Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Oct 16;5(42):27332–27343. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03675

Stereoselective Synthesis of Spirooxindole Derivatives Using One-Pot Multicomponent Cycloaddition Reaction and Evaluation of Their Antiproliferative Efficacy

Rajat Ghosh , Jorge B Vitor , Eduarda Mendes , Alexandra Paulo , Pratap Chandra Acharya †,*
PMCID: PMC7594148  PMID: 33134696

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c03675_0015.jpg

A highly stereoselective, one-pot, multicomponent method has been developed to synthesize pyrrolizidine- and N-methyl pyrrolidine-substituted spirooxindole derivatives. The [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction involves the reaction between the dipole azomethine ylides, generated in situ from the reaction between isatin and secondary amino acids such as L-proline or sarcosine, and α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds as the dipolarophile. The reaction condition was optimized to achieve excellent regio- and stereoselectivity. Products were obtained in good yield using ethanol as a solvent at the reflux temperature. The newly synthesized spirooxindole derivatives were evaluated for their antiproliferative efficacy against National Cancer Institute (NCI)-60 cancer cell lines and DNA G-quadruplex (G4) interaction capacity. Compound 14b produced selective cytotoxicity against leukemia, renal, colon, and prostate cancer cell lines at a 10 μM concentration. The G4 interaction studies further suggested that these spirooxindole derivatives were devoid of any activity as DNA G4 ligands.

1. Introduction

The search for a cancer chemotherapeutic agent with better efficacy and less toxicity endures a challenge for a new drug discovery process and has always compelled medicinal chemists to discover innovative agents with cancer selectivity.1 Isatin-inspired spirooxindole derivatives are a highly precious synthetic framework due to their diversified biological properties including the antiproliferative activity.2,3 Spirooxindoles are found in several bioactive natural products such as coerulescine, horsfiline, spirotryprostatin A, welwitindolinone A, elacomine, and alstonisine.3 The synthetic spirooxindoles have also been found to possess various biological properties such as progesterone receptors modulators, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), anticancer, antitubercular, antimalarial, and mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitor.46

The halogenated spirooxindole derivatives NITD609 (1) and MI-888 (2) (Figure 1) exhibited efficiency in nanomolar concentration for the treatment of malaria and cancer, respectively.4 The methoxyphenyl spirooxindole 3 and the halogenated derivative 4 also displayed potent activity against bacterial cell division and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, respectively (Figure 1).7 In the recent past, several spirooxindole derivatives have been studied against U937 human histiocytic lymphoma, B16F10 mouse melanoma, U87 human glioma, and MDM2-p53 protein–protein interaction and found to possess moderate to good anticancer efficacy.812

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Biologically active spirooxindole derivatives.

Various synthetic protocols have been reported for the preparation of biologically active spirooxindole scaffolds, and isatin-inspired multicomponent [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction is one of them.4,5 The spiro annulation reactions on the C-3 carbonyl function of isatin can be utilized to build several types of spiro-fused heterocyclic and carbocyclic frameworks, including the spirooxindole derivatives.6,7 The cycloaddition of the dipole azomethine ylide, which is produced in situ by the reaction between isatin and secondary amino acids, to a dipolarophile results in a one-pot, multicomponent, [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction, leading to stereoselective spirooxindole derivatives.8,9 Other advantages include high regio and stereoselectivity, catalyst-free reaction, high atom economy, wide structural diversity, and suitable bond-forming efficiency in a single-step method through the formation of in situ azomethine ylide.7

The antiproliferative activity of compounds bearing pyrrolizidine and N-methyl pyrrolidine fragments has been evidenced by the alkaloid casuarine (5) and thesinine (6) as well as coerulescine (7) and horsfiline (8), respectively (Figure 2).7,13 On the other hand, chalcones or α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds are also reported to have myriads of biological properties including antiproliferative activity.14

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Bioactive molecules with pyrrolizidine (5,6) and N-methyl pyrrolidine (7,8) scaffolds.

In the present study, we explored the feasibility of a one-pot multicomponent cycloaddition reaction using isatin-inspired azomethine ylide as the dipole and various halogenated as well as methoxy-substituted chalcones as dipolarophiles to yield stereoselective spirooxindole derivatives. The antiproliferative efficacy of the newly synthesized spirooxindoles was evaluated against various cancer cell lines National Cancer Institute (NCI)-60 using sulforhodamine B (SRB) cytotoxicity assay.

Furthermore, it was shown that small molecules with aromatic N-heterocycles, such as the indole nucleus, were able to bind and stabilize DNA G-quadruplex (G4) structures.15 G4 nucleic acids are known anticancer drug targets due to their involvement in several cell proliferation regulatory processes.16 In this regard, the spirooxindole derivatives were evaluated for their capacity to induce DNA G4 and, consequently, to stop the DNA replication by a polymerase, and also to selectively stabilize G4 structures of different topologies compared to a hairpin double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA) sequence.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of the target spirooxindole derivatives was achieved using a one-pot, multicomponent, [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction employing α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds (chalcones) as the dipolarophiles and azomethine ylides as dipoles under appropriate reaction conditions.

The Claisen–Schmidt condensation of various halogen or methoxy-substituted benzaldehydes 9 and acetophenones 10 at room temperature in alkaline medium afforded the desired trans-chalcones 11ae in good yield and were purified by recrystallization from ethanol (Scheme 1).1,17 The carbonyl stretching vibrations of the chalcones were found at a lowered wavenumber of ∼1650 cm–1 due to the introduction of α,β-unsaturation. The proton NMR showed the distinguishing doublets of vinylic and benzylic protons at ∼δ 6.93 to 8.24 ppm. The p-methoxy-substituted derivatives 11c showed sharp singlets at 3.85 and 3.89, whereas the singlets for 3,4,5-trimethoxy-substituted derivative 11d appeared at 4.25 and 4.27 ppm for the protons of −OCH3 in the 1H NMR spectra. The configuration of the chalcones was confirmed to be trans (E) from the higher coupling constant value (J = 15 Hz) for both vinylic and benzylic protons, consistent with earlier reports.7,18

Scheme 1. Reaction and Reagents for the Synthesis of the Substituted Chalcones 11ae: (a) NaOH, MeOH, Stirring, Room Temperature.

Scheme 1

Using these trans-chalcones as the dipolarophiles, we investigated the reaction conditions for the synthesis of pyrrolizidine spirooxindoles through the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction using in situ generated azomethine ylide to incorporate three new bonds, four stereocenters, and one spirocyclic quaternary carbon. For this purpose, equimolar quantities of isatin (12), L-proline (13), and chalcone 11a were taken together and stirred under various reaction conditions for the synthesis of p-bromophenyl-substituted pyrrolizidine spirooxindole 14a, as shown in Table 1. Unlike the reported methods, the nonpolar solvents were unsuitable for this reaction due to lack of solubility of the starting materials, especially the secondary amino acid L-proline.2 Polar aprotic solvents such as tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dioxane, acetone, ethylmethyl ketone, ethylacetate, and acetonitrile also did not produce desired results as the starting materials were sparingly soluble in these solvents even at the reflux temperature and longer reaction time. We further investigated the effect of various polar protic solvents like water, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, and n-butanol on the solubility of the starting material and progress of the reaction. The reaction did not proceed well with water or higher alcohols due to solubility issues of chalcones. The reaction proceeded with only methanol, isopropanol, and ethanol. However, complete consumption of the chalcone was not achieved even after 72 h of reflux with equimolar quantities of isatin and L-proline, as evidenced from thin-layer chromatography (TLC). On increasing the molar ratio of isatin and L-proline to 1.3 times, the reaction proceeded toward completion only with ethanol within 5 h of reflux with good yield. Therefore, the reaction condition was optimized to use an ethanolic solution of chalcone, isatin, and L-proline in the ratio of 1:1.3:1.3 at the reflux temperature for the synthesis of spirooxindole derivatives. Subsequently, all of the pyrrolizidine spirooxindoles 14ae were synthesized from various substituted α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds 11ae using ethanol as a solvent (Scheme 2).

Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions.

2.1.

entry solvent temperature (°C) time (h) yield (%)
1 toluene rt 72 ND
2 reflux 72 ND
3 xylene rt 72 ND
4 reflux 72 ND
5 dimethyl sulfoxide rt 72 ND
6 reflux 72 ND
7 tetrahydrofuran rt 72 ND
8 reflux 72 ND
9 1,4-dioxane rt 72 ND
10 reflux 72 ND
11 acetone rt 72 ND
12 reflux 72 ND
13 ethylmethyl ketone rt 72 ND
14 reflux 72 ND
15 ethylacetate rt 72 ND
16 reflux 72 ND
17 acetonitrile rt 72 ND
18 reflux 72 ND
19 chloroform rt 72 ND
20 reflux 72 ND
21 distilled water rt 72 ND
22 reflux 72 ND
23 methanol rt 72 ND
24 60 °C 72 30
25 reflux 72 47.5
26 isopropanol rt 72 ND
27 60 °C 72 28
28 reflux 72 35
29 n-butanol rt 72 ND
30 reflux 72 ND
31 ethanol rt 72 ND
32 60 °C 24 54
33 reflux 5 89.5

The reaction was carried out with 11a, 12, and 13 in the ratio of 1:1.3:1.3 stirred in 10 mL of solvent. Isolated yield was calculated based on chalcone. Reaction completion was monitored by TLC. ND = not detected, rt = room temperature.

Scheme 2. Reaction and Reagents for the Synthesis of the Pyrrolizidine Spirooxindoles 14ae: (a) Ethanol, Reflux with Stirring, 5 h.

Scheme 2

The stereoselectivity of the reaction was investigated with the help of NMR spectra of the p-bromophenyl-substituted pyrrolizidine spirooxindole 14a as a prototype by assigning the configuration at the stereocenters. The TLC analysis of the recrystallized product showed only a single isomer. However, there is a possibility of formation of four pairs of isomers due to the presence of four stereocenters, which cannot be detected in TLC owing to the same Rf value of stereoisomers. The proton NMR spectrum of the spirooxindole 14a did not show any isomeric peak splitting. Further analysis of the proton NMR also confirmed that the compound is a single stereoisomer.

First, the stereochemistry of the hydrogen of amino acid L-proline is predetermined. Therefore, the configuration of the Hd will always be retained, and it remained below the plane at C1 stereocenter. Second, there is a possibility of formation of either 14a(i) or 14a(ii) configuration with p-bromobenzoyl and p-bromophenyl groups interchanging their position at the stereocenter C2 and C3 (Figure 3). However, the proton NMR data and coupling constant (J) value support the formation of only 14a(i) having the p-bromobenzoyl substituent at C3 and p-bromophenyl substituent at C2 stereocenters, respectively. The doublets of Hf appeared downfield at δ 4.81 due to the presence of adjacent −C=O function compared to the triplets of He, which resonated at δ 3.87 ppm. Furthermore, the appearance of doublets of Hf confirms that only one proton (He) is present in the neighborhood. The less deshielded He produces a triplet due to the presence of neighboring Hf and Hd. Furthermore, the multiplet of Hd resonates at a downfield of δ 4.22 ppm. Therefore, it is confirmed that the pyrrolizidine spirooxindoles have 14a(i) configuration. The higher coupling constants of He (J = 12.00 Hz) and Hf (J = 11.60 Hz) support the fact that the trans orientation of p-bromobenzoyl and p-bromophenyl groups from the chalcones is retained in the product. The higher J value of He also implicates that it is trans to the Hd as well. Hence, considering below the plane orientation of Hd, the configuration of all of the three hydrogens at C1, C2, and C3 stereocenters can be assigned as all trans to each other to arrive at the structure of 14a, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pyrrolizidine spirooxindole 14a with two tentative configurations 14a(i) and 14a(ii).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pyrrolizidine spirooxindole 14a with configurations at C1, C2, and C3 stereocenters.

Furthermore, the stereochemistry of C4 spiro quaternary stereocenter can also produce a pair of isomers, as shown in Figure 5. However, it is well established that the cycloaddition of azomethine ylide proceeds preferably via an S-shaped ylide than a W-shaped ylide due to higher stability and resonance energy of the S-shaped ylide.7 Therefore, the orientation of C4 stereocenter is always predetermined, thus confirming the stereochemistry of the pyrrolizidine spirooxindoles 14a. Overall, the reaction is confirmed to be highly stereo- and regioselective, leading to the formation of only one stereoisomer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Formation of S-shaped and W-shaped azomethine ylides and their interaction with dipolarophile 11a.

All of the pyrrolizidine spirooxindole derivatives 14ae displayed similar Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), 1H, and 13C NMR spectra, confirming the formation of all of the products in agreement with the assigned stereochemistry. Aliphatic protons resonated between δ 1.50 and 4.86, and aromatic protons between δ 6.57–7.54 ppm in the 1H NMR spectra. The singlet for isatin −NH was observed at δ ∼ 7.5 ppm. Similarly, 13C NMR showed peaks for aliphatic carbon between δ 27.17 and 73.91 and aromatic carbon between 104.99 and 163.30 ppm. The two carbonyl carbons of pyrrolizidine spirooxindoles were observed between δ 180.34 and 196.13 ppm. Structures of the pyrrolizidine spirooxindole derivatives 14ae were further confirmed from the electrospray ionization-mass spectra (ESI-MS) and their molecular ion [M + H]+ peaks. In addition to the [M + H]+ peaks, the characteristic [MH + 2]+ and [MH + 4]+ peaks were also observed for spirooxindole derivatives 14a due to the presence of two bromine atoms with a peak intensity ratio of 1:2:1 at m/z 565, 567, and 569, respectively. Similarly, compound 14b carrying one bromine and one chlorine atom also displayed [M + H]+, [MH + 2]+, and [MH + 4]+ peaks in a 3:4:1 intensity ratio at m/z 521, 523, and 525, respectively. The [MH + 2]+ peak was also observed in 14d and 14e due to the presence of one bromine atom in each compound along with the molecular ion peak at m/z 579 and 489 in the peak intensity ratio of 1:1, respectively.

On a similar note, a series of N-methyl pyrrolidine-substituted spirooxindole derivatives 16ae were prepared employing α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds 11ae, isatin (12), and sarcosine (15) under analogous reaction conditions (Scheme 3). The reaction proceeded in accordance with the earlier experiment producing a single stereoisomer. The regioselectivity of the reaction toward the trans-chalcones was also retained, as evidenced by the 1H NMR spectra.

Scheme 3. Reaction and Reagents for the Synthesis of the N-Methyl Pyrrolidine Spirooxindoles 16ae: (a) Ethanol, Reflux with Stirring, 5 h.

Scheme 3

The stereochemistry of the N-methyl pyrrolidine spirooxindole derivatives 16ae was confirmed based on the structural information of the earlier series of pyrrolizidine spirooxindoles derivative; 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and COSY spectra; and literature support.19 The stereochemistry and orientation of protons and other substituents are portrayed in Figure 6 through the representative N-methyl pyrrolidine spirooxindole derivative 16a. The carbon resonating at δ 73.47 ppm was found to be the spiro carbon as it did not show any correlation with a proton in the 1H–13C COSY NMR spectrum.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Assignment of 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of N-methyl pyrrolidine spirooxindole 16a.

The infrared (IR) spectra of N-methyl spirooxindole derivatives 16ae exhibited characteristic −NH and carbonyl stretching vibrations at wavenumbers ∼3796 and ∼1690 cm–1, respectively. Proton NMR showed peaks for −N–CH3 at δ ∼ 2.22, aliphatic protons between 3.43 and 4.57 ppm, aromatic protons between 6.51 and 7.55, and singlet of −NH between 7.61 and 8.25 ppm. Similarly, peaks for aliphatic carbons were observed at δ between 34.90 and 73.58, aromatic carbons between 105.13 and 163.12, and two carbonyl carbons between 179.64 and 196.62 ppm in the 13C NMR. The structures of the spirooxindole derivatives 16ae were further confirmed from their ESI-MS. In mass spectrum, a characteristic [M + H]+ peak was observed for 16c at m/z 443, whereas compound 16a displayed an [MH + 2]+ peak at m/z 541 and [M – 2H], [(M – 2H) + 2], and [(M – 2H) + 4] peaks at m/z 536, 538, and 540, respectively, due to the presence of two bromine atoms with a peak intensity ratio of 1:2:1. Similarly, the N-methyl spirooxindole derivatives 16b showed [M – 2H], [(M – 2H) + 2], and [(M – 2H) + 4] peaks because of one bromine and one chlorine atom with a peak intensity ratio of 3:4:1 at m/z 492, 494, and 496, respectively. The [(M – H) + 2] peak was also observed in 16d and 16e along with molecular ion peak due to the presence of one bromine atom with a peak intensity ratio of 1:1 at m/z 551 and 461, respectively.

2.2. In Vitro Antineoplastic Activity

2.2.1. In Vitro Cancer Cell Line Assay

All of the newly synthesized spirooxindole derivatives 14ae and 16ae were submitted to National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda through their Developmental Therapeutics Program (DTP) for in vitro cytotoxicity assay on 60 different cancer cell lines of nine tissue origins.20 The initial assay at a single dose of 10 μM concentration revealed that these compounds have selective antiproliferative properties and do not exhibit general cytotoxicity. The results of the single dose in vitro cytotoxicity assay are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2. Percentage Growth of Cancer Cells Treated with Compounds 14a–e at a Dose of 10 μM.
  compound code
cell lines 14a 14b 14c 14d 14e
Leukemia
CCRF-CEM 71.50 68.19 100.36 95.61 71.38
HL-60 (TB) 85.63 74.17 98.35 99.62 86.62
K-562 40.44 33.54 88.12 98.34 49.72
MOLT-4 53.06 37.57 90.22 83.28 56.82
RPMI-8226 62.07 55.63 91.70 83.11 55.71
SR 54.98 46.71 94.33 110.60 63.03
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A549/ATCC 49.62 41.79 90.47 80.73 50.05
EKVX 62.12 55.67 94.73 86.66 62.59
HOP-62 74.00 69.46 93.10 96.48 80.65
HOP-92 74.00 63.35 80.32 77.50 69.19
NCI-H226 78.73 70.15 91.57 85.55 75.18
NCI-H23 73.57 68.08 89.45 92.28 80.01
NCI-H322M 94.03 88.49 104.84 87.93 94.89
NCI-H460 66.60 55.15 101.26 96.83 61.12
NCI-H522 64.00 58.49 85.49 74.65 60.43
Colon Cancer
COLO 205 62.68 62.49 102.44 96.67 76.94
HCC-2998 91.33 84.28 100.45 102.09 94.37
HCT-116 43.56 40.67 97.26 94.53 56.08
HCT-15 61.26 55.74 96.94 89.11 63.64
HT29 48.08 40.15 98.50 85.26 51.02
KM12 66.51 51.38 93.75 87.36 60.63
SW-620 71.04 65.24 96.16 99.75 73.74
CNS Cancer
SF-268 65.13 60.60 92.02 75.05 65.07
SF-295 67.97 61.48 90.14 89.53 59.94
SF-539 85.06 92.12 98.89 91.03 81.48
SNB-19 69.72 67.47 86.60 81.32 70.80
SNB-75 52.87 49.29 66.80 75.35 50.69
U251 71.61 62.43 96.50 85.96 68.25
Melanoma
LOX IMVI 81.68 69.19 87.65 87.59 75.58
MALME-3M 84.71 78.68 96.67 93.54 82.24
M14 73.67 70.35 87.71 105.17 68.36
MDA-MB-435 77.39 67.56 96.35 96.33 70.59
SK-MEL-2 87.53 90.99 99.01 88.49 85.77
SK-MEL-28 99.31 99.47 113.51 100.52 102.38
SK-MEL-5 91.31 85.03 98.70 93.57 80.91
UACC-257 86.29 79.50 99.11 87.35 84.56
UACC-62 57.28 53.14 74.33 81.49 54.50
Ovarian Cancer
IGROV1 58.20 47.30 83.72 93.05 49.15
OVCAR-3 80.46 66.91 102.30 92.51 72.45
OVCAR-4 72.50 64.86 83.50 90.29 65.48
OVCAR-5 79.86 78.10 99.24 90.00 85.94
OVCAR-8 70.10 63.16 93.55 90.19 68.88
NCI/ADR-RES 58.12 55.63 87.31 90.90 61.98
SK-OV-3 71.45 73.10 96.74 85.97 78.65
Renal Cancer
786–0 77.49 75.83 101.89 101.14 83.95
A498 95.62 64.76 107.42 77.00 80.27
ACHN 73.63 69.39 92.15 98.11 70.09
CAKI-1 45.04 40.58 68.86 75.97 46.05
RXF 393 63.02 51.07 87.44 81.82 65.70
SN12C 66.79 40.76 92.66 85.18 71.35
TK-10 95.84 90.62 104.27 81.46 97.60
UO-31 38.17 34.52 56.48 79.07 40.43
Prostate Cancer
PC-3 41.79 32.66 73.03 - 34.66
DU-145 86.15 81.52 102.88 95.82 77.79
Breast Cancer
MCF7 56.72 46.42 101.02 93.03 52.46
MDA-MB-231/ATCC 86.25 76.78 93.62 84.15 76.02
HS 578T 83.25 79.67 89.96 83.98 78.74
BT-549 102.10 91.99 103.03 95.83 95.00
T-47D 48.47 45.84 90.26 70.47 46.98
MDA-MB-468 84.16 82.10 111.00 79.61 72.04
mean % growth 70.59 63.79 93.11 89.01 69.44
Table 3. Percentage Growth of Cancer Cells Treated with Compounds 16a–e at a Dose of 10 μM.
  compound code
cell lines 16a 16b 16c 16d 16e
Leukemia
CCRF-CEM 80.22 88.04 97.38 101.53 101.57
HL-60 (TB) 98.35 99.55 99.05 100.80 99.82
K-562 44.82 54.78 77.07 92.78 75.30
MOLT-4 64.33 74.19 88.12 92.44 92.11
RPMI-8226 62.34 75.07 88.56 98.70 88.16
SR 68.10 80.58 98.05 92.78 97.00
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A549/ATCC 59.15 72.72 87.91 95.65 92.18
EKVX 70.09 78.49 90.97 95.58 91.78
HOP-62 68.97 77.78 94.29 97.31 94.75
HOP-92 70.15 87.22 83.00 95.10 86.33
NCI-H226 73.55 82.19 87.96 100.50 90.45
NCI-H23 67.72 82.43 86.05 92.43 96.24
NCI-H322M 89.94 94.29 102.92 98.57 102.78
NCI-H460 73.33 86.16 97.71 104.41 99.39
NCI-H522 58.18 67.43 76.39 85.73 82.98
Colon Cancer
COLO 205 76.58 95.47 104.94 110.37 112.22
HCC-2998 84.49 96.41 88.39 104.18 99.67
HCT-116 39.67 56.75 84.36 94.87 86.28
HCT-15 59.49 70.77 86.89 100.71 95.70
HT29 36.02 49.22 84.27 100.63 87.22
KM12 75.02 86.71 93.93 102.69 100.52
SW-620 72.04 83.60 95.19 105.74 95.41
CNS Cancer
SF-268 69.46 77.34 89.71 94.39 91.22
SF-295 78.46 87.77 90.64 97.51 93.95
SF-539 90.55 100.79 104.33 100.38 102.47
SNB-19 85.08 89.96 85.98 87.01 89.85
SNB-75 71.88 83.86 76.68 91.74 96.08
U251 82.30 82.13 92.86 91.07 94.12
Melanoma
LOX IMVI 79.81 88.84 92.97 97.67 97.29
MALME-3M 81.71 87.68 92.72 111.17 99.40
M14 76.03 85.48 98.93 109.01 101.58
MDA-MB-435 78.90 88.88 97.65 103.80 106.47
SK-MEL-2 82.90 93.09 96.90 104.38 99.20
SK-MEL-28 95.61 101.39 104.95 114.70 113.92
SK-MEL-5 94.24 97.21 99.07 98.92 99.04
UACC-257 85.54 97.67 97.50 102.49 103.32
UACC-62 63.88 65.22 66.32 75.93 78.38
Ovarian Cancer
IGROV1 62.55 67.05 80.82 85.77 79.66
OVCAR-3 79.31 95.23 97.80 107.31 101.14
OVCAR-4 63.65 79.33 83.64 102.88 96.31
OVCAR-5 82.07 88.79 88.56 98.18 98.89
OVCAR-8 83.79 90.09 95.46 100.69 98.81
NCI/ADR-RES 58.94 70.83 76.67 95.63 79.68
SK-OV-3 80.79 98.18 91.41 99.94 93.62
Renal Cancer
786–0 79.22 87.65 96.01 97.77 97.79
A498 88.93 102.44 99.79 102.85 104.93
ACHN 79.63 89.56 95.55 98.78 100.18
CAKI-1 46.90 54.08 68.21 70.13 63.20
RXF 393 69.66 92.66 80.83 92.48 92.58
SN12C 69.96 81.35 92.08 99.09 94.48
TK-10 92.06 97.01 102.72 105.97 109.46
UO-31 48.28 56.35 70.33 72.62 65.87
Prostate Cancer
PC-3 43.51 55.82 75.31 79.50 70.70
DU-145 83.54 99.22 99.00 106.99 103.63
Breast Cancer
MCF7 62.37 75.94 98.76 93.65 98.51
MDA-MB-231/ATCC 81.72 89.25 93.93 94.75 94.68
HS 578T 89.25 93.87 93.24 95.37 94.21
BT-549 100.02 99.28 105.31 105.13 110.56
T-47D 49.54 64.16 85.76 86.09 81.52
MDA-MB-468 81.40 91.24 95.45 114.03 105.94
mean % growth 73.10 83.11 90.79 97.49 94.51

The bis-p-bromophenyl-substituted pyrrolizidine spirooxindole derivative 14a produced the highest growth inhibitions of 59.56% and 61.83% selectively against K-562 leukemia and UO-31 renal cancer cell line at 10 μM concentration, respectively. Furthermore, compound 14a produced more than 50% growth inhibition against non-small cell lung cancer cell A549/ATCC, renal cancer CAKI-1, prostate cancer PC-3, breast cancer T-47D, colon cancer HCT-116, and HT29 cell lines. The p-bromophenyl- and p-chlorophenyl-substituted derivative 14b produced approximately 50% growth inhibition against leukemia cell line MOLT-4, non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549/ATCC, colon cancer cell lines HCT-116 and HT29, CNS cancer cell line SNB-75, ovarian cancer cell line IGROV1, breast cancer cell line T-47D, and renal cancer cell lines CAKI-1 and SN12C at 10 μM concentration. Furthermore, compound 14b showed the highest growth inhibitions of 66.46, 65.48, and 67.34% against K-562 (leukemia), UO-31 (renal cancer), and PC-3 (prostate cancer) cell lines, respectively. The p-bromophenyl-substituted pyrrolizidine spirooxindole 14e also displayed approximately 50% growth inhibition against leukemia cell line K-562, non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549/ATCC, colon cancer cell line HT29, CNS cancer SNB-75, ovarian cancer cell line IGROV1, renal cancer cell line CAKI-1, and breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and T-47D. Compound 14e showed the highest growth inhibitions of 59.57 and 65.34% against the renal cancer cell line UO-31 and prostate cancer cell line PC-3, respectively, at 10 μM concentration.

Similarly, the bis-p-bromophenyl-substituted N-methyl pyrrolidine spirooxindole derivative 16a displayed more than 50% growth inhibition against K-562 leukemia, PC-3 prostate, T-47D breast cancer, CAKI-1, and UO-31 renal cancer cell lines at a dose of 10 μM. The highest growth inhibitions of 60.33 and 63.98% were observed against the colon cancer cell lines HCT-116 and HT29, respectively. The p-bromophenyl- and p-chlorophenyl-substituted N-methyl pyrrolidine spirooxindoles derivative 16b displayed more than 50% growth inhibition only against HT29 colon cancer cell line at 10 μM concentration. All other N-methyl pyrrolidine spirooxindoles 16ce were found to be inactive against the NCI-60 cell lines.

In general, the halogenated spirooxindoles are found to produce selective cytotoxicity, whereas the methoxy-substituted derivatives are inactive. The physicochemical properties of the most active derivative 14b have been generated using SwissADME tool and are given in Supporting Information Figure S54. The physicochemical data predict that the spirooxindole derivative is lipophilic in nature and thereby have more affinity to inhibit the central nervous system (CNS) or lung cancer, as evident from the experimental data. Further, the pyrrolizidine spirooxindole derivative 14b emerged as a potential hit molecule and warrants further hit-to-lead optimization studies to discover a cancer chemotherapeutic drug candidate.

2.2.2. G-Quadruplex (G4) Interaction Studies

The spirooxindole derivatives 14ae and 16ae were further evaluated for their capacity to interact and stabilize DNA quadruplex structures to verify whether the selective cytotoxicity may be produced through the interaction of compounds with these regulatory nucleic acid structures. To assess this capacity, we used two complementary methodologies, following procedures previously reported by the authors.21,22

2.2.2.1. Polymerase-Stop Assay

The capacity of the spirooxindole derivatives 14ae and 16ae to selectively disrupt G4-DNA–polymerase interactions was evaluated using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-stop assay methodology and the G4-forming sequence (Pu27) controlling the transcription of c-MYC oncogene. A concentration of 100 μM was used for initial screen. The gel electrophoresis of the PCR-stop assay products presented in Figure 7 indicates that the spirooxindole derivatives 14ae and 16ae are not able to induce the formation of the G4, under the assay conditions, and subsequently stop polymerase activity.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Gel electrophoresis of PCR-stop assay product of the spirooxindole derivatives 14ae and 16ae in the presence of Pu27 oligonucleotide.

2.2.2.2. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Melting Assay

FRET melting studies with DNA sequences labeled at the 5′ and 3′ ends was performed in an RT-PCR, aiming to evaluate the G4-DNA stabilizing properties of the compounds. The initial screening was made at a concentration of 20 μM of the spirooxindole derivatives 14ae and 16ae, and the results are presented in Figures 8 and 9. The melting temperature of the DNA G4 has not significantly changed in the presence of the compounds, indicating that these compounds are not G4-DNA ligands.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

FRET melting assay curve-fitting plots for KRAS21 G4-DNA in the absence (blank) and presence of pyrrolizidine spirooxindole derivatives 14ae.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

FRET melting assay curve-fitting plots for KRAS21 G4-DNA in the absence (blank) and presence of N-methyl spirooxindole derivatives 16ae.

3. Conclusions

The methodology employed in the synthesis of spirooxindole derivatives employing α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds proved to be highly stereoselective and regioselective. In addition, the one-pot, multicomponent, [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction described herein is also a catalyst-free reaction with high atom economy and a single-step reaction forming the spirooxindoles efficiently viain situ azomethine ylide formation. The result also suggests that ethanol may be utilized as a suitable solvent to construct the spirocyclic framework instead of nonpolar or other polar solvents. This may be attributed to the higher solubilizing capacity and optimum boiling temperature of ethanol in comparison to other solvents.

The cytotoxicity assay of the spirooxindole derivatives revealed their selective antiproliferative activity against cancer cell lines. The pyrrolizidine spirooxindole derivative 14b emerged as a hit molecule emphasizing further hit-to-lead optimization studies to improve the therapeutic efficacy of these molecules. The spirooxindole derivatives could not prove to be G4 interactive ligands. In general, molecules with planar conformations are better G-quadruplex interactive substances. The spiro molecules have an inherent three-dimensional (3D) nature due to rotation at the spiro carbon, and this may be the possible reason that spirocyclic compounds are not suitable ligands for G4 stabilization.

4. Experimental Methods

4.1. Materials and Equipment

The substituted acetophenones and aldehydes were purchased from HiMedia Laboratories, India. Isatin, proline, sarcosine, and deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, India. Anhydrous sodium sulfate, precoated TLC plates (silica gel 60 F254), and solvents were purchased from Merck India. All solvents were distilled and dried according to the standard procedures prior to use.

Melting points were determined on a precision digital melting point apparatus (VEEGO Instruments Corporation, India) and are uncorrected. Infrared spectra (wavenumbers in cm–1) were recorded on an ATR-FTIR alpha (Bruker, Germany). The 1H, 13C, and COSY NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance-II 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica) using CDCl3 as a solvent containing tetramethylsilane as the internal standard (chemical shifts in δ, ppm). The spin multiplicities are indicated by the symbols, s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), and m (multiplet). Mass spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu LC-MS 8040 ESI-MS system (Kyoto, Japan). The purity of the spirooxindole derivatives was determined by an high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) (Agilent) using a C18 column and acetonitrile/water as solvent. The optical rotation of the compounds was recorded on a digital automatic polarimeter (Lasany, India). The NMR spectra, mass spectra, and HPLC chromatograms of all derivatives as well as 3D structure and SwissADME data of the most active derivative 14b are given in the Supporting Information.

For the G4 interaction assay, oligonucleotides and fluorophore were purchased from STAB VIDA (Portugal). Taq DNA polymerase and ThermoPol reaction buffer were purchased from New England Biolabs, Portugal, whereas water for dilutions and other chemicals were procured from Sigma, Portugal. RT-PCR plates were purchased from Axygen, Inc., and RT-PCR was performed in a 7300 RT-PCR equipment from Applied Biosystems (AB Sciex Pte. Ltd.). G4 assay experiments were performed in triplicate, and final analysis of the data was carried using nonlinear regression fit with GraphPad Prism v.5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

4.2. Synthesis of Substituted α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds 11a–e

The substituted acetophenones (9) (0.01mol), substituted aldehyde (10) (0.01mol), and sodium hydroxide (0.025 mol) were dissolved in methanol (10 mL) and stirred for 5–6 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then poured into crushed ice with stirring. The precipitate of the crude product was filtered under vacuum, washed with distilled water, air-dried, and recrystallized with ethanol to yield α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds 11ae.

4.2.1. 1,3-Di(p-bromophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (11a)

Light yellow solid (92%); mp 171–173 °C. FTIR (cm–1): 1653, 1588, 1481, 1398, 1324, 1215, 1070, 989, 811, 739, 663. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.41 (d,1H, HC–C=O, J = 15 Hz), 7.46 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 8 Hz), 7.52 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz), 7.61 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz), 7.70 (d,1H, HC=C, J = 15 Hz), 7.84 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 121.96, 125.07, 128.10, 129.84, 130.01, 132, 132.28, 133.62, 136.74, 143.93, 189.06.

4.2.2. 1-(p-Bromophenyl)-3-(p-chlorophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (11b)

Dark yellow solid (88%); mp 155–157 °C. FTIR (cm–1): 1652, 1586, 1482, 1398, 1323, 1212, 1079, 985, 811, 662. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.35 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz), 7.39 (d, 1H, HC–C=O, J = 15 Hz), 7.53 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz), 7.60 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz), 7.71 (d, 1H, HC=C, J = 15 Hz), 7.84 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 8 Hz); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 121.86, 128.08, 129.31, 129.66, 130.01, 131.99, 133.19, 136.75, 143.85, 189.03.

4.2.3. 1,3-Di(p-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (11c)

Yellow solid (90%); mp 92–94 °C. FTIR (cm–1): 1590, 1505, 1327, 1251, 1164, 1013, 813. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 3.85 (s, 3H, −OCH3), 3.89 (s, 3H, −OCH3), 6.93 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz), 6.97 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz), 7.42 (d, 1H, HC–C=O, J = 15 Hz), 7.59 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, HC=C, J = 15 Hz), 8.0 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 55.40, 55.48, 113.80, 114.15, 114.40, 119.57, 127.83, 130.12, 130.71, 131.37, 143.21, 161.53, 163.29, 188.77.

4.2.4. 1-(p-Bromophenyl)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (11d)

Pale yellow solid (87%); mp 123–125 °C. FTIR (cm–1) 1664, 1586, 1504, 1452, 1417, 1281, 1124, 989, 815, 769. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 4.25 (s, 3H, −OCH3), 4.27 (s, 6H, 2OCH3), 7.21 (s, 2H, Ar H), 7.67 (d, 1H, HC–C=O, J = 15 Hz), 7.99 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz), 8.05 (d, 1H, HC=C, J = 15 Hz), 8.22 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz); 13CNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 56.27, 61.02, 105.81, 120.87, 127.81, 130.02, 131.93, 137.02, 140.72, 145.61, 153.54, 189.42.

4.2.5. 1-(p-Bromophenyl)-3-phenyl-prop-2-en-1-one (11e)

Pale yellow solid (85%); mp 85–87 °C. FTIR (cm–1) 1654, 1566, 1392, 1326, 1278, 1207, 983, 824, 758, 689. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.40 (t, 3H, Ar H, J = 3 Hz), 7.43 (d,1H, HC–C=O, J = 15 Hz), 7.61 (d, 4H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, HC=C, J = 15 Hz), 7.85 (d, 2H, Ar H, J = 9 Hz); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 121.51, 127.91, 128.53, 129.02, 130.04, 130.77, 131.95, 134.71, 136.95, 145.43, 189.40.

4.3. Synthesis of Pyrrolizidine Spirooxindole Derivatives 14ae

A mixture of appropriate α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds 11ae (0.003 mol), isatin (12) (0.004 mol), and L-proline (13) (0.004 mol) was refluxed together in absolute ethanol (10 mL) for 5 h. After completion of the reaction, as indicated by TLC (chloroform/n-hexane = 4:1), the reaction mixture was filtered hot and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum to obtain the crude product. The crude was then dried and recrystallized from ether to obtain 14ae.

4.3.1. p-Bromophenyl-{1-(p-bromophenyl)-[3-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]-hexahydro-1H-pyrrolizin-2-yl}methanone (14a)

White solid (86%), mp 188–191 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 100%. FTIR (cm–1): 3845, 3743, 1719, 1544, 1463, 1176, 1067, 1001, 744, 646. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C27H22Br2N2O2 = 564, found 565 [M + H]+, 567 [MH + 2]+, 569 [MH + 4]+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm): 1.70–2.05 (m, 4H, Hb & Hc), 2.60–2.71 (m, 2H, Ha), 3.87 (t, 1H, He, J = 12 Hz), 4.19–4.24 (m, 1H, Hd), 4.80 (d, 1H, Hf, J = 11.60 Hz), 6.62–7.46 (m, 12H, Ar H), 8.19 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 27.20, 30.54, 48.13, 52.44, 64.68, 71.77, 73.32, 120.93, 121.49, 122.43, 124.24, 124.86, 127.57, 128.19, 129.38, 129.62, 129.81, 131.50, 131.86, 135.74, 138.69, 140.36, 180.34, 195.96.

4.3.2. p-Bromophenyl-{1-(p-chloro-phenyl)-[3-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]-hexahydro-1H-pyrrolizin-2-yl}methanone (14b)

White solid (80%); mp 195–197 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 100%. [α]25 = +17°. FTIR (cm–1): 3852, 3740, 1711, 1525, 1468, 1181, 997, 745. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C27H22BrClN2O2 = 520, found 521 [M + H]+, 523 [MH + 2]+, 525 [MH + 4]+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 1.75–2.06 (m, 4H, Hb & Hc), 2.60–2.73 (m, 2H, Ha), 3.88 (t, 1H, He, J = 12 Hz), 4.19–4.25 (m, 1H, Hd), 4.80 (d, 1H, Hf, J = 11.20 Hz), 6.61–7.46 (m, 12H, Ar H), 8.07 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 27.26, 30.63, 48.27, 52.36, 64.52, 71.89, 73.62, 110.38, 122.45, 124.78, 127.44, 128.30, 128.8, 128.91, 129.38, 129.44, 129.67, 131.48, 132.83, 135.58, 138.09, 140.57, 180.98, 195.95.

4.3.3. p-Methoxyphenyl-{1-(p-methoxyphenyl)-[3-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]hexahydro-1H-pyrrolizin-2-yl}methanone (14c)

White solid (87%); mp 239–241 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 97.32%. FTIR (cm–1): 3852, 3740, 1701, 1524, 1176, 745. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C29H28N2O4 = 468, found 469 [M + H]+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 1.50–2.08 (m, 4H, Hb & Hc), 2.64–2.76 (m, 2H, Ha), 3.71 (d, 6H, −OCH3), 3.90 (t, 1H, He, J = 11 Hz), 4.25–4.29 (m, 1H, Hd), 4.85 (d, 1H, Hf, J = 11.60 Hz), 6.57–7.54 (m, 12H, Ar H & 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 27.35, 30.77, 48.28, 52.32, 55.22, 55.28, 63.95, 71.97, 73.91, 110.01, 113.31, 114.06, 122.23, 125.25, 127.69, 129.03, 129.27, 130.14, 130.27, 130.81, 131.79, 140.43, 158.49, 163.30, 181.10, 195.11.

4.3.4. p-Bromophenyl-{1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-[3-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]hexahydro-1H-pyrrolizin-2-yl}methanone (14d)

White solid (76%); mp 205–207 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 99.48%. FTIR (cm–1): 3871, 3789, 3723, 3633, 2829, 1684, 1586, 1510, 1459, 1327, 1121, 997, 832, 754, 642. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C30H29BrN2O5 = 576, found 577 [M + H]+, 579 [MH + 2]+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 1.76–2.07 (m, 4H, Hb & Hc), 2.65–2.66 (m, 2H, Ha), 3.80–3.89 (m, 10H, −(OCH3)3 & He), 4.26 (m, 1H, Hd), 4.82 (d, 1H, Hf, J = 11.20 Hz), 6.61–7.37 (m, 10H, Ar H), 7.86 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 27.39, 30.98, 48.14, 53.23, 56.21, 60.75, 64.65, 71.87, 73.74, 104.99, 110.12, 122.42, 124.88, 127.56, 128.20, 129.43, 129.60, 131.50, 135.30, 135.78, 136.96, 140.38, 153.31, 180.45, 196.13.

4.3.5. p-Bromophenyl-{(1-phenyl)-[3-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]hexahydro-1H-pyrrolizin-2-yl} methanone (14e)

White solid (79%); mp 163–165 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 100%. FTIR (cm–1): 3849, 3785, 3699, 3638, 3202, 2847, 1679, 1586, 1465, 1392, 1334, 1188, 1071, 985, 797, 746, 693. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C27H23BrN2O2 = 486, found 487 [M + H]+, 489 [MH + 2]+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 1.76–2.06 (m, 4H, Hb & Hc), 2.60–2.75 (m, 2H, Ha), 3.89 (t, 1H, He, J = 11 Hz), 4.20–4.25 (m, 1H, Hd), 4.86 (d, 1H, Hf, J = 11.40 Hz), 6.57–7.46 (m, 13H, Ar H), 8.15 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 27.17, 30.60, 48.24, 52.85, 64.19, 72,73.64, 110.33, 122.29, 124.75, 127, 127.41, 127.98, 128.09, 128.65, 129.32, 129.52, 129.59, 131.34, 131.84, 135.58, 139.40, 140.54, 180.98, 195.94.

4.4. Synthesis of N-Methyl Spirooxindole Derivatives 16ae

A mixture of appropriate α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds 11ae (0.003 mol), isatin (12) (0.004 mol), and sarcosine (15) (0.004 mol) was refluxed in ethanol (10 mL) for 5 h. After completion of the reaction, as indicated by TLC (chloroform/n-hexane = 4:1), the reaction mixture was filtered hot and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum to obtain the crude product. The crude was then dried and recrystallized from ether to obtain 16ae.

4.4.1. p-Bromophenyl-{4-(p-bromophenyl)-[2-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]N-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl}methanone (16a)

White solid (93%); mp 221–223 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 97.12%. [α]25 = +14°. FTIR (cm–1): 3897, 3732, 3549, 1722, 1674, 1580, 1469, 1391, 1327, 1181, 1067, 1005, 825, 739. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C25H20Br2N2O2 = 538, found 541 [MH + 2]+, 536 [M – 2H], 538 [(M – 2H) + 2], 540 [(M – 2H) + 4]. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 2.22 (s, 3H, N-CH3), 3.44–3.51 (m, 1H, Hb), 3.62 (t, 1H, Hb, J = 9 Hz), 4.39 (d, 1H, Hd, J = 9.28 Hz), 4.45–4.52 (m, 1H, Hc), 6.51–7.46 (m, 12H, Ar H), 7.61 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 34.91, 43.91, 60.19, 62.93, 73.47, 109.47, 120.80, 123.11, 126.65, 126.77, 128, 129.13, 129.39, 129.91, 131.41, 131.79, 135.83, 140.37, 140.43, 179.87, 196.28

4.4.2. p-Bromophenyl-{4-(p-chlorophenyl)-[2-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]N-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl}methanone (16b)

White solid (81%); mp 230–232 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 100%. FTIR (cm–1): 3904, 3866, 3729, 3610, 2922, 2855, 1722, 1674, 1583, 1466, 1392, 1324, 1177, 1072, 1004, 935, 825, 777, 739, 676. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C25H20BrClN2O2 = 494, found 492 [M – 2H], 494 [(M – 2H) + 2], 496 [(M – 2H) + 4]. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 2.23 (s, 3H, N–CH3), 3.44–3.49 (m, 1H, Hb), 3.63 (t, 1H, Hb, J = 9 Hz), 4.41 (d, 1H, Hd, J = 9.24 Hz), 6.54–7.49 (m, 12H, Ar H), 8.05 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 34.90, 43.85, 60.24, 62.98, 73.41, 109.38, 123.10, 126.68, 126.77, 127.97, 128.81, 129.11, 129.31, 129.36, 129.51, 130.01, 131.40, 132, 132.70, 135.84, 139.85, 140.31, 143.92, 179.74, 196.28.

4.4.3. p-Methoxyphenyl-{4-(p-methoxyphenyl)-[2-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]N-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl}methanone(16c)

White solid (83%); mp 152–154 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 100%. FTIR (cm–1): 3851, 3740, 2925, 1657, 1508, 1461, 1246, 1167, 1020, 829, 742. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C27H26N2O4 = 442, found 443 [M + H]+; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 2.23 (s, 3H, −NCH3), 3.43–3.47 (m, 1H, Hb), 3.63 (t, 1H, Hb, J = 9 Hz), 3.71 (s, 3H, −OCH3), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.49–4.53 (m, 2H, Hb & Hc), 6.53–7.47 (m, 12H, Ar H), 7.99 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 35.01, 43.96, 55.25, 55.29, 60.53, 62.53, 73.58, 122.91, 127, 127.30, 128.92, 129.13, 130, 130.51, 133.53, 140.14, 158.44, 163.12, 179.64, 195.69.

4.4.4. p-Bromophenyl-{4-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-[2-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]N-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl}methanone (16d)

White solid (75%); mp 176–178 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 98.58%. FTIR (cm–1): 3863, 1720, 1674, 1585, 1460, 1326, 1240, 1181, 1121, 1003, 830, 746. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C28H27BrN2O5 = 550, found 549 [M – H], 551 [(M – H) + 2]. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 2.23 (s, 3H, N–CH3), 3.45–3.49 (m, 1H, Hb), 3.65–3.69 (m, 1H, Hb), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.90 (s, 6H, −OCH3), 4.45–4.48 (m, 2H, Hb & Hc), 6.52–7.32 (m, 10H, Ar H), 7.74 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 34.95, 44.83, 56.19, 60.34, 60.77, 62.96, 73.48, 105.13, 109.35, 123.01, 126.71, 126.77, 127.91, 129.18, 129.31, 131.39, 135.95, 136.87, 137.25, 140.35, 153.29, 179.73, 196.62.

4.4.5. p-Bromophenyl-{4-(phenyl)-[2-spiro-(indolin-2-one-3-yl)]N-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl}-methanone (16e)

White solid (78%); mp 193–195 °C. Purity in % (HPLC): 100%. IR (cm–1): 3943, 3864, 3776, 3571, 3173, 3057, 2795, 2040, 1721, 1672, 1585, 1467, 1392, 1327, 1172, 1072, 1005, 938, 829, 747, 698. ESI-MS (m/z), calcd for C25H21BrN2O2 = 460, found 459 [M – H], 461 [(M – H) + 2]. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 2.23 (s, 3H, −NCH3), 3.46–3.51 (m, 1H, Hb), 3.68 (t, 1H, Hb, J = 9 Hz), 4.49–4.57 (m, 2H, Hb & Hc), 6.92–7.55 (m, 13H, Ar H), 8.25 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 34.96, 44.51, 60.46, 62.89, 73.58, 109.44, 123.05, 126.84, 126.88, 126.93, 127.39, 127.85, 128.13, 128.37, 128.70, 128.74, 129.18, 129.29, 129.68, 131.36, 131.94, 135.57, 136, 140.45, 141.34, 143.37, 180.04, 196.49.

4.5. Antineoplastic Activity

4.5.1. In Vitro Cancer Cell Line Assay

The cytotoxicity assay was performed as per the protocol of NCI on 60 different cancer cell lines of nine tissue origins using a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay.20

4.5.2. G-Quadruplex (G4) Interaction Assay

The G-quadruplex interaction assay was performed using methodologies previously reported by the authors.21,22

4.5.2.1. FRET Melting Assay

The capacity of compounds to interact and stabilize/destabilize DNA G4 or duplex structures was assessed using a FRET melting assay. Tagged G4-forming oligonucleotides (Table 4) at 0.4 μM were annealed by heating at 90–95 °C for 10 min, followed by slow cooling to room temperature. Stock solutions of compounds (1 mM) were prepared in 10% DMSO. Subsequent dilutions were performed using FRET buffer. Annealed DNA (50 μL) and test compound solutions (50 μL) were distributed across 96-well RT-PCR plates (PCR-96-FLT-C, Axygen, Inc). Fluorescence readings (performed in a 7300 RT-PCR equipment from Applied Biosystems) were taken at intervals of 0.5 °C in the range 31–95 °C, with the temperature being maintained for 30 s prior to each reading. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Final analysis of the data was carried out with GraphPad Prism v.5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). The advanced curve-fitting function in GraphPad Prism (nonlinear regression fit) was used for the calculation of ΔTm values. Only results with fitting r2 values >0.75 (std error < 0.25) were considered.

Table 4. Synthetic Oligonucleotides Used in FRET Experiments.
code sequence ΔTm (°C) topology
KRAS21R 5′-FAM-AGG GCG GTG TGG GAA GAG GGA-TAMRA-3′ 52 parallel G4
Telo21 5′-FAM-GGG TTA GGG TAG GGT TAG GGG-TAMRA-3′ 57 hybrid G4
T-Loop 5′-FAM-TAT AGC TAT ATT TTT TTA TAG CTA TA-TAMRA-3′ 53 duplex
4.5.2.2. Polymerase-Stop Assay

Synthetic oligonucleotides enclosing the quadruplex-forming sequences Pu27, the corresponding complementary reverse sequence, and, as negative control, the mutated sequences unable to fold into a G4 structure (Pu27mut) were used for the experiment. PCR products from reaction mixtures containing each quadruplex-forming oligonucleotide (or the mutated), the complementary oligonucleotide, deoxynucleotides (DNTPs), Taq polymerase, and different concentrations of compounds were analyzed on 15% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. The DNA sequences used in this assay are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. DNA Sequences Used in Polymerase-Stop Assay.
primer code sequence
Pu27 5′ TGGGGAGGGTGGGGAGGGTGGGGAAGG 3′
Pu27mut 5′ TGGGGAGGGTGGAAAGGGTGGGGAAGG 3′
Rev 5′ ATCGAATCGCTTCTCGTCCTTCCCCA 3′

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by grants from the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi [CSIR Extramural Research Grant No. 02(0329)/17/EMR], and the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), Heidelberg [EMBO STF No. 7702], sanctioned to the principal investigator P.C.A. A.P. acknowledges FCT (Portugal) for financial support through project grant PTDC/QUI-QOR/29664/2017 and FCT and COMPETE Program (SAICTPAC/0019/2015). J.B.V. research was financed by New England Biolabs, Inc. The authors express their gratitude to National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, for carrying out the in vitro cytotoxicity assay, Dr. Rakesh Yadav, Department of Pharmacy, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, for providing the NMR spectra, and Dr. Nitesh Sahu for the HPLC and ESI-MS data.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c03675.

  • 1H, 13C and COSY NMR spectra, mass spectra, and HPLC chromatograms of the synthesized compounds (Figures S1–S52) as well as 3D structure and SwissADME data of the most active derivative 14b (PDF)

Author Contributions

The study was led and supervised by P.C.A. with the research idea, conception, design of synthesis schemes, analysis, interpretation of data, and writing and review of the manuscript. R.G. performed the synthesis experiments, characterization, interpretation of the analytical data, and wrote the manuscript. A.P. supervised the G4 assay, and analyzed and interpreted the data. P.C.A., J.B.V., and E.M. performed the G4 assay of the synthesized compounds and analyzed the data.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao0c03675_si_001.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

References

  1. Acharya P. C.; Bansal R.; Kharkar P. S. Hybrids of steroid and nitrogen mustard as antiproliferative agents: Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and in silico inverse screening. Drug Res. 2018, 68, 100–103. 10.1055/s-0043-118538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Senwar K. R.; Sharma K. P.; Reddy T. S.; Jeengar M. N.; Nayak V. L.; Naidu V. G. M.; Kamal A.; Shankaraiaha N. Spirooxindole-derived morpholine-fused-1,2,3-triazoles: Design, synthesis, cytotoxicity and apoptosis inducing studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 102, 413–424. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang M.; Yang W.; Qian M.; Zhao T.; Yang L.; Zhu C. Iodine-promoted three-component reaction for the synthesis of spirooxindoles. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 955–961. 10.1016/j.tet.2018.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lotfy G.; Ashry E. S. H. E.; Said M. M.; Tamany E. S. E.; Aziz Y. M. A.; Al-Dhfyan A.; Al-Majid A. M.; Barakat A. Regio- and stereoselective synthesis of new spirooxindoles via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction: Anticancer and molecular docking studies. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 2018, 180, 98–108. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tiwari S.; Pathak P.; Sagar R. Efficient synthesis of new 2,3-dihydrooxazole-spirooxindoles hybrids as antimicrobial agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 2513–2516. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu B.; Yu D. Q.; Liu H. M. Spirooxindoles: promising scaffolds for anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 673–698. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galvis C. E. P.; Kouznetsov V. V. Regio- and stereoselective synthesis of spirooxindole 1′-nitro pyrrolizidines with five concurrent stereocenters under aqueous medium and their bioprospection using the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo model. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 7372–7386. 10.1039/c3ob41302k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhou R.; Wu Q.; Guo M.; Huang W.; He X.; Yang L.; Peng F.; He G.; Han B. Organocatalytic cascade reaction for the asymmetric synthesis of novel chroman-fused spirooxindoles that potently inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13113–13116. 10.1039/C5CC04968G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yu B.; Yu Z.; Qi P.; Yu D.; Liu H. Discovery of orally active anticancer candidate CFI-400945 derived from biologically promising spirooxindoles: success and challenges. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 95, 35–40. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang J.; Hu Y.; Li Q.; Yu F.; Cao J.; Fang D.; Huang Z.; Shi D. Efficient and regioselective synthesis of novel functionalized dispiropyrrolidines and their cytotoxic activities. ACS Comb. Sci. 2014, 16, 139–145. 10.1021/co400096c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kidwai M.; Jain A.; Nemaysh V.; Kumar R.; Luthra P. M. Efficient entry to diversely functionalized spirooxindoles from isatin and their biological activity. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 2717–2723. 10.1007/s00044-012-0249-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao Y.; Liu L.; Sun W.; Lu J.; McEachern D.; Xiaoqin L.; Yu S.; Bernard D.; Ochsenbein P.; Ferey V.; Carry J. C.; Deschamps J. R.; Sun D.; Wang S. Diastereomeric spirooxindoles as highly potent and efficacious MDM2 inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7223–7234. 10.1021/ja3125417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rajakumar P.; Thirunarayanan A.; Raja S. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of novel N-methyl pyrrolidine dendrimers via [3+2] cycloaddition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A 2014, 84, 371–379. 10.1007/s40010-013-0120-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Winter E.; Locatelli C.; Dipietro A.; Creczynski-Pasa T. B. Recent trends of chalcones potentialities as antiproliferative and antiresistance agents. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 592–604. 10.2174/1871520615666150101130800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duarte A. R.; Cadoni E.; Ressurreicao A. S.; Moreira R.; Paulo A. Design of modular G-quadruplex ligands. ChemMedChem. 2018, 13, 869–893. 10.1002/cmdc.201700747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neidle S. Quadruplex nucleic acids as targets for anticancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0041 10.1038/s41570-017-0041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bansal R.; Acharya P. C. Synthesis and antileukemic activity of 16E-[4-(2-carboxy)ethoxybenzylidene]-androstene amides. Steroids 2012, 77, 552–557. 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Acharya P. C.; Bansal R. Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of hydroximino androstene derivatives. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2014, 347, 193–199. 10.1002/ardp.201300216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gorli V. N.; Srinivasan R. Synthesis of spirooxindole analogues from 2-cyclopropyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)quinoline-3-carbaldehyde. Synth. Commun. 2020, 50, 516–525. 10.1080/00397911.2019.1704009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. https://dtp.cancer.gov/discovery_development/nci-60/methodology.htm (accessed on July 26, 2020).
  21. Lavrado J.; Brito H.; Borralho P. M.; Ohnmacht S. A.; Kim N. S.; Leitão C.; Pisco S.; Gunaratnam M.; Rodrigues C. M.; Moreira R.; Neidle S.; Paulo A. KRAS oncogene repression in colon cancer cell lines by G-quadruplex binding indolo [3, 2-c] quinolines. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9696 10.1038/srep09696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mendes E.; Cadoni E.; Carneiro F.; Afonso M. B.; Brito H.; Lavrado J.; dos Santos D. J.; Vítor J. B.; Neidle S.; Rodrigues C. M.; Paulo A. Combining 1,3-ditriazolylbenzene and quinoline to discover a new G-quadruplex-interactive small molecule active against cancer stem-like cells. ChemMedChem. 2019, 14, 1325–1328. 10.1002/cmdc.201900243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao0c03675_si_001.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES