Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2021 Jan 9;34:106735. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106735

Dataset regarding the mechanical characterization of sedimentary rocks derived from Svalbard for possible use in local road constructions

Diego Maria Barbieri a,, Jean-Gabriel Dorval b, Baowen Lou a, Hao Chen a, Benan Shu c, Fusong Wang d,a, Inge Hoff a
PMCID: PMC7815468  PMID: 33506082

Abstract

The dataset deals with the mechanical characterization of sedimentary rocks collected along the banks of Longyear river in proximity of Longyearbyen (Svalbard) at the junction of Bolterdalen and Adventdalen valleys. As the rocks represent possible local construction materials that can be employed in the new road infrastructures located in the Svalbard archipelago, three types of laboratory investigations were performed for mechanical characterization: Los Angeles tests, micro-Deval tests and repeated load triaxial tests. The grading curve of the material characterized with the repeated load triaxial tests corresponded to a typical one commonly adopted in Norway for road base layer (0–31.5 mm). The dataset offers a thorough overview of the mechanical properties relevant for road constructions and the dataset can be useful to both contractors and transportation agencies operating in the Svalbard archipelago.

Keywords: Pavement unbound, Road construction materials, Los Angeles test, Micro-deval test, Repeated load triaxial test, Longyearbyen, Svalbard

Specifications Table

Subject Civil and Structural Engineering
Specific subject area Road pavement engineering, Material testing
Type of data Table
Image
Graph
Figure
How data were acquired The data were collected by performing the following laboratory tests: Los Angeles (LA) test, micro-Deval (MDE) test, Repeated Load Triaxial Test (RLTT)
Data format Raw
analysed
Parameters for data collection Los Angeles (LA) tests, micro-Deval (MDE) tests and Repeated Load Triaxial Tests (RLTTs) were performed according to codes EN 1097-2, EN 1097-1 and EN 13286-7, respectively. Specimens with two water contents (w = 2% and w = 7%) were investigated by means of RLTTs
Description of data collection The analysed materials were rocks derived from the banks of Longyear river in proximity of Longyearbyen (Svalbard) at the junction of Bolterdalen and Adventdalen valleys. Los Angeles (LA) tests, micro-Deval (MDE) tests and Repeated Load Triaxial Tests (RLTTs) were performed in the laboratory
Data source location The rock materials were collected in Svalbard, the coordinates of the specific location are 78°10′34.0″N 15°58′11.2″E. The testing campaign was performed at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Høgskoleringen 7A, Trondheim 7491, Norway
Data accessibility Dataset is uploaded on Mendeley Data
Repository name:
Mechanical characterization of sedimentary rocks derived from Svalbard for possible use in local road constructions
Data identification number:
DOI: 10.17632/mtn347g3gp.1
Direct URL to data:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/mtn347g3gp/1

Value of the Data

  • The data are related to the main mechanical properties that need to be ascertained when using rocks as construction aggregates in road infrastructures. The characterized materials could be employed for local purposes in the Svalbard archipelago.

  • The data can be useful for both contractors and transportation agencies operating in Svalbard when considering the suitability of the local rocks for road constructions. The dataset can also be beneficial to researchers operating in the sector.

  • The data can be effectively employed to characterize a rock material type available in the Svalbard archipelago and assess its feasible use as aggregates for local road constructions.

  • The possibility to make use of local materials in civil infrastructures located in the Svalbard archipelago is relevant as it can reduce the importation of aggregates from continental Norway.

1. Data Description

The dataset refers to the mechanical characterization of sedimentary rocks collected in Svalbard; the information contained in the dataset can be useful to assess the performance of the rocks considering their possible local use as road construction materials. The accomplished investigation campaign encompassed three laboratory investigations: Los Angeles (LA) test, micro-Deval (MDE) test and Repeated Load Triaxial Test (RLTT). The dataset is publicly available (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/mtn347g3gp/1).

The spreadsheet “Los Angeles and micro-Deval results.xlsx” reports on LA and MDE. As displayed in Fig. 1, five parallel samples were tested and the average values were 33.6 and 47.3, respectively. These outcomes can be compared to the thresholds defined by pavement design guidelines, i.e. Norwegian guidelines [1].

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Los Angeles (LA) and micro-Deval (MDE) values of each tested specimen.

Four specimens were investigated with the RLTTs, two of them (specimens 1 and 2) had water content w = 2% and two of them (specimens 3 and 4) had water content 7%. Fig. 2 displays the bulk density and the dry density for each tested sample [2].

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Bulk density and dry density of each specimen investigated with RLTTs.

The data corresponding to RLTTs are reported in “Repeated Load Triaxial Tests results - specimen 01 - water content 2%”, “Repeated Load Triaxial Tests results - specimen 02 - water content 2%”, “Repeated Load Triaxial Tests results - specimen 03 - water content 7%” and “Repeated Load Triaxial Tests results - specimen 04 - water content 7%” files, all the four spreadsheets are structured in the same fashion. Each spreadsheet is composed by five sheets corresponding to each RLTT loading sequence. Columns A, B, C, D, E report the step number (six steps in total), time t since the sequence started, temperature T (namely room temperature), deviatoric pulse number and frequency f (fixed to 10 Hz), respectively. Columns F and G display the dynamic and the static part of the deviatoric stress σd exerted vertically by the hydraulic jack, the former one (σd,dyn) varies as described in the next section, the latter one (σd,st) is always approximately equal to 5 kPa to guarantee a contact between the jack and the metal end-platen. Columns H and I display the dynamic and the static part of the triaxial stress σt exerted by the pressurized water surrounding the specimen, the former one (σt,dyn) is always approximately equal to 0 kPa and the latter one (σt,st) varies for each sequence as described in the next section. The axial deformations measured by the three vertical Linear Variable Displacement Transformers (LVDTs) are reported in Columns J, L, N (elastic components εa,el,1, εa,el,2, εa,el,3) and Columns K, M, O (plastic components εa,pl,1, εa,pl,2, εa,pl,3). The radial deformations measured by the three horizontal LVDTs are reported in Columns P, R, T (elastic components εr,el,1, εr,el,2, εr,el,3) and Columns Q, S, U (plastic components εr,pl,1, εr,pl,2, εr,pl,3).

The two main properties that are assessed are the resilient modulus MR and the resistance against permanent deformation. Following the definition of resilient modulus MR detailed in the next section, Fig. 3 reports the values of MR corresponding to each RLTT sequence (σt = 20 kPa, 45 kPa, 70 kPa, 100 kPa, 150 kPa) for specimen 1 (Fig. 3a), specimen 2 (Fig. 3b), specimen 3 (Fig. 3c) and specimen 4 (Fig. 3d) according to the number of load cycles N.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Fig 3

Resilient modulus MR and number of load cycles N for specimen 1 (a), specimen 2 (b), specimen 3 (c) and specimen 4 (d).

Furthermore, as reported in Fig. 4, all the experimental data can be also plotted in a two-dimensional space displaying bulk stress θ and resilient modulus MR along X-axis and Y-axis, respectively, for w = 2% (Fig. 4a) and w = 7% (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Resilient modulus MR and bulk stress θ for specimens 1 and 2 with w = 2% (a) and for specimens 3 and 4 with w = 7% (a).

Considering this two-dimensional space, the overall trend can be efficiently calculated adopting the Hicks & Monismith regression model as illustrated in Fig. 5 and described in the next section. Table 1 reports the values of the regression parameters k1, k2.

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

Resilient modulus MR and bulk stress θ for specimens with w = 2% and w = 7% according to Hicks and Monismith model.

Table 1.

Regression parameters k1, k2.

k1 k2
w = 2% 1646.2 0.64
w = 7% 1169.7 0.09

Considering the development of axial plastic deformations, Fig. 6 reports the values of εa,pl corresponding to each RLTT sequence (σt = 20 kPa, 45 kPa, 70 kPa, 100 kPa, 150 kPa) for specimen 1 (Fig. 6a), specimen 2 (Fig. 6b), specimen 3 (Fig. 6c) and specimen 4 (Fig. 6d) according to the number of load cycles N.

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

Fig 6

Axial plastic deformation εa,pl and number of load cycles N for specimen 1 (a), specimen 2 (b), specimen 3 (c) and specimen 4 (d).

Interpreting the axial plastic deformations according to the Coulomb approach described in the next section, each load step belongs to elastic, elasto-plastic or failure range: as reported in Fig. 7, green squares, yellow triangles and red circles symbolize elastic, elasto-plastic or failure range, respectively. Fig. 8 displays the mobilized angle of friction ρ and the angle of friction at incremental failure φ.

Fig. 7.

Fig 7

Fig 7

Classification of each RLTT loading step according to the Coulomb approach for specimen 1 (a), specimen 2 (b), specimen 3 (c) and specimen 4 (d).

Fig. 8.

Fig 8

Mobilized angle of friction ρ and angle of friction at incremental failure φ for specimens with w = 2% and w = 7% according to the Coulomb approach.

2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

The tested rock materials originated from the banks of Longyear river in proximity of Longyearbyen (Svalbard) and were collected at a stockpile near the junction of Bolterdalen and Adventdalen valleys, the coordinates of the specific position reported in Fig. 9 are 78°10′34.0″N 15°58′11.2″E, Fig. 9a, 9b and 9c are obtained from Google Maps [3]. The rock materials available in the Svalbard archipelago mostly have sedimentary origin [4].

Fig. 9.

Fig 9

Geographical location where the tested rock materials were collected; Fig. 9a, 9b and 9c are obtained from Google Maps [3].

A testing campaign was performed in the laboratories of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway) to characterize the mechanical properties of the rocks to serve as possible road construction materials. Given the geographical and climatic peculiarity of the Svalbard archipelago, civil structures built in the region must tackle significant engineering challenges [5,6]. Three types of tests were performed: Los Angeles (LA) tests, micro-Deval (MDE) tests and Repeated Load Triaxial Tests (RLTTs). Both LA and MDE tests were accomplished by investigating particle size comprised between 10 and 14 mm as indicated in the corresponding codes [7,8], five parallel samples were evaluated for each test. When it comes to RLTTs, the grading curve corresponding to a typical base layer used in Norwegian roads was tested [1]; the gradation is displayed in Fig. 10 and the loose material is depicted in Fig. 11.

Fig. 10.

Fig 10

Particle size gradation tested with RLTTs [1].

Fig. 11.

Fig 11

Loose material tested with RLTTs.

The RLTT thoroughly characterizes the mechanical properties of the rock materials, the two important results that can be evaluated from the test are the resilient modulus MR and the resistance against permanent deformation [9], [10], [11]. A total of four samples was tested with RLTTs, specimens 1 and 2 had water content w = 2% and specimens 3 and 4 had water content w = 7% (percentage in mass), each sample had a dry mass of 11,000 g. The preparation of the specimens was accomplished according to a precise order. Initially, the total mass mixed with the desired amount of water was divided in five plastic bags and rest overnight to ensure a uniform water distribution. The material inside each plastic bag corresponded to the grading curve displayed in Fig. 10. Subsequently, the content of the five plastic bags formed the testing sample composed by five layers: each layer was compacted inside a steel mould employing a Milwaukee 2″ SDS Max rotary hammer (hammer weight 12 kg, work per blow 27 N•m, tamping time 25 s) as reported in Fig. 12a.

Fig. 12.

Fig 12

RLTT sample operations: compaction (a), instrumentation (b) and testing (c).

The dimensions of the created specimen was 150 mm in diameter and 300 mm in height, it was possible to asses bulk and dry density at this point [2]. The sample was extracted from the mould with a customized ejection tool and the specimen was covered by two latex membranes, four O-rings, two hose clamps and two metal end-platens; afterwards, the specimen was placed into the RLTT device and two vertical LVDTs and three radial LVDTs were mounted on the specimen (Fig. 12b).

Subsequently, the RLTT chamber was sealed and filled with water. The RLTT apparatus exerted two types of actions, namely a vertical dynamic pressure (σd, deviatoric stress) and a uniform confining pressure (σ3, triaxial or confining stress). The former one was applied by a hydraulic jack located under the specimen, the latter one was applied by pressurized water. The hydraulic jack integrates an additional third axial LVDT. Fig. 12c displays the operating RLTT device. Table 2 reports the stress paths accomplished for each RLTT according to the Multi-Stage Low Stress Level (MS LSL) [12]: a RLTT is composed of five loading sequences and each sequence, formed by six steps, corresponds to a precise combination of σd and σ3. For each step, σ3 is constant while σd is repeated 10 000 times according to a sinusoidal pattern varying from a minimum of 5 kPa (to ensure contact between the top end-platen and the load cell) and the proper maximum value reported in Table 2. A sequence comes to a halt after the completion of the six steps or if the axial permanent deformation measured by the integrated axial LVDT reaches 0.5%.

Table 2.

Stress path for the Multi-Stage Low Stress Level (MSL SL) RLTT (data in kPa).

Sequence 1
Sequence 2
Sequence 3
Sequence 4
Sequence 5
σt σd σt σd σt σd σt σd σt σd
Step 1 20 20 45 60 70 80 100 100 150 100
Step 2 20 40 45 90 70 120 100 150 150 200
Step 3 20 60 45 120 70 160 100 200 150 300
Step 4 20 80 45 150 70 200 100 250 150 400
Step 5 20 100 45 180 70 240 100 300 150 500
Step 6 20 120 45 210 70 280 100 350 150 600

For a constant value of σ3 and a variation in the dynamic deviatoric stress Δσd,dyn, the resilient modulus MR is determined as

MR=Δσd,dynεa,el, (1)

with εa,el the average axial resilient strain measured by the three axial LVDTs. among the possible formulations that can be used to efficiently display MR [13], the Hicks & Monismith model [14] is largely adopted to efficiently interpret the empirical data

MR=k1σa(θσa)k2, (2)

where σa is a reference pressure (100 kPa) and k1, k2 parameters are evaluated by regression analysis. Several formulations exist to clearly display the development of permanent deformations [15]. Categorising each RLTT load step upon the average strain rate ε· for the cycles from 5 000 to 10 000, the Coulomb approach defines the mobilized angle of friction ρ and the angle of friction at incremental failure φ and thus identifies three different behaviours: elastic (ε· < 2.5 10−8), elasto-plastic (2.5 • 10−8 < ε· < 1.0 10−7) and failure (ε· > 1.0 10−7) [16]. The equations for the elastic limit line and incremental failure line are

σd=2sinρ(σ3+a)1sinρ, (3)
σd=2sinφ(σ3+a)1sinφ, (4)

where the apparent attraction a is assumed to be 20 kPa [17].

CRediT Author Statement

Diego Maria Barbieri: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Jean-Gabriel Dorval: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Baowen Lou: Methodology, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Chen Hao: Methodology, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Benan Shu: Methodology, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Fusong Wang: Methodology, Data curation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Inge Hoff: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The project was awarded a research grant from the Nordic Road Association (NVF).

Acknowledgments

The precious support kindly provided by the laboratory assistants Bent Lervik, Jan Erik Molde and Lisbeth Johansen is greatly acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2021.106735.

Contributor Information

Diego Maria Barbieri, Email: diego.barbieri@ntnu.no.

Jean-Gabriel Dorval, Email: s181675@student.dtu.dk.

Baowen Lou, Email: loubaowen@chd.edu.cn.

Hao Chen, Email: hao.chen@ntnu.no.

Benan Shu, Email: shuba@whut.edu.cn.

Fusong Wang, Email: fusong.wang@ntnu.no.

Inge Hoff, Email: inge.hoff@ntnu.no.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (29.8KB, docx)

References

  • 1.NPRA, Håndbok N200 Vegbygging, Vegdirektoratet, Norway, 2018.
  • 2.CEN, ISO 13286-4 Test Methods for Laboratory Reference Density and Water Content - Vibrating Hammer, Belgium, 2003.
  • 3.Google Maps, Google Maps, (2020). https://www.google.no/maps/place/78°10’34.0%22N+15°58’11.2%22E/@78.1759595,17.2125589,859096m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x0!8m2!3d78.1761111!4d15.9697778?hl=en. Accessed 25 October, 2020.
  • 4.Norwegian Polar Institute, Bedrock map of Svalbard and Jan Mayen, (1986). https://data.npolar.no/map/archive/3d58439a-a7ad-5df8-9524-75e0b43f1aef. Accessed 25 October, 2020.
  • 5.Humlum O., Instanes A., Sollid J.L. Permafrost in Svalbard: a review of research history, climatic background and engineering challenges. Polar Res. 2003;22:191–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-8369.2003.tb00107.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Instanes A. Incorporating climate warming scenarios in coastal permafrost engineering design—case studies from Svalbard and northwest Russia. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2016;131:76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CEN, ISO 1097-1 Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates. Part 1: Determination of the Resistance to Wear (micro-Deval), Belgium, 2011.
  • 8.CEN, ISO 1097-2 Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates. Part 2: Methods for the Determination of Resistance to Fragmentation, Belgium, 2010.
  • 9.Barbieri D.M., Hoff I., Mørk M.B.E. Organosilane and lignosulfonate as innovative stabilization techniques for crushed rocks used in road unbound layers. Transp. Geotech. 2020;22 doi: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barbieri D.M., Tangerås M., Kassa E., Hoff I., Liu Z., Wang F. Railway ballast stabilizing agents: comparison of mechanical properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020;252 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barbieri D.M., Hoff I., Mørk M.B.E. Innovative stabilization techniques for weak crushed rocks used in road unbound layers: a laboratory investigation. Transp. Geotech. 2019;18:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.CEN, ISO 13286-7 Cyclic Load Triaxial Test for Unbound Mixtures, Belgium, 2004.
  • 13.Lekarp F., Isacsson U., Dawson A. State of the art. I: resilient response of unbound aggregates. J. Transp. Eng. 2000;126:66–75. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.R.G. Hicks, C.L. Monismith, Factors influencing the resilient properties of granular materials, in: Highw. Res. Rec., 1971: pp. 15–31.
  • 15.Lekarp F., Isacsson U., Dawson A. State of the art. II: permanent strain response of unbound aggregates. J. Transp. Eng. 2000;126:76–83. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(76). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoff I., Bakløkk L.J., Aurstad J. 6th International Symposium Pavements Unbound. 2003. Influence of laboratory compaction method on unbound granular materials. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Uthus L., Tutumluer E., Horvli I., Hoff I. Influence of grain shape and texture on the deformation properties of unbound aggregates in pavements. Int. J. Pavements. 2007;6 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (29.8KB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES