Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 27;803:149931. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149931

Nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2) pollution in the Accra metropolis: Spatiotemporal patterns and the role of meteorology

Jiayuan Wang 1, Abosede Sarah Alli 1, Sierra Clark 2, Allison Hughes 3, Majid Ezzati 2,4,5,6, Andrew Beddows 7, Jose Vallarino 8, James Nimo 3, Josephine Bedford-Moses 3, Solomon Baah 3, George Owusu 9, Ernest Agyemang 10, Frank Kelly 4,7, Benjamin Barratt 4,7, Sean Beevers 4, Samuel Agyei-Mensah 10, Jill Baumgartner 11,12, Michael Brauer 13, Raphael E Arku 1,*
PMCID: PMC7611659  EMSID: EMS134135  PMID: 34487903

Abstract

Economic and urban development in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) may be shifting the dominant air pollution sources in cities from biomass to road traffic. Considered as a marker for traffic-related air pollution in cities, we conducted a city-wide measurement of NOx levels in the Accra Metropolis and examined their spatiotemporal patterns in relation to land use and meteorological factors. Between April 2019 to June 2020, we collected weekly integrated NOx (n=428) and NO2 (n=472) samples at 10 fixed (year-long) and 124 rotating (week-long) sites. Data from the same time of year were compared to a previous study (2006) to assess changes in NO2 concentrations. NO and NO2 concentrations were highest in commercial/business/industrial (66 and 76 μg/m3, respectively) and high-density residential areas (47 and 59 μg/m3, respectively), compared with peri-urban locations. We observed annual means of 68 and 70 μg/m3 for NO and NO2, and a clear seasonal variation, with the mean NO2 of 63 μg/m3 (non-Harmattan) increased by 25-56% to 87 μg/m3 (Harmattan) across different site types. The NO2/NOx ratio was also elevated by 19-28%. Both NO and NO2 levels were associated with indicators of road traffic emissions (e.g. distance to major roads), but not with community biomass use (e.g. wood and charcoal). We found strong correlations between both NO2 and NO2/NOx and mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation and water vapor mixing ratio. These findings represent an increase of 25 – 180% when compared to a small study conducted in two high-density residential neighborhoods in Accra in 2006. Road traffic may be replacing community biomass use (major source of fine particulate matter) as the prominent source of air pollution in Accra, with policy implication for growing cities in SSA.

Keywords: Nitrogen oxides, traffic, sub-Saharan Africa, Ghana, Harmattan, meteorology, mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation, COVID-19

1. Introduction

Air pollution is a major environmental health threat globally, and both the amount and impact are estimated to be highest in Asia and Africa.1 In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the world’s fastest urbanizing region,2 the combination of urban population and economic growth may be raising air pollution levels from diverse sources, particularly combustion related sources.35 Motorization in terms of the volume, distance travelled, and activity is rapidly growing in SSA’s sprawling cities along with persistence of older, more polluting imported vehicles in the fleet.6,7 For example, Ghana’s population grew by ~70%, while registered vehicles (mean age = 14 years8) increased more than eight times since 2000.9 Excessive traffic congestion undermines economic productivity by increasing commuting time and costs and road traffic can be a major source of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution in cities.10,11 Other combustion sources of air pollution in SSA cities include biomass use, an important source of particulate matter pollution, and diesel generators for household and commercial activities, informal industries, and household trash burning4,5. Together with traffic, these sources influence the outdoor air pollutant mixture in SSA cities.12 But similar to developed countries, road traffic emissions may now be the dominant source of urban air pollution in SSA cities amid the increasing expansion, motorization, and downward trend in primary biomass use 10,11,13.

As frequently used markers for traffic-related air pollution,1416 outdoor NO2 and other nitrogen oxides (NOx) are important pollutants in most American, European and Asian cities. Concerns over their adverse health impacts and contributions to secondary PM and ozone (O3) formation17,18 have resulted in national regulations and international guidelines to minimize population exposures.1,18 Besides traffic emissions, sustained household use of biomass fuels in SSA is considered an important source of NO2 pollution in cities.5 As SSA rapidly urbanizes, cities face “double threat” of NOx pollution: although declining, household biomass use remains substantial, while the influence of road traffic is rising. Consequently, there is a likely shift in emission sources from traditional biomass (PM dominant) toward “modern” road-traffic (NOx dominant), similar to cities in high-income countries.12,19 In addition to local emissions from combustion sources, seasonal changes in regional meteorology have significant influences on local air quality within the West African sub-region.20 Specifically, the dry, dusty Harmattan period (usually around November-February) characterized by north-easterly trade winds from the Sahara Desert worsens air quality through transboundary transport of mineral dusts and smoke from biomass burning. 12,2125 Conversely, the wet monsoon season (around April-October) improves air quality across the subregion due to stronger convection and wet removal.20,22,25,26 Thus, systematic and city-wide NOx data are needed to improve our understanding of air pollution and ensure effective urban air quality management in SSA cities that are in economic transition from low to middle/high income status, and accompanied by a transition to road traffic as a dominant source of urban air pollution.5,19,27

In a large city-wide campaign, we conducted a yearlong field measurement of NO2 and NOx concentrations at 134 locations within the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA), one of the fastest growing metropolises in the West African sub-region. This paper describes the space-time variation of the measured NO2 and NOx concentrations in relation to diverse land use factors across communities in the GAMA. We further assess the role of meteorology and seasonality on NO2 and NOx concentrations.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study location

This study took place in the GAMA, the most urbanized area of Ghana and hosts more than 60% of the country’s registered vehicles.9 Located along the Atlantic coast, the GAMA covers about 1500 km2 with the population of ~ 5 million,28 growing at ~3%29. It contains the old Accra Metropolitan Area (AMA) as its core, the fast-growing port and industrial city of Tema Metropolitan Area (TMA) to the east, and the surrounding peri-urban municipalities to the north east and north west. The central business district of Accra experiences an estimated one million passenger trips per day from Trotros (old imported minibuses used primarily for public transport) and taxis;30 a number that is expected to rise with urban sprawl. Like the rest of the country, the GAMA lies in dry coastal equatorial climatic zone with wet (April to October) and dry dusty Harmattan seasons (November to February).20,31 The average monthly temperature ranges from 25 to 33°C (77 – 91 F) while average daily humidity is at about 83%.

2.2. Study design

The study was nested within a large multi-country and multi-city “Pathways to Equitable Healthy Cities” study (http://equitablehealthycities.org/), which aims to improve population health, enhance health equity and ensure environmental sustainability in six study cities around the world. Detailed description of the full campaign protocol, which was part of the larger environmental monitoring campaign in the “Pathways to Equitable Healthy Cities” study, can be found elsewhere.32 Briefly, we collected weekly pairs of integrated NOx and NO2 samples at a combination of ‘fixed’ (year-long; n=10) and ‘rotating’ (week-long; n=124) sites to capture both the temporal (annual, seasonal, and weekly) and spatial variability across the GAMA. The location of the rotating sites were chosen using a stratified random approach based on population and land cover data from the World Bank33 to capture various land-use and socioeconomic factors: traffic areas, high-, and low-density residential neighborhoods, and peri-urban sites. The 10 fixed sites were selected deliberately to represent diverse geography, population density, road-traffic and road-networks, and neighborhood biomass fuel use based on 2010 national census. Relative to the entire GAMA, the sampling sites were over-represented in the more densely populated AMA (n= 51: 6 fixed and 45 rotating sites). Measurements took place between July 2019 and June 2020, following a one-month pilot study in April 2019. In each measurement week, we collected data simultaneously at the 10 fixed (year-long) sites along with five rotating (week-long) sites throughout the campaign. Given regular traffic congestion in the city, the five rotating sites for a particular measurement week were chosen in proximity to each other for easy access. A duplicate (side-by-side) sample and a field blank were collected each week at one (20%) of the five rotating sites throughout the campaign. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our field campaign was suspended between March and early May 2020, partly because Accra implemented partial lockdown and partly because our field team had to self-isolate through contact tracing. During the lockdown, individuals were directed to stay at home except for essential items (e.g. food, medicine, and water). Travel to and within Accra was also suspended (except for essential goods and services), while passenger vehicles (e.g. trotros) had to reduce the number passengers per trip to observe social distancing. The field campaign resumed shortly after, allowing us to glean information about the impact of the lockdown on local emissions in the city. In summary, we collected 281 NO2 and 251 NOx weekly samples in the pre-COVID-19 lockdown, 19 pairs during COVID-19 lockdown, and 50 pairs in the post-COVID-19 lockdown periods.

2.3. NOx and NO2 measurements

Pairs of weekly integrated ambient NOx and NO2 samples were collected using Ogawa passive samplers (Ogawa & Co., Inc., USA), which captured NOx and NO2 concentrations on pre-coated collection pads. The samplers were deployed on metal poles at a height of ~4 m above ground and covered by an opaque plastic container that served as a weather shield. After collection, the filters were sealed in vials and refrigerated at 4 °C prior to its cold courier to the University of Massachusetts Amherst for laboratory analysis. We followed Ogawa’s analytical protocol by first extracting the samples in Milli-Q water, and then added color reagent (sulfanilamide [99%, Sigma, USA] and N-(1-Naphthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride [99%, Sigma, USA]) and allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 20 minutes. The developed color was measured at 545 nm wavelength by a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax M2e, USA). Each sample was measured three times to ensure precision and the average of all three was used for calculating the final concentrations. Using the total sampling time, concentrations of NOx and NO2 were then calculated by linear calibration line, created from nitrite standard solution (Thermo Fisher, USA) and corrected for temperature and relative humidity measured at six of the ten fixed site locations throughout the measurement campaign. For easy comparison of our NOx and NO2 levels with other studies and international health guidelines, we report all results in the unit of μg/m3.

2.4. Data management and statistical analysis

The final data used in this analysis were blank corrected. We calculated a limit of detection (LOD) separately for NOx and NO2 as three times the standard deviation (SD) of their field blanks. The LODs were 0.07 and 0.02 μg/m3 for NOx and NO2, respectively. The duplicate samples were strongly correlated (R2 = 0.98 for NOx and 0.95 for NO2; Figure S1). Consequently, samples at duplicate sites were averaged to provide a single estimate at these sites. Though we could not co-locate against a reference monitor for comparison in Ghana’s climatic conditions, the Ogawa samplers have been well-characterized in field settings with good agreements34,35, including in similar setting as our study 36.

To assess variations in community level concentrations by land use factors, we categorized each individual monitoring station into one of four land-use categories: (i) commercial/business/industrial (CBI) – areas with commercial ventures, industrial activities or government offices, which are often along major motorways or highways; (ii) high-density residential (HD) – informal or formal densely populated residential neighborhoods with narrow paved or unpaved roads, low socioeconomic status (SES) and high biomass use; (iii) low-density residential (LD) – formal, sparsely populated, high SES, low biomass use residential communities with medium to wide roads; and (iv) peri-urban background (UB) – areas with high green space with little or no direct influence from traffic and biomass smoke. We describe the spatial patterns of the measured NOx and NO2 concentrations by this land-use classification.

Because the weekly samples from the rotating sites were collected in groups of five in different parts of the city across different months and seasons, we conducted temporal/seasonal adjustment on the concentrations measured at the rotating sites in order to remove temporal variations and allow comparison across sites. This approach also allowed us to obtain seasonal and annual mean equivalents for all sites. For each sampling week, a temporal factor (TF) for that week was calculated as the ratio of the weekly mean value to the annual mean at all fixed sites.

Concentrations from the rotating sites were adjusted for ‘time trends’ by dividing the samples by the TF for that week.37 The adjusted concentration (CiRotatingSite)j of the i rotating site for the j week was calculated as:

TF=(CFixedSite)j/(CFixedSite¯) (1)
(CiRotatingSite)j*=(CiRotatingSite)j/TF (2)

where (CFixed Site)j is the average NO2 or NOx concentration at all fixed sites in the j measurement week, (CFixedSite)¯ is the mean annual concentration at all fixed sites, and (CiRotating Site)j is the NOx or NO2 concentration measured at the i rotating site in the corresponding j measurement week. The median (interquartile range) of the TFs were 1.0 (0.9 – 1.2) for NOx and 1.0 (0.8 – 1.1) for NO2 (Figure S2).

We used the seasonally adjusted data from the rotating sites to assess the spatial patterns across the GAMA, and evaluated by the land use characteristics described above. The year-long data from the fixed sites were used to examine annual mean concentrations and seasonal trend in terms of the Harmattan (the dry and dusty northeasterly trade wind from the Sahara Desert, November to February20) and non-Harmattan periods. We also tested the impact of local changes in regional meteorology and transboundary pollution (e.g. smoke from biomass burning transported along with Sahara dusts during the Harmattan) on NOx concentrations in the GAMA by evaluating mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation and water vapor mixing ratio throughout the campaign period using the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS1) data downloaded from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (ftp://arlftp.arlhq.noaa.gov/pub/archives/gdas1), and output by the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) 4 model (https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/), which contains information on air parcel trajectories, transport, and dispersion.38 Further, we compared time equivalent data with a 2006 study to assess changes in NO2 levels within the AMA over the last decade.19

Because NOx is comprised primarily of nitric oxide (NO) and NO2, we operationally define NOx as NO + NO2. Our final results are presented as NO (i.e. NOx – NO2) and NO2. We used an alpha of 0.05 as cut-off for statistical significance. Data analyses, visualizations, and all summary statistics on the spatial and temporal trends were performed in RStudio (R version 3.6.1).

3. Results

We collected a total of 428 (2,996 site-days) and 472 (3,318 site-days) weekly integrated NO and NO2 samples, respectively, at 10 fixed (year-long) and 124 rotating (week-long) sites. The location of the sampling sites across the GAMA and their respective annual NO and NO2 concentrations (in comparison to WHO annual guideline of 40 μg/m3) are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Location of the sampling sites and annual concentrations of (A) NO and (B) NO2 across the GAMA. The colors of NO2 concentrations indicate comparison to the WHO annual guideline of 40 μg/m3. The concentrations at the fixed sites represent annual mean values, and the rotating sites represent season-adjusted mean values (i.e. an estimated annual means). Major and secondary road network were from OpenStreetMap (downloaded in 2019). Biomass use data and the GAMA boundaries were from Ghana Statistical Service (2010 Census).

3.1. Spatial patterns

The season-adjusted mean NO and NO2 concentrations across all the rotating sites were 39 (range: 6 – 156) μg/m3 and 50 (range: 9 – 136) μg/m3, respectively (Table 1). Both NO and NO2 concentrations varied substantially by neighborhood characteristics and land-use features. Levels were highest in CBI areas (mean NO = 66 μg/m3 and NO2 = 80 μg/m3), which are dominated by heavy vehicular traffic, followed by sites in HD residential neighborhoods (mean NO = 47 μg/m3 and NO2 = 59 μg/m3) with relatively less traffic (Figure 2). Concentrations in LD residential neighborhoods were lower compared to HD and CBI areas, but were significantly higher than UB locations, which registered the lowest values (mean NO and NO2: 34 and 45 vs 27 and 24 μg/m3, respectively) (Figure 2B). Pairwise analysis of variance revealed significant differences in the mean concentrations of both NO and NO2 across each category of site-type (p < 0.05). When compared by degree of urbanization, the mean NO and NO2 concentrations were highest in communities in the most densely populated AMA (51 μg/m3 and 69 μg/m3), followed by the TMA (42 μg/m3 and 50 μg/m3) where the port is located, and lowest in the other adjoining municipalities combined (32 μg/m3 and 37 μg/m3) (Table 1). Sites near major and medium roads registered significantly higher overall mean concentrations than sites near minor roads and alleys (NO: 88 vs 34 μg/m3, p < 0.001; and NO2: 89 vs 45 μg/m3, p < 0.001).

Table 1. Weekly integrated NO, NO2, NOx concentrations (μg/m3), and NO/NOx ratio at all rotating sites by site type.

City region Measureme
nt site
NO NO2 NOx NO/NOx
Type n Mean
(SD)
Range Mean
(SD)
Range Mean (SD) Range Mean (SD) Range
GAMA All sites 124 38 (26) 6 – 169 48 (26) 9 – 139 82 (45) 29 – 297 0.46 (0.10) 0.19 – 0.79
CBI 23 66 (40) 25 – 169 76 (25) 46 – 139 134 (61) 81 – 297 0.47 (0.09) 0.31 – 0.57
HD 32 44 (22) 19 – 110 56 (21) 20 – 93 100 (38) 41 – 180 0.44 (0.07) 0.33 – 0.63
LD 42 33 (19) 12 – 94 43 (18) 10 – 100 73 (33) 30 – 173 0.45 (0.11) 0.28 – 0.79
UB 27 23 (5) 6 – 30 24 (11) 9 – 62 48 (12) 29 – 82 0.49 (0.12) 0.19 – 0.71
AMA All sites 44 47 (30) 19 – 131 64 (26) 20 – 139 102 (48) 41 – 232 0.44 (0.12) 0.28 – 0.79
TMA All sites 16 44 (22) 24 – 92 51 (15) 28 – 89 96 (35) 53 – 182 0.45 (0.07) 0.33 – 0.57
Other * All sites 64 31 (22) 6 – 169 36 (21) 9 – 126 67 (41) 29 – 297 0.47 (0.10) 0.19 – 0.71
*

Other municipalities in the GAMA beside AMA and TMA.

Figure 2. Distribution of NOx (NOx = NO + NO2) concentrations by site-type.

Figure 2

(A) Site-specific values at each rotating site. (B) Median and interquartile range values. The dash lines are the WHO guideline for annual NO2 concentrations of 40 ug/m3.

3.2. Temporal patterns

3.2.1. Annual levels

The overall mean annual NO concentration across the ten year-long (fixed) sites was 63 μg/m3 and site-specific mean annual concentrations ranged from 20 μg/m3 at a UB site to 118 μg/m3 at CBI sites; NO2 followed same pattern with mean annual of 68 μg/m3 and ranged between 28 μg/m3 and 98 μg/m3 at different sites. Site-specific mean annual NO2 concentrations at all fixed sites, and 78% (n = 279) of the 350 total fixed site samples (except UB), exceeded the 40 μg/m3 WHO annual guideline. The mean annual NO levels in HD and LD residential communities were similar (42 vs 45 μg/m3), but NO2 concentrations were higher in HD than in LD neighborhoods (71 vs 56 μg/m3; p < 0.001) (Table 2). Unlike the data from rotating (week-long) sites, NO/NOx ratios at the year-long sites, which were overrepresented in the more populated areas of the GAMA, showed varied spatial patterns by site-type: they were highest at CBI (ratio: 0.53) sites, similar at LD and UB areas (0.42), and lowest at HD sites (0.37) (Table 2). In general, we observed a drastic increase in the NO/NOx ratios with increasing NOx at CBI sites, indicative of fresh and direct emissions of NO from traffic (Figure S3).

Table 2.

Weekly integrated NO, NO2, NOx concentrations (μg/m3), and NO/NOx ratio at the fixed (year-long) sites by site type and season.

Site
type
Period NO NO2 NOx NO/NOx
Mean
(SD)
Range Mean (SD) Range Mean
(SD)
Range Mean
(SD)
Range
All
sites
(n = 10)
Annual 68 (52) 0.4 – 238 70 (33) 8 – 199 139 (77) 16 – 359 0.46 (0.14) 0.01 – 0.84
Harmattan 59 (41) 4 – 165 87 (35) 19 – 199 147 (69) 43 – 333 0.37 (0.13) 0.1 – 0.66
Non-Harmattan 72 (56) 0.4 – 238 63 (29) 8 – 150 136 (81) 16 – 359 0.49 (0.12) 0.01 – 0.84
Pre-lockdown 70 (52) 4 – 238 72 (32) 11 – 199 144 (76) 28 – 354 0.45 (0.14) 0.10 – 0.84
Covid-19 lockdown 39 (41) 6.7 – 153 39 (29) 7.5 – 112 78 (68) 16 – 265 0.47 (0.10) 0.30 – 0.71
Post-lockdown 68 (51) 0.4 – 208 68 (32) 18 – 150 137 (80) 36 – 358 0.47 (0.11) 0.01 – 0.65
CBI
(n = 3)
Annual 126 (50) 17 – 238 101 (28) 30 – 199 228 (62) 48 – 359 0.54 (0.11) 0.24 – 0.78
Harmattan 107 (33) 52 – 165 123 (25) 90 – 199 229 (40) 176 – 333 0.46 (0.09) 0.24 – 0.64
Non-Harmattan 134 (54) 17 – 238 92 (23) 30 – 150 228 (70) 48 – 359 0.57 (0.09) 0.32 – 0.78
Pre-lockdown 130 (47) 52 – 238 104 (24) 58 – 199 236 (51) 151 – 354 0.55 (0.11) 0.24 – 0.78
Covid-19 lockdown 73 (54) 17 – 153 64 (34) 30 – 112 136 (86) 48 – 265 0.50 (0.09) 0.35 – 0.6
Post-lockdown 126 (55) 32 – 208 99 (28) 66 – 150 225 (78) 101 – 359 0.54 (0.1) 0.32 – 0.65
HD
(n = 2)
Annual 45 (12) 13 – 75 70 (18) 25 – 127 116 (21) 43 – 165 0.39 (0.09) 0.14 – 0.67
Harmattan 38 (11) 13 – 56 85 (16) 57 – 127 123 (20) 94 – 165 0.31 (0.07) 0.14 – 0.46
Non-Harmattan 46 (11) 18 – 75 64 (16) 25 – 97 113 (21) 43 – 160 0.42 (0.07) 0.19 – 0.67
Pre-lockdown 45 (12) 13 – 75 72 (16) 37 – 127 119 (15) 94 – 165 0.38 (0.1) 0.14 – 0.67
Covid-19 lockdown 19 (2) 18 – 21 25 (0.6) 25 – 25 44 (2) 43 – 45 0.43 (0.03) 0.41 – 0.46
Post-lockdown 46 (11) 32 – 69 66 (18) 35 – 90 112 (28) 67 – 160 0.41 (0.04) 0.35 – 0.47
LD
(n = 4)
Annual 49 (32) 7 – 158 56 (25) 9 – 132 106 (50) 16 – 221 0.44 (0.14) 0.11 – 0.84
Harmattan 47 (29) 8 – 108 75 (27) 27 – 132 122 (50) 56 – 221 0.36 (0.12) 0.11 – 0.56
Non-Harmattan 51 (34) 7 – 158 49 (20) 9 – 100 100 (48) 16 – 206 0.48 (0.13) 0.12 – 0.84
Pre-lockdown 51 (33) 8 – 158 58 (25) 12 – 132 111 (50) 28 – 221 0.44 (0.15) 0.11 – 0.84
Covid-19 lockdown 22 (16) 7 – 57 31 (16) 9 – 56 53 (31) 16 – 113 0.40 (0.07) 0.3 – 0.51
Post-lockdown 48 (26) 18 – 110 55 (23) 18 – 100 103 (47) 36 – 206 0.46 (0.07) 0.36 – 0.59
UB
(n = 1)
Annual 20 (9) 0.4 – 37 28 (10) 8 – 54 49 (9) 18 – 70 0.42 (0.17) 0.01 – 0.74
Harmattan 16 (11) 4 – 37 35 (9) 19 – 52 51 (6) 43 – 60 0.31 (0.18) 0.1 – 0.66
Non-Harmattan 22 (8) 0.4 – 37 26 (10) 8 – 54 48 (11) 18 – 70 0.46 (0.15) 0.01 – 0.74
Pre-lockdown 20 (9) 4 – 37 29 (9) 11 – 52 49 (7) 38 – 70 0.40 (0.16) 0.1 – 0.74
Covid-19 lockdown 20 (10) 10 – 30 14 (10) 8 – 25 34 (19) 18 – 55 0.61 (0.09) 0.55 – 0.71
Post-lockdown 22 (12) 0 – 31 34 (12) 20 – 54 57 (6) 48 – 63 0.39 (0.22) 0.01 – 0.59

3.2.2. Seasonal patterns

The year-long data from the ten fixed sites demonstrate clear seasonal patterns, with overall decreases in NO compared to notable increases in NO2 during the Harmattan period (Nov 2019 - Feb 2020) (Figure S4). We observed similar (and clearer) pattern when data from both fixed and rotating sites were combined (Figure S5). Although COVID-19 lockdown resulted in fewer Harmattan samples than initially planned, we still obtained enough data to gain insight into the impact of the dusty Harmattan on the measured levels. The mean NO concentration showed a 10% drop during Harmattan compared to non-Harmattan (59 vs. 66 μg/m3), while NO2 increased significantly by 45% (NO2: 87 vs. 60 μg/m3), and was more than double the WHO guideline in the Harmattan alone (Figure S4 and Table 2). Seasonality in both NO and NO2 concentrations persisted across all site types. While NO decreased slightly, NO2 increased by 35-56% during the Harmattan at CBI, HD, and LD areas. Interestingly, NO2 increases were also seen at the UB site (by ~25%) during the Harmattan, but with corresponding decreases in NO (Figure 3, Figure S5, Table 2), suggesting a regional/transboundary (meteorologic) impact rather than increases in local emissions. Similarly, the NO2/NOx ratios at all sites increased notably by 18-27% during Harmattan (Figure 3C and Table 2), with UB having the highest change (0.69 vs 0.54), indicative of the enhancement in local NO2 production. Overall, equivalent annual and seasonal (Harmattan vs non-Harmattan) mean estimates at all monitoring sites demonstrate strong interplay between site-type (source influence) and season influence (Figure S5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time series of (A) NO, (B) NO2 concentrations, and (C) NO2/NOx ratios at the fixed (year-long) measurement sites and grouped by site-type. The pilot data was excluded in the figure. The points represent individual weekly integrated samples and the lines represent the smoothed trend (method = “loess”) with their standard errors. The black line in (B) represents the WHO guideline for annual NO2 concentrations of 40 ug/m3.

* The field campaign was briefly suspended over the Christmas holidays and also for mid-campaign QA/QC as described in our protocol,32 which likely biased our annual mean results downward.

** There was missing data due to COVID-19 lockdown of Accra between March and April 2020 as well as mandatory quarantine for the field team through contact tracing.

3.2.3. Change in NO2 concentration in AMA since 2006

In 2006 weekly measurement at 26 sites in two HD neighborhoods in the AMA, Arku et al (2008) reported mean NO2 concentration of 21 ppb (39 μg/m3), ranging between 20 and 22 μg/m3 at small roads/alleys to 66 μg/m3 near major roads,19 For the same time period in similar neighborhoods in this present 2019/2020 study, the mean NO2 levels ranged between 53 and 101 μg/m3; this represents 53 – 152 % increase over the 2006 levels.

3.2.3. Effects of the harmattan

The GAMA experiences significant meteorological changes during the Harmattan season usually characterized by hotter, drier (higher temperature and lower relative humidity/water vapor mixing ratio) and stagnant wind that originates from the Saharan Desert (Figure S6). During this time, the mixing layer depth over the city lowers compared with non-Harmattan periods while incident solar radiation increases (Figure S7). We observed a fairly strong inverse relationship between the weekly averaged mixing layer depth and corresponding NO2 (r = −0.45, p < 0.01) and the NO2/NOx ratio (r = −0.57, p < 0.01) (Figure 4A and 4B), pointing to likely enhancement of local pollutant concentrations due to slower vertical mixing during Harmattan.2022 Also, we found a robust positive correlation between incident solar radiation and NO2 (r = 0.53, p < 0.01) and NO2/NOx ratio (r = 0.53, p < 0.01) (Figure 4C and 4D), indicating higher photochemical activity (likely higher O3 concentration) during the Harmattan season.22,39 Further, we observed a strong inverse correlation of NO2 concentration (r = −0.63, p < 0.01) and NO2/NOx ratio (r = −0.68, p < 0.01) with water vapor mixing ratio (Figure 4E and 4F), suggested that drier air promoted NO2 existence in the gas phase.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationship of weekly averaged mixing layer depth (A and B), incident solar radiation (C and D) and water vapor mixing ratio (MR) (E and F) with NO2 concentrations and NO2/NOx ratios. The mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation and water vapor mixing ratio data were calculated through Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) 4 model (https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/).

3.2.4. Changes during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown

COVID-19 pandemic lockdown of Accra had a considerable impact on NOx and NO2 concentrations (Figure 5). The mean NO and NO2 concentrations during the lockdown both dropped to ~39 μg/m3, approximately 40% lower than the mean pre-lockdown levels (64 and 70 μg/m3, respectively); the levels rapidly returned to pre-lockdown concentrations in the post-lockdown period (70 and 68 μg/m3, respectively) (Table 2). Specifically, during the lockdown, NO and NO2 concentrations decreased the most at the residential sites (HD: 58% and 65%, respectively; and LD: 57% and 47%, respectively) than in the CBI areas (44% and 38%). The significant reduction in both NO and NO2 caused the mean NO2 levels in the residential neighborhoods to fall below the WHO 40 μg/m3 health guideline. The reductions appear consistent with Google Mobility report of 48-61% drop in visits to places like restaurants, markets and public transport hubs during the lockdown in Accra.40 Interestingly, NO2 at the UB background site also decreased by ~50% during the lockdown (14 μg/m3) in comparison to the pre- (29 μg/m3) and post-lockdown (34 μg/m3) levels, but with no significant change in NO levels in either of these periods (pre/during/post-lockdown ranged 20-22 μg/m3).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Distribution of pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 lockdown (A) NO and (B) NO2 concentrations at the fixed (year-long) sites by site-type. The points in the box represent the mean values. Each box shows the median value (inside line), 25th (lower), and 75th (upper) percentile of the data, and the lines extending from the boxes (whiskers) indicate variability outside the upper and lower quartiles. The dash line in (B) show the WHO guideline for annual NO2 concentrations (40 ug/m3).

3.3. Correlations with traffic and biomass patterns

We combined data from both the fixed and rotating sites and tested the relative influence of traffic and biomass burning on NOx and NO2 concentrations in the GAMA using a series of correlation analyses. We evaluated the levels in relation to distance of the measurement location to major roads (indicator for traffic) as well as with proportion of households using biomass fuel in the census enumeration area (EA) containing the measurement site (indicator for biomass burning). We caution, however, that biomass use data was derived from the 2010 national census and might not be an accurate reflection of the present community biomass use in these EAs. We caution further that there might be some level of correlation between traffic and biomass indicators. We found that both NO (r = −0.38, p < 0.01, Figure S9A) and NO2 (r = −0.55, p < 0.01, Figure S9C) levels decreased with distance from major roads. Concentrations measured at location within 500 m of a major road were significantly higher than those beyond 500 m (NO: 60 vs 33 μg/m3, p < 0.01; and NO2: 68 vs 41 μg/m3, p < 0.01). However, we observed no clear relationship between our samples and community biomass use based on the 2010 census (Figure S9E, S9F).

4. Discussion

In an expansive measurement campaign in one of SSA’s fast-growing metropolitan areas, we found that more than half of all sampling sites, including densely populated residential communities, had NO2 levels above the WHO annual guideline. The mean annual NO2 concentrations over the entire city, and in both CBI and residential neighborhoods also surpassed the WHO guideline. Levels were associated with indicators of road traffic and consistently high in the highly urbanized areas (especially in AMA and TMA), as well as in densely populated neighborhoods. We observed a strong seasonality in NO2 concentrations, most likely from the enhancement of local pollution during the harmattan due to changes in the local meteorology. These findings represent an increase of 53 – 152% over the last decade when compared to a small study conducted in two densely populated neighborhoods of Accra in 2006,19 which found low NO2 levels with virtually no variation across sites.

The current annual and seasonal mean NO2 concentrations in Accra are substantially higher than the mean Harmattan levels in Abidjan (Cote d’ivoire),41 annual mean in Cape Town (South Africa)42 and Dakar (Senegal),43 and non-Harmattan means in Bamako (Mali)43. Our findings could not be compared directly with regional estimates derived from satellite-based approaches,44 which provided only broad view of NO2 pollution in the sub-region but could not capture within-city spatial variability driven predominantly by local emission sources. Our results suggest that large within-city spatial variability exists in SSA cities, with levels in commercial areas and some residential communities several times higher than the peri-urban background areas. The mean annual NO2 levels in AMA are more than double those reported for major European cities, 16,45 New York (USA),15 and Beijing (China)46 (Figure S8). Overall, mean annual NOx concentration in AMA is similar to concentrations during heavy polluted winter season in Beijing, China.47,48

NOx is central to the formation of PM and ground level O3. In general, NOx emissions from combustion sources are primarily in the form of NO, which further react with O3 to form NO2.17 Thus, NO/NOx ratios are higher in direct/fresher emissions and lower in aged plumes.49 Our findings of variations in NO and NO2 levels by site-type and season indicate the important roles of fresh traffic emissions during the non-Harmattan period (i.e. higher NO) and enhanced secondary formation from both transboundary transport (emissions from open biomass burning) 50 and changes in local meteorology (amplification of local emissions) during the Harmattan period (i.e. higher NO2).51 We found no indication of increases in actual local emissions during the Harmattan season. But rather significant meteorological changes, including increased incident solar radiation (Figure S8) and temperature inversion during the Harmattan season,21,22,26 which could in turn increase regional production of O3 as observed by Marais et al. (2014) (in Nigeria) and Aghedo et al.(2007) (regional).22,39 Studies of PM concentrations in Accra have also reported elevated levels during Harmattan, but these increases have been mostly attributed to mineral dust transport from the Saharan Desert.12,23,52 Our findings in relation to mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation and water vapor mixing ratio during the Harmattan point to the important role of meteorology in amplifying local air pollution beyond just dust transport during the Harmattan.21,22,53,54

We found reductions in NO and NO2 concentrations during the COVID-19 lockdown of Accra, especially in CBI and residential (HD and LD) areas. This finding was supported by Google Mobility data for Accra, which also showed between 48-61% drop in mobility patterns for the same period. 40 This is another suggestive evidence of the significance of local traffic emissions and other household/community combustion related activities on NOx pollution in Accra. At our UB sites, which were expected to be less influenced by direct emissions, we observed little changes in NO levels in pre-, during-, and post-lockdown periods, contrary to substantial decrease in NO2 levels during the lockdown, signifying broader impact of the lockdown through reduced secondary formation of pollutants from local emissions.

A recent paper found reductions in ambient PM2.5 pollution in Accra when compared to 2006/2007 data. 25 The paper noted that concentrations in the city have plateaued at levels lower than those seen in large Asian megacities. Combined with our analysis, there is a strong evidence that air pollution levels in Accra can be reduced city-wide if necessary policies are implemented. Like observed globally during the COVID-19 pandemic when reductions in transportation sector emissions accounted for about 31-60% reductions in NO2 levels, policies targeted at reducing traffic emissions in Accra would greatly improve air quality in the city. Specifically, with the rapid growth of vehicle numbers, policies on traffic (congestion) control and better road network planning, especially in relation to residential areas, are urgently needed. Additionally, Ghana’s efforts in reducing air pollution, including promotion of liquefied petroleum gas for household use, adoption of low sulfur content standard in diesel, and adoption of Euro 4/IV emission standards would require stronger enforcement to ensure cleaner air for all.

4.1. Strength and limitation

The main strength of our paper is its large scope and setting, a place where local data, evidence, and capacity building in this context are needed. We implemented the most comprehensive city-wide field campaign spanning a wide spatial and temporal extent than in any SSA city. We also combined geo-referenced data to assess impact of different emission sources, including traffic, biomass use, and meteorology, on ambient NO and NO2 concentrations. We were able to document substantial increase in the levels over a decade as well as the impact of Covid-19 lockdown on local emission in the city.

There are several limitations to our study. First, we could not compare our data with reference NOx monitors. Although no chemiluminescence measurements are conducted in Accra, Ogawa samplers have been comprehensively characterized, including in SSA setting and shown to be consistent.35,36,55,56 Second, due to Covid-19 pandemic, we had some gaps in our data. However, we still collected enough data over the entire year to provide large scale overview of temporal patterns of NO and NO2 pollution in Accra. Third, we had no data on O3, which could provide additional insights into the spatial distribution of NO and NO2. In evaluating the potential impact of biomass on NO2 and NOx in the city, we relied on 2010 census data because the 2020 national population census was still ongoing at the time of our study. The 2010 data likely did not accurately reflect the current household biomass use in the city as there were indications of a decline since 2010. This may have influenced our assessment of the role of biomass burning on the NO and NO2 emissions. Further, although the HYSPLIT model is well established and commonly used in a lot of studies, we did not have direct measurements (such as radiosonde profiles, vertical meteorology profiles, etc.) in Accra to determine mixing layer depth. Lastly, while the passive Ogawa is a cost-effective option in SSA settings where electricity from the grid to run active samplers is unreliable, we could not assess the levels at finer resolutions (e.g. diurnal patterns).

5. Conclusion

Ambient NOx levels in Accra are rising and NO2 concentrations are now significantly higher than international health guidelines, especially in CBI and densely populated residential neighborhoods which are dominated by road traffic. With the expectation of further increases in road traffic congestion due to urban population growth, air pollution in Accra (and in other SSA cites) will likely be dominated by road traffic emissions. Meteorological changes during the Harmattan also appear to enhance local NO2 levels in Accra. We recommend an integrated air quality management approach with emphasis on sources, land use, and meteorology to address growing urban air pollution problems in Accra and elsewhere in the sub-region.

Supplementary Material

Appendix

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the Pathways to Equitable Healthy Cities grant from the Wellcome Trust [209376/Z/17/Z]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. This work is also supported by a GCRF Digital Innovation for Development in Africa network grant from UKRI [EP/T029145/1].

Data availability statement

The measurement data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the authors.

References

  • (1).World Health Organization. A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. 2016.
  • (2).Unitied Nations. World Population Prospects 2019. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Rooney MS, Arku RE, Dionisio KL, Paciorek C, Friedman AB, Carmichael H, Zhou Z, Hughes AF, Vallarino J, Agyei-Mensah S, et al. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Particulate Matter Sources and Pollution in Four Communities in Accra, Ghana. Sci Total Environ. 2012;435-436:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Zhou Z, Dionisio KL, Verissimo TG, Kerr AS, Coull B, Howie S, Arku RE, Koutrakis P, Spengler JD, Fornace K, et al. Chemical Characterization and Source Apportionment of Household Fine Particulate Matter in Rural, Peri-Urban, and Urban West Africa. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(2):1343–1351. doi: 10.1021/es404185m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Marais EA, Wiedinmyer C. Air Quality Impact of Diffuse and Inefficient Combustion Emissions in Africa (DICE-Africa) Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(19):10739–10745. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Amegah AK, Agyei-Mensah S. Urban Air Pollution in Sub-Saharan Africa: Time for Action. Environ Pollut. 2017;220:738–743. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Marais EA, Silvern RF, Vodonos A, Dupin E, Bockarie AS, Mickley LJ, Schwartz J. Air Quality and Health Impact of Future Fossil Fuel Use for Electricity Generation and Transport in Africa. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(22):13524–13534. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Nyarku M, Buonanno G, Ofosu F, Jayaratne R, Mazaheri M, Morawska L. Schoolchildren’s Personal Exposure to Ultrafine Particles in and near Accra, Ghana. Environ Int. 2019;133:105223. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2019.105223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Hesse CA, Ofosu JB. Comparative Analysis of Regional Distribution of the Rate of Road Traffic Fatalities in Ghana. Open Sci Repos Math. 2014:e45011802. doi: 10.7392/openaccess.45011802. Online (open-access) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Van Vliet EDS, Kinney PL. Impacts of Roadway Emissions on Urban Particulate Matter Concentrations in Sub-Saharan Africa: New Evidence from Nairobi, Kenya. Environ Res Lett. 2007;2(4) doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Ngo NS, Asseko SVJ, Ebanega MO, Allo’o Allo’o SM, Hystad P. The Relationship among PM 2.5, Traffic Emissions, and Socioeconomic Status: Evidence from Gabon Using Low-Cost, Portable Air Quality Monitors. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2019;68:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.029. (February 2017) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Zhou Z, Dionisio KL, Verissimo TG, Kerr AS, Coull B, Arku RE, Koutrakis P, Spengler JD, Hughes AF, Vallarino J, et al. Chemical Composition and Sources of Particle Pollution in Affluent and Poor Neighborhoods of Accra, Ghana. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8(4) doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Arku RE, Bennett JE, Castro MC, Agyeman-Duah K, Mintah SE, Ware JH, Nyarko P, Spengler JD, Agyei-Mensah S, Ezzati M. Geographical Inequalities and Social and Environmental Risk Factors for Under-Five Mortality in Ghana in 2000 and 2010: Bayesian Spatial Analysis of Census Data. PLoS Med. 2016;13(6):1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Richmond-Bryant J, Chris Owen R, Graham S, Snyder M, McDow S, Oakes M, Kimbrough S. Estimation of On-Road NO2 Concentrations, NO2/NOX Ratios, and Related Roadway Gradients from near-Road Monitoring Data. Air Qual Atmos Heal. 2017;10(5):611–625. doi: 10.1007/s11869-016-0455-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Rattigan OV, Carpenter AC, Civerolo KL, Felton HD. Pollutant Measurements at near Road and Urban Background Sites in New York, USA. Atmos Pollut Res. 2020;11(5):859–870. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2020.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Cyrys J, Eeftens M, Heinrich J, Ampe C, Armengaud A, Beelen R, Bellander T, Beregszaszi T, Birk M, Cesaroni G, et al. Variation of NO2 and NOx Concentrations between and within 36 European Study Areas: Results from the ESCAPE Study. Atmos Environ. 2012;62(2):374–390. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. Wiley; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Why and How They Are Controlled. Epa-456/F-99-006R. 1999 Nov;48 EPA 456/F-99-006R. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Arku RE, Vallarino J, Dionisio KL, Willis R, Choi H, Wilson JG, Hemphill C, Agyei-Mensah S, Spengler JD, Ezzati M. Characterizing Air Pollution in Two Low-Income Neighborhoods in Accra, Ghana. Sci Total Environ. 2008;402(2-3):217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Knippertz P, Evans MJ, Field PR, Fink AH, Liousse C, Marsham JH. The Possible Role of Local Air Pollution in Climate Change in West Africa. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5(9):815–822. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2727. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Baumbach G, Vogt U, Hein KRG, Oluwole AF, Ogunsola OJ, Olaniyi HB, Akeredolu FA. Air Pollution in a Large Tropical City with a High Traffic Density - Results of Measurements in Lagos, Nigeria. Sci Total Environ. 1995;169(1-3):25–31. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04629-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Marais EA, Jacob DJ, Wecht K, Lerot C, Zhang L, Yu K, Kurosu TP, Chance K, Sauvage B. Anthropogenic Emissions in Nigeria and Implications for Atmospheric Ozone Pollution: A View from Space. Atmos Environ. 2014;99:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Dionisio KL, Arku RE, Hughes AF, Vallarino J, Carmichael H, Spengler JD, Agyei-Mensah S, Ezzati M. Air Pollution in Accra Neighborhoods: Spatial, Socioeconomic, and Temporal Patterns. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(7):2270–2276. doi: 10.1021/es903276s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Adon AJ, Liousse C, Doumbia ET, Baeza-Squiban A, Cachier H, Leon J-F, Yoboue V, Akpo AB, Galy-Lacaux C, Zoutien C, et al. Physico-Chemical Characterization of Urban Aerosols from Specific Combustion Sources in West Africaat Abidjan in Côte d’Ivoire and Cotonou in Benin in the Frame of DACCIWA Program. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss. 2019:1–69. doi: 10.5194/acp-2019-406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Alli AS, Clark SN, Hughes A, Nimo J, Bedford-Moses J, Baah S, Wang J, Vallarino J, Agyemang E, Barratt B, et al. Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5) and Black Carbon (BC) Pollution in Accra. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(7):074013. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac074a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Knippertz P, Fink AH, Deroubaix A, Morris E, Tocquer F, Evans MJ, Flamant C, Gaetani M, Lavaysse C, Mari C, et al. A Meteorological and Chemical Overview of the DACCIWA Field Campaign in West Africa in June-July 2016. Atmos Chem Phys. 2017;17(17):10893–10918. doi: 10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Hilboll A, Richter A, Burrows JP. Long-Term Changes of Tropospheric NO2 over Megacities Derived from Multiple Satellite Instruments. Atmos Chem Phys. 2013;13(8):4145–4169. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Ghana Statistic Service. Website https://www.statsghana.gov.gh/
  • (29).Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) 2010 Population & Housing Census National Analytical Report. Ghana Stat Serv. 2013:1–430. [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Quarshie M. Integrating Cycling in Bus Rapid Transit System in Accra. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2007;53:103–116. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6010-6_11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Addae B, Oppelt N. Land-Use/Land-Cover Change Analysis and Urban Growth Modelling in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA), Ghana. Urban Sci. 2019;3(1):26. doi: 10.3390/urbansci3010026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Clark SN, Alli AS, Brauer M, Ezzati M, Baumgartner J, Toledano MB, Hughes AF, Nimo J, Bedford Moses J, Terkpertey S, et al. High-Resolution Spatiotemporal Measurement of Air and Environmental Noise Pollution in Sub-Saharan African Cities: Pathways to Equitable Health Cities Study Protocol for Accra, Ghana. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).World Bank. Land Cover Classification Of Accra. Ghana: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/c-2014-land-cover-classification-accra-ghana. [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Sather ME, Slonecker ET, Mathew J, Daughtrey H, Williams DD. Evaluation of Ogawa Passive Sampling Devices as an Alternative Measurement Method for the Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Standard in El Paso, Texas. Environ Monit Assess. 2007;124(1-3):211–221. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9219-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Sather ME, Terrence Slonecker E, Kronmiller KG, Williams DD, Daughtrey H, Mathew J. Evaluation of Short-Term Ogawa Passive, Photolytic, and Federal Reference Method Sampling Devices for Nitrogen Oxides in El Paso and Houston, Texas. J Environ Monit. 2006;8(5):558–563. doi: 10.1039/b601113f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Moodley KG, Singh S, Govender S. Passive Monitoring of Nitrogen Dioxide in Urban Air: A Case Study of Durban Metropolis, South Africa. J Environ Manage. 2011;92(9):2145–2150. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2011.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Rivas I, Viana M, Moreno T, Pandolfi M, Amato F, Reche C, Bouso L, Álvarez-Pedrerol M, Alastuey A, Sunyer J, et al. Child Exposure to Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollutants in Schools in Barcelona, Spain. Environ Int. 2014;69:200–212. doi: 10.1016/J.envint.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Stein AF, Draxler RR, Rolph GD, Stunder BJB, Cohen MD, Ngan F. Noaa’s Hysplit Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2015;96(12):2059–2077. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Aghedo AM, Schultz MG, Rast S. The Influence of African Air Pollution on Regional and Global Tropospheric Ozone. Atmos Chem Phys. 2007;7(5):1193–1212. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-1193-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Google. [Accessed 17 Jun 2021];Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports. 2020 https//www.google.com/covid19/mobility/
  • (41).Bahino J, Yoboué V, Galy-Lacaux C, Adon M, Akpo A, Keita S, Liousse C, Gardrat E, Chiron C, Ossohou M, et al. A Pilot Study of Gaseous Pollutants’ Measurement (NO 2, SO 2, NH 3, HNO 3 and O 3) in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: Contribution to an Overview of Gaseous Pollution in African Cities. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018;18(7):5173–5198. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-5173-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Saucy A, Röösli M, Künzli N, Tsai MY, Sieber C, Olaniyan T, Baatjies R, Jeebhay M, Davey M, Flückiger B, et al. Land Use Regression Modelling of Outdoor NO2 and PM2.5 Concentrations in Three Low Income Areas in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7) doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Adon M, Yoboué V, Galy-Lacaux C, Liousse C, Diop B, Doumbia EHT, Gardrat E, Ndiaye SA, Jarnot C. Measurements of NO2, SO2, NH3, HNO3 and O3 in West African Urban Environments. Atmos Environ. 2016;135:31–40. doi: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2016.03.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Geddes JA, Martin RV, Boys BL, van Donkelaar A. Long-Term Trends Worldwide in Ambient NO2 Concentrations Inferred from Satellite Observations. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(3):281–289. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).EEA. European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/
  • (46).CNEMC. China National Environmental Monitoring Center. http://www.cnemc.cn/
  • (47).He H, Wang Y, Ma Q, Ma J, Chu B, Ji D, Tang G, Liu C, Zhang H, Hao J. Mineral Dust and NOx Promote the Conversion of SO 2 to Sulfate in Heavy Pollution Days. Sci Rep. 2014;4(2):1–6. doi: 10.1038/srep04172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Wang G, Zhang R, Gomez ME, Yang L, Levy Zamora M, Hu M, Lin Y, Peng J, Guo S, Meng J, et al. Persistent Sulfate Formation from London Fog to Chinese Haze. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(48):13630–13635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616540113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Kimbrough S, Chris Owen R, Snyder M, Richmond-Bryant J. NO to NO2 Conversion Rate Analysis and Implications for Dispersion Model Chemistry Methods Using Las Vegas, Nevada near-Road Field Measurements. Atmos Environ. 2017;165(2):23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Ofosu FG, Hopke PK, Aboh IJK, Bamford SA. Biomass Burning Contribution to Ambient Air Particulate Levels at Navrongo in the Savannah Zone of Ghana. J Air WasteManag Assoc. 2013;63(9):1036–1045. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.783888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Ossohou M, Galy-Lacaux C, Yoboue V, Hickman JE, Gardrat E, Adon M, Darras S, Laouali D, Akpo A, Ouafo M, et al. Trends and Seasonal Variability of Atmospheric NO2 and HNO3 Concentrations across Three Major African Biomes Inferred from Long-Term Series of Ground-Based and Satellite Measurements. Atmos Environ. 2019;207(2):148–166. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Malley CS, Ashmore MR, Kuylenstierna JCI, McGrath JA, Byrne MA, Dimitroulopoulou C, Benefoh D. Microenvironmental Modelling of Personal Fine Particulate Matter Exposure in Accra, Ghana. Atmos Environ. 2020:117376. doi: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2020.117376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Pandolfi M, Tobias A, Alastuey A, Sunyer J, Schwartz J, Lorente J, Pey J, Querol X. Effect of Atmospheric Mixing Layer Depth Variations on Urban Air Quality and Daily Mortality during Saharan Dust Outbreaks. Sci Total Environ. 2014;494-495:283–289. doi: 10.1016/J.scitotenv.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Querol X, Tobías A, Pérez N, Karanasiou A, Amato F, Stafoggia M, Pérez García-Pando C, Ginoux P, Forastiere F, Gumy S, et al. Monitoring the Impact of Desert Dust Outbreaks for Air Quality for Health Studies. Environ Int. 2019 Mar;130:104867. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Lee JH, Wu CF, Hoek G, de Hoogh K, Beelen R, Brunekreef B, Chan CC. Land Use Regression Models for Estimating Individual NOx and NO2 Exposures in a Metropolis with a High Density of Traffic Roads and Population. Sci Total Environ. 2014;472(2):1163–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Masey N, Gillespie J, Heal MR, Hamilton S, Beverland IJ. Influence of WindSpeed on Short-Duration NO2 Measurements Using Palmes and Ogawa Passive Diffusion Samplers. Atmos Environ. 2017;160:70–76. doi: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2017.04.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

Data Availability Statement

The measurement data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the authors.

RESOURCES