

3529

3670

3961

 in internal clusters

1004

939

586

607

803

 with Pfam domains

4918

4803

4225

4292

4619

 with signal peptides

657

634

511

532

626

 with transmembrane helices

1365

1311

1108

1126

1195

CRISPR repeats

1

1

0

1

0

 Assemblers

vpAllpaths v. r46652

vpAllpaths v. r46652

vpAllpaths v. r46652

Unknown program v. before 2013-03-26

Unknown program v. before 2013-03-26

 Gene-calling method

Prodigal 2.5

Prodigal 2.5

Prodigal 2.5

Prodigal 2.5

Prodigal 2.5

 Locus tag

Q381

Q380

Q378

H620

H621

 GenBank ID

JHYV01000000

JHYW01000000

JHYX01000000

AUEC01000000

AUED01000000

 GenBank date of release

16 August 2015

05 May 2014

05 May 2014

12 December 2013

12 December 2013

 GOLD ID

Gp0021953

Gp0039999

Gp0040000

Gp0021955

Gp0021956

 BIOPROJECT

PRJNA221052

PRJNA221051

PRJNA221049

PRJNA188913

PRJNA188914

Genome properties

The assemblies of the five genomes, their properties and statistics are summarized in Table 1, and the numbers of genes associated with general COG functional categories are shown in Table 2. The G+C percentages for each strain were 61.49, 63.95, 62.97, 61.84 and 61.51, respectively. The majority of protein-coding genes (76.58, 76.61, 80.04, 79.73 and 80.06 %) were assigned a putative function.

Table 2.

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Code

P. monteilii DSM 14164T

P. mosselii DSM 17497T

P. plecoglossicida DSM 14164T

P. taiwanensis DSM 21245T

P. vranovensis DSM 16006T

Description

Value

%

Value

%

Value

%

Value

%

Value

%

J

237

5.18

246

5.45

234

5.87

243

5.82

238

5.25

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

1

0.02

1

0.02

1

0.03

1

0.02

1

0.02

RNA processing and modification

K

420

9.18

398

8.82

336

8.43

365

8.74

415

9.15

Transcription

L

163

3.56

153

3.39

124

3.11

121

2.90

124

2.73

Replication, recombination and repair

B

2

0.04

3

0.07

3

0.08

4

0.10

3

0.07

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

43

0.94

45

1.00

39

0.98

40

0.96

38

0.84

Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

V

99

2.16

112

2.48

79

1.98

84

2.01

103

2.27

Defense mechanisms

X

73

1.60

73

1.62

44

1.10

16

0.38

48

1.06

Mobilome: prophages, transposons

w

32

0.70

39

0.86

23

0.58

28

0.67

34

0.75

Extracellular structures

T

289

6.32

301

6.67

248

6.22

282

6.75

286

6.31

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

247

5.40

255

5.65

230

5.77

241

5.77

244

5.38

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

130

2.84

137

3.04

139

3.49

134

3.21

119

2.62

Cell motility

U

114

2.49

139

3.08

101

2.53

73

1.75

86

1.90

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

165

3.61

179

3.97

155

3.89

160

3.83

157

3.46

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

298

6.51

283

6.27

263

6.60

273

6.53

298

6.57

Energy production and conversion

G

211

4.61

184

4.08

174

4.37

187

4.48

202

4.45

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

497

10.86

455

10.08

427

10.72

486

11.63

475

10.47

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

96

2.10

93

2.06

92

2.31

97

2.32

96

2.12

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

231

5.05

211

4.67

209

5.24

213

5.10

218

4.81

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

188

4.11

193

4.28

187

4.69

196

4.69

275

6.06

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

293

6.40

273

6.05

218

5.47

236

5.65

289

6.37

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

115

2.51

124

2.75

96

2.41

113

2.70

123

2.71

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

391

8.54

366

8.11

328

8.23

362

8.66

398

8.77

General function prediction only

S

241

5.27

251

5.56

235

5.90

223

5.34

266

5.86

Function unknown

2100

34.39

1956

33.06

1447

29.08

1422

27.93

1405

26.18

Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein-coding genes in the genome.

Genome-wide comparative analysis by ANI and GGDC

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) is a very useful approach to calculate the similarities among bacterial strains and to cluster them in groups with ANI values higher than 95 % similarity, which correspond to genomic species. In the IMG website (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/mer/main.cgi?section=ANI), the genome similarities among strains is computed by gANI, and clusters of strains with a similarity higher or equal to 95 % are considered a clique. In analysing the ANI values of these five type strains, we detected several discrepancies. For instance, the genomes of nine strains deposited as P. monteilii are distributed into five cliques; two genomes deposited for P. mosselii strains were allocated to clique 740 (together with P. putida 1A00316) and clique 7872 ( P. mosselii strain SJ10, a singleton); five genomes of P. plecoglossicida strains were distributed in two cliques; two genomes of P. taiwanensis were distributed in two cliques; P. vranovensis was a singleton. Clique 2323 contains 13 strains: three assigned to P. monteilii , two to P. plecoglossicida , five to P. putida , one to P. taiwanensis and two were assigned to Pseudomonas spp. These observations prompted us to calculate the ANI values of 130 genomes deposited in public databases and assigned to species in the P. putida phylogenetic group. The strains analysed and accession numbers of their genomes are given in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article). The genomes of the 15 recognized species in the group were included. To ensure the taxonomic value of the ANI groupings, we also calculated two other indices: the GGDC values, an algorithm very useful for detecting clusters of strains that correspond to genomic species [26, 31] and a three-gene MLSA as previously described [32]. Figs 1 and 2 show the dendrograms for the ANIb and GGDC values. Both methods tested gave the same groupings of strains using species cut-offs of 70 % (GGDC), 95 % (ANIb and gANI) and 97 % (MLSA). Clear gaps were detected between the groupings. Good concordance was observed between the ANIb and GGDC groupings, as shown in Table S1, with a few exceptions: ANIb grouping 6 was split into two GGDC groupings (27, 28); ANIb grouping 8 into GGDC groupings 22 and 23; ANIb grouping 10 into GGDC groupings 16, 17 and 18; and ANIb grouping 12 into GGDC groupings 19 and 20. The mentioned GGDC groupings were on the threshold species delineation. Sixty strains whose genomes have been deposited did not cluster with the genome of the corresponding species type strain at the aforementioned species threshold levels. It is also surprising that 36 genomic species can be differentiated in the P. putida phylogenetic group, while only 15 are currently accepted with species status. For example, the 13 strains in the aforementioned clique 2323 clustered as a unique genomospecies 20 in the dendrogram, and no species type strain was in that cluster.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

UPGMA dendrogram of the ANIb similarities of the genomes studied. The dotted line represents the recommended 95 % species threshold. Species type strains are labelled in bold. Groupings of strains using species cut-offs of 95 % are coloured and numbered.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

UPGMA dendrogram of the genome-to-genome distances of the genomes studied. The dotted line represents the recommended 70 % species threshold. Species type strains are labelled in bold. Groupings of strains using species cut-offs of 70 % are coloured and numbered.

Chemotaxonomy

Whole-cell protein profiles are very useful for the rapid identification of bacteria and are frequently used in clinical laboratories. Therefore, the major proteins were determined for the five type strains, and the mass to charge ratios of the proteins are given in Table S2. Protein profiles were compared with the other species type strains in the group [10], indicating that they can be used for identification and chemotaxonomic purposes as previously reported [2]. As shown in Fig. S1 the five type strains can be clearly differentiated in their protein profiles and were concordant with the corresponding profiles of the three type strains available in the Biotyper database.

Comparative analysis of genes relevant for taxonomic characteristics and for species differentiation

Genes coding for general phenotypic properties of species in the genus Pseudomonas were detected in the five type strains: cell motility, chemotaxis and flagellar assembly. Related to the oxidative metabolism of Pseudomonas , the following genes encoding enzymes characteristic of aerobic microorganisms were detected: cytochrome coxidase, catalase and superoxide dismutase. All the strains have genes coding for catecholate siderophore receptors, which are considered phenotypic characteristics of the iron-chelating systems used for species differentiation in the genus Pseudomonas [33, 34]. The five species studied are considered strictly aerobic, and no denitrification genes have been found in their genomes. Only P. plecoglossicida- and P. vranovensis -type strains have been described as able to reduce nitrate. Both these strains have a gene coding for an assimilatory nitrate/nitrite reductase.

The utilization of arginine by Proteobacteria has attracted attention for many years and is a biochemical property routinely tested by taxonomists. The arginine deiminase (‘dihydrolase’) test is included in commercial kit systems. The arginine deiminase reactions consist of the conversion of arginine to citrulline and of citrulline to ornithine with liberation of ammonia. This system provides a limited energy gain under anaerobic conditions; it is inhibited under aerobic conditions and is encoded by arcD (arginine/ornithine antiporter), arcA (arginine deiminase), arcB (ornithine carbamoyltransferase) and arcC (carbamate kinase). In accordance with the species descriptions, all four genes are present in the five type strains studied and are organized in the same order.

Structural genes for type IV pilus synthesis, associated with twitching motility, were found in four of the type strains, but not in P. taiwanensis . The P. monteilii and P. vranovensis genomes code for additional conjugal transfer pilus proteins.

A high percentage of genes coding for proteins connected to KEGG pathways (27 to 31 %) allow us to infer other biochemical properties. Genes for key enzymes in the catabolism of carbohydrates demonstrate that hexoses are channelled to the glycolysis (phosphofructokinase), pentose phosphate and Entner–Doudoroff (2-keto-3-deoxy-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase) pathways in all type strains. Glucoamylase for starch degradation is also present in the five type strains, although in the original description P. mosselii and P. vranovensis were reported as starch negative [4, 16]. The ability to assimilate starch was not reported for the other three species.

Many P. putida and related strains have been studied for their biodegradative capabilities toward anthropogenic compounds and for their use in environmental biotechnology. The diversity of aromatic degradation pathways in the group is a good example of the metabolic potential of the five species considered. P. mosselii has genes coding for the degradation of 4-hydroxy-phenylacetate via protocatechuate by means of an extradiol aromatic ring-opening enzyme. Genes coding for salicylate and 3-methylsalicylate hydroxylases were found, but none were found for the catechol or 3-methylcatechol dioxygenases that are expected to continue the ortho or meta degradative catechol pathway. P. monteilii presents a complete set of genes for the catabolism of phenol, which includes the six subunits of phenol hydroxylase and the subsequent ortho or meta pathways by means of the catechol-1,2 or catechol 2,3-dioxygenases. P. monteilii , P. plecoglossicida , P. taiwanensis and P. vranovensis strains have genes for enzymes needed for benzoate catabolism through catechol-1,2-dioxygenase (ortho pathway) and for a protocatechuate-3,4-dioxygenase for p-hydroxybenzoate catabolism in P. taiwanensis .

Strains in the P. putida phylogenetic group of species have also been studied for their capacity to synthesize poly-beta-hydroxyalkanoate (PHA) granules, although Pseudomonas was initially considered unable to accumulate poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) [6]. All five strains studied have a complete set of genes for the synthesis of PHA, including the polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase gene and the PHA granule-associated protein phasin. The ability to accumulate PHA as a reserve material has not been reported in the five original species proposals, but the five type strains were considered negative for the PHB production.

At least six different secretion systems (SS) have been described in species of the genus Pseudomonas . Type 1 and type 2 secretion systems (T1SS and T2SS) are considered general systems, but T3SS, T4SS and T6SS might be associated with virulence factors for plants and animals, and the presence of one of these three types of secretion systems in a strain is considered an indication of potential pathogenicity and is therefore important for risk assessment regarding the use of bacteria in bioaugmentation processes for bioremediation. The P. monteilii , P. mosselii and P. plecoglossicida type strains were isolated from clinical specimens or from haemorrhagic ascites and have genes for the synthesis of types 3 and 6 secretion systems, together with the secreted effectors HcP and VgrG. The P. monteilii and P. mosselii type strain genomes also contain genes for a T4SS. The P. taiwanensis and P. vranovensis strains are of environmental origin, and none has genes for a T3SS, but both possess the genes for a T6SS associated with the effectors HcP and VgrG. P. taiwanensis shows a remarkably high number of additional effectors, such as ImpK, ImpL, VarG and six copies of VgrG.

The agents that provide the transfer of genetic material among bacteria are distributed into four classes and generally classified in the genome as the mobilome [35]. Genes in this category include transposons, insertion elements, plasmids, bacteriophages and integrating chromosomal elements. The mobilome represents the adaptation of strains to changing environmental conditions; it is strain-specific in many instances and the main reason for bacterial intraspecies variability [36]. The four aforementioned mobile elements have been found in the studied type strains and are summarized in Table 3. Clusters of genes coding for phage proteins were found in the five strains: one cluster in P. plecoglossicida and P. taiwanensis , two in P. monteilii , three in P. vranovensis and five in P. mosselii . A remarkably high number of mobile genetic elements were found in the two clinical strains. P. monteilii has 237 genes distributed in three putative integrating chromosomal elements (ICE) and two mobile elements: ICE1, with 60 genes; ICE2, with 41 genes that include integration and transfer genes, as well as a toxin/antitoxin pair of genes; ICE3, with genes coding for transfer properties; mobile element 1, consisting of 20 genes, including Co, Zn and Cd resistance genes together with genes related to plasmids; and mobile element 2, containing 12 genes for the synthesis of conjugal transfer pili and conjugal transfer. The P. mosselii genome also contains five putative ICEs and mobile elements: ICE1 contains a ParD/ParE1 type toxin/antitoxin system and ICE2, with 76 genes, contains transfer genes and genes related to Hg, Co, Zn and Cd resistance. CRISPR arrays were found in all but P. plecoglossicida , and P. vranovenis type strains. The highest numbers of putative transposases, insertion elements and integrases were found in the pathogenic species P. monteilii (103), P. mosselii (71) and P. plecoglossicida (50).

Table 3.

Genes included in the mobilome category for P. monteilii DSM 14164T, P. mosselii DSM 17497T, P. plecoglossicida DSM 15088T, P. taiwanensis DSM 21245T and P. vranovensis DSM 16006T

Number of genes, their ID and their position in the chromosome are indicated for each type of mobile element detected.

P. monteilii

DSM 14164T

P. mosselii

DSM 17497T

P. plecoglossicida

DSM 15088T

P. taiwanensis

DSM 21245T

P. vranovensis

DSM 16006T

Type of mobile genes

Q381DRAFT_

Q380DRAFT_

Q378DRAFT_

H620DRAFT_

H621DRAFT_

Prophage 1

01819-01853

35 genes

01539-01552

14 genes

02943-02992

50 genes

04595-04663

69 genes

00220-00266

47 genes

Prophage 2

02854-028278

24 genes

03320-03375

56 genes

00490-00413

78 genes

Prophage 3

03884-03919

36 genes

01743-01765

23 genes

Prophage 4

04931-04946

16 genes

Prophage 5

O5397-05413

17 genes

ICE 1

0920-0979

60 genes

03803-03835

34 genes

ICE 2

01690-1730

41 genes

04259-04325

67 genes

ICE 3

04874-04969

34 genes

00238-00317

76 genes

Mobile element 1

00610-00591

20 genes

05448-05482

35 genes

Mobile element 2

05230-05241

12 genes

CRISPR array count

2

1

1

Transposases and insertion elements

86

61

42

13

22

Integrases

17

10

8

6

10

ICE: Integrating chromosomal element; CRISPR: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.

Conclusions

The genomic features observed here are in accordance with the characteristic metabolic versatility of Pseudomonas species and its capacity to occupy many environmental niches, including animal hosts, as evident by the pathogenic properties of some members of the group. The differentiation among pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains is of crucial importance, especially in the clinical laboratory. The large discrepancies detected in the comparison of genomes by ANI and GGDC demonstrate the need for a thorough revision of the taxonomy of strains assigned to species in the P. putida phylogenetic group. Accepting the predominant value of genome characteristics for the delineation of species in the actual taxonomy, we conclude that at least 36 genomic species can be delineated within the P. putida phylogenetic group of species, while only 15 are currently accepted with species status. Deeper phylogenomic and taxonomic analyses are needed to justify the proposal of 21 new species within the genus. Knowledge of the genome features of all bacterial species type strains is crucial to construct a reliable and stable bacterial taxonomy.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

This work was supported in the Spanish team by project CGL2015-70925-P (AEI/FEDER, UE) from the Spanish MINECO, with Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) co-funding.

Author contributions

A. B. and M. M. cultured the strains, isolated, purified and quality controlled the DNA and performed the multilocus sequence analysis of strains described in 2014. R. G. performed the WC-MALDI-TOF MS analysis. T. B. K. R., M. H., A. P., N. I., V. M. and N. C. K. performed draft sequencing, initial gap closure and annotation. A. P. and M.G. analysed the annotation and performed the statistical analysis. E. G. V., J. L., N. K. and H. P. K. conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. None of the authors have any competing interests regarding the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: ANIb, Average nucleotide identity based on BLAST; CDSs, coding sequences; dDDH, Digital DNA-DNA hybridization; DSMZ, Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures; gANI, whole-genome ANI-based MiSI method; GEBA, Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea; KMG, One thousand microbial genomes; MIGS, Minimum information about a genome sequence; MLSA, Multilocus sequence analysis.

Two supplementary tables and one supplementary figure are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Mulet M, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. DNA sequence-based analysis of the Pseudomonas species. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1513–1530. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mulet M, Gomila M, Scotta C, Sánchez D, Lalucat J, et al. Concordance between whole-cell matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multilocus sequence analysis approaches in species discrimination within the genus Pseudomonas . Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012;35:455–464. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gomila M, Peña A, Mulet M, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. Phylogenomics and systematics in Pseudomonas . Front Microbiol. 2015;6:214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dabboussi F, Hamze M, Singer E, Geoffroy V, Meyer J-M, et al. Pseudomonas mosselii sp. nov., a novel species isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:363–376. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-2-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Elomari M, Coroler L, Verhille S, Izard D, Leclerc H. Pseudomonas monteilii sp. nov., isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:846–852. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-3-846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Palleroni NJ. Pseudomonas. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd edition. Vol. 2. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 323–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peter S, Oberhettinger P, Schuele L, Dinkelacker A, Vogel W, et al. Genomic characterisation of clinical and environmental Pseudomonas putida group strains and determination of their role in the transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa . BMC Genomics. 2017;18:859. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4216-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rebolledo PA, Vu CCL, Carlson RD, Kraft CS, Anderson EJ, et al. Polymicrobial ventriculitis involving Pseudomonas fulva . J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2239–2241. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03545-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mulet M, Gomila M, Ramírez A, Cardew S, Moore ERB, et al. Uncommonly isolated clinical Pseudomonas: identification and phylogenetic assignation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:351–359. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2808-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peña A, Busquets A, Gomila M, Mulet M, Gomila RM, et al. High quality draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas fulva DSM 17717(T), Pseudomonas parafulva DSM 17004(T) and Pseudomonas cremoricolorata DSM 17059(T) type strains. Stand Genomic Sci. 2016;11:55. doi: 10.1186/s40793-016-0178-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gao J, Li B-Y, Wang H-H, Liu Z-Q, Li B. Pseudomonas hunanensis sp. nov., isolated from soil subjected to long-term manganese pollution. Curr Microbiol. 2014;69:19–24. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0545-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Eisen JA, Garrity G, Lilburn TG, et al. Genomic encyclopedia of type strains, phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes (KMG-I) project. Stand Genomic Sci. 2014;9:628–634. doi: 10.4056/sigs.5068949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mukherjee S, Seshadri R, Varghese NJ, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Meier-Kolthoff JP, et al. 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:676–683. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nishimori E, Kita-Tsukamoto K, Wakabayashi H. Pseudomonas plecoglossicida sp. nov., the causative agent of bacterial haemorrhagic ascites of Ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:83–89. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-1-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang L-T, Tai C-J, Wu Y-C, Chen Y-B, Lee F-L, et al. Pseudomonas taiwanensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:2094–2098. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.014779-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tvrzová L, Schumann P, Spröer C, Sedlácek I, Pácová Z, et al. Pseudomonas moraviensis sp. nov. and Pseudomonas vranovensis sp. nov., soil bacteria isolated on nitroaromatic compounds, and emended description of Pseudomonas asplenii . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2657–2663. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63988-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mavromatis K, Land ML, Brettin TS, Quest DJ, Copeland A, et al. The fast changing landscape of sequencing technologies and their impact on microbial genome assemblies and annotation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maccallum I, Przybylski D, Gnerre S, Burton J, Shlyakhter I, et al. ALLPATHS 2: small genomes assembled accurately and with high continuity from short paired reads. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R103. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huntemann M, Ivanova NN, Mavromatis K, Tripp HJ, Paez-Espino D, et al. The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI microbial genome annotation pipeline (MGAP v.4) Stand Genomic Sci. 2015;10:86. doi: 10.1186/s40793-015-0077-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen I-MA, Chu K, et al. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2271–2278. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen I-MA, Markowitz VM, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Chu K, et al. Supporting community annotation and user collaboration in the integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:30. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2629-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:504–509. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:6761–6771. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ø H, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4:9pp [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mukherjee S, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Ovchinnikova G, Katta HY, et al. Gold) v.7: updates and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D649–D659. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, et al. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D666–D677. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gomila M, Busquets A, Mulet M, García-Valdés E, Lalucat J. Clarification of taxonomic status within the Pseudomonas syringae species group based on a phylogenomic analysis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2422. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mulet M, Gomila M, Gruffaz C, Meyer J-M, Palleroni NJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and siderotyping as useful tools in the taxonomy of Pseudomonas stutzeri: description of a novel genomovar. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:2309–2315. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65797-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Meyer JM. Pyoverdine siderophores as taxonomic and phylogenic markers. In: Ramos JL, Filloux A, editors. Pseudomonas: Molecular Microbiology, Infection and Biodiversity. Vol. 6. Netherlands: Springer; 2010. pp. 201–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Siefert JL. Defining the mobilome. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;532:13–27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Canchaya C, Fournous G, Chibani-Chennoufi S, Dillmann ML, Brüssow H. Phage as agents of lateral gene transfer. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6:417–424. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES