Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Oct 1;9(40):e00949-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00949-20

Complete Genome Sequences of Four Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from Thailand

Peechanika Chopjitt a, Thidathip Wongsurawat b,c, Piroon Jenjaroenpun b,c, Parichart Boueroy a, Rujirat Hatrongjit d, Anusak Kerdsin a,
Editor: Kenneth M Stedmane
PMCID: PMC7530931  PMID: 33004459

Here, we report the complete genome sequences of four clinical isolates of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDRAB), isolated in Thailand. These results revealed multiple antimicrobial-resistant genes, each involving two sequence type 16 (ST16) isolates, ST2, and a novel sequence type isolate, ST1479.

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the complete genome sequences of four clinical isolates of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDRAB), isolated in Thailand. These results revealed multiple antimicrobial-resistant genes, each involving two sequence type 16 (ST16) isolates, ST2, and a novel sequence type isolate, ST1479.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the multidrug-resistant bacteria listed as a priority by the World Health Organization, as it exhibits resistance to most commercially available antibiotics and causes hospital-acquired infections (13). In particular, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections present limited therapeutic options and are associated with high morbidity and mortality as well as longer hospitalization (3). Recently, incidences of extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDRAB) infections have been reported worldwide, including in Thailand (4, 5). Four strains were isolated from individual sputum (n = 3) and bile (n = 1) samples by a tertiary hospital in northeastern Thailand between 2017 and 2018 (6). All isolates were cultured on sheep blood agar for DNA extraction. They were identified to the species level using gyrB multiplex PCR (7). These strains were resistant to 11 representative antimicrobial agents of all drug classes (piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline), whereas they had intermediate resistance to colistin, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2020) guidelines (8). The four XDRAB strains were grouped into international clone II (n = 2) and no clonal group (n = 2) based on a multiplex PCR assay (9).

Bacterial genomic DNA samples extracted using ZymoBIOMICS DNA kits (Zymo Research, USA) were sequenced using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Illumina platforms. Library preparation for ONT sequencing followed the rapid barcoding DNA sequencing protocol with the SQK-RBK004 kit without DNA size selection, to preserve the plasmid DNA, and the libraries were sequenced using a single R9.4.1/FLO-MIN106 flow cell on a MinION Mk1B sequencer. We base called and demultiplexed the raw data using Guppy v3.4.5 (ONT), specifying the high-accuracy model (-c dna_r9.4.1_450bps_hac.cfg). The ONT adapters were trimmed using Porechop v0.2.4 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop). Quality control of ONT reads was undertaken using NanoPlot v1.28.1 (https://github.com/wdecoster/NanoPlot). For the Illumina platform, the sequencing library was generated using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA library prep kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. We applied Fastp v0.19.5 (10) for quality filtering of the Illumina reads. Adapters were trimmed using Skewer v0.2.2 (11) (https://github.com/relipmoc/skewer). Quality checking of the Illumina reads was performed using FastQC v0.11.8 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Hybrid assemblies with the ONT and Illumina data were performed using Unicycler v0.4.8 (12) (https://github.com/rrwick/Unicycler/releases), and the genome sequences were checked for quality using QUAST v5.0.2 (13) (http://quast.sourceforge.net/). Complete circular DNA structures of the bacterial chromosomes and plasmids were automatically produced using Unicycler software. The genome sequences were submitted to the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.12 for annotation. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.

All isolates contained plasmids, and we detected seven plasmids in one isolate (Table 1). From the whole-genome sequencing, the following antimicrobial resistance determinants were ascertained using ResFinder (14) (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/) and CARD (15) (https://card.mcmaster.ca/): blaNDM-1, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM1D, blaVEB-1, blaIMP-14, blaADC-25, sul1, sul2, cmlA1, mphE, msrE, ARR2, tetB, tet(39), aac(3)-IId, aadA1, ant(2″)-Ia, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-VI, aph(6)-Id, and armA. The multilocus sequence type (MLST) findings using the PubMLST database indicated that two isolates were ST16 (or ST355), and the other isolates were ST2 (or ST195) and ST1479 (new sequence type), according to the Pasteur MLST scheme (with the Oxford MLST scheme in parentheses) (16, 17) (https://pubmlst.org/abaumannii/).

TABLE 1.

Assembly metrics and accession numbers of four clinically extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains

Strain Sequence type Total no. of bases (millions) No. of reads (thousands) N50 (bp) BioSample accession no. SRA accession no. for:
GenBank accession no. Total no. of contigs Type of contig Total length (bp) GC content (%) No. of ORFsa No. of rRNAs No. of tRNAs
ONT reads Illumina reads
A217 ST16 1,194 173 12,710 SAMN15596636 SRR12517409 SRR12517413 JACEIH000000000 5 Chromosome 3,897,448 39.05 3,606 18 75
Plasmid 118,657 41.06 127 0 1
Plasmid 78,040 43.88 82 0 0
1,266 8,400 150
Plasmid 43,239 38.81 62 0 0
Plasmid 12,366 34.46 14 0 0
A466 ST16 1,440 248 10,073 SAMN15596638 SRR12517407 SRR12517411 JACEIF000000000 2 Chromosome 3,944,195 39.02 3,683 18 74
1,208 8,100 150 Plasmid 8,731 34.37 10 0 0
A522 ST2 1,481 222 12,765 SAMN15596639 SRR12517406 SRR12517410 JACEIJ000000000 4 Chromosome 3,897,674 39.05 3,621 18 75
Plasmid 118,652 41.05 127 0 1
Plasmid 66,679 43.99 69 0 0
684 2,800 150
Plasmid 12,366 34.46 14 0 0
A423 ST1479 1,407 256 10,240 SAMN15596637 SRR12517408 SRR12517412 JACEIG000000000 8 Chromosome 3,806,348 39.00 3,517 18 75
Plasmid 108,874 43.13 116 0 0
Plasmid 95,364 41.49 104 0 1
Plasmid 6,078 39.17 5 0 0
Plasmid 4,554 41.26 4 0 0
1,310 8,700 150
Plasmid 2,924 37.82 4 0 0
Plasmid 2,816 38.74 4 0 0
Plasmid 2,309 38.54 2 0 0
a

ORFs, open reading frames.

Data availability.

These sequences have been submitted to GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA647677. The accession numbers and assembly statistics are provided in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand, provided a grant and English-editing assistance.

This study was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Roi Et Hospital (ERB). The ERB waived the requirement for informed consent as the study satisfied the conditions of the policy statement on ethical conduct for research involving humans. This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization. 2017. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland: https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/global-priority-list-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hsu L-Y, Apisarnthanarak A, Khan E, Suwantarat N, Ghafur A, Tambyah PA. 2017. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae in South and Southeast Asia. Clin Microbiol Rev 30:1–22. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00042-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. 2019. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom 5:e000306. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Teo J, Lim T-P, Hsu L-Y, Tan T-Y, Sasikala S, Hon P-Y, Kwa AL, Apisarnthanarak A. 2015. Extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Thai hospital: a molecular epidemiologic analysis and identification of bactericidal Polymyxin B-based combinations. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 4:2. doi: 10.1186/s13756-015-0043-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eichenberger EM, Thaden JT. 2019. Epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of extensively drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel) 8:37. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8020037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vaneechoutte M, Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Kampfer P, Wauters G. 2011. Acinetobacter, Chryseobacterium, Moraxella, and other nonfermentative gram-negative rods, p 714–738. In Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Jorgensen JH, Funke G, Landry ML, Warnock DW (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 10th ed, vol 1 ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Higgins PG, Lehmann M, Wisplinghoff H, Seifert H. 2010. gyrB multiplex PCR to differentiate between Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter genomic species 3. J Clin Microbiol 48:4592–4594. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01765-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2020. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th ed CLSI document M100-S30 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turton JF, Gabriel SN, Valderrey C, Kaufmann ME, Pitt TL. 2007. Use of sequence-based typing and multiplex PCR to identify clonal lineages of outbreak strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:807–815. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang H, Lei R, Ding S-W, Zhu S. 2014. Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinformatics 15:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen A-LV, Cheng AA, Liu S, Min SY, Miroshnichenko A, Tran H-K, Werfalli RE, Nasir JA, Oloni M, Speicher DJ, Florescu A, Singh B, Faltyn M, Hernandez-Koutoucheva A, Sharma AN, Bordeleau E, Pawlowski AC, Zubyk HL, Dooley D, Griffiths E, Maguire F, Winsor GL, Beiko RG, Brinkman FSL, Hsiao WWL, Domselaar GV, McArthur AG. 2020. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MAD, Wisplinghoff H, Rodríguez-Valera F. 2005. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol 43:4382–4390. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4382-4390.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Brisse S. 2010. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One 5:e10034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

These sequences have been submitted to GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA647677. The accession numbers and assembly statistics are provided in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES