Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Parkinson’s disease (PD) neuropathology is characterized by intraneuronal protein aggregates composed of misfolded α-Synuclein (α-Syn), as well as degeneration of substantia nigra dopamine neurons. Deficits in olfactory perception and aggregation of α-Syn in the olfactory bulb (OB) are observed during early stages of PD, and have been associated with the PD prodrome, before onset of the classic motor deficits. α-Syn fibrils injected into the OB of mice cause progressive propagation of α-Syn pathology throughout the olfactory system and are coupled to olfactory perceptual deficits.
OBJECTIVE:
We hypothesized that accumulation of pathogenic α-Syn in the OB impairs neural activity in the olfactory system.
METHODS:
To address this, we monitored spontaneous and odor-evoked local field potential dynamics in awake wild type mice simultaneously in the OB and piriform cortex (PCX) one, two, and three months following injection of pathogenic preformed α-Syn fibrils in the OB.
RESULTS:
We detected α-Syn pathology in both the OB and PCX. We also observed that α-Syn fibril injections influenced odor-evoked activity in the OB. In particular, α-Syn fibril-injected mice displayed aberrantly high odor-evoked power in the beta spectral range. A similar change in activity was not detected in the PCX, despite high levels of α-Syn pathology.
CONCLUSIONS:
Together, this work provides evidence that synucleinopathy impacts in vivo neural activity in the olfactory system at the network-level.
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, Dementia, olfaction, synucleinopathy, Lewy pathology, piriform cortex, olfactory bulb, local field potential
Introduction
In addition to loss of substantia nigra dopamine neurons, a major pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the presence of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, primarily composed of insoluble misfolded aggregates of α-Synuclein (α-Syn) [1,2]. Braak and colleagues [3,4], suggested that in the early stages of PD pathogenesis, α-Syn aggregates accumulate in olfactory structures, including the olfactory bulb (OB), and the enteric nervous system before appearing in other brain regions. Interestingly, ~90% of individuals with PD exhibited olfactory deficits [5,6] prior to the onset of classic motor symptoms [7–9]. Therefore, it is possible that pathogenic α-Syn aggregates within the olfactory system underlie the olfactory perceptual deficits observed in PD.
Recent studies in experimental animals have demonstrated that intracerebral inoculation of brain homogenates derived from mice and humans with synucleinopathy, or seeding recombinant pre-formed fibrils (PFFs) of α-Syn, triggers α-Syn pathology in vivo and in vitro (e.g., [10–14]. Injection of PFFs into the OB results in the spread of pathology between anatomically connected brain regions, including the piriform cortex (PCX) [15–18]. Although the relationship between PD pathology and olfactory dysfunction are being explored clinically [19–23], the mechanisms underlying olfactory deficits in PD are unclear and animal modelling might provide insight into how neural processing is perturbed.
In both humans and rodents, initial odor processing occurs in the OB where olfactory receptor neurons in the nasal epithelium synapse to form OB glomeruli. Following local synaptic processing of this input [24,25] odor evoked information is then transferred to several secondary olfactory structures, including the PCX [26]. As the primary region for processing odors, the OB is crucial for the basic initial aspects of olfaction, including the fundamental ability to detect and recognize odors. Additionally, the PCX contributes to higher-order aspects of odor perception including odor learning [27,28]. Therefore, any perturbations in odor information processing through the local neural activity of the OB and/or the PCX could result in perceptual changes [29–31]. Thus, accumulation of α-Syn in the OB and PCX in persons with PD [5,32] and olfactory deficits observed in PD (for review [19]) led us to propose that pathogenic α-Syn perturbs olfactory neural activity.
Prior in situ and ex vivo studies have established that the natively unfolded form of α-Syn can modulate synaptic activity [33–35]. One study used brain surface electroencephalography to uncover changes in network activity of transgenic mice overexpressing human α-Syn [36]. However, no studies to date have determined whether there are effects of pathogenic α-Syn assemblies on local neural activity in vivo. Here we use the olfactory system as a model to determine the influence of α-Syn aggregates on neural activity in awake animals. Specifically, we examined spontaneous and odor-evoked local field potentials (LFPs) within the OB and PCX of mice. LFPs reflect aggregate network activity [37,38], and in the olfactory system, LFPs are comprised of three spectral bands, including theta (2–12 Hz), beta (15–35 Hz) and gamma (40–80 Hz). These bands are thought to play unique roles in the olfaction [39]. Adding to their significance, beta and gamma oscillations in key basal ganglia structures are perturbed in PD [40–42].
Here we tested the hypothesis that accumulation of pathogenic α-Syn in the olfactory system leads to aberrant LFP activity. Through multi-site LFP recordings in awake mice following α-Syn PFF seeding in the OB, we found that α-Syn PFF seeding impairs olfactory oscillatory network activity. We present evidence that synucleinopathy impacts in vivo neural activity in the olfactory system in manners which might contribute to the olfactory deficits associated with early PD and the prodrome of the disease.
Materials and Methods
Experimental subjects
A schematic of the experimental timeline is displayed in Figure 1A. A total of 57 female C57BL/6J mice (from donor stock originating at the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were bred and maintained in a University of Florida, Gainesville, FL vivarium. Mice were group housed until intra-cranial electrode implants as described below, with food and water available ad libitum. We selected female mice in order to follow the methods of previous work which characterized pathological Pser129 expression throughout the brain following OB injections of α-Syn PFFs in females [15,17]. While estrous stage was not monitored in the present mice, it is likely that they were in various stages of estrous on the days of recordings. Therefore, the influence of estrous cycle, if any, on the physiological measures likely averaged out. All animal procedures were approved by the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the National Research Council.
Sonication and PFF handling
Purified recombinant full-length mouse α-Syn (as described in Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2014) was thawed at room temperature, and sonicated in a cup horn sonicator (QSonica, Q700, Newton, CT) to yield short length PFFs (Fig. 2). During sonication (amplitude of 50, process time of 3 mins with 1 s ON and 1 s OFF cycles), care was made to ensure the sample was submerged in water, to ensure consistent sonication power of the sample. Sonicated PFFs were stored at room temperature until being microinjected into the brain as described below.
Electron microscopy
Electron microscopy was used to verify optimal PFF sonication (Fig. 2A) in two separate runs of PFF samples following the guidelines recommended by [44]. The PFF samples from both runs were sonicated as described above. To allow for visualization and quantification of sonicated individual fibrils, the sonicated sample (not that injected into the experimental animals) was diluted (1:4) in PBS prior to imaging. The sonicated PFFs were then absorbed onto 400 mesh carbon coated grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) and stained with 1% uranyl acetate for subsequent electron microscopic imaging to confirm optimal sonication and thus fibril lengths. All images were captured with a Tecnai G2 Spirit TWIN 120 kV transmission electron microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR) equipped with an UltraScan 1000 (2k × 2k resolution) CCD camera (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA). Fibril lengths (Fig. 2B) were measured in Fiji Image J [45].
Surgical procedures and animal care
OB microinjections
We injected PFFs unilaterally in the OB of the mice no later than 3 hours after sonication as described above. Briefly, mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane (~3% in 1 l/min of O2) and mounted in a stereotaxic frame accompanied with a water-filled heating pad in order to maintain body temperature (38°C). Marcaine (1.7 mg/ml, s.c.; Hospira Inc., Lake Forest, IL) was injected into the site of the future wound margin. The analgesic meloxicam was also provided s.c. (5 mg/ml; Putney Inc, Overland Park, KS), and following, a midline incision was made to expose the skull cap. Next, a craniotomy (~0.5 mm) was drilled in order to access the right OB (5.4 mm anterior to bregma, 0.75 mm lateral) and injected with either 800 nl of sterile PBS (pH 7.4; Gibco, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) or 800 nl of sonicated PFFs using a glass micropipette at 2 nl/sec (1 mm ventral in the OB). Following the injection, and a resting period of 3 mins, the micropipette was gently withdrawn from the injection site at a rate of 200 μm/min. Following injections, the mice from all cohorts received ad libitum access to food and water, and were allowed to recover on a heating pad for at least 8 hrs.
Implantation of LFP electrodes
Following injection of PFFs, and either 1, 2, or 3 months follow up periods, all mice were again sedated and prepared for cranial surgery as outlined above; this surgery included implantation of two pairs of twisted teflon-coated stainless steel bipolar electrodes (catalog # 791500, 0.005” diameter; A-M systems, Carlsborg, WA). The electrodes were implanted ipsilaterally to the PFF injection into both the OB and PCX. The OB coordinates were 3.8 mm anterior from bregma, 1 mm lateral, 1 mm ventral and the PCX coordinates were 0 mm bregma, 3.4 mm lateral, and 4 mm ventral. A third craniotomy was drilled over the contralateral cortex for the placement of a single stainless steel electrode to serve as the ground (catalog # 792900, 0.008” diameter, A-M Systems). This assembly was then cemented onto the skull along with a small plastic head-bar for subsequent head-fixation as defined below. After surgery, the mice were singly housed and allowed to recover on a heating pad for at least 8 hrs. These implanted mice had ad libitum access to food, water, and received subcutaneous meloxicam daily for 3 days (5 mg/kg).
Outline of experimental groups
Mice were divided into two treatment groups (i.e., PBS or PFF treated) and survived for 3 different durations post injection (1, 2, or 3 months). All mice were injected at 2–3 months of age (mean age upon injection: 64 ± 1.5 days (mean ± SEM)). Total animals per group include PBS: 1 (n= 9), 2 (n=10), or 3 (n=8) months post injection and PFF: 1 (n= 8), 2 (n=10), or 3 (n=12) months post injection.
Awake LFP recordings and data acquisition
We recorded spontaneous and odor-evoked LFP activity from 17 mice at 1 month post injection (n= 9 PBS, n= 8 PFF), 20 mice at 2 months post injection (n= 10 PBS, n= 10 PFF), and 20 mice at 3 months post injection (n= 8 PBS, n= 12 PFF). During any given day, mice of more than one condition [1, 2, or 3 months post injection and/or PBS/PFF treatment group] were used in recordings. A schematic of the recording session structure is shown in Figures 3A & 3B. All the recordings were performed in a dimly-lit, well-ventilated room maintained at 20–22°C, between 0900 and 1800 hrs.
Mice were head-fixed and an odor-port was positioned ~2 cm from the nose, prior to the start of the recordings, as we have described previously [46]. To monitor spontaneous LFP activity, we allowed the animal to rest during head-fixation for several minutes (~5 mins) prior to and following a series of odor deliveries (Fig. 3B). While optimally, animals would have been habituated to this paradigm for days to mitigate stress which may influence neural activity, in order to reduce variability within groups, we sought to strictly schedule and record from each animal on a single day at a precise time post injection. All odors and the blank stimulus (mineral oil) were presented for 4 secs each, in a semi-automated pseudorandom order for a total of 4 times each, with an approximately 15 secs inter-stimulus interval. Activity from each channel of both bipolar electrodes (in OB and PCX) was recorded at 2 kHz and filtered (100 Hz, 2nd order low-pass, 60 Hz notch) along with stimulus presentation events using a Tucker Davis Technologies RZ5D amplifier (Alachua, FL). The activity of one of the bipolar channels was used for all analyses.
Stimulus delivery
For odor presentation, odors including isopentyl acetate, 2-butanone, and 1,7-octadiene (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were each diluted in their liquid state to 133.332 Pa (1 Torr) and 266.645 Pa (2 Torr) in light mineral oil (Sigma Aldrich) which also served as the blank stimulus. Stimulus vapors controlled with an air-dilution olfactometer were run from glass headspace vials (100 ml/min) where they were later blended with clean nitrogen (900 ml/min) in the odor port thereby yielding a total odor flow rate of 1 L/min. The olfactometer was equipped with independent stimulus lines up to the point of entry into a Teflon odor port, in order to eliminate chances of cross-contamination of the stimuli and also to allow for rapid temporal control of odor dynamics as they reach the animal. To confirm the dynamics of the odor plume as it leaves the odor port, we used a photoionization detector (Aurora Scientific, Aurora CO). As shown in Figure 3C, odor delivery occurred rapidly, and was largely stable throughout the 4 sec of delivery.
Tissue collection and histology
Within 48 hrs after recordings, the mice were overdosed with Fatal-plus (0.01 ml/g; Vortech Pharmaceutical Ltd, Dearborn, MI). Following confirmation of deep sedation, they were perfused with cold saline and subsequently 10% phosphate buffered formalin. Brains were collected and stored at 4 °C in 10% formalin / 30% sucrose prior to sectioning. Serial 40 μm thick coronal sections were collected using a sliding microtome, and stored in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.4) with 0.03% sodium azide. These sections were used for electrode verification and phosphoserine 129 (Pser129) immunofluorescence.
Pser129 immunofluorescence
Presence of Pser129 α-Syn-immunopositive inclusions is considered pathological given the abundance of this post-translationally modified form of α-Syn in Lewy pathology [47]. Our previous work has also shown that Pser129 α-Syn-immunopositive inclusions in the animal model we used in the present study are positive for ubiquitin, p62, Thioflavin S and are Proteinase K resistant, all features of clinical Lewy pathology [15]. Thus, we used Pser129 immunofluorescence to quantify pathological burden resultant from OB PFF or PBS microinjections (the latter as a control). Floating OB and PCX sections from PFF and PBS injected mice were rinsed thrice in TBS and subsequently, dilution buffer (10 mins each). The dilution buffer was comprised of 2% bovine serum albumin (Sigma Aldrich), 0.9% sodium chloride (Sigma Aldrich), 0.4% Triton-X 100 (Sigma Aldrich), and 1% normal goat serum (Sigma Aldrich) in TBS. Next, the sections were blocked in 20% normal donkey serum (Sigma Aldrich) in TBS for 20 mins and incubated for 24 hrs in primary antibody rabbit anti-Pser129 (1:5000 in dilution buffer, catalog # EP1536Y, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at room temperature. On the following day, all sections were rinsed four times in dilution buffer (10 mins) and incubated for 2 hrs in secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500 in dilution buffer, catalog # A11012, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Sections were rinsed thrice in TBS and twice in double distilled water (5 mins each). Finally, tissue was placed on slides and cover-slipped with mounting media containing DAPI (Fluoromount-G; 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Invitrogen). All immunofluorescence runs contained tissue from more than one age (1, 2, or 3 months post injection) and treatment group (PBS or PFF).
Electrode verification
PCX electrode tips/recording sites were verified with microscopy. Due to the ease of targeting, not all mice used in the study underwent exclusive examination for electrode tip placement in the OB. For PCX recording site verification, tissue processed for anti-Pser129 immunofluorescence (counterstained with DAPI) was used. When additional sections were needed for confirmation of recording sites, additional PCX tissue was placed on slides and counter-stained with DAPI. Only one mouse (PBS, 2 months post injection) did not contribute PCX data since the electrode was misplaced. The total numbers of animals contributing data / brain region is defined below. Representative images of electrode tips localized in the OB and separately in the PCX are displayed in Figure 1B.
Pser129 imaging and quantification
The OB and PCX were identified based on an established brain atlas [48]. Images of the OB and PCX were acquired from the hemisphere ipsilateral (identified from the electrode tracks) to the OB microinjection. All Pser129 imaging was performed with a Nikon Ti2e microscope equipped with a 15MP monochrome camera and using 20X magnification. Additionally, image acquisition settings, particularly the gain, light intensity, and exposure were kept constant for all images. First, images were collected which included the OB and PCX (≥4 images/region). Attempts were made to acquire images from similar anterior-posterior extents of each brain area. Next, by a treatment group blind experimenter, the images were cropped so that the resultant image included solely OB and PCX, and that the images spanned the majority of cell layers, as exemplified in Figure 4. Also by a treatment group blind experimenter, these cropped images were next thresholded using semi-automated routines in Nikon Elements and with fixed settings across all images for later quantification of Pser129 levels. The % area in each of the cropped and thresholded images occupied by Pser129 was then calculated as a ratio of the pixel area above threshold : the total pixel area. Representative images showing Pser129 burden in the OB and PCX are presented in an inverted grayscale (Fig. 4B), to allow ease of visualization of puncta, although all of the data analysis steps outlined above occurred in the original high-resolution color images.
Analysis and Statistics
In total, we acquired spontaneous and odor-evoked LFP activity from 17 mice at 1 month post injection (n= 9 PBS, n= 8 PFF), 20 mice at 2 months post injection (n= 9 PBS, n= 10 PFF), and 20 mice at 3 months post injection (n= 8 PBS, n= 12 PFF). As described in the electrode verification section above, these numbers only include mice which had electrodes verified in each of the target brain regions. All of these mice contributed clean artifact free signals and also passed the electrode placement confirmation described above.
Analysis of the LFP data was performed by experimenters blinded to the experimental groups using Spike 2 (Cambridge Electronic Design, Milton, Cambridge). Data were processed using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis [for spontaneous (1.006 secs Hanning window and 0.994 Hz resolution) and odor evoked (0.503 sec Hanning window and 1.987 Hz resolution)] in order to classify and distribute the data within different LFP frequency bands. While due to the time-window sizes, we used differing FFT resolutions for the above calculations, no comparisons are made between the spontaneous and odor-evoked events. Power spectra of spontaneous and odor-evoked LFP activity were extracted from 0–100 Hz. LFP spectral bands were defined as theta (1–10 Hz), beta (10–35 Hz), and gamma (40–70 Hz) [39]. OB-PCX spontaneous LFP activity was analyzed over a duration of 200 secs sampled both prior to and following presentation of odors (at the start and end of the recording session respectively). Odor-evoked response magnitude was used as a variable to measure odor-evoked LFP activity. OB-PCX odor-evoked response magnitude is a ratio of time matched (4 secs) LFP power during odor presentation to LFP power before odor presentation. Herein we focus our odor-evoked analyses solely on 1 Torr isopentyl acetate trials. This is based upon the inconsistent responses elicited by 2-butanone and 1,7-octadiene in all mice, including those PBS treated. Further, when collapsing across groups, we did not find an effect of 1 Torr versus 2 Torr intensity of isopentyl acetate and so for simplicity we restrict all analyses to 1 Torr isopentyl acetate.
All statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel and Graphpad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA). Any comparison between PFF and PBS injected mice or between brain regions was conducted using 2-way ANOVA. Mixed effects analyses were used to test for possible time-post injection effects (1, 2, or 3 months post injection). Post-hoc analyses included multiple comparison corrections whenever appropriate. All data are reported as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated.
Results
Accumulation of Pser129 pathology in key olfactory structures following OB α-Syn seeding.
To induce α-synucleinopathy in the olfactory system, PFFs or PBS as a control, were unilaterally injected into the OB of 2–3 months-old female mice. The mice were then allowed either 1, 2, or 3 months time post-injection prior to being implanted with electrodes into their OB and PCX, ipsilateral to the injection, and LFP recordings performed (Fig. 1) as described below. Following recordings, the brains were collected and processed for anti-Pser129 immunofluorescence. Confirming previous results using this OB PFF seeding model [15,17], we observed Pser129 burden in key olfactory structures, including the OB itself and the PCX, in mice injected with PFFs (Fig. 4). Pser129 immunostaining was detected throughout all cell layers in both brain regions of PFF injected mice (Fig. 4B). There was a significant effect of PFF treatment on Pser129 levels in the OB (F(1,36) = 10.56, p = 0.003), as well as the PCX (F(1,36) = 19.84, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4C). Additionally, across all time groups (1 to 3 mo), there was an effect of brain region on Pser129 immunostaining indicating that the PCX was more vulnerable to accumulation of misfolded α-Syn compared to the OB (F(1, 22) = 16.63, p = 0.0005). There was a non-significant trend towards increased levels of Pser129 in the PCX in the 3 versus the 1 month group (F(2,27) = 1.611, p = 0.218) which is in contrast to the largely stable Pser129 levels within the OB from 1 to 3 months (Fig. 4C).
Preservation of spontaneous LFP dynamics following α-Syn seeding.
We began our investigation into the influence of α-Syn aggregates on LFP dynamics by analyzing spontaneous (viz., those in the absence of experimentally-applied odors) levels of theta, beta, and gamma-band powers in the OB and PCX of mice that survived 1, 2, or 3 months post injection (the same mice used for histology above). As is well established (for review [39]), spontaneous OB and PCX LFP activity is characterized by prominent theta band power coupled to the respiratory cycles, along with beta and gamma band power which also occur in somewhat phasic manners with respiratory theta (Fig. 5A & 5B). Since the full spectrum is diverse in power (Fig. 5B), as is standard when quantifying olfactory LFPs, throughout this paper we calculated the power of each of these spectral bands separately and focused on testing for PFF treatment effects by comparing PBS vs PFF treated animals.
Despite the significant Pser129 burden in each structure (Fig. 4), we did not find an overall (across age groups) effect of PFF treatment on spontaneous activity in either the OB or PCX (Fig. 6). In the OB specifically, there was no change in theta (F(1,51) = 0.993, p = 0.324), beta (F(1,51) = 0.035, p = 0.853), or gamma band powers (F(1,51) = 0.013, p = 0.910) when comparing PBS injected animals to those injected with PFFs (Fig. 6A). Similarly in the PCX, we did not find an overall change in theta (F(1, 50) = 0.017, p = 0.897), beta (F(1, 50) = 0.084, p = 0.774), or gamma band powers (F(1, 50) = 0.073, p = 0.788) in PBS versus PFF injected animals (Fig. 6B). Thus, despite pathogenic propagation of α-Syn from the seeded structure (the OB) into a monosynaptically interconnected structure (the PCX), the spontaneous LFP activity in neither brain region was significantly disrupted.
α-Syn seeding results in heightened OB beta-band odor-evoked activity.
The OB and PCX are important for the formation of olfactory perception, and the processing of odor information in each of these stages is considered critical for olfaction. Odor-input drives increases in LFP activity in the OB [39]. Beta band power is especially considered important for the coordinated transfer of sensory information between brain regions [49,50] and thus any changes in beta activity during odor may be especially influential to perception. Therefore, we next took advantage of the monosynaptic and bisynaptic inputs of odor information into these structures by analyzing odor-evoked LFPs (Fig. 7) and how OB PFF seeding may impact odor-evoked activity. As expected based upon a wealth of prior research, odor-evoked increases in LFP power were observed in both the OB and PCX of PBS treated mice (Fig. 7, left panels). These example traces also suggested that the power may be different during odor in the PFF treated animals compared to those treated with PBS. To directly compare between groups, across all trials of the odor (1 Torr isopentyl acetate), we calculated the LFP spectral power during the 4 seconds odor was presented to the mouse’s nose and also the 4 seconds immediately prior to odor delivery. We then computed the ratio of the during-odor epoch : the pre-odor epoch, in order to calculate an odor-evoked power ratio. We then averaged the calculated ratios across all trials in the session (4–5 trials/animal) to calculate each animal’s average odor-evoked power ratios as a simple measure of odor-evoked network activity (Fig. 8).
In the OB, while analyses of odor-evoked power ratios did not uncover an effect in either the theta (F(1, 50) = 0.944, p = 0.336) or gamma bands (F(1, 50) = 0.389, p = 0.536), there was a significant effect of PFF treatment on increasing odor-evoked beta band power (F(1, 50) = 5.531, p = 0.023) (Fig. 8A). Post-hoc tests within these spectral bands, and also within individual age groups, did not reveal a similar effect of PFF treatment (p > 0.05, Sidak’s test for correction of multiple comparisons). Nevertheless, there is a clear elevation in beta-band odor evoked power ratios in the PFF-treated animals, which is comparable across the groups from 1 to 3 months post PFF injection.
In contrast to the OB, theta (F(1, 49) = 1.351, p = 0.251), beta (F(1, 49) = 0.042, p = 0.839), and gamma band odor-evoked powers (F(1, 49) = 3.380, p = 0.072) were similar between PBS and PFF treated animals across all ages in the PCX (Fig. 8B). This indicates that, at least at the level of LFP monitoring, the effect of α-Syn OB seeding is most dramatic in shaping OB odor-evoked activity. This is a significant finding since the OB provides nasal-derived odor information into the entirety of down-stream brain regions.
Are the changes in beta-band dynamics correlated with Pser129 levels?
Finally, we analyzed whether the levels of Pser129 immunostaining within the OB were correlated with the above levels in odor-evoked beta-band power. We focused on this possible relationship since the odor-evoked beta-band activity was significantly elevated in the OB following PFF injection (Fig. 8). Further, some PFF-treated animals contributed abnormally high levels of odor-evoked beta-band activity (Fig. 8, dark data point). Indeed, upon inspection, we determined that some of these mice were also those which displayed elevated Pser129 pathological burden in the olfactory system and that led us to predict these factors were related. Surprisingly, no significant correlation was found between levels of OB Pser129 and odor-evoked power ratios within beta activity in the OB (Pearson r(28) = 0.156, p = 0.411) (Fig. 9). Since, as discussed earlier, beta band activity in the OB may originate from centrifugal input coming from the PCX, we also tested whether a correlation exists between OB odor-evoked beta power and PCX Pser129 levels, yet also found no significance (Pearson r(28) = −0.018, p = 0.923) (not shown). Thus, the aberrant odor-evoked beta band activity observed in PFF treated mice is not correlated with levels of Pser129 pathology.
Discussion
We tested the hypothesis that progressive development of α-Syn aggregates in the olfactory system impacts neural dynamics. While key regions within the basal ganglia system display aberrant synchrony of neural dynamics which may contribute to motor deficits in PD [51–55], the direct contributions of α-Syn aggregates to neural dynamics in vivo are unresolved. This is an important question because hyposmia is prevalent in PD, and often develops before the onset of clear motor deficits. Furthermore, greater insight into the impact of α-Syn aggregates on neural circuits is important for our understanding of functional deficits in PD and related synucleinopathies. Perturbations in neural synchrony might be highly relevant to the symptomology of clinical synucleinopathies since they may alter key aspects of function, from cognitive, motor, to sensory – depending upon the system impaired.
We used α-Syn seeding in mice in combination with olfactory LFP recordings. The olfactory system is an excellent model to test whether pathogenic α-Syn impacts neural dynamics, given both the known aggregation of Lewy bodies in the OB during the earliest states of PD, and decades of work carefully examining the dynamics of LFPs in the OB and PCX, including how these dynamics are influenced by odors. Importantly, LFPs are reflective of aggregated network activity [37,38] and are considered a substrate for the rhythmic sampling of sensory information [49]. Therefore, changes in LFPs may impact odor perception. Here we found that the progressive development of α-Syn aggregates influenced specific sensory-evoked LFP activity in region-selective manners (viz., not all brain regions were equally affected).
Reconciling Pser129 pathology with that of previous studies.
The OB seeding model we used is associated with impaired odor perception, yet spared motor function [15,56]. We found, as expected, that injection of α-Syn PFFs into one OB triggered α-Syn accumulation of intraneuronal Pser129 immunoreactive aggregates in both the OB and in inter-connected olfactory structures, particularly in the PCX (Fig. 4) which has dense reciprocal connection with the OB. PFF injected mice had significantly greater Pser129 levels compared to mice injected with PBS. Based on prior studies demonstrating Pser129 immunoreactivity in olfactory brain regions of mice following PFF injections [15,17], we interpret the Pser129 immunofluorescence we observe in the PCX as being the consequence of seeding of endogenous α-Syn. The uptake pattern we observed is similar to that previously reported [10,15]. Herein and in our earlier studies [15,17], injection of PFFs into the OB resulted in elevations in Pser129 relative to the time following seeding. While there was no elevation over time of Pser129 staining in the OB itself, the PCX did show subtle increases in pathology from 1 to 3 months post seeding, albeit not significant. Also similar to our earlier studies [10,15], we found significantly greater levels of Pser129 in the PCX than the OB.
α-Syn PFF injection influences odor-evoked beta band activity.
Monitoring the spontaneous and odor-evoked LFP activities simultaneously in both the OB and PCX revealed elevations in OB beta-band power in mice with Pser129-positive aggregates. There are several points worthy of discussion in this regard, which we organize by oscillatory band:
Theta band activity
First, no changes were found in theta-band power, which is a prominent oscillatory power observed in both the OB and PCX. Theta oscillations in the OB are generated by intranasal afferent input, and OB and PCX theta cycles are often coupled to respiration [39,57,58]. The spared theta power observed herein suggests that OB α-Syn pathology did not overtly alter the basic sensory-motor functions impacting the olfactory system (i.e., respiration).
Gamma band activity
Reciprocal dendrodendritic activity between OB granule and mitral / tufted cells generates gamma band activity [59]. Gamma oscillations reflect local circuit interactions within both the OB and the PCX, since they are considered to originate within these structures independent of participation from other brain areas [60,61]. We did not find that PFF injection into the OB affected gamma band activity in either the OB or PCX, during the 3 months post-injection that we followed the mice.
Beta band activity
Our results indicate that α-Syn aggregates, seeded by PFF injection into the OB, can generate elevations in beta band activity during odor-evoked states (Fig. 8). Beta oscillations reflect large-scale activity between interconnected structures [50,62] such as that between the OB and PCX [60,63].
We propose that the changes we uncovered in beta activity are particularly relevant to PD pathophysiology. Striatal and cortical beta band activity is elevated in persons with PD, and deep brain stimulation, levodopa, and anti-cholinergic treatment may act by means of suppressing elevated beta power in the cortico-basal ganglia loop [41,42,64–67]. Additionally, deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus was shown in one study to improve cortical function in PD and reduce the excessive beta phase coupling of motor cortex neurons [52]. Differences in beta band activity are proposed to be a network determinant of PD pathophysiology [68]. Our results indicate an important role for α-Syn related pathologies in these clinical pathophysiologies.
Notably, beta oscillations increase depending upon sensory and cognitive demands [62,69–71] and in the olfactory system beta oscillations are considered especially involved in odor learning [72–74]. In our study, while the mice were awake while being delivered odors, they were not engaged in any task which may influence cognitive demand. Interestingly, in previous work using behavioral tests to assay odor detection and memory, progressive olfactory perceptual deficits, specifically in odor detection and odor retention (memory), were uncovered following injection of PFFs into the OB [15,56]. We propose that the aberrant OB odor-evoked beta-band activity we observed is likely to critically influence the PFF-induced changes in odor perception [15,56].
We cannot exclude an effect of hormones and biological sex on the influence of PFF injections on beta activity. Work from many labs, including ours, has shown that olfactory system activity can be modulated by sex hormones, including estrogen [56,75–78]. However, in our study it is unlikely all mice in each group (n>8/group) were at a similar estrous stage during the recordings. Most likely, possible effects of estrous stage would be washed out within groups. Whether or not males injected with PFFs show similar changes in beta activity is an intriguing question, although given the prominence of olfactory dysfunction in male mice following PFF seeding [56], it is likely. Further studies that address the possible influence of biological sex and on olfactory pathophysiology in the context of α-Syn pathology are greatly needed.
Some brain networks may be more vulnerable to the influence of α-Syn PFF injections than others.
The greatest effect of α-Syn PFF injection on neural activity was in the OB. Despite pathogenic propagation of α-Syn from the seeded structure (the OB) into a monosynaptically interconnected structure (the PCX), these structures (i.e., their networks) were not equally affected. For instance, a striking effect in PFF seeded mice was an elevation in odor-evoked beta power (Fig. 7 & 8). This was observed only in the OB – suggesting that the OB is either directly impacted by α-Syn pathology, or, that the PCX, which is known to innervate the OB and influence local inhibition, is impacted and this results in elevated beta power during odor inhalation. We propose the latter model is at play. This is based upon the known nature of beta activity to be originating/communicating between brain regions and also the notably low levels of Pser129 in the OB compared to the PCX. In our model, α-Syn aggregates are present within several processing stages of the olfactory system (OB, AON, and PCX). Indeed, in addition to the PCX, we observed elevated Pser129 in the AON of PFF seeded mice (data not shown). Since like the PCX, the AON also influences activity of the OB [79], it is possible that α-Syn acting within either of these structures is responsible for the changes we observed in the OB. Therefore, we cannot determine with certainty in which neuronal populations (single or multiple) that the α-Syn aggregates influence neural activity, which ultimately give rise to the altered LFPs we detect. Future work building upon the present results by recording from additional olfactory system sites will be needed to explore this. Regardless of mechanism, the results of the odor-evoked analyses highlight that the impact of α-Syn aggregates may be region specific.
The influence of α-Syn PFF injection on oscillations is not directly related to levels of pSer129.
The altered odor-evoked beta power in PFF injected mice (Fig. 7 & 8) was not correlated with levels of pSer129 pathology (Fig. 9). The elevations in beta power in the OB during odor were stable regardless of delay post seeding (Fig. 7 & 8) which had no impact on pSer129 levels in the OB (Fig. 4C).
Cell culture and slice physiology studies demonstrated that pathological α-Syn perturbs normal synaptic function [80,81], for instance, by oligomeric α-Syn’s actions upon glutamatergic receptors [82]. Further, brain-surface electroencephalography from transgenic mice overexpressing human α-synuclein, throughout the brain, uncovered aberrant activity, including epileptiform events [36]. Our in vivo results suggest that elevations in pathological α-Syn, up to a particular level, may be sufficient to entail changes in synaptic coupling or perhaps efficacy which may result in the aberrant LFP activity. While we do not elucidate the precise cellular mechanism whereby α-Syn seeding perturbed neural activity, our correlation results do indicate that function is not strongly correlated with pathogenic α-Syn levels at least at the level of the local networks (viz., detectable with LFPs). This outcome points towards the likely influential role of other pathologies related to α-Syn aggregates in shaping neural dynamics in the context of PD. For instance, α-Syn aggregates accumulate in axons where they likely cause degeneration of the axons as well as dendrites [81]. Thus, it is possible that the influence of α-Syn aggregates on neural activity would be more directly correlated with changes in activity as the aggregates mature. Further, while for the purpose of this study we focused upon pSer129 pathology, work to examine the possible relationship between neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and/or other neurodegenerative pathologies and the oscillatory activity we uncovered are the focus of a future, currently ongoing, study with several survival time points.
Conclusions.
Our results extend important mechanistic work performed in cell culture and in brain slices indicating that α-Syn aggregates can perturb synaptic activity. We used awake mice and studied how progressive changes in α-Syn aggregate pathology affect the olfactory system at the network level. We found a change in neural activity that was region-specific, but did not directly correlate to the local degree of α-Syn aggregate pathology. Future work to assess levels of other pathologies along with simultaneous neural recordings will be informative, as will be work utilizing methods allowing for monitoring the activity of select cell populations to understand the cell types specifically vulnerable to the effects of synucleinopathy.
Acknowledgements:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01DC016519 (D.W. and P.B.) and R01DC014443 (D.W.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We acknowledge the Van Andel Institute and many individuals and corporations that financially support research into neurodegenerative disease at Van Andel Institute. We also thank the Udall Center for Parkinson’s Research at the University of Pennsylvania for generously providing α-Syn PFFs and Karen Kelley at the University of Florida Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research for expert advice and training in electron microscopy.
Footnotes
Competing interests: P.B. has received commercial support as a consultant from Axial Biotherapeutics, CuraSen, Fujifilm-Cellular Dynamics International, Idorsia, IOS Press Partners, LifeSci Capital LLC, Lundbeck A/S and Living Cell Technologies LTD. He has received commercial support for grants/research from Lundbeck A/S and Roche. He has ownership interests in Acousort AB and Axial Biotherapeutics and is on the steering committee of the NILO-PD trial. The authors declare no additional competing financial interests.
References
- [1].Goedert M (2001) Alpha-synuclein and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci 2,. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R, Goedert M (1997) Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 388,. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Braak H, Ghebremedhin E, Rüb U, Bratzke H, Tredici K (2004) Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology. Cell Tissue Res 318, 121–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Braak H, Rüb U, Gai WP, Del Tredici K (2003) Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: Possible routes by which vulnerable neuronal types may be subject to neuroinvasion by an unknown pathogen. J. Neural Transm 110, 517–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Doty RL (2012) Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol 8, 329–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Doty RL, Ferguson-Segall M, Lucki I, Kreider M (1988) Effects of intrabulbar injections of 6-hydroxydopamine on ethyl acetate odor detection in castrate and non-castrate male rats. Brain Res 444, 95–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Mahlknecht P, Seppi K, Poewe W (2015) The concept of prodromal Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons. Dis 5, 681–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ross GW, Petrovitch H, Abbott RD, Tanner CM, Popper J, Masaki K, Launer L, White LR (2008) Association of olfactory dysfunction with risk for future Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol 63, 167–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Wu X, Yu C, Fan F, Zhang K, Zhu C, Wu T, Li K, Chan P (2011) Correlation between Progressive Changes in Piriform Cortex and Olfactory Performance in Early Parkinson’s Disease. Eur. Neurol 66, 98–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Rey NL, Petit GH, Bousset L, Melki R, Brundin P (2013) Transfer of human α-synuclein from the olfactory bulb to interconnected brain regions in mice. Acta Neuropathol 126, 555–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Luk KC, Song C, O’Brien P, Stieber A, Branch JR, Brunden KR, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY (2009) Exogenous α-synuclein fibrils seed the formation of Lewy body-like intracellular inclusions in cultured cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 106, 20051–20056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Luk K, Kehm V, Zhang B, O’Brien P, Trojanowski J, Lee V (2012) Intracerebral inoculation of pathological α-synuclein initiates a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative α-synucleinopathy in mice. J Exp Med 209,. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Peelaerts W, Bousset L, Baekelandt V, Melki R (2018) ɑ-Synuclein strains and seeding in Parkinson’s disease, incidental Lewy body disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and multiple system atrophy: similarities and differences. Cell Tissue Res. 373, 195–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Luk KC, Lee VM-Y (2014) Modeling Lewy pathology propagation in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord 20, S85–S87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Rey NL, Steiner JA, Maroof N, Luk KC, Madaj Z, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y, Brundin P (2016) Widespread transneuronal propagation of α-synucleinopathy triggered in olfactory bulb mimics prodromal Parkinson’s disease. J. Exp. Med 213, 1759–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Mezias C, Rey N, Brundin P, Raj A (2020) Neural connectivity predicts spreading of alpha-synuclein pathology in fibril-injected mouse models: Involvement of retrograde and anterograde axonal propagation. Neurobiol. Dis 134, 104623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Rey NL, George S, Steiner JA, Madaj Z, Luk KC, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y, Brundin P (2018) Spread of aggregates after olfactory bulb injection of α-synuclein fibrils is associated with early neuronal loss and is reduced long term. Acta Neuropathol. 135, 65–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Mason DM, Nouraei N, Pant DB, Miner KM, Hutchison DF, Luk KC, Stolz JF, Leak RK (2016) Transmission of α-synucleinopathy from olfactory structures deep into the temporal lobe. Mol. Neurodegener 11, 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Rey NL, Wesson DW, Brundin P (2018) The olfactory bulb as the entry site for prion-like propagation in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol. Dis 109, 226–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lee EY, Eslinger PJ, Du G, Kong L, Lewis MM, Huang X (2014) Olfactory-related cortical atrophy is associated with olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord 29, 1205–1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Wattendorf E, Welge-Lussen A, Fiedler K, Bilecen D, Wolfensberger M, Fuhr P, Hummel T, Westermann B (2009) Olfactory Impairment Predicts Brain Atrophy in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci 29, 15410–15413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Wen MC, Xu Z, Lu Z, Chan LL, Tan EK, Tan LCS (2017) Microstructural network alterations of olfactory dysfunction in newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep 7, 12559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Doty RL (2017) Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is there a common pathological substrate? Lancet Neurol. 16, 478–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Schoppa NE, Urban NN (2003) Dendritic processing within olfactory bulb circuits. Trends Neurosci 26, 501–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Wachowiak M, Shipley MT (2006) Coding and synaptic processing of sensory information in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17, 411–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Scott JW, McBride RL, Schneider SP (1980) The organization of projections from the olfactory bulb to the piriform cortex and olfactory tubercle in the rat. J Comp Neurol 194, 519–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Gottfried JA (2010) Central mechanisms of odour object perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 11, 628–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Wilson DA, Sullivan RM (2011) Cortical processing of odor objects. Neuron 72, 506–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Doucette W, Milder J, Restrepo D (2007) Adrenergic modulation of olfactory bulb circuitry affects odor discrimination. Learn Mem 14, 539–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Nusser Z, Kay LM, Laurent G, Homanics GE, Mody I (2001) Disruption of GABA(A) receptors on GABAergic interneurons leads to increased oscillatory power in the olfactory bulb network. J Neurophysiol 86, 2823–2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Wilson DA (2001) Scopolamine enhances generalization between odor representations in rat olfactory cortex. Learn Mem 8, 279–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Braak H, Tredici K, Rüb U, Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E (2003) Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 24, 197–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Chandra S, Fornai F, Kwon HB, Yazdani U, Atasoy D, Liu X, Hammer RE, Battaglia G, German DC, Castillo PE, Südhof TC (2004) Double-knockout mice for α- and β-synucleins: Effect on synaptic functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 101, 14966–14971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Burré J (2015) The synaptic function of α-synuclein. J. Parkinsons. Dis 5, 699–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Burré J, Sharma M, Tsetsenis T, Buchman V, Etherton MR, Südhof TC (2010) α-Synuclein promotes SNARE-complex assembly in vivo and in vitro. Science (80-.) 329, 1663–1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Morris M, Sanchez PE, Verret L, Beagle AJ, Guo W, Dubal D, Ranasinghe KG, Koyama A, Ho K, Yu GQ, Vossel KA, Mucke L (2015) Network dysfunction in α-synuclein transgenic mice and human Lewy body dementia. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol 2, 1012–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Buzsáki G, Anastassiou CA, Koch C (2012) The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci 13, 407–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Mitzdorf U (1985) Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol. Rev 65, 37–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Kay LM, Beshel J, Brea J, Martin C, Rojas-Líbano D, Kopell N (2009) Olfactory oscillations: the what, how and what for. Trends Neurosci. 32, 207–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Burciu RG, Vaillancourt DE (2018) Imaging of Motor Cortex Physiology in Parkinson’s Disease. Mov. Disord 33, 1688–1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Little S, Brown P (2014) The functional role of beta oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord 20, S44–S48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].McCarthy MM, Moore-Kochlacs C, Gu X, Boyden ES, Han X, Kopell N (2011) Striatal origin of the pathologic beta oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 108, 11620–11625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Volpicelli-Daley LA, Luk KC, Lee VM-Y (2014) Addition of exogenous α-synuclein preformed fibrils to primary neuronal cultures to seed recruitment of endogenous α-synuclein to Lewy body and Lewy neurite–like aggregates. Nat. Protoc 9, 2135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Polinski NK, Volpicelli-Daley LA, Sortwell CE, Luk KC, Cremades N, Gottler LM, Froula J, Duffy MF, Lee VM, Martinez TN, Dave KD (2018) Best Practices for Generating and Using Alpha-Synuclein Pre-Formed Fibrils to Model Parkinson’s Disease in Rodents. J. Parkinsons. Dis [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Gadziola MA, Tylicki KA, Christian DL, Wesson DW (2015) The Olfactory Tubercle Encodes Odor Valence in Behaving Mice. J. Neurosci 35, 4515–4527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Fujiwara H, Hasegawa M, Dohmae N, Kawashima A, Masliah E, Goldberg MS, Shen J, Takio K, Iwatsubo T (2002) α-Synuclein is phosphorylated in synucleinopathy lesions. Nat. Cell Biol 4, 160–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Paxinos G, Franklin K (2000) The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, Academic Press, San Diego. [Google Scholar]
- [49].Haegens S, Zion Golumbic E (2018) Rhythmic facilitation of sensory processing: A critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 86, 150–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Kopell N, Ermentrout GB, Whittington MA, Traub RD (2000) Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 97, 1867–1872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Brown P, Williams D (2005) Basal ganglia local field potential activity: Character and functional significance in the human. Clin. Neurophysiol 116, 2510–2519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].De Hemptinne C, Swann NC, Ostrem JL, Ryapolova-Webb ES, San Luciano M, Galifianakis NB, Starr PA (2015) Therapeutic deep brain stimulation reduces cortical phase-amplitude coupling in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Neurosci 18, 779–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Hammond C, Bergman H, Brown P (2007) Pathological synchronization in Parkinson’s disease: networks, models and treatments. Trends Neurosci 30, 357–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Kühn AA, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P (2006) Reduction in subthalamic 8–35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurosci 23, 1956–1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Moran A, Bergman H, Israel Z, Bar-Gad I (2008) Subthalamic nucleus functional organization revealed by parkinsonian neuronal oscillations and synchrony. Brain 131, 3395–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Johnson ME, Bergkvist L, Mercado G, Stetzik L, Meyerdirk L, Wolfrum E, Madaj Z, Brundin P, Wesson D (2020) Deficits in olfactory sensitivity in a mouse model of Parkinson ‘ s disease revealed by plethysmography of odor-evoked sniffing. Sci. Rep 10, 1–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Kay LM, Stopfer M (2006) Information processing in the olfactory systems of insects and vertebrates. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 17, 433–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Komisaruk BR (1970) Synchrony between limbic system theta activity and rhythmical behavior in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 70, 482–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Shepherd GM (1972) Synaptic organization of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol. Rev 52, 864–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Neville KR, Haberly LB (2003) Beta and gamma oscillations in the olfactory system of the urethane-anesthetized rat. J Neurophysiol 90, 3921–3930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Rall W, Shepherd GM (1968) Theoretical reconstruction of field potentials and dendrodendritic synaptic interactions in olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol 31, 884–915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Spitzer B, Haegens S (2017) Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation. eneuro 4, ENEURO.0170–17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Kay LM, Beshel J (2010) A beta oscillation network in the rat olfactory system during a 2-alternative choice odor discrimination task. J. Neurophysiol 104, 829–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Brown P, Oliviero A, Mazzone P, Insola A, Tonali P, Di Lazzaro V (2001) Dopamine Dependency of Oscillations between Subthalamic Nucleus and Pallidum in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci 21, 1033–1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Brown P (2006) Bad oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. In Journal of Neural Transmission, Supplement Springer, Vienna , pp. 27–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Giannicola G, Marceglia S, Rossi L, Mrakic-Sposta S, Rampini P, Tamma F, Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Priori A (2010) The effects of levodopa and ongoing deep brain stimulation on subthalamic beta oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol 226, 120–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Eisinger RS, Cagle J, Opri E, Alcantara J, Cernera S, Foote KD, Okun MS, Gunduz A (2020) Parkinsonian beta dynamics during rest and movement in the dorsal pallidum and subthalamic nucleus. J. Neurosci 40, 2859–2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Feingold J, Gibson DJ, DePasquale B, Graybiel AM (2015) Bursts of beta oscillation differentiate postperformance activity in the striatum and motor cortex of monkeys performing movement tasks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 112, 13687 LP – 13692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Bauer M, Oostenveld R, Peeters M, Fries P (2006) Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas. J. Neurosci 26, 490–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Spitzer B, Wacker E, Blankenburg F (2010) Oscillatory correlates of vibrotactile frequency processing in human working memory. J. Neurosci 30, 4496–4502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].van Ede F, Jensen O, Maris E (2010) Tactile expectation modulates pre-stimulus Α-band oscillations in human sensorimotor cortex. Neuroimage 51, 867–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Gervais R, Buonviso N, Martin C, Ravel N (2007) What do electrophysiological studies tell us about processing at the olfactory bulb level? J. Physiol. Paris 101, 40–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Lowry CA, Kay LM (2007) Chemical factors determine olfactory system beta oscillations in waking rats. J Neurophysiol 98, 394–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Martin C, Beshel J, Kay LM (2007) An olfacto-hippocampal network is dynamically involved in odor-discrimination learning. J Neurophysiol 98, 2196–2205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Doty RL, Cameron EL (2009) Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol. Behav 97, 213–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Phillips PD, Vallowe HH (1975) Cyclic fluctuations in odor detection by female rats and the temporal influences of exogenous steroids on ovariectomized rats. Proc. Pennsylvania Acad. Sci 49, 160–164. [Google Scholar]
- [77].Sorwell KG, Wesson DW, Baum MJ (2008) Sexually dimorphic enhancement by estradiol of male urinary odor detection thresholds in mice. Behav. Neurosci 122, 788–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Wesson DW, Keller M, Douhard Q, Baum MJ, Bakker J (2006) Enhanced urinary odor discrimination in female aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice. Horm. Behav 49, 580–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Markopoulos F, Rokni D, Gire DH, Murthy VN (2012) Functional Properties of Cortical Feedback Projections to the Olfactory Bulb. Neuron 76, 1175–1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Wu Q, Takano H, Riddle DM, Trojanowski JQ, Coulter DA, Lee VM-Y (2019) Alpha-synuclein (αSyn) preformed fibrils induce endogenous αSyn aggregation, compromise synaptic activity and enhance synapse loss in cultured excitatory hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci 0060–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Volpicelli-Daley LA, Luk KC, Patel TP, Tanik SA, Riddle DM, Stieber A, Meaney DF, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y (2011) Exogenous α-synuclein fibrils induce Lewy body pathology leading to synaptic dysfunction and neuron death. Neuron 72, 57–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Durante V, de Iure A, Loffredo V, Vaikath N, De Risi M, Paciotti S, Quiroga-Varela A, Chiasserini D, Mellone M, Mazzocchetti P, Calabrese V, Campanelli F, Mechelli A, Di Filippo M, Ghiglieri V, Picconi B, El-Agnaf OM, De Leonibus E, Gardoni F, Tozzi A, Calabresi P (2019) Alpha-synuclein targets GluN2A NMDA receptor subunit causing striatal synaptic dysfunction and visuospatial memory alteration. Brain 142, 1365–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]