Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Aug 12;85(17):11409–11425. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c01489

Synthesis of Polycyclic Fused Indoline Scaffolds through a Substrate-Guided Reactivity Switch

Cecilia Ciccolini , Giacomo Mari , Francesco G Gatti , Giuseppe Gatti , Gianluca Giorgi §, Fabio Mantellini , Gianfranco Favi †,*
PMCID: PMC8010796  PMID: 32786612

Abstract

graphic file with name jo0c01489_0015.jpg

Zn(II)-catalyzed divergent synthesis of functionalized polycyclic indolines through formal [3 + 2] and [4 + 2] cycloadditions of indoles with 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) is reported. The nature and type of substituents of substrates are found to act as a chemical switch to trigger two distinct reaction pathways and to obtain two different types of products upon the influence of the same catalyst. The mechanism of both [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadditions was investigated and fully rationalized by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

Introduction

Functionalized polycyclic fused indoline frameworks are central molecular architectures in nature and pharmaceuticals.1 As one of the indolines, C2,C3-fused indolines2 have attracted extensive research effort over the past decades because scaffolds of this type lead to relatively rigid structures that might be expected to show substantial selectivity in their interactions with enzymes or receptors.3 Representative naturally occurring polycyclic indolines such as vincorine, minfiensine, gliocladin C, kopsnone, pleiomaltinine, and communesin F are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Examples of naturally occurring compounds containing 2,3-fused indolines.

Among the annelated indolines, the pyrroloindoline, pyridazino indoline skeletons and their related structures, can be found in numerous natural bioactive products, marketed drugs, and other functional molecules.4,5 The desire to build such appealing polycyclic frameworks, particularly those with bridgehead amino acetal C2 carbons, has inspired the development of elegant methodologies over the past several years. Among the reported methods, dearomatization of indoles via cycloaddition reactions6 has been demonstrated as a reliable approach in converting simple planar aromatic molecules into structurally complex and stereoselective ring systems.

Following the initial discovery of the inverse electron-demand [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of electron-rich alkenes (furans, pyrroles, and indoles) with 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) by Gilchrist et al.,7 other elegant studies by the groups of Wang8 and Tan9 have been recently reported exploiting indoles as nucleophiles.

By taking advantage of the unique reactivity of DDs10 and intrigued by these and our recent findings in the manipulation of indolyl cores,11 we reasoned that the proper combination of indole and 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene elements might allow us to design a substrate-controlled divergent approach. In this design, DDs would be used as C2N1 or C2N2 units (1,3 or 1,4 dipole synthons) to realize [3 + 2] and [4 + 2] annulation reactions of indoles, respectively (Scheme 1). Thus, by tuning the substituents of both substrates upon the influence of the same catalyst, two series of fused indoline-based scaffolds such as tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indoles and tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles would be generated with chemodivergence.

Scheme 1. Working Hypothesis: Chemodivergent Synthesis of Polycyclic Fused Indoline Scaffolds.

Scheme 1

Distinct from previous findings, we herein report our successful development of a substituent-controlled divergent synthesis of fused indoline-based scaffolds. These [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadditions were realized in a straightforward, pretty challenging, and highly atom-economical/diastereselective manner from rationally designed indole and 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene substrates with C3 and/or C4 position(s) substituted, respectively.

Results and Discussion

We began our work by studying the reaction between indole 1a and cyclic 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2a (Table S1, Supporting Information (SI)). No reaction took place, and both compounds remained inactive in the absence of a Lewis acid catalyst. A series of Lewis acid catalysts [such as Sc(OTf)3, Zn(OAc)2, ZnSO4, Zn(OTf)2, SmCl3·6H2O, LiClO4, LiCl, CuCl2, Cu(OTf)2, CuBr2, InBr3, ZnBr2, and ZnCl2] and solvents [such as dichloromethane (DCM), acetone, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, and cyclohexane] were examined, and the combination of ZnCl2 and CH2Cl2 (heterogeneous catalytic system) was found to be superior for this transformation. Noteworthy, compound 3a was obtained as a single regio- and diastereoisomer (50% yield).

The substrate scope with respect to various 2,3-unsubstituted indoles 1an and cyclic DDs 2ah (see the SI for details) was then examined under the optimized reaction conditions, and a variety of tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indoles (tetracyclic fused ring (6-5-6-6/7/8) systems) 3ax was synthesized (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, indoles 1an with different electronic characters were suitable for the reaction, with six-membered cyclic DDs giving the relative fused indoline heterocycles 3ad in moderate to good yields. The Zn-catalyzed [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions were further extended to seven- and eight-membered cyclic DDs. We were glad to find that the use of seven-membered DDs gave rise to the best results in terms of isolated yields. Also, the wide functional group tolerance was well demonstrated by the fact that both electron-donating (5-OMe, 5-, 7-Me) and electron-withdrawing (6-Cl, 5-CO2Me, 5-CN, 5-CHO, 5-NO2) groups were well tolerated, providing efficient access to the fused indoline heterocycles 3es. Interestingly, the use of the 7-azaindole substrate also worked well to give the product 3t in 85% isolated yield. The formal [4 + 2] annulation was then extended to DDs bearing cyclooctane, and the reactions furnished the relative products 3ux with lower yields than those of seven-membered cyclic DDs. Additionally, the generality of the N-terminal protective group on DDs as well as for the N atom of indoles was explored. Remarkably, free N–H indoles were also compatible with this protocol, albeit slightly lower yields were observed, probably owing to the reduced nucleophilicity at C3 and the reduced electrophilicity at C2 of the starting indole (Scheme 1, 3svs3p, and 3xvs3u).

Table 1. Scope of the Zn(II)-Catalyzed [4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction of 2,3-Unsubstituted Indoles (1) and Cyclic Azoalkenes (2)a,b.

graphic file with name jo0c01489_0010.jpg

graphic file with name jo0c01489_0011.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: 1 (2.0 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (0.1 mmol, 10 mol %), DCM (2.0 mL), 25 °C.

b

Isolated yields.

c

Ring-opened product 4 was also isolated.

No annulation occurred when five-membered cyclic DD was employed under the optimized reaction conditions (3y, 0%).12 The relative configurations of cycloadducts 3 were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis of 3e(13) (see the SI for detailed X-ray crystallography data), and those of other compounds were assigned by analogy.

During the investigation on the ring size effect of the 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene substrate, it was also noted the formation of ring-opened [4 + 2] byproduct 4, highlighting the ease of rearomatization of 3 to give a more stable indole derivative. The sensitivity of 3 to the rearomatization process was confirmed by complete transformation of 3b into 4e in the presence of Amberlyst 15(H) (vide infra, Scheme 4b). This undesirable event appears to be the cause for lowering the [4 + 2] cycloaddition product yields found in some cases. Notably, this pathway remains dominant when the reaction was conducted using N-methyl indole (1a) or 1,2-dimethyl indole (1o) with linear DDs 2j and 2n (Scheme 2) in line with what was previously observed in the reactions of 2,3- (and 3-)unsubstituted indoles with cyclic and noncyclic DDs.7a,10e

Scheme 4. Control Experiments.

Scheme 4

Scheme 2. Other Substrates Scope Studies.

Scheme 2

More precisely, the reaction of N-methyl indole (1a) with linear DD 2n afforded the more polar ring-opened [4 + 2] product 4a (48% yield). However, thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis revealed the presence of a mixture of the diastereoisomers of pyridazine 3z. Consistent with Gilchrist’s observation,7b monitoring the progress of the reaction by 1H NMR, we detected an initial (preferential) formation of (cis,cis)-3z, which then partially isomerized to its isomer (cis,trans)-3z either during the course of the reaction or during chromatographic separation. Despite the isomerization side reaction, both diastereoisomers were isolated ((cis,cis)/(cis,trans) ∼ 2:1, 32% combined yield) and characterized (see the SI for details). On the other hand, the reaction of N-methyl indole (1a) with DD 2j or 1,2-dimethyl indole (1o) with DD 2j or 2a led to the formation of the sole ring-opened [4 + 2] products 4bd (Scheme 2). Therefore, given the results with the use of both 2,3- and 3-unsubstituted indoles (associated with the [4 + 2] pyridazine-ring-opening reaction) and to further showcase the flexibility of this catalytic annulation strategy, we next moved our attention to exploring the reactivity of C3-blocked indoles (e.g., 3-substituted and 2,3-disubstituted indoles) with DDs. To our surprise, the reaction of 3-methyl indole (1p) with linear DD 2n led to a mixture of two cycloadducts, the expected tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole compound 3ab and the tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole compound 5a(14) in a ratio of approximately 1:1, which could possibly be the result of the above-mentioned two competitive reaction pathways15 (Scheme 2). Interestingly, when 1,3-dimethyl indole (1q) was used in combination with DD 2j, the exclusive formation of product 5b (46% yield) was detected. As expected, when the reaction was repeated using cyclic DD 2c, the exclusive formation of the corresponding [4 + 2] product 3ad (40% yield) (Scheme 2) was observed. Intrigued by the starkly different reaction profile, we next focused our attention on the 2,3-disubstituted indole motif. Unfortunately, the reactions of 2,3-disubstituted indoles such as 2,3-dimethyl indole 1r and 2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazole 1t with cyclic DD such as 2c did not work well, and only a trace amount of the respective formal [4 + 2] cycloaddition product was detected in the complex crude reaction mixture (Scheme 2). Explanations for these findings are not immediately intuited, but the steric effect seems to be playing a major role.

To our pleasure, the reaction of 2,3-dimethyl indole (1r) with DD 2j proved efficient, leading to the relative [3 + 2] cycloadduct 5c (58% yield) as the sole product. Thus, to further extend the substrate scope, a series of differently 2,3-disubstituted indole entities 1rz containing electron-donating groups (5-OMe and 5-Me) or electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) (5-Cl) and 4-ester, 4-amide, or 4-phosphonate N-protected linear DDs 2js were tested. Pleasantly, all of the reactions proceeded smoothly and furnished the highly crowded tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole products 5cs in good to excellent yields (Table 2).

Table 2. Scope of the Zn(II)-Catalyzed [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction of 2,3-Substituted Indoles (1) and Linear Azoalkenes (2)a,b.

graphic file with name jo0c01489_0012.jpg

graphic file with name jo0c01489_0013.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.6 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), ZnCl2 (0.04 mmol, 10 mol %), DCM (2.0 mL), 25 °C.

b

Isolated yields.

The structures of compounds 5as were confirmed by subjecting 5s to N–N bond cleavage using the Magnus method.16 Treatment of compound 5s with ethyl bromoacetate/Cs2CO3/MeCN at 50 °C followed by heating to 80 °C resulted in N–N′ bond cleavage to the corresponding NH-free tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole 6a in 64% isolated yield (Scheme 4a).

As a synthetic strategy, this [3 + 2] annulation affords, in a single operation, the structurally rigid 6-5-5 tricyclic subunit with a substituent at the 3-position of the indole nucleus, which is the basic structure of pharmaceutically valuable natural products.4 Besides, this nonclassical approach provides access to functionalized pyrroloindoline systems with substitution patterns that are otherwise inaccessible using tryptamines17 as precursors.

The mechanism of the two divergent cycloadditions was studied by density functional theory (DFT) computational chemistry (model chemistry: B3LYP/6-31-G(d)/SCRF = PCM, solvent = DCM,18,19 Gaussian16 software;20 all details are available in the SI). We focused our attention on the reaction of 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2n (DD) with 3-methyl indole 1p (In), since such a combination affords both cycloaddition products, i.e., (cis,cis)-3ab (with a de of 99% by 1H NMR) and 5a, in the ratio of about 1:1, after column chromatography separation (Scheme 2). To begin with, we assumed a concerted mechanism for the [4 + 2] cycloaddition (Figure 2a) and a two-step mechanism for the nonpericyclic [3 + 2] cycloaddition (Figure 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Catalytic cycles for the model reactants 2n (DD) and 1p (In) catalyzed by ZnCl2. (a) [4 + 2] cycloaddition: (i) cisoid-DD·ZnCl2 catalytic complex formation; (ii) exo or endo adduct formation, exo-In·DD·ZnCl2 or endo-In·DD·ZnCl2; (iii) cycloaddition through the transition state [TS] affording the pyridazino indoline product complex, endo-cycle·ZnCl2 or exo-cycle·ZnCl2; (iv) substitution with DD affording (cis,cis)-3ab and cisoid-DD·ZnCl2 restoration. (b) [3 + 2] Cycloaddition: (v) transoid-DD·ZnCl2 catalytic complex formation; (vi) nonpericyclic In·DD·ZnCl2 adduct formation; (vii) [1,6]-addition to form the zwitterionic intermediate Zw·ZnCl2 through the transition state [TS1]; (viii) ring-closure through [TS2] affording the nonchelated [3 + 2]-cycle·ZnCl2 complex, (ix) [1,3]-H shift (tautomerization) giving the pyrazolo indoline product complex, PI·ZnCl2; (x) substitution with DD affording 5b and restoring the transoid-DD·ZnCl2. For clarity, the H atoms of the DFT-optimized structures are omitted.

The computed [4 + 2] energy reaction paths starting from the cisoid-1,2-diaza-1,3-diene·ZnCl2·catalytic complex (cisoid-DD·ZnCl2) leading to the complex endo-cycle·ZnCl2 and to exo-cycle·ZnCl2 are reported in Figure 3a; since the reaction is highly exoergonic, both reaction trajectories go through a typical reactant-like transition state [TS] having pericyclic topology. Both exo and endo transition states ([TS]exo and [TS]endo) are shown in Figure 3b.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) DFT-computed Gibbs free energy profile of the rate-limiting step of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition in CH2Cl2 at 298 K for reagents 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2n and indole 1p. The energies (kcal mol–1) are reported with respect to the cisoid-DD·ZnCl2 and In species. (b) Structures of endo and exo transition states; for clarity, some H atoms have been omitted.

The computations show clearly that the observed high diastereoselectivity toward the formation of the slightly less stable (cis,cis)-3ab pyridazino indoline ((cis,cis) → (cis,trans), ΔG° = −2.66 kcal mol–1) is obtained under kinetic control. Indeed, since its endo cyclic precursor is substantially more stable than the exo adduct (ΔΔG = −1.70 kcal mol–1, mainly for the lack of the steric clashes of the two methyl groups; see Figure 2a), the two associated activation energy barriers are very different (ΔG = 9.02 vs 10.46 kcal mol–1); thus, the endo path is kinetically more favorable. Interestingly, in both [TS], the ratio between the two forming C–C and C–N single bonds is about 1.3 (Figure 3b), which is symptomatic of an asynchronous concerted transition state.21

The comparison of the [3 + 2] cycloaddition energy diagram of the two stepwise mechanisms with that of the concerted cycloaddition suggested by Gilchrist et al. with very similar substrates7b,8 shows clearly that the latter mechanism is not active in our case (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Computed Gibbs free energy profile of the [3 + 2] cyclization: stepwise mechanism (blue path) vs the concerted mechanism (red path) in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The energies (kcal mol–1) are reported with respect to the transoid-DD·ZnCl2 and In species. For clarity, the H atoms of transition-state structures have been omitted.

The stepwise catalytic cycle is based on the formation of the very stable transoid-DD·ZnCl2 (transoid/cisoid, 99.4:0.6; see the SI), followed by the [1,6]-addition of indole to give the zwitterionic intermediate (Zw·ZnCl2) through [TS1]; then, the latter ring closes to form the nonchelated [3 + 2]-cycle·ZnCl2 complex through [TS2]. According to our computations, the energy barriers associated with these two steps are very similar (ΔG1 = 13.41 kcal mol–1vs ΔG2 = 12.04 kcal mol–1). However, the catalytic cycle ends through the following non-rate-limiting steps: [1,3]-H shift (tautomerization), product delivery, and transoid-DD·ZnCl2 catalytic complex restoration by substitution with a new molecule of DD.

Finally, as a corollary of the above-reported computations, we used them to evaluate the order of magnitude of the product ratio [(cis,cis)-pyridazinio indoline (3ab)]/[pyrazolo indoline (5b)] in comparison with the value experimentally obtained (∼1:1, after column chromatography separation). To this end, we have conveniently summarized the scheme of the two divergent cyclization reactions as follows

graphic file with name jo0c01489_m001.jpg

Since the two-reactant catalytic complexes (the cisoid-DD·ZnCl2 and the transoid-DD·ZnCl2) are in equilibrium, and their interconversion is much faster than the cycloaddition reaction rates, it is possible to apply the Curtin–Hammet equation,22 which, in our case with a ΔΔG = [TS]endo – [TS1] = 0.50 kcal mol–1, gave a ratio of 7:3, (cis,cis)-3ab and pyrazole indoline 5b, respectively. We reckon that this result is fair enough, considering the chemical accuracy attainable via the used model chemistry.

Combining the above experimental results, DFT studies, and available literature,7,10e a reasonable mechanism for these annulation processes is summarized in Scheme 3. Two competing (and independent) reaction pathways for both the tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole and tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole derivatives appeared to take place upon initial ZnCl2 activation of the 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene substrate. The [4 + 2] cycloaddition (path a) can be simply rationalized as a concerted inverse hetero-Diels–Alder reaction. The preference for an endo cycloaddition transition state, which requires the cisoid conformation for DD 2 (II), supports the high observed diastereoselectivity for product 3.23 Alternatively, [3 + 2] annulation (path b) can be viewed as proceeding via a stepwise process. Regioselective 1,6-addition of the indole nucleophile 1 on activated DD 2 (I) that is in a transoid conformation affords the zwitterionic intermediate IV, which undergoes intramolecular 5-exo-trig cyclization collapsing to the five-membered azomethine imide V. The subsequent 1,3-H shift furnishes via intermediate VI the tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole product 5 and restores the ZnCl2–diene catalytic complex.24 The fact that the indole 1q gave both [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadducts using cyclic (R4 ≠ H) and linear (R4 = H) DDs (3advs5b) supported this mechanism scenario.

Scheme 3. Plausible Reaction Mechanism for Zn(II)-Catalyzed Annulation Reactions.

Scheme 3

Likewise, the borderline example of Scheme 2 in which both cycloadducts 3ab and 5a concurrently formed15 from 1p and 2n illustrates the delicate balance and subtle nuances between the two annulation processes. It is evident that, in the presence of additional substituents on the indole ring (R3 ≠ H), the [3 + 2] mode of addition becomes competitive since the concerted [4 + 2] pathway is more susceptible to steric inhibition. Moreover, it was quite interesting to note that when six-membered cyclic 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2i was reacted with 1s, the exclusive formation of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition product 3ae was observed (Scheme 4c). Similarly, the use of linear 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2t yielded the product 3af (Scheme 4d). Our control experiments illustrate that the absence of EWG groups like esters, amides, or phosphonates in the C4 position of the starting DD (R4 = H; R5 ≠ CO2R, CONR2, and PO(OR)2), which likely disfavors the proton transfer process (VVI), also privileged the [4 + 2] mode of addition.

With this work, we have demonstrated that the nature and type of substituents of both 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene and indole substrates are critical factors dictating chemoselectivity in the annulation process. Notably, the presence of a H atom in the C3 position of the indole ring is responsible for the observed ring-opened [4 + 2] product 4. As already evidenced, this event becomes prevailing when N-methyl indole (1a) or 1,2-dimethyl indole (1o) is used as the nucleophile. To our surprise, when R3 = H, neither the formation of the [3 + 2] annulation product nor the ring-opened [3 + 2] product of type 7 described by Tan and co-workers was observed.25 This result shows that when R3 = H, the indole rearomatization process from 3 (and/or eventually from intermediate IV) to 4 is the preferred one.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed substrate-dependent divergent annulation reactions26 of indoles with 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes. By virtue of the versatility of these latter in switching reactivities, efficient synthesis of two types of polycyclic fused indoline scaffolds tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indoles and tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles was achieved. The DFT study revealed that [4 + 2] cycloadditions are concerted but quite asynchronous, while [3 + 2] reactions go undoubtedly through a stepwise mechanism. Our approach expands the scope of polycyclic fused indoline synthesis and increases the flexibility of synthetic strategies toward heterocycle-based scaffolds. Remarkably, the reactions feature a high step- and atom-economy, high chemo- and diastereoselectivity, broad substrate scope, good functional group tolerance, and readily accessible starting materials. The successful construction of unique rigid polycyclic skeletons, particularly those with challenging bridgehead N,N-aminal quaternary centers, enriches the chemistry of both indoles and 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes.

Experimental Section

General Experimental Details

Indoles 1a, 1l, 1m, 1o, 1p, 1r, and 1s are commercially available reagents and used without further purification. N-Alkylindole derivatives 1bk, 1n, and 1q were prepared from corresponding commercially available NH-indoles following literature procedures.27 3,4-Disubstituted indoles 1tz were synthesized from corresponding phenylhydrazine hydrochlorides as starting materials via Fisher indole synthesis according to the literature.28 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) 2at were synthesized from the corresponding hydrazones following literature procedures.29 Chromatographic purification of compounds was carried out on silica gel (60–200 μm). TLC analysis was performed on preloaded (0.25 mm) glass-supported silica gel plates (Kieselgel 60); compounds were visualized by exposure to UV light and by dipping the plates in 1% Ce(SO4)·4H2O and 2.5% (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O in 10% sulfuric acid, followed by heating on a hot plate. All 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 or CDCl3 on K2CO3 as the solvent. Chemical shifts (δ scale) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the central peak of the solvent and are sorted in a descending order within each group. The following abbreviations are used to describe peak patterns where appropriate: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; sex, sextet; m, multiplet; and br, broad signal. All coupling constants (J value) are given in hertz (Hz). Structural assignments were made with additional information from gradient correlation spectroscopy (gCOSY), gradient heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation (gHMQC), gradient heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (gHMBC), and nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (NOESY) experiments. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained as Nujol mulls or neat. High- and low-resolution mass spectroscopies were performed on a Micromass Q-ToF Micro mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, U.K.) using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. Elemental analyses were within ±0.4 of the theoretical values (C, H, N).

General Procedure for the Formal [4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions of Indoles 1 with Cyclic Azoalkenes 2

A mixture of indole 1 (2.0 mmol), azoalkene 2 (1.0 mmol), and zinc dichloride (0.1 mmol, 13.6 mg) was stirred in dry dichloromethane (2 mL). After the disappearance of azoalkene 2 (TLC check), the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford product 3. In some cases (see Table 1), a more polar ring-opened [4 + 2] byproduct 4 was also recovered.

(6aS*,11bR*,11cR*)-Ethyl 6-Carbamoyl-7-methyl-2,3,4,6,6a,7,11b,11c-octahydro-1H-indolo[2,3-c]cinnoline-11c-carboxylate (3a)

The product 3a was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 50% yield (178.2 mg); white solid; mp: 183–185 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.19 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.80 (br, 2 H), 6.79 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.20–4.35 (m, 2H), 3.44 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (s, 3H), 2.44–2.51 (m, 1H), 2.26 (dt, J1 = 12.0 Hz, J2 = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.78–1.84 (m, 1H), 1.50–1.63 (m, 2H), 1.24–1.35 (m, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (dt, J1 = 12.0 Hz, J2 = 4.4 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.3, 157.3, 155.3, 151.7, 129.3, 126.5, 125.7, 118.9, 108.7, 69.4, 61.8, 45.6, 42.4, 35.5, 33.8, 33.1, 27.4, 23.7, 14.3; IR (nujol): υmax = 3485, 3471, 1724, 1692 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 357 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H24N4O3 (356.42): C 64.03, H 6.79, N 15.72; found: C 63.91, H 6.84, N 15.82.

(6aS*,11b*R,11cR*)-Ethyl 7-Methyl-6-(phenylcarbamoyl)-2,3,4,6,6a,7,11b,11c-octahydro-1H-indolo[2,3-c]cinnoline-11c-carboxylate (3b)

The product 3b was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 10:90) in 56% yield (242.3 mg); white solid; mp: 183–185 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.31 (s, 1H), 7.68 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (dt, J1 = 7. 6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.02–7.08 (m, 2H), 6.78 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.19–4.34 (m, 2H), 3.52 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 2.30 (dt, J1 = 12.8 Hz, J2 = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.82–1.84 (m, 1H), 1.62 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 1.50–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.30–1.41 (m, 2H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (dt, J1 = 12.8 Hz, J2 = 4.4 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.8, 154.8, 153.4, 151.6, 139.2, 129.5, 128.9, 126.8, 125.8, 123.2, 120.3, 119.2, 109.2, 69.5, 61.9, 45.3, 41.8, 34.9, 34.3, 33.1, 27.3, 23.4, 14.4; IR (nujol): υmax = 3388, 1728, 1690 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C25H28N4O3 (432.51): C 69.42, H 6.53, N 12.95; found: C 69.30, H 6.59, N 13.06.

(6aS*,11bR*,11cR*)-Ethyl 6-Carbamoyl-9-chloro-7-methyl-2,3,4,6,6a,7,11b,11c-octahydro-1H-indolo[2,3-c]cinnoline-11c-carboxylate (3c)

The product 3c was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 22% yield (86.1 mg); white solid; mp: 188–190 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.01 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (br, 2H), 6.76 (dd, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.18–4.29 (m, 2H), 3.46 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (s, 3H), 2.45 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (dt, J1 = 12.8 Hz, J2 = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.78–1.80 (m, 1H), 1.58 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 1.51–1.53 (m, 1H), 1.27–1.32 (m, 2H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (dt, J1 = 12.8 Hz, J2 = 4.4 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.8, 156.8, 153.5, 153.1, 134.0, 126.9, 125.9, 118.4, 109.0, 69.2, 61.8, 44.8, 41.4, 34.8, 33.6, 32.9, 27.1, 23.3, 14.3; IR (nujol): υmax = 3280, 3206, 1732, 1692 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 413 [M + Na]+, 391 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H23ClN4O3 (390.86): C 58.38, H 5.93, N 14.33; found: C 58.51, H 5.98, N 14.23.

(6aS*,11bR*,11cR*)-Ethyl 7-Benzyl-6-carbamoyl-2,3,4,6,6a,7,11b,11c-octahydro-1H-indolo[2,3-c]cinnoline-11c-carboxylate (3d)

The product 3d was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 35:65) in 30% yield (129.7 mg); white solid; mp: 162–164 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.19–7.32 (m, 5H), 7.01–7.07 (m, 2H), 6.74 (br, 2H), 6.71 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.20–4.32. (m, 2H), 3.96 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.50–2.55 (m, 1H), 2.26 (dt, J1 = 12.8 Hz, J2 = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 1.85–1.89 (m, 1H), 1.50–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.37 (m, 2H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.03–1.11 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.1, 157.1, 154.1, 150.9, 140.1, 129.3, 128.7, 127.2, 127.1, 126.7, 125.8, 118.7, 108.5, 68.6, 61.8, 50.4, 45.1, 42.2, 35.2, 33.1, 27.6, 23.6, 14.4; IR (nujol): υmax = 3271, 3194, 1738, 1688 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C25H28N4O3 (432.51): C 69.42, H 6.53, N 12.95; found: C 69.31, H 6.49, N 13.06.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3e)

The product 3e was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 70:30) in 82% yield (292.3 mg); white solid; mp: 171–173 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.16 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.35 (br, 2H), 6.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.69 (s, 3H), 2.52–2.58 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.27 (m, 1H), 2.01–2.05 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.46–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.20–1.34 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.1, 170.6, 157.1, 152.5, 128.6, 126.1, 124.3, 116.2, 104.8, 73.4, 54.2, 53.1, 52.1, 32.6, 31.6, 30.2, 24.9, 24.6, 24.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3262, 3194, 1718, 1696 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 357 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H24N4O3 (356.42): C 64.03, H 6.79, N 15.72; found: C 64.19, H 6.71, N 15.60.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 8-Methyl-7-(phenylcarbamoyl)-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3f)

The product 3f was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 65% yield (281.2 mg); white solid; mp: 140–142 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.67 (s, 1H), 7.61 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01–7.06 (m, 2H), 6.55 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.73 (s, 3H), 2.70 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.28–2.35 (m, 1H), 2.05–2.10 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.93 (m, 4H), 1.54–1.64 (m, 1H), 1.22–1.38 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.4, 172.3, 154.0, 152.8, 139.3, 129.1, 128.9, 126.6, 124.7, 123.2, 120.4, 116.9, 105.5, 74.5, 55.7, 53.4, 52.7, 37.1, 33.1, 32.3, 30.6, 25.4, 25.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3345, 1725, 1691 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C25H28N4O3 (432.51): C 69.42, H 6.53, N 12.95; found: C 69.29, H 6.58, N 13.06.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-7-tert-Butyl 12c-Methyl 8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7a,8,12c-octahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-7,12c(12bH)-dicarboxylate (3g)

The product 3g was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 15:85) in 62% yield (256.4 mg); white solid; mp: 124–126 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.18 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.92 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.71 (s, 3H), 2.47 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (t, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.03 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.69–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.46 (s, 9H), 1.18–1.34 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.0, 173.6, 152.6, 129.2, 129.1, 126.6, 124.4, 116.7, 105.2, 80.8, 76.1, 54.9, 54.1, 52.5, 36.9, 33.0, 31.4, 30.8, 28.3, 25.3, 24.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 1732, 1730 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 414 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C23H31N3O4 (413.51): C 66.81, H 7.56, N 10.16; found: C 66.96, H 7.60, N 10.05.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-10-chloro-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3h)

The product 3h was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 45:55) in 90% yield (351.8 mg); white solid; mp: 161–163 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.14 (dd, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (dd, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.69 (s, 3H), 2.52–2.60 (m, 1H), 2.15–2.21 (m, 1H), 2.01–2.04 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.89 (m, 4H), 1.51–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.16–1.35 (m, 3H), 0.81–0.87 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.4, 171.6, 157.3, 154.2, 134.1, 127.7, 123.8, 115.7, 104.7, 74.0, 54.7, 53.2, 52.6, 37.1, 32.9, 31.6, 30.6, 25.3, 25.0; IR (nujol): υmax = 3287, 3215, 1730, 1701 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 391 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H23ClN4O3 (390.86): C 58.38, H 5.93, N 14.33; found: C 58.51, H 5.97, N 14.25.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-8,9-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3i)

The product 3i was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 54% yield (200.1 mg); yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.07 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (br, 2H), 5.81 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.91 (s, 3H), 2.53 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.21–2.32 (m, 1H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 2.03 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.71–1.83 (m, 4H), 1.45–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.18–1.33 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.2, 169.0, 157.4, 152.1, 131.4, 126.6, 123.8, 118.8, 118.6, 76.8, 54.3, 52.9, 52.1, 36.7, 33.1, 30.3, 24.9, 24.7, 18.9, 14.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3227, 3217, 1735, 1693 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 371 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H26N4O3 (370.44): C 64.84, H 7.07, N 15.12; found: C 64.69, H 6.99, N 15.24.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Dimethyl 7-Carbamoyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-11,12c-dicarboxylate (3j)

The product 3j was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 50:50) in 89% yield (368.9 mg); white solid; mp: 218–220 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 6.50 (br, 2H), 6.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.76 (s, 3H), 2.57 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.07–2.19 (m, 2H), 1.77–1.83 (m, 4H), 1.53 (q, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 1.16–1.33 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.3, 172.3, 166.6, 157.3, 156.4, 132.2, 127.6, 124.6, 116.8, 103.7, 73.7, 54.8, 53.1, 52.7, 51.8, 37.0, 32.8, 30.9, 30.7, 25.3, 24.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3267, 3211, 1729, 1727, 1684 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 415 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C21H26N4O5 (414.45): C 60.86, H 6.32, N 13.52; found: C 70.01, H 6.26, N 13.41.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-11-cyano-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3k)

The product 3k was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 45:55) in 84% yield (320.4 mg); white solid; mp: 273–275 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (br, 2H), 6.37 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 2.75 (s, 3H), 2.57 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.15–2.22 (m, 1H), 2.05 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.78–1.91 (m, 4H), 1.48–1.59 (m, 1H), 1.32–1.41 (m, 1H), 1.16–1.25 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.2, 172.5, 157.2, 155.7, 134.9, 129.9, 125.6, 121.0, 104.6, 96.7, 73.5, 54.6, 53.1, 52.7, 37.0, 32.7, 30.8, 30.5, 25.3, 24.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3293, 3219, 1724, 1686 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 382 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H23N5O3 (381.43): C 62.98, H 6.08, N 18.36; found: C 62.83, H 6.15, N 18.47.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Dimethyl 7-Carbamoyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-11,12c-dicarboxylate (3l)

The product 3l was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 60:40) in 89% yield (342.2 mg); white solid; mp: 212–214 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.60 (s, 1H), 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (br, 2H), 6.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 2.57 (dd, J1 = 14.4 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.08–2.24 (m, 2H), 1.73–1.87 (m, 4H), 1.48–1.57 (m, 1H), 1.15–1.35 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 190.1, 173.3, 172.7, 157.5, 157.2, 134.8, 127.3, 126.1, 125.4, 103.9, 73.8, 54.8, 52.8, 52.7, 37.1, 32.8, 30.8, 30.7, 25.3, 24.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3261, 3213, 1736, 1725, 1690 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 385 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H24N4O4 (384.43): C 62.49, H 6.29, N 14.57; found: C 62.35, H 6.33, N 14.44.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-8-methyl-11-nitro-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3m)

The product 3m was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 92% yield (369.3 mg); yellow solid; mp: 180–182 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.01 (dd, J1 = 9.2 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (br, 2H), 6.39 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 2.54–2.61 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.17 (m, 2H), 1.73–1.94 (m, 4H), 1.48–1.59 (m, 1H), 1.19–1.39 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.6, 172.5, 157.2, 156.6, 136.4, 127.5, 124.8, 122.6, 102.8, 73.5, 54.2, 52.3, 52.2, 36.5, 32.1, 30.4, 30.1, 24.9, 24.4; IR (nujol): υmax = 3362, 3347, 1736, 1692 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 402 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H23N5O5 (401.41): C 56.85, H 5.78, N 17.45; found: C 57.02, H 5.69, N 17.33.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-11-methoxy-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3n)

The product 3n was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 71% yield (274.4 mg); white solid; mp: 164–166 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 6.79 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (br, 2H), 6.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 2.64 (s, 3H), 2.56 (dd, J1 = 14 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.14–2.22 (m, 1H), 1.89–2.03 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.81 (m, 3H), 1.47–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.15–1.35 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.6, 169.6, 157.7, 151.8, 147.5, 126.5, 114.5, 113.3, 106.0, 74.7, 56.0, 54.3, 53.3, 52.7, 37.1, 33.6, 32.9, 30.5, 25.4, 25.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3274, 3215, 1726, 1676 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 387 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H26N4O4 (386.44): C 62.16, H 6.78, N 14.50; found: C 62.31, H 6.84, N 14.39.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-8-ethyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3o)

The product 3o was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 56% yield (207.5 mg); white solid; mp: 115–117 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.14 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.35 (br, 2H), 6.25 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.30 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.07 (sex, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.57 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.19–2.28 (m, 1H), 1.97–2.06 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.88 (m, 3H), 1.47–1.57 (m, 1H), 1.15–1.34 (m, 2H), 0.96 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.2, 171.1, 157.1, 151.2, 128.6, 126.4, 124.2, 115.7, 104.4, 71.6, 54.2, 53.4, 52.1, 38.5, 36.7, 32.7, 30.3, 24.9, 24.5, 11.3; IR (nujol): υmax = 3372, 3346, 1729, 1691 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 371 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H26N4O3 (370.44): C 64.84, H 7.07, N 15.12; found: C 64.71, H 7.11, N 15.23.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-11-methyl-8-propyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3p)

The product 3p was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 71% yield (283.0 mg); white solid; mp: 119–121 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 6.96 (s, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (br, 2H), 6.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.11–3.20 (m, 1H), 2.90–2.98 (m, 1H), 2.57 (dd, J1 = 13.2 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (q, J = 13.2 Hz, 3H), 2.16 (s, 3H), 2.02 (dd, J1 = 13.2 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.71–1.93 (m, 3H), 1.16–1.59 (m, 4H), 0.78 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.8, 171.3, 157.5, 150.2, 129.2, 127.6, 124.7, 124.5, 104.8, 72.9, 54.6, 53.9, 52.6, 46.9, 37.2, 33.2, 30.7, 25.5, 25.0, 20.9, 20.1, 11.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3291, 3219, 1732, 1688 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 399 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C22H30N4O3 (398.50): C 66.31, H 7.59, N 14.06; found: C 66.46, H 7.63, N 13.96.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 8-Benzyl-7-carbamoyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3q)

The product 3q was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 35:65) in 79% yield (341.7 mg); white solid; mp: 158–160 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.16–7.30 (m, 6H), 6.91 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (br, 2H), 6.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.65 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (t, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 2.07 (dd, J1 = 14.0 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.92 (t, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 1.72–1.86 (m, 3H), 1.57 (q, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 1.19–1.37 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.3, 171.5, 157.2, 151.8, 138.7, 128.5, 128.3, 126.8, 126.6, 126.5, 124.3, 116.4, 105.2, 72.9, 54.3, 53.7, 52.2, 49.1, 36.8, 32.8, 30.3, 25.0, 24.6; IR (nujol): υmax = 3279, 3208, 1733, 1678 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C25H28N4O3 (432.51): C 69.42, H 6.53, N 12.95; found: C 69.57, H 6.59, N 12.84.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3r)

The product 3r was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 50:50) in 89% yield (304.7 mg); white solid; mp: 165–167 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.14 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.47 (br, 2H), 6.40 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (dd, J1 = 9.6 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.55 (dd, J1 = 14.4 Hz, J2 = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.32 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.98 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 2H), 1.71–1.82 (m, 3H), 1.41–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.20–1.35 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.8, 161.9, 157.6, 151.6, 128.2, 125.6, 124.5, 116.8, 108.0, 69.0, 53.1, 52.3, 51.1, 36.7, 32.2, 29.6, 25.2, 24.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3426, 3251, 3228, 1737, 1692 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 343 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C18H22N4O3 (342.39): C 63.14, H 6.48, N 16.36; found: C 62.97, H 6.56, N 16.49.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-11-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3s)

The product 3s was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 66% yield (235.2 mg); white solid; mp: 198–200 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 6.95 (s, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.41 (br, 2H), 6.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (s, 1H), 5.74 (dd, J1 = 9.2 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.56 (dd, J1 = 14.4 Hz, J2 = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.05 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.95 (dd, J1 = 14.4 Hz, J2 = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.16 (s, 3H), 1.71–1.86 (m, 3H), 1.23–1.51 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.7, 160.7, 157.4, 149.1, 128.5, 126.1, 125.4, 124.9, 108.1, 69.1, 52.8, 52.1, 50.7, 36.6, 31.9, 29.3, 25.2, 24.7, 20.5; IR (nujol): υmax = 3327, 3271, 1734, 1693 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 357 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H24N4O3 (356.41): C 64.03, H 6.79, N 15.72; found: C 63.90, H 6.83, N 15.84.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[c]pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]pyrrolo[3,2-e]pyridazine-12c-carboxylate (3t)

The product 3t was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 80:20) in 85% yield (303.8 mg); white solid; mp: 222–224 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.74 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (br, 1H), 6.40 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (br, 1H), 6.12 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.76 (s, 3H), 2.58 (dd, J1 = 14.4 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.14–2.20 (m, 1H), 1.98–2.05 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.51 (q, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 1.16–1.32 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.2, 172.2, 162.4, 157.4, 147.1, 133.6, 118.7, 112.0, 71.1, 54.8, 52.7, 51.7, 37.1, 32.9, 30.7, 29.2, 25.3, 24.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3355, 3296, 1736, 1689 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 358 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C18H23N5O3 (357.41): C 60.49, H 6.49, N 19.59; found: C 60.63, H 6.41, N 19.48.

(8aS*,13bR*,13cR*)-Ethyl 8-Carbamoyl-9-methyl-2,3,4,5,6,8,8a,9,13b,13c-decahydro-1H-cycloocta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-13c-carboxylate (3u)

The product 3u was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 46% yield (177.5 mg); white solid; mp: 182–184 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.13 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (s, 2H), 6.67 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (dd, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (s, 3H), 2.33–2.40 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.98 (m, 1H), 1.47–1.75 (m, 7H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.21–1.30 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.2, 157.6, 156.4, 151.7, 128.7, 125.5, 124.7, 117.7, 106.8, 71.4, 61.0, 50.2, 45.9, 34.1, 33.1, 29.0, 25.9, 25.8, 25.7, 23.4, 13.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3408, 3394, 1720, 1684 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 385 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C21H28 N4 O3 (384.47): C 65.60, H 7.34, N 14.57; found: C 65.74, H 7.39, N 14.43.

(8aS*,13bR*,13cR*)-8-tert-Butyl 13c-Ethyl 9-methyl-3,4,5,6,8a,9,13b,13c-octahydro-1H-cycloocta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-8,13c(2H)-dicarboxylate (3v)

The product 3v was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 10:90) in 43% yield (189.9 mg); white solid; mp: 157–159 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.14 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.98–4.18 (m, 2H), 3.37 (s, 1H), 2.72 (s, 3H), 2.25–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.18 (m, 1H), 1.91–2.13 (m, 2H), 1.52–1.70 (m, 6H), 1.47 (s, 9H), 1.31–1.42 (m, 1H), 1.19 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.8, 170.2, 152.5, 151.9, 128.6, 125.2, 124.4, 116.7, 105.3, 80.4, 74.9, 60.9, 53.3, 53.2, 32.6, 31.3, 31.0, 27.8, 27.7, 25.6, 25.2, 24.7, 13.7; IR (nujol): υmax = 1732, 1724 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 442 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C25H35N3O4 (441.56): C 68.00, H 7.99, N 9.52; found: C 67.87, H 7.93, N 9.64.

(8aS*,13bR*,13cR*)-8-tert-Butyl 13c-Ethyl 9-benzyl-3,4,5,6,8a,9,13b,13c-octahydro-1H-cycloocta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-8,13c(2H)-dicarboxylate (3w)

The product 3w was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 10:90) in 50% yield (258.8 mg); yellowish oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.17–7.32 (m, 6H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.02 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 3.93–4.14 (m, 2H), 2.43–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.26–2.30 (m, 1H), 2.11–2.16 (m, 1H), 1.93–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.38–1.78 (m, 8H), 1.23 (s, 9H), 1.17 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.5, 171.9, 152.4, 151.1, 138.7, 128.5, 128.4, 126.6, 126.1, 125.6, 124.1, 116.6, 104.9, 80.2, 75.5, 60.8, 55.8, 53.8, 49.2, 32.3, 31.7, 28.3, 27.5, 25.8, 25.6, 24.5, 13.7; IR (nujol): υmax = 1731, 1723 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 518 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C31H39N3O4 (517.66): C 71.93, H 7.59, N 8.12; found: C 71.76, H 7.65, N 8.26.

(8aS*,13bR*,13cR*)-Ethyl 8-Carbamoyl-2,3,4,5,6,8,8a,9,13b,13c-decahydro-1H-cycloocta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-13c-carboxylate (3x)

The product 3x was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 37% yield (136.9 mg); white solid; mp: 168–170 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.01 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (dd, J1 = 8.8 Hz, J2 = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.44 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (dd, J1 = 14.4 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.37–2.46 (m, 1H), 1.90–1.99 (m, 1H), 1.32–1.64 (m, 8H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.07–1.19 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.0, 158.1, 151.9, 150.3, 128.6, 124.9, 124.3, 117.8, 109.4, 68.3, 61.1, 49.3, 45.6, 35.1, 27.9, 26.0, 24.2, 21.9, 21.3, 13.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3332, 3315, 3298, 1731, 1688 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 371 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H26 N4 O3 (370.44): C 64.84, H 7.07, N 15.12; found: C 64.98, H 6.99, N 15.02.

(4S*,4aS*,9aS*)-Ethyl 1-Carbamoyl-3,9-dimethyl-4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-4-carboxylate ((cis,cis)-3z)

The more polar product was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80); amorphous white solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.01–7.07 (m, 2H), 6.64 (s, 2H), 6.59 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.88 (m, 2H), 3.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 1.92 (s, 3H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.0, 157.5, 151.9, 151.7, 129.1, 127.3, 125.4, 117.8, 107.1, 70.8, 60.9, 44.6, 33.0, 23.0, 14.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3309, 3298, 1729, 1678 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 317 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20 N4 O3 (316.35): C 60.75, H 6.37, N 17.71; found: C 60.64, H 6.49, N 17.56.

During the course of the reaction, the following workup, and the long standing in DMSO-d6 solution at 20 °C for 24 h, the diastereomer (cis,cis)-3z gives a partial isomerization to more stable (cis,trans)-3z together with the ring-opening reaction leading to the byproduct 4a. Diastereomers 3z were isolated in a combined yield of 32%, based on the amount of 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene consumed.

The relative configurations of diastereomers 3z were assigned by means of two-dimensional (2D) NOESY experiments.

(4R*,4aS*,9aS*)-Ethyl 1-Carbamoyl-3,9-dimethyl-4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-4-carboxylate ((cis,trans)-3z)

The less polar product was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80); amorphous white solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.03–7.11 (m, 2H), 6.34 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (s, 2H), 6.46 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.11–4.24 (m, 2H), 3.84 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.29 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (s, 3H), 1.90 (s, 3H), 1.20 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.2, 157.3, 151.8, 150.8, 129.1, 129.0, 123.6, 118.3, 107.3, 70.3, 61.6, 46.4, 33.0, 23.1, 14.4; IR (nujol): υmax = 3314, 3306, 1736, 1682 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 317 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20 N4 O3 (316.35): C 60.75, H 6.37, N 17.71; found: C 60.64, H 6.49, N 17.56.

(4S*,4aS*,9aS*)-Ethyl 1-Carbamoyl-3,4a-dimethyl-4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-4-carboxylate ((cis,cis)-3ab)

NOESY correlations allowed the assignment of the relative stereochemistry. The compound partially isomerized to (cis,trans)-3ab when allowed to stand in a CDCl3 solution at 20 °C for 24 h, while no conversion was observed using DMSO-d6 as a solvent. The product was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 24% yield (75.9 mg); white solid; mp: 171–173 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.21 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.58–6.65 (m, 3H), 6.54 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.80 (m, 2H), 3.28 (s, 1H), 1.91 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 168.5, 157.5, 149.5, 145.2, 131.6, 128.5, 124.4, 118.0, 109.7, 73.1, 60.8, 51.1, 44.2, 25.4, 23.1, 13.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3338, 3306, 3301, 1728, 1694 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 317 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20 N4 O3 (316.35): C 60.75, H 6.37, N 17.71; found: C 60.59, H 6.31, N 17.58.

(7aS*,12bR*,12cR*)-Methyl 7-Carbamoyl-8,12b-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,5,7,7a,8,12b,12c-decahydrocyclohepta[5,6]pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-12c-carboxylate (3ad)

The product 3ad was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 60:40) in 40% yield (148.2 mg); white solid; mp: 127–129 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.17 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (br, 2H), 6.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.71 (s, 3H), 2.53–2.57 (m, 1H), 2.13–2.24 (m, 1H), 1.91–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.65–1.80 (m, 3H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.12–1.43 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.2, 166.0, 156.5, 150.9, 132.0, 128.2, 123.6, 117.3, 106.0, 78.6, 55.7, 52.3, 51.5, 36.2, 31.8, 29.7, 29.0, 25.1, 24.9, 22.2; IR (nujol): υmax = 3347, 3298, 1729, 1698 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H27N4O3[M + H]+: 371.2083; found: 371.2069.

N-Phenyl-3,4,7,11c-tetrahydro-1H-6a,11b-propanoindolo[2,3-c]cinnoline-6(2H)-carboxamide (3ae)

The product 3ae was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 15:85) in 67% yield (258.9 mg); whitish oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.54 (s, 1H), 7.41–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.93–7.01 (m, 3H), 6.14–6.61 (m, 3H), 1.40–2.18 (m, 15H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 156.2, 150.1, 139.5, 133.5, 128.6, 127.1, 122.9, 121.8, 118.5, 117.8, 113.2, 108.9, 100.6, 68.9, 26.4, 25.2, 25.1, 22.4, 22.1, 21.2, 20.8, 20.7; IR (nujol): υmax = 3375, 3246, 1696 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 387 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C24H26N4O (386.49): C 74.58, H 6.78, N 14.50; found: C 74.42, H 6.86, N 14.62.

Methyl 3,4a,9a-Trimethyl-4-phenyl-4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole-1-carboxylate (3af)

The product 3af was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 22% yield (76.9 mg); white solid; mp: 186–188 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.01–7.12 (m, 3H), 6.88 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81–6.85 (m, 2H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (s, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.39 (s, 1H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.49 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.8, 155.3, 147.7, 134.2, 131.5, 130.0, 128.3, 127.4, 127.1, 123.9, 118.3, 108.9, 82.8, 54.9, 53.5, 52.3, 24.3, 23.4, 21.7; IR (nujol): υmax = 3290, 1736 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C21H23N3O2 (349.43): C 72.18, H 6.63, N 12.03; found: C 72.03, H 6.72, N 12.17.

General Procedure for the Formal [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions of Indoles 1 with Linear Azoalkenes 2

A mixture of indole 1 (0.6 mmol), azoalkene 2 (0.4 mmol), and zinc dichloride (0.04 mmol, 5.45 mg) was stirred in dry dichloromethane (2 mL). After the disappearance of azoalkene 2 (TLC check), the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford product 5.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Ethyl 2,3a-Dimethyl-1-ureido-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5a)

The product 5a was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 27% yield (85.3 mg); white solid; mp: 218–220 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.74 (s, 1H), 9.23 (s, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (br, 2H), 4.94 (s, 1H), 4.16 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.20 (s, 3H), 1.82 (s, 3H), 1.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.1, 157.6, 145.1, 136.2, 128.8, 128.5, 121.5, 118.7, 118.5, 111.6, 108.4, 61.3, 52.0, 15.6, 14.5, 8.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3478, 3464, 3328, 3321, 1725, 1688 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 317 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20 N4 O3 (316.35): C 60.75, H 6.37, N 17.71; found: C 60.88, H 6.29, N 17.84.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 1-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,3a,8-trimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5b)

The product 5b was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 46% yield (60.9 mg); white solid; mp: 127–129 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (br, 1H), 6.72 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.96 (s, 3H), 2.09 (s, 3H), 1.67 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.5, 160.0, 156.1, 149.7, 134.7, 127.9, 124.9, 118.8, 106.9, 106.6, 96.1, 54.5, 53.2, 50.5, 34.8, 25.4, 12.5; IR (nujol): υmax = 3287, 1739, 1701 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H22N3O4[M + H]+: 332.1610; found: 332.1639.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 1-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,3a,8a-trimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5c)

The product 5c was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 58% yield (76.9 mg); white solid; mp: 128–130 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.31 (s, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (s, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.01 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.5, 159.1, 157.1, 148.7, 133.7, 126.9, 124.7, 117.3, 107.9, 102.8, 92.8, 55.3, 52.1, 49.8, 19.6, 18.6, 12.0; IR (nujol): υmax = 3274, 1739, 1698 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 332 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C17H21N3O4 (331.36): C 61.62, H 6.39, N 12.68; found: C 61.74, H 6.31, N 12.57.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Benzyl 1-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,3a,8a-trimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5d)

The product 5d was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 88% yield (158.3 mg); white solid; mp: 149–151 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.02 (s, 1H), 7.29–7.54 (m, 5H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.41 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.27 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.9, 159.9, 155.6, 148.6, 137.1, 133.9, 128.3, 127.9, 127.7, 126.8, 124.9, 117.2, 107.8, 101.5, 92.8, 79.5, 64.1, 55.4, 27.9, 19.8, 18.4, 12.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3363, 3324, 1741, 1696 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C26H32N3O4[M + H]+: 450.2393; found: 450.2411.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Ethyl 2,3a,8a-Trimethyl-1-ureido-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5e)

The product 5e was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 70:30) in 68% yield (89.9 mg); white solid; mp: 171–173 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (br, 2H), 6.01 (br, 1H), 4.05 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.9, 159.7, 159.3, 148.9, 133.1, 126.7, 124.9, 117.0, 107.7, 102.5, 92.9, 58.2, 55.2, 18.6, 15.1, 14.3, 12.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3482, 3467, 3338, 3325, 1731, 1684 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H23N4O3[M + H]+: 331.1770; found: 331.1791.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 2,3a,8a-Trimethyl-1-(3-phenylureido)-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5f)

The product 5f was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 70:30) in 88% yield (138.1 mg); white solid; mp: 226–228 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.41 (br, 2H), 7.19–7.77 (m, 5H), 6.86–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.41–6.72 (m, 2H), 6.15 (br, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.54 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.5, 159.6, 155.6, 148.6, 139.1, 133.3, 128.5, 126.9, 124.8, 122.1, 118.9, 118.3, 117.6, 108.1, 93.0, 55.4, 49.8, 20.6, 18.8, 12.3; IR (nujol): υmax = 3389, 3282, 3270, 1726, 1694 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C22H25N4O3[M + H]+: 393.1927; found: 393.1963.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 2-Ethyl-1-((methoxycarbonyl)amino)-3a,8a-dimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5g)

The product 5g was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 25:75) in 73% yield (100.9 mg); white solid; mp: 157–159 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.38 (br, 1H), 3.86 (br, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.47–2.68 (m, 2H), 1.62 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.07 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.8, 163.8, 156.9, 147.6, 134.2, 127.5, 126.0, 120.1, 109.5, 105.9, 93.4, 56.4, 53.1, 50.4, 20.0, 19.7, 19.4, 12.5; IR (nujol): υmax = 3332, 3275, 1727, 1692 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C18H24N3O4[M + H]+: 346.1767; found: 346.1761.

(3aS*,8bR*)-Methyl 11-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-10-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3a,8b-(epiminoetheno)cyclopenta[b]indole-9-carboxylate (5h)

The product 5h was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 98% yield (134.8 mg); white solid; mp: 150–152 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (br, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (br, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.16–2.45 (m, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 1.60–1.88 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.6, 159.5, 157.3, 148.7, 135.4, 127.8, 125.9, 120.7, 110.3, 104.3, 99.9, 67.3, 53.2, 50.5, 41.0, 40.2, 25.3, 12.4; IR (nujol): υmax = 3370, 3302, 1718, 1662 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C18H22N3O4 [M + H]+: 344.1610; found: 344.1606.

(4bR*,8aS*)-Methyl 10-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-11-methyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-8a,4b-(epiminoetheno)carbazole-12-carboxylate (5i)

The product 5i was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 95% yield (135.8 mg); yellowish solid; mp: 121–123 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.27 (s, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (s, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 2.04 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 8H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.6, 159.2, 157.1, 149.6, 132.6, 126.8, 124.4, 117.4, 108.3, 103.4, 91.3, 55.0, 52.0, 49.8, 30.3, 26.3, 18.9, 18.5, 12.0; IR (nujol): υmax = 3370, 3302, 1736, 1697 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H24N3O4 [M + H]+: 358.1767; found: 358.1782.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 5-Chloro-3a-ethyl-1-((methoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,8a-dimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5j)

The product 5j was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 85% yield (129.2 mg); white solid; mp: 113–115 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.34 (s, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (br, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 2.26–2.42 (m, 1H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.63–1.79 (m, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 0.60–0.89 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.3, 160.0, 156.9, 148.1, 134.8, 126.5, 124.9, 120.3, 108.6, 99.5, 93.3, 59.2, 52.1, 49.9, 17.9, 15.1, 11.9, 9.0; IR (nujol): υmax = 3360, 3266, 1739, 1694 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C18H23N3O4Cl [M + H]+: 380.1377; found: 380.1374.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 3a-Ethyl-5-methoxy-1-((methoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,8a-dimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5k)

The product 5k was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 98% yield (147.2 mg); white solid; mp: 153–155 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.28 (s, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (dd, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (s, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 2.27–2.45 (m, 1H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 1.60–1.79 (m, 1H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 0.69–0.91 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.1, 160.5, 157.6, 152.5, 143.6, 134.6, 112.5, 112.3, 108.5, 100.3, 93.9, 59.9, 55.8, 52.5, 50.3, 25.0, 18.5, 12.4, 9.6; IR (nujol): υmax = 3369, 3267, 1754, 1693 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H26N3O5[M + H]+: 376.1872; found: 376.1837.

(5aS*,10aR*)-Methyl 2-Methoxy-13-((methoxycarbonyl)amino)-12-methyl-5,6,7,8,9,10-hexahydro-5a,10a-(epiminoetheno)cyclohepta[b]indole-11-carboxylate (5l)

The product 5l was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 60% yield (96.4 mg); brown solid; mp: 166–168 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.14 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (br, 1H), 6.57 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 3.62 (br, 1H), 2.16 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 10H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.2, 160.1, 156.9, 154.3, 140.7, 137.3, 113.1, 112.0, 110.2, 103.7, 95.9, 63.2, 55.9, 52.9, 50.3, 35.8, 33.9, 30.8, 27.0, 25.5, 12.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3392, 3317, 1738, 1691 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 332 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C21H27N3O5 (401.45): C 62.83, H 6.78, N 10.47; found: C 62.98, H 6.70, N 10.36.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Ethyl 1-((Ethoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,3a,5,8a-tetramethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5m)

The product 5m was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 47% yield (70.2 mg); white solid; mp: 151–153 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.19 (s, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.88 (s, 1H), 3.98–4.20 (m, 4H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 2.02 (s, 3H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 1.15–1.31 (m, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.2, 159.2, 156.5, 146.3, 133.8, 127.1, 125.5, 125.4, 107.7, 102.3, 93.0, 60.6, 58.1, 55.3, 20.6, 19.7, 18.4, 14.4, 14.3, 11.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3343, 3306, 1734, 1689 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H28N3O4 [M + H]+: 374.2080; found: 374.2091.

(3aR*,8aS*)-tert-Butyl 1-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,3a,8a-trimethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5n)

The product 5n was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:50) in 50% yield (85.9 mg); whitish oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.88 (s, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.86 (s, 1H), 2.16 (s, 3H), 1.97 (s, 3H), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 9H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.23 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.1, 158.8, 155.8, 146.4, 134.4, 127.0, 125.4, 124.8, 107.8, 103.3, 92.9, 79.3, 77.9, 55.3, 28.4, 27.9, 20.6, 19.8, 18.3, 11.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3439, 3304, 1738, 1696 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 430 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C24H35N3O4 (429.52): C 67.11, H 8.21, N 9.78; found: C 67.26, H 8.12, N 9.69.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 1-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-3a,5,8a-trimethyl-2-propyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5o)

The product 5o was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 74% yield (110.6 mg); white solid; mp: 163–165 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (s, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (br, 1H), 3.80 (br, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.47 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.42–2.64 (m, 2H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.61 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 1.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.9, 162.4, 156.9, 145.3, 134.4, 129.3, 128.0, 126.7, 109.4, 106.5, 93.7, 65.9, 56.4, 50.3, 28.1, 21.1, 20.1, 19.5, 15.4, 14.3; IR (nujol): υmax = 3394, 3272, 1729, 1691 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H28N3O4 [M + H]+: 374.2080; found: 374.2091.

(7aS*,10aR*)-Methyl 8-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-7a,9,10a-trimethyl-7,7a,8,10a-tetrahydrobenzo[e]pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-10-carboxylate (5p)

The product 5p was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 38% yield (58.1 mg); white solid; mp: 137–139 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (s, 1H), 5.26 (s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 1.79 (s, 3H), 1.63 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.8, 159.5, 157.1, 148.2, 131.3, 130.9, 129.8, 129.5, 126.9, 121.6, 121.5, 120.5, 113.7, 104.5, 79.8, 65.9, 53.4, 50.6, 21.2, 17.4, 12.5; IR (nujol): υmax = 1732, 1730 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 414 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C21H23N3O4 (381.42): C 66.13, H 6.08, N 11.02; found: C 65.98, H 6.16, N 11.16.

(3aR*,8aS*)-N,N,2,3a,8a-Pentamethyl-1-ureido-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxamide (5q)

The product 5q was isolated by column chromatography (methanol/ethyl acetate 05:95) in 52% yield (68.5 mg); white solid; mp: 191–193 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.04 (br, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (br, 2H), 6.04 (s, 1H), 2.73 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 1.58 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.2, 159.9, 148.9, 142.7, 132.3, 127.0, 121.8, 117.3, 109.8, 107.9, 92.6, 56.9, 20.7, 18.9, 18.0, 11.0; IR (nujol): υmax = 3489, 3337, 3326, 3297, 1698, 1689 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H24N5O2[M + H]+: 330.1930; found: 330.1932.

Methyl ((4bS*,8aS*)-12-(Dimethoxyphosphoryl)-11-methyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-8a,4b-(epiminoetheno)carbazol-10-yl)carbamate (5r)

The product 5r was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 90:10) in 31% yield (50.6 mg); white solid; mp: 198–200 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.14 (s, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (t, J = 7.6, 1H), 6.59 (t, J = 7.6, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (s, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 3.35 (s, 3H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 1.91 (s, 3H), 1.75–1.96 (m, 1H), 0.91–1.54 (m, 7H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.0, 157.0, 149.7, 131.5, 127.0, 124.1, 117.4, 108.4, 97.0, 91.7, 59.7, 56.1 (2JCP = 10.1 Hz), 51.9, 50.9 (2JCP = 4.3 Hz), 31.5, 26.3, 20.7, 19.3, 11.6; IR (nujol): υmax = 3319, 3283, 1695 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 408 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C19H26N3O5P (407.40): C 56.01, H 6.43, N 10.31; found: C 56.16, H 6.35, N 10.18.

(3aR*,8aS*)-Methyl 1-((Methoxycarbonyl)amino)-2,3a,8,8a-tetramethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (5s)

The product 5s was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 25:75) in 94% yield (129.9 mg); white solid; mp: 155–157 °C. Notably, compound 5q at NMR analysis shows two sets of peaks. This fact is probably ascribable to the presence of a second axis along the N–N bond that determines the existence of syn/anti rotamers of carbamates.9,301H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.59 and 9.38 (s, 1H), 7.32 and 7.29 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 and 6.96 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.59 and 6.56 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.37 and 6.33 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.67 and 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.63 and 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.75 and 2.69 (s, 3H), 1.99 and 1.95 (s, 3H), 1.45 and 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.30 and 1.26 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.1 and 165.5, 160.9 and 158.8, 157.0 and 156.4, 149.4 and 148.8, 134.4 and 133.1, 127.4 and 127.2, 124.2 and 123.4, 117.5 and 117.1, 105.7 and 104.9, 102.8 and 102.5, 95.5 and 95.1, 55.6 and 55.0, 52.3 and 52.1, 50.1 and 49.8, 29.8 and 27.9, 21.1 and 19.8, 14.2 and 13.6, 12.0 and 11.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3369, 1741, 1693 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 346 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C18H23N3O4 (345.39): C 62.59, H 6.71, N 12.17; found: C 62.43, H 6.80, N 12.31.

Ethyl 3-(2-Carbamoylhydrazono)-2-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)butanoate (4a)

The product 4a was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 80:20) in 48% yield (151.8 mg); white solid; mp: 189–191 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.73 (br, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.13 (m, 2H), 5.99 (br, 1H), 5.67 (br, 1H), 4.87 (s, 1H), 4.23 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 1.86 (s, 3H), 1.29 (s, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.0, 158.2, 147.4, 137.0, 128.0, 127.2, 121.9, 119.5, 119.2, 109.4, 108.1, 61.2, 52.0, 32.8, 14.2, 13.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3502, 3387, 3177, 1738, 1693 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 317 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20N4O3 (316.35): C 60.75, H 6.37, N 17.71; found: C 60.61, H 6.25, N 17.82.

Methyl 2-(4-Methoxy-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-4-oxobutan-2-ylidene)hydrazinecarboxylate (4b)

The product 4b was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 40:60) in 70% yield (222.2 mg); white solid; mp: 189–191 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.88 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (s, 1H), 7.16 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (s, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 6H), 1.79 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.6, 155.1, 151.5, 137.0, 129.0, 127.3, 121.8, 119.5, 119.2, 110.3, 108.0, 52.4, 52.3, 51.8, 32.9, 14.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3354, 1740, 1726, 1696 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 318 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H19N3O4 (317.33): C 60.56, H 6.03, N 13.24; found: C 60.42, H 6.12, N 13.31.

Methyl 2-(3-(1,2-Dimethyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-4-methoxy-4-oxobutan-2-ylidene)hydrazinecarboxylate (4c)

The product 4c was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 52% yield (172.3 mg); white solid; mp: 223–225 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.84 (s, 1H), 7.35–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.08 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (s, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.75 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.1, 155.0, 152.3, 136.7, 136.1, 127.0, 120.7, 119.4, 118.6, 109.7, 104.6, 52.2, 52.1, 51.5, 29.9, 15.5, 10.6; IR (nujol): υmax = 3365, 1743, 1732, 1701 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 332 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C17H21N3O4 (331.36): C 61.62, H 6.39, N 12.68; found: C 61.57, H 6.50, N 12.52.

Ethyl 2-(2-Carbamoylhydrazono)-1-(1,2-dimethyl-1H-indol-3-yl)cyclohexanecarboxylate (4d)10e

The product 4d was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 60:40) in 61% yield (113.0 mg); white solid; mp: 207–210 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.57 (s, 1H), 7.37 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 5.84 (br, 2H), 3.94–4.13 (m, 2H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.67–2.91 (m, 2H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.14–2.23 (m, 2H), 1.38–1.59 (m, 4H), 1.09 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.2, 157.4, 152.6, 136.2, 135.0, 126.3, 119.8, 119.4, 118.6, 109.3, 108.1, 60.3, 56.9, 35.7, 29.3, 25.5, 24.8, 21.5, 13.9, 11.6; IR (nujol): υmax = 3510, 3393, 3182, 1734, 1687 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 371 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C20H26N4O3 (370,45): C 64.84, H 7.07, N 15.12; found: C 64.69, H 6.99, N 14.99.

Procedure for the Ring-Opening Reaction of Tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole (3b)

To a solution of compound 3b (0.4 mmol) in dichloromethane (2 mL), Amberlyst 15(H) (500 mg/mmol) was added. After the disappearance of starting 3b (TLC check, 20 h), the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford product 4e.

Ethyl 1-(1-Methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-(2-(phenylcarbamoyl)hydrazono)cyclohexanecarboxylate (4e)

The product 4e was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 25:75) in 71% yield (122.8 mg); white solid; mp: 210–212 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.02 (s, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (s, 1H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 7.18 (dt, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (dt, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (dt, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.48 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.05–4.19 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.04 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 2.11–2.23 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.85 (m, 2H), 1.44–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.13 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.5, 153.3, 151.0, 138.1, 137.1, 128.3, 127.5, 126.6, 121.9, 120.9, 120.8, 118.8, 117.5, 113.5, 109.8, 60.7, 55.5, 35.6, 32.4, 25.5, 25.3, 22.6, 13.9; IR (nujol): υmax = 3190, 3088, 1726, 1681 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C25H28N4O3 (432.51): C 69.42, H 6.53, N 12.95; found: C 69.57, H 6.44, N 12.87.

Ethyl 2-(2-Carbamoylhydrazono)-1-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)cyclopentanecarboxylate (4f)

The product 4f (see Scheme 1) was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 90:10) in 67% yield (229.4 mg); white solid; mp: 168–170 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.14 (s, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (s, 1H), 6.98 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 5.92 (br, 2H), 4.04–4.12 (m, 2H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.43–2.56 (m, 3H), 2.29–2.36 (m, 1H), 1.62–1.87 (m, 2H), 1.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.7, 156.9, 156.4, 137.2, 127.5, 126.1, 121.0, 120.2, 118.4, 113.4, 109.8, 60.6, 56.8, 36.2, 32.3, 27.9, 21.4, 14.1; IR (nujol): υmax = 3470, 3200, 3160, 1733, 1696 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 343 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C18H22N4O3 (342.39): C 63.14, H 6.48, N 16.36; found: C 62.98, H 6.58, N 16.45.

Ethyl Bromoacetate-Assisted Cleavage of the N–N Bond in 5s (Magnus’ Procedure16)

Ethyl 2-bromoacetate (1.5 equiv) and Cs2CO3 (2.5 equiv) were added to a solution of compound 5s (0.3 mmol) in acetonitrile (2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred in an oil bath heated at 50 °C until the starting material was consumed (TLC check, 1 h) and then refluxed for an additional 1.5 h (TLC check). The crude mixture was filtered and then purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the product 6a. The NMR experiments show that the title compound has no rotamers.

(3aR*,8aR*)-Methyl 2,3a,8,8a-Tetramethyl-1,3a,8,8a-tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole-3-carboxylate (6a)

The product 6a was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 30:70) in 64% yield (52.3 mg); whitish oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.45 (s, 1H), 7.26 (dd, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (dd, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (s, 3H), 2.67 (s, 3H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.9, 159.3, 149.3, 134.7, 126.8, 123.8, 116.9, 104.9, 101.6, 90.9, 56.4, 49.3, 28.2, 19.8, 17.4, 14.5; IR (nujol): υmax = 3369, 1741 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 273 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20N2O2 (272.34): C 70.56, H 7.40, N 10.29; found: C 70.41, H 7.47, N 10.39.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Urbino “Carlo Bo” for the financial support. The authors also thank Dr. A. A. Massaccesi for his precious advice and Dr. Anna Maria Gioacchini who competently performed the mass spectra. F.G.G. thanks POR-Lombardia, VIPCAT project (Value Added Innovative Protocols for Catalytic Transformations-ID 228775), for the financial support. We acknowledge CINECA for the high-performance computing resources and support (Class C Research Projects ISC21, ISC29, ISC37).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.0c01489.

  • Structures of starting materials (Figure S1), optimization for reaction of 1a with cyclic azoalkene 2a (Table S1), copies of NMR spectra for all products (PDF)

  • Crystal data of compounds 3e (CIF)

  • Cartesian coordinates of all computed structures for the reaction of 2n with 1p (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jo0c01489_si_001.pdf (961.3KB, pdf)
jo0c01489_si_002.cif (306.1KB, cif)
jo0c01489_si_003.pdf (4.7MB, pdf)

References

  1. For reviews, see:; a Silva T. S.; Rodrigues M. T. Jr.; Santos H.; Zeoly L. A.; Almeida W. P.; Barcelos R. C.; Gomes R. C.; Fernandes F. S.; Coelho F. Recent advances in indoline synthesis. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 2063–2097. 10.1016/j.tet.2019.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Griffiths B. M.; Burl J. D.; Wang X. Bioinspired Discovery of Chemical Reactions and Biological Probes. Synlett 2016, 2039–2042. 10.1055/s-0035-1561638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Zi W.; Zuo Z.; Ma D. Intramolecular Dearomative Oxidative Coupling of Indoles: A Unified Strategy for the Total Synthesis of Indoline Alkaloids. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 702–711. 10.1021/ar5004303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Zhang D.; Song H.; Qin Y. Total Synthesis of Indoline Alkaloids: A Cyclopropanation Strategy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 447–457. 10.1021/ar200004w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Liu D.; Zhao G.; Xiang L. Diverse Strategies for the Synthesis of the Indoline Scaffold. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 3975–3984. 10.1002/ejoc.201000323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. For examples of C2,C3-fused indolines, see:; a Cheng Q.; Zhang F.; Cai Y.; Guo Y.-L.; You S.-L. Stereodivergent Synthesis of Tetrahydrofuroindoles through Pd-Catalyzed Asymmetric Dearomative Formal [3+2] Cycloaddition. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2134–2138. 10.1002/anie.201711873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Feng L.-W.; Ren H.; Xiong H.; Wang P.; Wang L.; Tang Y. Reaction of Donor-Acceptor Cyclobutanes with Indoles: A General Protocol for the Formal Total Synthesis of (±)-Strychnine and the Total Synthesis of (±)-Akuammicine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3055–3058. 10.1002/anie.201611734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Jing C.; Cheng Q.-Q.; Deng Y.; Arman H.; Doyle M. P. Highly Regio- and Enantioselective Formal [3 + 2]-Annulation of Indoles with Electrophilic Enol Carbene Intermediates. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4550–4553. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Jia M.; Monari M.; Yang Q.-Q.; Bandini M. Enantioselective gold catalyzed dearomative [2+2]-cycloaddition between indoles and allenamides. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2320–2323. 10.1039/C4CC08736D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Ruchti J.; Carreira E. M. Ir-Catalyzed Reverse Prenylation of 3-Substituted Indoles: Total Synthesis of (+)-Aszonalenin and (−)-Brevicompanine B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16756–16759. 10.1021/ja509893s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Horning B. D.; MacMillan D. W. C. Nine-Step Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (−)-Vincorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6442–6445. 10.1021/ja402933s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g DeLorbe J. E.; Horne D.; Jove R.; Mennen S. M.; Nam S.; Zhang F.-L.; Overman L. E. General Approach for Preparing Epidithiodioxopiperazines from Trioxopiperazine Precursors: Enantioselective Total Syntheses of (+)- and (−)-Gliocladine C, (+)-Leptosin D, (+)-T988C, (+)-Bionectin A, and (+)-Gliocladin A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4117–4128. 10.1021/ja400315y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Kim J.; Ashenhurst J. A.; Movassaghi M. Total Synthesis of (+)-11,11′-Dideoxyverticillin A. Science 2009, 324, 238–241. 10.1126/science.1170777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shaheen R. M.; Davis D. W.; Liu W.; Zebrowski B. K.; Wilson M. R.; Bucana C. D.; McConkey D. J.; McMahon G.; Ellis L. M. Antiangiogenic therapy targeting the tyrosine kinase receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibits the growth of colon cancer liver metastasis and induces tumor and endothelial cell apoptosis. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 5412–5416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. For selected reviews of hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles, see:; a Song J.; Chen D.-F.; Gong L.-Z. Recent progress in organocatalytic asymmetric total syntheses of complex indole alkaloids. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017, 4, 381–396. 10.1093/nsr/nwx028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Ruiz-Sanchis P.; Savina S. A.; Albericio F.; Álvarez M. Structure, Bioactivity and Synthesis of Natural Products with Hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole. Chem. – Eur. J. 2011, 17, 1388–1408. 10.1002/chem.201001451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Steven A.; Overman L. E. Total synthesis of complex cyclotryptamine alkaloids: stereocontrolled construction of quaternary carbon stereocenters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5488–5508. 10.1002/anie.200700612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Crich D.; Banerjee A. Chemistry of the Hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles: Configuration, Conformation, Reactivity, and Applications in Synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 151–161. 10.1021/ar050175j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For selected papers, see:; e Jamison C. R.; Badillo J. J.; Lipshultz J. M.; Comito R. J.; MacMillan D. W. C. Catalyst-controlled oligomerization for the collective synthesis of polypyrroloindoline natural products. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 1165–1169. 10.1038/nchem.2825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Lindovska P.; Movassaghi M. Concise Synthesis of (−)-Hodgkinsine, (−)-Calycosidine, (−)-Hodgkinsine B, (−)-Quadrigemine C, and (−)-Psycholeine via Convergent and Directed Modular Assembly of Cyclotryptamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17590–17596. 10.1021/jacs.7b09929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Trost B. M.; Osipov M. Palladium-catalyzed asymmetric construction of vicinal all-carbon quaternary stereocenters and its application to the synthesis of cyclotryptamine alkaloids. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9176–9181. 10.1002/anie.201302805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Spangler J. E.; Davies H. M. L. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Pyrroloindolines via a Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Annulation of Indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6802–6805. 10.1021/ja4025337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i DeLorbe J. E.; Jabri S. Y.; Mennen S. M.; Overman L. E.; Zhang F.-L. Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (+)-Gliocladine C: Convergent Construction of Cyclotryptamine-Fused Polyoxopiperazines and a General Approach for Preparing Epidithiodioxopiperazines from Trioxopiperazine Precursors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6549–6552. 10.1021/ja201789v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Only sporadic examples of 1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole derivatives are reported:; a Cao W.-B.; Xu X.-P.; Ji S.-J. Synthesis of fused indoline heterocycles via dearomatization of indoles with α-bromohydrazones: a systematic study on the substrates. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 1651–1654. 10.1039/C6OB02362B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bleile M.; Wagner T.; Otto H.-H. Synthesis of Substituted Pyrrolo[3,4-a]carbazoles. Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 2879–2891. 10.1002/hlca.200590231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; See also ref (7).
  6. For reviews on dearomatization strategies of indoles, see:; a Huang G.; Yin B. Recent Developments in Transition Metal-Catalyzed Dearomative Cyclizations of Indoles as Dipolarophiles for the Construction of Indolines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 405–425. 10.1002/adsc.201800789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Roche S. P.; Youte Tendoung J.-J.; Tréguier B. Advances in dearomatization strategies of indoles. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 3549–3591. 10.1016/j.tet.2014.06.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Clarke S. J.; Gilchrist T. L.; Lemos A.; Roberts T. G. Reactions of azoalkenes derived from hydrazones of ethyl bromopyruvate with electron rich alkenes and heterocycles. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 5615–5624. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)80992-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Clarke S. J.; Davies D. E.; Gilchrist T. L. Competing [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloaddition in the reactions of nucleophilic olefins with ethyl 3-(toluene-p-sulphonylazo)but-2-enoate. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983, 1803–1807. 10.1039/p19830001803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tong M.-C.; Chen X.; Li J.; Huang R.; Tao H.; Wang C.-J. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of [2,3]-Fused Indoline Heterocycles through Inverse-Electron-Demand Aza-Diels–Alder Reaction of Indoles with Azoalkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4680–4684. 10.1002/anie.201400109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Qi L.-W.; Mao J.-H.; Zhang J.; Tan B. Organocatalytic asymmetric arylation of indoles enabled by azo groups. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 58–64. 10.1038/nchem.2866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. For reviews on the chemistry of 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes, see:; a Attanasi O. A.; De Crescentini L.; Favi G.; Filippone P.; Mantellini F.; Perrulli F. R.; Santeusanio S. Cultivating the Passion to Build Heterocycles from 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes: the Force of Imagination. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 3109–3127. 10.1002/ejoc.200900243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Lopes S. M. M.; Cardoso A. L.; Lemos A.; Pinho e Melo T. M. V. D. J. Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Conjugated Nitrosoalkenes and Azoalkenes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11324–11352. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For recent examples, see:; c Mari G.; Ciccolini C.; De Crescentini L.; Favi G.; Santeusanio S.; Mancinelli M.; Mantellini F. Metal and Oxidant-Free Brønsted Acid-Mediated Cascade Reaction to Substituted Benzofurans. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 10814–10824. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Hu S.; Du S.; Yang Z.; Ni L.; Chen Z. Synthesis of Multi-substituted Dihydropyrazoles by Copper-Mediated [4+1] Cycloaddition Reaction of N-Sulfonylhydrazones and Sulfoxonium Ylides. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 3124–3136. 10.1002/adsc.201900212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Ciccolini C.; De Crescentini L.; Mantellini F.; Santeusanio S.; Favi G. Zn(II)-Catalyzed Addition of Aromatic/Heteroaromatic C(sp2)–H to Azoalkenes: A Polarity-Reversed Arylation of Carbonyl Compounds. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4388–4391. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Zhang Y.; Cao Y.; Lu L.; Zhang S.; Bao W.; Huang S.; Rao Y. Perylenequinonoid-Catalyzed [4 + 1] and [4 + 2] Annulations of Azoalkenes: Photocatalytic Access to 1,2,3-Thiadiazole/1,4,5,6-Tetrahydropyridazine Derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 7711–7721. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Shao J.; Chen W.; Zhao M.; Shu K.; Liu H.; Tang P. Substrate-Controlled Synthesis of Spirocyclopropylpyrazolones and Bicyclic 4,5-Dihydropyrazoles from 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes with Sulfur Ylides. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3992–3995. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Santeusanio S.; Majer R.; Perrulli F. R.; De Crescentini L.; Favi G.; Giorgi G.; Mantellini F. Divergent Approach to Thiazolylidene Derivatives: A Perspective on the Synthesis of a Heterocyclic Skeleton from β-Amidothioamides Reactivity. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 9773–9778. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Ran G.-Y.; Gong M.; Yue J.-F.; Yang X.-X.; Zhou S.-L.; Du W.; Chen Y.-C. Asymmetric Cascade Assembly of 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes and α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes via Dienamine Activation. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1874–1877. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Ciccolini C.; Mari M.; Lucarini S.; Mantellini F.; Piersanti G.; Favi G. Polycyclic Indolines by an Acid-Mediated Intramolecular Dearomative Strategy: Reversing Indole Reactivity in the Pictet-Spengler-Type Reaction. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 4060–4067. 10.1002/adsc.201800981. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Mantenuto S.; Ciccolini C.; Lucarini S.; Piersanti G.; Favi G.; Mantellini F. Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Intramolecular Oxidative C–H/C–H Cross-Coupling Reaction of C3,N-Linked Biheterocycles: Rapid Access to Polycyclic Nitrogen Heterocycles. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 608–611. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Only formation of ring-opened [4 + 2] product 4f was recovered (see SI).
  13. Crystallographic data for 3e have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as deposition number CCDC 1950877.
  14. During the writing of this manuscript, Lu reported a similar reaction using chiral phosphoric acid as a catalyst.; Mei G.-J.; Tang X.; Tasdan Y.; Lu Y. Enantioselective Dearomatization of Indoles by an Azoalkene-Enabled (3+2) Reaction: Access to Pyrroloindolines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 648–652. 10.1002/anie.201911686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. No interconversion between two cycloaddition products was noted by subjecting separately compounds 3ab and 5a under the standard conditions.
  16. Magnus P.; Garizi N.; Seibert K. A.; Ornholt A. Synthesis of Carbamates from Diethoxycarbonyl Hydrazine Derivatives by E1cB Eliminative Cleavage of the NN′-Bond Rather than Reduction. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5646–5648. 10.1021/ol902313v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. For a review on synthetic approaches to tryptamine and related bioactive compounds, see:; a Lancianesi S.; Palmieri A.; Petrini M. Synthetic Approaches to 3-(2-Nitroalkyl) Indoles and Their Use to Access Tryptamines and Related Bioactive Compounds. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7108–7149. 10.1021/cr400676v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For some examples, see:; b Bartolucci S.; Mari M.; Di Gregorio G.; Piersanti G. Observations concerning the synthesis of tryptamine homologues and branched tryptamine derivatives via the borrowing hydrogen process: synthesis of psilocin, bufotenin, and serotonin. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 2233–2238. 10.1016/j.tet.2016.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Shmatova O. I.; Shevchenko N. E.; Nenajdenko V. G. Fischer Reaction with 2-Perfluoroalkylated Cyclic Imines ― An Efficient Route to 2-Perfluoroalkyl-Substituted Tryptamines and Their Derivatives and Homologues. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 6479–6488. 10.1002/ejoc.201500860. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Schmidt A. M.; Eilbracht P. Synthesis of Pharmacologically Relevant Indoles with Amine Side Chains via Tandem Hydroformylation/Fischer Indole Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5528–5535. 10.1021/jo050464l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Becke A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. 10.1063/1.464913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Ditchfield R.; Hehre W. J.; Pople J. A. Self-Consistent Molecular-Orbital Methods. IX. An Extended Gaussian-Type Basis for Molecular-Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724–728. 10.1063/1.1674902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miertuš S.; Scrocco E.; Tomasi J. Electrostatic interaction of a solute with a continuum. A direct utilization of AB initio molecular potentials for the prevision of solvent effects. Chem. Phys. 1981, 55, 117–29. 10.1016/0301-0104(81)85090-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Frisch M. J.; Trucks G. W.; Schlegel H. B.; Scuseria G. E.; Robb M. A.; Cheeseman J. R.; Scalmani G.; Barone V.; Petersson G. A.; Nakatsuji H.; Li X.; Caricato M.; Marenich A. V.; Bloino J.; Janesko B. G.; Gomperts R.; Mennucci B.; Hratchian H. P.; Ortiz J. V.; Izmaylov A. F.; Sonnenberg J. L.; Williams-Young D.; Ding F.; Lipparini F.; Egidi F.; Goings J.; Peng B.; Petrone A.; Henderson T.; Ranasinghe D.; Zakrzewski V. G.; Gao J.; Rega N.; Zheng G.; Liang W.; Hada M.; Ehara M.; Toyota K.; Fukuda R.; Hasegawa J.; Ishida M.; Nakajima T.; Honda Y.; Kitao O.; Nakai H.; Vreven T.; Throssell K.; Montgomery J. A. Jr.; Peralta J. E.; Ogliaro F.; Bearpark M. J.; Heyd J. J.; Brothers E. N.; Kudin K. N.; Staroverov V. N.; Keith T. A.; Kobayashi R.; Normand J.; Raghavachari K.; Rendell A. P.; Burant J. C.; Iyengar S. S.; Tomasi J.; Cossi M.; Millam J. M.; Klene M.; Adamo C.; Cammi R.; Ochterski J. W.; Martin R. L.; Morokuma K.; Farkas O.; Foresman J. B.; Fox D. J.. Gaussian 09; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Png Z. M.; Zeng H.; Ye Q.; Xu J. Inverse-Electron-Demand Diels–Alder Reactions: Principles and Applications. Chem. – Asian J. 2017, 12, 2142–2159. 10.1002/asia.201700442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. a Seeman J. I. Effect of conformational change on reactivity in organic chemistry. Evaluations, applications, and extensions of Curtin-Hammett Winstein-Holness kinetics. Chem. Rev. 1983, 83, 83–131. 10.1021/cr00054a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Eliel E. L.; Wilen S. H.; Mander L. N.. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alternatively, one extreme mechanism in which the zwitterionic intermediate IV undergoes an intramolecular 6-exo-trig azacyclization (not shown) to afford product 3 is unlikely.
  24. Thus, a highly symmetrical concerted mode of the addition of reagents seems to be excluded.; Sommer S. [3+2]-Cycloadditions of Azoalkenes to Enamines–Criss-Cross Cycloadditions to Azoalkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1979, 18, 695–696. 10.1002/anie.197906951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; Also, a mechanism in which a 1,3-H shift (in practice, a CH/NH tautomerism) precedes the 5-exo-trig azacyclization seems not to be operative.
  25. [3 + 2] annulation product 5 (R3 = H) and/or its indole ring-opened product (aniline–indole) 7, whose structures are shown below, were not generated under our reaction conditions (see ref (9)).graphic file with name jo0c01489_0014.jpg
  26. For recent examples of substrate-controlled divergent annulation reactions, see:; a Dhandabani G. K.; Mutra M. R.; Wang J.-J. FeCl3-Promoted ring size-dictating diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) of N-heterocycles using in situ-generated cyclic imines and enamines. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 7542–7545. 10.1039/C9CC03375K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Li M.; Li W.; Lin C.-D.; Wang J.-H.; Wen L.-R. One Base for Two Shots: Metal-Free Substituent-Controlled Synthesis of Two Kinds of Oxadiazine Derivatives from Alkynylbenziodoxolones and Amidoximes. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 6904–6915. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Liu S.; Qu J.; Wang B. Substrate-controlled divergent synthesis of polycyclic indoloazepines and indolodiazepines via 1,5-hydride shift/7-cyclization cascades. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7928–7931. 10.1039/C8CC03804J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Roslan I. I.; Ng K.-H.; Chuah G.-K.; Jaenicke S. Reagent-controlled regiodivergent intermolecular cyclization of 2-aminobenzothiazoles with β-ketoesters and β-ketoamides. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 2739–2750. 10.3762/bjoc.13.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Zhang Y.-S.; Tang X.-Y.; Shi M. Org. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 1516–1520. 10.1039/C5QO00216H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. N-Alkylindole derivatives 1b–k, 1n, and 1q were prepared as described in 11b [procedure B]. The N-methylindole 1e was prepared as described in 11b [procedure A].
  28. 3,4-Disubstituted indoles 1tz were synthesized as described in the literature:Gao S.; Wu Z.; Fang X.; Lin A.; Yao H. Palladium-Catalyzed Dearomative Allylic Alkylation of Indoles with Alkynes To Synthesize Indolenines with C3-Quarternary Centers. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3906–3909. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. For cyclic azoalkenes 2a–i, see:; a Attanasi O. A.; De Crescentini L.; Favi G.; Filippone P.; Giorgi G.; Mantellini F.; Perrulli F. R.; Spinelli D. Simple construction of fused and spiro nitrogen/sulfur containing heterocycles by addition of thioamides or thioureas on cycloalkenyl-diazenes: examples of click chemistry. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3837–3858. 10.1016/j.tet.2008.01.102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; For linear azoalkenes 2jt, see:; b Attanasi O. A.; Filippone P.; Mei A.; Santeusanio S. Effect of Metal Ions in Organic Synthesis; Part XXIII. Easy and High-Yield Direct Synthesis of 3-Aminocarbonyl-1-ureidopyrroles by the Copper(II) Chloride-Catalyzed Reaction of Aminocarbonylazoalkenes with 3-Oxoalkanamides. Synthesis 1984, 671–672. 10.1055/s-1984-30928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Attanasi O. A.; Filippone P.; Mei A.; Santeusanio S. Effect of Metal Ions in Organic Synthesis; Part XXIV. Facile One-Flask Synthesis of 1-Alkoxycarbonylamino-3-aminocarbonylpyrroles by Reaction of Alkoxycarbonylazoalkenes with 3-Oxoalkanamides under Copper(II) Chloride Catalysis. Synthesis 1984, 873–874. 10.1055/s-1984-31005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Preti L.; Attanasi O. A.; Caselli E.; Favi G.; Ori C.; Davoli P.; Felluga F.; Prati F. One-Pot Synthesis of Imidazole-4-Carboxylates by Microwave-Assisted 1,5-Electrocyclization of Azavinyl Azomethine Ylides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 4312–4320. 10.1002/ejoc.201000434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Barrett K. T.; Metrano A. J.; Rablen P. R.; Miller S. J. Spontaneous transfer of chirality in an atropisomerically enriched two-axis system. Nature 2014, 509, 71–75. 10.1038/nature13189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jo0c01489_si_001.pdf (961.3KB, pdf)
jo0c01489_si_002.cif (306.1KB, cif)
jo0c01489_si_003.pdf (4.7MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES