Graphical abstract
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, chilblains, COVID toes, acral lesions, serology tests, RT-PCR, pandemic
Abstract
Background
Numerous of cases of chilblains have been observed, mainly in young subjects with no or mild symptoms compatible with COVID-19. The pathophysiology of these lesions is still widely debated and an association with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unconfirmed.
Objectives
This paper focus on the unresolved issues about these COVID toes and in particular whether or not they are associated with COVID-19.
Arguments
The temporal link between the outbreak of chilblains and the COVID-19 pandemic is a first suggests a link between the two events.
Positive anti-SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 immunostaining on skin biopsy of chilblains seem to confirm the presence of the virus in the lesions, but lack specificity and must be interpreted with caution.
Conversely, RT-PCR and anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology were negative in the majority of patients with chilblains. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 infection can be excluded, with relative certainty, even after accounting for possible lower immunization in mild/asymptomatic patients and for some differences in sensitivity/specificity between the tests used.
Some authors hypothesize that chilblains could be the cutaneous expression of a strong type I interferon (IFN-I) response. High production of IFN-I is suggested to be associated with early viral control and may suppress antibody response. However, the absence of other cutaneous or extracutaneous symptoms as observed in other interferonopathies raises unanswered questions.
To date, a direct link between chilblains and COVID-19 still seems impossible to confirm. A more indirect association due to lifestyle changes induced by lockdown is a possible explanation. Improvement of chilblains when protective measures were adopted and after lifting of lockdown, support this hypothesis.
Conclusion
Conflicting current evidence highlights the need for systematic and repeated testing of larger numbers of patients and the need for valid follow-up data that take into consideration epidemic curves and evolution of lockdown measures.
Perspective
Skin manifestations are considered infrequent presentations of COVID-19 but no causal link has been formally demonstrated to date (Daneshgaran et al., 2020, Freeman et al., 2020a). A significant number of cases of chilblains have been observed, mainly in adolescents and young adults with no or mild symptoms compatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. An association between chilblains and COVID-19 is suspected but the pathophysiology of these lesions is still widely debated. Although numerous publications on the subject of chilblains, pseudo-chilblains, chilblain-like lesions, covid-toes, or acral ischemic lesions exist, an association with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains currently unconfirmed.
The prevalence of these COVID-toes observed in several European countries but also in the United States is difficult to assess, with some authors drawing attention to possible SALAMI publishing and to overlapping cases reported in scientific literature and social networks (Kluger, 2020). These lesions seem to mainly affect feet of children, adolescents and young adults who are otherwise in good health and who have no particular medical history (Fig.1 ). However, in our series, blood tests revealed isolated positive anti-nuclear antibodies in one third of patients and these lesions seem to preferentially affect patients with a low BMI (Median:19.13) (Herman et al., 2020, Baeck et al., 2020a). Several patients report symptoms consistent with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the days and weeks prior to the onset of chilblains or contact with people who experienced such symptoms.
In most reported series, other causes of chilblains such as coagulopathy or systemic diseases were excluded. Several authors performed histopathological and/or immunofluorescence analyses that confirm the diagnosis of chilblains sometimes with vasculitis and microthromboses (Herman et al., 2020, Kanitakis et al., 2020). These features are classically encountered in chilblains and should not lead to confusion with the ischemic acral lesions due to thrombotic vasculopathy and systemic procoagulant state observed in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 and mainly triggered by endothelial damage (probably due to direct viral effect and perivascular inflammation) (Baeck et al., 2020b, Zhang et al., 2020, Magro et al., 2020).
The discussion focuses on whether or not chilblains are associated with COVID-19:
-
-
The temporal link between the outbreak of chilblains and the COVID-19 pandemic (moreover during an unusual season for this type of lesion) is a first argument to suggest a link between the two events.
-
-
Some authors have also shown positive anti-SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 immunostaining on skin biopsy specimens of chilblains, which seem to confirm the presence of the virus in the lesions (Colmenero et al., 2020, Santonja et al., 2020). However, due to lack specificity, these immunostainings should be interpreted with caution. (Baeck et al., 2020c, Ko et al., 2020).
-
-
Conversely, RT-PCR and anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology were mostly negative (Herman et al., 2020, Baeck et al., 2020a, Caselli et al., 2020, El Hachem et al., 2020, Neri et al., 2020, Roca-Ginés et al., 2020, Rouanet et al., 2020, Rizzoli et al., 2020, Mahieu et al., 2020, García-Legaz Martínez et al., 2020, Garcia-Lara et al., 2020, Freeman et al., 2020b, Colonna et al., 2020, Le Cleach et al., 2020, Lesort et al., 2020, Stavert et al., 2020, Denina et al., 2020). Negative RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs could suggest that chilblains are a late symptom of COVID-19. However, serological tests were often negative. A few publications reported positive serology for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA (El Hachem et al., 2020, Hubiche et al., 2020). However, the sensitivity of these antibodies is questionable and it cannot be ruled out that false positives may be due to excessive sensitivity (Jääskeläinen et al., 2020). Negative RT-PCR and serological tests in the majority of patients with chilblains allow to exclude, with relative certainty, SARS-CoV-2 infection, even accounting for possible lower immunization in mild/asymptomatic patients and for some differences in sensitivity/specificity between the tests used. For a viral associated phenomenon, the strikingly low rate of testing positivity raises questions.
-
-
Some authors hypothesize that chilblains could be the cutaneous expression of a strong type I interferon (IFN-I) response (Lipsker, 2020, Battesti et al., 2020, Damsky et al., 2020, Rodríguez-Villa Lario et al., 2020). A high production of IFN-I is suggested to be associated with early viral control and mild course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. IFN-I may also suppress antibody response which could explain why these patients would not develop antibodies and fail serologic detection. However, some questions remain unanswered with regard to the sometimes-long delay between the suspected COVID-19 symptoms and the appearance of the skin lesions or the absence of other cutaneous or extracutaneous symptoms as observed in other interferonopathies (Rodero and Crow, 2016, Papa et al., 2020).
-
-
To date, a direct link between chilblains and COVID-19 still seems impossible to confirm. Our study, like others, points towards a more indirect association due to lifestyle changes induced by lockdown, in particular sedentary lifestyles and bare-feet exposure to cool indoors (Freeman et al., 2020a, Kluger, 2020, Caselli et al., 2020, El Hachem et al., 2020). Patient follow-up support this hypothesis with the observed improvement of chilblains when protective and warm-up measures were adopted and containment restrictions relaxed. It should also be noted that we have observed no new cases of chilblains since lifting of lockdown measures despite recent new infections.
Shedding light on unanswered questions would be significant for patient management and information, testing strategies and implementation of isolation measures. Only data on large series of patients with systematic and repeated testing, as well as follow-up information considering epidemic curves and evolution of lockdown measures, will make it possible to strengthen any one hypothesis.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Funding Source
The authors disclose no financial associations nor funding.
Ethical Approval
The data have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Specific national laws have also been observed.
Authors contributions
Marie Baeck and Anne Herman performed literature searches, prepared the manuscript, reviewed and approved the manuscript and decided to submit the manuscript for publication.
Acknowledgments
The patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent for publication of their case details.
References
- Daneshgaran G., Dubin D.P., Gould D.J. Cutaneous Manifestations of COVID-19: An Evidence-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(5):627–639. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00558-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman E.E., McMahon D.E., Lipoff J.B. The spectrum of COVID-19-associated dermatologic manifestations: An international registry of 716 patients from 31 countries [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 2] J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.1016. S0190-9622(20)32126-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kluger N. Pitfalls of possible reporting of same patients with COVID-19 in dermatology journals [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 3] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16690. 10.1111/jdv.16690. doi:10.1111/jdv.16690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herman A., Peeters C., Verroken A. Evaluation of Chilblains as a Manifestation of the COVID-19 Pandemic [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 25] JAMA Dermatol. 2020:e202368. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baeck M., Peeters C., Herman A. Chilblains and COVID-19: further evidence against a causal association [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 31] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanitakis J., Lesort C., Danset M., Jullien D. Chilblain-like acral lesions during the covid-19 pandemic ("covid toes"): histologic, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical study of 17 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(3):870–875. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baeck M., Herman A., Peeters C., Marot L., Hermans C. Are chilblains a skin expression of COVID-19 microangiopathy? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 13] J Thromb Haemost. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jth.15008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Cao W., Xiao M. Clinical and Coagulation Characteristics of 7 Patients With Critical COVID-2019 Pneumonia and Acro-Ischemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(4):302–307. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magro C., Mulvey J.J., Berlin D. Complement associated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection: A report of five cases. Transl Res. 2020;220:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colmenero I., Santonja C., Alonso-Riaño M. SARS-CoV-2 endothelial infection causes COVID-19 chilblains: histopathological, immunohistochemical and ultraestructural study of 7 paediatric cases [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 20] Br J Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bjd.19327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santonja C, Heras F, Núñez L, Requena L. COVID-19 chilblain-like lesion: immunohistochemical demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in blood vessel endothelium and sweat gland epithelium in a polymerase chain reaction-negative patient [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 25] Br J Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bjd.19338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baeck M., Hoton D., Marot L., Herman A. Chilblains and COVID-19: why SARS-CoV-2 endothelial infection is questioned [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 15] Br J Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bjd.19489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko C.J., Harigopal M., Damsky W. Perniosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: Negative anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunohistochemistry in six patients and comparison to perniosis before the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 3] J Cutan Pathol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/cup.13830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caselli D., Chironna M., Loconsole D. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by polymerase chain reaction or serology in children with pseudo-chilblain [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 1] Br J Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bjd.19349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Hachem M., Diociaiuti A., Concato C. A clinical, histopathological and laboratory study of 19 consecutive Italian paediatric patients with chilblain-like lesions: lights and shadows on the relationship with COVID-19 infection [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 31] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16682. 10.1111/jdv.16682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neri I., Virdi A., Corsini I. Major cluster of pediatric " true " primary chilblains during the COVID-19 pandemic: a consequence of lifestyle changes due to lockdown [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 13] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16751. 10.1111/jdv.16751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roca-Ginés J., Torres-Navarro I., Sánchez-Arráez J. Assessment of Acute Acral Lesions in a Case Series of Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 25] JAMA Dermatol. 2020:e202340. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouanet J., Lang E., Beltzung F. Recent outbreak of chilblain-like lesions is not directly related to SARS-CoV-2 infection [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 26] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16776. 10.1111/jdv.16776. doi:10.1111/jdv.16776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizzoli L., Collini L., Magnano M. Chilblain-like lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a serological study on a case series [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 1] Br J Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bjd.19348. 10.1111/bjd.19348. doi:10.1111/bjd.19348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahieu R., Tillard L., Le Guillou-Guillemette H. No antibody response in acral cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 2] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16688. 10.1111/jdv.16688. doi:10.1111/jdv.16688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Legaz Martínez M., Martínez-Doménech Á, Magdaleno-Tapial J. Acute acral cutaneous manifestations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single-centre experience [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 26] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16777. 10.1111/jdv.16777. doi:10.1111/jdv.16777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Lara G., Linares-González L., Ródenas-Herranz T., Ruiz-Villaverde R. Chilblain-like lesions in pediatrics dermatological outpatients during the COVID-19 outbreak [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 6] Dermatol Ther. 2020:e13516. doi: 10.1111/dth.13516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman E.E., McMahon D.E., Lipoff J.B. Pernio-like skin lesions associated with COVID-19: A case series of 318 patients from 8 countries. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(2):486–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colonna C., Spinelli F., Monzani N.A., Ceriotti F., Gelmetti C. Chilblains in children in the time of Covid-19: new evidence with serology assay [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 13] Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/pde.14269. 10.1111/pde.14269. doi:10.1111/pde.14269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Cleach L., Dousset L., Assier H. Most chilblains observed during the COVID-19 outbreak occur in patients who are negative for COVID-19 on PCR and serology testing [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 6] Br J Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bjd.19377. 10.1111/bjd.19377. doi:10.1111/bjd.19377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesort C., Kanitakis J., Villani A. COVID-19 and outbreak of chilblains: are they related? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 27] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16779. 10.1111/jdv.16779. doi:10.1111/jdv.16779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stavert R., Meydani-Korb A., de Leon D., Osgood R., Blau J., Luu T. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 24 patients presenting with chilblains-like lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 18] J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.049. S0190-9622(20)32440-32443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denina M., Pellegrino F., Morotti F. All that glisters is not COVID: low prevalence of seroconversion against SARS-CoV-2 in a pediatric cohort of patients with Chilblain-like lesions [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 8] J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.021. S0190-9622(20)32409-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubiche T., Le Duff F., Chiaverini C., Giordanengo V., Passeron T. Negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR in patients with chilblain-like lesions [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 18] Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30518-1. S1473-3099(20)30518-1. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30518-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jääskeläinen A.J., Kuivanen S., Kekäläinen E. Performance of six SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays in comparison with microneutralisation [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 15] J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104512. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipsker D. A chilblain epidemic during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sign of natural resistance to SARS-CoV-2? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 6] Med Hypotheses. 2020;144 doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109959. 109959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Battesti G., El Khalifa J., Abdelhedi N. New insights in COVID-19-associated chilblains: A comparative study with chilblain lupus erythematosus [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 3] J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.1018. S0190-9622(20)32147-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damsky W., Peterson D., King B. When interferon tiptoes through COVID-19: Pernio-like lesions and their prognostic implications during SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(3):e269–e270. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Villa Lario A., Vega-Díez D., González-Cañete M. Histological findings in chilblain lupus-like COVID lesions: in search of an answer to understand their aetiology [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 12] J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jdv.16733. 10.1111/jdv.16733. doi:10.1111/jdv.16733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodero MP, Crow YJ. Type I interferon-mediated monogenic autoinflammation: The type I interferonopathies, a conceptual overview. J Exp Med. 2016;213(12):2527–2538. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papa R., Volpi S., Gattorno M. Type I interferonopathies: cutaneous vasculopathy, chilblains, panniculitis-induced lipodystrophyand others skin manifestations [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 2] G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2020 10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06709-7. doi:10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06709-7. [Google Scholar]