Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2019 Feb;73(2):265–272. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12150

The multilayered interplay between fructose and salt in development of hypertension: What has been revealed so far

Ozgur C Eren 1, Alberto Ortiz 2, Baris Afsar 3, Adrian Covic 4, Masanari Kuwabara 5, Miguel A Lanaspa 6, Richard J Johnson 6, Mehmet Kanbay 7
PMCID: PMC7954341  NIHMSID: NIHMS1515843  PMID: 30595116

Introduction

The prevalence of hypertension escalated over the past decades reaching an epidemic level worldwide (1). Currently the prevalence of hypertension is approximately 30% of the adult United States population, according to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, with many of these subjects having insulin resistance and or other features of the metabolic syndrome (2).

In this regard, dietary fructose from sucrose or high-fructose-corn-syrup (HFCS) in food and beverages has been convincingly linked with hypertension in large epidemiological studies(3).One of the largest report is the International Study of Macro/Micronutrients and Blood Pressure (INTERMAP), a cross-sectional epidemiological study on cross-cultural BP differences analyzing 4,680 men and women, aged 40–59 years, from Japan, China, United Kingdom and the United States. INTERMAP has previously reported that intakes of vegetable protein, glutamic acid, total and insoluble fibers, total polyunsaturated fatty linoleic acid and n-3 fatty acids, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, and non-heme iron were inversely related to BP. Direct positive associations of sugars (fructose, glucose, and sucrose) and sugar-sweetened beverages (especially combined with high sodium intake), was reported by the INTERMAP Study(4).In subjects whose 24-h urinary sodium excretion was over the median, high fructose intake (greater than2SD, or5.6% kcal) was associated with increased systolic/diastolic BP of 2.5/1.7 mmHg(5).Some studies have not reported an association of fructose intake with increased blood pressure (6, 7), and this may relate to diets that are high in fruit (a major source of fructose), as fruits contain substances such as potassium, vitamin C, flavonols, and other components that block fructose-mediated metabolic effects (8-11). However, when epidemiological studies evaluate the relationship of fructose from added sugars on blood pressure, the findings are strong(3), as noted by a recent meta-analysis (12). Furthermore, when fructose is provided as a liquid, either alone or as part of a high-fructose corn syrup or sucrose-containing beverage, there is an acute BP raising effect (13-15). Likewise, studies suggest that lowering sugar intake can reduce blood pressure in hypertensive individuals (16).

Several papers have summarized the effects of fructose on blood pressure (17). One important finding is that fructose does not raise blood pressure simply as a consequence of weight. Indeed, pair feeding studies have shown that rats fed fructose will develop hypertension, as well as hypertriglyceridemia, hyperuricemia, hyperinsulinemia and mild renal injury despite no difference in weight with control animals (18-20). Furthermore, we have not observed metabolic effects from artificial sugars (21), although one group did report that saccharin might induce insulin resistance in mice (22). Rather, animals studies suggest fructose may induce hypertension by a variety of mechanisms, including fructose-induced salt and water retention (23-25), insulin resistance (26), increased serum uric acid levels (27), decreased renal nitric oxide availability (28), and, recently, in utero programming of hypertension (29).

Here we review more recent studies, particularly focusing on the complex synergism between sugar and salt in the development of hypertension (Figure 1). Excess dietary fructose may contribute to the development of sodium-induced hypertension through recruitment of several mechanisms known to increase blood pressure (Figure 2). These include promotion of salt and water retention, sensitization to the renin-angiotensin system, and promotion of insulin resistance and nitric oxide (NO) deficiency (30-34).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Salt intake increases fructose endogenous production

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Excess dietary fructose and sodium retention through increased jejunal NaCl absorption and increased proximal tubular NaCl reabsorption.

Effect of fructose on the development of sodium-induced hypertension

The potential synergy between fructose and salt is becoming increasingly appreciated. While fructose intake does increase blood pressure in rats (18) and humans (15), many species show relatively little BP response to fructose, and/or the rise in BP does not result in hypertension as noted by radiotelemetry (35). In this regard, the dietary salt content had a permissive effect for hypertension in rats fed 20% fructose for 7 days. The combination of high-fructose and high-salt in the diet was required for the hypertensive response, which did not develop in rats fed either alone (23, 24).This raises the question of whether dietary fructose might enhance the effects of high salt diet on blood pressure.

Dietary fructose enhances salt absorption in the gut

Dietary fructose, generated either from the breakdown of sucrose by the enzyme sucrose, or from fructose present in foods or HFCS, is absorbed in the small bowel (especially the jejunum) via theGlut5(Slc2a5) transporter. Fructose enters the enterocyte by facilitated diffusion via Glut5, and the level of Glut5 expression is regulated in part by dietary fructose and sucrose (36, 37). Low doses of fructose are ∼90% cleared by the intestine, with only trace fructose but extensive fructose-derived glucose, lactate, and glycerate found in the portal blood (38). High doses of fructose (≥1 g/kg) overwhelm intestinal fructose absorption and clearance, resulting in fructose reaching both the liver and colonic microbiota (38, 39). In turn, the fructose metabolized by the intestine can lead to a “gut leak” syndrome (40) in which endotoxin escapes from the gut into the portal system, enhancing the effects of fructose to induce fatty liver and metabolic syndrome (41). While part of the “gut leak” likely relates to the effect of fructose metabolism in the enterocyte to induce local oxidative stress via the fructokinase pathway (40), studies suggest that high fructose diets may alter the gut microbiota, resulting in an enhancement of Firmicute and Proteobacteria with a reduction in Bacteroidetes, consistent with a more obesogenic phenotype (42, 43). Interestingly, similar findings were observed with diets with liquid glucose (43), possibly because glucose is also converted to fructose in the body (44).

The development of hypertension in response to fructose and salt requires an intact Glut5 system, as elevated blood pressure does not occur in Glut5 knockout mice (45). Furthermore, the fructose-driven hypertension was dependent on increased jejunal salt absorption in response to increased luminal fructose absorption (45).

Indeed, the absorption of sodium chloride from the gut modulated by dietary fructose. PAT1 (putative anion transporter 1, Slc26a6, CFEX) is a major chloride transporter (46-52) in the gut, and, like Glut5, is regulated by dietary fructose, resulting in increased mRNA and protein levels of PAT1 in the apical membrane of jejunum (36). Increased chloride absorption through PAT1 facilitates salt uptake and the development of increased blood pressure. Thus, Slc26a6−/− mice (i.e. mice lacking PAT1) failed to develop hypertension while on a fructose-rich diet whereas wild type (Slc26a6+/+)mice did not develop hypertension when dietary chloride content was low (36). In addition to the effects of fructose on PAT1, a high dietary fructose intake also increases the jejunal expression of the sodium transporter NHE3, which also contributes to intestinal sodium absorption (39).

Kidney involvement in fructose-related hypertension

Excess dietary fructose leads to local renal renin angiotensin system activation and increased proximal tubular sodium reabsorption (Figure 3). After glomerular filtration, fructose is partially reabsorbed in the proximal tubules via transporters SGLT5 (SLC5A10), GLUT2 (SLC2A2) and GLUT5 (36, 53-56). Tubular internalization and subsequent metabolism remains a pivotal step in the fructose-induced hypertension cascade. Among fructose metabolites, diacylglycerol (DAG) is a potent activator of protein kinase C (PKC)(57-59). Increased PKC activity sensitizes proximal tubules to angiotensin II (24). In addition, fructose metabolism in tubular cells increases urinary levels of uric acid, even without increasing serum uric acid(60).Fructose-induced local uric acid production is a potent stimulator of renal full length and soluble (pro)renin receptor (PRR)expression and local intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation (25, 61). Both PRR blockade and prevention of uric acid formation by the xanthine-oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol, independently prevented the hypertensive cascade to the dietary combination of fructose and salt in rats (25).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Excess dietary fructose leads to local renal renin angiotensin system activation and increased proximal tubular sodium reabsorption.

Around 65% of filtered sodium is reabsorbed in proximal tubules via the sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3) in an angiotensin II-sensitive manner (62-65). A high-fructose diet enhances NHE3 expression and activity, increases intracellular angiotensin II levels and sensitizes the cell to angiotensin II, thus increasing Na reabsorption and water retention by proximal tubules (24, 66, 67). In this regard, fructose and angiotensin II-induced hypertension is prevented by NHE3deficiency in mice (68), and by the angiotensin II receptor blocker, losartan (69) (Figure 3).

Increased fructose intake may also enhance glucocorticoid action that has an anti-natriuretic action. Bursac et al. showed that a high fructose diet in rats led to increased 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase Type 1 (11βHSD1) and hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (H6PDH) expression and elevated corticosterone level within the adipose tissue, which was paralleled with enhanced GR nuclear accumulation (70).

Salt intake increases endogenous fructose production

There are strong interactions between salt and fructose intake, and it has been proposed that salt intake, by increasing thirst, might encourage the intake of sugary beverages thereby enhancing fructose intake (71). Indeed, high salt diets have been associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes regardless of the calorie intake (21, 72). However, the relationship of salt with fructose may be more complex (Figure 1), for while a high salt diet may encourage intake of sugary beverages, recent studies suggest a high salt diet may activate processes that result in fructose generation in the liver (endogenous fructose production) (73). Salt intake activates tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein (TonEBP, NFAT5), a transcription factor that promotes kidney inflammation and osmolyte production in response to inflammation and osmotic stress (39). In turn, TonEBP activates the aldose reductase pathway, which results in the conversion of glucose to sorbitol, with the sorbitol being further metabolized by sorbitol dehydrogenase to generate fructose. The metabolism of endogenous fructose by fructokinase leads to intracellular energy (ATP) depletion, resulting in leptin resistance that decreases satiety (73). Over time mice develop insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, with increases in blood pressure. Of note, the effects of a high salt diet to raise blood pressure and induce metabolic syndrome is abrogated when fructose metabolism is blocked (73). This suggests that fructose generation might have a role in how salt raises blood pressure.

Fructose-induced insulin resistance and subsequent sodium retention

Fructose-rich feeding has been linked with insulin resistance in rats, represented by high insulin levels and abnormal plasma lipid profiles (74-76). As argued by Catena et al. (26), mechanisms proposed to explain the prohypertensive nature of insulin include activation of the sympathetic nervous system (77), growth-promoting activity on vascular smooth muscle cells (78), increased intracellular calcium level (79), and increased renal sodium reabsorption(80) (Figure 4). Reinforcing the latter, the anti-natriuretic effect has been proven to stem from direct effects on various segments of nephron (26, 81-83), such as stimulation of epithelial Na channel (ENaC) via phosphatidylinositide-3 (PI3)-kinase (84).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Fructose-induced insulin resistance contribution to hypertension.

