Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Mar 1;15(3):e0009219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009219

Burden of soil-transmitted helminth infection in pregnant refugees and migrants on the Thailand-Myanmar border: Results from a retrospective cohort

Tobias Brummaier 1,2,3,4,*, Nay Win Tun 1, Aung Myat Min 1,2, Mary Ellen Gilder 1,5, Laypaw Archasuksan 1, Stephane Proux 1, Douwe Kiestra 1, Prakaykaew Charunwatthana 6,7, Jürg Utzinger 3,4, Daniel H Paris 3,4, Mathieu Nacher 8,9, Julie A Simpson 10, Francois Nosten 1,2, Rose McGready 1,2
Editor: Keke C Fairfax11
PMCID: PMC7951971  PMID: 33647061

Abstract

Background

Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are widespread in tropical and subtropical regions. While many STH infections are asymptomatic, vulnerable populations such as pregnant women face repercussions such as aggravation of maternal anaemia. However, data on prevalence and the effect of STH infections in pregnancy are limited. The aim of this analysis was to describe the burden of STH infections within and between populations of pregnant women from a local refugee camp to a mobile migrant population, and to explore possible associations between STH infection and pregnancy outcomes.

Methodology

This is a retrospective review of records from pregnant refugee and migrant women who attended Shoklo Malaria Research Unit antenatal care (ANC) clinics along the Thailand-Myanmar border between July 2013 and December 2017. Inclusion was based on provision of a stool sample during routine antenatal screening. A semi-quantitative formalin concentration method was employed for examination of faecal samples. The associations between STH mono-infections and maternal anaemia and pregnancy outcomes (i.e., miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth, and small for gestational age) were estimated using regression analysis.

Principal findings

Overall, 12,742 pregnant women were included, of whom 2,702 (21.2%) had a confirmed infection with either Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, or a combination of these. The occurrence of STH infections in the refugee population (30.8%; 1,246/4,041) was higher than in the migrant population (16.7%; 1,456/8,701). A. lumbricoides was the predominant STH species in refugees and hookworm in migrants. A. lumbricoides and hookworm infection were associated with maternal anaemia at the first ANC consultation with adjusted odds ratios of 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.72) and 1.65 (95% CI 1.19–2.24), respectively. Pregnant women with A. lumbricoides infection were less likely to miscarry when compared to women with negative stool samples (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.84). STH infections were not significantly associated with stillbirth, preterm birth or being born too small for gestational age. One in five pregnant women in this cohort had STH infection. Association of STH infection with maternal anaemia, in particular in the event of late ANC enrolment, underlines the importance of early detection and treatment of STH infection. A potential protective effect of A. lumbricoides infection on miscarriage needs confirmation in prospective studies.

Author summary

Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are parasitic worms transmitted through the faecal-oral or transcutaneous route. STHs are ubiquitous in tropical and subtropical regions where access to clean water, improved sanitation, and hygiene are lacking. STH infections are often asymptomatic; however, heavy infections can cause adverse effects such as abdominal discomfort and anaemia. Anaemia in pregnancy can increase the risk of pregnancy problems such as miscarriage, preterm delivery, and poor fetal growth. This retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from more than 12,000 pregnant refugee and migrant women who attended antenatal care clinics along the Thai-Myanmar border shows that one in five pregnant women were infected with STHs. Moreover, pregnant women with a STH infection were more likely to present with anaemia, suggesting that early presentation to antenatal care as well as anthelmintic treatment with subsequent anaemia prophylaxis may reduce the risk of anaemia. Interestingly, our data also indicate that STH infections may have beneficial effects on pregnancy outcomes, as miscarriage was less likely to occur in pregnancies with maternal STH infections. This finding was significant for infection with the roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides. Verification of these findings in prospective studies is warranted.

Introduction

Estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) suggest that approximately 25% of the world’s population is infected with soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) [1], causing a global burden of 1.92 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) [2]. The common STH species are Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and the two hookworms Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus. Most STH infections occur in tropical and subtropical regions, and disproportionally affect resource-limited settings where the population faces barriers in access to clean water, adequate sanitation, and general hygiene [3,4]. STH infections are often asymptomatic, but can present with asthenia, loss of appetite, and variable abdominal symptoms [3]. Intestinal helminthiasis has repercussions on nutritional uptake leading to reduced food intake, impaired digestion, and malabsorption [5]. The latter predominantly leads to unfavourable consequences, such as poor growth or development in children and depletion of iron stores with subsequent anaemia [5]. Maternal anaemia is a public health issue in many regions, often aggravated by STH infection and associated with unfavourable pregnancy outcomes [3,6,7]. Chronic blood loss and mucosal inflammation caused by intestinal nematode infections increase with intensity of infection and explain the association between hookworm infection and anaemia in pregnancy and, to a smaller extent, T. trichiura infection [8–10].

Based on population and STH endemicity estimates, approximately 688 million women of reproductive age (i.e., 15–49 years) require preventive chemotherapy for STH worldwide and the effect of STH infection on pregnancy needs attention [11]. Recent data suggest that even though only 20.5% of the women requiring treatment globally were treated in 2015, about 622,000 DALYs were averted by providing this intervention [11,12]. The positive effects of anthelmintic treatment during pregnancy are mostly attributed to an increase in maternal haemoglobin and were observed when concomitant iron supplementation was provided [13–15]. Conversely, positive effects of A. lumbricoides have been reported; for instance, A. lumbricoides creates a favourable immunological environment for the fetus reflected by increased fecundity [16]. However, little is known about the effects of STH treatment during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal morbidity [17].

The aim of this study was to assess the burden of STH infection in a pregnant population living on the Thailand-Myanmar border with no routine chemoprevention (deworming) and to describe the prevalence of different STH species in a mobile migrant population and a population confined to the largest refugee camp along the Thailand-Myanmar border. Additionally, we report an exploratory analysis on associations between STH infection, maternal health, and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

Ethics statement

Retrospective analysis of routinely collected antenatal care (ANC) data was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine at Mahidol University (Ethics reference: TMEC 17–027). Note that attendance at ANC is voluntary. All women are assigned to a group and one-on-one counselling in relation to screening tests that are offered routinely at Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU). All women have the choice to opt-out of the screening procedures.

Study setting and population

This analysis of prospectively and routinely collected ANC data included pregnant women from a refugee and mobile migrant population residing on the Thailand-Myanmar border. The region is a rural and tropical environment with a high STH burden as previously reported [18]. SMRU is a field station of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University (Bangkok, Thailand), and is part of the Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit. SMRU combines humanitarian work and clinically relevant research with a focus on maternal and child health. All SMRU consultations are free of charge and registration to the ANC program is voluntary. Pregnant women were either followed in clinics at one of two sites for migrants (Mawker Thai (MKT) and Wang Pha (WPA)), or in Mae La (MLA) refugee camp (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Location of Shoklo Malaria Research Unit antenatal care clinics on the Thailand-Myanmar border.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the average population size of MLA over the study period was 41,700 refugees living in an area of approximately 2 km2 (population density 20,850/km2). In this population-dense environment, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) support water (wells with pumps) and sanitation (predominantly pit toilets) for displaced persons from Myanmar, mostly of Karen ethnicity. School-age children in MLA camp receive mebendazole deworming on a 6-monthly basis from medical NGOs. Outside the camps, migrants tend to be mobile, so housing is often temporary, the quality of water and sanitation is variable (often poor), and deworming is not routinely available.

Data from records of all women enrolled in the SMRU ANC program between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 were analysed. Pregnant women who did not provide a stool sample at ANC, multiple (twin) pregnancies and hydatidiform moles were excluded from the analysis (S1 Table).

As per routine ANC procedures, the gestational age was estimated by obstetric ultrasound at the first visit. All three sites offer 24-hour birthing services with skilled birth attendants and emergency referral for caesarean section. More than 80% of women deliver at SMRU where the neonate is weighed on an electronic SECA 354 scale (precision 5 g) with weekly calibration.

Routine anaemia and malaria detection was conducted through active screening: malaria blood films (every 2 weeks in this unstable transmission setting) and haematocrit (HCT; approximately 5 times per pregnancy at first ANC, 12–16, 22, 28, and 34–36 weeks) [19]. Malaria treatment was provided in accordance with WHO guidelines, anaemia prophylaxis was offered at each visit (ferrous sulphate 200 mg/day, equivalent to 60 mg elemental iron, folate 5 mg per week) or treatment given (ferrous sulphate 400 mg twice daily, vitamin C 100 mg twice daily, folate 5 mg per day), if anaemia was detected. Complete blood counts (CBC) were done routinely for all women at their first ANC contact until the end of 2016. CBCs done 28 days prior or at the same day as the stool sample, were included in the analysis of the association between eosinophils and STH infections.

Routine screening for intestinal parasite infections for all pregnant women was introduced in mid-2013 by providing a fresh faecal sample at the first ANC visit. In case pregnant women were unable to provide a stool sample during the first visit, a small plastic container was given to each woman to collect a sample at home on the morning of the next ANC visit. In the event of a STH-positive sample, anthelmintic treatment was provided: for hookworm and A. lumbricoides, either using albendazole (single oral dose of 400 mg) or mebendazole (100 mg twice daily for 3 days), and for T. trichiura either albendazole (400 mg once daily for 3 days) or mebendazole (100 mg twice daily for 3 days). Treatment of first trimester infections was delayed until 14 weeks of gestation.

Definitions

Status was determined by residence: refugees from MLA camp or migrants from MKT or WPA. Definitions of ethnicity followed a self-identification approach with women nominating their own ethnic affiliation, using the locally preferred term [20].

Anaemia was defined as any HCT level less than 30%. Relative eosinophilia was defined as ≥6% of circulating leucocytes [21]. Body-mass index (BMI) definitions followed recommendations for Asian BMI groups [22]: underweight <18.5 kg/m2; normal weight 18.5 to <23 kg/m2; overweight 23 to <27.5 kg/m2; obese ≥27.5 kg/m2. Ideally, BMI assessment is based on the preconception BMI but as this was not known for most women, a BMI of <18.5 kg/m2, at any stage of pregnancy, was used instead.

Miscarriage was defined as fetal loss before 28+0 weeks of gestation; cases for the assessment of miscarriage were only considered if the first ANC contact was in the first trimester (estimated gestational age (EGA) less than 14 weeks). Stillbirth was defined as birth of a fetus with no signs of life, at a gestation of ≥28+0 weeks. SMRUs definition for stillbirth follows that recommended by WHO for international comparison and the rationale for the miscarriage definition, which has no agreed international standard, is provided elsewhere [23]. Preterm birth (PTB) was defined as pregnancy outcome between 28+0 and 37+0 weeks of gestation; only cases with their first ANC contact before completion of 37 weeks of gestation were considered for this analysis. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as a birthweight (within 72 hours) below the 10th centile, following gestation and sex adjusted birthweight centiles as published by the Intergrowth 21st Consortium [24].

Diagnosis of STH infection

All faecal samples were processed in the on-site laboratory following standard procedures for sample preparation and interpretation. A formalin concentration method was used to examine faecal samples. Briefly, 500 mg of faecal matter was mixed with 10 ml of 10% formol saline and homogenized until all faecal material was suspended. This emulsion was filtered through a moulded strainer (Caplugs Evergreen FPC Fecal Parasite Concentrator; Rancho Dominguez, California, United States of America), whose 0.6 mm x 0.6 mm holes allow parasite eggs to pass, while excess faecal debris are retained. After centrifugation (500 g for 5 min), the supernatant was discarded, and the remaining deposit was re-suspended in a 0.85% saline solution. Finally, wet mounts with 1–2 drops of this solution were prepared, and slides were examined under a microscope by experienced laboratory technicians. In STH-positive samples, a semi-quantitative approach to estimate the intensity of infection was adapted. Intensity of infection was categorized by counting the number of helminth eggs per slide into rare (1 egg/slide), low (2–3 eggs/slide), medium (4–10 eggs/slide), and high (>10 eggs/slide).

Statistical analysis

Demographic characteristics of this cohort were described by median (inter-quartile range (IQR)) and frequency (proportion), where appropriate. Logistic regression modelling was performed to assess the association between anaemia at the first ANC contact and STH infection. The model was adjusted for the following potential confounders that were selected based on content knowledge: (i) STH categories, (ii) migration status, (iii) smoking, (iv) age, (v) gravidity (primi- vs multigravida), (vi), trimester first ANC contact, (vii), underweight, (viii) malaria 1st ANC contact.

To estimate the association between STH infection and pregnancy outcomes, Cox proportional hazards models were fitted for the outcome miscarriage and stillbirth, and logistic regression models for the outcomes PTB and SGA.

The models were adjusted for the following confounders:

  1. Association of STH infections and miscarriage: (i) STH categories, (ii) migration status, (iii) smoking, (iv) age, (v) gravidity, (vi) history of miscarriage, (vii) ethnicity, (viii) literacy status, (ix) anaemia at first HCT and (x) non-malarial fever 1st trimester.

  2. Association between STHs and stillbirth: (i) STH categories, (ii) migration status, (iii) smoking, (iv) age, (v) gravidity, (vi) history of stillbirth, (vii) literacy status, (viii) anaemia in pregnancy.

  3. Association between STH infections and preterm birth: (i) STH categories, (ii) migration status, (iii) smoking, (iv) ethnicity, (v) age, (vi) gravidity (primigravida vs multigravida), (vii) previous PTB, (viii) underweight, (ix) GH/Chronic HTN and (x) preeclampsia/eclampsia.

  4. Association of STH infections and being born too small for gestational age: (i) STH categories, (ii) migration status, (iii) smoking, (iv) age, (v) gravidity (primigravida vs multigravida), (vi) literacy status, (vii) underweight, (viii) short stature, (ix) GH/Chronic HTN and (x) preeclampsia/eclampsia.

Further details are provided in the Supporting Information (S1 Text).

Population-adjusted fraction (PAF) of anaemia at the first ANC contact attributable to STH infections were calculated from multivariable logistic regression models using the Stata punaf package. All other statistical analyses was performed using R software, version 3.6.1 [25].

Results

Between July 2013 and December 2017, 83.9% (12,742/15,191) of all women registered to ANC at SMRU were included in this analysis (Fig 2). Differences in the excluded compared to the included population, e.g., a higher proportion of migrants 19.1% (2,048/10,749) than refugees 6.0% (256/4,297), multigravidae, late presenters, smokers, anaemic, and illiterate women, were expected (S1 Table).

Fig 2. Participant selection flow diagram.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; SMRU, Shoklo Malaria Research Unit; STH, soil-transmitted helminths.

Four in 10 women had their first ANC contact in the first trimester (39.6%, 5,052/12,742), with 46.3% (5,898/12,742) and 14.1% (1,792/12,742) in the second and third trimester, respectively. Following routine screening procedures, 93.7% (11,939/12,742) of ANC attendees provided one stool sample mostly at first contact, while multiple stool tests were done in 6.3% (803/12,742). As these procedures became routine in the second half of 2013, and as ANC operations ceased in Mae La refugee camp at the end of 2016, the total number of tests was lower in 2013 and 2017, compared to the other years (S2 Table).

Pregnant women in the refugee camp were enrolled earlier in the ANC programme than women from the migrant population; median (IQR) EGA at first ANC contact 14+2 (9+0–22+4) vs. 18+0 (11+5–24+6) weeks+days. Consequently, STH infections were detected earlier in gestation in refugees compared to migrants (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the migrant and refugee population.

Data shown for cases with an absent STH infection in pregnancy or a monoinfection with hookworm, A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura.

Migrants (n = 8,517) Refugees (n = 3,909)
Table 1 STH neg (n = 7,245) HW MI (n = 592) AL MI (n = 470) TT MI (n = 210) STH neg (n = 2,795) HW MI (n = 69) AL MI (n = 943) TT MI (n = 102)
EGA stool test (weeks+days), median (IQR) 19+3 (12+4–26+6) 21+1 (14+4–28+6) 21+4 (15+2–28+5) 22+3 (15+3–28+3) 14+4 (9+0–23+0) 17+5 (11+6–24+5) 14+4 (9+1–22+4) 16+6 (9+5–25+1)
Demographics
Age (years), median (IQR) 25 (21–31) 25 (20–31) 25 (20–30) 23 (19–28) 25 (21–31) 24 (21–30) 25 (20–31) 23 (19–30)
Age group, n(%)
- <20 1,213 (16.7) 121 (20.4) 84 (17.9) 54 (25.7) 459 (16.4) 10 (14.5) 193 (20.5) 27 (26.5)
- 20–29 3,790 (52.3) 292 (49.3) 254 (54.0) 116 (55.2) 1,448 (51.8) 40 (58.0) 447 (47.4) 47 (46.1)
- 30–39 1,919 (26.5) 152 (25.7) 110 (23.4) 33 (15.7) 782 (28.0) 13 (18.8) 262 (27.8) 24 (23.5)
- ≥ 40 323 (4.5) 27 (4.6) 22 (4.7) 7 (3.3) 106 (3.8) 6 (8.7) 41 (4.3) 4 (3.9)
- Underweight§, n (%) 766 (10.6) 77 (13.0) 42 (8.9) 28 (13.3) 232 (8.3) 7 (10.1) 80 (8.5) 12 (11.8)
Short stature¤, n (%) 642 (8.9) 66 (11.1) 67 (14.3) 21 (10.0) 300 (10.7) 9 (13.0) 130 (13.8) 11 (10.8)
Karen ethnicity, n (%) 3,842 (53.0) 258 (43.6) 205 (43.6) 77 (36.7) 2,333 (83.5) 65 (94.2) 791 (83.9) 92 (90.2)
Parity, median (IQR) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 0 (0–2) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–2)
No. of previous pregnancies, n (%)
- Primigravida, n (%) 2,515 (34.7) 198 (33.4) 134 (28.5) 104 (49.5) 913 (32.7) 21 (30.4) 241 (25.6) 48 (47.1)
- Multigravida n (%) 4,730 (65.3) 394 (66.6) 336 (71.5) 106 (50.5) 1,882 (67.3) 48 (69.6) 702 (74.4) 54 (52.9)
First ANC in T1, n (%) 2,601 (35.9) 210 (35.5) 127 (27.0) 66 (31.4) 1,370 (49.0) 28 (40.6) 482 (51.1) 48 (47.1)
Literate, n (%) 4,515 (62.3) 308 (52.0) 251 (53.4) 129 (61.4) 1,956 (70.0) 24 (34.8) 528 (56.0) 56 (54.9)
Smoker, n (%) 729 (10.1) 79 (13.3) 51 (10.9) 17 (8.1) 326 (11.7) 16 (23.2) 156 (16.5) 22 (21.6)
Anaemia 1st ANC, n (%) 329 (4.5)i 38 (6.4) 22 (4.7) 11 (5.2) 151 (5.4)ii 11 (15.9)iii 83 (8.8) 5 (4.9)
Malaria in pregnancy 158 (2.2) 25 (4.2) 17 (3.6) 3 (1.4) 18 (0.6) 1 (1.4) 15 (1.6) 0 (0.0)
Eosinophilia (≥6%), n (%) 815 (15.1)1 137 (31.5)2 65 (18.6)3 25 (16.4)4 234 (8.6)5 10 (15.4)6 129 (14.4)7 11 (11.1)8
Open in a new tab

Data displayed as proportions n (%) or median (IQR). Multiple infections (i.e., 184 in the migrant population and 132 in the refugee population) are not shown in Table 1.

§ defined as BMI <18.5 kg/m2 according to Asian BMI groups.

¤ defined as height < 145 cm.

(i) 3 missing cases

(ii) 2 missing cases

(iii) 1 missing case.

Eosinophilia: results included if CBC taken within 28 days before the stool exam.

Eosinophilia missing cases n (%):

(1) 1,830 (25.3%) (2) 157 (26.5%) (3) 121 (25.7%) (4) 58 (27.6%) (5) 77 (2.8%) (6) 4 (5.8%) (7) 46 (4.9%) (8) 3 (2.9%).

Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; AL, Ascaris lumbricoides; BMI, body mass index; CBC, complete blood count; EGA, estimated gestational age; HW, hookworm; IQR, interquartile range; MI, monoinfection; neg, negative; STH, soil-transmitted helminths; TT, Trichuris trichiura; T1, first trimester (0–13 completed weeks); wt, weight (under-wt BMI<18.5 kg/m2).

Prevalence of STH infection and associated consequences

Overall, a positive stool test for STHs was identified in 21.2% (2,702/12,742; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.5–21.9%) of pregnant women. The annualised and pooled numbers in years for which complete set of data was available for the migrant and refugee population, showed a minor reduction STH prevalence (2014, 25.7%; 2015, 21.8% and 2016: 17.8% respectively). A similar trend was observed when the prevalence was disaggregated by the migrant and refugee population (S2 Table).

STH mono-infection was the most common finding: 88.3% (2,386/2,702), while concurrent infection with two STH species was detected in 10.8% (293/2,702) and a combination of all three STH species in 0.9% (23/2,702) of women (S2 Table).

There was two-fold higher odds of STH infection in refugees with a prevalence of 30.8% (1,246/4,041) compared to migrants, with a prevalence of 16.7% (1,456/8,701). The heterogeneity of STH infection was apparent when comparing prevalence of mono-infections between these two populations, as A. lumbricoides was much more prevalent in the refugee camp compared to migrant clinics (23.3% (943/4,041) vs. 5.4% (470/8,701)). T. trichiura prevalence was similar between the migrant (2.4%, 210/8,701) and refugee population (2.5%, 102/4,041). On the contrary, a lower proportion of refugee women were infected with hookworm, 1.7% (69/4,041) compared to the migrant population, 6.8% (592/8,701). Multiple STH infections were slightly more common in the migrant population as two species were detected in 11.5% (167/1,456) of positive cases vs. 10.1% (126/1,246) in refugees, and three species in 1.2% (17/1,456) vs. 0.5% (6/1,246), respectively. STH infection was associated with eosinophilia and the association was strongest for hookworm (p<0.001), followed by A. lumbricoides (p<0.001), but not significant for T. trichiura (p = 0.493) (Table 1).

After removal of cases with missing HCT and multiple STH infections, 4.8% (480/10,035) of women with a negative stool sample were diagnosed with anaemia at the first ANC contact: migrants 4.5% (329/7,242) vs. refugees 5.4% (151/2,793). Anaemia at the first ANC contact was more common in women with STH infection compared to their uninfected counterparts: 7.1% (170/2,385) vs. 4.8% (480/10,035) (p<0.001).

A. lumbricoides (7.4%; 105/1,413) and hookworm (7.4%; 49/660) had an identical prevalence of anaemia at first ANC contact, while it was lower for T. trichiura at 5.1% (16/312) (Table 1). In an adjusted logistic regression model, the association between STH infection and anaemia at the first ANC contact remained significant for A. lumbricoides (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.08–1.72) and hookworm (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.19–2.24), while no association for T. trichiura was evident (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.60–1.71). Overall, the intensity of infection was associated with anaemia at the first ANC contact as pregnant women with higher egg counts were more likely to present with anaemia. The strongest association was recorded for hookworm (S3 Table and S1 Fig).

As expected, age, malaria at first ANC and, in particular, late presentation to ANC were associated with an increased odds for anaemia at first ANC contact. Late presentation to ANC was also associated with an increased proportion of anaemia at the first ANC contact in STH-positive, compared to negative cases: first trimester 2.0% (19/960) STH positive vs. 1.6% (65/3,967) STH-negative; second trimester: 9.0% (101/1,129) vs. 6.5% (299/4,623); and in the third trimester 16.9% (50/296) vs. 8.0% (116/1,445). STH infection accounted for a PAF of 6.9% (95% CI 2.7–10.8%) of all anaemia at the first ANC contact, while late presentation to ANC was the strongest contributor to anaemia (S3A and S3B Table).

Malaria during pregnancy was diagnosed in 250 of 12,742 women. Of these, 91.2% (228/250) were Plasmodium vivax infections, 7.6% (19/250) P. falciparum, and 1.2% (3/250) were mixed infections. Overall, malaria was more often diagnosed in pregnant women with STH infection (2.7%, 74/2,702 vs. 1.8%, 176/10,040; p = 0.001). In an unadjusted analysis, a significant association between STH mono-infection and malaria in pregnancy was seen for hookworm (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.51–3.49), but not for A. lumbricoides (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.89–1.90) and T. trichiura (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17–1.71) when compared to STH-negative cases.

Pregnancy outcome

The analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with a documented STH infection included: 13.8% (556 of 4,023 eligible cases) miscarriages, 1.0% (88/9,250) stillbirths, 6.1% (551/8,974) PTBs, and 18.9% (1,528/8,079) being SGA (Fig 3 and S4 Table). When adjusting for confounders, A. lumbricoides mono-infections were associated with a lower rate of miscarriage (0.63 [adjusted HR], 95% CI: 0.48–0.84, p = 0.002), with a similar, non-significant association observed for hookworm (0.74, 95% CI 0.49–1.12, p = 0.158). Non-significant associations included a higher odds of PTB with hookworm mono-infection (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 0.97–1.95, p = 0.070), and a reduced odds of SGA with A. lumbricoides mono-infection (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69–1.02, p = 0.072). The direction of association for miscarriage and stillbirth was the same for all three STH species, while hookworm had a divergent association for PTB and SGA when compared to A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura. The intensity of infection did not have a significant impact on any of the reported pregnancy outcomes in both, unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Fig 3. Forrest plots depicting the association between a soil-transmitted helminth infection and pregnancy outcomes.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

Data presented as n (%) for the investigated outcomes miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth and being born too small for gestational age alongside the adjusted hazards ratio and odds ratio respectively. Detailed statistical methods are provided in the Supporting Information (S1 Text). Abbreviations: AGA, appropriate for gestational age; aHR, adjusted hazards ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SGA, small for gestational age; STHs, soil-transmitted helminths.

Discussion

Over the past decade progress in controlling STH infections has been made; however, further effort is required to reduce the STH prevalence and attributable morbidity in primarily affected populations from low- and middle income countries in order to meet the 2030 WHO targets [26]. Currently the WHO recommends preventive chemotherapy (deworming) as a public health intervention for pregnant women, after the first trimester who live in areas where the baseline prevalence of hookworm and/or T. trichiura infection is 20% or higher, and the anaemia prevalence is 40% or higher among pregnant women [27]. While these criteria were not met, one in five pregnant women in this rural-tropical population at the Thailand-Myanmar border were infected with STHs. Although, the prevalence of STH infections has declined considerably over the past 20 years in this border population [28], our findings confirm that STH remain high in these vulnerable populations, in particular when considering the suboptimal stool testing method. A cross-sectional survey carried out in pregnant women from Mae La refugee camp in 1996 revealed a prevalence of STH as high as 81% (95% CI: 76–84%). In a more recent cross-sectional survey, conducted in 2007, including Mae La refugee camp and mobile migrant pregnant women, the observed STH prevalence was 62% (95% CI: 58–66%) [18], while we found a prevalence of any STH of 21.2% (95% CI: 20.5–21.9%) in samples collected between mid-2013 and the end of 2017. Importantly, the same diagnostic technique (i.e., formalin concentration method) was used in all surveys, and hence, the results are readily comparable. It should be noted, however that other techniques are available for STH diagnosis that provide higher sensitivity than formalin concentration, such as Kato-Katz thick smear or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques [29].

Pregnant women from the refugee camp were two times more likely to be infected with STHs and the different distribution of STH species is suggestive of a differential risk of infection in these two populations. The A. lumbricoides prevalence was over four times higher in refugees, while hookworm was four times higher in migrants. The explanations for the observed heterogeneity are unclear, but sanitation and hygiene in the densely packed refugee camp may have contributed. A. lumbricoides eggs are particularly robust and can remain viable in the soil for over 5 years and A. lumbricoides is associated with high egg output [30]. Mae La refugee camp is constructed on a clay soil type that inhibits migration of the hookworm larvae, which are more suited to sandy soils [30]. Additionally, mass drug administration has been linked to a reduction of benzimidazole efficacy against A. lumbricoides [31] and deworming programs in the refugee population have been routine for more than 20 years. To our knowledge, no formal investigation on selective pressures and the efficacy of benzimidazole for treatment of STH infection in the area has been done.

STH infections, in particular hookworm, are associated with immediate consequences such as anaemia due to depletion of iron stores [5,9]. The prevalence of anaemia at first ANC contact was 1.5-fold higher in pregnant women diagnosed with STH infection and the PAF suggests that STH infection account for nearly 7% of all anaemia detected at the first ANC contact. As anaemia at first ANC contact in STH-positive compared to negative cases increased from 1.2-fold to 2.1-fold from first to third trimester, early ANC attendance with detection and treatment of STH infection is an important strategy to prevent anaemia in pregnancy, and corroborates findings in published literature [13,14]. The higher eosinophil count associated with STH infection is consistent with the literature [32,33].

Hookworm infections were associated with malaria at first ANC, confirming previous epidemiologic reports from this population, albeit at a significantly declining overall malaria positivity rate over time: 27% in 1996, 20% in 2007 [18], compared with 1.8% in the current dataset. P. vivax was the predominant form of malaria in these populations, and the ratio of P. vivax to P. falciparum in this study is similar to the ratio found in the general population [34]. While the problem of malaria in pregnancy as an independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome is well described [35,36], the role of STH infections has been largely neglected [37].

In an exploratory and adjusted analysis, having an infection with one of the three STH species was associated with a reduced risk of miscarriage, which was significant for A. lumbricoides. Published data on the association between A. lumbricoides and miscarriage is limited and anecdotal [38,39]. However, STH infections might induce immune modulation toward a non-inflammatory T-regulatory (TReg) and T helper 2 (TH2) response, which is thought to protect the parasites from the host immune response [40–42], and thus may reduce the risk of miscarriage.

The numbers for stillbirth were low, but the absence of an association is consistent with current evidence [43]. While having a STH infection was not significantly associated with PTB or SGA, hookworm was associated with an increase in PTB while A. lumbricoides was associated with a decrease in SGA. Overall, the divergent associations for hookworm compared to A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura, for both of these outcomes limited the utility of pooling women infected with different species. Interestingly, the direction of associations for all adverse pregnancy outcomes were identical when only cases with a single stool test were included.

Limitations of the presented data pertain to its observational nature. Moreover, the burden of STH infections is likely underestimated, as the examination of a single stool specimen is insufficient to rule out an infection and the method used for stool examination is less sensitive when compared to other techniques [44,45]. Hence, examination techniques with increased sensitivity and specificity profiles would allow to better characterize differences between infected and uninfected groups and to more accurately estimate the infection density. As stool tests were done routinely only at ANC enrolment, any STH infection that was acquired later in pregnancy was likely missed. Easier accessibility to ANC services in the refugee camp, resulted in earlier ANC contact and detection of STHs. Moreover, women were less likely to have an unknown outcome because they could be readily traced. This difference likely increased reporting of miscarriage in the refugee population, when compared to migrants. Secondly, treatment provided routinely to women with a positive stool sample, could have potentially influenced pregnancy outcome; hence, whether STH infection treated at an EGA of 14 weeks has an effect on the risk for PTB or SGA cannot be definitively answered from the observational data reported here. Expected associations with established risk factors of anaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes are suggestive of the robustness of the current epidemiologic data.

Conclusion

STH are ubiquitous and infect one in five pregnant women in this vulnerable population on the Thailand-Myanmar border with considerable heterogeneity of STH infection between refugees and migrants. Improved examination techniques (e.g., Kato-Katz methods) would provide a more accurate assessment of burden and intensity of infection and would enable better informed policy decisions. STH infections are a preventable cause of anaemia in pregnancy and, based on the findings of this analysis, systematic screening and deworming of positive cases contributes to this, as would early ANC attendance and appropriate management. The preliminary results on the association between species-specific STH infections and pregnancy outcomes–while plausible from a biological point of view–require confirmation and more in-depth investigations in controlled clinical research settings, preferably with a higher number of cases to increase the statistical power.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Proportion of anaemia at the first ANC contact in relation to the infection intensity and compared between STH monoinfections.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (33.8KB, docx)
S1 Table. Comparison of included and excluded cases.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (25.9KB, docx)
S2 Table. Time trend of infected pregnant women attending the migrant and refugee ANC clinics.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (27.9KB, docx)
S3 Table. A Table: Associations between anaemia at first ANC contact and a STH infection in the migrant population. B Table: Associations between anaemia at first ANC contact and a STH infection in the refugee population.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (38.2KB, docx)
S4 Table. Pregnancy outcome compared between STH infections in migrants and refugees.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (26.3KB, docx)
S1 Text. Statistical methods for the estimation of the association between a soil-transmitted helminth infection and pregnancy outcome.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (33.3KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all pregnant women who enrolled in the antenatal care program as results of this report are reliant on data generated through their participation. Additionally, we appreciate the relentless effort of all SMRU staff to improve the antenatal care for the pregnant population at the Thailand-Myanmar border.

The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) is part of the Wellcome Trust Mahidol University Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Programme, supported by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain (Major Overseas Programme).

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because this is a population of undocumented refugees and migrants. Data are available from the Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit Institutional data access committee (contact Rita Chanviriyavuth, email: rita@tropmedres.ac) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. (2019). Soil-transmitted helminth infections (Fact sheet). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections (accessed 4 October 2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392: 1859–1922. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jourdan PM, Lamberton PHL, Fenwick A, Addiss DG. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. Lancet. 2018;391: 252–265. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31930-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Strunz EC, Addiss DG, Stocks ME, Ogden S, Utzinger J, Freeman MC. Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS Medicine. 2014;11: e1001620. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Crompton DWT, Nesheim MC. Nutritional impact of intestinal helminthiasis during the human life cycle. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22: 35–59. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.120501.134539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McLean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D, de Benoist B. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993–2005. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12: 444–454. 10.1017/S1368980008002401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Allen LH. Anemia and iron deficiency: effects on pregnancy outcome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71: 1280S–4S. 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1280s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Larocque R, Casapia M, Gotuzzo E, Gyorkos TW. Relationship between intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and anemia during pregnancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73: 783–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brooker S, Hotez PJ, Bundy DAP. Hookworm-related anaemia among pregnant women: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2: e291. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gyorkos TW, Gilbert NL, Larocque R, Casapía M. Trichuris and hookworm infections associated with anaemia during pregnancy. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16: 531–537. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02727.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mupfasoni D, Mikhailov A, Mbabazi P, King J, Gyorkos TW, Montresor A. Estimation of the number of women of reproductive age in need of preventive chemotherapy for soil-transmitted helminth infections. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12: e0006269. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Montresor A, Trouleau W, Mupfasoni D, Bangert M, Joseph S, Mikhailov A, et al. Preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminthiasis averted more than 500 000 DALYs in 2015. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017;111: 457–463. 10.1093/trstmh/trx082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Torlesse H, Hodges M. Albendazole therapy and reduced decline in haemoglobin concentration during pregnancy (Sierra Leone). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95: 195–201. 10.1016/s0035-9203(01)90164-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Urassa DP, Nystrom L, Carlsted A. Effectiveness of routine antihelminthic treatment on anaemia in pregnancy in Rufiji District, Tanzania: a cluster randomised controlled trial. East Afr J Public Health. 2011;8: 176–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Christian P, Khatry SK, West KP. Antenatal anthelmintic treatment, birthweight, and infant survival in rural Nepal. Lancet. 2004;364: 981–983. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17023-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blackwell AD. Helminth infection during pregnancy: insights from evolutionary ecology. Int J Womens Health. 2016;8: 651–661. 10.2147/IJWH.S103529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mpairwe H, Tweyongyere R, Elliott A. Pregnancy and helminth infections. Parasite Immunol. 2014;36: 328–337. 10.1111/pim.12101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boel M, Carrara VI, Rijken M, Proux S, Nacher M, Pimanpanarak M, et al. Complex Interactions between soil-transmitted helminths and malaria in pregnant women on the Thai-Burmese border. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4: e887. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gilder ME, Simpson JA, Bancone G, McFarlane L, Shah N, van Aalsburg R, et al. Evaluation of a treatment protocol for anaemia in pregnancy nested in routine antenatal care in a limited-resource setting. Glob Health Action. 2019;12: 1621589. 10.1080/16549716.2019.1621589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bancone G, Gilder ME, Chowwiwat N, Gornsawun G, Win E, Cho WW, et al. Prevalences of inherited red blood cell disorders in pregnant women of different ethnicities living along the Thailand-Myanmar border. Wellcome open research. 2017;2: 72. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12338.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;114: 1326–31. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2bde8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet. 2004;363: 157–163. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McGready R, Paw MK, Wiladphaingern J, Min AM, Carrara VI, Moore KA, et al. The overlap between miscarriage and extreme preterm birth in a limited-resource setting on the Thailand-Myanmar border: a population cohort study. Wellcome Open Research. 2018;1: 32. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10352.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet (London, England). 2014;384: 857–68. 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60932-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available: https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Montresor A, Mupfasoni D, Mikhailov A, Mwinzi P, Lucianez A, Jamsheed M, et al. The global progress of soil-transmitted helminthiases control in 2020 and World Health Organization targets for 2030. Babu S, editor. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020;14: e0008505. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.World Health Organization (2017). Guideline: preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminth infections in at-risk population groups. Available from: https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/deworming/en/ (accessed 4 January 2021). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wai KT, Han KT, Oo T. Intensifying responsiveness towards neglected intestinal helminth infections in a resource-constrained setting. Tropical Medicine and Health. 2017;45. 10.1186/s41182-017-0053-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dunn JC, Turner HC, Tun A, Anderson RM. Epidemiological surveys of, and research on, soil-transmitted helminths in Southeast Asia: a systematic review. Parasites & Vectors. 2016;9. 10.1186/s13071-016-1310-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brooker S, Clements AC, Bundy DA. Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Adv Parasitol. 2006;62: 221–261. 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)62007-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Furtado LFV, de Paiva Bello ACP, Rabelo ÉML. Benzimidazole resistance in helminths: From problem to diagnosis. Acta Trop. 2016;162: 95–102. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schulte C, Krebs B, Jelinek T, Nothdurft HD, von Sonnenburg F, Loscher T. Diagnostic significance of blood eosinophilia in returning travelers. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2002;34: 407–411. 10.1086/338026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Darlan DM, Tala ZZ, Amanta C, Warli SM, Arrasyid NK. Correlation between soil transmitted helminth infection and eosinophil levels among primary school children in Medan. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;5: 142–146. 10.3889/oamjms.2017.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chu CS, Carrara VI, Parker DM, Proux S, Charunwatthana P, McGready R, et al. Declining Burden of Plasmodium vivax in a Population in Northwestern Thailand from 1995 to 2016 before Comprehensive Primaquine Prescription for Radical Cure. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019. 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moore KA, Simpson JA, Wiladphaingern J, Min AM, Pimanpanarak M, Paw MK, et al. Influence of the number and timing of malaria episodes during pregnancy on prematurity and small-for-gestational-age in an area of low transmission. BMC Med. 2017;15: 117. 10.1186/s12916-017-0877-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.White NJ. Anaemia and malaria. Malar J. 2018;17. 10.1186/s12936-018-2509-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Olds GR. Deworming the world. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2013;124: 265–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Deveci S, Tanyuksel M, Deveci G, Araz E. Spontaneous missed abortion caused by Ascaris lumbricoides. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2001;9: 188–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shah OJ, Robanni I, Khan F, Zargar SA, Javid G. Management of biliary ascariasis in pregnancy. World J Surg. 2005;29: 1294–1298. 10.1007/s00268-005-0015-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McSorley HJ, Maizels RM. Helminth infections and host immune regulation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25: 585–608. 10.1128/CMR.05040-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Allen JE, Maizels RM. Diversity and dialogue in immunity to helminths. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11: 375–388. 10.1038/nri2992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Maizels RM, Pearce EJ, Artis D, Yazdanbakhsh M, Wynn TA. Regulation of pathogenesis and immunity in helminth infections. J Exp Med. 2009;206: 2059–2066. 10.1084/jem.20091903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Salam RA, Maredia H, Das JK, Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA. Community-based interventions for the prevention and control of helmintic neglected tropical diseases. Infect Dis Poverty. 2014;3: 23. 10.1186/2049-9957-3-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Young KH, Bullock SL, Melvin DM, Spruill CL. Ethyl acetate as a substitute for diethyl ether in the formalin-ether sedimentation technique. J Clin Microbiol. 1979;10: 852–853. 10.1128/JCM.10.6.852-853.1979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Garcia LS, Arrowood M, Kokoskin E, Paltridge GP, Pillai DR, Procop GW, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of parasites from the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;31. 10.1128/CMR.00025-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009219.r001

Decision Letter 0

Keke C Fairfax

22 Dec 2020

Dear Mr Brummaier,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Burden of soil-transmitted helminth infection in pregnant refugees and migrants on the Thailand-Myanmar border: results from a retrospective cohort" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Keke Fairfax, PhD

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Keke Fairfax

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: see general comments

Reviewer #2: Given the primary objectives of the study, it was expected that the evidence would be used to inform health policy and practice in the two study populations of migrants and refugees in terms of timing and frequency of antenatal care and public health interventions like deworming and iron supplementation. Given also the significant difference in the occurrence of STH infection in the two study populations, an appreciation of what is currently being provided in terms of antenatal care in the respective settings would be warranted and, if necessary, appropriate population-specific remedial action proposed. An analysis of relevant outcomes, again in the two populations separately, would seem the most beneficial in terms of subsequent health interventions that should be considered by health authorities. Therefore all analyses should, as a minimum, be disaggregated by population.

The rationale for undertaking exploratory analyses is missing. For example, an examination of the association between STH and anemia is not informative, as this association is well known and one would design a different study to examine such an association anyway (e.g. STH diagnosis would be based on a different test). The rationale for all exploratory analyses therefore should be clarified or the analyses should be removed.

Retrospective data can certainly be used to explore the study’s primary objectives. But there are limitations to this type of data. Selection bias is one such limitation. Selection bias here can occur from missing important numbers of pregnant women in the database, or limiting the numbers of women in certain analyses because of incomplete data. To give one example, as ANC was known to only be fully operational at the end of 2013 in the study populations until the end of 2016, why were data to be analyzed not restricted to the three full years of 2014, 2015 and 2016? It should be kept in mind that the ‘prevalence’ reported in this study is a 54-month cumulative prevalence. It would be helpful to annualize this figure. It might then be clarified whether STH is, or is not, of public health importance in these populations and that relevant health policy and practice should be reviewed. Also, as migrant and refugee populations were found to be significantly different in terms of STH infection (despite the measurement error), all analyses should be performed for each of these study populations separately.

The question of trimester is always problematic. WHO defines the first 16 weeks of pregnancy as the first trimester, so why was 14 weeks used in this study (line 200)? (WHO. Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care: A guide for Essential Practice. WHO, 2015; see page 180.) At a minimum, the data need to re-analyzed with the WHO definition of trimester. The definition of trimester is important as this will affect the estimate of the number of miscarriages (line 200). All instances referring to trimester in the text and tables require revision.

The measurement of the STH infection itself is problematic and subject to measurement error. WHO recommends that the Kato-Katz method be used to assess the prevalence and intensity of STH infection in order to then implement a preventive chemotherapy program in endemic areas. As a non-standardized diagnostic test was used in this study, with unknown estimates of species-specific sensitivity and specificity, it is difficult to interpret the results. Therefore, the accuracy of the estimates of prevalence and intensity for monoinfections, or the prevalence of multiple species infections, is unknown, and any analysis using these figures is subject to measurement error. This is one of the reasons for dropping the exploratory analyses. It is unclear why the 6.3% due to multiple stool testing from the same individuals was not removed from all analyses…They bias the results if they are not removed.

Reviewer #3: The study population, objectives, design and ethics are well described and appropriate statistical analyses are employed to support their conclusions.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: see general comments

Reviewer #2: All results tables, figures and supplementary material need to be reconsidered given the above comments.

Reviewer #3: Results are clearly presented in line with the study objectives. However, I identified a few issues below, these need to be addressed

1. A couple of numbers in the text do not match what is indicated in the tables, let the authors be consistent with this.

2. Lines 256 – 258: STH infections were detected earlier… The numbers on line 257 e.g. 14+2(9+0 – 22+4) do not match the numbers in Table 1

3. Table S2: what is the motivation for showing STH neg while for the other mono infections it shows positivity? Wouldn’t it be better if all infections showed the same thing (either positivity or negativity)?

4. Lines 269 – 281: The denominators are 4041 and 8701 for refugee and migrant populations respectively. This contradicts the figures in Table 1 i.e. 3909 and 8517 respectively. Please ensure that this is well explained.

5. Line 289: In an adjusted logistic regression model… I think that the potential confounders adjusted for need to be mentioned, perhaps in the methods section.

6. Lines 293 – 294: would you consider a trend test to confirm the result that the intensity of infection was associated with anaemia?

7. Lines 307 – 309: in an unadjusted analysis… you have reported adjusted analyses before, why not for this result also?

8. Please make Figure 3 clearer, it looks fuzzy at the moment

9. Lines 315 – 316: when adjusting for confounders, … please mention these confounders in the methods section. I know they appear in supplementary information but it might be better to include them in the main text.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: see general comments

Reviewer #2: The discussion also then should be focussed on the primary objectives to inform public health interventions to the two study populations. There is considerable repetition of results in the discussion which can be removed. All mention of benzimidazole efficacy should be removed as this was not adequately investigated in this study.

Reviewer #3: Conclusions are supported by the data and limitations are largely well described, save for the statistical power for association analyses.

Public health relevance is addressed, though I think a bit more of this needs to appear in the abstract!

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: see general comments

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Burden of soil-transmitted helminth infection in pregnant refugees and migrants on the Thailand-Myanmar border: results from a retrospective cohort.

By Brummaier et al

General comment

The article is well written and the experiment is well conducted but in my opinion this paper has an important drawback:

The authors do not recognize that the women population selected presents low level of STH infection (around 20%) principally due to A lumbricoides and therefore their experiment had no possibility to show any morbidity caused by the parasites.

A population with so low STH prevalence of hookworm (1%-6%) and T. trichiura (2.4%) do not qualify for preventive chemotherapy according the WHO recommendations

(please refers to WHO guidelines 2017:“ Preventive chemotherapy, using single-dose albendazole (400 mg) or mebendazole (500 mg), is recommended as a public health intervention for pregnant women, after the first trimester living in areas where both: (i) the baseline prevalence of hookworm and/or T. trichiura infection is 20% or higher among pregnant women, and (ii) anaemia is a severe public health problem, with a prevalence of 40% or higher among pregnant women.”)

The reason why PC is not recommended in populations of women where the prevalence of Hookworm and T. trichiura is lower than 20% is because at this level of prevalence the only infections present are the ones of light intensity that are not expected to cause morbidity.

I think that an experiment conducted in this population with so low pevalence had no possibility to demonstrate any morbidity caused by the parasites and therefore is probably unnecessary.

However, there is a specific reason why suggest to reject this article despite the fact that I considered well written and resulting from a well conducted experiment:

Unfortunately, researchers that conduct systematic review are frequently not experienced on the specific disease but only on the methodology for conducting the review; as consequence, especially in the area of deworming, when the results of studies similar to the ones I am reviewing here (no possibility to demonstrate an effect because of the low prevalence) are summarized with the ones conducted in population where the level of parasites warrant intervention, they produce serious distortion of the results of the systematic review and therefore are leading to inapropriate conclusion.

This is why I consider this kind of articles not only unnecessary but counterproductive and therefore I reccomend rejection.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript details a retrospective review of cumulative data (recorded between 2013 and 2017) from screening for STH infection among migrant and refugee pregnant women living in camps along the Thai-Myanmar border. It is actually unclear why the study’s objective was to describe and compare STH infection between these two study populations. Describe yes, but why compare? Would results influence screening procedures or deworming policy/practice? If this was the intent, it needs to be made clearer.

Reviewer #3: This is a very well-written paper about the burden of STH infection in a pregnant population living on the Thailand-Myanmar border. Authors compare the prevalence of different STH species between a migrant population and a population of refugees in a camp, they also report an exploratory analysis on associations between STH infection, maternal health and pregnancy outcomes.

I think though, that the authors need to acknowledge the limitation of lack of statistical power for the exploratory association analyses or else confirm that this is not a problem.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Lawrence Lubyayi

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009219.r003

Decision Letter 1

Keke C Fairfax

8 Feb 2021

Dear Mr Brummaier,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Burden of soil-transmitted helminth infection in pregnant refugees and migrants on the Thailand-Myanmar border: results from a retrospective cohort' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Keke C Fairfax, PhD

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Keke Fairfax

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009219.r004

Acceptance letter

Keke C Fairfax

23 Feb 2021

Dear Mr Brummaier,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Burden of soil-transmitted helminth infection in pregnant refugees and migrants on the Thailand-Myanmar border: results from a retrospective cohort," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Proportion of anaemia at the first ANC contact in relation to the infection intensity and compared between STH monoinfections.

    (DOCX)

    Click here for additional data file. (33.8KB, docx)
    S1 Table. Comparison of included and excluded cases.

    (DOCX)

    Click here for additional data file. (25.9KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Time trend of infected pregnant women attending the migrant and refugee ANC clinics.

    (DOCX)

    Click here for additional data file. (27.9KB, docx)
    S3 Table. A Table: Associations between anaemia at first ANC contact and a STH infection in the migrant population. B Table: Associations between anaemia at first ANC contact and a STH infection in the refugee population.

    (DOCX)

    Click here for additional data file. (38.2KB, docx)
    S4 Table. Pregnancy outcome compared between STH infections in migrants and refugees.

    (DOCX)

    Click here for additional data file. (26.3KB, docx)
    S1 Text. Statistical methods for the estimation of the association between a soil-transmitted helminth infection and pregnancy outcome.

    (DOCX)

    Click here for additional data file. (33.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 4. PNTD-D-20-01995_Response.docx

    Click here for additional data file. (54.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because this is a population of undocumented refugees and migrants. Data are available from the Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit Institutional data access committee (contact Rita Chanviriyavuth, email: rita@tropmedres.ac) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES