Abstract
Implementations of suitable in vitro cell culture systems of the human intestine have been essential tools in the study of the interaction among organs, commensal microbiota, pathogens and parasites. Due to the great complexity exhibited by the intestinal tissue, researchers have been developing in vitro/ex vivo systems to diminish the gap between conventional cell culture models and the human intestine. These models are able to reproduce different structures and functional aspects of the tissue. In the present review, information is recapitulated on the most used models, such as cell culture, intestinal organoids, scaffold-based three-dimensional models, and organ-on-a-chip and their use in studying the interaction between human intestine and microbes, and their advantages and limitations are also discussed.
Keywords: intestinal cell culture, organoids, three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds, organ-on-a-chip, microbiota, parasites
1. Introduction
The gastrointestinal (GI) tract, is the principal internal barrier of the body that separates human tissues from the external environment, including food, antigens, toxic molecules, xenobiotics and microbes. In the GI barrier, cells must respond to and survive all of these multiple stimuli; they must also ensure the capacity of the intestinal tissue to allow efficient transport of essential nutrients, these facts indicate that the intestinal ecosystem has significant functional complexity. Understanding the complex interaction among all of the elements present in the intestinal environment has been a main objective of research for the comprehension of homeostasis and diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), cancer and microbial infections (table 1).
Table 1.
model | commensal bacteria | pathogenic bacteria | parasite |
---|---|---|---|
tissue explant. Portions of organs maintained in culture by means of specialized media, substrates and atmospheres these models are commonly used to study human cells and parasite interaction, principally in human obligate pathogen advantages: the presences of mucus layer, immunological, neuronal and vascular responses. Models that recapitulate microenvironment observed during human pathologies disadvantages: difficulty in obtaining tissue samples and also, they show short duration of viability. There are genetic variations among the samples, which in some cases affect the interpretation of the data |
—study of microbiome. Demonstration of the protective effect of lectin-like protein, ZG16, as protector against Gram-positive bacterial infection [73] —study of probiotic and commensal Escherichia coli strains. Demonstration that outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) secreted by E. coli Nissle 1917 and E. coli ECOR12, is an effective system to communicate human host and bacteria to trigger specific responses [74] —study of commensal bacteria. In ileal explants from Crohn's disease (CD) patients, incubation with commensal bacteria E. coli or Lactobacillus casei the alterations observed in CD samples were partially recovered [75] |
—study of early events of Shigella flexneri infection. Interaction between human tissue and the invasive strain of S. flexneri induce desquamation and reduction of epithelial height and neuronal alteration of submucosal neurons [76] —evaluation of cholera toxin B subunit (CT-B) from Vibrio cholerae. Mucosal explants from CD patients incubated with recombinant CT-B demonstrated the effects of CT-B as an inhibitor of mucosal Th1 cell signalling [81] |
—study of virulent factors of Entamoeba histolytica. Demonstration of cysteine proteinase A5 activity as a modulator of human metalloproteinase-3 to trigger trophozoite invasion [77]. Transcriptome comparisons between virulent (HM1:IMSS) and non-virulent (Rahman) strains, to provide a global view of the gene expression profile of each strain [78]. In different contexts, was carried out the transcriptome analysis of gene expression of E. histolytica. The major transcriptome changes were observed in human explants [79] —study of gene expression of Cryptosporidium parvum or Cryptosporidium hominis during intestinal invasion. During tissue invasion, both strains showed overexpression of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and inhibition in the OPG ligand tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) b via OPG. [80] |
organoid. Miniaturized intestine that derives from proliferation of the intestinal stem cells (ISC) and show tissue structures such as villus-like domains with cellular polarization and crypt-like domains with proliferative regions these models are currently used as a platform in pharmacology studies and also as host–bacteria and host–virus interaction models principally, in cases that lack a suitable animal model advantages: their major, strengths are the presence of 3D structures, cellular polarization and presences of several epithelial-cell lineages organoids can be developed from biopsy derivate from healthy samples or from patient samples in two weeks disadvantages: the biggest disadvantage is the need to manipulate the structure to establish the interaction between the organoid and pathogens. At the moment, there are three major methods to stablish host–microbe interaction studies: |
—evaluation of microbiota-derived molecules. In organoids deriving from duodenal biopsies from gluten-intolerant patients, the barrier function was improved after the microinjection of microbiota-derived molecules [92] —study of regulatory effects of Lactobacillus reuteri in damaged mucosal barrier. By co-culture of mouse intestinal organoids and lamina propria lymphocytes, it was demonstrated that the presence of L. reuteri D8 was effective to repair the damaged epithelium caused by TNF-α treatment [93] —evaluation of non-pathogenic strain of E. coli in immature human epithelium. In human organoids, it was shown that microinjection of non-pathogenic E. coli generated a close host–microbe interaction in naive epithelium. This interaction increases antimicrobial peptide production, maturation of mucus layer, and improve of barrier function [94] |
—study of earliest stages of infection of enterohaemorrhagic E. coli. Human colonoids, were used to generate a differentiated monolayer in trans-wells inserts. Their infection with enterohaemorrhagic E. coli showed high levels of the serine protease EspP. This protein sequentially targets the Mucin-2 and protocadherin-24 to allow the bacterial attachment to the epithelium [95] —infection by Clostridium difficile. Microinjection of C. difficile showed reduction of MUC2 production, but no changes in mucus oligosaccharide composition [96]. Likewise, a marked epithelial disruption and loss of paracellular barrier promoted by the toxin A were observed [97]. Colonoids derived from Wnt receptor Frizzled 7 (FZD7) KO mice, show that the toxin B is targeted by FZDs receptors in the colonic epithelium [98] —infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Microinjection of S. Typhimurium induced changes in the human transcriptional pattern and sustained bacterial invasion [100] |
—study of the life cycle of Cryptosporidium spp. Organoids derived from human small intestine were microinjected with Cryptosporidium. This model showed substantial physiological relevance by its ability to complete the complex life cycle of parasite [107,108] |
microinjection, mechanical shearing and plating, and by making monolayers | —evaluation of non-pathogenic strain and pathogenic strain of E. coli. Microinjection of commensal strains and pathogenic strain O157:H7 of E. coli showed rapid growth. The commensal strain did not cause damage suggesting the positive effect of mucus production. Conversely, a loss of actin and epithelial integrity was observed with O157:H7 [99] | —infection with Helicobacter pylori. Microinjection of H. pylori was used in a model to study bacterial infection [102]. Also, bacterial infection resulted in rapid association of CagA with the c-Met receptor and the induction of epithelial proliferation [101]. Infection induces epithelial proliferation and c-Met phosphorylation [103] —infection with Shigella flexneri. Human enteroids were used to generate epithelial layer in trans-well inserts. Their infection showed basolateral invasion and disruption of tight junctions. Finally, bacterial replication, actin tails and increase in proinflammatory signals were observed [104] —infection with pathogenic E. coli. Polarized organoids were disaggregated and grown on trans-well inserts. They demonstrated novel adherence phenotypes in various strains of pathogenic E. coli [106] |
|
scaffold-based 3D models. Matrices made with synthetic or natural materials for the deposition of cells to mimic the architecture of the intestine and promote the acquisition of tissue characteristics these models are commonly used to study human cells and bacterial or parasite interactions, principally in human obligate pathogens advantages: their major strengths are the presence of 3D structures, cellular polarization and presence of several cell lineages in some models, the major advantages are their versatility. Components can be varied independently according to the study objectives. There is the possibility of combining 3D scaffolds and cells derived from human intestinal explants or organoids disadvantages: the biggest disadvantage is their lack of physical forces presents in tissues |
—study of Lactobacillus gasseri and E. coli Nissle 1917 as protective agents of the intestinal tract. The therapeutic potential of L. gasseri and E. coli Nissle 1917 against Salmonella typhimurium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was demonstrated [125] —culture of probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Development of bioengineered human intestinal tissues that mimic in vivo luminal oxygen levels. This system supports the growth of dominant anaerobic probiotic bacteria, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG [128] —study of commensal bacterial strains. Development of a scaffold-based 3D model that contained enterocytes, goblet and immune-like cells. The cells were exposed to synthetic commensal microbial community and LPS from E. coli O111:B4 strain. This interaction promotes the adhesion of specific bacterial strains, Veillonella parvula, to stimulate the epithelium barrier function and interleukin production [134] |
—infection with Salmonella typhimurium. The human intestinal villi epithelium was mimicked in a hydrogel scaffold. Using this model it was possible to establish the importance of MUC17 during bacterial infection [126] —infection with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. The human intestinal lumen was replicated in a 3D porous scaffold. In to evaluate the importance of mucus and the establishment of low oxygen to study bacterial interactions/colonization [128] —infection with Campylobacter jejuni. A decellularized extracellular matrix scaffold and reseeded with human Caco-2 cells was designed to study host–pathogen interactions. The infection with C. jejuni replicated some pathogenic processes previously observed in animal models and showed new virulent factors involved [132] |
—infection with Cryptosporidium parvum. It was possible to reproduce the microenvironmental conditions of the intestinal tract to support the life cycle of C. parvum in a bioengineered 3D human intestinal tissue model. This system has opened the possibility to evaluate host–parasite interactions and identify new drug targets [129,130] —study of the early steps of Entamoeba histolytica infection. The general aspects of the human colon were reproduced in a 3D model, which highlighted the importance of several virulence markers previously observed and also, described new molecules and regulatory factors involved in the amoebic invasive process [136] |
organ-on-a-chip. These are micropatterned synthetic surfaces that support the correct spatial arrangement of the cells and help to control gradients of biomolecules by means of microfluidic applications these models are currently used as platform to study host–microbe interaction models for long periods of time. Those models are used principally to study bacterial interaction in cases that lack a suitable animal model advantages: their major advantage is the ability to reproduce the physiology of the human gastrointestinal tract in 3D context, in the presence of flux fluid, peristaltic motion and oxygen gradient disadvantages: their principal weakness lies in the implementation of highly complex structures requiring qualified personnel for their design, and PDMS, the material most commonly used for chip construction, which absorbs small hydrophobic molecules that could interfere with some drug-screening studies |
—infection with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Organ-on-a-chip support long cultivation of L. rhamnosus GG with improved barrier functions and without compromising epithelial viability [142] —iIntestinal interaction among commensal and pathogenic bacteria and intestinal cells. The co-cultivation of commensal microbes and human intestinal epithelial cells suppress villus injury induced by enteroinvasive E. coli (O124:NM) [145] —study of complex communities of anaerobic and aerobic commensal bacteria and intestinal epithelium. The control of physiological oxygen gradients was possible in a gut-on-a-chip model, which grew aerobic and anaerobic human microbiota. The model established the importance of oxygen gradient in barrier function and maintaining relevant levels of microbial diversity [149] —study of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bacteroides caccae under anaerobic conditions. A microfluidics-based model demonstrated that the co-culture of both bacterial strains promotes the transcriptional response in epithelial cells, which is distinct from that of a co-culture solely comprising L. rhamnosus [150] |
—infection with Shigella flexneri. A gut-on-a-chip model demonstrated the positive impact of peristalsis during the epithelial invasion of S. flexneri [144] —infection with enterohaemorrhagic E. coli. An organ-on-a-chip model demonstrated that during infection by enterohaemorrhagic E. coli, administration of human microbiome metabolites promote the expression of virulent bacterial factors and increased epithelial injury [148] |
no information available |
1.1. Many different cells build the intestine
The GI tract contains two anatomical divisions: the upper GI and the lower GI [1]. The upper GI extends from the oral cavity to the small intestine and includes the oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum and ileum. The lower GI includes the colon, rectum and anus [1]. These anatomical divisions of the GI tract are in addition organized by several layers including the mucosa, the submucosa, the muscularis propria and the connective tissue [2,3]. The mucosal level is home to commensal microbiota, interacts with infectious microbes and comprises subsequent strata: (i) the epithelium facing the intestinal lumen and secreting mucus, (ii) the lamina propria, composed of an elastic connective tissue enriched with collagen, homing fibroblasts, and containing blood vessels, nerves, and immune cells and (iii) the thin muscularis mucosa responsible for the slow intestinal movements supporting intestinal secretion (figure 1a).
The epithelial layer is of great interest because it is the physico-chemical and immunological barrier against luminal antigens and enteric pathogens yet allowing the absorption of nutrients and water. For intestinal absorption functions, the epithelium folds into multiple invaginations, making the intestinal surface the largest mucus-covered absorption area in the body (approx. 400 m2) [4]. The intestinal epithelium digests and absorbs nutrients by organizing different cells into multiple structures: gastric pits (stomach) and tubular invaginations called crypts (in the colon), which combine with villi (in the small intestine) (figure 1a) [4]. The cellular building block of this enteric surface is composed of diverse cells: enterocytes adapted for absorptive metabolic and digestive functions; goblet cells (GC), which secrete mucin, with the newly described specialized GC denominated the ‘sentinel goblet cell’ (senGC) that are localized at the entrances of the colonic crypt and that play a main role in the protection against bacterial infection [5]; enteroendocrine cells, which secrete hormones; Paneth cells, at the bottom of the crypts, which deliver anti-microbial peptides; microfold cells, which are transporters of microbes and particles across the epithelial cell layer, playing a role in mucosal immunity; cup cells of unknown function [6] and chemosensory epithelial cells (Tuft cells), mainly in the small intestine [7]. All of these epithelial cells are derived from the differentiation of the intestinal stem cell (ISC) located at the bottom of the crypts [8]. The intestinal epithelium is renewed every 4–5 days as a result of the proliferation of ISC. Another essential element of the epithelium is the extracellular matrix (ECM), which acts as a scaffold involved in epithelial morphogenesis, differentiation and homeostasis. The ECM is a complex mix of proteins, glycoproteins and glycosaminoglycans secreted by cells, the main functions of which are to provide architectural support to cells. In addition, the ECM is involved in cellular communication by the diffusion of soluble and insoluble molecular components derived from its degradation [9]. In GI tract, the ECM is principally composed of a dense connective network of collagens (collagen type I [70%], type III [20%] and type V [12%]) [10], fibronectin and laminin [11].
The mucus layer is also of prime interest because it forms an interface between the environment of the intestinal lumen and the epithelium, protecting the tissue against microorganisms and toxins (figure 1b), shear stress and chemical damage while facilitating colonization by commensal bacteria. Mucus is a two-gel structure (figure 1b), there is a firm inner layer, impermeable to bacteria, and its integrity is crucial to avoid direct contact of pathogenic microbes with the epithelium [12,13], and a loose outer layer that interfaces with the microbiota, food products and pathogens [14]. In both layers, a network of glycoprotein containing several mucins secreted by GCs builds the gel; among them, mucin-type 2 (MUC2) is enriched in all structural domains of the intestine, with the exception of the stomach, which is enriched in mucin 5A (MUC5A) (figure 1b) [15–17]. In the small intestine, the mucus layer is less defined, and the tips of the villi commonly are not covered by MUC2 (figure 1b). In addition, a specific proteome modulated according to tissue specialization along the intestinal tract is present in the mucus [16]. The intestinal microbial ecosystem uses glycans derived from mucins as an energy resource [18–20].
1.2. The microbiome as a component of the intestinal tract
According to data obtained from MetaHit and the Human Microbiome Project, the bacterial gut microbiota presents 2172 species classified into 12 different phyla, of which 93.5% belonged to Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes [21–23]. The specific distribution of these bacteria along the GI tract or, from the lumen to the mucus layer, is determined by specific factors such as pH, oxygen, gradients of antimicrobial peptides (AMP), bile acids and the transit speed [24]. In the case of pH, it is basic in the oesophagus and acidic in the stomach. Then, it gradually returns to basic until the jejunum where it becomes acidic again. From the ileum to the colon, the pH gradually returns to basic (6–7.5 in the small intestine) and is close to 7 in the colon. The drop in pH at the ileocecal junction is attributed to the production of short-chain fatty acids by bacterial fermentation. There is also an oxygen gradient toward the GI with high levels in the upper GI and lower levels of oxygen in the distal GI [25]. Breathing air at sea level has an oxygen pressure (PO2) of approximately 145 mmHg (approx. 21% O2). By contrast, in the lumen of a healthy colon, there is a PO2 of less than 10 mmHg. PO2 levels decrease along the radial axis of the intestinal submucosa to the lumen. The amounts of mucus are another element that determines the composition of the microbiome (figure 1b) [26]. These physiological parameters regulate the total number of microbes per gram of faeces (from the stomach with 102 to the distal colon with 1012 microbes) [25] and influence the variability of the microbiome. In the upper GI, there are mainly aerobes or facultative anaerobic microorganisms that are able to live in an acidic and oxygenated environment (e.g. Helicobacter, Vibrio, Giardia, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus etc.) and in the lower GI, the microbe population is made up of facultative anaerobes and strict anaerobes organisms that grown in basic–neutral pH media little or no oxygen flow (e.g. Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella, Listeria, Cryptosporidium, Blastocystis, Entamoeba etc.) (figure 1b).
All these commensal organisms play important roles in intestinal homeostasis such as protection against pathogens [27], helping to maintain the integrity of the mucosal barrier [28], providing nutritional elements such as vitamins [29] and aiding the mucosal intestinal immune response [27,28,30]. In addition, the bacterial microbiota is essential for ensuring important metabolic functions that cannot be performed by the host. For instance, some obligate anaerobic bacteria are able to degrade complex non-digestible carbohydrates (fibbres) to produce short-chain fatty acids such as acetate, butyrate and propionate [31]. These lipids, rather than glucose, are the preferred energy substrate for colon epithelial cells. In addition, the increase of plant-derived fatty acids in diets leads to changes in intestinal morphology characterized by elongated villus structures with an increased number of epithelial cells and a reduced rate of epithelial proliferation [32]. In turn, the fat-rich diet changes the composition of the bacterial microbiota [32], suggesting the need to maintain a balance among tissue renewal, bacteria and the immune system in order to ensure intestine homeostasis [28]. Dysbiosis, originating from a disorder of the gut microbiota caused by excessively fatty diets or antimicrobial drugs, is involved in intestinal diseases (e.g. IBD, and metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabetes).
The impact of other microbes on intestinal homeostasis is poorly studied, despite the fact that several eukaryotic microbes (the eukaryome) are common residents of the healthy human intestine. For example, the influence of intestinal colonization by a protozoan on the composition of the bacterial microbiota has been demonstrated by the presence of Blastocystis [33,34], a component of the eukaryome detected with high prevalence as a commensal in healthy people. In addition, Blastocystis has also been found in association with other protozoa such as non-pathogenic Entamoeba species [35]. Co-colonization by Entamoeba spp. and Blastocystis hominis exists in healthy human populations [36]. Some recent data indicate that the protozoan Tritrichomonas musculis is a commensal of the intestine [37] and protects mice from bacterial infections. Over 140 fungal genera have been discovered as permanent or transient biota in the intestinal tract; many are either beneficial or commensal (e.g. Saccharomyces), and are considered probiotics with a role in the treatment of diarrhoea [38]. Finally, the virome comprises all the virus-like particles associated with the GI tract; it is mainly composed of two groups, eukaryotic viruses and prokaryotic virus also known as bacteriophages [39]. Eukaryotic viruses are able to interact with human body as pathogens, agents causing acute or persistent infections, or as benign agents, or even symbiotic agents without affecting the human body [40]. Bacteriophages are the principal component of the GI tract virome by their ability to infect bacteria and archaea [41,42]. Their distribution across the GI tract is varied but average is 109 particles per gram [39]. Bacteriophages from the human gut principally belong to the virus families Myoviridae, Podoviridae and Siphoviridae [43] and in general, opposed to bacterial population, the bacteriophage community in the human gut is highly personalized [44].
All these findings suggest a specific role that can be expected from each intestinal microbiome constituent to govern the balance of the intestinal ecosystem, a hypothesis constituting the subject of emerging research.
1.3. Microbiota and intestine changes during intestinal infection
Microbial pathogens such as parasites, bacteria and viruses, that are normally only present transiently in the intestine, can colonize or invade intestinal tissue under abnormal conditions [45]. In humans, the most common intestinal parasitic infections are caused by helminths and protozoans. Intestinal helminths are worms, of which the most common cases are nematodes, cestodes and trematodes [46,47], represented by the worldwide disseminated species: Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiuria, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanicus [46]. These parasites infect 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant ill health [48]. Likewise, the most common intestinal protozoan parasites in humans are Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba spp., Cyclospora and Cryptosporidium spp. [47]. The presence of intestinal protists such as Entamoeba, G. intestinalis and B. hominus, induces significant changes in the bacterial diversity of the microbiome, and consequently in intestinal homeostasis [49]. Among the pathogenic bacteria invading the human intestine, the most common groups are Helicobacter pylori, Vibrio cholerae, Campylobacter, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella spp. and virulent strains of Escherichia coli [50], while the main target of invasive bacteria are the cells lining the epithelium. In the case of virus, rotaviruses are the major cause of gastroenteritis in infants and young children [51]. Likewise, Norwalk and Norwalk-like viruses, are the major cause of gastroenteritis in adults and older children [52]. Noroviruses are also the other principal aetiological agents of viral gastroenteritis [53].
The features above indicate the great cellular complexity present in the intestine. To be able to understand human GI physiology under healthy and pathological conditions, it is necessary to determine the role of cellular activities, as well as the biochemical and mechanical signals involved therein. For this reason, for many years, researchers have been developing in vitro/ex vivo systems that could mimic the cellular diversity present in the human intestine, the flow of metabolites and peristaltic movements. In this review, we summarized data obtained with simple and complex systems used to assess the interaction between human intestine and commensal or pathogenic microbes; their advantages and limitations are also discussed.
2. Experimental models established for the study of intestinal infections and beyond
2.1. Monolayers of epithelial cells
The use of animals as a model to understand human diseases is a common approach [54]. However, the applicability and validity of animals to study interactions between intestine and microbes is permanently questioned mainly because in the case of obligated pathogens, animals do not reflect the tissue and immune responses observed in humans. To overcome these weaknesses, there is growing interest in the development of in vitro models capable of reproducing human intestinal function. Among the systems developed are included the culture of cells, which uses cells removed from tissues and placed in multiwell microplates or Petri dishes as culture vessels. In the correct environment, those cells grown in a monolayer (two-dimensional (2D) conditions) and are used to evaluate cellular responses to a specific stimulus. These in vitro cultures of epithelial cells have for many years been the most used system to study the interaction of pathogenic microbes and the intestine and important discoveries and advances in our understanding of infectious disease. Their principal advantages are the cells' ability to polarize and form cell–cell tight junctions, promoting the integrity of the epithelial barrier, they are reproducible, and many molecular and biochemical tools can be implemented in them [55]. As major disadvantages, cells grow in 2D in vitro conditions, limiting the expression of tissue-specific factors, such as mucus, and in general, they are used to study the interaction between a single microbe and a single or a few types of host cell. The monolayers are derived from the primary cell or from intestinal tumours. Primary cells in culture are able to proliferate in vitro without, or with very few, subculture steps, retaining some in vivo functionality [56]. Interesting data have been obtained with primary gastric cells interacting with Helicobacter pylori, thereby confirming that this bacterium attaches to cell–cell interfaces [57]. Two non-tumour intestinal cell lines with epithelial phenotypes (FHC CRL-1831 and CCD 841 CoN) have been, respectively, used to evaluate the effective antimicrobial activity of nanocomposites against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus [58], or to demonstrate the positive effect of several probiotics to decrease the adhesion of several Clostridium difficile strains [59]. Likewise, the low cytotoxicity effect of 19 new fluoro-benzimidazole derivatives was demonstrated in cell line CCD 841 CoN, in contrast to the high inhibitory activity of those molecules against Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 and Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 1331 [60].
The culture of tumour cells is a much more popular system to study cellular physiology during infection. As an advantage, these cell cultures are relatively inexpensive, the cells survive after several subculture steps, and there are many options for applying technologies of genetic manipulation. However, the use of cancer cell lines is limited in terms of establishing the functional character of human intestine, in that they derive from a sole cell linage [61]. The most popular human colon tumorigenic cell lines employed in vitro are Caco-2 and HT-29, derived from a colon tumour and able to differentiate, respectively, into enterocyte-like and mucus-producing GC. These cells have been widely used under monoculture or co-culture conditions [19,62–64]. Extensive research has been performed using these cells to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which pathogenic microbes (parasites, bacteria or virus) create structural lesions on human tissues [65–67]. These will not be further discussed in this review and have been well summarized previously [3,68–70].
In the following sections are described three-dimensional (3D) models considered as devices that reconstruct the 3D architecture of human intestine, are able to recapitulate the most basic functional units present in the original tissue, express the functions of differentiate intestinal epithelium (e.g. mucus production, villi) and respond to chemical, biological and physical interventions.
2.2. Human intestinal explants
Experimentation with intestinal explants has rendered possible the study of tissue interactions with microbiota, bacteria or parasites in a 3D context. This is a technology devoted to maintaining a whole organ, or portions of an organ, in culture by the use of specialized media, substrates and atmospheres (figure 2a) [71]. Although their major disadvantages are the difficulty of obtaining tissue samples and the short explant viability, these models are very attractive for studying the interaction among human tissues and microbiota. For instance, this technology has been employed in several studies: to analyse the interaction of the intestinal microbiome; to detect the presence and effect of different microorganism populations [30,72,73]; to determine that bacterial outer membrane vesicles are internalized by polarized cells and it is an effective strategy to communicate signals among beneficial gut bacteria and to modulate host responses [74]; and to observe in ileum explants that alterations in the transportome system in Crohn's disease are partially restored by commensal bacteria [75]. The human colon explant model reproduced early pathogenic events following Shigella flexneri infection and the mechanisms involved [76]. Furthermore, loading Entamoeba histolytica on human colon explants demonstrated that amoebic cysteine proteinase A5 promotes the activation of human matrix metalloproteinase-3, which in turn activates human matrix metalloproteinase-1, leading to remodelling of the fibrillar collagen and mucosa invasion [77]. Likewise, transcriptome profiling of amoebic gene expression shows the potential role of carbohydrate metabolism in colon invasion by E. histolytica [78], and it was determined that the rapid changes in gene expression profiles, rather than genetic derivation, account for the invasive phenotype of a single virulent amoebic isolate [79]. The infection of ileum explants with Cryptosporidium parvum or Cryptosporidium hominis causes, in the early stages, the overexpression of osteoprotegerin, which prevents the early apoptosis of human cells. The system also allows the parasite to achieve its complete life cycle, a feature not obtained with cell cultures [80]. Human intestinal explants have also been used to study immunological response. For example, the administration of the Cholera toxin B subunit reduces mucosal Th1 cell signalling [81]. Although impressive data have been obtained with human explants, as was mentioned, the major disadvantages of this model lie in the difficulty of obtaining human tissue and the short duration of viability of the explant.
2.3. Organoid models
Although at present the term intestinal organoids continues to be used in a broad and unspecific manner, herein referred to as a 3D miniaturized intestine able to grow in vitro and that is characterized by its ability to generate villus-like structures and crypt-like proliferative zones (figure 2b) [82,83]. Organoids derive from the proliferation of ISC, which are isolated from embryonic or mature crypts. Under specific cell-culture conditions, ISC proliferate and form spheres (from 100 µm to 700 µm) and, promoting their differentiation into intestinal epithelium, mesenchyme and lumen-like structures [84]. The most widely used method to develop organoids was described in 2009. This methodology isolates intestinal crypts further cultured in collagen matrix leading to the subsequent development of villus-like and crypt-like structures [85]. Later works have improved the method to allow the differentiation of intestinal organoids into enterocyte, goblet cell, Paneth cell and enteroendocrine lineages (figure 2b) [86]. Likewise, according to the ISC sources, organoids could be referred to as ‘enteroid' when the cells come from the small intestine, and ‘colonoid' when cells derive from colon [87]. The advantage of organoids includes the presence of 3D structures with villus-like domains able to maintain cellular polarization toward the tissue. They also possess crypt-like domains with proliferative regions that contain cells expressing ISC markers and that are able to differentiate into all of the epithelial cell lineages (figure 2b) [69]. Furthermore, intestinal organoids can be genetically manipulated and, if they were obtained from embryonic stem cells, they can be expanded indefinitely and cryopreserved, permitting long-term storage [88]. However, as these models represent only the general aspects of the epithelial layer, their use presents some limitations, including the lack of immune, nerve or vascular cells. Another important point to consider is organoid morphology as a closed system. As they have a spherical shape, the intestinal lumen occurs inside the device. To overcome this limitation, the uses of organoids require modification of certain technical approaches, such as mechanical shearing to promote the solubilization of the semi-solid spherical structure and further, to generate a polarized epithelial layer in trans-well chambers, or the microinjection of compounds to avoid the barrier effect [89,90]. For instance, a high-throughput organoid microinjection system was recently developed that allowed for the correct delivery of samples into the organoid's lumen [91]. In organoids deriving from duodenal biopsies from gluten-intolerant patients, the barrier function was improved after the microinjection of butyrate, lactate and polysaccharide A [92]. All of these aspects unquestionably situate organoids as excellent models for studying the interaction between the intestinal epithelium and microbes. For example, the co-culture of mouse intestinal organoids and human lamina propria lymphocytes in the presence of Lactobacillus reuteri D8, was able to repair the epithelial damage caused by TNF-α treatment, improving intestinal barrier function and epithelial layer proliferation [93]. In organoids derived from human pluripotent ISC localized near the immature epithelium, the interaction between cells and the non-pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli results in stable host–microbe symbiosis, permitting the maturation of both the mucus layer and the epithelial barrier [94]. Human colonoids were used to generate a differentiated monolayer in trans-wells inserts. In them, infection with enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) showed efficient bacterial attachment to the apical surface of mucus-producing cell monolayers, affecting brush border integrity [95]. Furthermore, with organoids, it has been possible to overcome the obstacle that the anaerobic requirements represent of many organisms. For instance, deposition by microinjection of the obligate anaerobe bacterium Clostridium difficile into the lumen of organoids, reveals disruption of organoid's epithelium, loss of paracellular barrier function, loss of polarity, and finally, reduction of mucus production [96,97]. Another study demonstrated that the pathological mechanism of Clostridium difficile depends on the expression of the Frizzled receptor [98]. Similarly, microinjection of the non-pathogenic commensal strain of Escherichia coli SGUC183 or of the clinical isolate E. coli (PT29S) O157:H7 into the organoid's lumen exhibits bacterial viability after 20 h. The commensal bacterial strain does not cause damage in the lumen; by contrast, a clinical virulent isolate producing the Shiga toxin gives rise to cellular damage, activation of the SOS stress response by production of reactive oxygen species and the upregulation of inflammatory response genes, including interleukin 8 [99]. Microinjection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium promotes large-scale transcriptional changes in organoids, including in genes linked to the proinflammatory response [100]. Microinjection of Helicobacter pylori into the lumen of the organoids demonstrates bacterial adhesion to the epithelium leading to the disruption of apical cell–cell junctions, supporting the idea that organoids reflect the pathology in the original tissue [101–103]. The infection with Shigella flexneri of epithelial layer derived from enteroids shows basolateral invasion and disruption of tight junctions. In this system were observed bacterial replication, actin tails and increase in proinflammatory signals [104]. Likewise, the infection process of S. flexneri was evaluated in disaggregated organoids from human enteroids [105]. In this system was observed how the apical invasion by S. flexneri was increased (10-fold) when the enteroids were differentiated to M cells. Also, invasion increased when the parasite infection was via the basolateral surface. Finally, the secretion of interleukin-8 and MUC2 were also increased after S. flexneri infection [105]. Similarly, the study of Escherichia coli infection process was studied in polarized organoids. Those 3D models were disaggregated and grown on trans-well inserts and infected with pathogenic strains showing novel adherence phenotypes [106]. Impressive data showed that microinjection of Cryptosporidium spp. [107,108] were able (as with tissue explants) to infect human enteroids with completion of the parasite's life cycle following dynamic regulation of transcripts related to the life cycle [107]. These findings have opened great avenues for further experimentations with Cryptosporidium, which is unable to proliferate in vitro. Recently a new model was developed, derived from stem-cell-derived spheroids seeded and cultivated on trans-well insert by an ‘air–liquid interface' [109]. These culture conditions allow the infection with C. parvum, and the completion of the parasite life cycle and parasite expansion to generate viable oocysts.
Viral gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Our understanding of the pathogenesis of human intestinal viral infection is limited and comes primarily from clinical investigation of the infection. The use of human organoids has provided new data on this important health problem [110]. For example, organoids derived from patient samples have been developed as a model for understanding the process of rotavirus infection [111–113]. The experimental setting recapitulates the essential characteristics of the in vivo tissue architecture allowing viral infection and water influx to the intestinal lumen [113]. The system demonstrated the great importance of the PI3 K-Akt-mTOR signalling pathway and the exchange of GDP/GTP in the small GTPase protein Rac1 on rotavirus infection [114,115]. As mentioned earlier, noroviruses are another major cause of gastroenteritis in humans. Recently, there has been successful adaptation of the use of a human intestinal epithelial monolayer derived from organoids as a norovirus culture system [116–118]. In addition, although infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus typically presents respiratory disease, emerging clinical reports indicate possible viral replication in the intestinal epithelium. In this case, through the use of intestinal organoids, viral infection of human enteric cells has been determined associated with infection of respiratory cells [119,120].
In conclusion, organoids reiterate anatomical aspects of the human intestine such as villus-like crypt structures. This tissue model is generalized to explore the interaction of human intestine and commensal, pathogenic bacteria or virus. Although their use as models to study the interaction between the parasite and intestinal tissue will certainly require overcoming various technical problems, it is undoubtedly a powerful tool for understanding the process and signalling pathways evoked during intestinal infections.
2.4. Scaffold-based three-dimensional models
Another revolutionary type of 3D intestinal model are scaffold-based 3D models. Tissue engineering has provided specialized biomaterials as substrates for the deposition of the ECM and cells to mimic the architecture of tissue. These biomaterials require biocompatibility in order to allow for cell adhesion, porosity to ensure adequate diffusion of nutrients, and the capability to act as guides for the organization of cells, leading to the reproduction of their general layout in the human gut. Two types of materials are regularly used: synthetic materials (e.g. polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyglycolic acid (PGA) and poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)) and natural extracellular materials (e.g. collagen or matrigel) [121]. PDMS is the most popular of these materials due to its low cost and relatively easy handling, as well as its high permeability to gases such as oxygen [122]. Although cell scaffolds reproduce, in many structural and functional aspects, the original tissue, they entail some limitations, such as incomplete 3D tissue architecture, reduced multicellular complexity, and the absence of physical forces demonstrated by natural tissues [70]. Nevertheless, scaffold-based 3D models have generated important results.
Scaffold-based 3D models build with synthetic materials such as PLGA with Caco-2 and/or HT29-MTX cells recapitulate cell differentiation along the villus axis and mucus (figure 2c(i)) [123,124]. Following the interaction of intestinal cells with the microbiota, it was successfully proven that two probiotics (Lactobacillus gasseri and E. coli Nissle 1917) were able to prevent adhesion and invasion of the pathogens Salmonella typhimurium 14038 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 15692 [125]. Employing the sacrificial mould procedure (PDMS villi mould–alginate reverse mould–3D hydrogel mould), a 3D villi scaffold was built with collagen as the substrate and Caco-2 cells (figure 2c(ii)) [126]. This procedure permits the easier separation of the hydrogel structure and creates a scaffold with better-conserved detail. The gene expression profile of differentiated cells significantly changed in comparison to cells in 2D culture; mainly, there is a significant increase in mucin-gene family expression. Salmonella typhimurium was able to invade the crypt part of the 3D scaffold, while no invasion was observed in cells on villi tips [126]. Recently, by means of the cell-printing process, a blood capillary structure was incorporated into the villi (figure 2c(iii)) [127]. This system revealed a higher rate of cell growth, overexpression of MUC17, and enhancement of barrier function. Another interesting scaffold was constructed by means of the combination of PDMS and silk fibroin as substratum, hosting human intestinal myofibroblasts, Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells (figure 2c(vii)) [128]. Mucus accumulates on the epithelial surface, low oxygen tension was observed in the lumen and bacteria colonize the scaffold (e.g. Yersinia or probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) [128]. The same system reproduced a long-term infection by Cryptosporidium parvum. The parasite developed asexual and sexual stages or was able to form new oocytes. Also, ablation, blunting, microvilli distortion in infected epithelial cells were observed [129]. Recently, the use of this device, was extended with the co-culture of human intestinal myofibroblasts and cells from human intestinal enteroids and the infection with C. parvum [130].
Scaffold-based 3D models built with natural extracellular matrices open emerging alternatives for the study of intestinal infections, for example, the very recent approach that the use of Caco-2 cells reseeded over decellularized porcine jejunal segments used as supporting material [131]. The hybrid human–porcine 3D model revealed intestinal features such as epithelial polarization and recapitulated the pathological process of Campylobacter jejuni previously observed in animal models; it particularly confirmed the role in the infection of the small regulatory RNA pair CJnc180/190 [132]. There are complex 3D scaffolds that employ purified collagen as support; in these, different types of cell lines, including immune cells, have been embedded, resulting in enhancement of physiological relevance. For example, for the evaluation of drug absorption, the 3D scaffold was built with Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells seeded over a collagen matrix, primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts were found within the collagen, and human monocytes THP-1 differentiated into macrophages were seeded into the base of the well (figure 2c(iv)) [133]. In this cells–collagen + cell–filter–cell scaffold the following was observed: mucus production, overexpression of the efflux transporter BCRP gene, and significant values of absorption for specific drugs. Other scaffolds employed the compartmentalization properties of trans-well chambers: the mix of Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells was seeded on the apical side of the filter and on the opposite side, a drop of collagen-containing THP-1 macrophages was deposited (figure 2c(v)). This cell–filter-collagen + cells scaffold reproduced the features of the small intestine microbiome after the addition of a set of eight commensal bacterial strains (Enterococcus faecalis, LMG-7937; Escherichia coli, DSM-18039; Streptococcus salivarius, LMG-11489; Streptococcus mitis, LMG-14557; Lactobacillus plantarum, LMG 1284; Veillonella parvula, DSM-2008; Veillonella atypica, DSM-20739 and Prevotella intermedia, DSM-20706) [134]. Another complex scaffold composed of decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosal collagen, Caco-2 cells, and primary human microvascular endothelial cells supplemented with peripheral blood leucocytes providing the vascular immune system was infected with Salmonella; it showed the communication of epithelial, endothelial, monocytes and natural killer cells among each other and with the pathogen [135]. A recently built 3D scaffold contains Caco-2/TC7 and HT29-MTX cells seeded on top of a collagen layer containing CCD-18Co human fibroblasts and THP-1 differentiated macrophages to mimic the basal lamina propria (figure 2c(vi)). This cells–collagen + cells scaffold presents intestinal features such as mucus production, epithelial cell polarization, fibroblast networking and cytokine production. The combination of imaging, omics and the evaluation of immune responses led to the analysis of the earlier steps of infection evoked by Entamoeba histolytica [136]. The data highlighted several virulence markers previously reported in the explants model or in patients with intestinal amoebiasis; in addition, new regulatory factors in the amoebic invasive process, including non-coding RNAs, ion transporters and nuclear receptors, were identified. For the first time, it was also observed that Entamoeba histolytica swallowed pieces of mucus after detaching them from the epithelium, and that immune and anti-microbial human defences are inhibited when the parasite interacts with the cells [136].
In conclusion, scaffold-based 3D models recapitulate diverse cell types presents in the intestinal epithelium. The advantages are the following: (i) versatility, in that all of its components can be varied independently, given the opportunity of adding or removing elements according to the study objectives within a 3D context, and (ii) the possibility of combining 3D scaffolds and cells derived from human intestinal explants or organoids. Tissue scaffold models reproduce architecture of living tissues, promoting the correct intestinal cell differentiation and facilitating the study of the earlier steps of pathogenic processes in conditions similar to the original tissue.
2.5. Organ-on-a-chip models
Microengineering approaches (e.g. soft lithography, moulding and micromachining) have developed 3D devices known as ‘organs-on-a-chip' [137]. These chips are models that control the environment around cells thanks to their micropatterned surfaces, which support the correct spatial arrangement of the cells and help to control the gradients of the biomolecules by microfluidic applications. Organ-on-a-chip systems demonstrate many advantages, including a 3D environment that emulates tissue structure with the presence of cell lines or stem cells, and microenvironmental cues with microfluidic systems that permit the mimicking of the cellular microenvironment [138]. Their principal weakness lies in the implementation of highly complex structures requiring qualified personnel for their design, and PDMS, the material most commonly used for chip construction, which absorbs small hydrophobic molecules that could interfere with some drug-screening studies [70]. One of the first intestinal chips was developed in 2008 (figure 2d(i)) [139]. This device made with PDMS is divided into two independent microfabricated hollow channels separated by a polyester semipermeable membrane. To support the inoculation and culture of Caco-2 cells, the upper side of the membrane was coated with collagen. The cells showed polarization and were successfully maintained for 30 days. An additional system was developed to evaluate intestinal absorption (figure 2d(ii)) [140]; this system was composed of two PDMS sheets, separated by a collagen-coated permeable membrane. Two vertical microchannels connect the upper (apical side) and lower side (basal side) of the membrane. Caco-2 cells were cultured on the apical side. Those conditions were able to support the precise control of the fluid, mimicking vascular flow. Although these models were an important step in emulating general intestinal functions, they were not able to reproduce physiological characteristics such as villi structure, the presence of multiple specialized cells and peristaltic movements, all necessary to simulate the symbiotic relationship between intestinal cells and resident bacteria [141]. To overcome these limitations, in 2012, the same microengineering principles employed in the ‘lung-on-a-chip', were used to build the ‘gut-on-a-chip' (figure 2d(iii)) [142]. This chip incorporates two microfluidic channels separately by means of a porous flexible membrane coated with ECM proteins. In the upper side, containing Caco-2 cells, the cell polarizes and forms villi-like structure by their exposition to micro-flow and cyclic strain to mimic peristaltic motion. The chip showed successful interaction, for one week, between human cells and the commensal bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. The intestinal villi-like structure differentiates, produces mucus, and increases in the activity of the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme, both important during the morphogenesis of villi-like structures [143]. In this model, it was also demonstrated that the infection of Shigella flexneri is significantly increased by the villi-like structure [144]. To engineer the intestinal tissue–tissue interface, on the lower side of the membrane were added microvascular endothelial cells [145]. Under these conditions, the interaction was studied between cell and commensal microbes (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum and Bifidobacterium infantis). Bacterial contact modified the gene expression of Caco-2 cells, rendering it similar to the gene expression of normal human ileum. It was also demonstrated that peristaltic motion and the administration of therapeutic probiotic formulation avoided the damage in the intestinal barrier promoted by pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli and protected against bacterial overgrowth [145]. Another step forward taken to improve the gut-on-a-chip models was their combination with enteroids cultured from duodenal biopsies [146], or lines from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), which were fragmented and seeded on the apical side of the ECM-coated membrane with fluid-flow and peristalsis-like deformations to the basal side [147]. Likewise, enteroid cells were able to produce villus-like structures with multilineage differentiation and, as expected, transcriptomic analysis revealed a host-defence response to infection of the human duodenum [146]. Recently, also was demonstrated that EHEC led to greater epithelial injury when exposed to metabolites derived from the human gut microbiome (4-methyl benzoic acid, 3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid, hexanoic acid and heptanoic acid). The authors suggest that these metabolites could be the reason why some human populations are more susceptible to EHEC infection [148]. To study the interaction of aerobic and anaerobic human gut microbiota and intestinal cells, a microscale oxygen sensor was incorporated to measure the amount of oxygen in situ [149]. Intestinal epithelium and microvascular endothelium were grown in parallel chambers, separated by an ECM-coated porous membrane. Then, the device was placed within an anaerobic chamber to establish oxygen gradients between the upper and lower chamber, establishing differential amounts of oxygen between the epithelial cells and endothelial cells. The set-up permits the stable co-culture of highly complex communities of anaerobic and aerobic commensal bacteria and the intestinal epithelium in the same channel [149].
The HuMiX microfluidic device was developed to study the GI human—microbe interface [150,151]. This is a human–microbial crosstalk system composed of three microfluidic chambers separated by semipermeable membranes. The lower chamber is a perfusion chamber, the middle chamber is the cell-culture chamber and the upper chamber is the microbial-culture chamber [151]. The system can be used to grow human cell or bacterial strains under oxygen and biomolecule gradients [150]. In this system, a successful co-culture either with a facultative anaerobe bacterial strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, or in combination with the obligate anaerobe bacterial strains, Bacteroides caccae, was obtained [150]. Organ-on-a-chip technology has been employed also to develop an in vitro model of the human colon [152]. Colonoids were obtained from re-sections or endoscopic tissue biopsies; these were disaggregated, and the cells were seeded in the chip above described. Colon cells were able to produce a polarized epithelium containing GC carrying mucus granules and importantly, a bilayer structure of mucus over the epithelium. All of these properties render this colon chip a new tool for the analysis of the role of mucus during commensal or pathogenic infections. Finally, it is important to highlight that, in all of these organ-on-a-chip models, the continuous fluid flow removes secreted molecules that might suppress villi formation, emphasizing the importance of this aspect in the design of the chip models [153–155].
The complexity of microfluidic chips has gained popularity. A recent study combines a microfluidic chip and a 3D villi scaffold to culture Caco-2 cells [156]. This system allows the formation of an epithelial barrier across the membrane or villi surface and high activity of the cytochrome P450 3A4. Another example combines a micrometre resolution membrane that is synthesized from rat-tail type-I collagen in a microfluidic device with apical and basolateral chambers [157]. However, to date, neither of these two systems has been employed to explore intestinal interaction with commensal bacteria, virus, pathogens or parasites.
In conclusion, despite the fact that organ-on-a-chip technologies will undoubtedly be required to overcome methodological limitations, their use will aid in understanding the role of important factors (e.g. tissue mechanics, microbiota, daily diet) on microbial infectious processes. The combination of organoids with microfluidics has opened alternatives for studying the interaction between human gut and microbes, taking into account oxygen rates and peristaltic movements.
3. Conclusion
Fundamental research on infectious diseases affecting humans has been limited in the past by the lack of robust experimental models that reproduce pathogen–host interactions in an environment relevant to the disease. This fact motivated the development of diverse 3D intestinal models, their application offers an excellent opportunity to experiment with devices closer to the native intestine. The establishment of organoids partly solves the technological limitations that the tissue explants present (e.g. scarce disposition of human tissues and their short life span). Organoids summarize many architectural aspects of the intestine and have been mainly used to explore organ interaction with commensal or pathogenic bacteria and viruses, while few cases have used organoids to study the pathological stages triggered by intestinal parasites. This model could rapidly spread in parasitology studies due to the validation of organoid disaggregation to form epithelial layers. Parasite–intestine interaction tests, in the early stages of infection, can be clearly enriched by the implementation of scaffold-based 3D models due to their nature of open systems. In addition, organ-on-a-chip technologies are able to combine cells or organoids with microfluidics, opening opportunities for complexes environments to examine intestinal invasion by for parasites (table 1).
The field of tissue engineering has also enriched multidisciplinary research in order to resolve the limitations that these 3D models present, in addition the teams, composed of biologists, engineers, physicists, mathematicians and clinicians, have been working together to design and develop more realistic 3D intestinal models. Behind their complex engineering, experimentation with these models actually poses great technological challenges. For example, in cell biology, the acquisition of microscope images (in particular, live imaging) requires instruments with greater penetration depth and multiple wavelengths, faster acquisition, and reduced phototoxicity. All of these parameters are only found combined in a few microscopes [158]. Another important challenge comprises the analysis of microscope images requiring mathematical tools and computing that produce large sets of volumetric data; indeed, reducing the computational load is an important task that will complement image analysis with all-omics approaches.
In that a unique model cannot afford the entire picture of humans, we think that, only when employed in conjunction, the data obtained with each of the different 3D models will increase our knowledge concerning the processes activated during the interaction of bacteria or parasites and the human intestine.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Aleix Boquet-Pujadas, BIA Unit at Institute Pasteur, for helpful comments on the document. The authors apologize to the authors who could not be cited due to limitations in the length of the text.
Data accessibility
This article does not contain any additional data.
Authors' contributions
A.A.-R., J.-C.O.-M. and N.G. wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
Authors have received funding from the European ERA-NET Infect-ERA programme AMOEBAC (grant no. ANR-14-IFEC-0001-02), from the Labex IBEID (grant no. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID), France-BioImaging infrastructure (grant no. ANR-10-INBS-04) and the programme PIA INCEPTION (grant no. ANR-16-CONV-0005). A.A.-R. is a recipient of Research Career Development Awards from Fundación-IMSS, México.
References
- 1.Greenwood-Van Meerveld B, Johnson AC, Grundy D. 2017. Gastrointestinal physiology and function. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 239, 1–16. ( 10.1007/164_2016_118) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yoo BB, Mazmanian SK. 2017. The enteric network: interactions between the immune and nervous systems of the gut. Immunity 46, 910–926. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.05.011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maresca M, Pinton P, Ajandouz EH, Menard S, Ferrier L, Oswald IP. 2018. Overview and comparison of intestinal organotypic models, intestinal cells, and intestinal explants used for toxicity studies. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 142, 1–18. ( 10.1007/82_2018_142) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peterson LW, Artis D. 2014. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 141–153. ( 10.1038/nri3608) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Birchenough GM, Nyström EE, Johansson ME, Hansson GC. 2016. A sentinel goblet cell guards the colonic crypt by triggering Nlrp6-dependent Muc2 secretion. Science 352, 1535–1542. ( 10.1126/science.aaf7419) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng H, Leblond CP. 1974. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V. Unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am. J. Anat. 141, 537–561. ( 10.1002/aja.1001410407) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schneider C, O'Leary CE, Locksley RM. 2019. Regulation of immune responses by tuft cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 584–593. ( 10.1038/s41577-019-0176-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van der Flier LG, Clevers H. 2009. Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 71, 241–260. ( 10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163145) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mouw JK, Ou G, Weaver VM. 2014. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 771–785. ( 10.1038/nrm3902) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Petrey AC, Carol A. 2017. The extracellular matrix in IBD: a dynamic mediator of inflammation. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 33, 234 ( 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000368) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hussey GS, Keane TJ, Badylak SF. 2017. The extracellular matrix of the gastrointestinal tract: a regenerative medicine platform. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 540 ( 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.76) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Johansson ME, Phillipson M, Petersson J, Velcich A, Holm L, Hansson GC. 2008. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15 064–15 069. ( 10.1073/pnas.0803124105) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Johansson ME, et al. 2014. Bacteria penetrate the normally impenetrable inner colon mucus layer in both murine colitis models and patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 63, 281–291. ( 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303207) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsuo K, Ota H, Akamatsu T, Sugiyama A, Katsuyama T. 1997. Histochemistry of the surface mucous gel layer of the human colon. Gut 40, 782–789. ( 10.1136/gut.40.6.782) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Johansson ME, et al. 2011. Composition and functional role of the mucus layers in the intestine. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 3635–3641. ( 10.1007/s00018-011-0822-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodríguez-Piñeiro AM, Bergström JH, Ermund A, Gustafsson JK, Schütte A, Johansson ME, Hansson GC. 2013. Studies of mucus in mouse stomach, small intestine, and colon. II. Gastrointestinal mucus proteome reveals Muc2 and Muc5ac accompanied by a set of core proteins. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 305, G348–G356. ( 10.1152/ajpgi.00047.2013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pelaseyed T, et al. 2014. The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 260, 8–20. ( 10.1111/imr.12182) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Falk P, Borén T, Normark S. 1994. Characterization of microbial host receptors. Methods Enzymol. 236, 353–374. ( 10.1016/0076-6879(94)36027-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cencič A, Langerholc T. 2010. Functional cell models of the gut and their applications in food microbiology—a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 141, S4–S14. ( 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.026) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gustafsson JK, Ermund A, Johansson MEV, Schütte A, Hansson GC, Sjövall H. 2012. An ex vivo method for studying mucus formation, properties, and thickness in human colonic biopsies and mouse small and large intestinal explants. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 302, G430–G438. ( 10.1152/ajpgi.00405.2011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thursby E, Juge N. 2017. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 474, 1823–1836. ( 10.1042/BCJ20160510) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hugon P, Dufour J-C, Colson P, Fournier P-E, Sallah K, Raoult D. 2015. A comprehensive repertoire of prokaryotic species identified in human beings. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 1211–1219. ( 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00293-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li J, et al. 2014. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 834–841. ( 10.1038/nbt.2942) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wlodarska M, Kostic AD, Xavier RJ. 2015. An integrative view of microbiome–host interactions in inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Host Microbe 17, 577–591. ( 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gorkiewicz G, Moschen A. 2018. Gut microbiome: a new player in gastrointestinal disease. Virchows Arch. 472, 159–172. ( 10.1007/s00428-017-2277-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tropini C, Earle KA, Huang KC, Sonnenburg JL. 2017. The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function. Cell Host Microbe 21, 433–442. ( 10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rolhion N, Chassaing B. 2016. When pathogenic bacteria meet the intestinal microbiota. Phil. Trans. R Soc. B 371, 20150504 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0504) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kayama H, Okumura R, Takeda K. 2020. Interaction between the microbiota, epithelia, and immune cells in the intestine. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 38, 23–48. ( 10.1146/annurev-immunol-070119-115104) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Magnúsdóttir S, Ravcheev D, de Crécy-Lagard V, Thiele I. 2015. Systematic genome assessment of B-vitamin biosynthesis suggests co-operation among gut microbes. Front. Genet. 6, 148 ( 10.3389/fgene.2015.00148) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bermudez-Brito M, Plaza-Díaz J, Fontana L, Muñoz-Quezada S, Gil A. 2013. In vitro cell and tissue models for studying host–microbe interactions: a review. Br. J. Nutr. 109(Suppl. 2), S27–S34. ( 10.1017/S0007114512004023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burgess SL, Oka A, Liu B, Bolick DT, Oakland DN, Guerrant RL, Bartelt L. 2019. Intestinal parasitic infection alters bone marrow derived dendritic cell inflammatory cytokine production in response to bacterial endotoxin in a diet-dependent manner. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13, e0007515 ( 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007515) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Todorov H, et al. 2020. α-Linolenic acid-rich diet influences microbiota composition and villus morphology of the mouse small intestine. Nutrients 12, 732 ( 10.3390/nu12030732) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Audebert C, Even G, Cian A, The Blastocystis Investigation Group, Loywick A, Merlin S, Viscogliosi E, Chabé M. 2016. Colonization with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis is associated with increased diversity of human gut bacterial microbiota. Sci. Rep. 6, 25255 ( 10.1038/srep25255) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nieves-Ramírez ME, et al. 2018. Asymptomatic intestinal colonization with protist Blastocystis is strongly associated with distinct microbiome ecological patterns. mSystems 3, e00007-18 ( 10.1128/mSystems.00007-18) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lokmer A, Cian A, Froment A, Gantois N, Viscogliosi E, Chabé M, Ségurel L. 2019. Use of shotgun metagenomics for the identification of protozoa in the gut microbiota of healthy individuals from worldwide populations with various industrialization levels. PLoS ONE 14, e0211139 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0211139) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Iebba V, et al. 2016. Gut microbiota related to Giardia duodenalis, Entamoeba spp. and Blastocystis hominis infections in humans from Côte d'Ivoire. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries 10, 1035–1041. ( 10.3855/jidc.8179) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Escalante NK, Lemire P, Cruz Tleugabulova M, Prescott D, Mortha A, Streutker CJ, Girardin SE, Philpott DJ, Mallevaey T. 2016. The common mouse protozoa Tritrichomonas muris alters mucosal T cell homeostasis and colitis susceptibility. J. Exp. Med. 213, 2841–2850. ( 10.1084/jem.20161776) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gouba N, Drancourt M. 2015. Digestive tract mycobiota: a source of infection. Med. Mal. Infect. 45, 9–16. ( 10.1016/j.medmal.2015.01.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zárate S, Taboada B, Yocupicio-Monroy M, Arias CF. 2017. Human virome. Arch. Med. Res. 48, 701–716. ( 10.1016/j.arcmed.2018.01.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Virgin HW, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. 2009. Redefining chronic viral infection. Cell 138, 30–50. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.036) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pride DT, Salzman J, Haynes M, Rohwer F, Davis-Long C, White RA, Loomer P, Armitage GC, Relman DA. 2012. Evidence of a robust resident bacteriophage population revealed through analysis of the human salivary virome. ISME J. 6, 915–926. ( 10.1038/ismej.2011.169) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carding SR, Davis N, Hoyles L. 2017. Review article: the human intestinal virome in health and disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 46, 800–815. ( 10.1111/apt.14280) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Breitbart M, Hewson I, Felts B, Mahaffy JM, Nulton J, Salamon P, Rohwer F. 2003. Metagenomic analyses of an uncultured viral community from human feces. J. Bacteriol. 185, 6220–6223. ( 10.1128/JB.185.20.6220-6223.2003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N, Angly FE, Heath AC, Rohwer F, Gordon JI. 2010. Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature 466, 334–338. ( 10.1038/nature09199) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hsiao WWL, Metz C, Singh DP, Roth J. 2008. The microbes of the intestine: an introduction to their metabolic and signaling capabilities. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 37, 857–871. ( 10.1016/j.ecl.2008.08.006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Glendinning L, Nausch N, Free A, Taylor DW, Mutapi F. 2014. The microbiota and helminths: sharing the same niche in the human host. Parasitology 141, 1255–1271. ( 10.1017/S0031182014000699) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Haque R. 2007. Human intestinal parasites. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 25, 387–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ. 2014. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors 7, 37 ( 10.1186/1756-3305-7-37) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vitetta L, Saltzman ET, Nikov T, Ibrahim I, Hall S. 2016. Modulating the gut micro-environment in the treatment of intestinal parasites. J. Clin. Med. 5, 102 ( 10.3390/jcm5110102) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Flint A, Butcher J, Stintzi A. 2016. Stress responses, adaptation, and virulence of bacterial pathogens during host gastrointestinal colonization. Microbiol. Spectr 4 ( 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0007-2015) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang CM, Chen SC, Chen KT. 2015. Current status of rotavirus vaccines. World J. Pediatr. 11, 300–308. ( 10.1007/s12519-015-0038-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lopman BA, Steele D, Kirkwood CD, Parashar UD. 2016. The vast and varied global burden of norovirus: prospects for prevention and control. PLoS Med. 13, e1001999 ( 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001999) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Atmar RL, Ramani S, Estes MK. 2018. Human noroviruses: recent advances in a 50-year history. Curr. Opin Infect. Dis. 31, 422–432. ( 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000476) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Robinson NB, et al. 2019. The current state of animal models in research: a review. Int. J. Surg. 72, 9–13. ( 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.015) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shin K, Fogg VC, Margolis B. 2006. Tight junctions and cell polarity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 207–235. ( 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104219) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Freshney RI. 2010. Primary culture. In Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique and specialized applications, 6th edn, 163–186. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; ( 10.1002/9780470649367.ch11) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Conlin VS, Curtis SB, Zhao Y, Moore ED, Smith VC, Meloche RM, Finlay BB, Buchan AM. 2004. Helicobacter pylori infection targets adherens junction regulatory proteins and results in increased rates of migration in human gastric epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 72, 5181–5192. ( 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5181-5192.2004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yu Z, Wang W, Dhital R, Kong F, Lin M, Mustapha A. 2019. Antimicrobial effect and toxicity of cellulose nanofibril/silver nanoparticle nanocomposites prepared by an ultraviolet irradiation method. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 180, 212–220. ( 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.04.054) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Piotrowski M, Wultańska D, Obuch-Woszczatyński P, Pituch H. 2019. Fructooligosaccharides and mannose affect Clostridium difficile adhesion and biofilm formation in a concentration-dependent manner. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38, 1975–1984. ( 10.1007/s10096-019-03635-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cevik UA, Saglik BN, Ozkay Y, Canturk Z, Bueno J, Demirci F, Koparal AS. 2017. Synthesis of new Fluoro-benzimidazole derivatives as an approach towards the discovery of novel intestinal antiseptic drug candidates. Curr. Pharm. Des 23, 2276–2286. ( 10.2174/1381612822666161201150131) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ben-David U, et al. 2018. Genetic and transcriptional evolution alters cancer cell line drug response. Nature 560, 325–330. ( 10.1038/s41586-018-0409-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Martínez-Maqueda D, Miralles B, Recio I. 2015. HT29 Cell line. In The impact of food bioactives on health: in vitro and ex vivo models (eds Verhoeckx K, et al.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ferraretto A, Bottani M, De Luca P, Cornaghi L, Arnaboldi F, Maggioni M, Fiorilli A, Donetti E. 2018. Morphofunctional properties of a differentiated Caco2/HT-29 co-culture as an in vitro model of human intestinal epithelium. Biosci. Rep. 38, BSR20171497 ( 10.1042/BSR20171497) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Marziano M, et al. 2019. Monitoring Caco-2 to enterocyte-like cells differentiation by means of electric impedance analysis on printed sensors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1863, 893–902. ( 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.02.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Amieva MR, Vogelmann R, Covacci A, Tompkins LS, Nelson WJ, Falkow S. 2003. Disruption of the epithelial apical–junctional complex by Helicobacter pylori CagA. Science 300, 1430–1434. ( 10.1126/science.1081919) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Boyle EC, Brown NF, Finlay BB. 2006. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium effectors SopB, SopE, SopE2 and SipA disrupt tight junction structure and function. Cell. Microbiol. 8, 1946–1957. ( 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00762.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Harrer A, Bücker R, Boehm M, Zarzecka U, Tegtmeyer N, Sticht H, Schulzke JD, Backert S. 2019. Campylobacter jejuni enters gut epithelial cells and impairs intestinal barrier function through cleavage of occludin by serine protease HtrA. Gut Pathog. 11, 4 ( 10.1186/s13099-019-0283-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kaeffer B. 2002. Mammalian intestinal epithelial cells in primary culture: a mini-review. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 38, 123–134. ( 10.1290/1071-2690(2002)0383C0123:MIECIP3E2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Noben M, Vanhove W, Arnauts K, Santo Ramalho A, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Verfaillie C, Ferrante M. 2017. Human intestinal epithelium in a dish: current models for research into gastrointestinal pathophysiology. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 5, 1073–1081. ( 10.1177/2050640617722903) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Barrila J, et al. 2018. Modeling host–pathogen interactions in the context of the microenvironment: three-dimensional cell culture comes of age. Infect. Immun. 86, e00282-18 ( 10.1128/IAI.00282-18) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Resau JH, Sakamoto K, Cottrell JR, Hudson EA, Meltzer SJ. 1991. Explant organ culture: a review. Cytotechnology 7, 137–149. ( 10.1007/BF00365924) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Randall KJ, Turton J, Foster JR. 2011. Explant culture of gastrointestinal tissue: a review of methods and applications. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 27, 267–284. ( 10.1007/s10565-011-9187-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bergström JH, Birchenough GM, Katona G, Schroeder BO, Schütte A, Ermund A, Johansson ME, Hansson GC. 2016. Gram-positive bacteria are held at a distance in the colon mucus by the lectin-like protein ZG16. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13 833–13 838. ( 10.1073/pnas.1611400113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fábrega MJ, Aguilera L, Giménez R, Varela E, Alexandra Cañas M, Antolín M, Badía J, Baldomà L. 2016. Activation of immune and defense responses in the intestinal mucosa by outer membrane vesicles of commensal and probiotic Escherichia coli strains. Front. Microbiol. 7, 705 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00705) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Pérez-Torras S, Iglesias I, Llopis M, Lozano JJ, Antolín M, Guarner F, Pastor-Anglada M. 2016. Transportome profiling identifies profound alterations in Crohn's disease partially restored by commensal bacteria. J. Crohns Colitis 10, 850–859. ( 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Coron E, Flamant M, Aubert P, Wedel T, Pedron T, Letessier E, Galmiche JP, Sansonetti PJ, Neunlist M. 2009. Characterisation of early mucosal and neuronal lesions following Shigella flexneri infection in human colon. PLoS ONE 4, e4713 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0004713) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Thibeaux R, Avé P, Bernier M, Morcelet M, Frileux P, Guillén N, Labruyère E. 2014. The parasite Entamoeba histolytica exploits the activities of human matrix metalloproteinases to invade colonic tissue. Nat. Commun. 5, 5142 ( 10.1038/ncomms6142) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Thibeaux R, Weber C, Hon CC, Dillies MA, Avé P, Coppée JY, Labruyère E, Guillén N. 2013. Identification of the virulence landscape essential for Entamoeba histolytica invasion of the human colon. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003824 ( 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003824) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Weber C, Koutero M, Dillies MA, Varet H, Lopez-Camarillo C, Coppée JY, Hon CC, Guillén N. 2016. Extensive transcriptome analysis correlates the plasticity of Entamoeba histolytica pathogenesis to rapid phenotype changes depending on the environment. Sci. Rep. 6, 35852 ( 10.1038/srep35852) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Castellanos-Gonzalez A, Yancey LS, Wang HC, Pantenburg B, Liscum KR, Lewis DE, White AC. 2008. Cryptosporidium infection of human intestinal epithelial cells increases expression of osteoprotegerin: a novel mechanism for evasion of host defenses. J. Infect. Dis. 197, 916–923. ( 10.1086/528374) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Coccia EM, Remoli ME, Di Giacinto C, Del Zotto B, Giacomini E, Monteleone G, Boirivant M. 2005. Cholera toxin subunit B inhibits IL-12 and IFN-γ production and signaling in experimental colitis and Crohn's disease. Gut 54, 1558–1564. ( 10.1136/gut.2004.062174) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wallach TE, Bayrer JR. 2017. Intestinal organoids: new frontiers in the study of intestinal disease and physiology. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 64, 180–185. ( 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001411) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Schutgens F, Clevers H. 2020. Human organoids: tools for understanding biology and treating diseases. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 15, 211–234. ( 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032611) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Spence JR, et al. 2011. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature 470, 105–109. ( 10.1038/nature09691) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sato T, et al. 2009. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265. ( 10.1038/nature07935) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Almeqdadi M, Mana MD, Roper J, Yilmaz ÖH. 2019. Gut organoids: mini-tissues in culture to study intestinal physiology and disease. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 317, C405–C419. ( 10.1152/ajpcell.00300.2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Stelzner M, et al. 2012. A nomenclature for intestinal in vitro cultures. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 302, G1359–G1363. ( 10.1152/ajpgi.00493.2011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Blutt SE, Crawford SE, Ramani S, Zou WY, Estes MK. 2018. Engineered human gastrointestinal cultures to study the microbiome and infectious diseases. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 241–251. ( 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Young M, Reed KR. 2016. Organoids as a model for colorectal cancer. Curr. Colorectal Cancer Rep 12, 281–287. ( 10.1007/s11888-016-0335-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hill DR, Huang S, Tsai Y-H, Spence JR, Young VB. 2017. Real-time measurement of epithelial barrier permeability in human intestinal organoids. J. Vis. Exp. 130 e56960 ( 10.3791/56960) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Williamson IA, et al. 2018. A high-throughput organoid microinjection platform to study gastrointestinal microbiota and luminal physiology. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 301–319. ( 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.05.004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Freire R, Ingano L, Serena G, Cetinbas M, Anselmo A, Sapone A, Sadreyev RI, Fasano A, Senger S. 2019. Human gut derived-organoids provide model to study gluten response and effects of microbiota-derived molecules in celiac disease. Sci. Rep. 9, 7029 ( 10.1038/s41598-019-43426-w) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hou Q, Ye L, Liu H, Huang L, Yang Q, Turner JR, Yu Q. 2018. Lactobacillus accelerates ISCs regeneration to protect the integrity of intestinal mucosa through activation of STAT3 signaling pathway induced by LPLs secretion of IL-22. Cell Death Differ. 25, 1657–1670. ( 10.1038/s41418-018-0070-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hill DR, et al. 2017. Bacterial colonization stimulates a complex physiological response in the immature human intestinal epithelium. Elife 6, e29132 ( 10.7554/eLife.29132) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.In J, et al. 2016. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli reduce mucus and intermicrovillar bridges in human stem cell-derived colonoids. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2, 48–62. ( 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.10.001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Engevik MA, Yacyshyn MB, Engevik KA, Wang J, Darien B, Hassett DJ, Yacyshyn BR, Worrell RT. 2015. Human Clostridium difficile infection: altered mucus production and composition. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 308, G510–G524. ( 10.1152/ajpgi.00091.2014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Leslie JL, Huang S, Opp JS, Nagy MS, Kobayashi M, Young VB, Spence JR. 2015. Persistence and toxin production by Clostridium difficile within human intestinal organoids result in disruption of epithelial paracellular barrier function. Infect. Immun. 83, 138–145. ( 10.1128/IAI.02561-14) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tao L, et al. 2016. Frizzled proteins are colonic epithelial receptors for C. difficile toxin B. Nature 538, 350–355. ( 10.1038/nature19799) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Karve SS, Pradhan S, Ward DV, Weiss AA. 2017. Intestinal organoids model human responses to infection by commensal and Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 12, e0178966 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0178966) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Forbester JL, Goulding D, Vallier L, Hannan N, Hale C, Pickard D, Mukhopadhyay S, Dougan G. 2015. Interaction of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium with intestinal organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Infect. Immun. 83, 2926–2934. ( 10.1128/IAI.00161-15) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.McCracken KW, et al. 2014. Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids. Nature 516, 400–404. ( 10.1038/nature13863) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Bartfeld S, Bayram T, van de Wetering M, Huch M, Begthel H, Kujala P, Vries R, Peters PJ, Clevers H. 2015. In vitro expansion of human gastric epithelial stem cells and their responses to bacterial infection. Gastroenterology 148, 126–136. ( 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.042) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bertaux-Skeirik N, et al. 2015. CD44 plays a functional role in Helicobacter pylori-induced epithelial cell proliferation. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004663 ( 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004663) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Koestler BJ, Ward CM, Fisher CR, Rajan A, Maresso AW, Payne SM. 2019. Human intestinal enteroids as a model system of shigella pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 87, e00733-18 ( 10.1128/IAI.00733-18) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ranganathan S, Doucet M, Grassel CL, Delaine-Elias B, Zachos NC, Barry EM. 2019. Evaluating Shigella flexneri pathogenesis in the human enteroid model. Infect. Immun. 87, e00740-18 ( 10.1128/IAI.00740-18) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.VanDussen KL, Marinshaw JM, Shaikh N, Miyoshi H, Moon C, Tarr PI, Ciorba MA, Stappenbeck TS. 2015. Development of an enhanced human gastrointestinal epithelial culture system to facilitate patient-based assays. Gut 64, 911–920. ( 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306651) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Heo I, et al. 2018. Modelling Cryptosporidium infection in human small intestinal and lung organoids. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 814–823. ( 10.1038/s41564-018-0177-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Dutta D, Heo I, O'Connor R. 2019. Studying Cryptosporidium infection in 3D tissue-derived human organoid culture systems by microinjection. J. Vis. Exp. 151, e59610. ( 10.3791/59610) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wilke G, et al. 2019. A stem-cell-derived platform enables complete cryptosporidium development in vitro and genetic tractability. Cell Host Microbe 26, 123–134. ( 10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kolawole AO, Wobus CE. 2020. Gastrointestinal organoid technology advances studies of enteric virus biology. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008212 ( 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008212) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Finkbeiner SR, Zeng X-L, Utama B, Atmar RL, Shroyer NF, Estes MK. 2012. Stem cell-derived human intestinal organoids as an infection model for rotaviruses. MBio 3, e00159-12 ( 10.1128/mBio.00159-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Yin Y, et al. 2015. Modeling rotavirus infection and antiviral therapy using primary intestinal organoids. Antiviral Res. 123, 120–131. ( 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.09.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Saxena K, et al. 2016. Human intestinal enteroids: a new model to study human rotavirus infection, host restriction, and pathophysiology. J. Virol. 90, 43–56. ( 10.1128/JVI.01930-15) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yin Y, et al. 2018. 6-Thioguanine inhibits rotavirus replication through suppression of Rac1 GDP/GTP cycling. Antiviral Res. 156, 92–101. ( 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.06.011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Yin Y, et al. 2018. PI3 K-Akt-mTOR axis sustains rotavirus infection via the 4E-BP1 mediated autophagy pathway and represents an antiviral target. Virulence 9, 83–98. ( 10.1080/21505594.2017.1326443) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ettayebi K, et al. 2016. Replication of human noroviruses in stem cell–derived human enteroids. Science 353, 1387–1393. ( 10.1126/science.aaf5211) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Costantini V, Morantz EK, Browne H, Ettayebi K, Zeng X-L, Atmar RL, Estes MK, Vinjé J. 2018. Human norovirus replication in human intestinal enteroids as model to evaluate virus inactivation. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 1453 ( 10.3201/eid2408.180126) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Sato S, Hisaie K, Kurokawa S, Suzuki A, Sakon N, Uchida Y, Yuki Y, Kiyono H. 2019. Human norovirus propagation in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived intestinal epithelial Cells. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 7, 686–688. ( 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.11.001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Zhou J, et al. 2020. Infection of bat and human intestinal organoids by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 1077–1083. ( 10.1038/s41591-020-0912-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Lamers MM, et al. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science 369, 50–54. ( 10.1126/science.abc1669) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.O'brien FJ. 2011. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 14, 88–95. ( 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE. 2011. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 745–754. ( 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Sung JH, Yu J, Luo D, Shuler ML, March JC. 2011. Microscale 3-D hydrogel scaffold for biomimetic gastrointestinal (GI) tract model. Lab. Chip 11, 389–392. ( 10.1039/c0lc00273a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Costello CM, Hongpeng J, Shaffiey S, Yu J, Jain NK, Hackam D, March JC. 2014. Synthetic small intestinal scaffolds for improved studies of intestinal differentiation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 1222–1232. ( 10.1002/bit.25180) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Costello CM, Sorna RM, Goh YL, Cengic I, Jain NK, March JC. 2014. 3-D intestinal scaffolds for evaluating the therapeutic potential of probiotics. Mol. Pharm. 11, 2030–2039. ( 10.1021/mp5001422) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Kim SH, Chi M, Yi B, Kim SH, Oh S, Kim Y, Park S, Sung JH. 2014. Three-dimensional intestinal villi epithelium enhances protection of human intestinal cells from bacterial infection by inducing mucin expression. Integr Biol (Camb) 6, 1122–1131. ( 10.1039/c4ib00157e) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Kim W, Kim G. 2018. Intestinal villi model with blood capillaries fabricated using collagen-based bioink and dual-cell-printing process. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 41 185–41 196. ( 10.1021/acsami.8b17410) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Chen Y, et al. 2015. Robust bioengineered 3D functional human intestinal epithelium. Sci. Rep. 5, 13708 ( 10.1038/srep13708) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.RePass MAD, Chen Y, Lin Y, Zhou W, Kaplan DL, Ward HD. 2017. Novel bioengineered three-dimensional human intestinal model for long-term infection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Infect. Immun. 85, e00731-16 ( 10.1128/IAI.00731-16) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Cardenas D, et al. 2020. Two- and three-dimensional bioengineered human intestinal tissue models for Cryptosporidium. Methods Mol. Biol. 2052, 373–402. ( 10.1007/978-1-4939-9748-0_21) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Pusch J, Votteler M, Göhler S, Engl J, Hampel M, Walles H, Schenke-Layland K. 2011. The physiological performance of a three-dimensional model that mimics the microenvironment of the small intestine. Biomaterials 32, 7469–7478. ( 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.035) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Alzheimer M, Svensson SL, König F, Schweinlin M, Metzger M, Walles H, Sharma CM. 2020. A three-dimensional intestinal tissue model reveals factors and small regulatory RNAs important for colonization with Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008304 ( 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008304) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Li N, Wang D, Sui Z, Qi X, Ji L, Wang X, Yang L. 2013. Development of an improved three-dimensional in vitro intestinal mucosa model for drug absorption evaluation. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 19, 708–719. ( 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0463) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Calatayud M, Dezutter O, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Hidalgo-Martinez S, Meysman FJR, Van de Wiele T. 2019. Development of a host–microbiome model of the small intestine. FASEB J. 33, 3985–3996. ( 10.1096/fj.201801414R) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Schulte LN, Schweinlin M, Westermann AJ, Janga H, Santos SC, Appenzeller S, Walles H, Vogel J, Metzger M. 2020. An advanced human intestinal coculture model reveals compartmentalized host and pathogen strategies during Salmonella infection. Mbio 11, e03348-19 ( 10.1128/mBio.03348-19) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Aguilar-Rojas A, et al. 2020. Insights into amebiasis using a human 3D-intestinal model. Cell. Microbiol. 8 e13203 ( 10.1111/cmi.13203) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Sen AK, Raj A, Banerjee U, Iqbal SR. 2019. Soft lithography, molding, and micromachining techniques for polymer micro devices. Methods Mol. Biol. 1906, 13–54. ( 10.1007/978-1-4939-8964-5_2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Ingber DE. 2016. Reverse engineering human pathophysiology with organs-on-chips. Cell 164, 1105–1109. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.049) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kimura H, Yamamoto T, Sakai H, Sakai Y, Fujii T. 2008. An integrated microfluidic system for long-term perfusion culture and on-line monitoring of intestinal tissue models. Lab. Chip 8, 741–746. ( 10.1039/b717091b) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Imura Y, Asano Y, Sato K, Yoshimura E. 2009. A microfluidic system to evaluate intestinal absorption. Anal. Sci. 25, 1403–1407. ( 10.2116/analsci.25.1403) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Balijepalli A, Sivaramakrishan V. 2017. Organs-on-chips: research and commercial perspectives. Drug Discov. Today 22, 397–403. ( 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kim HJ, Huh D, Hamilton G, Ingber DE. 2012. Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab. Chip 12, 2165–2174. ( 10.1039/c2lc40074j) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Kim HJ, Ingber DE. 2013. Gut-on-a-chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation. Integr. Biol. (Camb) 5, 1130–1140. ( 10.1039/c3ib40126j) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Grassart A, Malardé V, Gobaa S, Sartori-Rupp A, Kerns J, Karalis K, Marteyn B, Sansonetti P, Sauvonnet N. 2019. Bioengineered human organ-on-chip reveals intestinal microenvironment and mechanical forces impacting Shigella infection. Cell Host Microbe 26, 435–444. ( 10.1016/j.chom.2019.08.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Kim HJ, Li H, Collins JJ, Ingber DE. 2016. Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7–E15. ( 10.1073/pnas.1522193112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Kasendra M, et al. 2018. Development of a primary human small intestine-on-a-chip using biopsy-derived organoids. Sci. Rep. 8, 2871 ( 10.1038/s41598-018-21201-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Workman MJ, et al. 2018. Enhanced utilization of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human intestinal organoids using microengineered chips. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 669–677. ( 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Tovaglieri A, et al. 2019. Species-specific enhancement of enterohemorrhagic E. coli pathogenesis mediated by microbiome metabolites. Microbiome 7, 43 ( 10.1186/s40168-019-0650-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, et al. 2019. A complex human gut microbiome cultured in an anaerobic intestine-on-a-chip. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 520–531. ( 10.1038/s41551-019-0397-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Shah P, et al. 2016. A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human–microbe interface. Nat. Commun. 7, 11535 ( 10.1038/ncomms11535) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Eain MMG, Baginska J, Greenhalgh K, Fritz JV, Zenhausern F, Wilmes P. 2017. Engineering solutions for representative models of the gastrointestinal human–microbe interface. Engineering 3, 60–65. ( 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Sontheimer-Phelps A, et al. 2020. Human colon-on-a-chip enables continuous in vitro analysis of colon mucus layer accumulation and physiology. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 507–526. ( 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.11.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Pinto D, Gregorieff A, Begthel H, Clevers H. 2003. Canonical Wnt signals are essential for homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium. Genes Dev. 17, 1709–1713. ( 10.1101/gad.267103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Kuhnert F, Davis CR, Wang HT, Chu P, Lee M, Yuan J, Nusse R, Kuo CJ. 2004. Essential requirement for Wnt signaling in proliferation of adult small intestine and colon revealed by adenoviral expression of Dickkopf-1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 266–271. ( 10.1073/pnas.2536800100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shin W, Hinojosa CD, Ingber DE, Kim HJ. 2019. Human intestinal morphogenesis controlled by transepithelial morphogen gradient and flow-dependent physical cues in a microengineered gut-on-a-chip. iScience 15, 391–406. ( 10.1016/j.isci.2019.04.037) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Shim KY, Lee D, Han J, Nguyen NT, Park S, Sung JH. 2017. Microfluidic gut-on-a-chip with three-dimensional villi structure. Biomed. Microdevices 19, 37 ( 10.1007/s10544-017-0179-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Wang C, Tanataweethum N, Karnik S, Bhushan A. 2018. Novel microfluidic colon with an extracellular matrix membrane. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4, 1377–1385. ( 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00883) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. 2014. Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully connected crfs. arXiv 1412.7062. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This article does not contain any additional data.