Appreciating that insulin stimulates Na reabsorption in the kidney (85-88), there was an inverse relationship between salt intake and insulin receptor mRNA levels, suggesting a protective mechanism against insulin induced hypertension via excessive Na-retention (89). Fructose-fed rats failed to show a significant down-regulation of insulin receptor mRNA levels as dietary salt consumption increased from low, to normal or to a high-salt diet. As the protective mechanism is impaired in fructose-fed rats, insulin resistance and high insulin levels could lead to high systolic blood pressure via salt retention. Of importance, the finding was not reflected in rats fed with a high-fructose-low-salt diet, further supporting the salt dependence of fructose-induced hypertension (26).

Targeting these mechanisms, animal studies have succeeded in altering the BP response to chronic fructose and salt ingestion (90, 91). Serum and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK1) is one of the mediators of PI3-kinase-induced ENaC stimulation (92, 93). The combination of dietary salt loading and high fructose levels increased in blood pressure of SGK1+/+ mice, but not in SGK1−/− mice (91).

α-Lipoic acid (LA, thioctic acid) is an anti-oxidant, thiol-replenisher and redox-modulator, that improves insulin sensitivity (90, 94-97). α-Lipoic acid prevented hypertension in rats fed a high fructose diet for 20 days and this was associated with lower Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) index (90).

Decreased Nitric Oxide availability contributes to fructose-induced salt-sensitive hypertension

A substantial literature suggests that NO deficiency may cause salt-sensitive hypertension through a variety of mechanisms including enhanced sensitivity to vasoconstrictors, increased basal renal vascular resistance, increased renal tubular sodium reabsorption and amplified renin release (98). A high salt diet causes a compensatory increase in renal NO levels (99).Thus, the urinary excretion of NO metabolites, NO2/NO3,is higher in rats on high salt or high salt/high fructose diets than in control and high fructose rats. However, urinary NO metabolites were lower in high salt/high fructose than in high salt alone rats. This suggests that fructose interferes with adaptive NO production in response to a high salt diet. Supporting the view, renal medullary endothelial NO Synthase (NOS) levels were lower in fructose-fed, salt-sensitive hypertensive rats (100). In addition, one major mechanism by which fructose may reduce NO bioavailability is by generating uric acid, which reduces NO levels by blocking L-arginine uptake, stimulating arginase, inhibiting eNOS, and by direct scavenging (18, 101-104).

Finally, decreased NO availability further impairs renal function, both due to salt or fructose supplementation (105-108). Treatment of rats on high salt/high fructose diets with N-acetyl-cysteine (antioxidant) and L-arginine (NOS substrate) prevented the increase in blood pressure after 3 weeks of diet.

Further Perspective: in utero programming of hypertension

Accumulating evidence supports the view that in utero and early postnatal events define predisposition to chronic conditions such as metabolic syndrome, osteoporosis or even cancer (109). The process can be explained by the concept of developmental plasticity, referring to the capacity of an organism to thrive in a specific way that is shaped by environmental cues (110). Early insults hence “program” the development of certain diseases, decades before their clinical onset. From this aspect, although renal programming to some extent is thought to be related to maternal fructose intake, development of programmed hypertension remains unclear as the specific genetic and epigenetic mechanisms involved have not been discovered yet (111).

Tain et al. examined the synergistic effect between maternal high fructose and postnatal high salt, focusing on the concept of programmed hypertension (29). Some pregnant rats receive high fructose during pregnancy and lactation, while others received normal chow. Male offspring from each group were again separated in two groups so that one received high salt load while the other did not. From 4 to 12 weeks of age, the presence of either maternal high fructose or postnatal high salt was sufficient for offsprings to develop hypertension. More interestingly, systolic blood pressure was highest when maternal high fructose and postnatal high salt were combined, as expected from the synergistic effect of fructose and sodium hypothesis. Supporting these results, a high fructose diet in pregnancy increased mean arterial pressure and peak glucose levels in offspring (112).

Clinical Relevance

Fructose is the primary sugar in fruits, but is also a key component in added sugars, most notably sucrose and high fructose corn syrup. A common confusion is why sugary beverage intake strongly predicts metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and hypertension (113, 114) while intake of natural fruits is associated with improved metabolic profiles (115). However, natural fruits tend to contain less fructose (typically 3–6 g per fruit) and to be high in fiber, potassium, magnesium, flavonols, vitamin C and other substances that tend to block fructose effects. In contrast, sugary beverages have high fructose content, are often ingested rapidly, and have the glucose component that accelerates fructose absorption. Fruit juices may carry some ingredients that are protective, but they often contain higher fructose content since they are often result from more than one fruit. Indeed, some studies, but not all, have associated fruit juice intake with greater risk for metabolic syndrome (116).

Studies have also documented a benefit of lowering intake of fructose-containing added sugars on blood pressure(16). For example, a low fructose diet reduced blood pressure in chronic kidney disease subjects with a “dipping” pattern (117). The DASH diet that is effective at lowering BP is essentially a low added sugar, high fruit diet (118), and its effect to lower BP is enhanced when salt intake is further reduced (119). A low fructose diet (reducing fructose from added sugars) also reduced BP even if supplemented by fruit in obese adults (120).

Perspectives

Fructose is a common sugar present in sucrose and high-fructose-corn-syrup (HFCS) that is present in sugary beverages and nearly 70 percent of processed foods found in the marketplace. Here we review the association of fructose with hypertension and its potential mechanisms, focusing on its interaction with salt. Fructose enhances salt absorption in the gut and kidney and enhances intracellular angiotensin formation. In turn, salt-induced increases in osmolarity feedback to generate fructose generation, documenting a complex interplay in which the two synergize together to raise BP. Thus sugar and salt work together to drive the BP response.

Conclusion

Combining its detrimental effects with the commonality of the entity itself, hypertension is among – if not the most – serious health threat of the society. From a bottom-up perspective, understanding the co-dependence of fructose and salt in the development of the disease may contribute to novel therapeutic approaches to hypertension focusing on the different contributing pathways identified (Figure 5). Directly or via insulin-resistance-associated cascades or other pathways, fructose consumption promotes high blood pressure in the individual and may program hypertension in the offsprings when pregnant women are exposed. Animal studies also showed limiting dietary fructose improves the outcome. As a final word, we suggest novel therapies targeting this synergistic effect would be helpful against the disease itself and associated cardiovascular or kidney complications.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Pathways contributing to promotion of hypertension by high dietary fructose.

Acknowledgements:

AO was supported by ISCIII and FEDER funds, PI16/02057, Sociedad Española de Nefrologia, ISCIII-RETIC REDinREN RD016/009, Comunidad de Madrid CIFRA2 B2017/BMD-3686.

MK gratefully acknowledge use of the services and facilities of the KoC University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), funded by the Republic of Turkey​​ Ministry of Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Ministry of Development.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure: None

References

  • 1.Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, Chen J, He J. Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control: A Systematic Analysis of Population-Based Studies From 90 Countries. Circulation 2016; 134: 441–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yoon SS, Carroll MD, Fryar CD. Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011-2014. NCHS Data Brief 2015: 1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jalal DI, Smits G, Johnson RJ, Chonchol M. Increased fructose associates with elevated blood pressure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21: 1543–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chan Q, Stamler J, Griep LM, Daviglus ML, Horn LV, Elliott P. An Update on Nutrients and Blood Pressure. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016; 23: 276–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown IJ, Stamler J, Van Horn L, Robertson CE, Chan Q, Dyer AR, Huang CC, Rodriguez BL, Zhao L, Daviglus ML, Ueshima H, Elliott P, International Study of MM, Blood Pressure Research G. Sugar-sweetened beverage, sugar intake of individuals, and their blood pressure: international study of macro/micronutrients and blood pressure. Hypertension 2011; 57: 695–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ha V, Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, Chiavaroli L, Wang DD, Cozma AI, Mirrahimi A, Yu ME, Carleton AJ, Dibuono M, Jenkins AL, Leiter LA, Wolever TM, Beyene J, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ. Effect of fructose on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Hypertension 2012; 59: 787–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Forman JP, Choi H, Curhan GC. Fructose and vitamin C intake do not influence risk for developing hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 863–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vasdev S, Gill V, Parai S, Longerich L, Gadag V. Dietary vitamin E and C supplementation prevents fructose induced hypertension in rats. Mol Cell Biochem 2002; 241: 107–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reungjui S, Hu H, Mu W, Roncal CA, Croker BP, Patel JM, Nakagawa T, Srinivas T, Byer K, Simoni J, Wesson D, Sitprija V, Johnson RJ. Thiazide-induced subtle renal injury not observed in states of equivalent hypokalemia. Kidney Int 2007; 72: 1483–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perez-Vizcaino F, Duarte J, Jimenez R, Santos-Buelga C, Osuna A. Antihypertensive effects of the flavonoid quercetin. Pharmacol Rep 2009; 61: 67–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hu QH, Wang C, Li JM, Zhang DM, Kong LD. Allopurinol, rutin, and quercetin attenuate hyperuricemia and renal dysfunction in rats induced by fructose intake: renal organic ion transporter involvement. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2009; 297: F1080–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kelishadi R, Mansourian M, Heidari-Beni M. Association of fructose consumption and components of metabolic syndrome in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition 2014; 30: 503–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brown CM, Dulloo AG, Yepuri G, Montani JP. Fructose ingestion acutely elevates blood pressure in healthy young humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008; 294: R730–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Le MT, Frye RF, Rivard CJ, Cheng J, McFann KK, Segal MS, Johnson RJ, Johnson JA. Effects of high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose on the pharmacokinetics of fructose and acute metabolic and hemodynamic responses in healthy subjects. Metabolism 2012; 61: 641–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perez-Pozo SE, Schold J, Nakagawa T, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Johnson RJ, Lillo JL. Excessive fructose intake induces the features of metabolic syndrome in healthy adult men: role of uric acid in the hypertensive response. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010; 34: 454–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen L, Caballero B, Mitchell DC, Loria C, Lin PH, Champagne CM, Elmer PJ, Ard JD, Batch BC, Anderson CA, Appel LJ. Reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with reduced blood pressure: a prospective study among United States adults. Circulation 2010; 121: 2398–2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Madero M, Perez-Pozo SE, Jalal D, Johnson RJ, Sanchez-Lozada LG. Dietary fructose and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2011; 13: 29–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakagawa T, Hu H, Zharikov S, Tuttle KR, Short RA, Glushakova O, Ouyang X, Feig DI, Block ER, Herrera-Acosta J, Patel JM, Johnson RJ. A causal role for uric acid in fructose-induced metabolic syndrome. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2006; 290: F625–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nakayama T, Kosugi T, Gersch M, Connor T, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Lanaspa MA, Roncal C, Perez-Pozo SE, Johnson RJ, Nakagawa T. Dietary fructose causes tubulointerstitial injury in the normal rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2010; 298: F712–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reungjui S, Roncal CA, Mu W, Srinivas TR, Sirivongs D, Johnson RJ, Nakagawa T. Thiazide diuretics exacerbate fructose-induced metabolic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 2724–2731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lanaspa MA, Kuwabara M, Andres-Hernando A, Li N, Cicerchi C, Jensen T, Orlicky DJ, Roncal-Jimenez CA, Ishimoto T, Nakagawa T, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, MacLean PS, Johnson RJ. High salt intake causes leptin resistance and obesity in mice by stimulating endogenous fructose production and metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115: 3138–3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, Maza O, Israeli D, Zmora N, Gilad S, Weinberger A, Kuperman Y, Harmelin A, Kolodkin-Gal I, Shapiro H, Halpern Z, Segal E, Elinav E. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature 2014; 514: 181–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klein AV, Kiat H. The mechanisms underlying fructose-induced hypertension: a review. J Hypertens 2015; 33: 912–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cabral PD, Hong NJ, Hye Khan MA, Ortiz PA, Beierwaltes WH, Imig JD, Garvin JL. Fructose stimulates Na/H exchange activity and sensitizes the proximal tubule to angiotensin II. Hypertension 2014; 63: e68–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xu C, Lu A, Lu X, Zhang L, Fang H, Zhou L, Yang T. Activation of Renal (Pro)Renin Receptor Contributes to High Fructose-Induced Salt Sensitivity. Hypertension 2017; 69: 339–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Catena C, Cavarape A, Novello M, Giacchetti G, Sechi LA. Insulin receptors and renal sodium handling in hypertensive fructose-fed rats. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 2163–2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yerlikaya A, Dagel T, King C, Kuwabara M, Lanaspa MA, Andres-Hernando A, Covic A, Manitius J, Sag AA, Kanbay M. Dietary and commercialized fructose: Sweet or sour? Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49: 1611–1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gordish KL, Kassem KM, Ortiz PA, Beierwaltes WH. Moderate (20%) fructose-enriched diet stimulates salt-sensitive hypertension with increased salt retention and decreased renal nitric oxide. Physiol Rep 2017; 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tain YL, Lee WC, Leu S, Wu K, Chan J. High salt exacerbates programmed hypertension in maternal fructose-fed male offspring. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2015; 25: 1146–1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haddy FJ. Role of dietary salt in hypertension. Life Sci 2006; 79: 1585–1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Karppanen H, Mervaala E. Sodium intake and hypertension. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2006; 49: 59–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meneton P, Jeunemaitre X, de Wardener HE, MacGregor GA. Links between dietary salt intake, renal salt handling, blood pressure, and cardiovascular diseases. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 679–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Wardener HE, He FJ, MacGregor GA. Plasma sodium and hypertension. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 2454–2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.O’Shaughnessy KM, Karet FE. Salt handling and hypertension. J Clin Invest 2004; 113: 1075–1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.D’Angelo G, Elmarakby AA, Pollock DM, Stepp DW. Fructose feeding increases insulin resistance but not blood pressure in Sprague-Dawley rats. Hypertension 2005; 46: 806–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Singh AK, Amlal H, Haas PJ, Dringenberg U, Fussell S, Barone SL, Engelhardt R, Zuo J, Seidler U, Soleimani M. Fructose-induced hypertension: essential role of chloride and fructose absorbing transporters PAT1 and Glut5. Kidney Int 2008; 74: 438–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roncal-Jimenez CA, Lanaspa MA, Rivard CJ, Nakagawa T, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Jalal D, Andres-Hernando A, Tanabe K, Madero M, Li N, Cicerchi C, Mc Fann K, Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Sucrose induces fatty liver and pancreatic inflammation in male breeder rats independent of excess energy intake. Metabolism 2011; 60: 1259–1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jang C, Hui S, Lu W, Cowan AJ, Morscher RJ, Lee G, Liu W, Tesz GJ, Birnbaum MJ, Rabinowitz JD. The Small Intestine Converts Dietary Fructose into Glucose and Organic Acids. Cell Metab 2018; 27: 351–361 e353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Melancholic microbes: a link between gut microbiota and depression? Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society 2013; 25: 713–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Johnson RJ, Rivard C, Lanaspa MA, Otabachian-Smith S, Ishimoto T, Cicerchi C, Cheeke PR, Macintosh B, Hess T. Fructokinase, Fructans, Intestinal Permeability, and Metabolic Syndrome: An Equine Connection? J Equine Vet Science 2013; 33: 120–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bergheim I, Weber S, Vos M, Kramer S, Volynets V, Kaserouni S, McClain CJ, Bischoff SC. Antibiotics protect against fructose-induced hepatic lipid accumulation in mice: role of endotoxin. J Hepatol 2008; 48: 983–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Volynets V, Louis S, Pretz D, Lang L, Ostaff MJ, Wehkamp J, Bischoff SC. Intestinal Barrier Function and the Gut Microbiome Are Differentially Affected in Mice Fed a Western-Style Diet or Drinking Water Supplemented with Fructose. J Nutr 2017; 147: 770–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Do MH, Lee E, Oh MJ, Kim Y, Park HY. High-Glucose or -Fructose Diet Cause Changes of the Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Disorders in Mice without Body Weight Change. Nutrients 2018; 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lanaspa MA, Ishimoto T, Li N, Cicerchi C, Orlicky DJ, Ruzicky P, Rivard C, Inaba S, Roncal-Jimenez CA, Bales ES, Diggle CP, Asipu A, Petrash JM, Kosugi T, Maruyama S, Sanchez-Lozada LG, McManaman JL, Bonthron DT, Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Endogenous fructose production and metabolism in the liver contributes to the development of metabolic syndrome. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barone S, Fussell SL, Singh AK, Lucas F, Xu J, Kim C, Wu X, Yu Y, Amlal H, Seidler U, Zuo J, Soleimani M. Slc2a5 (Glut5) is essential for the absorption of fructose in the intestine and generation of fructose-induced hypertension. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 5056–5066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miyamoto K, Tatsumi S, Morimoto A, Minami H, Yamamoto H, Sone K, Taketani Y, Nakabou Y, Oka T, Takeda E. Characterization of the rabbit intestinal fructose transporter (GLUT5). Biochem J 1994; 303 ( Pt 3): 877–883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seidler U, Rottinghaus I, Hillesheim J, Chen M, Riederer B, Krabbenhoft A, Engelhardt R, Wiemann M, Wang Z, Barone S, Manns MP, Soleimani M. Sodium and chloride absorptive defects in the small intestine in Slc26a6 null mice. Pflugers Arch 2008; 455: 757–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Simpson JE, Schweinfest CW, Shull GE, Gawenis LR, Walker NM, Boyle KT, Soleimani M, Clarke LL. PAT-1 (Slc26a6) is the predominant apical membrane Cl-/HCO3- exchanger in the upper villous epithelium of the murine duodenum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292: G1079–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chernova MN, Jiang L, Friedman DJ, Darman RB, Lohi H, Kere J, Vandorpe DH, Alper SL. Functional comparison of mouse slc26a6 anion exchanger with human SLC26A6 polypeptide variants: differences in anion selectivity, regulation, and electrogenicity. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 8564–8580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Z, Wang T, Petrovic S, Tuo B, Riederer B, Barone S, Lorenz JN, Seidler U, Aronson PS, Soleimani M. Renal and intestinal transport defects in Slc26a6-null mice. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2005; 288: C957–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Knauf F, Yang CL, Thomson RB, Mentone SA, Giebisch G, Aronson PS. Identification of a chloride-formate exchanger expressed on the brush border membrane of renal proximal tubule cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 9425–9430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lohi H, Kujala M, Kerkela E, Saarialho-Kere U, Kestila M, Kere J. Mapping of five new putative anion transporter genes in human and characterization of SLC26A6, a candidate gene for pancreatic anion exchanger. Genomics 2000; 70: 102–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sugawara-Yokoo M, Suzuki T, Matsuzaki T, Naruse T, Takata K. Presence of fructose transporter GLUT5 in the S3 proximal tubules in the rat kidney. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 1022–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Park SH, Lee YJ, Lim MJ, Kim EJ, Lee JH, Han HJ. High glucose inhibits fructose uptake in renal proximal tubule cells: involvement of cAMP, PLC/PKC, p44/42 MAPK, and cPLA2. J Cell Physiol 2004; 200: 407–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Manolescu AR, Witkowska K, Kinnaird A, Cessford T, Cheeseman C. Facilitated hexose transporters: new perspectives on form and function. Physiology (Bethesda) 2007; 22: 234–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Douard V, Ferraris RP. Regulation of the fructose transporter GLUT5 in health and disease. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008; 295: E227–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Burch HB, Choi S, Dence CN, Alvey TR, Cole BR, Lowry OH. Metabolic effects of large fructose loads in different parts of the rat nephron. J Biol Chem 1980; 255: 8239–8244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Farese RV, Konda TS, Davis JS, Standaert ML, Pollet RJ, Cooper DR. Insulin rapidly increases diacylglycerol by activating de novo phosphatidic acid synthesis. Science 1987; 236: 586–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nishizuka Y The role of protein kinase C in cell surface signal transduction and tumour promotion. Nature 1984; 308: 693–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Angelopoulos TJ, Lowndes J, Sinnett S, Rippe JM. Fructose Containing Sugars at Normal Levels of Consumption Do Not Effect Adversely Components of the Metabolic Syndrome and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients 2016; 8: 179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Oshima Y, Morimoto S, Ichihara A. Roles of the (pro)renin receptor in the kidney. World J Nephrol 2014; 3: 302–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li XC, Zhuo JL. Phosphoproteomic analysis of AT1 receptor-mediated signaling responses in proximal tubules of angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats. Kidney Int 2011; 80: 620–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Banday AA, Lokhandwala MF. Angiotensin II-mediated biphasic regulation of proximal tubular Na+/H+ exchanger 3 is impaired during oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011; 301: F364–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang T, Yang CL, Abbiati T, Schultheis PJ, Shull GE, Giebisch G, Aronson PS. Mechanism of proximal tubule bicarbonate absorption in NHE3 null mice. Am J Physiol 1999; 277: F298–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Houillier P, Chambrey R, Achard JM, Froissart M, Poggioli J, Paillard M. Signaling pathways in the biphasic effect of angiotensin II on apical Na/H antiport activity in proximal tubule. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 1496–1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Doris PA. Renal proximal tubule sodium transport and genetic mechanisms of essential hypertension. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 509–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Aldred KL, Harris PJ, Eitle E. Increased proximal tubule NHE-3 and H+-ATPase activities in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 623–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li XC, Shull GE, Miguel-Qin E, Chen F, Zhuo JL. Role of the Na+/H+ exchanger 3 in angiotensin II-induced hypertension in NHE3-deficient mice with transgenic rescue of NHE3 in small intestines. Physiol Rep 2015; 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Navarro-Cid J, Maeso R, Perez-Vizcaino F, Cachofeiro V, Ruilope LM, Tamargo J, Lahera V. Effects of losartan on blood pressure, metabolic alterations, and vascular reactivity in the fructose-induced hypertensive rat. Hypertension 1995; 26: 1074–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bursac BN, Djordjevic AD, Vasiljevic AD, Milutinovic DD, Velickovic NA, Nestorovic NM, Matic GM. Fructose consumption enhances glucocorticoid action in rat visceral adipose tissue. J Nutr Biochem 2013; 24: 1166–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.He FJ, Marrero NM, MacGregor GA. Salt intake is related to soft drink consumption in children and adolescents: a link to obesity? Hypertension 2008; 51: 629–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kim MK. Dietary Sodium Intake in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab J 2016; 40: 280–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lanaspa MA, Kuwabara M, Andres-Hernando A, Li N, Cicerchi C, Jensen T, Orlicky DJ, Roncal-Jimenez CA, Ishimoto T, Nakagawa T, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, MacLean PS, Johnson RJ. High salt intake causes leptin resistance and obesity in mice by stimulating endogenous fructose production and metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115: 3138–3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tobey TA, Mondon CE, Zavaroni I, Reaven GM. Mechanism of insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats. Metabolism 1982; 31: 608–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zavaroni I, Sander S, Scott S, Reaven GM. Effect of fructose feeding on insulin secretion and insulin action in the rat. Metabolism 1980; 29: 970–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hwang IS, Ho H, Hoffman BB, Reaven GM. Fructose-induced insulin resistance and hypertension in rats. Hypertension 1987; 10: 512–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rowe JW, Young JB, Minaker KL, Stevens AL, Pallotta J, Landsberg L. Effect of insulin and glucose infusions on sympathetic nervous system activity in normal man. Diabetes 1981; 30: 219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pfeifle B, Ditschuneit H. Effect of insulin on growth of cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells. Diabetologia 1981; 20: 155–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pershadsingh HA, McDonald JM. Direct addition of insulin inhibits a high affinity Ca2+-ATPase in isolated adipocyte plasma membranes. Nature 1979; 281: 495–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.DeFronzo RA. The effect of insulin on renal sodium metabolism. A review with clinical implications. Diabetologia 1981; 21: 165–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Song J, Hu X, Shi M, Knepper MA, Ecelbarger CA. Effects of dietary fat, NaCl, and fructose on renal sodium and water transporter abundances and systemic blood pressure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2004; 287: F1204–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hayashida T, Ohno Y, Otsuka K, Suzawa T, Shibagaki K, Suzuki H, Ikeda H, Saruta T. Salt-loading elevates blood pressure and aggravates insulin resistance in Wistar fatty rats: a possible role for enhanced Na+ -H+ exchanger activity. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1643–1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.El-Atat FA, Stas SN, McFarlane SI, Sowers JR. The relationship between hyperinsulinemia, hypertension and progressive renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 2816–2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Blazer-Yost BL, Esterman MA, Vlahos CJ. Insulin-stimulated trafficking of ENaC in renal cells requires PI 3-kinase activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003; 284: C1645–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.DeFronzo RA, Cooke CR, Andres R, Faloona GR, Davis PJ. The effect of insulin on renal handling of sodium, potassium, calcium, and phosphate in man. J Clin Invest 1975; 55: 845–855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Saudek CD, Boulter PR, Knopp RH, Arky RA. Sodium retention accompanying insulin treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1974; 23: 240–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Nizet A, Lefebvre P, Crabbe J. Control by insulin of sodium potassium and water excretion by the isolated dog kidney. Pflugers Arch 1971; 323: 11–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Baum M Insulin stimulates volume absorption in the rabbit proximal convoluted tubule. J Clin Invest 1987; 79: 1104–1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sechi LA, Griffin CA, Schambelan M. Effect of dietary sodium chloride on insulin receptor number and mRNA levels in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: F31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Thirunavukkarasu V, Anitha Nandhini AT, Anuradha CV. Lipoic acid attenuates hypertension and improves insulin sensitivity, kallikrein activity and nitrite levels in high fructose-fed rats. J Comp Physiol B 2004; 174: 587–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Huang DY, Boini KM, Friedrich B, Metzger M, Just L, Osswald H, Wulff P, Kuhl D, Vallon V, Lang F. Blunted hypertensive effect of combined fructose and high-salt diet in gene-targeted mice lacking functional serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase SGK1. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006; 290: R935–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Park J, Leong ML, Buse P, Maiyar AC, Firestone GL, Hemmings BA. Serum and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK) is a target of the PI 3-kinase-stimulated signaling pathway. EMBO J 1999; 18: 3024–3033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kobayashi T, Cohen P. Activation of serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated protein kinase by agonists that activate phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase is mediated by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) and PDK2. Biochem J 1999; 339 ( Pt 2): 319–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Packer L, Roy S, Sen CK. Alpha-lipoic acid: a metabolic antioxidant and potential redox modulator of transcription. Adv Pharmacol 1997; 38: 79–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Castro MC, Massa ML, Arbelaez LG, Schinella G, Gagliardino JJ, Francini F. Fructose-induced inflammation, insulin resistance and oxidative stress: A liver pathological triad effectively disrupted by lipoic acid. Life Sci 2015; 137: 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rochette L, Ghibu S, Muresan A, Vergely C. Alpha-lipoic acid: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential in diabetes. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2015; 93: 1021–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Henriksen EJ, Jacob S, Streeper RS, Fogt DL, Hokama JY, Tritschler HJ. Stimulation by alpha-lipoic acid of glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle of lean and obese Zucker rats. Life Sci 1997; 61: 805–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hall JE, Granger JP, do Carmo JM, da Silva AA, Dubinion J, George E, Hamza S, Speed J, Hall ME. Hypertension: physiology and pathophysiology. Compr Physiol 2012; 2: 2393–2442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shultz PJ, Tolins JP. Adaptation to increased dietary salt intake in the rat. Role of endogenous nitric oxide. J Clin Invest 1993; 91: 642–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Nishimoto Y, Tomida T, Matsui H, Ito T, Okumura K. Decrease in renal medullary endothelial nitric oxide synthase of fructose-fed, salt-sensitive hypertensive rats. Hypertension 2002; 40: 190–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Khosla UM, Zharikov S, Finch JL, Nakagawa T, Roncal C, Mu W, Krotova K, Block ER, Prabhakar S, Johnson RJ. Hyperuricemia induces endothelial dysfunction. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1739–1742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zharikov S, Krotova K, Hu H, Baylis C, Johnson RJ, Block ER, Patel J. Uric acid decreases NO production and increases arginase activity in cultured pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008; 295: C1183–1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Choi YJ, Yoon Y, Lee KY, Hien TT, Kang KW, Kim KC, Lee J, Lee MY, Lee SM, Kang DH, Lee BH. Uric acid induces endothelial dysfunction by vascular insulin resistance associated with the impairment of nitric oxide synthesis. FASEB J 2014; 28: 3197–3204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Schwartz IF, Grupper A, Chernichovski T, Hillel O, Engel A, Schwartz D. Hyperuricemia attenuates aortic nitric oxide generation, through inhibition of arginine transport, in rats. J Vasc Res 2011; 48: 252–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Araujo M, Wilcox CS. Oxidative stress in hypertension: role of the kidney. Antioxid Redox Signal 2014; 20: 74–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kamata K, Yamashita K. Insulin resistance and impaired endothelium-dependent renal vasodilatation in fructose-fed hypertensive rats. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 1999; 103: 195–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Trolliet MR, Rudd MA, Loscalzo J. Oxidative stress and renal dysfunction in salt-sensitive hypertension. Kidney Blood Press Res 2001; 24: 116–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Vasdev S, Gill VD, Randell E, Han Y, Gadag V. Fructose and moderately high dietary salt-induced hypertension: prevention by a combination of N-acetylcysteine and L-arginine. Mol Cell Biochem 2010; 337: 9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 61–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Bateson P, Barker D, Clutton-Brock T, Deb D, D’Udine B, Foley RA, Gluckman P, Godfrey K, Kirkwood T, Lahr MM, McNamara J, Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P, Spencer HG, Sultan SE. Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature 2004; 430: 419–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Tain YL, Wu KL, Lee WC, Leu S, Chan JY. Maternal fructose-intake-induced renal programming in adult male offspring. J Nutr Biochem 2015; 26: 642–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Saad AF, Dickerson J, Kechichian TB, Yin H, Gamble P, Salazar A, Patrikeev I, Motamedi M, Saade GR, Costantine MM. High-fructose diet in pregnancy leads to fetal programming of hypertension, insulin resistance, and obesity in adult offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 378 e371–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 2010; 121: 1356–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, Flanders WD, Merritt R, Hu FB. Added Sugar Intake and Cardiovascular Diseases Mortality Among US Adults. JAMA Intern Med 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J, Zhu M, Zhao G, Bao W, Hu FB. Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ 2014; 349: g4490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Bazzano LA, Li TY, Joshipura KJ, Hu FB. Intake of fruit, vegetables, and fruit juices and risk of diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1311–1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Brymora A, Flisinski M, Johnson RJ, Goszka G, Stefanska A, Manitius J. Low-fructose diet lowers blood pressure and inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 608–612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Sacks FM, Bray GA, Vogt TM, Cutler JA, Windhauser MM, Lin PH, Karanja N. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1117–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER 3rd, Simons-Morton DG, Karanja N, Lin PH. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Madero M, Arriaga JC, Jalal D, Rivard C, McFann K, Perez-Mendez O, Vazquez A, Ruiz A, Lanaspa MA, Jimenez CR, Johnson RJ, Lozada LG. The effect of two energy-restricted diets, a low-fructose diet versus a moderate natural fructose diet, on weight loss and metabolic syndrome parameters: a randomized controlled trial. Metabolism 2011; 60: 1551–1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES