Abstract
The dielectric environment and membrane dipole potential are key electrostatic properties of biological membranes, which modulate the function of membrane-associated proteins. If and how these properties are shaped by species-specific cellular lipid landscapes are fundamental questions. Here, we use two related fission yeast species, Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S. pombe) and Schizosaccharomyces japonicus (S. japonicus), which exhibit remarkable differences in membrane lipid composition, to address this problem. S. pombe synthesizes membranes from largely unsaturated glycerophospholipids with 18- and 16-carbon-long fatty acyl chains and the major fungal sterol ergosterol. Its relative S. japonicus produces abundant saturated asymmetrical glycerophospholipids that contain a medium-chain fatty acyl C10:0 at the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbone. Alongside ergosterol, its membranes contain the sterol mimic diplopterol, produced by a horizontally transferred squalene hopene cyclase of bacterial origin. Using fluorescence lifetime imaging of the solvatochromic dye di-4-ANEPPDHQ, we show that S. pombe and S. japonicus exhibit comparable dielectric environments. Interestingly, dipole potential measurements using the voltage-sensitive probe di-8-ANEPPS show that S. japonicus membranes have higher dipole potential than S. pombe. The in vivo measurements of sterol- and diplopterol-lacking S. japonicus mutants, supported by experiments with model membranes and S. pombe retroengineered to produce the C10-containing glycerophospholipids, indicate that both ergosterol and the saturated asymmetrical glycerophospholipids support high membrane dipole potential. Our results suggest that membrane physicochemical properties result from a combination of lipid composition, packing, and interfacial electrostatics and point to possible avenues in exploring the evolutionary differences in membrane protein function.
Why it matters
Our results lay important groundwork for further investigations of the relationship between the species-specific cellular lipid composition, membrane physicochemical properties, and the evolution of membrane-associated proteins and membrane-centered biological processes.
Introduction
Lipids are essential building blocks of cells. They form biological membranes delimiting cells and subcellular compartments, modulate functions of membrane-associated proteins, participate in cellular signaling, and facilitate energy production.1,2,3,4 Eukaryotic lipids exhibit large structural diversity, from several hundred species in model yeasts to up to thousands in mammals.5,6,7 Glycerophospholipids (GPLs) that form the structural scaffold of cellular membranes differ in their head groups and the length and degree of unsaturation of the fatty acyl (FA) chains. Depending on their chemical structure, glycerophospholipids endow membranes with different physicochemical properties; for example, glycerophospholipid unsaturation decreases membrane order.8,9 Triterpenoid lipids, sterols, and sphingolipids interact with glycerophospholipids and membrane-associated proteins, further modifying membrane properties.10,11 Lipid composition varies between species, cell types, intracellular organelles, and even within individual membranes. How specific lipids contribute to membrane physicochemical properties and cellular physiology remains an important question.
The widely used model fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S. pombe) and its relative, the emerging model system Schizosaccharomyces japonicus (S. japonicus), exhibit fascinating differences in membrane lipid composition. S. pombe synthesizes largely di-unsaturated and mono-unsaturated glycerophospholipid species, where most FA chains are 18 and 16 carbon atoms long. On the other hand, S. japonicus produces a substantial amount of saturated asymmetrical glycerophospholipids, usually with the long C18:0 FA at the sn-1 position and the medium C10:0 FA at the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbone.12 Furthermore, S. japonicus produces abundant hydroxyl-containing triterpenoid diplopterol, which belongs to the class of hopanoids, the bacterial mimics of eukaryotic sterols. It also synthesizes minor hopanoids, including the nonpolar diploptene.13,14 Hopanoids in S. japonicus are produced by a horizontally transferred squalene hopene cyclase (SHC) of bacterial origin.13,14 Unlike sterols, the synthesis of which consumes large amounts of molecular oxygen,15 SHC enzymes do not require oxygen for hopanoid production.16 S. japonicus produces diplopterol already in normoxia, alongside the major fungal sterol ergosterol, and switches completely to the production of hopanoids in anoxia, when sterol synthesis is not possible. On the other hand, S. pombe, like most eukaryotes, relies exclusively on sterol (ergosterol) production.12,14 The acquisition of SHC has allowed S. japonicus to thrive in the absence of oxygen,13,14,17,18 unlike S. pombe, which is an obligate aerobe. Interestingly, beyond anaerobic growth, hopanoids appear to contribute to growth at higher temperatures in both S. japonicus and upon their introduction into S. pombe,14 suggesting that they may broadly modify membrane physiology.
Our recent work identified the glycerophospholipid FA asymmetry, prevalent in S. japonicus, as a critical feature allowing it to accommodate both ergosterol and diplopterol in membranes, at least in vitro.14 Cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) measurements revealed that the asymmetrical saturated C18:0-C10:0 (1-stearoyl-2-decanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [SDPC]) formed thinner membranes in comparison to symmetrical unsaturated C16:0-C18:1 (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [POPC]). Two-component mixtures of SDPC or POPC with either triterpenoid were relatively disordered as compared to DPPC/ergosterol gel-phase membranes, but ergosterol supported higher membrane order relative to diplopterol. In ternary lipid mixtures with DPPC, SDPC supported phase separation in the presence of either ergosterol or diplopterol, whereas only ergosterol could induce phase separation in the presence of POPC.14 Interestingly, the measurements of membrane order in live cells using C-Laurdan indicated that—as compared to S. pombe—the nuclear membrane and the plasma membrane (PM) appeared more ordered in S. japonicus, with both diplopterol and ergosterol contributing to maintaining membrane order.14
Beyond membrane order, dielectric properties of the membrane environment and dipole potential play key roles in membrane organization and the function of membrane-associated proteins.19 Here, we investigate these parameters in S. japonicus and S. pombe using the voltage-sensitive probes di-4-ANEPPDHQ and di-8-ANEPPS.20,21 Using confocal microscopy-based imaging of live cells and spectroscopic measurements of model membranes, we determine the contribution of diplopterol and ergosterol, as well as the glycerophospholipid architecture, to these membrane properties. Our results indicate that the dielectric environment and dipole potential exhibit a nonlinear relationship and emerge from a combination of lipid packing, composition, and interfacial electrostatics.
Materials and methods
Fission yeast strains and growth conditions
The prototrophic S. japonicus and S. pombe strains used in this work are listed in Table S1. Cells were grown in the modified minimal yeast nitrogen base (YNB) medium (YNB containing 111 mM glucose, 14.7 mM potassium hydrogen phthalate, 15.5 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate, and the following supplements: adenine [93.75 mg/L], uracil [75 mg/L], histidine [75 mg/L], and leucine [75 mg/L], as done previously.14
Labeling fission yeast cells with voltage-sensitive dyes
Cells were routinely pre-cultured overnight, diluted to an OD595 of 0.1, and grown in minimal modified YNB medium in 200 rpm shaking incubators at 30°C to reach mid-exponential phase (OD595 = 0.4–0.6).
A 1 mL cell culture was concentrated to 30 μL by centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 1 min. Cells were labeled with either 2 μM di-8-ANEPPS for dipole potential measurements or 2 μM di-4-ANEPPDHQ for fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) measurements, and incubated at 25°C for 30 min. Following incubation, cells were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 1 min, resuspended in fresh modified YNB medium, and mounted on a glass slide. Acquisitions were performed immediately after sample preparation.
Fluorescence lifetime imaging measurements in live fission yeast cells
Confocal fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) measurements were performed on an inverted Stellaris 8 Falcon (Leica) microscope (Microscopy Innovation Center, King’s College London) equipped with a white-light laser (440–790 nm) using a 63×/1.4 NA oil-immersion objective under 1 airy condition. Di-4-ANEPPDHQ was excited at 468 nm (laser intensity: 0.21%) and detected in the range of 500–830 nm (Hyd X3 detector), with a pixel dwell time of 5.6 μs. Images were acquired with a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels, and frame repetitions were set to 50. Raw data were analyzed using the dedicated LAS X FLIM analysis software. Regions of interest (ROIs) in the plasma or nuclear membrane were fit to a single exponential decay model using the n-exponential tail fit, and fluorescence lifetimes <τ> were computed by the software, according to the equation below:
where I(t) represents the intensity at time t, A is the fluorescence decay amplitude at t = 0, τ is the fluorescence lifetime (the time at which amplitude A decays to A/e, ∼37%), and C is the offset value. Fit quality was assessed using the χ2 values generated by LAS X. Representative fluorescence decay profiles, together with the corresponding fluorescence lifetime (τ) and χ2 values obtained from the LAS X fits, are provided in Figure S1.
Live confocal microscopy-based measurements of dipole potential
Ratiometric imaging was carried out on a Nikon AXR inverted confocal microscope with NSPARC1 enabled with 2 GaAsP detectors with a 63×/1.4 NA oil-immersion objective under 1 airy condition. Labeled cells were imaged using two excitation wavelengths (445 and 514 nm) with a 650–717 nm emission band pass in both cases. Keeping the emission wavelength at the red edge of the fluorescence spectrum was previously shown to rule out membrane fluidity effects.22 All measurements were done at room temperature (∼25°C). The fluorescence intensity ratio (R), defined as the ratio of fluorescence intensities at an excitation wavelength of 445 nm to that at 514 nm, was calculated using Fiji/ImageJ, while the ND2-format images were analyzed using a custom macro.23 For quantitative analysis, ROIs were defined on the raw fluorescence images rather than on the pseudocolor ratio maps. Plasma-membrane ROIs were placed at cell tips, and nuclear envelope (NE)/endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ROIs were drawn over clearly resolved segments of the nuclear membrane. Identical ROI coordinates were applied to both fluorescence channels. Background fluorescence was determined and subtracted separately for each channel, and the fluorescence ratio (R) was calculated from the mean background-corrected fluorescence intensities within each ROI. Poorly resolved regions and regions with insufficient fluorescence signal were excluded. Pseudocolor ratiometric maps were generated for qualitative visualization only and were not used for quantitative measurements.
Preparation of large unilamellar vesicles
Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) were prepared as described previously with slight modifications.24 Specifically, for dipole potential measurements, 300 nmol lipids and 1 nmol di-8-ANEPPS (lipid-to-probe ratio of 300:1) were mixed and dried using a nitrogen stream while being warmed gently at 37°C. Lipid samples were dried in vacuum for 3 h, followed by hydration at 60°C for 1 h in 1 mL of buffer A (10 mM sodium phosphate and 150 mM NaCl [pH 7.4]) for dipole potential measurements. Samples were vortexed for 1 min to form homogeneous multilamellar vesicles (MLVs). LUVs were prepared by extrusion using an Avestin Liposofast Extruder (Ottawa, Canada) as previously described.25 Briefly, MLVs were freeze-thawed five times using liquid nitrogen and extruded through polycarbonate filters (pore diameter of 100 nm) mounted on an extruder fitted with Hamilton syringes (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV). The samples were subjected to 21 passes for all liposomes on a 55°C hot plate. LUV sizes were measured using dynamic light scattering (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS). Samples were kept overnight at 25°C before measurements.
Dipole potential measurements in liposomes
Spectroscopic dipole potential measurements were performed at 25°C on a FP-8300 spectrofluorometer (Jasco, West Yorkshire, UK) using a quartz cuvette with a 1 cm path length. Fluorescence excitation spectra of the voltage-sensitive probe di-8-ANEPPS were measured from 400 to 600 nm while keeping the emission wavelength fixed at 670 nm. Fluorescence emission spectra of the probe were measured from 490 to 700 nm while keeping the excitation at 470 nm. All experiments were carried out using excitation and emission slits with a band pass of 5 nm. The fluorescence intensity ratio (R), defined as the ratio of fluorescence intensities at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm to that at 510 nm, provides an estimate of the membrane dipole potential. R is related to the dipole potential (ψd) according to the linear relationship below26,27,28:
Statistics and reproducibility
The statistical details of experiments, including the number of biological replicates, can be found in the figure legends and supplemental information. Data were analyzed using unpaired t test statistical analysis, unless mentioned otherwise. All plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 11.
Results
S. pombe and S. japonicus membranes exhibit comparable dielectric environment
We first set out to probe the dielectric environment in the membranes of live S. pombe and S. japonicus cells by FLIM of the solvatochromic dye di-4-ANEPPDHQ. Fluorescence lifetime is determined by the excited-state relaxation dynamics of the probe and depends on its immediate molecular environment.29,30 Although di-4-ANEPPDHQ is sometimes used as a probe for membrane order, its spectral emission characteristics and solvatochromic behavior correlate with dielectric properties of the local membrane environment.31 We measured the di-4-ANEPPDHQ fluorescence lifetimes at the plasma membrane and the ER. Since in fission yeasts, the peripheral ER is tightly associated with the plasma membrane at the lateral cell cortex,32,33,34 plasma membrane measurements were performed at cell tips, where the ER tends to be spatially separated from the plasma membrane. Accordingly, the NE was used as a proxy for the ER.
Our measurements showed comparable fluorescence lifetimes for di-4-ANEPPDHQ in membranes of the two species (Figures 1A–1C and S1). As expected, the values for the plasma membrane were consistently higher than those for the NE/ER.
Figure 1.

Di-4-ANEPPDHQ FLIM measurements reveal comparable dielectric environment in S. pombe and S. japonicus membranes. (A) Representative single-plane pseudocolored FLIM images of wild-type (WT) and scs2Δscs22Δ mutant S. pombe strains (top). Representative FLIM images of WT S. japonicus and mutants deficient in synthesizing either ergosterol (erg1Δ) or diplopterol (shc1Δ) (bottom). The corresponding color-coded scale bars for fluorescence lifetime (selected automatically for best contrast) are shown, where blue represents shorter fluorescence lifetimes and red represents longer fluorescence lifetimes. Images were obtained after processing raw data in the LAS X FLIM analysis software. Dashed boxes indicate regions shown at higher magnification. Representative regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to the plasma membrane at the cell tip and the nuclear membrane are indicated. Scale bar represents 5 μm in the main images and 2 μm in the magnified images. (B) Chemical structure of the solvatochromic dye di-4-ANEPPDHQ used for FLIM measurements. (C) A plot representing individual fluorescence lifetimes at the plasma membrane and at the NE/ER in cells of specified genotypes. The fluorescence lifetime values were obtained from a single exponential fitting of the decay curves acquired from the indicated representative ROIs. Data points represent measurements from individual cells, and data from three independent biological replicates are color coded. Horizontal lines indicate the mean of each biological replicate. p values were obtained by two-tailed unpaired parametric t tests, using the means of the three independent biological replicates (n = 3).
We validated the FLIM approach using S. pombe cells lacking the two VAMP-associated proteins (VAPs) Scs2 and Scs22, which promote the anchoring of the ER to the plasma membrane and play a role in phosphoinositide (PI) homeostasis.35,36 The loss of the two VAPs leads to an increase in the levels of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) at the plasma membrane.36 PI4P is an anionic lipid that powers strong electrostatic interactions, controlling interactions and function of membrane-associated proteins and potentially contributing to membrane potential.37,38,39,40 We indeed observed a longer fluorescence lifetime for di-4-ANEPPDHQ specifically at the plasma membrane of scs2Δscs22Δ S. pombe cells relative to the wild type (Figures 1A and 1C).
In S. japonicus, the lack of either hopanoids (due to the deletion of shc1, the gene encoding the SHC) or sterols (due to the deletion of erg1 encoding the squalene monooxygenase Erg1) led to a comparable decrease in di-4-ANEPPDHQ fluorescence lifetime at the plasma membrane (Figures 1A and 1C). Although the fluorescence lifetime values at the NE tended to be lower than in the wild type in both mutants, the difference reached statistical significance only in the absence of ergosterol (Figures 1A and 1C). These results are broadly consistent with our previous C-Laurdan measurements showing reduced membrane order upon depletion of either triterpenoid, although the extent of perturbation differs at the nuclear membrane.14
Dipole potential differs in S. pombe and S. japonicus membranes
The dielectric environment in the interfacial region impacts membrane dipole potential.41,42,43 Membrane dipole potential is a positive electrostatic potential within the membrane, which originates due to the nonrandom arrangement of interfacial water and lipid dipoles.20,44,45,46 Dipole potential can be measured by dual-wavelength ratiometric imaging using voltage-sensitive dyes, such as di-8-ANEPPS.47,48,49 The probe exhibits a shift in its excitation spectrum in response to changes in the surrounding electric field. A ratio of fluorescence intensities at the blue and red edges of the spectrum (R) thus represents the probe’s response to the electric field, indicating dipole potential (Figure 2A).
Figure 2.

Ratiometric imaging reveals higher membrane dipole potential in S. japonicus cells as compared to S. pombe. (A) A schematic representation of the mechanism for estimating membrane dipole potential using the voltage-sensitive probe di-8-ANEPPS. A membrane bilayer composed of varied glycerophospholipid headgroups (light blue, gray, and green) and sterol (yellow) was incorporated with the probe. The dipole potential is generated due to the anisotropic arrangement of water (shown in proximity to the outer membrane leaflet for clarity) and lipid dipoles in the interfacial region. Charge transfer leads to a shift in the excitation spectrum of the probe, which is associated with changes in the local electric field strength. The final measurable parameter is the fluorescence intensity ratio (R), defined as the ratio of fluorescence intensities at the blue edge (Iblue) and red edge (Ired) of the excitation spectrum, and is proportional to the value of dipole potential. (B) Representative single-plane fluorescence intensity ratio (R) maps (color coded on a scale of 0.0–0.4) in S. pombe and S. japonicus of indicated genotypes. R is defined as the ratio of fluorescence intensities at an excitation wavelength of 445 nm to that at 514 nm (emission band pass at 650–717 nm in both cases). Ratiometric images were generated using a custom Fiji macro and are shown as representative visual maps. Quantitative R values shown in (C) were calculated from the corresponding raw fluorescence images acquired at the two excitation wavelengths and not from the color-coded ratiometric maps. Scale bars represent 2 μm. (C) A plot representing the individual values of fluorescence intensity ratios (R) calculated at the plasma membrane and at the NE/ER in cells of specified genotypes. Representative regions of interest (ROIs) are shown in Figure S2. The same ROI was applied to the corresponding images acquired at 445 and 514 nm, background fluorescence was subtracted separately in each channel, and R was calculated from the mean fluorescence intensities within the ROI. Data points represent measurements from individual cells from three independent biological replicates, with horizontal lines indicating the mean of each biological replicate. p values were obtained by two-tailed unpaired parametric t tests, using the means of the three independent biological replicates (n = 3).
We performed ratiometric fluorescence imaging of di-8-ANEPPS-labeled S. pombe and S. japonicus cells using confocal microscopy. In contrast to our FLIM measurements (Figure 1), the fluorescence intensity ratio (R) at the plasma membrane of S. pombe scs2Δscs22Δ cells was not significantly different from that of the wild type (Figures 2B and 2C). Interestingly, despite the FLIM measurements indicating comparable dielectric environments in S. japonicus and S. pombe membranes, the measurements of dipole potential indicated higher values in S. japonicus (Figures 2B and 2C; see raw fluorescence images in Figure S2). Of note, the lack of ergosterol (erg1Δ) resulted in a significant reduction of dipole potential at the plasma membrane. In the absence of hopanoids (shc1Δ), the dipole potential measurements also trended lower but did not reach statistical significance.
Ergosterol and saturated asymmetrical lipids support dipole potential
Given the complexity of biological membranes, we turned to artificial membranes in order to analyze the influence of glycerophospholipid architecture and fungal triterpenoids on membrane dipole potential. Using spectroscopy, we determined R values for di-8-ANEPPS-labeled single- and two-component LUVs composed of POPC (C16:0/C18:1; mono-unsaturated symmetrical lipid) or SDPC (C18:0/C10:0; asymmetrical saturated lipid) in combination with ergosterol or diplopterol. We detected a blue shift in the probe’s emission maximum in two-component LUVs of both POPC and SDPC in the presence of ergosterol but not diplopterol (Figure 3A). This is indicative of a more hydrophobic ordered environment in membranes containing ergosterol and aligns with our earlier generalized polarization (GP) measurements using C-Laurdan in two-component GUVs14 and in vivo dipole potential measurements (Figure 2). Strikingly, SDPC exhibited a higher value of R relative to POPC in single- and two-component liposomes with ergosterol or diplopterol (Figure 3B). Additionally, both POPC/ergosterol and SDPC/ergosterol liposomes showed increased values of fluorescence intensity ratio (R) relative to their counterpart two-component liposomes containing diplopterol. Although fluorescence-based imaging and cryo-EM measurements indicated that SDPC forms thin, disordered membranes,14 the high dipole potential values suggest that SDPC membranes are relatively ordered in the interfacial region as compared to POPC-containing membranes. To disentangle the contribution of glycerophospholipid FA asymmetry versus FA unsaturation, we made use of S. pombe cells where both fas2 and fas1 genes encoding the α and β subunits of the cytosolic fatty acid synthase (FAS) were replaced with their S. japonicus orthologs (fasS.j.). The fasS.j S. pombe mutant cells exhibit increased synthesis of the medium-chain C10:0 FA and a concomitant increase in asymmetrical glycerophospholipids.12 Unlike in S. japonicus, where most asymmetrical glycerophospholipids are saturated (C18:0-C10:0 and C16:0-C10:0), the asymmetrical glycerophospholipids in fasS.j S. pombe are mono-unsaturated (C18:1-C10:0).12 Interestingly, dipole potential in fasS.j S. pombe mutants was comparable to the wild type, suggesting that it is the glycerophospholipid FA saturation status rather than FA asymmetry that contributes to membrane dipole potential (Figures 3C and 3D; see raw fluorescence images in Figure S3).
Figure 3.

Ergosterol and saturated asymmetrical glycerophospholipids drive high membrane dipole potential. (A and B) Representative emission maximum (A) and fluorescence intensity ratio (R) values (B) of di-8-ANEPPS from spectroscopic measurements in single- and two-component LUVs made with POPC or SDPC with either ergosterol (Erg) or diplopterol (Dip). Values represent average ± SD (n = 3 biological repeats). p values were obtained by two-tailed unpaired parametric t tests. (C) Representative single-plane fluorescence intensity ratio (R) maps (color coded on a scale of 0.0–0.4) in S. pombe wild-type and fasS.j. cells. Scale bars represent 2 μm. (D) A plot representing the individual values of fluorescence intensity ratios (R) calculated at the cell tip regions of the plasma membrane and at the ER/NE in cells of specified genotypes. Representative regions of interest (ROIs) are shown in Figure S3. R values were obtained as described in Figure 2. p values were obtained by two-tailed unpaired parametric t tests, using the means of the three independent biological replicates (n = 3).
Taken together, our results indicate that in S. japonicus, the saturated asymmetrical glycerophospholipids together with the “native” triterpenoid ergosterol support high membrane dipole potential. The “foreign” triterpenoid diplopterol may have a relatively minor contribution to this parameter, at least in normoxia.
Discussion
Membrane order, the dielectric environment, and dipole potential are interrelated. High membrane order deep in the bilayer implies that dipole-manifesting groups are well aligned, leading to higher dipole potential. In disordered membranes, dipolar molecules would orient randomly, resulting in lower dipole potential. Within the interfacial region, the relationship is not as straightforward. On the one hand, higher order reduces water penetration, yet water molecules may be ordered, yielding higher dipole potential. On the other hand, lower interfacial order allowing more water penetration may alter the orientation of dipolar molecules and the dielectric field, also increasing membrane dipole potential.50,51 Although related, membrane physicochemical properties can vary independently based on local electrostatic effects and differences in lipid composition. Interestingly, previous di-4-ANEPPDHQ GP estimates produced higher values for S. japonicus membranes than S. pombe,12,52 whereas our FLIM measurements revealed comparable fluorescence lifetimes. Whereas GP is derived from changes in the steady-state emission spectrum of the probe, the fluorescence lifetime reflects its excited-state relaxation dynamics. Both are sensitive to the local membrane environment, where the relationship between lipid packing, hydration, and polarity can be complex.21,31,53 The two approaches therefore provide complementary readouts of membrane physicochemical properties.
Both ergosterol and diplopterol contribute to the maintenance of membrane polarity within the plasma membrane of S. japonicus (Figure 1). Interestingly, we observed a reduction in the di-4-ANEPPDHQ fluorescence lifetime at the NE/ER of S. japonicus erg1Δ cells relative to the wild type but not in shc1Δ cells. Although sterols are enriched at the plasma membrane, they are synthesized in the ER—in fact, it was recently shown that the budding yeast ER membranes contain around 10% ergosterol.54 Sterol concentrations of ∼10% are often sufficient to support liquid-liquid phase separation in model membranes,55,56 suggesting that even relatively modest ergosterol levels may contribute to the physicochemical organization of the NE/ER. Our results indicate that GP and fluorescence lifetime values need not co-vary in complex cellular membranes.
Despite comparable di-4-ANEPPDHQ fluorescence lifetimes, the dipole potential is higher in S. japonicus membranes than in S. pombe, with ergosterol but not diplopterol being a major contributor to this parameter both in vivo and in model membranes (Figures 2 and 3). Unlike sterols, diplopterol is less efficient at ordering the glycerophospholipids containing FA chains mono-unsaturated at position Δ-9,57 which are the most prevalent unsaturated species in this organism.12,58 In line with that, the aerobic physiology of S. japonicus relies largely on sterol production as compared to hopanoid biosynthesis, with erg1Δ mutant cells lacking sterols exhibiting a more pronounced decrease in cellular fitness versus shc1Δ cells.14 However, in anaerobically growing S. japonicus, diplopterol fully substitutes for ergosterol. The shift toward a more saturated lipidome and increased abundance of asymmetric glycerophospholipids in the absence of oxygen14 may enhance the capacity of diplopterol to support membrane organization.
Of note, we observed a higher dipole potential in the NE/ER as compared to the plasma membrane in both fission yeast species. This observation is surprising because the ER membrane in mammalian cells showed lower membrane dipole potential than the plasma membrane.59 In addition, such a higher dipole potential does not correlate with our GP14 and FLIM measurements (Figure 1), which showed higher disorder and increased polarity in the NE/ER membranes. The enrichment in diacylglycerol and phosphatidic acid,32,60,61,62 higher protein density, and/or asymmetric lipid distribution in the NE/ER membranes may potentially contribute to local dipolar fields and increase the dipole potential. Importantly, our results using di-4-ANEPPDHQ and di-8-ANEPPS dyes imply that the relationship between closely related membrane biophysical properties is complex and that measurements using different approaches should be interpreted with care.63
S. japonicus is a unique model eukaryote that has integrated hopanoids in its cellular metabolism and physiology. Together with its sister species S. pombe, it constitutes a powerful composite model system for probing the relationship between membrane lipid composition, physicochemical properties, and the evolution of membrane proteins and membrane-centered biological processes. Indeed, we have previously shown that a subset of single-pass transmembrane proteins exhibit shortened transmembrane helices in S. japonicus as compared to other fission yeasts.12 Higher membrane dipole potential in S. japonicus suggests that there could be additional molecular adaptations within the interfacial regions of transmembrane domains with potential implications for protein function, pointing to an interesting direction for future studies.
Data and code availability
Data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Oliferenko lab for their input in the project and to Hirak Chakraborty, Andreas Bodén, and Eugene Makeyev for suggestions on the manuscript. Many thanks to Andreas Bodén at the Microscopy Innovation Centre at King’s College London for his advice on FLIM measurements and data analysis. We thank Ani Jose (Microscopy Innovation Centre) for his help with data analysis. We thank Dylan Herzog (Nikon Imaging Centre, King’s College London) for his help in setting up membrane dipole potential measurements. Many thanks to Laura Masino for help in setting up spectroscopic measurements in model membranes. Our work was supported by the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (CC0103), the UK Medical Research Council (CC0103), and the Wellcome Trust (CC0103), and by the Wellcome Trust Investigator Award in Science (220790/Z/20/Z) to S.O.
Author contributions
B.D.R. conceived and performed all biophysical experiments, analyzed the data, and co-wrote the manuscript. S.O. conceived and interpreted the experiments and co-wrote the manuscript.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Editor: Erdinc Sezgin.
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100283.
Contributor Information
Bhagyashree Dasari Rao, Email: bhagyashree.rao@kcl.ac.uk.
Snezhana Oliferenko, Email: snezhka.oliferenko@crick.ac.uk.
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Mollinedo F. Lipid raft involvement in yeast cell growth and death. Front. Oncol. 2012;2:140. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Santos A.L., Preta G. Lipids in the cell: organisation regulates function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:1909–1927. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2765-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hurst L.R., Fratti R.A. Lipid rafts, sphingolipids, and ergosterol in yeast vacuole fusion and maturation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:539. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sych T., Levental K.R., Sezgin E. Lipid-protein interactions in plasma membrane organization and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2022;51:135–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090721-072718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Meer G., Voelker D.R., Feigenson G.W. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;9:112–124. doi: 10.1038/nrm2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harayama T., Riezman H. Understanding the diversity of membrane lipid composition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:281–296. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh P. Budding yeast: an ideal backdrop for in vivo lipid biochemistry. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016;4:156. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Renne M.F., de Kroon A.I.P.M. The role of phospholipid molecular species in determining the physical properties of yeast membranes. FEBS Lett. 2018;592:1330–1345. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baccouch R., Shi Y., et al. Alves I.D. The impact of lipid polyunsaturation on the physical and mechanical properties of lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Biomembr. 2023;1865 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.184084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guan X.L., Souza C.M., et al. Riezman H. Functional interactions between sphingolipids and sterols in biological membranes regulating cell physiology. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009;20:2083–2095. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-11-1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Belin B.J., Busset N., et al. Newman D.K. Hopanoid lipids: from membranes to plant–bacteria interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018;16:304–315. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Makarova M., Peter M., et al. Oliferenko S. Delineating the rules for structural adaptation of membrane-associated proteins to evolutionary changes in membrane lipidome. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:367–380.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bouwknegt J., Wiersma S.J., et al. Pronk J.T. A squalene-hopene cyclase in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus represents a eukaryotic adaptation to sterol-limited anaerobic environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105225118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rao B.D., Gomez-Gil E., et al. Oliferenko S. Horizontal acquisition of prokaryotic hopanoid biosynthesis reorganizes membrane physiology driving lifestyle innovation in a eukaryote. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:3291. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58515-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Galea A.M., Brown A.J. Special relationship between sterols and oxygen: were sterols an adaptation to aerobic life? Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009;47:880–889. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Siedenburg G., Jendrossek D. Squalene-hopene cyclases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:3905–3915. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00300-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bulder C.J. Anaerobic growth, ergosterol content and sensitivity to a polyene antibiotic, of the yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 1971;37:353–358. doi: 10.1007/BF02218505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kaino T., Tonoko K., et al. Kawamukai M. Schizosaccharomyces japonicus has low levels of CoQ10 synthesis, respiration deficiency, and efficient ethanol production. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018;82:1031–1042. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2017.1401914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Richens J.L., Lane J.S., et al. O'Shea P. The electrical interplay between proteins and lipids in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1848:1828–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sarkar P., Chattopadhyay A. Membrane dipole potential: an emerging approach to explore membrane organization and function. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022;126:4415–4430. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c02476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kothalawala R.C., Makay C., et al. Kovacs T. Disorder in order-related membrane biophysical parameters: an in-depth analysis of di-4-ANEPPDHQ generalized polarization. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2026;17:4723–4731. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6c00048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clarke R.J., Kane D.J. Optical detection of membrane dipole potential: avoidance of fluidity and dye-induced effects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1997;1323:223–239. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(96)00188-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., et al. Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shrivastava S., Dutta D., Chattopadhyay A. Effect of local anesthetics on the organization and dynamics in membranes of varying phase: a fluorescence approach. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2016;198:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.MacDonald R.C., MacDonald R.I., et al. Hu L.R. Small-volume extrusion apparatus for preparation of large, unilamellar vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1991;1061:297–303. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90295-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Starke-Peterkovic T., Turner N., et al. Clarke R.J. Cholesterol effect on the dipole potential of lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 2006;90:4060–4070. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.074666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haldar S., Kanaparthi R.K., et al. Chattopadhyay A. Differential effect of cholesterol and its biosynthetic precursors on membrane dipole potential. Biophys. J. 2012;102:1561–1569. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shrivastava S., Ror P., Chattopadhyay A. Effect of local anesthetics on dipole potential of different phase membranes: a fluorescence study. J. Membr. Biol. 2022;255:363–369. doi: 10.1007/s00232-022-00240-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Becker W. Fluorescence lifetime imaging--techniques and applications. J. Microsc. 2012;247:119–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Datta R., Heaster T.M., et al. Skala M.C. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: fundamentals and advances in instrumentation, analysis, and applications. J. Biomed. Opt. 2020;25:1–43. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.7.071203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Amaro M., Reina F., et al. Sezgin E. Laurdan and Di-4-ANEPPDHQ probe different properties of the membrane. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017;50 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa5dbc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Foo S., Cazenave-Gassiot A., et al. Oliferenko S. Diacylglycerol at the inner nuclear membrane fuels nuclear envelope expansion in closed mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 2023;136 doi: 10.1242/jcs.260568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hoh K.L., Mu B., et al. Zhang D. VAP-mediated membrane-tethering mechanisms implicate ER-PM contact function in pH homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2024;43 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Willet A.H., Park J.S., et al. Gould K.L. Fission yeast Duc1 links to ER-PM contact sites and influences PM lipid composition and cytokinetic ring anchoring. J. Cell Sci. 2024;137:jcs262347. doi: 10.1242/jcs.262347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kors S., Costello J.L., Schrader M. VAP proteins – from organelle tethers to pathogenic host interactors and their role in neuronal disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.895856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang D., Vjestica A., Oliferenko S. Plasma membrane tethering of the cortical ER necessitates its finely reticulated architecture. Curr. Biol. 2012;22:2048–2052. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Marković V., Jaillais Y. Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate: a key determinant of plasma membrane identity and function in plants. New Phytol. 2022;235:867–874. doi: 10.1111/nph.18258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Simon M.L.A., Platre M.P., et al. Jaillais Y. A PtdIns(4)P-driven electrostatic field controls cell membrane identity and signalling in plants. Nat. Plants. 2016;2 doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hammond G.R.V., Fischer M.J., et al. Irvine R.F. PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 are essential but independent lipid determinants of membrane identity. Science. 2012;337:727–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1222483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Clayton E.L., Minogue S., Waugh M.G. Mammalian phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases as modulators of membrane trafficking and lipid signaling networks. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013;52:294–304. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brockman H. Dipole potential of lipid membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1994;73:57–79. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(94)90174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Clarke R.J. The dipole potential of phospholipid membranes and methods for its detection. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;89–90:263–281. doi: 10.1016/s0001-8686(00)00061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Starke-Peterkovic T., Clarke R.J. Effect of headgroup on the dipole potential of phospholipid vesicles. Eur. Biophys. J. 2009;39:103–110. doi: 10.1007/s00249-008-0392-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Peterson U., Mannock D.A., et al. Pohl E.E. Origin of membrane dipole potential: Contribution of the phospholipid fatty acid chains. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2002;117:19–27. doi: 10.1016/s0009-3084(02)00013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang L., Bose P.S., Sigworth F.J. Using cryo-EM to measure the dipole potential of a lipid membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:18528–18533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608714103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang L. Measurements and implications of the membrane dipole potential. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012;81:615–635. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-070110-123033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Loew L.M., Scully S., et al. Waggoner A.S. Evidence for a charge-shift electrochromic mechanism in a probe of membrane potential. Nature. 1979;281:497–499. doi: 10.1038/281497a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Loew L.M. Potentiometric dyes: Imaging electrical activity of cell membranes. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996;68:1405–1409. doi: 10.1351/pac199668071405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sarkar P., Chakraborty H., Chattopadhyay A. Differential membrane dipolar orientation induced by acute and chronic cholesterol depletion. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:4484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04769-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Warshaviak D.T., Muellner M.J., Chachisvilis M. Effect of membrane tension on the electric field and dipole potential of lipid bilayer membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1808:2608–2617. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lev B., Vorobyov I., et al. Allen T.W. The membrane dipole potential and the roles of interfacial water and lipid hydrocarbon chains. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2024;128:9482–9499. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Panconi L., Lorenz C.D., et al. Makarova M. Phospholipid tail asymmetry allows cellular adaptation to anoxic environments. J. Biol. Chem. 2023;299 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Owen D.M., Lanigan P.M.P., et al. Magee A.I. Fluorescence lifetime imaging provides enhanced contrast when imaging the phase-sensitive dye di-4-ANEPPDHQ in model membranes and live cells. Biophys. J. 2006;90:L80–L82. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.084673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Reinhard J., Starke L., et al. Ernst R. MemPrep, a new technology for isolating organellar membranes provides fingerprints of lipid bilayer stress. EMBO J. 2024;43:1653–1685. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00063-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Veatch S.L., Keller S.L. Separation of liquid phases in giant vesicles of ternary mixtures of phospholipids and cholesterol. Biophys. J. 2003;85:3074–3083. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Veatch S.L., Keller S.L. Miscibility phase diagrams of giant vesicles containing sphingomyelin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.148101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nguyen H.N.A., Sharp L., et al. Saenz J.P. Varying the position of phospholipid acyl chain unsaturation modulates hopanoid and sterol ordering. Biophys. J. 2024;123:1896–1902. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gomez-Gil E., Guerra P., et al. Oliferenko S. Adaptation of eukaryotic membrane homeostasis to species-specific cellular lipid landscapes. Genes Dev. 2026;40:1429–1447. doi: 10.1101/gad.353500.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Szabo M., Cs Szabo B., et al. Kovacs T. Look beyond plasma membrane biophysics: revealing considerable variability of the dipole potential between plasma and organelle membranes of living cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:889. doi: 10.3390/ijms26030889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Goñi F.M., Alonso A. Structure and functional properties of diacylglycerols in membranes. Prog. Lipid Res. 1999;38:1–48. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(98)00021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhukovsky M.A., Filograna A., et al. Valente C. Phosphatidic acid in membrane rearrangements. FEBS Lett. 2019;593:2428–2451. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhou H., Huo Y., et al. Wei T. Phosphatidic acid: from biophysical properties to diverse functions. FEBS J. 2024;291:1870–1885. doi: 10.1111/febs.16809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gupta A., Kallianpur M., et al. Maiti S. Different membrane order measurement techniques are not mutually consistent. Biophys. J. 2023;122:964–972. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
