Abstract
Gamete production in mammals and insects is controlled by cell signaling pathways that facilitate communication between germ cells and somatic cells. Nuclear receptor signaling is a key mediator of many aspects of reproduction, including gametogenesis. For example, the NR5A subfamily of nuclear receptors is essential for gonad development and sex steroid production in mammals. Despite the original identification of the NR5A subfamily in the model insect Drosophila melanogaster, it has been unclear whether Drosophila NR5A receptors directly control oocyte production. Ftz-f1 is expressed throughout the ovary, including in germline stem cells, germline cysts, and several populations of somatic cells. We show that ftz-f1 is required in follicle cells prior to stage 10 to promote egg chamber survival at the mid-oogenesis checkpoint. Our data suggest that egg chamber death in the absence of ftz-f1 is due, at least in part, to failure of follicle cells to exit the mitotic cell cycle or failure to accumulate oocyte-specific factors in the germline. Taken together, these results show that, as in mammals, the NR5A subfamily promotes maximal reproductive output in Drosophila. Our data underscore the importance of nuclear receptors in the control of reproduction and highlight the utility of Drosophila oogenesis as a key model for unraveling the complexity of nuclear receptor signaling in gametogenesis.
Keywords: oocyte, follicle cells, nuclear hormone receptor, oogenesis
Introduction
Oogenesis is a multistage process requiring precise spatiotemporal cellular communication. A variety of paracrine and endocrine signals enable a coordinated response of ovarian cells to intrinsic and physiological cues. In mice, humans, and insects, nutritionally-responsive growth factors and reproductive steroids control cell proliferation, survival, and the timing of oocyte development (Grive and Freiman 2015; Uryu et al. 2015; Ables and Drummond-Barbosa 2017; Wang et al. 2017; Chou and Chen 2018; Richards 2018; Swevers 2019; Yatsenko and Rajkovic 2019). Cells respond to reproductive steroids and other nutritionally regulated small molecules via the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-gated transcription factors (King-Jones and Thummel 2005; Pardee et al. 2011). Due to their unique ability to bind DNA in response to circulating cues, nuclear receptors are key transcriptional regulators of gene expression in diverse species (Evans and Mangelsdorf 2014).
The mammalian NR5A subgroup of nuclear receptors has been implicated in a variety of reproductive contexts, including sex determination, gonad development, and ovulation (Yazawa et al. 2015; Meinsohn et al. 2019). NR5A receptors are considered “orphan” nuclear receptors, able to bind phospholipids but also adopt an active conformation in the absence of a ligand (Krylova et al. 2005; Yoo et al. 2011; Lu et al. 2013; Musille et al. 2013; Daffern et al. 2018). Mammalian NR5A members Liver Receptor Homolog 1 (LRH-1) and Steroidogenic Factor-1 (SF-1) bind the same DNA sequence motif but regulate distinct sets of target genes in multiple tissues associated with the reproductive axis (Meinsohn et al. 2019). In the mouse ovary, LRH-1 is critical for granulosa cell proliferation, ovulation, and proper formation and function of the corpus luteum (Duggavathi et al. 2008; Bertolin et al. 2014; Bertolin et al. 2017; Meinsohn et al. 2018). Global knockout of SF-1 abrogated gonad and adrenal development, resulting in early perinatal lethality (Parker et al. 1996), whereas ovarian granulosa cell-specific deletion of SF-1 resulted in sterility, fewer oocytes, and decreased follicle growth (Pelusi et al. 2008; Buaas et al. 2012). Uterine morphology and endometrial establishment were also compromised in SF-1 and LRH-1 knockout models, resulting in infertility or unsuccessful embryo implantation (Pelusi et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2013).
In contrast to the 48 nuclear receptors in most mammals, the Drosophila melanogaster genome encodes only 18 nuclear receptor genes, representing six subfamilies of receptors with minimal genetic redundancy (King-Jones and Thummel 2005). Although some nuclear receptors, such as the steroid-responsive Ecdysone Receptor (EcR) and nitric oxide-responsive Ecdysone-induced protein 75B (E75), are essential for female reproduction, it is not fully understood whether or how other receptors mediate oogenesis (Ables and Drummond-Barbosa 2017). The Drosophila genome encodes two conserved NR5A family members, Hormone receptor-like in 39 (Hr39) and ftz transcription factor 1 (ftz-f1) (King-Jones and Thummel 2005). Hr39 is necessary for reproductive tract development, but is not intrinsically required in the ovarian epithelium for oogenesis (Allen and Spradling 2007; Sun and Spradling 2012; 2013; Ables et al. 2016). Hr39 and Ftz-f1 contain DNA binding domains that are structurally conserved with mammalian homologs and bind similar DNA sequences as SF-1 and LRH-1 (King-Jones and Thummel 2005). Interestingly, SF-1 and LRH-1 can functionally replace ftz-f1 in transcriptional activation of embryonic genes, but only LRH-1 can rescue loss of HR39 in reproductive tissues (Lu et al. 2013). Crystal structure analysis suggests that Ftz-f1 can bind phospholipids, but also can be activated in the absence of ligand binding (Yoo et al. 2011; Daffern et al. 2018).
Ftz-f1 is well-known in insects for its role in embryonic patterning, metamorphosis, and pupal development. In Drosophila, the ftz-f1 gene locus encodes two isoforms. α-ftz-f1 is maternally loaded in the egg and functions as an essential co-factor with fushi tarazu for proper embryo anterior/posterior patterning (Ueda et al. 1992; Guichet et al. 1997; Schwartz et al. 2001). β-ftz-f1 is necessary at metamorphosis for remodeling of larval tissues and for ecdysone-induced gene expression (Broadus et al. 1999; Yamada et al. 2000; Boulanger et al. 2011). β-ftz-f1 is necessary for cholesterol uptake and conversion to ecdysone in the larval prothoracic gland, suggesting functional conservation with SF-1 in steroid hormone biosynthesis (Parvy et al. 2005; Talamillo et al. 2013). Intriguingly, ftz-f1 is also essential for oogenesis in the mosquito Aedes aegypti and the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Li et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2010). More recently, ftz-f1 was shown to be required in follicle cells during the final stages of oogenesis to promote ovulation (Knapp et al. 2020).
Given the importance of NR5A family members in oogenesis in other species, it is somewhat surprising that Ftz-f1 has not been well-studied in Drosophila. Each female fly contains two ovaries, made of 14-16 ovarioles which are strings of progressively mature egg chambers or follicles (McLaughlin and Bratu 2015; Hinnant et al. 2020). Each egg chamber contains a cyst of 16 interconnected germ cells surrounded by somatic follicle cells. Egg chamber development begins in the germarium, located at the anterior of each ovariole (Figure 1A). Here, germline stem cells (GSCs) divide asymmetrically to produce one self-renewing GSC daughter and another daughter cell (called a cystoblast) capable of differentiation. Cystoblasts divide four times with incomplete cytokinesis to generate 2-,4-,8-, and 16-cell cysts. As germ cells prepare for final rounds of mitosis, three to four cyst cells begin to build synaptonemal complexes necessary for meiosis; concurrent expression of oocyte-specific proteins begins in 8- and 16- cell cysts (Hughes et al. 2018; Hinnant et al. 2020). Soon after the completion of the last mitotic division, only one cyst cell remains in meiosis and maintains expression of oocyte-specific factors. The remaining 15 cells adopt a nurse cell fate, which transcribe maternal mRNAs and transport them into the oocyte for later use in early embryogenesis.
Figure 1.
ftz-f1 is expressed in the ovarian epithelium. (A) The Drosophila ovary is made of 14-16 ovarioles (top), each consisting of a germarium and progressively older egg chambers. Germline stem cells (GSCs) are housed in the germarium (enlarged below) and divide asymmetrically away from cap cells (light blue). GSC daughters, called cystoblasts, divide four additional times to form 16-cell cysts composed of 15 nurse cells and one oocyte (yellow). Escort cells (dark blue) navigate the cysts towards the follicle stem cells (FSC, light green) and follicle cells (kelly green). Cysts are encapsulated by follicle cells to form egg chambers that pinch off from the germarium and progress through 14 stages of oogenesis. (B-D') Single plane image of ovariole (B, B'), germarium (C, C'), and stage 10B egg chamber (D, D') from ftz-f1::GFP females labeled with anti-GFP (green; Ftz-f1::GFP), anti-Hts (red; fusomes and follicle cell membranes), and anti-LamC (red; nuclear envelopes). GSCs are outlined in solid white lines; cap cells are outlined in dotted yellow lines. Asterisks indicate GFP-positive escort cells. B'-D’ depict the GFP channel of the image above. Filled arrowhead denotes GFP-positive follicle cells; open arrowhead denotes GFP-negative follicle cells. Arrows indicate GFP-positive border cells and main body follicle cells. (E–G) Gal4 lines ftz-f1VT032964 (E, F) and ftz-f1VT032969 are sufficient to drive reporter expression (green) in escort cells (asterisks in E), main body follicle cells (F) and stage 10A border cells (arrows in G). Scale bars, 10 μm (C, C', E), 20 μm (B, B'), or 50 μm (D, D', F, G).
As in mammals, Drosophila oocytes are intimately associated with somatic cells that ensure proper oocyte differentiation and survival. Mitotically dividing germ cells are guided through the germaria by somatic escort cells (Banisch et al. 2017). Cessation of germ cell mitosis coincides with a transfer of 16-cell cysts from escort cells to pre-follicle cells, which originate from a second population of stem cells, the follicle stem cells (Rust and Nystul 2020). Pre-follicle cells migrate around cysts and interdigitate to separate newly forming egg chambers (Lovegrove et al. 2019). Pre-follicle cell proliferation creates more separation between the germarium and the developing egg chambers, eventually budding off to form individual egg chambers. As they leave the germarium, pre-follicle cells differentiate into the main body, polar, and stalk cells (Duhart et al. 2017). Main body follicle cells make up most of the egg chamber and are proliferative during stages 1–6 to cover the growing cyst in an epithelial monolayer (Jia et al. 2015). At stage 6, concomitant with the onset of yolk uptake into the oocyte, the follicle cells exit mitosis and shift to endocycling, wherein repeated rounds of DNA synthesis occur without mitosis. From stages 10B to 13, follicle cells cease whole-genome duplication and instead amplify selective genomic regions essential for eggshell formation. At stage 14, the egg chamber is characterized as a mature egg and is ready to be ovulated.
In this study, we show that ftz-f1 is essential during the early stages of egg chamber growth for optimal Drosophila female fecundity, underscoring the evolutionarily conserved role of the NR5A family in female reproduction. Using cell-type-specific loss-of-function techniques, we find that ftz-f1 promotes egg chamber survival. In follicle cells, ftz-f1 promotes the integrity of the follicle cell monolayer, non-autonomously preventing caspase-mediated cell death of the underlying germ cells. Moreover, when ftz-f1 is depleted simultaneously from the follicle cells and the germline, egg chambers fail to progress past stage 4 due to germ cell death. We provide evidence that ftz-f1 may promote egg chamber survival, at least in part, by two distinct mechanisms. In follicle cells, ftz-f1 promotes mitotic exit at stage 6. In germ cells, ftz-f1 controls accumulation of oocyte-specific factors, likely impacting oocyte polarity. We postulate that the combined roles of ftz-f1 in the developing germline and soma function interdependently to sustain egg chamber growth and survival. With these data, our study adds to a growing body of literature emphasizing the multifaceted roles of nuclear receptors in the control of female reproduction.
Materials and methods
Drosophila husbandry and culture
All Drosophila stocks were maintained on standard cornmeal/molasses/yeast medium (Genesee Scientific, Nutri-Fly-MF) at 22°C–25°C. Genes/alleles with multiple names are referenced using FlyBase nomenclature (www.flybase.org; last accessed October 2020) for simplicity. Except where noted, female flies were collected one to two days after eclosion and maintained on standard medium supplemented with wet yeast paste for 2–3 days (changed daily) at 25°C prior to ovary dissection. For assessment of Ftz-f1 expression in the ovary, we used transgenic line ftz-f1sfGFP, Tag: FLAG (ftz-f1::GFP), which carries a bacterial artificial chromosome containing the entire ftz-f1 gene locus and surrounding regulatory DNA, including an sfGFP-Tag: FLAG cassette introduced at the C-terminal end of the ftz-f1 coding region (Bloomington stock #38645; R. Spokony). Expression of ftz-f1 in escort cells and follicle cells was further confirmed using P{VT032964-GAL4}attP2 (VT032964-Gal4) and P{VT032969-GAL4}attP2 (VT032969-Gal4), in which ∼2 kB of intronic sequence from ftz-f1-RB is fused upstream of a Drosophila synthetic core promoter and GAL4 (Kvon et al. 2014; McDonald et al. 2019). VT032964-Gal4 and VT032969-Gal4 were crossed with P{w+mC=UAS-lacZ.NZ}J312 (UASt-lacZ; Bloomington stock #3956) to confirm driver expression. Balancers and other genetic tools are described in FlyBase (Thurmond et al. 2019).
Tissue-specific RNA interference
For knock-down of ftz-f1 in somatic cells, we used the following RNA interference (RNAi) lines: y1 v1; P{TRiP.JF02738}attP2 (ftz-f1JF; Bloomington stock #27659) (Li et al. 2014), P{KK108995}VIE-260B (ftz-f1KK; Vienna stock #104463), and P{TRiP.HMS00019}attP2 (ftz-f1HMS; Bloomington stock #33625). To limit Gal4 expression specifically to adult follicle cells (thus circumventing developmental lethality), we used the Gal4/Gal80ts system (McGuire et al. 2003). Flies bearing tj-Gal4; tubGal80ts (tj-Gal4; Sahai-Hernandez and Nystul 2013) (kindly provided by E. Matunis) were raised at 18°C and then shifted to 29°C at eclosion to induce expression of the UAS-RNAi constructs as described (Blake et al. 2017). Driver expression was confirmed using y1 w*; P{w+mC=UAS-mCD8::GFP.L}LL5 (UAS-mCD8::GFP; Bloomington stock #5137). Egg chambers were staged based on size, shape, yolk accumulation, and germ cell nuclear morphology as described (King 1970; Spradling 1993).
Egg production and viability assays
Egg-laying assays were conducted to assess female fertility. Five young (∼24 h old) females were mated with five age-matched wild-type males in bottles with Nutri-fly Grape Agar Premix (Genesee Scientific) plates topped with a small amount of wet yeast paste and maintained at 25°C. Bottles were set in triplicate for each control and experimental genotype. Agar plates were replaced every 24 h for ten days. The number of eggs were counted for each plate and divided by the number of females in the bottle. During the first two days of the assay, eggs were removed from their original plate to a fresh grape agar plate and allowed to develop at 25°C for an additional 24 h. Hatch rates were calculated by dividing the number of eggs that completed hatching by the total number of eggs in the assay.
Genetic mosaic generation
For genetic mosaic analyses using flippase (FLP)/FLP recognition target (FRT) (Xu and Rubin 1993), we obtained mutant alleles ftz-f1ex7 and ftz-f119 on FRT79D-containing chromosome arms (kindly provided by L. Pick, C. Woodard, and J. Dura). Genetic mosaics were generated by FLP/FRT-mediated recombination in 2- to 3- d old females carrying a ftz-f1 mutant allele in trans to a wild-type allele (linked to a nuclear-GFP marker; kindly provided by M. Buszczak) on homologous FRT arms, and a hs-FLP transgene, as described (Laws and Drummond-Barbosa 2015). Flies were heat shocked at 37°C two times per day for 3 days, and incubated at 25°C for 8 or 12 days with transfers to freshly yeasted vials occurring every other day (standard media supplemented with dry yeast, and wet yeast paste on the last 3 days prior to dissection). Wild-type alleles were used for generation of control mosaics. Germline cysts in the germarium were identified based on fusome morphology (de Cuevas and Spradling 1998; Ong and Tan 2010) and egg chambers were staged based on size and nuclear morphology as described (King 1970; Spradling 1993). Additional phenotypes, including egg chamber death, were noted in comparison with adjacent GFP-positive wild-type cells in stage-matched or adjacent egg chambers.
Immunostaining and microscopy
Ovaries were prepared for immunofluorescence microscopy as described (Ables and Drummond-Barbosa 2013). Ovaries were dissected and ovarioles teased apart in Grace's medium without additives (Caisson Labs) and fixed in 5.3% formaldehyde (Ted Pella Inc, 18505) in Grace's medium for 13 min at room temperature. They were then washed extensively in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4; Fisher) with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked for 3 h in blocking solution [5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma), 5% normal goat serum (MP Biomedicals), and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS] at room temperature. To detect cells in S phase, dissected ovaries were kept intact (no teasing of ovarioles) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in Grace's media containing 10 μM 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU; Life Technologies). Ovaries labeled with EdU were then fixed, ovarioles teased apart, washed extensively in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and blocked as described above. The following primary antibodies were used overnight at 4°C: mouse anti-Hts [1B1, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB); 1:10], mouse anti-Lamin C (LamC) (LC28.26, DSHB; 1:100), chicken anti-GFP (ab13970, Abcam; 1:2000), mouse anti-Orb (4H8/6H4, DSHB; 1:100), mouse anti-BicD (1B11/4C2, DSHB; 1:10), rabbit anti-phosphoHistone H3 (06-570, Millipore; 1:200), rabbit anti-Dcp1 (37729, Cell Signaling; 1:100), and chicken anti-β-Galactosidase (ab9361, Abcam; 1:2000). Following an overnight incubation at 4°C with Alexa Fluor 488-, 568-, or 633- conjugated goat species-specific secondary antibodies (Life Technologies; 1:200), EdU was detected (if necessary) using AlexaFluor-594 via Click-It chemistry, following the manufacturer's recommendations (Life Technologies). Ovaries were counter-stained with 0.5 mg/ml 49-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma) to identify nuclei or phalloidin-AlexaFluor-647 (Life Technologies; 1:400) to visualize F-actin. Ovaries were mounted in 90% glycerol containing 20 mg/ml n-propyl gallate (Sigma). Confocal Z-stacks (1 μm optical sections) were collected with a Zeiss LSM700 microscope using Zeiss ZEN software. Images were analyzed, and minimally and equally enhanced via histogram using Zeiss ZEN software.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate from independent genetic crosses, using at least 10 ovaries per replicate. Statistical analysis was performed in Prism (GraphPad, Inc.) and Excel (Microsoft) software. Statistical differences between one control group and one experimental group were analyzed by Student’s two-tailed t-test or Chi-square analyses (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). Bar graphs show averages plus/minus the standard error of the mean (SEM). Sample values (n) are presented on graphs in or above bars and represent the number of cells, ovarioles, or germaria examined as indicated.
Data availability
Fly strains and plasmids are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article and figures.
Results
ftz-f1 is widely expressed in the adult ovary
The nuclear receptor encoded by ftz-f1 is expressed in a variety of tissue types and required for multiple developmental processes, including adult head eversion, leg elongation, salivary gland cell death, and ovulation (Broadus et al. 1999; Knapp et al. 2020). To assess ftz-f1 expression in the ovarian epithelium, we took advantage of a reporter transgene in which a bacterial artificial chromosome corresponding to the entire ftz-f1 gene locus (and surrounding DNA) was engineered to include green fluorescent protein (GFP) inserted in frame on the C-terminal end of the ftz-f1 locus (ftz-f1::GFP; Figure 1, B–D’; R. Spokony, personal communication). The fusion protein created by ftz-f1::GFP is likely functional, as it is sufficient to partially rescue hypomorphic (ftz-f119) and null (ftz-f1ex7) mutants to adulthood. To identify cell type-specific expression of Ftz-f1::GFP in the adult ovary, we performed co-immunofluorescence with antibodies against the adducin-like protein Hu li tai shao (Hts), which is abundant in germ cell fusomes and in the cytoskeleton of follicle cells (Zaccai and Lipshitz 1996; de Cuevas and Spradling 1998), and LaminC (LamC), to visualize nuclear envelopes (particularly useful for identifying cap cells). We found that Ftz-f1::GFP is broadly expressed at varying levels throughout the adult ovary, including the germarium and follicles at each stage of oogenesis (Figure 1, B and B’), and predominantly localized to nuclei. In the germarium, Ftz-f1::GFP was detectable in GSCs, cystoblasts, and dividing cysts, but was less abundant than in the surrounding somatic cap cells and escort cells (Figure 1, C and C’). We also observed Ftz-f1::GFP in pre-follicle cells and differentiated follicle cells in egg chambers from stage 2 to 5 (Figure 1, B and B’). Intriguingly, Ftz-f1::GFP was largely absent from follicle cells in egg chambers from stages 6–8 (open arrowhead in Figure 1, B and B’), but was abundant in post-migratory follicle cells in stage 10 (arrows in Figure 1, D and D’). This pattern is consistent with a recent study in which high levels of Ftz-f1 protein were detected transiently in follicle cells in stages 10–12 (Knapp et al. 2020). To further validate the ftz-f1 expression in early follicle cells, we used two ftz-f1 enhancer trap lines (ftz-f1VT032964 and ftz-f1VT032969) that are sufficient to drive reporter gene expression in the ovary (McDonald et al. 2019). Both reporters correspond to α-ftz-f1 intronic DNA, and ftz-f1VT032964 overlaps a previously characterized β-ftz-f1 enhancer element (Kageyama et al. 2003; McDonald et al. 2019). Similar to Ftz-f1::GFP expression, ftz-f1 enhancer trap lines were able to drive expression of a lacZ reporter in cap cells and escort cells in the germarium (ftz-f1VT032964; Figure 1E) and some main body follicle cells in stages 5–10B (both reporters; Figure 1, F and G). Interestingly, neither enhancer trap line was sufficient to completely recapitulate the Ftz-f1::GFP follicle cell expression pattern. We speculate that multiple enhancer elements are required to fully activate expression. Our results show that ftz-f1 is expressed in germ cells and somatic cells prior to vitellogenesis, albeit at lower levels than in stages 10–12 follicle cells.
ftz-f1 is essential in the soma for female fertility and early embryo viability
Previous studies showed that Ftz-f1 is maternally deposited into oocytes and functions as a co-factor with fushi tarazu to establish proper embryonic patterning (Guichet et al. 1997; Yu et al. 1997; Hou et al. 2009). Transient expression of Ftz-f1 in stage 10-12 follicle cells is also necessary for the final stages of follicle cell maturation and oocyte ovulation (Knapp et al. 2020). As we observed Ftz-f1::GFP expression in ovarian epithelial cells prior to stage 10, we hypothesized that ftz-f1 could impact oocyte development via an essential role earlier in oogenesis. Flies harboring homozygous mutant alleles of ftz-f1 do not survive to adulthood (Lavorgna et al. 1993; Guichet et al. 1997; Yu et al. 1997; Broadus et al. 1999; Yamada et al. 2000). We therefore used short hairpin interfering RNA (RNAi) to specifically reduce ftz-f1 function in ovarian cells via the tissue-specific UAS-Gal4 system (Figure 2A) (Ni et al. 2011). Somatic driver tj-Gal4 is strongly expressed in somatic cells in the germarium as well as main body follicle cells in stages 6–10 (Figure 2, B and C), and weakly in follicle cells in stages 1–5 (Figure 2D). Because tj-Gal4 is also expressed in the developing nervous system prior to adulthood, we combined the Gal4 system with the temperature-sensitive Gal80ts to suppress Gal4 activity until after eclosion to avoid developmental lethality. To determine whether ftz-f1 is necessary in ovarian somatic cells to support oogenesis, we quantified egg deposition by ftz-f1 mutant females mated to wild-type males as a physiological assessment of oocyte production (Figure 2E). Females in which ftz-f1 was knocked-down in ovarian somatic cells prior to stage 10 using tj-Gal4 laid fewer eggs compared to driver-alone or RNAi-alone controls (Figure 2E). We then asked whether knock-down of ftz-f1 in ovarian somatic cells could support embryonic development post-fertilization. Eggs were collected 24 h after mating, allowed to develop at 25°C for an additional 24 h, and monitored for deflation, a sign of embryo hatching. Interestingly, oocytes produced by tj-Gal4>ftz-f1RNAi females did not support embryonic development as well as wild-type controls (Figure 2F). Taken together, these results show that ftz-f1 is necessary in ovarian somatic cells prior to their final maturation for proper female fecundity.
Figure 2.
ftz-f1 is necessary in ovarian follicle cells for optimal female fecundity. (A) Schematic of the ftz-f1 locus with mutant alleles and RNAi constructs used in this study. Orange (ftz-f119) or purple (ftz-f1ex7) lines represent genomic regions deleted in indicated mutant alleles; for RNAi lines, colored dashes (red, ftz-f1KK; blue, ftz-f1JF; green, ftz-f1HMS) indicate gene regions targeted by the corresponding shRNA. (See Materials and Methods for full RNAi description.) (B–D) tj-Gal4 drives expression in ovarian somatic cells. Single z-plane images of ovarioles (B, D) or a germarium (C) from tj-Gal4>UASt-GFP (B, C) or tj-Gal4>UASt-nls-DsRed (D) females. Ovarioles were immunostained for anti-GFP (green, B, C) or anti-DsRed (green, D), anti-Hts (red; fusomes and follicle cell membranes), and anti-LamC (red; nuclear envelopes). Scale bars, 20 μm (C-D) or 50 μm (B). (E) Number of eggs laid per day by age-matched control (tj-Gal4 alone; black) or ftz-f1 knock-down (tj-Gal4>UAS-ftz-f1KK, red; tj-Gal4>UAS-ftz-f1JF, blue) females. Each dot represents an average number of eggs laid by five females (n = 6 independent experiments for driver control; n = 3 independent experiments each for tj-Gal4>UAS-ftz-f1KK and tj-Gal4>UAS-ftz-f1JF). Lines represent the average number of eggs laid by each genotype. (F) Eggs laid by control and ftz-f1 knock-down females (fertilized by wild-type males) were monitored for hatching. Numbers in bars represent the total number of eggs analyzed. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; Student’s two-tailed t-test.
ftz-f1 is necessary in follicle cells for egg chamber survival
Somatic follicle cells enwrap germline cysts as they exit the germarium, forming an epithelial layer that surrounds each cyst and aids in oocyte growth, maturation, and vitellogenesis (McLaughlin and Bratu 2015; Duhart et al. 2017). Because knock-down of ftz-f1 in somatic cells prior to stage 10 resulted in decreased egg production, we hypothesized that ftz-f1 is needed in follicle cells to promote egg chamber growth or development. Using immunostaining for the follicle cell cytoskeletal protein Hts and DAPI to visualize nuclei, we assessed egg chamber development in ovarioles dissected from females five days after eclosion. Wild-type ovarioles consisted of four to five successively larger pre-vitellogenic egg chambers outside of the germarium and at least one vitellogenic (stage 10-14) egg chamber (Figure 3A). In pre-vitellogenic egg chambers, follicle cells formed an epithelial monolayer around the periphery of each egg chamber, and germline nurse cells in the center of each egg chamber had large nuclei with dense DNA (Figure 3A; see Figure 1A for schematic). In contrast, ftz-f1 RNAi knockdown in follicle cells using three independent RNAi transgenes resulted in ovarioles with abnormally developed or degenerating pre-vitellogenic egg chambers (Figure 3, B and D–G; quantified in Figure 3H). Some egg chamber defects were relatively mild, including small gaps or thinning of the follicle cell monolayer (brackets in Figure 3, B and E) and did not appear to alter nurse cell nuclear morphology. In other egg chambers, the follicle cell monolayer was disorganized and collapsed (Figure 3D), follicle cells were stretched or rounded (as visualized by phalloidin staining for F-actin; arrows in Figure 3F), or follicle cell nuclei had been extruded out of the monolayer (box in Figure 3G). These more severe defects were typically accompanied by pyknotic nuclei in the underlying nurse cells (Figure 3, D, F, and G). Although it was not possible to confidently stage abnormal or degenerating egg chambers according to size, shape, or nurse cell nuclear morphology, we estimate that egg chamber defects in tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi females occurred between stages 5–8 (based on the stage of the preceeding egg chamber).
Figure 3.
ftz-f1 promotes egg chamber survival. (A, B, D, G) Single z-plane images of driver control (A) or tj-Gal4>ftz-f1RNAi ovarioles (B, D, G) immunostained with anti-Dcp-1 (green; activated caspase), anti-Hts (red; fusomes and follicle cell membranes) and anti-LamC (red; nuclear envelopes), and DAPI (blue, nuclei). (C) Mosaic ftz-f1ex7 FRT79D ovariole labeled with anti-GFP (green, wild-type cells), anti-Hts and anti-LamC (red), and DAPI (blue). Homozygous ftz-f1ex7 mutant cysts are outlined in dotted white lines; open arrowheads denote GFP-positive (wild-type) cysts. (E) Stage 7 egg chamber from a tj-Gal4>ftz-f1JF ovariole labeled with anti-Orb (yellow, oocytes), anti-Hts and anti-LamC (red), and DAPI (blue). (F) Degenerating egg chamber from a tj-Gal4>ftz-f1KK ovariole labeled with phalloidin (red, F-actin) and DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 20 μm. (H, I) Percent of ovarioles containing an abnormal or degenerating egg chamber (H) or Dcp-1-positive egg chamber (I). Numbers in bars represent the total number of ovarioles analyzed. ***P < 0.001; chi-squared test.
As an independent assessment of ftz-f1 function in somatic cells, we used genetic mosaic analysis using the flippase/flippase recognition target (Flp/FRT) system and two previously characterized loss-of-function ftz-f1 alleles to generate ftz-f1 mutant ovarian cells. Although ftz-f1ex7 and ftz-f119 both harbor deletions in the gene locus, ftz-f1ex7 lacks the exon encoding the Ftz-f1 DNA binding domain (Yamada et al. 2000; Suzuki et al. 2001; Fortier et al. 2003), suggesting that the mutation abrogates function of both ftz-f1 isoforms (Figure 2A). Following clone induction, we compared ftz-f1 mutant cells (identified by the absence of GFP) to adjacent wild-type cells (identified by a nuclear-localized GFP linked to the wild-type allele) (Figure 3C). Intriguingly, from more than 100 mosaic egg chambers, we found no egg chambers older than stage 6 (for ftz-f1ex7 mosaics) or stage 7 (for ftz-f119 mosaics) containing a somatic cell layer composed solely of ftz-f1 mutant cells. We did, however, find examples of egg chambers with both ftz-f1 mutant somatic cells and mutant germ cells; these cases were all stage 6 or smaller and frequently had pyknotic germ cell nuclei, indicative of egg chamber death (Figure 3C). Taken together with our RNAi analyses, these results suggest that ftz-f1 is necessary in follicle cells for the survival of mid-stage egg chambers.
Mid-oogenesis is sensitive to female starvation and serves as a checkpoint for caspase-mediated cell death and clearance of unfit egg chambers (Peterson et al. 2015). We therefore asked whether knock-down of ftz-f1 in somatic cells resulted in caspase-dependent programmed cell death using antisera against cleaved Death caspase-1 (Dcp-1), an effector caspase (Laundrie et al. 2003; Peterson et al. 2015). As expected, we did not detect Dcp-1-positive ovarian cells when driver control female flies were fed a yeast-rich diet (Figure 3, A and I); however, about 10% of ovarioles contained a Dcp-1-positive egg chamber when control females were fed sugar only for two days (Figure 3I). In contrast, the percentage of ovarioles with a caspase-positive egg chamber after induction of ftz-f1 knockdown in follicle cells was significantly greater than that of the controls (Figure 3, D, G, and I). Based on this result, we conclude that most egg chamber death in tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi ovarioles can be attributed to inappropriate activation of cleaved caspases. Intriguingly, Dcp-1 immunoreactivity in tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi egg chambers was not detected in follicle cells (Figure 3, B, C, and F). Rather, knock-down of ftz-f1 in mutant follicle cells indirectly caused caspase-mediated cell death in the underlying germline (Figure 3G). These results suggest that ftz-f1 is essential in follicle cells to protect germ cells from caspase-mediated cell death.
ftz-f1 promotes follicle cell mitotic exit at mid-oogenesis
During their development, main body follicle cells progress through three distinct modes of cell cycles (Jia et al. 2015). From the germarium to stage 5, follicle cells undergo a typical mitotic cell cycle, including G1, S, G2, and M phases marked by oscillation of mitotic cyclins, the S-phase indicator 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU), and the mitotic indicator phospho-Histone H3 (pHH3) (Figure 4A). At stage 6, main body follicle cells switch to endocycling, a specialized cell cycle in which cells alternate G and S phases for repeated rounds of DNA synthesis without cell division. This switch is marked by an abrupt disappearance of the mitotic cyclins and pHH3 (Figure 4, C and F). The final cell cycle switch occurs at stage 10B when the follicle cells exit endocycling, instead amplifying specific genomic regions necessary for proper eggshell morphogenesis (Deng et al. 2001; Klusza and Deng 2011; Jia et al. 2015).
Figure 4.
ftz-f1 promotes timely mitotic exit in follicle cells. (A–D) Single z-plane images of control and tj-Gal4>ftz-f1HMS egg chambers at stage 5 or stage 6, labeled with anti-phospho-histone H3 (pHH3; green), EdU (red), and anti-Hts (white; follicle cell membranes). Scale bars, 20 μm. (E, F) Percent of follicle cells labeled with EdU (E) or pHH3 (F) in control and tj-Gal4>ftz-f1RNAi egg chambers. Numbers above bars in E represent the total number of follicle cells analyzed in both E and F. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; chi-squared test.
Knock-down of ftz-f1 in tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi females resulted in egg chamber death predominantly during stages 5–8 (Figure 3). Given the correlation with the timing of the mitotic-to-endocycle switch, we hypothesized that egg chamber death might be a result of aberrant follicle cell proliferation. To investigate cell cycle control in wild-type and tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi follicle cells, we co-labeled antisera against pHH3 with a fluorescently labeled EdU incorporated in dividing cells over a 1-h pulse (Figure 4). As expected, the percentage of wild-type (driver control) follicle cells that incorporated EdU decreased as egg chambers developed from stages 4 to 6 and was maintained at a low level through stage 7 as endocycling begins (Figure 4, A, C, and E). In contrast, knock-down of ftz-f1 was sufficient to significantly deregulate EdU incorporation in multiple developmental stages (Figure 4, B, D, and E). Moreover, the percentage of EdU-positive follicle cells in ftz-f1KK and ftz-f1HMS RNAi egg chambers remained higher than stage-matched wild-type cells through stage 7 (Figure 4E). Furthermore, we detected a small percentage of ftz-f1RNAi follicle cells in which the timing of mitotic divisions (characterized by the presence of pHH3 antisera) was extended into stages 6 and 7, suggesting that they fail to exit the mitotic cell cycle (Figure 4, D and F). Although this result only reached statistical significance for the ftz-f1HMS transgene, we also found pHH3-positive follicle cells at stage 6 in ftz-f1KK and ftz-f1JF transgenes. This contrasts with wild-type follicle cells, where pHH3 was never detected after stage 5 (Figure 4, C and F). We conclude that ftz-f1 promotes timely exit from the mitotic cell cycle in main body follicle cells. Though this does not rule out the possible effects of other cellular processes, failure to exit the mitotic cell cycle may be a contributing factor to the premature egg chamber death in the tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi model.
Accumulation of oocyte-specific proteins depends on ftz-f1 in germ cells
Expression of Ftz-f1::GFP in GSCs and mitotically dividing germ cells suggested that ftz-f1 could also be necessary in early germ cells for their development. In Drosophila germline cysts, oocyte differentiation occurs concurrently with completion of the mitotic program (Hinnant et al. 2020). Accumulation of oocyte-specific proteins, such as Oo18 RNA-binding protein (Orb) and Bicaudal D (BicD), in the presumptive oocyte occurs when mitotic divisions are completed and is essential for establishing oocyte polarity. Orb protein localizes near the fusome in most cystocytes in wild-type 16-cell cysts just after the last mitotic division, becoming enriched specifically in the single oocyte as pre-follicle cells migrate around the cyst to initiate egg chamber formation (arrowheads in Figure 5, A and A’). Orb levels then increase specifically in the posteriorly-positioned oocyte as the cyst grows through stages 1–5. We therefore used Orb and BicD expression as indicators of the oocyte fate and asked whether ftz-f1 mutant cystocytes could properly differentiate. To assess egg chamber development, we again turned to the Flp/FRT mosaic recombination system to generate ftz-f1 mutant germ cells in the same ovariole adjacent to wild-type egg chambers. Although GFP-negative ftz-f1 mutant cysts (outlined in Figure 5, A–C’) expressed Orb, the levels of Orb protein in ftz-f1 mutant cysts were much lower than in adjacent, less-developed wild-type cysts (Figure 5A; compare arrowhead in the stage 1 wild-type cyst with the outlined stage 3 mutant cyst). Most ftz-f1 mutant cysts contained a cell with a condensed, under-replicated nucleus, consistent with typical oocyte nuclear morphology; however, oocytes were frequently mispositioned and expressed low levels of Orb (Figure 5, B and B’) and BicD (Figure 5C). These data suggested that ftz-f1 is necessary in germ cells, independent of its role in follicle cells, for proper oocyte development. Indeed, ftz-f1RNAi in follicle cells in did not impact Orb expression (Figure 5D), suggesting that the effect of ftz-f1 on oocyte positioning is autonomous to the germline.
Figure 5.
ftz-f1 promotes accumulation of oocyte-specific factors cell autonomously in germ cells. (A–C’) Maximum intensity projections (5 μm z-plane) of representative ftz-f1ex7 FRT79D mutant mosaic germaria labeled with anti-GFP (green; wild-type cells), anti-Hts (red; fusomes and follicle cell membranes), and anti-LamC (red; nuclear envelopes). Oocytes were visualized in mosaic germaria using anti-Orb (yellow; A–B) or anti-BicD (yellow; C). ftz-f1ex7 mutant cysts are outlined in dotted white lines; open arrowheads denote GFP-positive (wild-type) cysts. Panels A’–C’ depict the green channel (cytoplasmic Orb or BicD and nuclear GFP) of the images above. (D, D’) Single z-plane image of a representative ovariole from a tj-Gal4>ftz-f1JF female, immunostained for anti-Orb (yellow), anti-Hts and anti-LamC (red), and DAPI (blue). Panel D’ depicts the green channel (cytoplasmic Orb) of the image above. Scale bars, 20 μm.
Discussion
Although ftz-f1 is evolutionarily conserved with essential regulators of reproduction in mammals and necessary for early embryonic anterior-posterior patterning in Drosophila, it has been unclear whether or how ftz-f1 impacts female reproductive function in early to mid-oogenesis. In this study, we show that ftz-f1 is expressed throughout the ovarian epithelium and required in follicle cells for female fecundity. We show that ftz-f1 is required in somatic cells to protect germ cells from premature caspase-dependent cell death at mid-oogenesis. We provide evidence that ftz-f1 in follicle cells regulates the timing of mitotic exit at mid-oogenesis, coincident with down-regulation of Ftz-f1::GFP reporter expression in follicle cells at this timepoint. We conclude that Ftz-f1 normally promotes cell cycle progression in follicle cells, and that its down-regulation at stage 6 permits timely mitotic exit and egg chamber survival. Our studies also suggest that ftz-f1 is necessary in early germ cells to promote accumulation of oocyte-specific polarity factors and suppress germ cell death. Taken together with a recent study showing that ftz-f1 is required for ovulation (Knapp et al. 2020), our study adds to a growing body of literature showing that critical roles of the NR5A family are conserved from mammalian to Drosophila oogenesis. In particular, loss-of-function studies suggest that NR5A family members are essential in a specific spatiotemporal sequence in ovarian somatic cells for the regulation of oocyte development (Luo et al. 1994; 1995; Buaas et al. 2012; Bertolin et al. 2014; Meinsohn et al. 2018). Like SF-1 and LRH-1, ftz-f1 is necessary for proper somatic cell shape and maintenance of the somatic epithelium and may affect somatic cell proliferation and cell survival independently of its role in ovulation (Duggavathi et al. 2008; Buaas et al. 2012; Meinsohn et al. 2018; Knapp et al. 2020). Further studies will be necessary to fully elucidate the intricate molecular networks by which ftz-f1 regulates oocyte development. Given the level of structural and functional conservation between Drosophila and mammalian nuclear receptor signaling pathways, we propose that ftz-f1 will provide an excellent model for better understanding of how interactions between nuclear receptors promotes optimal female fertility.
One of the most intriguing aspects of our study is the finding that ftz-f1 is necessary to sustain egg chamber viability through mid-oogenesis. Stages 6–8 of oocyte development are a key decision point during oogenesis (Peterson et al. 2015). During these stages, the oocyte begins to take up yolk, whereas follicle cells initiate a concurrent mass cell migration to cover the expanding surface area of the oocyte (McLaughlin and Bratu 2015; Duhart et al. 2017). Vitellogenesis is an energetically-intensive process for females; for example, ovaries from females deprived of nutrients (particularly yeast and protein) arrest at stages 6–8 of oogenesis as egg chambers undergo programmed cell death (Jenkins et al. 2013; Peterson et al. 2015; Mirth et al. 2019). This nutrient-mediated developmental checkpoint likely saves valuable resources, preserving fertility until the nutritional environment improves (Peterson et al. 2015; Sieber and Spradling 2017; Mirth et al. 2019). It is thus tempting to speculate that Ftz-f1 may participate in the mid-oogenesis nutritional checkpoint. At present, we cannot clearly distinguish whether the increased egg chamber death in our tjGal4>ftz-f1RNAi models is the result of caspase-independent follicle cell death (Figure 3), defective mitotic exit (Figure 5), or other cellular changes in follicle cells that disrupt soma-germline intercellular signaling. Future studies will investigate whether Ftz-f1 cooperates with other known regulators of the mid-oogenesis checkpoint, including well-known nutrient signaling pathways such as insulin signaling.
It is noteworthy that regulation of the mid-oogenesis developmental checkpoint is also controlled by ecdysone signaling, a critical regulator of insect development and fecundity. In insects, ecdysone controls gonad development and function, as well as the timing of key stages of the life cycle (Uryu et al. 2015; Ables and Drummond-Barbosa 2017; Swevers 2019). Like mammalian reproductive hormones, ecdysone is synthesized in developing ovarian follicles in adults (Uryu et al. 2015). Cellular responses to ecdysone are mediated by a heterodimeric nuclear receptor complex consisting of EcR and Ultraspiracle (Usp). Although the transcriptional response to EcR/Usp is extensive, several key targets have been identified, including the nuclear receptors encoded by E75 and Ecdysone-induced protein 78C (E78) and the transcription factors encoded by broad (br) and Ecdysone-induced protein 74EF (E74) (Yamanaka et al. 2013; Stoiber et al. 2016; Uyehara and McKay 2019). EcR/Usp controls the nutritional checkpoint for progression past stage 8 and is essential for vitellogenesis and eggshell formation, making this complex critical for follicle survival (Buszczak et al. 1999; Carney and Bender 2000; Sieber and Spradling 2015). Moreover, E74, E75, and E78 are necessary for follicle survival and are thought to cooperate with EcR/Usp (Buszczak et al. 1999; Terashima and Bownes 2006; Ables and Drummond-Barbosa 2010; Ables et al. 2015). Nuclear receptor function apparently converges at mid-oogenesis, suggesting that a complex network of molecular interactions between Ftz-f1, EcR, E78, and E75 may collectively promote egg chamber survival.
Additional studies will be necessary to tease apart whether and how Ftz-f1 participates in the ecdysone signaling network at mid-oogenesis. Some clues to uncovering this interaction can potentially be gleaned from studies of Ftz-f1 in larval cells as they prepare for metamorphosis. In pre-pupae, ftz-f1 transcription is repressed by ecdysone (Woodard et al. 1994; Rewitz et al. 2010). Yet expression of ftz-f1 in the presence of ecdysone enhances transcription of E74, E75, and br (Woodard et al. 1994; Broadus et al. 1999; Zhu et al. 2006; Ruaud et al. 2010). Previous studies have thus suggested that Ftz-f1 functions as a competence factor, setting up a transcriptional program when ecdysone levels are low that permits activation of ecdysone signaling at later points of development (Broadus et al. 1999). One possibility is that Ftz-f1 is indirectly influenced by an ecdysone-induced transcription factor, such as EcR, E74, E75, and/or E78, to promote mid-oogenesis survival. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to tease apart the interactions between these factors, given the high degree of egg chamber death in loss-of-function mutants. Our recent identification of cis-regulatory enhancers located in ecdysone response genes (McDonald et al. 2019) may prove to be useful reagents to analyze these complex genetic interactions.
Another possibility is that Ftz-f1 may promote egg chamber survival by activating the transcription of steroid hormone biosynthesis genes. Previous studies showed that ftz-f1 is required in the larval ring gland for ecdysone synthesis via cytochrome P-450 enzymes (Parvy et al. 2005; 2014; Borsos et al. 2015). As applied to the ovary, this is an intriguing hypothesis worthy of additional study. The ovary produces ecdysone in response to maternal nutrition and ecdysone biosynthesis genes are necessary for egg chamber survival at mid-oogenesis (Buszczak et al. 1999; Warren et al. 2002; Petryk et al. 2003; Ono et al. 2006; Uryu et al. 2015). But in contrast to the well-studied prothoracic gland (Ou and King-Jones 2013; Ou et al. 2016; Uryu et al. 2018), transcriptional regulation of the biosynthesis enzymes in the ovary remains largely unknown (Uryu et al. 2015). Mammalian NR5A receptors LRH-1 and SF-1 are essential for steroid hormone biosynthesis, suggesting that Ftz-f1 may likewise promote ecdysone biosynthesis (Meinsohn et al. 2019). Future studies investigating how ecdysone biosynthesis is regulated by nuclear receptors in the Drosophila ovary will provide an intriguing genetically tractable model to study how maternally derived nutrients and maternal physiology promote female fertility, with potential applications for fertility preservation in humans.
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Xie, E. Matunis, D. Drummond-Barbosa, M. Buszczak, L. Pick, C. Woodard, J. Dura, R. Spokony, A. Spradling, and J. Sun for their kind gifts of fly stocks. We are also grateful to the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center and Genomics Resource Center, the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center, the Kyoto Drosophila Genomics and Genetic Resources Center, the Transgenic RNAi Project at Harvard Medical School, and the University of Iowa Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for making other fly lines and antibodies available. Many thanks to members of the Ables laboratory for helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript.
E.T.A., A.N.B., K.M.W., and S.I.M. conceived, designed, and performed experiments, analyzed data, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. H.E.B. and D.N.P. performed experiments and collected and analyzed data. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health R15 GM117502 (to E.T.A.) and the East Carolina University Division of Research and Graduate Studies and Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences (to E.T.A.).
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
Literature cited
- Ables ET, Bois KE, Garcia CA, Drummond-Barbosa D. 2015. Ecdysone response gene e78 controls ovarian germline stem cell niche formation and follicle survival in drosophila. Dev Biol. 400:33–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ables ET, Drummond-Barbosa D. 2010. The steroid hormone ecdysone functions with intrinsic chromatin remodeling factors to control female germline stem cells in drosophila. Cell Stem Cell. 7:581–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ables ET, Drummond-Barbosa D. 2013. Cyclin e controls drosophila female germline stem cell maintenance independently of its role in proliferation by modulating responsiveness to niche signals. Development. 140:530–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ables ET, Drummond-Barbosa D. 2017. Steroid hormones and the physiological regulation of tissue-resident stem cells: Lessons from the drosophila ovary. Curr Stem Cell Rep. 3:9–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ables ET, Hwang GH, Finger DS, Hinnant TD, Drummond-Barbosa D. 2016. A genetic mosaic screen reveals ecdysone-responsive genes regulating drosophila oogenesis. G3 (Bethesda). 6:2629–2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allen AK, Spradling AC. 2007. The sf1-related nuclear hormone receptor hr39 regulates drosophila female reproductive tract development and function. Development. 135:311–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banisch TU, Maimon I, Dadosh T, Gilboa L. 2017. Escort cells generate a dynamic compartment for germline stem cell differentiation via combined stat and erk signalling. Development. 144:1937–1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertolin K, Gossen J, Schoonjans K, Murphy BD. 2014. The orphan nuclear receptor nr5a2 is essential for luteinization in the female mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 155:1931–1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertolin K, Meinsohn MC, Suzuki J, Gossen J, Schoonjans K, et al. 2017. Ovary-specific depletion of the nuclear receptor nr5a2 compromises expansion of the cumulus oophorus but not fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Biol Reprod. 96:1231–1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blake AJ, Finger DS, Hardy VL, Ables ET. 2017. RNAi-based techniques for the analysis of gene function in drosophila germline stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 1622:161–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borsos BN, Pankotai T, Kovacs D, Popescu C, Pahi Z, et al. 2015. Acetylations of ftz-f1 and histone h4k5 are required for the fine-tuning of ecdysone biosynthesis during drosophila metamorphosis. Dev Biol. 404:80–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulanger A, Clouet-Redt C, Farge M, Flandre A, Guignard T, et al. 2011. Ftz-f1 and hr39 opposing roles on ecr expression during drosophila mushroom body neuron remodeling. Nat Neurosci. 14:37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Broadus J, McCabe JR, Endrizzi B, Thummel CS, Woodard CT. 1999. The drosophila beta ftz-f1 orphan nuclear receptor provides competence for stage-specific responses to the steroid hormone ecdysone. Mol Cell. 3:143–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buaas FW, Gardiner JR, Clayton S, Val P, Swain A. 2012. In vivo evidence for the crucial role of sf1 in steroid-producing cells of the testis, ovary and adrenal gland. Development. 139:4561–4570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buszczak M, Freeman MR, Carlson JR, Bender M, Cooley L, et al. 1999. Ecdysone response genes govern egg chamber development during mid-oogenesis in drosophila. Development. 126:4581–4589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carney GE, Bender M. 2000. The drosophila ecdysone receptor (ecr) gene is required maternally for normal oogenesis. Genetics. 154:1203–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chou CH, Chen MJ. 2018. The effect of steroid hormones on ovarian follicle development. Vitam Horm. 107:155–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daffern N, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Pick L, Radhakrishnan I. 2018. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the ligand-binding domain of an orphan nuclear receptor reveal a dynamic helix in the ligand-binding pocket. Biochemistry. 57:1977–1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Cuevas M, Spradling AC. 1998. Morphogenesis of the drosophila fusome and its implications for oocyte specification. Development. 125:2781–2789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng WM, Althauser C, Ruohola-Baker H. 2001. Notch-delta signaling induces a transition from mitotic cell cycle to endocycle in drosophila follicle cells. Development. 128:4737–4746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duggavathi R, Volle DH, Mataki C, Antal MC, Messaddeq N, et al. 2008. Liver receptor homolog 1 is essential for ovulation. Genes Dev. 22:1871–1876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duhart JC, Parsons TT, Raftery LA. 2017. The repertoire of epithelial morphogenesis on display: Progressive elaboration of drosophila egg structure. Mechan Dev. 148:18–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans RM, Mangelsdorf DJ. 2014. Nuclear receptors, rxr, and the big bang. Cell. 157:255–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortier TM, Vasa PP, Woodard CT. 2003. Orphan nuclear receptor betaftz-f1 is required for muscle-driven morphogenetic events at the prepupal-pupal transition in drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 257:153–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grive KJ, Freiman RN. 2015. The developmental origins of the mammalian ovarian reserve. Development. 142:2554–2563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guichet A, Copeland JW, Erdelyi M, Hlousek D, Zavorszky P, et al. 1997. The nuclear receptor homologue ftz-f1 and the homeodomain protein ftz are mutually dependent cofactors. Nature. 385:548–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinnant TD, Merkle JA, Ables ET. 2020. Coordinating proliferation, polarity, and cell fate in the drosophila female germline. Front Cell Dev Biol. 8:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hou HY, Heffer A, Anderson WR, Liu J, Bowler T, et al. 2009. Stripy ftz target genes are coordinately regulated by ftz-f1. Dev Biol. 335:442–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes SE, Miller DE, Miller AL, Hawley RS. 2018. Female meiosis: Synapsis, recombination, and segregation in drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 208:875–908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins VK, Timmons AK, McCall K. 2013. Diversity of cell death pathways: Insight from the fly ovary. Trends Cell Biol. 23:567–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia D, Huang YC, Deng WM. 2015. Analysis of cell cycle switches in drosophila oogenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 1328:207–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kageyama Y, Masuda S, Hirose S, Ueda H. 2003. Temporal regulation of the mid-prepupal gene ftz-f1: Dhr3 early late gene product is one of the plural positive regulators. Genes Cells. 2:559–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King RC. 1970. Ovarian Development in Drosophila Melanogaster. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- King-Jones K, Thummel CS. 2005. Nuclear receptors–a perspective from drosophila. Nat Rev Genet. 6:311–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klusza S, Deng WM. 2011. At the crossroads of differentiation and proliferation: Precise control of cell-cycle changes by multiple signaling pathways in drosophila follicle cells. Bioessays. 33:124–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knapp EM, Li W, Singh V, Sun J. 2020. Nuclear receptor ftz-f1 promotes follicle maturation and ovulation partly via bhlh/pas transcription factor sim. eLife. 9:e54568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krylova IN, Sablin EP, Moore J, Xu RX, Waitt GM, et al. 2005. Structural analyses reveal phosphatidyl inositols as ligands for the nr5 orphan receptors sf-1 and lrh-1. Cell. 120:343–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kvon EZ, Kazmar T, Stampfel G, Yanez-Cuna JO, Pagani M, et al. 2014. Genome-scale functional characterization of drosophila developmental enhancers in vivo. Nature. 512:91–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laundrie B, Peterson JS, Baum JS, Chang JC, Fileppo D, et al. 2003. Germline cell death is inhibited by p-element insertions disrupting the dcp-1/pita nested gene pair in drosophila. Genetics. 165:1881–1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavorgna G, Karim FD, Thummel CS, Wu C. 1993. Potential role for a ftz-f1 steroid receptor superfamily member in the control of drosophila metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci UUSA. 90:3004–3008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laws KM, Drummond-Barbosa D. 2015. Genetic mosaic analysis of stem cell lineages in the drosophila ovary. Methods Mol Biol. 1328:57–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li C, Kapitskaya MZ, Zhu J, Miura K, Segraves W, et al. 2000. Conserved molecular mechanism for the stage specificity of the mosquito vitellogenic response to ecdysone. Dev Biol. 224:96–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Ma Q, Cherry CM, Matunis EL. 2014. Steroid signaling promotes stem cell maintenance in the drosophila testis. Dev Biol. 394:129–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lovegrove HE, Bergstralh DT, St Johnston D. 2019. The role of integrins in drosophila egg chamber morphogenesis. Development. dev182774.146: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Y, Anderson WR, Zhang H, Feng S, Pick L. 2013. Functional conservation of drosophila ftz-f1 and its mammalian homologs suggests ligand-independent regulation of nr5a family transcriptional activity. Dev Genes Evol. 223:199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo X, Ikeda Y, Lala DS, Baity LA, Meade JC, et al. 1995. A cell-specific nuclear receptor plays essential roles in adrenal and gonadal development. Endocr Res. 21:517–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo X, Ikeda Y, Parker KL. 1994. A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell. 77:481–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald SI, Beachum AN, Hinnant TD, Blake AJ, Bynum T, et al. 2019. Novel cis-regulatory regions in ecdysone responsive genes are sufficient to promote gene expression in drosophila ovarian cells. Gene Expr Patterns. 34:119074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGuire SE, Le PT, Osborn AJ, Matsumoto K, Davis RL. 2003. Spatiotemporal rescue of memory dysfunction in drosophila. Science. 302:1765–1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin JM, Bratu DP. 2015. Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis: an overview. Methods Mol Biol. 1328:1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meinsohn MC, Morin F, Bertolin K, Duggavathi R, Schoonjans K, et al. 2018. The orphan nuclear receptor liver homolog receptor-1 (nr5a2) regulates ovarian granulosa cell proliferation. J Endocr Soc. 2:24–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meinsohn MC, Smith OE, Bertolin K, Murphy BD. 2019. The orphan nuclear receptors steroidogenic factor-1 and liver receptor homolog-1: Structure, regulation, and essential roles in mammalian reproduction. Physiol Rev. 99:1249–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mirth CK, Nogueira Alves A, Piper MD. 2019. Turning food into eggs: Insights from nutritional biology and developmental physiology of drosophila. Curr Opin Ins Sci. 31:49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musille PM, Pathak M, Lauer JL, Griffin PR, Ortlund EA. 2013. Divergent sequence tunes ligand sensitivity in phospholipid-regulated hormone receptors. J Biol Chem. 288:20702–20712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ni JQ, Zhou R, Czech B, Liu LP, Holderbaum L, et al. 2011. A genome-scale shrna resource for transgenic rnai in drosophila. Nat Methods. 8:405–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ong S, Tan C. 2010. Germline cyst formation and incomplete cytokinesis during drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Dev Biol. 337:84–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ono H, Rewitz KF, Shinoda T, Itoyama K, Petryk A, et al. 2006. Spook and spookier code for stage-specific components of the ecdysone biosynthetic pathway in diptera. Dev Biol. 298:555–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ou Q, King-Jones K. 2013. What goes up must come down: Transcription factors have their say in making ecdysone pulses. Curr Top Dev Biol. 103:35–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ou Q, Zeng J, Yamanaka N, Brakken-Thal C, O'Connor MB, et al. 2016. The insect prothoracic gland as a model for steroid hormone biosynthesis and regulation. Cell Reports. 16:247–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pardee K, Necakov AS, Krause H. 2011. Nuclear receptors: small molecule sensors that coordinate growth, metabolism and reproduction. Subcell Biochem. 52:123–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker KL, Ikeda Y, Luo X. 1996. The roles of steroidogenic factor-1 in reproductive function. Steroids. 61:161–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parvy JP, Blais C, Bernard F, Warren JT, Petryk A, et al. 2005. A role for betaftz-f1 in regulating ecdysteroid titers during post-embryonic development in drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 282:84–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parvy JP, Wang P, Garrido D, Maria A, Blais C, et al. 2014. Forward and feedback regulation of cyclic steroid production in drosophila melanogaster. Development. 141:3955–3965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pelusi C, Ikeda Y, Zubair M, Parker KL. 2008. Impaired follicle development and infertility in female mice lacking steroidogenic factor 1 in ovarian granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 79:1074–1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson JS, Timmons AK, Mondragon AA, McCall K. 2015. The end of the beginning: Cell death in the germline. Curr Top Dev Biol. 114:93–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petryk A, Warren JT, Marqués G, Jarcho MP, Gilbert LI, et al. 2003. Shade is the drosophila p450 enzyme that mediates the hydroxylation of ecdysone to the steroid insect molting hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:13773–13778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rewitz KF, Yamanaka N, O'Connor MB. 2010. Steroid hormone inactivation is required during the juvenile-adult transition in drosophila. Dev Cell. 19:895–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards JS. 2018. From follicular development and ovulation to ovarian cancers: an unexpected journey. Vitam Horm. 107:453–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruaud AF, Lam G, Thummel CS. 2010. The drosophila nuclear receptors dhr3 and betaftz-f1 control overlapping developmental responses in late embryos. Development. 137:123–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rust K, Nystul T. 2020. Signal transduction in the early drosophila follicle stem cell lineage. Curr Opin Ins Sci. 37:39–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahai-Hernandez P, Nystul TG. 2013. A dynamic population of stromal cells contributes to the follicle stem cell niche in the drosophila ovary. Development. 140:4490–4498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz CJ, Sampson HM, Hlousek DP, Smith A, Copeland JW, et al. 2001. Ftz-factor1 and fushi tarazu interact via conserved nuclear receptor and coactivator motifs. EMBO J. 20:510–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sieber MH, Spradling AC. 2015. Steroid signaling establishes a female metabolic state and regulates srebp to control oocyte lipid accumulation. Curr Biol. 25:993–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sieber MH, Spradling AC. 2017. The role of metabolic states in development and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 45:58–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spradling AC. 1993. Developmental genetics of oogenesis. In: Bate M, editor. The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. p. 1–70. [Google Scholar]
- Stoiber M, Celniker S, Cherbas L, Brown B, Cherbas P. 2016. Diverse hormone response networks in 41 independent drosophila cell lines. G3 (Bethesda). 6:683–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J, Spradling AC. 2012. Nr5a nuclear receptor hr39 controls three-cell secretory unit formation in drosophila female reproductive glands. Curr Biol. 22:862–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J, Spradling AC. 2013. Ovulation in drosophila is controlled by secretory cells of the female reproductive tract. eLife. 2:e00415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki T, Kawasaki H, Yu RT, Ueda H, Umesono K. 2001. Segmentation gene product fushi tarazu is an lxxll motif-dependent coactivator for orphan receptor ftz-f1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:12403–12408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swevers L. 2019. An update on ecdysone signaling during insect oogenesis. Curr Opin Ins Sci. 31:8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talamillo A, Herboso L, Pirone L, Perez C, Gonzalez M, Sanchez J, et al. 2013. Scavenger receptors mediate the role of sumo and ftz-f1 in drosophila steroidogenesis. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terashima J, Bownes M. 2006. E75a and e75b have opposite effects on the apoptosis/development choice of the drosophila egg chamber. Cell Death Differ. 13:454–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thurmond J, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, Attrill H, Gramates LS, Marygold SJ, the FlyBase Consortium, et al. 2019. Flybase 2.0: The next generation. Nucleic Acids Res. 47:D759–D765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueda H, Sun GC, Murata T, Hirose S. 1992. A novel DNA-binding motif abuts the zinc finger domain of insect nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 and mouse embryonal long terminal repeat-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 12:5667–5672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uryu O, Ameku T, Niwa R. 2015. Recent progress in understanding the role of ecdysteroids in adult insects: germline development and circadian clock in the fruit fly drosophila melanogaster. Zool Lett. 1:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uryu O, Ou Q, Komura-Kawa T, Kamiyama T, Iga M, et al. 2018. Cooperative control of ecdysone biosynthesis in drosophila by transcription factors séance, ouija board, and molting defective. Genetics. 208:605–622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uyehara CM, McKay DJ. 2019. Direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor ecr in mediating the response to ecdysone in drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116:9893–9902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C, Zhou B, Xia G. 2017. Mechanisms controlling germline cyst breakdown and primordial follicle formation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 74:2547–2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren JT, Petryk A, Marques G, Jarcho M, Parvy JP, et al. 2002. Molecular and biochemical characterization of two p450 enzymes in the ecdysteroidogenic pathway of drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:11043–11048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodard CT, Baehrecke EH, Thummel CS. 1994. A molecular mechanism for the stage specificity of the drosophila prepupal genetic response to ecdysone. Cell. 79:607–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J, Tan A, Palli SR. 2010. The function of nuclear receptors in regulation of female reproduction and embryogenesis in the red flour beetle, tribolium castaneum. J Ins Physiol. 56:1471–1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu T, Rubin GM. 1993. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult drosophila tissues. Development. 117:1223–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamada M, Murata T, Hirose S, Lavorgna G, Suzuki E, et al. 2000. Temporally restricted expression of transcription factor betaftz-f1: Significance for embryogenesis, molting and metamorphosis in drosophila melanogaster. Development. 127:5083–5092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamanaka N, Rewitz KF, O'Connor MB. 2013. Ecdysone control of developmental transitions: Lessons from drosophila research. Annu Rev Entomol. 58:497–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yatsenko SA, Rajkovic A. 2019. Genetics of human female infertility. Biol Reprod. 101:549–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yazawa T, Imamichi Y, Miyamoto K, Khan MR, Uwada J, et al. 2015. Regulation of steroidogenesis, development, and cell differentiation by steroidogenic factor-1 and liver receptor homolog-1. Zool Sci. 32:323–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoo J, Ko S, Kim H, Sampson H, Yun JH, Choe KM, et al. 2011. Crystal structure of fushi tarazu factor 1 ligand binding domain/fushi tarazu peptide complex identifies new class of nuclear receptors. J Biol Chem. 286:31225–31231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y, Li W, Su K, Yussa M, Han W, et al. 1997. The nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 is a cofactor for the drosophila homeodomain protein ftz. Nature. 385:552–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaccai M, Lipshitz HD. 1996. Differential distributions of two adducin-like protein isoforms in the drosophila ovary and early embryo. Zygote. 4:159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang C, Large MJ, Duggavathi R, DeMayo FJ, Lydon JP, et al. 2013. Liver receptor homolog-1 is essential for pregnancy. Nat Med. 19:1061–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu J, Chen L, Sun G, Raikhel AS. 2006. The competence factor beta ftz-f1 potentiates ecdysone receptor activity via recruiting a p160/src coactivator. MCB. 26:9402–9412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Fly strains and plasmids are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article and figures.





