Cryo-EM can produce maps with resolutions that are sufficiently high that fine structural details can be discerned. Using calculated electrostatic potential maps, it is shown that it is possible to identify Mg2+ ions bound to nucleotide bases at which no charge compensation occurs, in contrast to Mg2+-bound phosphate groups, in the ribosomal RNA.
Keywords: cryo-EM, Mg2+ ions, nucleotides, electrostatic potential maps, charge effects
Abstract
Cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM) can produce maps of macromolecules that have resolutions that are sufficiently high that structural details such as chemical modifications, water molecules and bound metal ions can be discerned. However, those accustomed to interpreting the electron-density maps of macromolecules produced by X-ray crystallography need to be careful when assigning features such as these in cryo-EM maps because cations, for example, interact far more strongly with electrons than they do with X-rays. Using simulated electrostatic potential (ESP) maps as a tool led us to re-examine a recent cryo-EM map of the human ribosome, and we realized that some of the ESP peaks originally identified as novel groups covalently bonded to the N7, O6 or O4 atoms of several guanines, adenines or uridines, respectively, in this structure are likely to instead represent Mg2+ ions coordinated to these atoms, which provide only partial charge compensation compared with Mg2+ ions located next to phosphate groups. In addition, direct evidence is provided for a variation in the level of 2′-O ribose methylation of nucleotides in the human ribosome. ESP maps can thus help in identifying ions next to nucleotide bases, i.e. at positions that can be difficult to address in cryo-EM maps due to charge effects, which are specifically encountered in cryo-EM. This work is particularly relevant to nucleoprotein complexes and shows that it is important to consider charge effects when interpreting cryo-EM maps, thus opening possibilities for localizing charges in structures that may be relevant for enzymatic mechanisms and drug interactions.
1. Introduction
The impact of high-resolution cryo-EM on structural biology has increased dramatically over the past few years thanks to the development of improved direct electron detectors and image-processing methods, which also includes structure sorting by classification and methods to resolve less ordered regions by focused classification and refinement (Orlov et al., 2017 ▸; Chiu & Downing, 2017 ▸; Ognjenović et al., 2019 ▸; von Loeffelholz et al., 2017 ▸; Klaholz, 2015 ▸; Orlova & Saibil, 2010 ▸; Khoshouei et al., 2017 ▸; Banerjee et al., 2016 ▸; Bartesaghi et al., 2015 ▸; Cheng, 2015 ▸; Nakane et al., 2018 ▸; Costa et al., 2017 ▸). Cryo-EM maps resemble the electron-density maps generated by X-ray crystallography, and consequently microscopists are interpreting their maps in the same way as X-ray crystallographers do (Brown et al., 2015 ▸; Natchiar et al., 2017a ▸; Afonine, Poon et al., 2018 ▸; Afonine, Klaholz et al., 2018 ▸). While this practice may be appropriate as a means for a microscopist to obtain an initial atomic model from his or her map, it is important that at some point the difference in physical properties between cryo-EM and X-ray crystallographic maps be taken into account. Cryo-EM maps are electrostatic potential (ESP) maps to which the charges of both nuclei and electrons contribute, and they are much more sensitive to atomic charges than X-ray maps, which report only on the locations of electrons (Wang & Moore, 2017 ▸; Wang et al., 2017 ▸, 2018 ▸, 2020 ▸; Hryc et al., 2017 ▸; Marques et al., 2019 ▸; Gisriel et al., 2020 ▸).
Here, we compare calculated ESP maps of Mg2+ ions bound to nucleotide bases with the ESP maps of several bases as visible in the cryo-EM map of the human ribosome (Natchiar et al., 2017b ▸). This structure was recently determined to a resolution (average resolutions of 2.9, 3.0 and 3.1 Å for the 60S ribosomal subunit and the body and head parts of the 40S ribosomal subunit, respectively) at which numerous chemical modifications such as 2′-O-methylations or base modifications could be visualized (Natchiar et al., 2017b ▸). While there are chemical data that support the assignment of many of the modified bases identified in this map (i.e. the sites belonging to classes I and II in our original publication; Natchiar et al., 2017b ▸), some of these assignments lacked such support (i.e. the class III sites that required further analysis). Of particular interest in this regard are the extra features in the ESP map adjacent to the N7, O6 or O4 atoms of the guanosines, adenines or uracils, respectively, of several of the class III bases that were initially annotated as xp4 and xp6, i.e. yet to be identified/confirmed chemically (Natchiar et al., 2017b ▸). To obtain a better understanding of these features, we have compared them with ESP maps that we have calculated for hydrated Mg2+ ions coordinately bound to these bases at the same positions.
2. Results and discussion
To begin this analysis, we selected two residues from the class III set: G3897 and U1348 (Fig. 1 ▸). G3897 exhibits a strong and large ESP map feature adjacent to its N7 position that splits off from the ESP belonging to the rest of the base only when visualized at high contour levels (Fig. 1 ▸ a). This feature was originally modelled as an acetyl group covalently bonded to the N7 atom of G3897 because in maps contoured at normal levels it appeared to be continuously connected to the base. An acetyl group does fit into this density moderately well at normal contour levels, but it is clear from the simulated ESP map (Fig. 1 ▸ b), which was calculated as recently described (Wang et al., 2018 ▸; see details in Section 2), that a hydrated Mg2+ ion fits it even better at all contour levels (Figs. 1 ▸ b and 1 ▸ c). Similarly, the strong ESP map feature next to the O4 atom of U1348 is better explained as a hydrated Mg2+ ion (Figs. 1 ▸ d–1 ▸ f). Based on these observations, we reanalyzed the density that corresponds to all of the class III nucleotides where the modifications proposed initially involved the N7, O6 or O4 atoms of guanosines, adenines or uridines, respectively. We have concluded that the extra features in the ESP maps associated with these bases represent bound hydrated Mg2+ ions, and we have now annotated these residues accordingly (Table 1 ▸). Our revised annotation of these nucleotides is consistent with a recent biochemical study that showed no chemical modification of these particular nucleotides in the human ribosome (Taoka et al., 2018 ▸); octahedrally coordinated hydrated Mg2+ ions have recently also been visualized in the 50S ribosomal subunit from Escherichia coli (Stojković et al., 2020 ▸).
Table 1. Reannotations to Mg2+ ions that have been made for densities in the vicinity of N7, O6 or O4 atoms (bold) of guanosines, adenines or uridines, respectively (28S rRNA; no changes in 18S rRNA).
28S rRNA residue name | Previous annotation | Comments |
---|---|---|
G237 | xp6G237 | Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 2.6 Å) |
U1348 | xp4U1348 | Mg2+ (distance between O4 and Mg2+ ion is 2.3 Å); see also calculated ESP map (Fig. 1 ▸) |
G1574 | xp6G1574 | Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
G1605 | m7G1605 | Weak Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.0 Å) |
U1659 | xp4U1659 | Mg2+ (distance between O4 and Mg2+ ion is 2.1 Å) |
G1797 | xe7G1797 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
G1909 | xp7G1909 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion 2.9 Å) |
G2297 | xe7G2297 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion 2.8 Å) |
G2380 | m6G2380 | Weak Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 1.6 Å) |
G2522 | m7G2522 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.8 Å) |
G2754 | xp6G2754 | Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 2.1 Å) |
G3880 | xp7G3880 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.7 Å) |
G3897 | ac7G3897 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.4 Å); see also calculated ESP map (Fig. 1 ▸) |
Gm3899 | ac7Gm3899 | Mg2+ at N7 (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
G4129 | m6G4129 | Weak Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 1.8 Å) |
G4185 | m6G4185 | Weak Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
U4194 | xp4U4194 | Mg2+ (distance between O4 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
G4355 | xe6G4355 | Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
G4371 | m2xp7G4371 | Mg2+ (distance between N2 and Mg2+ ion is 2.4 Å) |
G4472 | m6G4472 | Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 2.1 Å) |
m6G4529 | m6G4529 | Weak Mg2+ (distance between O6 and Mg2+ ion is 1.7 Å) |
G4550 | m7G4550 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.9 Å) |
A4564 | m7A4564 | Possible Mg2+ or water molecule (distance to N7 is 1.5 Å) |
G4690 | ac7G4690 | Mg2+ (distance between N7 and Mg2+ ion is 2.2 Å) |
The reason that the ESP map features for these Mg2+ ions are so large and conspicuous (see also a comparison between two nucleotides with and without Mg2+; Fig. 1 ▸ g) is that the two positive charges of the Mg2+ ion are only partially compensated for by the partial negative charges of the water molecule O atoms and the base N7, O6 or O4 atoms that are coordinated to them. In contrast, the full negative charges of the O atoms of the phosphate groups in the rRNA backbone are much more effective in reducing the amplitudes of the ESP peaks of any Mg2+ ions bound to them, which makes it easier to resolve the peak corresponding to a phosphate O atom from the peak of an associated Mg2+ ion. Modifications at 2′-O ribose positions and on the less polarized N1, N2, N3, N4 and C5 atoms of the nucleotide bases are much less affected by charge effects (Fig. 2 ▸) and give rise to ESP map features that are much easier to assign because they are so similar to the corresponding features in electron-density maps.
It is clear from the comparison of experimental and simulated ESP maps of an Mg2+ ion shown here that the peak of an Mg2+ ion in an ESP map is much larger than the corresponding peak in an electron-density map (Fig. 1 ▸). For this reason, Mg2+ ion peaks tend to merge with those of the neighbouring atoms in ESP maps contoured at low and normal levels (Fig. 1 ▸ g). This is especially true when the interaction distance is short, for example often ∼2.0–2.2 Å (Table 1 ▸), which is only slightly longer than the length of an ordinary covalent bond and is not resolvable at the resolution relevant here (hence there is some variability compared with the standard distances, which are around 2.1 Å; Dokmanić et al., 2008 ▸). Peak size is less of a problem for other kinds of nucleotide modifications when there are no charged species involved.
Quantitative comparison of methylation levels at different locations in cryo-EM maps is very difficult because the resolution in one part of a map may not be the same as it is in another. Interestingly, there is one region in the ESP map of the human ribosome that contains several 2′-O-methylated nucleotides where the local resolution is effectively constant (Fig. 3 ▸). There it is clear that the modification levels are not the same: A2363 has the highest level of 2′-O-methylation, C2365 has the lowest and G2364 is in between. These observations may indicate the presence of partial modifications, i.e. a mixture of the absence and presence of 2′-O-methylation, which may be functionally relevant (Natchiar et al., 2018 ▸).
In summary, our observations demonstrate how important it is to take atomic charges into account when interpreting cryo-EM, i.e. ESP, maps and deriving detailed atomic models (Liebschner et al., 2019 ▸; Klaholz, 2019 ▸). Compared with previous studies on the localization of Mg2+ ions next to phosphate groups (Wang et al., 2018 ▸), the novelty here is to identify ions in positions next to nucleotide bases that are particularly difficult to address in cryo-EM maps due to charge effects. These are typically attached to the N7, O6 or O4 atoms of nucleotide bases, i.e. at positions with only little charge compensation compared with Mg2+ ions located next to phosphate groups. This opens new possibilities for localizing charges in structures, which may be relevant to enzymatic mechanisms and drug interactions etc. This is particularly important for all structures that contain RNA or DNA in various nucleoprotein complexes, which are full of negatively charged phosphate groups, and bound counter-ions, notably divalent ions such as Mg2+. Until the community better understands the effects that local charges have on ESP maps, calculated ESP maps of the sort we used here may have a useful role to play when analyzing cryo-EM maps.
3. Methods
Our revised annotation was made by careful comparison of the experimental ESP map with calculated ESP maps from atomic models as recently described (Wang et al., 2018 ▸). For these calculations, atomic partial charges were taken from Cornell et al. (1995 ▸) and Pavlov et al. (1998 ▸), and unknown atomic B factors were systematically varied with an increment of 10 Å2. Scripts, libraries and examples are provided in the supporting information: (i) awk_NucleicAcidProtein_PDB_Kollman, which assigns charges for nucleotide and amino-acid residues according to Cornell et al. (1995 ▸), (ii) awk_ESP_with_charges_ions_P1_PDB, which calculates ESP structure factors with assigned charges and standard form factors for ionized atoms (Peng, 1998 ▸, 1999 ▸), (iii) HexahydratedMG_PSS1998_lib.cir, which is a crystallographic information file library for a hexahydrated Mg2+ ion according to Pavlov et al. (1998 ▸), and (iv) U1348A1508Pair_HHMg_center1.pdb, which is an example for the U1348⋯A1508 base pair (see Fig. 1 ▸) with a hydrated Mg2+ complex included placed in a cubic P1 box with a = b = c = 30 Å.
Supplementary Material
awk_NucleicAcidProtein_PDB_Kollman script. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup1.exe
awk_ESP_with_charges_ions_P1_PDB script. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup2.exe
HexahydratedMG_PSS1998_lib.cir library. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup3.txt
U1348A1508Pair_HHMg_center1.pdb. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup4.pdb
Acknowledgments
We thank Nicolas Ballet for IT support, Léo Fréchin and Brice Beinsteiner for maintaining computing clusters. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique grant . Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer grant . Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale grant . Agence Nationale de la Recherche grant . Université de Strasbourg grant USIAS-2018-012. French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology grant ANR-10-INSB-05-01.
References
- Afonine, P. V., Klaholz, B. P., Moriarty, N. W., Poon, B. K., Sobolev, O. V., Terwilliger, T. C., Adams, P. D. & Urzhumtsev, A. (2018). Acta Cryst. D74, 814–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Afonine, P. V., Poon, B. K., Read, R. J., Sobolev, O. V., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. & Adams, P. D. (2018). Acta Cryst. D74, 531–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, S., Bartesaghi, A., Merk, A., Rao, P., Bulfer, S. L., Yan, Y., Green, N., Mroczkowski, B., Neitz, R. J., Wipf, P., Falconieri, V., Deshaies, R. J., Milne, J. L. S., Huryn, D., Arkin, M. & Subramaniam, S. (2016). Science, 351, 871–875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Bartesaghi, A., Merk, A., Banerjee, S., Matthies, D., Wu, X., Milne, J. L. S. & Subramaniam, S. (2015). Science, 348, 1147–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Brown, A., Long, F., Nicholls, R. A., Toots, J., Emsley, P. & Murshudov, G. (2015). Acta Cryst. D71, 136–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Cheng, Y. (2015). Cell, 161, 450–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Chiu, W. & Downing, K. H. (2017). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 46, iv–viii. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Cornell, W. D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C. I., Gould, I. R., Merz, K. M. J., Ferguson, D. M., Spellmeyer, D. C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J. W. & Kollman, P. (1995). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5179–5197.
- Costa, T. R. D., Ignatiou, A. & Orlova, E. V. (2017). Methods Mol. Biol. 1615, 377–413. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Dokmanić, I., Šikić, M. & Tomić, S. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 257–263. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Gisriel, C. J., Wang, J., Brudvig, G. W. & Bryant, D. A. (2020). Commun. Biol. 3, 408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Hryc, C. F., Chen, D. H., Afonine, P. V., Jakana, J., Wang, Z., Haase-Pettingell, C., Jiang, W., Adams, P. D., King, J. A., Schmid, M. F. & Chiu, W. (2017). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 3103–3108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Khoshouei, M., Danev, R., Plitzko, J. M. & Baumeister, W. (2017). J. Mol. Biol. 429, 2611–2618. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Klaholz, B. P. (2015). Open J. Stat. 5, 820.
- Klaholz, B. P. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 878–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J. & Adams, P. D. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877.
- Loeffelholz, O. von, Natchiar, S. K., Djabeur, N., Myasnikov, A. G., Kratzat, H., Ménétret, J.-F., Hazemann, I. & Klaholz, B. P. (2017). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 46, 140–148. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Marques, M. A., Purdy, M. D. & Yeager, M. (2019). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 58, 214–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Nakane, T., Kimanius, D., Lindahl, E. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2018). eLife, 7, e36861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Natchiar, S. K., Myasnikov, A. G., Hazemann, I. & Klaholz, B. P. (2018). Biomolecules, 8, 125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Natchiar, S. K., Myasnikov, A., Kratzat, H., Hazemann, I. & Klaholz, B. (2017a). Protocol Exchange, https://doi.org/10.1038/protex.2017.122.
- Natchiar, S. K., Myasnikov, A. G., Kratzat, H., Hazemann, I. & Klaholz, B. P. (2017b). Nature, 551, 472–477. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Ognjenović, J., Grisshammer, R. & Subramaniam, S. (2019). Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21, 395–415. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Orlova, E. V. & Saibil, H. R. (2010). Methods Enzymol. 482, 321–341. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Orlov, I., Myasnikov, A. G., Andronov, L., Natchiar, S. K., Khatter, H., Beinsteiner, B., Ménétret, J.-F., Hazemann, I., Mohideen, K., Tazibt, K., Tabaroni, R., Kratzat, H., Djabeur, N., Bruxelles, T., Raivoniaina, F., Pompeo, L., Torchy, M., Billas, I., Urzhumtsev, A. & Klaholz, B. P. (2017). Biol. Cell, 109, 81–93. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Pavlov, M., Siegbahn, P. E. M. & Sandström, M. (1998). J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 219–228.
- Peng, L.-M. (1998). Acta Cryst. A54, 481–485.
- Peng, L.-M. (1999). Micron, 30, 625–648.
- Stojković, V., Myasnikov, A. G., Young, I. D., Frost, A., Fraser, J. S. & Fujimori, D. G. (2020). Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 2723–2732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Taoka, M., Nobe, Y., Yamaki, Y., Sato, K., Ishikawa, H., Izumikawa, K., Yamauchi, Y., Hirota, K., Nakayama, H., Takahashi, N. & Isobe, T. (2018). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 9289–9298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang, J., Brudvig, G. W., Batista, V. S. & Moore, P. B. (2017). Protein Sci. 26, 2410–2416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang, J., Liu, Z., Frank, J. & Moore, P. B. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 375–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang, J. & Moore, P. B. (2017). Protein Sci. 26, 122–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang, J., Perez-Cruet, J. M., Huang, H.-L., Reiss, K., Gisriel, C. J., Banerjee, G., Kaur, D., Ghosh, I., Dziarski, A., Gunner, M. R., Batista, V. S. & Brudvig, G. W. (2020). Biochemistry, 59, 2823–2831. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
awk_NucleicAcidProtein_PDB_Kollman script. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup1.exe
awk_ESP_with_charges_ions_P1_PDB script. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup2.exe
HexahydratedMG_PSS1998_lib.cir library. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup3.txt
U1348A1508Pair_HHMg_center1.pdb. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321001893/vo5001sup4.pdb