Abstract
Early innate education of hematopoietic progenitors within the bone marrow (BM) stably primes them for either trained immunity or instead immunoregulatory functions. We herein demonstrate that in vivo or in vitro activation within the BM via Toll-like receptor-9 generates a population of plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) precursors (CpG-pre-pDCs) that, unlike pDC precursors isolated from PBS-incubated BM (PBS-pre-pDCs), are endowed with the capacity to halt progression of ongoing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. CpG activation enhances the selective migration of pDC precursors to the inflamed spinal cord, induces their immediate production of TGF-β, and after migration, of enhanced levels of IL-27. CpG-pre-pDC derived TGF-β and IL-27 ensure protection at early and late phases of the disease, respectively. Spinal cords of CpG-pre-pDC-protected recipient mice display enhanced percentages of host-derived pDCs expressing TGF-β as well as an accumulation of IL-10 producing B cells and of CD11c+ CD11b+ dendritic cells. These results reveal that pDC precursors are conferred stable therapeutic properties by early innate activation within the BM. They further extend to the pDC lineage promising perspectives for cell therapy of autoimmune diseases with innate activated hematopoietic precursor cells.
Subject terms: Immunology, Neuroscience, Stem cells
Introduction
Adaptive hematopoiesis has been described as a key response to infections or injury. Indeed, hematopoietic progenitors are not only confined to the bone marrow (BM) to replenish the immune system by differentiation but can also sense pathogens and danger signals and travel to injured or inflammatory tissues1. Recent findings have highlighted that the innate ability of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors to sense, respond to stress and adapt to subsequent immune responses shapes trained immunity2,3. Trained immunity was shown to foster expansion of myeloid progenitors driving myelopoiesis, thereby enabling a sustained response to a secondary microbial challenge4.
A challenging hypothesis is that primary innate education of hematopoietic progenitors may not only enhance secondary responses to infections but also induce immune regulatory responses. Askenase et al. showed that gastrointestinal infection primes monocyte precursors prior to BM egress for regulatory function within peripheral tissues5. Moreover, beyond myeloid progenitors, innate activated hematopoietic progenitors including multipotent6–8 and B-cell9,10 progenitors were also described to acquire regulatory properties against adaptive immune responses such as autoimmune diseases. Thus, we have shown that G-CSF, a response factor to infections, mobilizes multipotent progenitors from the bone marrow to the spleen, a process conferring to the progenitors the capacity to enhance the expansion of functional Tregs and thereby, upon adoptive transfer, protecting against type 1 diabetes (T1D) onset in Non Obese Diabetic (NOD) mice6,7 and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a murine model of multiple sclerosis8. We also showed that activation with the TLR-9 agonist CpG within the BM conferred to B-cell committed progenitors, at the pro-B cell stage (CpG-proBs), the capacity to control effector T cells and provide protection against disease in both T1D and multiple sclerosis (MS) models, at the onset of clinical signs9. CpG-proBs have the capacity to migrate towards the immune reaction site and target tissues, where they differentiate into diverse mature Breg subsets that act locally9. Altogether, these observations suggested that early education of hematopoietic progenitors within the BM may be essential to imprint regulatory functions that enable them to control immune responses in the periphery.
Optimal treatments for autoimmune conditions require efficacy when symptoms are detected, i.e. at the effector phase of disease. Cell therapy with Tregs is poorly efficient at the effector phase of EAE as Tregs tend to lose their immunosuppressive properties in an inflammatory environment11. Indeed, the timing and stimuli sensed by immune cells affect their capacity to restore tolerance or instead contribute to disease severity.
Similar versatility has been reported for plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In MS patients, pDCs accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) and the cerebrospinal fluid12. In the peripheral blood, although pDCs remain stable in numbers, they display a dysfunctional phenotype13. Interestingly, the recovery of pDC functions correlates with clinical improvement in MS patients treated with glatiramer acetate, suggesting a capacity of human pDCs to gain a regulatory role in MS.
In mice, CNS pDCs, although far less efficiently than mDCs, are able to present auto-antigen and induce a CD4+ T-cell response, mostly Th1- and Th17-oriented and thereby exert inflammatory influence14. As a result, pDC depletion before EAE induction is clinically beneficial15. It promotes significant reduction of circulating IFN-α and lower frequency of peripheral Th17 cells, effects that are only partially reproduced by type I IFN neutralization in pDC-replete animals16. These results suggested that pDCs are required for EAE initiation, in part via their IFN-I production. Conversely, pDC depletion one week after immunization results in aggravation of EAE, suggesting that pDCs adopt a regulatory function once disease has started. They inhibit CNS pro-inflammatory myeloid DCs and thereby reduce pathogenic CNS Th17 differentiation14. Moreover, after EAE induction, pDCs establish MHC-II dependent myelin-Ag specific contacts with CD4+ T-cells in lymph nodes that promote selective expansion of myelin antigen specific regulatory T cells17. Such property was shown to strictly depend on their pre-loading with myelin antigen18 whereas simple activation with CpG, although enhancing MHC-II expression, did not confer to adoptively transferred mature pDCs a protective function against EAE18.
Whether immune regulatory function can be stably imprinted at the early BM precursor stage and downstream the pDC lineage remains unknown.
We herein investigated whether early education of pDCs with TLR agonists during development, at the stage of pDC precursors prior to bone marrow egress, determines whether they exert pro-inflammatory or immunoregulatory functions in the context of an experimental model of multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We report that either in vivo or in vitro activation with the TLR-9 agonist CpG confers them a highly stable capacity to control ongoing EAE. CpG activation enhances the selective migration of pDC precursors to the inflamed spinal cord, induces their production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β and, after migration, IL-27, acting sequentially for protection against disease. These results reveal that early innate activation of pDC precursors within the BM allows them to effectively control tissue-specific immunity.
Results
Emergence of pDC precursors in bone marrow after CpG activation: isolation, phenotypic and functional characterization
Incubation of a BM cell suspension with CpG-B (10 µg/ml) for 18 h led to the accumulation of hematopoietic progenitors that were first enriched by c-kit positive magnetic selection. Upon further staining, we proceeded to FACS-cell sorting by elimination of doublets followed by gating of c-kit+Sca-1+ cells, then B220intPDCA-1+ cells. We identified a fraction expressing the phenotype c-kit+Sca-1+B220+PDCA-1+ (Fig. 1a). This PDCA-1+ cell population expressed only low levels of the myeloid lineage marker CD115 (M-CSFR) but expressed CD2, CD127 (IL7-Rα) and low levels of Ly6D. Altogether, its c-kit+Sca-1+B220lowPDCA-1+CD11clowSiglec-H+Ly6C+Ly6DlowCD2+CD127+CD115− phenotype (Fig. 1b) suggested a plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursor derived from the common lymphoid progenitor (CLP)19–21 that we named CpG-pre-pDCs. Notably, comparison with a c-kit+Sca-1+B220+PDCA-1+ fraction sorted from the BM with 25-fold lower frequency among c-kit+ cells after 18 h incubation with PBS instead (PBS-pre-pDCs) showed that CpG activation reduced CD2 and Ly6D expression levels. It also reduced MHC II, CD80 and CD86 but enhanced CD40 expression levels. Additionally, CpG modulated the expression of various receptors playing a role in migration22–24, reducing CCR5 expression but enhancing CX3CR1, CXCR4 and notably CD29 expression (Fig. 1b), the latter reported to condition pDC migration to the CNS during neuroinflammation25.
Engagement of the CpG-activated cell-sorted progenitor population into the pDC lineage was further confirmed by assessing the respective nuclear expression of several transcription factors including the basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor E2-2 (also known as TCF4) which is essential for the specification, commitment as well as maintenance of the pDC identity26,27 and Id2, a repressor of E2.2 that drives cDC development instead28. Additionally, we checked for IRF8, which is activated by E2.229 as well as PU.1, the latter active in early lympho-myeloid development and reported to be expressed by pDC precursors30. Comparison with PBS-pre-pDCs (Fig. 1a) showed that activation with CpG has nearly no effect on the expression level of both E2-2 and PU.1 in the sorted population (Fig. 1c) whereas expression of IRF8 was enhanced and conversely Id2 reduced. The observed transcription factors expression confirms the pDC lineage of the BM precursors.
A survey of various TLR agonists demonstrated that only TLR-4, TLR-7 and TLR-9 agonists were able to promote the emergence of this population within BM cell culture at significant levels (Fig. 1d).
The functional properties of CpG-pre-pDCs and PBS-pre-pDCs were examined. After activation with PMA + ionomycin, both PBS- and CpG-induced progenitors released essentially IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-2, TNF-α and IL-10, fitting with a typical cytokine profile of pDCs, with no major differences between the two emergence conditions, except for enhanced IFN-γ and reduced TNF-α upon CpG activation (Fig. 1e). No significant IL-27 production was measured in any condition. Notably, only CpG-activated pDC precursors expressed TGF-β (Fig. 1f). Furthermore, as previously reported for human31 and murine Sca-1+ BM pDC progenitors32, they showed restricted ability, nearly abrogated for CpG-pre-pDCs, to produce IFN-α in response to activation by the TLR-9 agonists CpG-B and CpG-P (a form of the oligonucleotide specific for activating pDCs) as well as by the TLR-7 agonist R848 and the TLR-4 agonist LPS (Fig. 1g). CpG-pre-pDCs produced nearly tenfold less IFN-α than mature spleen pDCs in response to CpG-B stimulation (Fig. 1h).
Altogether, these key characteristics support the identification of the cell fraction isolated from CpG-incubated BM suspension displaying the following phenotype: c-kit+Sca-1+CD115−CD11clowSiglec H+PDCA-1+Ly6C+Ly6D+CD2+CD115−E2.2+IRF8+ Id2+PU-1hi, standing for a pDC precursor.
CpG-pre-pDCs provide protection against EAE at the onset of clinical signs
To investigate any possible protective properties in an autoimmune disease, the CpG-pre-pDC progenitors were adoptively transferred in mice immunized for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of multiple sclerosis (Fig. 2a,b). A single intravenous injection of only 80,000 CpG-pre-pDCs per recipient at the onset of clinical signs (day-12) significantly protected against EAE (Fig. 2b). CpG stimulation was absolutely required for the protective effect of PDCA-1+ precursor population since the cell fraction recovered after incubation of BM cells with PBS, instead of CpG, conferred no protection (Fig. 2b). Both disease incidence (Fig. 2c) and severity assessed by maximum clinical scores in mice with EAE (Fig. 2c,d) were reduced by CpG-pre-pDCs. Moreover, the same PDCA-1+ precursor fraction cell-sorted from the BM of mice 18 h after an i.p. injection of CpG-B (30 µg/recipient) (Supplementary Fig. S1), representing 1.37% of total BM cells (enriched approximately tenfold over pre-pDCs that represent 0.1% of total cells in PBS-injected mice) and 0.98% of c-kit+ BM cells, respectively, exerted a protective effect against EAE similar to that achieved by in vitro activated CpG-pre-pDCs (Fig. 2e,f), suggesting the pathophysiological relevance of this precursor cell population.
Fate and functional properties of adoptively transferred CpG-pre-pDCs in EAE-developing recipients
CpG-pre-pDCs and PBS-prepDCs prepared from congenic CD45.1 or actin-GFP+ donor mice were used to track their migration and differentiation profile in CD45.2 C57Bl/6J recipients in which they were adoptively transferred at day-12 after immunization. Six days after their adoptive transfer, the vast majority of CD45.1 cells in CpG-pre-pDC recipients were found in the spinal cord, while only very few were found in the spleen and the cervical lymph nodes of the recipient mice (Fig. 3a). PBS-pre-pDCs exhibited similar specificity of migration to the spinal cord but migrated half less than their CpG-activated counterparts (Fig. 3a). In the spinal cord, FACS analysis of gated GFP+ cells showed that both migrated CpG- and PBS-pre-pDCs exhibited a c-kit+Sca-1+B220lowSiglec-H+CD11clow PDCA-1+ phenotype similar to their pre-injection phenotype (Fig. 3b). In addition to their conserved immature phenotype, we further assessed whether protective CpG-pre-pDCs retained an immature functional profile. In keeping with their low IFN-α response to CpG stimulation, CpG-pre-pDCs expressed low levels of IRF7, the master positive regulator of IFN-α response to TLR-9 stimulation, compared to mature spleen pDCs (Fig. 3c). Moreover, CD45.1 adoptively transferred CpG-pre-pDCs retained their significantly reduced IRF7 expression after migrating to the spinal cord in CD45.2 recipients (Fig. 3d,e), as compared to host CD45.2 PDCA-1+ cells in the same tissue in CD45.2 recipients and to CD45.2 PDCA-1+ cells in control mice with EAE injected with PBS medium only. MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 expression did not change at the surface of CpG-pre-pDCs upon migration but CD40 expression was nearly lost (Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, CpG activation confers improved selective migration to the inflamed spinal cord to pDC precursors where they retain their precursor stage of differentiation and remain limited in their IFN-α response capacity.
Role of IL-27 production by CpG-pre-pDCs in the protection against EAE
CpG- and PBS-pre-pDCs derived from CD45.1 or GFP donor mice were used to assess their cytokine production profile after migration. Notably, CD45.1/GFP+ CpG-pre-pDCs recovered from the spinal cord of recipients at day-18 demonstrated in response to PMA + ionomycin stimulation intracytoplasmic expressions of GM-CSF and of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-27 in recipients that were enhanced relative to PBS-pre-pDCs, but no more displayed TGF-β expression (Fig. 3f,g).
To investigate the functional role of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-27 characterizing the protective progenitors migrated into the spinal cord, CpG-pre-pDCs were prepared from IL-27p28 genetically deficient donor mice. Recipients of IL-27−/− progenitors were protected against EAE similar to recipients of WT CpG-pre-pDCs until day-22, but disease gradually worsened thereafter to reach the clinical score of controls (Fig. 3h). IL-27 thus plays a late role in the protection against EAE afforded by CpG-pre-pDCs. These data may further suggest that adoptively transferred pDC progenitors persist at least until approximately d-22 and probably longer in recipients.
Modulation of host cells in the spinal cord of pDC precursors recipients
We studied the impact of the adoptive transfer of CpG-versus PBS-pre-pDCs on host cells in the spinal cord of recipients, at d-18, compared to controls with EAE injected with PBS medium but no progenitors. Surprisingly, CpG-pre-pDC recipients only showed enhanced percentages of GM-CSF expressing CD4+ T-cells relative to CD4+ T-cells in other groups while no significant changes were observed in the proportion of CD4+ T-cells expressing IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-10, IL-27 or TGF-β (Fig. 4a,b) nor in the percentages of Foxp3+ CD4+ T-cells (Fig. 4c). Instead, in keeping with reports showing that GM-CSF, here produced by both migrated CpG-pre-pDCs and CD4+ T-cells in their recipients, may exert regulatory effects by triggering accumulation of IL-10 producing B-cells (B10)33,34 and of CD11c+CD11b+ tolerogenic DCs35,36, we found that these populations were significantly accumulated in the spinal cord of CpG-pre-pDC recipients compared to controls for the B10 (Fig. 4d) and to both controls and PBS-pre-pDC recipients for the DCs (Fig. 4e,f). Finally, F4/80+CD11b+ macrophages were similarly enhanced compared to controls in recipients of both PBS- and CpG-pre-pDCs (Fig. 4g,h).
Adoptive transfer of CpG-pre-pDCs transiently modifies host pDCs
Contrary to mature pDCs bearing the auto-antigen, reported to induce host pDC accumulation in the spinal cord18, neither CpG- nor PBS-pre-pDCs induced significant host pDC accumulation at d-18 (Fig. 5a) nor at d-15 or d-25 (Supplementary Fig. S3).
We further investigated if qualitative changes were induced in host pDCs by the adoptive transfer of pDC progenitors. No significant differences in cytokine expression by GFP-PDCA-1+ host pDCs were observed at d-18 among the three groups (controls with EAE not injected with progenitors, CpG-pre-pDC recipients and PBS-pre-pDC recipients) and no TGF-β expression was detectable (Fig. 5b,c). However, TGF-β was detectable earlier at d-15 in CpG-pre-pDC recipients, in PDCA-1+ cells either derived from the adoptively transferred CD45.1/GFP+ precursors or from the CD45.2 host (Fig. 5d,e), that displayed equivalent overall cytokine expression. Notably, at d-15 of EAE, host CD45.2 PDCA-1+ cells expressed more TGF-β when examined in the spinal cord of CpG-pre-pDC recipients than in controls with EAE injected with PBS medium only but no progenitors (Fig. 5f,g). This TGF-β expression both in migrated progenitors and in host pDCs in CpG-pre-pDC recipients is in keeping with the report that TGF-β exposure of pDCs prompts in turn their production of TGF-β37. Therefore, adoptively transferred CD45.1 CpG-pre-pDCs retain their TGF-β expression until d-15 and promote TGF-β expression also by host CD45.2 pDCs until that same time.
Role of TGF-β expressed by CpG-pre-pDCs in the spinal cord in the protection against EAE
To evaluate the role of TGF-β expressed selectively by CpG-pre-pDCs, before injection and until d-15, in their protection against EAE, we sought to deprive TGF-β from the adoptively transferred CpG-pre-pDCs. Given that TGF-β deficient mice are not viable, and technics based on the use of RNAs are susceptible to activate pDCs, we inserted a neutralizing antibody directed against TGF-β into the progenitors with the help of a protein transfection vector Chariot. We previously reported efficient neutralization of a chemokine released by adoptively transferred DCs38 using the same experimental method. We now confirmed using a bioassay for TGF-β39 based on inhibition of IL-4 induced HT-2 cell proliferation (Supplementary Fig. S4), that while TGF-β bioactivity was detectable in the lysate of isotype-transfected CpG-pre-pDCs, insertion within CpG-pre-pDCs of the vector coupled with a TGF-β neutralizing antibody reduced by approximately 40% the TGF-β bioactivity in the precursor lysate, thereby suggesting at least partial neutralization of TGF-β by the Chariot-antibody complex within pDC precursors. In addition, the vector-antibody complex insertion procedure did not affect the viability of CpG-pre-pDCs, nor altered their phenotype or their cytokine production profile (Supplementary Fig. S5), except for two-fold reduced TGF-β detectable levels, suggesting that half of the TGF-β content was complexed by the Chariot-coupled antibody. Notably, while CpG-pre-pDCs in which an isotype antibody had been inserted were still able to provide some protection against EAE, CpG-pre-pDCs containing a TGF-β-neutralizing antibody lost their protective capacity and even worsened the disease score (Fig. 6a). Analysis at day-25 showed that such aggravation of disease correlated with a higher frequency of CD4+ T-cells from the spinal cord producing GM-CSF and TNF-α, relative to recipients of CpG-pre-pDCs bearing the isotype antibody (Fig. 6b). In addition, enhanced percentages, but not numbers, of B10 cells in the spinal cord of recipients of CpG-pre-DCs in which an isotype Ab was inserted was lost when an anti-TGF-β antibody was inserted instead (Fig. 6c,d). However, the tendency to enhanced percentages or numbers of Foxp3 Tregs (Fig. 6e,f) did not reach statistical significance among groups.
CpG-pre-pDCs protect against all phases of EAE
Finally, we further explored the therapeutic window of CpG-pre-pDCs in the course of EAE. When 80,000 CpG-pre-pDCs were adoptively transferred at the time of immunization, at day-0, recipients remained protected until the end of the experiment, i.e. day-35 (Fig. 7a). More importantly, when 80,000 CpG-pre-pDCs were transferred at the peak of the disease, i.e. day-17, the clinical scores were stabilized within the 3 following days and thereafter decreased by approximately 60% from day-22 until day-32 (Fig. 7b). Therefore, the CpG-activated pDC precursors demonstrate a unique therapeutic potential against EAE at any stage of disease.
A graphical summary of cellular and molecular mechanisms accounting for the protective effect of CpG-pre-pDCs against EAE is displayed in Fig. 8.
Discussion
CpG-activated pDC precursors represent a powerful regulatory cell population that provides protection against EAE disease at remarkably low cell counts, compared to most mature cell types so far tested. Contrary to Tregs that tend to lose their suppressive properties in an inflammatory environment11, CpG-pre-pDCs are equally protective at all disease stages, i.e. initiation, onset of clinical signs and at peak of disease, therefore displaying a promising therapeutic potential, highly desirable for a robust cell therapy.
The susceptibility of CpG-pre-pDCs to adopt regulatory functions selectively upon either in vivo or in vitro stimulation with the TLR-9 agonist CpG-B differs from the report that CpG-B was instead unable to confer protective properties against EAE onto mature pDCs18 where loading with antigen was strictly required to acquire therapeutic properties. Six days after injection, CpG-pre-pDCs have essentially migrated to the inflamed spinal cord, a feature they share with reported myelin antigen-loaded pDCs18 and do so approximately twice more than PBS-pre-pDCs. However, it is noteworthy that CpG-pre-pDCs, even after migration to the inflamed spinal cord, kept both an immature phenotype with c-kit expression as well as an immature functional profile retaining low expression levels of IRF7, a master positive regulator of IFN-α response to TLR-9 stimulation40,41. Therefore, the immature state of pDC progenitors is a key characteristic of their tolerogenic properties that clearly differ from those of mature pDCs.
Nevertheless, the functionally immature state of pDCs is not sufficient to confer a pro-tolerance profile as injections of PBS-pre-pDCs (our data) as well as of immature pDCs42 in vivo were unable to induce antigen-specific tolerance. Notably, CpG enhanced the pDC precursor migration to the spinal cord, in correlation with enhanced CD29 expression, enabling CpG-pre-pDCs to exert their tolerogenic role in the CNS where neuroinflammation takes place25. Additionally, CpG activation induced their TGF-β expression that appeared crucial for their regulatory properties. Altogether, our data demonstrate that both the precursor stage of CpG-pre-pDCs and activation by CpG are crucial for developing a tolerogenic cell population within the inflamed spinal cord.
Once injected, CpG-pre-pDCs produce both TGF- β and IL-27. We demonstrated that each one of these regulatory cytokines plays a functional role, with TGF-β being expressed and required from the day of their adoptive transfer whereas IL-27, a member of the IL-12 family43, is induced after migration and appears to play a non-redundant key role in the late events taking place 10 days after the transfer. Higher expression of both IL-27 and its receptor have been found at the effector phases of EAE, disease peak, and relapse44. This sequential action of TGF-β and IL-27 is in line with the capacity of TGF-β to induce IL-27 in pDCs45.
The tolerogenic role of TGF-β produced by pDCs has been reported in various immune settings, including tumor defense as well as autoimmune diseases. TGF-β production, induced by GM-CSF and TNF-α in tumors, is a recognized feature of intra-tumoral pDCs that promote tumor escape37. In T1D, viral infection triggered the production of TGF-β by pancreatic pDCs via activation of NKT cells46 involving both IL-10 and PDL-1, resulting in lower T1D incidence. Moreover, TGF-β controls IRF7 in TLR-9 activation of pDCs47 and we observed reduced IRF7 expression in CpG-pre-pDCs at their emergence and after their migration into the spinal cord. Furthermore, contrasting with the endogenous pDC recruitment observed by Duraes et al.18 that was essential in the protective effect of myelin-Ag exposed pDCs, TGF-β expressing CpG-pre-pDCs did not recruit endogenous pDCs into the spinal cord but instead prompted local host pDCs to transiently produce TGF-β.
Although both TGF-β and IL-27 have the capacity to act directly on effector T-cells, there was no major modulation of cytokine production by T cells in the spinal cord of protected CpG-pre-pDC recipients, except for a transiently enhanced GM-CSF production, apparent at d-18 but no more at d-25. While GM-CSF is implicated in neuropathogenesis in EAE48,49, it was also reported to exert immunoregulatory effects by triggering accumulation of tolerogenic CD11c+CD11b+ DCs36 and of regulatory B10 cells33,34. In addition, it was previously reported that pDCs induced IL-10 producing Bregs (B10)50. Interestingly, both host B10 and DCs likewise accumulated in the spinal cord of CpG-pre-pDC recipients, but not in PBS-pre-pDC recipients, compared to controls with EAE injected with PBS medium but no pDC precursors. Therefore, various host cells may contribute to the long-lasting protection provided by CpG-pre-pDCs.
In addition to TGF-β and IL-27 that play a major role in the protection against EAE afforded by CpG-pre-pDCs, the progenitors also express GM-CSF that despite very low levels when measured by ELISA in their supernatants, was clearly detectable by intracellular flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. S5). Upon migration into the inflamed spinal cord, CpG-pre-pDCs express significantly more GM-CSF as well as IL-27 than PBS-pre-pDCs (Fig. 3f,g). GM-CSF expression by pDCs has been reported51 to be induced by CpG but its role remains to be elucidated. Finally, CpG also induced PDL-1 expression on CpG-pre-pDCs (Supplementary Fig. S6). The role of this surface molecule warrants further investigation.
The cellular and molecular mechanisms of protection exerted by CpG-pre-pDCs against EAE are summarized in Fig. 8, highlighting the sequential role of TGF-β and IL-27 as well as the accumulation of host regulatory cells such as B10, cDCs and TGF-β producing host pDCs.
Altogether, data herein suggest that early CpG activation of pDC precursors within the BM generates unique powerful regulatory cells that are effective at very low cell counts at all phases of EAE and migrate selectively to the site of the autoimmune response. Compared with previous demonstrations regarding mainly progenitors in the monocyte and B-cell lineages5,9,10, as well as progenitors still at the multipotent stage of differentiation6–8, we demonstrate that innate stimuli prime BM pDC hematopoietic progenitors into a tolerogenic function which remains imprinted in inflammatory settings. Whether equivalent therapeutic human pDC precursors exist and display protective properties against MS, either on their own or in the context of autologous HSCT, already implemented in patients with severe MS52–56, might be worth investigating.
Methods
Mice
WT CD45.2 C57Bl/6J mice were obtained from Janvier Laboratories (Le Genest Saint Isle, France) and housed in our animal facility for at least 2 weeks before EAE induction. Congenic CD45.1 and GFP-actin KI C57Bl/6J mice, all backcrossed for at least ten generations, were bred in our accredited animal facility at Institut Necker Enfants Malades under pathogen-free conditions. IL-27p28−/− C57Bl/6J mice were raised at the Medical College of Wisconsin department of Medicine. Female 10-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used as a model for MOG35–55-induced EAE and received intravenous progenitor cell transfers at various times after immunization. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.
EAE induction
Active EAE was induced in 10-week-old female mice by s.c. immunization at two sites, upper and lower back, with 200 µg MOG35–55 peptide emulsified in CFA containing 400 µg heat-killed Mycobacteria tuberculosis H37Ra (Hooke Laboratories, Lawrence, MA) on day 0. In addition, mice received 300 ng pertussis toxin (Hooke Laboratories) i.p. in 0.1 ml per mouse on days 0 and 1. Clinical signs of EAE were assessed daily on a 0–5 scale defined as follows: 0, no obvious changes in motor function compared to non-immunized mice; 0.5, tip of tail is limp; 1, limp tail; 1.5, limp tail and unstable gait; 2, limp tail and hind leg inhibition; 2.5, limp tail and dragging of hind legs; 3, limp tail and complete paralysis of hind legs or paralysis of one front and one hind leg; 3.5, limp tail and complete paralysis of hind legs that are together on one side of body; 4, limp tail, complete hind leg and partial front leg paralysis; mouse is still minimally moving and appears feeding; 4.5, complete hind leg and partial front leg paralysis; no movement around the cage, mouse is not alert; 5, severe paralysis or death. Mice with score ≥ 4 for 2 consecutive days and mice with score 5 were euthanized and a score of 5 retained for the rest of the experiment.
Sorting of TLR-activated bone marrow progenitors
Bone marrow (BM) cells removed from tibiae, femurs and hips of 8- to 14-week-old C57BL/6J mice were incubated in low endotoxin RPMI-1640 medium (Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FCS and 1% antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) for 18 h with 1 μg/ml of the oligodeoxynucleotide CpG 1668 (CpG-B) (Eurogentec, Angers, France) or with the respective agonists of TLR1-9, supplied in a commercial kit (InvivoGen, Toulouse, France), including: Pam3CSK4 (0.5 μg/ml), FSLI (1 μg/ml), HKLM (2 × 106 cells/ml), Poly I:C (HMW) (5 μg/ml), Poly I:C (LMW) (5 μg/ml), LPS-EK standard (1 μg/ml), FLA-ST standard (1 μg/ml), ssRNA40/LyoVec (2 μg/ml) as well as CpG 1826 (CpG-B) (1 μg/ml). c-kit+ BM cells were sorted by immuno-magnetic separation using a RoboSep automaton (StemCell Technologies, Grenoble, France). Sorted cells were further stained with appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs against Sca-1, B220 (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France), PDCA-1 (eBioscience, Paris, France or BioLegend, London, UK) and electronically sorted as a c-kit+Sca-1+B220+PDCA-1+ cell subset using a FACS-Aria IIIu (BD Biosciences).
Isolation of immune cells from the spinal cord
Spinal cords isolated from control and CpG- or PBS-pre-pDC-recipient mice were passed through a 70 μm cell strainer, using the back side of a syringe plunger to smash the tissue. Cells were then resuspended in 3–5 ml of 30% Percoll underlayed with the same volume of 70% Percoll (in PBS) and centrifuged for 20 min at 1300g without brakes to form a smooth interface. Cells were collected with a Pasteur pipette and diluted ten times with complete RPMI 10% FCS medium. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in 2–3 ml of complete medium and further stained with appropriately labeled mAbs.
Staining of cells for flow cytometry analysis
To block nonspecific Fc receptor binding, cells were pre-incubated for 10 min at room temperature with FcR blocker 2.4G2 mAb. Cells were then stained with appropriately labeled mAbs against CD4, B220, MHC II, PDCA-1, CD115, Siglec-H, Ly6D, PDL-1, PDL-2 (eBioscience, ThermoFisher Scientific, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France), c-Kit (CD117) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD127, CD11c, Sca-1 (anti-Ly6A/E), CD40, CD80, CD86, CD45.1, CD45.2 (BD Bioscience/Pharmingen, Le Pont-de-Claix, France), CD2, CD81 (Sony, Weybridge, Surrey, UK) or GFP (ThermoFisher Scientific). Nuclear Foxp3, Id2, IRF7, IRF8 expression was measured by FACS analysis as per the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience, ThermoFisher Scientific). Positive cells were defined using a “fluorescence minus one” (FMO) sample or an isotype control as indicated in figure legends. Nuclear factor expression of E2-2 and PU-1 was measured by Quantigene FlowRNA (Affymetrix, ThermoFisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cytokine assays
Intra-cytoplasmic expression of cytokines by cells, either just after cell-sorting or recovered from the spinal cord was assessed after a 4-h stimulation with PMA (10 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (500 ng/ml) in the presence of Brefeldin A (2 mg/ml), followed by fixation/permeabilization with PFA/saponin and subsequent staining with specific antibodies including PE-labeled anti-TGF-β, PE-labeled anti-IL-27p28, PE-labeled anti-GM-CSF, APC-labeled anti-IL-10, APC-labeled anti–IFN-γ (eBioscience), APC-labeled anti-IL-17 (BD bioscience), FITC-labeled anti-IL-6 and FITC-labeled anti-TNF-α (Biolegend). Positive cells were defined using isotype Ab stained controls (from BD Biosciences and eBioscience) or FMO sample, as indicated in figure legends. Membrane and intracellular antigen expression was analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR).
Cytokine production by PBS- and CpG-pre-pDCs was measured in supernatant after 4 h-activation of the cell-sorted precursors with PMA + ionomycin by multiplex ELISA using LegendPlex detection reagents from BioLegend. IFN-α production was measured by LegendPlex ELISA (BioLegend) after 24 h stimulation of PBS- and CpG-pre-pDCs with R848 (0.5 μg/ml), or 1 μg/ml CpG-B (Eurogentec, Angers, France), CpG-P (Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France), LPS (InVivogen) and PBS.
TGF-β neutralization with Chariot vector
0.1 mg Chariot (Active Motif, La Hupe, Belgium) was combined with 50 µg of either LEAF purified anti-TGF-β neutralizing antibody (clone 2D11.16.8) (BioXCell, West Lebanon, NH) or IgG1 isotype control (Biolegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Electronically sorted CpG-pre-pDCs were incubated with the Chariot construct for 20 min and thoroughly rinsed in PBS alone. Transfected cells were then injected intravenously in PBS, 2% FCS.
Study approval
All experiments were conducted according to the EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments under an animal study proposal approved by the Paris Descartes University Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation and the French Ministry of Research and Higher Education, number 3846-2015070622031545v4.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Normality and variance equality were assessed for every data set with D’Agostino-Pearson and F Test respectively. Disease curves and multiple cytokine production were analyzed using two-way ANOVA test, with Bonferroni post-test and Geisser-Greenhouse correction when needed. Cell proportions were analyzed using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test. Cytokine production were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s post-test. MFI comparisons were analyzed with unpaired t-test. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m.. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Part of this work was previously published in Hélène Letscher’s PhD dissertation at Paris Descartes University, entitled "Étude des propriétés régulatrices d’une population de précurseurs de cellules dendritiques plasmacytoïdes conditionnée par le CpG dans le cadre de réponses auto-immune et allogénique ". This work was supported by core funding from CNRS and INSERM. It was also funded by a Grant to FZ from Fondation pour l'Aide à la Recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques (ARSEP) (https://www.arsep.org/) and from The Secular Society (TSS). VAA was supported by a doctoral fellowship from TSS. HL was supported by a PhD fellowship from Région Ile de France, Domaine d’Intérêt Majeur Ile de France Biothérapies, and by a subsequent fellowship from Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC). SK was supported by a Grant from ARSEP and the Greek Scholarship IKY. WRD was supported by Grants NIH R01 HL126166 and R01 HL139008. Funding sources were not involved in the conduct of the research nor in the preparation of the article. Figure 8 and mice in figures were created using Biorender.com.
Author contributions
V.A.A., H.L., S.K. and F.Z. performed experiments, analyzed data, prepared figures and wrote the manuscript. P.G. performed experiments, analyzed data and prepared figures. E.T., C.G. and J.M. performed experiments and analyzed data. A.M. and W.R.D. provided IL-27−/− mice, discussed the results and provided critical review of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data availability
All data are available upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Hélène Letscher and Viviane A. Agbogan.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-84023-0.
References
- 1.Massberg S, et al. Immunosurveillance by hematopoietic progenitor cells trafficking through blood, lymph, and peripheral tissues. Cell. 2007;131:994–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kaufmann E, et al. BCG educates hematopoietic stem cells to generate protective innate immunity against tuberculosis. Cell. 2018;172:176–190.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Naik S, Larsen SB, Cowley CJ, Fuchs E. Two to tango: Dialog between and immunity and stem cells in health disease. Cell. 2018;175:908–920. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mitroulis I, et al. Modulation of myelopoiesis progenitors is an integral component of trained immunity. Cell. 2018;172:147–161.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Askenase MH, et al. Bone-marrow-resident NK cells prime monocytes for regulatory function during infection. Immunity. 2015;42:1130–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kared H, et al. Jagged2-expressing hematopoietic progenitors promote regulatory T cell expansion in the periphery through notch signaling. Immunity. 2006;25:823–834. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kared H, et al. Role of GM-CSF in tolerance induction by mobilized hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2008;112:2575–2578. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-140681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Korniotis, S. et al. Mobilized multipotent hematopoietic progenitors stabilize and expand regulatory T-cells to protect against autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Front. Immunol.11, 607175 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Korniotis S, et al. Treatment of ongoing autoimmune encephalomyelitis with activated B-cell progenitors maturing into regulatory B cells. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12134. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Montandon R, et al. Innate pro-B-cell progenitors protect against type 1 diabetes by regulating autoimmune effector T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E2199–E2208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222446110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bailey-Bucktrout SL, et al. Self-antigen-driven activation induces instability of regulatory T cells during an inflammatory autoimmune response. Immunity. 2013;39:949–962. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pashenkov M, et al. Two subsets of dendritic cells are present in human cerebrospinal fluid. Brain. 2001;124:480–492. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.3.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stasiolek M, et al. Impaired maturation and altered regulatory function of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2006;129:1293–1305. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bailey-Bucktrout SL, et al. Cutting edge: Central nervous system plasmacytoid dendritic cells regulate the severity of relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2008;180:6457–6461. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.10.6457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ioannou M, Alissafi T, Boon L, Boumpas D, Verginis P. In vivo ablation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells inhibits autoimmunity through expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J. Immunol. 2013;190:2631–2640. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isaksson M, et al. Plasmacytoid DC promote priming of autoimmune Th17 cells and EAE. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009;39:2925–2935. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Irla M, et al. MHC class II-restricted antigen presentation by plasmacytoid dendritic cells inhibits T cell-mediated autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:1891–1905. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duraes FV, et al. pDC therapy induces recovery from EAE by recruiting endogenous pDC to sites of CNS inflammation. J. Autoimmun. 2016;67:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manz MG. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: Origin matters. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:652–654. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0143-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rodrigues PF, et al. Distinct progenitor lineages contribute to the heterogeneity of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:711–722. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0136-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dress RJ, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells develop from Ly6D+ lymphoid progenitors distinct from the myeloid lineage. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:852–864. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0420-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prinz M, Priller J. Tickets to the brain: Role of CCR2 and CX3CR1 in myeloid cell entry in the CNS. J. Neuroimmunol. 2010;224:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kohler RE, et al. Antagonism of the chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CXCR4 reduces the pathology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain Pathol. 2008;18:504–516. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00154.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McCandless EE, Wang Q, Woerner BM, Harper JM, Klein RS. CXCL12 limits inflammation by localizing mononuclear infiltrates to the perivascular space during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2006;177:8053–8064. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.8053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Garnier A, et al. CD49d/CD29-integrin controls the accumulation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells into the CNS during neuroinflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2019;49:2030–2043. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cisse B, et al. Transcription factor E2–2 is an essential and specific regulator of plasmacytoid dendritic cell development. Cell. 2008;135:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nagasawa M, Schmidlin H, Hazekamp MG, Schotte R, Blom B. Development of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells depends on the combined action of the basic helix-loop-helix factor E2–2 and the Ets factor Spi-B. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008;38:2389–2400. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ghosh HS, Cisse B, Bunin A, Lewis KL, Reizis B. Continuous expression of the transcription factor e2–2 maintains the cell fate of mature plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Immunity. 2010;33:905–916. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Reizis B. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: Development, regulation, and function. Immunity. 2019;50:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schotte R, et al. The transcription factor Spi-B is expressed in plasmacytoid DC precursors and inhibits T-, B-, and NK-cell development. Blood. 2003;101:1015–1023. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Martín-Martín L, et al. Immunophenotypical, morphologic, and functional characterization of maturation-associated plasmacytoid dendritic cell subsets in normal adult human bone marrow. Transfusion. 2009;49:1692–1708. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Niederquell M, et al. Sca-1 expression defines developmental stages of mouse pDCs that show functional heterogeneity in the endosomal but not lysosomal TLR9 response. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013;43:2993–3005. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sheng JR, Quan S, Soliven B. CD1d(hi)CD5+ B cells expanded by GM-CSF in vivo suppress experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J. Immunol. 2014;193:2669–2677. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sheng JR, Quan S, Soliven B. IL-10 derived from CD1dhiCD5+ B cells regulates experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2015;289:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bhattacharya P, et al. Dual role of GM-CSF as a pro-Inflammatory and a regulatory cytokine: Implications for immune therapy. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2015;35:585–599. doi: 10.1089/jir.2014.0149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ganesh BB, Cheatem DM, Sheng JR, Vasu C, Prabhakar BS. GM-CSF-induced CD11c+CD8a− dendritic cells facilitate Foxp3+ and IL-10+ regulatory T cell expansion resulting in suppression of autoimmune thyroiditis. Int. Immunol. 2009;21:269–282. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Saas P, Perruche S. Functions of TGF-β-exposed plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2012;32:529–553. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2013005868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Layseca-Espinosa E, et al. CCL22-producing CD8α− myeloid dendritic cells mediate regulatory T cell recruitment in response to G-CSF treatment. J. Immunol. 2013;191:2266–2272. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tsang, M. L. S., Weatherbee, J. A., Dietz, M., Kitamura, T. & Lucas, R. C. TGF-beta specifically inhibits the IL-4 dependant proliferation of multifactor-dependent murine T-helper and human hematopoietic cell lines. Lymphokine. Res.9, 607–609 (1990).
- 40.Pitha PM, et al. Role of the interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) in virus-mediated signaling and regulation of cell growth. Biochimie. 1998;80:651–658. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9084(99)80018-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marié I, Durbin JE, Levy DE. Differential viral induction of distinct interferon-alpha genes by positive feedback through interferon regulatory factor-7. EMBO J. 1998;17:6660–6669. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Salio M, Palmowski MJ, Atzberger A, Hermans IF, Cerundolo V. CpG-matured murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells are capable of in vivo priming of functional CD8 T cell responses to endogenous but not exogenous antigens. J. Exp. Med. 2004;199:567–579. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hunter CA. New IL-12-family members: IL-23 and IL-27, cytokines with divergent functions. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5:521–531. doi: 10.1038/nri1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fitzgerald DC, et al. Suppressive effect of IL-27 on encephalitogenic Th17 cells and the effector phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2007;179:3268–3275. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pallotta MT, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a signaling protein in long-term tolerance by dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:870–878. doi: 10.1038/ni.2077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Diana J, et al. Viral infection prevents diabetes by inducing regulatory T cells through NKT cell-plasmacytoid dendritic cell interplay. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:729–745. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sisirak V, et al. Breast cancer-derived transforming growth factor-β and tumor necrosis factor-α compromise interferon-α production by tumor-associated plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2013;133:771–778. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.El-Behi M, et al. The encephalitogenicity of T(H)17 cells is dependent on IL-1- and IL-23-induced production of the cytokine GM-CSF. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:568–575. doi: 10.1038/ni.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Codarri L, et al. RORγt drives production of the cytokine GM-CSF in helper T cells, which is essential for the effector phase of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:560–567. doi: 10.1038/ni.2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Menon M, Blair PA, Isenberg DA, Mauri C. A regulatory feedback between plasmacytoid dendritic cells and regulatory B cells is aberrant in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. 2016;44:683–697. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bauer M, et al. Bacterial CpG-DNA triggers activation and maturation of human CD11c−, CD123+ dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2001;166:5000–5007. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.8.5000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mancardi G, Sormani MP, Muraro PA, Boffa G, Saccardi R. Intense immunosuppression followed by autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a therapeutic strategy in aggressive forms of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2017;24:1352458517742532. doi: 10.1177/1352458517742532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Muraro PA, et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017;13:391–405. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lutterotti A. Challenges and needs in experimental therapies for multiple sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2018;31:263–267. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Massey JC, Sutton IJ, Ma DDF, Moore JJ. Regenerating immunotolerance in multiple sclerosis with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:410. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mariottini A, De Matteis E, Muraro PA. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: Current status. BioDrugs. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00414-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available upon reasonable request.