Abstract
BACKGROUND
Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilar junction (BTVBJ-GFDA) are extremely difficult to treat.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate factors influencing survival and outcome of BTVBJ-GFDA by performing a retrospective multicenter cohort study.
METHODS
A total of 32 patients with BTVBJ-GFDA were included in this study. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment measures, and outcomes were collected from medical records and imaging studies. Autopsy and histological findings of the aneurysm and adjacent brain tissue were also obtained in 9 cases.
RESULTS
A total of 11 patients did not undergo surgery, of whom 10 died; 3 from progressive brainstem compression, 4 from subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2 from brainstem infarction, and 1 from associated atherosclerotic disease. The remaining 21 patients underwent a surgical treatment, consisting of immediately proximal parent artery occlusion, remotely proximal parent artery occlusion, clip reconstruction, and distal bypass and achieved significantly longer overall survival compared with those who received conservative therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 1.508, 95% CI 1.058-2.148, P = .02). Histological examination of the aneurysms demonstrated staged clots, open lumen, and intrathrombotic channels with endothelial lining. The patients younger than 45 yr of age showed statistically longer survival than those equal and older than 45 yr (P = .03).
CONCLUSION
Surgical intervention achieved greater survival than conservative management in BTVBJ-GFDA. Narrow ideal treatment window of the blood flow within the aneurysm to maintain sufficient but not excess supply should be targeted based on the hemodynamics of both the posterior communicating arteries and perforating vessel collaterals.
Keywords: Basilar trunk, Dolichoectasia, Dolichoectatic aneurysms, Fusiform aneurysms, Megadolichobasilar anomaly, Vertebrobasilar junction
Graphical Abstract
ABBREVIATIONS
- BTVBJ-GFDA
giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilar junction
- CI
confidence interval
- CR
clip reconstruction
- DB
distal bypass
- IPO
immediately proximal occlusion
- IU
international unit
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- mRS
modified Rankin Scale
- Pcom
posterior communicating artery
- PVCC
perforating vessel collateral circulation
- RPO
remotely proximal occlusion
- SAH
subarachnoid hemorrhage
Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilar junction (BTVBJ-GFDA) are rare vascular anomalies with histological prevalence report of 0.17% to 5.8%.1,2 Anatomic, hemodynamic, and biological factors are reported as the triggers for the dolichoectatic processes,3 and prior studies demonstrated pathological resemblance of fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms,4,5 but detailed developing mechanisms remain unknown. BTVBJ-GFDA manifests as clinical symptoms caused by thrombosis or mass effect compressing the brainstem, which usually progress to death if untreated.6-11 Unfortunately, surgical treatment is extremely difficult because of the location, absence of discrete aneurysm neck, and presence of thrombosis, with limited reports of satisfactory outcomes.6,7,9,11 In general, various combinations of occlusion of the parent arteries to reduce blood supply to the aneurysm with or without bypass construction to compensate by a nonphysiological route have been adopted, and recently, endovascular treatment with flow diverters has been performed.12-14 Still, choosing the optimal treatment for individuals is complexed. The present study reviewed our surgical series of BTVBJ-GFDA to retrospectively analyze the treatment outcomes to elucidate the factors affecting outcomes.
METHODS
Patient Demographics
A total of 32 patients with BTVBJ-GFDA treated at 2 international institutions between April 1980 and September 2015 were included. Cerebral angiography and computed tomography were performed in all cases for diagnosis, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained in most cases. We defined GFDA as nonsaccular, fusiform, and dolichoectatic aneurysms, with giant GFDA having maximum diameter of 25 mm or larger and large GFDA of 15 mm or larger measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal sections. All patients were followed up with angiogram and MRI when available. Treatment planning involved both neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists, including surgical, endovascular, or combinations of both approaches. This study was approved by the internal review board of each hospital. All the patients provided written consent for future publication in academic purposes in anonymous fashion at the time of treatment, and this report has implemented Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology guideline.
