Abstract
This work aimed to study the dysregulated network of galectins in OA chondrocyte pellets, and to assess whether their recently discovered activity as molecular switches of functional biomarkers results in degradation of extracellular matrix in vitro. Scaffold-free 3D pellet cultures were established of human OA chondrocytes. Expression and secretion of galectin(Gal)-1, -3, and -8 were monitored relative to 2D cultures or clinical tissue sections by RT-qPCR, immunohistochemistry and ELISAs. Exposure of 2D and 3D cultures to an in vivo-like galectin mixture (Gal-1 and Gal-8: 5 µg/ml, Gal-3: 1 µg/ml) was followed by the assessment of pellet size, immunohistochemical matrix staining, and/or quantification of MMP-1, -3, and -13. Application of inhibitors of NF-κB activation probed into the potential of intervening with galectin-induced matrix degradation. Galectin profiling revealed maintained dysregulation of Gal-1, -3, and -8 in pellet cultures, resembling the OA situation in situ. The presence of the galectin mixture promoted marked reduction of pellet size and loss of collagen type II-rich extracellular matrix, accompanied by the upregulation of MMP-1, -3, and -13. Inhibition of p65-phosphorylation by caffeic acid phenethyl ester effectively alleviated the detrimental effects of galectins, resulting in downregulated MMP secretion, reduced matrix breakdown and augmented pellet size. This study suggests that the dysregulated galectin network in OA cartilage leads to extracellular matrix breakdown, and provides encouraging evidence of the feasible inhibition of galectin-triggered activities. OA chondrocyte pellets have the potential to serve as in vitro disease model for further studies on galectins in OA onset and progression.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s00223-020-00774-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Chondrocytes, Galectin, Lectin, NF-κB, Osteoarthritis, 3D cell culture
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) poses an enormous burden on the individual patient that adds up to a profound socioeconomic impact on health care sectors worldwide [1]. This justifies vigorous efforts to systematically study the molecular basis of disease onset and progression with the aim to develop innovative therapeutic strategies that interfere with the complex OA pathogenesis [2, 3], currently culminating in multi-omics approaches to identify relevant molecular signatures [4]. Obviously, the strategic combination of work on clinical material with tailored in vitro models would be helpful to generate meaningful pathobiological results and improve translatability of new knowledge into clinical practice [5]. From a practical perspective, two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures have been considered as the starting point on the way to mimic an in situ-like microenvironment in vitro. The step from 2D to three-dimensional (3D) systems, however, is the logical continuation to narrow the gap from in vitro to in vivo conditions [6, 7]. Since the status of 3D culture for joint degeneration has recently been assessed to be “still in infancy” [7], intensive research is urgently required to foster its maturation.
Following this reasoning, the applicability of scaffold-free 3D pellet cultures of OA chondrocytes needs to be rigorously put to the test. When starting such cultures with mesenchymal stem cells, lubricin-expressing chondrocytes were found to be generated [8], and postnatal chondroprogenitors were shown to produce zonally organized hyaline cartilage in pellet culture [9]. When using chondrocytes from cartilage regions that were unaffected from OA, distinct aspects of the mRNA expression profile associated with the chondrogenic potential and the hypertrophic phenotype revealed differences between cells in 2D and 3D cultures [10]. The hereby proven feasibility to grow pellets from mature chondrocytes prompted us to do so with cells from clinical OA specimens. Such 3D cultures could well be an appropriate model to answer the open question on whether the expression of OA biomarkers—that is typically studied in 2D cultures with cells isolated from clinical specimens—is of functional significance in the context of OA cartilage degeneration. Considering OA cartilage in vivo as standard, the comparative profiling of histological appearance and biomarker presence in pellets will yield decisive information on the status of pellets as OA model.
We here focus on a class of recently discovered potent enhancers of pro-degradative/inflammatory effectors, i.e., ga(lactose-binding)lectins (galectins). On a fundamental level, the members of the galectin family are emerging as versatile missing link between glycan-encoded signals presented by cellular glycoconjugates and manifold processes in cellular homeostasis and in diseases [11]. A context-specific multifunctionality is characteristic for galectins that share the β-sandwich fold and a sequence signature for specific ligand contact [12–14]. Initial studies in animal cartilage, mouse models, and human OA cartilage with galectins-1 and -3 (Gal-1 and -3) revealed evidence for their presence in cartilage and for their potential to affect pig chondrocyte differentiation and catabolic processes as well as for their association with chondrocyte survival and disease manifestation ([15, 16]; for recent review, please see [17]). Systematic mapping of galectin presence in vitro in human OA chondrocytes and in sections of OA lesions traced a significant dysregulation that was found to correlate with the histological degree of cartilage degeneration in the cases of Gal-1, -3, and -8 [18]. By subsequently studying each of these galectins in functional assays in vitro, we discovered (i) the glycan-inhibitable induction of an NF-κB-dependent increase of functional disease markers and (ii) first cues for a teamworking among these lectins [19–21].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of OA chondrocyte pellets as a functional in vitro model for testing the contribution of galectins to OA pathogenesis. Thus, we evaluated if the typical dysregulation of galectin expression observed in OA cartilage is retained in chondrocytes under 3D conditions, and if Gal-1, -3, and -8 applied as an in situ-like mixture were capable of triggering functional disease markers that drive the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) in these 3D pellets. Finally, this study tested whether or not blocking NF-κB-dependent signaling elicited by the galectins had an impact on presence of disease markers and matrix loss.
Methods
Galectins
Human recombinant galectins, fluorescent galectins and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Gal-1, -3, or -8 were prepared, purified and tested as described previously [21–23]. For details, please refer to Supplemental File 1.
Clinical Specimens and Cell Culture
Specimens of human articular cartilage were obtained from endstage OA patients (24 female, 12 male; age range 49–84 years; Knee Society Scores: Knee Score 25–87, Functional Score 30–70; Mankin score range 6–12) during total knee replacement surgery with written informed consent and in accordance with the terms of the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK-No. 1822/2017 and 1555/2019). Comorbidities in included patients comprised cardiovascular diseases (24 cases), obesity (15 cases), neurological pathologies (9 cases), hyperlipidemia (9 cases), nicotine abuse (6 cases), hyperuricemia (6 cases), and cancer (4 cases).
Chondrocytes were isolated from femoral condyles and tibial plateaus including OA lesions and cultured in growth medium (DMEM GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Biochrom), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), and 0.1% amphotericin B (Sigma)) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air at 37 °C. For all assays, primary chondrocytes were used without subculturing to preserve the chondrocyte phenotype. 2D chondrocyte cultures (90% confluency) were kept overnight without serum addition and exposed to galectins combined in a standard mixture based on previous experience [21]. The NF-κB pathway was inhibited using Bay 11-7082, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) and IKK inhibitor VII (all from Merck). Concentrations of reagents and time periods of cell treatment with reagents are listed in respective figures and their legends.
Pellet Formation, Treatment and Analysis
5 × 105 chondrocytes were seeded per 1.5 ml tubes in growth medium and centrifugated at 1000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature (RT). The pelleted cells were cultured for 2 days in growth medium, then brought into starvation medium [DMEM GlutaMAX, 1% penicillin/streptomycin mixture, 0.1% amphotericin B and 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (Gibco)]. Following culture for 3 weeks, resulting pellets were treated with the mixture of Gal-1/-3/-8 (5 µg/ml, 1 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml, respectively) either for 48 h and for 1 week (mRNA isolation), or for 2 weeks (histological examination). An additional set of pellets was used for RT-qPCR and ELISA analyses after 2 weeks of treatment (i.e., at the time of histological evaluation), to determine the effect of CAPE. Culture medium with galectins was replaced twice a week. The pellet size was analyzed with a Nikon ECLIPSE TE2000-U microscope (×2 magnification) and NIS-Elements software (Version 4.20.03). Macroscopic pictures were taken with the ZEISS Lumar V12 equipment (×24 magnification). GAGs released into the pellet supernatant were analyzed using the DMMB assay (Supplemental File 1).
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
Cartilage preparation, assessment of degree of degeneration using the Mankin score (MS), and immunohistochemical galectin stainings were performed as previously described [18, 21]. For details, please refer to Supplemental File 1. Pellets were processed accordingly, followed by HE, SO, and DMMB stainings, as well as immunohistochemical stainings using anti-collagen type II (mouse; Acris), anti-collagen type I (mouse; Novus Biologicals), anti-MMP-13 (mouse; R&D Systems), anti-aggrecan (mouse; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies and the set of non-cross-reactive anti-galectin antibodies. Immunohistochemical stainings were quantified using the Image J software with the plugin “Color Deconvolution” program. Of each pellet, five random pictures were recorded and quantified by splitting RGB images into defined codes (Supplemental File 1). Equal threshold settings of signal intensities were used, and the measured signal intensity was related to the average number of nuclei per image.
RT-qPCR
Isolation of total RNA, cDNA synthesis and SYBR-green-based qPCR experiments were performed as previously described [18, 21]. Levels were calculated as relative quantities compared to controls considering amplification efficiencies and normalization to succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit A (SDHA). A detailed checklist according to the MIQE guidelines is provided in Supplemental File 2.
Cytochemistry Using Fluorescent Galectins
Cell suspensions of 3 × 105 chondrocytes in 50 µl PBS were incubated at 4 °C for 10 min with a mixture of 2 µg/50 µl AlexaFluor647-labeled Gal-1, 4 µg/50 µl AlexaFluor488-labeled Gal-3, and 5 µg/50 µl AlexaFluor555-labeled Gal-8 in the presence or absence of cognate sugar, i.e., 0.1 M lactose. Photomicrographs were immediately taken without fixation by laser scanning microscopy at ×630 magnification (LSM700 microscope; Zeiss).
In-Cell Western Assay
OA chondrocytes were grown in 96-well plates, exposed to the standard galectin mixture (5 µg/ml Gal-1, 1 µg/ml Gal-3, and 5 µg/ml Gal-8) fixed with methanol (-20 °C). Primary antibodies included NF-κB p65 (mouse; 1:1000; Cell Signaling) and pNF-κB p65 (Ser536; rabbit; 1:800; Cell Signaling) and secondary antibodies were donkey anti-mouse IgG IRDye 800CW (1:1000) and goat anti-rabbit IgG IRDye 680RD (1:1000). Signals were recorded using the Odyssey CLx Infrared Imaging System and Image Studio Version 5.2 (LI-COR Biosciences). For details, please refer to Supplemental File 1.
ELISA
Cell culture supernatants were obtained from untreated pellets and pellets exposed to the galectin mixture in the presence or absence of CAPE by centrifugation and stored at −80 °C. ELISAs for pro-MMP-1, pro-MMP-13, total-MMP-3 (all from R&D Systems), Gal-1 (R&D Systems), Gal-3 (R&D Systems), and Gal-8 (Cloud-Clone Corp.) were performed with culture supernatants following the manufacturers’ protocols. ELISA standard curve ranges were 0.156–10 ng/ml (pro-MMP-1, total-MMP-3, Gal-3, Gal-8), 0.313–20 ng/ml (Gal-1), and 78–5000 pg/ml (pro-MMP-13).
Cell Viability Assays
Cell viability of chondrocytes and pellets was determined with the EZ4U assay (Biomedica) and the CyQUANT LDH Cytotoxicity Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. For details, please refer to Supplemental File 1.
Statistics
All experiments were repeated independently with primary chondrocytes from different OA patients. The number of biological replicates (i.e., different patients) is given in the respective figure legends. Technical replicates of each biological replicate were averaged and the resulting mean values were used for statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0. Normal distribution of the data was analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Statistical significance of normally distributed data was delineated using paired t-test or ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. For non-normally distributed data, the Wilcoxon test or Friedman test with pairwise comparison was used. p-Values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Phenotypic, Immunohistochemical and Transcriptional Characterization of OA Chondrocyte Pellet Cultures
After 5 weeks of culture, chondrocyte pellets from four OA patients were histologically processed. HE-stained sections revealed cells of round morphology in lacunae, surrounded by considerable amounts of ECM (Fig. 1a). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a pronounced staining of the ECM for collagen type II, the main collagenous component of native articular cartilage (Fig. 1b). Positivity of the ECM for collagen type I was also found (Fig. 1a). Despite some interindividual variability regarding staining intensities between the donors, collagen type II was far more abundant than collagen type I in each of the four independent cell populations, as it is expected for articular chondrocytes. In addition, the ECM was positive in 2 cases for glycosaminoglycans (SO and DMMB staining) and in 3 cases for aggrecan (Supplementary File 3). Immunohistochemistry further developed strong signals for the presence of MMP-13, a major collagenase with a key role in cartilage degeneration, in the cytoplasm of chondrocytes (Fig. 1a, bottom). This staining demonstrates the intrinsic ability of the OA-derived cells in pellets to produce this typical catabolic enzyme (Fig. 1a).
Additional characterization of the pellet cultures was performed at the level of mRNA expression (Fig. 1b). In line with the immunohistochemical findings, transcripts of COL2A1 were significantly more abundant than those of COL1A1, resulting in COL2A1/COL1A1 ratios of 61 ± 25 (n = 4 OA patients). The mRNA levels of the aggrecan-encoding gene (ACAN) as well as that of the chondrocyte differentiation factor SOX9 were detectable at levels exceeding that of the reference gene SDHA. The extent of expression of the ‘tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases’ TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 (but not of TIMP-3) was significantly higher than that of MMP-1 and MMP-13, respectively, resulting in a TIMP-1/MMP-1 ratio of 24 ± 36 and a TIMP-2/MMP-13 ratio of 50 ± 58.
Taken together, these data demonstrate (i) the maintenance of the chondrocyte phenotype in 3D pellet cultures over several weeks of culture, (ii) the accumulation of cartilage-like ECM and (iii) the expression of catabolic enzymes, thereby suggesting the suitability of this model for the functional investigation of galectin activity on ECM degradation in vitro.
Characterization of Galectin Expression and Secretion in OA Chondrocyte Pellet Cultures
We next proceeded to examine the expression of Gal-1, -3, and -8 in the OA chondrocyte pellet model at the level of transcription and of secretion. Quantification of their mRNA levels disclosed high signal intensities, exceeding that of the reference gene SDHA (Fig. 2a). Since secretion of effector proteins is a prerequisite for triggering cell signaling via cell surface receptors, we next analyzed culture supernatants for presence of these galectins. As shown in Fig. 2b, presence of galectins in the culture medium of pellets was detected in each case. Thus, cells in the 3D culture system can export galectins after their production on free ribosomes. This initial location without common entry to the endoplasmic reticulum is visualized by the predominant cytoplasmic localization of the galectins throughout cross sections of histological specimens (Fig. 2c).
In order to unravel similarities between the 3D culture model and the physiologic setting in vivo, clinical specimens were processed in parallel under identical conditions, using serial sections for assessing galectin presence and their distribution as network. As illustrated in Supplemental File 4(A), staining profiles for the three galectins monitored simultaneously in OA cartilage (with the typical upregulation in relation to an increase in the MS) closely resembled the pattern in the sections of pellet cultures. The sizes of the Spearman correlation coefficients and of associated significance levels confirmed the expectation for a positive association among the galectins [Supplemental File 4(B) and (C)]. Pellet cultures obviously retained the typical upregulation of galectins, previously seen in clinical specimens and in 2D OA chondrocyte cultures [19–21]. In order to establish pellet cultures as tools for studying therapeutic means in vitro to interfere with disease onset and progression, we further pursued work with pellets to answer the pertinent question whether galectins will promote typical characteristics of disease manifestation in these models. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of a mixture of Gal-1, -3, and -8 (i.e., Gal-1/-3/-8) on functional ECM breakdown in vitro.
Galectins as Inducers of Matrix Degradation and Functional Disease Markers Via NF-κB and Effect of CAPE as Inhibitor
Setting an internal standard for these functional assays in pellets, we first proceeded with experiments in 2D-cultured OA chondrocytes. The obtained results demonstrated the ability of Gal-1, -3, -and -8 to simultaneously bind to OA chondrocytes when applied as mixture to mimic the in vivo condition (Fig. 3a). In addition, the data, here obtained by using 3-color fluorescence microscopy, confirmed previous results on galectin-surface counterreceptor pairing [19–21]. Presence of the cognate sugar lactose completely abolished the binding of the three galectins, excluding a carbohydrate-independent binding process (not shown). Neither the mixture of galectins nor the presence of CAPE affected chondrocyte viability (Fig. 3b). Whereas IL-1β-specific mRNA levels were upregulated by Gal-1/-3/-8, the additional presence of lactose alleviated this induction (Fig. 3c), highlighting glycan binding of the galectins as a prerequisite for triggering an effect. Lactose (without Gal-1/-3/-8) did not significantly modulate IL1B mRNA levels in this experimental setting (not shown). Intracellularly, the increase of phosphorylated p65 as sensor of galectin-dependent NF-κB activation underscored the activity of the galectin mixture at this point (Fig. 3d and e), again confirming and extending previous observations made in assays with separately tested galectins [19–21]. The involvement of NF-κB signaling prompted us to select an appropriate inhibitor in the attempt to attenuate the expression of functional disease markers. Among the three compounds tested, CAPE actively reduced the mRNA levels of IL1B (Fig. 3f) and MMP-13 (Fig. 3g), which were selected as representative indicators for the disease-associated inflammatory and degradative processes.
With this experience in hand, we proceeded to expose pellet cultures to the galectin mixture in the absence or presence of CAPE. Shown exemplarily as photomicrographs (Fig. 4a) and as dot plot after quantitative analysis (Fig. 4b), the galectin mixture was effective to reduce the pellet size during the course of treatment, while the presence of CAPE ameliorated this status. HE-stained histological sections of the treated pellets showed no obvious signs of necrosis or apoptosis that might explain the reduction of pellet sizes after treatment with Gal-1/-3/-8 (Fig. 4c). Additional analyses of LDH activity in supernatants of pellets support the absence of cytotoxic effects of a Gal-1/-3/-8 treatment in pellet cultures (not shown). As reference, untreated control pellets were characterized by a small number of chondrocytes per field of view and highly abundant ECM that was strongly immunopositive for collagen type II (Fig. 4c). Treatment with the galectin mixture, however, resulted in a significantly increased cell density per field of view (Fig. 4d), accompanied by a significantly reduced intensity of staining of the ECM for collagen type II (Fig. 4c and d). Of note, the additional treatment of pellets with CAPE alleviated these effects of Gal-1/-3/-8, resulting in cell density and collagen type II-staining that was comparable to untreated pellets (p > 0.05; Fig. 4c and d). Immunohistochemical staining for MMP-13 resulted in an apparently increased staining of chondrocytes in the Gal-1/-3/-8-treated pellets per field of view (Fig. 4c). Since this staining concerned the chondrocytes and not the ECM, normalization to the number of cells was mandatory. When done, the obtained data made clear that neither Gal-1/-3/-8 nor CAPE had an effect on the presence of MMP-13 in the chondrocytes within the pellets (Fig. 4d). In those cases where the pellet ECM was positive for GAGs and aggrecan, treatment with Gal-1/-3/-8 reduced this positivity [Supplementary File 6(A)]. Analysis of pellet supernatants of 13 OA patients indicated levels of GAGs between 8 and 53 µg/ml, which were significantly reduced by Gal-1/-3/-8 [p < 0.05; Supplementary File 6(B)]. Addition of CAPE was not able to recover this GAG loss (p > 0.05; n = 9; not shown).
To identify the molecular triggers that are responsible for the observed ECM breakdown induced by the galectin mixture, RT-qPCR analyses and ELISAs were performed in chondrocyte pellets that were treated with the galectin mixture for 2 or 7 days. Figure 5a shows that the mRNA levels of MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13 were significantly upregulated at both time points, whereas transcripts of COL2A1 and ACAN were markedly downregulated. The COL1A1 mRNA level, in contrast, was not significantly affected. At the end of the culture period (i.e., after 2 weeks of treatment, when histology was performed), protein levels of secreted MMPs were strongly induced by Gal-1/-3/-8, i.e., from 3.4 ± 1.5 to 68.4 ± 33.2 ng/ml pro-MMP-1 (p > 0.05), from 0.3 ± 0.2 to 4.0 ± 0.8 µg/ml total-MMP-3 (p < 0.05), and from 0.3 ± 0.2 to 2.9 ± 3.0 ng/ml pro-MMP-13 (p = 0.81). The presence of CAPE evoked the significant reduction to basal levels in case of pro-MMP-1 (1.0 ± 2.1 ng/ml) and pro-MMP-13 (0.8 ± 1.4 ng/ml). Albeit not statistically significant, Gal-1/-3/-8-induced total-MMP-3 levels were alleviated by CAPE in all samples (0.9 ± 0.4 µg/ml).
Discussion
A key challenge for OA research is to define in molecular terms the steps from elicitors to effectors, and then to the progressive degradation of articular cartilage including the detrimental crosstalk to underlying subchondral bone [2, 24]. Thus, availability of reliable in vitro disease models that intend to simulate the degenerative phenotype (e.g., by applying genome editing, as recently suggested for intervertebral disk degeneration [25]) is required. Ideally, such in vitro models should morphologically and functionally resemble the in vivo situation, along with retaining the capacity of the cultured OA chondrocytes to respond to drivers of pathogenesis by increasing functional biomarkers. As illustrated by the presented results, 3D pellet cultures of OA chondrocytes appear to meet these prerequisites for the measured characteristics. Most importantly, OA chondrocyte pellets facilitated the evaluation and quantification of the degradation of collagen type II-rich ECM, together with the assessment of associated functional markers at the mRNA and protein levels, in response to galectins in vitro.
Of conceptual significance, functional activity was determined in all assays with a mixture of the three galectins that share capacity for upregulation of disease markers. The possibility for teamworking among galectins in OA had been suggested by our work, and respective initial testing had been performed previously [21]. In general overview, galectins had first been detected and analyzed for functionality in a strictly separated manner. In few cases, evidence for a cooperation among galectins had been detected, first for proto-type Gal-1 and chimera-type Gal-3 in human neuroblastoma cells [26] and for proto-type Gal-1, -2, and -7 in human activated T cells to activate different caspase profiles/cyclin B1 expression [27], then for Gal-1 and -3 in human activated neutrophils to initiate phosphatidylserine exposure [28] as well as for Gal-1 and -8 to promote plasma cell formation [29] and to enhance antigen-specific stimulation of murine naïve peripheral CD4+ T cells [30]. Just as approaching the histological architecture in vivo by proceeding from 2D to 3D culture, the components of the galectin network should no longer be tested separately, but combined in mixtures to purposefully mimic the situation in vivo. Moreover, this co-incubation would ensure to include protein species into the functional analysis that are known to form in such mixtures, i.e., heterodimers [31].
Having revealed the suitability of OA chondrocyte pellets for studies on the role of galectins in disease onset and progression, we further tested the hypothesis that OA chondrocyte pellets can serve as an in vitro model to trace a pharmacological attenuation of OA features. After comparative testing of three inhibitors in vitro, CAPE was selected as test substance for this proof-of-concept study. CAPE, which had previously been described as an effective inhibitor of NF-κB-dependent expression of Gal-7 in breast cancer cells [32], was applied to Gal-1/-3/-8-treated OA chondrocyte pellets and, in this model, led to a strong reduction of signs of disease progression, i.e., ECM breakdown and biomarker expression. Mechanistically, these results underscored the capacity of the tested galectin mixture to cause tissue degradation via NF-κB activation. Since stimulation of this pathway by galectins has been implicated in processes associated with fibrosis, i.e., in increased production of the chemokines CXCL1 and CCL2 by rat pancreatic stellate cells (via Gal-1) [33] and in enhanced interleukin-8 secretion by colonic lamina propria fibroblasts (via Gal-3) [34], galectin-triggered NF-κB signaling deserves attention even beyond OA.
Of note, NF-κB can also modify the responsiveness of cells to galectins. Toward this end, NF-κB has been postulated to promote the extent of functional pairing of Gal-1 on activated human T (L7) cells to effectively induce apoptosis by increasing gene expression, in cooperation with Sp1, of its counterreceptor CD7 [35]. This glycoprotein is required for Gal-1-mediated T cell death in vitro and in vivo [36]. Consequently, further work in OA chondrocytes should aim at the identification of the binding partner(s) of the galectins that trigger the first steps of the post-binding signaling cascade toward NF-κB activation. The case of carcinoma growth regulation by Gal-1, which is started by lattice formation with α5β1-integrin that is switched on/off by regulating extent of α2,6-sialylation of the glycoprotein’s N-glycans, offers a precedent, in which expression of galectin and counterreceptor are intimately orchestrated [37]. Of note, on the cell surface, a galectin can not only serve as crosslinker for lattice formation with its counterreceptor [38, 39], but it can also act as molecular glue associating more than one binding partner in a ternary or even higher-order complex by protein-glycan/protein recognition [40].
Equally important, pellet cultures can likewise be instrumental to address the pertinent question on the nature of the elicitor(s) that induce the concerted increase of galectin expression. Candidates among these elicitors are Runt proteins and hypoxia-inducible factors [41], which have been demonstrated to affect Gal-1 and/or Gal-3 gene transcription [42, 43]. Elicitors that act further upstream in OA pathogenesis are not yet known. Of interest in this context, butyrate is an example for a small molecule enhancer of Gal-1 expression in human cancer cells [44]. Activation with anti-CD3/CD28 or reconstitution of the tumor suppressor (p16INK4a) status document the presence of efficient routes for upregulating Gal-1 expression in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells, along with increased counterreceptor presence [45].
Finally, it is anticipated to apply the described pellet model to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic agents that interfere with galectin activity. In this context, 3D pellets are illustrated to provide a valuable asset to study the functional process of ECM degradation under controlled conditions in vitro.
Conclusion
Application of OA chondrocyte pellets revealed that a mixture of Gal-1, -3, and -8 triggered ECM breakdown along with the upregulation of functional disease markers, underscoring the deleterious role of the combined presence of these galectins in the pathobiology of OA. Providing therapeutic perspective, the presence of CAPE alleviated the process of ECM degradation via inhibition of NF-κB signaling. This study therefore proposes the use of this model as a practical in vitro disease model to study the (galectin-induced) degradation of cartilage-like ECM and the inhibition of this process using pharmacological agents. Future studies should integrate this model as a tool in experiments to identify the counterreceptors and the elicitors of galectins, and to discover strategies that might suppress the ECM-degrading potential of galectins in OA.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Melanie Cezanne, Ruth Gruebl-Barabas, Bettina Rodriguez Molina, and Alexander Stoegner for excellent technical assistance. Inspiring discussions with Drs. B. Friday, A. Leddoz and A. W. L. Nose are gratefully acknowledged.
Author Contributions
ST and HJG conceived the study design and drafted the article together with KMP. KMP performed the experiments and analyzed the data, with essential contributions by DW, SS, JA and ST. HJG provided galectins and galectin antibodies. ST managed the biobank, sought approval from the ethics committee, and provided funding. BK, RL, LM, and RW provided clinical specimens and informed consents of the patients. All authors discussed, revised and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna. Parts of this study were supported by a grant from the Association for Orthopaedic Research (AFOR) loaned to ST. AFOR had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; or in the writing of the manuscript and decision to submit for publication.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
K. M. Pichler, D. Weinmann, S. Schmidt, B. Kubista, R. Lass, L. Martelanz, J. Alphonsus, R. Windhager, H.-J. Gabius, S. Toegel have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Approval
Human cartilage tissues were donated by OA patients to the biobank of the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery with written informed consent and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The use of the specimens for the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Salmon JH, Rat AC, Sellam J, et al. Economic impact of lower-limb osteoarthritis worldwide: a systematic review of cost-of-illness studies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24:1500–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen D, Shen J, Zhao W, et al. Osteoarthritis: toward a comprehensive understanding of pathological mechanism. Bone Res. 2017;5:16044. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2016.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ghouri A, Conaghan PG. Prospects for therapies in osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020;386:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00672-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ratneswaran A, Rockel JS, Kapoor M. Understanding osteoarthritis pathogenesis: a multiomics system-based approach. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2020;32:80–91. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nickien M, Heuijerjans A, Ito K, van Donkelaar CC. Comparison between in vitro and in vivo cartilage overloading studies based on a systematic literature review. J Orthop Res. 2018;36:2076–2086. doi: 10.1002/jor.23910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johnson CI, Argyle DJ, Clements DN. In vitro models for the study of osteoarthritis. Vet J. 2016;209:40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Samvelyan HJ, Hughes D, Stevens C, Staines KA. Models of osteoarthritis: relevance and new insights. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020;22:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00670-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nakagawa Y, Muneta T, Otabe K, et al. Cartilage derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells expresses lubricin in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walzer SM, Toegel S, Chiari C, et al. A 3-dimensional in vitro model of zonally organized extracellular matrix. Cartilage. 2019;1:1947603519865320. doi: 10.1177/1947603519865320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Caron MMJ, Emans PJ, Coolsen MME, et al. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: comparison of 2D and 3D cultures. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012;20:1170–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaltner H, Abad-Rodríguez J, Corfield AP, et al. The sugar code: letters and vocabulary, writers, editors and readers and biosignificance of functional glycan-lectin pairing. Biochem J. 2019;476:2623–2655. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20170853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kaltner H, Toegel S, Caballero GG, et al. Galectins: their network and roles in immunity/tumor growth control. Histochem Cell Biol. 2017;147:239–256. doi: 10.1007/s00418-016-1522-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hirabayashi J (ed) (1997) Recent topics on galectins. Trends Glycosci Glycotechnol 9:1–180
- 14.García Caballero G, Kaltner H, Kutzner TJ, et al. How galectins have become multifunctional proteins. Histol Histopathol. 2020;35:509–539. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Janelle-Montcalm A, Boileau C, Poirier F, et al. Extracellular localization of galectin-3 has a deleterious role in joint tissues. Arthr Res Ther. 2007;9:R20. doi: 10.1186/ar2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marsich E, Mozetic P, Ortolani F, et al. Galectin-1 in cartilage: expression, influence on chondrocyte growth and interaction with ECM components. Matrix Biol. 2008;27:513–525. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Salamanna F, Veronesi F, Frizziero A, Fini M. Role and translational implication of galectins in arthritis pathophysiology and treatment: a systematic literature review. J Cell Physiol. 2018;234:1588–1605. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Toegel S, Bieder D, André S, et al. Human osteoarthritic knee cartilage: fingerprinting of adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins in vitro and in situ indicates differential upregulation in severe degeneration. Histochem Cell Biol. 2014;142:373–388. doi: 10.1007/s00418-014-1234-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Toegel S, Weinmann D, André S, et al. Galectin-1 couples glycobiology to inflammation in osteoarthritis through the activation of an NF-κB-regulated gene network. J Immunol. 2016;196:1910–1921. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weinmann D, Schlangen K, André S, et al. Galectin-3 induces a pro-degradative/inflammatory gene signature in human chondrocytes, teaming up with galectin-1 in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39112. doi: 10.1038/srep39112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weinmann D, Kenn M, Schmidt S, et al. Galectin-8 induces functional disease markers in human osteoarthritis and cooperates with galectins-1 and -3. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:4187–4205. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2856-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Manning JC, García Caballero G, Knospe C, et al. Network analysis of adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins and their binding sites in adult chicken retina and choroid. J Anat. 2017;231:23–37. doi: 10.1111/joa.12612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.García Caballero G, Schmidt S, Manning JC, et al. Chicken lens development: complete signature of expression of galectins during embryogenesis and evidence for their complex formation with α-, β-, δ-, and τ-crystallins, N-CAM, and N-cadherin obtained by affinity chromatography. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;379:13–35. doi: 10.1007/s00441-019-03129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yuan XL, Meng HY, Wang YC, et al. Bone–cartilage interface crosstalk in osteoarthritis: potential pathways and future therapeutic strategies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22:1077–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krupkova O, Cambria E, Besse L, et al. The potential of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for the study and treatment of intervertebral disc pathologies. JOR Spine. 2018;1:e1003. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kopitz J, von Reitzenstein C, André S, et al. Negative regulation of neuroblastoma cell growth by carbohydrate-dependent surface binding of galectin-1 and functional divergence from galectin-3. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:35917–35923. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105135200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sturm A, Lensch M, André S, et al. Human galectin-2: novel inducer of T cell apoptosis with distinct profile of caspase activation. J Immunol. 2004;173:3825–3837. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.3825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stowell SR, Qian Y, Karmakar S, et al. Differential roles of galectin-1 and galectin-3 in regulating leukocyte viability and cytokine secretion. J Immunol. 2008;180:3091–3102. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsai CM, Guan CH, Hsieh HW, et al. Galectin-1 and Galectin-8 have redundant roles in promoting plasma cell formation. J Immunol. 2011;187:1643–1652. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tribulatti MV, Figini MG, Carabelli J, et al. Redundant and antagonistic functions of galectin-1, -3, and -8 in the elicitation of T cell responses. J Immunol. 2012;188:2991–2999. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miller MC, Ludwig A-K, Wichapong K, et al. Adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins tested in combination: evidence for formation of hybrids as heterodimers. Biochem J. 2018;475:1003–1018. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20170658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Campion CG, Labrie M, Lavoie G, St-Pierre Y. Expression of galectin-7 is induced in breast cancer cells by mutant p53. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Masamune A, Satoh M, Hirabayashi J, et al. Galectin-1 induces chemokine production and proliferation in pancreatic stellate cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:729–736. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00511.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lippert E, Falk W, Bataille F, et al. Soluble galectin-3 is a strong, colonic epithelial-cell-derived, lamina propria fibroblast-stimulating factor. Gut. 2007;56:43–51. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.081646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Koh HS, Lee C, Lee KS, et al. CD7 expression and galectin-1-induced apoptosis of immature thymocytes are directly regulated by NF-κB upon T-cell activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;370:149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pace KE, Hahn HP, Pang M, et al. CD7 delivers a pro-apoptotic signal during galectin-1-induced T cell death. J Immunol. 2000;165:2331–2334. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Amano M, Eriksson H, Manning JC, et al. Tumour suppressor p16INK4a: anoikis-favouring decrease in N/O-glycan/cell surface sialylation by down-regulation of enzymes in sialic acid biosynthesis in tandem in a pancreatic carcinoma model. FEBS J. 2012;279:4062–4080. doi: 10.1111/febs.12001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Boscher C, Dennis JW, Nabi IR. Glycosylation, galectins and cellular signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:383–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gabius H-J, Manning JC, Kopitz J, et al. Sweet complementarity: the functional pairing of glycans with lectins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:1989–2016. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2163-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.García Caballero G, Schmidt S, Schnölzer M, et al. Chicken GRIFIN: binding partners, developmental course of localization and activation of its lens-specific gene expression by L-Maf/Pax6. Cell Tissue Res. 2019;375:665–683. doi: 10.1007/s00441-018-2931-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nishimura R, Hata K, Nakamura E, et al. Transcriptional network systems in cartilage development and disease. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149:353–363. doi: 10.1007/s00418-017-1628-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stock M, Schäfer H, Stricker S, et al. Expression of galectin-3 in skeletal tissues is controlled by Runx2. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:17360–17367. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207631200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao X-Y, Chen T-T, Xia L, et al. Hypoxia inducible factor-1 mediates expression of galectin-1: the potential role in migration/invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1367–1375. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Katzenmaier E-M, André S, Kopitz J, Gabius H-J. Impact of sodium butyrate on the network of adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins in human colon cancer in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:5429–5438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang J, Lu Z-H, Gabius H-J, et al. Cross-linking of GM1 ganglioside by galectin-1 mediates regulatory T cell activity involving TRPC5 channel activation: possible role in suppressing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2009;182:4036–4045. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.