Skip to main content
Brain Communications logoLink to Brain Communications
. 2020 Sep 26;2(2):fcaa153. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa153

Chronic stress induces significant gene expression changes in the prefrontal cortex alongside alterations in adult hippocampal neurogenesis

Ksenia Musaelyan 1,2,, Selin Yildizoglu 1, James Bozeman 1, Andrea Du Preez 1,3,4, Martin Egeland 1,3,4, Patricia A Zunszain 3, Carmine M Pariante 3, Cathy Fernandes 4,5, Sandrine Thuret 1
PMCID: PMC7850288  PMID: 33543135

Abstract

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in stress-related disorders such as depression, posttraumatic stress disorders, as well as in the mechanism of antidepressant effects. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in these associations remain to be fully explored. In this study, unpredictable chronic mild stress in mice resulted in a deficit in neuronal dendritic tree development and neuroblast migration in the hippocampal neurogenic niche. To investigate molecular pathways underlying neurogenesis alteration, genome-wide gene expression changes were assessed in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and the hypothalamus alongside neurogenesis changes. Cluster analysis showed that the transcriptomic signature of chronic stress is much more prominent in the prefrontal cortex compared to the hippocampus and the hypothalamus. Pathway analyses suggested huntingtin, leptin, myelin regulatory factor, methyl-CpG binding protein and brain-derived neurotrophic factor as the top predicted upstream regulators of transcriptomic changes in the prefrontal cortex. Involvement of the satiety regulating pathways (leptin) was corroborated by behavioural data showing increased food reward motivation in stressed mice. Behavioural and gene expression data also suggested circadian rhythm disruption and activation of circadian clock genes such as Period 2. Interestingly, most of these pathways have been previously shown to be involved in the regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. It is possible that activation of these pathways in the prefrontal cortex by chronic stress indirectly affects neuronal differentiation and migration in the hippocampal neurogenic niche via reciprocal connections between the two brain areas.

Keywords: chronic stress, gene expression, adult hippocampal neurogenesis, prefrontal cortex


To investigate molecular pathways underlying neuroplasticity changes upon chronic stress, genome-wide gene expression was assessed in three brain regions. Most changes were found in prefrontal cortex with signalling pathways of leptin and brain-derived neurotrophic factor among others being activated. These pathways may indirectly affect neuroplasticity via prefrontal cortex–hippocampal connections.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is thought to play an important role in depression and antidepressant effects (Miller and Hen, 2015; Egeland et al., 2017; Boldrini et al., 2019), however its exact role in the course of disease neurobiology is unknown. Chronic stress has been identified as a significant risk factor for depression (Bernet and Stein, 1999; Fava and Kendler, 2000; Pawlby et al., 2011). Unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) is widely used as a valid model of depression. UCMS induces such behavioural endophenotypes as anhedonia, anxiety, decreased grooming and weight loss (Ducottet et al., 2004; Mutlu et al., 2012; Nollet et al., 2013). However some groups report hyperactivity and anxiolytic effect of this paradigm (Pothion et al., 2004; Schweizer et al., 2009; Strekalova et al., 2011). UCMS is also associated with a decline in hippocampal neurogenesis. While multiple hypotheses have been put forward to explain the mechanism of neurogenic decline (Egeland et al., 2015), a full coherent clinically relevant picture has not yet been formed. One of the ways to study neurobiological mechanisms in their full complexity is to utilize hypothesis-free explorative approach of a genome-wide transcriptome changes in selected tissues and brain regions. This approach is currently being widely utilized in clinical depression research to discover novel genes and pathways involved in the neurobiology of depression (Hervé et al., 2017; Cattaneo et al., 2018).

The majority of the research on depression and chronic stress focuses on the brain areas of the cortico-limbic circuit, including but not limited to the hippocampus (HIP), hypothalamus and the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Human neuroimaging studies confirm the involvement of these regions in depression (Lorenzetti et al., 2009; van Tol et al., 2014). The role of PFC in depression is further supported by the evidence from the deep brain stimulation trials, showing that deep brain stimulation over PFC and anterior cingulate cortex produces an antidepressant effect (Levkovitz et al., 2009; Berlim et al., 2014). Investigation of PFC pathology in animal models of depression demonstrated that exposure to chronic stress and increased glucocorticoid levels cause damage and neurodegenerative changes in the PFC, such as appearance of reactive microglia (Hinwood et al., 2013), atrophy of pyramidal neurons (Cerqueira, 2005), dendritic atrophy (Liston et al., 2006; Dias-Ferreira et al., 2009) and reduction of synaptic proteins expression and synaptic currents (Li et al., 2011; Müller et al., 2011).

Yet the majority of transcriptomic studies of chronic stress effects in rodents focussed on the consequence of stress on gene expression in the HIP. The HIP has been shown to be particularly sensitive to stress, potentially due to a high expression of the glucocorticoid receptor activated by corticosteroid hormone released in the course of stress response. Both rat and mouse studies find activation of immune response-related gene networks and signalling pathways often centred on nuclear factor kappa B (Malki et al., 2013, 2015; Gray et al., 2014). A number of other studies investigating the effect of chronic mild or restraint stress on hippocampal gene expression in rats and mice identified signalling pathways involved in cell fate, such as cell apoptosis (Bergström et al., 2007), proliferation and cell cycle control (Liu et al., 2010), axonal guidance and cell migration (Jungke et al., 2011; Datson et al., 2012; Zitnik et al., 2013).

Another region of interest in the chronic stress research is the hypothalamus. As a central organ in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis regulating the systemic level of glucocorticoids, hypothalamus plays a central role in the endocrinal stress response of the body. Hypothalamus also receives neuroendocrine input from the gut metabolic hormones ghrelin and leptin (Lep) and is connected with the reward-related ventral tegmental area (van Zessen et al., 2012). Another hypothalamic area implicated in chronic stress response is the suprachiasmatic nucleus, a major regulator of the circadian clock, relevant for sleep disturbance and alteration of molecular circadian rhythms observed in depression (Li et al., 2013).

For these reasons, the three limbic circuit brain areas described above were selected in this study to analyse genome-wide transcriptomic changes induced by UCMS exposure to find novel potential mechanisms of stress-induced neurogenic decline using a hypothesis-free approach.

Materials and methods

Experimental design

Seven weeks old male BALB/cAnNCrl mice were obtained from Charles River (Margate, Kent, UK). All mice were housed in the Biological Services Unit at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience in standard conditions [19–22°C, humidity 55%, 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle with lights on at 7.30 am, food (Rat and Mouse No. 1 Diet; Special Diet Services, Essex, UK) and water ad libitum]. Mice were allowed to acclimatize to new housing conditions for 1 week before experimental procedures commenced. All housing and experimental procedures were carried out in compliance with the local ethical review panel of King’s College London under a UK Home Office project licence held in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the European Directive 2010/63/EU.

Two cohorts of 8 weeks old male BALB/c mice were exposed to UCMS or control (CNTRL) conditions. Mice were randomly allocated to experimental groups. The BALB/c strain was selected for this study due to its high sensitivity to stress and high immune system reactivity (Potter, 1985; Kim et al., 2002; Surget and Belzung, 2009). The first cohort was sacrificed for tissue collection after 6 weeks of UCMS exposure to examine the behavioural changes and the state of the hippocampal neurogenic niche (n = 10 per group). As the behavioural data from Cohort 1 demonstrated the strongest behavioural phenotype at Week 4, Cohort 2 was sacrificed for tissue collection after 4 weeks of UCMS exposure to detect UCMS-induced gene expression events potentially preceding changes in the adult hippocampal neurogenesis (n = 8 per group). For graphical representation of the study design, see Supplementary Fig. 1.

