Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0243980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243980

Intellectual disability-associated gain-of-function mutations in CERT1 that encodes the ceramide transport protein CERT

Hiroaki Murakami 1,#, Norito Tamura 2,#, Yumi Enomoto 3, Kentaro Shimasaki 2, Kenji Kurosawa 1,*, Kentaro Hanada 2,*
Editor: Ajay Srivastava4
PMCID: PMC7751862  PMID: 33347465

Abstract

Intellectual disability (ID) is a developmental disorder that includes both intellectual and adaptive functioning deficits in conceptual, social, and practical domains. Although evidence-based interventions for patients have long been desired, their progress has been hindered due to various determinants. One of these determinants is the complexity of the origins of ID. The ceramide transport protein (CERT) encoded by CERT1 mediates inter-organelle trafficking of ceramide for the synthesis of intracellular sphingomyelin. Utilizing whole exome sequencing analysis, we identified a novel CERT variant, which substitutes a serine at position 135 (S135) for a proline in a patient with severe ID. Biochemical analysis showed that S135 is essential for hyperphosphorylation of a serine-repeat motif of CERT, which is required for down-regulation of CERT activity. Amino acid replacements of S135 abnormally activated CERT and induced an intracellular punctate distribution pattern of this protein. These results identified specific ID-associated CERT1 mutations that induced gain-of-function effects on CERT activity. These findings provide a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1.

Introduction

ID is a developmental disorder that includes both intellectual and adaptive functioning deficits in conceptual, social, and practical domains [1]. ID has an overall general population prevalence of ~1%, which varies by age [1]. Although evidence-based interventions for patients have long been desired, their progress has been hindered due to various determinants [2, 3]. One of these determinants is the complexity of the origins of IDs, which include: inborn genomic mutations, malconditions (e.g., hypoxia) in the fetal period, detrimental stresses (e.g., physical and/or mental abuse) in the infant period, an inferior social environment (e.g., unavailability of education) in childhood, and other factors.

Recent advances in human medical genomics have facilitated the identification of causative mutations of various genetic diseases, which may provide rationales for personally tailored interventions for patients with specific mutations. Whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis has been applied to ID studies, and has identified various de novo mutations that are strongly associated with the induction of IDs [49]. Recently, several independent studies found that de novo mutations in CERT1 can induce IDs [47]. The lipid ceramide is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the ceramide transport protein CERT encoded by CERT1 transports ceramide from the ER to the trans-Golgi regions. Once localized to the trans-Golgi regions, ceramide is metabolized to sphingomyelin (SM), which is one of the major phospholipid types in mammalian cells [10, 11]. Previous studies demonstrated that a serine-repeat motif (SRM) of CERT undergoes multiple phosphorylations, which down-regulate CERT activity [12]. Intriguingly, various examples of ID-related de novo mutations in CERT1 were mapped to the region encoding the SRM [4, 5, 7]. These mutations are expected to inhibit SRM hyperphosphorylation, thereby disrupting the post-translational down-regulation of CERT. However, it has not been shown whether these mutations affect the phosphorylation of the CERT SRM and render the mutated CERT abnormally active.

In this study, we identified a novel de novo missense mutation, which substitutes a serine at position 135 for a proline (S135P), in CERT1 (NM_0031361.3:c.403T>C:p.[Ser135Pro]) by trio WES analysis of a patient with a severe ID and systemic symptoms. Moreover, we showed that this novel mutation and other previously reported mutations inhibited the hyperphosphorylation of the CERT SRM, which resulted in abnormally activated CERT.

Materials and methods

Study subjects and ethics statement

This study was approved by the Review Board and Ethics Committee of the Kanagawa Children’s Medical Center (Approval number: 118–17). Written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) was obtained from the patient’s parents, which included consent for the pictures appearing in the manuscript. The biochemical and cell biological analyses of LCLs were also approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (Approval number: 1030).

Mutation screening and assessment

Genomic DNA was purified from the peripheral blood of the patient and her parents utilizing a QIAcube (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Initially, we performed a single WES analysis of the patient. Purified DNA was enriched using a SureSelectXT Human All Exon Enrichment kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and sequenced on a HiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Sequence data alignment, variant calling, and variant annotation were performed as described previously [13]. Additionally, we conducted WES analysis of the parent’s genomic DNA, which was sequenced using a NovaSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). In order to evaluate the variants identified in the patient, we used the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) (http://exac.broadinstitute.org.), 1000 Genomes Project (https://www.internationalgenome.org/), and jMorp (https://jmorp.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/202001/variants) as the control healthy populations. All the detected variants were classified according to the 2015 ACMG guidelines [14]. The prediction of pathogenicity was performed using the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) (https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/), Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) (http://sift.jcvi.org/), and Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (PolyPhen-2) tools (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/). The current Human Genome Variation Society standards were employed for the mutation nomenclature, which was confirmed with Mutalyzer software (http://mutalyzer.nl/).

Establishment of immortalized B-cell lines

Immortalized B-cell lines were established by Epstein-Barr virus transformation of fresh peripheral blood lymphocytes of the patient and her parents as described previously [15].

Cell culture

Immortalized B-cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and were grown in a 5% CO2 incubator. Pseudodiploid HCT116 cells were obtained from the RIKEN cell bank [16], These cells were cultured in low glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; WAKO, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% FBS and were grown in a 5% CO2 incubator. For lysenin treatment, cells were incubated in serum-free DMEM containing 250 ng/ml of lysenin for 1 h.

Retroviral preparation and establishment of stable cell lines

Stable cell lines were generated using a previously described method, with modifications [17]. Briefly, Plat-E cells were transiently transfected with pLP-VSV-G (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and retroviral vectors using the FuGENE6 transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). After 48 h, the culture medium containing retrovirus particles was collected and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter unit (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Next, the HCT116 cells were incubated with the retrovirus particles and 8 μg/ml of polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The uninfected cells were removed by treatment with 2 μg/ml blasticidin S (Kaken Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan).

Plasmids, antibodies, and reagents

cDNAs encoding the full-length human CERT (NP_112729) and its variants were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subcloned into the pMXs-IB [18] or pCX4 [19] backbone vectors together with the human influenza HA tag or the mVenus tag. The plasmid pSpCas9 (BB)-2A-GFP (pX458) (plasmid # 48138; Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used for the establishment of the KO cell line. For Western blotting analysis, the following primary antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-CERT (ab72536; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-HA conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP; clone 3F10; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) as well as mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and the following secondary antibodies were used: anti-mouse (NA934; Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) and anti-rabbit (172–1011; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) HRP-conjugated immunoglobulin G (IgG). For immunofluorescence, the following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal anti-GM130 (610822; BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) as well as rabbit polyclonal anti-VAP-A (HPA009174; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and the following secondary antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (A11032; Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A32795; Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA).

Lysenin tolerance assay

Lysenin purified from the coelomic fluid of the earthworm Eisenia foetida was a gift from Yoshiyuki Sekizawa (Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Tokyo, Japan) [20]. Cells were seeded at an initial density of 1.0 x 104 cells/well in a 24-well plate and were grown under normal conditions overnight. The cells were then incubated in serum-free DMEM containing 250 ng/ml of lysenin for 1 h. The cell viability was measured with LDH cytotoxicity assay kit (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In our assay, the cell viability (“survival ratio after lysenin-treatment”) was defined as the following formula: 1-(A1-A2)/(A3-A2). Here, A1, A2, and A3 represent LDH activity (measured by absorbance) from lysenin-treated cells, un-treated control cells, and detergent-treated cells, respectively. The LDH activity from culture medium that was not used to grow cells was measured and subtracted as a background control. The luminescence was measured with an iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Immunofluorescence

Cells grown on coverslips (Matsunami Glass, Osaka, Japan) were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Mildform 10N; WAKO, Osaka, Japan) for 15 min at room temperature. The fixed cells were then permeabilized with 0.1% TritonX-100 in PBS for 5 min, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS, and incubated with specific primary antibodies for 1 h. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with either Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies for 1 h. The cells were viewed using a confocal laser microscope (LSM700; Carl Zeiss, Jena, TH, Germany) equipped with a 100 × oil immersion objective lens (1.46 NA; Carl Zeiss, Jena, TH, Germany), and the view was captured with the ZEN software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, TH, Germany). Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for the final presentation of the images.

λPPase treatment

Cells were lysed with the lysis buffer lacking phosphatase inhibitor cocktails, and the protein concentration of each lysate was determined with the BCA method. Next, the lysates (50 μl) were incubated with 400 units of λPPase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) at 30°C for 15 min.

Establishment of CERT1 KO cell lines

The CRISPR guide RNA (gRNA) sequence designed to target the human CERT1 gene was cloned into the pX458 vector. The target sequence is 5’-GCTCTGATTATCCGACATGG-3’. HCT116 cells were transfected with the pX458 vector harboring the above gRNA with the ViaFect Transfection Reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). After 48 h, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive cells were isolated using a cell sorter (BD FACSMelody; BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) and single clones were obtained. The cell clones containing the desired mutations in both CERT1 alleles were identified by genomic DNA sequencing (S3A Fig), utilizing the genomic PCR primers 5’-AAATTGGCATCGAGGGGGCTAAGTTCGGG-3’, and 5’-CTCATCCCTAGTCGCTGCAGCAACAC-3’.

Western blotting

Cells were lysed with a lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails 2 and 3 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)] and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were collected, and the protein concentrations were quantitated with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. The lysates were then solubilized with immunoblot sample buffer [46.7 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 5% glycerol, 1.67% SDS, 1.55% dithiothreitol, and 0.003% bromophenol blue]. Next, the samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to an Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and blotted with primary and secondary antibodies. Each protein signal was detected with the Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The signal intensities were captured with the LuminoGraph image analyzer (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) and the images were processed using Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA).

Sphingolipid labeling with radioactive serine and thin layer chromatography (TLC)

The metabolic labeling of sphingolipids with radioactive serine was performed as described previously [21]. Briefly, LCLs or HCT116 cells (5.0 x 105–1.0 x 106 cells) were cultured in a 12- or 6-well plate, respectively. After overnight incubation under normal conditions, LCLs or HCT116 cells were incubated with 1% Neutridoma-SP (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and 18.5 kBq of L-[U-14C]serine (Moravek Biochemicals, Brea, CA, USA) for 16 h in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS or in serum-free low glucose DMEM, respectively. After the labelled cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), they were lysed with a 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution. The lipids were extracted from the lysate and separated by TLC with the solvent methyl acetate/n-propanol/chloroform/methanol/0.25% KCl (50/50/50/20/18, vol/vol) as described previously [22]. The radioactive lipids on TLC plates (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) were detected using an image analyzer (Typhoon FLA 7000; GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA). The intensities of the radioactive lipid bands visualized on the TLC plates were determined by densitometric scanning using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). The intensity levels of SM were normalized to phosphatidylserine in order to compare the relative levels of labelled SM among different cell lines.

Statistics

For data analysis of biochemical assays, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s or Dunnett’s test was conducted. Descriptive statistics are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from technical replicates. Results were considered significant at the 95% significance level (p < 0.05). The statistical analysis was performed using R software (R Core Team).

Results

Phenotypic details of a proband

The proband was a 23-year-old girl and the second child of healthy nonconsanguineous parents. She was born after a full-term delivery with normal birth parameters after an uneventful pregnancy (Fig 1A). Her developmental milestones were severely delayed. She attained head control at the age of 6 months. She could not roll over but could sit with support at the age of 4 years. At 5 years of age, she developed epilepsy triggered by an influenza virus infection and began taking an anti-epilepsy drug. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 5 years of age showed delayed myelination of the cerebrum and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. Her intelligence quotient was less than 35 at 6 years of age and she could not stand alone nor speak any meaningful words. The progression of her leukodystrophy, especially in the frontal lobe, was confirmed by MRI at 23 years of age (Fig 1B and 1C). On physical examination, she exhibited several systemic complications and distinctive facial features (Fig 1A and 1D) (for additional clinical information, see S1 Table).

Fig 1. Clinical features of a patient with severe ID.

Fig 1

(A) Perinatal information and systemic symptoms of the patient. SD, standard deviation. (B) Brain MRI (T2-weighted imaging) of the patient at 23 years of age (axial imaging). The MRI revealed general cerebral atrophy, especially in the frontal lobe, and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. (C) Coronal MRI imaging. (D) Patient photograph showing the coarse face, thick eyebrows, hypotelorism, long palpebral fissures, midface hypoplasia, bulbous nose, wide ala nasi, short philtrum, thin upper lip, and hypertrichosis.

Mutation screening and assessment

At 20 years of age, we conducted trio WES analysis of the patient and her parents and identified a novel heterozygous missense variant in CERT1 (NM_001130105.1:c.787T>C:p.[Ser263Pro]) (Fig 2A and 2B). Trio Sanger sequencing confirmed that this was a de novo variant (Fig 2C) that was absent in the control healthy population found in the genome aggregation database (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) and the Japanese multi omics reference panel (jMorp; https://jmorp.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/202001/variants). In silico pathogenicity prediction tools indicated strong pathogenicity of this variant (Table 1). According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [14], this variant was pathogenic. The CERT1 probability score that predicts the presence of autosomal dominant changes was high (pAD = 0.849) [23], while the CERT1 probability score for the loss-of-function intolerant was not high (pLI = 0.67, observed/expected metric = 0.21) (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/gene/ENSG00000113163?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). These data indicated that CERT1 likely acquires pathogenicity by dominant active or negative mechanisms and is likely not a haploinsufficiency gene. This is consistent with the fact that all the previously reported CERT1 variants that cause ID or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were missense variants, and not truncation variants (Fig 2D and Table 1) [47, 9, 24, 25].

Fig 2. An ID-associated de novo CERT1 mutation.

Fig 2

(A) WES sequencing quality. (B) Filtering pipeline of variants identified by trio WES. A total of 1864 variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 0.01 were found in the patient. After excluding low-quality variants and variants found in the control healthy population, 16, 5, and 21 variants were identified as de novo heterozygous, homozygous, and compound heterozygous, respectively. (C) Trio Sanger sequence of the CERT1 variant (NM_0031361.3:c.403T>C:p.[Ser135Pro], Chr5[GRCh37]:g.74722249A>G) identified in our patient. (D) Variant distribution of the CERT protein structure (NP_112729.1), which includes the PH domain, SRM, FFAT motif, and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein-related lipid transfer (START) domain.

Table 1. Pathogenicity assessment of CERT1 variants identified in the present and previous studies.

References Variants Isoform 3 = > 1 Inheritance Frequency in control cohort CADD SIFT PolyPhen2 Criteria in ACMG 2015
Takata et al. 2018 c.561T>G:p.(Asp187Glu) p.(Asp59Glu) de novo Nothing 12.31 Tolerated 0.03
Benign
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM2
Kosmicki et al. 2017 c.776G>A:p.(Gly259Asp) p.(Gly131Asp) de novo Nothing 28.5 Damaging 1.00
Probably damaging
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM2, PP3
Fitzgerald et al. 2015 c.779C>T:p.(Ser260Leu) p.(Ser132Leu) de novo Nothing 32.0 Damaging 0.998
Probably damaging
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM1, PM2, PP3
This study c.787T>C:p.(Ser263Pro) p.(Ser135Pro) de novo Nothing 28.0 Damaging 0.999
Probably damaging
Pathogenic
PS2, PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3
Lelieveld et al. 2017 c.788C>G:p.(Ser263Cys) p.(Ser135Cys) de novo Nothing 28.2 Damaging 0.999
Probably damaging
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM1, PM2, PP3
de Ligt et al. 2012 c.797C>G:p.(Ser266Cys) p.(Ser138Cys) de novo Nothing 28.3 Damaging 1.000
Probably damaging
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM1, PM2, PP3
Wang et al. 2016 c.880A>G:p.(Thr294Ala) p.(Thr166Ala) de novo Nothing 22.8 Damaging 0.287
Benign
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM2
Wang et al. 2016 c.928T>C:p.(Phe310Leu) p.(Phe182Leu) de novo Nothing 23.4 Damaging 0.01
Benign
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM2
Hamdan et al. 2014 c.1111G>A:p.(Gly371Arg) p.(Gly243Arg) de novo Nothing 32.0 Damaging 1.000
Probably damaging
Likely pathogenic
PS2, PM2, PP3

CADD; Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion, SIFT; Sorting intolerance from tolerance, PolyPhen-2; Polymorphism phenotyping version 2; ACMG; American college of medical genetics and genomics; PS, strong pathogenicity; PM, moderate pathogenicity; PP, supporting pathogenic

Predominant form of CERT1 transcripts

CERT1 contains 20 exons and produces at least three alternatively spliced variants, which we have named isoforms 1–3 (S1 Fig). The isoform 3 transcript is the longest CERT1 mRNA isoform that encodes a putative very long variant of CERT (CERT/VL). However, RNA sequencing data from human tissues found in the Genotype-Tissue Expression project (GTEx; https://gtexportal.org/home/) indicated that the expression of exon 1 from CERT1 (that is present in isoform 3) is absent or very rare in all human tissues except for the testis (S2 Fig). In contrast, the CERT1 isoform 1 transcript consisting of exons 2–11 and 13–19 was the most abundant type. Moreover, the isoform 2 transcript consisting of exons 2–19, which encodes a long variant of CERT (CERT/L) is expressed but at lower levels than isoform 1 in most tissue types (S2 Fig). These expression levels are consistent with a previous mRNA hybridization study [26]. Hereafter, we refer to isoform 1 as the predominant CERT1-derived transcript, which is translated into the 598 amino-acid protein CERT (NP_112729.1) (S1 Fig). Our ID patient contained a mutation in isoform 1, which is translated into a variant form of CERT that substituted a serine at position 135 for a proline (S135P) in the SRM.

Characterization of CERT in trio-derived permanent cell lines

Our previous study demonstrated that phosphorylation of multiple S/T residues of the CERT SRM down-regulated the activity of CERT. Moreover, a S132A substitution in CERT renders the protein constitutively active [12]. Recent human WES studies have revealed various examples of missense mutations (e.g., S132L, S135C and S138C) that generated amino acid replacements in the SRM of CERT and induced inherent ID disorders [4, 5, 7]. However, it has not been determined whether the ID-associated missense mutations in CERT1 affected the phosphorylation status of the CERT SRM. Thus, we examined this phenomenon using trio-derived B-cell lines that were established by Epstein-Barr virus infection.

A maximum of 10 phosphorylations occur on the SRM of CERT and the SRM-hyperphosphorylated form of CERT can be separated from its dephosphorylated and/or hypophosphorylated (de/hypophosphorylated) forms in SDS-PAGE [12]. The hyperphosphorylated form of CERT is far more abundant than the de/hypophosphorylated forms in CHO cells [10], HeLa cells [12], and human colon cancer-derived HCT116 cells (S3B Fig). Moreover, Western blotting of lymphoblastoid cell (LCL) extracts derived from our ID patient and her parents showed that the hyperphosphorylated form of CERT was more abundant than the de/hypophosphorylated forms in both the mother and father, while the de/hypophosphorylated forms were more abundant than the hyperphosphorylated form in the patient (Fig 3A). These results are in line with the finding that the patient’s mutation is heterozygous and suggest that the CERT S135P mutant is incapable of becoming hyper-phosphorylated. A faint band comprising the hyperphosphorylated form of CERT/L was also observed in all trio LCLs (Fig 3A). The de/hypophosphorylated forms of CERT/L were not clearly observed, presumably due to their size overlap with the hyperphosphorylated form of CERT (Fig 3A). When cell lysates were treated with the lambda protein phosphatase (λPPase), the Western blotting patterns of the trio were converted into two bands. The upper and lower bands correspond to the de-phosphorylated forms of CERT/L and CERT, respectively (Fig 3B). The phosphatase treatment experiment validated the accuracy of the assignments of the various CERT forms in the untreated samples. It should also be noted that no protein derived from the putative CERT1 isoform 3 transcript was detected in LCLs (Fig 3A and 3B) and HCT116 cells (S3B Fig).

Fig 3. The ID-associated de novo mutation in CERT1 affects the phosphorylation status of CERT in LCLs.

Fig 3

(A) The trio-derived LCLs were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. Hyperphosphorylated (hyper-p-) and de/hypophosphorylated (d/hypo-) CERT are shown (left). The de/hypophosphorylated levels of CERT in the trio-derived LCLs were quantified by densitometric scanning of the band intensities (right). The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 3 (**, p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). (B) Trio LCL lysates were incubated with or without λPPase and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. The white and black arrowheads represent completely de/hypophosphorylated CERT and CERT/L, respectively. (C) Trio LCLs were cultured with L-[U-14C]serine for 16 hr. Metabolically labelled lipids separated on a TLC plate were visualized (representative image, left) and labelled SM was quantified (right). PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PS, phosphatidylserine. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 4.

In order to explore whether the ID-associated mutations rendered CERT abnormally active, we conducted metabolic labelling of sphingolipids with radioactive serine. All the types of sphingolipids and several types of glycerophospholipids use serine as their metabolic precursor and CERT activity in living cells can be semi-quantitatively monitored by the level of de novo SM synthesis [10]. Under our experimental conditions, no significant difference was observed in the de novo SM synthesis among the trio LCLs, although the synthesis of SM in patient-derived LCLs was slightly higher than that in the parents (Fig 3C).

Characterization of CERT S135 mutants in the absence of the endogenous wild-type CERT

In order to confirm that the CERT S135P mutant protein is incapable of being hyperphosphorylated, we characterized CERT mutants in the absence of the endogenous wild-type (WT) CERT. For this purpose, we disrupted both alleles of CERT1 in HCT116 cells, and various constructs encoding CERT mutants tagged with influenza hemagglutinin (HA) or monomeric Venus (mVenus) were stably expressed in the HCT116 CERT1 knockout (KO) cells. Like the endogenous CERT in HCT116 cells, the ectopically expressed HA- or mVenus-tagged WT CERT displayed a major hyperphosphorylated form (Fig 4A and S3C Fig). In contrast, all the ectopically expressed HA- or mVenus-tagged CERT S135P, S135C, and S135A mutant constructs only displayed de/hypophosphorylated forms, which indicated that these mutants were not hyperphosphorylated on the SRM.

Fig 4. The CERT S135P mutant enhances de novo SM synthesis in HCT116 cells.

Fig 4

(A) WT (HCT116 WT) and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various HA-CERT constructs were analyzed by Western blotting. (B) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were cultured with L-[U-14C]serine for 16 hr. Metabolically labeled lipids were analyzed by TLC. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 4 (*, p < 0.05). (C) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing the indicated mVenus-CERT constructs were cultured with 250 ng/ml of lysenin for 1 hr. The cell viability was measured with a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 4 (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01). (D) CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing the indicated mVenus-CERT constructs were analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. The data are representative of two independent experiments. Areas enclosed by rectangles are enlarged (insets). Scale bars, 10 μm and 1 μm (inset).

Next, we conducted metabolic labeling of lipids with radioactive serine. Metabolic labelling of SM, but not other sphingolipids (i.e., ceramide and glucosylceramide) nor glycerophospholipids (i.e., phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine), was markedly reduced in CERT1 KO cells, compared with parental HCT116 cells (Fig 4B and S3D Fig). This reduction was restored to the parental control levels when either mVenus-tagged WT CERT or CERT/L was expressed in the CERT1 KO cells (S4 Fig). When the mutant CERT S135A, S135C, or S135P constructs were expressed, the levels of labelled SM were significantly higher than the level observed in the WT CERT rescued cells, despite lower expression levels of these CERT mutants compared to WT CERT levels (S3C Fig). The sensitivity to lysenin, an SM-binding cytolysin, was monitored as another measure of SM synthesis. Cells expressing the CERT mutants exhibited higher lysenin sensitivity (Fig 4C), which indicated that the intracellular CERT S135A, S135C, and S135P mutants exhibited higher activity than the WT CERT.

When mVenus-tagged CERT variants were expressed in HCT116 CERT1 KO cells, the WT CERT was diffused throughout the cytoplasm with a partial enrichment in the peri-nuclear regions, which are adjacent to a 130 kDa cis-Golgi matrix protein (GM130) (Fig 4D). Interestingly, all the CERT S135 variants exhibited a punctate distribution pattern, and part of the puncta co-stained with the vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein (VAP)-A (Fig 4D).

The abnormal phenotypes of CERT S135 mutants require their Golgi- and ER-binding activities

CERT is recruited to the Golgi apparatus via binding of its pleckstrin homology (PH) domain to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns4P) in the trans-Golgi regions [10] while CERT is associated with the ER via binding of its diphenylalanine in an acidic tract (FFAT)-motif to VAP [27]. Replacement of a glycine at position 67 to glutamic acid (G67E) in CERT disrupts the PtdIns4P-binding activity of the PH domain [10]. The punctate distribution of the CERT S135P mutant was abrogated by an additional mutation of either G67E (i.e., G67E/S135P) or deletion of the FFAT-motif (i.e., S135P/ΔFFAT) (Fig 5A and 5B). When the intracellular activity of CERT was assessed by both the lysenin sensitivity assay and de novo SM synthesis, the enhanced activity of CERT conferred by the S135P mutation was partially blocked by the additional mutation of G67E or ΔFFAT (Fig 5C and 5D). Together with our previous studies showing the analogous behavior of other activated CERT mutants (i.e., S132A and S315E) [12, 28] that exhibited punctate distributions, these results suggested that the constitutively activated CERT mutants commonly display a subcellular punctate distribution, depending on their ability to associate with both Golgi-embedded PtdIns4P and ER-embedded VAP-A. Although the entity of the CERT-associated puncta remains unclear, the common intracellular punctate distribution pattern of various activated CERT mutants may be applicable as a molecular diagnostic assay to assess whether CERT is abnormally activated by CERT1 mutations.

Fig 5. The S135 mutations in CERT enhance its de novo SM synthesis activity.

Fig 5

(A) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. (B) CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were fixed and analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. GM130 and VAP-A were immuno-stained with specific antibodies. The data are representative of two independent experiments. The areas enclosed by rectangles are enlarged (insets). Scale bars, 10 μm and 1 μm (inset). (C) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were cultured with 250 ng/ml of lysenin for 1 hr. Next, cell viability was measured with an LDH cytotoxicity assay. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 3 (***, p < 0.001). (D) The lipids in WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were metabolically labelled with L-[U-14C]serine. The labeled lipids were analyzed by TLC and visualized using an image analyzer. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 3 (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001).

Discussion

The novel CERT1 missense mutation in our patient is located in the SRM, which is also the site of other CERT1 mutations previously found in patients with ID (Fig 2D) [4, 5, 7]. Biochemical characterization revealed that amino acid substitutions at S135 in CERT resulted in the loss of SRM hyperphosphorylation, thereby abnormally activating the CERT mutants. Thus, ID patients with activated CERT might be treated with pharmacological inhibitors of CERT activity. To this end, small chemicals that inhibit the inter-membrane ceramide transfer activity of CERT in cultured cells have been developed [2931].

Our patient exhibited multiple congenital anomalies including cerebral leukodystrophy, skeletal abnormalities and distinctive facial features (Fig 1). It is currently infeasible to determine whether these traits are typical in patients with abnormally activated CERT because clinical features of patients with CERT1 mutations have not been reported in detail [47, 9, 24, 25]. One case of a patient with a substitution of a glycine at position 243 for an arginine (G243R) in CERT exhibited unilateral renal aplasia as well as abnormal brain structures, which included dilated ventricles and periventricular leukomalacia [6]. Additional clinical case reports are required to elucidate whether congenital anomalies other than ID are typical features of CERT1 mutation. Considering that CERT mutations have been identified as the cause of ASD outside of SRM [24, 25], future case accumulation may indicate that CERT is the causative gene of neurodevelopmental disorders, including ID, developmental delay, and ASD.

Importantly, the ID-inducing missense mutations in CERT1 described previously have been classified as heterozygous dominant mutations. However, we failed to detect a significant difference in SM synthesis among the trio-derived LCLs by metabolic lipid-labeling experiments and lysenin tolerance assay (Fig 3C and 3D). Although we currently lack a conclusive answer to this discrepancy, there are a few possible explanations: (1) both the metabolic lipid-labeling experiment and lysenin tolerance assay might not be sensitive enough to detect an enhancement in intracellular CERT activity and (2) LCLs might not be a good cell model to monitor changes in the activity of CERT with ID-inducing mutations.

Our patient exhibited delayed cerebrum myelination. Galactosylceramide (GalCer) and its sulfonated metabolite are abundant in the brain and testis, and are essential for the electrophysiological function and stability of the myelin sheath [32, 33]. Since ceramide is a common precursor for SM, glucosylceramide, and GalCer, the enhanced production of SM due to constitutively activated CERT might induce a shortage of the precursor ceramide for GalCer, thereby inhibiting myelination. In order to test this hypothesis, further studies including the generation of a model ID animal with a heterozygous CERT1 mutation is required.

In conclusion, the present study provided a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Three major isoforms of CERT1 transcripts and their protein products.

(A) The structures of CERT1 transcripts (isoforms 1–3) whose exons are indicated by gray boxes (top panel) and their protein products (CERT/L, CERT, and CERT/VL) (bottom panel). CERT has a PH domain, a SRM, a FFAT motif, and a START domain. Isoform 1 (NM_0031361.3) contains 17 exons (2–11 and 13–19) and is translated into CERT (NP_112729.1) (top panel). Isoform 2 (NM_005713.3) contains 18 exons (2–19) and is translated into CERT/L (NP_005704.1) (middle panel). Isoform 3 (NM_001130105) contains 19 exons (1–19) and is translated into CERT/VL (NP_001123577) (bottom panel).

(PDF)

S2 Fig. RNA-sequencing data of CERT1 transcripts from human tissues using the GTEx database.

(A) Exon-level expression data of CERT1 (https://gtexportal.org/home/transcriptPage). The heatmap summarizes the median read counts per base of each exon across all tissues. This indicated that the transcript containing exon1 is barely detected in all tissues except for testis and Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphocytes. In most tissues, RNA-seq short reads from exon12 were detected at lower frequencies than those from exon11 or exon13. (B) Junction expression data of CERT1 (https://gtexportal.org/home/transcriptPage). The heatmap summarizes the median raw read counts of junctions from individual isoforms. This demonstrated that read counts of junction21 connecting exon1 with exon2 were barely detected, which indicated that isoform 3 of CERT1 is not expressed in most human tissues. The read counts of junction10 connecting exon11 with exon13 were detected at higher frequencies than junction9 or junction11, which indicated that the isoform 1 of CERT1 is the predominant transcript in most human tissues.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Establishment of CERT1 KO HCT116 cells.

(A) Diagram of the location of gRNA-targeted sequences of human CERT1. The 5’-untranslated regions (UTRs) and coding regions are shown as white and black rectangles, respectively. The red lines represent the first and second methionines. In the WT allele, the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence is shown in bold. The red highlighted sequence (ATG) indicates the second methionine within exon2. The gRNA-targeted sequence is underlined. A 1 bp insertion that generates a frame-shift mutation is shown in blue in both CERT1 alleles from the CERT1 KO cell line. (B) Cell lysates prepared from WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells were incubated with or without λPPase and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. (C) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were lysed and subjected to Western blotting analysis with the indicated primary antibodies. (D) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing the indicated mVenus-CERT variants were cultured with L-[U-14C]serine for 16 hr. Metabolically labelled lipids were separated by TLC analysis and visualized using an image analyzer. A representative image is shown. PC, putative phosphatidylcholine. Note that serine is directly incorporated into PS by the base exchange reaction with PC, and labelled PS is converted to PE by decarboxylation [34, 35]. Metabolic labeling of PC with L-[U-14C]serine can occur by two different pathways [34, 35]. One pathway occurs via N-methylation of labelled PE, and the other pathway occurs via the conversion of serine to pyruvate, which is then anabolized to fatty acids via acetyl-CoA, followed by the synthesis of PC from the labeled fatty acids.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. CERT/L rescues the de novo SM synthesis defect in CERT1 KO HCT116 cells.

(A) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing either mVenus-CERT or mVenus-CERT/L were lysed and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. (B) The lipids from WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing either mVenus-CERT or mVenus-CERT/L were metabolically labelled with L-[U-14C]serine. The labeled lipids were analyzed by TLC and visualized using an image analyzer. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 3 (***, p < 0.001).

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot.

(PDF)

S1 Table. Clinical information of the patient in the present study.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Ituro Inoue (Division of Human Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan) for WES analysis of the patient. We also thank Drs. Kumagai Keigo, Shota Sakai, and Toshiyuki Yamaji (Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo) for their helpful comments on the biochemical and cell biological parts of this work.

Data Availability

As described under “Data Availability” of the manuscript, the original uncropped and unadjusted images for all blot are presented in S5 Fig. In addition, other unprocessed images and raw data for quantitative results have been posted at a public data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12830852).

Funding Statement

N.T.: Grant No. 19J01972, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/index.html). K.K.: Grant No. 16H06279, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/index.html). K.H.: Grant No. JP17H06417, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (https://www.mext.go.jp/en/index.htm). K.H.: Grant No. JP20gm0910005j0006, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (https://www.amed.go.jp/en/index.html). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schalock RL (2011) International perspectives on intellectual disability. West Sussex, United Kingdom: A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Koslowski N, Klein K, Arnold K, Kosters M, Schutzwohl M, Salize HJ, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for adults with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities and mental health problems: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2016; 209: 469–474. 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Ligt J, Willemsen MH, van Bon BW, Kleefstra T, Yntema HG, Kroes T, et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1921–1929. 10.1056/NEJMoa1206524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study. Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature. 2015; 519: 223–228. 10.1038/nature14135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hamdan FF, Srour M, Capo-Chichi JM, Daoud H, Nassif C, Patry L, et al. De novo mutations in moderate or severe intellectual disability. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10: e1004772 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lelieveld SH, Wiel L, Venselaar H, Pfundt R, Vriend G, Veltman JA, et al. Spatial Clustering of de Novo Missense Mutations Identifies Candidate Neurodevelopmental Disorder-Associated Genes. Am J Hum Genet. 2017; 101: 478–484. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bowling KM, Thompson ML, Amaral MD, Finnila CR, Hiatt SM, Engel KL, et al. Genomic diagnosis for children with intellectual disability and/or developmental delay. Genome Med. 2017; 9: 43 10.1186/s13073-017-0433-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kosmicki JA, Samocha KE, Howrigan DP, Sanders SJ, Slowikowski K, Lek M, et al. Refining the role of de novo protein-truncating variants in neurodevelopmental disorders by using population reference samples. Nat Genet. 2017; 49: 504–510. 10.1038/ng.3789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hanada K, Kumagai K, Yasuda S, Miura Y, Kawano M, Fukasawa M, et al. Molecular machinery for non-vesicular trafficking of ceramide. Nature. 2003; 426: 803–809. 10.1038/nature02188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hanada K. Co-evolution of sphingomyelin and the ceramide transport protein CERT. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1841: 704–719. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumagai K, Kawano M, Shinkai-Ouchi F, Nishijima M, Hanada K. Interorganelle trafficking of ceramide is regulated by phosphorylation-dependent cooperativity between the PH and START domains of CERT. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 17758–17766. 10.1074/jbc.M702291200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Enomoto Y, Tsurusaki Y, Harada N, Aida N, Kurosawa K. Novel AMER1 frameshift mutation in a girl with osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2017; 58: 145–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17: 405–424. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fukushima Y, Ohashi H, Wakui K, Nishida T, Oh-ishi T. A rapid method for starting a culture for the establishment of Epstein-Barr virus-transformed human lymphoblastoid cell lines. Jpn J Hum Genet. 1992; 37: 149–150. 10.1007/BF01899737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roschke AV, Stover K, Tonon G, Schaffer AA, Kirsch IR. Stable karyotypes in epithelial cancer cell lines despite high rates of ongoing structural and numerical chromosomal instability. Neoplasia. 2002; 4: 19–31. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morita S, Kojima T, Kitamura T. Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther. 2000; 7: 1063–1066. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kitamura T, Koshino Y, Shibata F, Oki T, Nakajima H, Nosaka T, et al. Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer and expression cloning: powerful tools in functional genomics. Exp Hematol. 2003; 31: 1007–1014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Akagi T, Sasai K, Hanafusa H. Refractory nature of normal human diploid fibroblasts with respect to oncogene-mediated transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 13567–13572. 10.1073/pnas.1834876100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yamaji A, Sekizawa Y, Emoto K, Sakuraba H, Inoue K, Kobayashi H, et al. Lysenin, a novel sphingomyelin-specific binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 5300–5306. 10.1074/jbc.273.9.5300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yamaji T, Hanada K. Establishment of HeLa cell mutants deficient in sphingolipid-related genes using TALENs. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e88124 10.1371/journal.pone.0088124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hanada K, Hara T, Fukasawa M, Yamaji A, Umeda M, Nishijima M. Mammalian cell mutants resistant to a sphingomyelin-directed cytolysin. Genetic and biochemical evidence for complex formation of the LCB1 protein with the LCB2 protein for serine palmitoyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 33787–33794. 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Quinodoz M, Royer-Bertrand B, Cisarova K, Di Gioia SA, Superti-Furga A, Rivolta C. DOMINO: Using Machine Learning to Predict Genes Associated with Dominant Disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2017; 101: 623–629. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang T, Guo H, Xiong B, Stessman HA, Wu H, Coe BP, et al. De novo genic mutations among a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 13316 10.1038/ncomms13316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Takata A, Miyake N, Tsurusaki Y, Fukai R, Miyatake S, Koshimizu E, et al. Integrative Analyses of De Novo Mutations Provide Deeper Biological Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cell Rep. 2018; 22: 734–747. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Raya A, Revert-Ros F, Martinez-Martinez P, Navarro S, Rosello E, Vieites B, et al. Goodpasture antigen-binding protein, the kinase that phosphorylates the goodpasture antigen, is an alternatively spliced variant implicated in autoimmune pathogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 40392–40399. 10.1074/jbc.M002769200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kawano M, Kumagai K, Nishijima M, Hanada K. Efficient trafficking of ceramide from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus requires a VAMP-associated protein-interacting FFAT motif of CERT. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 30279–30288. 10.1074/jbc.M605032200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumagai K, Kawano-Kawada M, Hanada K. Phosphoregulation of the ceramide transport protein CERT at serine 315 in the interaction with VAMP-associated protein (VAP) for inter-organelle trafficking of ceramide in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289: 10748–10760. 10.1074/jbc.M113.528380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yasuda S, Kitagawa H, Ueno M, Ishitani H, Fukasawa M, Nishijima M, et al. A novel inhibitor of ceramide trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum to the site of sphingomyelin synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 43994–44002. 10.1074/jbc.M104884200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ueno M, Huang YY, Yamano A, Kobayashi S. Revised stereochemistry of ceramide-trafficking inhibitor HPA-12 by X-ray crystallography analysis. Org Lett. 2013; 15: 2869–2871. 10.1021/ol401101u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nakao N, Ueno M, Sakai S, Egawa D, Hanzawa H, Kawasaki S, et al. Natural ligand-nonmimetic inhibitors of the lipid-transfer protein CERT. Commun Chem. 2019; 2: Article 20. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coetzee T, Fujita N, Dupree J, Shi R, Blight A, Suzuki K, et al. Myelination in the absence of galactocerebroside and sulfatide: normal structure with abnormal function and regional instability. Cell. 1996; 86: 209–219. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80093-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bosio A, Binczek E, Stoffel W. Functional breakdown of the lipid bilayer of the myelin membrane in central and peripheral nervous system by disrupted galactocerebroside synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 13280–13285. 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hanada K. Lipid transfer proteins rectify inter-organelle flux and accurately deliver lipids at membrane contact sites. J Lipid Res. 2018; 59: 1341–1366. 10.1194/jlr.R085324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.de Koning TJ, Snell K, Duran M, Berger R, Poll-The BT, Surtees R. L-serine in disease and development. Biochem J. 2003; 371: 653–661. 10.1042/BJ20021785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ajay Srivastava

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

16 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-26020

Intellectual disability-associated gain-of-function mutations in CERT1 that encodes the ceramide transport protein CERT

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hanada,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 31 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ajay Srivastava, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

3.PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4.We note that Figure [1] includes an image of a patient / participant  in the study. 

As per the PLOS ONE policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research) on papers that include identifying, or potentially identifying, information, the individual(s) or parent(s)/guardian(s) must be informed of the terms of the PLOS open-access (CC-BY) license and provide specific permission for publication of these details under the terms of this license. Please download the Consent Form for Publication in a PLOS Journal (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=8ce6/plos-consent-form-english.pdf). The signed consent form should not be submitted with the manuscript, but should be securely filed in the individual's case notes. Please amend the methods section and ethics statement of the manuscript to explicitly state that the patient/participant has provided consent for publication: “The individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details”.

If you are unable to obtain consent from the subject of the photograph, you will need to remove the figure and any other textual identifying information or case descriptions for this individual.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

6. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

<h1> </h1>

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This manuscript has now undergone peer review and as you will see both of the reviewers have expressed enthusiasm about this manuscript. I would request that you incorporate the suggestions made by the reviewers and then resubmit. Thanks.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study characterizes several de novo mutations in CERT that are linked to a broad spectrum neurodevelopmental disorder in children. Here (and conjunction with previous reports) the authors characterize the effect of these SRM point mutations on CERT activity in patient and KO cells. The experiments indicate that S315 mutations cause constitutive dephosphorylation and activation of CERT, consistent with localization to cellular puncta that appear to be contact sites between he Golgi and ER. The effect of mutant expression is to increase SM synthesis in a CERT-null cell but did not affect SM synthesis in immortalized B cells from patient and patents. Overall an interesting and convincing characterization of these novel mutations.

I have no major concerns with the study with respect to design and data interpretation. There are a few typos and awkward sentences here and there but generally clearly written (Line 33 in abstract –basis not bases).

The one point that should be addressed is the author’s focus on the mutations as a cause intellectual disability (ID) when it is clear that the S315P and other S315 mutations are linked to a broad spectrum neurodevelopmental disorder. ID is only one component of this disorder, which the authors clearly slate on line 402 and 403. The title and some passages in the text give the impression that ID is the only or major defect associated with the mutation when this is not the case. I suggest that the title, as well as some instances in the abstract and introduction, be changed to refer to the spectrum of neurological and other defects associated with CERT SRM mutations. It is evident that the CERT mutations cause demyelination and likely other brain malformations. Thus the defect associated with CERT mutations should be referred to as a “neurodevelopmental disorder” (or something similar) that captures the range of symptoms, including but not limited to intellectual disability.

Reviewer #2: Previous work identified various de novo mutations in CERT1 that are strongly associated with the induction of intellectual disability (ID). In the present study, Murakami report the identification of a novel CERT variant with a S135P substitution in a patient with severe ID. Biochemical experiments with patient-derived cell lines and cells that express pathogenic CERT variants in the absence of the wild-type protein indicate that S135P and several previously identified ID-associated mutants give rise to a constitutively activated CERT protein that is unable to undergo hyperphosphorylation and renders cells more sensitive to lysenin, a sphingomyelin-binding toxin.

Overall, this is a compelling, interesting and well conducted study that provides fresh insight into the molecular basis of ID linked to mutations in CERT. The data are of high quality and the manuscript is well written. I only have a few minor comments.

1) The version of the MS that I reviewed lacked figure legends. To avoid delays, I will be happy to have a closer look at those in a next round of review.

2) All ID-inducing missense mutations in CERT1 described so far, including the one reported in this study, have been classified as heterozygous dominant mutations. However, the authors were unable to detect any significant differences in SM biosynthesis between the patient- and parent-derived immortalized B-cell lines by metabolic lipid labeling. On p. 27 (lines 415-419) they anticipate that metabolic lipid labeling might not be sensitive enough to detect an enhanced CERT activity or that the immortalized B-cell lines are not a good cell model to monitor changes in CERT activity. I wonder whether they checked whether these cell lines showed any differences in the lysenin sensitivity assay, as this assay seems more sensitive than metabolic lipid labeling (Fig. 4B and C).

3) On p. 21 the authors state: “Since the CERT phosphorylation status was only partially shifted to the de/hypophosphorylated form of the ID patient, this indicated that the patient’s mutation is heterozygous….”. As the heterozygous nature of the mutation can only be directly inferred from the sequencing data and not from the WB analysis, I would rephrase this sentence to “These results are in line with the finding that the patient’s mutation is heterozygoes and suggest that the CERT S135P mutant is incapable of becoming hyper-phosphorylated”.

4) The authors should rephrase the last sentence of the Abstract. More suitable would be if they write: “These findings provide a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders cause by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1.”

5) p. 20, line 303: “…using trio-derived B-cell lines that was established…” should read “…using trio-derived B-cell lines that were established…”

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Neale Ridgway

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0243980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243980.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


26 Nov 2020

Responses to Reviewers’ comments

Major changes are highlighted in red (in the file of Revised Manuscript with Track Changes).

Dr. Kentaro Shimasaki performed new experiments for the revision of the manuscript. All authors have agreed that he become a co-author in the revised manuscript. (p.1 Line 6)

Reviewer #1

General Comment: This study characterizes several de novo mutations in CERT that are linked to a broad spectrum neurodevelopmental disorder in children. Here (and conjunction with previous reports) the authors characterize the effect of these SRM point mutations on CERT activity in patient and KO cells. The experiments indicate that S315 mutations cause constitutive dephosphorylation and activation of CERT, consistent with localization to cellular puncta that appear to be contact sites between he Golgi and ER. The effect of mutant expression is to increase SM synthesis in a CERT-null cell but did not affect SM synthesis in immortalized B cells from patient and patents. Overall an interesting and convincing characterization of these novel mutations.

Response: Thank you very much for your favorable evaluation to our manuscript, and also for helpful specific comments depicted below.

Comment: I have no major concerns with the study with respect to design and data interpretation. There are a few typos and awkward sentences here and there but generally clearly written (Line 33 in abstract –basis not bases).

The one point that should be addressed is the author’s focus on the mutations as a cause intellectual disability (ID) when it is clear that the S315P and other S315 mutations are linked to a broad spectrum neurodevelopmental disorder. ID is only one component of this disorder, which the authors clearly slate on line 402 and 403. The title and some passages in the text give the impression that ID is the only or major defect associated with the mutation when this is not the case. I suggest that the title, as well as some instances in the abstract and introduction, be changed to refer to the spectrum of neurological and other defects associated with CERT SRM mutations. It is evident that the CERT mutations cause demyelination and likely other brain malformations. Thus the defect associated with CERT mutations should be referred to as a “neurodevelopmental disorder” (or something similar) that captures the range of symptoms, including but not limited to intellectual disability.

Response: According to the comments by you and another reviewer, we rephrased the last sentence of abstract as followed: These findings provide a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1.

Thank you for your important comment that ID is the only or major defect associated with the mutation when this is not the case. The reviewer’s view is right on our patient with the S135P variant. However, for a previously reported patient with S135C variant, clinical or neurological features other than ID are unclear (not described in literature. Therefore, we can’t refer to the common spectrum of neurological and other defects associated with CERT SRM mutations at the present. To present the view pointed by the reviewer, we discussed as followed: “Considering that CERT mutations have been identified as the cause of ASD outside of SRM [24, 25], future case accumulation may indicate that CERT is the causative gene of neurodevelopmental disorders, including ID, developmental delay, and ASD.” (p. 30, Line 472-475)

Other revisions:

According to the editorial rule of PLoS One, we stated “Written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) was obtained from the patient’s parents, which included consent for the pictures appearing in the manuscript.” (p. 5, Line 74-76).

We improved the description of the procedures for “lysenin tolerance assay” as followed: In our assay, the cell viability (“survival ratio after lysenin-treatment”) was defined as the following formula: 1-(A1-A2)/(A3-A2). Here, A1, A2, and A3 represent LDH activity (measured by absorbance) from lysenin-treated cells, un-treated control cells, and detergent-treated cells, respectively (p. 9, Line 155-158). The caption for the y-axis of the panels for lysenin-sensitivity (Fig. 4C and Fig. 5C) was also changed from "Cell viability (relative to lysenin-treated cells)” to “Cell viability (survival ratio after lysenin-treatment)”.

Reviewer #2:

General comment: Previous work identified various de novo mutations in CERT1 that are strongly associated with the induction of intellectual disability (ID). In the present study, Murakami report the identification of a novel CERT variant with a S135P substitution in a patient with severe ID. Biochemical experiments with patient-derived cell lines and cells that express pathogenic CERT variants in the absence of the wild-type protein indicate that S135P and several previously identified ID-associated mutants give rise to a constitutively activated CERT protein that is unable to undergo hyperphosphorylation and renders cells more sensitive to lysenin, a sphingomyelin-binding toxin.

Overall, this is a compelling, interesting and well conducted study that provides fresh insight into the molecular basis of ID linked to mutations in CERT. The data are of high quality and the manuscript is well written. I only have a few minor comments.

Response: Thank you very much for your favorable evaluation to our manuscript, and also for constructive specific comments. We attempted to answer all specific comments as described below.

Comment 1) The version of the MS that I reviewed lacked figure legends. To avoid delays, I will be happy to have a closer look at those in a next round of review.

Response: We are very sorry for the big mistake. The legends to figures of the main text were added in the Result section, not after the Reference section, according to the PLoS One style (each Figure legend was highlighted in red, respectively). We deeply appreciate so high scientific capacity of both reviewers who were able to evaluate the original manuscript even without figure legends.

Comment 2) All ID-inducing missense mutations in CERT1 described so far, including the one reported in this study, have been classified as heterozygous dominant mutations. However, the authors were unable to detect any significant differences in SM biosynthesis between the patient- and parent-derived immortalized B-cell lines by metabolic lipid labeling. On p. 27 (lines 415-419) they anticipate that metabolic lipid labeling might not be sensitive enough to detect an enhanced CERT activity or that the immortalized B-cell lines are not a good cell model to monitor changes in CERT activity. I wonder whether they checked whether these cell lines showed any differences in the lysenin sensitivity assay, as this assay seems more sensitive than metabolic lipid labeling (Fig. 4B and C).

Response: Thank you for your helpful advice. According to the advice, we have examined the sensitivity of the trio LCLs to lysenin, an SM-binding cytolysin. The patient-derived LCLs did not exhibit a clear difference in the lysenin-sensitivity when compared with the parents’ controls (the actual data are shown below for reviewers only). Although the father-derived LCLs may have a trend of more tolerance, we noticed that the growth of father-derived LCLs is slower than that of patient- and mother-derived LCLs under normal culture conditions. This might affect the lysenin-sensitivity of the father-derived LCLs. Therefore, we consider that it is inappropriate to include the new experimental data in the revised manuscript at the current stage.

Trio LCLs were cultured with 250 ng/ml of lysenin for 1 hr. Next, cell viability was measured with a LDH cytotoxicity assay kit. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n=3 (n.s., not significant).

The reviewer’s comment also let us notice that the description of the procedures for “lysenin tolerance assay” was confusing. To improve the description, we rewrote it using a formula as followed: In our assay, the cell viability (“survival ratio after lysenin-treatment”) was defined as the following formula: 1-(A1-A2)/(A3-A2). Here, A1, A2, and A3 represent LDH activity (measured by absorbance) from lysenin-treated cells, un-treated control cells, and detergent-treated cells, respectively (p. 9, L 155-158). The caption for the y-axis of the panels for lysenin-sensitivity (Fig. 4C and Fig. 5C) was also changed from "Cell viability (relative to lysenin-treated cells)” to “Cell viability (survival ratio after lysenin-treatment)”.

Comment 3) On p. 21 the authors state: “Since the CERT phosphorylation status was only partially shifted to the de/hypophosphorylated form of the ID patient, this indicated that the patient’s mutation is heterozygous….”. As the heterozygous nature of the mutation can only be directly inferred from the sequencing data and not from the WB analysis, I would rephrase this sentence to “These results are in line with the finding that the patient’s mutation is heterozygoes and suggest that the CERT S135P mutant is incapable of becoming hyper-phosphorylated”.

Response: We agree with the reviewer’s consideration and rephrased the sentence as the reviewer commented. (p. 22, Line 334-336)

Comment 4) The authors should rephrase the last sentence of the Abstract. More suitable would be if they write: “These findings provide a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1.”

Response: According to the comment by the reviewer, the last sentence of abstract was revised as followed: These findings provide a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1. (p. 2, Line 33-35). In addition, the rephrased sentence was also added as the last sentence of the discussion section: “In conclusion, the present study provided a possible molecular basis for not only new diagnostics but also a conceivable pharmaceutical intervention for ID disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in CERT1.” (p. 31, Line 493-495).

Comment 5) p. 20, line 303: “…using trio-derived B-cell lines that was established…” should read “…using trio-derived B-cell lines that were established…”

Response: Corrected as commented.

Other revisions:

According to the editorial rule of PLoS One, we stated “Written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) was obtained from the patient’s parents, which included consent for the pictures appearing in the manuscript.” (p. 5, Line 74-76).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers1125.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ajay Srivastava

2 Dec 2020

Intellectual disability-associated gain-of-function mutations in CERT1 that encodes the ceramide transport protein CERT

PONE-D-20-26020R1

Dear Dr. Hanada,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ajay Srivastava, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors addressed all my concerns thoughtfully and to the best of their ability. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Joost Holthuis

Acceptance letter

Ajay Srivastava

10 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-26020R1

Intellectual disability-associated gain-of-function mutations in CERT1 that encodes the ceramide transport protein CERT

Dear Dr. Hanada:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ajay Srivastava

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Three major isoforms of CERT1 transcripts and their protein products.

    (A) The structures of CERT1 transcripts (isoforms 1–3) whose exons are indicated by gray boxes (top panel) and their protein products (CERT/L, CERT, and CERT/VL) (bottom panel). CERT has a PH domain, a SRM, a FFAT motif, and a START domain. Isoform 1 (NM_0031361.3) contains 17 exons (2–11 and 13–19) and is translated into CERT (NP_112729.1) (top panel). Isoform 2 (NM_005713.3) contains 18 exons (2–19) and is translated into CERT/L (NP_005704.1) (middle panel). Isoform 3 (NM_001130105) contains 19 exons (1–19) and is translated into CERT/VL (NP_001123577) (bottom panel).

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. RNA-sequencing data of CERT1 transcripts from human tissues using the GTEx database.

    (A) Exon-level expression data of CERT1 (https://gtexportal.org/home/transcriptPage). The heatmap summarizes the median read counts per base of each exon across all tissues. This indicated that the transcript containing exon1 is barely detected in all tissues except for testis and Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphocytes. In most tissues, RNA-seq short reads from exon12 were detected at lower frequencies than those from exon11 or exon13. (B) Junction expression data of CERT1 (https://gtexportal.org/home/transcriptPage). The heatmap summarizes the median raw read counts of junctions from individual isoforms. This demonstrated that read counts of junction21 connecting exon1 with exon2 were barely detected, which indicated that isoform 3 of CERT1 is not expressed in most human tissues. The read counts of junction10 connecting exon11 with exon13 were detected at higher frequencies than junction9 or junction11, which indicated that the isoform 1 of CERT1 is the predominant transcript in most human tissues.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Establishment of CERT1 KO HCT116 cells.

    (A) Diagram of the location of gRNA-targeted sequences of human CERT1. The 5’-untranslated regions (UTRs) and coding regions are shown as white and black rectangles, respectively. The red lines represent the first and second methionines. In the WT allele, the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence is shown in bold. The red highlighted sequence (ATG) indicates the second methionine within exon2. The gRNA-targeted sequence is underlined. A 1 bp insertion that generates a frame-shift mutation is shown in blue in both CERT1 alleles from the CERT1 KO cell line. (B) Cell lysates prepared from WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells were incubated with or without λPPase and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. (C) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing various mVenus-CERT constructs were lysed and subjected to Western blotting analysis with the indicated primary antibodies. (D) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing the indicated mVenus-CERT variants were cultured with L-[U-14C]serine for 16 hr. Metabolically labelled lipids were separated by TLC analysis and visualized using an image analyzer. A representative image is shown. PC, putative phosphatidylcholine. Note that serine is directly incorporated into PS by the base exchange reaction with PC, and labelled PS is converted to PE by decarboxylation [34, 35]. Metabolic labeling of PC with L-[U-14C]serine can occur by two different pathways [34, 35]. One pathway occurs via N-methylation of labelled PE, and the other pathway occurs via the conversion of serine to pyruvate, which is then anabolized to fatty acids via acetyl-CoA, followed by the synthesis of PC from the labeled fatty acids.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. CERT/L rescues the de novo SM synthesis defect in CERT1 KO HCT116 cells.

    (A) WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing either mVenus-CERT or mVenus-CERT/L were lysed and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated primary antibodies. (B) The lipids from WT and CERT1 KO HCT116 cells stably expressing either mVenus-CERT or mVenus-CERT/L were metabolically labelled with L-[U-14C]serine. The labeled lipids were analyzed by TLC and visualized using an image analyzer. The data comprise the mean ± SEM; n = 3 (***, p < 0.001).

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. Original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Clinical information of the patient in the present study.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers1125.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    As described under “Data Availability” of the manuscript, the original uncropped and unadjusted images for all blot are presented in S5 Fig. In addition, other unprocessed images and raw data for quantitative results have been posted at a public data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12830852).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES