Abstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the initial site of biogenesis of secretory pathway proteins, including proteins localized to the ER, Golgi, lysosomes, intracellular vesicles, plasma membrane, and extracellular compartments. Proteins within the secretory pathway contain a high abundance of disulfide bonds to protect against the oxidative extracellular environment. These disulfide bonds are typically formed within the ER by a variety of oxidoreductases, including members of the protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) family. Here, we establish chemoproteomic platforms to identify oxidized and reduced cysteine residues within the ER. Subcellular fractionation methods were utilized to enrich for the ER and significantly enhance the coverage of ER-localized cysteine residues. Reactive-cysteine profiling ranked ~900 secretory pathway cysteines by reactivity with an iodoacetamide-alkyne probe, revealing functional cysteines annotated to participate in disulfide bonds, or S-palmitoylation sites within proteins. Through application of a variation of the OxICAT protocol for quantifying cysteine oxidation, the percentages of oxidation for each of ~700 ER-localized cysteines were calculated. Lastly, perturbation of ER function, through chemical induction of ER stress, was used to investigate the effect of initiation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) on ER-localized cysteine oxidation. Together, these studies establish a platform for identifying reactive and functional cysteine residues on proteins within the secretory pathway, as well as for interrogating the effects of diverse cellular stresses on ER-localized cysteine oxidation.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the largest intracellular organelle and contains cisternae that are contiguous with the nuclear membrane and extend toward the plasma membrane. The ER is separated into the smooth and rough ER, each of which performs distinct cellular functions. The smooth ER is absent of ribosomal proteins and is responsible for lipid biogenesis, Ca2+ storage and signaling, and xenobiotic metabolism. The rough ER is characterized by a high density of ribosomes and predominantly mediates protein synthesis, folding, and export1, 2. Proteins destined for the secretory pathway are co-translationally translocated into the ER lumen, where protein folding, glycosylation, and disulfide-bond formation occurs to generate the mature protein3. Properly folded proteins are transported to the Golgi via coated protein complex II (COPII)-mediated anterograde transport for further processing. From the Golgi, proteins are either retrograde transported back to the ER in COPI vesicles4, or assembled into secretory granules for transport to the plasma membrane or extracellular environment3.
Protein maturation within the ER involves several folding chaperones, including heat shock proteins (HSPs), and lectin-based chaperones. HSPs, such as HSPA5 (BiP), stabilize intermediate structures to promote folding and minimize aggregation5. The lectin-based chaperones, calreticulin (CALR) and calnexin (CALX), recognize N-linked glycan intermediates as a quality-control mechanism to promote proper folding6. Dysregulation of protein folding in the ER leads to the accumulation of unfolded proteins and upregulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR attenuates translation and upregulates expression of folding chaperones and endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation (ERAD) components7. ERAD degrades irreversibly misfolded proteins through ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation upon translocation to the cytosol8. Dysregulated protein folding in the ER is associated with several diseases, including diabetes, cancer, and neurodegeneration9–13.
A critical component of ER-localized protein folding, is the proper formation of disulfide bonds to stabilize protein structure. The highly oxidizing extracellular environment can spontaneously introduce inter- and intramolecular disulfide bonds14, necessitating the controlled formation of disulfide bonds prior to extracellular export. As one of the most oxidizing organelles in the cell, the ER is the favored location for the installation of disulfide bonds on secretory proteins15, 16. Disulfide-bond formation in the ER is mediated by the protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) family through thiol-disulfide exchange reactions17. Dysregulated disulfide-bond formation can lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins, and contribute to various diseases, including transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), where improper disulfide-bond formation leads to protein misfolding and aggregation11–13.
Methods to identify functional cysteines and quantify cysteine oxidation in the ER can illuminate the (dys)regulation of disulfide-bond formation, and protein-folding processes within the secretory pathway. Cysteine-reactivity profiling using isotopic tandem orthogonal proteolysis – activity-based protein profiling (isoTOP-ABPP) has enabled the interrogation of cysteine reactivity, modifications and inhibition18–20. Briefly, isoTOP-ABPP analysis utilizes a cysteine-reactive iodoacetamide-alkyne (IA) probe to covalently modify reactive cysteines within a proteome. Incorporation of distinct isotopic labels to IA-tagged peptides from two proteomes allows for assessing cysteine reactivity changes induced by oxidation, or covalent inhibition. Typical isoTOP-ABPP studies are performed in whole-cell lysates18, and afford poor coverage of the ER proteome; 42 ER-localized cysteine residues (from 35 proteins) are identified in a prototypical study18. Recently, an ER-localized chloroacetamide probe was generated to selectively target ER cysteines. In total, 195 proteins were identified, of which 180 were annotated as ER and secretory pathway proteins. However, despite enriching proteins using a cysteine-targeted probe, this study did not identify or evaluate reactivity changes to the individual cysteine residues that were probe labeled21. Therefore, with currently available methods, the number of ER-localized cysteine residues that has be identified remain minimal, necessitating platforms that combine ER enrichment with cysteine profiling. Potential strategies to enrich ER proteins, include the use of engineered ascorbate peroxidases (APEX)22, 23, proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID/TurboID)24, and subcellular fractionation by differential centrifugation25. Previously, mitochondrial isolation using differential centrifugation provided enhanced coverage of reactive mitochondrial cysteines26, without the need to engineer the cellular system, as required for APEX and BioID/TurboID. Differential centrifugation methods to isolate the ER have previously identified ~469 ER-associated proteins from rat pancreas27. Combining these established ER fractionation methods with isoTOP-ABPP has the potential to significantly enhance coverage of ER-localized cysteines for reactivity profiling.
Although cysteine-reactivity profiling can indirectly inform on cysteine oxidation state through an observed loss in cysteine reactivity across two samples, several proteomic methods exist to more directly monitor cysteine oxidation within a single biological sample28–30. One such method is OxICAT (isotopically coded affinity tags), which adapts thiol-trapping techniques with isotopically encoded alkylating reagents to interrogate cysteine oxidation state31. Briefly, all reduced cysteine residues are capped with an isotopically light alkylating reagent, followed by treatment with a reducing agent to expose previously oxidized cysteines for tagging with an isotopically heavy reagent. Light:heavy (L:H) ratios for identified cysteine-containing peptides directly reflect the percentage of oxidation for each cysteine residue. OxICAT methods have been performed in E. coli31, yeast32, and mammalian cells33, as well as in enriched mitochondria34. More recently, OxICAT was implemented to study the effects of ethanol consumption on redox homeostasis in the ER of murine pancreas tissue35. In this study, the oxidation states of ~ 500 secretory pathway localized cysteines were identified and evaluated for changes due to ethanol consumption.
Here, we report the use of ER isolation by differential centrifugation coupled to isoTOP-ABPP and OxICAT analyses to monitor cysteine reactivity and oxidation, respectively. For cysteine-reactivity studies, we apply the isoTOP-ABPP platform to rank 923 ER-localized cysteine residues by reactivity. Our studies revealed a subset of hyperreactive ER-localized cysteines that are functionally implicated in protein stabilization through disulfide bonds, and membrane localization through S-palmitoylation. To directly interrogate the oxidation state of cysteines in the ER, OxICAT analysis afforded the quantification of percent oxidation of 736 cysteines on secretory proteins. Together, these studies establish methodological guidelines for in-depth proteomic interrogation of cysteine function and oxidation within the ER. We demonstrate the utility of this platform by evaluating the effects of UPR upregulation on the cysteine oxidation state of ER-localized proteins.
Results and Discussion
Isolation of the endoplasmic reticulum using differential centrifugation.
The low abundance of ER proteins, relative to highly abundant cytosolic and nuclear proteins, results in poor coverage of ER-localized cysteines in typical isoTOP-ABPP analyses of whole-cell lsates18, 36 (Supplemental Figure S1A37 and B). To enrich for ER proteins prior to isoTOP-ABPP analysis, a differential centrifugation method developed for isolation of rat pancreas ER27 was adapted to mammalian cells (Figure 1A). Briefly, SKOV-3 cells were gently homogenized to disrupt the cell membrane while preserving the integrity of organelles. Multiple differential centrifugation steps were used to pellet dense organelles, such as nuclei and mitochondria, after which a high speed centrifugation step (150,000g × 30 min.) afforded a microsomal fraction. This microsomal fraction was stripped of ribosomal proteins, and a final centrifugation step (48,000g × 30 min.) generated ER proteomes for isoTOP-ABPP and OxICAT-based proteomic studies.
Figure 1.

Proteomic platform for the enrichment and identification of ER proteins and peptides. A) Schematic representation of the differential centrifugation steps used to isolate the ER proteome, and proteomic workflow to analyze ER-derived trypsin-digested peptides. B) Western-blot analysis of isolated organellar fractions against ER markers, PDIA4 and CALR, cytosolic marker, GAPDH, ribosomal marker, RPS6, nuclear marker, H3FA, and mitochondrial marker, ATPIF1. Subcellular fractions analyzed include: whole-cell lysate (WC), nucleus (Nuc.), mitochondria (Mito.), cytosol (Cyto.), ribosomes (Ribo.), and ER. C) Percentage of proteins Uniprot annotated as ER proteins identified from MS analyses of trypsin digests from whole-cell and ER fractions. D) Percentage of proteins Uniprot annotated as ER and secretory pathway proteins (ER, cell surface, extracellular, intracellular vesicle, and golgi) from MS analyses of trypsin digests from whole-cell and isolated ER fractions .
ER enrichment was confirmed by western blot of each fraction, including whole-cell, nucleus, mitochondria, cytosol, ribosomes, and ER (Figure 1B). Two ER markers, protein disulfide isomerase A4 (PDIA4) and CALR, a cytosolic marker, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), a ribosomal marker, 40s ribosomal protein S6 (RPS6), a nuclear marker, histone H3 (H3FA), and a mitochondrial marker, ATPase inhibitor (ATPIF1), were used to confirm successful organelle fractionation. Relative to the whole-cell fraction, the isolated ER fraction demonstrates a strong enrichment for ER resident proteins, PDIA4 and CALR, and a significant decrease of proteins found in other subcellular locations, confirming successful enrichment of ER proteins through differential centrifugation.
Confirmation of ER enrichment using mass spectrometry.
In addition to western-blot analysis, mass-spectrometry (MS) analyses was performed to determine the major protein constituents of the ER-enriched samples. To achieve this, whole-cell lysates and ER fractions were analyzed by LC/LC-MS/MS after trypsin digestion. Filtering of MS data for proteins with ≥2 identified peptides, generated 1,582 and 1,844 proteins for whole-cell and ER fractions, respectively (Supplemental Table S1). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis38 (Supplemental Figure S2A and Supplemental Table S2 and S3) demonstrated that the ER fraction was enriched for ER-associated processes, such as protein localization to the ER, vesicle cargo loading, N-linked glycosylation, and chaperone-mediated folding. None of these aforementioned biological processes were significantly enriched in the whole-cell sample.
Subcellular localization of identified proteins was determined by mining the Uniprot database for cellular locations. In total, MS analysis of the ER fraction identified 1,926 ER peptides from 212 proteins, in contrast to the 488 ER peptides from 38 proteins identified in whole-cell lysates (Figure 1C). In addition to Uniprot, the Human Protein Atlas database37 contains annotation for proteins whose localization to the ER has been experimentally detected. Of all protein encoding genes, 443 genes have been experimentally shown to localize to the ER. Using this database as a measure of ER coverage, only ~10% of all experimentally detected ER proteins are identified in whole-cell lysates compared to ~40% in the ER fraction, representing a substantial increase in coverage of ER proteins using differential centrifugation to enrich the ER prior to MS analysis (Supplemental Figure S2B and Supplemental Table S4).
In addition to ER-annotated proteins, UniProt annotation were used to identify the number of secretory pathway proteins (cell surface, extracellular, intracellular vesicle, and golgi) included in the dataset. These proteins would be expected to pass through the ER toward their final cellular destination. In total, 719 proteins were identified as localized to the ER and secretory pathway in the ER fraction, compared to 234 in whole-cell lysates (Figures 1D). In subsequent analyses, we use the term ER proteins to refer to both ER-localized and secretory pathway proteins identified in our ER-enriched fraction.
IsoTOP-ABPP analysis uncovers reactive and functional cysteines in the ER.
Reactive-cysteine profiling by isoTOP-ABPP18 enables the quantification of cysteine reactivity across two different samples. This platform relies on the use of a cysteine-reactive iodoacetamide-alkyne (IA) probe to modify highly nucleophilic cysteines within complex proteomes. Concentration-dependent analysis of cysteine labeling by the IA probe can be used to rank cysteines by reactivity. Here, we applied isoTOP-ABPP to ER-enriched samples, in order to rank cysteines in the ER by reactivity. Isotopically encoded IA-alkyne (IA-light and IA-heavy) probes were utilized for this analysis33. ER proteomes were treated with either 10 µM IA-heavy or 100 µM IA-light prior to copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) of a photo-cleavable biotin azide tag (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure S3). Following CuAAC, light and heavy samples were combined, labeled cysteines were enriched on streptavidin beads, and subjected to on-bead trypsin digestion and UV exposure to release IA-tagged peptides for MS analysis. LC/LC-MS/MS analysis generated parent ion (MS1) spectra for peptide quantitation, and fragmentation (MS2) spectra for peptide identification. For each identified peptide, the light to heavy ratio (L:H) reports on the reactivity of the referenced cysteine residues. A highly reactive cysteine is expected to saturate labeling at low IA concentrations to generate low L:H values of ~1, while less reactive cysteines will show increased labeling in the 100 uM (IA-light) sample resulting in L:H ratios >>1. isoTOP-ABPP analysis of ER-enriched samples, determined L:H ratios for 923 cysteine-containing peptides from ER proteins (Figure 2B and Supplemental Table S5).
Figure 2.

Quantitative MS analysis of reactive and functional cysteines in isolated ER fractions. A) Schematic representation of the isoTOP-ABPP platform used to rank cysteine residues by reactivity. B) L:H ratio plot ranking secretory pathway cysteines by reactivity. Inset 1 is composed of cysteine residues with a ratio <2.5 (highly reactive cysteines) while inset 2 consists of cysteine residues with a ratio >7.5 (cysteines with low reactivity). Cysteines with no functional annotation are grey. Cysteine functional annotation was obtained from Uniprot and SwissPalm. Protein localization was determined using UniprotKB and GO databases.
Highly reactive cysteines (L:H <2.5) identified in the ER fraction were searched against a previous whole-cell analysis18 to evaluate whether subcellular fractionation reveals a novel subset of highly reactive cysteines. This comparative analysis revealed that ~85% (332 out of 388) of these highly reactive cysteines were unique to the ER. To further interrogate the relationship between cysteine reactivity and function in the ER, cysteines annotated as functional in Uniprot and SwissPalm databases were binned by isoTOP-ABPP ratio (L:H <2.5, 2.5-5.0, 5.0-7.5, and >7.5) (Supplemental Figure S4A and Supplemental Table S5). This analysis revealed that ~30% of all highly reactive secretory pathway cysteines were functionally annotated, which is comparable to the percentage of highly reactive cysteines identified as functional in the whole-cell proteome (Supplemental Figure S4B). Interestingly, the functions attributed to reactive cysteines in the ER differed significantly from total cellular proteins. Specifically, highly reactive cysteines (L:H <2.5) in the ER were enriched for disulfides and S-palmitoylated residues, compared to unreactive cysteines (L:H >7.5) (Figure 2B Insets 1 and 2). These cysteines are likely from partially matured proteins in the ER where disulfide bonds and S-palmitoyl units have yet to be installed. In contrast, disulfide and palmitoylated cysteines were significantly underrepresented in whole-cell datasets, likely because these cysteines are fully oxidized or S-palmitoylated, rendering them unreactive. Intriguingly, our data show that cysteines destined for disulfide-bond formation or S-palmitoylation display significantly elevated reactivity relative to other non-functional cysteines within the ER proteome. In addition to disulfide and S-palmitoylated residues, cysteines located within nucleotide-binding regions of proteins were identified in the ER but not whole-cell fractions, including cysteines in the highly conserved G-domain of several secretory pathway localized Ras superfamily members (Supplemental Figure S5). The majority of these G-domain cysteines belong to a G4 motif containing a conserved GNKCD motif that interacts with guanidine39, and is known to be sensitive to oxidation40, 41.
Adaptation of the OxICAT platform to interrogate cysteine oxidation in the ER.
The significant presence of reactive cysteines annotated to be sites of disulfide-bond formation triggered our interest in more directly interrogating the oxidation states of cysteines, and thereby differentiating fully oxidized ER cysteines from those that are fully or partially reduced. To achieve this, we implemented a proteomic platform combining ER enrichment with an adapted OxICAT method34. For this analysis, ER fractions were isolated from SKOV-3 cells, and these microsomal fractions were immediately lysed in a denaturing buffer containing 10 mM IA-light. Reversibly oxidized cysteines were then reduced with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) and alkylated with 10 mM IA-heavy. A photocleavable biotin-azide tag was appended to labeled cysteines via CuAAC, followed by streptavidin enrichment, trypsin digestion, photocleavage, and LC/LC-MS/MS analysis (Figure 3A and Supplemental Figure S3). Cysteine oxidation was determined by converting L:H and H:L ratios into a calculated value of percent oxidation (Supplemental Methods) for each individual cysteine.
Figure 3.

OxICAT analysis to determine cysteine oxidation states in the ER. A) Schematic representation of the OxICAT platform designed to quantify oxidation states of cysteines from the ER fraction. B) Plot of cysteine oxidation states in ER and secretory pathway proteins. Uniprot annotated cysteine residues that partake in disulfide bonds are colored blue. SwissPalm annotated sites of S-palmitoylation are colored red. Oxidation states are presented as an average percent oxidized, calculated directly from light:heavy and heavy:light ratios of cysteine residues, n = 2. C) Extracted ion chromatograms from OxICAT analysis for cysteine residues in CALR and ERp44. Uniprot annotated disulfide bonds are represented by a bridge. Displayed chromatograms are representative of a single replicate. Protein localization was determined using UniprotKB and GO databases.
Across two replicates, oxidation states were determined for 734 cysteines on ER proteins (Figure 3B and Supplemental Table S6). Of these cysteines, the majority (499, 68%) were highly reduced (<25% oxidation), and ~16% (116 peptides) were highly oxidized (>75% oxidized). Of these 116 highly oxidized cysteines, 70 cysteines (60%) were functionally annotated as structural disulfides. The remaining 46 cysteines have no functional annotation, however, it is likely that many of these residues are unannotated structural disulfides. For example, C192 and C208 (95% oxidized) in the CD151 antigen are part of a large extracellular loop (EC2) conserved in the tetraspanin superfamily. These residues are predicted to form intramolecular disulfides based on structural similarities with other tetraspanins42, 43. Additionally, several unannotated oxidized cysteines belonging to proteins that are highly disulfide rich were identified, including six cysteine residues (C531, C1042, C1270, C1282, C1461, and C1476; 79-95% oxidized) in cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor (IGF2R) and C615 (93% oxidized) in plexin-B2 (PLXNB2). Therefore, our data help to identify previously unannotated structural disulfides on ER proteins.
Notably, only three cysteines annotated as disulfides are found in a highly reduced state. These include C13 in S100A11 (5% oxidized), C343 in Annexin A1 (ANXA1) (7% oxidized), and C166 in ERO1A (21% oxidized). Of these, C13 in S100A11 has been shown to form an interchain disulfide upon S100A11 dimerization in the peroxisomes44. Therefore, the ER-resident pool of S100A11 would be expected to be in the monomeric, cysteine reduced form as indicated by our data. In general, cysteines annotated as metal binding, S-nitrosated, or within nucleotide-binding domains were mostly reduced. Notably, S-palmitoylated cysteines were also generally highly reduced (91 residues) (Figure 3B and Supplemental Table S6), agreeing with the established observation that plasma membrane proteins primarily undergo S-palmitoylation in the Golgi prior to trafficking to the membrane45, and are therefore found in the reduced and unmodified state within the ER.
The ability of the OxICAT platform to provide residue-specific oxidation information is underscored by several proteins where multiple cysteines with disparate oxidation states were detected. For example, the oxidation states for 3 out of 4 cysteines in CALR were quantified (Figure 3C), where two of these cysteines (C105 and C137) form a disulfide bond and were highly oxidized (86.17% and 92.65% oxidized, respectively), while the third cysteine (C163) was mostly reduced (27.57% oxidized) and is proposed to participate in a disulfide-bridged homodimer under physiological stress46. Similarly, ERp44 is a multifunctional chaperone protein responsible for quality control in the early secretory pathway47. Three cysteine oxidation states were quantified in ERp44. C301 and C318, which are annotated as a structural disulfide, were found to be highly oxidized (84.76% and 95.24% oxidized, respectively). C92 was identified in our data as mostly reduced (18.38% oxidized). These findings are in agreement with the available structural data on ERp44 (PDB 2R2J48), where C301 and C318 are present as a disulfide, whereas C92 is present in the reduced thiol state. ERp44 is known to retain ERO1 in the ER through an interchain disulfide bond, but the cysteine involved in disulfide linkages with ERO1 (C58) was not identified in our analyses.
Upregulation of the UPR has minimal effects on cysteine oxidation state.
We applied the OxICAT analysis to interrogate changes in cysteine oxidation upon induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR). The accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER activates the UPR by triggering three different signaling pathways: activating transcription factor-6α (ATF6), inositol-requiring 1α (IRE1α), and PKR-like ER kinase (PERK)7, 49, 50. Several small molecules, including thapsigargin (Tg) and tunicamycin (Tn) (Figure 4A), target different homeostatic mechanisms in the ER to activate the UPR. Tg is a sesquiterpene lactone that non-competitively inhibits the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). Inhibiting SERCA-mediated Ca2+ import decreases the activity of Ca2+ binding chaperones such as CALR, CALX, and BiP51, 52, leading to an accumulation of unfolded proteins. Tn is a nucleoside antibiotic that inhibits GlcNAc phosphotransferase (GPT), preventing the formation of preassembled oligosaccharides required for N-linked glycosylation in the ER. Inhibition of N-glycosylation hinders proper protein folding, and additionally prevents lectin chaperones53 from recognizing misfolded proteins, leading to activation of the UPR. Although none of these chemical UPR modulators directly target disulfide-bond forming pathways in the ER, we were interested to study the effects on cysteine oxidation since dysregulation of protein homeostasis could potentially indirectly alter disulfide-bond formation within the ER.
Figure 4.

Quantification of changes to ER cysteine oxidation states following induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR). A) Structures of UPR activating agents, Tg and Tn. B) Activation of UPR target genes after 5 hours of treatment was evaluated by qRT-PCR following treatments with DMSO, Tg (5 µM), or Tn (3 µM). Data was plotted as a fold change in mRNA expression, Tg or Tn relative to DMSO, and represents the mean ± s.d. of two replicates. * P value <0.05, *** P value <0.001, unpaired t test. C,D) ReDiMe MS analyses of unenriched ER fractions upon 5 hours of Tg and Tn treatment. Proteins above (>1) or below (<-1) dotted lines are more than 2-fold upregulated or downregulated, respectively. C) Log2 ratio plot (Tg:DMSO) of identified ER and secretory pathway proteins. D) Log2 ratio plot (Tn:DMSO) of identified ER and secretory pathway proteins. E) Plot comparing secretory pathway cysteine oxidation states in DMSO and Tg (5 hr) treated samples. F) Plot comparing ER cysteine oxidation states in DMSO and Tg (24 hr) treated samples. Light colored regions indicate cysteine residues that show >10% change in cysteine oxidation state, and dark colored regions indicate cysteine residues that show >50% change in oxidation state. Protein localization was determined using UniprotKB and GO databases.
UPR activation upon administration of Tg and Tn was confirmed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Briefly, SKOV-3 cells were treated with DMSO, Tg (5 µM), or Tn (3 µM) for 5 hours and qPCR analysis was performed for known downstream targets from each arm of the UPR, including GRP94 (ATF6-regulated), ERDJ4 (IRE1α-regulated), and CHOP (PERK-regulated). As expected, all three arms of the UPR were activated following Tg and Tn treatments (Figure 4B).
Prior to examining cysteine-oxidation changes upon Tg and Tn treatments, unenriched proteomic analyses were performed to determine changes in protein abundance in ER fractions from UPR-upregulated cells. Quantitative proteomic analyses were performed upon isotopic tagging of peptides using reductive dimethylation (ReDiMe) of primary amines54. Peptides resulting from the DMSO-treated sample were dimethylated with light ReDiMe reagents while Tg or Tn samples were dimethylated with heavy ReDiMe reagents for LC/LC-MS/MS analysis. Across two replicates, we quantified 656 and 632 ER proteins in DMSO:Tg (Figure 4C and Supplemental Table S7) and DMSO:Tn samples (Figure 4D and Supplemental Table S8), respectively. While we were able to confirm activation of the UPR at the transcriptomic level for both treatments, only Tg treatments led to increased expression of proteins known to be associated with UPR activation. PDIs (e.g. PDIA3, PDIA4 and PDIA6), HSPs (e.g. HSPA5, HSPA13, and HYOU1), and N-linked glycosylation and lectin-assisted folding chaperones (e.g. STT3A and CALR) showed a greater than two-fold increase following Tg treatment (Figure 4C). Furthermore, the protein abundance changes following Tg treatment were similar to those reported in a previous proteomic study after independent activation of the IRE1α and ATF6 arms of the UPR55. Surprisingly, very few changes in protein abundance were observed for Tn-treated samples (Figure 4D and Supplemental Table S8), where folding chaperones were relatively unchanged. This general proteome profile was similar to a recent study using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) to profile changes in protein abundance following Tn treatments21. Additionally, the differences between Tn-treated transcriptomic and proteomic data could be attributed to known discrepancies between mRNA expression and protein expression or a temporal delay between transcriptional and translational machineries or both56, 57.
To explore perturbations to disulfide-bond formation upon UPR activation, the OxICAT platform was implemented in Tg and Tn treated cells. As before, SKOV-3 cells were treated with DMSO, Tg (5 µM), or Tn (3 µM) for 5 hours and subjected to the OxICAT analysis (Figure 3A) (Supplemental Table S9 and S10). Percent oxidation for each cysteine upon Tn and Tg treatment was compared to the DMSO control (Figure 4E and Supplemental Figure S6). The majority of identified cysteine residues showed minimal changes in oxidation state upon Tg and Tn treatment (grey circles, <10% change in oxidation state). However, 105 cysteines (21.0%) and 68 cysteines (19.9%) in Tg and Tn treated samples, respectively, exhibited a change larger than 10% (black circles). For example, C163 in CALR become >10% more oxidized following Tg treatments. This observation is supported by a previous study that found that Tg-mediated ER Ca2+ depletion resulted in the formation of a CALR disulfide bound homodimer at C16358. Only three cysteines displayed large (>50%) changes in oxidation. These include C312 in neural cell adhesion molecule L1 precursor (L1CAM) (76% decrease in oxidation), C1257 in myopalladin (MYPN) (65% decrease in oxidation), and C657/C663 in lysyl oxidase (LOXL2) (58% decrease in oxidation). C312 in L1CAM is annotated as a structural disulfide. It has been shown that L1CAM expression is Ca2+ dependent, whereby Tg treatment leads to increased expression59. This Tg-induced increase in L1CAM expression may overwhelm folding chaperones producing a misfolded population where the C312 disulfide is not properly installed. The identified cysteines (C657 and C663) on LOXL2 are also annotated as a structural disulfide. Interestingly, overexpression of LOXL2 is known to induce the UPR by interacting with BiP60, but the effect of UPR activation on LOXL2 function are unknown. Our data suggests that UPR activation by Tg results in partial misfolding of LOXL2 due to improper disulfide-bond formation. C1257 in MYPN is not annotated as a structural disulfide, and this protein has not previously been implicated in the UPR.
Since the changes observed after 5hr treatments with Tg and Tn were relatively minimal (only 3 cysteines with >50% change in oxidation state), we sought to determine if longer incubation times with Tg would show more dramatic perturbations to disulfide-bond formation. We collected OxICAT data after 24hrs of incubation with Tg (Figure 4F) (Supplemental Table S11). Surprisingly, fewer changes to cysteine oxidation were observed at the longer time point, suggesting that both acute and sustained UPR activation has minimal effects on disulfide-bonding capacity of the ER, likely due to upregulation of the PDIs and folding chaperones that ensure proper disulfide-bond formation on ER proteins.
In conclusion, we have developed a proteomic platform to quantify cysteine reactivity and oxidation in secretory pathway proteins localized in the ER. Previous studies on ER cysteines relied on isoTOP-ABPP analysis of whole-cell lysates18 or the use of fluorinated-rhodol tagged alkylating reagents (ERMs)21, but both strategies were plagued by low ER cysteine coverage. Using subcellular fractionation by differential centrifugation prior to proteomic analysis, we enrich for ~40% of the Human Protein Atlas annotated ER proteome, a 4-fold enrichment compared to whole-cell lysates. Combining ER enrichment with isoTOP-ABPP, we ranked 923 cysteine residues from 523 ER proteins by reactivity, representing a significant increase in identified cysteine residues relative to previous studies18, 21. Highly reactive cysteines were annotated as destined for S-palmitoylation or disulfide-bond formation, highlighting a subset of cysteine functionality typically not identified in whole-cell cysteine reactivity studies.
To investigate cysteine oxidation in the ER, we combined ER isolation with OxICAT to quantify the percentage oxidation for 734 cysteine residues on ER proteins. Highly oxidized cysteines were enriched in annotated structural disulfide bonds while S-palmitoylated residues were predominantly present in the reduced state. These results were expected, given the spatiotemporal introduction of each cysteine modification within the cell, whereby disulfide-bond formation occurs in the ER, resulting in annotated disulfides identified as primarily oxidized, whereas S-palmitoylation occurs primarily in the Golgi, and thereby S-palmitoylated cysteines in the ER would be expected to be in the reduced, unmodified state. The OxICAT platform was applied to evaluate changes in cysteine oxidation following chemical induction of the UPR with Tg or Tn. In general, these treatments resulted in minimal changes to cysteine oxidation, with a few proteins, such as L1CAM, displaying dysregulated disulfide-bond formation after 5 hrs of Tg treatment. One limitation of the OxICAT approach is that artifactual cysteine oxidation on ER proteins could occur during organelle fractionation. Capping reduced cysteines prior to organelle fractionation would better preserve endogenous oxidation states through the lengthy fractionation protocol, however the requirement for complete protein denaturation prior to labeling with the IA-light probe precludes cysteine labeling pre-fractionation. As a means to minimize artifactual oxidation, we ensure that the ER membrane is preserved during the fractionation steps, and cysteine capping is performed concurrent to ER membrane lysis.
Together, these studies demonstrate the advantages of combining organelle isolation with MS-proteomic platforms such as isoTOP-ABPP and OxICAT to improve coverage of low-abundant proteins in organelles such as the ER. These chemoproteomic platforms can be applied to investigate proteomic changes induced by direct perturbation of ER disulfide-bond forming chaperones, and in misfolding diseases, such as prion-related disorders and ALS, where changes in disulfide-bond formation are proposed to induce protein aggregation61. Further improvements in fractionation methodology, at the organelle, protein and/or peptide level, together with improved sensitivity of new MS instrumentation, can generate even more improved coverage of the ER cysteinome.
Methods
See Supporting Information for detailed experimental protocols for ER isolation, qPCR, mass spectrometry preparation, and data analysis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by NIH grants R01GM117004 and R01GM118431-01A1 to E.W. We thank members of the Weerapana Lab for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Experimental procedures and Supplemental Figures 1-6 and Supplemental Tables 1-11. Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschembio.9b01014.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Schwarz DS, and Blower MD (2016) The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling, Cell Mol Life Sci 73, 79–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cribb AE, Peyrou M, Muruganandan S, and Schneider L (2005) The endoplasmic reticulum in xenobiotic toxicity, Drug Metab Rev 37, 405–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lippincott-Schwartz J, Roberts TH, and Hirschberg K (2000) Secretory protein trafficking and organelle dynamics in living cells, Annu Rev Cell Dev Bi 16, 557–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee MCS, Miller EA, Goldberg J, Orci L, and Schekman R (2004) Bi-directional protein transport between the ER and Golgi, Annu Rev Cell Dev Bi 20, 87–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mayer MP, and Bukau B (2005) Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism, Cell Mol Life Sci 62, 670–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Williams DB (2006) Beyond lectins: the calnexin/calreticulin chaperone system of the endoplasmic reticulum, J Cell Sci 119, 615–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walter P, and Ron D (2011) The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation, Science 334, 1081–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Smith MH, Ploegh HL, and Weissman JS (2011) Road to ruin: targeting proteins for degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum, Science 334, 1086–1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hotamisligil GS (2010) Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease, Cell 140, 900–917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Madden E, Logue SE, Healy SJ, Manie S, and Samali A (2019) The role of the unfolded protein response in cancer progression: From oncogenesis to chemoresistance, Biol Cell 111, 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Welker E, Wedemeyer WJ, and Scheraga HA (2001) A role for intermolecular disulfide bonds in prion diseases?, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 4334–4336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Torres M, Medinas DB, Matamala JM, Woehlbier U, Cornejo VH, Solda T, Andreu C, Rozas P, Matus S, Munoz N, Vergara C, Cartier L, Soto C, Molinari M, and Hetz C (2015) The Protein-disulfide Isomerase ERp57 Regulates the Steady-state Levels of the Prion Protein, J Biol Chem 290, 23631–23645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Medinas DB, Rozas P, Traub FM, Woehlbier U, Brown RH, Bosco DA, and Hetz C (2018) Endoplasmic reticulum stress leads to accumulation of wild-type SOD1 aggregates associated with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, 8209–8214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feige MJ, and Hendershot LM (2011) Disulfide bonds in ER protein folding and homeostasis, Curr Opin Cell Biol 23, 167–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hwang C, Sinskey AJ, and Lodish HF (1992) Oxidized Redox State of Glutathione in the Endoplasmic-Reticulum, Science 257, 1496–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bechtel TJ, and Weerapana E (2017) From structure to redox: The diverse functional roles of disulfides and implications in disease, Proteomics 17, 1600391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hatahet F, and Ruddock LW (2009) Protein Disulfide Isomerase: A Critical Evaluation of Its Function in Disulfide Bond Formation, Antioxid Redox Sign 11, 2807–2850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Weerapana E, Wang C, Simon GM, Richter F, Khare S, Dillon MB, Bachovchin DA, Mowen K, Baker D, and Cravatt BF (2010) Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes, Nature 468, 790–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Backus KM, Correia BE, Lum KM, Forli S, Horning BD, Gonzalez-Paez GE, Chatterjee S, Lanning BR, Teijaro JR, Olson AJ, Wolan DW, and Cravatt BF (2016) Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems, Nature 534, 570–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou Y, Wynia-Smith SL, Couvertier SM, Kalous KS, Marletta MA, Smith BC, and Weerapana E (2016) Chemoproteomic Strategy to Quantitatively Monitor Transnitrosation Uncovers Functionally Relevant S-Nitrosation Sites on Cathepsin D and HADH2, Cell Chem Biol 23, 727–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fujisawa A, Tamura T, Yasueda Y, Kuwata K, and Hamachi I (2018) Chemical Profiling of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteome Using Designer Labeling Reagents, J Am Chem Soc 140, 17060–17070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hung V, Lam SS, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Guzman G, Mootha VK, Carr SA, and Ting AY (2017) Proteomic mapping of cytosol-facing outer mitochondrial and ER membranes in living human cells by proximity biotinylation, Elife 6, e24463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee SY, Kang MG, Park JS, Lee G, Ting AY, and Rhee HW (2016) APEX Fingerprinting Reveals the Subcellular Localization of Proteins of Interest, Cell Rep 15, 1837–1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Carr SA, Feldman JL, Perrimon N, and Ting AY (2018) Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID, Nat Biotechnol 36, 880–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen X, Karnovsky A, Sans MD, Andrews PC, and Williams JA (2010) Molecular characterization of the endoplasmic reticulum: insights from proteomic studies, Proteomics 10, 4040–4052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bak DW, Pizzagalli MD, and Weerapana E (2017) Identifying Functional Cysteine Residues in the Mitochondria, ACS Chem Biol 12, 947–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen XQ, Sans MD, Strahler JR, Karnovsky A, Ernst SA, Michailidis G, Andrews PC, and Williams JA (2010) Quantitative Organellar Proteomics Analysis of Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum from Normal and Acute Pancreatitis Rat Pancreas, J Proteome Res 9, 885–896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang J, Gupta V, Carroll KS, and Liebler DC (2014) Site-specific mapping and quantification of protein S-sulphenylation in cells, Nat Commun 5, 4776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Paulsen CE, Truong TH, Garcia FJ, Homann A, Gupta V, Leonard SE, and Carroll KS (2011) Peroxide-dependent sulfenylation of the EGFR catalytic site enhances kinase activity, Nat Chem Biol 8, 57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shakir S, Vinh J, and Chiappetta G (2017) Quantitative analysis of the cysteine redoxome by iodoacetyl tandem mass tags, Anal Bioanal Chem 409, 3821–3830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Leichert LI, Gehrke F, Gudiseva HV, Blackwell T, Ilbert M, Walker AK, Strahler JR, Andrews PC, and Jakob U (2008) Quantifying changes in the thiol redox proteome upon oxidative stress in vivo, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 8197–8202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brandes N, Reichmann D, Tienson H, Leichert LI, and Jakob U (2011) Using quantitative redox proteomics to dissect the yeast redoxome, J Biol Chem 286, 41893–41903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abo M, Li C, and Weerapana E (2018) Isotopically-Labeled Iodoacetamide-Alkyne Probes for Quantitative Cysteine-Reactivity Profiling, Mol Pharmaceut 15, 743–749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Topf U, Suppanz I, Samluk L, Wrobel L, Boser A, Sakowska P, Knapp B, Pietrzyk MK, Chacinska A, and Warscheid B (2018) Quantitative proteomics identifies redox switches for global translation modulation by mitochondrially produced reactive oxygen species, Nat Commun 9, 324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Waldron RT, Su HY, Piplani H, Capri J, Cohn W, Whitelegge JP, Faull KF, Sakkiah S, Abrol R, Yang W, Zhou B, Freeman MR, Pandol SJ, and Lugea A (2018) Ethanol Induced Disordering of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Endoplasmic Reticulum: An ER Stress/Defective Unfolded Protein Response Model, Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 5, 479–497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abo M, and Weerapana E (2015) A Caged Electrophilic Probe for Global Analysis of Cysteine Reactivity in Living Cells, J Am Chem Soc 137, 7087–7090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thul PJ, Akesson L, Wiking M, Mahdessian D, Geladaki A, Ait Blal H, Alm T, Asplund A, Bjork L, Breckels LM, Backstrom A, Danielsson F, Fagerberg L, Fall J, Gatto L, Gnann C, Hober S, Hjelmare M, Johansson F, Lee S, Lindskog C, Mulder J, Mulvey CM, Nilsson P, Oksvold P, Rockberg J, Schutten R, Schwenk JM, Sivertsson A, Sjostedt E, Skogs M, Stadler C, Sullivan DP, Tegel H, Winsnes C, Zhang C, Zwahlen M, Mardinoglu A, Ponten F, von Feilitzen K, Lilley KS, Uhlen M, and Lundberg E (2017) A subcellular map of the human proteome, Science 356, eaal3321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mi HY, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang XS, and Thomas PD (2019) PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools, Nucleic Acids Res 47, D419–D426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Colicelli J (2004) Human RAS superfamily proteins and related GTPases, Sci STKE 2004, RE13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Messina S, De Simone G, and Ascenzi G (2019) Cysteine-based regulation of redox-sensitive Ras small GTPases, Redox Biology, 26,101282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mitchell L, Hobbs GA, Aghajanian A, and Campbell SL (2013) Redox regulation of Ras and Rho GTPases: mechanism and function, Antioxid Redox Signal 18, 250–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Termini CM, and Gillette JM (2017) Tetraspanins Function as Regulators of Cellular Signaling, Front Cell Dev Biol 5, 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yamada M, Tamura Y, Sanzen N, Sato-Nishiuchi R, Hasegawa H, Ashman LK, Rubinstein E, Yanez-Mo M, Sanchez-Madrid F, and Sekiguchi K (2008) Probing the interaction of tetraspanin CD151 with integrin alpha 3 beta 1 using a panel of monoclonal antibodies with distinct reactivities toward the CD151-integrin alpha 3 beta 1 complex, Biochem J 415, 417–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Saho S, Satoh H, Kondo E, Inoue Y, Yamauchi A, Murata H, Kinoshita R, Yamamoto KI, Futami J, Putranto EW, Ruma IM, Sumardika IW, Youyi C, Suzawa K, Yamamoto H, Soh J, Tomida S, Sakaguchi Y, Saito K, Iioka H, Huh NH, Toyooka S, and Sakaguchi M (2016) Active Secretion of Dimerized S100A11 Induced by the Peroxisome in Mesothelioma Cells, Cancer Microenviron 9, 93–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salaun C, Greaves J, and Chamberlain LH (2010) The intracellular dynamic of protein palmitoylation, J Cell Biol 191, 1229–1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jorgensen CS, Ryder LR, Steino A, Hojrup P, Hansen J, Beyer NH, Heegaard NH, and Houen G (2003) Dimerization and oligomerization of the chaperone calreticulin, Eur J Biochem 270, 4140–4148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Anelli T, Alessio M, Mezghrani A, Simmen T, Talamo F, Bachi A, and Sitia R (2002) ERp44, a novel endoplasmic reticulum folding assistant of the thioredoxin family, EMBO J 21, 835–844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang L, Wang L, Vavassori S, Li S, Ke H, Anelli T, Degano M, Ronzoni R, Sitia R, Sun F, and Wang CC (2008) Crystal structure of human ERp44 shows a dynamic functional modulation by its carboxy-terminal tail, EMBO Rep 9, 642–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hetz C (2012) The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 89–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schroder M, and Kaufman RJ (2005) The mammalian unfolded protein response, Annu Rev Biochem 74, 739–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lievremont JP, Rizzuto R, Hendershot L, and Meldolesi J (1997) BiP, a major chaperone protein of the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, plays a direct and important role in the storage of the rapidly exchanging pool of Ca2+, J Biol Chem 272, 30873–30879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vassilakos A, Michalak M, Lehrman MA, and Williams DB (1998) Oligosaccharide binding characteristics of the molecular chaperones calnexin and calreticulin, Biochemistry 37, 3480–3490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Braakman I, and Hebert DN (2013) Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5, a013201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Boersema PJ, Raijmakers R, Lemeer S, Mohammed S, and Heck AJ (2009) Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics, Nat Protoc 4, 484–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shoulders MD, Ryno LM, Genereux JC, Moresco JJ, Tu PG, Wu C, Yates JR 3rd, Su AI, Kelly JW, and Wiseman RL (2013) Stress-independent activation of XBP1s and/or ATF6 reveals three functionally diverse ER proteostasis environments, Cell Rep 3, 1279–1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Koussounadis A, Langdon SP, Um IH, Harrison DJ, and Smith VA (2015) Relationship between differentially expressed mRNA and mRNA-protein correlations in a xenograft model system, Sci Rep 5, 10775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fournier ML, Paulson A, Pavelka N, Mosley AL, Gaudenz K, Bradford WD, Glynn E, Li H, Sardiu ME, Fleharty B, Seidel C, Florens L, and Washburn MP (2010) Delayed correlation of mRNA and protein expression in rapamycin-treated cells and a role for Ggc1 in cellular sensitivity to rapamycin, Mol Cell Proteomics 9, 271–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rizvi SM, Mancino L, Thammavongsa V, Cantley RL, and Raghavan M (2004) A polypeptide binding conformation of calreticulin is induced by heat shock, calcium depletion, or by deletion of the C-terminal acidic region, Mol Cell 15, 913–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bouillon M, and Audette M (1994) Retinoic acid-stimulated intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on SK-N-SH cells: calcium/calmodulin-dependent pathway, Cancer Res 54, 4144–4149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cuevas EP, Eraso P, Mazon MJ, Santos V, Moreno-Bueno G, Cano A, and Portillo F (2017) LOXL2 drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition via activation of IRE1-XBP1 signalling pathway, Sci Rep 7, 44988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mossuto MF (2013) Disulfide bonding in neurodegenerative misfolding diseases, Int J Cell Biol 2013, 318319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