Medical charts and imaging studies were reviewed to collect such data as patient age, systemic atherosclerotic risks, and related diseases (eg, hypertension, coronary artery disease, history of smoking, and abdominal aorta aneurysm),8,15 and angiographical features including patency of the bilateral posterior communicating arteries (Pcoms). Treatment types were divided into 4 categories: immediately proximal parent artery occlusion (IPO) and remotely proximal parent artery occlusion (RPO: clips were applied more proximally than IPO), both intending flow reversal to facilitate aneurysm thrombosis, clip reconstruction (CR) to eliminate the flow within the aneurysm, and distal bypass with or without branch artery occlusion (DB) to achieve the flow reduction within the aneurysm (Figure 1). IPO and RPO also entailed bypass selectively depending on the results of preoperative angiogram and balloon occlusion test. Clinical outcome was assessed with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 mo after surgery and at the last follow-up. Favorable collateral was defined positive when bilateral large (more than 1 mm) Pcoms were demonstrated on angiographical collateral assessment with the balloon occlusion and/or Allcock test.
Histopathological Analysis
In mortality cases, aneurysm tissues were obtained at autopsy and were histologically examined after fixation in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections with 4-μm thickness were made and stained with hematoxylin and eosin stains. Immunohistochemical detection of factor VIII was performed using antiserum for factor VIII-related antigen (DAKO Corp, Carpinteria, California; polyclonal, dilution 1:1500) as the primary antibody.
Statistical Analysis
Those mention above clinical, histological, and radiographical data were collected, whose frequencies were calculated. We performed a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Overall survival was defined as the duration from the date of treatment until the date of death or the last follow-up. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison between age groups was performed with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to identify prognostic factors that might influence survival. Adjusted hazard ratios for death were calculated after adjusting for sex, age, aneurysm size, location, atherosclerotic risk, bilateral Pcom patency, and preoperative mRS. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess factors related to survival. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. All data analyses used Dr SPSS II version 11.01 (IBM, Armonk, New York) for Windows.
RESULTS
Clinical Manifestations
The patient demographics of 32 patients (12 women and 20 men, mean age 56.8 yr) are summarized in Table 1. The follow-up period ranged from 1 d to 15 yr (mean 45.2 mo). Aneurysms were located in the proximal BT in 18 cases and at the VBJ in 14 cases. A total of 29 patients had a giant aneurysm and 3 had a large aneurysm as the mean size was 27.6 mm. All cases were symptomatic: ischemic strokes in 10 cases, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in 2, and brainstem compression in 20. A patient flow chart is demonstrated in Figure 2.
TABLE 1.
Variable | All included patients | Surgically treated patients | Conservatively managed patients | P value, surgery vs conservative management |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of patients | 32 | 21 | 11 | |
Sex, female: male | 12: 20 | 9: 12 | 3: 8 | .54 |
Age, ≥45 yr: < 45 yr | 27: 5 | 16: 5 | 11: 0 | .078 |
Location, BAT: VBJ | 18: 14 | 11: 10 | 7: 4 | .54 |
An size, mean ± SD (mm) | 27.62 ± 5.57 | 28.3 ± 6.44 | 26.4 ± 6.41 | .39 |
Atherosclerosis risk, no: yes | 7: 25 | 5: 16 | 2: 9 | .71 |
Bilateral Pcom patency, favorable: poor | 5: 27 | 5: 16 | 0: 11 | .078 |
Preoperative mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5 | 4: 2: 10: 9: 7 | 4: 1: 7: 6: 3 | 0: 1: 3: 3: 4 | .10 |
Tx category, IPO: RPO: CR: DB: no Tx | 7: 6: 5: 3: 11 | 7: 6: 5: 3: 0 | 0: 0: 0: 0: 11 | |
Construction of bypass, no: yes | 20: 12 | 20: 12 | 0: 0 | |
Postoperative mRSa, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6 | 3: 2: 6: 8: 9: 4 | 3: 2: 6: 8: 9: 4 | NA | |
Latest follow-up mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6 | 5: 1: 1: 1: 2: 22 | 5: 0: 1: 1: 2: 12 | 0: 1: 0: 0: 0: 10 | .11 |
Follow-up from latest Tx, mean ± SD (mo) | 45.21 ± 53.60 | 56.1 ± 60.8 | 19.4 ± 26.7 | .10 |
An indicates aneurysm; BAT, basilar trunk; CR, clip reconstruction; DB, distal bypass; IPO, immediate proximal occlusion; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; Pcom, posterior communicating artery; RPO, remote proximal occlusion; Tx, treatment; VBJ, vertebrobasilar junction.
aFor untreated patients, mRS was obtained at 3 mo after the initial diagnosis.
Conservative Treatment vs Surgical Treatment
Of the 32 patients, 11 underwent conservative medical treatment without any surgical intervention. Of these 11 patients, 10 died; 3 from progressive brainstem dysfunction caused by continued growth of the aneurysm (mean at 12 mo from initial presentation), 4 from SAH (mean at 21.6 mo), 2 from brainstem infarction (mean at 68 mo), and 1 from acute renal failure at 6 mo. One patient remained moderately disabled for 5 mo and was lost to follow-up. The overall morbidity and mortality rates of conservative treatment were 90.9% and 90.9%, respectively.
Surgical treatments were performed in 21 patients. In the early postoperative period, morbidity, and mortality rates were 47.6% and 14.3%, respectively. At the last follow-up (mean 56.6 mo), the overall morbidity and mortality rates of all surgical interventions were 71.4% and 57.1%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with surgical intervention had significantly longer overall survival than those conservatively managed (adjusted hazard ratio 1.508, 95% CI 1.058-2.148, P = .02). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the median survival time was 72.0 mo (range 0.0-151.9 months) for patients who underwent surgery, which was significantly longer than that of 9.0 mo (range 3.2-14.8 mo) for patients with conservative management (Figure 3A).
Difference of Clinical and Radiological Characteristics and Outcomes by Age
We performed a subgroup analysis divided by age, younger patient group (younger than 45 yr of age, n = 5, mean age 26.2 yr) and elderly patient group (equal or older than 45 yr, n = 27, mean age 62.5 yr) (Table 2). Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test showed that the median survival time of the elderly group was 11.0 mo (95% CI 0.00-23.25 mo), whereas that of the younger group was unreached (P = .03; Figure 3B). Albeit without statistical significance, the younger group tended to have favorable hemodynamic collaterals from the bilateral Pcoms than the elderly group (40% vs 11.1%, P = .073). A total of 4 of the 5 patients in the younger group were free from any atherosclerosis risk factors or diseases, whereas 24 of the 27 patients in the elderly group had at least one of them (88.9% vs 20%, P = .004).
TABLE 2.
Variable | <45 yr | ≥45 yr | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Number of patients | 5 | 27 | |
Sex, male: female | 2:3 | 18:9 | .26 |
Treatment, treatment: no treatment | 5: 0 | 16: 11 | .14 |
Location, BAT: VBJ | 1: 4 | 17: 10 | .14 |
An size (mm), mean ± SD | 28.00 ± 7.58 | 27.56 ± 5.68 | .88 |
Atherosclerosis risk, no: yes | 4:1 | 3: 24 | .004 |
Bilateral Pcom patency, favorable: poor | 2: 3 | 3: 24 | .073 |
Preoperative mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5 | 0: 0: 3: 2: 0 | 4: 2: 7: 7: 7 | .37 |
Tx category, IRO: RPO: CR: DB: No Tx | 1: 1: 3: 0: 0 | 6: 5 2: 3: 11 | .039 |
Construction of bypass, no: yes | 4: 1 | 16: 11 | .63 |
Postoperative mRSa, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6 | 2: 0: 1: 1: 1: 0 | 0: 3: 5: 7: 8: 4 | .031 |
Latest follow-up mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6 | 3: 0: 0: 1: 0: 1 | 2: 1: 1: 0: 2: 21 | .008 |
Follow-up from latest Tx (mo), mean ± SD | 77.40 ± 50.14 | 39.25 ± 52.93 | .15 |
An indicates aneurysm; BAT, basilar trunk; CR, clip reconstruction; DB, distal bypass; IPO, immediate proximal occlusion; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; Pcom, posterior communicating artery; RPO, remote proximal occlusion; Tx, treatment; VBJ, vertebrobasilar junction.
aFor untreated patients, mRS was obtained at 3 mo after the initial diagnosis.
Treatment Options and Outcomes
The patient demographics divided by the treatment types are summarized in Table 3. Kaplan-Meier analyses by the surgical treatments are shown in Figure 3C. Median survival time showed no significant difference between the treatment types. Treatment selection evolved with our accumulated experience: CR was mainly performed during the initial period from 1980 to 1991, IPO was primarily selected from 1991 to 1999, RPO from 1999 to 2010, and DB was exclusively selected from 2010 to 2015.
TABLE 3.
Treatment | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | IPO | RPO | CR | DB | P value |
Number of patients | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | |
Sex, female: male | 2: 5 | 2: 4 | 3: 2 | 2: 1 | .55 |
Age, (years), ≥45 yr: < 45 yr | 6: 1 | 5: 1 | 2: 3 | 3: 0 | .17 |
Location, BAT: VBJ | 3: 4 | 3: 3 | 2: 3 | 3: 0 | .35 |
An size (mm), mean ± SD | 28.29 ± 7.89 | 29.67 ± 6.98 | 27.00 ± 6.71 | 27.67 ± 2.52 | .93 |
Atherosclerosis risk, no: yes | 2: 5 | 1: 5 | 2: 3 | 0: 3 | .59 |
Bilateral Pcom patency, favorable: poor | 1:6 | 2: 4 | 2:3 | 0:3 | .51 |
Preoperative mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5 | 2: 0: 2: 2: 1 | 2: 0: 2: 1: 1 | 0: 0: 2: 2: 1 | 0: 1: 1: 1: 0 | .64 |
Construction of bypass, no: yes | 1: 6 | 3: 3 | 5: 0 | 0: 3 | .010 |
Postoperative mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6 | 1: 0: 0: 2: 2: 2 | 1: 2: 1: 1: 1: 0 | 0: 0: 1: 2: 2: 0 | 0: 0: 1: 1: 0: 1 | .56 |
Postoperative angiographic findings | AD6, PBR6 | AD4, CD5, PBR3 | AD5 | AD0, PB3 | |
Latest follow-up mRS, 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6 | 1a: 0: 0: 0: 2: 4 | 3b: 0: 0: 0: 0: 3 | 1a: 0: 0: 1: 0: 3 | 0: 0: 1: 0: 0: 2 | .19 |
Follow-up from latest Tx (mo), mean ± SD | 38.90 ± 37.72 | 87.58 ± 91.59 | 50.80 ± 37.48 | 45.67 ± 60.37 | .54 |
AD, aneurysm disappeared; An, aneurysm; BAT, basilar artery trunk; CD, collateral development via either external carotid artery branches or vertebral artery muscular branches; CR, clip reconstruction; DB, distal bypass; IPO, immediately proximal occlusion; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; PB, patent bypass; PBR, patent bypass retrograde filling to distal basilar artery; Pcom, posterior communicating artery; RPO, remotely proximal occlusion; Tx, treatment; VBJ, vertebrobasilar junction.
aOne patient with IPO and one patient with CR attained mRS 1 at the latest follow-up, both aged younger than 45 yr (20 and 27).
bThree patients with RPO attained mRS 1 at the latest follow-up, 2 patients aged older than 45 yr (51and 57) and 1 aged 21 yr.
Staged IPO was performed in 7 patients. A total of 3000 international units (IU) of heparin was administered intraoperatively. Postoperatively, continuous intravenous administration of 10 000 IU of heparin per day was maintained for 2 wk and then gradually switched to oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 100 mg daily or cilostazol 100 mg twice per day over a week, which was maintained for 1 to 3 mo. Two patients attained the same mRS in the early postoperative period as preoperatively (Figure 4A-4D). In contrast, 5 patients suffered devastating progressive brainstem infarction (Figures 5A-5D and 6A and 6B). Two of these 5 patients died. One patient with BT aneurysm with favorable Pcom collateral flows ended up with unilateral occlusion because of patient refusal. This aneurysm did not disappear at postoperative angiogram (Table 3). The early postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 71.4% and 28.6%, respectively. At the last follow-up (mean 38.90 mo), 1 patient remained in mRS 1, 2 in mRS 5, and 4 had died (mRS 6). The overall morbidity and mortality rates of IPO were 85.7% and 57.1%, respectively.
Staged RPO, either surgical or endovascular, was performed in 6 patients (Figures 7 and 8, and Video, Supplemental Digital Content). Anticoagulation treatment was administered intraoperatively, maintained for 7 d, and then tapered gradually for each vertebral artery occlusion. After the bypass construction, antiplatelet therapy with prostaglandin E1 infusion was initiated immediately, and this was switched to oral cilostazol on postoperative day 7, and then continued for 1 mo. Four patients attained the same mRS as the preoperative status (Figure 7). Among other 2 patients, one patient initially presented with deterioration of consciousness due to pontine hemorrhage, and remained in the vegetative state postoperatively. The other patient suffered temporary deterioration due to brainstem ischemia (mRS 3 immediately after surgery), then recovered to mRS1 at the last follow-up at 180 mo (Figure 8). The aforementioned 4 patients without postoperative neurological decline all showed remarkable aneurysm shrinkage over the follow-up period (Figure 9). Of the 6 patients, 5 developed collateral flow from either or both of the vertebral artery muscular branches and the external carotid artery branches into the basilar artery (Figure 9C). Two patients with BT aneurysm ended up with unilateral occlusion due to severe clinical condition and patient refusal, respectively. These 2 aneurysms did not disappear (Table 3). The early postoperative morbidity and mortality rates of RPO were 33% and 0%, respectively. At the last follow-up (mean 87.58 mo), 3 patients achieved mRS 1, and 2 died of undetermined causes. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 50% and 50%, respectively.
CR was performed in 5 patients. Immediately after surgery, 2 patients attained the same mRS as the preoperative condition, and 3 developed severe brainstem infarction. The early postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 60% and 0%, respectively. At the last follow-up (mean 50.80 mo), 3 patients died after 16, 33, and 80 mo. One patient attained good neurological recovery to mRS 1 over 3 yr. The morbidity and mortality rates at the last follow-up were 80% and 60%, respectively.
DB was performed in 3 patients. Both anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatments were administered as the same protocol as RPO. Immediately after surgery, 2 of the 3 patients attained the same mRS as the preoperative status. One patient who underwent high-flow bypass developed fatal SAH on the day after surgery and died. The early postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 33.3% and 33.3%, respectively. One patient attained mRS 3 at 120 mo, whereas one patient who underwent DB with remote unilateral vertebral artery occlusion subsequently developed SAH and died 6 mo later. At the latest follow-up (mean 45.67 mo), morbidity and mortality rates were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Both 2 patients who died after DB were older than 45 yr and did not have favorable Pcom flow collaterals but did have atherosclerotic risk factors. All 5 patients who had favorable Pcom collateral flows underwent surgery (RPO in 2, IPO in 1, and DB in 2) but did not require bypass construction. Contrarily, 12 of 17 patients who underwent surgery with poor Pcom collaterals (70.6%) required bypass construction.
Transition of mRS in all patients is demonstrated in Figure 10A, whereas that of 21 surgically treated patients in Figures 10B, and 11 conservatively managed patients in Figure 10C.
Pathological Findings
Histological examination of 2 aneurysms obtained from 2 patients (case 1: Figures 5 and 6; case 2: Figure 11A-11C) demonstrated prominent neovascularization in both the thickened intima and intrathrombotic organized staged clots. The normal intracranial arterial wall contained no neovascularization or thickened intima and intrathrombotic organized staged clots (Figure 11D and 11E). The perforating vessels located in the adjacent brainstem parenchyma and the recanalizing vessels within the thickened adventitia (vasa vasorum) were aligned continuously, apparently maintaining their patency (Figure 11F and 11G). This patent lumen was further supported by the factor VIII-positive endothelial lining, without occluding organized clots.
DISCUSSION
Factors Affecting the Natural History of BTVBJ-GFDA
A major problem in treating BTVBJ-GFDA is that the lesion often extends to the entire circumference of the vessel wall and involves vital perforating arteries arising from the affected vessel.13 Occlusion of the aneurysm by clipping or coils carries a high risk of sacrificing those critical perforating vessels. Nevertheless, these aneurysms have been reported of an extremely poor natural history,6-11 indeed, as demonstrated in our series with a median survival of 9 mo. Of our 11 patients, 10 patients without surgical treatment died. Therefore, any procedures which could improve this otherwise devastating natural prognosis should be considered. Both hemorrhage caused by excess of blood flow and ischemia due to poor blood flow can occur and be fatal, so surgical treatment of BTVBJ-GFDA should achieve adequate hemodynamic status by targeting the narrow treatment window. Two procedures constitute the core keys to achieve this delicate goal, occlusion of the parent arteries and bypass construction. Appropriate combination of these 2 procedures to match the specific hemodynamic status in individuals should provide the best chance of improving the poor clinical course of this disease. In our series, 4 types of surgical treatments were performed in 21 cases, achieving the median survival of 72 mo. Our study suggests that surgical treatment is an essential factor to reverse the dismal prognosis.
Surgical Treatment vs Conservative Management
Admittedly, selection bias regarding decision making toward surgery cannot be neglected in our limited cohort. As shown in Table 1, those patients who underwent surgery tended to be younger and to present with less severe condition (better mRS) than those managed conservatively (P = .078 and 0.10, respectively). Our present study was unable to demonstrate superiority of surgery over conservative management regarding neurological outcome despite this potential patient characteristics’ advantages, which could emphasize the complexity of the disease: only 5 patients among 21 patients who underwent surgery (23.8%) achieved mRS 1.
Parent Artery Occlusion Immediately Proximal or Remotely Proximal to the Aneurysm
Only 1 patient among 6 who underwent RPO developed brainstem infarction and suffered early postoperative neurological deterioration, but recovered remarkably at the last follow-up. The other 5 patients tolerated the procedure well with early morbidity in 1 patient. In contrast, 5 of the 7 patients treated with IPO suffered brainstem infarction, and 4 of the 7 patients died. From our limited case series, RPO seemed more favorable than IPO. Our hypothesis is because of the dramatic pathological change from dolichoectasia, manipulation or occlusion just proximal to the lesion carries a risk of occluding the nearby brainstem perforators. Exceptionally, one patient who underwent IPO of bilateral vertebral arteries had good outcome; however, this was a young patient (20-yr-old female) with no atherosclerotic risk and had large unilateral Pcom: this patient was in extremely fortunate condition. IPO might be more likely to be tolerated if good collateral circulation can be expected after parental artery occlusion.
Two Types of Collateral Blood Flow: Pcom and Perforating Vessels
Close histological examination of the autopsy cases showed rich microvascular networks on the surfaces of the aneurysms, which apparently were connected to the vessels in the brainstem, as we previously reported.16 Such vessels may form collateral circulation at another level besides Pcom, namely perforating vessel collateral circulation (PVCC). The poor outcomes after IPO may have been caused by injuring PVCC. Indeed, a recent study of surgical outcome in dolichoectatic BT aneurysms in 37 patients concluded that good outcomes are determined by perforator preservation and mitigating aneurysm thrombosis.16 However, evaluation of PVCC requires indirect parameters because direct evaluation is very guarded with currently available imaging studies. Given that atherosclerotic small artery disease is probably the most prominent risk for perforating vessel occlusion, atherosclerosis risk factors can be a reasonable parameter for evaluation of PVCC. In our series, 24 of the 27 patients in the elderly group had some atherosclerosis risks (88.9%) and, indeed, less satisfactory survival. Contrarily, only one patient in the younger patient group had atherosclerosis risk factors (20%, P = .004). Furthermore, there was a tendency that younger patients had more favorable Pcom collateral flows (P = .073). This suggests younger patients with healthier vasculature and arterial plasticity, and good Pcom collateral flows that enable the circle of Willis to habituate to new established hemodynamic flow out of BTVBJ-GFDA could enjoy good outcome. Additionally, both 2 patients who died after DB were older than 45 yr of age and did not have favorable Pcom collateral flows but did have atherosclerotic risk factors, all of which could contribute to lack of arterial plasticity. This can potentially guide surgical treatment options: in younger patients with good Pcom collateral flow and without atherosclerosis risk factors, IPO can be selected if technically more approachable. On the other hand, in elderly patients or patients with multiple atherosclerosis risk factors, RPO might be a safer option to minimize risk of perforator injury, as insufficient arterial plasticity is suggested. Furthermore, requirement of bypass construction should also be considered in patients with poor Pcom collateral flows, as in our cohort, 70.6% of those patients required bypass construction in surgery.
Limitations
One limitation of this study is scarcity of treatment options. Recently, flow diverter treatment for vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms has been performed,12-14 which can be another treatment option. One major problem regarding flow diverter treatment in BTVBJ-GFDA is lack of long-term follow-up. Recent published meta-analysis in 2018 included 13 studies worldwide; however, the longest mean follow-up period among these studies was 25.2 mo. In their meta-analysis, small size (≤10 mm) was the prognostic factor for good neurological outcome, and avoidance of perforator injury was reported as a key for achieving good neurological outcome.14 Patients with a relatively small fusiform/dolichoectatic aneurysm might benefit from flow diverter treatment. However, the concern remains as we try to save the perforators, because this inevitably saves the vasa vasorum as well, which is also believed to be a contributing factor for aneurysm growth. Large fusiform/dolichoectatic aneurysms with severe symptomatology, on the other hand, may require thoughtful consideration of more drastic approach including surgery, which comes with a risk with high mortality rate (57.1%). Second, we cannot exclude selection bias in our limited cohorts: 10 of the 11 patients who were managed conservatively presented with moderate/severe disability (mRS ≥ 3), and we might have included more severe patients eccentrically than those with benign symptomatology (eg, incidentally found BTVBJ-GFDA). Furthermore, functional outcome of surgery in our limited cohort was still dismal, with just 28.1% achieving mRS 1. External validity should be carefully implemented from our study in decision-making process of intervention, especially when comparing to the natural history of BTVBJ-GFDA. One possible explanation is our series included already grown BTVBJ-GFDA, because the inclusion criteria was ≥15 mm, as Mangrum et al17 demonstrated that mortality rate of patients who have grown vertebrobasilar fusiform or dolichoectatic aneurysms was 5.7 times higher than those without aneurysm growth. Third, because of the long study period, and severe conditions in many patients, access to the follow-up imaging studies was very limited. Indeed, 4 patients in 22 surgically treated patients (18.2%) did not undergo MRI because they died very soon after surgery (1-15 d). Likewise, long-term follow-up MRI was accessible in only 3 patients (Figures 5-7). Further case accumulation and sharing of treatment experience is crucial for investigation of this validity.
CONCLUSION
BTVBJ-GFDA has a devastating natural history, but surgery can offer longer survival. Patients younger than 45 yr of age enjoyed longer survival in our limited series. In surgery, a narrow treatment window of hemodynamic conditions within the aneurysm to maintain sufficient but not excess blood supply should be targeted based on the hemodynamics of both the Pcoms and perforating vessel collaterals.
Disclosures
This work was supported by a Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Scientific Research Grant on rare and intractable diseases to Dr Nakatomi (No. 2015-38) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.
Contributor Information
Hirofumi Nakatomi, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Collaborative Laboratory for Medical Science of Neural Dynamics, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Saitama, Japan.
Satoshi Kiyofuji, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideaki Ono, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru Tanaka, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyasu Kamiyama, Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke, Teishinkai Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsumi Takizawa, Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hideaki Imai, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhito Saito, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki Shiokawa, Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akio Morita, Department of Neurosurgery, Nippon Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kelly D Flemming, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael J Link, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
COMMENT
Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilarjunction (BTVBJ-GFDA) are the ‘glioblastomas of neurovascular surgery’ often with very poor natural history. Diffuse anomaly of whole vertebrobasilar (VBA) system makes often the neurosurgeon unarmed - sudden spontaneous or induced changes of hemodynamics may cause the anomaly to rupture or thrombose leading to sudden death. This is a nice paper but conclusions drawn on these 21 selected cases should be cautious. As the authors have concluded even some blood flow through the dolichoectacy may be enough to extend the survival of the patients. This was achieved by modification of hemodynamics from the aneurysm toward the Pcoms - from posterior circulation to anterior circulation. The main message is that the outcome is highly patient-depended and related to vascular plasticity and tolerance to the newly established hemodynamic stress. Revascularization procedures via deep corridors in the eloquent posterior fossa are quite complex and risky, too. The best results are achieved when induced changes are slow enough to give possibilities for Pcoms and collaterals to grow in timely fashion without changing dramatically blood flow inside of the dolichoectasy and critical perforators to the brainstem. This may also be achieved in the not so far away future by a slowly closing ‘Helsinki clip’.1
Behnam Rezai Jahromi
Mika Niemelä
Helsinki, Finland
REFERENCE
- 1.Rezai Jahromi B, Hirvelä V, Sarpaneva S, et al. A device for applying external pressure on a surface of an anatomical object. 4/4/2019, “FI Patent PCT/FI2017/050,690” WO 2019/06 3871 Al. [Google Scholar]
REFERENCES
- 1.Resta M, Gentile MA, Di Cuonzo F, Vinjau E, Brindicci D, Carella A. Clinical-angiographic correlations in 132 patients with megadolichovertebrobasilar anomaly. Neuroradiology. 1984;26(3):213-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu YL, Moseley IF, Pullicino P, McDonald WI. The clinical picture of ectasia of the intracerebral arteries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982;45(1):29-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pico F, Labreuche J, Amarenco P. Pathophysiology, presentation, prognosis, and management of intracranial arterial dolichoectasia. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(8):833-845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nakatomi H, Segawa H, Kurata Aet al.. Clinicopathological study of intracranial fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms: insight on the mechanism of growth. Stroke. 2000;31(4):896-900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ono H, Nakatomi H, Tsutsumi Ket al.. Symptomatic recurrence of intracranial arterial dissections: follow-up study of 143 consecutive cases and pathological investigation. Stroke. 2013;44(1):126-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Anson JA, Lawton MT, Spetzler RF. Characteristics and surgical treatment of dolichoectatic and fusiform aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1996;84(2):185-193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Drake CG, Peerless SJ. Giant fusiform intracranial aneurysms: review of 120 patients treated surgically from 1965 to 1992. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(2):141-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Flemming KD, Wiebers DO, Brown RD Jret al.. The natural history of radiographically defined vertebrobasilar nonsaccular intracranial aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(4):270-279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haddad GF, Haddad FS. Cerebral giant serpentine aneurysm: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(1):92-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nasr DM, Brinjikji W, Rouchaud A, Kadirvel R, Flemming KD, Kallmes DF. Imaging characteristics of growing and ruptured vertebrobasilar non-saccular and dolichoectatic aneurysms. Stroke. 2016;47(1):106-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tomasello F, Albanese V, Cioffi FA. Giant serpentine aneurysms: a separate entity. Surg Neurol. 1979;12(5):429-432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S, Itshayek E. Successful endovascular treatment of a growing megadolichoectasic vertebrobasilar artery aneurysm by flow diversion using the “diverter-in-stent” technique. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(1):166-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tan LA, Moftakhar R, Lopes DK. Treatment of a ruptured vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysm using pipeline embolization device. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2013;15(1):30-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kiyofuji S, Graffeo CS, Perry Aet al.. Meta-analysis of treatment outcomes of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms by flow diverters. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(5):493-499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pico F, Labreuche J, Cohen A, Touboul PJ, Amarenco P, GENIC Investigators. Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia is associated with enlarged descending thoracic aorta. Neurology. 2004;63(11):2016-2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lawton MT, Abla AA, Rutledge WCet al.. Bypass surgery for the treatment of dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms: a work in progress. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(1):83-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mangrum WI, Huston J 3rd, Link MJet al.. Enlarging vertebrobasilar nonsaccular intracranial aneurysms: frequency, predictors, and clinical outcome of growth. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(1):72-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]