Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Oct 19;12(10):e11033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11033

Can Neuron Specific Enolase Be a Diagnostic Biomarker for Neuronal Injury in COVID-19?

Latha Ganti 1, Enrique Serrano 2, Hale Z Toklu 3,4,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7673275  PMID: 33214960

Abstract

Neuron specific enolase (NSE) is a biomarker for neuronal injury. However, increased levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum is associated with the clinical outcome in patients with head injury, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, cardiac arrest, anoxic encephalopathy, encephalitis, brain metastasis, and status epilepticus.

Recently, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which started in China, rapidly evolved into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients with COVID-19 have a wide range of symptoms varying from mild upper respiratory symptoms to severe illness requiring mechanical ventilation. While coronaviruses primarily target the human respiratory system, neurological symptoms are also observed in some patients. These include symptoms such as loss of taste and olfaction and diseases like cerebrovascular disorders including ischemic stroke and hemorrhages, encephalopathies, Guillain‐Barré syndrome and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.

Here we report an observation from a patient whose NSE levels increased approximately four-fold in CSF. This finding was accompanied by increased white blood cell count and elevated protein in CSF indicating neuroinflammation. Thus, we suggest that NSE may be used as a CSF biomarker in COVID-19 patients with encephalopathy.

Keywords: neuron specific enolase, nse, cerebrospinal fluid, csf, covid-19, sars-cov2

Introduction

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a glycolytic enzyme, which is expressed abundantly in the neurons and neuroendocrine cells. It was first used as a tumor marker for small-cell lung cancer, neuroblastoma and other malignancies of neuroendocrine origin, and later it was introduced as a marker for brain damage [1], because it is found that the NSE levels increase in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following acute neurotrauma as an indicator for neuronal injury and synaptic dysfunction [2]. NSE is located in the cytoplasm of the neurons. The disruption of the blood-brain barrier integrity and damage to the neuronal tissue causes the release of NSE into the CSF and then the blood [3]. Therefore the level of NSE correlates with damage [4]. NSE levels was shown to be associated with the clinical outcome in patients with serious clinical manifestations such as head injury, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, cardiac arrest, anoxic encephalopathy, encephalitis, brain metastasis, and status epilepticus [5]. 

Recently, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which started in China, rapidly evolved into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients with COVID-19 have a wide range of symptoms varying from mild upper respiratory symptoms to severe illness requiring mechanical ventilation. Neurological symptoms are also observed in some patients. Previous evidence suggested that studies on the samples from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have demonstrated the presence of SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) particles in the brain, where they were located almost exclusively in the neurons. Thus, the respiratory failure could be partially due to the neuroinvasion of the brainstem by the virus [6,7].

Case presentation

A 77-year-old white male patient admitted to the hospital with headache, nausea, respiratory distress, and pneumonia. Patient was diagnosed with COVID-19, which was confirmed with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the nasopharyngeal swab. The patient had a history of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, fatty liver, and gout.

The patient had acute respiratory distress and required ventilator support on day two which continued for the next 17 days. He died afterward on day 20 of the hospitalization. The patient developed hypernatremia on day eight, which was treatment-resistant and continued until day 19. His sodium levels were >151 mEq/L from day 11 to the end. The patient also developed acute renal failure and hepatic failure due to sepsis. (Day 16-17: alanine aminotransferase (ALT): 207; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): 186; Creatinine: 1.58; white blood cells (WBCs): 12,500). The patient was evaluated for meningoencephalitis and electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring was performed for seizures.

The patient demographics, admission vitals, laboratory findings in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and clinical outcome are summarized in Table 1

Table 1. The demographic characteristic, vitals, laboratory findings in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and clinical outcome.

    Result Normal Range/ Remarks
Demographics Age 77  
Sex Male  
Race White  
Vitals (admission) Oxygen saturation SPO2 (%) 91 95-100 %
Temperature 97.5 97-99 F
Pulse 71 60-80 beats/min
Blood pressure 139/68 120/ 80 mmHg
Serum (Admission) White blood cell count 2.99 3.80-10.80                                       
Platelet 81 140-400                                          
Hemoglobin 15.7 13.7-17.7 g/dl                                     
D-dimer (day 3) 1.62 0.15-0.50 mg/L FEU                                       
Troponin I 0.018 0.000-0.045 ng/ml                                 
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 32 16-63 (U/L)                                            
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 54 15-37 U/L)                                                                                        
Creatinine 0.89 0.60-1.30 mg/ dL                                        
Sodium (admission) 139 136-145 (mEq/L)
Sodium (day 16) 156 136-145 (mEq/L)
CSF (day 17) Appearance Clear Clear
Color Colorless Colorless
Glucose (mg/dl) 107 40-70 mg/dL
Lymphocyte count 75 40-80 %                                     
Monocytes and macrophages 25 15-45 %                                            
Polymorponuclear cell count 0 <6   %                                            
Nucleated cell count 10 0-5  /mcL                                            
Erythrocyte count 12 0-10 /mcl                                       
Total Protein (mg/dl) 51.4 15-45mg/dl
Immunoglobulin G 3.95        0.0-3. 4 mg/dL                                      
Neuron specific enolase (NSE) 33 <8.9 ng/ ml                                   
VDRL (venereal disease research laboratory) Negative Negative
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) HSV1 HSV2 Negative Negative
Clinical outcome Neurological symptoms Present Nausea, Seizures, urinary incontinence  
Other diagnosis Sepsis, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Acute kidney failure Acute liver failure  
Disease severity Critically ill  
Ventilator need Yes  
Ventilator time   17 days  
Length of stay in hospital 20  
In-hospital mortality Expired  

The patient's chest X-ray which indicates pneumonia and ground-glass opacities in the lung is shown in Figure 1

Figure 1. Chest x-ray of the patient indicating COVID-19 pneumonia.

Figure 1

Discussion

Unlike bacterial infections, viral infections are less likely to cause remarkable changes in CSF glucose, cell count, or protein [8]. In this COVID-19 case, CSF findings such as increase in total protein, total cell count, and immunoglobulin G (IgG) indicated the presence of inflammation in the central nervous system. The marked increase (approximately four-fold) in NSE levels in CSF further supported the inflammatory invasion and neuronal injury. Additionally, this patient had persistent hypernatremia, which continued for over 10 days, which may have contributed to the encephalopathy and osmotic demyelination.

Conclusions

NSE is an old marker, which is sensitive but poorly specific. Nevertheless, the findings are in tune with prior literature as NSE is a marker of neuronal damage. Based on this single observation, we suggest that NSE can be a candidate for a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for neuroinflammation in COVID-19, especially for patients who have neurological symptoms. However, a study with a larger cohort is needed to evaluate the clinical significance. 

Acknowledgments

This research was supported (in whole or in part) by Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) and/or an HCA affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA or any of its affiliated entities.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. HCA IRB Manager issued approval 551. Ethics: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the HCA institutional review board (IRB) Manager system (Protocol no: 2020-551). The requirement for written informed consent was waived as the obtained data was de-identified

References

  • 1.Neuron-specific enolase as a biomarker: biochemical and clinical aspects. Isgrò MA, Bottoni P, Scatena R. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:125–143. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.New insights into the role of neuron-specific enolase in neuro-inflammation, neurodegeneration, and neuroprotection. Haque A, Polcyn R, Matzelle D, Banik NL. Brain Sci. 2018;8 doi: 10.3390/brainsci8020033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Protein S-100B, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myelin basic protein (MBP) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood of neurological patients. Lamers KJ, Vos P, Verbeek MM, Rosmalen F, van Geel WJ, van Engelen BG. Brain Res Bull. 2003;61:261–264. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(03)00089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peripheral markers of brain damage and blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Marchi N, Rasmussen P, Kapural M, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14530574/ Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2003;21:109–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Use of neuron-specific enolase for assessing the severity and outcome in patients with neurological disorders. Lima JE, Takayanagui OM, Garcia LV, Leite JP. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2004;37:19–26. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2004000100003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. Baig AM, Khaleeq A, Ali U, Syeda H. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11:995–998. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. Li YC, Bai WZ, Hashikawa T. J Med Virol. 2020;92:552–555. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and interpretation in neurocritical care for acute neurological conditions. Hrishi AP, Sethuraman M. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019;23:115–119. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES