Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2021 Mar 31;19(3):e3001169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001169

Microbial colonization induces histone acetylation critical for inherited gut-germline-neural signaling

Chunlan Hong 1,, Jonathan Lalsiamthara 1,, Jie Ren 1, Yu Sang 1, Alejandro Aballay 1,*
Editor: Jennifer L Garrison2
PMCID: PMC8041202  PMID: 33788830

Abstract

The gut-neural axis plays a critical role in the control of several physiological processes, including the communication of signals from the microbiome to the nervous system, which affects learning, memory, and behavior. However, the pathways involved in gut-neural signaling of gut-governed behaviors remain unclear. We found that the intestinal distension caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces histone H4 Lys8 acetylation (H4K8ac) in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans, which is required for both a bacterial aversion behavior and its transmission to the next generation. We show that induction of H4K8ac in the germline is essential for bacterial aversion and that a 14-3-3 chaperone protein family member, PAR-5, is required for H4K8ac. Our findings highlight a role for H4K8ac in the germline not only in the intergenerational transmission of pathogen avoidance but also in the transmission of pathogenic cues that travel through the gut-neural axis to control the aversive behavior.


This study shows that microbial colonization of the intestine of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans intestine induces changes in the germline that not only influence the inheritance of pathogen avoidance but also the transmission of pathogenic cues that travel through the gut-neural axis to control aversive behavior.

Introduction

Increasing evidence suggests that the intestine plays an important role in response to environmental changes, which ultimately affect behaviors by communicating with neurons [15]. While there is also evidence indicating that microbial cues sensed by the intestine can be transmitted to the offspring and affect their behavior [6,7], the pathways involved in gut-neural communication and the inheritability of gut-governed behaviors remain unclear. The germline can transmit epigenetic information from the environment to the next generation through communication with other tissues [8,9], and it may regulate behaviors in response to environmental stress [10,11]. However, a potential role of the germline in the gut-neural axis has not been established.

To provide insights into the gut-neural circuits that regulate behaviors in response to microbial colonization of the intestine, we have taken advantage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which has evolved behavioral responses that allow the animal to avoid potentially pathogenic bacteria. Upon exposure to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, C. elegans exhibits a pathogen-aversive behavior, which is governed by distinct groups of neurons [1215]. Moreover, recent studies indicate that P. aeruginosa colonization of the intestine causes a distension that regulates behavior and learning via neuroendocrine signaling [16,17].

In this study, we show that the germline is part of the gut-neural axis involved in pathogen avoidance. The mechanism through which intestinal colonization by bacteria induces pathogen avoidance requires histone H4 Lys8 acetylation (H4K8ac) in the germline. H4K8ac is also needed for the transmission of the pathogen-aversive behavior to the next generation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (ChIP-MS) identified a 14-3-3 chaperone protein family member, PAR-5, as essential in the germline for H4K8ac and gut-neural signaling of pathogen avoidance. These results suggest that H4K8ac in the germline participates in a circuit that receives inputs from the infected gut and transmits the information to the nervous system to elicit pathogen avoidance.

Results and discussion

Microbial colonization of the intestine induces H4K8ac in the germline

Histone posttranslational modifications (PTM) are the most common epigenetic mechanisms, and different modifications have been found to be involved in diverse biological processes across species, including C. elegans [1820]. Methylation and acetylation are common histone PTM that generally affect gene expression by altering the activity of origins of DNA replication or chromatin structure and gene transcription [21,22]. As a first step to studying whether histone PTM play a role in the control of the pathogen-aversive behavior elicited by microbial colonization of the C. elegans intestine, we looked at monomethylation of histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4me1), trimethylation of histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4me3), and histone H4K8ac as they have been linked to immunological memory in plants and mammals [23,24]. First, we studied these histone modifications in young adult animals that were exposed to P. aeruginosa for 24 hours. To ensure that the histone PTM analyzed do not correspond to the progeny of the animals, we used fer-1 animals, which are infertile at 25°C due to a mutation that prevents the sperm from penetrating the oocyte [25]. We found that only H4K8ac increased (Fig 1A and S1A Fig), suggesting that P. aeruginosa infection induces it in the infected animals.

Fig 1. P. aeruginosa infection and intestinal distension induce H4K8ac in the germline.

Fig 1

(A) Western blots of extracts from fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000; representative of 3 independent experiments). (B) Western blots on extracts from fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000; representative of 3 independent experiments). The fer-1(b232) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4-stage animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment (A, B). (C) Representative microscopic images of portions of C. elegans germline depicting differences in H4K8ac patterns. Yellow-dotted lines were used to outline the germline. (D) Whole-mount immunofluorescence profile of wild-type animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody, post exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi for 24 hours at 25°C. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

Because infection by P. aeruginosa correlates with colonization and distension of the C. elegans intestinal lumen, which triggers bacterial aversion [16,26], we reasoned that H4K8ac may also increase as a consequence of intestinal distension. To test this hypothesis, we studied H4K8ac in aex-5 and eat-2 RNA interference (RNAi) animals. Inhibition of genes aex-5 and eat-2, which alters the defecation motor program (DMP) of the animals, results in pathogen avoidance triggered by intestinal distension [16]. Consistent with the idea that intestinal distension alone induces H4K8ac, inhibition of aex-5 and eat-2 resulted in induced H4K8ac in uninfected animals (Fig 1B, S1B and S1C Fig).

To determine where histone acetylation occurs, we performed whole animal fluorescent immunohistochemistry using an antibody that recognizes H4K8ac. We found that H4K8ac increased mainly in the germline upon exposure to P. aeruginosa (Fig 1C) or inhibition by RNAi of aex-5 or eat-2 (Fig 1D, S1D Fig). These results highlight an important role of the germline in communicating danger signals from the intestine to the nervous system to elicit pathogen avoidance.

Gut-germline-neural signaling is required for pathogen avoidance

We sought to address whether the germline was part of the gut-neural signaling required for the elicitation of pathogen avoidance. To study a potential role of the germline in gut-neural signaling, we used glp-1 animals, which lack most germline cells due to defects in mitotic and meiotic division [27,28]. As shown in Fig 2A and S2A Fig, P. aeruginosa-induced H4K8ac was not observed in glp-1 animals. We also confirmed the lack of H4K8ac by immunohistochemistry (Fig 2B, S2B Fig), which also indicates that histone acetylation indeed occurs in the germline in response to intestinal distension caused by microbial colonization.

Fig 2. The germline is part of the gut-neural axis involved in pathogen avoidance.

Fig 2

(A) Western blot of extracts from fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000; representative of 3 independent experiments). (B) Representative microscopic images of wild-type N2 and glp-1(e2141) animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody following exposure to P. aeruginosa for 24 hours at 25°C. (C) Lawn occupancy of wild-type N2 (WT) or glp-1(e2141) animals at 24 hours of exposure to P. aeruginosa at 20°C following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **** P ≤ 0.0001. (D) Bacterial colonization of wild-type N2 and glp-1(e2141) animals after 48 hours of exposure to P. aeruginosa at 20°C following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi (n = 4). (E) Lawn occupancy of wild-type N2 (WT) or glp-1(e2141) animals at 48 hours of exposure to P. aeruginosa at 20°C following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **** P ≤ 0.0001. The fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop into young adults and subjected to the corresponding assays. For RNAi induction, L4-stage animals were transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference; WT, wild type.

