Skip to main content
Bioscience Reports logoLink to Bioscience Reports
. 2021 Jan 6;41(1):BSR20203727. doi: 10.1042/BSR20203727

The N-terminus of Paenibacillus larvae C3larvinA modulates catalytic efficiency

Madison Turner 1, Kayla A Heney 2, A Rod Merrill 1,
PMCID: PMC7789906  PMID: 33289829

Abstract

C3larvinA was recently described as a mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (mART) toxin from the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) III genotype of the agricultural pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae. It was shown to be the full-length, functional version of the previously described C3larvintrunc toxin, due to a 33-residue extension of the N-terminus of the protein. In the present study, a series of deletions and substitutions were made to the N-terminus of C3larvinA to assess the contribution of the α1-helix to toxin structure and function. Catalytic characterization of these variants identified Asp23 and Ala31 residues as supportive to enzymatic function. A third residue, Lys36, was also found to contribute to the catalytic activity of the enzyme. Analysis of the C3larvinA homology model revealed that these three residues were participating in a series of interactions to properly orient both the Q-X-E and S-T-S motifs. Ala31 and Lys36 were found to associate with a structural network of residues previously identified in silico, whereas Asp23 forms novel interactions not previously described. At last, the membrane translocation activity into host target cells of each variant was assessed, highlighting a possible relationship between protein dipole and target cell entry.

Keywords: ADP-ribosyltransferase toxins, enzyme mechanisms, honey bee diseases, macrophage cell entry, protein-protein interactions

Introduction

Mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (mART) toxins are an exoenzyme class used by pathogenic bacteria to confer damage to host cells [1–9]. These virulence factors function by binding an NAD+ molecule and catalyzing the transfer of the ADP-ribose moiety on to a target macromolecule [10–13]. Covalent modification of these macromolecules, such as Gαs, RhoA and DNA, results in altered cellular function and can lead to cell death [14–19]. This enzyme class can also exhibit glycohydrolase (GH) activity in the absence of a target macromolecule, where the glycosidic bond of NAD+ is hydrolyzed to release ADP-ribose and nicotinamide [20–23]. Human pathogens, including Vibrio cholera, Clostridium botulinum and Corynebacterium diphtheriae have been previously described to use mART toxins [4,24–27]; however, more recently mART toxins were discovered in the agricultural pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae [28–32].

P. larvae is a Gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium, and the causative agent of American Foulbrood (AFB) disease [33–36]. This lethal infection targets honeybee larvae, and has led to the loss of hives worldwide through the destruction of colony progeny [33,34,37]. AFB is transmitted through bacterial spores, which are inadvertently fed to naïve larvae by nurse bees [34,38]. The spores quickly propagate within the larval midgut, and eventually the bacteria begin to attack the cell–cell and cell–matrix junctions of the midgut epithelial lining [33,38]. Breaching this barrier results with access to the hemocoel, or main body cavity of the host, where the bacteria will feed on larval tissues. As nutrient sources are depleted, P. larvae sporulates, re-forming the infectious agent of the disease. Host death correlates to the breach of the epithelial lining, which can take 7–12 days depending on the P. larvae genotype present in the infection [38].

Four genotypes of P. larvae have been established using by mass spectrometry [39] and repetitive-element PCR analysis [40,41]. Primers specific to enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) sequences revealed four distinct banding patterns, resulting in the nomenclature of P. larvae ERIC I–IV. The genotypes differ greatly from one another, including colony phenotype, energy metabolism and toxin production [33,40]. This also applies to the associated mART toxins expressed by each genotype. To date, three mART toxins have been characterized in P. larvae: Plx2A in ERIC I, C3larvintrunc in ERIC I and II, and C3larvinA in ERIC III [28,29,32].

The first mART toxin to be enzymatically characterized from P. larvae was C3larvintrunc, previously denoted as C3larvin [32]. It was shown to be a single-domain toxin that targeted RhoA through a catalytic Q-X-E motif, resulting in its classification as a C3-like mART toxin. However, unlike other C3 toxins, C3larvintrunc failed to intoxicate target macrophage cells despite being lethal when expressed in yeast cells. It was determined that the protein had a truncated N-terminal α1-helix which led to an inability to gain entry to host cells and cause intracellular damage [32]. The full-length protein, C3larvinA, was later identified in the ERIC III genotype [29,30]. Like C3larvintrunc, C3larvinA targets RhoA for ADP-ribosylation through a catalytic Q-X-E motif, and possesses GH activity; however, the rate of reaction was 12-fold, and 200-fold higher than that of C3larvintrunc, respectively. Additionally, C3larvinA has the necessary N-terminal machinery (α-helix 1) to translocate the host cell membrane and initiate infection [29]. These findings further confirm the importance of the N-terminus in cell entry as well as enzymatic activity.

In the present study, the role of the N-terminus is examined in relation to the structure, enzyme activity and cell entry of C3larvinA. The characterization of N-terminal variants showed decreased protein stability and enzymatic activity in relation to the wild-type (WT) toxin. These findings support the importance of residues previously identified through computational studies, while further identifying novel interactions between the α1-helix and the ADP-ribosyl-turn-turn (ARTT)-loop, which houses the catalytic Q-X-E motif [42]. At last, C3larvinA was shown to have improved RhoA-targeting capabilities within macrophage cells compared with C3larvintrunc. However, these results indicated that the differences were not attributed to the 33-residue extension at the N-terminus of the protein.

Materials and methods

Protein expression and purification

All C3larvinA WT and variant proteins were expressed and purified as previously described [29]. Briefly, protein expression was induced in Escherichia coli BL21 λDE3 cells using 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 37°C for 4 h. Cells were harvested through centrifugation and resuspended in 500 mM NaCl and 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5. An Emulsiflex C3 high-pressure homogenizer (Avestin Inc., Ottawa, Canada) was used to lyse the cells in the presence of 120 µM PMSF, 50 µg/ml CHAPS, 100 µg/ml DNase and 1 mM EDTA before a second round of centrifugation. After incubation with 10 mM MgCl2, the protein of interest was purified from the soluble fraction using a combination of metal-affinity and size-exclusion chromatography.

Differential-scanning fluorimetry

The thermal stability of each variant was assessed using the Protein Thermal Shift dye, SYPRO Orange™ (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), while fluorescence was monitored with a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, U.S.A.). Experiments were carried out in triplicate in 500 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5 with a final protein concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and dye concentration of 1×.

STRUM analysis

The relative fold change in stability of each single-residue variant compared with C3larvinA WT was assessed using the STRUM server [43]. This method uses multiple-sequence alignments, threading template alignments and i-TASSER structure prediction models to predict the fold stability change caused by single-residue changes to the protein sequence [43]. The C3larvinA homology model was submitted to the STRUM server, which then reported the fold stability change (ΔΔG), for each substitution. A fold change below zero indicates that the mutation is destabilizing to protein structure, while a score above zero indicates the mutation is stabilizing the protein structure.

NAD+-binding

The affinity of each variant for the NAD+ substrate was assessed through a tryptophan-quenching assay [44]. A buffer solution (50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.9) at an initial volume of 600 µl containing 1.25 µM protein was titrated with β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (β-NAD+) to achieve a range of substrate concentrations between 1 and 1000 µM. Measurements were taken using a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer (Varian Instruments, Mississauga, Canada) with an excitation wavelength of 295 nm, emission wavelength of 340 nm and excitation and emission bandpasses of 5 nm. Measurements were taken in triplicate using 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm fluorescence quartz cuvettes. Kinetic values were calculated on GraphPad Prism ver 5.0 (San Diego, U.S.A.).

GH activity

The GH activity of each protein was assessed using etheno-adenosine monophosphate (ε-NAD+) as the substrate [21,29]. The reaction was held at 25°C in a reaction buffer of 50 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.9. Measurements were made at a protein concentration of 20 µM and ε-NAD+ concentrations ranging from 0 to 500 µM, using an excitation wavelength of 305 nm, emission wavelength of 405 nm and an excitation and emission bandpass of 5 nm. The reaction was monitored for 5 min, and the resulting slope was converted from fluorescence units into product concentration using a standard ε-AMP curve. All measurements were carried out in triplicate and kinetic values were calculated using GraphPad Prism ver. 5.0 (San Diego, CA).

C3larvinA homology model

The C3larvinA homology model was built as described earlier [29]. Briefly, the 1.65 Å crystal structure of Plx2A (PDB: 5URP; 55% sequence identity) was used as a template to model the C3larvinA structure in Phyre2 [45]. The resulting homology model was reported with 100% confidence, and shared similar topology to other C3-toxins [29].

Cell morphology assay

J774A.1 mouse macrophage cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin as previously described [32]. Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were lifted by scraping and diluting ten-fold in complete growth medium. To assess the effect of each protein on cell morphology, confluent cells were diluted to 250000 cells/ml and mixed with 300 nM of toxin. From this cell suspension, 37500 cells were seeded in triplicate in a 96-well plate and incubated for 20 h. Cells were then assessed and imaged under a Nikon TMS inverted phase-contrast microscope with the 20× objective (Nikon Canada; Mississauga, Canada) to identify any morphological changes.

Fluorescence microscopy

Purified protein in 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M Na3PO4, pH 7.5 was conjugated with Dylight 488 NHS Ester (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) according to manufacturer’s instructions, with the following exception: a two- to three-fold molar excess of dye was used in place of the recommended eight- to ten-fold to maintain a molar ratio of labeled protein to dye under 2.0. Excess dye was then removed through dialysis coupled with buffer exchange to yield conjugated protein in a final buffer system of 500 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5.

J774A.1 mouse macrophage cells were prepared as described above. Cells were seeded at 500000 cells per well in a six-well plate prepared with sterile glass coverslips and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were then treated with 300 nM of toxin–Dylight 488 conjugate and incubated for 4 h. All media were removed after the incubation step and cells were washed three times with PBS. Note that all following wash steps were performed in triplicate with prewarmed PBS. Cells were fixed with buffered 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution for 15 min on ice. Cells were then washed, incubated with 150 mM glycine in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, and washed again. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. After washing, the cells were treated with 2 µg/ml of 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-1H-indole-6-carboxamidin (DAPI) in methanol for 15 min at room temperature, followed by a final wash. During co-localization studies, additional steps were carried out to target cellular RhoA before the final incubation with DAPI. Following permeabilization, samples were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 1.5 h after permeabilization with Triton X-100. Cells were then washed before incubation with a mouse monoclonal antibody specific to human RhoA (1:50 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Samples were washed and incubated with a 1/1000 dilution with 2° antibody (Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse, Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature with gentle agitation. After a final wash step, cells were treated with DAPI as described above.

Coverslips were mounted on to glass microscopic slides using either DAKO Fluorescent mounting medium (Agilent Technologies, California, U.S.A.) or ProLong™ Gold Antifade mountant (Thermo Fisher, Mississauga, ON). Samples were imaged through a 60× oil immersion lens using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Canada; Mississauga, Canada) using the NikonNIS software v4.51. An exposure time of 40 ms was used for DAPI and 100 ms for FITC. Images were analyzed using ImageJ.

Results

N-terminal variant production

Seven deletions were made to the N-terminus of C3larvinA. Deletions were made based on the hypothesis that residues of interest would be situated in the N-terminus of C3larvinA before the region that is absent from the truncated C3larvintrunc. However, the proposed N-terminal ‘hot-spot’ is expected to be shared with the full-length P. larvae toxin, Plx2A—a mART toxin with similar biochemical properties as C3larvinA as described below. For this reason, the first deletion made to the N-terminus of C3larvinA produced a protein of the same length as Plx2A, and the last deletion resulted in a protein of the same length as C3larvintrunc.

C3larvinA and Plx2A display C3-like activity, meaning each protein targets RhoA through a catalytic Q-X-E motif, and both can initiate infection in a target cell [28,32]. Despite their shared characteristics with C3-toxins, C3larvinA and Plx2A are unique in that they represent the only proposed binary proteins identified within the subgroup [30–32]. In silico analysis revealed that both toxins were encoded by loci containing two genes. In each case, the second gene was identified as a putative B-domain. It is proposed that the respective A- and B-domains associate with one another, as seen in the C2-subgroup of mART toxins, possibly to enhance target cell infection [30–32]. The C2-subgroup of mART toxins function as binary AB toxins, where the catalytic activity is housed in the A-domain and the translocating activity is housed in the B-domain [2,46]. The two proteins are secreted separately, but associate at a target cell membrane through interactions made with the N-terminus of the catalytic A-domain. The B-domain then binds to a membrane-bound receptor to mediate endocytosis [2]. Through a multiple-sequence alignment of CT-toxin N-termini, it was found that Plx2A and C3larvinA share conserved residues with the C2-subgroup (Figure 1A) [42]. This conserved motif was predicted to have a high degree of solvent accessibility and a net charge that could help facilitate electrostatic interactions with another macromolecule. Therefore, these residues were deemed to be a possible site of protein–protein interaction, and were named the Binding-motif (B-motif) [42]. It should be noted, however, that the role of this motif in protein binding is yet to be explored and that the nomenclature used in this paper is meant to be reflective of current literature. The first four residues of the B-motif occurred within the N-terminus of C3larvinA that was not shared with C3larvintrunc. As such, these residues were used to select regions for deletion and were also targeted for substitution, resulting in the C3larvinA D23A/K25A/D27A/R28A variant. A second motif was present in the N-terminal extension of C3larvinA that was missing from C3larvintrunc, one that was shared among both C2- and C3-toxins. These conserved residues belong to the Structure-motif (S-motif), and were predicted to contribute to protein stability through interactions made with the phospho-nicotinamide (PN)- and ARTT-loops [42]. Again, these residues were used to guide regions for deletion and were targeted for substitution, resulting in the C3larvinA F24A/A31L/W34A variant.

Figure 1. Multiple-sequence alignment of the N-terminus of C3-, C3/C2-, and C2-like toxins.

Figure 1

(A) Residues of the S-motif, conserved in all groups, are shown in purple; residues conserved in C3- and C3/C2-like toxins are shown in pink; residues of the B-motif, conserved in C3/C2- and C2-like toxins, are shown in yellow; residues conserved in C3-like toxins are shown in gray. Bold residues denote deviations from otherwise conserved positions. Gaps within the sequence are denoted by (.) and continuation within a sequence is denoted by (-). Sequence numbers correspond to C3larvinA. (B) Graphical depiction of α1-helix length in each N-terminal deletion variant. Sequence numbers correspond to C3larvinA.

N-terminal residues structurally support kinetic function

The kinetic parameters of each variant were assessed against the NAD+ substrate (GH activity) (Table 1). Binding affinity was investigated using β-NAD+ as the substrate/ligand and the results showed that variants lacking residue Asp23, specifically ΔY2-D23 and D23A/K25A/D27A/R28A (Figure 1B), had lower affinity for the substrate compared with WT (ANOVA, P=0.0057) (Table 1). Interestingly, substrate affinity continually improved with subsequent deletions after the removal of Asp23, which may suggest a conformational change within the active-site of the enzyme. This is corroborated by the C3larvintrunc crystal structure, which shows an open, more flexible ARTT-loop conformation when compared with other C3-toxins with longer N-termini (Figure 2). The GH activity was then characterized using the fluorescent substrate analog, ε-NAD+. The rate of reaction was decreased with each deletion (see Figure 1B for deletion series) until the GH activity reached zero (Table 1). Surprisingly, there was also no detectable reaction for the F24A/A31L/W34A variant; when correlated to the loss of activity of the ΔY2-K33 deletion variant, this result reveals the significance of Ala31 in the enzymatic function of C3larvinA. To investigate the role of Asp23 and Ala31 in substrate-binding and GH activity, respectively, single-residue variants D23A and A31L were further characterized.

Table 1. Binding affinity and GH activity of C3LarvinA WT and N-terminal variants against NAD+.

C3larvinA KM (μM) kcat (min−1) × 10−3 kcat/KM (M−1.min−1) × 101 KD (μM)
WT 107 ± 20 261 ± 20 244 56 ± 11
ΔY2-A21 120 ± 31 100 ± 10 83 59 ± 2
ΔY2-D23 160 ± 23 46 ± 4 31 117 ± 10
ΔY2-K25 104 ± 27 19 ± 2 18 102 ± 3
ΔY2-D27 112 ± 17 12 ± 0.7 11 93 ± 5
ΔY2-A30 84 ± 17 7 ± 0.4 8 94 ± 3
ΔY2-K33 ∼0 ∼0 ∼0 75 ± 7
ΔY2-W34 ∼0 ∼0 ∼0 38 ± 9
F24A/A31L/W34A ∼0 ∼0 ∼0 85 ± 14
D23A/K25A/D27A/R28A 28 ± 6 46 ± 2 166 140 ± 14
D23A 94 ± 28 7 ± 0.5 7 131 ± 27
A31L ∼0 ∼0 ∼0   87 ± 11
K36E 72 ± 12 82 ± 5 114 38 ± 0.4
K36A 75 ± 18 58 ± 4 76 42 ± 2
G35T ∼0 ∼0 ∼0 113 ± 30
I153A 95 ± 13 40 ± 2 42 85 ± 8
Y178A 99 ± 12   8 ± 0.3 8   65 ± 14

Each value is the average of three replicates ± S.D.; ∼0 = not detectable.

Figure 2. Comparison between the active-site loops of C3larvintrunc and other C3-toxins.

Figure 2

All toxins are depicted as cartoons. C3larvintrunc (PBD ID: 4TR5, colored light blue) was structurally aligned with C3bot1 (PBD ID: 2C89, colored gray80), C3lim (PBD ID: 3BW8, colored gray40) and Plx2A (PDB ID: 5URP, colored gray70) using PyMOL ver. 1.3. The ARTT-loops of C3bot1, C3lim and Plx2A are colored blue (density, blue and tv_blue, respectively) and the ARTT-loop of C3larvintrunc is colored purple.

The kinetic characterization of D23A and A31L confirmed their role in GH enzymatic function. Substitution of Asp23 resulted in a similar KD value for NAD+ substrate affinity as seen in the ΔY2-D23 and D23A/K25A/D27A/R28A variants, representing a loss of affinity for the NAD+ substrate (ANOVA, P=0.029). Similarly, GH activity was abolished in the A31L variant, as reported in the ΔY2-K33 and F24A/A31L/W34A variants. Since the residues are members of either the B-motif or S-motif, respectively, it is reasonable to assume that they serve a critical, conserved function (Figure 3). The B-motif, represented by D-(K/R)-D-(K/R)-(K/R)-E-K (Figure 1A, yellow residues), was predicted to mediate the association of the A-domain with its translocating B-domain, or as a possible translocation motif for trafficking the complex into the cytoplasm, for reasons that were previously described [42]. Conversely, the S-motif, which is represented by F-(A/G)-W (FAW motif in C3larvinA) and conserved among both C2- and C3-toxins (Figure 1A, purple residues), was predicted to structurally support the orientation of the α1-helix in relation to the ARTT-loop. These N-terminal, nonpolar residues were anticipated to interact with an Ile/Leu within the PN-loop, and a Tyr found on the β5-strand was proposed to anchor the protein segments together. A conserved glycine residue from the α1-helix also participates, specifically by stabilizing the Tyrβ5 orientation [42]. To further understand the relationship between kinetic function and the structural location of Asp23 and Ala31, the C3larvinA homology model was scrutinized and then analyzed.

Figure 3. Location of N-terminal motifs in the C3larvinA homology model.

Figure 3

The C3larvinA homology model is shown in cartoon and colored pale cyan. The ARTT-loop is shown in red; the α1-helix is shown in cyan; the unstructured N-terminus is shown in blue. Using the structural alignment tool in PyMOL ver. 1.3, the NAD+ substrate (magenta) was modeled into the active site of C3larvinA using the C3bot1–NAD+ complex (PDB ID: 2C8F) as a template. (A) Residues of the B-motif, D23/K25/D27/R28/K36/E38/K45, are shown using the space-filling model and are colored yellow. (B) Residues of the S-motif, F24/A31/W34, are shown using the space-filling model and are colored purple. (C) The residues of interest, Asp23, Ala31 and Lys36, are shown using the space-filling model and colored based on their respective motifs (D23 and K36 in yellow; A31 in purple).

The C3larvinA homology model built on the shared core with Plx2A (55% identity; PDB: 5URP) revealed that both Asp23 and Ala31 indirectly affect the orientation of the enzyme catalytic motifs through polar and hydrophobic interactions (Figure 4). Located on the N-terminal loop, the Asp23 side chain forms polar interactions with three other residues: Lys25, Gln102 and Tyr104 (Figure 4B). The first oxygen in the carbonyl group of the Asp23 side chain interacts with the backbone amino group of Lys25, likely as a way of positioning the aspartate side chain toward the center of the protein. The same oxygen then associates with the amino and carbonyl groups of the Gln102 and Tyr104 side chains, respectively. The other carboxyl oxygen atom of the Asp23 side chain also participates in the interaction with Gln102 and Tyr104, possibly strengthening the resulting orientation of the two residues. It should be noted, however, that this interaction is mediated by a water molecule in the Plx2A crystal structure (data not shown). From this position, the Tyr104 backbone carbonyl and amino groups interact with Ser152 of the S-T-S motif (Figure 4B,C). The tyrosine amino group hydrogen bonds to the serine hydroxyl side chain, while the carbonyl group forms a likely hydrogen bond with the amino group of the serine backbone. Note that this serine has been previously shown to hydrogen bond with the glutamine of the Q-X-E motif, ensuring proper orientation of the catalytic residue [14].

Figure 4. Proposed structural interactions between the N-terminus and catalytic motifs.

Figure 4

(A) The two structural clusters supporting the Q-X-E motif (blue and bound by blue oval) and S-T-S motif (red and bound by red oval). C3larvinA homology model is shown in cartoon, gray70. Residues of interest are shown as sticks and surface (50% transparency), and colored red or blue based on the respective cluster. (BI) C3larvinA homology model is shown in cartoon, colored gray70, and set to 60% transparency. All residues are shown as stick or space-filling models and are colored by element. The residues were colored as follows: Asp23, yellow; Lys25, green; Ala31, purple; Glu32, smudge; Gly35, pink; Lys36, yellow; Gln102 and Tyr104 are marine; Thr151 and Ser152, teal; Ile153, cyan; Tyr178, orange; Asp180, smudge; and Tyr189 is magenta. (B) Interactions between Asp23 and the S-T-S motif are shown as sticks. Polar interactions formed by the first carboxyl group atom of the Asp23 side chain are depicted in cyan. Polar interactions formed by the second carboxyl atom in its side chain are depicted in blue. Polar interactions between Tyr104 and Ser152 are shown in yellow. (C) Space-filling model to depict residue-packing between Asp23 and the S-T-S motif. (D) Orientation of Ala31, Ile153 and Tyr189 are depicted as sticks. Polar interactions between Ile153 and Tyr189 are shown in yellow. (E) Space-filling model to depict residue-packing between Ala31, Ile153 and Tyr189. (F) Orientation of Lys36 and Tyr178 side chains in relation to Tyr189 are shown as sticks. Polar interactions formed by the lysine side chain are shown in yellow. (G) Positioning of the Lys36 and Tyr178 polar side chains toward the phenol ring of Tyr189 are depicted in the space-filling model. (H) All residues contributing to the orientation of Tyr189 are shown as sticks. (I) All residues interacting to position both the S-T-S and Q-X-E motifs are shown as sticks.

Within C3larvinA, Ala31 faces toward the center of the protein. Herein, it is close to Ile153 (identified through computational analysis), as well as to Val154, both of which pack against the N-terminus through hydrophobic interactions (Figure 4D,E). The amine-backbone of Ile153 forms a polar interaction with the backbone carbonyl group of Tyr189, which sits between the catalytic glutamine and glutamate. Substitution of Ala31 with a larger leucine would, therefore, force Ile153 into an altered conformation that can no longer participate in the positioning of Tyr189. Without the proper orientation of the bulky, aromatic tyrosine side chain, the two catalytic residues would become displaced, and no longer positioned for catalysis. It is feasible, then, that other toxins share similar interaction patterns, and that an alanine or glycine is used for this purpose depending on the size constraints of the given toxin.

Single-residue difference between C3larvintrunc and C3larvinA

A pairwise sequence alignment between C3larvinA and C3larvintrunc revealed a single-residue difference within the α1-helix of the two proteins. As a result of a guanine to adenine point mutation, C3larvinA encodes a lysine residue whereas C3larvintrunc contains an oppositely charged glutamate. Notably, this lysine is the fifth residue in the proposed B-motif (Figure 1A), and as the only difference within the shared sequence between C3larvintrunc and C3larvinA, its significance was investigated using the single-residue variants, K36E and K36A.

The kinetic parameters of K36E and K36A against the NAD+ substrate was characterized as previously described and are shown in Table 1. These substitutions resulted in a reduced kcat for the GH activity when compared with WT, demonstrating a role of Lys36 in catalytic function (ANOVA, P≤0.0001). Like Asp23, Lys36 forms a series of interactions serving to position Tyr189 in the C3larvinA homology model (Figure 4F). The amino side chain of Lys36 was found to form polar interactions with two carboxyl side chains, one from Glu32 and one from Asp180. These interactions seemingly position the lysine side chain toward the protein center, where it is near Tyr178. As stated previously, this tyrosine residue had been identified as a structural support for the N-terminus; however, these interactions had only been predicted to occur with the S-motif, not the B-motif [42]. The 4.1 Å distance between the amino side chain of Lys36 and the hydroxyl group of Tyr189 suggests the residues may be forming an electrostatic interaction, which is directly oriented toward the phenol ring of Tyr189. By directing these polar groups toward the nonpolar benzene ring, Tyr189 may be forced into position through repulsion electrostatics. An opposing or lack of charge at this position, therefore, would disrupt these associations and modify the orientation of the Q-X-E motif, accounting for the loss of activity. Discovery of the possible association between Lys36 and Tyr178 prompted the investigation into the other supportive residues identified in silico.

As previously described, there were three residues deemed to associate with the S-motif and contribute to the orientation of the N-terminus toward the body of the enzyme [42]. To further investigate this series of interactions within C3larvinA, the single-residue variants G35T, I153A and Y178A were characterized. Unfortunately, the G35L variant proved to be unstable and was excluded from the present study. In all three variants, the GH activity was compromised (ANOVA, P≤0.0001). The largest decrease was seen in the G35T variant, which had no detectable GH activity and showed the greatest increase in KD value for the NAD+ substrate (ANOVA, P=0.048). The GH activity of Y178A, while still being measurable, showed the second largest decrease in kcat value with a 33-fold reduction, and I153A yielded the smallest decrease between the three variants, with a 6.5-fold reduction. Both Ile153 and Tyr178 were previously shown in the present study to be in contact with Tyr189, a member of the Q-X-E motif. Therefore, substitution of either residue, or of Gly35, likely results in altered residue-packing, shifting the orientation of the catalytic motif and affecting the enzymatic activity of the protein. These findings reinforce the designation of these residues as being structurally supportive to the enzyme active-site.

Stability of single-residue variants

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was used to probe for changes in secondary structure caused by residue substitutions. All variant CD spectra were comparable with that of WT and it was concluded that the substitutions did not have a significant effect on protein structure (Supplementary Figure S1). The bioinformatics tool, STRUM, and differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) were then used to assess the impact of each single-residue substitution on protein stability. STRUM analysis predicts the change in protein folded stability, while DSF directly measures the change in protein thermal stability. All residues identified through computational studies as structurally supportive, Ala31, Gly35, Ile153, and Tyr178, were predicted to contribute to protein folded stability (Table 2). This means that, in the STRUM analysis, substitution of these residues resulted in a negative ΔΔG score, indicating a loss of stability. The two residues predicted to have the greatest impact on protein stability were Ile153 and Tyr178. Alanine substitution of either residue resulted in a ΔΔG score near −2, and correspondingly, the TM values of each variant were reduced by 5 and 4°C, respectively, when compared with WT. The substitutions A31L and G35T were predicted to be mildly destabilizing, with both having a ΔΔG score approximately −0.4. Interestingly, through DSF analysis, both variants displayed significant decreases in TM values, like those seen in the I153A and Y178A variants, with a 4 and 3°C reduction, respectively. At last, both Asp23 and Lys36 were predicted to be destabilizing to protein folded stability. The alanine-substitution of Asp23 resulted in a ΔΔG score of +0.16, however, DSF analysis for D23A showed a 3°C decrease in TM value. Conversely, the Lys36 variants, K36E and K36A, yielded high ΔΔG scores of +0.65 and +0.83, respectively, and both showed increases in thermal stability. The K36E variant had a 3.6°C increase in TM value, the largest seen in any variant, while K36A had a modest 0.6°C increase.

Table 2. Thermal stability of single-residue variants determined by DSF and predicted fold-stability of each substitution by STRUM analysis.

Protein Tm (°C)1 ΔTm (°C)2 ΔΔGcalc (kcal/mol)3
I153A 57.3 ± 0.1 −5 −1.98
Y178A 58.4 ± 0.1 −4.1 −1.79
A31L 58.4 ± 0.1 −4.1 −0.47
G35T 59.4 ± 0.1 −3.1 −0.45
D23A 59.8 ± 0.1 −2.7 +0.16
K36A 63.1 ± 0.1 +0.6 +0.83
K36E 66.1 ± 0.1 +3.6 +0.65
WT 62.5 ± 0.1 N/A N/A
1

The Tm values were determined from the thermal melt curves for each C3larvinA protein using Thermal Shift Software v1 (Applied Biosystems).

2

The ΔTm values were calculated from the difference between the WT Tm (62.5°C) and each variant (Δ Tm = Tm variant − Tm wild-type).

3

The ΔΔG values (kcal/mol) for folded stability change for each substitution variant were calculated using the STRUM algorithm where ΔΔG = ΔG wild-type − ΔG variant. A ΔΔG value above zero indicates the substitution is stabilizing, while a value under zero indicates the substitution is destabilizing.

Cell entry experiments

The seven deletions shown in Figure 1B were tested against J774A.1 murine macrophage cells at a final concentration of 300 nM. After a 20-h incubation period, cells were assessed for morphological changes associated with C3-toxin infection (Figure 5). As previously demonstrated for C3larvinA, the WT protein at 300 nM (Figure 5B) showed morphology changes indicating host cell entry and disruption of the RhoA function, the physiological target of the toxin [29]. Morphological changes caused by C3-toxin treatment are characterized by enlarged cells with filopodia-like protrusions, with the most obvious changes occurring in the J774A.1 murine macrophage cell line [47]. Interestingly, the extent of the morphology changes seen in the variant-treated cells appeared to be inversely related to the length of the protein (Figure 5C–I). However, it was unclear whether these findings were based on the ability of each toxin variant to penetrate the cell membrane, or due to weakened catalytic activity of the shorter variants. Fluorescence microscopy experiments were then developed as a means of differentiating between cell entry and enzymatic function.

Figure 5. C3larvinA N-terminal deletions have varying effects on the morphology of macrophage cells.

Figure 5

J774A.1 mouse macrophage cells were treated with 300 nM toxin and incubated for 20 h at a cell density of 37500 cells/well. Effects to morphology were less dramatic in the larger N-terminal deletions. (A) Buffer control; (B) C3larvinA (full length); (C) ΔY2-A21; (D) ΔY2-D23; (E) ΔY2-K25; (F) ΔY2-D27; (G) ΔY2-A30; (H) ΔY2-K33; (I) ΔY2-W34.

Purified toxin was conjugated to an amine-reactive, green fluorophore to allow for visualization in the cell experiments. The toxin–conjugate was then incubated with macrophage cells for 4 h at a final concentration of 300 nM. Afterward, cells were thoroughly washed, fixed and treated with DAPI to stain the nucleus. WT C3larvintrunc and C3larvinA toxins were used as controls and acted as references to classify the phenotypes arising from the different variants tested. The C3larvinA phenotype showed the appearance of small, dispersed clusters (Figure 6A, arrows). Conversely, C3larvintrunc-treated cells exhibited a phenotype in which the protein appeared as larger puncta within the cell (Figure 6D, arrows). This phenotype was clearly distinctive from that of C3larvinA (Figure 6A). Two N-terminal deletions, C3larvinA ΔY2-A31 and C3larvinA ΔY2-W34 (Figure 6B,C) displayed phenotypes like that of C3larvinA. Attention was then shifted to the single-residue difference between ΔY2-W34 and C3larvintrunc, resulting in the addition of the ΔY2-W34 K36E variant to the present study. Figure 6E (see arrow) reveals that this variant had an identical protein sequence and similar cellular phenotype to C3larvintrunc, suggesting a role of Lys36 and/or net charge in the translocation activity of the enzyme.

Figure 6. Fluorescence microscopy of J774A.1 mouse macrophage cells treated with toxins conjugated with Dylight 488.

Figure 6

Macrophage cells were seeded overnight at 500000 cells/well before subsequent treatment with 300 nM of toxin for 4 h. Samples were exposed for 40 ms at 358 nm for DAPI and 100 ms at 495 for FITC. Data were analyzed using ImageJ. (A) C3larvinA WT; (B) C3larvinA ΔY2-A31; (C) C3larvinA ΔY2-W34; (D) C3larvintrunc; (E) C3larvinA ΔY2-W34 K36E. Co-localization of C3larvinA and C3larvintrunc with cellular RhoA. Mouse macrophage J774A.1 cells were seeded overnight at 250000 cells/ml before treatment with 300 nM of toxin conjugated with Dylight 488 for 4 h. Samples were exposed for 40 ms at 358 nm for DAPI, 100 ms at 495 nm for FITC, and 100 ms at 532 nm for TRITC. Data were analyzed using ImageJ. (F) C3larvinA-treated cells and (G) C3larvintrunc-treated cells.

A final study was conducted to further investigate the different cellular phenotypes displayed in C3larvintrunc- and C3larvinA-treated macrophage cells. When combining the current results from those of previous studies, namely that C3larvintrunc fails to elucidate morphology changes within treated cells, it is reasonable to assume that the toxin is failing to target cellular RhoA, despite its ability to modify the G-protein in vitro [32]. It is also important to note that, in a yeast-based assay, C3larvintrunc showed strong cytotoxicity against yeast cells when the toxin was expressed in the cytoplasm under the control of a CUP1 promoter [28,32]. This yeast cell cytotoxicity was dependent on the enzymatic activity of the toxin since catalytically inactive variants showed no cell killing effects [48]. These studies suggest that C3larvintrunc is catalytically capable of disrupting cellular function in macrophage cells yet is unable to do so when added into the extracellular medium. In contrast, C3larvinA causes extensive morphology changes in toxin-treated macrophage cells, indicating it is successfully modifying its target substrate [29]. This theory was tested through a co-localization study in which cellular RhoA was targeted using antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 595, a red fluorophore. As expected, the fluorescence from both C3larvinA and RhoA overlapped, resulting in a yellow colour, indicating colocalization of the toxin and its RhoA target (Figure 6F, arrows). Conversely, samples treated with C3larvintrunc largely appeared green (C3larvinA) and red (RhoA) (Figure 6G, arrows), indicating that the RhoA protein was not being targeted by the green C3larvintrunc toxin–conjugate. Therefore, despite being visible within the cell, the C3larvintrunc toxin fails to target/modify cellular RhoA in live mammalian cells.

Discussion

N-terminal residues within the α1-helix of the C3larvinA toxin from P. larvae were probed to determine their functional role in cell entry and RhoA modification. The extended N-terminus of C3larvinA imparts the ability to target cellular RhoA while significantly improving its catalytic ability when compared with the truncated, C3larvintrunc [28,32]. Deletions and point-mutations within the extended N-terminal region revealed key structural interactions between the α1-helix and the active-site of the enzyme. Residues previously identified through computational studies were shown to participate in the orientation of the N-terminus and demonstrated their important role in the enzymatic activity of the protein. Additionally, novel interactions were discovered, revealing the structural role of two additional residues important to catalytic function. Interestingly, only a single residue was found to participate in the cell translocation function of the toxin.

Deletions were made to the C3larvinA N-terminus based on a 13-residue region of interest. The consistent decrease in kcat values with subsequent deletions shows the importance of N-terminal interactions to manage enzymatic function. Removal of these interactions likely allows more flexibility in the ARTT-loop, resulting in conformations that are catalytically less efficient. Evidence of this can be seen in the C3larvintrunc crystal structure, which has an extended ARTT-loop conformation when compared with other C3-toxin structures. The increased flexibility may allow the substrate-binding site to adopt additional protein conformations, some of which may not be catalytically active (or less so). While not as efficient for enzymatic function, the open conformation has similar affinity for the NAD+ substrate. The loss of interactions of the enzyme core with the N-terminus may allow the protein to increase interactions with the NAD+ molecule and form a tighter but less catalytically efficient Michaelis complex. Characterization of these variants along with the two multiresidue variants, D23A/K25A/D27A/R28A and F24A/A31L/W34A, led to the discovery that Asp23 and Ala31 play important secondary roles in substrate-binding and catalytic activity.

A network of interactions between the N-terminus and key catalytic residues was uncovered through the investigation of Asp23 and Ala31, and later through the investigation of Lys36. The interactions can be classified into two main clusters, which orient either the Q-X-E or S-T-S motifs. Within the first cluster, the semi-conserved alanine residue from the S-motif, and lysine residue from the B-motif contribute to the orientation of Tyr189. Residue packing between the Ala31 and Ile153 side chains directs the peptide bond of Ile153 to interact with the corresponding bond in Tyr189. The Tyr189 side chain is then oriented through repulsion electrostatics via the combined positions of the Lys36 and Tyr178 side chains (Figure 4A). The B-motif is also responsible for the second cluster of interactions which orient the S-T-S motif (Figure 4H). The Asp23 side chain positions the peptide bond of Tyr104 allowing for the formation of hydrogen bonds with Ser152. Interestingly, these two clusters of interactions are connected through the hydrogen bonds formed between the S-T-S and Q-X-E motifs (Figure 4I), which contribute to the structure of the active-site [10,14].

The contribution of each residue to protein stability was assessed to better understand their respective roles in enzyme structure and function. The substitution of both Ile153 and Tyr178 were predicted to be largely destabilizing, and indeed the respective TM values supported this prediction. These findings further substantiated the classification of these residues as structural, and the loss of activity associated with their substitution indicates that this interaction is not only beneficial to protein stability, but also to enzymatic function. Interestingly, G35T and A31L were predicted to be mildly destabilizing; however, the TM values were reduced by at least 3°C, like those of I153A and Y178A. All four residues were identified in silico as participating in the interaction between the α1-helix and ARTT-loop [2]; therefore, substitution would be expected to alter residue packing between these structures. This could lead to increased flexibility within the protein, causing the decrease in thermal stability and producing more protein conformations with an overall reduction in catalytic efficiency reflected in the reduced GH activity. At last, the substitution of either Asp23 or Lys36 were both predicted to be stabilizing to protein structure, but only the substitution of Lys36 showed this effect. Since Lys36 and Tyr178 work to position Tyr189 through repulsive forces, the replacement of this residue would be expected to have a stabilizing effect on protein structure. However, this interaction is also key to proper enzymatic function in ensuring the orientation of the Q-X-E motif into a catalytically efficient conformation, hence, the Lys36 substitution caused a loss of GH activity.

In addition to enzymatic function and protein stability, residues within the N-terminus of C3larvinA were predicted to contribute to cell intoxication. This prediction was based on the morphological changes seen in C3larvinA-treated macrophage cells, and the lack of changes in cells treated with C3larvintrunc [29,32]. As previously stated, these changes in morphology represent a loss of activity of cellular RhoA, indicating that the toxin has successfully infected the target cell and associated with its physiological target. It was previously shown that a 17-residue N-terminal extension from the α1-helix of C3bot1 on to C3larvintrunc allowed C3larvintrunc to elicit morphology changes within macrophage cells, similar to full-length C3 toxins [32]. This suggested that critical residues responsible for mediating cell entry are in the N-terminus. To date, very little is known about the cellular uptake of C3 toxins. Some research has suggested that C3 toxins are internalized into endosomes and traverse into the cytoplasm during the acidification process; others propose that C3 toxins bind membrane-bound vimentin using an RGD motif to gain access to the cell [47,49]. Currently, the only widely accepted theory is that these toxins are selectively internalized and inevitably locate to cytoplasmic Rho-GTPases.

To investigate the membrane-translocation activity of the N-terminal variants, a fluorescence microscopy assay was developed. Interestingly, C3larvintrunc, which was previously shown to be unable to enter cells, was visible inside macrophages in fluorescence microscopy experiments [32]. Therefore, while the protein may be unable to exert toxic effects on the cell, these findings suggest that the truncated toxin can gain access to the host cell by translocating across the plasma cell membrane. Co-localization studies confirmed that C3larvintrunc was not targeting the RhoA substrate, leading to the possibility that, although the protein can enter host cells, it may be trapped within the vesicle system that parades from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm. Conversely, C3larvinA displayed a dispersed phenotype in the cell and was shown to colocalize with RhoA. A similar phenotype was seen in all N-terminal deletions that were tested, including the ΔY2-W34 deletion, which is the same length as C3larvintrunc. Importantly, there is a single-residue difference found at position 36 between C3larvinA ΔY2-W34 and C3larvintrunc proteins that may account for the different phenotypes: Lys compared with Glu in C3larvinA and C3larvintrunc, respectively. A final variant, ΔY2-W34 K36E, was therefore tested in the assay and confirmed to share a phenotype with C3larvintrunc.

As a member of the B-motif, Lys36 is not conserved among C3-toxins, raising the question of how it contributes to cell entry. If C3larvinA shares a mode of entry and translocation like that of other C3-toxins, the importance of this residue may lie solely in its charge. The inability of C3larvintrunc to exert toxic effects on target cells without an N-terminal addition from C3bot1 led to the original interpretation that C3larvintrunc was lacking the machinery required to gain access to the cell. Given the current findings, however, it is possible that the residues from the N-terminal additional segment imparted C3larvintrunc with the ability to escape the vesicle system and translocate into the cell cytoplasm. This change may not have been due to the specific residues or a given length but may instead be based on the protein net or global charge. Computational analysis of C3larvintrunc with and without the N-terminal addition revealed that there was a shift in protein dipole when the N-terminus was extended [42]. This change also made the dipole more comparable with that of other C3-toxins, possibly indicating the importance of this global charge to cell intoxication, as seen previously [42]. Due to the largely unknown nature of the cellular pathway taken by C3-toxins, it is difficult to say how this charge is affecting translocation, and this observation will require further studies.

C3larvinA offers many unique opportunities for future research. It shares qualities between both the C2- and C3-subgroups that may prove insightful to the evolutionary relationship between the two groups. Namely, identifying equivalent residues in C3-toxins to the B-motif, which has been shown in this work to be supportive to enzymatic function in C3larvinA, is an interesting avenue for research pursuit. Furthermore, the possible relationship between protein dipole and cellular localization may prove useful to extending the current understanding of cellular intoxication, and therefore, warrants additional examination.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure S1

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Olivier Tremblay and Michael McCarthy for their technical assistance during the present study.

Abbreviations

AFB

American Foulbrood

ARTT

ADP-ribosyl-turn-turn

CD

circular dichroism

DAPI

2-(4-amidinophenyl)-1H-indole-6-carboxamidine

ERIC

enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus

GH

glycohydrolase

mART

mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase

PN

phospho-nicotinamide

WT

wild-type

ɛ-AMP

etheno-adenosine monophosphate

ɛ-NAD+

etheno-β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

β-NAD+

β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

Data Availability

All data shown in this work are readily available upon request from the authors at rmerrill@uoguelph.ca. The C3larvinA homology model was built with Phyre2 http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/∼phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index using the PDB: ID 5URP, found at https://www.rcsb.org/.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Discovery, DND and Strategic Grants [grant #04626, #04262 and #494213, respectively (to A.R.M.)].

Author Contribution

A.R.M. conceived the project. K.A.H. and M.T. performed the experiments. K.A.H., M.T. and A.R.M. wrote the paper.

References

  • 1.Cohen M.S. and Chang P. (2018) Insights into the biogenesis, function, and regulation of ADP-ribosylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 236–243 10.1038/nchembio.2568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simon N.C., Aktories K. and Barbieri J.T. (2014) Novel bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins: structure and function. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 599–611 10.1038/nrmicro3310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shniffer A., Visschedyk D.D., Ravulapalli R., Suarez G., Turgeon Z.J., Petrie A.A. et al. (2012) Characterization of an actin-targeting ADP-ribosyltransferase from Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 37030–37041 10.1074/jbc.M112.397612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jorgensen R., Purdy A.E., Fieldhouse R.J., Kimber M.S., Bartlett D.H. and Merrill A.R. (2008) Cholix toxin, a novel ADP-ribosylating factor from Vibrio cholerae. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10671–10678 10.1074/jbc.M710008200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aktories K., Rosener S., Blaschke U. and Chhatwal G.S. (1988) Botulinum ADP-ribosyltransferase C3. Purification of the enzyme and characterization of the ADP-ribosylation reaction in platelet membranes. Eur. J. Biochem. 172, 445–450 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13908.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aktories K. and Just I. (2005) Clostridial Rho-inhibiting protein toxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 291, 113–145 10.1007/3-540-27511-8_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pautsch A., Vogelsgesang M., Trankle J., Herrmann C. and Aktories K. (2005) Crystal structure of the C3bot-RalA complex reveals a novel type of action of a bacterial exoenzyme. EMBO J. 24, 3670–3680 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aktories K. (2015) Rho-modifying bacterial protein toxins. Pathog. Dis. 73, ftv091 10.1093/femspd/ftv091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilde C., Vogelsgesang M. and Aktories K. (2003) Rho-specific Bacillus cereus ADP-ribosyltransferase C3cer cloning and characterization. Biochemistry 42, 9694–9702 10.1021/bi034583b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yates S.P., Jorgensen R., Andersen G.R. and Merrill A.R. (2006) Stealth and mimicry by deadly bacterial toxins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 123–133 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Palazzo L., Mikoc A. and Ahel I. (2017) ADP-ribosylation: new facets of an ancient modification. FEBS J. 10.1111/febs.14078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Han S. and Tainer J.A. (2002) The ARTT motif and a unified structural understanding of substrate recognition in ADP-ribosylating bacterial toxins and eukaryotic ADP-ribosyltransferases. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291, 523–529 10.1078/1438-4221-00162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Menetrey J., Flatau G., Stura E.A., Charbonnier J.B., Gas F., Teulon J.M. et al. (2002) NAD binding induces conformational changes in Rho ADP-ribosylating Clostridium botulinum C3 exoenzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 30950–30957 10.1074/jbc.M201844200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holbourn K.P., Shone C.C. and Acharya K.R. (2006) A family of killer toxins. Exploring the mechanism of ADP-ribosylating toxins. FEBS J. 273, 4579–4593 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05442.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsuge H., Tsurumura T., Toda A., Murata H., Toniti W. and Yoshida T. (2017) Comparative studies of Actin- and Rho-specific ADP-ribosylating toxins: insight from structural biology. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 399, 69–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Toda A., Tsurumura T., Yoshida T., Tsumori Y. and Tsuge H. (2015) Rho GTPase recognition by C3 exoenzyme based on C3-RhoA complex structure. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 19423–19432 10.1074/jbc.M115.653220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sanchez J. and Holmgren J. (2008) Cholera toxin structure, gene regulation and pathophysiological and immunological aspects. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 1347–1360 10.1007/s00018-008-7496-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takamura-Enya T., Watanabe M., Totsuka Y., Kanazawa T., Matsushima-Hibiya Y., Koyama K. et al. (2001) Mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation of 2′-deoxyguanosine residue in DNA by an apoptosis-inducing protein, pierisin-1, from cabbage butterfly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 12414–12419 10.1073/pnas.221444598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aktories K., Jung M., Bohmer J., Fritz G., Vandekerckhove J. and Just I. (1995) Studies on the active-site structure of C3-like exoenzymes: involvement of glutamic acid in catalysis of ADP-ribosylation. Biochimie 77, 326–332 10.1016/0300-9084(96)88142-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang Y., Liu S., Lajoie G. and Merrill A.R. (2008) The role of the diphthamide-containing loop within eukaryotic elongation factor 2 in ADP-ribosylation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Biochem. J. 413, 163–174 10.1042/BJ20071083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yates S.P. and Merrill A.R. (2005) Characterization of oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)) analogues using a high-pressure-liquid-chromatography-based NAD(+)-glycohydrolase assay and comparison with fluorescence-based measurements. Anal. Biochem. 340, 41–51 10.1016/j.ab.2005.01.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim H., Jacobson E.L. and Jacobson M.K. (1994) NAD glycohydrolases: a possible function in calcium homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 138, 237–243 10.1007/BF00928467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oppenheimer N.J. (1994) Nad hydrolysis - chemical and enzymatic mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 138, 245–251 10.1007/BF00928468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fieldhouse R.J., Turgeon Z., White D. and Merrill A.R. (2010) Cholera- and anthrax-like toxins are among several new ADP-ribosyltransferases. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1001029 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aktories K., Barmann M., Ohishi I., Tsuyama S., Jakobs K.H. and Habermann E. (1986) Botulinum C2 toxin ADP-ribosylates actin. Nature 322, 390–392 10.1038/322390a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O’Neal C.J., Jobling M.G., Holmes R.K. and Hol W.G. (2005) Structural basis for the activation of cholera toxin by human ARF6-GTP. Science 309, 1093–1096 10.1126/science.1113398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Collier R.J. (2001) Understanding the mode of action of diphtheria toxin: a perspective on progress during the 20th century. Toxicon 39, 1793–1803 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00165-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ebeling J., Funfhaus A., Knispel H., Krska D., Ravulapalli R., Heney K.A. et al. (2017) Characterization of the toxin Plx2A, a RhoA-targeting ADP-ribosyltransferase produced by Paenibacillus larvae. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 5100–5116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Turner M., Tremblay O., Heney K.A., Lugo M.R., Ebeling J., Genersch E. et al. (2020) Characterization of C3larvinA, a novel RhoA-targeting ADP-ribosyltransferase toxin produced by the honey bee pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae. Biosci. Rep. 40, BSR20193405 10.1042/BSR20193405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ebeling J., Knispel H., Fünfhaus A. and Genersch E. (2019) The biological role of the enigmatic C3larvinAB toxin of the honey bee pathogenic bacterium Paenibacillus larvae. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 3091–3106 10.1111/1462-2920.14709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Funfhaus A., Poppinga L. and Genersch E. (2013) Identification and characterization of two novel toxins expressed by the lethal honey bee pathogen Paenibacillus larvae, the causative agent of American foulbrood. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 2951–2965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Krska D., Ravulapalli R., Fieldhouse R.J., Lugo M.R. and Merrill A.R. (2015) C3larvin Toxin, an ADP-ribosyltransferase from Paenibacillus larvae. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 1639–1653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Djukic M., Brzuszkiewicz E., Funfhaus A., Voss J., Gollnow K., Poppinga L. et al. (2014) How to kill the honey bee larva: genomic potential and virulence mechanisms of Paenibacillus larvae. PLoS ONE 9, e90914 10.1371/journal.pone.0090914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Genersch E. (2010) American Foulbrood in honeybees and its causative agent, Paenibacillus larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 103, S10–S19 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.de Graaf D.C., Alippi A.M., Brown M., Evans J.D., Feldlaufer M., Gregorc A. et al. (2006) Diagnosis of American foulbrood in honey bees: a synthesis and proposed analytical protocols. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43, 583–590 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02057.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chan Q.W., Cornman R.S., Birol I., Liao N.Y., Chan S.K., Docking T.R. et al. (2011) Updated genome assembly and annotation of Paenibacillus larvae, the agent of American foulbrood disease of honey bees. BMC Genomics 12, 450 10.1186/1471-2164-12-450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vanengelsdorp D. and Meixner M.D. (2010) A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 103, S80–S95 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ebeling J., Knispel H., Hertlein G., Funfhaus A. and Genersch E. (2016) Biology of Paenibacillus larvae, a deadly pathogen of honey bee larvae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 7387–7395 10.1007/s00253-016-7716-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schafer M.O., Genersch E., Funfhaus A., Poppinga L., Formella N., Bettin B. et al. (2014) Rapid identification of differentially virulent genotypes of Paenibacillus larvae, the causative organism of American foulbrood of honey bees, by whole cell MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Vet. Microbiol. 170, 291–297 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Genersch E., Forsgren E., Pentikainen J., Ashiralieva A., Rauch S., Kilwinski J. et al. (2006) Reclassification of Paenibacillus larvae subsp. pulvifaciens and Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae as Paenibacillus larvae without subspecies differentiation. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 501–511 10.1099/ijs.0.63928-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Erban T., Zitek J., Bodrinova M., Talacko P., Bartos M. and Hrabak J. (2019) Comprehensive proteomic analysis of exoproteins expressed by ERIC I, II, III and IV Paenibacillus larvae genotypes reveals a wide range of virulence factors. Virulence 10, 363–375 10.1080/21505594.2019.1603133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lugo M.R. and Merrill A.R. (2019) An in-silico sequence-structure-function analysis of the N-terminal lobe in CT group bacterial ADP-RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE TOxins. Toxins (Basel) 11, 365 10.3390/toxins11060365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Quan L., Lv Q. and Zhang Y. (2016) STRUM: structure-based prediction of protein stability changes upon single-point mutation. Bioinformatics 32, 2936–2946 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beattie B.K. and Merrill A.R. (1999) A fluorescence investigation of the active site of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15646–15654 10.1074/jbc.274.22.15646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kelley L.A., Mezulis S., Yates C.M., Wass M.N. and Sternberg M.J. (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barth H., Aktories K., Popoff M.R. and Stiles B.G. (2004) Binary bacterial toxins: biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 373–402 10.1128/MMBR.68.3.373-402.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fahrer J., Kuban J., Heine K., Rupps G., Kaiser E., Felder E. et al. (2010) Selective and specific internalization of clostridial C3 ADP-ribosyltransferases into macrophages and monocytes. Cell. Microbiol. 12, 233–247 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01393.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Turgeon Z., White D., Jorgensen R., Visschedyk D., Fieldhouse R.J., Mangroo D. et al. (2009) Yeast as a tool for characterizing mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 300, 97–106 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01777.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rohrbeck A., Schroder A., Hagemann S., Pich A., Holtje M., Ahnert-Hilger G. et al. (2014) Vimentin mediates uptake of C3 exoenzy0me. PLoS ONE 9, e101071 10.1371/journal.pone.0101071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1

Data Availability Statement

All data shown in this work are readily available upon request from the authors at rmerrill@uoguelph.ca. The C3larvinA homology model was built with Phyre2 http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/∼phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index using the PDB: ID 5URP, found at https://www.rcsb.org/.


Articles from Bioscience Reports are provided here courtesy of Portland Press Ltd

RESOURCES