Skip to main content
Germs logoLink to Germs
. 2020 Sep 1;10(3):229–239. doi: 10.18683/germs.2020.1209

Infective endocarditis by Proteus species: a systematic review

Petros Ioannou 1,*, Georgios Vougiouklakis 2
PMCID: PMC7572214  PMID: 33134201

Abstract

Proteus spp. are members of the Enterobacteriaceae family and are Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria known to mainly cause urinary tract infections (UTIs) in humans. However, even though scarce evidence exists suggesting their potential to cause infective endocarditis (IE), a study summarizing the existing evidence is lacking. The purpose of this study was to systemically review all published cases of IE by Proteus species in the literature. A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library (through 5th May 2020) for studies providing epidemiological, clinical and microbiological data as well as data on treatment and outcomes of IE by Proteus species was performed. A total of 16 studies, containing data of 16 patients, were included. A prosthetic valve was present in 25%, while the most common causative pathogen was P. mirabilis. Aortic valve was the most common infected site in 33.3%, followed by mitral valve in 26.7%. Diagnosis was set with transesophageal echocardiography in 37.5%, and transthoracic echocardiography in 25%, while the diagnosis was set at autopsy in 25%. Fever and sepsis were present in 100% and 84.6%, respectively. Aminoglycosides and cephalosporins were the most common antimicrobials used for treatment. Clinical cure was noted in 62.5%, while overall mortality was 43.8%. This systematic review describes IE by Proteus species in detail and provides information on epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment and outcomes.

Keywords: Endocarditis, systematic review, Proteus, P. mirabilis

Introduction

Proteus spp. are members of the Enterobacteriaceae family and are motile, lactose-negative, urease-producing, Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria that are able to differentiate from typical enterobacterial bacilli into highly elongated rods covered with thousands of flagella, thus producing swarming colonies.1-3 Even though there are several species of the Proteus genus, the vast majority of the isolated clinical isolates are P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris.1Proteus spp. are most commonly associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs), both in regular hosts, as well as in patients with indwelling catheters and anatomic or functional abnormalities of the urinary tract.1,3

P. mirabilis, due to its flagella and the production of adhesins, can form biofilms quite quickly and easily, leading to fouling of foreign materials, such as urinary tract catheters.4 This ability to form biofilms is associated with its ability to cause UTIs.3 Furthermore, Proteus spp. are commonly isolated from the blood of patients, more commonly in the context of a UTI.5 Importantly, Proteus spp. have been associated with several other infections beyond UTIs, such as primary bacteremias and more rarely with other types of infections, such as respiratory tract, or wound infections.5

The ability of Proteus to form biofilms, in combination with its ability to cause bacteremia, could denote the potential to cause complicated bloodstream infections, such as infective endocarditis (IE), which is of particular importance, due to the notable morbidity and mortality that IE carries.6,7 Due to its rarity, IE by Gram-negative bacteria poses therapeutic dilemmas due to the lack of adequate experience and clear guidelines on how to treat these infections.7 Interestingly, even though there are some case reports with short literature reviews summarizing the characteristics of IE by Proteus species, a review adequately summarizing all available evidence in the literature is lacking.8

The aim of this paper was to systemically review all published cases of IE by Proteus species in the literature and describe the epidemiology, microbiology, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of these infections.

Methods

Data search

For this study, we adopted the Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines.9 Eligible studies were identified through search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library with the following terms: Proteus AND endocarditis. Day of last search was 5th May 2020.

Study selection

Studies meeting the following criteria were included in analysis: 1) published in English; 2) reporting data on patients’ clinical characteristics, microbiology, treatment and outcomes. Studies with the following criteria were excluded from the analysis: 1) secondary research papers (e.g., reviews), editorials and papers not reporting results on primary research; 2) studies not in humans; 3) studies not in English. Two investigators (PI, GV) using Abstrackr10 independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the resulting references and then they retrieved and rescreened the full text publications of potentially relevant articles. Study selection was based on consensus. Reference lists of included studies were searched for relevant articles.

Outcomes of interest

The primary outcomes of the study were to record data on: a) epidemiology of patients with IE by Proteus species and b) patients’ outcomes. Secondary outcomes were to record data on: a) the exact site of infection, b) the clinical characteristics of the patients, c) antimicrobial susceptibility and d) their treatment. Finally, another endpoint was the identification of independent risk factors for mortality by these infections.

Data extraction and definitions

Data from each eligible study were extracted by two investigators (PI, GV). The extracted data included study type, year of publication and country; patient demographic data (age and gender); patient’s relevant medical history (previous cardiac surgery or cardiac valve replacement, time after cardiac valve replacement); infection data and microbiology (infection site, isolated strains, presence of complications, presence of embolic phenomena); treatment administered for IE; and outcomes (i.e., cure or death). Data on microbiology and relation of death to the index infection was reported according to the study authors. Diagnosis of IE was confirmed by the investigators based on the information provided by the authors and the modified Dukes’ criteria if the diagnosis was at least possible (at least 1 major and 1 minor criterion or at least 3 minor criteria) or if pathological data established a diagnosis of IE.11 The complications recorded included any organ dysfunction or clinical deterioration that was considered by the authors to be related to the IE. The quality of evidence of the outcomes of included studies was assessed using the Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE).12

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as number (%) for categorical variables and median (interquartile range, IQR) or mean (± standard deviation, SD) for continuous variables. A univariate linear regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality and IE-specific mortality of patients with IE by Proteus species. The above-mentioned statistics were calculated with GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).

Results

Literature search

A total of 294 articles from PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library were screened. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, 23 articles were selected for full-text review.13-35 From these studies, 8 were excluded from the review: 3 had non-extractable data,28-30 2 did not describe IE by Proteus,31,32 1 full text could not be found,33 1 did not include any outcomes of interest34 and 1 study was a secondary research article (review).35 One additional study was found during the hand-screening of the included articles’ references. Finally, 16 met the present study’s inclusion criteria.8,13-27 The review process is graphically presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of study inclusion.

Figure 1

Included studies’ characteristics

The 16 studies that were finally included in the present analysis involved 16 patients in total. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of included studies. Among those studies, 10 were conducted in North and South America, 5 in Europe and 1 in Asia. There were 13 case reports and 3 case series, thus, the overall quality of the evidence that contributed to this systematic review was rated as low to very low, implying that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the data presented in this systematic review.12

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

Study, year published Age (years) Gender Site of infection Microbiology of infection Site of microorganism isolation Treatment administered, duration Infection outcomes, n
Taniguchi et al., 195013 55 Female Mural Proteus spp. Blood
Vegetation
Splenic abscesses
Penicillin, NR and aminoglycoside, NR Clinical cure 0a
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 1
Hiller et al., 196814 1 Male TrV Proteus mirabilis
Escherichia coli
Blood Chloramphenicol, NR Clinical cure 0
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 1
Rosen et al., 197315 52 Female NR Proteus mirabilis Blood
Valve
Urine
Chloramphenicol, NR Clinical cure 0
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 1
Carruthers et al., 197716 45 Male MV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Urine
Aminopenicillin, 12 days
and aminoglycoside, 12 days
then carbenicillin, 3 days
and aminoglycoside, 3 days
Clinical cure 0
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 0
Venezio et al., 198417 67 Male Mural Proteus mirabilis Blood Cephalosporin, 42 days post-surgery
and aminoglycoside, 42 days post-surgery
Surgery
Clinical cure 1
O
verall mortality 0
Ananthasubramaniam et al., 200018 50 Female AoV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Urine
NR
Surgery
Clinical cure 0
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 1
Sawhney et al., 200119 68 Male Eustachian valve Proteus vulgaris Blood NR Clinical cure 0
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 1
Lloyd et al., 200520 64 Male MV Proteus mirabilis Blood Cephalosporin, NR
Surgery
Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Claassen et al., 200721 58 Female MV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Urine
Cephalosporin, 28 days Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Kalra et al., 20118 62 Female MV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Urine
Aminopenicillin, 42 days
and aminoglycoside, 42 days
Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Liu et al., 201522 71 Male AoV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Wound
Aminopenicillin, NR
and aminoglycoside, NR
then cephalosporin, NR
and fosfomycin, NR
and aminoglycoside, NR
Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 1
IE-specific mortality 0
Goel et al., 201523 42 Male TrV Proteus mirabilis Blood Aminopenicillin, 42 days Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Rimoldi et al., 201624 39 Female AoV Proteus mirabilis Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Blood
Valve
Carbapenem, 42 days
and daptomycin, 42 days
Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Brotzki et al., 201625 59 Male AoV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Urine
Carpbapenem, NR
then cephalosporin, 42 days
and aminoglycoside, 42 daysb
Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Salsano et al., 201626 43 Female TrV Proteus mirabilis Blood
Urine
BAL
NRSurgery Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
Albuquerque et al., 201927 62 Male AoV Proteus mirabilis Prosthetic valve
BAL
Cephalosporin, 42 days
and quinolone, 42 days
Surgery
Clinical cure 1
Overall mortality 0
a

Defined as clinical resolution of the infection as a result of treatment.

b

Monotherapy with carbapenem led to clinical failure. Time-kill assays revealed that the combination of ceftriaxone and gentamicin were associated with the most efficient bacterial killing.

Each study included one patient.

AoV – aortic valve; BAL – bronchoalveolar lavage; MV – mitral valve; NR – not reported; TrV – tricuspid valve.

Epidemiology of IE by Proteus species

Age of patients ranged from 1 to 71 years, mean age was 52.4 years, and 56.3% (9 out of 16 patients) were male. A prosthetic cardiac valve was present in 25% (4 out of 16 patients) and was metallic in 1 patient and bioprosthetic in 3 patients. Furthermore, 18.8% (3 patients) had a history of intravenous drug use (IVDU), 12.5% (2 patients) had a history of a previous IE, 6.3% (1 patient) had a central venous catheter and 6.3% (1 patient) had a foreign material in the heart (bristle) due to unintended ingestion. The characteristics of patients with IE by Proteus species can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2.

Characteristics of 16 patients with infective endocarditis by Proteus species. Values show cases among patients with available data.

Characteristic Value
Male, n (%) 9 out of 16 (56.3%)
Age, mean (±SD) in years 52.4 (±16.9)
Predisposing factors
Prosthetic valve, n (%) 4 out of 16 (25%)
IVDU, n (%) 3 out of 16 (18.8%)
Previous IE, n (%) 2 out of 16 (12.5%)
CVC, n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Foreign material in heart (traumatic), n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Site of infection inside heart
Aortic valve, n (%) 5 out of 15 (33.3%)
Mitral valve, n (%) 4 out of 15 (26.7%)
Tricuspid valve, n (%) 3 out of 15 (20%)
Mural endocardium, n (%) 2 out of 15 (13.3%)
Eustachian valve, n (%) 1 out of 15 (6.7%)
Microbiology
Proteus mirabilis, n (%) 14 out of 16 (87.5%)
Proteus vulgaris, n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Proteus spp., n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Polymicrobial, n (%) 2 out of 16 (12.5%)
Staphylococcus aureus, n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Escherichia coli, n (%) 1 out of 15 (6.7%)
Antimicrobial resistance
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, n (%) 1 out of 3 (33.3%)
Quinolones, n (%) 1 out of 4 (25%)
Aminopenicillins, n (%) 1 out of 6 (16.7%)
Cephalosporins, n (%) 0 out of 8 (0%)
Piperacillin/tazobactam, n (%) 0 out of 3 (0%)
Carbapenems, n (%) 0 out of 4 (0%)
Aminoglycosides, n (%) 0 out of 9 (0%)
Method of diagnosis
Transesophageal echocardiography, n (%) 6 out of 16 (37.5%)
Transthoracic echocardiography, n (%) 4 out of 16 (25%)
Echocardiography non-diagnostic*, n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Autopsy, n (%) 4 out of 16 (25%)
Clinical characteristics
Feverish, n (%) 15 out of 15 (100%)
Septic, n (%) 11 out of 13 (84.6%)
Concurrent UTI, n (%) 7 out of 15 (43.8%)
Embolic phenomena, n (%) 6 out of 14 (42.9%)
Heart failure, n (%) 2 out of 14 (14.3%)
Immunologic phenomena, n (%) 2 out of 14 (14.3%)
Paravalvular abscess, n (%) 2 out of 15 (13.3%)
Concurrent SSTI, n (%) 1 out of 16 (6.3%)
Treatment
Duration of treatment in weeks, median (IQR) 6 (6, 6)
Aminoglycosides, n (%) 6 out of 13 (46.2%)
Cephalosporin, n (%) 6 out of 13 (46.2%)
Aminopenicillin, n (%) 3 out of 13 (23.1%)
Chloramphenicol, n (%) 2 out of 13 (15.4%)
Carbapenem, n (%) 1 out of 13 (7.7%)
Quinolone, n (%) 1 out of 13 (7.7%)
Fosfomycin, n (%) 1 out of 13 (7.7%)
Carbenicillin, n (%) 1 out of 13 (7.7%)
Penicillin, n (%) 1 out of 13 (7.7%)
Daptomycin, n (%) 1 out of 13 (7.7%)
Surgical intervention, n (%) 5 out of 16 (31.3%)
Outcomes
Clinical cure, n (%) 10 out of 16 (62.5%)
Deaths due to infection, n (%) 5 out of 16 (31.3%)
Deaths overall, n (%) 7 out of 16 (43.8%)
*

Diagnosis of IE met current (Duke’s) diagnostic criteria.

CVC – central venous catheter; IE – infective endocarditis; IVDU – intravenous drug use; IQR – interquartile range; SD – standard deviation; SSTI – skin and soft tissue infection; UTI – urinary tract infection.

Microbiology of IE and antimicrobial resistance of Proteus species

The most commonly identified species was P. mirabilis in 87.5% (14 out of 16 patients), P. vulgaris in 6.3 (1 patient), while in 6.3% (1 patient), the species were not specified. S. aureus and E. coli were isolated in 6.3% (1 patient) of IE each. Resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was noted in 33.3% (1 out of 3 patients), to quinolones in 25% (1 out of 4 patients), to aminopenicillins in 16.7% (1 out of 6 patients), while no resistance was noted to cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides.

Diagnosis of IE by Proteus species

The most common site of infection was the aortic valve in 33.3% (5 out of 15 patients with available data), the mitral valve in 26.7% (4 patients), the tricuspid valve in 20% (3 patients), the mural endocardium in 12.5% (2 patients) and the eustachian valve in 6.3% (1 patient). Diagnosis was set with transesophageal echocardiography in 37.5% (6 out of 16 patients), with transthoracic echocardiography in 25% (4 patients), at autopsy in 25% (4 patients), through valve culture in 6.3% (1 patient) while diagnosis was set empirically due to non-diagnostic echocardiography in 6.3% (1 patient). In the last case, the patient presented with signs and symptoms of IE and was treated as such, while according to the Duke criteria, diagnosis of IE was possible (one major and one minor criterion), thus, this study was included in this analysis.

Clinical characteristics of IE by Proteus species

Fever was present in 100% (15 out of 15 patients with available data); sepsis in 84.6% (11 out of 13 patients with available data), a concurrent UTI in 43.8% (7 out of 16 patients), while embolic phenomena occurred in 42.9% (6 out of 14 patients with available data) and immunologic phenomena and heart failure in 14.3% (2 out of 14 patients) each. Furthermore, 13.3% (2 out of 15 patients with available data) developed a paravalvular abscess, and a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) was present in 6.3% (1 out of 16 patients).

Treatment and outcomes of IE by Proteus species

Treatment administered for IE by Proteus species can be seen in detail in Table 1 and in summary in Table 2. Duration of treatment among survivors ranged from 4 to 6 weeks, with a median duration of 6 weeks. Surgical intervention was performed in 31.3% (5 out of 16 patients). Clinical cure was achieved in 62.3% (10 out of 16 patients), overall mortality was 43.8% (7 patients) and the mortality attributed directly to IE was 31.3% (5 patients).

Statistical analysis of IE by Proteus species

We performed a univariate linear regression analysis in order to identify any association between gender, age, being an IVDU, having a prosthetic cardiac valve, concurrent UTI, having IE at the aortic, the mitral or the tricuspid valve, presenting with sepsis or embolic phenomena, treatment with aminoglycosides or cephalosporins, and having a surgery, with overall mortality and IE-specific mortality. The analysis did not identify any statistically significant association with mortality.

Discussion

IE is an uncommon disease that carries a significant mortality and is mostly caused by Gram-positive microorganisms. However, Gram-negative microorganisms may be involved in some cases of IE.28,36 More specifically, IE by Proteus species is a very rare disease. Thus, even though there are some case reports in the literature, there is no study summarizing its characteristics. To our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically reviews IE by Proteus species, and provides thorough information on its clinical and microbiological characteristics, as well as data on treatment and outcomes.

Mean age at diagnosis of patients with Proteus IE herein was 52.4 years, while a slight male predominance was noted; findings that share similarity with IE caused by non-HACEK Gram-negative bacteria (NHGNB) according to literature.28,29,37 Among all patients with IE by Proteus species, 25% had a prosthetic cardiac valve, which is similar to the rate in other studies that ranged from 19% to 67%.28,37-39 Furthermore, 12.5% of patients with IE by Proteus species had a previous episode of IE, while, in other studies, that rate ranged from 3.8% to 67%.28,37-39 Finally, 18.8% of patients with IE by Proteus species were IVDU, while the rate of IVDU patients with IE by NHGNB in the literature varied widely from 0% to 93%.28,37-39

The most commonly infected intracardiac sites were the aortic valve in 33.3% and the mitral valve in 26.7%. In other studies, with IE by NHGNB, the infected sites differed, with the aortic valve being most commonly infected in 42%, followed by the tricuspid valve in 33% in one study37 and the mitral valve being the commonest infected valve in 31%, followed by the aortic valve in 24% in another study.28

Regarding clinical presentation, fever was the most common symptom, and it occurred in all patients with available data, while 84.6% of patients were septic. In studies with IE caused by NHGNB, presence of fever ranged from 77% to 92%.37,38 Among patients with Proteus IE, 14.3% developed heart failure, which is similar to the rate in other studies that ranged from 8% to 38%.28,29,37,38 Embolic and immunologic phenomena in Proteus IE were present in 42.9% and 14.3% respectively, which are similar to the rates in IE caused by NHGNB that ranged from 14% to 65% and from 8% to 40% respectively.28,37-39 A paravalvular abscess occurred in 13.3% of patients with IE by Proteus species, which approximates the rate of abscess development in IE by NHGNB, that ranged from 5.2% to 42%.28,37,39

Among the studies included in this systematic review, the most common species causing IE was P. mirabilis, while in one case P. vulgaris was identified and in one remaining case the species was not noted. This is, however, in line with the literature that shows that, in general, P. mirabilis is the most clinically relevant species causing human infection.1 Interestingly, a close association of IE with concomitant UTI was noted, since 43.8% of patients with IE had a diagnosis of UTI at the same time, which confirms the predilection of this pathogen to causing UTIs.1,3 In terms of pathophysiology, the most reasonable scenario would be that a UTI led to bacteremia and that led to IE. However, based on the data provided from the included studies, one cannot exclude the possibility of a bacteremia due to IE leading to bacterial seeding of the kidneys and secondary UTI.

Proteus spp. are not globally considered to pose a significant problem in terms of antimicrobial resistance until now. This systematic review identified resistance of Proteus strains to co-trimoxazole and quinolones in up to 33%, while the resistance to other antimicrobials was minimal. However, many of the studies were old, and may not represent the current trends of antimicrobial resistance. Additionally, few studies provided data on antimicrobial resistance and thus, this information should be read with caution. These data come to confirm the literature, where increased resistance of Proteus strains to co-trimoxazole and quinolones has been noted, even though those resistance rates were higher than in this systematic review.40

Given the above, it is no surprise that for the treatment of IE by Proteus species, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins and aminopenicillins were the most common antimicrobials used, while quinolones and carbapenems were used in fewer cases. Mortality was, however, high, with two out of five patients dying and the vast majority of them dying specifically due to the IE by Proteus which was higher than the rate in studies of IE by NHGNB, where mortality ranged from 5% to 24%.28,29,38,39 However, it should be noted that even though the in-hospital mortality was relatively low in those studies, two studies showed data on one-year mortality that reached up to 30%, thus, implying that IE by NHGNB is a lethal disease.37,39

The present systematic review has some limitations. First of all, it consists of case reports and case series, rendering the quality of evidence contributed low to very low. Furthermore, the possibility of publication bias also exists. However, since there is no study in the literature giving specifically data on IE by Proteus species with an adequate number of patients, we could not have used another methodology than the one we used.

Conclusions

To conclude, this study describes the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, microbiology, treatment and outcomes of IE by Proteus species. P. mirabilis was the most common cause, while mortality was high. Antimicrobial resistance does not seem to be a problem until now, with most of the cases being treated with aminoglycosides, cephalosporins and aminopenicillins.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions statement: PI conceived the study; PI and GV collected and analyzed the data and led the writing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest: All authors – none to declare.

Funding: None to declare.

References

  • 1.Donnenberg M. Enterobacteriaceae. In: Bennett JE, et al., editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2015. p. 2516. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Armbruster CE, Mobley HL. Merging mythology and morphology: the multifaceted lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:743–54. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schaffer JN, Pearson MM. Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Armbruster CE, Mobley HLT, Pearson MM. Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis Infection. EcoSal Plus. 2018;8 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0009-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kwiecińska-Piróg J, Skowron K, Gospodarek-Komkowska E. Primary and secondary bacteremia caused by Proteus spp.: epidemiology, strains susceptibility and biofilm formation. Pol J Microbiol. 2018;67:471–8. doi: 10.21307/pjm-2018-055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang A, Gaca JG, Chu VH. Management considerations in infective endocarditis: a review. JAMA. 2018;320:72–83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1435–86. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kalra A, Cooley C, Tsigrelis C. Treatment of endocarditis due to Proteus species: a literature review. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15:e222–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wallace BC, Small K, Brodley CE, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr; Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium; 2012. pp. 819–24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633–8. doi: 10.1086/313753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Taniguchi T, Murphy FD. Mural bacterial endocarditis produced by Proteus. J Am Med Assoc. 1950;143:427–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.82910400001006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hiller EJ. Bristle in the heart. Br Med J. 1968;4:812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5634.812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rosen P, Armstrong D. Infective endocarditis in patients treated for malignant neoplastic diseases: a postmortem study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973;60:241–51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/60.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carruthers MM. Endocarditis due to enteric bacilli other than Salmonellae: case reports and literature review. Am J Med Sci. 1977;273:203–11. doi: 10.1097/00000441-197703000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Venezio FR, Thompson JE, Sullivan H, Subramanian R, Ritzman P, Gunnar RM. Infection of a ventricular aneurysm and cardiac mural thrombus. Survival after surgical resection. Am J Med. 1984;77:551–4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90119-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ananthasubramaniam K, Karthikeyan V. Aortic ring abscess and aortoatrial fistula complicating fulminant prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Proteus mirabilis. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:63–6. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sawhney N, Palakodeti V, Raisinghani A, Rickman LS, DeMaria AN, Blanchard DG. Eustachian valve endocarditis: a case series and analysis of the literature. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14:1139–42. doi: 10.1067/mje.2001.114012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lloyd M, Satterwhite L, Lerakis S. Successfully treated mitral valve Proteus mirabilis endocarditis. Am J Med Sci. 2005;329:267–9. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200505000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Claassen DO, Batsis JA, Orenstein R. Proteus mirabilis: a rare cause of infectious endocarditis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39:373–5. doi: 10.1080/00365540600981652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu CH, Chang WJ, Chin C. An unusual cause of infective endocarditis: Proteus mirabilis bacteremia from an infected pressure ulcer. Int J Gerontol. 2015;9:243–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijge.2014.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goel R, Sekar B, Payne MN. Proteus endocarditis in an intravenous drug user. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2015212447. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-212447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rimoldi SG, De Vecchi E, Pagani C, et al. Use of dithiothreitol to dislodge bacteria from the biofilm on an aortic valve in the operating theatre: a case of infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:e357–9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brotzki CR, Mergenhagen KA, Bulman ZP, Tsuji BT, Berenson CS. Native valve Proteus mirabilis endocarditis: successful treatment of a rare entity formulated by in vitro synergy antibiotic testing. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2016215956. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-215956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Salsano A, Sportelli E, Borile S, Santini F. Proteus mirabilis bioprosthetic tricuspid valve endocarditis with massive right ventricular vegetation: a new entity in the prosthetic valve endocarditis aetiology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:581–2. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Albuquerque I, Silva AR, Carreira MS, Friões F. Proteus mirabilis endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12:e230575. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-230575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morpeth S, Murdoch D, Cabell CH, et al. Non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:829–35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-12-200712180-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Falcone M, Tiseo G, Durante-Mangoni E, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of endocarditis due to non-HACEK gram-negative bacilli: data from the prospective multicenter italian endocarditis study cohort. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e02208–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02208-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Polewczyk A, Janion M, Podlaski R, Kutarski A. Clinical manifestations of lead-dependent infective endocarditis: analysis of 414 cases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1601–8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2117-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Madhavan T, Quinn EL, Freimer E, et al. Clinical studies of cefazolin and comparison with other cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973;4:525–31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.4.5.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tolan RW, Jr, Kleiman MB, Frank M, King H, Brown JW. Operative intervention in active endocarditis in children: report of a series of cases and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:852–62. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.4.852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Acuna JM, Garcia-Bengoechea J, et al. Endocarditis with pericardial bioprostheses: clinico-pathologic characteristics, immediate and long term prognosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:172–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abela GS, Majmudar B, Felner JM. Myocardial abscesses unassociated with infective endocarditis. South Med J. 1981;74:432–4. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198104000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis: past, present and future. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1972;6:161–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2016;387:882–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00067-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Loubet P, Lescure FX, Lepage L, et al. Endocarditis due to gram-negative bacilli at a French teaching hospital over a 6-year period: clinical characteristics and outcome. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015;47:889–95. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1075660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ertugrul Mercan M, Arslan F, Ozyavuz Alp S, et al. Non-HACEK Gram-negative bacillus endocarditis. Med Mal Infect. 2019;49:616–20. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Veve MP, McCurry ED, Cooksey GE, Shorman MA. Epidemiology and outcomes of non-HACEK infective endocarditis in the southeast United States. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0230199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lin MF, Liou ML, Kuo CH, Lin YY, Chen JY, Kuo HY. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of Proteus mirabilis isolates from three hospitals in northern Taiwan. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25:1338–46. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Germs are provided here courtesy of European Academy of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Diseases

RESOURCES