Skip to main content
Journal of Medicine and Life logoLink to Journal of Medicine and Life
. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):87–92. doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0116

The effect of ketamine on preventing postpartum depression

Mina Alipoor 1, Marzeyeh Loripoor 2,*, Majid Kazemi 3, Farshid Farahbakhsh 4, Ali Sarkoohi 4
PMCID: PMC7982256  PMID: 33767791

Abstract

Postpartum depression is a common disabling psychosocial disorder that could have adverse effects on the life of the mother, infant, and family. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of ketamine on preventing postpartum depression in women undergoing caesarian sections considering the relatively known positive effect of ketamine on major depression. The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 134 women undergoing scheduled caesarian sections. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups of control and intervention. To induce anesthesia, 1–2 mg/kg of body weight of Nesdonal and 0.5 mg/kg of body weight of ketamine were used in the intervention group, while only 3–5 mg/kg of body weight Nesdonal was administered in the control group. Data were gathered using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in three stages: before the caesarian section and two and four weeks after the caesarian section. Data were analyzed using variance analysis with repeated measures and the Chi-square test. Results of the present study showed that the mean (± standard deviation) of the depression score in the intervention and control groups were 13.78±3.87 and 13.79±4.78(p = 0.98) before the caesarian section, 11.82±3.41 and 14.34±4.29 (p < 0.001) two weeks after and 10.84±3.48 and 13.09±3.79 (p = 0.001) four weeks after the caesarian section, respectively. Using ketamine in the induction of general anesthesia could be effective in preventing postpartum depression. However, further studies are required to strengthen these findings.

Keywords: ketamine, postpartum depression, caesarian section, general anesthesia, prevention

Introduction

Depression is the most common complication of delivery with a prevalence of 10% to 15% and is more common than gestational diabetes (3–8%) and preterm delivery (12.3%) [1]. Major depression, which requires hospitalization, occurs more frequently after birth than in any other period of life in women [2]. The World Health Organization has estimated that this disorder would be the second cause of the global disease burden in 2020. In the conducted evaluations, the prevalence of postpartum depression has been reported between 25% and 42.1% in Iran [3].

Postpartum depression has destructive effects on the mother, neonate, and family [4]. It would expose the mother to the risk of social isolation due to the lack of energy, exhaustion and the feeling of disability, worthlessness, and disappointment [5]. Fifty percent of the mothers think about killing themselves or their neonates due to postpartum depression [6, 7]. On the other hand, 24% to 50% of the husbands of depressed mothers also suffer from depression [8]. Following postpartum depression, conflicts, quarrels, and discontinuing couple’s social support for each other, separation and divorce would threaten the couple’s married life [911].

Postpartum depression affects the mother-neonate relationship all around the world; despite various cultures and socioeconomic statuses, the suffering mothers are less sensitive and responding to their neonates. Neonatal care such as feeding the neonate - breastfeeding, routine sleeping, regular visits to the physician, vaccination, and providing the safety of the neonate is decreased in these mothers [12]. Also, studies have indicated the negative effects of postpartum depression on cognitive and emotional growth during the neonatal period and afterward [13, 14].

A significant number of patients do not seek treatment due to various reasons such as feeling ashamed for not being happy when they are expected to be happy, being labeled as a mental health patient, and unawareness; and when they seek treatment, they mostly prefer not to consume psychotropic drugs during breastfeeding, although the evidence has shown their relatively significant safety for the neonate [1518].

Preventing this disorder is of great importance due to its unpleasant consequences for the physical and psychological health of the parents and particularly the neonate [19]. Furthermore, about 30 to 50 billion dollars are spent annually for the treatment of depression, and it also causes more indirect costs considering the inability to work [20].

One of the drugs that have been considered for the treatment of depression is ketamine [21]. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and is considered an inexpensive, accessible anesthetic medicine [22]. Prescribing a dosage of ketamine that is lower than its anesthetic dose before anesthesia induction during caesarian sections would prevent severe hemodynamic changes along with appropriate analgesia induction; also, it does not have a decreasing effect on the respiration rate of the neonate’s [23].

Ketamine has a rapid anti-depressant effect in many patients resistant to treatment, although its level and stability of response is not predictable [24, 25]. Some studies have reported decreased symptoms of depression two hours after intravenous administration of low-dose ketamine with a two-week length of effect [26]. Although the effect of ketamine on major depression has been investigated and discussed in many studies, its effect on postpartum depression during general anesthesia for the caesarian section has rarely been investigated. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the effect of ketamine on preventing postpartum depression in women undergoing caesarian sections.

Material and Methods

The study population for the present double-blind clinical trial included all the pregnant women who were a candidate for caesarian section referring to the educational centers of the Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. The sample size was calculated using the following formula and previous studies [2729]. A primary error of 5%, a secondary error of 10%, a standard deviation of 4.1, and a score difference of 2.5 were considered for the 35 participants of each group.

graphic file with name JMedLife-14-87eq-01.jpg

The inclusion criteria were having a low-risk pregnancy, being 18 to 35 years old, being a candidate for a caesarian section, being ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class 1 or 2, (not having any underlying diseases such as ischemic heart diseases, diabetes mellitus or hypertension), not having any contraindication for receiving ketamine, and not having a history of drug abuse. Post-delivery hemorrhage, which required a blood transfusion, and the patient's unwillingness to continue the study were the exclusion criteria.

After receiving the approval of the University's Ethics Committee, data were gathered using a demographic characteristics questionnaire that investigated age, education, number of pregnancies, history of miscarriage, having a wanted or unwanted pregnancy, history of depression and satisfaction with life, and also the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). This questionnaire consists of ten 4-choice questions so that its minimum score is 0 and its maximum score is 30. Mothers who would gain a score of 13 or higher are probably suffering from depression with various intensities, and they need further investigation to diagnose depression. Holden et al. reported that this questionnaire has a desirable validity and, using Cronbach's α, reported that its reliability is higher than 0.80 [30]. Ahmadi et al. reported a reliability of 0.70 among the Iranian population [31].

After obtaining written informed consent, eligible participants were divided into two groups (intervention and control) using simple randomization. The demographic characteristics form and Edinburgh scale were completed at the first stage and before the caesarian through an in-person interview. In the intervention group, along with Nesdonal (1–2 mg/kg of body weight), 0.5 mg/kg of body weight of ketamine was intravenously injected during the induction of anesthesia; the control group only received 3–5 mg/kg of body weight of Nesdonal intravenously during the induction of anesthesia. At the second and third stages of the study, which were two and four weeks after the caesarian section, the Edinburgh scale was completed again through phone calls. The gathered data were entered into the SPSS software (version 18) and analyzed using variance analysis with repeated measures and the Chi-square test.

Results

In total, 67 participants were studied in both groups (Figure 1). The mean age of the mothers in the Nesdonal group and the Ketamine-Nesdonal group was 27.4±4.09 and 28.24±4.81, respectively, and the difference between both groups was not statistically significant. Based on the results, both of the studied groups were similar regarding the number of pregnancies, having wanted or unwanted pregnancy, education, history of depression, and satisfaction with life (Table 1). The mean Apgar score in the first minute after delivery in the Nesodnal group was 7.30±0.63, and 7.82±0.68 in the Ketamine-Nesdonal group; in this regard, the difference between both groups was statistically significant (p > 0.001). Therefore, the Apgar score in the first minute was considered as a confounding factor in the model, and it was revealed that, despite this fact, there was a significant difference between both groups at different times regarding the score of depression (the interactive effect between time and Apgar score: P = 0.71, F = 0.35; the interactive effect between time and group: P < 0.001, F = 14.17). The Apgar score of all the neonates in the fifth minute was 10.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Consort flow diagram.

Table 1:

The mean and standard deviation of the demographic characteristics of the participants in the intervention and control groups.

Demographic characteristics Intervention group Control group Independent t-test P-value
Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation
Mother’s age 27.40 4.09 28.24 4.81 -1.08 0.28
Number of pregnancies 2.06 0.85 2.21 0.98 -0.96 0.34
Frequency Percent Frequency Percent Chi-square test P-value
Pregnancy Wanted 58 86.6 54 81.8 0.56 0.45
Unwanted 9 13.4 12 18.2
Education Under diploma 5 7.5 4 6 2.23 0.33
Diploma 17 25.3 25 37.3
Bachelor’s degree or higher 45 67.2 38 56.7
History of depression Yes 15 22.4 10 14.9 1.23 0.27
No 52 77.6 57 85.1
Satisfaction with life Excellent 11 16.4 8 11.9 0.63 0.89
Good 36 53.7 37 55.2
Moderate 16 23.9 17 25.4
Poor 4 6 5 7.5

Results of variance analysis with repeated measures showed that in the Ketamine-Nedonal group, the mean score of depression was significantly lower four weeks after the caesarian section compared to two weeks afterward and also was significantly lower two weeks after caesarian section than before caesarian section (p > 0.001). In the Nesdonal group, the mean score of depression was increased two weeks after the caesarian section compared to before the caesarian section, but the difference was not statistically significant; in this group, the mean score of depression was significantly decreased four weeks after the caesarian section in comparison to two weeks after the caesarian section (p > 0.001). The mean score of depression had a significant difference between both groups, two and four weeks after the caesarian section (Table 2).

Table 2:

Comparison of mean depression scores at different times between the two groups.

Group
Variable
Nesdonal group Ketamine-Nesdonal group Independent t-test and P-value Variance analysis with repeated measures P-value
Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation
Score of depression before caesarian section 13.79 4.78 13.78 3.87 t = 0.02
p = 0.98
6.56 0.012
Score of depression two weeks after caesarian section 14.34 4.29 11.82 3.41 t = 3.77
p < 0.001
Score of depression four weeks after caesarian section 13.09 3.79 10.84 3.48 t = 3.58
p < 0.001
Greenhouse-Geisser test F = 4.68 F = 52.52 -
P-value 0.019 < 0.001 -

Discussion

The present study showed a significant difference between the intervention and the control groups at different times regarding the score of depression except for before the caesarian section, meaning that the scores of depression two and four weeks after the caesarian section were significantly lower than the control group. The depression scores in the intervention group at the three studied times were significantly lower and descending; the scores were lower than the cut-off point of the Edinburgh scale for the possible depression diagnosis two and four weeks after the caesarian section. In the Nesdonal group, the score of depression was increased two weeks after the caesarian section compared to before the intervention, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the score of depression was significantly decreased in the control group four weeks after the caesarian section compared to two weeks after the caesarian section. Nevertheless, this score was still higher than 13 and considered possible depressed according to the Edinburgh scale and required more investigation.

Although the difference in the Apgar score of the neonates in the first minute was statistically significant between the two groups, the difference was not clinically significant, and both groups received a score of 7 and had similar categorization regarding their need for resuscitation. However, considering it as a confounding factor in the investigation model, it had no effect on the score of depression. In a systematic review by Hessen et al. in 2015, ketamine did not have an effect on the Apgar score either [32].

In a study that was titled “the effect of Ketamine on postpartum depression in women undergoing caesarian section”, Jianxin et al. also found similar results in 2015 and reported the positive effect of ketamine on preventing postpartum depression [33].

Unlike the results of the present study, the results of the study conducted by Xu et al. in 2017 showed that ketamine had no effect on preventing postpartum depression [34]. The reason for not finding any effect was probably the lower dose of ketamine (0.25 mg/kg of body weight) in comparison to the present study (0.5 mg/kg of body weight) because Jianxin et al. also reported similar results and a positive effect in their study with a higher dose of ketamine (4 mg/kg of body weight) than the dose used in the present study.

In 2016, Xia et al. evaluated the effect of chronic stress before pregnancy on postpartum depression and compared the effect of fluoxetine and ketamine in rats. They reported that acute ketamine had improved the molecular signaling disorder, and behavioral flaws in rats with postpartum depression were corrected rapidly and stably compared to the poor treatment with chronic fluoxetine [35]. The greater effectiveness of ketamine compared to fluoxetine in the treatment of postpartum depression was a notable point in this study because selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), during pregnancy and after delivery are potentially capable of affecting the development process of the neonate due to passing the placenta and being active in the breast milk. However, the weight of the effect of the mother’s depression or these drugs on the development of the neonate has not been determined [36]. Therefore, in the case of the positive effect of ketamine on postpartum depression, there are no concerns.

Regarding the effect of ketamine on postpartum depression, unlike its effect on major depression, the studies are limited. However, considering the extensive confirmation of the effect of ketamine for the treatment of major depression and suicidal thoughts in various studies [3741], it would not be too much to expect a positive effect from it on postpartum depression.

Various studies have been conducted in the midwifery and gynecology setting on issues other than postpartum depression, such as its analgesic effect after caesarian sections and also analgesia during labor, and most of the studies have confirmed the positive effect of ketamine.

Appropriate pain relief after a caesarian section is essential for mother-neonate bonding, early recovery of the mother, and early discharge from the hospital. Most of the conducted studies in this regard studied ketamine’s spinal administration, which had appropriate effectiveness and decreased the need for pain killers after the caesarian section [32].

Inducing appropriate analgesia during labor with a safe, affordable, simple method with the least maternal and fetal complications that would not affect the process of labor is considered an ideal method, and some studies have found ketamine appropriate for this purpose [42, 43].

Considering the reported advantageous effects of ketamine in the conducted studies such as analgesia [44, 45], analgesia during labor [42, 46] after caesarian section and vaginal delivery [47], safety during labor and caesarian section[48], and its relatively known effect for the treatment of major depression, if its effect on preventing postpartum depression would be confirmed through another clinical trial, it would become a multipurpose appropriate option in gynecology and midwifery departments. This effect could especially be considered in people who are more prone to postpartum depression.

Conclusion

Postpartum depression is a disabling common psychosocial disorder and could have destructive effects on the mother, neonate, family, and society. The present study evaluated the effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine during a caesarian section on preventing postpartum depression, considering the conducted studies on the effect of ketamine on treating major, treatment-resistant depression. Based on the results of the present study, it could be concluded that a single dose of ketamine in women who are a candidate for a caesarian section could be effective in preventing postpartum depression. Since ketamine is inexpensive and available, it could mainly be used for this purpose in women who are more prone to postpartum depression. However, extensive clinical trials should be conducted in this regard.

Acknowledgments

Ethical approval

The approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (approval ID: IR.RUMS.REC.1395.27). The trial was registered at the Iran Clinical Trial Registration Center (reference number: IRCT2016122726971N2).

Consent to participate

Written consent was obtained from each participant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Werner E, Miller M, Osborne LM, Kuzava S, Monk C. Preventing postpartum depression: review and recommendations. Archives of women's mental health. 2015;18(1):41–60. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0475-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boath EH, Pryce AJ, Cox JL. Postnatal depression: The impact on the family. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 1998;16(2–3):199–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Najafian M, Cheraghi M, Nazeri Astaneh A, Namazi M. A Study on the Relationship of Postpartum Depression and Method of Delivery. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2013;13(1):67–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stein A, Arteche A, Lehtonen A, Craske M, Harvey A, Counsell N, Murray L. Interpretation of infant facial expression in the context of maternal postnatal depression. Infant Behavior and Development. 2010;33(3):273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Holopainen D. The experience of seeking help for postnatal depression. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The. 2002;19(3):39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barr JA, Beck CT. Infanticide secrets: qualitative study on postpartum depression. Canadian Family Physician. 2008;54(12):1716–1717.e1715. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fairbrother N, Woody SR. New mothers’ thoughts of harm related to the newborn. Archives of women's mental health. 2008;11(3):221–229. doi: 10.1007/s00737-008-0016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goodman JH. Paternal postpartum depression, its relationship to maternal postpartum depression, and implications for family health. Journal of advanced nursing. 2004;45(1):26–35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meadows SO, McLanahan SS, Brooks–Gunn J. Parental depression and anxiety and early childhood behavior problems across family types. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2007;69(5):1162–1177. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davies PT, Windle M. Gender-specific pathways between maternal depressive symptoms, family discord, and adolescent adjustment. Developmental psychology. 1997;33(4):657. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.4.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Leinonen JA, Solantaus TS, Punamäki RL. Parental mental health and children's adjustment: The quality of marital interaction and parenting as mediating factors. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 2003;44(2):227–241. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.t01-1-00116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Field T. Postpartum depression effects on early interactions, parenting, and safety practices: a review. Infant Behavior and Development. 2010;33(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu P, Sun MS, Hao JH, Chen YJ, Jiang XM, Tao RX, Huang K, Tao FB. Does prenatal maternal stress impair cognitive development and alter temperament characteristics in toddlers with healthy birth outcomes? Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2014;56(3):283–289. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Conroy S, Pariante CM, Marks MN, Davies HA, Farrelly S, Schacht R, Moran P. Maternal psychopathology and infant development at 18 months: the impact of maternal personality disorder and depression. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012;51(1):51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beck CT. Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nursing research. 2001;50(5):275–285. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goodman JH. Women’s attitudes, preferences, and perceived barriers to treatment for perinatal depression. Birth. 2009;36(1):60–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cott AD, Wisner K. Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy. International Review of Psychiatry. 2003;15(3):217–230. doi: 10.1080/0954026031000136848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freeman MP. Antenatal depression: navigating the treatment dilemmas. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;164(8):1162–1165. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07020341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ramchandani P, Stein A, Evans J, O'Connor TG, Team AS. Paternal depression in the postnatal period and child development: a prospective population study. The Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2201–2205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66778-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Masoudnia E. Relationship between perceived social support and risk of postpartum depression disorder. 2011 [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kheirkhah F, Moghadamnia A, Tayebi G, Bijani A, Tayebi P, Salavati A. Effect of ketamine in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aroni F, Iacovidou N, Dontas I, Pourzitaki C, Xanthos T. Pharmacological aspects and potential new clinical applications of ketamine: reevaluation of an old drug. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2009;49(8):957–964. doi: 10.1177/0091270009337941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arbabi S, Hemati Khatami A, Hossein Khan Z. The effect of preinduction low dose of intravenous ketamine on homodynamic stability of parturient scheduled for elective cesarean section. Journal Of Guilan University Of Medical Sciences. 2007;16(61):30–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zarate CA, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, Charney DS, Manji HK. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Archives of general psychiatry. 2006;63(8):856–864. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, Iqbal S,, Pillemer S,, Foulkes A,, Shah A. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;170(10):1134–1142. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. How does ketamine elicit a rapid antidepressant response? Current opinion in pharmacology. 2015;20:35–39. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McGirr A, Berlim M, Bond D, Fleck M, Yatham L, Lam R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes. Psychological medicine. 2015;45(4):693–704. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bechtholt-Gompf AJ, Smith KL, John CS, Kang HH, Carlezon WA, Cohen BM, Öngür D. CD-1 and Balb/cJ mice do not show enduring antidepressant-like effects of ketamine in tests of acute antidepressant efficacy. Psychopharmacology. 2011;215(4):689–695. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.aan het Rot M, Collins KA, Murrough JW, Perez AM, Reich DL,, Charney DS,, Mathew SJ. Safety and efficacy of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Biological psychiatry. 2010;67(2):139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British journal of psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ahmadi kani, Golzar A, GoliZadeh Z. Validation of Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening postpartum depression in Iran. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2015;3(3):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heesen M, Böhmer J, Brinck E, Kontinen V, Klöhr S, Rossaint R, Straube S. Intravenous ketamine during spinal and general anaesthesia for caesarean section: systematic review and meta–analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2015;59(4):414–426. doi: 10.1111/aas.12468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gao J, Junmei X. Efficacy of ketamine in preventing postpartum depression in patients undergoing cesarean section. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015;35(6):674–676. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu Y, Li Y, Huang X, Chen D, She B, Ma D. Single bolus low-dose of ketamine does not prevent postpartum depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective clinical trial. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2017;295(5):1167–1174. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4334-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xia B, Chen C, Zhang H, Xue W, Tang J, Tao W, Wu R, Ren L, Wang W, Chen G. Chronic stress prior to pregnancy potentiated long-lasting postpartum depressive-like behavior, regulated by Akt-mTOR signaling in the hippocampus. Scientific reports. 2016;6:35042. doi: 10.1038/srep35042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Weissman AM, Levy BT, Hartz AJ, Bentler S, Donohue M, Ellingrod VL, Wisner KL. Pooled analysis of antidepressant levels in lactating mothers, breast milk, and nursing infants. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;161(6):1066–1078. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grady SE, Marsh TA, Tenhouse A, Klein K. Ketamine for the treatment of major depressive disorder and bipolar depression: A review of the literature. Mental Health Clinician. 2017;7(1):16–23. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2017.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Singh I, Morgan C, Curran V, Nutt D, Schlag A, McShane R. Ketamine treatment for depression: opportunities for clinical innovation and ethical foresight. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(5):419–426. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wilkinson ST, Ballard ED, Bloch MH, Mathew SJ, Murrough JW, Feder A, Sos P, Wang G, Zarate CA, Jr, Sanacora G. The effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine on suicidal ideation: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. American journal of psychiatry. 2017;175(2):150–158. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17040472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grunebaum MF, Galfalvy HC, Choo T-H, Keilp JG, Moitra VK, Parris MS, Marver JE, Burke AK, Milak MS,, Sublette ME. Ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal thoughts in major depression: a midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;175(4):327–335. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17060647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Duman RS. Ketamine and rapid-acting antidepressants: a new era in the battle against depression and suicide. F1000Research. 2018:7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14344.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jagatia K, Mehta J, Patel N. Low dose ketamine for painless labour-a comparative study of 100 patients. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013;2(2):707–711. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Joel S, Joselyn A, Cherian VT, Nandhakumar A, Raju N, Kaliaperumal I. Low-dose ketamine infusion for labor analgesia: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial. Saudi journal of anaesthesia. 2014;8(1):6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.125897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Doan LV, Wang J. An Update on the Basic and Clinical Science of Ketamine Analgesia. The Clinical journal of pain. 2018 doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karlow N, Schlaepfer CH, Stoll CR, Doering M, Carpenter CR, Colditz GA, Motov S, Miller J, Schwarz ES. A Systematic Review and Meta–analysis of Ketamine as an Alternative to Opioids for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2018 doi: 10.1111/acem.13502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Okorie O, Ezike H, Iroezindu M, Obuna J, Okike C. Evaluation of oral ketamine for pain relief during normal labour in Nigerian parturients. Journal of Medical Sciences and Clinical Research. 2014;2(5):904–925. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Radvansky BM, Shah K, Parikh A, Sifonios AN, Le V, Eloy JD. Role of ketamine in acute postoperative pain management: a narrative review. BioMed research international. 2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/749837. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gimovsky AC, Fritton K, Viscusi E, Roman A. Evaluating the Use of Ketamine for Pain Control With Sickle Cell Crisis in Pregnancy: A Report of 2 Cases. A&A Practice. 2018;10(1):20–22. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medicine and Life are provided here courtesy of SC Jurnalul pentru Medicina si Viata SRL

RESOURCES