Abstract
The molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of bladder cancer (BC) are complex and have not been fully elucidated. Alterations in base excision repair (BER) capacity, one of several DNA repair mechanisms assigned to preserving genome integrity, have been reported to influence cancer susceptibility, recurrence, and progression, as well as responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We report herein that non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) tissues exhibit increased uracil incision, abasic endonuclease and gap-filling activities, as well as total BER capacity in comparison to normal bladder tissue from the same patient (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in 8-oxoG incision activity between cancer and normal tissues. NMIBC tissues have elevated protein levels of uracil DNA glycosylase, 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, AP endonuclease 1 and DNA polymerase β protein. Moreover, the fold increase in total BER and the individual BER enzyme activities were greater in high-grade tissues than in low-grade NMIBC tissues. These findings suggest that enhanced BER activity may play a role in the etiology of NMIBC and that BER proteins could serve as biomarkers in disease prognosis, progression or response to genotoxic therapeutics, such as Bacillus Calmette–Guérin.
Subject terms: Bladder cancer, DNA repair enzymes, Base excision repair, Bladder cancer
Introduction
Bladder cancer (BC) is the ninth most common cancer worldwide1. Non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) is responsible for approximately 75–85% of newly diagnosed BCs and includes tumors with pathological stages Ta (noninvasive papillary carcinoma), T1 (invasive into the subepithelial connective tissue), and carcinoma in situ (CIS, flat tumor). The recurrence rate of NMIBC is 30–80%, and 10–20% of the recurrent cases progress to muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) (stages ≥ T2) within 2–5 years. Several studies have reported that grade is a better prognostic indicator for NMIBC progression and mortality, because patients with high-grade tumors progress with similar frequency regardless of whether they were invasive (T1 stage) or noninvasive (Ta stage)2–4. The molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of BC are complex and have not been completely defined. Lifestyle choices and environmental agents, such as smoking, exposure to certain industrial aromatic amines or polycyclic hydrocarbons, and consumption of water that is contaminated with arsenic, are important risk factors for NMIBC3. Because only a subset of the individuals exposed to these factors develop NMIBC, there likely exists different hereditary and/or predisposing genetic factors for the disease.
Notably, many of the environmental risk factors for NMIBC increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which generate oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules, including DNA. Base excision repair (BER) is a major protective pathway against the adverse effects of oxidative, alkylative and hydrolytic DNA damage, generated by both endogenous (such as ROS) and exogenous sources5,6. Not surprisingly, a defect in BER, particularly in the face of genotoxic stress, can lead to the accumulation of DNA damage and genomic instability, and has been linked to genetic disorders exhibiting cancer proneness7–9. More broadly speaking, DNA repair rate/capacity, which is different among individuals and tumors, is an important phenotype that contributes to the inter-individual variability in cancer development and therapeutic response10–13.
BER is initiated by several lesion-specific DNA glycosylases that recognize and remove inappropriate or damaged bases. For example, uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) removes uracil from the genome, and 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) excises 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) from DNA. After the modified base is removed, the resulting apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is cleaved primarily by the major AP endonuclease, APE1. Subsequently, BER proceeds either through single nucleotide gap-filling by DNA polymerase β (POLβ) (short-patch) or long-patch repair synthesis (2–13 nt) that commonly involves the replicative DNA polymerases δ/ε. Following termini clean-up by either POLβ or the 5′-flap structure-specific endonuclease 1 (FEN1), the remaining nick is sealed by a DNA ligase 3 (LIG3) and X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) complex or LIG16.
Several BER genes, including APE1, POLβ and XRCC1, are overexpressed in multiple cancer types, such as prostate, cervical, non-small cell lung, ovarian, glioma, triple-negative breast and BCs14–33, suggesting that alterations in BER gene expression can influence disease susceptibility, initiation, and progression. High expression levels of the APE1/REF1 protein in serum, urine, and tissue samples of NMIBC and MIBC patients that have not received chemotherapy or radiotherapy are indeed associated with the progression of BC16,22,23. Additional studies on the role of BER in NMIBC and MIBC have focused on variant profiles9,34–41 of BER genes, including UNG, OGG1, APE1, single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1), thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG), MutY DNA glycosylase (MUTYH), and nei like DNA glycosylase 1 (NEIL1), NEIL2, and XRCC1. The work of Wei et al. has found that the UNG rs3890995 variant is significantly associated with NMIBC progression, while the NEIL2 rs804256 variant is associated with recurrence in the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG)-treated NMIBC group34. In a separate study, it was reported that the SNP most significantly associated with BC risk is SMUG1 rs202916736. The APE1 Asp148Glu variant has also been associated with increased35 and decreased39 risks of BC. Studies with large sample sizes are now needed to verify the above observations. To further define the role of BER in NMIBC, we measured total BER and individual BER protein activities and levels in whole lysates prepared from NMIBC tissue and normal tissue from the same individual.
Results
Total BER activity, uracil incision, 8-oxoG incision, AP endonuclease and gap-filling activities were measured in seventeen NMIBC tissues in comparison to normal bladder tissue from the same patient. Before performing each BER activity assay, we determined the optimal tissue extract protein concentration using increasing amounts of whole tissue extracts of NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissues as indicated in Supplementary Fig. S1a–S5a. As seen, each activity increased in a protein concentration-dependent manner, and at each concentration examined, the activity was higher in NMIBC tissue than in the corresponding normal tissue (Supplementary Fig. S1a–S5a). In addition to tissue extracts, we also measured BER activities of T24 cell extracts (Supplementary Fig. S1b–S3b; S4c and S5b).
Increased total BER activity in NMIBC tissues
To compare the BER capacity of NMBIC tissue with normal bladder tissue from the same individual (of seventeen patients, Table 1), whole tissue lysates were prepared and uracil-initiated total BER activity was measured. In this assay, we determined the efficiency of incorporation of 32P-dCMP in place of a substrate uracil (at position 26, U/G base pair) within a 51mer duplex (Fig. 1a, 26mer band) and subsequent ligation of the nicked intermediate (Fig. 1a, 51mer band). A representative gel for uracil-initiated total BER activity using whole tissue extracts prepared from NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissue is shown in Fig. 1a; the lower band represents the 1nt-32P-dCMP insertion product (26mer) and the upper band represents the 51mer final ligated repair product. Importantly, β-actin protein levels were similar in the NMIBC and corresponding normal tissue protein extracts used in the activity assays (see for example Fig. 2e), indicating that any differences measured would reflect true differences in the repair activity interrogated. Moreover, when whole tissue extracts were incubated with an undamaged control substrate (Table 2), no product was observed (data not shown), demonstrating the specificity of the assays selected. Quantification of the BER capacity experiments found that the incorporation (Fig. 1b), the ligation (Fig. 1c), and the incorporation plus ligation activities (Fig. 1d) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in both low-grade and high-grade NMIBC tissues as compared to their corresponding normal tissues. All NMIBC tissues classified as Ta/T1 stage (n = 17) had enhanced BER activity compared to the normal tissue sample (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1b,d). Direct comparison of each NMIBC tissue separately to the normal tissue of the same patient is shown in Supplementary Table S1 online. Consistent with the collective results, we see up-regulation in total BER capacity in each NMIBC tissue compared to its corresponding normal material (Supplementary Table S1 online). Notably, high-grade NMIBC tissues have higher total BER activity compared to low-grade NMIBC tissues (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S1 online).
Table 1.
Characteristics | |
---|---|
Number of patients | 17 |
Gender (male/female) (n/n) | 14/3 |
Mean age (years) | 68.65 ± 15.02 |
Age range (years) | 37–92 |
Diagnosis (n) | NMIBC, transitional cell carcinoma (17) |
Grade (n) | Low-grade (6); High-grade (11) |
Stage (n) | Ta (14); T1 (3) |
Primer/recurrence | primer |
Treatment | None |
Control (n) | Normal bladder tissue* (17) |
Table 2.
Oligodeoxynucleotides |
---|
U = Uracil 5′-GCTTAGCTTGGAATCGTATCATGTAUACTCGTGTGCCGTGTAGACCGTGCC-3′ 3′-CGAATCGAACCTTAGCATAGTACATGTGAGCACACGGCACATCTGGCACGG-5′ |
OHG = 8-oxoG 5′-GCTTAGCTTGGAATCGTATCATGTAOHGACTCGTGTGCCGTGTAGACCGTGCC-3′ 3′-CGAATCGAACCTTAGCATAGTACAT GTGAGCACACGGCACATCTGGCACGG-5′ |
OHG = 8-oxoG 5′-GCTTAGCTTGGAATCGTATCATGTAOHGACTCGTGTGCCGTGTAGACCGTGCC-3′ 3′-CGAATCGAACCTTAGCATAGTACAT CTGAGCACACGGCACATCTGGCACGG-5′ |
X = Tetrahydrofuran 5′-GCTTAGCTTGGAATCGTATCATGTAXACTCGTGTGCCGTGTAGACCGTGCC-3′ 3′-CGAATCGAACCTTAGCATAGTACATGTGAGCACACGGCACATCTGGCACGG-5′ |
1nt-gap 5′-GCTTAGCTTGGAATCGTATCATGTAACTCGTGTGCCGTGTAGACCGTGCC-3′ 3′-CGAATCGAACCTTAGCATAGTACATGTGAGCACACGGCACATCTGGCACGG-5′ |
Control 5′-GCTTAGCTTGGAATCGTATCATGTACACTCGTGTGCCGTGTAGACCGTGCC-3′ 3′-CGAATCGAACCTTAGCATAGTACATGTGAGCACACGGCACATCTGGCACGG-5′ |
NMIBC tissues have increased uracil incision activity, but not 8-oxoG incision activity
In follow-up to the uracil-initiated BER assay performed above, we next examined exclusively uracil incision activity in NMIBC and corresponding normal tissue extracts. In addition, 8-oxoG incision activity, predominantly performed by the DNA glycosylase, OGG1, was examined. Uracil and 8-oxoG repair activities were measured as the incision of double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide substrates containing either a single uracil (U:G) or 8-oxoG lesion (8-oxoG:G and 8-oxoG:C) (Table 2). Uracil incision activity was also measured using a single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide substrate containing uracil (ssU). An undamaged duplex oligodeoxynucleotide substrate (Table 2) was used as a negative control in both experiments, and no product was observed in either case (Supplementary Fig. S2b and S3b). The activities of U:G incision and 8-oxoG incision of the tissue extracts were effectively neutralized by UDG and OGG1 antibodies, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2c and S3d). Co-incubation of tissue extracts with ugi completely inhibited the UDG activity (Supplementary Fig. S2d), but not the 8-oxoG incision activity (Supplementary Fig. S3c). The recombinant UDG and OGG1 proteins incised uracil and 8-oxoG in substrates completely (100% incision), respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2d and S3e). Thus, the collective data indicate that the observed uracil and 8-oxoG incision activities are attributable to UDG and OGG1, respectively. Representative gels for uracil and 8-oxoG incision in whole tissue extracts are shown in Fig. 2a and Fig. 3a, respectively.
Uracil incision activity (U:G substrate, mainly conducted by UDG) was found to be significantly higher in all high-grade (Fig. 2b, p = 0.001) and all low-grade (Fig. 2c, p = 0.03) NMIBC tissue extracts compared with the corresponding normal tissue. All NMIBC tissues at the Ta/T1 stage exhibited a significant increase in UDG activity (Fig. 2d, p < 0.0001). Comparisons of uracil incision between each NMIBC and its corresponding normal tissue are shown in Supplementary Table S1 online. Collectively, uracil incision activity was 4.02 ± 0.69 fold higher in high-grade and 2.65 ± 0.62 fold higher in low-grade NMIBC tissue (Fig. 2b,c, Supplementary Table S1 online). UDG protein levels of whole tissue extracts were at least 3.56 fold higher in NMIBC tissues than their corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Table S2 online). We note that the UDG protein level of two normal tissues (N10 and N11) was found too low to detect with Western blot analysis (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Table S2 online).
To further address specificity of uracil incision activity, we performed assays using ssU substrates with eight NMIBC and corresponding normal tissue extracts, due to the limited amount of tissue extract available in all samples. Similar to what was seen in the U:G experiments, ssU incision activity was significantly higher in the eight NMIBC tissues (2.87 ± 0.71 fold) compared with the corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 2f,g and Supplemental Fig. S2f,g, p = 0.0078). Although SMUG1 is the major DNA glycosylase for ssU42, we could not detect the protein in these extracts by western blot analysis, suggesting that UDG is the main enzyme responsible for the uracil excision activity. There was a significant Pearson correlation between U:G incision activity and UDG protein level in NMIBC (r = 0.51, p = 0.04) but not in normal tissue (p = 0.18) (Supplementary Table S3 online).
Collectively, we found no significant difference in 8-oxoG incision (mainly performed by OGG1) activity in both high-grade (Fig. 3b, p = 0.98) and low-grade (Fig. 3c, p = 0.84) NMIBC tissue compared to its normal tissue; to maintain the U:G arrangement, initial experiments were performed with 8-oxoG:G substrates. When looking at each patient individually, four of the high-grade NMIBC tissues showed no change in 8-oxoG incision activity (1.03 ± 0.01 fold) relative to the comparative normal tissue. Three of the high-grade NMIBC tissues did, however, display a small (1.48 ± 0.25 fold) increase in 8-oxoG incision activity, while three of the low-grade NMIBC tissues also exhibited a similar (1.91 ± 0.37) slight increase. In addition, three low-grade and four high-grade NMIBC tissues displayed a decrease in 8-oxoG incision activity compared to normal tissues (2.24 ± 0.91 and 1.99 ± 0.57 fold, respectively). All NMIBC tissues at the Ta/T1 stage showed no significant change in 8-oxoG incision activity relative to their normal controls (Fig. 3d, p = 0.85). Nine NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissues were also tested for 8-oxoG:C incision activity, as this substrate is more biologically relevant (Fig. 3e,f). As shown, there was no significant change in 8-oxoG:C incision activity in NMIBC tissues compared to the corresponding normal tissue (Fig. 3f, p = 0.195). Fold changes in 8-oxoG:G and 8-oxoG:C incision activities of each NMIBC tissue to its corresponding normal tissue are shown in Supplementary Table S1 online. The same blot used for UDG was stripped and analyzed using antibody against OGG1. Strikingly, OGG1 protein level was found dramatically higher (fold range 1.24 to 85) in NMIBC tissues compared to their corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 3g, Supplementary Table S2 online). OGG1 enzyme activity did not correlate significantly with its protein level in NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissue (p > 0.05) (Supplementary Table S3 online). As a recent report has suggested that DNA damage binding protein 1 (DDB1), a protein that is a component of the UV-DDB DNA damage recognition complex, exhibits the ability to stimulate OGG1 activity43, we examined the levels of DDB1 in NMIBC and corresponding normal tissue extracts. We observed a significant correlation between the protein levels of DDB1 and OGG1 in NMIBC tissues (r = 0.57, p = 0.02) and in the corresponding normal tissues (r = 0.86, p = 0.0001) (Supplementary Fig. S3h). The levels of DDB1 do not correlate with 8-oxoG:G or 8-oxoG:C activities (p > 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S3h). Our results suggest that DDB1 is not operating as a major stimulating factor of OGG1, and that the activity of the glycosylase is being suppressed by an unknown mechanism.
NMIBC tissues have increased AP endonuclease activity
We next measured AP site incision activity, perhaps exclusively carried out by APE1, in whole tissue extracts of NMIBC and corresponding normal tissues using a tetrahydrofuran (THF)-containing DNA substrate. THF is analog of an AP site that can be cleaved by APE1, a class II AP endonuclease, but not bifunctional DNA glycosylases that use alternative incision mechanisms44. A representative gel for AP endonuclease (from hereon APE1) activity using whole tissue extracts is shown in Fig. 4a. As with the other substrates, a lesion-free oligodeoxynucleotide duplex was used as a negative control, and no product was observed (data not shown). APE1 activity was found significantly higher in both high-grade (Fig. 4b, p < 0.001) and low-grade (Fig. 4c, p = 0.03) NMIBC tissues compared with the corresponding normal tissue. The activity was 2.15 ± 0.35 and 2.35 ± 0.35 fold higher in low- and high-grade NMIBC tissues, respectively. Analyzing all NMIBC patients (low and high grades) at the Ta/T1 stage revealed a significant increase in APE1 activity (p < 0.0001) in NMIBC compared to normal tissues (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Table S1 online). Furthermore, APE1 protein level was at least 1.86 fold higher in NMBIC tissues than their corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Table S2 online). APE1 protein levels were correlated significantly with the activity levels of APE1 in NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissues (r = 0.49, p = 0.05 and r = 0.48, p = 0.05) (Supplementary Table S3 online).
NMIBC tissues have increased gap-filling activity
Proceeding through the BER pathway, we next analyzed 1-nt gap-filling activity in NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissues, monitoring incorporation of a radiolabeled dCTP nucleotide into a 51mer duplex harboring a 1-nt gap at position 26 (Table 2). A representative gel for 1-nt gap filling is shown in Fig. 5a. Quantification of the results revealed that single nucleotide gap-filling activity in both low- and high-grade NMIBC tissues was significantly elevated in comparison to the corresponding normal tissue (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001, respectively) (Fig. 5b,c). The gap-filling activity was 2.650 ± 0.51 and 2.77 ± 0.52 fold higher in low- and high-grade NMBIC tissues, respectively (Supplementary Table S1 online). Analyzing all NMIBC patients at Ta/T1 stage demonstrated a significant increase in 1-nt nucleotide gap-filling activity (p < 0.0001) in cancer tissues relative to normal material (Fig. 5d). Since POLβ is the predominant protein to carry out single nucleotide gap-filling 6,53, we measured POLβ levels and found them to be at least 1.86 fold higher in NMBIC tissues than the corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 5e, Supplementary Table S2 online). POLβ protein levels were significantly correlated with the activity levels of gap-filling in the corresponding normal tissues (r = 0.0.57, p = 0.02) but not in NMIBC tissues (r = 0.32, p = 0.21) (Supplementary Table S3 online).
Uracil-initiated total BER activity correlates with uracil incision activity
Several studies have reported different rate-limiting factors in BER, including UDG, APE1, POLβ or the lyase step, with investigators arguing that the rate-limiting step may change with age, cell and lesion type. Knowledge of the rate-limiting step in BER would provide important insight into determining overall BER capacity45–49. In this study, uracil-initiated total BER activity (incorporation plus ligation) positively and significantly correlates with uracil incision activity in both NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissue (Table 3). Conversely, uracil-initiated total BER activity is not significantly correlated with APE1 activity or single nucleotide gap filling (Table 3). Thus, uracil incision activity (i.e., DNA glycosylase activity) appears to be rate-limiting in BER, at least for this lesion, in NMIBC and normal bladder tissues.
Table 3.
Uracil initiated total BER activity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
R2* | r* | p value† | ||
Uracil incision | NMIBC | 0.42 | 0.65 | 0.005 |
Normal | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.001 | |
APE1 incision | NMIBC | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.12 |
Normal | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.09 | |
Gap filling activity | NMIBC | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.54 |
Normal | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.49 |
*R2 is the Pearson coefficient of determination. *r is the Pearson correlation coefficient. †p is a statistical significance of association, two-sided (p < 0.05).
BER protein levels are mostly higher in BC material
To more broadly compare the BER protein levels in NMIBC tissue, we performed western blotting experiments with extracts from the T24 urinary BC cell line and different types of normal tissues/cells [normal bladder tissue, normal human skin fibroblast cell line (GM00969), and normal human lung fibroblast cell line (IMR-90)]. As shown in Fig. 6, the amount of UDG, OGG1, APE1 and POLβ proteins in NMIBC tissues and BC cells are higher than normal tissue and cells. The amount of UDG protein appears to be very low in normal cells/tissues, as we could not detect the protein via western blot analysis (Fig. 6). The protein levels of NMIBC tissue compared to the corresponding normal tissue are as follows: OGG1 is 7.03 ± 1.02 fold, APE1 is 4.45 ± 0.07 fold, and POLβ is 5.56 ± 0.22 fold higher (Fig. 6). The protein levels of T24 cell line compared to normal human skin fibroblast cell line (GM00969) and normal human lung fibroblast cell line (IMR-90) are as follows: OGG1 is 1.29 ± 0.4 and 0.99 ± 0.00 fold, APE1 is 32.35 ± 1.4 and 5.36 ± 0.06 fold, and POLβ is 120.36 ± 4.1 and 6.82 ± 0.01 fold higher, respectively (Fig. 6).
BER activities show wide inter-individual variation among NMIBC and normal tissues
Using the repair activity measurements from the studies above, we evaluated the distribution of BER activities among the cancer and corresponding normal tissues obtained from the seventeen NMIBC patients (Fig. 7a-g). Using uracil incision activity as an example, NMIBC tissues exhibited a 7.02 fold inter-individual variability in repair activity (from 1.75 fmol/min/μg for NMIBC9 to 12.28 fmol/min/μg for NMIBC13), with a mean of 6.32 for NMIBC tissues of all patients (Fig. 7a). The inter-individual variations in NMIBC tissues for the other BER functions are as follows: 5.35 fold in 8-oxoG incision activity (Fig. 7b), 2.58 fold in APE1 activity (Fig. 7c), 9.81 fold in 1-nt gap filling activity (Fig. 7d), and 27.28 fold in incorporation plus ligation BER activity (Fig. 7g). The inter-individual variations in the corresponding healthy tissues are as follows: 8.83 fold in uracil incision activity (Fig. 7a), 4.02 fold in 8-oxoG incision activity (Fig. 7B), 3.53 fold in APE1 activity (Fig. 7c), 8.83 fold in 1-nt gap filling activity (Fig. 7d), and 53.94 fold in incorporation plus ligation activity (Fig. 7g).
Discussion
Because alterations in BER capacity of various cancer types can influence cancer susceptibility, recurrence, progression, and responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy6, we have investigated BER activities in NMIBC tissue. Previous studies have suggested the importance of some BER enzymes in BC progression and the response to oxidative stress caused by BCG16,22,23. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that NMIBC tissues have increased total BER activity in comparison to normal bladder tissue from the exact same patient. The consistently enhanced BER capacity of NMIBC could play an important role in any number of aspects of carcinogenesis, including preserving the genome integrity in the primary tumor environment to facilitate progression and metastasis with increased efficacy50.
We observed a significant increase in uracil (U:G and ssU) incision activity and UDG protein levels in both low- and high-grade NMIBC compared to the corresponding normal tissues. Enhanced uracil (U:G) incision activity and UDG protein levels have also been reported in human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues compared to adjacent normal mucosa51. Notably, UDG expression is cell cycle regulated, with the highest level of UDG being observed in S phase42,51, seemingly tying its production to replicative status. In addition, overexpression of UNG in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and lung cancer cell lines is associated with a more aggressive phenotype52,53. It has been speculated that cancer tissues have a higher demand for UDG activity due to their high proliferation rate and increased synthesis of the precursor nucleotides that result in enhanced uracil incorporation into DNA51. Indeed, Pulukuri et al.54 have demonstrated that the function of UDG is essential for cancer cell survival. Moreover, UDG deficiency in cancer cells, including colon and lung cancers, results in sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents that introduce uracil, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine lesions into DNA52,53,55–58. Thus, the enhanced UDG activity could be necessary for NMIBC survival and provide resistance to chemotherapeutic agents that induce DNA lesions repaired by UDG.
Collectively, studies indicate that UDG expression or activity levels do not simply correlate with the cytotoxicity of 5-FU. In particular, some studies have shown that UDG levels do not influence the cytotoxicity of 5-FU, whereas others have shown that high UDG levels cause cellular lethality to 5-FU due to futile BER cycling59. In the current study, while there is not much difference in UDG protein levels in T24 BC cells compared to SV-40 transformed SV-HUC-1 normal bladder cells (1.2 fold higher in T24), T24 cells are almost 50-fold more sensitive to 5-FU treatment (100 μM at 72 h post-treatment) (Supplementary Fig. S7). Thus, the cellular lethality of 5-FU depends on many factors, including BER components, such as UDG, SMUG1 and APE1, and the mismatch repair pathway, with several mechanistic details still requiring further elucidation59.
Visnes et al.49 observed a correlation between activity and protein levels of UNG2, the nuclear form of UDG, in nuclear extracts of different cancer cell lines. We used whole tissue extracts in the current study, and the UDG protein level also correlated with uracil incision activity in whole NMIBC tissue extracts. Nevertheless, a limitation of the present study is the lack of ability to address issues of subcellular localization of the different proteins, a factor that has been shown to be significantly affected by transformation and the cancer state. Future analysis should aim to conduct immunohistochemistry to examine BER protein localization in different BC stages.
OGG1 is the main DNA glycosylase for the repair of one of the most common and mutagenic oxidative DNA lesions, 8-oxoG. If it is not repaired, 8-oxoG can induce GC to TA transversions, consistent with the accumulation of 8-oxoG increasing mutagenesis and the risk of carcinogenesis. OGG1 activity was found lower in leukocytes and lung tumor tissues of NSCLC60–63, and leukocytes of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) cancers64. The reduced OGG1 activity, and in turn, a high amount of 8-oxoG is associated with an increased risk of NSCLC and SCCHN60–64. In contrast, OGG1 activity was found significantly higher in leukocytes and tumor tissues of CRC patients65,66. It has been suggested that increased oxidative stress in CRC stimulates the expression and activity of OGG1, which at its normal level is not sufficient to counteract the increased oxidative DNA damage65. Paz-Elizur et al.62,64,67–69 demonstrated that the presence of cancer did not cause low OGG1 activity, but instead the low activity represents an inherent characteristic of SCCHN individuals, putting them at risk of cancer development. We found that seven of NMIBC tissues have reduced (1.96 ± 0.33 fold) 8-oxoG incision activity, whereas six of them had increased (1.86 ± 0.45 fold) and four of them had similar activities compared to normal tissue. Furthermore, in line with other studies61,68–71, we did not find a significant correlation between OGG1 activity and its protein levels in NMIBC and the corresponding normal tissues. It has been suggested that OGG1 activity can be affected by several other factors, including BER enzymes, such as XRCC1, APE161,72,73. Thus, mRNA expression and the protein levels of OGG1 cannot be used to predict OGG1 activity61,69. Notably, we observed marked increases in OGG1 protein levels in NMIBC tissue relative to the normal material (that did not correlate with the 8-oxoG incision measurements), suggesting that much of the protein produced is likely inactive or inactivated, possibly through post-translational mechanisms. In addition, OGG1 activity can be influenced by many other factors. Recently, it has been shown that UV-DDB stimulates OGG1 incision activity43. Notably, a significant correlation was observed between the protein levels of DDB1 and OGG1 in both NMIBC and in the corresponding normal tissues, although DDB1 does not appear to be responsible for the lack of correlation between OGG1 protein and activity levels.
APE1 repairs mutagenic and cytotoxic AP sites in DNA. The overexpression of APE1 has been demonstrated in the development, recurrence, and progression of different cancer types, including BC, and in resistance to various anticancer drugs and ionizing radiation6,14–27,74,75. Previous studies demonstrated high expression levels of APE1 in serum, urine, and tissue samples of NMIBC and MIBC patients who had not received chemotherapy or radiotherapy16,22,23,73. The increased APE1 levels are associated with bladder tumor stage, grade, muscle invasion, and recurrence. Thus, it has been suggested that APE1 could be a good prognostic biomarker for BC22,23. However, these studies reported only gene expression or protein levels of APE1 in serum and urine samples of NMIBC compared to healthy individuals22,23, in low-grade NMIBC tissues compared to high-grade tissues16,22, and in BC tissue compared to benign urothelium73. In this study, we have expanded the analysis to compare NMIBC tissues with their corresponding normal tissues in terms of both total AP endonuclease activity and APE1 protein levels. The results of our work agree with previous findings16,22,23,73 that NMIBC tissues have increased APE1 protein and activity levels, supporting the idea that APE1 would be an excellent prognostic biomarker for BC. Inhibition of APE1/Ref1 redox signaling reduces the BC cell proliferation and that enhances the therapeutic effect of cisplatin on BC cells, suggesting that APE1/Ref1 is a good drug target for the treatment of BC73.
POLβ is overexpressed in several different types of cancers, including stomach, ovary, colon, prostate, and BC16,28–31. Furthermore, the activity and protein levels of POLβ are increased in human ovarian tumor cells32. It has been suggested that the overexpression of POLβ may play a role in cancer predisposition and tumor progression, because the polymerase increases the spontaneous mutation rate due to its error-prone nature32,33,76. Chantre-Justino et al.16 compared POLβ expression levels between low- and high-grade NMIBC tissues, and found that the expression level of POLβ is increased in high-grade compared to the low-grade NMIBC tissues. We showed that gap-filling activity, a major function of POLβ, and POLβ protein levels are significantly higher in both low- and high-grade NMIBC tissues compared to corresponding normal tissue. Collectively, the results suggest that increased POLβ activity is associated with NMIBC development and progression. Interestingly, POLβ protein and gap-filling activity levels are correlated significantly in the corresponding normal tissues, but not in NMIBC tissues. It is possible that not all overexpressed POLβ proteins in NMIBC tissues that we detected on the western blot are active. Several tumors carry mutations in the POLβ gene that are not found in the germline. Many of these sporadic POLβ gene variants have impaired, often reduced, activity9, which may explain the lack of correlation between gap-filling activity and POLβ protein levels.
Visnes et al.49 identified UNG2 as the major rate-limiting factor in uracil-initiated total BER in human cancer cell lines. The observed positive and significant correlation between uracil-initiated total BER activity and UDG activity in both NMIBC and normal tissue supports this result. That said, in the Visnes et al.49 study, ligase III was also found as a minor rate-regulator for U:G repair, indicating that no single factor can be identified as rate-limiting in human cancer cell lines49. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that the dRP lyase activity of POLβ or nick ligation is the rate-limiting step in BER11. Brenerman et al.11 suggested that because of the variability in the rate of repair among individuals, any step of BER could be rate-limiting. The inter-individual variations in the activities of BER enzymes may affect the correlation between the activities of total BER and specific BER enzymes.
Poly-ADP ribosylation (PARylation) by PARP1/2 plays a key role in various cellular processes, such as transcription, DNA damage response and apoptosis. PARylation increases the recruitment of BER proteins to the DNA damage site77. NMIBC tissues have higher levels of both PARylation and BER capacity compared with the corresponding normal tissues (Supplementary Fig. S8). A general increase in BER capacity would presumably protect the cell from genotoxic stress. Additionally, elevated BER could provide the cell with a growth advantage as it converts from a normal to transformed state. However, it is also known that imbalances within the steps of BER, which may arise from up-regulation of only a subset of enzymes, can have more harmful effects than simply reduced pathway capacity. Whether the increased activities reported herein contributed to the early genomic instability that promoted transformation or supported increased growth rates during the carcinogenic process is unknown; but it seems reasonable to conclude that at minimum, the broadly increased BER would play a role in anticancer genotoxin agent resistance.
In conclusion, enhanced BER capacity may play an important role in the etiology and prognosis of NMIBC. Thus, the activity of BER proteins might serve as useful biomarkers in the prognosis and progression of NMIBC or the response to genotoxic therapeutics, such as BCG. Future retrospective and prospective studies are needed to verify that activities of BER enzymes can be used as a biomarker for NMIBC prognosis, progression, and response to genotoxic agents.
Materials and methods
NMIBC patients and samples
Seventeen NMIBC tissues and non-cancerous normal bladder tissue from the same individual were obtained using the cold cup biopsy technique during TURBT at the Department of Urology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. The fresh tissue samples were immediately snap-frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. Evaluation and grading of the NMIBC and corresponding normal tissues were done by the Pathology Department of Acibadem Maslak Hospital according to the previously published criteria78. The characteristics of the seventeen NMIBC patients are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 68.65 ± 15.02 years (range 37 to 92). Of the seventeen NMIBC patients, six were diagnosed as low-grade, and eleven were diagnosed as high-grade. Fourteen NMIBC tissues were Ta stages, and three were T1 stages (Table 1). All NMIBC patients used in this study were newly diagnosed and had not been previously treated with BCG, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy at the time of the biopsy. Written informed consents were obtained from all patients before participation in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Acibadem University (ACU) and Acibadem Health Institutions Medical Research (ATADEK), and was performed in accordance with the guidelines of human research. All subjects involved in the study provided their written informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki, as approved by the Ethics Committee of ACU and ATADEK.
Whole tissue lysates preparation for BER assays
Whole tissue lysates were prepared as previously described79 with some modifications. Briefly, tissues were suspended in ice-cold buffer containing 210 mM D-mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 0.75 mM spermidine, 0.15 mM spermine, 5 mM DTT, 1X complete protease inhibitor tablet (Roche Applied Sciences, USA) and homogenized using a Dounce glass-glass homogenizer. The homogenate was spun at 16,000xg for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in one volume of buffer 1 (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8 and 200 mM KCl) and two volumes of buffer 2 (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8, 200 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 40% glycerol, 0.2% NP-40, 2 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 1X complete protease inhibitor tablet) followed by sonication to fragmentize DNA. After incubation for 2 h at 4 °C with rocking, the cell lysate was centrifuged at 130,000xg for 1 h and the supernatant dialyzed overnight in dialysis buffer (25 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 15% glycerol). Subsequently, the samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, USA). Besides, β-actin levels were determined by the western blot analysis in NMIBC and corresponding normal tissues as described in the western blot section.
Oligodeoxynucleotides
The sequences of the oligodeoxynucleotides used in this study are shown in Table 2. The oligodeoxynucleotides were purchased from DNA Technology, Denmark and the oligodeoxynucleotide containing C opposite to 8-oxoG was purchased from Eurofins. The oligodeoxynucleotides used in DNA glycosylase and APE1 activity assays were 5′-end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32P]ATP (Perkin Elmer, USA) as described before79. The oligodeoxynucleotides were then annealed to the complementary strands by heating the samples at 90 °C for 5 min and slowly cooling to room temperature. For single strand uracil incision assay, the single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide containing uracil (Table 1) protected by phosphorothioate (four bonds) at each end to avoid degradation of the substrate by nucleases in tissue extracts was purchased from Eurofins and 5′-end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32P]ATP (Perkin Elmer, USA) as described before79.
Repair synthesis incorporation assay
Reactions were done as previously described79,80 with some modifications. Briefly, reactions (10 µl) were done in BER buffer (40 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mg/ml BSA, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 40 mM phosphocreatine, 100 µg/ml creatine phosphokinase (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 2 mM ATP (GE-Healthcare, USA), 40 µM of each dATP, dTTP, dGTP and 4 µM of dCTP (Roche Applied Sciences, USA), 2 µCi 32P-dCTP (Perkin Elmer, USA), 3% glycerol, and 100 fmol of uracil-containing double-stranded DNA substrate). Reactions were initiated by adding 0.4 µg whole tissue lysate and were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by termination with the equal volume of formamide stop dye (90% formamide, 10 mM EDTA, 0.01% bromphenol blue, 0.01% xylene cyanol). Samples were heated at 37 °C for 10 min and then run on 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel (PAGE-Urea). The reactions were visualized using a Typhoon FLA 9500 PhosphorImager and quantitated with ImageQuant TL v8.1 software (GE Healthcare). The experiments were performed at least in duplicate. The incorporation, ligation and incorporation plus ligation activities are presented as PhosphorImager units per min per μg protein.
Activities of DNA glycosylases
Incision activity assays were performed as previously described49,63,79,80 with some modifications. Incision of uracil was performed in a reaction mixture (10 µl) containing 70 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 50 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 100 fmol of 32P-labeled double-stranded uracil-containing DNA substrate (U:G) (Table 2). The reactions were initiated by adding 0.25 µg whole tissue extract or 1 U recombinant UDG protein (New England Biolabs, USA) for uracil incision and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. UDG was inhibited by pre-incubating tissue extracts with 1 U uracil glycosylase inhibitor (ugi) (New England Biolabs, USA) and with 0.1μg and 1 μg UDG antibody on ice for 10 min (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), followed by uracil incision activity assay as described above. Incision of uracil in 32P-labeled single-stranded uracil containing substrate was performed in a reaction mixture (10 µl) containing 40 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 70 mM KCl, 10% glycerol and 100 fmol of 32P-labeled single-stranded uracil-containing DNA substrate. The reactions were initiated by adding 0.5 µg whole tissue extract, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The reactions were stopped by the addition of formamide stop dye with 100 mM NaOH. Samples were heated at 95 °C for 10 min and then run on 20% PAGE-Urea gel. The 8-oxoG:G incision activity was performed in 10 µl reaction mixture containing 70 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 75 mM KCl, 10% glycerol and 50 fmol 32P-labeled 8-oxoG:G-containing DNA substrate (Table 2). The reaction was initiated by adding 1 µg whole tissue extract and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. For the complete strand cleavage at the abasic sites, an equal amount of formamide loading dye containing 100 mM NaOH was added and the samples were incubated at 75 °C for 15 min. OGG1 proteins (Trevigen, USA) were used. The 8-oxoG:C incision activity was performed in 20 µl reaction mixture containing 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.8, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, and 50 fmol 32P-labeled 8-oxoG:C-containing DNA substrate. The reactions were initiated by adding 1 µg whole tissue extract pre-incubated with 1U ugi as described above, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and then incubated with 1 µg proteinase K at 37 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixtures were incubated with 0.2 M NaOH at 70 °C for 30 min, and the reactions were stopped by the addition of formamide stop dye. Samples were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min and resolved by electrophoresis on 20% PAGE-Urea gel. Gels were visualized by Typhoon FLA 9500 PhosphorImager and analyzed using the ImageQuant TL v8.1 software (GE Healthcare, USA). The experiments were performed in triplicate, and the incision activity is presented as fmol of substrate converted to product per min per μg protein.
AP endonuclease activity
APE1 incision activity was performed as previously described80,81 with some modifications. APE1 activity was measured using a 51-mer oligonucleotide containing the abasic site analog THF at position 26 (Table 2). Reactions (10 µl) contained 50 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.4, 25 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.01% Tween-20, 50 fmol of 32P-labeled THF containing DNA substrate and 0.02 μg whole tissue extract or 1U recombinant APE1 protein (New England Biolabs). Reactions were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C and stopped by the addition of an equal amount of the formamide loading dye, and the samples were heated at 75 °C for 15 min. Samples were separated on 20% PAGE-Urea gel, and gels were visualized by Typhoon FLA 9500 PhosphorImager and analyzed using the ImageQuant software TL v8.1 (GE Healthcare). The experiments were performed in triplicate, and the incision activity is presented as fmol of substrate converted to product per min per μg protein.
Gap-filling assay
Reactions were done as previously described80,82 with some modifications. Single nucleotide gap-filling reactions were performed in 10 µl reaction buffer (40 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 5 µM dCTP, 5% glycerol) and contained 100 fmol of duplex oligonucleotide containing 1-nt gap at position 26 (Table 2) and 2 µCi of 32P-dCTP (GE Healthcare, USA). Reactions were initiated by adding 0.5 µg whole tissue extract and were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After the addition of the equal volume of the formamide stop dye, reactions were incubated at 75 °C for 10 min. Samples were run on 20% PAGE-Urea gel and visualized as described above. The experiments were performed at least in duplicate. The incorporation of 32P-dCTP activity was quantified as the increase in the signal intensity. The activity is presented as PhosphorImager units per min per μg protein.
Western blot analysis
The normal human skin fibroblast cell line (GM00969) was obtained from Coriell Institute for medical research, and the normal human lung fibroblast cell line (IMR-90), and human urinary bladder transitional cell carcinoma cell line (T24), and SV-HUC-1 transformed normal bladder cell line were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The cell extracts were prepared using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, and protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, USA). Proteins were separated on 4–12% Bis–Tris–plus gels (Invitrogen, USA) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad, USA). The membrane was blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad, USA) with TBST (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) followed by exposure to the primary antibody. After incubating with secondary antibody, the membrane was exposed to Pierce ECL Plus or Super Signal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate according to the manufacturer's protocol (Pierce, USA). The immunoblots were then visualized using ChemiDoc MP Imaging systems (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The immunoblots were analyzed with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-APE1 (1:1000, Abcam); mouse anti-POLβ (1:1000, Abcam); mouse anti-UDG (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); mouse anti-OGG1 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Rabbit anti-UV-DDB1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), Mouse anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Trevigen) and mouse anti-beta-actin (1:1000; Cell Signaling). PAR-PARP western control protein (Trevigen). Secondary antibodies employed: anti-mouse IgG, HRP linked (1:5000, Cell Signaling) and anti-rabbit IgG, HRP linked (1:5000, Cell Signaling). The membranes were stripped using restore plus western blot stripping buffer according to the manufacturer's protocol (Thermo Scientific, USA) to re-probe with different antibodies.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 6.1 software. Differences in the activities between NMIBC tissue and the corresponding normal tissue from the same individuals were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. The Pearson test was performed for correlation analysis. To use Pearson`s correlation test, all data were examined for normality using D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus test as recommended in GraphPad Prism software, and then the variables that were not normally distributed were normalized via transformation to natural logs. The Pearson correlation coefficient (parametric) measures the strength of the linear relationship between normally distributed variables. Spearman nonparametric correlation makes no assumption about the distribution of the values, as the calculations are based on ranks, not the actual values. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Supplementary information
Author contributions
M.M., S.K. and D.M.W. conceived and designed the work. B.S., S.K., F.M.A., A.E., T.E. and M.M. designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Y.S. and U.I. evaluated and graded NMIBC tissues and confirmed the healthy bladder tissues. S.K., M.B.T., C.O. and A.R.K. performed the cold cup biopsy of NMIBC and the healthy bladder tissues. M.M. and D.M.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors read, edited and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
All data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Berna Somuncu and Selcuk Keskin.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-73370-z.
References
- 1.Antoni S, et al. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends. Eur. Urol. 2017;71:96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Isharwal S, Konety B. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer risk stratification. Indian J. Urol. 2015;31:289–296. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.166445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Knowles MA, Hurst CD. Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:25–41. doi: 10.1038/nrc3817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.van Rhijn BW, et al. Recurrence and progression of disease in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: from epidemiology to treatment strategy. Eur. Urol. 2009;56:430–442. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wilson DM, III, Sofinowski TM, McNeill DR. Repair mechanisms for oxidative DNA damage. Front Biosci. 2003;8:d963–d981. doi: 10.2741/1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Illuzzi JL, Wilson DM., III Base excision repair: contribution to tumorigenesis and target in anticancer treatment paradigms. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012;19:3922–3936. doi: 10.2174/092986712802002581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Al-Tassan N, et al. Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C–>T: a mutations in colorectal tumors. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:227–232. doi: 10.1038/ng828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sampath H. Oxidative DNA damage in disease–insights gained from base excision repair glycosylase-deficient mouse models. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2014;55:689–703. doi: 10.1002/em.21886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wallace SS, Murphy DL, Sweasy JB. Base excision repair and cancer. CancerLett. 2012;327:73–89. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilson DM, III, Kim D, Berquist BR, Sigurdson AJ. Variation in base excision repair capacity. Mutat. Res. 2011;711:100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brenerman BM, Illuzzi JL, Wilson DM., III Base excision repair capacity in informing healthspan. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:2643–2652. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nagel ZD, Chaim IA, Samson LD. Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research. DNA Repair (Amst) 2014;19:199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaivao I, Piasek A, Brevik A, Shaposhnikov S, Collins AR. Comet assay-based methods for measuring DNA repair in vitro; estimates of inter- and intra-individual variation. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2009;25:45–52. doi: 10.1007/s10565-007-9047-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kelley MR, et al. Elevated and altered expression of the multifunctional DNA base excision repair and redox enzyme Ape1/ref-1 in prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;7:824–830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu Y, et al. The apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE/ref-1) DNA repair enzyme is elevated in premalignant and malignant cervical cancer. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:3713–3719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chantre-Justino M, et al. Impact of reduced levels of APE1 transcripts on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Oncol. Rep. 2015;34:1667–1674. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Koukourakis MI, et al. Nuclear expression of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (HAP1/Ref-1) in head-and-neck cancer is associated with resistance to chemoradiotherapy and poor outcome. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2001;50:27–36. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01561-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wen X, et al. APE1 overexpression promotes the progression of ovarian cancer and serves as a potential therapeutic target. Cancer Biomark. 2016;17:313–322. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen T, et al. The expression of APE1 in triple-negative breast cancer and its effect on drug sensitivity of olaparib. Tumour. Biol. 2017;39:1010428317713390. doi: 10.1177/1010428317713390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fan X, et al. The expression profile and prognostic value of APE/Ref-1 and NPM1 in high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma. APMIS. 2017;125:857–862. doi: 10.1111/apm.12733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bobola MS, Blank A, Berger MS, Stevens BA, Silber JR. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity is elevated in human adult gliomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;7:3510–3518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shin JH, et al. APE1/Ref-1 as a serological biomarker for the detection of bladder cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 2015;47:823–833. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Choi S, et al. Urinary APE1/Ref-1: a potential bladder cancer biomarker. Dis. Markers. 2016;2016:7276502. doi: 10.1155/2016/7276502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang D, Luo M, Kelley MR. Human apurinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) expression and prognostic significance in osteosarcoma: enhanced sensitivity of osteosarcoma to DNA damaging agents using silencing RNA APE1 expression inhibition. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004;3:679–686. doi: 10.4161/cbt.3.7.967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fung H, Demple B. Distinct roles of Ape1 protein in the repair of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation or bleomycin. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:4968–4977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.146498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Silber JR, et al. The apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity of Ape1/Ref-1 contributes to human glioma cell resistance to alkylating agents and is elevated by oxidative stress. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002;8:3008–3018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sak SC, Harnden P, Johnston CF, Paul AB, Kiltie AE. APE1 and XRCC1 protein expression levels predict cancer-specific survival following radical radiotherapy in bladder cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:6205–6211. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu J, et al. DNA repair pathway profiling and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:5104–5111. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dong ZM, Zheng NG, Wu JL, Li SK, Wang YL. Difference in expression level and localization of DNA polymerase beta among human esophageal cancer focus, adjacent and corresponding normal tissues. Dis. Esophagus. 2006;19:172–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Albertella MR, Lau A, O'Connor MJ. The overexpression of specialized DNA polymerases in cancer. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005;4:583–593. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Srivastava DK, Husain I, Arteaga CL, Wilson SH. DNA polymerase beta expression differences in selected human tumors and cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1049–1054. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.6.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bergoglio V, et al. Enhanced expression and activity of DNA polymerase beta in human ovarian tumor cells: impact on sensitivity towards antitumor agents. Oncogene. 2001;20:6181–6187. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bergoglio V, et al. Deregulated DNA polymerase beta induces chromosome instability and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3511–3514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wei H, et al. Association of polymorphisms in oxidative stress genes with clinical outcomes for bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huang M, et al. High-order interactions among genetic variants in DNA base excision repair pathway genes and smoking in bladder cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007;16:84–91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xie H, Gong Y, Dai J, Wu X, Gu J. Genetic variations in base excision repair pathway and risk of bladder cancer: a case-control study in the United States. Mol. Carcinog. 2015;54:50–57. doi: 10.1002/mc.22073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Manuguerra M, et al. Multi-factor dimensionality reduction applied to a largeb prospective investigation on gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:414–422. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Michiels S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in 85 DNA repair genes and bladder cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:763–768. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang M, et al. Genetic variants of XRCC1, APE1, and ADPRT genes and risk of bladder cancer. DNA Cell Biol. 2010;29:303–311. doi: 10.1089/dna.2009.0969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Figueroa JD, et al. Genetic variation in the base excision repair pathway and bladder cancer risk. Hum. Genet. 2007;121:233–242. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0294-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li S, et al. DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphisms, smoking, and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kavli B, Otterlei M, Slupphaug G, Krokan HE. Uracil in DNA–general mutagen, but normal intermediate in acquired immunity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007;6:505–516. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jang S, et al. Damage sensor role of UV-DDB during base excision repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019;26:695–703. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0261-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hinz JM. Impact of abasic site orientation within nucleosomes on human APE1 endonuclease activity. Mutat. Res. 2014;766–767:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Intano GW, et al. Base excision repair is limited by different proteins in male germ cell nuclear extracts prepared from young and old mice. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;22:2410–2418. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.7.2410-2418.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Izumi T, et al. Requirement for human AP endonuclease 1 for repair of 3'-blocking damage at DNA single-strand breaks induced by reactive oxygen species. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1329–1334. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.7.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Oei SL, Ziegler M. ATP for the DNA ligation step in base excision repair is generated from poly(ADP-ribose) J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:23234–23239. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002429200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Srivastava DK, et al. Mammalian abasic site base excision repair. Identification of the reaction sequence and rate-determining steps. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:21203–21209. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.33.21203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Visnes T, Akbari M, Hagen L, Slupphaug G, Krokan HE. The rate of base excision repair of uracil is controlled by the initiating glycosylase. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008;7:1869–1881. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sarasin A, Kauffmann A. Overexpression of DNA repair genes is associated with metastasis: a new hypothesis. Mutat. Res. 2008;659:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dusseau C, et al. Analysis of uracil DNA glycosylase in human colorectal cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2001;18:393–399. doi: 10.3892/ijo.18.2.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Saviozzi S, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer exhibits transcript overexpression of genes associated with homologous recombination and DNA replication pathways. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3390–3396. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Weeks LD, Fu P, Gerson SL. Uracil-DNA glycosylase expression determines human lung cancer cell sensitivity to pemetrexed. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013;12:2248–2260. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pulukuri SM, Knost JA, Estes N, Rao JS. Small interfering RNA-directed knockdown of uracil DNA glycosylase induces apoptosis and sensitizes human prostate cancer cells to genotoxic stress. Mol. Cancer Res. 2009;7:1285–1293. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bulgar AD, et al. Removal of uracil by uracil DNA glycosylase limits pemetrexed cytotoxicity: overriding the limit with methoxyamine to inhibit base excision repair. Cell Death. Dis. 2012;3:e252. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sawant A, et al. Differential role of base excision repair proteins in mediating cisplatin cytotoxicity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2017;51:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Weeks LD, Zentner GE, Scacheri PC, Gerson SL. Uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) loss enhances DNA double strand break formation in human cancer cells exposed to pemetrexed. Cell Death. Dis. 2014;5:e1045. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yan Y, et al. Inhibition of uracil DNA glycosylase sensitizes cancer cells to 5-fluorodeoxyuridine through replication fork collapse-induced DNA damage. Oncotarget. 2016;7:59299–59313. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wyatt MD, Wilson DM., III Participation of DNA repair in the response to 5-fluorouracil. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2009;66:788–799. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8557-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gackowski D, et al. Products of oxidative DNA damage and repair as possible biomarkers of susceptibility to lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4899–4902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Janik J, et al. 8-Oxoguanine incision activity is impaired in lung tissues of NSCLC patients with the polymorphism of OGG1 and XRCC1 genes. Mutat. Res. 2011;709–710:21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Paz-Elizur T, et al. DNA repair activity for oxidative damage and risk of lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1312–1319. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Speina E, et al. Contribution of hMTH1 to the maintenance of 8-oxoguanine levels in lung DNA of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97:384–395. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Paz-Elizur T, et al. Reduced repair of the oxidative 8-oxoguanine DNA damage and risk of head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11683–11689. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Obtulowicz T, et al. Oxidative stress and 8-oxoguanine repair are enhanced in colon adenoma and carcinoma patients. Mutagenesis. 2010;25:463–471. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geq028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kondo S, et al. Overexpression of the hOGG1 gene and high 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) lyase activity in human colorectal carcinoma: regulation mechanism of the 8-OHdG level in DNA. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:1394–1400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Paz-Elizur T, et al. Novel molecular targets for risk identification: DNA repair enzyme activities. Cancer Biomark. 2007;3:129–133. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2007-3303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Paz-Elizur T, et al. Development of an enzymatic DNA repair assay for molecular epidemiology studies: distribution of OGG activity in healthy individuals. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007;6:45–60. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Paz-Elizur T, et al. DNA repair of oxidative DNA damage in human carcinogenesis: potential application for cancer risk assessment and prevention. Cancer Lett. 2008;266:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Slyskova J, et al. Functional, genetic, and epigenetic aspects of base and nucleotide excision repair in colorectal carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:5878–5887. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Slyskova J, Langie SA, Collins AR, Vodicka P. Functional evaluation of DNA repair in human biopsies and their relation to other cellular biomarkers. Front Genet. 2014;5:116. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hill JW, Hazra TK, Izumi T, Mitra S. Stimulation of human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase by AP-endonuclease: potential coordination of the initial steps in base excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:430–438. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.2.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Marsin S, et al. Role of XRCC1 in the coordination and stimulation of oxidative DNA damage repair initiated by the DNA glycosylase hOGG1. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:44068–44074. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306160200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bobola MS, et al. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity is associated with response to radiation and chemotherapy in medulloblastoma and primitive neuroectodermaltumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:7405–7414. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fishel ML, et al. Antitumor activity and mechanistic characterization of APE1/Ref-1 inhibitors in bladder cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1947–1960. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Canitrot Y, et al. Overexpression of DNA polymerase beta in cell results in a mutator phenotype and a decreased sensitivity to anticancer drugs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:12586–12590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wei H, Yu X. Functions of PARylation in DNA damage repair pathways. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2016;14:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Stenzl A, et al. The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2009;55:815–825. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Aamann MD, et al. Cockayne syndrome group B protein stimulates NEIL2 DNA glycosylase activity. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2014;135:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2013.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Weissman L, et al. Defective DNA base excision repair in brain from individuals with Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:5545–5555. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wong HK, et al. Cockayne syndrome B protein stimulates apurinic endonuclease 1 activity and protects against agents that introduce base excision repair intermediates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4103–4113. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Muftuoglu M, et al. Telomere repeat binding factor 2 interacts with base excision repair proteins and stimulates DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase beta. Cancer Res. 2006;66:113–124. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.