Skip to main content
ERJ Open Research logoLink to ERJ Open Research
. 2020 Oct 19;6(4):00159-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00159-2020

Rhinovirus-16 increases ATP release in A549 cells without concomitant increase in production

Samantha K Atkinson 1, Alyn H Morice 2, Laura R Sadofsky 1,
PMCID: PMC7569158  PMID: 33123553

Abstract

Human rhinovirus (RV) is the most common cause of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and chronic airway disease exacerbation. Cough is present in 50–80% of URTI cases, accompanied by heightened airway hypersensitivity, yet no effective treatment currently exists for this infectious cough. The mechanism by which RV causes cough and airway hypersensitivity in URTI is still unknown despite recent advances in potential therapies for chronic cough.

The effect of RV-16 infection (MOI 1) on intracellular ATP stores and ATP release in A549 alveolar epithelial cells was measured.

RV-16 infection was found to significantly increase (by 50% from basal at 24 h) followed by decrease (by 50% from basal at 48 and 72 h) intracellular ATP concentrations, while increasing ATP release (from 72 h) independently of secondary stimulation. This effect was mimicked by intercellular adhesion molecule 1 receptor binding alone through ultraviolet-inactivated sham control. In addition, RV-16-infected cells became more sensitive to secondary stimulation with both hypotonic and isotonic solutions, suggestive of a hypersensitive response. These responses were not mediated via increased TRPV4 or pannexin-1 whole-cell expression as determined by Western blotting. Interestingly, the increased ATP release seen was not a result of increased mitochondrial ATP production.

Thus, this is the first report demonstrating that RV-16 infection of airway epithelial cells causes hypersensitivity by increasing ATP release. These finding provide a novel insight into the process by which viruses may cause cough and identify a potential target for treatment of viral and post-viral cough.

Short abstract

Rhinovirus-infected airway epithelial cells (A549) show increased ATP release with and without a secondary stimulation (mechanical or hypotonic), which may account for increased cough sensitivity seen during respiratory viral infections https://bit.ly/3eABEY9

Introduction

Human rhinovirus (RV) is a major cause of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). RV infections are associated with acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD [1, 2], and are thought to precipitate the development of post-viral and subsequent chronic cough [3, 4]. During URTI, vagal afferent nerves become hypersensitive to various stimuli, including tussive agents such as capsaicin [5, 6] and even inhaled saline [7]. This airway hypersensitivity in URTI has yet to be fully characterised, although it is hypothesised to contribute to the cause of cough in URTI [610]; however, that mechanism is also unclear.

Other groups have previously investigated the effect of human rhinovirus-16 (RV-16), and other respiratory viruses, on the expression of “cough receptors” thermo-TRP channels TRPA1, TRPV1 and TRPM8 expression in airway in vitro cell models [11, 12] as a means of unravelling the cause of cough in URTI, but to no avail. However, patients with chronic cough display hypersensitivity to hypotonic solutions [13]. In vitro, hypotonic stimulation of the thermo-TRP channel TRPV4 led to ATP release via pannexin-1 in the airway [1416]. However, the role of RV-16 infection on TRPV4 expression and function is unknown.

It is now thought that ATP is a major component in causing chronic cough through stimulation of the P2X3 receptor [8, 1719], which has been shown to be effectively blocked by specific antagonists including gefapixant (formally MK-7624, AF-219) [19]. However, peripheral ATP alone was deemed not to be the primary source of increased coughing [17]. To date, RV-14 has been shown to increase extracellular ATP levels in NCI-H292 airway epithelial cells measured at 24 and 28 h [20]. In the study presented here, ATP release from RV-16 infected A549 alveolar epithelial cells was investigated over a time course (up to 168 h post-infection) to determine whether the common cold affected ATP storage and release, and altered TRPV4 function to hypotonic stimulation.

Materials and methods

Virus

RV-16 was a gift from Michael Edwards from Imperial College London (UK) and was grown and titred in HeLa Ohio cells determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose end-point (TCID50), as previously described [21].

Cells and RV infection

A549 and HeLa Ohio cells were obtained from Public Health England (UK) and grown in DMEM, 10% heat inactivated FBS, 50 U·mL−1 penicillin, 50 µg·mL−1 streptomycin and 1% l-glutamine and grown at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cultures of A549 cells were infected with RV-16 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. The cultures were mock infected with ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated virus preparation, as previously described [21]. These preparations were used to determine whether direct interaction with inactive or active virus particles were responsible for the change in cellular ATP production and release.

ATP measurement

RV-16 infected (MOI 1) A549 cell intracellular ATP levels were measured using a commercially available kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), as per the manufacturer's protocol. Measurements were assayed in duplicate, standardised to background luminescence and ATP concentration was quantified.

Extracellular ATP levels were assayed using a luminescent measurement kit (Invitrogen, MA, USA) on A549 cells, as previously described [22]. Cells infected with RV-16 were washed, incubated in Hanks’ buffered salt solution (+10 mM HEPES) and allowed to equilibrate for at least 1 hour. Supernatants were sampled at regular intervals, either undisturbed (basal), following isotonic control or 33% hypotonic stimulation. Results displayed as fold change (peak) or following area under curve analysis (total).

Western blot analysis (SDS–PAGE)

Cells infected with RV-16 were lysed in Cell Lysis Buffer (New England Biolabs, Hertfordshire, UK) containing anti-proteases. An equal amount of protein (50 µg) was subject to Western blot analysis with antibodies raised against pannexin-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA) or TRPV4 (Abcam). Equal protein loading was confirmed by anti-tubulin staining. Membranes were imaged with LI-COR (LI-COR, NE, USA) secondary antibodies on LI-COR Odyssey-CLx. Specific bands were normalised to tubulin, quantified by densitometry and expressed as fold change from basal.

Intracellular calcium signalling

Receptor function was assessed using a fluorescent calcium probe, Fluo-4AM NW (Invitrogen), as per manufacture's protocol. Cells infected with RV-16 were loaded with 2× fluo-4 direct assay reagent buffer (λex/em 494/506 nm) (Invitrogen) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Transient intracellular calcium responses were measured using Flexstation3 Molecular Devices with SoftMax Pro software. Responses were calculated as a percentage of 2 µM A23187, as previously described [23, 24].

Mitochondrial respiration analysis

Mitochondrial respiration was assessed using the Seahorse Extracellular Flux analyser (Agilent, CA, USA). Cells cultured on Seahorse XFp plates were infected with RV-16 and a mitochondrial stress test was performed. Lysates were salvaged and total protein was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid kit (G Biosciences, MO, USA). Respiration rates were normalised to µg protein per well.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean (±sem) of at least three independent experiments. Data were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's or Sidak post hoc test for multiple comparisons to a control. Differences were considered significant at p≤0.05.

Results

RV-16 infection affects intracellular ATP concentration

Hypotonic exposure and mechanical stimulation in A549 cells cause ATP release [15, 25]. Therefore, we decided to investigate the effect of RV-16 infection on production, storage and release of ATP. First, we investigated the effect of RV-16 on total intracellular stores of ATP at both short-term (figure 1a) and long-term infection (figure 1b). Between 96 and 168 h there was no significant difference in intracellular ATP stores from basal control, including UV-inactivated sham viral control (figure 1b, p>0.05; n=4). However, there was a 50% increase in intracellular ATP concentration at 24 h (figure 1a, p=0.0034; n=4) and UV sham control (p=0.0022; n=4). Followed by a 50% decrease in intracellular ATP concentration at 48 and 72 h (p<0.0001; n=4) from basal control.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Intracellular ATP stores reduced during early rhinovirus (RV)-16 infection. Total intracellular ATP concentration of A549 cells infected with RV-16 a) short term (3–72 h) or b) long term (96–168 h), with UV-inactivated viral sham control or left uninfected (basal). Intracellular ATP concentration quantified using commercially available kit at each time point. Results are displayed as mean±sem. of four independent experiments. Statistical analysis was carried out using multiple comparison one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. **: p<0.0034; ****: p<0.0001; ns: not statistically significant; n=4.

Basal ATP release is increased during rhinovirus infection

To clarify the decline in ATP concentration seen during early infection time points, ATP release in response to RV-16 infection was investigated. We assayed extracellular supernatants for ATP concentration in RV-16-infected A549 cells basally (without any further stimulation).

Over a 72-h period there was no significant change in peak ATP release basally (figure 2a, p>0.05; n=3). However, all other time points displayed a time-dependent increase in ATP release. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis revealed a significant increase in total ATP release at 72 h when compared to basal control (figure 2b, p=0.0185; n=3), all other time points were not significant (p>0.05; n=3).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Total basal ATP release increased during rhinovirus (RV)-16 infection. Peak ATP release shown as fold change from basal (a and c). Area under the curve (AUC) analysis determined over 5-min period (b and d). Results are displayed as mean±sem of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was carried out using a multiple comparison one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. ABU: arbitrary units. *: p<0.03; **: p<0.003; ***: p=0.006; ns: not statistically significant; n=3.

When measuring the effect of RV-16 at MOI 1 over a long-term infection (96–168 h), no significant change in unstimulated peak ATP release could be seen (figure 2c, p>0.05; n=3), despite a 7–12-fold increase seen in all conditions. However, once again AUC analysis revealed a significant increase in total ATP release from 120 to 168 h including UV-inactivated viral sham control (figure 2d, 120 h p=0.03, 144 h p=0.0012, 168 h p=0.0028, UV p=0.0006; n=3). Changes in ATP release at 96 h were not significant (p>0.05; n=3).

RV-16 infection increases ATP release following secondary stimulation

To determine whether the cells became more sensitive to mechano-sensation, a stimulatory response caused by the physical addition of solution to cells creating a mechanical force during RV-16 infection, the effect of isotonic control of A549 cells was investigated. During short-term infections with RV-16 there was no significant change in peak ATP release following isotonic addition at any time point (figure 3a, p>0.05; n=3). However, AUC analysis identified significant increases in total ATP release at 24 and 72 h (figure 3b, p=0.0233 and p=0.0464, respectively; n=3) when compared to uninfected isotonic control. There was no significant difference in ATP release at either 3 h, 48 h or UV control (p>0.05; n=3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Extracellular ATP release significantly increased during rhinovirus (RV)-16 infection when exposed to secondary stimulation compared to basal. Isotonic (ISO) stimulation (a–d). Hypotonic (HT) stimulation (e–h). Peak ATP release shown as fold change from basal (a, c, e and g). Area under the curve (AUC) analysis determined over a 5-min period (b, d, f and h). Results are displayed as mean±sem of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was carried out using multiple comparison one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. ns: not statistically significant. b–d) (ISO) *p<0.04, **p<0.0097, ***p=0.0005. e–h) (HT) *p<0.04, **p<0.01, ***p<0.0001. n=3.

Over long-term infection with RV-16, isotonic control induced a general trend of increased peak ATP release from 96 to 168 h, including UV control. Only 168 h was deemed significant with a 9.5-fold increase in ATP release from basal control (figure 3c, p=0.0204; n=3). Following AUC analysis, there was no significant change in total ATP release at 96 and 168 h following isotonic control (figure 3d, p>0.05; n=3). However, there was a significant increase in ATP release at 120 h, 144 h and UV control (figure 3d, p=0.0097, p=0.0005 and p=0.0012, respectively; n=3).

Finally, we looked at the effect of hypotonic stimulation on RV-16 infected A549 cells. Once again, despite a general trend of increased peak ATP release over short-term infection when compared to uninfected hypotonic control, only 72 h was significant with a 7.38-fold increase in ATP release (figure 3e, p=0.0099; n=3). Following the application of AUC analysis, the same trend was seen whereby total ATP release at 72 h was significant (figure 3f, p=0.0127; n=3) and all other time points were not significant (p>0.05; n=3).

We found a statistically significant trend of increased peak ATP release following hypotonic stimulation as time progressed over long-term infection (figure 3g). There were significant 2.7-, 4-, 4.3- and 5-fold increases in ATP release in uninfected hypotonic controls at 96, 120, 144 and 168 h, respectively (p=0.0185, p=0.0068, p=0.0028 and p<0.0001; n=3). Importantly, incubation with UV-inactivated viral sham control induced a 2.9-fold increase in ATP release compared to uninfected hypotonic control (p=0.0394; n=3), suggesting an intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-mediated response.

Following AUC analysis, compared to the uninfected hypotonic control, all time points and UV control were significant (figure 3, 120 h p=0.0011, 144 h p=0.0035, 168 h p<0.0001, UV p=0.0049; n=3), except 96 h (figure 3h, p=0.2466; n=3).

Ratiometric analysis of intracellular ATP and extracellular ATP release

To contextualised, quantified extracellular release (ExR) and intracellular ATP concentration ([ATP]) ratiometric analysis of short (figure 4a) and long-term infection was performed (figure 4b). A ratio was determined for ExR (isotonic and hypotonic conditions) to intracellular basal [ATP], for each time point over the 168-h time course.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Ratio of ATP release to ATP stores significantly increased as time of infection with rhinovirus (RV)-16 increased. Ratio analysis of sampled supernatant from basal, isotonic and hypotonic sampling experiments (figures 2 and 3) against total intracellular ATP concentration (figure 1) of RV-16 infected, UV-inactivated sham viral control (UV) or uninfected (basal) A549 cells. Results displayed as mean±sem of three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc statistical analysis was carried out, or paired t-test (basal versus 144, basal versus 168, HT versus 96). UV: ultraviolet; ABU: arbitrary units; HT: hypotonic; ISO: Isotonic; Intra/extra: intercellular/extracellular ratio. *: p<0.03, **: p=0.0041, ***: p<0.0004, ****: p<0.00001, n=3.

At 72 h, there was a significant increase in the ratio of unstimulated ExR to intracellular [ATP] when compared to basal (figure 4a, p=0.0001; n=3). At 48 and 72 h, there was a significant increase in the ratio of isotonic-induced ExR to intracellular [ATP] when compared to basal (p<0.0001; n=3). Finally, at 72 h, there was a significant increase in the ratio of hypotonic induced ExR to intracellular [ATP] when compared to basal (p=0.0041; n=3). No other short-term infection time points in any condition had significant change in their ratio of extra/intracellular ATP release (p>0.05).

During long-term infection with RV-16 there was a significant increase at 144 and 168 h in the ratio of unstimulated ExR to intracellular [ATP] when compared to basal (figure 4b, p=0.0003 and p=0.016, respectively; n=3). There was no significant change at any time point in the ratio of isotonic-induced ExR to intracellular [ATP] (p>0.05; n=3). Finally, all time points and UV sham infection control had significant increases in the ratio of hypotonic induced ExR to intracellular [ATP] when compared to basal (96 h p=0.0125, 120 h p=0.0004, 144 h p=0.0001, 168 h p<0.0001 and UV p=0.0313; n=3).

Rhinovirus infection has no effect on global pannexin-1 or TRPV4 protein expression

To determine whether the increased ATP release seen was a result of increased pannexin-1 or TRPV4 expression, Western blot analysis was performed on whole-cell lysates isolated from A549 cells infected with RV-16 at MOI 1, with and without isotonic or hypotonic stimuli. Lysates were probed for global expression of pannexin-1, TRPV4 and loading control α-tubulin.

Surprisingly, our data indicated that endogenous expression of either pannexin-1 or TRPV4 was not affected by RV-16 infection at any time point (figure 5a p>0.05; n=5, B p>0.05; n=3, C p>0.05; n=5, D p>0.05; n=3) or isotonic or hypotonic conditions (data not shown). Loading control α-tubulin expression remained constant across the infection time course. However, expression does not correlate to function. Therefore, TRPV4 function during RV-16 infection was investigated to see if altered TRPV4 function explained the heightened response to hypotonic stimulation and the resultant ATP release seen here. The data showed that there was no statistical difference in TRPV4 response to specific agonist GSK1016790A at any time point over the 168-h time course (p>0.05; n=3; data not shown).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Rhinovirus (RV)-16 infection has no effect on pannexin-1 or TRPV4 expression in A549 cells. Whole-cell A549 lysate (50 µg protein) infected (a) and (c) short term or (b) and (d) long term with RV-16 at MOI 1, probed for α-tubulin loading control and pannexin-1 (a and b) or TRPV4 (c and d) global protein expression, as labelled. Results are displayed as mean±sem of either (a) and (c) five or (b) and (d) three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was carried out using multiple comparison one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc analysis. Densitometry was carried and expressed as fold change from basal following normalisation to loading control α-tubulin; p>0.05.

RV-16 infection does not change overall ATP production rates

Finally, to determine whether the increased ATP release we identified during RV-16 infection was due to viral hijacking of cellular ATP production rates, we carried out a mitochondrial stress test.

The data provided read outs for ATP-linked, nonmitochondrial respiration, proton leak and ATP production rates. Surprisingly, infection with RV-16 did not significantly affect the ATP production rates at any time point or UV sham control when compared to uninfected basal control (figure 6a and b, p>0.05). Furthermore, the data demonstrate that during short-term infection (24–72 h) ATP-linked respiration and proton leak was not affected by RV-16 infection (figure 6c, p>0.05). However, nonmitochondrial respiration was significantly increased (35% versus 69%) when incubated with UV-inactivated viral sham control (p=0.0299) when compared to basal control. In contrast, during long-term infection (96–168 h) there was no significant change in ATP-linked respiration, nonmitochondrial respiration or proton leak at any time point or UV sham control when compared to basal (figure 6d, p>0.05).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Rhinovirus (RV)-16 infection does not affect ATP production rates in A549 cells. RV-16 infected A549 cells subject to a mitochondrial stress test at 0–168 h, including UV-inactivated viral sham control (UV), measured using a Seahorse Extracellular Flux analyser (XFp). a and b) ATP production rates for short and long term, respectively, calculated from oxygen consumption rate (OCR) measurements prior to and following addition of oligomycin. c and d) ATP-linked and nonmitochondrial respiration (non-mito), and proton leak analysed parameters from the initial OCR measurements represented as percentage of basal control from short- and long-term infection, respectively. Data are normalised to µg protein and displayed as mean±sem. ns: not statistically significant; *: p=0.0299 versus control; n=3.

Discussion

The common cold is a major cause of morbidity in society and it has been estimated that, in the United Kingdom, 120 million episodes occur each year [26], with children each accounting for 7–10 infections annually. The societal impact in terms of education, working days lost and morbidity is enormous. While this condition can be caused by a myriad of viruses, RV is a major culprit. The illness typically starts with a sore throat, rhinitis and nasal congestion, followed by cough in approximately half of all URTIs. Cough generally starts 2–4 days after the initial prodrome. However, it is reported as the most troublesome symptom and may persist long after resolution of other symptoms leading to a condition known as post-viral cough [27]. Unfortunately, little is still known of the mechanism(s) by which RV causes cough.

Airway hypersensitivity seen in viral infection was initially thought to be caused by thermo-TRP channels, TRPA1 and TRPV1 [8, 17, 18]. However, clinical trials have failed to show the importance of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in causing cough, particularly in chronic cough conditions [28]. Recent clinical trials, that have shifted focus to ATP as the culprit in causing cough and have shown potentially life-changing results through inhibition of the ATP-sensitive P2X3 receptor [19]. Despite these advances, we are still no closer to defining the mechanism of cough during URTI. We and others believe that ATP/TRPV4 may underpin the mechanism of viral cough during URTI.

Here we show that, no change in global TRPV4 expression or function was detected following RV-16 infection. TRPA1 and TRPV1 global expression and function was also unchanged (data not shown). This is in contrast to Abdullah et al. [11] who saw that RV-16 infection led to increased TRPA1, TRPV1 and TRPM8 expression, which may be due to differences in cell models used. We therefore sought to investigate whether altered ATP release in vitro could account for increased cough sensitivity seen during in vivo URTI. To investigate the effects of the common cold virus (RV-16) on ATP release, we used airway alveolar epithelial A549 cells infected with RV-16 for up to 168 h (7 days), a model commonly used for RV infections [21, 29]. Analysis of global protein expression, ATP release and mitochondrial function was undertaken to determine the role that RV-16 exerts on these essential cellular mechanisms. We have shown, for the first time, through the course of this research that RV-16 causes increased basal ATP release, and increased ATP release following stimulation with hypotonic solution and after the addition of nonstimulating, but mechano-activating, isotonic control. RV-16-infected A549 cells may become more mechano-sensitive under relatively innocuous stimulation the longer infection continues, with the largest impact becoming apparent between 96 and 168 h (4–7 days), thus mimicking the clinical course of disease. During the early stages of RV-16 infection (24 h post-infection), total intracellular ATP concentration was increased, followed by a large significant reduction (48–72 h post-infection) coinciding with increased extracellular release. We also show that this effect was mimicked by ICAM-1 receptor binding alone through our UV-inactivated sham control. Furthermore, we identified for the first time that RV-16 infection causes increased ATP release irrespective of further stimulation. This supports previous studies that ATP and P2X3 signalling are the molecular underpinning of chronic, and potentially viral, cough [19]. It is also in agreement with Shishikura and colleague's [20] work, which showed that RV-14 increased extracellular ATP levels in a model of viral-induced COPD exacerbations. These findings also correlate with the incubation period of in vivo rhinoviral infection and the onset of a symptomatic cough.

Ratiometric analysis between intracellular ATP and extracellular ATP release identified a significantly larger ratio of ATP release from 72 h post-infection, irrespective of stimulation type. This trend continued throughout the 168-h time course. Despite these findings, we found no significant change in pannexin-1 protein expression at any point in the infection.

Previous studies have shown that RV-B14 is able to directly influence the cellular metabolism of HeLa and fibroblast cells causing an anabolic reprogramming of host metabolism [30]. However, the use of nonairway cells and a nonphysiological MOI (3.5–5) means we cannot assume this same reprogramming response occurs in the airway during an URTI in vivo. Therefore, we carried out mitochondrial stress tests on A549 cell line infected with RV-16. Consistent with published literature [30], A549 cells displayed a minor glycolytic shift in phenotype during RV-16 infection following mitochondrial stress; however, this was not significant (data not shown). We had expected to see a larger shift in phenotype and increased ATP production from basal as indicated by our extracellular ATP sampling and intracellular ATP concentration experiments. However, given the well-characterised Warburg effect seen in cancerous cell lines, including A549 [31], we cannot assume that RV infection is not able to induce a stronger and more significant glycolytic shift in phenotype. There was no discernible difference from basal at any infection point for ATP-linked respiration, or proton leak. Although, we did identify a general trend of increased proton leak during early infection, not seen by late infection. We hypothesise that this is a result of increased reactive oxygen species production, a feature previously reported in RV infection [32, 33], due to an inducible proton leak [33, 34]. Furthermore, there was increased nonmitochondrial respiration in cells stimulated with UV-inactivated viral sham control. Collectively, these data suggest, and we hypothesise that at 48 and 72 h, a reduction in total intracellular ATP concentration, and an increase in ATP release without concurrent increased production is caused by a metabolic pressure elsewhere in the cell, probably a result of ICAM-1 stimulation (which will still be induced by the UV-inactivated viral sham control) and/or viral replication and early immune signalling pathways such as MAP kinase and NF-κB pathways, within the cells, enough to increase cellular metabolism. This would require further work to confirm, not under the scope of the work discussed here.

There are several limitations of this study, including our sampling method, duration of infection and cell line choice. We are aware that studying the effect of RV-16 infection long term without the presence of an aiding immune system makes our in vitro model not physiological; a tissue model would have been preferential. Our sampling method, while not ideal, has been used and published previously and we aimed to minimise any negative effect of our sampling, so we are confident in our data. Finally, the common cold, in particular RV, causes symptoms predominately in the upper respiratory tract, whereas our cell line of choice, alveolar epithelial A549 cells, is from the lower respiratory tract. However, RV infections are associated with frequent acute exacerbation of airway disease and research has shown the presence of pathogens including RV, thus whether these represent commensals of the microbiome of the upper and lower respiratory tract is unknown [35, 36]. We also believe that any effect that RV infection exerts in the airway would not be localised to the upper or lower respiratory tract. A prime example is that our data identified ATP release. This ATP would move freely through the respiratory tract and likely cause hypersensitive airways precipitating a cough reflex, further spreading ATP throughout the airway.

The data presented here give an unprecedented insight into the aetiology of viral and post-viral cough. To date, research in the field of cough has largely focussed on the importance of ATP-sensitive P2X3 receptors and pharmacological inhibition of vagal sensitivity within the airway. However, the data presented here lead us to conclude that infection of RV-16 causes increased extracellular ATP release in the airway without a concomitant increase in ATP production and thus accounts for the airway hypersensitivity seen with viral cough. Thus, ATP release is important in post-viral cough and may be a target for the treatment of viral and post-viral cough.

Footnotes

Author contributions: S.K. Atkinson conceived and designed the study; acquired, analysed and interpreted the data; and drafted and revised the final manuscript for publication. A.H. Morice conceived and designed the study; interpreted the data; and drafted and revised the final manuscript for publication. L.R. Sadofsky conceived and designed study; provided supervision; interpreted the data; and drafted, revised and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Conflict of interest: S.K. Atkinson has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: A.H. Morice has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: L.R. Sadofsky has nothing to disclose.

Support statement: This project formed part of a University of Hull-funded PhD studentship.

References

  • 1.Johnston SL, Pattemore PK, Sanderson G, et al. Community study of role of viral infections in exacerbations of asthma in 9–11-year-old children. BMJ 1995; 310: 1225–1229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6989.1225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Greenberg SB, Allen M, Wilson J, et al. Respiratory viral infections in adults with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 167–173. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9911019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Braman SS. Postinfectious cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129: 138S–146S. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.138S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Irwin RS, Baumann MH, Bolser DC, et al. Diagnosis and management of cough executive summary: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129: 1S–23S. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.1S [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dicpinigaitis PV, Tibb AS, Ramsey DL, et al. Stability of cough reflex sensitivity during viral upper respiratory tract infection (common cold). Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2014; 28: 154–157. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2014.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O'Connell F, Thomas VE, Studham JM, et al. Capsaicin cough sensitivity increases during upper respiratory infection. Respir Med 1996; 90: 279–286. doi: 10.1016/S0954-6111(96)90099-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dicpinigaitis PV, Bhat R, Rhoton WA, et al. Effect of viral upper respiratory tract infection on the urge-to-cough sensation. Respir Med 2011; 105: 615–618. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Atkinson SK, Sadofsky LR, Morice AH. How does rhinovirus cause the common cold cough? BMJ Open Respir Res 2016; 3: e000118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jacoby DB. Pathophysiology of airway viral infections. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2004; 17: 333–336. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2004.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eccles R, Lee PCL. Cough induced by airway vibration as a model of airway hyperreactivity in patients with acute upper respiratory tract infection. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2004; 17: 337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2004.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abdullah H, Heaney LG, Cosby SL, et al. Rhinovirus upregulates transient receptor potential channels in a human neuronal cell line: implications for respiratory virus-induced cough reflex sensitivity. Thorax 2014; 69: 46–54. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Omar S, Clarke R, Abdullah H, et al. Respiratory virus infection up-regulates TRPV1, TRPA1 and ASICS3 receptors on airway cells. In: Tripp R, editor. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0171681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morice AH, Kitt MM, Ford AP, et al. The effect of gefapixant, a P2X3 antagonist, on cough reflex sensitivity: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1900439. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00439-2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ransford GA, Fregien N, Qiu F, et al. Pannexin 1 contributes to ATP release in airway epithelia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2009; 41: 525–534. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0367OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seminario-Vidal L, Okada SF, Sesma JI, et al. Rho signaling regulates pannexin 1-mediated ATP release from airway epithelia. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 26277–26286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.260562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seminario-Vidal L, Kreda S, Jones L, et al. Thrombin promotes release of ATP from lung epithelial cells through coordinated activation of rho- and Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 20638–20648. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.004762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fowles HE, Rowland T, Wright C, et al. Tussive challenge with ATP and AMP: does it reveal cough hypersensitivity? Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1601452. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01452-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bonvini SJ, Birrell MA, Grace MS, et al. Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 4 and airway sensory afferent activation: role of adenosine triphosphate. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138: 249–261. e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abdulqawi R, Dockry R, Holt K, et al. P2X3 receptor antagonist (AF-219) in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet 2015; 385: 1198–1205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61255-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shishikura Y, Koarai A, Aizawa H, et al. Extracellular ATP is involved in dsRNA-induced MUC5AC production via P2Y2R in human airway epithelium. Respir Res 2016; 17: 121. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0438-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Papi A, Johnston SL. Rhinovirus infection induces expression of its own receptor intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) via increased NF- B-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 9707–9720. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.14.9707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seminario-Vidal L, Lazarowski ER, Okada SF. Assessment of extracellular ATP concentrations. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 574: 25–36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-321-3_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Morgan K, Sadofsky LR, Crow C, et al. Human TRPM8 and TRPA1 pain channels, including a gene variant with increased sensitivity to agonists (TRPA1 R797T), exhibit differential regulation by SRC-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Biosci Rep 2014; 34: e00131. doi: 10.1042/BSR20140061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chandrabalan A, McPhillie MJ, Morice AH, et al. N-Cinnamoylanthranilates as human TRPA1 modulators: structure-activity relationships and channel binding sites. Eur J Med Chem 2019; 170: 141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.02.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grygorczyk R, Furuya K, Sokabe M. Imaging and characterization of stretch-induced ATP release from alveolar A549 cells. J Physiol 2013; 591: 1195–1215. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.244145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Morice AH, McGarvey L, Pavord I. British Thoracic Society Cough Guideline Group. Recommendations for the management of cough in adults. Thorax 2006; 61: Suppl. 1, 1–24. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.065144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Witek TJ, Ramsey DL, Carr AN, et al. The natural history of community-acquired common colds symptoms assessed over 4-years. Rhinology 2015; 53: 81–88. doi: 10.4193/Rhin14.149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khalid S, Murdoch R, Newlands A, et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonism in patients with refractory chronic cough: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Johnston SL, Papi A, Bates PJ, et al. Low-grade rhinovirus infection induces a prolonged release of IL-8 in pulmonary epithelium. J Immunol 1998; 160: 6172–6181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gualdoni GA, Mayer KA, Kapsch A-M, et al. Rhinovirus induces an anabolic reprogramming in host cell metabolism essential for viral replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115: E7158–E7165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800525115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu M, Neilson A, Swift AL, et al. Multiparameter metabolic analysis reveals a close link between attenuated mitochondrial bioenergetic function and enhanced glycolysis dependency in human tumor cells. Am J Physiol Physiol 2007; 292: C125–C136. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00247.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Comstock AT, Ganesan S, Chattoraj A, et al. Rhinovirus-induced barrier dysfunction in polarized airway epithelial cells is mediated by NADPH oxidase 1. J Virol 2011; 85: 6795–6808. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02074-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Unger BL, Ganesan S, Comstock AT, et al. Nod-like receptor X-1 is required for rhinovirus-induced barrier dysfunction in airway epithelial cells. J Virol 2014; 88: 3705–3718. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03039-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheng J, Nanayakkara G, Shao Y, et al. Mitochondrial proton leak plays a critical role in pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017; 982: 359–370. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55330-6_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mitchell AB, Mourad B, Tovey E, et al. Spirometry filters can be used to detect exhaled respiratory viruses. J Breath Res 2016; 10: 46002. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/4/046002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mitchell AB, Tang B, Shojaei M, et al. A novel sampling method to detect airborne influenza and other respiratory viruses in mechanically ventilated patients: a feasibility study. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8: 45. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0396-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ERJ Open Research are provided here courtesy of European Respiratory Society

RESOURCES