Because H4K8ac is induced in the germline of DMP-defective animals, which exhibit rapid pathogen avoidance, and glp-1 animals lack most germline cells and exhibit no H4K8ac, we hypothesized that intestinal distention in glp-1 animals would fail to elicit avoidance to P. aeruginosa. As shown in Fig 2C, inhibition of aex-5 and eat-2 did not elicit pathogen avoidance in glp-1 animals. It is known that glp-1 animals exhibit enhanced resistance to a wide array of microbes, including P. aeruginosa [29], which results in a slow microbial colonization [30]. Thus, it was not clear whether the inability of glp-1 animals to avoid P. aeruginosa was due to the absence of the germline or the enhanced resistance to infection and colonization by the pathogen. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we tested pathogen avoidance after 48 hours, when bacterial colonization was comparable in wild-type and glp-1 animals deficient in aex-5 and eat-2 (Fig 2D, S2C Fig). We did not observe any difference in the pathogen avoidance of glp-1 animals compared to that of glp-1 animals deficient in aex-5 and eat-2 (Fig 2E), even at times when they were similarly colonized by P. aeruginosa (Fig 2D, S2C Fig).

To further confirm the relationship between bloating-mediated avoidance behavior and H4K8ac, we measured acetylation levels in animals deficient in the nol-6 gene. Previous studies have shown that the RNAi of nol-6, a nucleolar RNA-associated protein-encoding gene, reduces bloating of the intestinal lumen caused by bacterial infection [30]. This reduction in nol-6 expression results in delayed pathogen avoidance [17]. We found that nol-6 RNAi suppressed the enhanced H4K8ac in the germline of P. aeruginosa-infected animals (S2D and S2E Fig). Taken together, these results indicate that intestinal distension caused by P. aeruginosa infection enhances H4K8ac in the germline that is required for pathogen avoidance.

PAR-5 is required for H4K8ac in the germline

To identify potential interacting partners that may affect H4K8ac in response to P. aeruginosa colonization, we performed ChIP-MS. A total of 25 H4K8 acetylated-interacting candidate proteins that were up-regulated more than 3-fold in infected animals were identified (S1 Table). We decided to further study PAR-5 because out of all the H4K8 acetylated-interacting candidate proteins that are up-regulated more than 3-fold by P. aeruginosa infection, it is the only one that is expressed in the germline and in neurons, from where it could also be involved in the control of pathogen avoidance. Another reason why we focused on PAR-5 is that it belongs to a 14-3-3 family of chaperones [31,32] that, through interactions with different proteins, can regulate PTM such as H4K8ac.

We confirmed the direct binding of PAR-5 and H4 using coimmunoprecipitation (S3A Fig). We also confirmed the protein–protein interaction in vivo using bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), which allows for the determination of physical interactions of proteins in living cells through direct visualization [33]. The BiFC constructs were engineered to individually express, under the control of the heat shock promoter Phsp-16.41, green fluorescent protein (GFP) fragments translationally fused with PAR-5 and H4, which is a C. elegans ortholog of human H4. The interaction between the two proteins would bring the nonfluorescent fragments into close proximity for reconstitution and fluorescence. Twelve hours after heat shock, we observed fluorescence, indicating a physical interaction between PAR-5 and H4 in vivo (Fig 3A). Animals carrying BiFC constructs without H4 did not exhibit fluorescence. Knockdown of par-5 by RNAi resulted in a significant reduction of fluorescence (Fig 3B and 3C), further confirming that the presence of the two proteins is required for the GFP reconstitution. As shown in Fig 3A and 3D, the protein interaction occurs in the nuclei of hsp-16.41-expressing cells. Even though PAR-5 is required for development and its inhibition may have wide effects on the germline that might indirectly affect H4 acetylation, our results indicate that PAR-5 directly interacts with histone.

Fig 3. PAR-5 is required for P. aeruginosa H4K8ac in the germline.

Fig 3

(A) Representative microscopic images of vector control or par-5 RNAi animals expressing BiFC constructs 12 hours after heat shock at 33°C. Control animals without the H4::VC155 construct were used to establish the background fluorescence. (B) Dot-plot representation of green fluorescence intensity versus TOF of vector or par-5 RNAi BiFC animals. (C) Frequency distribution of green fluorescence-AUC of vector and par-5 RNAi transgenic BiFC animals. Three independent experiments were performed. “*” indicates significant difference; **** P ≤ 0.0001. (D) High-magnification fluorescent micrograph of nuclear localization of PAR-5 protein, post 12 hours heat shock recovery. (E) Western blot of extracts from fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000; representative of 3 independent experiments). The fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop into L4s. L4 animals were transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. (F) Whole-mount immunofluorescence profile of wild-type animals stained with anti-H4K8ac, post exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi for 24 hours at 25°C. (G) Lawn occupancy of wild-type N2 animals at 24 hours of exposure to P. aeruginosa following par-5 RNAi at 25°C (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **** P ≤ 0.0001. (H) Lawn occupancy of tissue-specific RNAi animals at 24 hours of exposure to P. aeruginosa following par-5 RNAi in the germline, neurons, or the intestine at 25°C (n = 20). Four independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; “ns” indicates nonsignificant; ** P ≤ 0.005. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. AUC, area under the curve; BiFC, bimolecular fluorescence complementation; H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference; TOF, time of flight.

Consistent with this idea that PAR-5 regulates H4K8ac, we found that par-5 RNAi inhibited the induction of H4K8ac caused by P. aeruginosa infection (Fig 3E and S3B Fig). We also found that par-5 RNAi inhibited H4K8ac in the germline (Fig 3F and S3C Fig). To further confirm the relationship between H4K8ac and pathogen avoidance, we asked whether animals fail to avoid P. aeruginosa when par-5 is inhibited. As shown in Fig 3G, animals did not avoid P. aeruginosa when par-5 was inhibited by RNAi. Because par-5 and the homolog gene ftt-2 share approximately 78.2% sequence identity at the nucleotide level and approximately 85.9% sequence identity at the amino acid level [34], we studied the specificity of par-5 RNAi. First, we investigated the pathogen avoidance of ftt-2 mutants and found that unlike par-5 RNAi animals, ftt-2 animals were capable of avoiding P. aeruginosa (S4A Fig). We also investigated the expression of the two proteins using anti-FTT-2 and anti-PAR-5 antibodies and found that PAR-5 but not FTT-2 diminished upon par-5 RNAi (S4B and S4C Fig). Our results indicate that enhanced H4K8ac in the germline is required for pathogen avoidance. Thus, we employed strains capable of tissue-specific RNAi to evaluate the tissue-specific contributions of par-5 RNAi responsible for the inhibition of pathogen avoidance. As shown in Fig 3H, par-5 RNAi in the germline significantly reduced pathogen avoidance, which is consistent with our previous results and suggests that H4K8ac occurs in the germline in response to infection. Consistent with this idea, par-5 RNAi in the germline, but not in the intestine or in neurons, significantly suppressed the P. aeruginosa-induced H4K8ac (S5 Fig). Whole animal fluorescent immunohistochemistry confirmed that P. aeruginosa-induced H4K8ac is inhibited by par-5 RNAi in the germline (S6 Fig).

Enhanced H4K8ac in the germline induces an intergenerational pathogen avoidance behavior

We hypothesized that if the intestinal distension caused by bacterial colonization or inhibition of DMP genes induces H4K8ac in the germline, the signal may be transmitted to the progeny. Thus, we asked whether the offspring of animals exposed to P. aeruginosa could also exhibit increased H4K8ac in the germline. Because the effect of RNAi is transgenerationally transmitted, we cannot investigate whether H4K8ac induced by inhibition of DMP genes is also passed to the progeny. Therefore, we used heat-killed E. coli that induces intestinal distension, similar to that of DMP-defective animals, and also elicits a similar pathogen avoidance behavior [16]. We exposed L4 animals to P. aeruginosa or heat-killed E. coli for 24 hours, two conditions which can induce bloating in the intestinal lumen and result in bacterial aversion [16]. As shown in Fig 4A and S7 Fig, the F1 offspring from infected P0 animals exhibited higher H4K8ac in the germline than control animals, indicating that bloating of the intestine induces H4K8ac in the germline that is intergenerationally transmitted.

Fig 4. Enhanced H4K8ac in the germline is required for the intergenerational pathogen avoidance.

Fig 4

(A) Whole-mount immunofluorescence using an anti-H4K8ac antibody to strain F1 wild-type N2 young adults from P0 animals exposed to E. coli (E. c), P. aeruginosa (P. a), or heat-killed E. coli (HK E. c) starting at the L4 stage for 24 hours. (B) Lawn occupancy of F1 wild-type N2 animals at 12 hours from P0 animals exposed to E. coli (E. c), P. aeruginosa (P. a), or heat-killed E. coli (HK E. c) starting at the L4 stage for 24 hours (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05. (C) C. elegans exposure to P. aeruginosa causes an intestinal colonization and distention that leads to H4K8ac in the germline. Both H4K8ac in the germline and the germline itself are required for an intergenerational pathogen avoidance. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation.

Intestinal distension caused by bacterial colonization or inhibition of DMP genes induces pathogen avoidance [16,17] and H4K8ac in the germline (Fig 1D). Moreover, the enhanced H4K8ac is transmitted to the F1 offspring (Fig 4A and S7 Fig). Thus, we investigated whether the F1 offspring also exhibits higher pathogen avoidance. The progeny of animals infected with P. aeruginosa or fed heat-killed E. coli to induce intestinal distension exhibited significantly higher pathogen avoidance than the progeny of animals fed control live E. coli, which does not cause intestinal distension (Fig 4B). Taken together, these results demonstrate that enhanced H4K8ac in the germline is required for the intergenerational pathogen avoidance induced by bloating caused by bacterial colonization of the intestine.

Conclusions

The gut-neural axis plays a critical role in transmitting signals from the microbiome to the nervous system to respond to environmental changes. We have shown that histone H4K8ac increased in the germline upon exposure to P. aeruginosa, suggesting that the intestinal distension caused by microbial colonization induces histone H4K8ac in the germline. Indeed, we observed that H4K8ac increases in animals that exhibit distended intestines due to aex-5 or eat-2 inhibition. The rapid pathogen avoidance elicited by aex-5 or eat-2 inhibition is suppressed by the absence of the germline. Furthermore, we found that PAR-5 regulates pathogen avoidance induced by intestinal distension by stabilizing H4K8ac and that reduction of H4K8ac in the germline by par-5 inhibition suppressed pathogen avoidance (Fig 4C). The inheritance of avoidance elicited by small RNAs from P. aeruginosa requires the germline [35,36]. We do not know whether H4K8ac plays a role in the avoidance mediated by small RNAs, which accounts for a fraction of the avoidance elicited by P. aeruginosa. Our results highlight a critical role for H4K8ac in the germline in the control of the gut-neural axis in response to P. aeruginosa infection. Further studies will be required to identify the downstream signals involved in germline-neural communication.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

The following bacterial strains were used: Escherichia coli OP50, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14, and P. aeruginosa PA14-GFP. Bacterial cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C.

Nematode strains and growth conditions

C. elegans hermaphrodites were maintained on E. coli OP50 at 20°C, except HH142 fer-1(b232), CB4037 glp-1(e2141) strains that were maintained at 15°C. Bristol N2 was used as the wild-type control. Germline-specific RNAi strain DCL569 (mkcSi13 II;rde-1(mkc36) V), neuron-specific RNAi strain TU3401 (sid-1(pk3321) V;uIs69 V), gut-specific RNAi strain MGH171 (sid-1(qt9) V;alxIs9), HH142 fer-1(b232), CB4037 glp-1(e2141), and MT14355 ftt-2(n4426) strains were obtained from the Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics Center (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis).

Bacterial lawn avoidance assay

The bacterial lawns were prepared by picking individual P. aeruginosa PA14 colonies into 3 mL of the LB and growing them at 37°C for 12 hours on a shaker. Then, a 20-μL culture was seeded onto the center of a 3.5-cm modified NGM plate and incubated at 37°C for 12 hours. Twenty synchronized hermaphroditic animals grown on E. coli HT115(DE3) carrying a control vector or an RNAi clone targeting a gene were transferred into the bacterial lawns, and the number of animals on and off the lawn were counted at the indicated times for each experiment. Experiments were performed at 25°C except for aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi animals, which are hypersusceptible to P. aeruginosa at 25°C [16]. The percent occupancy was calculated as (Non lawn/Ntotal) ×100.

P. aeruginosa-GFP colonization assay

Bacterial lawns were prepared by inoculating individual bacterial colonies into 3 mL of LB with 50 μg/mL kanamycin and growing them at 37°C for 12 hours on a shaker. For the colonization assays, bacterial lawns of P. aeruginosa-GFP were prepared by spreading 200 μL of the culture on the entire surface of 3.5 cm diameter-modified NGM plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 12 hours and then cooled to room temperature before the animals were transferred. Synchronized L1-stage wild-type N2 and glp-1(e2141) were transferred to 25°C. L4-stage animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. Exposure to P. aeruginosa-GFP was conducted at 20°C for 48 hours. The animals were transferred from P. aeruginosa-GFP plates to fresh E. coli plates for 10 minutes to eliminate P. aeruginosa-GFP adhered to their body. This procedure was repeated 3 times. Subsequently, 10 animals/condition were transferred into 50 μL of PBS containing 0.01% Triton X-100 and grounded with pestle and glass beads. Ten-fold serial dilutions of the lysates (10−1, 10−2, 10−3, 10−4) were made and seeded onto LB plates containing 50 μg/mL of kanamycin to select for P. aeruginosa-GFP cells and grown overnight at 37°C. Single colonies were counted the next day, the dilution factors were incorporated into the colony-counts, and the results were represented as colony-forming units (CFU) per animal. Three independent experiments were performed.

RNA interference

The preparation of RNAi experiments has been explained in previous studies [37]. Briefly, E. coli, with the appropriate vectors, was grown in LB broth containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) at 37°C overnight and plated onto NGM plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 3 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (RNAi plates). RNAi-expressing bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C. Synchronized L4-stage animals were transferred to RNAi plates and grown for 24 hours at 25°C, unless otherwise indicated, before the subsequent experiments. All RNAi clones except eat-2 were from the Ahringer RNAi library.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry

Total protein extracts from fer-1(b232) animals were obtained by sonication in FA buffer after crosslinking with formaldehyde for 30 minutes. Anti-H4K8ac antibody was used to precipitate proteins bound to H4K8ac by incubation overnight followed with magnetic beads incubation at 4°C for 1 hour to pull down the proteins. Proteins were eluted with sample buffer and resolved on a 4% to 12% NuPage Novex gel (Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and stained with Imperial Protein Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Gel was run for 10 minutes. Cut bands were reduced, alkylated with iodoacetamide, and in-gel digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) prior to MS analysis.

Western blot assay

Synchronized fer-1(b232) or glp-1(e2141) animals were transferred to plates with P. aeruginosa for 24 hours with E. coli as control. Worms were collected and washed 3 times with M9 to remove the bacteria. The cell lysates were obtained by sonication. The samples were mixed with sample loading buffer for gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred from the gel to the membrane at 300 mA for 50 minutes. After 1 hour blocking at room temperature, the membrane was incubated at 4°C overnight with anti-H4K8ac (ab15823, Abcam, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), anti-FTT-2, anti-β-actin (ab8227, Abcam, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), and anti-PAR-5 antibodies followed with 1-hour anti-Rabbit antibody at room temperature. β-actin serves as internal control. Anti-FTT-2 and anti-PAR-5 antibodies were gifts from Dr. Andrew Golden. Chemiluminescence signal was detected using ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, USA). The densities of the protein bands were quantified using Image J and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of test sample over control sample after normalization with β-actin.

Whole mount fluorescent immunohistochemistry

Bristol N2 wild-type animals were used for whole mount fluorescent immunohistochemistry, unless otherwise indicated. Synchronized young adult animals were exposed to P. aeruginosa or E. coli for 24 hours at 25°C. Worms were washed 3 times with M9 to remove the bacteria and resuspended in fixing solution (160 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 40 mM NaCl, 20 mM Na2EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM spermidine HCl, 30 mM PIPES (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 50% methanol, 2% formaldehyde) and subjected to snap freezing in liquid nitrogen. The worms were fixed on ice for 4 hours and washed briefly in T buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) before a 15-minute incubation in T buffer supplemented with 1% β-mercaptoethanol at 37°C. The worms were washed with borate buffer (25 mM H3BO3, 12.5 mM NaOH (pH 9.5)) and then incubated in borate buffer containing 10 mM DTT for 15 minutes, followed by H2O2 incubation for another 30 minutes. Worms were blocked in PBST (PBS (pH 7.4), 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA) containing 1% BSA for 30 minutes and incubated overnight with anti-H4K8ac antibody (1:100; ab15823, Abcam) and with Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibody (1:300; ab150080, Abcam). 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 20 μg/mL) was added to visualize nuclei. The worms were mounted on a microscope slide and visualized using stereofluorescence microscope (Leica M165 FC or DM4-B, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The fluorescence intensity was quantified using Image J. The whole animal fluorescence was calculated using the following equation: corrected whole animal fluorescence = integrated density − (area of selected animal × mean fluorescence of background readings).

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and plasmid construction

To construct plasmids for the BiFC assay for protein interaction, par-5 and his-1 cDNA were subcloned into pCE-BiFC-VN173 and pCE-BiFC-VC155 plasmids (Addgene, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA), which contain the heat shock promoter Phsp-16.41. Full-length par-5 cDNA was subcloned in-frame into pCE-BiFC-VN173 between BmtI and KpnI, and the full length of the H4-encoding gene his-1was subcloned in-frame into pCE-BiFC-VC155 between BmtI and KpnI. The his-1 gene encodes for an ortholog of human histone H4, which shares a similar epitope-target that is specific to the anti-H4K8ac antibody (ab15823, Abcam). The BiFC plasmid constructs were injected into N2 worms at 15 ng/μL each, together with coel::RFP at 100 ng/μL (coinjection marker) [33]. To detect the interaction, transgenic animals carrying the BiFC plasmid constructs were raised to young adults at 20°C, heat shocked for 3 hours at 33°C, and allowed to recover for 12 hours at 20°C. Direct visualization of fluorescent signals of the induced expression of fusion proteins (PAR-5 and H4) were captured using a Leica M165 FC fluorescence stereomicroscope. The BiFC assay involving RNAi of par-5 gene transcript was performed and compared to vector control. Coelomocytes RFP-labelled transgenic animals were first gated using the red channel, and the green fluorescence intensity of transgenic animals was measured using the Copas Biosort instrument (Union Biometrica, Holliston, Massachusetts, USA).

Statistical analysis

Two-tailed Student t test for independent samples was used to analyze the data. For comparing the means of more than two groups, one-way ANOVA with post hoc analysis was performed. All the experiments were repeated at least 3 times and error bars represent the standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated. The data were judged to be statistically significant when P < 0.05. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. P. aeruginosa infection and intestinal distension induce H4K8ac in the germline.

(A) Quantification of band density of western blots assay performed on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000). (B) Quantification of band density of western blots assay performed on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following aex-5 (n ≈ 1,000) and (C) eat-2 RNAi (n ≈ 1,000). Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected, and the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli sample or the control E. coli vector sample for the RNAi assays. The fer-1(b232) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4-stage animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. Pathogen exposure was performed at 25°C for 24 hours. (D) Quantification of immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody post exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed for the above experiments (A–D, except for H3K4me3 immunoblot assay). “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; H3K4me1, monomethylation of histone H3 Lys4; H3K4me3, trimethylation of histone H3 Lys4; RNAi, RNA interference.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Intact germline is required for pathogen or bloating induced H4K8ac.

(A) Quantification of band density of western blots assay from fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals exposed to E. coli or P. aeruginosa for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000). Four independent experiments were performed. The densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control fer-1 E. coli sample. (B) Quantification of immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 and glp-1(e2141) animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody after exposure to P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n = 5). (C) CFU of wild-type N2 or glp-1(e2141) animals grown on vector control, aex-5 RNAi, or eat-2 RNAi were exposed to P. aeruginosa-GFP for 48 hours at 20°C. Bars represent mean log10 CFU ± SEM. The fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1 animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4 animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. Pathogen exposure was performed at 25°C for 24 hours, unless otherwise indicated. (D) Representative microscopic images of wild-type N2 animals treated with vector control or nol-6 RNAi and stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody following exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C. (E) Quantification of immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody post exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following nol-6 RNAi (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed for the above experiments (B–E). “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. CFU, colony-forming unit; GFP, green fluorescent protein; H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. PAR-5 is required for H4K8ac.

(A) Coimmunoprecipitation of PAR-5 using anti-H4K8ac antibody followed by western blot detection of PAR-5 on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi (n ≈ 2,000). Error bar represents ±SEM. Three independent experiments were performed. (B) Quantification of band density of western blots assay performed on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli or P. aeruginosa for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi (n ≈ 1,000). Three independent experiments were performed. Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected; the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli vector sample. (C) Quantification of the immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody after exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) following par-5 RNAi (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. PAR-5 is required for pathogen avoidance.

(A) Lawn occupancy of wild-type N2 or ftt-2(n4426) animals at 24 hours following par-5 RNAi at 25°C (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. (B) Western blot detection of FTT-2 or PAR-5 and (C) its quantification on extracts of fer-1(b232) animals, exposed to E. coli (E.c) or P. aeruginosa (P.a) for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi (n ≈ 1,000). Two independent experiments were performed. Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected, and the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli vector sample. The fer-1(b232) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4-stage animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. RNAi, RNA interference; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. PAR-5 is required for P. aeruginosa-mediated H4K8ac in the germline.

Western blot detection and quantification of H4K8ac on different tissue-specific RNAi animals upon par-5 RNAi and subsequent exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000). Three independent experiments were performed. Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected, and the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli vector sample. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **P ≤ 0.005. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. PAR-5 is required for P. aeruginosa-induced H4K8ac in the germline.

(A) Whole-mount immunofluorescence profiles of tissue-specific RNAi animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody. (B) Quantification of immunofluorescence of tissue-specific RNAi animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C, following par-5 RNAi induction for 24 hours (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Pathogen exposure and intestinal distension of P0 maternal animals increases H4K8ac levels in the germline of F1 offspring.

Quantification of immunofluorescence of H4K8ac levels on F1 progeny from P0 maternal animals exposed to E. coli (E. c), P. aeruginosa (P. a), or heat-killed E. coli (HK E. c) (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation.

(TIF)

S1 Raw Images. Original uncropped blot images.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Raw data and quantitative observations for all main and supporting figures.

(XLSX)

S1 Table. List of histone H4 Lys8 acetylation interacting proteins.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (Univ. of Minnesota) for the strains used in this study, Dr. Andy Golden (NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) for providing anti-FTT-2 and anti-PAR-5 antibodies, Dr. Casey Hoffman and Dr. Abiola O. Olaitan for technical advice, and Dr. Jogender Singh for the suggestions.

Abbreviations

BiFC

bimolecular fluorescence complementation

ChIP-MS

chromatin immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry

DMP

defecation motor program

GFP

green fluorescent protein

H4K8ac

histone H4 Lys8 acetylation

H3K4me1

monomethylation of histone H3 Lys4

H3K4me3

trimethylation of histone H3 Lys4

PTM

posttranslational modifications

RNAi

RNA interference

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant number AI117911 (AA) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant number GM070977 (AA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Goncalves D, Vinera J, Zitoun C, Duchampt A, et al. Microbiota-generated metabolites promote metabolic benefits via gut-brain neural circuits. Cell. 2014;156:84–96. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Han W, Tellez LA, Perkins MH, Perez IO, Qu T, Ferreira J, et al. A neural circuit for gut-induced reward. Cell. 2018;175:665–678.e23. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaelberer MM, Buchanan KL, Klein ME, Barth BB, Montoya MM, Shen X, et al. A gut-brain neural circuit for nutrient sensory transduction. Science. 2018;361. 10.1126/science.aat5236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Williams EK, Chang RB, Strochlic DE, Umans BD, Lowell BB, Liberles SD. Sensory neurons that detect stretch and nutrients in the digestive system. Cell. 2016;166:209–221. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Labed SA, Wani KA, Jagadeesan S, Hakkim A, Najibi M, Irazoqui JE. Intestinal epithelial wnt signaling mediates acetylcholine-triggered host defense against infection. Immunity. 2018;48:963–978.e4. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, Sharon G, Hyde ER, McCue T, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell. 2013;155:1451–1463. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell. 2016;165:1762–1775. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kishimoto S, Uno M, Okabe E, Nono M, Nishida E. Environmental stresses induce transgenerationally inheritable survival advantages via germline-to-soma communication in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–12. 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nono M, Kishimoto S, Sato-Carlton A, Carlton PM, Nishida E, Uno M. Intestine-to-germline transmission of epigenetic information intergenerationally ensures systemic stress resistance in C. elegans. Cell Rep. 2020;30:3207–3217.e4. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen D, Li PWL, Goldstein BA, Cai W, Thomas EL, Chen F, et al. Germline signaling mediates the synergistically prolonged longevity produced by double mutations in daf-2 and rsks-1 in C.elegans. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1600–1610. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee HJ, Noormohammadi A, Koyuncu S, Calculli G, Simic MS, Herholz M, et al. Prostaglandin signals from adult germline stem cells delay somatic ageing of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Metab. 2019;1:790–810. 10.1038/s42255-019-0097-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jin X, Pokala N, Bargmann CI. Distinct circuits for the formation and retrieval of an imprinted olfactory memory. Cell. 2016;164:632–643. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Styer KL, Singh V, Macosko E, Steele SE, Bargmann CI, Aballay A. Innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans is regulated by neurons expressing NPR-1/GPCR. Science. 2008;322:460–464. 10.1126/science.1163673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH. Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell. 2014;159:267–280. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cao X, Kajino-Sakamoto R, Doss A, Aballay A. Distinct roles of sensory neurons in mediating pathogen avoidance and neuropeptide-dependent immune regulation. Cell Rep. 2017;21:1442–1451. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh J, Aballay A. Microbial colonization activates an immune fight-and-flight response via neuroendocrine signaling. Dev Cell. 2019;49:89–99.e4. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh J, Aballay A. Intestinal infection regulates behavior and learning via neuroendocrine signaling. Elife. 2019;8. 10.7554/eLife.50033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gryder BE, Pomella S, Sayers C, Wu XS, Song Y, Chiarella AM, et al. Histone hyperacetylation disrupts core gene regulatory architecture in rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1714–1722. 10.1038/s41588-019-0534-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Campbell RR, Wood MA. How the epigenome integrates information and reshapes the synapse. Nat Rev Neurosci. Nature Publishing Group; 2019. pp. 133–147. 10.1038/s41583-019-0121-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ho JWK, Jung YL, Liu T, Alver BH, Lee S, Ikegami K, et al. Comparative analysis of metazoan chromatin organization. Nature. 2014;512: 449–452. 10.1038/nature13415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou VW, Goren A, Bernstein BE. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2011. pp. 7–18. 10.1038/nrg2905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kimura H. Histone modifications for human epigenome analysis. J Hum Genet. 2013: 439–445. 10.1038/jhg.2013.66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saeed S, Quintin J, Kerstens HHD, Rao NA, Aghajanirefah A, Matarese F, et al. Epigenetic programming of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and trained innate immunity. Science. 2014;345:1251086. 10.1126/science.1251086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jaskiewicz M, Conrath U, Peterhälnsel C. Chromatin modification acts as a memory for systemic acquired resistance in the plant stress response. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:50–55. 10.1038/embor.2010.186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Achanzar WE, Ward S. A nematode gene required for sperm vesicle fusion. J Cell Sci. 1997;110:1073–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar S, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Schneider DL, Murphy JT, Diwan A, et al. Lifespan extension in C. elegans caused by bacterial colonization of the intestine and subsequent activation of an innate immune response. Dev Cell. 2019;49:100–117.e6. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Austin J, Kimble J. glp-1 Is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell. 1987;51:589–599. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90128-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Crittenden SL, Troemel ER, Evans TC, Kimble J. GLP-1 is localized to the mitotic region of the C. elegans germ line. Development. 1994;120:2901–2911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.TeKippe M, Aballay A. C. elegans Germline-deficient mutants respond to pathogen infection using shared and distinct mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11777. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fuhrman LE, Goel AK, Smith J, Shianna K V., Aballay A. Nucleolar proteins suppress Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity by inhibiting p53/CEP-1. PLoS Genet. 2009;5. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aristizábal-Corrales D, Fontrodona L, Porta-de-la-Riva M, Guerra-Moreno A, Cerón J, Schwartz S. The 14-3-3 gene par-5 is required for germline development and DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1716–1726. 10.1242/jcs.094896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gomes JE, Bowerman B. Caenorhabditis elegans par genes. Curr Biol. 2002;12. 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00939-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kerppola TK. Design and implementation of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays for the visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1278–1286. 10.1038/nprot.2006.201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang W, Shakes DC. Expression patterns and transcript processing of ftt-1 and ftt-2, two C. elegans 14-3-3 homologues. J Mol Biol. 1997;268:619–630. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moore RS, Kaletsky R, Murphy CT. Piwi/PRG-1 argonaute and TGF-β mediate transgenerational learned pathogenic avoidance. Cell. 2019;177:1827–1841.e12. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pereira AG, Gracida X, Kagias K, Zhang Y. C elegans aversive olfactory learning generates diverse intergenerational effects. J Neurogenet. 2020. 10.1080/01677063.2020.1819265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Singh J, Aballay A. Endoplasmic reticulum stress caused by lipoprotein accumulation suppresses immunity against bacterial pathogens and contributes to immunosenescence. MBio. 2017;8. 10.1128/mBio.00778-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

10 Jul 2020

Dear Dr Aballay,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Microbial colonization induces histone acetylation critical for inherited gut-germline-neural signaling" for consideration as a Short Reports by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by Jul 13 2020 11:59PM.

Login to Editorial Manager here: https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology

During resubmission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF when you re-submit.

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. Once your manuscript has passed all checks it will be sent out for review.

Given the disruptions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, please expect delays in the editorial process. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience caused and will do our best to minimize impact as far as possible.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road

Cambridge, CB4 3DN

+44 1223–446970

Decision Letter 1

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

14 Sep 2020

Dear Dr Aballay,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Microbial colonization induces histone acetylation critical for inherited gut-germline-neural signaling" for consideration as a Short Report at PLOS Biology. Thank you also for your patience as we completed our editorial process, and please accept my sincere apologies for the delay in providing you with our decision. Your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by three independent reviewers.

As you will see, the reviewers find the conclusions interesting and significant for the field, however they also raise several concerns that should be addressed before we can consider the manuscript for publication. While both Reviewers 2 and 3 mainly ask for several controls, the use of appropriate statistical tests and clarifications, Reviewer 1 finds the conclusions correlative rather than causative and suggests several experiments to address this issue. After discussing the reviews with the academic editor, we think the concerns raised by this reviewer are valid. Although we note this reviewer missed the details included in the manuscript about how the ChIP-MS was performed, the concerns raised need to be addressed experimentally. Specifically, you would need to add data to strengthen the connection between pathogen avoidance and the germline, and to more convincingly demonstrate that PAR-5 interacts with H4K8ac. Depending on how some of the major comments of this reviewer are addressed, we would consider the merit of converting the manuscript into a Research Article.

In light of the reviews (attached below), we will not be able to accept the current version of the manuscript, but we would welcome re-submission of a revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments. We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent for further evaluation by the reviewers.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 3 months.

Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension. At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may end consideration of the manuscript at PLOS Biology.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

*Re-submission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this re-submission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

---------------------------------------------

Reviewers' comments

Rev. 1:

Hong and Aballay present a study that describes H4K8ac as a epigenetic mark in response to exposure to the pathogen PA14. They've shown that there is an increase in H4K8ac marks following pathogen exposure. The authors use a combination of genetics, RNAi, and biochemistry to define a germline response to PA14 with the ability to impact subsequent generations. In addition, the authors define additional players in system that to begin developing a pathway for this innate immunity response. While the data is presented clearly, there are some concerns with regard to interpretation of the results and the methodologies used that reduce enthusiasm for this short article. This potential importance of this finding and the need to identify additional mechanistic details suggest this should be a full length article as in its present form many of the conclusion are correlative rather than causative.

Major concerns:

The biggest drawback to this study is the lack of identification of the enzymes responsible for the addition of H4K8ac marks.

Using glp-1 completely gets rid of germline so there could be confounding factors that affect pathogen avoidance, which are known. Why not use germline restricted RNAi or other germcell manipulations (or gonad loss mutants) to strengthen this section? Although glp-1 mutants can indeed reduce the number of germ cells, they do not abolish all germ cells (it is incomplete). Intriguingly, glp-1 mutants appear to have a low-level of H4K8ac (Figure 2A) with E.coli that does not increase with PA14?

The identification of PAR-5 is not clear. It was identified by ChIP-ms? More details are needed here as I assume this was done with the H4K8ac antibody, but it isn't clear why this would directly pull down PAR-5. The authors should show that PAR-5 is binding directly to H4K8ac or define what it is interacting with. What is missing is a clear identification of what is PAR-5 regulating since it is a cytoplasmic chaperone. Since PAR-5 is important for embryo development and knockdown of par-5 could affect the germline in other ways as well the connection to H4K8ac is confounded.

Based on the IF results, there appears to be some somatic cells with H4K8ac marks? Could the authors look at the levels of H4K8ac marks either through WB or IF for the tissue specific RNAi.

The connection to pathogen avoidance is the weakest as the germline has been shown to impact this response. The authors could look at H4K8ac levels in ftt-2 knockdown worms too, since they share so much homology with PAR-5 but don't affect avoidance.

Lastly, the authors should check what happens to H4K8ac marks following PA14 exposure if intestinal distension is suppressed like with nol-6 RNAi. If H4K8ac marks don't appear if intestinal distension is suppressed that would help back their claim.

Minor concerns:

There are several temperature sensitive mutants used, but it is sometimes unclear what temperatures were used for raising animals in development, versus adulthood, verus experiment. Most seem to be done at 25 (with some exceptions), but the methods state that experiments were done at 20, unless otherwise indicated. It would be nice to have this explicitly outlines for each experiments.

The authors include a whole section where they introduce PAR-5 and how 14-3-3 chaperones are involved with PTMs such as H4K8ac without citations.

Similarly, the transgenerational marks for H4K8ac are cool, but they should reference work that has already shown transgenerational inheritance of pathogen avoidance and specifically Coleen Murphy's work as possible future targets of study or H4K8ac inheritance.

Rev. 2:

Although many bacterial infections are restricted to the intestine, there is increasing evidence that infection causes signaling between different tissues. C. elegans is a powerful system to study bacterial infections, pathogen avoidance, and effects that are passed down between generations. In this manuscript the authors investigate the connection between the intestine and germline, and how this effects animal behavior. The authors find that infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces H4Kac methylation in the germline. This methylation also occurs by knocking down several genes that cause intestinal distension. These RNAi conditions also induce pathogen avoidance which is dependant on the germline. The authors also identify PAR-5 as interacting with H4Kac. The authors show that PAR-5 is necessary for H4Kac methylation in the germline and for bacterial avoidance. Finally, the authors show that under conditions that induce this methylation, that it can be passed on to the next generation and the progeny have increased bacterial avoidance. This is a very interesting and well-carried out study that provides new insight into the connection between the intestine and germline and how communication between these tissues can influence behavior.

Major point:

1. The authors claim that "results demonstrate that enhanced H4K8ac in the germline is required for the transgenerational pathogen avoidance induced by bloating caused by bacterial colonization of the intestine" and claim in 4c that PAR-5 is required for this transgenerational effect. The authors do not show that animals that lack H4K8ac in the germline generate progeny that are defective for bacterial avoidance. They also don't show that PAR-5 is necessary for this transgenerational effect. All though this experiment is not possible with par-5 RNAi, the authors should either conditionally deplete PAR-5 (such as with auxin inducible degradation) in the P0s, or reword the text and figure to remove these claims.

Minor points:

1.The convention in the field is to only use "transgenerational" to refer to effects that are passed down at least three generations (Perez and Lehner nature cell biology 2019). Effects that are only shown to be passed down a single generation are referred to as "intergenerational". Although the effect shown in this manuscript may indeed be transgenerational, the authors haven't shown this. The authors should either test how many generations this effect lasts, or change the text to clarify that it maybe either intergenerational or transgenerational.

2. Insert in the following sentence "not" after "did": "As shown in Fig 2B, inhibition of aex-5 and eat-2 did elicit pathogen avoidance in glp-1 animals."

3. In Figure 1C and 3A, outlines of the germline are necessary as it is hard to know where the germline is in the current fluorescent images.

4. Other examples of pathogen avoidance being transmitted to progeny have been demonstrated in C. elegans and should be cited:

Moore RS, Kaletsky R & Murphy CT (2019) Piwi/PRG-1 Argonaute and TGF-beta Mediate Transgenerational Learned Pathogenic Avoidance. Cell 177, 1827-1841.e12.

If preprints can be cited:

Kaletsky R, Moore RS, Vrla GD, Parsons LL, Gitai Z & Murphy CT (2020) C. elegans "reads" bacterial non-coding RNAs to learn pathogenic avoidance. bioRxiv, 2020.01.26.920322.

Pereira AG, Gracida X, Kagias K & Zhang Y (2020) C. elegans aversive olfactory learning generates diverse intergenerational effects. bioRxiv, 2020.02.07.939017.

5. There are several instances of "C elegans" which should be "C. elegans".

Rev. 3:

The work of Hong and Aballay aims at contributing to the elucidation of the mechanisms involved in the determination of behavior by signaling from the gut. The particular question the group is addressing is how the intestinal distention caused by bacteria P. aeruginosa in C. elegans mediates avoidance behaviors (by measuring the permanence of animals in the pathogen’s lawn). The authors find that the acetylation of lysine 8 in histone 4 in the gonad is caused by intestinal distention and is essential for both behavioral avoidance and inheritance. Authors highlight a role for the gonad in the intestinal-brain communication axis that triggers behavioral change. This is a fascinating topic of great significance for the field.

I suggest a number of issues need to be addressed:

1. There is no mention in the text of the role of histone modification and specifically of what the H4K8ac is doing transcriptionally. Also, authors do not discuss why this specific modification could be occurring compared to H3K4me3 or H3K4me1, and why were these three selected.

2. Authors used a t-test for their analysis (as mentioned in the methods section). They should instead use a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc analysis for those experiments that contain more than two conditions.

3. Figure 1C. It is really hard to see the gonad in these pictures or distinguish it from any other structure. A bright field or Nomarski picture should be provided and a marker to confirm the localization of the marks. It would be important to show whether neurons are also marked. Can authors explain why animals appear curved?

4. As in point 3, images in Figure S5 need improving. It is hard to distinguish the germline in the photos. Also, there is expression (red color) elsewhere. Which cells are those? It is important that authors show Nomarski images for those staining’s. It will really help to show an independent marker for the gonad or provide clear DAPI images.

5. Figure legends need more detail. For example: Quantification of western blots of extracts from fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. C) or P. aeruginosa (P. A). What is it that is being quantified? Fold change of what? How is this calculated? How many animals in each experiment? In the same line, this should be clarified in the figure axis (applies to all graphs with fold change). For those graphs quantifying intensity of histone acetylation, the same clarification will be important. Are those pixels? Intensity over a control?

6. In the second paragraph of the second section of results reads “As shown in Fig 2B, inhibition of aex-5 and eat-2 did elicit pathogen avoidance in glp-1 animals”. What figure 2B shows is the opposite. I imagine this is a typo (an important one) given what is said afterward.

7. Figure 2C will be very hard to understand for a general audience. I suggest (as mentioned before for the other images) to include a Nomarski image. In these pictures, the glp-1 mutants do not appear equally colonized by PA14-GFP as wild type animals. Additionally, there are other methods that more accurately measure the number of bacteria colonizing the animal intestine (CFU count for instance).

8. The experimental paradigm used in this work does not correspond to transgenerationally inherited phenomena. For an effect to be transgenerational animals should skip at least one generation of encounter to the pathogen and the following generation examined (see Rechavi’s papers for examples of transgenerational paradigms. For transgenerational effects involving pathogens see Palominos et al., 2017 or Moore et al., 2019). The effect observed here could be called intergenerational instead.

9. In the quantifications of immunofluorescence (Supplementary Figures) the n values seem to be random. For example:

S6 Fig n=4

S8 Fig. n=5

S11 Fig n=20

Are these n=4, n=5, n=20 per condition? 4, 5 or 20 on each bacterium or RNAi experiment? Or is it the total of animals screened. In any case, why are the numbers so different?

10. Other points (or simple suggestions):

• I suggest to mention throughout the text the strain of P. aeruginosa used is PA14.

• In the first paragraph of the Results section authors state “P. aeruginosa colonization specifically induces histone H4K8 acetylation in the infected animals”. In the following paragraph it is said that distention alone causes H4K8 acetylation. This apparent contradiction could be avoided by rephrasing the first sentence with “colonization” or other similar word because at that point they do not know whether it is specific to the pathogen.

• It would be nice if all graphs had a homogenous font size.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review Hong and Aballay.docx

Decision Letter 2

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

4 Feb 2021

Dear Dr Aballay,

Thank you for submitting your revised Short Reports entitled "Microbial colonization induces histone acetylation critical for inherited gut-germline-neural signaling" for publication in PLOS Biology. I have now obtained advice from the three original reviewers and have discussed their comments with the Academic Editor. 

Based on the reviews, we will probably accept this manuscript for publication, assuming that you will modify the manuscript to address the data and other policy-related requests noted at the end of this email.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within two weeks.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following:

-  a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests.

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information  

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods 

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

PLOS Biology

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY: IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ

You may be aware of the PLOS Data Policy, which requires that all data be made available without restriction: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability. For more information, please also see this editorial: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797 

Note that we do not require all raw data. Rather, we ask that all individual quantitative observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures and results of your paper be made available in one of the following forms:

1) Supplementary files (e.g., excel). Please ensure that all data files are uploaded as 'Supporting Information' and are invariably referred to (in the manuscript, figure legends, and the Description field when uploading your files) using the following format verbatim: S1 Data, S2 Data, etc. Multiple panels of a single or even several figures can be included as multiple sheets in one excel file that is saved using exactly the following convention: S1_Data.xlsx (using an underscore).

2) Deposition in a publicly available repository. Please also provide the accession code or a reviewer link so that we may view your data before publication. 

Regardless of the method selected, please ensure that you provide the individual numerical values that underlie the summary data displayed in the following figure panels as they are essential for readers to assess your analysis and to reproduce it:

Fig. 2C, E; Fig. 3B, C, G, H; Fig. 4B; Fig. S1A-D; Fig. S2A-C, E; Fig. S3A-C; Fig. S4A, C; Fig. S5; Fig. S6B and Fig. S7

NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values).

Please also ensure that figure legends in your manuscript include information on WHERE THE UNDERLYING DATA CAN BE FOUND, and ensure your supplemental data file/s has a legend.

Please ensure that your Data Statement in the submission system accurately describes where your data can be found.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

BLOT AND GEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

For manuscripts submitted on or after 1st July 2019, we require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare and upload them now. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements 

---------------------------------------------------------

Reviewers’ comments

Rev. 1:

The authors have thoroughly responded to all reviewers comments. This is a very nice study.

Rev. 2:

The authors have addressed all of my concerns and I now enthusiastically support the publication of the article.

Rev. 3: Andrea Calixto - this reviewer has waived anonymity

The authors have answered all my questions and done the proposed improvements to the manuscript. I especially appreciate all the effort done to perform new experiments which required the inclusion of new authors. This work is an important contribution to the field.

Decision Letter 3

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

27 Feb 2021

Dear Dr Aballay,

Thank you for submitting your revised Short Reports entitled "Microbial colonization induces histone acetylation critical for inherited gut-germline-neural signaling" for publication in PLOS Biology.

We are almost satisfied with the manuscript, but we do have two questions about the data that should be addressed:

Figure S1C: Values in independent assays 1 and 2 are exactly the same. Are these really independent or is it a mistake? If so, please correct it and add the right values.

Figure S4C. There are only 2 replicas – could you please explain why? Please note that we do require 3 replicates for all experiments.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within one week.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

PLOS Biology

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org

Decision Letter 4

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

4 Mar 2021

Dear Dr Aballay,

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Jennifer Garrison, I am pleased to say that we can in principle offer to publish your Short Report entitled "Microbial colonization induces histone acetylation critical for inherited gut-germline-neural signaling" in PLOS Biology, provided you address any remaining formatting and reporting issues. These will be detailed in an email that will follow this letter and that you will usually receive within 2-3 business days, during which time no action is required from you. Please note that we will not be able to formally accept your manuscript and schedule it for publication until you have made the required changes.

Please take a minute to log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production process.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing. We look forward to publishing your paper in PLOS Biology. 

Sincerely, 

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD 

Senior Editor 

PLOS Biology

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. P. aeruginosa infection and intestinal distension induce H4K8ac in the germline.

    (A) Quantification of band density of western blots assay performed on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000). (B) Quantification of band density of western blots assay performed on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following aex-5 (n ≈ 1,000) and (C) eat-2 RNAi (n ≈ 1,000). Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected, and the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli sample or the control E. coli vector sample for the RNAi assays. The fer-1(b232) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4-stage animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. Pathogen exposure was performed at 25°C for 24 hours. (D) Quantification of immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody post exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following aex-5 and eat-2 RNAi (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed for the above experiments (A–D, except for H3K4me3 immunoblot assay). “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; H3K4me1, monomethylation of histone H3 Lys4; H3K4me3, trimethylation of histone H3 Lys4; RNAi, RNA interference.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Intact germline is required for pathogen or bloating induced H4K8ac.

    (A) Quantification of band density of western blots assay from fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals exposed to E. coli or P. aeruginosa for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000). Four independent experiments were performed. The densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control fer-1 E. coli sample. (B) Quantification of immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 and glp-1(e2141) animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody after exposure to P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n = 5). (C) CFU of wild-type N2 or glp-1(e2141) animals grown on vector control, aex-5 RNAi, or eat-2 RNAi were exposed to P. aeruginosa-GFP for 48 hours at 20°C. Bars represent mean log10 CFU ± SEM. The fer-1(b232) and glp-1(e2141) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1 animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4 animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. Pathogen exposure was performed at 25°C for 24 hours, unless otherwise indicated. (D) Representative microscopic images of wild-type N2 animals treated with vector control or nol-6 RNAi and stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody following exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C. (E) Quantification of immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody post exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following nol-6 RNAi (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed for the above experiments (B–E). “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. CFU, colony-forming unit; GFP, green fluorescent protein; H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. PAR-5 is required for H4K8ac.

    (A) Coimmunoprecipitation of PAR-5 using anti-H4K8ac antibody followed by western blot detection of PAR-5 on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi (n ≈ 2,000). Error bar represents ±SEM. Three independent experiments were performed. (B) Quantification of band density of western blots assay performed on fer-1(b232) animals exposed to E. coli or P. aeruginosa for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi (n ≈ 1,000). Three independent experiments were performed. Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected; the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli vector sample. (C) Quantification of the immunofluorescence of wild-type N2 animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody after exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) following par-5 RNAi (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.0005, ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. PAR-5 is required for pathogen avoidance.

    (A) Lawn occupancy of wild-type N2 or ftt-2(n4426) animals at 24 hours following par-5 RNAi at 25°C (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. (B) Western blot detection of FTT-2 or PAR-5 and (C) its quantification on extracts of fer-1(b232) animals, exposed to E. coli (E.c) or P. aeruginosa (P.a) for 24 hours at 25°C following par-5 RNAi (n ≈ 1,000). Two independent experiments were performed. Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected, and the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli vector sample. The fer-1(b232) animals were maintained at 15°C. To induce sterility, L1-stage animals were transferred to 25°C and allowed to develop. L4-stage animals were then transferred to RNAi plates and allowed to grow for 24 hours at 25°C. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; ****P ≤ 0.0001. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. RNAi, RNA interference; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. PAR-5 is required for P. aeruginosa-mediated H4K8ac in the germline.

    Western blot detection and quantification of H4K8ac on different tissue-specific RNAi animals upon par-5 RNAi and subsequent exposure to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C (n ≈ 1,000). Three independent experiments were performed. Chemiluminescence signals from samples were detected, and the densities of the protein bands were quantified and represented as fold change. Fold change is the ratio of mean density of a given sample over the control E. coli vector sample. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **P ≤ 0.005. See S1 Raw Images for uncropped immunoblot images and S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. PAR-5 is required for P. aeruginosa-induced H4K8ac in the germline.

    (A) Whole-mount immunofluorescence profiles of tissue-specific RNAi animals stained with anti-H4K8ac antibody. (B) Quantification of immunofluorescence of tissue-specific RNAi animals exposed to E. coli (E. c) or P. aeruginosa (P. a) for 24 hours at 25°C, following par-5 RNAi induction for 24 hours (n = 5). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation; RNAi, RNA interference.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Pathogen exposure and intestinal distension of P0 maternal animals increases H4K8ac levels in the germline of F1 offspring.

    Quantification of immunofluorescence of H4K8ac levels on F1 progeny from P0 maternal animals exposed to E. coli (E. c), P. aeruginosa (P. a), or heat-killed E. coli (HK E. c) (n = 20). Three independent experiments were performed. “n” represents the number of animals for each experiment. “ns” indicates nonsignificant; “*” asterisk indicates significant difference; **P ≤ 0.005, ***P ≤ 0.0005. See S1 Data for the corresponding data. H4K8ac, histone H4 Lys8 acetylation.

    (TIF)

    S1 Raw Images. Original uncropped blot images.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Raw data and quantitative observations for all main and supporting figures.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Table. List of histone H4 Lys8 acetylation interacting proteins.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review Hong and Aballay.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES