Skip to main content
Italian Journal of Food Safety logoLink to Italian Journal of Food Safety
. 2021 Jan 18;9(4):8401. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2020.8401

Multi-locus sequence typing and virulence profile in Bacillus cereus sensu lato strains isolated from dairy products

Angelica Bianco 1, Loredana Capozzi 1, Angela Miccolupo 1, Simona Iannetti 1, Maria Luisa Danzetta 1, Laura Del Sambro 1, Marta Caruso 1, Gianfranco Santagada 1, Antonio Parisi 1,
PMCID: PMC7844584  PMID: 33532366

Abstract

Members of Bacillus cereus group are important food contaminants and they are of relevant interest in food safety and public heath due to their ability to cause two distinct forms of food poisoning, emetic and diarrhoeal syndrome. In the present study, 90 strains of B. cereus isolated from dairy products, have been typed using Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) analysis and investigated for the occurrence of 10 enterotoxigenic genes (hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, nheC, cytK, entFM, entS and bceT) and one emetogenic gene (ces), to determine their genetic diversity. A total of 58 sequence types were identified and among these 17 were signalled as new profiles. Among the virulence genes, the majority of our strains carried the entS (92%), entFM (86%), nhe (82%) and cytK (72%) genes. All remaining genes were identified in at least one strain with different prevalence, stressing the genetic diversity, how even the different grade of pathogenicity of B. cereus isolated from dairy products.

Key words: Bacillus cereus, food poisoning, Multi-locus Sequence Typing, toxin genes

Introduction

Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) is Grampositive, rod shaped, endospore-forming, facultative anaerobic organism of genus Bacillus. Several closely related Bacillus species share a significant genetic similarity with B. cereus, thus they are included in a heterogeneous B. cereus group (Chang et al., 2003). B. cereus group is ubiquitous in the environment, particularly soil and water, because of the resistance of its spores to adverse environmental conditions (Brillard et al., 2015). It has been isolated from a variety of foods, including meat, rice, pasta, condiments, raw fruits, spices and vegetables (Harmon and Kautter, 1991), chinese “take-out foods” (Beuchat Ma-Lin et al., 1980), cooked chicken (López et al., 2015), milk and dairy products (Christiansson, Bertilsson, and Svensson, 1999).

Some members of B. cereus group (i.e. B. cereus and B. thuringiensis) can cause human gastrointestinal diseases, the emetic and diarrhoeal syndromes. The emetic syndrome is characterised by vomiting, followed by diarrhoea (Beecher and Wong, 1994). This syndrome is caused by the ingestion of the cereulide toxin, preformed in the food (Agata et al., 2002). The diarrhoeal syndrome, is characterized by watery diarrhoea associated with abdominal pain (Granum and Lund, 1997) and it is caused by the ingestion of vegetative cells of B. cereus present in food, that colonize the small intestine before starting the enterotoxins production (i.e. non-haemolytic enterotoxin NHE, haemolysin BL, cytotoxin K) (Granum and Lund, 1997). Additionally, enterotoxin FM (EntFM), enterotoxin T (BceT) and enterotoxin S (EntS) have been also described as potential diarrheal toxins, although it is not clear the role they play in the pathogenesis of the disease (Hendriksen et al., 2006).

The aim of this study was to identify the virulence genes and to determine the sequence type of B. cereus sensu lato (s.l.) strains isolated from dairy products using Multi-locus Sequence Typing (MLST).

Materials and Methods

Multi-locus sequence typing

A total of 90 strains of B. cereus s.l. were isolated from dairy products: 64% (57/90) from caciocavallo, 25% (22/90) from mozzarella, 2% (2/90) from sheep’s cheese; 2% (2/90) from butter; 2% (2/90) from milk; 1% (1/90) from Buffalo mozzarella; 1% (1/90) from cacioricotta; 1% (1/90) from cream cheese; 1% (1/90) from caciotta; 1% (1/90) from yogurt. All the samples were collected from 2016 to 2018.

Genomic DNA was purified using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturer’s protocol. The MLST analysis was performed as described elsewhere (http://www.pubmlst.org/bcereus/).

DNA sequencing was performed on both strands using ABI PRISM Big DyeTM Terminator Cycle 3.1 sequencing kit cycle (Life Technologies) according to the manufacture’s instruction and analyzed by ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied BiosystemThermoScientific inc.). The sequence of each allele was imported and assembled by Bionumerics v7.5 software (Applied Maths, Belgium), and then compared to those available in the MLST database. New allele sequences were submitted to the B. cereus MLST database.

Virulence genes detection

The presence of potential virulence genes hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, nheC, cytK, entFM, entS, bceT and ces was evaluated by PCR using primers listed in Table 1 (Asano et al., 1997; Guinebretière et al., 2002; Fagerlund et al., 2004) and followed the procedure described in Ghelardi et al., 2002 and Fricker et al., 2007

Results

In our study we collected a total of 90 B. cereus s.l. strains isolated from different dairy products (Table 2). The MLST profiles of all isolates are shown in Table 2. A total of 58 STs were identified with ST 1986 as the most frequent. Additionally, 17 STs never described before were identified (Table 2). Thirteen STs belonged to 7 clonal complexes (CC). The major clonal complex was represented by the CC-142, that includes two STs, ST4 and ST2010 (Table 2). The CC-23 included three STs, ST197, ST2013 and ST2033; each CC-111, CC-142 and CC-365 included two STs: ST562 and ST800, ST4 and ST2010, ST1263 and ST2084, respectively. The CC-97 and CC-205 included each only one ST, 1578 and 255, respectively. The ST1986 was the most frequent ST ad it was detected only in caciocavallo. When we considered the distribution of STs among the samples collected in this study (including samples with two or more strains isolated), we identified 34 different STs in caciocavallo, 15 STs in mozzarella, 2 STs were identified in both butter and milk and sheep’s cheese. Only two STs, ST92 and ST142, were identified in more than one dairy product.

All strains analyzed in this study were tested for the presence or absence of eleven virulence genes; the results were summarized on Table 2. Three genes encoding enterotoxin HBL were identified in 58% (53/90) of strains, with different prevalence: the hblA, hblC and hblD were identified in 67% (60/90), 64% (58/90) and 79% (71/90) of the strains, respectively. Similarly, the cluster of nhe genes was identified in 84% (76/90) of the strains with different prevalence between genes: the nheA, nheB and nheC genes were identified in 92% (83/90), 93% (84/90) and 90% (81/90) of the strains, respectively. The cytK, entFM, bceT and entS genes were identified in 72% (65/90), 86% (77/90), 64% (59/90) and 92% (83/90) of the strains, respectively. Only the 10% (9/90) of the strains carried the ces gene.

Discussion and Conclusions

B. cereus s.l. is a ubiquitous bacterium in the environment that can be present in a wide range of foodstuffs. It is prevalent in soil from cattle grazing fields, raw milk and dairy products. In this study we describe the characterization and the pathogenic potential of a collection of 90 B. cereus strains isolated from dairy products. Based on MLST profiles our strains showed a high genetic diversity. Indeed, on a total of 90 isolates 58 MLST profiles were identified, of which 17 were new ST profiles and were submitted in available online database. The ST1986 was the most frequent ST detected and it was found only in the strains isolated from caciocavallo. Interestingly, only the ST92 and ST142 were identified in more than one dairy product; all the other 56STs were detected in a particular dairy product variety. Among previously described STs, ten (ST4, ST12, ST15, ST24, ST26, ST33, ST164, ST205, ST1063 and ST1097) were identified in milk or milk products (Cardazzo et al., 2008; Didelot, Barker, Falush, and Priest, 2009; Yang et al., 2017). The remaining 31 STs were isolated in other foods or in the environment (Didelot et al., 2009; Priest et al., 2004).

Different virulence genes have been associated to the pathogenic power of B. cereus, the Enterotoxins BL (HBL), Non- Hemolytic Enterotoxin (NHE), cytotoxin K, and enterotoxin FM are primarily associated to diarrheal disease (Madeira et al., 2015 Sergeev et al., 2006); evidence suggests that the enterotoxin EntS and BceT also contribute to the severity of diarrheal illness Agata et al., 1995; Castiaux et al., 2016; whereas the ability of B. cereus s.l. to synthesize the heat stable cereulide protein is connected to the emetic disease (Ehling- Schulz et al., 2005). In our study we found that the non-emetic strains (90%) were more numerous than the emetic strains (10%). This finding agreed with previous studies, which showed a low prevalence rate of emetic toxin gene ces in B. cereus s.l. isolated from milk, dairy product and other various food sources (Yim et al., 2015; Owusu-Kwarteng et al., 2017). All these data seem to suggest that emetic toxin gene is rare among B. cereus s.l. strains, but an infection supported by this specific toxin is considered to be the worst-case scenario (Wetterhall et al., 2019). Generally, B. cereus s.l. strains related with emetic food poisoning were associated with ST26 (Ehling-Schulz et al., 2005). Based on the genetic profile of our strains, we not only corroborated this thesis, but we identified additionally five STs (ST4, ST33, ST1986, ST2045 and ST2062) as potential emetic strains. Interestingly, among these strains, those belonging to ST26 did not carried HBL gene complexes, as previous reported (Ehling-Schulz et al., 2005); among these, in the BC003 strain we identified only two virulence genes, ces and entS. Similarly, to ST26, both the strains belonged to ST2045 did not carried HBL gene complexes. Among the non-emetic B. cereus s.l. strains, we found a high prevalence rate (≥60%) of all enterotoxin genes investigated. The higher prevalence rate was related to entS gene, identified in 93% of all strains, followed by entFM gene (83%), nhe gene complex (82%), cytK gene (72%), bceT gene (66%) and hblACD gene complex (60%). Similar results of high prevalence of cytK, entFM and hbl gene complexes in B. cereus isolated from milk and dairy products (Reis et al., 2013) and of nhe gene complex, entS and bceT genes complexes in B. cereus isolated from several food and environmental source (i.e. soil) have been described (Yang et al., 2005; Chaves et al., 2012; Yim et al., 2015). When we considered the virulence genes profile and the source analysed, none correlation was found. Whereas when we correlated the ST profiles to virulence genes detected we found nine STs (ST8, ST509, ST996, ST1097, ST1263, ST2028, ST2033, ST2084 and ST2116) that were associated to an exclusive virulence genes combination. Nevertheless, this genetic profile correlation is questionable, considering that we identified one strain for each of nine STs previously mentioned. Thus, further studies will be necessary for demonstrated really correlation between MLST and virulence genes profiles.

Table 1.

Sequence of PCR primers targeting eleven virulence genes used in this study.

Target Primer name Primer sequence (5'-3') Reference
hblA hblA_F GTGCAGATGTTGATGCCGAT (Guinebretière et al., 2002)
HBLA_R ATGCCACTGCGTGGACATAT
hblC L2A_F AATGGTCATCGGAACTCTAT (Guinebretière et al., 2002)
L2B_R CTCGCTGTTCTGCTGTTAAT
hblD L1A_F AATCAAGAGCTGTCACGAAT (Guinebretière et al., 2002)
L1B_R CACCAATTGACCATGCTAAT
nheA nheA_F TACGCTAAGGAGGGGCA (Guinebretière et al., 2002)
nheA_R GTTTTTATTGCTTCATCGGCT
nheB nheB_F CTATCAGCACTTATGGCAG (Fagerlund et al., 2004)
nheB_R ACTCCTAGCGGTGTTCC
nheC nheC_F CGGTAGTGATTGCTGGG (Fagerlund et al., 2004)
nheC_R CAGCATTCGTACTTGCCAA
cytK cytK_F ACAGATATCGGKCAAAATGC (Ghelardi et al., 2002)
cytK_R TCCAACCCAGTTWSCAGTTC
entFM entFM_F ATGAAAAAAGTAATTTGCAGG (Asano et al., 1997)
entFM_R TTAGTATGCTTTTGTGTAACC
bctE entT_F GCTACGCAAAAACCGAGTGGTG (Agata et al., 1995)
entT_R AATGCTCCGGACTATGCTGACG
Ces ces_F GGTGACACATTATCATATAAGGTG (Fricker et al., 2007)
ces_R GTAAGCGAACCTGTCTGTAACAACA

Table 2.

Source, clonal complex (CC), sequence type (ST) and enterotoxin and emetic toxin genes identified in B. cereus s.l. isolated from dairy products. The new STs identified for the first time were indicated with asterisks.

ID sample Source CC ST Virulence genes
hblA hblC hblD nheA nheB nheC cytK entFM bceT entS ces
BC001 Caciocavallo 1967* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC002 Mozzarella 26 - - - + + + - + - + +
BC003 Mozzarella 26 - - - - - - - - - + +
BC004 Caciocavallo 26 - - - + + + - + - + +
BC005 Caciocavallo 34 - - - + + - + + + + -
BC006 Caciocavallo 33 + + + + + + + + + + +
BC007 Caciocavallo 509 - - + + + + + - + + -
BC026 Caciocavallo ST-111 complex 800 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC009 Caciocavallo 34 - - - + + + + + + + -
BC0010 Caciocavallo ST-8 complex 8 + + - + + - + + + + -
BC0011 Caciocavallo ST-142 complex 2010* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0012 Caciocavallo 2002* + + + + + + - + + + -
BC0013 Caciocavallo 500 + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0014 Caciocavallo ST-23 complex 2013* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0015 Caciocavallo 2026* + + + + + + - + + - -
BC0016 Caciocavallo 2028* - - + + - + - + - - -
BC0017 Caciocavallo ST-365 complex 1263 - - - + + - - + - + -
BC0018 Caciocavallo ST-8 complex 15 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0019 Caciocavallo ST-142 complex 4 + + + + + + + + + + +
BC0020 Caciocavallo ST-142 complex 4 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0021 Caciocavallo 2031* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0022 Caciocavallo 34 - - - + + + + + + + -
BC0023 Caciocavallo ST-23 complex 2033* + - + + + + - - + + -
BC0025 Caciocavallo 2036* + + + + + + - - + + -
BC0024 Cream cheese 996 - - - + + - - + + + -
BC0027 Caciocavallo ST-142 complex 4 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0028 Caciocavallo 59 + - + + + + + + + + -
BC0029 Caciocavallo 2041* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0030 Mozzarella 369 - - - + + + + + + + -
BC0031 Caciocavallo 2045* - - - + + + - - - + +
BC0032 Caciocavallo 2045* - - - + + + + - + + +
BC0033 Mozzarella 12 + + + + + + + - + + -
BC0034 Caciocavallo 1986* - + + + + + + + - + +
BC0035 Mozzarella 1420 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0036 Buffalo mozzarella 278 - - + + + + + + + + -
BC0037 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0038 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0040 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + - - + -
BC0041 Caciocavallo ST-23 complex 197 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0042 Caciocavallo 2062* - - + - + + - + - + +
BC0043 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0044 Caciocavallo 262 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0045 Caciocavallo 1986* + + - + + + + + - + -
BC0046 Caciocavallo 2116 - - + - - - + - + - -
BC0047 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0048 Caciocavallo ST-205 complex 205 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0049 Cacioricotta 164 - - + + + + + + + + -
BC0050 Mozzarella 818 - - + + + + + + + + -
BC0051 Mozzarella 1097 - - + + + + - + - + -
BC0052 Mozzarella 2038 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0053 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0054 Caciocavallo 26 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0055 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0056 Butter 120 + - + + + + + + + + -
BC0057 Mozzarella 1665 + - + + + + + + - + -
BC0058 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0059 Caciocavallo ST-142 complex 4 + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0060 Mozzarella ST-97 complex 1578 + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0061 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0062 Caciocavallo 500 + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0063 Mozzarella 1097 - + - + + + - + - + -
BC0064 Sheep's cheese 1063 - - + + + + - + + + -
BC0065 Caciotta 12 - - + + + + - + + + -
BC0066 Mozzarella 12 - - + + - - + - - + -
BC0067 Caciocavallo 371 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0068 Mozzarella 1007 - - - + + + + + + + -
BC0069 Caciocavallo 92 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0070 Caciocavallo 1986* + + + + + + + + - + -
BC0071 Mozzarella 92 + + + + + + + - + + -
BC0072 Mozzarella 2261 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC008 Caciocavallo 632 + + + + + + - + + - -
BC0073 Mozzarella ST-111 complex 562 - - - + + + - + - + -
BC0074 Mozzarella 92 + + + - + - + + + - -
BC0075 Sheep's cheese 1223 - - - + + + - + - - -
BC0076 Mozzarella 24 - - + + + + - - + + -
BC0077 Mozzarella 92 + + + - + + + - + + -
BC0078 Caciocavallo 2083* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0079 Caciocavallo ST-365 complex 2084* - + + + - + - + - + -
BC0080 Milk 56 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0081 Caciocavallo 1833* + + + + + + - + + + -
BC0082 Butter 1355 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0083 Caciocavallo 1967* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0084 Mozzarella 414 - - - + + + + + + + -
BC0085 Mozzarella 142 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0086 Mozzarella 24 + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0087 Caciocavallo 1967* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0088 Milk 1810 + + + + + + - + + + -
BC0089 Yogurt 142 + - - - + + - + + + -
BC0090 Caciocavallo 2095* + + + + + + + + + + -
BC0094 Caciocavallo 2036* + + + - - - - + + - -

Based on the results and considering the genetic diversity of B. cereus s.l., the MLST approach has proven to be an accurate method for strain genetic typing. Interestingly, our analysis demonstrated the presence of toxin genes in all strains of the B. cereus s.l., stressing the their potentially pathogenic power. Taken together, these data appear to be of significant interest for public health, since highlight potential risk connected to ready-to-eat foods, generally consumed without cooking. In order to prevent contamination by B. cereus s.l., it is very important observe the correct hygiene practices along food chain. In addition, it would be advisable to implement scrupulous control measures of food preservation, to prevent the multiplication of the microorganism and the consequent production of toxins.

Funding Statement

Funding: Fondi Ricerca Corrente Ministero della Salute IZS PB 04/16 RC.

References

  1. Agata N, Ohta M, Arakawa Y, Mori M, 1995. The bceT gene of Bacillus cereus encodes an enterotoxic protein. Microbiol 141:983-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agata N, Ohta M, Yokoyama K, 2002. Production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cereulide) in various foods. Int J Food Microbiol 73:23-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asano SI, Nukumizu Y, Bando H, Iizuka T, Yamamoto T, 1997. Cloning of novel enterotoxin genes from Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 63:1054-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beecher DJ, Wong AC, 1994. Identification and analysis of the antigens detected by two commercial Bacillus cereus diarrheal enterotoxin immunoassay kits. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 60:4614-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beuchat LR, Ma-Lin CF, Carpenter JA, 1980. Growth of Bacillus cereus in media containing plant seed materials and ingredients used in Chinese cookery. J Appl Bacteriol 48:397-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brillard J, Dupont CMS, Berge O, Dargaignaratz C, Oriol-Gagnier S, Doussan C, Broussolle V, Gillon M, Clavel T, Bérard A, 2015. The water cycle, a potential source of the bacterial pathogen Bacillus cereus. Biomed Res Int 2015:356928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cardazzo B, Negrisolo E, Carraro L, Alberghini L, Patarnello T, Giaccone V, 2008. Multiple-locus sequence typing and analysis of toxin genes in Bacillus cereus food-borne isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:850-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Castiaux V, Laloux L, Schneider YJ, Mahillon J, 2016. Screening of Cytotoxic B. cereus on Differentiated Caco-2 Cells and in Co-Culture with Mucus-Secreting (HT29-MTX) Cells. Toxins 5:8(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang YH, Shangkuan YH, Lin HC, Liu HW, 2003. PCR assay of the groEL gene for detection and differentiation of Bacillus cereus group cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4502-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaves JQ, Cavados C de FG, Vivoni AM, 2012. Molecular and toxigenic characterization of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from commercial ground roasted coffee. J Food Prot 75:518-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Christiansson A, Bertilsson J, Svensson B, 1999. Bacillus cereus spores in raw milk: factors affecting the contamination of milk during the grazing period. J Dairy Sci 82:305-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Didelot X, Barker M, Falush D, Priest FG, 2009. Evolution of pathogenicity in the Bacillus cereus group. Syst Appl Microbiol 32:81-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ehling-Schulz M, Svensson B, Guinebretiere MH, Lindbäck T, Andersson M, Schulz A, Fricker M, Christiansson A, Granum PE, Märtlbauer E, Nguyen-The C, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Scherer S, 2005. Emetic toxin formation of Bacillus cereus is restricted to a single evolutionary lineage of closely related strains. Microbiol 151:183-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fagerlund A, Ween O, Lund T, Hardy SP, Granum PE, 2004. Genetic and functional analysis of the cytK family of genes in Bacillus cereus. Microbiol 150:2689-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fricker M, Messelhäusser U, Busch U, Scherer S, Ehling-Schulz M, 2007. Diagnostic real-time PCR assays for the detection of emetic Bacillus cereus strains in foods and recent food-borne outbreaks. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1892-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghelardi E, Celandroni F, Salvetti S, Barsotti C, Baggiani A, Senesi S, 2002. Identification and characterization of toxigenic Bacillus cereus isolates responsible for two food-poisoning outbreaks. FEMS Microbiol Lett 208:129-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Granum PE, Lund T, 1997. Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol Lett 157:223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guinebretière MH, Broussolle V, Nguyen-The C, 2002. Enterotoxigenic profiles of food-poisoning and food-borne Bacillus cereus strains. J Clin Microbiol 40:3053-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Harmon SM, Kautter DA, 1991. Incidence and growth potential of Bacillus cereus in ready-to-serve foods. J Food Prot 54:372-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hendriksen NB, Hansen BM, Johansen JE, 2006. Occurrence and pathogenic potential of Bacillus cereus group bacteria in a sandy loam. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 89:239-49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. López AC, Minnaard J, Pérez PF, Alippi AM, 2015. A case of intoxication due to a highly cytotoxic Bacillus cereus strain isolated from cooked chicken. Food Microbiol 46:195-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Madeira JP, Alpha-Bazin B, Armengaud J, Duport C, 2015. Time dynamics of the Bacillus cereus exoproteome are shaped by cellular oxidation. Front Microbiol 6:342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Owusu-Kwarteng J, Wuni A, Akabanda F, Tano-Debrah K, Jespersen L, 2017. Prevalence, virulence factor genes and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus cereus sensu lato isolated from dairy farms and traditional dairy products. BMC Microbiol 17:65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Priest FG, Barker M, Baillie LWJ, Holmes EC, Maiden MCJ, 2004. Population structure and evolution of the Bacillus cereus group. J Bacteriol 186:7959-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reis ALS, Montanhini MTM, Bittencourt JVM, Destro MT, Bersot LS, 2013. Gene detection and toxin production evaluation of hemolysin BL of Bacillus cereus isolated from milk and dairy products marketed in Brazil. Braz. J Microbiol 44:1195-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sergeev N, Distler M, Vargas M, Chizhikov V, Herold KE, Rasooly A, 2006. Microarray analysis of Bacillus cereus group virulence factors. J Microbiol Methods 65:488-502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wetterhall M, Grönberg A, Grönlund S, Björkman T, Sandberg L, Musunuri S, Chaloupka K, Gammell P, 2019. Removal of B. cereus cereulide toxin from monoclonal antibody bioprocess feed via two-step Protein A affinity and multimodal chromatography. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1118–1119:194-202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang IC, Shih DYC, Huang TP, Huang YP, Wang JY, Pan TM, 2005. Establishment of a novel multiplex PCR assay and detection of toxigenic strains of the species in the Bacillus cereus group. J Food Prot 68:2123-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang Y, Yu X, Zhan L, Chen J, Zhang Yunyi, Zhang J, Chen H, Zhang Z, Zhang Yanjun, Lu Y, Mei L, 2017. Multilocus sequence type profiles of Bacillus cereus isolates from infant formula in China. Food Microbiol 62:46-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yim JH, Kim K Y, Chon JW, Kim DH, Kim HS, Choi DS, Choi IS, Seo KH, 2015. Incidence, antibiotic susceptibility, and toxin profiles of Bacillus cereus sensu lato Isolated from Korean fermented soybean products. J Food Sci 80:M1266-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Italian Journal of Food Safety are provided here courtesy of PAGEPress

RESOURCES