Abstract
Fibrosis is a key pathological feature in muscle disorders, but its quantification mainly relies on histological and biochemical assays. Muscle fibrosis most frequently is entangled with other pathological processes, as cell membrane lesions, inflammation, necrosis, regeneration, or fatty infiltration, making in vivo assessment difficult. Here, we (1) describe a novel mouse model with variable levels of induced skeletal muscle fibrosis displaying minimal inflammation and no fat infiltration, and (2) report how fibrosis affects non-invasive metrics derived from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and ultrasound shear-wave elastography (SWE) associated with a passive biomechanical assay. Our findings show that collagen fraction correlates with multiple non-invasive metrics. Among them, muscle stiffness as measured by SWE, T2, and extracellular volume (ECV) as measured by NMR have the strongest correlations with histology. We also report that combining metrics in a multi-modality index allowed better discrimination between fibrotic and normal skeletal muscles. This study demonstrates that skeletal muscle fibrosis leads to alterations that can be assessed in vivo with multiple imaging parameters. Furthermore, combining NMR and SWE passive biomechanical assay improves the non-invasive evaluation of skeletal muscle fibrosis and may allow disentangling it from co-occurring pathological alterations in more complex scenarios, such as muscular dystrophies.
Subject terms: Diagnostic markers, Neuromuscular disease, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasonography
Introduction
Fibrosis is observed in almost any tissue in response to injury or within pathological processes. It is characterized by loss of tissue function due to an accumulation of extracellular matrix, predominantly composed of collagen1. In skeletal muscles, diffuse or endomysial fibrosis develops in various conditions, including diabetes and aging, but is particularly relevant in neuromuscular disorders such as muscular dystrophies. In these diseases, skeletal muscle fibrosis can be observed even before the detection of muscle degeneration2 and has been associated with worse prognoses3 and reduced effect of possible therapies4.
While other skeletal muscle alterations such as atrophy, fat infiltration, and inflammation may be non-invasively assessed with NMR5, quantitative methods to evaluate skeletal muscle fibrosis non-invasively are still lacking. Currently, fibrosis is mainly quantified by histological and biochemical assays. However, these methods require biopsies, invasive procedures that poorly reflect the whole muscle status.
Imaging modalities including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and ultrasound (US) evaluate the whole muscle non-invasively and may be sensitive to fibrosis6–13. In the heart, myocardial fibrosis has been related to increased extracellular volume (ECV) estimated with NMR6,7. In skeletal muscles, thickened perimysial layers can be imaged with NMR11, but it depends on high spatial resolution, currently unavailable in clinical scanners. Other NMR variables, such as T1, T2, and T2*, may also be altered by fibrosis in skeletal muscle8–10, although it is unclear how and to which extent. Fibrosis has also been associated with increased muscle stiffness in passive biomechanical assays14,15. Ultrasound shear-wave elastography (SWE) allows real-time assessment of tissue stiffness and has been considered a reliable marker for staging hepatic fibrosis13, being potentially sensitive to skeletal muscle fibrosis.
The use of NMR and SWE to evaluate skeletal muscle fibrosis is however challenging. Skeletal muscle fibrosis most frequently develops simultaneously with other pathological processes such as membrane lesions, inflammation, necrosis, regeneration, and fat infiltration, which may affect both NMR and SWE metrics, possibly impairing fibrosis estimation.
In this study, we aimed at assessing how collagen fraction, an invasive marker of skeletal muscle fibrosis, correlates with non-invasive NMR and SWE metrics when other pathological processes are minimized. For that, we developed a non-dystrophic mouse model with variable levels of skeletal muscle fibrosis while minimizing inflammation, fat infiltration, and membrane leakage. Mice were evaluated in vivo by NMR [native-T1 (T1 before injection of Gd contrast agent), extracellular volume (ECV), T2, T2*, perfusion, and texture analysis on T1-weighted images] and SWE (muscle shear modulus at variable muscle length). Correlations between NMR/SWE metrics and collagen fraction obtained from histological analysis were investigated, in addition to partial correlation analyses where perfusion metrics from NMR and inflammation, calcification, and centronucleation scores from histology were included as covariates. The sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive NMR and SWE metrics in the identification of fibrotic muscles were then evaluated.
Results
Fibrosis was successfully induced in healthy skeletal muscles
Two genetic backgrounds, C57BL/6 and DBA/2J, were selected to allow the induction of variable levels of fibrosis in wild-type mice. DBA/2J mice harbour a polymorphism in the Ltbp4 gene that increases the susceptibility to develop fibrosis when compared to C57BL/6 mice16,17. A combination of one extensive injury (electroporation of the left leg) and repeated localized injuries [intramuscular injection of saline solution thrice weekly in the left tibialis cranialis (TC)] was applied twice. A 2-week interval after each injury cycle allowed tissue regeneration and reduction of the inflammation levels while fibrosis still developed. Uninjured contralateral TCs (right) served as control muscles in pairwise comparisons (Fig. 1).
This combination of extensive and localized repeated injuries successfully induced endomysial skeletal muscle fibrosis in wild-type mice (Fig. 2a–f), with approximately 40% increase in total and endomysial collagen fraction in injured muscles. Total collagen surface fraction in Sirius red stains was 17 (3)% in injured muscles and 12.5 (2)% in control muscles (delta: 4 (4)%, p = 0.0004; Fig. 2e). Endomysial collagen fraction was 14 (2)% versus 10 (3)% in injured and controls muscles, respectively (delta: 3 (4)%, p = 0.002; Fig. 2e). When each strain was evaluated separately, total collagen fraction was increased in both strains (DBA/2J-injured: 18.0 (3.0)%, DBA/2J-control: 13.0 (3.0)%, delta: 5.0 (4.0)%, p = 0.006; C57BL/6-injured: 15.0 (2.5)%, C57BL/6-control: 11.0 (2.5)%, delta: 3.0 (2.5)%, p = 0.03), and endomysial collagen was increased in DBA/2J mice (DBA/2J-injured: 14.0 (2.5)%, DBA/2J-control: 10.0 (2.0)%, delta: 4.0 (5.0)%, p = 0.006; C57BL/6-injured: 12.0 (2.0)%, C57BL/6-control: 9.0 (2.5)%, delta: 3.0 (2.5)%, p = 0.11).
DBA/2J mice presented higher collagen fraction than C57BL/6 mice in injured TCs, for both total collagen (DBA/2J-Inj: 18 (3)%, C57Bl/6-Inj: 15 (3)%, p = 0.0005) and endomysial collagen (DBA/2J-Inj: 14 (3)%, C57Bl/6-Inj: 12 (2)%, p = 0.02). No differences were observed in non-injured muscles from DBA/2J and C57Bl/6 mice for total collagen fraction (DBA/2J: 13 (3)%, C57Bl/6: 11 (3)%, p = 0.05) and for endomysial collagen fraction (DBA/2J: 10 (2)%, C57Bl/6: 9 (3)%, p = 0.31) (Fig. 2e).
The proposed model induced variable collagen fraction in skeletal muscles, with total collagen ranging from 8 to 25%, and endomysial collagen ranging from 6 to 20% of the tissue surface. Total and endomysial collagen fractions were strongly correlated (R = 0.92, p = 2.8e−15, Fig. 2f). Despite the presence of fibrosis in injured muscles, no fat infiltration and only mild to moderate inflammation were observed (Fig. 2g–m). Centronucleated regenerating fibers were common features after injury in both mouse strains (Fig. 2g,h,m). Additionally, mineralized necrotic fibers could be observed in injured DBA/2J muscles (Fig. 2g,l).
Perfusion is higher in injured skeletal muscles
Muscle perfusion was assessed with NMR-arterial spin labelling (ASL). A hyperaemic response paradigm with ischemia–reperfusion stress was used to increase the global perfusion and highlight differences between normal and altered muscles18. Perfusion was measured at rest for 3′ 20″, during 6′ 50″ of ischemia and following the hyperaemic response for 10′ 40″.
The global volume repaid during the hyperaemic response after ischemia (total perfusion) was higher in injured muscles (total perfusion: injured: 252.6 (138.6) ml/100 g, control: 50.0 (161.0) ml/100 g, delta: 172.9 (88.4) ml/100 g, p = 2.3e−5), and presented a mild but significant correlation with endomysial collagen (R = 0.35, p = 0.035). When the strains were evaluated separately, both presented higher muscle perfusion in injured muscles (DBA/2J-injured: 271.1 (151.6) ml/100 g, DBA/2J-control: 97.1 (190.5) ml/100 g, delta: 187.4 (63.5) ml/100 g, p = 0.001; C57BL/6-injured: 207.7 (106.5) ml/100 g, C57BL/6-control: 35.0 (142.6) ml/100 g, delta: 137.4 (141.1) ml/100 g, p = 0.047). No difference was detected in maximal perfusion when grouping the two strains (injured: 91.5 (37.0) ml/min/100 g, control: 80.9 (50.4) ml/min/100 g, delta: 14.5 (62.8) ml/min/100 g, p = 0.20) or when the strains were evaluated separately (DBA/2J-injured: 92.2 (38.3) ml/min/100 g, DBA/2J-control: 74.3 (66.5) ml/min/100 g, delta: 19.3 (61.9) ml/min/100 g, p = 0.12; C57BL/6-injured: 77.5 (40.6) ml/min/100 g, C57BL/6-control: 86.0 (25.7) ml/min/100 g, delta: 4.2 (41.5) ml/min/100 g, p = 0.94). Increased total perfusion after injury could be caused by altered vascular control, angiogenesis or vascular remodelling during the regeneration process19,20, all possibly affecting other NMR and SWE measurements. To take vascular alterations into account, total and maximal perfusion were considered as covariates in all partial correlation analyses.
Extracellular volume (ECV) correlates with collagen fraction in skeletal muscles
ECV was estimated from muscle and plasma T1 measured before and one hour after an injection of Gd-contrast agent (Gd-CA, Supplementary Fig. S1), according to Eq. (1):
1 |
Injured muscles presented approximately 15% higher ECV when all mice were evaluated together (injured: 6.6 (2.0)%, control: 5.9 (1.4)%, delta: 0.9 (1.4)%, p = 0.0008; Fig. 3a). When the strains were evaluated separately, the differences in ECV did not reach significance (DBA/2J-injured: 8.0 (2.1)%, DBA/2J-control: 6.6 (1.9), delta: 1.4 (1.3)%, p = 0.13; C57BL/6-injured: 6.4 (0.6)%, C57BL/6-control: 5.7 (0.4)%, delta: 0.4 (0.8)%, p = 0.07). ECV correlated significantly with collagen fraction (ECV × Collagen-total: R = 0.50, p = 0.002; Fig. 3b). Within the partial correlation analysis, the correlation between ECV and collagen fraction was reduced, but remained significant (ECV × Collagen-total: R′ = 0.38, p = 0.028).
No difference could be detected in native-T1 between injured and control muscles when the two strains were evaluated together (injured: 1647.0 (38.6) ms, control: 1649.9 (37.6) ms, delta: − 9.5 (38.6) ms, p = 0.18) or when the strains were evaluated separately (DBA/2J-injured: 1661.6 (29.9) ms, DBA/2J-control: 1657.0 (48.6) ms, delta: − 3.5 (37.1) ms, p = 0.90; C57BL/6-injured: 1628.7 (59.0), C57BL/6-control: 1635.0 (31.1), delta: − 28.2 (35.5) ms, p = 0.46). No correlation between native-T1 and collagen fraction could be detected (Supplementary Table S1).
T2-maps revealed a negative correlation between T2 and collagen fraction in skeletal muscle
In this study, we used two complementary approaches to estimate T2 values: MSME, which allows the estimation of T2 values voxel-by-voxel with a high spatial resolution (T2-map), but with a possible bias due to diffusion and local susceptibility effects; and ISIS-CPMG, which allows the extraction of a T2-spectrum from a volume, with less bias due to diffusion and local susceptibility changes, but with lower spatial resolution.
T2-maps estimated from MSME data showed a slightly reduced T2 in injured muscles in paired comparisons when both strains were grouped (injured: 21.4 (0.8) ms, control: 21.5 (0.6) ms, delta: − 0.2 (0.7), p = 0.014; Fig. 4a). However, no significant difference was detected when each strain was evaluated separately (DBA/2J-injured: 21.1 (1.2) ms, DBA/2J-control: 21.4 (0.3) ms, delta: − 0.2 (0.3) ms, p = 0.56; C57BL/6-injured: 21.8 (0.7) ms, C57BL/6-control: 22.2 (0.9) ms, delta: − 0.8 (0.6) ms, p = 0.16). T2 estimated from MSME data correlated negatively with total collagen fraction (R = − 0.48, p = 0.003; Fig. 4b), and this correlation was stronger when inflammation, centronucleated fibers, calcifications, and perfusion variables were considered as covariates in the partial correlation analysis (R′ = − 0.50, p = 0.003).
ISIS-CPMG data was acquired on a voxel over the tibialis cranialis muscle (mean dimensions 0.9 × 1.0 × 4.6 mm3; Supplementary Fig. S2a), and the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) allowed to model the signal as a combination of three components with different T2 values. The T2 values for each component (short-, intermediary- and long-T2) and the respective fractions were estimated. However, despite the slight reduction in muscle T2 estimated from MSME data, no differences could be observed between injured and control muscles for any of the T2 values or fractions extracted from ISIS-CPMG data (Supplementary Table S2). Additionally, T2 values and fractions extracted from ISIS-CPMG data did not correlate with collagen fraction (Supplementary Table S1).
Reduced water T2* in injured skeletal muscles
Ultra-short time to echo (UTE) acquisitions using variable echo times allowed the estimation of T2* values in the tissue. UTE signal decay was best characterized by a bi-exponential model with a short-T2* component chemically shifted by 970 Hz from the water frequency, and a water component with long T2*. 970 Hz is the chemical shift difference between water and the methylene group in macromolecules at 7 T10,21,22. The source of this signal is still debatable, being possibly originated from lipids10, phospholipids, and/or collagen or other macromolecules21,22. No fat suppression was used to avoid interfering with this oscillating signal since a contribution from collagen cannot be excluded.
No differences were observed in the short-T2* value or in the fractions of each component when the two strains were analysed together (short-T2*: injured 0.51 (0.71) ms, control 0.63 (0.88) ms, delta: − 0.11 (0.44), p = 0.26; short-T2* fraction: injured 5.8 (4.1)%, control 4.9 (3.5)%, delta: 0.35 (3.01)%, p = 0.61) or separately (short-T2*: DBA/2J-injured: 0.86 (1.99) ms, DBA/2J-control: 0.82 (1.13) ms, delta: − 0.14 (1.18) ms, p = 0.90; C57BL/6-injured: 0.39 (0.16) ms, C57BL/6-control: 0.43 (0.26) ms, delta: − 0.08 (0.25) ms, p = 0.46; short-T2* fraction: DBA/2J-injured: 5.9 (5.2)%, DBA/2J-control: 4.4 (4.7)%, delta: 0.4 (3.4)%, p = 0.71; C57BL/6-injured: 5.0 (2.7)%, C57BL/6-control: 6.1 (1.6)%, delta: 0.3 (1.8)%, p = 0.70).
Interestingly, water long-T2* was reduced in injured muscles (long-T2*: injured 13.0 (6.6) ms, control 17.3 (7.0) ms, delta: − 5.1 (8.4), p = 0.005; Fig. 4c). However, no difference was detected in water long-T2* when each strain was evaluated separately (DBA/2J-injured: 14.1 (9.3) ms, DBA/2J-control: 18.5 (7.2) ms, delta: − 5.7 (10.2), p = 0.12; C57BL/6-injured: 12.2 (4.7) ms, C57BL/6-control: 16.9 (4.8) ms, delta: − 4.7 (3.7) ms, p = 0.13).
No correlation was observed between water long-T2* and collagen fraction (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Table S1). However, there was a mild but significant correlation between endomysial collagen fraction and short-T2* in the partial correlation analysis, when histological and perfusion changes were considered as covariates (R′ = 0.36, p = 0.038; Supplementary Table S1).
Texture analysis in high spatial resolution images
Texture analysis was performed by extracting histogram features from T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) images acquired at 50 μm in-plane resolution and 200 μm slice thickness. Figure 5 shows representative images of a C57Bl/6 and a DBA/2J mouse, and the histograms of signal intensity in the left (injured) and right (control) tibialis cranialis. Skewness, kurtosis, and energy values for injured and control muscles are detailed in Supplementary Table S3. When the strains were evaluated together, injured muscles exhibited higher kurtosis and energy (kurtosis-injured: 4.7 (2.8), kurtosis-control: 3.6 (0.7), p = 0.03; energy-injured: 11.1 (3.2) × 103, energy-control: 9.5 (2.5) × 103, p = 0.02). When the strains were evaluated separately, C57Bl/6 mice had increased energy in injured muscles (injured: 13.3 (3.4), control: 9.4 (1.7), p = 0.015). Kurtosis correlated with total (R = 0.33, p = 0.046) and endomysial collagen fraction (R = 0.42, p = 0.010), and energy correlated with endomysial collagen fraction (R = 0.35, p = 0.037). When histological and perfusion variables were considered as covariates in the partial correlation analysis, only kurtosis correlated with endomysial collagen fraction (R = 0.36, p = 0.039; Supplementary Table S1).
SWE detects increased stiffness in fibrotic skeletal muscles
B-mode ultrasound images and shear modulus (SM) maps were acquired at 0°, 40°, 60°, and 80° of ankle plantar flexion (Supplementary Fig. S3). SM values increased during ankle extension for both strains (Fig. 6a). No significant difference was observed between injured and control muscles when grouping all mice, but when the strains were evaluated separately DBA/2J showed reduced stiffness in injured muscles at rest, and C57BL/6 mice presented increased stiffness at 40° and 60° of plantar flexion (Supplementary Table S4).
A viscosity index, SMi, was calculated according to Eq. (2):
2 |
with SM80 and SM0 the shear modulus at 80° and 0° of ankle plantar flexion, respectively.
SMi was increased in injured muscles when C57BL/6 and DBA/2J mice were evaluated together (1.17 (1.00) a.u. versus 0.67 (0.44) a.u., delta: 0.29 (0.86) a.u., p = 0.016; Fig. 6b). No difference could be detected when the strains were evaluated separately (Supplementary Table S4).
Both SM80 and SMi correlated with total collagen fraction (SM80: R = 0.46, p = 0.009, SMi: R = 0.41, p = 0.019, Fig. 6c). SM80 correlated with total collagen fraction when perfusion and histological alterations were considered as covariates in the partial correlation analysis (R′ = 0.35, p = 0.044), and both SM0 (at rest) and SM80 correlated with endomysial collagen fraction in partial correlation analyses (SM0: R′ = 0.38, p = 0.031, SM80: R′ = 0.35, p = 0.047; Supplementary Table S1).
Combining non-invasive modalities improves the identification of skeletal muscle fibrosis
To evaluate the ability of NMR and SWE markers to identify skeletal muscle fibrosis, the metrics that correlated with collagen fraction (Supplementary Table S1) were selected for ROC analysis. Since SMi was evaluated, SM0 and SM80 were excluded from this analysis to avoid redundancies. The collagen fraction in our murine model was lower than the maximum values observed in muscle dystrophy patients23, so samples were divided into only two groups. Samples with total collagen fraction up to 14% were classified as normal (22 samples), and those with total collagen fraction from 15 to 25% were classified as fibrotic (14 samples). The threshold of 14% corresponded to the intersection between the median collagen fraction plus the interquartile range for non-injured muscles (12.5% (2.0), and the median minus the interquartile range for injured muscles (17.0% (3.0)) (Fig. 2f).
When each metric was evaluated separately, SMi and ECV presented the highest AUCs (Table 1). The evaluated metrics were then gradually added to assess the diagnostic power of composed indexes. The same weight was assigned to all metrics, and each metric could contribute positively or negatively to the composed index. Figure 7 shows that when ECV and SMi were added, an AUC of 0.83 was achieved (95% confidence interval: 0.66–1.00), and when ECV, SMi, and T2 (from MSME data) were combined, AUC was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.70–1.00). A maximal AUC of 0.87 was obtained when combining ECV, SMi, short-T2*, T2 (from MSME data), and Kurtosis (95% confidence interval 0.74–1.00). Including more metrics did not further improve the AUC.
Table 1.
Modality | Metric | AUC | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
SWE | SMi | 0.77 | 0.60–0.95 |
NMR-ECV | ECV | 0.74 | 0.56–0.93 |
NMR-T2 map (MSME) | T2 | 0.69 | 0.51–0.87 |
NMR-T2* map (UTE) | Short-T2* | 0.63 | 0.41–0.85 |
NMR-texture | Kurtosis | 0.60 | 0.40–0.81 |
Energy | 0.51 | 0.31–0.71 |
AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval, SWE shear-wave elastography, ECV extracellular volume.
Discussion
The present study shows that skeletal muscle fibrosis affects non-invasive metrics, notably leading to higher ECV, lower T2 as estimated from MSME data, and increased viscoelastic index. Our murine model presented skeletal muscle fibrosis without fat infiltration or dystrophic lesions, and only minimal inflammation, allowing a better characterization of the effects of fibrosis on NMR and SWE metrics.
Variable levels of fibrosis in skeletal muscles were achieved by combining injuries in aged mice from two genetic backgrounds: while aging leads to an accumulation of extracellular matrix24, DBA/2J mice are more susceptible to develop fibrosis than C57Bl/6 due to a polymorphism in the Ltbp4 gene16,17. The presence of fibrosis in skeletal muscles while other pathological processes were minimized makes this murine model a promising resource for studies on skeletal muscle fibrosis and potential therapies23.
ECV, estimated from blood- and myocardium-T1 pre-/post-injection of Gd-CA, is a well-validated method to assess myocardial fibrosis6,7. In cardiac imaging, blood- and myocardium-T1 are extracted from the same T1-map. This approach is virtually impossible in skeletal muscle imaging due to the smaller blood volume and the anatomy of blood vessels. In our study, skeletal muscle ECV could be estimated by measuring plasma-T1 in samples collected before and after Gd-CA injection. It is worth noting that we observed ECV values that were considerably lower than those reported in the myocardium6,7, reflecting the smaller microvascular volume fraction and milder fibrotic response in injured skeletal muscles than in post-infarct myocardium.
Several pathogenic mechanisms can affect ECV as measured with NMR: fibrosis, inflammation, and vascular changes can lead to a real expansion of the extracellular space, while membrane lesions allow Gd-CA to distribute inside cells, also resulting in increased ECV measures. In our study, ECV was increased in fibrotic muscles and correlated with collagen fraction when other pathological processes were minimized, indicating that ECV is indeed sensitive to fibrosis in skeletal muscle.
T2 estimated with MSME sequence was slightly lower in injured muscles, but no difference was detected in T2 values and fractions calculated from ISIS-CPMG data. T2 estimated from MSME acquisitions can be biased by diffusion effects combined with local susceptibility changes, while T2 estimated with ISIS-CPMG is less affected due to a shorter inter-echo-spacing. Indeed, simulations suggest that skeletal muscle fibrosis might alter NMR-diffusion metrics25, while a susceptibility-induced signal drop is observed in perimysial layers on high-resolution gradient-echo images11,26. Interestingly, T2 estimated with MSME had a stronger correlation with collagen fraction in the partial correlation analysis, further indicating that reduced T2 due to fibrosis might be masked by increased T2 induced by inflammation, regeneration, and vascular changes.
Injured muscles also presented reduced long-T2*, in agreement with observations in fibrotic myocardium10. However, long-T2* did not correlate with collagen fraction. Kurtosis and energy were also increased in injured muscles in high-resolution gradient-echo T1w-images and correlated with collagen fraction. Changes in both long-T2* and texture features in gradient-echo images (GRE) reinforce the hypothesis of altered tissue susceptibility, which could be a consequence of fibrosis and/or co-occurring alterations, such as calcifications or vascular changes19. Calcifications, blood vessels, and possibly fibrosis lead to changes in local tissue susceptibility and consequently to dephasing and reduced signal intensity, especially in images acquired with GRE sequences. In this study, GRE sequences were used for T2* measurements (UTE) and to acquire high-resolution images (FLASH), both being thus similarly affected by local susceptibilities changes. In the high-resolution images acquired in this study, this local alteration in signal intensity may not have been enough to change the mean signal intensity on the whole muscle. However, the distribution of signal intensities in the region of interest was altered, as quantified by changes in kurtosis and energy.
Interestingly, short-T2* correlated with collagen fraction, despite not showing differences between injured and control muscles. Short-T2* signal with a chemical shift difference of 970 Hz from the water peak has been associated with lipids and phospholipids10, but also with collagen and other macromolecules21,22. The correlation between the oscillatory short-T2* signal and collagen fraction might indicate that this signal is indeed affected by collagen in fibrotic skeletal muscles. How much do collagen density and maturation impact on this signal remains an open question. While tendons present very short T2* and no visible oscillatory component27, collagen solutions present longer T2* values for the component with short-T2*, and a clear oscillatory pattern on the signal21,22. In fibrotic skeletal muscles, non-compacted and/or immature collagen molecules might be contributing to this oscillatory signal with short T2*.
To avoid overfitting, we limited the models used to fit the UTE signal decay to up to two components. There was a clear oscillating component on the signal decay, and F-tests confirmed that the model with an oscillatory component with short-T2* best fitted the majority of the data. As a consequence, this choice of model with one oscillating and one on-resonance component prevented us from quantifying any water component with short-T2* (water bound to macromolecules). While the contribution of bound water was undetectable with this technique, it does not mean it is negligible, and we acknowledge it as a limitation of our approach.
On the SWE metrics, the viscoelastic index was increased in injured skeletal muscles and correlated with collagen fraction, indicating that SWE can detect increased muscle stiffness induced by fibrosis. It is in agreement with previous studies describing the consequences of fibrosis on passive muscle mechanics, with increased collagen fraction leading to higher muscle stiffness14,15,28. Additionally, it agrees with the reported use of SWE to stage liver fibrosis13. Using SWE to evaluate fibrotic skeletal muscle is challenging though: muscle stiffness can be altered by factors not related to pathologies, like muscle contraction and changes in the relative probe-muscle positioning. In this study, we used a standardized positioning system for mice and probe, controlling muscle length and without any pressure exerted by the probe. It allowed measuring muscle viscoelastic properties at different muscle lengths and confirmed that passive stretch-induced stiffening correlates with fibrosis in skeletal muscles.
Among the non-invasive metrics evaluated, ECV and SWE presented the highest power to identify fibrotic skeletal muscles. Combining metrics in a composed index further increased the ability to discriminate between fibrotic and non-fibrotic muscles. We hypothesize that the combination of non-invasive metrics might allow to disentangle skeletal muscle fibrosis from co-occurring pathological alterations in more complex scenarios, and further studies are needed to test this hypothesis. Other metrics, such as those extracted from MR-elastography, diffusion-MRI, and quantitative susceptibility mapping, might improve even more the non-invasive assessment of muscle fibrosis, and such a combined index may allow the non-invasive estimation of the collagen fraction in skeletal muscles.
Fibrosis has been associated with increased distance between muscle fibers and capillaries, pointing to a potential reduction in muscle perfusion due to fibrosis3. Indeed, hypertensive rats present reduced skeletal muscle perfusion, as a potential consequence of perivascular fibrosis29. In our study, however, muscle perfusion was increased in injured muscles, possibly reflecting the angiogenesis and vascular remodelling that take place during muscle regeneration19,20. Both angiogenesis and altered vascular control would affect local tissue susceptibility and proportion of free water, impacting on NMR and SWE metrics and being a confounding factor in our model. As a limitation, we could not assess the muscle vascular network with histology. To account for it, perfusion metrics were considered as an indirect measurement of vascular remodelling and included as covariates in partial correlation analyses.
In conclusion, our findings showed that in a mouse model with skeletal muscle fibrosis and minimized concurrent pathological alterations, fibrosis is associated with increased extracellular volume (ECV) estimated with NMR, increased stretch-induced stiffening detectable with shear-wave elastography (SWE), and reduced T2 from T2 maps. ECV and the viscoelastic index as measured with SWE were the best markers of skeletal muscle fibrosis, and the combination of non-invasive metrics improved the ability to identify fibrotic muscles. This study shows that NMR and SWE are sensitive to skeletal muscle fibrosis when other pathological processes are minimized, a necessary step towards the non-invasive assessment of skeletal muscle fibrosis in complex pathologies, such as muscular dystrophies.
Materials and methods
Animal model
Seven C57Bl/6 and eleven DBA/2J male mice were studied with NMR and histology. One C57BL/6 and one DBA/2J mouse were excluded from SWE analyses due to technical issues during data acquisition (six C57Bl/6 and ten DBA/2J mice studied with SWE). These two genetic backgrounds were selected since DBA/2J mice are more prone to develop fibrosis than C57Bl/6 mice due to a polymorphism in the Ltbp4 gene16,17. This study was performed following French laws and regulations concerning the use of animals for research (license #12975 validated by the Ethical Committee Charles Darwin n-5, Paris, France).
Fibrosis was induced in mice’s left tibialis cranialis muscle (TC) by combining two types of injuries. Electroporation of the left leg (8 pulses, 100 V, 20 ms pulse duration, 2 Hz pulse frequency, pulse train applied twice turning the electrodes by 90°) caused extensive muscle injury, followed by repeated local injuries with intramuscular injections of saline solution, thrice-weekly during 3 weeks (NaCl 0.9%, 50 µl). Subsequently, 2 weeks without injuries allowed tissue regeneration and reduction of inflammation. This combination of extensive injury, repeated local injuries, and regeneration was applied twice (10-weeks-long injury protocol). At the endpoint, mice (1-year-old) were evaluated in vivo by SWE and NMR. Tissue was then collected for histology. Uninjured right TCs served as control muscles in pairwise comparisons. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental protocol used to induce diffuse skeletal muscle fibrosis in C57BL/6 and DBA/2J wild-type mice.
Ultrasound shear-wave elastography
Muscle shear modulus (SM) was measured using an Aixplorer ultrasound scanner driving a 25–5 MHz probe (Supersonic Imagine, Aix en Provence, France), with B-mode enabled, shear wave imaging mode enabled in penetration mode, tissue tuner 1540 m/s, dynamic range 80 dB, and using a micro manipulated probe without contact with mice. Scans were done under isoflurane anaesthesia (~ 2%, 1 l/min O2). Legs were shaved and mice were positioned supine on an ergometer allowing control of ankle plantar/dorsal flexion. B-mode ultrasound images and SM maps were acquired at 0°, 40°, 60°, and 80° of ankle plantar flexion (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Images were processed using MATLAB (2018b, MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Mean SMs in a region of interest (ROI) over the TC were extracted from SM-maps (Supplementary Fig. S3B), and the viscoelasticity index (SMi) was calculated according to Eq. (2) in the “Results” section.
Nuclear magnetic resonance
NMR data were acquired using a 7T Bruker BioSpec system interfaced with an Avance III spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). Mice were scanned under isoflurane anaesthesia (1–2%, 1 l/min O2) on a heating bed. Two NMR setups were used: a custom-made transceiver volume coil (300 MHz, 1 cm diameter/length) was used in the first NMR session (legs evaluated separately in consecutive exams), and a transceiver surface Cryoprobe (Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) was used in the second session (both legs imaged simultaneously). While our surface cryoprobe allowed to image the two legs (injured and control) at the same time with an increased signal to noise ratio and spatial resolution, it is not suitable for acquisitions that require a homogeneous B1 field. Sessions including both setups were performed 1–3 days apart.
The volume coil allowed measurements of short-, intermediate-, and long-T2 values and fractions with an ISIS-CPMG sequence (Image selected in vivo spectroscopy—Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill)30, and perfusion assessment with arterial spin labelling (ASL). ISIS-CPMG acquisitions require a homogeneous B1 field to ensure complete refocusing of the protons in the volume of interest in order to respect the CPMG conditions. Similarly, a spatially homogeneous tagging is required for assessing tissue perfusion using the ASL method implemented in the present work.
ISIS-CPMG data was acquired in a parallelepiped voxel placed over the tibialis cranialis muscle with mean dimensions 0.9 × 1.0 × 4.6 mm3 (Supplementary Fig. S2a). The inter-echo-spacing was 1 ms, 200 echoes were acquired, and the repetition time was 9.5 s.
For ASL, incoming arterial blood was saturated using a tagging module with 2000 slice-selective 90° pulses (constructor SINC10H, pulse bandwidth: 28,741 Hz, 700 µs; each pulse respecting an RF-spoiling scheme and followed by a variable spoiler gradient of 1.5 ms). The tagging module was applied during 4.6 s, to a 7.5 mm thick slice, positioned 7.5 mm proximally from the target slice centre for tagged images. Control images were acquired after applying the tagging module to a 75 mm thick slice, positioned 75 mm distally from the target slice, ensuring that the saturation slice was out of the RF-coil’s field of view. Under this scheme, control images were acquired without arterial blood saturation while keeping the frequency offset of the saturation pulse to the centre of the target slice, resulting in similar magnetization-transfer weighting in control and tagged images. After an evolution time of 200 ms, tagged or control images were acquired (single-shot RARE—rapid imaging with refocused echoes, echo-spacing: 2.05 ms, effective echo time: 2.05 ms, partial Fourier: 1.78, echo-train-length: 18, repetition time: 5 s, 2D, in plane matrix size: 32 × 32, resolution: 0.3 × 0.3 × 2 mm3). Tagged and control images were sequentially acquired twice, allowing the calculation of a perfusion map every 20 s. A hyperaemic response paradigm with ischemia–reperfusion stress was used to increase the global perfusion and highlight differences between normal and altered muscles18. Perfusion at rest was measured during 3′ 20″. Then, ischemia was induced by occlusion of the femoral artery after pulling two surgical threads placed bellow the thigh’s skin and connected to a 500 g weight. After 6′ 50″ of ischemia, the weight was removed and the tourniquet released, leading to a hyperaemic response that was monitored during 10′ 40″.
The cryoprobe setup was used in the second NMR session for: (1) high-resolution T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) images (2D-FLASH—fast low angle shot: flip angle: 6.6°, echo time: 3.4 ms, repetition time: 11.9 ms, 256 averages, resolution 50 × 50 × 200 µm3); (2) T2*-weighted images using an ultra-short time to echo (UTE) sequence31,32 (2D-UTE: 16 echo times: 0.012, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.6, 3.0, 6.0 and 8 ms, repetition time: 20 ms, resolution 0.2 × 0.2 × 1 mm3); (3) T2-maps (2D-MSME—multi-slice-multi-echo: repetition time: 3500 ms, first echo time: 5.15 ms, echo spacing: 5.15 ms, 32 echoes, resolution 0.1 × 0.1 × 1 mm3) and (4) T1-maps (Saturation-recovery 2D-RARE: adiabatic saturation pulse, echo time: 6.66 ms, 13 repetition times: 82.9, 100, 128, 171, 214, 602, 286, 359, 1010, 1694, 2842, 4769, 8000 ms, muscle MRI: resolution 0.1 × 0.1 × 1 mm3). T1-maps were acquired before (native-T1) and one hour after the intraperitoneal injection of a Gd-contrast agent (Gd-CA) (Dotarem, Guerbet, Villepinte, France; 2 µmol Gd/g mouse weight, saline:Dotarem 1.6:1). Gd-CA was injected through an intraperitoneal catheter placed before the exam and filled with saline solution (NaCl 0.9%, 100–150 µl). Blood samples were collected using heparinized capillaries immediately before the second NMR session and after the last T1-map. Samples were centrifuged (1500g, 15′, 4 °C) and kept at 4 °C before T1 measurements were performed (up to 2 h). After samples reached room temperature, plasma-T1 pre- and post-Gd-CA was measured with the same T1-mapping sequence used in vivo, using lower spatial resolution (plasma MRI: resolution 0.2 × 0.2 × 4 mm3). Muscle and plasma T1 measurements were then combined for estimation of ECV6 (Supplementary Fig. S1).
NMR data processing
Python (https://www.python.org/) and MATLAB custom routines were used to process NMR data.
Muscle and plasma T1 maps were estimated by fitting T1 recovery curves to a mono-exponential model accounting for a variable flip angle. ECV maps were estimated by combining muscle and plasma T1 values before and one hour after Gd-CA injection, according to Eq. (1). Supplementary Fig. S1 shows representative T1 maps for one mouse before and after Gd-CA injection in vivo and in plasma samples, as well as the correspondent ECV map.
Two complementary approaches were used to estimate T2 values: MSME and ISIS-CPMG. MSME data allowed the estimation of T2 maps by matching the signal from MSME images in each voxel to a dictionary of normalized signal decay curves (variable T2 and B1 values), generated with a single-component extended phase-graph (EPG) algorithm33. B1 values were allowed to vary in the model to accommodate the expected differences in flip angle with the distance to the surface coil. Mean T1, ECV and T2 values from the respective maps were extracted from regions of interest (ROIs) drawn over left (injured) and right (control) tibialis cranialis (Supplementary Fig. S2b).
ISIS-CPMG data allowed the estimation of multiple T2 values and fractions due to the higher signal-to-noise ratio and finer temporal sampling of the signal decay than MSME data, at the cost of lower spatial resolution and coverage. T2 values and fractions were estimated by fitting the ISIS-CPMG signal decay to a mono-exponential (Eq. 3), a bi-exponential (Eq. 4) and a tri-exponential (Eq. 5) decay models:
3 |
4 |
5 |
where the indexes s, i and l refer to short-, intermediary- and long-T2 or T2-fraction, respectively.
Fitting results were compared with F-tests and the tri-exponential model (Eq. 5) was the one that best fitted the majority of the data. This model was then selected for the statistical analysis of T2 and respective fractions (short-, intermediate-, and long-T2). Supplementary Fig. S2a illustrates the voxel positioning over the tibialis cranialis muscle, and the corresponding signal fitted to a tri-exponential decay.
T2* values and fractions were estimated by fitting the UTE amplitude signal decay from ROIs over injured and control muscles to three models: a mono-exponential decay (Eq. 6), a bi-exponential decay with two water components with short- and long-T2* (Eq. 7), and a bi-exponential decay model with a short-T2* component chemically shifted by 970 Hz from the water frequency in addition to a water component with long-T2* (Eq. 8)10,21,22:
6 |
7 |
8 |
where, is the total magnetization at steady state, is the short-T2* signal amplitude at TE = 0, and is the water long-T2* signal amplitude at TE = 0 ms. Models were limited to up to two components to avoid overfitting. Results after fitting the signal decay to each model were compared with F-tests. The bi-exponential model with an oscillatory component (Eq. 8) presented the highest F-value in the majority of the data and was then selected for statistical analysis. Supplementary Fig. S2c shows representative UTE images at different echo times, the corresponding signal decay in the ROI and the curve fitted using the bi-exponential model with an oscillatory component.
Muscle perfusion in ROIs drawn over injured and control muscles was calculated from the relative difference between consecutive tagged () and control () images, according to Eq. (9):
9 |
where is the tissue-blood partition coefficient, estimated as 0.75 for skeletal muscle; is the intrinsic muscle T1 (in absence of perfusion), estimated as 2 s since it should be higher than the T1 value of muscles under perfusion (1649.9 (37.6) ms in this study); is the intrinsic arterial blood T1, set as 2.2 s34; and is the mean travel time of arterial blood from the tagging slice to the imaged voxel (3.5 mm away), estimated as 0.2 s. Total perfusion, integrated over the recovery time, and maximal perfusion were then extracted. Although there is no consensus on the precise values for the tissue:blood partition coefficient, intrinsic muscle T1 and arterial blood T1, in this study these values were used as scaling factors to estimate the tissue perfusion in ml(plasma)/min/100 ml(tissue) from ASL measurements. Any difference observed in perfusion measurements between groups is therefore independent of the choice of these values.
Image texture analysis was performed in T1-weighted high spatial resolution images through histogram features. Skewness, kurtosis, and energy were extracted from the same ROIs as for muscle T1, T2, and ECV (Fig. 5). Energy reflects the uniformity of the signal distribution, and was defined as:
10 |
where pi refers to the proportion of pixel with signal intensity i.
Histology
Up to 48 h after NMR, both tibialis cranialis were collected, fixed in formalin 10% during 48 h and kept in ethanol 70% before the preparation of paraffin blocks. Three slices per muscle (¼, ½, and ¾ of muscle length) were stained with Sirius red and haematoxylin–eosin. Slides were digitalised using Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0 HT digital slide scanner and visualized using the software NDP.view2 (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan). Collagen fraction was quantified from Sirius red slides with Fiji (NIH, Bethesda, MD35). Endomysial collagen was quantified in ROIs drawn excluding tendons, fascia and perivascular connective tissue around veins or arteries. The degree of inflammation, centronucleation, fat infiltration and necrotic calcifications in haematoxylin–eosin slides was rated independently by two researchers with more than 10 years of experience in muscle histology (ABMB, YF). Each of these variables was scored as absent, mild, moderate or severe. A stringent classification of inflammation was adopted because even very mild alterations could affect NMR and SWE metrics. Inflammation was considered absent when no sign of infiltrated inflammatory cells or necrosis were observed; mild when punctual infiltration of inflammatory cells was detected; moderate when scattered infiltration of immune cells and possible necrosis was observed, but in a reduced level; and severe when clear infiltration of inflammatory cells and presence of necrotic muscle fibers were detected. Calcifications and fat infiltration were scored based on the number and size of calcified fibers or adipose cells clusters. Centronucleation was scored as absent when central nuclei were observed in less than 1% of fibers; mild when 2–30% of myofibers had central nuclei; moderate when 30–60% of myofibers had central nuclei; and severe when more than 60% of myofibers had central nuclei. Scores were compared and a consensus was reached in case of discordances.
Statistical analysis
Injured and control muscles were compared for each strain and after grouping C57BL/6 and DBA/2J mice. Grouping the strains allowed to increase the sample size and improved the statistical power of the comparisons. Additionally, it allowed to cover a broader range of collagen fractions, improving the identification of correlations between collagen fraction and NMR or SWE metrics.
Statistical analysis was performed using R (3.5.1; R Core Team, 2018)36 and RStudio environment (1.1.463, RStudio, Boston, MA, USA)37, and the packages dplyr38, Hmisc39, psych40, and stats36. Figures were generated using the packages ggplot241, ggpubr42, patchwork43, plotROC44, pROC45, unikn46 and viridis47. Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon post-hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons. Paired-Wilcoxon tests were used for comparisons between injured and control muscles. Bonferroni correction accounted for multiple comparisons. Spearman rank-order correlations and partial correlations were calculated between NMR/SWE variables and total/endomysial collagen fractions. Inflammation, centronucleated fibers, calcifications, maximal and total perfusion accounted as covariates in partial correlations. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Numerical data are reported as median (inter-quartiles range). Delta is the difference between injured and control muscles for each animal, reported as median (inter-quartile range).
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding from France Life Imaging for the purchase of the Bruker cryoprobe system, and co-funding from Région Ile de France DIM Biothérapies and Association Institute of Myology (project BIOT-2014-PME-010) for the purchase of the Aixplorer® platform. We thank the Association Institute of Myology—AFM-Télethon, France, the National Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm) and the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) for funding this research group, and to Dr. Valérie Allamand and Dr. Gisèle Bonne for supporting the scientific project.
Author contributions
A.B.M.B. contributed with the study design (main), data acquisition (NMR: main, histology: main), data analysis (NMR: main, histology: main, statistical analysis: main), figure preparation and drawing (main), and manuscript writing. D.B. contributed with the study design, data acquisition (SWE: main), data analysis (SWE: main, statistical analysis), resources, figure preparation (Fig. 6, Supplementary Fig. S3) and manuscript writing and review. E.C.A.A. contributed with the study design, resources (ISIS-CPMG, ASL and UTE pulse sequences) data acquisition (NMR), data analysis (NMR), and manuscript review. L.S. and P.L.S. contributed with resources (UTE pulse sequence) and manuscript review. Y.F. contributed with the study design, data analysis (histology), and manuscript review. P.G.C. contributed to the study design (main), resources, and manuscript review.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-020-78747-8.
References
- 1.Lieber RL, Ward SR. Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 4. Structural and functional consequences of skeletal muscle fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2013;305:C241–C252. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00173.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Klingler W, Jurkat-Rott K, Lehmann-Horn F, Schleip R. The role of fibrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Acta Myol. 2012;31:184–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Desguerre I, et al. Endomysial fibrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A marker of poor outcome associated with macrophage alternative activation. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009;68:762–773. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181aa31c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kharraz Y, Guerra J, Pessina P, Serrano AL, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Understanding the process of fibrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Biomed Res. Int. 2014;2014:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/965631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Carlier PG, et al. Skeletal muscle quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy as an outcome measure for clinical trials. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2016;3:1–28. doi: 10.3233/JND-160145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Flett AS, et al. Equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the measurement of diffuse myocardial fibrosis: Preliminary validation in humans. Circulation. 2010;122:138–144. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.930636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller CA, et al. Comprehensive validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of myocardial extracellular volume. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2013;6:373–383. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Małek ŁA, et al. Native T1-mapping for non-contrast assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy—Comparison with late enhancement quantification. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2015;33:718–724. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bun S-S, et al. Value of in vivo T2 measurement for myocardial fibrosis assessment in diabetic mice at 11.75 T. Invest. Radiol. 2012;47:319–323. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318243e062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Nierop BJ, et al. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis in mice using a T2*-weighted 3D radial magnetic resonance imaging sequence. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0129899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mahmoud-Ghoneim D, Bonny J-M, Renou J-P, de Certaines JD. Ex-vivo magnetic resonance image texture analysis can discriminate genotypic origin in bovine meat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005;85:629–632. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith LR, Barton ER. Collagen content does not alter the passive mechanical properties of fibrotic skeletal muscle in mdx mice. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014;306:C889–C898. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00383.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferraioli G, et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: A pilot study. Hepatology. 2012;56:2125–2133. doi: 10.1002/hep.25936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith LR, Lee KS, Ward SR, Chambers HG, Lieber RL. Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length. J. Physiol. 2011;589:2625–2639. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.203364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gillies AR, et al. High resolution three-dimensional reconstruction of fibrotic skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. J. Physiol. 2017;595:1159–1171. doi: 10.1113/JP273376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fukada S, et al. Genetic background affects properties of satellite cells and mdx phenotypes. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176:2414–2424. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coley WD, et al. Effect of genetic background on the dystrophic phenotype in mdx mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25:130–145. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bertoldi D, de Sousa PL, Fromes Y, Wary C, Carlier PG. Quantitative, dynamic and noninvasive determination of skeletal muscle perfusion in mouse leg by NMR arterial spin-labeled imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2008;26:1259–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Baligand C, et al. Multiparametric functional nuclear magnetic resonance imaging shows alterations associated with plasmid electrotransfer in mouse skeletal muscle. J. Gene Med. 2012;14:598–608. doi: 10.1002/jgm.2671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Latroche C, et al. Coupling between myogenesis and angiogenesis during skeletal muscle regeneration is stimulated by restorative macrophages. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:2018–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Siu AG, et al. Characterization of the ultrashort-TE (UTE) MR collagen signal. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1236–1244. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Araujo ECA, Azzabou N, Vignaud A, Guillot G, Carlier PG. Quantitative ultrashort TE imaging of the short-T 2 components in skeletal muscle using an extended echo-subtraction method. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017;78:997–1008. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pessina P, et al. Novel and optimized strategies for inducing fibrosis in vivo: focus on Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Skelet. Muscle. 2014;4:7. doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-4-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Serrano AL, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Regulation and dysregulation of fibrosis in skeletal muscle. Exp. Cell Res. 2010;316:3050–3058. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Berry DB, Regner B, Galinsky V, Ward SR, Frank LR. Relationships between tissue microstructure and the diffusion tensor in simulated skeletal muscle. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;80:317–329. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bonny J-M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of connective tissue: A non-destructive method for characterising muscle structure. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001;81:337–341. doi: 10.1002/1097-0010(200102)81:3<337::AID-JSFA827>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ma Y-J, Chang EY, Bydder GM, Du J. Can ultrashort-TE (UTE) MRI sequences on a 3-T clinical scanner detect signal directly from collagen protons: Freeze-dry and D 2 O exchange studies of cortical bone and Achilles tendon specimens. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:912–917. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meyer GA, Lieber RL. Elucidation of extracellular matrix mechanics from muscle fibers and fiber bundles. J. Biomech. 2011;44:771–773. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bertoldi D, et al. New insight into abnormal muscle vasodilatory responses in aged hypertensive rats by in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion. J. Vasc. Res. 2006;43:149–156. doi: 10.1159/000090944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Araujo ECA, Fromes Y, Carlier PG. New insights on human skeletal muscle tissue compartments revealed by in vivo T2 NMR relaxometry. Biophys. J. 2014;106:2267–2274. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Harkins KD, Horch RA, Does MD. Simple and robust saturation-based slice selection for ultrashort echo time MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;73:2204–2211. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Soustelle, L. et al. On the use of frequency modulated pulses in sat-UTE. in Proc. 26th ISMRM, Paris, Fr. 5–7 (2018).
- 33.Lebel RM, Wilman AH. Transverse relaxometry with stimulated echo compensation. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;64:1005–1014. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dobre MC, Uǧurbil K, Marjanska M. Determination of blood longitudinal relaxation time (T1) at high magnetic field strengths. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2007;25:733–735. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2018).
- 37.RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/ (2016).
- 38.Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.0.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (2020).
- 39.Harrell Jr, F. E. with contributions from Dupont, C. and many others. Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. R package version 4.3-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc (2020).
- 40.Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. R package version 2.0.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych (2020).
- 41.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kassambara, A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. R package version 0.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr (2020).
- 43.Pedersen, T. L. patchwork: The composer of plots. R package version 1.1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=patchwork (2020).
- 44.Sachs MC. {plotROC}: A tool for plotting ROC curves. J. Stat. Softw. Code Snippets. 2017;79:1–19. doi: 10.18637/jss.v079.c02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Müller M. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Neth, H. & Gradwohl, N. unikn: Graphical elements of the University of Konstanz’s corporate design. Social Psychology and Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, Germany. R package version 0.3.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=unikn (2020).
- 47.Garnier, S. viridis: Default color maps from ‘matplotlib’. R package version 0.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=viridis (2018).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.