Abstract
In this research, hWJ-MSCs were grown on silk scaffolds and induced towards chondrogenesis by supplementation with L-ascorbic acid (LAA) or platelet rich plasma (PRP). Silk scaffolds were fabricated with salt leaching method by mixing silk fibroin (SF) with silk spidroin (SS). The silk fibroin was obtained from Bombyx mori cocoon that had been degummed, and the silk spidroin was obtained from wild-type spider Argiope appensa. The effect of scaffold composition and inducer on cell proliferation was observed through MTT assay. The most optimal treatment then continued to be used to induce hWJ-MSC towards chondrogenic differentiation for 7 and 21 days. Scaffolds characterization showed that the scaffolds produced had 3D structure with interconnected pores, and all were biocompatible with hWJ-MSCs. Scaffold with the addition of 10% SS + 90% SF showed higher compressive strength and better pore interconnectivity in comparison to 100% silk fibroin scaffold. After 48 h, cells seeded on scaffold with spidroin and fibroin mix had flattened morphology in comparison to silk fibroin scaffold which appeared to be more rounded on the scaffold surface. Scaffold with 10% (w/w) of silk spidroin (SS) + 90% (w/w) of silk fibroin (SF) was the most optimal composition for cell proliferation. Immunocytochemistry of integrin β1 and RGD sequence, showed that scaffold with SS 10% provide better cell attachment with the presence of RGD sequence from the spidroin silk which could explain the higher cell proliferation than SF100% scaffold. Based on Alcian Blue staining and Collagen Type II immunocytochemistry (ICC), cells grown on 10% SS + 90% SF scaffold with 10% PRP supplementation were the most optimal to support chondrogenesis of hWJ-MSCs. These results showed that the addition of spidroin silk from A. appensa. had impact on scaffold compressive strength and chondrogenic differentiation of hWJ-MSC and had the potential for further development of bio-based material scaffold in cartilage tissue engineering.
Subject terms: Biotechnology, Cell biology, Stem cells, Materials science
Introduction
Articular cartilage is tissue that lacks vascular, nervous, and lymphatic systems, with chondrocytes located sparsely between the matrix. These properties limit tissue regeneration once damage or injury occurs. Therefore, the tissue does not have the capacity to be fully repaired1,2. Tissue engineering is currently studied as a new alternative for articular cartilage damage. It has three important, mutually interacting factors that regenerate or repair the damaged tissue: cells, biomaterial/scaffold, and bioactive factors3,4. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are currently being studied as a new therapy to repair damaged articular cartilage. MSC can be isolated from bone marrow, adipose tissue, or Wharton’s Jelly (WJ) tissue from the umbilical cord5. The process for isolation of cells from the umbilical cord does not cause problems in terms of ethical consideration6. MSCs derived from hWJ have wider plasticity, and a higher proliferation rate compared to other MSCs cell sources7. hWJ-MSCs are widely used in the development of tissue engineering to differentiate into chondrocyte, and are able to increase the production of hyaluronic acid and glycosaminoglycans as well as collagen type II, the specific component of articular cartilage ECM8. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and ascorbic-2-phosphate acid (LAA) are bioactive factors that control MSC towards chondrogenic differentiation. PRP is an autologous derivative of blood tissue that mainly contains important growth factors, such as transforming growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and epidermal growth factor, that are important for cell proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation9,10. LAA is able to increase the proliferation rate of cells derived from mesenchymal and to support differentiation. LAA is also an important cofactor for the key enzyme in collagen biosynthesis, the latter is part of the extracellular matrix11. Scaffold in tissue engineering is important for providing structure and substrate for cells to proliferate and undergo differentiation12. Methods for producing porous 3D scaffolds can be achieved through salt leaching, 3D-printing, or emulsion freeze drying. Producing scaffolds with pores of a certain size can be achieved by the salt leaching method13. Currently, silk has been studied in tissue engineering for its biocompatibility and biodegradability14. Silk fibroin (SF) produced by Bombyx mori has been extensively studied as biomaterial for articular cartilage and bone tissue engineering since it has high mechanical strength and low immunogenicity15. Previous research has shown that silk fibroin scaffold was able to support chondrogenic differentiation of adipose derived stem cells (hADSC)16. However, cells are known to attach weakly to fibroin scaffold due to the lack of specific amino acid sequence recognized by cells17,18. Silk spidroin (SS) produced by spider A. appensa. has never been studied before. Silk spidroin produced by spiders is well known for its mechanical strength and non-toxicity19. In this research, silk fibroin was mixed with silk spidroin to produce 3D porous scaffold that could improve hWJ-MSCs attachment, proliferation, and chondrogenic differentiation. Chondrogenic differentiation of cells on the silk scaffolds were induced by the addition of PRP or LAA in the medium.
Results and Discussion
FTIR spectroscopy of the silk fibroin-spidroin fiber and scaffold
FTIR analysis was performed to the unprocessed silk spidroin (SS) and fibroin (SF) (Fig. 1a,b) and the processed scaffolds (Fig. 1c). Amide I can be observed on 1513 cm−1 wavelength, amide II on 1230 cm−1, and amide III on wavenumber around 1440 cm−120. Silk fibroin is known to have specific wavenumber for β-sheet at 1630, 1530, and 1240 cm−1. Wavenumber at around 3300 cm−1 is specific for hydrogen bonds21,22. FTIR result of unprocessed silk fibroin and spidroin showed that unprocessed silk spidroin had slightly lower amide transmittance in comparison to silk fibroin. Wet unprocessed silk fibroin fiber was also compared to dry spidroin and fibroin, the result showed that water had effects on wavenumber at 3300 cm−1 which correspond to hydrogen bonds. On the processed scaffold, it can be observed that salt leaching process had slight effect on widening at wavelength around 3300 cm−1. Overall, the incorporation of silk spidroin into each scaffold composition had no effect on amide bonds and secondary structure of the protein.
Scaffold contact angle and wettability measurement
Contact angle and water uptake measurements were performed to assess the hydrophilicity of the scaffolds. In tissue engineering, hydrophilic biomaterial could facilitate better cell adhesion The ideal contact angle for a biomaterial to be hydrophobic would be under 90°23. Previous study on silk fibroin scaffold with direct dissolution technique showed that 100% silk fibroin scaffold (12% w/v) contact angle was 58°, which was around the result obtained in this study (Fig. 2a) at 57,61 ± 0,83°24. The mixing of silk spidroin into silk fibroin to form a scaffold had increased the contact angle. Biomaterial ability to absorb water or water uptake is also an important properties in tissue engineering to enable tissue regeneration and repairing25. The result from water uptake measurement (Fig. 2b) showed similar water uptake capacity between silk fibroin scaffold and scaffold with silk spidroin (125,433% to 141,177%), except for scaffold composition SF 80% + SS 20% (125,453%). Silk fibroin was known to have hydrophilic amino acids and carboxylic group, therefore it was able to improve hydrophilicity when combined with hydrophobic biomaterials such as polycaprolactone (PCL)26. Scaffold with the addition of 20% silk spidroin had lower hydrophilic properties and water uptake capacity, which could be influenced by the amino acid composition of silk spidroin and eventually tertiary structure of the protein.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of silk fibroin-spidroin mix scaffold
The pore size and interconnectivity formed on the silk scaffolds were observed with SEM (Fig. 3). Formation of pores was observed in all scaffold variations, but not in SF 80% + SS 20%; while the formation of interconnected pores could be observed in all scaffold variations, except for SF 95% + SS 5% scaffold. The average pore size of the scaffolds was measured using ImageJ software (Table 1). The overall pore size formed on scaffold was between the range of NaCl particles used (400–570 μm). Several studies have reported that scaffold with larger pore size; 370–400 μm27, 400–500 μm16,28 were able to support MSCs chondrogenesis better than smaller pore size, mainly due to higher permeability of gases and nutrition from culture medium29.
Table 1.
NaCl size (μm) | Scaffold composition | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
SF 100% | SF 95% + SS 10% | SF 90% + SS 10% | SF 85% + SS 15% | |
500 ± 21 | 462 ± 65 | 477 ± 53 | 456 ± 61 | 412 ± 79 |
SF silk fibroin; SS silk spidroin.
Scaffold compressive strength
Mechanical properties of the scaffolds with different silk fibroin and silk spidroin composition were observed by measuring compressive strength. In Fig. 4, scaffold with the addition of 5%SS and 10% SS had the highest compression strength, measuring at 0,0372 MPa and 0,0304 MPa respectively, while SF 100% and scaffold with 20% had the lowest mechanical strength. Based on these observations, the addition of silk spidroin into the scaffolds had effect in improving the compressive strength. However, the increase was dependent on silk spidroin concentration since scaffold with the highest silk spidroin concentration (SF80% + SS20%) had the lowest mechanical properties. Compressive strength of porous scaffolds is influenced by material composition, pore diameter, and porosity30. Incorporation of silk spidroin which is known for its mechanical strength were able to improve compressive strength of the scaffolds in this study19. Healthy cartilage is known to have compressive modulus between 0,24–0,85 MPa, and several engineered constructs are known to have modulus between 0.005–5.9 MPa31. Scaffold with 5% of SS were better in mechanical strength than scaffold with 10%SS, however for further study the SF90% + SS10% scaffold would be used as it had more ideal pore morphology with interconnectivity which would be ideal to support cell growth and differentiation.
hWJ-MSC isolation and characterization
hWJ-MSCs were isolated from the WJ tissue of umbilical cords from cesarean sections using explant method32. The morphology of the primary hWJ-MSCs that had migrated from the WJ explants (Fig. 5a) were fibroblast-like and adherent to tissue culture flask surface under a standard culture condition. Multipotency of the hWJ-MSCs was confirmed by induction with adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic medium for 21 days. Lipid droplet formation was confirmed with Oil Red O staining (Fig. 5b), GAG with Alcian Blue staining (Fig. 5c), and calcium accumulation with Alizarin Red staining (Fig. 1d). Flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 5e) showed that the isolated hWJ-MSCs were positive for these MSC markers: CD90 (100%), CD73 (100%), and CD 105 (95.3%) at percentages higher than 95% and negative for CD34, CD45, CD11b, and CD19 (0,5%) at percentages lower than 2%. Based on these characterization results, the isolated hWJ-MSCs were in accordance with MSC characteristics as stated by ISCT (International Society for Cellular Therapy)33,34.
Morphology of hWJ-MSC seeded on silk fibroin-spidroin mix scaffold
SEM was also used to observe the morphology of hWJ-MSC grown on the scaffolds for 48 h. The image (Fig. 6) showed that cells grown on 100% SF scaffold were round in shape compared to cells grown on scaffolds with spidroin silk that appeared more elongated and had spread evenly all over scaffold surface. Cells grown on silk fibroin scaffold had more rounded morphology since fibroin contains no specific amino acid sequence for cell attachment, such as RGD sequence18,35. Therefore, scaffold with silk spidroin was able to support better cell attachment for hWJ-MSCs. Based on SEM result, scaffold with the compositions SF 100%, SF 90% + SS 10%, and SF 85% + SS 15% would be further tested on cell viability assay.
Scaffold composition optimization for cell proliferation
The effect of silk scaffold composition on cell proliferation was observed through MTT assay (Fig. 7). Cells were grown for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days on standard growth medium. Overall, cell viability was slightly decreased from day 1 to day 5 and then increased steadily from day 7 until day 14. Initial decrease of cell viability of cells grown on silk scaffold was also observed on Antheraea mylitta silk fibroin scaffold14 and B.mori silk fibroin scaffold16,36. This result was likely caused by cell adaptation and migration on the porous structure of the scaffold37. Scaffolds with the addition of spidroin silk showed higher cell viability until day 14, indicating that scaffold with silk spidroin was able to increase cell viability on the scaffold better than silk fibroin scaffold (SF 100%). Cells grown on scaffold with 90% SF + 10% SS had significantly higher growth than scaffold with 15% SS (p < 0.005). Based on this result, scaffold with 10% SS was the most optimal composition to support cell proliferation and should be used for chondrogenic differentiation, in comparison to SF 100% scaffold. A previous study showed that film with a blend of recombinant spidroin and silk fibroin at 10:90 had similar capacity to support cell attachment to film with higher spidroin composition38.
Effect of LAA or PRP supplementation on hWJ-MSC proliferation
The optimal LAA and PRP concentrations used for hWJ-MSC chondrogenic differentiation were determined through cell viability using MTT assay. hWJ-MSC grown on medium with PRP at various concentrations (Fig. 8a) showed that cell viability was increasing until day 14. Supplementation of 10% PRP significantly had the highest cell viability for 14 days in comparison to 5% PRP and 20% PRP. Several studies showed that the addition of 10% PRP was optimal for proliferation of MSCs7,39 after 7 days of culture40. Study by Cho et al., 2011 observed an increase in DNA content after 12 days culture of MSC41. High concentration of PRP at 30% was shown to have no significant effect on cell proliferation in comparison to lower PRP concentration, however the mechanism is currently unclear41. The PRP in this study was first activated before used in cell culture. Once activated, the released growth factor contained such as PDGF, TGF-β, and FGF-2 that were able to support cell proliferation42,43.
LAA supplementation (Fig. 8b) showed that cell viability increased until day 14. Up to day 3, a higher dose of LAA supplementation (100 μg/ml and 200 μg/ml) was able to increase cell viability compared to the remaining treatment. However, from day 5 to day 14, the viability started to decrease. In contrast, 25 μg/ml and 50 μg/ml supplementations were able to steadily maintain cell viability from day 1 to day 14. The addition of 50 μg/ml LAA had the highest cell viability compared to the remaining concentration (p < 0.05). Addition of LAA at 250 mM (64,1 μg/ml) has been reported to increase proliferation of umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB-MSC), while high concentration of LAA decreases cell proliferation43. Previous studies have also reported that supplementation of 10% PRP16,44,45 or 50 μg/ml LAA11,34 in the medium were the optimal concentration to support proliferation of MSC. Cells with higher proliferation rate before directed differentiation is known to have correlation with superior chondrogenic differentiation capacity46. Therefore, supplementation with 10% PRP and 50 μg/ml LAA was the most optimal concentration to support the differentiation of hWJ-MSC grown on scaffold.
Cell attachment on silk scaffold based on RGD and integrin β1 immunocytochemistry
Attachment of cells on a biomaterial surface is an important step to further sustain proliferation and differentiation of cells. Integrin β1 is important in mediating early interaction between cells and matrix or biomaterial. On images of integrin β1 (Fig. 9) from hWJ-MSCs grown on scaffold without spidroin silk, SF 100% appeared to have significantly less integrin intensity (shown in red) in comparison to cells grown on SF 90% + SS 10% scaffold. The cells on scaffold with spidroin appeared to be spread all over the scaffold surface. This result was supported by SEM analysis, in which after 48 h the cells on SF 100% scaffold were forming aggregate with rounded morphology, while cells grown on SF 90% + SS 10% scaffold already appeared more elongated, with cell protrusion covering the scaffold surface. Based on the confocal images, the scaffold with silk spidroin was hypothesized to contain the specific amino acid sequence that could possibly affect the attachment of hWJ-MSC on the scaffold surface via integrin β1.
Silk produced by non-mulberry silkworm Antheraea mylitta is known to contain RGD sequence47. Scaffold produced from the silk of A.mylitta, was able to support attachment of rat neonatal cardiomyocyte better than silk fibroin scaffold48. In this study, the presence of RGD sequence on spidroin silk produced by spider Argiope appensa is still being investigated. Based on confocal images of RGD immunocytochemistry (Fig. 10), scaffold with spidroin silk had little green dots of RGD sequence scattered over the surface which could indicate the presence of RGD sequence in the A.appensa spidroin. Integrin β1 could recognize RGD sequence in the silk scaffold, thus provide more efficient cell attachment within the structure49. The sequence is commonly found in fibronectin, known to further activated integrin which then will interact with talin, vinculin, and actin filaments forming focal adhesion complex50. The complex is essential for cell survival, as it would had effect on cell polarity and migration51,52. Previous study observed vinculin expression on hWJ-MSCs grown on scaffold with silk spidroin, and the result showed that vinculin expression increased on scaffold with spidroin in comparison to silk fibroin scaffold.
hWJ-MSC differentiation on silk scaffold with PRP or LAA supplementation based on GAG staining and collagen type II Immunochemistry
hWJ-MSCs were grown on scaffolds with PRP or LAA induction medium for 21 days to analyze GAG accumulation through Alcian Blue staining. The absorbance of GAG stained with Alcian Blue was measured at 650 nm (Fig. 11). Overall, cells grown on 10% (v/v) PRP medium had higher GAG accumulation in comparison to 25 μg/ml LAA medium and control. Cells grown on scaffold 90% SF + 10% SS had higher GAG accumulation compared to cells grown on 100% SF scaffold with PRP or LAA supplementation. Based on these results, 10% (v/v) PRP supplementation was the most optimal treatment to support chondrogenic differentiation, and incorporation of 10% silk spidroin into the scaffold also influenced the amount of GAG accumulation.
Collagen type II is the specific component produced by cells during chondrogenic differentiation, and in this research was observed through a confocal microscope after differentiation for 7 and 21 days. On day 7 (Fig. 12), differentiation of hWJ-MSCs with PRP medium had already started to produce collagen type II, while those with LAA medium had not. Cells grown on scaffold SF 90% + SS 10% with PRP 10% medium appeared to produce more of collagen type II in comparison to cells grown on fibroin scaffold (SF 100%). On day 21 (Fig. 13), collagen II produced from hWJ-MSCs grown on SF 90% + SS 10% with PRP 10% medium were the highest.
The effect of PRP on MSC chondrogenesis has been reported in several studies. Addition of PRP 10% into differentiation medium was reported to be the most optimal concentration to induce chondrogenesis in hADSC (human adipose-derived stem cells)16,53,54 by increasing the synthesis of GAG and collagen type II into the surrounding ECM after 21 days. Activated PRP releases several growth factors, with TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor beta) being one of the highest in concentration55,56. TGF-β1 binds to TGF receptor, causing signaling cascade involving Smad 2/3 and 4 protein which then translocate into the nucleus and interacting with transcription factor Sox 9. Sox 9 is important in regulating expression of collagen type II and GAG54,57.
Overall, in this research scaffold with silk spidroin (SF 90% + SS 10%) was able to support chondrogenic differentiation of hWJ-MSCs significantly better in comparison to silk fibroin scaffold (SF 100%) as shown in collagen type II ICC and GAG accumulation. Based on SEM analysis and Integrin β1 ICC, it was speculated that the spidroin silk collected from Argiope appensa contained a specific amino acid sequence, such as RGD, which was recognized by cells to attach on a biomaterial surface or ECM. Previous research on silk produced from A.mylitta, which is known to contain RGD sequence, showed that it was able to support chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation better than silk fibroin scaffold14,58. In this research the presence of RGD sequence in the A.appensa silk were observed through confocal images, which was incorporated into the silk fibroin-spidroin mix scaffold. The addition of silk spidroin has improved the mechanical properties of the porous scaffold, which is an important factor in cartilage tissue engineering. Scaffold with 10% SS also provided better surface for cell attachment, an important early step for cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation with the addition of PRP.
Materials and Methods
Isolation and primary culture of human Wharton’s Jelly Mesenchymal stem cells (hWJ-MSC)
Human umbilical cord samples were obtained from caesarean section deliveries at Rumah Sakit Khusus Ibu dan Anak (RSKIA), Bandung with approval from the Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Padjajaran University (Number: 09/UN6.KEP/EC/2020). The participants were informed and agreed on the sampling of the umbilical cord. All methods in this research were in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Explant method was used to isolate primary hWJ-MSC from the umbilical cord sample32. 10–15 cm of umbilical cord was washed with sterile PBS, and then the arteries were removed from the Wharton’s Jelly part. The tissue was cut into about 0.5–1 cm pieces, then attached to 100 mm tissue culture plate. Once attached, 5 mL of growth medium were carefully added around the tissues. Growth medium was Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic. Culture cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2, and the medium was replaced every 2 days. After about 10–12 days, when cells with fibroblast-like morphology migrated from the explant, the tissues were removed. Once the primary culture (P0) reached 80% confluency, the cells were expanded until passage 5 (P5).
Characterization of hWJ-MSC
Multipotency assay
hWJ-MSCs P5 were grown on 24 well plate (2 × 104 cells/well) for multipotency assay. Once the confluency reached about 80% the growth medium was replaced with adipogenic medium (StemPro Adipogenesis Differentiation Kit), chondrogenic medium (StemPro Chondrogenesis Differentiation Kit), and osteogenic medium (StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit). The culture was incubated for 21 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After 21 days, the remaining medium was washed with PBS 3 times and the cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde. Cells were stained with Oil Red O to stain lipid droplet formation, Alcian Blue to stain glycosaminoglycan (GAG) accumulation, or Alizarin Red to stain calcium deposits. Staining results were observed under an inverted microscope.
MSC specific surface marker
Flow cytometry analysis of a specific mesenchymal surface marker was performed using Human MSC Analysis Kit (BD Bioscience). The kit contains hMSC positive cocktail (CD90 FITC, CD105PerCP, and CD73APC) and MSC negative cocktail (CD34 PE, CD11 PE, CD19, CD45, and HLA-DR). hWJ-MSCs passage 5 was tripsinized and resuspended in 1 ml buffer, then each 100 ul of the suspension was stained with 5 ul of the positive cocktail, negative cocktail, or isotype. Samples were washed with staining buffer and resuspended with 500 ul staining buffer, and then the flow cytometry was performed with BD FACSAria II and analyzed with software BD FACSDiva 8.0.2.
Preparation of silk fibroin-spidroin scaffold
Two types of scaffold were used: silk fibroin scaffold (SF) and silk fibroin mixed with silk spidroin scaffold (SF + SS) with various compositions (Table 2). Scaffolds were fabricated using a modified salt leaching method24. Silk fibroin (SF) fibers collected from a Bombyx mori (CV. Wisata Imu Sutra, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia) cocoon were degummed to remove the sericin protein by heating the silkworm cocoon in a solution of 0.05 (wt/v%) NaHCO3 for 1 hour59. Silk spidroin (SS) were collected from spider Argiope appensa. A. appensa were caught around Lembang, West Java. The spiders were placed and fed regularly in a wooden box with lid covered with thin meshed fabrics. Dragline silk produced on the box were collected/rolled manually using clean tools without harming the spiders. The degumming process was not carried out on silk spidroin (SS) fibers. Scaffolds were prepared with the following composition: SF 100% (w/w), SS 15% (w/w) + SF 85% (w/w), SS 10% (w/w) + SF 90% (w/w).
Table 2.
Scaffold composition | Silk fibroin (gram) | Silk spidroin (gram) |
---|---|---|
SF 100% | 0.06 | – |
SF 95% + SS 5% | 0.057 | 0.003 |
SF 90% + SS 10% | 0.054 | 0.006 |
SF 85% + SS 15% | 0.051 | 0.009 |
SF 80% + SS 20% | 0.048 | 0.012 |
A total of 0.06 g of silk was dissolved in 500 µL of 8 wt% CaCl2-formic acid solution (PT. Bratachem, Bandung) at room temperature. The solution was then poured into a polystyrene mold and mixed with 2.5 g of 500 µm NaCl particles. NaCl particles create the pores in scaffolds. The NaCl-silk mixture was dried on a fume hood overnight. Once the scaffold was formed, it then was soaked in 70% ethanol for 30 min. The scaffold was then immersed in distilled water for 3 days to remove the NaCl. The scaffold was released from the base of the mold and cut into 5 × 5 mm size.
Scaffold scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis
SEM was utilized to observe the formation of interconnected pore, pore size, and distribution of hWJ-MSCs inside the scaffold. SEM analysis was also used, to observe the morphology of hWJ-MSC on the scaffold surface. hWJ-MSCs were grown on the silk scaffolds for 48 h at 37 °C; 5% CO2. The samples were fixed with 100 µl of 2.5 glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, incubated for 24 h at 4 °C, dehydrated with serial alcohol, and freeze dried for 3 h. Samples were coated with gold and observed under SEM (SU 3500; Hitachi, Krefeld, Germany; Center of Advanced Science ITB).
Fourier transform infared (FTIR) analysis
FTIR spectroscopy was necessary in analyzing structure of the scaffolds, in this current study FTIR was performed on wet and dry unprocessed silk fibroin and spidroin fiber as comparison to scaffold with fibroin and spidroin mixed in. FTIR spectroscopy was recorded between 1000 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 (Shimadzu IR Prestige-21, Japan).
Contact angle and water uptake measurement
Hydrophilicity of the silk fibroin and silk spidroin mix scaffold was observed by measuring contact angle and water uptake capacity of the scaffolds. The contact angle was measured by dropping 10 µl of distilled water onto the surface. The angle formed was captured after 10 s using portable microscope and measured using application (Dino-Lite, Taiwan). Scaffold capacity to absorb water/ water uptake was measured by submerging previously weighed dry scaffold (W0) into distilled water for 24 h at room temperature. Any excess water was removed using paper towel, and the wet scaffold was weighed again (W1) to obtain scaffold water uptake capacity.
Mechanical testing (compressive)
The cylindrical scaffold of fibroin and spidroin silk with 13 mm in diameter and 6 mm in thickness was tested with compressive machine (TENSILON Universal testing machine). The scaffold was in dry condition with drying in ambient temperature for 72 h. The machine pressed the scaffold from 6 to 2 mm (about 60% strain) with compressive speed at 0.1 mm/min. The result was then plotted to obtain the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of the scaffold.
Growth of hWJ-MSCs on silk scaffold
The growth of hWJ-MSCs grown on silk scaffold was analysed with ([3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide]) MTT cytotoxicity assay. 105 hWJ-MSCs were grown with standard growth medium on the scaffolds, with the following compositions: 100% SF, 90% SF + 10% SS, and 85% SF + 15% SS for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days. As a control, 105 hWJ-MSCs were grown on 96 well plate without scaffold. After 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days the remaining medium on each well was replaced with 10 µl MTT reagent in 100 µl growth medium and incubated in the dark for 4 h at 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. The MTT reagent was discarded, and 100 µl of DMSO were added on each well and incubated at room temperature for 5 min to dissolve the formazan crystal. Absorbance of the solution was read using a microplate reader at 570 nm (n = 3).
Optimization of PRP and LAA concentration as chondrogenesis inducer
The effect of PRP and LAA on hWJ-MSC proliferation was observed through MTT assay. PRP concentration in the induction medium was 5% (v/v), 10% (v/v), and 20% (v/v). LAA concentration in the medium was 25 µg/ml. 50 µg/ml, 100 µg/ml, and 200 µg/ml. 2 × 104 cells were grown on 96 well plates for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days. The remaining medium on each well was replaced with 10 µl MTT reagent in 100 µl growth medium and incubated in the dark for 4 h at 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. The MTT reagent was discarded, and 100 µl of DMSO were added on each well and incubated at room temperature for 5 min to dissolve the formazan crystal. Absorbance of the solution was read using a microplate reader at 570 nm (n = 3).
Integrin β1 immunocytochemistry
5 × 105 of hWJ-MSCs were grown on scaffold SF 100% and SF 90% + 10% for 6, 12, and 48 h. The cells were fixated using serial methanol-DMEM (50%, 70%, and 80%) for 5 min at − 20 °C, and further fixated with 100% methanol for 20 min at − 20 °C. The fixated cells were permeabilized using 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS for 20 min and blocked with 3% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBS for 60 min. A primary antibody against integrin β1 (PA5-29606, ThermoFisher Scientific) was added and followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C. Any remaining primary antibodies were washed with PBS three times. The cells were incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 647, Abcam) for 2 h. 2,5 µg/ml DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was added to stain cell nucleus. The images were observed using a confocal microscope (Olympus Fv1200) at three different points54.
RGD sequence immunocytochemistry
5 × 105 of hWJ-MSCs were grown on scaffold SF 100% and SF 90% + 10% for 6 and 48 h. The cells were fixated using serial methanol-DMEM (50%, 70%, and 80%) for 5 min at − 20 °C, and further fixated with 100% methanol for 20 min at − 20 °C. The fixated cells were permeabilized using 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS for 20 min and blocked with 3% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBS for 60 min. A primary antibody against integrin RGD (ab224465, Abcam) was added and followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C. Any remaining primary antibodies were washed with PBS three times. The cells were incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488, Abcam) for 2 h. 2,5 µg/ml DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was added to stain cell nucleus. The images were observed using a confocal microscope (Olympus Fv1200) at three different points54.
Alcian Blue staining to quantify GAG content
Alcian Blue staining was used to quantify GAG accumulation of the cells grown on the silk scaffolds. hWJ-MSCs were grown until the end of passage 4. Once the confluency reached 80%, the cells were trypsinized. 5 × 105 cells were resuspended in 20 µl medium and seeded onto the scaffolds and then incubated at 37 °C 5% CO2 for 3 h to allow attachment of cells onto the scaffold surface. After 3 h, the constructs were moved into non-treated 24 well plate, and 500 ul induction medium were added. The culture was maintained for 21 days, and the medium was replaced every 2 or 3 days. After 21 days, the remaining medium was discarded and the culture was washed three times with PBS. The culture was fixed with acetone-methanol (50%: 50%, v/v) for 3 min at 4 °C. The fixative solution was removed and 1% (v/v) Alcian Blue in 3% (v/v) acetic acid was added into the construct and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The remaining stain was washed with 3% acetic acid and deionized water, then 1% (w/v) of SDS was added to the well and incubated on a shaker for 30 min. Absorbance reading of dissolved GAG was done with a microplate reader at 605 nm.
Collagen type II ICC
5 × 105 of hWJ-MSCs were grown on scaffold SF 100% and SF 90% + 10%, with the addition of LAA or PRP differentiation medium for 7 and 21 days. The cells were fixated using serial methanol-DMEM (50%, 70%, and 80%) for 5 min at − 20 °C, and further fixated with 100% methanol for 20 min at − 20 °C. The fixated cells were permeabilized using 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS for 20 min and blocked with 3% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBS for 60 min. A primary antibody against collagen type II (ab34712, Abcam) was added and followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C. Any remaining primary antibodies were washed with PBS three times. The cells were incubated with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488, Abcam) for 2 h. 2.5 µg/ml DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was added to stain cell nucleus. The images were acquired and observed at three random different points using confocal microscope (Olympus Fv1200) and Fluoview software.
Statistical analysis
Evaluation of hWJ-MSC viability and GAG were performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post-hoc analysis was performed via Tukey’s multiple comparison test. All values are expressed as mean and represent three independent experiments. All analysis was carried out using software GraphPad Prism version 8.4.1 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego CA).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This current work were financially supported by Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency (Risetdikti No.3143/I1.CO2.2/KU/2018). We would like to thank Dr. Veinardi Suendo for his help on FTIR analysis and Mr. Hutomo Tanoto for helping with compressive strength measurement. We also would like to thank Olympus for the help in using and operating confocal microscope Olympus Fv1200.
Author contributions
A.B., H.J., and A.R. designed and conceptualize the experiments. A.R.W. and M.E.L performed the experiments. All authors prepared, discussed the results, and reviewed this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-76466-8.
References
- 1.Perera JR, Gikas PD, Bentley G. The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2012;94:381–387. doi: 10.1308/003588412X13171221592573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang L, Hu J, Athanasiou KA. The role of tissue engineering in articular cartilage repair and regeneration. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009;37:1–57. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v37.i1-2.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Batsali AK, Kastrinaki M-C, Papadaki HA, Pontikoglou C. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from Wharton’s Jelly of the umbilical cord: biological properties and emerging clinical applications. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013;8:144–155. doi: 10.2174/1574888X11308020005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chiang H, Jiang CC. Repair of articular cartilage dafects: review and perspectives. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2009;108:87–101. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martín AR, Patel JM, Zlotnick HM, Carey JL, Mauck RL. Emerging therapies for cartilage regeneration in currently excluded ‘red knee’ populations. NPJ Regen. Med. 2019;4:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0074-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim D-W, et al. Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells: phenotypic characterization and optimizing their therapeutic potential for clinical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:11692–11712. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Amable PR, Teixeira MVT, Carias RBV, Granjeiro JM, Borojevic R. Mesenchymal stromal cell proliferation, gene expression and protein production in human platelet-rich plasma-supplemented media. PLoS ONE. 2014 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhosale AM, Richardson JB. Articular cartilage: structure, injuries and review of management. Br. Med. Bull. 2008;87:77–95. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xie, X., Zhang, C. & Tuan, R. S. Biology of platelet-rich plasma and its clinical application in cartilage repair. https://arthritis-research.com/content/16/1/204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Kennedy MI, Whitney K, Evans T, Laprade RF. Platelet-rich plasma and cartilage repair. Curr. Rev. Musculoskeletal Med. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9516-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Temu TM, Wu KY, Gruppuso PA, Phornphutkul C. The mechanism of ascorbic acid-induced differentiation of ATDC5 chondrogenic cells. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;299:325–335. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00145.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2013;19:485–502. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Janik H, Marzec M. A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2015;48:586–591. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mandal BB, Kundu SC. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow cells on non-mulberry and mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5019–5030. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Farokhi M, Mottaghitalab F, Fatahi Y, Reza M. Silk fi broin sca ff olds for common cartilage injuries : possibilities for future clinical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2019;115:251–267. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barlian A, Judawisastra H, Alfarafisa NM, Wibowo UA, Rosadi I. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells induced by L-ascorbic acid and platelet rich plasma on silk fibroin scaffold. PeerJ. 2018;2018:1–20. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leal-Egaña A, et al. Interactions of fibroblasts with different morphologies made of an engineered spider silk protein. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2012;14:67–75. doi: 10.1002/adem.201180072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Leal-ega A, Scheibel T. Interactions of cells with silk surfaces. J. Mater Chem. 2017 doi: 10.1039/C2JM31174G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007;32:991–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang H, et al. Preparation and characterization of silk fibroin as a biomaterial with potential for drug delivery. J. Transl. Med. 2012;10:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang X, Cao C, Ma X. Optimization of macroporous 3-D silk fibroin scaffolds by salt-leaching procedure in organic solvent-free conditions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012;23:315–324. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4476-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freddi G, Pessina G, Tsukada M. Swelling and dissolution of silk fibroin (Bombyx mori) in N-methyl morpholine N-oxide. Int. J. Biol. Micromol. 1999;24:251–263. doi: 10.1016/S0141-8130(98)00087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ahmed M, André T, Damanik F, Le BQ. OPEN A combinatorial approach towards the design of nanofibrous scaffolds for chondrogenesis. Nat. Publ. Gr. 2015 doi: 10.1038/srep14804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wibowo UA, et al. Development of salt leached silk fibroin scaffold using direct dissolution techniques for cartilage tissue engineering. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2019;9:810–815. doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.9.3.4511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang Y, et al. A biomimetic silk fibroin/sodium alginate composite scaffold for soft tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1038/srep39477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee H, Jang CH, Kim GH. A polycaprolactone/silk-fibroin nanofibrous composite combined with human umbilical cord serum for subacute tympanic membrane perforation; an in vitro and in vivo study. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2014;2:2703–2713. doi: 10.1039/c4tb00213j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oh SH, Kim TH, Im GIL, Lee JH. Investigation of pore size effect on chondrogenic differentiation of adipose stem cells using a pore size gradient scaffold. Biomacromol. 2010;11:1948–1955. doi: 10.1021/bm100199m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Article O. Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2014;1–3(00):1–12. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Im G, Ko J, Lee JH. Chondrogenesis of adipose stem cells in a porous polymer scaffold: influence of the pore size. Cell Transpl. 2012;21:2397–2405. doi: 10.3727/096368912X638865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yang M, Shuai Y, He W, Min S, Zhu L. Preparation of porous scaffolds from silk fibroin extracted from the silk gland of Bombyx mori (B. mori) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:7762–7775. doi: 10.3390/ijms13067762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Izadifar Z, Chen X, Kulyk W. Strategic design and fabrication of engineered scaffolds for articular cartilage repair. J. Funct. Biomater. 2012;3:799–838. doi: 10.3390/jfb3040799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Secunda R, et al. Isolation, expansion and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood and matrix: a comparative study. Cytotechnology. 2015;67:793–807. doi: 10.1007/s10616-014-9718-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fitzsimmons REB, Mazurek MS, Soos A, Simmons CA. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Stem Cell Int. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/8031718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dominici M, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bray LJ, Suzuki S, Harkin DG, Chirila TV. Functional biomaterials incorporation of exogenous RGD peptide and inter-species blending as strategies for enhancing human corneal limbal epithelial cell growth on Bombyx mori silk fibroin membranes. J. Funct. Biomater. 2013;4:74–88. doi: 10.3390/jfb4020074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cheng N, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Shi B. The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thevenot P, Nair A, Dey J, Yang J, Tang L. Method to analyze three-dimensional cell distribution and infiltration in degradable scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2008 doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Morgan AW, et al. Characterization and optimization of RGD-containing silk blends to support osteoblastic differentiation. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2556–2563. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mishra A, et al. Buffered platelet-rich plasma enhances mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2009;15:431–435. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang S, Li P, Yuan Z, Tan J. Effects of platelet-rich plasma on the activity of human menstrual blood-derived stromal cells in vitro. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018;9:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0735-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cho HS, et al. Individual variation in growth factor concentrations in platelet-rich plasma and its influence on human mesenchymal stem cells. Korean J. Lab. Med. 2011;31:212–218. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lucarelli E, et al. Platelet-derived growth factors enhance proliferation of human stromal stem cells. Biomater. 2003;24:3095–3100. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00114-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kumar Mekala N, Raju Baadhe R, Rao Parcha S, Devi YP. Enhanced proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord blood stem cells by L-ascorbic acid in vitro Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013;8(156):162. doi: 10.2174/1574888x11308020006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Amable PR, Teixeira MVT, Carias RBV, Granjeiro JM, Borojevic R. Protein synthesis and secretion in human mesenchymal cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue and Wharton’s jelly. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014;5:1–13. doi: 10.1186/scrt442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Choi KM, et al. Effect of ascorbic acid on bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008;105:586–594. doi: 10.1263/jbb.105.586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dexheimer V, Frank S, Richter W. Proliferation as a requirement for in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Dev. 2012 doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li ZH, Ji SC, Wang YZ, Shen XC, Liang H. Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering. Front. Mater. Sci. 2013;7:237–247. doi: 10.1007/s11706-013-0214-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Patra C, et al. Silk protein fibroin from Antheraea mylitta for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2673–2680. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bellis SL. NIH Public Access. 2012;32:4205–4210. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Karimi F, Connor AJO, Qiao GG, Heath DE. Integrin clustering matters : a review of biomaterials functionalized with integrin clustering matters : a review of biomaterials functionalized with multivalent integrin-binding ligands to improve cell adhesion, migration, differentiation. Angiogenesia. 2018 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Prowse ABJ, Chong F, Gray PP, Munro TP. Stem cell integrins: Implications for ex-vivo culture and cellular therapies. Stem Cell Res. 2011;6:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bays JL, Demali KA. Vinculin in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017;74:2999–3009. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2511-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mardani M, et al. The effect of platelet rich plasma on chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose derived stem cells in transwell culture. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 2013;16:1163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rosadi I, et al. In vitro study of cartilage tissue engineering using human adipose-derived stem cells induced by platelet-rich plasma and cultured on silk fibroin scaffold. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019;10:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1443-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cells R, Vitro I. Platelet-rich plasma contains high levels. J. Periodontol. 2003;74:849–857. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.6.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Javier Sánchez-González, D., Méndez-Bolaina, E. & Trejo-Bahena, N. I. Platelet-Rich Plasma peptides: key for regeneration. Int. J. Pept.10.1155/2012/532519 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Wang W, Rigueur D, Lyons KM. TGFβ signaling in cartilage development and maintenance. Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2014 doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bhardwaj N, Singh YP, Mandal BB. Silk fibroin scaffold-based 3D co-culture model for modulation of chondrogenesis without hypertrophy via reciprocal cross-talk and paracrine signaling. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019;5:5240–5254. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sah MK, Pramanik K. Regenerated silk fibroin from B. mori silk cocoon for tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2010;1:404–408. doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2010.V1.78. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.