Glycopeptides as Potential Interventions for COVID-19

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease that primarily attacks the human pulmonary system, is caused by a viral strain called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The outbreak emerged from Wuhan, China, and later spread throughout the world. Until the first week of May 2020, over 3.7 million cases had been reported worldwide and more than 258,000 had died due to the disease. So far, off label use of various drugs has been tried in many clinical settings, however, at present, there is no vaccine or antiviral treatment for human and animal coronaviruses. Therefore, repurposing of the available drugs may be promising to control emerging infections of SARS-COV2; however, new interventions are likely to require months to years to develop. Glycopeptides, which are active against gram-positive bacteria, have demonstrated significant activity against viral infections including SARS-COV and MERS-COV and have a high resemblance of sequence homology with SARS-COV2. Recent in vitro studies have also shown promising activities of aglycon derivative of glycopeptides and teicoplanin against SARS-COV2. Hydrophobic aglycon derivatives and teicoplanin, with minimal toxicity to human cell lines, inhibit entry and replication of SARS-COV2. These drugs block proteolysis of polyprotein a/b with replicase and transcription domains. Teicoplanin use was associated with complete viral clearance in a cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms. This review attempts to describe the activity, elucidate the possible mechanisms and potential clinical applications of existing glycopeptides against corona viruses, specifically SARS-COV2.

Introduction

Coronaviruses (CoVs), spherical and enveloped viruses with a diameter of 100–160 nm, cause respiratory and gastro-intestinal infections both in humans and animals.¹ The family of corona viruses is classified into α, β, γ and δ genus. Both α and β genus infect mammals, whereas γ and δ have been thought pathogenic only to birds.²

Previously, seven CoVs have been identified as human-susceptible viruses, of these α-CoVs, HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63, and β–CoVs, HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43 are less pathogenic to humans and usually cause common cold or mild respiratory infections, particularly in individuals with strong immune status.^3–5 However, certain vulnerable groups such as patients with co-morbidities and elderly people may experience severe infections.⁵ The other three, SARS-CoV, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV2, emerged in 2002, 2012, and 2019, respectively, and can cause severe respiratory illness and fatalities.⁶

SARS-CoV2 epidemic has diffused to many counties in the world from the epicenter Wuhan city, China; it was initially named as 2019-Novel Corona Virus (2019-nCoV) on January 12, 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO).^2,7 Later on, WHO designated the name of the disease as Corona Virus Disease-2019 (COVID-19)⁹ on February 11, 2020^2,7 that recently led to huge impacts on humans' health globally,⁸ indicating that coronaviruses pose a continuous pandemic threat to humans. On January 30, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 as a public health emergency of international concern.⁹

COVID-19 initially resulted in a cluster of viral pneumonia cases¹⁰ and later the number of cases escalated in China and globally.¹¹ In less than 3 months, the virus advanced to the whole world and has led to global shutdown.¹² Until the first week of May 2020, over 3.7 million cases had been reported worldwide. Currently, the United States of America (USA) (>1.2 million) has the largest number of cases followed by nearly 260,000 cases in Spain and 213,000 cases in Italy. The death toll from the disease surpassed 258,000 and nearly 1,240,000 had recovered from the disease.¹³ The case fatality rate of COVID-19 is 4% (Surveillances, 2020) compared to a rate of 9.65% reported due to SARS.¹⁴

The ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 has challenged the health care systems and communities in many countries¹⁵ for secondary transmissions have occurred through, for example, travellers and the speed of transmission is accelerating.¹⁶ The outbreak has negatively affected service-oriented economies^17,18 by interrupting global trade and supply chains, depressing asset prices, and forcing multinational businesses to make hard decisions with limited information.^19,20 Due to the ongoing progress of the disease, many nations have declared lockdown strategies and ordered people to stay at home; they have also allocated budgets for pandemic preparedness.²⁰

Initially, most patients infected with the virus were reportedly exposed to Huanan seafood market and wet animal market in Wuhan City, Hubei Province suggesting a potential zoonotic origin.^6,10 Genome sequencing and evolutionary analysis demonstrated 96.2% of genetic similarity between SAR S-CoV-2 and bat CoV RaTG13. This hinted that SAR S-CoV-2 might be transmitted from the natural reservoir, bat, to human via unknown intermediate hosts.²¹ Then person-to-person transmission has been reported both in hospital, family settings and communities,²² where symptomatic, presymptomatic and asymptomatic individuals transmit the virus via droplets from coughing or sneezing or direct contact with another person.⁶

Most patients with COVID19 experience fever, cough, difficulty of breathing and fatigue or myalgia. Less frequent symptoms including increased sputum production, headache, hemoptysis and diarrhea have also been reported. This viral pneumonia may complicate to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute cardiac injury, and secondary infection.^6,10 These symptoms and complications are highly pronounced in individuals with comorbidities such as cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities.^7,23 Among patients diagnosed with COVID-19, 17.1%, 16.4%, and 9.7% of the cases had hypertension, other cardiovascular disease and diabetes, respectively, and acute cardiac injury was reported in at least 8.0% of the individuals.¹²

Several measures have already been implemented to prevent and control the disease; however, the management and control of local transmission after importation heavily rely on a country’s health capacity on the application and execution of strict measures of detection, prevention, and control.^24,25 As of nations’ awareness of the epidemic, drugs such as chloroquine phosphate,²⁶ lopinavir/ritonavir,^18,24 broad-spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids, interferons, ribavirin, and mycophenolate mofetil have shown some activity against COVs infection.²⁷ Nevertheless, effective vaccines or antiviral therapeutic agents have not been approved to treat COVID-19 till now²⁸ and the treatment approaches were not selected based on well-organized clinical trials.²⁷

Glycopeptides had demonstrated anti-SARS-COV, anti-MERS-COV activities, and are effective against other superimposed viral and bacterial infections. Given that SARS-COV and MERS-COV have high genetic resemblance with SARS-COV2, drugs which are effective against these viruses could be considered for 2019-nCoV treatment.¹² More recent evidence also showed that teicoplanin potently inhibited SARS-COV2 infection in in vitro studies.²⁹ In addition, teicoplanin exhibited promising clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients who received a dose of 6 mg/kg every 24 hours (loading dose every 12 hours for three doses) for 7–12 days.³⁰

Assuming the urgency of treatment for 2019-nCoV outbreak, the potential to repurpose existing glycopeptides or in development could be considered as potential drugs for 2019-nCoV infections. Thus, the aim of this review was to describe the activity, elucidate the possible mechanism and potential to repurpose existing glycopeptides against coronaviruses, especially SARS-COV2.

Glycopeptides (GPs) as Potential Drugs for Coronavirus Treatment

Insight into the potential use of GPs against SARS-COV2 emerged after in vitro and animal studies demonstrated the effect of vancomycin, teicoplanin, ristomycin, eremimycin-type aglycons, and their semisynthetic derivatives to treat or prevent viral infections caused by Coronaviridae, especially, SARS-CoV and MERS-COV.³¹ Studies also indicated that GPs, teicoplanin and its derivatives, were effective against enveloped viruses such as ebola envelope pseudotyped viruses (pEBOV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV),^32,33 human hepatitis C virus (HCV),^34,35 influenza viruses,³⁶ dengue virus and other flu viruses,³⁷ SARS-CoV and feline (FIPV).³⁸ GPs, including DA-40926 showed antiviral activity with different degrees of inhibition in cell culture.³² High genetic similarity (79.5%) between SARS-COV and 2019-nCOV and their ability to recognize the same enzyme, ACE2, strengthen the speculation that GPs may exert anti-SARS-COV2 activity.³⁹

Particularly, the aglycons (Figure 1), onto which various functional groups attach, preferably hydrophobic residue, have marked activity against human immunodeficiency virus type1 (HIV1) and human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV2) at low micromolar concentrations (1–5 uM). Nevertheless, some of the compounds were toxic for human cells even at low drug concentrations.³² Cell toxicity was avoided (IC50> 500M), by removing all the carbohydrate residues, but anti-HIV-1 activity (EC50~50–65 M) was achieved at relatively high concentrations.⁴⁰ In later studies, these GPs devoid of carbohydrate residues exhibited no inhibitory action to SARS-CoV and FIPV. Interestingly, modifications made to the basic structure lead to the synthesis of aglycon derivatives, and glycopeptide antibiotics with a modified or partially destroyed peptide core, with potent activity against SARS-CoV and FIPV in cell culture.⁴⁰

Figure 1.

Major targets for anti-SARS-COV2 agents.

Teicoplanin and its derivatives (dalbavancin, oritavancin, and telavancin) mainly target SARS-COV2 and other enveloped virus entry (Figure 2), an ideal drug target for antiviral activity,²⁸ in to the cytoplasm of host cells.⁴¹ Another study on COVs also confirmed that the main molecular event associated with the action of GPs and aglycons is inhibition of virus entry into the host cells.³² In fact, virus entry into the host cells requires several biochemical and molecular changes.^42,43

Figure 2.

Chemical structure of a teicoplanin derivative aglycon.

GPs inhibit cathepsin L which is involved in the proteolysis of S protein, a spike protein that is selected and targeted for recognition of host cells by nCoV-2019.^44,45 S protein priming by cathepsin L and other cellular proteases, trans-membrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), furin and trypsin is fundamental to virus attachment and fusion^28,46 (Figure 2) of viral and host cell membranes. Enzymatic modification of S protein by TMPRSS2 accompanies cleavage-mediated conformational changes to both S protein and ACE2, which allows the host cell membrane to invaginate for initiation of viral endocytosis into the endosomes and the lysosomes.⁴²

Subsequently, S protein undergoes a series of enzymatic cleavages and modifications by endo-lysosomal cysteine proteases, cathepsin L, and to a lesser degree by cathepsin B in the endosomes.⁴¹ All the aforementioned process could not be assumed without proteolysis modification of S protein and ACEI with accompanied attachment and fusion. Thus, cathepsin L inhibition could interfere with entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cells.⁴³

According to in vitro studies, teicoplanin potently inhibited attachment of SARS-CoV2 virus to ACE2 receptors of the host, indicating that this glycopeptide blocks entrance of 2019-nCoV-Spike-pseudoviruses into the cytoplasm (IC₅₀, 1.66 μM).^44,45 Previously teicoplanin, has routinely been used in clinics to treat infection of human cells by MERS-COV, pEBOV, SARS-COV⁴⁴ by specifically inhibiting the activity of cathepsin L, opening a novel avenue for the development of additional glycopeptides as potential inhibitors of cathepsin L-dependent viruses.^21,41

The other targets for GPs are SARS-CoV encoded proteases. The genetic information of CoVs encoded in a large polyprotein with a replicase domain that shares two-thirds of the genome length and the structural regions. The nonstructural protein 5 (nsp5), the main protease (Mpro), picornavirus3C-like cysteine protease (3CLpro), and the papain-like cysteine protease (PLpro) involve in the extensive proteolytic processing of nonstructural and structural polyproteins, providing the functional proteins for SARS-CoV viral replication and propagation.^47–50 SARS-CoV 3CLpro, potently inhibited a glycopeptide derivative (Figure 1),³¹ and was considered as a promising target for anti-SARS therapy through its interference with virus propagation process and replication (Figure 2). Following large protein proteolysis, replication of the virus will proceed by the action of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.⁵¹ Remdesivir, monophosphoramidate prodrug of an adenosine analog, blocked CoVs replication through targeting the key replication enzyme, RNA polymerase in vitro and animal studies.⁵²

Moreover, GPs inhibit transcription and replication-competent virus-like particles, with an IC 50 as low as 330 nM.⁵³ With this, teicoplanin (Figure 3) efficiently inhibited enveloped human respiratory syncytial virus, but not non-enveloped viruses (IC50 as low as 330 Nm),⁵⁴ indicating that the agent probably targets common components of enveloped viruses,⁵³ including SARS-CoV2.²⁸

Figure 3.

Chemical structure of teicoplanin (a glycopeptide antibiotic).

Viral infection activates multiple pathways, like virus-encoded or virus-induced protein kinases which are considered as targets for antimicrobials and antiviral agents.^55–58 Protein kinases (PKs) of mature virions are thought to facilitate virus entry and replication of human pathogenic viruses. According to more recent studies, glycopeptide antibiotics, teicoplanin and eremomycin inhibit protein kinases, a key regulator of cell signaling.⁵⁹ Replacing the sugar moiety with hydrophobic residue in to aglycons and pseudo aglycons of glycopeptides is a means to synthesize glycopeptide aglycon derivatives with efficient activity against PKs of the viruses.³⁷ Another in vitro study also confirmed that various hydrophobic residues of teicoplanin aglycon carboxamides which were effective against PKs of SARS-COV, successfully inhibited all tested human PKs at low micromolar IC₅₀ values.⁵⁹

Clinical Application of Glycopeptides

Based on the aforementioned collective evidences, glycopeptides have been utilized as a potential antiviral agent or as intervention for likely superimposed bacterial pneumonia. Indeed, a number of reports have suggested that bacterial copathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, among others,^60,61 and viruses such as influenza, rhinovirus/enterovirus, influenza B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus⁶² are commonly identified in SARS-COV2 respiratory infections. These bacterial pathogens cause infections in up to 7.1% of COVID-19 cases, and have led to the empiric use of broad spectrum antibiotics in the majority of patients (71.3%).^61,63

Besides bacterial co-infection, the empiric use of broad spectrum antibiotics may be attributed to indistinguishable symptoms of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and viral infections.^7,64 In this regard, teicoplanin has been recommended as promising potential antiviral and antibacterial agent in some studies. A recent cohort study was carried out on 21 severe COVID-19 patients who received teicoplanin 6 mg/kg every 24 hours (loading dose every 12 hours for three doses) for 7–12 days, suggested that the drug might be considered as a potential intervention for COVID-19 following achievement of a complete viral clearance.30 Importantly, the anti SARS-COV2 activity of aglycons and teicoplanin is associated with reduced risk of nephrotoxicity and less frequent cutaneous rash, red man syndrome, and total adverse events.⁶⁵

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Since no vaccine or drugs are currently available for treatment and prevention of coronavirusinfections, antibacterial drugs that have previous reports of activities against viruses of similar species of coronavirus could be effective against COVID-19 and other coronaviruses strengthening the arsenal of existing antiviral options. For instance, glycopeptide antibiotics and their derivatives such as teicoplanin, oritavancin and dalbavancin could be repurposed for COVID-19 treatment because these antibiotics have been shown to inhibit several coronaviruses like SARS-COV, MERS-COV, SARS-COV2 and other enveloped viruses in the laboratory. Glycopeptides and their derivatives have demonstrated inhibitory action on transcription-replication competent of virus-like particles. This may give a hint towards the impeding action of glycopeptides on replication of SARS-COV2. Recent clinical evidence has also shown that complete viral clearance was achieved following administration of teicoplanin for a cohort of patients. We recommend further in vitro studies to rule out their effectiveness against COVID-19.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.