Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2021 Jan 5;9:1161. Originally published 2020 Sep 21. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26170.2

Development of species-specific SCAR markers for identification and authentication of three rare Peninsular Malaysian endemic Coelogyne (Orchidaceae) orchids

Yoh Kok Hon 1, Christina Seok-Yien Yong 1, Janna Ong Abdullah 2, Rusea Go 1,a
PMCID: PMC7707113  PMID: 33299554

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

1. We added Seidenfaden and Wood, 1992 into introduction 2. We replace Figure 1, showing the vegetative structure 3. We replace Table 2 that includes all the suggested information by reviewer 1. 4. We insert ". Thus, a comprehensive screening on more samples of the three species was not feasible in this case. Furthermore, the RAPD-SCAR markers have yet to be tested on other Malaysian Coelogyne to confirm the specificity of the markers. Hence, the RADP-SCAR markers should be tested on the more commonly available Coelogyne species such as C. asperata and C. speciosa using in future experiments." into discussion section as marked in 'track changes'

Abstract

Background: Coelogyne kaliana, Coelogyne stenochila and Coelogyne tiomanensis are three valuable rare orchid species endemic to Peninsular Malaysia, currently rampantly traded illegally via the internet and through local nurseries, which label them as hybrids to avoid enforcement detection. Drastic measures to ensure the continued existence of their populations in the wild should be introduced as they are rapidly diminishing into extinction, including the development of rapid and accurate species-specific identification tools. These three orchid species are highly similar morphologically and currently it is impossible to distinguish among them without their reproductive structures.

Methods:  RAPD-based species-specific SCAR markers were developed to distinguish and authenticate the identity of these three endemic Peninsular Malaysian Coelogyne species.

Results: Three SCAR markers were successfully developed in this study. SCAR marker primer pair , CKL_f / CKL_r was specific to C. kaliana as it produced a unique single band of 271 bp but not in C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis.  SCAR marker primer pair CST_f / CST_r amplified a single band of 854 bp in C. stenochila and two bands of different sizes (372 bp and 858 bp) in C. tiomanensis, but no amplification in C. kaliana. The third SCAR marker primer pair, CTI_f / CTI_r produced a single band (about 500 bp) for both C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis, but showed no amplification in C. kaliana.

Conclusions: Although not all these SCAR markers were species amplification specific, they could be used to discriminate among the three Coelogyne species effectively.  Accurate species identification is one of the most important steps to allow a proper management plan to be established in the effort to conserve these three endangered orchid species of Peninsular Malaysia. Besides, it could effectively put a stop to the illegal trading of these rare endangered orchid species worldwide.

Keywords: Coelogyne kaliana, Coelogyne stenochila, Coelogyne tiomanensis, endemic species, RAPD, SCAR, species identification, taxon delimitation

Introduction

The genus Coelogyne L. belongs to the Orchidaceae family, which is comprised of about 200 sympodial species distributed throughout India, southwest China, southeast Asia and the Fiji Islands. Their main centres of diversity are Borneo, Papua New Guinea, Sumatra and the Himalayan range ( Butzin, 1992; Gravendeel et al., 2001). There are 26 species of Coelogyne in Peninsular Malaysia based on the latest Checklist of Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia ( Ong et al., 2017) and Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992. Amongst them, Coelogyne kaliana, Coelogyne stenochila and Coelogyne tiomanensis are endemic to Peninsular Malaysia ( Figure 1). They are mostly found in the highland regions at elevations of 1200 m above sea level. These three Peninsular Malaysian endemic species are very rare and are present in small populations. Endemic orchid species are national treasures, which have high commercial values among orchid collectors and enthusiasts. This leads to their illegal and indiscriminate collections from the wild. Moreover, the survival of many endemic species may be jeopardized due to rapid climate change, which causes their populations to decline gradually. This eventually would reduce the likelihood of them to being found in their natural habitats ( Ong, 2013). Scientific and efficient discriminations of morphologically similar species have been indispensable in achieving the ultimate goal of preservation and conservation of endemic orchid species. Apart from their distinctive floral appearances, C. kaliana, C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis are morphologically similar with indistinguishable common vegetative structures. Thus, it is crucial that molecular markers be developed, which would enable us to easily distinguish among them taxonomically.

Figure 1. The three endemic Coelogyne species in Peninsular Malaysia.

Figure 1.

( A) Coelogyne tiomanensis; ( B) Coelogyne kaliana and ( C) Coelogyne stenochila (all with flower and vegetative structure).

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method ( Williams et al., 1990) that uses short and arbitrary oligonucleotides with GC contents of at least 50% to produce amplification products at random. The short oligonucleotide primer of approximately 10 bp in length is called a decamer and serves as both the forward and reverse primers. The amplification process in RAPD analysis is performed on total genomic DNA. Thus, it can be used to study genetic polymorphisms within the whole genome instead of just polymorphisms within a single genetic region. It also allows the amplification of random fragments of the genome without prior sequence knowledge. The main constraint of RAPD is its low fidelity. However, the conversion of RAPD markers into new, longer and specific Sequence Characterized Amplified Region (SCAR) markers can significantly improve reliability and reproducibility. Some other PCR-based methods, such as single locus microsatellites, Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLP), show better reproducibility of amplifications than the RAPD method. But, SCAR marker developments from these methods are often costlier, time consuming and laborious ( Kumar & Gurusubramanian, 2011) when compared to its development from the RAPD method.

The SCAR marker ( Paran & Michelmore, 1993) is a robust and reliable method used to detect and differentiate different samples by using specific primers derived from RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and other DNA markers. SCAR markers can discriminate among closely related samples or species by amplifying products of different sizes or no amplification in non-targeted samples and positive amplifications in targeted samples. Over the past few years, this method had been widely adopted in the identification of morphologically similar but genetically different organisms. A large number of robust and reliable SCAR markers had been successfully developed through the RAPD-based method for Pisum sativum ( Srivastava et al., 2012), Oryza sativa ( Semsang et al., 2013), Sorghum halepense ( Zhang et al., 2013) and even for orchids, such as Phalaenopsis ( Goh et al., 2005; Niknejad et al., 2009) and Paphiopedilum ( Sun et al., 2011). However, currently there is still no genetic marker for the species identification of Peninsular Malaysia’s endemic Coelogyne species.

Hence, in this present investigation, RAPD-based SCAR markers were developed to distinguish among the three endemic Coelogyne species in Peninsular Malaysia. RAPD primers were used to screen the DNA samples of these three species to amplify reproducible species-specific bands. A single or a combination of two SCAR markers, which we developed, allowed us to successfully distinguish among the three morphologically similar and closely related Peninsular Malaysian endemic Coelogyne species. To our best knowledge, this is the first study on developing species-specific SCAR markers to identify the three endemic Coelogyne orchids of Peninsular Malaysia.

Methods

Plant materials and DNA extraction

Due to the rarity of these species, only two samples of C. kaliana (YKH 020, Genting Highlands and YKH 004, Cameron Highlands, Malaysia), one sample of C. stenochila (YKH 031, Gunung Tahan, Malaysia) and one sample of C. tiomanensis (FRI 75329, Tioman Island, Malaysia) were collected from their native locations in Peninsular Malaysia. A small piece (3 cm × 3 cm) of fresh leaf from each sample was used for the DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted based on the conventional CTAB method ( Doyle & Doyle, 1987). The DNA pellets were suspended in 50 μl sterile DNase free water and kept at −20 °C until ready for use. The purity and concentration of the DNA samples were determined using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, USA).

RAPD-PCR amplification

A total of 16 decamer universal RAPD primers (synthesized by First Base Laboratory, Serdang, Malaysia), as shown in Table 1, were used to amplify the DNA samples of the three Malaysian endemic Coelogyne species. These sequences were obtained from published articles ( Table 1) where they have been used successfully in other orchid species. The RAPD amplification reactions were performed in a 10 μl volume containing 50 ng of plant DNA, 1.0 μM of RAPD primer (First Base Laboratory), 1 × PCR buffer (Promega, USA), 2.5 mM of MgCl 2 (Promega, USA), 0.1mM dNTPs mix (Promega, USA), 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), using a thermal cycler machine (Eppendorf Master Cycler Gradient, Hamburg, Germany), The run conditions were: 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min; 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 35°C for 2 min and extension at 72°C for 2 min; and 1 cycle of final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplicons were electrophoresed on 1.2% TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA) agarose gel for 90 minutes at 70 V and stained with 0.5μg/mL ethidium bromide. The gel was visualised under a UV transilluminator (UVIdoc, USA) and the gel image was taken using a camera (UVItec, UK). Species-specific bands were identified from the bands produced during the RAPD amplifications.

Table 1. RAPD primers used for PCR amplifications.

Primer code Sequence 5'−3' Reference
OPA 03 AGTCAGCCAC ( Grünanger et al., 1998; Obara-Okeyo & Kako, 1998; Parab & Krishnan, 2008)
OPA 04 AATCGGGCTG ( Parab & Krishnan, 2008)
OPA 09 GGGTAACGCC ( Grünanger et al., 1998; Parab & Krishnan, 2008)
OPA 12 TCGGCGATAG ( Grünanger et al., 1998; Parab & Krishnan, 2008)
OPA 14 TCTGTGCTGG ( Grünanger et al., 1998; Parab & Krishnan, 2008)
OPF 02 GAGGATCCCT ( Benner et al., 1995)
OPF 03 CCTGATCACC ( Benner et al., 1995)
OPF 04 GGTGATCAGG ( Benner et al., 1995)
OPF 05 CCGAATTCCC ( Benner et al., 1995)
OPF 06 GGGAATTCGG ( Benner et al., 1995)
OPU 03 CTATGCCGAC ( Goh et al., 2005; Lim et al., 1999; Niknejad et al., 2009)
OPU 08 GGCGAAGGTT ( Goh et al., 2005; Niknejad et al., 2009)
OPU 10 ACCTCGGCAC ( Goh et al., 2005; Niknejad et al., 2009)
OPU 12 TCACCAGCCA ( Goh et al., 2005; Niknejad et al., 2009)
OPU 13 GGCTGGTTCC Goh et al., 2005; Niknejad et al., 2009
OPU 16 CTGCGCTGGA Goh et al., 2005; Niknejad et al., 2009

Cloning and sequencing of specific RAPD fragments

Primers that consistently generated species specific PCR profiles in all the DNA samples were selected for primer design. The amplified PCR products were cloned and sequenced using the service provided by First Base Laboratory. All species-specific RAPD-generated PCR amplicons were cloned into pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector by chemical transformation into the E. coli competent cells. The white colonies, which contained the recombinant DNA (plasmid), were picked from LB/ampicillin/X-gal plates and the recombinant DNA was isolated from the bacterial culture. The targeted inserts were sequenced using SP6 and T7 universal sequencing primers.

Design and validation of SCAR primers

The DNA sequences obtained were first subjected to nucleotide similarity searches using the BLASTN function of the NCBI database to check for significant similarities of the sequences with any sequences in GenBank Species-specific SCAR marker primer pairs were then designed based on the DNA sequences obtained. Species-specific SCAR marker primer pairs of 20–24 bases in length were designed with high stringency using the program Primer3 ( Rozen & Skaletsky, 2000). Then, the designed SCAR marker primer pairs were synthesised by First Base Laboratory. Primer specificities were validated by amplifying the SCAR markers using the DNA samples of the three endemic Coelogyne species and by the same reaction mixture as was described in the section RAPD-PCR Amplification. The PCR profiles used for the amplifications of the designed SCAR primer pairs were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 51 to 53°C (depending on the SCAR primer pair) for 2 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were sequenced by First Base Laboratory, Serdang, Malaysia to confirm sequence specificities.

Results

RAPD profile analysis

In the preliminary screenings of 16 random decanucleotide RAPD primers, all primers were able to amplify genomic DNA samples of Coelogyne kaliana, Coelogyne stenochila and Coelogyne tiomanensis, to produce a variable number of bands of different sizes. However, out of the 16 universal RAPD primers screened, only two RAPD primers, namely OPU 08 and OPU 12 showed a high level of consistency, producing distinct and reproducible fingerprint patterns in all the DNA samples tested. Amplification by primer OPU 08 consistently produced a clear band between 1 kb and 1.5 kb ( Figure 2), which was unique to C. stenochila but absent in C. kaliana and C. tiomanensis. Primer OPU 08 also consistently amplified an intense band of roughly 750 bp that was specific to C. tiomanensis only and not found in C. stenochila and C. kaliana. Primer OPU 12 consistently amplified a distinct fragment of about 500 bp ( Figure 2), which was present in all DNA samples of C. kaliana, but which was not observed in the DNA samples of C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis.

Figure 2. RAPD fingerprint results from amplification of DNA samples using primers OPU 08 on 1.2% agarose gel.

Figure 2.

Lanes 1 and 2 are biological samples of C. kaliana (YKH004 and YKH020) while lanes 3 and 4 are technical replicates of YKH004 and YKH020 respectively; lane 5 is a biological sample of C. stenochila (YKH031) while lanes 6 to 8 are technical replicates of YKH031; lane 9 is a biological sample of C. tiomanensis (FRI75329) while lanes 10 to 12 are technical replicates of FRI75329. Lane M represents the 1.0 kb DNA ladder (Promega, USA). Fragments indicated by arrows were the specific bands, which were selected and subsequently sequenced for SCAR marker primer pair design.

Based on the RAPD fingerprinting results of OPU 08 and OPU 12, very few species-specific bands were observed. However, in selecting species-specific fragments for cloning and sequencing, other than focusing on bright and clear monomorphic band, fragment size was also taken into consideration. The ideal fragment size usually should range from 500 bp to 1.5 kbp, as too large a fragment faced difficulty in the cloning process; while too small a fragment provided less sequence for designing the SCAR marker primer pair. Therefore, a fragment of between 1 kbp to 1.5 kbp amplified by the OPU 08 primer was selected for C. stenochila, while another of approximately 750 bp was selected for C. tiomanensis. A fragment of about 500 bp amplified by primer OPU 12 was chosen for C. kaliana ( Figure 3).

Figure 3. RAPD fingerprints amplified from DNA samples using primers OPU 12 on 1.2% agarose gel.

Figure 3.

Lanes 1 and 2 are biological samples while lanes 3 and 4 are technical replicates of C. kaliana; lane 5 is a biological sample while lanes 6 to 8 are technical replicates of C. stenochila; lane 9 is a biological sample while lanes 10 to 12 are technical replicates of C. tiomanensis. Lane M represents the 1.0 kb DNA ladder (Promega, USA). Fragments indicated by arrows were the specific bands selected and sequenced for SCAR marker primer pair design.

Sequencing of the selected fragments yielded a sequence of 517 bp for C. kaliana, 1207 bp for C. stenochila and 742 bp for C. tiomanensis respectively. Homology searches using BLASTN showed that the fragments did not have similarity with any known nucleotide sequences in the NCBI database. The SCAR primer pairs of 20 to 24 bases each were designed with high stringency to ensure the specificity for each endemic Coelogyne species using these primer pair sequences. Details of the three designed primer pairs are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Species-specific SCAR primer pairs derived from RAPD amplified nucleotide sequences for C. kaliana, C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis.

Species Locality Section Voucher Gene
bank
accession
number
Collector
name
Date of
collection
SCAR
primer
name
Sequence (5’-3’) Annealing
tempeature (°C)
Expected
size(bp)
C.kaliana Genting
Highlands,
Malaysia
Tomentosae YKH 004 MK398165 Yoh Kok Hon
& Rusea Go
(UPM)
10 Jan.
2020
CKL_f

CKL_r
AGTGGAAAATCCGTTCAGTCTC

TCAAAACCTCAGTCCCTCTTC
51.7 297
C.kaliana Cameron
Highlands,
Malaysia
Tomentosae YKH 020 MK398164 Yoh Kok Hon
& Rusea Go
(UPM)
14 Feb.
2020
CKL_f

CKL_r
AGTGGAAAATCCGTTCAGTCTC

TCAAAACCTCAGTCCCTCTTC
51.7 297
C. stenochila Gunung
Tahan,
Malaysia
Longifoliae YKH 031 MK398181 Yoh Kok Hon
& Rusea Go
(UPM)
3 Sept.
2013
CST_f

CST_r
ACTATGTTGGTTAGGCGGTG

CTTTTCTGAGAGAGGGGTGT
51.6 874
C. tiomanensis Gunung
Kajang,
Malaysia
Speciosae FRI 75329 MK398182 Ong Poh
Tech (FRIM)
8 Aug.
2013
CTI_f

CTI_r
AGGAGGAAATCACGAGCATAACA

TGCGTTGAAAATAGCAGGAGCG
53.2 591

The efficacy and specificity of the designed SCAR primers were screened for using DNA samples of the three endemic Coelogyne species. SCAR primer pair CKL_f and CKL_r amplified a single, clear, distinct and easily identifiable band of 271 bp only in DNA samples of C. kaliana, while no amplification was observed for C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis ( Figure 4). Hence, the SCAR primer pair CKL_f and CKL_r is a species-specific marker for C. kaliana.

Figure 4. PCR amplification of genomic DNA from C. kaliana (lanes 1 to 4), C. stenochila (lanes 5 to 7) and C. tiomanensis (lanes 8 to 11) using the designed SCAR primer pair (CKL_f / CKL_r).

Figure 4.

Lane M represents the 1.0 kb DNA ladder (Promega, USA).

The SCAR primer pair CST_f and CST_r, designed based on the specific fragment selected from the RAPD profile of C. stenochila, was not species amplification specific as anticipated. However, this SCAR marker still allowed the differentiation of the three endemic Coelogyne species by amplifying a single and bright band of 854 bp in C. stenochila but two bands of different sizes (858bp and 372 bp) in C. tiomanensis, and no DNA amplification in C. kaliana ( Figure 5).

Figure 5. PCR amplification of genomic DNA from C. kaliana (lanes 1 to 4), C. stenochila (lanes 5 to 7) and C. tiomanensis (lanes 8 to 11) using the designed SCAR primer pair (CST_f / CST_r).

Figure 5.

Lane M represents the 1.0 kb DNA ladder (Promega, USA).

The SCAR primer pair CTI_f and CTI_r, designed from the species-specific RAPD fragment for C. tiomanensis, was also not species amplification specific to C. tiomanensis. Nonetheless, it could still be used to differentiate C. kaliana from the other two endemic species, C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis. This SCAR marker amplified a single band of about 500 bp in both C. stenochila and C. tiomanensis but no DNA amplification in C. kaliana ( Figure 6).

Figure 6. PCR amplification of genomic DNA from C. kaliana (lanes 1 to 4), C. stenochila (lanes 5 to 7) and C. tiomanensis (lanes 8 to 11) using the designed SCAR primer pair (CTI_f / CTI_r).

Figure 6.

Lane M represents the 1.0 kb DNA ladder (Promega, USA).

Discussion

Based on the results of the present study, selected bands amplified by universal RAPD primers were successfully converted into specific SCAR markers. These SCAR markers were able to be used for the rapid identification and authentication of three Peninsular Malaysian endemic Coelogyne species, Coelogyne kaliana, Coelogyne stenochila and Coelogyne tiomanensis. Endemic species refers to species that are found exclusively or confined to a restricted geographical area. Both Coelogyne kaliana and Coelogyne tiomanensis were named after the regions from which they were first found. Coelogyne kaliana was first discovered in Gunung Ulu Kali of Genting Highlands in Peninsular Malaysia and was described by Cribb in 1982. Coelogyne tiomanensis, first described by Henderson in 1930, is found exclusively in Gunung Kajang of Tioman Island. Coelogyne stenochila, first described by Hook in 1890, can only be found in Pahang and Selangor states ( Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992). The endemism and rarity of these Coelogyne species make their conservation of utmost importance. The accurate identification of these three morphologically similar species is one of the first steps towards achieving this goal by effectively preventing their illegal trading.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported RAPD-SCAR study on the three endemic Peninsular Malaysian Coelogyne species. Although not all the SCAR markers developed in this study were species amplification specific, they could still elucidate the identity of the three endemic Coelogyne species efficiently and correctly. This was impossible through the traditional vegetative morphological characteristics method usually used by botanists. The main constraint in this study was that the number of samples available for use was very few due to the rarity and protected status of these endemic species. Thus, a comprehensive screening on more samples of the three species was not feasible in this case. Furthermore, the RAPD-SCAR markers have yet to be tested on other Malaysian Coelogyne to confirm the specificity of the markers. Hence, the RADP-SCAR markers should be tested on the more commonly available Coelogyne species such as C. asperata and C. speciosa in future experiments. Nonetheless, the SCAR markers developed in this study are new to science and are able to differentiate the three species accurately. This study further reinforced the robustness and suitability of SCAR makers as one of the leading methods for species identification of members of cryptic species complexes. This approach could also be used for other flagship species of economic and aesthetic importance. We hope that with the assistance of these markers, an exhaustive conservation plan could be developed in the immediate future to ensure the continued survival of these three rare endemic orchid species. Currently, the biggest threat to their survival is the high demand for them by orchid enthusiasts worldwide. This has resulted in them being obtained and traded illegally often by the sellers claiming that they are selling hybrid plants. It is expected that with the availability of the SCAR markers, which we have developed, this legal loophole can be successfully plugged.

Data availability

Underlying data

Sequences are available from GenBank:

Open Science Framework: Development of species-specific SCAR markers for identification and authentication of three rare Peninsular Malaysian endemic Coelogyne (Orchidaceae) orchids, http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/35XBG ( Go, 2020) (project registered on September 1st, 2020; https://osf.io/dxtb2).

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • Sequences resulted from cloning.

  • Uncropped/unedited images of RAPD fingerprint blots for the 16 decamer universal RAPD primers.

  • Uncropped/unedited images of SCAR primer pair blots.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Acknowledgements

The authors are also grateful to the Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) for providing the Coelogyne tiomanensis plant sample, and Forest Department of Peninsular Malaysia for giving us permission to access the study areas where the other samples were collected. Permit numbers are as follows: (a). National Park, Pulau Tioman - JPHL&TN(IP):80-4/2 Jld 17(11) dated 22 October 2013; (b) National Park, Gunung Tahan - JPHL&TN(IP):80-4/2 Jld 16 dated 3 June 2013.

Funding Statement

This study was financially supported by grants from Universiti Putra Malaysia through the Research University Grant Scheme (RUGS 05-02-12-2175RU) Vot. No. 9374500 and Putra Grant IPB 2013 (GP/IPB/2013/9413603), Vot. No. 9413603.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  1. Benner MS, Braunstein MD, Weisberg MU: Detection of DNA polymorphisms within the genus Cattleya (Orchidaceae). Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1995;13(2):147–155. 10.1007/BF02668786 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butzin F: Coelogyne Lindl.In F. G. Brieger, R. Maatsch, & K. Senghas (Eds.): Die OrchideenBerlin: Verlag Paul Parey.1992;919–940. [Google Scholar]
  3. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin. 1987;19:11–15. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  4. Go R: Development of species-specific SCAR markers for identification and authentication of three rare Peninsular Malaysian endemic Coelogyne (Orchidaceae) orchids. 2020. 10.17605/OSF.IO/35XBG [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goh MW, Kumar PP, Lim SH, et al. : Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of the moth orchids, Phalaenopsis (Epidendroideae: Orchidaceae). Euphytica. 2005;141(1–2): 11–22. 10.1007/s10681-005-4814-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gravendeel B, Chase MW, de Vogel EF, et al. : Molecular phylogeny of Coelogyne (Epidendroideae; Orchidaceae) based on plastid RFLPS, matK, and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences: evidence for polyphyly. Am J Bot. 2001;88(10):1915–1927. 10.2307/3558367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grünanger P, Caporali E, Marziani G, et al. : Molecular (RAPD) analysis on Italian taxa of the Ophrys bertolonii aggregate ( Orchidaceae). Plant Sys Evol. 1998;212(3–4): 177–184. 10.1007/BF01089738 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar NS, Gurusubramanian G: Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and its applications. Sci Vis. 2011;11(3): 116–124. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  9. Lim S, Chye-peng Teng P, Lee Y, et al. : RAPD Analysis of Some Species in the Genus Vanda (Orchidaceae). Ann Bot. 1999;83(2):193–196. 10.1006/anbo.1998.0801 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Niknejad A, Kadir M, Kadzimin S, et al. : Molecular characterization and phylogenetic relationships among and within species of Phalaenopsis (Epidendroideae: Orchidaceae) based on RAPD analysis. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(20): 5225–5240. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  11. Obara-Okeyo P, Kako S: Genetic diversity and identification of cymbidium cultivars as measured by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Euphytica. 1998;99(2): 95–101. 10.1023/A:1018374226074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ong PT: Orchid Gems on Tioman.Conservation Malaysia Bulletin No.2013;13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ong PT, O’ Bryne P, Saw LG, et al. : Checklist of Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia.Research Pamphlet No. 136,2017. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  14. Parab GV, Krishnan S: Assessment of genetic variation among populations of Rhynchostylis retusa, an epiphytic orchid from Goa, India using ISSR and RAPD markers. Indian J Biotechnol. 2008;7:313–319. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  15. Paran I, Michelmore RW: Development of reliable PCR-based markers linked to downy mildew resistance genes in lettuce. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;85(8): 985–993. 10.1007/BF00215038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.In S. Krawetz & S. Misener (Eds.): Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular BiologyTotowa, N. J.: Humana Press.2000;365–386. Reference Source [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Seidenfaden G, Wood JJ: The Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. Fredensborg: Olsen and Olsen. 1992;13(3):256–256. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  18. Semsang N, Chundet R, Phanchisri B: Development of a SCAR Marker for Discrimination of a Thai Jasmine Rice ( Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105) Mutant, BKOS6, and Associated with Purple Color Trait in Thai Jasmine Rice-Related Varieties. Am J Plant Sci. 2013;4(9): 1774–1783. 10.4236/ajps.2013.49218 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Srivastava RK, Mishra SK, Singh AK, et al. : Development of a coupling-phase SCAR marker linked to the powdery mildew resistance gene ‘ er1’ in pea ( Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica. 2012;186(3): 855–866. 10.1007/s10681-012-0650-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun YW, Liao YJ, Hung YS, et al. : Development of ITS sequence based SCAR markers for discrimination of Paphiopedilum armeniacum, Paphiopedilum micranthum, Paphiopedilum delenatii and their hybrids. Sci Hortic. 2011;127(3): 405–410. 10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2010.10.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, et al. : DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(22): 6531–6535. 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang W, Wei S, Yin L, et al. : RAPD Marker Conversion into a SCAR Marker for Rapid Identification of Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.]. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 2013;41(1): 306 10.15835/nbha4119001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2021 Jan 6. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.31486.r76641

Reviewer response for version 2

Jean Wan Hong Yong 1

The revised paper has addressed all the suggestions and clarifications to improve the manuscript. Thus, it is  suitable for indexing in the Journal

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Orchid biology, Horticulture

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2020 Nov 30. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.28880.r71757

Reviewer response for version 1

Jean Wan Hong Yong 1

This is an interesting, and timely paper pertaining to the molecular identification of three endemic Coelogyne (Orchidaceae) orchids in Malaysia. When these orchids are not flowering (vegetative stage), it is nearly impossible to identify them taxonomically.

Sequence Characterized Amplified Region (SCAR) markers, an improvement from RAPD, was used to discriminate successfully the three closely related Coelogyne species in Peninsular Malaysia.

The literature review carried out by the authors was adequate, appropriate, and organized in a logical fashion. Only minor adjustment is needed (see below).

The paper was well written and the experiments were conducted carefully. The sample size, research approaches (standard molecular techniques, following manufacturer’s protocols) and profile analyses, were appropriate.

Scientific suggestion

My only technical critique is the lack of “outlier” in the analyses. The type species is Coelogyne cristata (may not be available to the authors). Perhaps, the authors could consider using a commonly available Malaysian Coelogyne (e.g. C. asperata) as an ‘“outlier” in future experiments as a form of control. Hence, the authors could discuss/explain the lack of a “outlier” in their experiments.

Figure improvement

A new figure 2 or an expanded Fig 1 with vegetative features (featuring leaf and pseudobulb) of the three Coelogyne species should be included, in addition to the (beautiful) flowers. See Plate 12 (four Coelogyne species featured, especially C. viscosa), page 732, The Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore as a photographic guide 1.

Text corrections

"Seidenfaden and Wood, (1992)" 1, the authoritative reference for orchids of Malaysia should feature prominently in the Introduction.

There are 26 species of Coelogyne in Peninsular Malaysia based on the latest Checklist of Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia 2 (see also Seidenfaden and Wood, 1992) 1.

Recommendation

This paper should be indexed with some minor revision.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Orchid biology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

References

  • 1. : The Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore.1992;
  • 2. : Checklist of Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia.2017;
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 13. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.28880.r71987

Reviewer response for version 1

Mohd Norfaizal Ghazali 1

This manuscript discussed the information and identification of Coelogyne kaliana, Coelogyne stenochila and Coelogyne tiomanensis (Orchidaceae) which are considered as three unique rare orchid species. Although the SCAR markers used in this study were not considered as species amplification specific, the information is quite useful in discriminating three Coelogyne species effectively. This paper is recommended for your intended journal, and the authors are required to amend the following as suggested below:

My recommendations:

  • Abstract section 

Insert Orchidaceae after C. tiomanensis (para 2)

Keywords: Coelogyne stenochila, C. tiomanensis, C. kaliniana – italic 

  • Methodology

Insert the plant materials collection and details in a Table

The table should consist of these information:

1. Date of collection

2. Scientific name

3. Localities

4. Collector’s name

5.Voucher number

  • Discussion section

 Italic all the scientific name in the section:

‘Data Availability’

Underlying data

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Plant Systematic, Plant Anatomy and Micromorphology, Palynology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Sequences are available from GenBank:

    Open Science Framework: Development of species-specific SCAR markers for identification and authentication of three rare Peninsular Malaysian endemic Coelogyne (Orchidaceae) orchids, http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/35XBG ( Go, 2020) (project registered on September 1st, 2020; https://osf.io/dxtb2).

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • Sequences resulted from cloning.

    • Uncropped/unedited images of RAPD fingerprint blots for the 16 decamer universal RAPD primers.

    • Uncropped/unedited images of SCAR primer pair blots.

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES