Abstract
The photosynthetic CO2 fixing enzyme ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) forms dead-end inhibited complexes while binding multiple sugar phosphates, including its substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate. Rubisco can be rescued from this inhibited form by molecular chaperones belonging to the ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA+ proteins) termed Rubisco activases (Rcas). The mechanism of green-type Rca found in higher plants has proved elusive, in part because until recently higher-plant Rubiscos could not be expressed recombinantly. Identifying the interaction sites between Rubisco and Rca is critical to formulate mechanistic hypotheses. Toward that end here we purify and characterize a suite of 33 Arabidopsis Rubisco mutants for their ability to be activated by Rca. Mutation of 17 surface-exposed large subunit residues did not yield variants that were perturbed in their interaction with Rca. In contrast, we find that Rca activity is highly sensitive to truncations and mutations in the conserved N terminus of the Rubisco large subunit. Large subunits lacking residues 1–4 are functional Rubiscos but cannot be activated. Both T5A and T7A substitutions result in functional carboxylases that are poorly activated by Rca, indicating the side chains of these residues form a critical interaction with the chaperone. Many other AAA+ proteins function by threading macromolecules through a central pore of a disc-shaped hexamer. Our results are consistent with a model in which Rca transiently threads the Rubisco large subunit N terminus through the axial pore of the AAA+ hexamer.
Keywords: ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO); ATPase associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA); photosynthesis; molecular chaperone; carbon fixation; Rubisco activase
Virtually all carbon dioxide that enters the biosphere does so via the Calvin Benson Bassham cycle (1). Aerobic autotrophic organisms such as plants, algae, and cyanobacteria all utilize this somewhat suboptimal CO2-fixation process, which depends on catalysis by the slow and promiscuous enzyme Rubisco. The enzyme binds the five carbon sugar ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP), adds a carbon dioxide molecule, and hydrolyzes the six carbon intermediate to form two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate (3PGA). In plants each active site only processes ∼1–3 reactions/s, and frequently oxygen gas is incorporated instead of CO2, which leads to production of the toxic metabolite 2-phosphoglycolate.
To overcome these flux limitations, Rubisco is overexpressed to constitute up to 50% of the leaf soluble protein and is believed to be the most abundant protein on earth (2, 3). Recognition that the enzyme catalyzes the rate-limiting step has made its performance the center of multiple ongoing crop improvement strategies (4, 5). In addition to its slow speed and inaccuracy, the enzyme is also susceptible to form dead-end inhibited complexes with several sugar phosphates that are present in its environment (6, 7). CO2 fixation ceases, unless the inhibitors are constantly removed. This action is performed by a group of dedicated molecular chaperones that have been termed the Rubisco activases (Rcas) (8–10). Three classes of Rca exist, and although all belong to the superfamily of AAA+ proteins, their primary sequences and mechanisms are highly distinct, indicating convergent evolution (11, 12). Red-type Rca found in red-lineage phytoplankton and proteobacteria transiently threads the C terminus of the Rubisco large subunit through the axial pore of the AAA+ hexamer (10, 13, 14). In contrast the CbbQO-type Rca found in chemoautotrophic proteobacteria consists of a cup-shaped AAA+ hexamer (CbbQ6) bound to a single adaptor protein CbbO, which is essential for Rubisco activation (9). During Rca function the hexamer remodels CbbO, which is bound to inhibited Rubisco via a von Willebrand Factor A domain (15).
The detailed molecular mechanism by which inhibitory compounds are removed by higher-plant Rca-mediated modeling of Rubisco's active site has long remained elusive (11, 16). Because functional Rca could be produced recombinantly, a large volume of biochemical information has accumulated on Rca variants (17, 18). In summary the data support a canonical AAA+ pore-loop threading mechanism in which the flat top surface of the hexameric disc engages Rubisco, followed by axial pore-loop threading of an element of Rubisco (19, 20). The intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain, especially a conserved tryptophan, is also important in engaging the holoenzyme (20, 21). Regarding Rubisco, early studies using green algal Chlamydomonas Rubisco were able to pinpoint two residues on the Rubisco large subunits' βC–βD loop that contact the specificity helix (H9) of Rca (22, 23). However, a historical inability to produce plant Rubisco in heterologous organisms such as Escherichia coli hampered further progress. This hurdle was recently removed via the concurrent functional expression of specific plant chaperonins and assembly factors within the heterologous host (24). Here, we took advantage of the newly established capability to produce and biochemically characterize many plant Rubisco variants for their interaction with Rca. We find that the highly conserved RbcL N terminus is essential for Rca function, with a particular importance of two threonine residues: Thr5 and Thr7. This is consistent with an N-terminal pore-loop threading mechanism for higher-plant Rca.
Results
A surface scan of higher-plant Rubisco for Rca-interacting residues
We used the recently established E. coli plant Rubisco expression platform (24, 25) to produce a series of Arabidopsis Rubisco large subunits variants mutated in surface-localized residues in an effort to discover additional regions important for protein–protein interactions. We first tested the βC–βD loop mutations E94K and P89A as positive controls (Fig. 1A), because these substitutions had earlier been shown to greatly perturb the ability of spinach Rca to activate Chlamydomonas Rubisco (26). We then assayed the fully activated holoenzyme (ECM) and the inhibited apo-enzyme bound to the substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (ER) in the presence and absence of the short (Rcaβ) isoform of Arabidopsis Rca (Fig. 1B). Consistent with the Chlamydomonas–spinach result, the inhibited E94K variant of Arabidopsis Rubisco remained nonfunctional in the presence of its cognate Rca, reconfirming the importance of the N-terminal βC–βD loop in the interaction. The P89A variant, however, was activated well in this system (Fig. 1C), suggesting that the βC–βD loop–Rca interaction is less sensitive to mutation when using Arabidopsis proteins.
Figure 1.

Production and Rca assay of plant Rubisco variants. A, SDS-PAGE analysis of purified recombinant WT Arabidopsis Rubisco and βC–βD mutant variants. B, Rca functions to remodel inhibited ER complexes, releasing RuBP. The apo-enzyme E can then bind nonsubstrate CO2 and Mg2+ to form the functional ECM holoenzyme. C, Rubisco activation assays of WT and βC–βD loop mutant Rubisco variants. For every carboxylation of RuBP by Rubisco, two molecules of 3PGA are produced. Each 3PGA molecule is then utilized as the initial substrate for a coupled enzyme reaction that results in the oxidation of two NADH molecules. Overall, four NADH molecules are oxidized per RuBP catalyzed. The assays were performed at 25 °C and contained 0.5 μm Rubisco active sites in the presence and absence of Arabidopsis Rca (2 μm protomer). Error bars indicate the S.D. of at least three independent experiments.
We next targeted a range of surface-localized Rubisco large subunit residues for mutagenesis (Fig. 2A and Fig. S2). As we found earlier, multiple positively charged residues on the face of the Rca disc are important for its ability to activate Rubisco (20, 27), and therefore the chosen mutations were biased toward probing negatively charged surface residues. This included those located in a negatively charged pocket at the dimer–dimer interface that has recently been implicated in the binding of carboxysomal Rubisco linker proteins in prokaryotic green-type Rubiscos (Fig. 2B) (28, 29). We successfully purified 17 variants (Fig. S1), which were all able to carboxylate RuBP similarly to WT (Fig. 2C, Table S2, and Fig. S3). Rca assays indicated that the different variants could still be activated, effectively indicating that the chosen residues were not of critical importance to the Rubisco–Rca interaction (Fig. 2C and Fig. S3). Only K14A showed a statistically significant 52% increase in its Rca-mediated activation rate, possibly reflecting a reduced stability of the inhibited complex. In several species of plants, Lys14 is trimethylated, a modification that is catalyzed by Rubisco large subunit methyltransferase (Rubisco LSMT) (30–32). In the context of activase-mediated remodeling, however, the lack of conservation across all plants diminishes the likelihood of Lys14 trimethylation as essential for reactivation but could possibly represent a mechanism for species-specific regulatory control. Clearly the chosen single amino acid substitutions were insufficient to disrupt the extensive protein–protein interaction interface involved in Rubisco activation. However, attempts to produce combinations of mutations were unsuccessful because of either insolubility or nonfunctionality for all tested cases.
Figure 2.

Mutational scan of the Rubisco surface. A, mutated surface residues are visualized on the surface of inhibited Arabidopsis Rubisco (PDB entry 5IUO) and colored in groups. B, electrostatic surface potential as analyzed by the adaptive Poisson–Boltzmann solver plugin in PyMOL. Negative (red) and positive (blue) potentials are colored continuously between −5 and 5 kT e−1. The location of a negatively charged patch between two large subunit dimers is circled in yellow. C, Rca function and carboxylation rates of surface mutants in groups corresponding to A. Only K14A was observed with a significant increase in reactivation when compared with the WT enzyme. Assays were conducted at 25 °C using 0.5 μm Rubisco active sites (ER or ECM) and 2 μm WT activase protomers when appropriate. Error bars indicate the S.D. of at least three independent experiments. The corresponding time-course data are shown in Fig. S3 with the exception of the WT enzyme, which is shown in Fig. 1C. A significant difference from the WT value is indicated by an asterisk (one-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey test, p < 0.05).
The RbcL N terminus is essential for Rca function
The red-type Rubisco activase CbbX transiently threads the RbcL C terminus (10, 13, 14). However, the C terminus of green-type Rubisco large subunits is poorly conserved and is of variable length (33), indicating a distinct mechanism for green-type Rca function. In contrast, although sequences at the N terminus of red-type Rubisco large subunits differ between species, both the length and the sequence of the N terminus of higher-plant RbcL is essentially completely conserved (Fig. 3A). In available crystal structures, residues 8–20 of the N terminus are ordered only when the active site is in the closed (ligand-bound) form (Fig. 3B). In the closed conformation, the N terminus is positioned directly above the 60s loop that coordinates P1 of the substrate, with Phe13, Lys14, Gly16, and Lys18 forming interactions with multiple residues of the 60s loop (34). Coupled with evidence that residues 9–15 of Rubisco from both spinach and wheat are essential for functional carboxylation activity (31, 35, 36), the stringent conservation of the first eight residues thus suggested a tantalizing target for mutational analysis.
Figure 3.

The N terminus of the Rubisco large subunit is essential for Rca function. A, sequence alignment of RbcL N-terminal sequences. In higher plants the N termini are almost completely conserved, as indicated by a WebLogo representation of the consensus sequence (∼500 plant RbcL sequences). B, visualization of the ordered N-terminal segment (yellow, starting from residue 7) using a model of the inhibited Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Rubisco (PDB entry 1GK8). C, Rubisco activase assays of WT and ΔN7 mutant Arabidopsis Rubiscos. The assays were conducted at 25 °C with 2 μm WT activase protomers and 0.5 μm Rubisco active sites. Error bars indicate the S.D. of at least three independent experiments.
A Rubisco variant with the first seven amino acids replaced by methionine (ΔN7) displayed 83% of WT carboxylation velocity (Fig. 3C). However, when the ER complex was formed, Rca was unable to reactivate ΔN7 (Fig. 3C). This result was consistent with the notion that a higher-plant Rca hexamer engages the disordered N terminus via its axial pore-loops during reactivation and is likely followed by limited threading that leads to active site disruption and inhibitor release.
A dissection of the RbcL N-terminal binding motif
We then performed a detailed mutational analysis of the RbcL N terminus, generating a series of variants that, in the ECM form, were all able to carboxylate at least as well as WT (Fig. 4). Mutant variants were designed either with sequential truncations (ΔN1, ΔN2, and ΔN3), specific deletions or substitutions (ΔTET and TET-AAA), or targeted insertions (M1insAA and T7insAAA) (Fig. 4A). In plants, post-translational processing of the Rubisco large subunit results in the removal of two residues, leaving an acetylated Pro3 as the innate N terminus (30–32, 36). The Rubisco purified using the present E. coli system by Aigner et al. (24) was reported to be N-terminally processed by the endogenous machinery. We therefore determined the N terminus of selected variants using de novo mass spectrometric sequencing (Fig. 4A, Table 1, and Table S3).
Figure 4.
Mutational analysis of the RbcL N terminus. Activase activity and carboxylation rates of Rubisco N-terminal truncations and insertions (A) and point mutant (B) variants were assayed. A schematic of the N-terminally processed identities of N-terminal variants of RbcL is shown (A), with dotted outlines denoting partial processing as detailed in Table 1. Time courses are shown in Fig. S4, with the exception of WT, P89A, and E94K variants, which are shown in Fig. 1C. Values significantly different from their WT equivalent are indicated by an asterisk (one-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Table 1.
N-terminal identity of recombinantly purified wild-type and mutant RbcL
The N terminus of Rubisco large subunits from wild-type and variant mutants shown in Fig. 4A as determined by mass spectrometry de novo sequencing. The ratios of the corresponding peak areas are indicated.
| Protein | Unprocessed N termini | Observed N termini | Ratios of the peak areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | |||
| WT | MSPQTETKAS | MSPQTETKAS | 36 |
| SPQTETKAS | 15 | ||
| PQTETKAS | 49 | ||
| ΔN1 | MPQTETKAS | PQTETKAS | 100 |
| ΔN2 | MQTETKAS | QTETKAS | 42 |
| TETKAS | 58 | ||
| ΔN3 | MTETKAS | TETKAS | 100 |
| ΔN7 | MKAS | MKAS | 100 |
| ΔTET | MSPQKAS | MSPQKAS | 100 |
| TET-AAA | MSPQAAAKAS | MSPQAAAKAS | 72 |
| SPQAAAKAS | 8 | ||
| PQAAAKAS | 20 | ||
| M1insAA | MAASPQTETKAS | AASPQTETKAS | 99 |
| ASPQTETKAS | <1 | ||
| SPQTETKAS | <1 | ||
| T7insAAA | MSPQTETAAAKAS | MSPQTETAAAKAS | 34 |
| SPQTETAAAKAS | 2 | ||
| PQTETAAAKAS | 64 |
Our recombinantly purified WT RbcL was found to contain a mixture of unprocessed, partially processed, and fully processed (∼50%) N termini (Table 1 and Fig. 4A). Shortening the N terminus of RbcL by a single amino acid after methionine (ΔN1) resulted in a homogenous pool of post processed native-like N termini that did not negatively affect Rca function (Fig. 4A). Sequential removal of the next amino acid (ΔN2) resulted in a heterogenous mix of post processed RbcL states (with the first amino acid being either Gln4 or Thr5), which resulted in a 67% increase in Rca functionality. In contrast, removal of the first three amino acids after methionine (ΔN3) or deleting residues 5–7 (ΔTET) almost completely eliminated the ability of Rca to activate Rubisco (Fig. 4A). The dramatic difference between ΔN2 and ΔN3 suggests that Gln4 is critical for Rca function, but the N-terminal sequencing result suggests it does not have to be present on every large subunit.
Lengthening the N terminus by inserting two alanine residues upstream of residue 2 (M1insAA), which resulted in a postprocessed population of mostly lengthened N termini states, was found to greatly reduce Rca function by ∼64%. Changing the register of the N-terminal sequence by inserting an AAA sequence upstream of Lys8 (T7insAAA) in the WT or ΔTET variant (TET-AAA) also eliminated Rca function. These results indicated that Rca function was highly sensitive to both length and identity of the RbcL N terminus.
Next, we evaluated the effect of single amino acid substitutions in the N-terminal motif. Whereas E6A and K8A substitutions were well-tolerated, both T5A and T7A resulted in ∼70% reductions in Rca functionality. This finding indicates that the two threonine residues are likely to play an important role in the threading process, possibly via specific interactions with residues in Rca's pore-loops 1 and 2 (19, 20). We also further note that the observed 2-amino acid step interval would be consistent with successive zipper-like interactions that have been described to be utilized for substrate engagement and threading by the central pore in multiple other AAA+ proteins (37–41). In RbcL, the hydroxl side chain of Tyr20 forms a hydrogen bond to Glu60, a key catalytic residue that interacts with Lys334 that is positioned at the apex of loop 6 and thought to orient the CO2 molecule for gas addition (42). We hypothesized that this interaction could act to disrupt the active site when the N terminus is displaced by Rca threading. The Y20F Rubisco mutant, which lacks the hydrogen bond caused by the absence of the hydroxyl side chain, had a ∼73% reduced carboxylation rate but an increase in reactivation by 39% (Fig. 4B). This result suggests that the Tyr20–Glu60 interaction is important for the integrity of the active site, and its loss facilitates disruption of the inhibited complex.
Notably, we found that multiple N-terminal variants and E94K presented with significantly enhanced carboxylation velocities (up to 53%) compared with the WT enzyme in our spectrophotometric Rubisco assay (Fig. 4, A and B). Independent measurement of enzyme carboxylation kinetics (43) via 14C-CO2 fixation assays confirmed these findings (Table 2 and Fig. S5). In these assays we also found that the C-terminal hexahistidine tag added to the small subunit in our constructs did not significantly affect kinetics, in contrast to that reported for tobacco Rubisco expressed in planta (44). However, the N-terminally processed ΔN1 variant that resembles natively processed RbcL in plants (Table 1) was among the fastest enzymes using both methods (Fig. 4A, Table 2, and Figs. S4 and S5). Therefore, recombinant WT enzyme purified in this manner (and presumably all single amino acid substitutions reported in this study) are not legitimate predictors of in planta enzyme kinetics because of the presence of partially processed N termini (Table 1). Our findings indicate that correct N-terminal processing of RbcL is required to achieve full carboxylase function in planta and strongly suggest that future work using E. coli–produced recombinant plant Rubisco should utilize a ΔN1 construct for kinetic studies.
Table 2.
Kinetic Parameters of recombinant wild-type and mutant Rubisco variants
The kinetic parameters of recombinant wild-type and mutant Rubisco variants from Arabidopsis were measured at 25 °C. At least two data sets at six variable CO2 concentrations (6–60 μm CO2 in CO2-free air) were collected for each enzyme preparation, and the data were fit to the Michaelis–Menten model. Individual Michaelis–Menten plots are shown in Fig. S5.
| Kcatc | KC21%O2 | Kcatc/KC21%O2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| s−1 | µm | s−1 mm−1 | |
| AtRbcLScHis | 2.2 ± 0.0 | 21.6 ± 0.9 | 100 |
| AtRbcLS | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 23.1 ± 1.6 | 98 |
| ΔN1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 22.9 ± 1.3 | 120 |
| ΔN2 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 28.1 ± 1.5 | 97 |
| T5A | 2.7 ± 0.0 | 18.9 ± 0.9 | 142 |
| E6A | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 22.1 ± 1.3 | 124 |
| T7A | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 22.6 ± 2.1 | 133 |
| K14A | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 23.6 ± 2.1 | 92 |
| E94K | 2.7 ± 0.0 | 20.0 ± 0.8 | 133 |
| T7insAAA | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 21.3 ± 1.7 | 118 |
| TET-AAA | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 19.5 ± 1.2 | 140 |
Discussion
The availability of E. coli produced recombinant higher-plant Rubiscos permitted us to rapidly produce many variants and assay their capability to be engaged and activated by their cognate Rca chaperone. Mutational analysis of the holoenzyme surface indicated that Rca compatibility was not easily disrupted, with the tested variants remaining functional (Fig. 2). Arguably, inclusion of less conservative substitutions such as charge switches could have been more informative here. In contrast, mutagenesis of the highly conserved N terminus resulted in multiple variants that were able to carboxylate RuBP but could not be activated by Rca. The best described conserved mechanism of numerous AAA+ ATPases concerns the translocation of a substrate peptide through the central pore of the hexamer (45), and this is the modus operandi of the red-type Rca (13). Green-type Rca pore-loops have been shown to be critical for Rubisco activation (19, 20). In addition we have long been aware of the RbcL βC–βD loop–Rca specificity helix H9 interaction (23, 26, 46). Assuming an axial pore-loop–RbcL N-terminal threading mechanism, we can now further constrain the positioning of an Rca hexameric model (19) in relation to an inhibited Rubisco structure (47). Helix 9 elements of two adjacent Rca subunits can be placed in proximity to two RbcL βC–βD loops that are located on two adjacent dimers (Fig. 5). In this configuration the N-terminal tail (starting at Thr7 in the structure used) is then accessible to the Rca pore. Threading of the N termini would then result in pulling residues 13–20 away from the large subunit body. Disruptions of the associated van der Waal's and polar interactions (34), especially with the RbcL 60s loop, may be sufficient to trigger active site opening. In this manner, it is conceivable for inhibitor relief to be achieved through limited remodeling of the RbcL N-terminal domain. The stark difference observed between the ΔN2 (Rca-activatable) and ΔN3 (Rca-defective) proteins is intriguing because some ΔN2 N termini were identical to those of ΔN3 when determined by de novo peptide sequencing (Fig. 4A). This may indicate that not every large subunit of the L8S8 oligomer needs to be engaged to achieve full Rca function and would suggest cooperativity in the process.
Figure 5.
Model for the Rubisco–Rca interaction. By placing the Helix9 interaction site (in red) of two adjacent Rca subunits in proximity to the βC–βD loops (yellow) of two large subunits belonging to different dimers, the RbcL N terminus (in magenta, N-terminal 6 amino acids missing) can be positioned under the axial pore of the Rca hexamer. Transient pore-loop threading would then lead to disruptions of interactions between the N terminus and the catalytic 60s loop, followed by inhibitor release (PDB entries 1GK8 for Rubisco and 3ZW6 for Rca). The figure was drawn using ChimeraX (58).
An important question that remains completely unaddressed is the role of the critical Rca N-terminal domain. This disordered stretch of ∼60 amino acids is not resolved in structural models, and a single amino acid substitution of W15A eliminates Rca function (20, 21). It is likely involved in an additional, so far undescribed, anchoring site.
This work also inadvertently highlighted that in our hands E. coli did not completely process the N termini of protein produced using the WT construct, leading to lower carboxylase activity than the homogeneously processed ΔN1 variant (Fig. 4A and Table 2). Future studies aiming to evaluate the effect of amino acid substitutions on plant carboxylase function should therefore use the ΔN1 variant. Although a C-terminal hexahistidine tag on the small subunit did not appear to affect kinetics in our system (Table 2), we agree it is prudent practice not to include affinity tags when preparing Rubiscos for kinetic analysis (44).
Other reported post-translationally modifications (Pro3 acetylation and Lys14 trimethylation (30, 31), phosphorylation at multiple sites (48–50)) that are absent in recombinantly purified RbcL (Table S3) (24, 51), may also have effects on carboxylase function. Among these, acetylation of Pro3 has been well-established in both plants and algae (30), but the enzyme responsible and its functional significance remain unknown. Steric hindrance from a bulkier trimethyl Lys14 could also interfere with engagement and threading through the axial pore of the activase. However, the post-translational modification of Lys14 is not universal, with RbcL from Arabidopsis and spinach among species not naturally methylated (30, 52). In summary, the recombinant plant Rubisco production system in conjunction with purified enzymes that catalyze post-translational modifications will permit outstanding questions (32) to be resolved.
Our model is consistent with an exquisite structural snapshot of a prokaryotic carboxysome-associated green-type Rca hexamer bound to cyanobacterial Rubisco that has been communicated in a concurrent bioRxiv preprint (53). In agreement with our findings, the study also reports that an N-terminal 9-amino acid truncation of the tobacco Rubisco large subunit abolishes tobacco Rca function. Green-type Rubisco activation is thus an ancient, conserved process that appears to precede the primary endosymbiotic event leading to the chloroplast (11).
Materials and methods
Molecular biology
Plasmids pBAD33k-AtRbcLS, p11a-AtC60αβ/C20 and pCDFduet-AtR1/R2/Rx/B2 utilized in the production of Arabidopsis Rubisco in E. coli were a gift from Dr. Manajit Hayer-Hartl (24). To achieve our final construct containing the large and small subunits of Rubisco, a hexahistidine tag was appended to the C terminus of rbcS via the QuikChange protocol (Stratagene). Restriction-free cloning of the RBS-AtRbcLScHis cassette was utilized to insert the cassette into the multiple cloning site 1 of the pRSFDuetTM-1 plasmid (Novagen). To obtain single mutants, the QuikChange protocol was applied to pRSFduet-AtRbcLScHis. Truncations of the N terminus were performed by PCR amplification of regions flanking the unwanted sequence. Linearized products were then phosphorylated by T4 PNK (NEB) before end-to-end ligation. All primers used are listed in Table S1, and protein-encoding sequences were verified by DNA sequencing.
To obtain a vector encoding Arabidopsis thaliana Rca (AtRcaβ), the sequence corresponding to amino acid residues 59–474 (Uniprot P10896) was amplified from a cDNA library of Arabidopsis with BamHI and NotI restriction sites at the 5′ and 3′ end, respectively. The sequence was then inserted into the multiple cloning site of the pHue expression vector using the appropriate restriction sites to yield the final construct pHueAthRcaβ.
Protein purification
Recombinant WT activase from Arabidopsis were expressed and purified following our protocol for the purification of Agave tequilana activases to yield activases with a single glycine prior to the native N terminus of the enzyme (27). For expression and purification of recombinant Rubiscos, BL21 (DE3) E. coli cells containing p11a-AtC60αβ/C20, pCDFduet-AtR1/R2/Rx/B2, and pRSFduet-AtRbcLScHis were grown in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (200 µg ml−1), kanamycin (30 µg ml−1), and streptomycin (50 µg ml−1), respectively. Starter cultures of 2 ml were grown overnight at 37 °C prior to inoculation of 1-liter cultures. Large-scale cultures were grown for 3 h at 37 °C to reach an A600 of 0.3–0.4 before temperatures were lowered to 23 °C and induced with 0.5 mm isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside. The cells were harvested 16 h following induction and lysed in HisTrap buffer A (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mm NaCl, 10 mm imidazole). Soluble fractions were then applied to HisTrap HP 5-ml columns (Sigma–Aldrich) equilibrated with HisTrap buffer A. The proteins were eluted with a linear imidazole gradient from 10 to 200 mm. Following elution, Rubisco-containing fractions were immediately subjected to a Superdex 200 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer A (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mm NaCl) supplemented with 5% (v/v) glycerol. Pure Rubisco fractions were then pooled, concentrated, and flash-frozen for storage at −80 °C. Pure proteins were quantified my measuring their absorbance at 280 nm using extinction coefficients calculated using the ProtParam tool (RRID:SCR_018087).
Biochemical assays
Rubisco and Rubisco reactivation activities were measured and quantified as described (14), using the spectrophotometric Rubisco assay (54). RuBP was synthesized enzymatically from ribose 5-phosphate (55) and purified by anion-exchange chromatography (56). ECM was formed by incubating 20 μm Rubisco active sites in buffer A supplemented with 20 mm NaHCO3 and 10 mm MgCl2 (50 min, 25 °C). For ER, complexes were generated by incubating 20 μm Rubisco active sites in buffer A containing 4 mm EDTA (10 min) prior to addition of RuBP to a final concentration of 1 mm (50 min, 25 °C). Rca activities were calculated using the ECM and ER carboxylase time courses collected on the same day. All assays were performed in assay buffer (100 mm Tricine, pH 8.0, 5 mm MgCl2) containing 3 μl of coupling enzymes mixture (creatine phosphokinase (2.5 units/ml), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (2.5 units/ml), 3-phosphoglycerate kinase and Triose-P isomerase/glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (20/2 units/ml)), 20 mm NaHCO3, 0.5 mm NADH, 2 mm ATP, 10 mm creatine phosphate, 1 mm RuBP. Final concentrations of 0.5 μm Rubisco active sites and 2 μm Rca protomer were utilized where appropriate. All spectrophotometric assays were performed on different days with individual preparations of ECM, ER, and assay buffer A.
Radiometric kinetic assays
14CO2 fixation assays (0.5 ml of reaction volume) were performed at 25 °C in 7.7-ml septum-capped glass scintillation vials with assay buffer (100 mm EPPS-NaOH, pH 8.0, 20 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EDTA), 10 μg/ml carbonic anhydrase, and 1 mm RuBP. All the assay components were equilibrated with CO2-free air prior to addition of 14CO2 concentration varying from 0.46 to 4.7 mm NaH14CO3 (corresponding to 6–60 μm 14CO2). Purified Rubisco (≈5 μm active sites) was first activated with assay buffer containing 10 mm NaHCO3, and the assay was initiated by addition of 20 µl of activated Rubisco. The assay was stopped after 1 min using 200 μl of 50% (v/v) formic acid. The specific activity of 14CO2 was measured using the highest 14CO2 concentration and 5.2 nmol of RuBP. The reaction was assayed for 30 min, and the activity ranged from 840 to 1200 CPM/mol RuBP. The reactions were dried using a heat block and resuspended in 750 μl of water and 1 ml of Ultima Gold XR scintillant before quantification using a scintillation counter. Rubisco active sites were quantified using 14C-CABP (2-carboxy-arabinitol 1,5 bisphosphate) binding assay with 20 μl of activated Rubisco (54). The 14C-CABP–bound Rubisco was separated from the free ligand using size-exclusion chromatography and quantified by scintillation counting.
De novo mass spectrometric sequencing
De novo mass spectrometric sequencing services were provided by the Bioprocessing Technology Institute (BTI-A*STAR). Briefly, purified proteins were separated on SDS gels prior to excision of RbcL-containing regions and in-gel trypsin digestion. LC–MS/MS analysis was performed using a nanoACQUITY UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a LTQ Orbitrap Elite ETD mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as described in Ref. 57. The spectra were obtained using data-dependent scanning tandem MS with full MS scans at 120,000 resolution from 350 to 1600 m/z followed by HCD Orbitrap tandem MS scans of the 12 most intense peptide ions with normalized collision energy of 35.0% at a resolution of 15,000. Tandem MS raw files were directly analyzed using the PEAKS Studio X plus software (Bioinformatics Solutions; Waterloo, Canada) for de novo sequencing, semi-specific tryptic peptide database search, peptide area detection, and annotation of MS/MS spectra according to the software instructions. Database search was conducted against the sequence of WT RbcL (Uniprot:O03042) or our described N-terminal variants from Arabidopsis. Peptide and fragment ion mass tolerances used were ± 10 ppm and ± 0.5 Da, respectively. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was included as a fixed modification, whereas oxidation of methionine, N-terminal acetylation, and N/Q deamidation were considered as variable modifications. Two missed cleavages were allowed for searching the data. The false discovery rate was set at 0.1%.
Data availability
The data generated and analyzed in this study are available at https://researchdata.ntu.edu.sg/dataverse/cajar.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Manajit Hayer-Hartl for the gift of plasmids pBAD33k-AtRbcLS, p11a-AtC60αβ/C20, and pCDFduet-AtR1/R2/Rx/B2. Lynette Liew synthesized RuBP. pHueAthRcaβ was cloned by Devendra Shivhare. We also thank Dr. Bi Xuezhi from the Bioprocessing Technology Institute at the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (BTI-A.STAR) in Singapore for providing expertise in de novo sequencing.
This article contains supporting information.
Author contributions—J. N. conceptualization; J. N. and Z. G. formal analysis; J. N. and Z. G. investigation; J. N. and Z. G. methodology; J. N. and O. M.-C. writing-original draft; O. M.-C. supervision; O. M.-C. funding acquisition; O. M.-C. writing-review and editing.
Funding and additional information—This work was funded by Grant MOE2016-T2-2-088 from the Ministry of Education of Singapore and Grant NRF2017-NRF-ISF002-2667 from the National Research Foundation of Singapore (to O. M.-C.).
Conflict of interest—The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
- Rubisco
- ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
- AAA
- ATPase associated with diverse cellular activities
- RuBP
- ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate
- 3PGA
- 3-phosphoglycerate
- ECM
- activated holoenzyme
- ER
- enzyme-RuBP
- PDB
- Protein Data Bank.
References
- 1. Spreitzer R. J., and Salvucci M. E. (2002) Rubisco: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 449–475 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Raven J. A. (2013) Rubisco: still the most abundant protein of Earth? New Phytol. 198, 1–3 10.1111/nph.12197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bar-On Y. M., and Milo R. (2019) The global mass and average rate of Rubisco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 4738–4743 10.1073/pnas.1816654116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Long S. P., Marshall-Colon A., and Zhu X. G. (2015) Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zhu X. G., Long S. P., and Ort D. R. (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 235–261 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Parry M. A., Keys A. J., Madgwick P. J., Carmo-Silva A. E., and Andralojc P. J. (2008) Rubisco regulation: a role for inhibitors. J. Exp. Botanz 59, 1569–1580 10.1093/jxb/ern084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pearce F. G., and Andrews T. J. (2003) The relationship between side reactions and slow inhibition of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase revealed by a loop 6 mutant of the tobacco enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 32526–32536 10.1074/jbc.M305493200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Salvucci M. E., Portis A. R. Jr., and Ogren W. L. (1985) A soluble chloroplast protein catalyzes ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activation in vivo. Photosynth. Res. 7, 193–201 10.1007/BF00037012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tsai Y. C., Lapina M. C., Bhushan S., and Mueller-Cajar O. (2015) Identification and characterization of multiple Rubisco activases in chemoautotrophic bacteria. Nat. Commun. 6, 8883 10.1038/ncomms9883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Mueller-Cajar O., Stotz M., Wendler P., Hartl F. U., Bracher A., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2011) Structure and function of the AAA+ protein CbbX, a red-type Rubisco activase. Nature 479, 194–199 10.1038/nature10568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mueller-Cajar O. (2017) The diverse AAA+ machines that repair inhibited Rubisco active sites. Front. Mol. Biosci. 4, 31 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hayer-Hartl M., and Hartl F. U. (2020) Chaperone machineries of Rubisco: the most abundant enzyme. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 748–763 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bhat J. Y., Milicic G., Thieulin-Pardo G., Bracher A., Maxwell A., Ciniawsky S., Mueller-Cajar O., Engen J. R., Hartl F. U., Wendler P., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2017) Mechanism of enzyme repair by the AAA+ chaperone Rubisco activase. Mol. Cell 67, 744–756 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Loganathan N., Tsai Y.-C. C., and Mueller-Cajar O. (2016) Characterization of the heterooligomeric red-type Rubisco activase from red algae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 14019–14024 10.1073/pnas.1610758113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tsai Y. C., Ye F., Liew L., Liu D., Bhushan S., Gao Y. G., and Mueller-Cajar O. (2020) Insights into the mechanism and regulation of the CbbQO-type Rubisco activase, a MoxR AAA+ ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 381–387 10.1073/pnas.1911123117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bracher A., Whitney S. M., Hartl F. U., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2017) Biogenesis and metabolic maintenance of Rubisco. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 29–60 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Portis A. R., Jr. (2003) Rubisco activase: Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth. Res. 75, 11–27 10.1023/A:1022458108678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Carmo-Silva E., Scales J. C., Madgwick P. J., and Parry M. A. (2015) Optimizing Rubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1817–1832 10.1111/pce.12425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Stotz M., Mueller-Cajar O., Ciniawsky S., Wendler P., Hartl F. U., Bracher A., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2011) Structure of green-type Rubisco activase from tobacco. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1366–1370 10.1038/nsmb.2171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shivhare D., Ng J., Tsai Y. C., and Mueller-Cajar O. (2019) Probing the rice Rubisco–Rubisco activase interaction via subunit heterooligomerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 24041–24048 10.1073/pnas.1914245116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. van de Loo F. J., and Salvucci M. E. (1996) Activation of ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) involves Rubisco activase Trp16. Biochemistry 35, 8143–8148 10.1021/bi9604901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wang Z. Y., Snyder G. W., Esau B. D., Portis A. R., and Ogren W. L. (1992) Species-dependent variation in the interaction of substrate-bound Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (Rubisco) and Rubisco activase. Plant Physiol. 100, 1858–1862 10.1104/pp.100.4.1858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Larson E. M., O'Brien C. M., Zhu G., Spreitzer R. J., and Portis A. R. Jr (1997) Specificity for activase is changed by a Pro-89 to Arg substitution in the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17033–17037 10.1074/jbc.272.27.17033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Aigner H., Wilson R. H., Bracher A., Calisse L., Bhat J. Y., Hartl F. U., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2017) Plant RuBisCo assembly in E. coli with five chloroplast chaperones including BSD2. Science 358, 1272–1278 10.1126/science.aap9221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wilson R. H., Thieulin-Pardo G., Hartl F. U., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2019) Improved recombinant expression and purification of functional plant Rubisco. FEBS Lett. 593, 611–621 10.1002/1873-3468.13352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ott C. M., Smith B. D., Portis A. R. Jr., and Spreitzer R. J. (2000) Activase region on chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: nonconservative substitution in the large subunit alters species specificity of protein interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26241–26244 10.1074/jbc.M004580200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Shivhare D., and Mueller-Cajar O. (2017) Characterization of thermostable CAM Rubisco activase reveals a Rubisco interacting surface loop. Plant Physiol. 174, 1505–1516 10.1104/pp.17.00554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang H., Yan X., Aigner H., Bracher A., Nguyen N. D., Hee W. Y., Long B. M., Price G. D., Hartl F. U., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2019) Rubisco condensate formation by CcmM in β-carboxysome biogenesis. Nature 566, 131–135 10.1038/s41586-019-0880-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Oltrogge L. M., Chaijarasphong T., Chen A. W., Bolin E. R., Marqusee S., and Savage D. F. (2020) Multivalent interactions between CsoS2 and Rubisco mediate α-carboxysome formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 281–287 10.1038/s41594-020-0387-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Houtz R. L., Poneleit L., Jones S. B., Royer M., and Stults J. T. (1992) Posttranslational modifications in the amino- terminal region of the large subunit of ribulose- 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from several plant species. Plant Physiol. 98, 1170–1174 10.1104/pp.98.3.1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Houtz R. L., Stults J. T., Mulligan R. M., and Tolbert N. E. (1989) Post-translational modifications in the large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 1855–1859 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Houtz R. L., Magnani R., Nayak N. R., and Dirk L. M. (2008) Co- and post-translational modifications in Rubisco: unanswered questions. J. Exp. Botany 59, 1635–1645 10.1093/jxb/erm360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Satagopan S., and Spreitzer R. J. (2004) Substitutions at the Asp-473 latch residue of Chlamydomonas ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase cause decreases in carboxylation efficiency and CO2/O2 specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 14240–14244 10.1074/jbc.M313215200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Schreuder H. A., Knight S., Curmi P. M. G., Andersson I., Cascio D., Branden C. I., and Eisenberg D. (1993) Formation of the active-site of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase by a disorder order transition from the unactivated to the activated form. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9968–9972 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Gutteridge S., Millard B. N., and Parry M. A. J. (1986) Inactivation of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase by limited proteolysis. FEBS Lett. 196, 263–268 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80260-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mulligan R. M., Houtz R. L., and Tolbert N. E. (1988) Reaction-intermediate analogue binding by ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase causes specific changes in proteolytic sensitivity: the amino-terminal residue of the large subunit is acetylated proline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 1513–1517 10.1073/pnas.85.5.1513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Puchades C., Rampello A. J., Shin M., Giuliano C. J., Wiseman R. L., Glynn S. E., and Lander G. C. (2017) Structure of the mitochondrial inner membrane AAA+ protease YME1 gives insight into substrate processing. Science 358, eaao0464 10.1126/science.aao0464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Shin M., Puchades C., Asmita A., Puri N., Adjei E., Wiseman R. L., Karzai A. W., and Lander G. C. (2020) Structural basis for distinct operational modes and protease activation in AAA+ protease Lon. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8404 10.1126/sciadv.aba8404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gates S. N., Yokom A. L., Lin J., Jackrel M. E., Rizo A. N., Kendsersky N. M., Buell C. E., Sweeny E. A., Mack K. L., Chuang E., Torrente M. P., Su M., Shorter J., and Southworth D. R. (2017) Ratchet-like polypeptide translocation mechanism of the AAA+ disaggregase Hsp104. Science 357, 273–279 10.1126/science.aan1052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Han H., Monroe N., Sundquist W. I., Shen P. S., and Hill C. P. (2017) The AAA ATPase Vps4 binds ESCRT-III substrates through a repeating array of dipeptide-binding pockets. eLife 6, 10.7554/eLife.31324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yu H., Lupoli T. J., Kovach A., Meng X., Zhao G., Nathan C. F., and Li H. (2018) ATP hydrolysis-coupled peptide translocation mechanism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E9560–E9569 10.1073/pnas.1810648115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Parry M. A. J., Andralojc P. J., Mitchell R. A. C., Madgwick P. J., and Keys A. J. (2003) Manipulation of Rubisco: the amount, activity, function and regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 1321–1333 10.1093/jxb/erg141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wilson R. H., Martin-Avila E., Conlan C., and Whitney S. M. (2018) An improved Escherichia coli screen for Rubisco identifies a protein–protein interface that can enhance CO2-fixation kinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 18–27 10.1074/jbc.M117.810861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Martin-Avila E., Lim Y. L., Birch R., Dirk L. M. A., Buck S., Rhodes T., Sharwood R. E., Kapralov M. V., and Whitney S. M. (2020) Modifying plant photosynthesis and growth via simultaneous chloroplast transformation of Rubisco large and small subunits. Plant Cell 32, 2898–2916 10.1105/tpc.20.00288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Puchades C., Sandate C. R., and Lander G. C. (2020) The molecular principles governing the activity and functional diversity of AAA+ proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 43–58 10.1038/s41580-019-0183-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Portis A. R., Li C. S., Wang D. F., and Salvucci M. E. (2008) Regulation of Rubisco activase and its interaction with Rubisco. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 1597–1604 10.1093/jxb/erm240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Taylor T. C., Backlund A., Bjorhall K., Spreitzer R. J., and Andersson I. (2001) First crystal structure of Rubisco from a green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 48159–48164 10.1074/jbc.M107765200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Aggarwal K. K., Saluja D., and Sachar R. C. (1993) Phosphorylation of Rubisco in Cicer rietinum: non-phosphoprotein nature of Rubisco in Nicotiana tabacun. Phytochemistry 34, 329–335 10.1016/0031-9422(93)80004-C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen X., Zhang W., Zhang B., Zhou J., Wang Y., Yang Q., Ke Y., and He H. (2011) Phosphoproteins regulated by heat stress in rice leaves. Proteome Sci. 9, 37 10.1186/1477-5956-9-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lohrig K., Müller B., Davydova J., Leister D., and Wolters D. A. (2009) Phosphorylation site mapping of soluble proteins: bioinformatical filtering reveals potential plastidic phosphoproteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 229, 1123–1134 10.1007/s00425-009-0901-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Lin M. T., Stone W. D., Chaudhari V., and Hanson M. R. (2019) Enzyme kinetics of tobacco Rubisco expressed in Escherichia coli varies depending on the small subunit composition. bioRxiv 10.1101/562223 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52. Mininno M., Brugière S., Pautre V., Gilgen A., Ma S., Ferro M., Tardif M., Alban C., and Ravanel S. (2012) Characterization of chloroplastic fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolases as lysine-methylated proteins in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 21034–21044 10.1074/jbc.M112.359976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Flecken M., Wang H., Popilka L., Hartl F. U., Bracher A., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2020) Dual role of a Rubisco activase in metabolic repair and carboxysome organization. bioRxiv 10.1101/000000 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 54. Kubien D. S., Brown C. M., and Kane H. J. (2011) Quantifying the amount and activity of Rubisco in leaves. Methods Mol. Biol. 684, 349–362 10.1007/978-1-60761-925-3_27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Horecker B. L., Hurwitz J., and Weissbach A. (1958) Ribulose diphosphate. Biochem. Prep. 6, 83–90 [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kane H. J., Wilkin J. M., Portis A. R., and Andrews T. J. (1998) Potent inhibition of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase by an oxidized impurity in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate. Plant Physiol. 117, 1059–1069 10.1104/pp.117.3.1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Bi X., Ye L., Lau A., Kok Y. J., Zheng L., Ng D., Tan K., Ow D., Ananta E., Vafiadi C., and Muller J. (2018) Proteomic profiling of barley spent grains guides enzymatic solubilization of the remaining proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 4159–4170 10.1007/s00253-018-8886-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Goddard T. D., Huang C. C., Meng E. C., Pettersen E. F., Couch G. S., Morris J. H., and Ferrin T. E. (2018) UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 10.1002/pro.3235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated and analyzed in this study are available at https://researchdata.ntu.edu.sg/dataverse/cajar.