UCMS protocol and behavioural assessments

The UCMS protocol used was based on the methodology described by Nollet et al. (2013). The UCMS group was exposed to four daily stressors in a random-like order repeated every week. In order to avoid habituation, the longevity of stressors varied from 30 min on Week 1 to 4 h towards the end of the UCMS protocol. For the schedule of stressors included in the protocol, see Supplementary Methods  Table 1.

Table 1.

Canonical pathways deemed significant in the PFC dataset by IPA

Ingenuity canonical pathways −log (P-value) Ratio Z-score Associated differentially expressed genes
Axonal guidance signalling 2.61 0.05 Ephb2, Tuba4a, Gng13, Sema4f, Robo3, Gng7, Tubb2b, Ephb6, Sema6d, Mag, Wnt10a, Efna5, Arhgef6, Lingo1, Mras, Myl4, Fzd5, Sema7a, Adamts4
Glutamate receptor signalling 2.12 0.10 Slc17a7, Slc17a6, Homer1, Grm4, Gng7
Calcium signalling 2.03 0.06 2.45 Camk2a, Tnnc1, Myh3, Rcan3, Myl4, Mef2c, Itpr1, Camkk2, Camk2g
Wnt/β-catenin signalling 2.01 0.06 0.33 Csnk2a2, Nlk, Wnt10a, Dkk3, Sox10, Fzd5, Acvr2b, Sox11, Tcf7l2
GABA receptor signalling 1.94 0.09 Slc32a1, Gabrg1, Gad1, Mras, Ap2s1
Paxillin signalling 1.65 0.07 0.45 Actn2, Actb, Arhgef6, Mras, Itgb4, Mapk11
Thrombin signalling 1.64 0.05 1.89 Camk2a, Arhgef6, Mras, Myl4, Gng13, Itpr1, Mapk11, Gng7, Camk2g
Gαq signalling 1.63 0.06 1.13 Napepld, Adrbk1, Mras, Gng13, Arhgef25, Itpr1, Chrm3, Gng7
Ephrin B signalling 1.50 0.07 Ephb6, Ephb2, Mras, Gng13, Gng7
RhoGDI signalling 1.49 0.05 −0.82 Dgkz, Arhgdig, Actb, Arhgef6, Mras, Myl4, Gng13, Gng7
B-cell receptor signalling 1.40 0.05 2.12 Synj2, Map3k10, Camk2a, Inpp5f, Mras, Mef2c, Mapk11, Camk2g
CCR5 signalling in macrophages 1.35 0.08 Mras, Gng13, Mapk11, Gng7
G protein signalling mediated by tubby 1.34 0.09 Mras, Gng13, Gng7
Triacylglycerol degradation 1.33 0.14 Faah, Mgll
α-Adrenergic signalling 1.31 0.06 Adra2a, Mras, Gng13, Itpr1, Gng7
Glutamate-dependent acid resistance 1.30 0.50 GAD1

Canonical pathways deemed significant in the PFC dataset ordered by the log (P-value) derived from Fisher’s exact test, with dataset genes/pathway genes ratio and Z-score of predicted pathway up- or downregulation, calculated for pathways where differential gene expression showed consistent direction of change.

Animals’ weight and coat state were assessed during UCMS on a weekly basis. Coat score was determined on a scale of 0–7 according to Nollet et al. (2013) by a researcher blinded to experimental conditions. Sucrose preference test was conducted during and at the end of the UCMS exposure. The following additional tests were conducted at the end of the UCMS exposure: open field, novelty suppressed feeding (NSF), splash test and Porsolt swim test (PST). For the details of experimental procedures, see Supplementary Methods.

Blood collection

For cytokine and corticosterone analysis, blood was collected by incision method from the lateral tail vein (Sadler and Bailey, 2013) 24 h before and 30 min after the PST. Whole blood (30–50 µl) was collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid covered (EDTA) microvette CB 300 tubes (Sarstedt, Leicester, UK) and separated by centrifugation for 10 min at 3000 rpm (4°C). Blood was also collected by the cardiac puncture after terminal general anaesthesia has been induced. In total, 100–200 μl of whole blood was collected using syringe injected into the cardiac cavity and subsequently processed as described above. This blood draw was used for cytokine, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Lep measurements.

Corticosterone measurement

Plasma corticosterone levels were measured using a commercially available corticosterone enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Lausen, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for small sample volume. All samples were analysed in technical duplicates. Obtained data were analysed using five-parameter logistic curve analysis using the My Assays online data tool, MyAssays Ltd, http://www.myassays.com/five-parameter-logistic-curve.assay (last accessed 5 October 2020).

Luminex

The level of cytokines in the plasma was determined using the multiplex screening assay based on magnetic Luminex® xMAP® technology as described in Hye et al. (2014). For this assay, custom-made pre-mixed multianalyte kit was purchased from RnD systems, Minneapolis, USA (catalogue N LXSAMSM). This kit contained multi-coloured magnetic microparticles pre-coated with antibodies to 10 selected analytes (granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor, interleukins IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interferon gamma, CRP and Lep). To measure the fluorescent signal, Luminex® 100/200TM system was used. All assay steps were conducted according to the manufacturer instructions. Due to the small volume of blood collected, technical replicates for plasma samples were not included. Obtained data were analysed using five-parameter logistic curve analysis using the My Assays online data tool, MyAssays Ltd, http://www.myassays.com/five-parameter-logistic-curve.assay (last accessed 5 October 2020).

Brain tissue collection

To collect fixed tissue, animals were anaesthetized with Euthatal i.p. (Merial Animal Health Ltd, Harlow, UK) at a dose of 40 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium. Deep anaesthesia was confirmed by the loss of righting and pain reflexes and slowing of the rate of respiration. Animals were subsequently transcardially perfused with 30 ml of saline and 50 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde (Paraformaldehyde, prills, 95%, 441244, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) in phosphate-buffered saline (pH = 7.4 from phosphate-buffered saline tablets, 18912-014, Gibco by Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) through the left cardiac ventricle. Brains were post-fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 24 h, and subsequently stored at 4°C in 30% sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) in phosphate-buffered saline until sectioning (1–3 weeks).

For fresh frozen tissue collection, following decapitation brains were removed from the skull and placed dorsal side down on a wetted filter paper on a petri dish kept on ice. For the dissection of the brain areas technique, see Supplementary Methods. Right and left dissected areas were pooled for each sample, while brain tissue from each mouse was analysed as individual samples. Dissected brain areas were immediately flash frozen on dry ice.

Immunohistochemistry

Serial coronal sections of 40-μM thickness were cut on a HM430 sliding freezing microtome (Thermo Scientific) and stored in Tris-buffered saline (pH = 7.4) with 30% v/v glycerol, 15% w/v sucrose and 0.05% w/v sodium azide (all Sigma-Aldrich, UK). For immunohistochemistry on free floating sections, every sixth section was used. Immunohistochemistry was conducted as previously described (Dias et al., 2014). For neuroblast detection, anti-doublecortin (anti-DCX) antibody (Ab18723 raised in rabbit, Abcam, UK, 1:1000 dilution) was used; for microglia immunostaining, antibody for ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1; 019-19741, Wako, Japan, 1:500 dilution) was used.

Stereological analysis of immunopositive cell density

For microscopy, the Axioskop 2 MOT Plus Microscope (Zeiss) with automated stage connected to Stereoinvestigator v.7 (MBF Bioscience, USA) software was used. Immunopositive cell density was determined using the volume and cell population number estimated by semi-automated Optical Fractionator method applied by the stereological software (see Supplementary Methods). All quantifications were done by an experimenter blinded to the experimental conditions.

DCX cell classification based on dendrite morphology and their morphometric analysis

The DCX positive cells were visually classified according to the categorization of Plümpe et al. (2006). EF-type neurons from each section were selected for morphometric analysis of dendrites. For this, sections were imaged using a 40× objective, and micrographs were acquired using a Zeiss AxioCam MR Rev3 camera. Primary, secondary and tertiary dendrites were manually traced using the NeuronJ plugin for ImageJ developed by Meijering et al. (2004) and measured using image pixel to millimetre calibration as has been done previously (Srivastava et al., 2012; Dias et al., 2014). For details, see Supplementary Methods.

Migration distance of DCX+ cells

To estimate relative distance of DCX+ cells migration through the granular zone (GZ), the height of the GZ has been divided into 10 bins, and a relative distance of migration was estimated by assigning a score from 0 to 1 to each DCX+ cell based on the position of its cell body relative to the borders of the GZ as has been done previously (Han et al., 2016). The average percentage of cells positioned within each distance bin for each brain was used in statistical analysis.

Microarray and data analysis

Genome-wide gene expression was assessed in fresh frozen brain tissue using the Mouse WG-6 BeadChip Kit (Illumina, USA) (for details of RNA extraction, see Supplementary Methods). Eight brains were sampled for each treatment condition; no technical replicates were utilized. Sample labelling, hybridization and signal detection and imaging were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. Images were analysed using the GenomeStudio software (Illumina, USA). Raw data were pre-processed using the R package Lumi (Du et al., 2008). Statistical analysis of differential expression was performed using the statistical analysis of microarrays method and R-based software (Tusher et al., 2001). The dataset for each brain region was analysed separately as a two-class unpaired data. For further details, see Supplementary Methods. Microarray data analysis was verified using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. For gene selection, primer design and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, see Supplementary Methods. Pathway, upstream regulator and predicted functions analyses were conducted through the use of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis (last accessed 5 October 2020).

Statistical analysis

Unpaired two-tailed t-test was used for between group comparisons after normal distribution of the data was confirmed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for single measures. For the weekly coat state between group comparisons, Mann–Whitney U test used for each week as the data were not normally distributed. For related measures, such as DCX+ cells, dendritic morphology types and migration distance groups, two-way ANOVA was used with post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons within each type or distance group.

Data availability

Output of statistical analysis of microarrays for each brain region is available in the Supplementary materials for this article. Raw microarray output data are available on request.

Results

UCMS impaired coat state and grooming behaviour in exposed mice

UCMS induced significant coat state deterioration detectable from Week 4 of stress exposure (Mann-Whitney for Week 4 U = 2, P < 0.0001; for Week 5 U = 21, P = 0.023; for Week 6 U = 9, P = 0.004) (see Fig. 1A). Repeated measures two-way ANOVA showed that body weight of animals was significantly affected by week of exposure (Effect of Time F(6,108) = 127.2, P < 0.0001) and UCMS × Time interaction (F(6,108) = 5.026, P = 0.0001) (see Fig. 1B). Sucrose consumption, measured once every 2 weeks, was significantly decreased in UCMS group compared to CNTRL only on Week 4 when sucrose concentration was increased from 1% to 2% (see Fig. 1C). The CNTRL group responded to 2% sucrose with 79% preference, while the UCMS-exposed group did not prefer it over water (46%) (Effect of Time × Stress F(3,39) = 13.15, P < 0.0001). In the splash test, UCMS-exposed mice spent shorter time grooming (t(18) = 3.304, P = 0.004) (see Fig. 1D). UCMS also induced hyperactivity in the open field test (see Fig. 1E) (Mann–Whitney U = 16, P = 0.009). In the NSF test, UCMS-exposed group’s latency to feed was reduced compared to CNTRL group (unpaired two-tailed t-test t(18) = 3.227, P = 0.005) (see Fig. 1F). No differences were found in the time of immobility on the PST (see Fig. 1G).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Behavioural and serological parameters in the UCMS-exposed mice. Male BALB/cAnNCrl mice (n = 10/group) aged 7 weeks at the beginning of the experiment were subjected to UCMS or CNTRL conditions for 6 weeks. (A) Weekly coat state deterioration score measurements from Week 4, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 derived from Mann–Whitney U-test between CNTRL and UCMS, data represent median and interquartile range. (B) Weekly weight monitoring, *P < 0.05 derived from Bonferroni multiple comparison between CNTRL and UCMS group means at Week 1 of UCMS. (C) Sucrose consumption measured once every 2 weeks over 2 consecutive nights, **P < 0.01 derived from Bonferroni multiple comparisons. (D) Time spent grooming during the splash test. (E) Distance moved during a 5-min exposure to a dimly lit open field. (F) Latency to start eating the pellet in the NSF test. (G) Immobility in the PST. (H) Plasma corticosterone (CORT) response to the PST measured 24 h before (PRE-PST) and 30 min after (POST-PST) the test. (I) Plasma levels of the CRP in the blood collected by the cardiac puncture at the end of the behavioural testing battery (7 days after termination of the UCMS protocol). (J) Plasma levels of leptin in the blood collected by the cardiac puncture at the end of the behavioural testing battery (7 days after termination of the UCMS protocol). In DJ, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 derived from two-tailed unpaired t-test, data represent mean ± SEM.

UCMS did not affect plasma corticosterone response to acute swim stress but increased plasma CRP and reduced plasma leptin levels

To analyse the HPA axis regulation of glucocorticoid release in response to stressful stimulation, blood samples were collected 24 h before and 30 min after a 6-min long PST. Corticosterone levels were significantly elevated after PST in both groups but UCMS did not affect the baseline level of CORT or response to swim stress (Effect of PST F(1,16) = 108.6, P < 0.0001) (see Fig. 1H). None of the 10 cytokines, measured at the time of sacrifice, were detected in the plasma. However, CRP was significantly elevated in the UCMS group (t(16) = 2.508, P = 0.023) (see Fig. 1I). Lep levels, reflecting hormonal regulation of appetite, were significantly decreased in UCMS group compared to CNTRLs (t(14) = 2.477, P = 0.027) (see Fig. 1J).

UCMS reduces the density of mature DCX+ neuroblasts and the percentage of DCX+ cells residing in the subgranular zone

UCMS group presented with a reduced number of DCX+ neuroblasts in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) (t(14) = 2.954, P = 0.01) (see Fig. 2D). Density reduction was specific to neuroblasts with mature-like dendritic trees reaching into the molecular layer of the DG [type ‘EF’ in Plümpe et al. (2006)]. See Fig. 2D for quantification and Fig. 2E for examples of each neuroblast type.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of UCMS on the density, morphology and migration of DCX+ neuroblasts and microglial density. (A) Number of neuroblasts residing in the subgranular zone (0) and in 10 different layers of the GZ (0.1–1). (B) Examples of the DCX+ cells with a high relative migration distance in the hippocampal GZ of the UCMS-exposed mice. (C) Average relative migration distance of DCX+ cell bodies. (D) The density of all DCX+ neuroblasts (TOTAL) and of the ‘AB’, ‘CD’ and ‘EF’ types classified based on their dendritic tree morphology. (E) Examples of AB, CD and EF types of neuroblasts. (F) Representative microphotographs of the Iba1+ cells in the DG. (G) Density of the Iba1+ cells in the GZ of the DG. (H) Density of Iba1+ cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). (I) Representative microphotographs of Iba1+ cells in the mPFC. Data presented as mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 derived from unpaired t-test CNTRL versus UCMS; #P < 0.05 derived from post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons CNTRL versus UCMS.

As adverse environment has been previously shown to affect migration of the adult-born neuroblasts (Belarbi et al., 2012), the effect of the UCMS on migration distance of the DCX+ cells was analysed (Effect of Interaction F(10,170) = 1.99, P = 0.037; Effect of Distance F(10,170) = 622, P < 0.0001). UCMS reduced the percentage of DCX+ cells residing in the subgranular zone (P = 0.005), see Fig. 2B for examples and Fig. 2A for quantification. However, the average relative distance of migration of DCX+ cell bodies from the subgranular zone was not significantly different between the two groups (see Fig. 2C).

UCMS does not affect the number of Iba1+ microglia in the hippocampal GZ but increases its density in the medial PFC

Analysis of Iba1+ microglial density showed that no significant effect of UCMS on the number of microglial cells was found (see Fig. 2F and G). However, density of Iba1+ microglia was increased in the medial PFC of the UCMS-exposed group compared to CNTRL (t(16) =3.139, P = 0.006) (see Fig. 2H and I).

UCMS exerted the strongest effect on gene expression in the PFC

To elucidate molecular pathways underlying UCMS effects, bulk genome-wide gene expression analysis of the brain tissue was conducted using the gene expression microarray. For this, a separate cohort of mice (Cohort 2) was exposed to UCMS or CNTRL conditions (n = 8 per group). As behavioural monitoring during 6 weeks of UCMS exposure in Cohort 1 showed the strongest phenotype on Week 4 (see Fig. 1A and C), this time point was chosen for gene expression analysis. Behavioural assessment preceded tissue collection at Week 4. Behavioural data confirmed the presence of low grooming and hyperactivity phenotypes seen in Cohort 1, however some differences were observed in the dynamics of sucrose preference response (see Supplementary Fig. 2).

Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the top 500 variable genes showed that samples primarily clustered based on the brain region they derived from, while within the regions some treatment group-based clustering was observed. The PFC samples clustered based on the UCMS exposure, apart from two outlier samples, which were excluded from subsequent analysis as shown in Fig. 3. In the HIP, only few CNTRL and UCMS-exposed samples clustered together, and no clear distinct pattern of expression could be seen on the heatmap for the hippocampal (HIP) UCMS and CNTRL samples. In the hypothalamus, no clustering based on stress exposure was observed (see Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Heatmap of cluster analysis based on the top 500 variable genes. Adult male BALB/c mice were exposed to UCMS or control (CON) for 4 weeks (n = 8/group) after which fresh frozen brain tissue from selected brain regions [whole HIP, hypothalamus (HYP) and PFC] were subjected to a genome-wide transcriptomic analysis using Illumina microarray platform. The heatmap shows the clustering of samples (top connecting lines) and the heatmap pattern of expression based on intensity values of the top 500 variable genes. The gradient of green and red represents the deviation of each sample intensity value for this gene from the mean intensity across all samples. Individual sample IDs and their groups highlighted at the bottom of the heatmap.

Differential expression analysis using statistical analysis of microarrays package yielded the highest number of significant genes in the PFC

Significance analysis of microarrays method detected 467 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the UCMS and CNTRL groups in the PFC with false discovery rate of 0. For the full list of top up- and downregulated genes selected based on their fold changes, see Supplementary Table 4. As such a low level of false discovery rate was calling a very small number of genes in other regions, false discovery rate level was relaxed to a recommended 0.095 for the HIP and the hypothalamus. Such settings called 46 and 27 DEGs in the HIP and in the hypothalamus, respectively (see Supplementary Table 5).

Pathway analysis revealed meaningful pathways, functions and predicted upstream regulators in the PFC dataset

Canonical pathway analysis conducted by the IPA™ software mapped the DEGs on known canonical pathways. The software identified a total of 240 canonical pathways associated with the DEGs. Among these, 17 were statistically significant (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s exact test analysis utilized by the IPA (see Table 1). The software also quantified the ratio of the number of DEGs involved in each pathway to the total number of genes comprising the pathway. Table 1 lists all DEGs involved in each of the significantly activated pathways. Based on the fold changes of the DEGs, IPA also made a prediction of whether the pathway would be up (positive Z-score) or down (negative Z-score) regulated and its magnitude (Z-score value). Due to conflicting direction of DEGs change in some pathways, it was not always possible to make such a prediction (missing Z-score). Interestingly a pathway directly related to axonal maturation, the axonal guidance pathway was identified as the most significant. The list also included pathways previously shown to be involved in neurogenesis regulation such as Wnt/β-catenin and Ephrin signalling. Common pathways of neuronal signalling such as glutamate, calcium and GABA receptor signalling were also identified. Interestingly, immune response-related B-cell receptor pathway also appeared to be significantly activated.

Next, the predicted upstream regulators analysis was conducted using the IPA software. Upstream regulator analysis identifies molecules, which activation or suppression can explain gene expression changes in the dataset, as well as regulators’ own interactions with each other. The software utilizes a broad definition of the upstream regulator for this analysis, so that any type of regulatory molecule, from microRNA to a drug, can be included in the results. IPA identified 63 potential upstream regulators of DEGs, with 59 being significant according to Fisher’s exact test. Table 2 lists the top 15 predicted upstream regulators with P-value ≤ 0.01, connected to two or more DEGs. In some cases, the software could also make a prediction of the direction and magnitude of up- or downregulation based on the fold changes data available for target genes (activation Z-score).

Table 2.

Upstream regulators of differentially expressed genes in the PFC dataset predicted by the IPA software

Upstream regulator Gene name Activation Z-score P-value No. of target genes
1 Htt Huntingtin −0.004 0.0000 25
2 Lep Leptin −0.970 0.0000 8
3 Myrf Myelin regulatory factor 0.0001 3
4 Mecp2 Methyl-CpG binding protein 2 1.126 0.0001 7
5 Bdnf Brain-derived neurotrophic factor −0.181 0.0001 9
6 Hdac4 Histone deacetylase 4 0.0001 8
7 Kmt2a Lysine methyltransferase 2A 1.342 0.0002 5
8 Ntrk2 Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 0.0011 3
9 Dcc DCC netrin 1 receptor 0.0018 2
10 Pou4f1 POU class 4 homeobox 1 0.0022 4
11 Comt Catechol-O-methyltransferase 0.0035 2
12 Mtor Mechanistic target of rapamycin 0.0054 3
13 Arntl Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator like 0.0117 2
14 Ascl1 Achaete-scute family bHLH transcription factor 1 0.0123 3
15 Bckdk Branched chain ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase 0.0153 2

IPA predicted upstream regulators in the PFC dataset, P-value derived from Fisher’s exact test. Z-score reflects the direction of change where the software was able to make such a prediction.

Figure 4 highlights several key upstream regulators with the most number of target genes [huntingtin (Htt), Lep, Myelin Regulatory Factor (Myrf), methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (Mecp2) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf)] at the centre of the regulatory network, as well as the predicted complexity of their regulatory relationships with the DEGs and among themselves. According to the analysis, Htt was identified as the leading regulator, with 25 DEGs from the PFC dataset listed as its target genes. Lep, Mesp2, Bdnf and Hdac4 followed Htt with seven to nine target genes among the DEGs. Some of the top upstream regulators could be grouped into three main categories: those previously implicated in neurogenesis regulation [Bdnf, mechanistic target of rapamycin (Mtor), achaete-scute homolog 1 (Ascl1)], those involved in epigenetic regulation (Mecp2 and Hdac4) and those related to some of the observed behaviours (Htt, Lep). The relationships between the main upstream regulators and their differentially expressed target genes are shown in Fig. 4. Colour coding reflects direction of fold change of the DEGs (red for upregulation and green for downregulation). Interestingly, most upstream regulators were not themselves differentially expressed, with the exception of BAF chromatin remodelling complex subunit B (Bcl11b), which was downregulated. In the HIP and the hypothalamus, the number of genes was not sufficient to produce meaningful results in the pathway analysis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The predicted network of upstream regulators and their target differentially expressed genes in the PFC, designed by the IPA software based on the upstream regulator analysis. Network of upstream regulators linked to genes differentially expressed in the PFC dataset. The relative size of the upstream regulator molecules reflects their significance ranking with Htt, Lep, Myrf, Mecp2 and Bdnf being the top five predicted upstream regulators.

Functional analysis identified functions related to dendritic morphology

Next, we assessed if DEGs in the PFC dataset were linked to particular functions in the IPA database. IPA identified 185 functions related to the DEGs. The most relevant functions, based on their relation to the brain, the number of associated DEGs and their activation Z-score are listed in Table 3. These functions fell in the main three groups: those related to synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation or synaptic depression, those related to dendritic morphology, such as neurite formation or neuritogenesis and branching of neurites, and those related to cell fate such as cell proliferation, differentiation and migration. Overall, functions related to cellular and nervous system development dominated the list.

Table 3.

Predicted functions associated with the differentially expressed genes in the PFC dataset

Categories Functions annotation P-value Activation Z-score No. of genes
Cell-to-cell signalling and interaction Long-term potentiation of brain
0.005
−1.177 9
Long-term potentiation of cerebral cortex
0.007
−0.923 8
Neurotransmission
0.009
−0.164 8
Long-term potentiation
0.013
−0.978 10
Release of neurotransmitter
0.016
−1.718 4
Synaptic depression
0.031
−0.527 6
Cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, cellular development, cellular function and maintenance, cellular growtd and proliferation, embryonic development, nervous system development and function, tissue development Branching of neurites
0.004
−0.250 13
Neuritogenesis
0.004
−0.250 15
Dendritic growtd/branching
0.008
−1.342 11
Outgrowtd of neurites
0.050
1.898 6
Cellular assembly and organization, cellular development, cellular growtd and proliferation, nervous system development and function, tissue development Microtubule dynamics
0.003
−0.346 17
Growtd of neurites
0.039
2.129 8
Cellular development, cellular growtd and proliferation, nervous system development and function, tissue development Proliferation of neuronal cells
0.013
0.995 11
Development of neurons
0.001
0.017 20
Cellular growtd and proliferation Proliferation of cells
0.002
0.512 27
Generation of cells
0.000
0.101 22
Cellular development Differentiation of cells 0.001 0.460 19
Lipid metabolism, molecular transport, small molecule biochemistry Concentration of lipid 0.007 −2.400 7
Nervous system development and function, tissue morphology Density of neurons 0.014 −2.213 7
Developmental disorder, neurological disease, organismal injury and abnormalities Cerebral dysgenesis 0.024 0.931 4
Behaviour Behaviour 0.037 0.687 8
Cellular movement, nervous system development and function Migration of neurons 0.050 −0.124 6

Gene functions predicted by IPA software and selected based on their relevance for the brain, number of genes related to each function and the ability of the software to make a prediction regarding the direction of change (activation Z-score).

Discussion

In this study, adult male BALB/c mice were exposed to 6 weeks of UCMS conditions, which resulted in low grooming, hyperactivity, transient anhedonia and change in food reward behaviour in UCMS-exposed mice. Behavioural changes were accompanied by increase in CRP and decrease in Lep plasma levels, reactive microglia changes in the PFC area and decline in the number of neuroblasts and their aberrant migration in the GZ of the hippocampal DG.

UCMS is known to induce a complex behavioural response, with our study being no exception. As expected, UCMS consistently reduced grooming in mice. Hyperactivity was also very prominent, in line with many previous UCMS studies (Couch et al., 2013; Dournes et al., 2013), especially where the stressors are administered in the light phase and therefore likely disrupt the circadian rhythm of mice (Aslani et al., 2014). Hyperactivity following UCMS has been previously linked to impulsivity (Couch et al., 2016). Contrary to expectations, UCMS-exposed mice demonstrated decreased latency to feed in the NSF test. There are several possible explanations for this effect. First, it could be simply linked to hyperactivity in the UCMS group. Second, it is possible that UCMS stimulated food reward drive in mice. Such explanation goes in line with a decline in blood Lep in the UCMS group. Lep is a negative feedback inhibitor released by adipose tissue to regulate food consumption through Lep receptors in the hypothalamus (Ahima and Osei, 2004), thus its reduction could lead to a higher drive for food rewards. Such effect of chronic stress on Lep levels has been previously documented (Ge et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2015). Importantly, calorie intake and satiety regulating hormones are known to modulate adult neurogenesis (Garza et al., 2012; Hornsby et al., 2016; Morgan et al., 2017). Change in Lep levels might be reflecting a shift in circadian rhythm, which could have affected the time of feeding drive and levels of hormones regulating it, as has been shown in previous studies of circadian rhythm gene knockouts or mice exposed to disrupted light–dark cycles (Kettner et al., 2015).

Lastly, it has been shown previously that mouse response in the NSF test is dependent on the ambiguity of the previous experience of aversive stimuli and the state of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Glover et al. (2017) demonstrated that neurogenesis-deficient mice, which undergone ambiguous cue fear conditioning training, showed lower latency to feed in the NSF test compared to their neurogenesis-intact counterparts. This effect was attributed to the failure of neurogenesis-deficient mice to generalize the aversive experience to novel environments. Due to the unpredictable nature of UCMS, it could have exerted an effect similar to ambiguous cue and led to analogous deficiency of fear generalization in the NSF arena. While fear conditioning paradigm differs significantly from the UCMS and their underlying mechanisms might not overlap, it is still interesting to consider that anomalous NSF response in neurogenesis-deficient mice has been described previously.

To investigate molecular changes, which underlie this combination of endophenotypes associated with chronic stress exposure, we used a hypothesis-free approach of genome-wide gene expression microarray. As behavioural monitoring showed the strongest stress behavioural response at 4 weeks, this time point was selected for gene expression analysis. A number of differences were observed in behavioural response between the two cohorts, which could be attributed to the difference in the length of UCMS exposure and variable nature of UCMS protocol well described in the literature (Willner, 2005).

Potential expression changes were assessed in areas previously involved in chronic stress response, such as HIP, the hypothalamus and the PFC. Interestingly, genome-wide gene expression changes were most apparent in the PFC among the three regions investigated, with no overlap among the regions. This finding goes in line with previous studies, which compared the effect of chronic mild stress on gene expression across different brain regions. As such, Hervé et al. (2017) found the strongest effect on UCMS in anterior cingulate cortex compared to the DG, with only five overlapping DEGs between the two regions. Similarly, Surget et al. (2009) reported less DEGs in the DG upon UCMS compared to amygdala and the cortex, with the cortex response being more broad in terms of cellular functions involved. Interestingly, the RNAseq study conducted by Nollet et al. (2019) showed much more overlap between HIP and the PFC upon UCMS exposure. It is possible that the differences in the methodology of this paper (surgery was conducted on all mice prior to UCMS; older age of mice at the start of UCMS; higher sensitivity of the RNAseq compared to microarray approach) could explain variation in results. Nonetheless, a strong gene expression response of the PFC to the UCMS exposure is a common finding among all studies and has been confirmed by our results. The lack of hippocampal response can be explained by the fact that UCMS mostly induces affective, not cognitive symptoms in mice, which would be expected to correlate with hippocampal response.

Many target genes, upstream regulators and signalling pathways involved in the PFC response in our study could be linked to dendritic remodelling and spine atrophy, a well-described effect of chronic stress on the PFC. Based on the IPA pathway and upstream regulator analysis, glutamatergic and calcium signalling, as well as Htt and Bdnf-centred networks stood out as the most significantly involved. Indeed, repeated stress is known to cause suppressed glutamate receptor expression and signalling in the PFC, which is thought to be linked to dendritic atrophy (Yuen et al., 2012). Many recent studies have explored the antidepressant potential of ketamine in chronic stress animal models of depression, strengthening the glutamatergic theory of depression (Zhu et al., 2015; Sun, 2016). In addition, disruption of glutamatergic signalling has been previously linked to hyperactivity (Procaccini et al., 2011). Calcium signalling has also been implicated in dendrite remodelling, via its effect on protein kinase A and protein kinase C. Calcium is a necessary cofactor in the activation of protein kinase A and protein kinase C, and it has been shown that pharmacological suppression of the protein kinase A and protein kinase C activation prevented spine atrophy following chronic stress exposure (Hains et al., 2009, 2015).

The limited number of DEGs in the HIP did not permit carrying out pathway analyses. It is possible that the lack of differential gene expression detection comes from the heterogeneity of the dorsal and ventral hippocampal tissues, which were pulled together in this study. Alternatively, this could be a limitation of a time point of tissue collection, as the mice displaying neurogenesis changes were exposed to the UCMS for 2 weeks longer than the mice from which tissue for gene expression analysis was derived. However, it is also conceivable that the activation of the signalling pathways affecting dendritic morphology in the PFC has a downstream indirect effect on hippocampal neurons via PFC–hippocampal connections. Indeed, PFC and the HIP are known to be connected via multiple direct and indirect pathways, mostly involved in memory functions (Eichenbaum, 2017). This notion is supported by the enrichment of cell proliferation, differentiation and migration functions in the functional analysis of the PFC dataset. Indeed UCMS reduced dendritic length in PFC as well as in the HIP in a previous study (Morais et al., 2017). Importantly, in line with our findings, this study also showed that dendritic tree alterations were associated with a more pronounced decrease in neuroplasticity-related gene expression in the PFC compared to the HIP. Interestingly, PFC–HIP connections have been previously implicated in food reward-related behaviour (Hsu et al., 2018). In addition, increased functional connectivity in the PFC areas and the HIP among other limbic structures was associated with sleep disruption in people reporting depressive problems (Cheng et al., 2018). Dendritic tree and dendritic spine density measurements in the PFC and the HIP could show if these molecular changes led to dendritic morphology alteration in adult neurons in these two regions.

Similarly, microglial cell density was increased in the PFC but not the HIP of the UCMS-exposed mice. While appearance of reactive microglia upon chronic stress has been described to take place simultaneously in the HIP and the PFC (Wohleb et al., 2012), previous studies also suggested that the PFC is more sensitive to chronic stress than the HIP (Yuen et al., 2012). At the same time PFC has been shown to be less prone to microglial dystrophy following chronic stress, which could also explain the presence of microglial increase at the time of sacrifice only in this area (Kreisel et al., 2014). Interestingly however, inflammatory pathways did not come up in the gene expression analysis. This could be related to the length of UCMS exposure prior to frozen tissue harvesting, as most previous studies collected tissue after 7–9 weeks of UCMS schedule as opposed to 4 weeks in our study.

Finally, our genome-wide gene expression analyses suggested the involvement of two mechanisms not predicted from the behavioural or immunohistochemical experiments carried out in this project, namely the modulation of myelination by Myrf and epigenetic pathways regulated by Mecp2. Future myelin measurements and epigenetic regulation assays could show if indeed UCMS caused any functional changes in these domains.

To conclude, UCMS induces major gene expression changes in the PFC, which could potentially underlie UCMS-associated deficiency in the adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Glutamatergic and calcium signalling, Lep signalling, as well as Htt and Bdnf-regulated networks were identified as the main pathways involved. These gene expression changes preceded changes in food reward behaviour, increase in microglia density in the PFC and a decline in the number of neuroblasts in the hippocampal DG, as well as their aberrant migration through the GZ. These findings highlight the heterogeneous neurobiological effects of the chronic stress exposure, which could lead to depression-like phenotype.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.

Supplementary Material

fcaa153_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre research facility for conducting the microarray detection and Abdul Hye, PhD, for help with the Luminex technology.

Funding

This study was funded by Janssen Pharmaceutica. K.M. and A.D.P. were funded by Janssen Pharmaceutica Studentships.

Competing interests

This study was funded by Janssen Pharmaceutica to develop a model to test novel strategies for the treatment of depression, which are being developed by the company. S.Y., J.B., M.E., S.T., P.A.Z., C.M.P. and C.F. declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Glossary

Bdnf =

brain-derived neurotrophic factor;

CNTRL =

control;

CRP =

C-reactive protein;

DCX =

doublecortin;

DEGs =

differentially expressed genes;

DG =

dentate gyrus;

GZ =

granular zone;

HIP =

hippocampus;

Htt =

huntingtin;

Iba1 =

ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1;

IL =

interleukin;

IPA =

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis;

Lep =

leptin;

Mecp2 =

methyl-CpG binding protein 2;

Myrf =

myelin regulatory factor;

NSF =

novelty suppressed feeding;

PFC =

prefrontal cortex;

PST =

Porsolt swim test;

UCMS =

unpredictable chronic mild stress

References

  1. Ahima RS, Osei SY.  Leptin signaling. Physiol Behav  2004; 81: 223–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aslani S, Harb MR, Costa PS, Almeida OFX, Sousa N, Palha JA.  Day and night: diurnal phase influences the response to chronic mild stress. Front Behav Neurosci  2014; 8: 82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belarbi K, Arellano C, Ferguson R, Jopson T, Rosi S.  Chronic neuroinflammation impacts the recruitment of adult-born neurons into behaviorally relevant hippocampal networks. Brain Behav Immun  2012; 26: 18–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergström A, Jayatissa MN, Thykjær T, Wiborg O.  Molecular pathways associated with stress resilience and drug resistance in the chronic mild stress rat model of depression—a gene expression study. J Mol Neurosci  2007; 33: 201–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berlim MT, McGirr A, Van Den Eynde F, Fleck MPA, Giacobbe P.  Effectiveness and acceptability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subgenual cingulate cortex for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. J Affect Disord  2014; 159: 31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernet CZ, Stein MB.  Relationship of childhood maltreatment to the onset and course of major depression in adulthood. Depress Anxiety  1999; 9: 169–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boldrini M, Galfalvy H, Dwork AJ, Rosoklija GB, Trencevska-Ivanovska I, Pavlovski G, et al.  Resilience is associated with larger dentate gyrus, while suicide decedents with major depressive disorder have fewer granule neurons. Biol Psychiatry  2019; 85: 850–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cattaneo A, Cattane N, Malpighi C, Czamara D, Suarez A, Mariani N, et al.  FoxO1, A2M, and TGF-β1: three novel genes predicting depression in gene X environment interactions are identified using cross-species and cross-tissues transcriptomic and miRNomic analyses. Mol Psychiatry  2018; 23: 2192–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerqueira JJ.  Morphological correlates of corticosteroid-induced changes in prefrontal cortex-dependent behaviors. J Neurosci  2005; 25: 7792–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng W, Rolls ET, Ruan H, Feng J.  Functional connectivities in the brain that mediate the association between depressive problems and sleep quality. JAMA Psychiatry  2018; 75: 1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Couch Y, Anthony DC, Dolgov O, Revischin A, Festoff B, Santos AI, et al.  Microglial activation, increased TNF and SERT expression in the prefrontal cortex define stress-altered behaviour in mice susceptible to anhedonia. Brain Behav Immun  2013; 29: 136–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Couch Y, Trofimov A, Markova N, Nikolenko V, Steinbusch HW, Chekhonin V, et al.  Low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inhibits aggressive and augments depressive behaviours in a chronic mild stress model in mice. J Neuroinflammation  2016; 13: 108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Datson NA, Speksnijder N, Mayer JL, Steenbergen PJ, Korobko O, Goeman J, et al.  The transcriptional response to chronic stress and glucocorticoid receptor blockade in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Hippocampus  2012; 22: 359–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dias GP, Bevilaqua MCDN, da Luz ACDS, Fleming RL, de Carvalho LA, Cocks G, et al.  Hippocampal biomarkers of fear memory in an animal model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Brain Res  2014; 263: 34–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dias-Ferreira E, Sousa JC, Melo I, Morgado P, Mesquita AR, Cerqueira JJ, et al.  Chronic stress causes frontostriatal reorganization and affects decision-making. Science  2009; 325: 621–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Du P, Kibbe WA, Lin SM.  lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray. Bioinformatics  2008; 24: 1547–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ducottet C, Aubert A, Belzung C.  Susceptibility to subchronic unpredictable stress is related to individual reactivity to threat stimuli in mice. Behav Brain Res  2004; 155: 291–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dournes C, Beeské S, Belzung C, Griebel G.  Deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression in mice: comparison with the CRF1 antagonist, SSR125543. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry  2013; 40: 213–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Egeland M, Guinaudie C, Du Preez A, Musaelyan K, Zunszain PA, Fernandes C, et al.  Depletion of adult neurogenesis using the chemotherapy drug temozolomide in mice induces behavioural and biological changes relevant to depression. Transl Psychiatry  2017; 7: e1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Egeland M, Zunszain PA, Pariante CM.  Molecular mechanisms in the regulation of adult neurogenesis during stress. Nat Rev Neurosci  2015; 16: 189–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Eichenbaum H.  Prefrontal–hippocampal interactions in episodic memory. Nat Rev Neurosci  2017; 18: 547–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fava M, Kendler KS.  Major depressive disorder. Neuron  2000; 28: 335–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garza JC, Guo M, Zhang W, Lu X-Y.  Leptin restores adult hippocampal neurogenesis in a chronic unpredictable stress model of depression and reverses glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Mol Psychiatry  2012; 17: 790–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ge JF, Qi CC, Zhou JN.  Imbalance of leptin pathway and hypothalamus synaptic plasticity markers are associated with stress-induced depression in rats. Behav Brain Res  2013; 249: 38–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Glover LR, Schoenfeld TJ, Karlsson R-M, Bannerman DM, Cameron HA, Reynolds R.  Ongoing neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus mediates behavioral responses to ambiguous threat cues. PLoS Biol  2017; 15: e2001154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gray JD, Rubin TG, Hunter RG, McEwen BS.  Hippocampal gene expression changes underlying stress sensitization and recovery. Mol Psychiatry  2014; 19: 1171–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hains AB, Vu MAT, Maciejewski PK, van Dyck CH, Gottron M, Arnsten AFT.  Inhibition of protein kinase C signaling protects prefrontal cortex dendritic spines and cognition from the effects of chronic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  2009; 106: 17957–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hains AB, Yabe Y, Arnsten AFT.  Chronic stimulation of alpha-2A-adrenoceptors with guanfacine protects rodent prefrontal cortex dendritic spines and cognition from the effects of chronic stress. Neurobiol Stress  2015; 2: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Han J,  KimH,  SchaferS,  PaquolaA,  ClemensonG,  Toda T, et al. Functional implications of miR-19 in the migration of newborn neurons in the adult Brain. Neuron  2016; 91: 79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hervé M, Bergon A, Le Guisquet A-M, Leman S, Consoloni J-L, Fernandez-Nunez N, et al.  Translational identification of transcriptional signatures of major depression and antidepressant response. Front Mol Neurosci  2017; 10: 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hinwood M, Tynan RJ, Charnley JL, Beynon SB, Day TA, Walker FR.  Chronic stress induced remodeling of the prefrontal cortex: structural re-organization of microglia and the inhibitory effect of minocycline. Cereb Cortex  2013; 23: 1784–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hornsby AKE, Redhead YT, Rees DJ, Ratcliff MSG, Reichenbach A, Wells T, et al.  Short-term calorie restriction enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis and remote fear memory in a Ghsr-dependent manner. Psychoneuroendocrinology  2016; 63: 198–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hsu TM, Noble EE, Liu CM, Cortella AM, Konanur VR, Suarez AN, et al.  A hippocampus to prefrontal cortex neural pathway inhibits food motivation through glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling. Mol Psychiatry  2018; 23: 1555–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hye A, Riddoch-Contreras J, Baird AL, Ashton NJ, Bazenet C, Leung R, et al.  Plasma proteins predict conversion to dementia from prodromal disease. Alzheimers Dement  2014; 10: 799–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jungke P, Ostrow G, Li JL, Norton S, Nieber K, Kelber O, et al.  Profiling of hypothalamic and hippocampal gene expression in chronically stressed rats treated with St. John’s wort extract (STW 3-VI) and fluoxetine. Psychopharmacology  2011; 213: 757–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kettner NM, Mayo SA, Hua J, Lee C, Moore DD, Fu L.  Circadian dysfunction induces leptin resistance in mice. Cell Metab  2015; 22: 448–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim S, Lee S, Ryu S, Suk J, Park C.  Comparative analysis of the anxiety-related behaviors in four inbred mice. Behav Processes  2002; 60: 181–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kreisel T, Frank MG, Licht T, Reshef R, Ben-Menachem-Zidon O, Baratta MV, et al.  Dynamic microglial alterations underlie stress-induced depressive-like behavior and suppressed neurogenesis. Mol Psychiatry  2014; 19: 699–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Levkovitz Y, Harel EV, Roth Y, Braw Y, Most D, Katz LN, et al.  Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex: evaluation of antidepressant and cognitive effects in depressive patients. Brain Stimul  2009; 2: 188–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li JZ, Bunney BG, Meng F, Hagenauer MH, Walsh DM, Vawter MP, et al.  Circadian patterns of gene expression in the human brain and disruption in major depressive disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  2013; 110: 9950–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li N, Liu RJ, Dwyer JM, Banasr M, Lee B, Son H, et al.  Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol Psychiatry  2011; 69: 754–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liston C, Miller MM, Goldwater DS, Radley JJ, Rocher AB, Hof PR, et al.  Stress-induced alterations in prefrontal cortical dendritic morphology predict selective impairments in perceptual attentional set-shifting. J Neurosci  2006; 26: 7870–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu W, Wang H, Wang Y, Li H, Ji L.  Metabolic factors-triggered inflammatory response drives antidepressant effects of exercise in CUMS rats. Psychiatry Res  2015; 228: 257–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu Y, Yang N, Zuo P.  CDNA microarray analysis of gene expression in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of BALB/c mice subjected to chronic mild stress. Cell Mol Neurobiol  2010; 30: 1035–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lorenzetti V, Allen NB, Fornito A, Yucel M.  Structural brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a selective review of recent MRI studies. J Affect Disord  2009; 117: 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Malki K, Mineur YS, Tosto MG, Campbell J, Karia P, Jumabhoy I, et al.  Pervasive and opposing effects of Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress (UCMS) on hippocampal gene expression in BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J mouse strains. BMC Genomics  2015; 16: 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Malki K, Tosto MG, Jumabhoy I, Lourusamy A, Sluyter F, Craig IW, et al.  Integrative mouse and human mRNA studies using WGCNA nominates novel candidate genes involved in the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder. Pharmacogenomics  2013; 14: 1979–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Meijering E, Jacob M, Sarria JCF, Steiner P, Hirling H, Unser M.  Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry A  2004; 58A: 167–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Miller BR, Hen R.  The current state of the neurogenic theory of depression and anxiety. Curr Opin Neurobiol  2015; 30: 51–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Morais M, Patrício P, Mateus-Pinheiro A, Alves ND, MacHado-Santos AR, Correia JS, et al.  The modulation of adult neuroplasticity is involved in the mood-improving actions of atypical antipsychotics in an animal model of depression. Transl Psychiatry  2017; 7: e1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Morgan AH, Andrews ZB, Davies JS.  Less is more: caloric regulation of neurogenesis and adult brain function. J Neuroendocrinol  2017; 29: e12512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Müller HK, Wegener G, Popoli M, Elfving B.  Differential expression of synaptic proteins after chronic restraint stress in rat prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Brain Res  2011; 1385: 26–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mutlu O, Gumuslu E, Ulak G, Komsuoglu I, Kokturk S, Maral H, et al.  Effects of fluoxetine, tianeptine and olanzapine on unpredictable chronic mild stress-induced depression-like behavior in mice. Life Sci  2012; 91: 1252–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nollet M, Guisquet A, Le Belzung C.  Models of depression: unpredictable chronic mild stress in mice. Curr Protoc Pharmacol  2013; 61: 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Nollet M, Hicks H, McCarthy AP, Wu H, Möller-Levet CS, Laing EE, et al.  REM sleep’s unique associations with corticosterone regulation, apoptotic pathways, and behavior in chronic stress in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  2019; 116: 2733–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pawlby S, Hay D, Sharp D, Waters CS, Pariante CM.  Antenatal depression and offspring psychopathology: the influence of childhood maltreatment . Br J Psychiatry  2011; 199: 106–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Plümpe T, Ehninger D, Steiner B, Klempin F, Jessberger S, Brandt M, et al.  Variability of doublecortin-associated dendrite maturation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis is independent of the regulation of precursor cell proliferation. BMC Neurosci  2006; 7: 77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pothion S, Bizot JC, Trovero F, Belzung C.  Strain differences in sucrose preference and in the consequences of unpredictable chronic mild stress. Behav Brain Res  2004; 155: 135–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Potter M.  The BALB/c mouse: genetics and immunology. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol  1985; 122: 1–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Procaccini C, Aitta-Aho T, Jaako-Movits K, Zharkovsky A, Panhelainen A, Sprengel R, et al.  Excessive novelty-induced c-Fos expression and altered neurogenesis in the hippocampus of GluA1 knockout mice. Eur J Neurosci  2011; 33: 161–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sadler AM,  Bailey SJ.  Validation of a refined technique for taking repeated blood samples from juvenile and adult mice. Lab Anim  2013; 47: 316–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schweizer MC, Henniger MSH, Sillaber I.  Chronic mild stress (CMS) in mice: of anhedonia, ‘anomalous anxiolysis’ and activity. PLoS One  2009; 4: e4326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Srivastava DP, Copits BA, Xie Z, Huda R, Jones KA, Mukherji S, et al.  Afadin is required for maintenance of dendritic structure and excitatory tone. J Biol Chem  2012; 287: 35964–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Strekalova T, Couch Y, Kholod N, Boyks M, Malin D, Leprince P, et al.  Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters. Behav Brain Funct  2011; 7: 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sun D.  Endogenous neurogenic cell response in the mature mammalian brain following traumatic injury. Exp Neurol  2016; 275: 405–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Surget A, Belzung C.  Unpredictable chronic mild stress in mice In: Kalueff AV, LaPorte JL, editors. Experimental animal models in neurobehavioral research. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2009. p. 79–112. [Google Scholar]
  67. Surget A, Wang Y, Leman S, Ibarguen-Vargas Y, Edgar N, Griebel G, et al.  Corticolimbic transcriptome changes are state-dependent and region-specific in a rodent model of depression and of antidepressant reversal. Neuropsychopharmacology  2009; 34: 1363–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  2001; 98: 5116–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. van Tol M, Li M, Metzger CD, Hailla N, Horn DI, Li W, et al.  Local cortical thinning links to resting-state disconnectivity in major depressive disorder. Psychol Med  2014; 44: 2053–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. van Zessen R, van der Plasse G, Adan R. A H.  Contribution of the mesolimbic dopamine system in mediating the effects of leptin and ghrelin on feeding. Proc Nutr Soc  2012; 71: 435–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Willner P.  Chronic mild stress (CMS) revisited: consistency and behavioural- neurobiological concordance in the effects of CMS. Neuropsychobiology  2005; 52: 90–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wohleb ES, Fenn AM, Pacenta AM, Powell ND, Sheridan JF, Godbout JP.  Peripheral innate immune challenge exaggerated microglia activation, increased the number of inflammatory CNS macrophages, and prolonged social withdrawal in socially defeated mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology  2012; 37: 1491–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuen EY, Wei J, Liu W, Zhong P, Li X, Yan Z.  Repeated stress causes cognitive impairment by suppressing glutamate receptor expression and function in prefrontal cortex. Neuron  2012; 73: 962–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhu X, Li P, Hao X, Wei K, Min S, Luo J, et al.  Ketamine-mediated alleviation of electroconvulsive shock-induced memory impairment is associated with the regulation of neuroinflammation and soluble amyloid-beta peptide in depressive-like rats. Neurosci Lett  2015; 599: 32–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zitnik GA, Clark BD, Waterhouse BD.  The impact of hemodynamic stress on sensory signal processing in the rodent lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Res  2013; 1518: 36–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

fcaa153_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

Output of statistical analysis of microarrays for each brain region is available in the Supplementary materials for this article. Raw microarray output data are available on request.


Articles from Brain Communications are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES