Abstract
Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a derivative from the gut microbiota metabolite trimethylamine (TMA), has been identified to be an independent risk factor for promoting atherosclerosis. Evidences suggest that berberine (BBR) could be used to treat obesity, diabetes and atherosclerosis, however, its mechanism is not clear mainly because of its poor oral bioavailability. Here, we show that BBR attenuated TMA/TMAO production in the C57BL/6J and ApoE KO mice fed with choline-supplemented chow diet, and mitigated atherosclerotic lesion areas in ApoE KO mice. Inhibition of TMA/TMAO production by BBR-modulated gut microbiota was proved by a single-dose administration of d9-choline in vivo. Metagenomic analysis of cecal contents demonstrated that BBR altered gut microbiota composition, microbiome functionality, and cutC/cntA gene abundance. Furthermore, BBR was shown to inhibit choline-to-TMA conversion in TMA-producing bacteria in vitro and in gut microbial consortium from fecal samples of choline-fed mice and human volunteers, and the result was confirmed by transplantation of TMA-producing bacteria in mice. These results offer new insights into the mechanisms responsible for the anti-atherosclerosis effects of BBR, which inhibits commensal microbial TMA production via gut microbiota remodeling.
Subject terms: Microbiome, Health care
Introduction
Atherosclerosis is the main pathological basis for cardiovascular disease, which is one of the leading causes of death worldwide1. While genetics have been shown to play a strong role in the development of atherosclerosis, environmental factors, such as diet and lifestyle, may also be a prominent contributor to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease2,3. Gut microbiota that reside in the intestinal tract has been linked to numerous pathologies, including cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome4–6. For example, host cholesterol homeostasis, which includes modulating cholesterol levels, biosynthesis, and trafficking, is regulated by gut microbiota in addition to genetic and environmental factors7. The gut microbiota can convert diet nutrients into various small-molecule metabolites that enter the blood and can modulate host cardiovascular physiology8–10. In fact, some gut microbiota-derived metabolites have been associated with the progress of cardiovascular diseases. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are major products of gut microbial fermentation of nondigestible dietary fibers including acetate, propionate and butyrate, and may provide metabolic and cardiovascular benefits11. For example, with well-characterized anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties12,13, butyrate was recently found to be anti-atherosclerosis by increasing ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux in peripheral macrophages14. Secondary bile acids, another kind of important gut microbiota metabolites, have been linked to lipid and glucose metabolism and prevention of atherosclerosis by functioning as signaling molecules15–17.
Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO), a gut microbiota-associated metabolite, has been reported to increase atherosclerosis risk, independent of known major atherosclerosis risk factors such as plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level and chronic inflammation18–20. In general, trimethylamine (TMA)-containing nutrients including choline, phosphatidylcholine and carnitine can be metabolized by several distinct gut microbial enzyme complexes including CutC/D and CntA/B to generate TMA21,22. TMA then enters the host circulation and is further metabolized to TMAO by host enzymes of the flavin monooxygenase (FMO) family in the liver23. In line with this notion, the production of TMA was proposed to be a pathway that might be therapeutically targeted at the level of gut microbiota. Several choline or betaine analogues were found or designed based on the ‘natural substrate’ mimicking strategy and characterized as specific CutC/D inhibitors. 3,3-dimethyl-1-butanol (DMB), betaine aldehyde and halomethylcholines showed TMA production inhibition from various human gut bacteria isolates containing cutC/D genes and human fecal suspensions. They could suppress plasma TMAO levels and reversed the choline diet-enhanced atherosclerosis and thrombus formation in mice24–26. Natural product resveratrol was also found to inhibit the choline metabolism by gut microbiota in mice, thus reduce the production of TMAO and retard the progression of atherosclerosis27.
Berberine (BBR) is an isoquinoline alkaloid extracted from herbal plants such as Coptis chinensis and Berberis vulgaris, which is traditionally used for the treatment of bacterial diarrhea in China. Its therapeutic effects in cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders have been clinically verified, and its molecular mechanisms of action have also been well illuminated28–31, e.g., BBR could reduce serum TDL and LDL cholesterol by stabilizing LDLR mRNA to post-transcriptionally increase LDLR expression32. However, with regard to its good therapeutic efficacy, the oral bioavailability of BBR is so poor that more than 99% of orally administrated BBR cannot be absorbed33,34. Like most traditional Chinese medicines35, BBR is usually administered orally and is inevitably exposed to the gut microbiota, thus BBR might also work through remodeling gut microbiota to reestablish host homeostasis. Some studies have shown that BBR may regulate the metabolism of the host at least partially via gut microbiota36 and their derived metabolites such as SCFAs37 and secondary bile acids38. Recently, Shi et al.39 showed that the anti-atherosclerotic effect of BBR on high-fat diet-fed ApoE KO mice was related to alterations in gut microbiota compositions and a lower serum TMAO level. However, the role of BBR in gut microbiota and its mode of action in decreasing choline-TMA-TMAO related atherosclerosis, independent of cholesterol homeostasis, are still largely unclear.
Given the close association among BBR, gut microbiota, TMAO and pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the goal of this study is to examine the role of BBR in gut microbiota remodeling and TMA/TMAO generation in C57BL/6J and ApoE KO mice with atherosclerosis induced by choline-supplemented chow diet. We found that BBR decreased choline to TMA conversion and ultimately the serum TMAO level, and attenuated atherosclerosis development by remodeling gut microbiota through reducing functional gene levels of cutC and cntA, key genes of the main TMA-synthesis pathways. The inhibition of choline-to-TMA transformation by BBR was observed in some known TMA-producing bacteria cultured anaerobically in vitro and in choline-fed mice by transplantation of TMA-producing bacteria. Furthermore, BBR could reduce TMA production in the gut microbial consortium from feces of choline-fed mice and human volunteers, providing new evidences for the potential therapeutic value of BBR in treating atherosclerosis by modulating the gut microbiome.
Results
BBR decreased TMAO level in choline diet-fed C57BL/6J mice
In order to investigate the effect of BBR on TMAO production from choline, C57BL/6J mice were fed chow diet or choline (1%) supplemented chow diet with or without BBR treatment. The body weight and food intake were similar between the groups. As shown in Fig. 1a, b, the serum TMA and TMAO levels in chow diet-fed mice were 11.4 µM and 32.7 µM. Compared with that, 6-weeks choline treatment significantly increased both serum TMA and TMAO levels by 2.3 and 28.6 folds, respectively, which were abolished by antibiotics (Abs) treatment. These findings are consistent with the previous reports that gut microbiota plays a key role in the production of TMA from choline25. Of note, 200 mg/kg of BBR-treatment for 6 weeks significantly reversed the increase of TMAO induced by choline (Fig. 1b), although the inhibitory effect on TMA level was not significant at that point (Fig. 1a). Interestingly, although still drastically lower than that in choline-fed mice, both serum TMA and TMAO levels in chow diet-fed mice were dose-dependently increased by BBR, which was also inhibited by Abs treatment (Fig. 1a, b).
To investigate whether TMAO inhibition by BBR under choline condition is mediated by gut microbial remodeling, we first explored bacterial populations in the cecal content samples from four groups of mice (chow, BBR-H, Choline, C + BBR-H) by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequence analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Compared to choline-fed mice, alpha diversity was significantly reduced in the C + BBR-H group as measured using the Shannon index (Fig. 1c) as well as the Sobs, Chao, and Simpson index (Supplementary Fig. 1b). The overall structural changes of the gut microbiota were then analyzed via principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). The result showed a dramatic difference in microbiota composition among the four groups at OTU level (Fig. 1d). Based on the linear discriminant analysis (LDA), some bacteria were significantly enriched in choline-fed mice, while others were enriched in BBR-treated mice (Fig. 1e). In order to investigate if the microbial composition changes correlated with the BBR-induced decrease of TMAO levels, we performed a redundancy analysis (RDA) (Fig. 1f). Most samples in the choline-fed mice (8/10) were positively correlated to TMAO levels, and a negative correlation was shown in the BBR-treated mice (10/10), suggesting that decreasing TMAO level by BBR under choline diet was directly associated with gut microbiota changes. The above results indicated that a high-choline diet coupled with BBR treatment could induce gut microbiota composition changes in C57BL/6J mice, which were directly related to the TMAO level.
BBR decreased TMAO production and protected ApoE KO mice from TMAO-induced atherosclerosis
To further investigate whether BBR-mediated TMAO reduction improved the pathologic changes of atherosclerosis under high choline condition, ApoE KO mice were given 1% choline in the chow diet for 4 months. After 4 months’ treatment of 100 or 200 mg/kg BBR (BBR-L or BBR-H), the body weight and food intake were similar between the groups. The serum TMA and TMAO levels under chow diet were 11.4 and 353.9 µM respectively, which were significantly increased by 2.5 and 1.7 folds with 1% choline addition. The choline diet-induced increments of TMA and TMAO levels were significantly decreased by BBR in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2a, b). Similarly, in chow diet-fed ApoE KO mice, BBR decreased the serum TMA level in a dose-dependent manner, while serum TMAO level appeared unaffected (Fig. 2a, b).
To further investigate the TMAO formation in mice that were treated with choline and BBR for 4 months, we detected the d9-TMAO contents in serum after administration of a single dose of d9-choline (400 mg/kg of body weight) or d9-TMA (40 mg/kg) by intragastric gavage. First, TMAO contents in serum were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after administration of a single dose of choline (400 mg/kg) or TMA (40 mg/kg) in the C57BL/6J mice. It was found that peak concentrations of TMAO with the treatment of choline or TMA occurred 4 or 1 h after respective administration (Fig. 2c, d). These times points were used for subsequent experiments. Following a single dose of d9-choline, both serum d9-TMA and d9-TMAO levels decreased significantly in BBR-treated mice in the choline diet-fed group, while barely any d9-TMA and d9-TMAO were produced in Abs treated mice (Fig. 2e, f). These results suggested that BBR treatment inhibited the metabolism of choline to TMA and thus TMAO through gut microbiota in choline diet-fed ApoE KO mice.
In addition, when BBR-treated mice were given d9-TMA, d9-TMAO levels were also lower than those in the control group under choline condition, but not altered under chow condition (Fig. 2g). This suggests that BBR may inhibit the transition of TMA to TMAO in the liver of ApoE KO mice fed choline. We then determined the level of FMO3 mRNA in the liver, and consistently, the result showed that BBR decreased FMO3 expression in choline-fed ApoE KO mice but not in the chow groups (Fig. 2h).
Serum TMAO was reported to be tightly related to atherosclerosis19. Thus, we further investigated whether BBR-induced serum TMAO reduction was associated with the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE KO mice. Oil Red O (ORO) staining was used to visualize and assess atherosclerotic lesion development. As shown in Fig. 3a, b, choline markedly enhanced the atherosclerotic lesion areas in the whole aorta, and also increased lipid accumulation in the aortic root sections albeit not to a statistically significant level. All these effects were markedly reversed by BBR treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3a, b). In chow diet-fed mice, 200 mg/kg BBR also slightly reduced the atherosclerotic plaques in both the whole aorta (p = 0.09) and aortic root sections (p = 0.07). Mac-3 was identified as a macrophage-specific biomarker of macrophages-derived foam cells. The results from an immunostaining assay showed that BBR treatment in choline diet markedly reduced mac-3 positive macrophages content in aortic roots (Fig. 3c), which was consistent with the effect on ORO-stained lesion size (Fig. 3b). In addition, under choline diet BBR treatment increased the level of SM22α-positive smooth muscle cells albeit just outside of statistical significance (Fig. 3d), which indicated plaque remodeling to a rather early and more stable stage, a hallmark of atherosclerosis retarding. Consistent with previous studies, the tendency of serum TMA and TMAO among different groups showed a significant positive correlation with that of plaque area by Linear Regression analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2). Taken together, with 1% choline feeding, BBR promoted the clearance of lipid deposits and overall decreased atherosclerotic progress along with decreasing serum TMAO level. However, in ApoE KO mice there was no change in serum total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) or total bile acid (TBA) level in the BBR-treated group compared to the control group (Supplementary Fig. 3). These results suggested that decreasing TMAO originating from gut microbial metabolite TMA was the main cause of BBR’s atherosclerosis-protective role in this study. Also, BBR caused no damage to hepatic or renal function, as evidenced by no increase in serum levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), urea, creatinine (CRE) or total protein (TP). Even more, BBR markedly reversed choline diet-induced serum urea increment (Supplementary Fig. 3).
BBR decreased TMA and TMAO levels and atherosclerosis via remodeling microbiota in ApoE KO mice
To determine the role of the gut microbiota in the BBR-induced decrease of TMA and thus TMAO, we explored bacterial populations in the cecal contents of four groups ApoE KO mice (chow, BBR-H, Choline, C + BBR-H) by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Supplementary Fig. 4a). An increased intestinal microbiota alpha diversity was observed in the choline group, which significantly decreased after 4 months of BBR treatment by using the Shannon index (Fig. 4a), the Sobs index, the Chao index or the Simpson index test (Supplementary Fig. 4b). The PCoA analysis showed that there were dramatic changes in microbiota composition among the four groups at OTU level (Fig. 4b). Through the LDA analysis, we found that at the genus level choline administration markedly enriched Roseburia, Lachnospiraceae (unclassified), Alistipes, Turicibacter etc. and BBR significantly increased the abundance of Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group, Bacteroidales S24-7 group (unclassified), Eubacterium etc. (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Taken together, these results demonstrated that BBR altered the cecal microbial composition in ApoE KO mice.
In order to investigate the correlation between gut microbial composition remodeling and the BBR-induced phenotypic changes, we performed db-RDA analysis at OTU level. As shown in Fig. 4c, the cecal microbiota composition showed a notable correlation with both TMA and TMAO levels and with aortic plaque area. The Spearman’s correlation tests were applied at OTU level, and the results showed that more common OTUs were significantly correlated with plaque area and serum TMA/TMAO content, but not with TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TBA or FMO3 mRNA levels (Fig. 4d). The abundance of OTU282, OTU256, OTU280, OTU78, OTU406, and OTU54 etc. were positively correlated with TMA and TMAO levels and with aortic plaque area, which was enriched in choline group and significantly decreased after BBR treatment (Fig. 4e). The abundance of OTU401, OTU245, OTU45, OTU130, OTU440, and OTU452 were negatively correlated with TMA and TMAO levels and with aortic plaque area, which was enriched after BBR treatment compared to the choline group (Fig. 4e). These results indicated that BBR played an important role in reducing serum TMA and TMAO levels and aortic plaque area by remodeling gut microbiota.
BBR-modulated gut microbiome, especially cutC and cntA for TMA production
To further explore the mechanism of BBR to modulate gut microbiota, we performed metagenomic sequencing of cecal contents in 4 groups of C57BL/6J mice (chow, BBR-H, Choline, C + BBR-H, n = 21). An average of 49 million paired-end reads for each sample (ranging from 38 million to 60 million) was obtained, which led to a catalog of 3,118,451 nonredundant microbial genes. The C + BBR-H group (n = 5) had a notable reduction in gene counts (the number of genes identified per sample) compared to choline group (n = 6) (Supplementary Fig. 5a). This was consistent with the reduced community diversity of intestinal microbiota in 16S rRNA gene sequencing assays (Fig. 1c). On the basis of Bray-Curtis distances in PCoA assay, the overall structure of the gut microbiota from the four groups of mice showed significant alteration (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Sequences associated with four distinct domains were detected, and the majority microbial population were Bacteria (98.94–99.12%), with a low abundance of Eukaryota (0.31–0.48%), Archaea (0.06–0.08%) and Viruses (0.08–0.12%). Interestingly, the proportion of sequences assigned to Archaea and Viruses were significantly decreased in the C + BBR-H group compared to the choline group (Supplementary Fig. 5c–e). By LDA analysis at the genus level, the bacteria enriched in the choline group including Clostridium, Eubacterium, Lachnoclostridium, Roseburia, Odoribacter etc. and the C + BBR-H group significantly enriched Bacteroides, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, Alloprevotella etc. (Supplementary Fig. 5f), which is mostly consistent with the 16S rRNA gene sequencing results (Fig. 1e).
To explore the functional changes of the gut microbiota that might contribute to the improved phenotypic outcomes of BBR treatment, the non-redundant coding sequences were annotated based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. The result revealed that differential enrichment of microbial metabolic pathways by BBR treatment was linked to carbohydrate, amino acid and energy metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 6a). The genes for carbohydrate utilization—carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) showed similar PCoA patterns as that of the total genes (Supplementary Fig. 6b), suggesting that the carbohydrate utilization changes in the gut microbiota contributed to BBR treatment-induced protection from atherosclerosis. The bile salt hydrolase (BSH), a key enzyme involved in bile acid deconjugation40, decreased in the choline group and was restored by BBR treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6c). Accordingly, the ratio of T-β-MCA/β-MCA (conjugated/unconjugated β-muricholic acid) was significantly reduced in the BBR-treated mice compared to that in choline-fed mice, while the serum TBA level was not affected (Supplementary Fig. 6d).
In this study, TMA and TMAO levels decreased by BBR in choline-fed mice led us to focus on cutC and cntA, which are key genes responsible for TMA production41. However, according to the metagenomic sequencing data, there was a very low abundance of cutC gene (on average, 0.005%), and cntA gene was not even detected in any of the samples. This was consistent with the previous study42 and thus, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was applied to further measure the abundance of the two genes in cecal contents of ApoE KO mice using the degenerate primers designed by Rath et al.42. To verify the specificity and the quality of the qPCR results, amplified products were electrically separated on an agarose gel for visual inspections (Supplementary Fig. 7). Normalized to the 16S rRNA gene from each sample, the relative abundance of cutC and cntA genes was decreased after BBR treatment under both chow- and choline-diet conditions (Fig. 5a).
To further confirm the influence of BBR on the potential microbial communities responsible for TMA generation, cecal contents from choline-fed ApoE KO mice with or without BBR treatment were collected and cultured for an ex vivo choline-TMA transformation assay. The result showed that d9-TMA production was markedly reduced and the remaining d9-choline content was significantly increased in the BBR group compared to that in the choline group at both time points, suggesting that the transformation of d9-choline to d9-TMA in the anaerobic fermentation of the cecal contents was significantly decreased in BBR group (Fig. 5b). These results demonstrated that BBR could remodel the gut microbiome for inhibition of TMA production and ultimate TMAO formation in mice, especially by decreasing the levels of cutC and cntA genes.
BBR inhibited TMA formation in TMA-producing strains
Considering the antibacterial activity of BBR, we explored whether the BBR-mediated reduction of TMA was due to its inhibitory effect on the growth of anaerobic strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of BBR against four reported TMA-producing human commensal strains (Clostridium aparagiforme, Clostridium sporogenes, Anaerococcus hydrogenalis, and Escherichia fergusonii) and four non-TMA-producing strains (Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron)43 was anaerobically tested using standard methods including the agar dilution method and the broth microdilution method44. From both methods, a similar result was found that BBR has different inhibitory effects on the growth of these strains (Table 1). Notably, BBR showed stronger suppression on TMA-producing bacteria A. hydrogenalis and C. sporogenes than other detected strains, with MIC of 64 and 128 µg/ml, respectively.
Table 1.
Strains | Agar dilution method | Broth microdilution method | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC (µg/ml)a | |||||
MTRb | BBR | MTRb | BBR | ||
TMA-producing strains (Community A) | Clostridium asparagiforme DSM 15981 | 0.5 | 512 | >64 | >512 |
Clostridium sporogenes ATCC 19404 | 0.25 | 128 | 0.25–0.5 | 128 | |
Anaerococcus hydrogenalis DSM 7454 | 1 | 64 | 1–4 | 64 | |
Escherichia fergusonii ATCC 35469 | >64 | >512 | >64 | >512 | |
non-TMA producing strains (Community B) | Clostridium perfringens CICC 22949 | 1–2 | 256 | 4 | 256 |
Escherichia coli CGMCC 1.2385 | >64 | >512 | >64 | >512 | |
Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 | 0.5 | 256 | 0.5–1 | 256–>512 | |
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741 | 2–4 | 256 | 1–2 | 256–512 |
aThree biological repeated experiments were carried out under different measurement methods.
bMTR, metronidazole, as a positive control drug.
Subsequently, the four TMA-producing strains were cultured anaerobically in vitro to assess the inhibitory effect of BBR on d9-TMA transformation from d9-choline. Considering its antibacterial activities, the working concentrations of BBR were set as 1/64, 1/16, 1/4 of the MIC of each strain. After 6 h of incubation, the TMA production was significantly inhibited by BBR at a concentration of 1/16 MIC and completely eliminated at 1/4 MIC, except for E. fergusonii (Fig. 6a). Especially at the concentration of 1/16 MIC, BBR markedly inhibited the choline-to-TMA transformation in the strains of C. sporogenes and A. hydrogenalis whereas their growth was hardly changed (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 8). To further discern whether BBR influenced TMA production independent of its antibacterial activity, we detected the effect of BBR on choline-to-TMA transformation in C. sporogenes cell lysate. The results showed that BBR treatment inhibited d9-TMA production at enzyme activity level in a dose-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 9), implying there are broader metabolic effects of BBR on gut microbiota other than its effect on the growth of gut microbes. Besides, we found BBR did not affect choline uptake in C. sporogenes at its non-lethal concentration (Supplementary Fig. 9).
Furthermore, to mimic the complex physiological environments of the microbial community in the intestinal tract, four TMA-producing strains (Community A, Table 1), four non-TMA-producing strains (Community B, Table 1), and the above eight strains (Community A + B, Table 1) were mixed. Cultures were incubated anaerobically with different concentrations (8, 40, and 200 µg/ml) of BBR and d9-choline for 3 h, then d9-TMA generation was detected. While Community B group could not produce TMA from choline as expected, in Community A and Community A + B groups BBR effectively inhibited TMA production in a dose-dependent manner without dramatically influencing the bacterial growth (Fig. 6b). These results showed that BBR could suppress TMA production from choline by some human intestinal bacteria at their sub-MIC anaerobically in vitro. To further demonstrate the role of TMA-producing microbes in BBR reduced TMAO content, TMA-producing strains from Community A were intragastrically administrated into C57BL/6J mice fed choline-supplemented chow diet with or without BBR treatment for 8 days. The results showed that the Community A transplant significantly increased serum TMAO level which was decreased by BBR (Fig. 6c), providing a direct evidence of the critical role of BBR in the inhibition of gut microbe-induced TMA and TMAO formation.
We next examined the effect of BBR on gut microbes recovered from feces of C57BL/6J mice fed chow or high-choline diet for 6 weeks in an ex vivo assay. As previously reported, the CutC/D specific inhibitor bromomethylcholine (BMC) displayed a potent inhibition in TMA production (IC50 = 160 nM (40 ng/ml) against human fecal cultures ex vivo)26 and was used as a positive control. In our assay, TMA production was inhibited by both BBR and BMC in a dose-dependent manner, while BMC exhibited a much stronger suppression of TMA generation in gut microbes of mice under both diets (IC50 = 0.4–21 ng/ml, Fig. 6d). However, BBR had a better TMA inhibitory effect in gut microbes from choline diet-fed mice (IC50 = 43.5 and 185.4 µg/ml) than that from chow diet-fed mice (IC50 > 512 µg/ml, Fig. 6d), implying that BBR may exert different inhibitory capacities on diverse intestinal microbiome under different conditions. Finally, to assess the inhibitory effect of BBR on choline-to-TMA transformation by human gut microbes, fresh stool samples of three volunteers were cultured with different concentrations of BBR for 6 h under anaerobic conditions. Although there are apparent differences in the conversion rate of choline to TMA by intestinal bacteria from different individuals, BBR efficiently inhibited the TMA production ex vivo at similar concentrations in choline diet-fed mice (Fig. 6e). Overall, the results from in vitro, ex vivo to in vivo studies demonstrated that BBR can suppress anaerobic production of TMA in both bacterial isolates and in the complex gut microbial community, which may be the main underlying mechanism of BBR in reducing serum TMA and TMAO levels.
Discussion
BBR is abundantly found in the rhizomes of many Chinese traditional medicinal herbs, such as Coptis chinensis (Huang Lian in Chinese) which is widely used as an anti-diarrhea remedy in China for thousand years. The anti-diabetic activity of Huang Lian was documented for the first time in ~500 AD, and many contemporary pharmacological studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effects of BBR on cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders with good safety28. However, BBR exhibits a very low oral bioavailability which has been ascribed to the intestinal first-pass elimination34. During the last decade, accumulating evidences suggest a strong interaction between gut microbiota homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases or metabolic disorders, and some studies have been focused on the interaction of BBR with the gut microbiota, showing that BBR can alleviate obesity or atherosclerosis in high-fat diet-fed mice or rats via gut microbiota modulation37,45,46 and microbial metabolite production37,38. Recently, serum TMAO, a gut microbiota-derived metabolite mainly from animal protein-rich diets such as eggs, red meat, etc., was strongly associated with atherosclerosis in both human and animal trials19,47,48. There are some inconsistent reports49, but the discrepancy may be attributed to the different experimental setups including sex of the mice, diet background, and duration of choline feeding, etc50. A number of studies in mouse models suggest a causal relationship between plasma TMAO level and atherosclerosis19,27,47,51 and small molecule inhibitors of the major bacterial choline-TMA lyase have been reported to show efficacy to attenuate choline diet-enhanced atherosclerosis25,26. In this study, we disclosed the role and mechanism of the gut microbiota in BBR-induced protection against choline-induced atherosclerosis (Fig. 7).
It has been widely reported that BBR could reduce plasma cholesterol levels in ApoE or LDLR deficient mice fed a high-fat diet or Western diet39,46,52–55, which may influence cholesterol metabolism and bile acid metabolism significantly. Thus, to investigate the involvement of BBR in choline-TMA-TMAO pathway, choline-supplemented chow diet-fed mice were applied in this study to avoid the interference of cholesterol metabolism. In the atherosclerosis-prone ApoE KO mice, overdose of choline under chow diet took a longer period (16 weeks)27,47 to induce milder atherosclerosis than mice fed high cholesterol/fat diet (8–12 weeks). Oral administration of BBR effectively reduced the serum TMAO level in both choline-fed C57BL/6J and ApoE KO mice, and markedly limited progression of atherosclerotic plaque area in ApoE KO mice (Figs. 1–3). The mice had similar body weight and food intake, as well as serum TC, LDL-C, HDL-C or TBA levels and liver and renal function indexes (except that serum urea level was increased by choline supplementation and reversed by BBR treatment), in BBR-treated and untreated groups (Supplementary Fig. 3). The results suggest the serum TMAO level may be the major factor influencing the atherosclerosis severity in this study and BBR attenuates atherosclerosis by inhibition of TMA and TMAO production.
BBR treatment resulted in structural modulation of the gut microbiota in choline-supplemented chow diet-fed C57BL/6J and ApoE KO mice, with a significant reduction in the microbial diversity (Figs. 1, 4). This is consistent with some previous reports of BBR in high-fat diet-fed rats36,45. Although the overall gut microbiota richness was thought to be associated with healthy conditions in previous studies56, there are also some studies showed that this could not be always a reliable indicator of health in different situations57, especially at drug intervention. The decreased diversity of gut microbiota by BBR treatment may be ascribed to its known moderate to weak antibacterial activity against most tested bacteria58. We found BBR showed moderate growth inhibitory effects on TMA-producing bacteria under anaerobically incubation and may markedly inhibit the choline-to-TMA transformation in some strains even when their growth was hardly inhibited (Fig. 6a). More importantly, BBR may markedly decrease serum TMA and TMAO level increased by TMA-producing bacteria transplantation in choline-fed mice (Fig. 6c). But the mode of action of BBR on gut microbiota is quite different from Abs which exhibit potent anti-aerobe or anti-anaerobe activity. Indeed, the Abs would reduce the production of TMA more effectively (Figs. 1, 2) by inhibiting the growth of most intestinal bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 10), but may lead to severe gut microbiota dysbiosis and are not suitable for clinical long-term anti-atherosclerosis treatment. On the contrary, when repressing or killing harmful gut bacteria, BBR treatment enriched some beneficial gut bacteria significantly, which were negatively correlated with the TMA and TMAO levels as well as atherosclerotic plaque sizes (Fig. 4).
To gain an insight into the global gene diversity of gut microbiota influenced by choline and BBR, the analysis of the metagenomic data based on KEGG revealed differential enrichment of microbial metabolic pathways linked to carbohydrate utilization, however, the key genes involved in the SCFA production were not changed significantly in this study (Supplementary Fig. 6e) as in a previous study37, which may be attributed to the choline-supplemented chow diet used in this study instead of high-fat diet. Interestingly, it was observed that BBR restored the abundance of BSH gene as well as the ratio of conjugated/unconjugated β-muricholic acid which was changed in choline-fed mice, but the TBA level was not affected by choline addition or BBR treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6c and d). This was similarly found in the study of resveratrol which increased the BSH activity while inhibiting the production of TMAO and the progression of atherosclerosis27. Most importantly, the abundance of cutC and cntA, key genes responsible for two major pathways for TMA production, was decreased in BBR-treated mice (Fig. 5a). These results suggest that BBR may have various beneficial effects on gut microbiome functionality, especially the inhibition of TMA production in this study. If changes of gut microbiota functions other than choline-TMA-TMAO metabolism are involved in the role of BBR in high choline chow-fed mice remains to be investigated in future studies.
It is noteworthy that BBR showed a better TMA production inhibitory effect in gut microbes from choline-fed mice than that from chow diet-fed mice (Fig. 6d). Meanwhile, BMC, a microbial choline TMA lyase (CutC) specific inhibitor26, exhibited a much higher non-selective inhibitory effect on mice with both diets. The selective regulatory role of BBR in choline metabolism has also been shown in the in vivo animal experiments (Figs. 1, 2). The levels of TMA and TMAO only decreased significantly in choline-fed mice, but did not decrease or even slightly increased in chow-fed ApoE KO mice (Fig. 2) or C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 1), respectively. The result was also confirmed by an additional single-dose administration assay in C57BL/6J mice and this effect was abolished by Abs (Supplementary Fig. 11). This leads to an intriguing hypothesis that BBR may exert different inhibitory capacities on diverse intestinal microbiome, i.e., BBR may inhibit the formation of TMA by gut microbiota only when the choline has overdosed. If this is true, BBR will be a better modulator for TMA production by gut microbiota, as it will show different effects corresponding to different diets with different amounts of TMA-containing nutrient. The underlying mechanisms warrant further investigation.
Numerous clinical trials supported that BBR may inhibit the development of atherosclerotic plaque59. However, TMAO level was less investigated in BBR-treated patients. Notably, BBR showed a good inhibitory effect on TMA formation of gut microbiota from fecal samples of different volunteers (Fig. 6e). Given the different dietary habits, ages and health conditions, plasma TMA and TMAO levels showed great variation among human individuals as previously reported60,61. Although the plasma level of TMAO in mice was at least an order of magnitude higher than observed in humans61, the inhibitory effect of BBR on TMA formation of gut microbiota from human feces was comparable to that of choline-fed mice (Fig. 6d, e), at the concentration range of BBR (as high as 1–2 mg/g) detected in the gut content of different animals62,63. This result indicated that the effect and mechanism of BBR on TMA formation of gut microbiota observed here using choline-fed mice might be extrapolated to human. One clinical research in stable coronary artery disease patients found that the plasma TMAO level treated by BBR plus standard therapy (including aspirin and rosuvastatin) was 25 ± 16% lower after treatment, which was better than that of standard therapy alone (18 ± 16%), although did not reach statistical significance64. Further investigation will be needed to clarify the effect of BBR on TMAO level in humans, as both aspirin and statin were reported to reduce TMAO level in clinic studies60,65.
Methods
Animal and treatments
C57BL/6J mice (8 weeks, female) and ApoE KO mice with a C57BL/6 genetic background (8-weeks old, female) were purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China), and maintained at 22 ± 2 °C, 55 ± 5% relative humidity, with a 12-h light/dark period. In the experiments, mice were fed a standard chow diet (containing 0.1% choline) or choline diet (chow diet with 1% additional choline) with or without additional BBR (Deze biotechnology, Nanjing, China) and libitum access to water. A mixture of Abs (200 mg/kg vancomycin, 400 mg/kg neomycin sulfate, 400 mg/kg metronidazole, 400 mg/kg ampicillin; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were given by gavage. During the experiment, C57BL/6J mice and ApoE KO mice were fed for 6 weeks and 16 weeks before sacrificed respectively. Mice were weighed every week. At the end of the experiment, mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium anesthesia (50 mg/kg of body weight) to surgical procedures to minimize suffering, then the heart was perfused with PBS. At euthanasia, tissues and cecal content were harvested and stored at −80 °C. All animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Authority for Laboratory Animal Care of Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology.
HPLC-MS/MS detection of serum TMA, TMAO level
For quantitation of TMA, TMAO, d9-TMA and d9-TMAO level, serum protein was precipitated by adding 3-fold volumes of 80% acetonitrile at room temperature for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged (14,000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C) and the supernatants were filtrated and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. Briefly, HPLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using an Agilent 1100 series HPLC coupled to Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source. Separation of TMA and TMAO was performed on an XBridge™ HILIC column (150 × 2.1 mm, the internal diameter of 3.5 μm; WATERS, Milford, MA, USA) with a flex capillary XBridge™ HILIC guard column (10 × 2.1 mm, the internal diameter of 3.5 μm; WATERS). The column was eluted isostatically at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min with a mobile phase that mixed by an equal volume proportion of acetonitrile (phase A) and water with 10 mM ammonium formate (phase B). The capillary voltage was set at +4000 V and heated to 350 °C. Analytes were monitored in positive-ion mode with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of precursor and characteristic product-ion transitions of TMA at m/z 60 → 44, TMAO at m/z 76 → 58, d9-TMA at m/z 69 → 49 and d9-TMAO at m/z 85 → 66. Calibration curves were prepared by spiking various concentrations of the standard into control sample for quantification of serum analytes. The standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Evaluate the conversion rate of choline and TMA in vivo
To evaluate the peak TMA and TMAO concentrations in serum, the 8-week-old female C57BL/6J mice were made to fast overnight and given a dose of choline (400 mg/kg) or TMA (40 mg/kg) via gastric gavage. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital plexus at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after gavage. Serum was collected and subjected to HPLC-MS/MS detection TMA and TMAO level as mentioned above.
ApoE KO mice fed a chow diet or 1% choline diet with or without BBR (100 mg/kg) for 4 months (n = 10 per group) were administered a single dose of d9-choline (400 mg/kg) or d9-TMA (40 mg/kg). At 4 h after choline was given, or 1 h after TMA was given, the mice were euthanized and blood was collected. Serum d9-TMA and d9-TMAO levels were determined by HPLC-MS/MS as mentioned above.
Atherosclerotic plaque analysis
Atherosclerosis lesions were quantified in aortas by staining for lipid depositions with Oil Red O (ORO; Sigma-Aldrich) as described previously66. Briefly, for enface analysis of the aorta, aorta samples (from the proximal ascending aorta to bifurcation of the iliac artery) were dissected from mice and stored in 20% sucrose and cleaned from peri-adipose tissue after fixing in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h at 4 °C. Then the aortas were opened longitudinally and stained with ORO to determine the lesion area. For analyzing aortic root lipid deposition, the heart with ascending aorta was cut through below the aortic root, embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) tissue freezing medium (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) following a snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −20 °C. The aortic sinus was sectioned by serial 7 µm slices (Leica CM1950; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), which were stained by ORO and pictured using Leica DM3000 Graphic Analysis System. All the pictures were analyzed and quantified using ImageJ software (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Atherosclerotic lesions were expressed as a percentage of total area, which was calculated by dividing the ORO-stained area over the total surface.
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence assay
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on the cryosections from the aortic root to characterize the presence of macrophages in the aortic sinus plaque with mouse macrophage-specific antibody (Mac-3) (BD Pharmingen, CA, USA) and pictured by Leica DM3000 Graphic Analysis System. Immunofluorescence staining was used to characterize the presence of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), determined with SM22α antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Abcam). Nuclei were labeled using DAPI and images were recorded using Olympus IX71 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). All the primary antibodies and secondary antibodies were used in 1:100 dilution. All the images were processed and quantified with Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) microscope software (Leica Microsystems).
Serum lipid analysis
Blood was collected by retro-orbital sampling. Serum TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C were enzymatically measured with the commercial cholesterol assay kit from Zhong Sheng Biotechnology (Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum ALT and AST activity were also detected by kit from Zhong Sheng Bio-technology. All the detections were performed on Hitachi-7100 automatic analyser (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Serum β-MCA and T-β-MCA level analysis
For β-muricholic acid (β-MCA) and tauro-β-muricholic acid (T-β-MCA) detection, 100 μl serum was added to 400 μl of methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The sample was vortexed for 10 s and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Then centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and the organic phase was evaporated at 30 °C. The residue was reconstituted in 100 μl 50% methanol. Ten microliters of each reconstituted sample was injected for HPLC-MS/MS analysis. The chromatographic separation of bile acids was carried out on an Agilent 6410 Series Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer. A Capcell Pak AQ C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm; internal diameter of 5.0 µm, Shiseido) was used to separate the bile acids. The HPLC conditions were: 60% B for 2 min, a gradient increasing to 100% B over 40 min, 100% B for 2 min, a gradient decreasing to 60% B over 10 min, and finally, 60% B for 10 min (solvent A = 2.6 mM ammonium acetate in water, pH 6.5; solvent B = methanol). The flow rate through the column was 0.8 ml/min. The detection and quantification of β-MCA and T-β-MCA were accomplished by MRM mode with the transitions of β-MCA at m/z 391.1 → 355.2 and T-β-MCA at m/z 516.3 → 462.4. Different concentrations of standards β-MCA (Sigma) and T-β-MCA (Sigma) were added to the control sample to generate calibration allowing to quantification.
Quantification analysis of FMO3 by Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from liver with the SV total RNA isolation system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and reverse transcription was preformed using the GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA and cDNA were quantified by Nanodrop spectrophotometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed in triplicate with the Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The following primers and probes were used: flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO3; Fmo3; Mm01306345_m1), Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Gapdh; Mm99999915_g1) was used as the internal standard.
Gut microbial metagenomic DNA extraction and microbial diversity analysis
Mice cecal content samples were collected and snap frozen at −80 °C. Total DNA was isolated and purified using the FastDNA® SPIN kit for Feces and the FastPrep® Instrument (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The quality of DNA samples was assessed by gel electrophoresis and the concentration was measured by Nanodrop 8000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). To investigate the microbiota community composition in the cecum, bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing assay was performed. Extracted DNA was used as a template to amplify the V4 region (for C57BL/6J mice) of the 16S rRNA gene with barcode-indexed primers 515F (5′-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R1 (5′-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′), and V3-V4 region (for ApoE KO mice) with barcode-indexed primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R2 (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). PCR was carried out with initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min and subsequently 27 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. For each sample, three independent PCRs were performed to avoid bias. The PCR products for each sample were pooled and were extracted from a 2% agarose gel and further purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA). The amplicon libraries for high-throughput sequencing were subjected to the Illumina MiSeq platform according to standard protocols (C57BL/6J mice samples were performed by Promegene Technology Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China), and ApoE KO mice samples were performed by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology, Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). After removal of the barcodes and primers, the obtained sequences were clustered into the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% similarity threshold and was aligned with SILVA128/16 S bacteria database for taxonomy information. Bioinformatics analysis of microbial diversity was analyzed on Majorbio I-Sanger Cloud Platform (www.i-sanger.com).
Whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing and analysis
Metagenomic DNA was extracted from cecal content samples of C57BL/6J mice which were fed a chow or choline diet with or without BBR for 6 weeks by using the PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (MoBio, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA was fragmented and sequenced in the Illumina HiSeq X Ten instrument at Promegene Technology Co., Ltd. Paired-end reads were decoded and trimmed. The remaining reads were filtered to eliminate host DNA based on the mice genome reference GRCm38.p5 and human genome reference GRCh38.p10. Clean reads were assembled into contigs using IDBA-UD software (http://i.cs.hku.hk/~alse/hkubrg/projects/idba_ud/) with default parameters. Genes were predicted by MetaGene (http://metagene.cb.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp). A non-redundant gene catalogue was constructed with CD-HIT (http://www.bioinformatics.org/cd-hit/), of which identity more than 95% with a minimum coverage over 90% were removed as redundancies. Gene taxonomy was annotated to NCBI NR databases by BLASTP search (version 2.2.28+, e-value cut-off 1e−5). Gene functional identification was annotated to KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) by BLASTP search (version 2.2.28+, e-value cut-off 1e−5) and CAZy (Carbohydrate-active enzymes, http://www.cazy.org/) databases by hmmscan (e-value cut-off 1e−5), respectively. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and relative abundance of domains/pathways/enzymes were analyzed on Majorbio I-Sanger Cloud Platform (www.i-sanger.com).
Detection of cutC, cntA abundance via quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
The cutC and cntA gene abundances were measured by qPCR using degenerate primers (cutC_qF: 5′-TTYGCIGGITAYCARCCNTT-3′, cutC_qR: 5′-TGNGGYTCIACRCAICCCAT-3′; cntA_qF: 5′-TAYCAYGCITGGRCITTYAARCT-3′, cntA_qR: 5′-RCAGTGRTARCAYTCSAKRTAGTTRTCRAC-3′) designed by Rath et al.42. Amplification was performed with 100 ng of metagenomic DNA from cecal contents of ApoE KO mice using FS Universal SYBR Green Master (Rox, Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final primer concentration was 400 nM. An initial 95 °C for 10 min was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s; annealing at 60 or 53 °C for cutC or cntA, respectively, for 30 s; and an extension step at 72 °C for 20 s. Reactions were performed on the Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The relative fold change of abundance levels was analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCt method normalized to 16S rRNA gene levels from each sample using degenerate primers (16S_q515F: 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG-3′, 16S_q806R, 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) with an annealing temperature of 57 °C. qPCR amplified products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (5 μl each line).
MIC test
Eight bacterial strains (see Table 1) were used in the susceptibility test for BBR. The MICs of BBR were determined through the agar dilution method and broth microdilution method according to the CLSI guidelines44. BBR was tested at concentrations of 1 to 512 µg/ml. Metronidazole was tested at concentrations of 0.125–64 µg/ml and used as positive control. B. fragilis and B. thetaiotaomicron were standard strains and served as quality controls. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an agent that prevents turbidity after 48 h of anaerobic condition (10% CO2–10% H2–80 % N2) in AW400SG anaerobic workstation (Electrotek, West Yorkshire, UK). The experiment was repeated three times.
Growth curve assay of TMA-producing bacteria with or without BBR treatment
TMA-producing bacteria, Clostridium asparagiforme DSM 15981, Clostridium sporogenes ATCC 19404, Anaerococcus hydrogenalis DSM 7454, and Escherichia fergusonii ATCC 35469 were inoculated in the 10 ml of Mega media43 with 15 mM d9-choline at an initial concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/ml. The final concentrations of BBR were 1/64, 1/16, 1/4 of the MIC of each strain. Cultures were incubated for 0, 6, 9, 12, 24 h at 37 °C in anaerobic condition (10% CO2–10% H2–80% N2) using AW400SG anaerobic workstation (Electrotek). OD600 values were measured using Ultrospec 10 Cell Density Meter (Biochrom, Cambridge, UK).
Quantitation of d9-TMA production from d9-choline in vitro
To determine the effects of BBR on TMA production in the above growth curves assay, cultures were harvested at 6 h (except for C. asparagiforme, which was harvested at 9 h).
To determine the effects of BBR on different bacteria mixture (see Table 1), four strains of TMA-producing bacteria (Community A), four of non-TMA-producing bacteria (Community B), and all eight (Community A + B) were mixed at 1 × 106 CFU/ml of each strain and cocultured in 10 ml of Mega media with 15 mM d9-choline for 3 h anaerobically.
The production of d9-TMA in all culture medium samples was determined using HPLC-MS/MS according to the above-mentioned procedure.
Colonization of C57BL/6J mice with TMA-producing bacteria
For in vivo study, four strains of TMA-producing bacteria (Community A) were anaerobically grown in Mega Medium for 24 h at 37 °C. Each strain was adjusted to 2–8 × 107 CFU per mice. The supernatant was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 5 min and the strains were resuspended in saline and were combined, intragastrically administrated into C57BL/6J mice with or without BBR treatment for 8 days under choline diet condition. The mice were then sacrificed, and serum TMA and TMAO levels were determined using HPLC-MS/MS according to the above-mentioned procedure.
Quantitation of d9-TMA production from d9-choline via ex vivo incubation
Fresh cecal content samples from choline-fed ApoE KO mice were diluted 1:20 (wt/vol) in sterile Mega medium. The dilution was vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged (100 × g, 30 s) at room temperature. A 50-μl supernatant was transferred to a capped 2-ml 96-deep-well plate containing 1 ml of Mega medium supplemented with 15 mM d9-choline. Samples were incubated in duplicate for 12 h, 24 h at 37 °C in anaerobic condition (10% CO2–10% H2–80% N2) using AW400SG anaerobic workstation (Electrotek). The concentration of d9-TMA in the culture medium was determined using HPLC-MS/MS according to the above-mentioned procedure. d9-choline was similarly quantified by HPLC-MS/MS using a Capcell-Pak C18 ADME column (250 × 4.6 mm, the internal diameter of 5.0 µm; Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with 98% (V/V) aqueous solution of 0.2% acetic acid (phase A) and 2% (V/V) methanol (phase B). m/z 113 → 69 for d9-choline.
To investigate the dose-response curves of BBR on TMA-producing ability of different diet-fed mice, the intestinal microbiota of the feces from chow or choline diet-fed C57BL/6J mice (n = 5 for each cage, the feces of the same cage were pooled) were cultured under anaerobic condition ex vivo. 50 mg of fresh sample was vortexed to suspended in 500 μL of sterile Brucella broth (BD Biosciences) and centrifuged (200 × g, 10 s, 4 °C). Then 100 μL of supernatant was inoculated into a capped 96-deep-well plate containing 1 ml of Brucella broth (containing 5% horse blood) supplemented with 1 mM d9-choline and BBR in doses ranging from 1 to 512 µg/ml. BMC was tested at doses ranging from 0.32 ng/ml to 625 µg/ml and used as the positive control. The plate was subsequently sealed with sterile foil and incubated anaerobically for 14 h at 37 °C. The concentration of d9-TMA in the culture medium was determined using HPLC-MS/MS according to the above-mentioned procedure. Dose-response curves were fit using nonlinear regression to determine IC50 values in Graphpad Prism software.
Similarly, the IC50 values of BBR on TMA-production were determined in human gut microbiota from three volunteers. Human fecal samples were collected from volunteers had not received Abs within 2 months of donation and provided written informed consent. 125 mg of fresh sample was vortexed to suspended in 1 mL of sterile Mega medium and centrifuged (200 × g, 10 s, 4 °C). Then 100 μL of supernatant was added into 1 ml of Mega medium supplemented with 1 mM d9-choline and BBR in doses ranging from 1 to 512 µg/ml. After anaerobic incubation at 37 °C for 6 h, the production of d9-TMA was measured by HPLC-MS/MS and IC50 values were calculated as described above-mentioned procedure.
Determination of the effect of BBR on TMA production in C. sporogenes lysates
C. sporogenes ATCC 19404 was inoculated in 100 ml of sterile Mega media supplemented with 1 mM choline chloride (to induce expression of the cut genes) and grown anaerobically at 37 °C overnight. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 10 mL of PBS buffer supplemented with one Mini Protease Inhibitor Tablet (Pierce). Cells were placed in a Lysing Matrix B tube (MP Biomedicals) and then were disrupted using FastPrep® Instrument (MP Biomedicals) following parameters of speed 6.0 m/s for 40 s, two cycles. The soluble protein fraction of the cell lysate was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration of the clarified cell lysates was determined by a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co.). Lysate concentrations were diluted to 1.5 mg/mL with PBS buffer. C. sporogenes lysate were incubated with 20 mM of d9-choline in the presence or absence of different concentrations of BBR for 13 h at 37 °C in anaerobic condition (10% CO2–10% H2– 80% N2) in AW400SG anaerobic workstation (Electrotek). Sealed reaction mixtures were stopped by addition of three-fold volumes of 80% acetonitrile (containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid). The production of d9-TMA in all reaction mixtures was determined using HPLC-MS/MS according to the above-mentioned procedure.
Quantitation of choline uptake
To determine the effects of BBR on bacteria choline uptake, C. sporogenes ATCC 19404 was inoculated in sterile Mega media until an OD600 of around 0.5. Intact cells (1 ml) were incubated with different concentrations of d9-choline in the presence of different concentrations of BBR for 15 min at 37 °C in anaerobic condition (10% CO2–10% H2– 80% N2) in AW400SG anaerobic workstation (Electrotek). Then the supernatant was collected by centrifugation and the extracellular d9-choline was quantified by HPLC-MS/MS according to the above-mentioned procedure.
Statistical analysis
Data from animal experiments were presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analysis among groups were tested by a two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance, followed by Bonferroni’s correction as applicable (GraphPad Prism Software; Graph-Pad). p values are two-sided and < 0.05 denote statistical significance. Error bars denote SEM. p values for microbiota alpha diversity were conducted with the Kruskal–Wallis H test with false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. p values for four groups’ comparation in the relative abundance of OTUs/domains/pathways/enzymes were conducted with Kruskal–Wallis H test with Tukey-kramer post hoc test.
Reporting Summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this research provided by the Drug Innovation Major Project of China (2018ZX09711001-003-006, 2018ZX09711001-007-002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81473214, 81402929, 81621064), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2016-I2M-1-011 and 2016-I2M-2-002).
Author contributions
L.W. and B.H. conceived and designed the study. X.L., C.S., and L.W. performed most of the experiments. Z.J., Y.Y., Y.Z., M.Y., X.Z., Y.D., and J.Z. assisted with carrying out experiments. X.L., C.S., and L.W. co-wrote the manuscript. B.H. and J.J. revised the manuscript extensively. All of the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All of the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
Raw sequence reads for all 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing datasets from both C57BL/6J mice and ApoE KO mice have been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra] and are accessible under BioProject No. PRJNA667196 and PRJNA667205, respectively. All other remaining relevant data are provided in the article, Supplementary information, or available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Xingxing Li, Chunyan Su.
Contributor Information
Li Wang, Email: wangli_imb@163.com.
Jiandong Jiang, Email: jiang.jdong@163.com.
Bin Hong, Email: binhong69@hotmail.com.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41522-021-00205-8.
References
- 1.Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:1135–1143. doi: 10.1161/hc0902.104353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ardissino D, et al. Influence of 9p21.3 genetic variants on clinical and angiographic outcomes in early-onset myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58:426–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van Bussel BC, et al. A healthy diet is associated with less endothelial dysfunction and less low-grade inflammation over a 7-year period in adults at risk of cardiovascular disease. J. Nutr. 2015;145:532–540. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.201236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu H, et al. Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nat. Med. 2017;23:850–858. doi: 10.1038/nm.4345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eberl G, Lochner M. The development of intestinal lymphoid tissues at the interface of self and microbiota. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2:478–485. doi: 10.1038/mi.2009.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jonsson AL, Backhed F. Role of gut microbiota in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017;14:79–87. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Le Roy T, et al. The intestinal microbiota regulates host cholesterol homeostasis. BMC Biol. 2019;17:94. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0715-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Donia MS, Fischbach MA. HUMAN MICROBIOTA. Small molecules from the human microbiota. Science. 2015;349:1254766. doi: 10.1126/science.1254766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:341–352. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Du Y, et al. The human gut microbiome - a new and exciting avenue in cardiovascular drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019;14:1037–1052. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2019.1638909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wichmann A, et al. Microbial modulation of energy availability in the colon regulates intestinal transit. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:582–590. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li M, van Esch B, Henricks PAJ, Folkerts G, Garssen J. The anti-inflammatory effects of short chain fatty acids on lipopolysaccharide- or tumor necrosis factor alpha-stimulated endothelial cells via activation of GPR41/43 and inhibition of HDACs. Front. Pharm. 2018;9:533. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lin Y, et al. Use of sodium butyrate as an alternative to dietary fiber: effects on the embryonic development and anti-oxidative capacity of rats. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e97838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Du Y, et al. Butyrate protects against high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis via up-regulating ABCA1 expression in apolipoprotein E-deficiency mice. Br. J. Pharm. 2020;177:1754–1772. doi: 10.1111/bph.14933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sayin SI, et al. Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell Metab. 2013;17:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pols TW, et al. TGR5 activation inhibits atherosclerosis by reducing macrophage inflammation and lipid loading. Cell Metab. 2011;14:747–757. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miyazaki-Anzai S, Masuda M, Levi M, Keenan AL, Miyazaki M. Dual activation of the bile acid nuclear receptor FXR and G-protein-coupled receptor TGR5 protects mice against atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ufnal M, Zadlo A, Ostaszewski R. TMAO: a small molecule of great expectations. Nutrition. 2015;31:1317–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koeth RA, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 2013;19:576–585. doi: 10.1038/nm.3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhu W, et al. Gut microbial metabolite TMAO enhances platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis risk. Cell. 2016;165:111–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Craciun S, Balskus EP. Microbial conversion of choline to trimethylamine requires a glycyl radical enzyme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:21307–21312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215689109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhu Y, et al. Carnitine metabolism to trimethylamine by an unusual Rieske-type oxygenase from human microbiota. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:4268–4273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316569111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bennett BJ, et al. Trimethylamine-N-oxide, a metabolite associated with atherosclerosis, exhibits complex genetic and dietary regulation. Cell Metab. 2013;17:49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Orman M, et al. Structure-guided identification of a small molecule that inhibits anaerobic choline metabolism by human gut bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;141:33–37. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b04883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang Z, et al. Non-lethal inhibition of gut microbial Trimethylamine production for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2015;163:1585–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roberts AB, et al. Development of a gut microbe-targeted nonlethal therapeutic to inhibit thrombosis potential. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1407–1417. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0128-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen ML, et al. Resveratrol attenuates Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO)-induced atherosclerosis by regulating TMAO synthesis and bile acid metabolism via remodeling of the gut microbiota. mBio. 2016;7:e02210–e02215. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02210-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Feng X, et al. Berberine in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Theranostics. 2019;9:1923–1951. doi: 10.7150/thno.30787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Derosa G, et al. Effects of berberine on lipid profile in subjects with low cardiovascular risk. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2013;13:475–482. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.776037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang Y, et al. Treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia with the natural plant alkaloid berberine. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:2559–2565. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abidi P, Zhou Y, Jiang JD, Liu J. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase-dependent stabilization of hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA by herbal medicine berberine. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005;25:2170–2176. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000181761.16341.2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kong W, et al. Berberine is a novel cholesterol-lowering drug working through a unique mechanism distinct from statins. Nat. Med. 2004;10:1344–1351. doi: 10.1038/nm1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tan XS, et al. Tissue distribution of berberine and its metabolites after oral administration in rats. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu YT, et al. Extensive intestinal first-pass elimination and predominant hepatic distribution of berberine explain its low plasma levels in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2010;38:1779–1784. doi: 10.1124/dmd.110.033936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhao L, et al. Targeting the human genome-microbiome axis for drug discovery: inspirations from global systems biology and traditional Chinese medicine. J. Proteome Res. 2012;11:3509–3519. doi: 10.1021/pr3001628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang X, et al. Structural changes of gut microbiota during berberine-mediated prevention of obesity and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed rats. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang Y, et al. Berberine-induced bioactive metabolites of the gut microbiota improve energy metabolism. Metabolism. 2017;70:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun R, et al. Orally administered berberine modulates hepatic lipid metabolism by altering microbial bile acid metabolism and the intestinal FXR signaling pathway. Mol. Pharm. 2017;91:110–122. doi: 10.1124/mol.116.106617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shi Y, et al. Berberine treatment reduces atherosclerosis by mediating gut microbiota in apoE−/− mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;107:1556–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ridlon JM, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:241–259. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tang WH, Hazen SL. The contributory role of gut microbiota in cardiovascular disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124:4204–4211. doi: 10.1172/JCI72331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rath S, Heidrich B, Pieper DH, Vital M. Uncovering the trimethylamine-producing bacteria of the human gut microbiota. Microbiome. 2017;5:54. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0271-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Romano KA, Vivas EI, Amador-Noguez D, Rey FE. Intestinal microbiota composition modulates choline bioavailability from diet and accumulation of the proatherogenic metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide. mBio. 2015;6:e02481. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02481-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria. 8th edn. CLSI standard M11-A8 (ISBN 1-56238-789-8). (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, Wayne PA, 2012).
- 45.Feng R, et al. Transforming berberine into its intestine-absorbable form by the gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12155. doi: 10.1038/srep12155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhu L, et al. Berberine treatment increases Akkermansia in the gut and improves high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis in Apoe(−/−) mice. Atherosclerosis. 2018;268:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang Z, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nature09922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tang WHW, Wang Z, Levison BS. Gut microbiota appear novel but modifiable CV risk factor. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;2013:1575–1584. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109400. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jonsson AL, et al. Impact of Gut microbiota and diet on the development of atherosclerosis in Apoe(−/−) mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018;38:2318–2326. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Getz GS, Reardon CA. Diet, microbes, and murine atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018;38:2269–2271. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gregory JC, et al. Transmission of atherosclerosis susceptibility with gut microbial transplantation. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:5647–5660. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.618249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ma X, et al. Functional nano-vector boost anti-atherosclerosis efficacy of berberine in Apoe (−/−) mice. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2020;10:1769–1783. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wu M, et al. Effect of berberine on atherosclerosis and gut microbiota modulation and their correlation in high-fat diet-fed ApoE−/− mice. Front. Pharm. 2020;11:223. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Singh AB, Liu J. Berberine decreases plasma triglyceride levels and upregulates hepatic TRIB1 in LDLR wild type mice and in LDLR deficient mice. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:15641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52253-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang J, et al. Berberine ameliorates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in ApoE(−/−) mice. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;14:4134–4140. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Le Chatelier E, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500:541–546. doi: 10.1038/nature12506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhao L, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359:1151–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lin Y, Zhang HJ, Han YX, Jiang JD. Antibacterial activity of berberine on intestinal bacteria. Chin. Med. Biotechnol. 2018;13:335–338. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fatahian A, et al. Promising anti-atherosclerotic effect of berberine: evidence from in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020;178:83–110. doi: 10.1007/112_2020_42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhu W, Wang Z, Tang WHW, Hazen SL. Gut microbe-generated Trimethylamine N-Oxide from dietary choline is prothrombotic in subjects. Circulation. 2017;135:1671–1673. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.DiNicolantonio JJ, McCarty M, J OK. Association of moderately elevated trimethylamine N-oxide with cardiovascular risk: is TMAO serving as a marker for hepatic insulin resistance. Open Heart. 2019;6:e000890. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Feng R, et al. Gut microbiota-regulated pharmacokinetics of berberine and active metabolites in beagle dogs after oral administration. Front. Pharm. 2018;9:214. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Guo, H. H. et al. Dual-stimuli-responsive gut microbiota-targeting berberine-CS/PT-NPs improved metabolic status in obese hamsters. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1808197 (2019).
- 64.Zhang BJ, Zhang Y, Xu QF, Meng S. The effect of berberine on plasma trimethylamine N-oxide levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease on the top of statin therapy. J. Clin. Cardiol. 2017;33:17–22. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li DY, Wang ZN, Li XMS, Hazen SL, Tang WHW. Relationship between statin use and trimethylamine N-oxide in cardiovascular risk assessment. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;71:115–115. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(18)30656-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jiang H, et al. microRNA-185 modulates low density lipoprotein receptor expression as a key posttranscriptional regulator. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequence reads for all 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing datasets from both C57BL/6J mice and ApoE KO mice have been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra] and are accessible under BioProject No. PRJNA667196 and PRJNA667205, respectively. All other remaining relevant data are provided in the article, Supplementary information, or available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.