Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;114(2):315–321. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000054

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Risk of Diverticulitis

Manol Jovani 1,2, Wenjie Ma 1,2, Amit D Joshi 1,2, Po-Hong Liu 1,2, Long H Nguyen 1,2, Yin Cao 1,2,3, Idy Tam 4, Kana Wu 5, Edward L Giovannucci 5,6,7, Andrew T Chan 1,2,7,8, Lisa L Strate 9
PMCID: PMC8074020  NIHMSID: NIHMS1595304  PMID: 30730324

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Diverticulitis is a significant cause of morbidity among older women, and little attention has been paid to understanding its etiology. We have shown that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with the risk of inflammatory bowel disease. In this study, we prospectively examined the association between MHT and the risk of incident diverticulitis.

METHODS:

We studied 65,367 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study who provided detailed information on hormone use and other medical and lifestyle factors biennially, and on diet every 4 years. Between 2008 and 2014, participants reported any episodes of diverticulitis that required antibiotics and the date of occurrence. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS:

Over 24 years encompassing 1,297,165 person-years of follow-up, we documented 5,425 incident cases of diverticulitis. We observed an increased risk of diverticulitis among both current (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.18–1.39) and past (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.25–1.45) MHT users compared to never users. The increased risk was observed among participants using estrogen only (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.20–1.41) and those using combined estrogen and progesterone (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.21–1.42) compared to nonusers. The risk did not increase with longer duration of use (P-trend = 0.76). The association between MHT and diverticulitis was not modified by age, body mass index, past oral contraceptive use, or fiber intake (all P-interaction >0.11).

CONCLUSIONS:

Menopausal hormone therapy was associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis. Further studies are needed to understand the potential mechanisms that may underlie this association.

INTRODUCTION

Diverticulitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal indications for hospital admission in the United States (13), with more than $2 billion spent annually on inpatient management alone (4). It is also among the leading gastrointestinal diagnoses in the ambulatory care setting (4). Despite the impact of diverticulitis on patients and the healthcare system, its epidemiology and etiopathogenesis remain poorly understood (5). Recent studies have focused on identifying lifestyle risk factors (6), such as smoking (7,8), alcohol use (9), physical inactivity and obesity (1013), use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (14), as well as dietary factors including a Western dietary pattern (15), fiber and red meat (16,17).

The incidence of diverticulitis increases with age, particularly among postmenopausal women (2,1820). In addition, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a gastrointestinal condition that may have some histological similarities to diverticulitis (21). These findings suggest a possible role for menopause and MHT in the development of diverticulitis. Only one prior study suggested that MHT may be associated with an increased risk of diverticular disease (17). However, that analysis had a number of important limitations. Therefore, we sought to prospectively examine the association between MHT and the risk of incident diverticulitis in an ongoing large prospective cohort of US postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Study population

We utilized the Nurses’ Health Study, an ongoing cohort of 121,739 female registered nurses, aged 30–55 years at enrollment in 1976. Participants were mailed follow-up questionnaires every 2 years to provide data on lifestyle factors, medical history, and disease outcomes, and every 4 years to report dietary intake. The follow-up rates have been greater than 90%. The Institutional Review Boards of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Partners Healthcare approved the study protocol.

Assessment of menopausal hormone therapy

Menopausal hormone therapy was ascertained beginning in 1976 and every 2 years thereafter. On each biennial questionnaire, participants reported the number of months during the previous 2 years when prescription MHT was taken, whether MHT was currently being used, and the type of MHT preparation (estrogen, progestin, or combination of estrogen plus progestin).

Ascertainment of diverticulitis

In 2008 and 2012, participants were asked whether they ever had a diagnosis of diverticulitis requiring antibiotic therapy or hospitalization. If yes, participants were asked the year of each episode dating back to 1990. In 2014, participants were asked the same question, but restricted to the previous 2 years. In a review of 107 medical records from women reporting incident diverticulitis in 2008, self-report was confirmed in 88% of cases, through review of medical records. We confirmed the self-report of diverticulitis by a combination of factors presented in the medical records, such as imaging (e.g., computed tomography scan) and/or clinical notes (e.g., hospitalization or need for antibiotics) and/or need for surgery.

Assessment of other exposures

Participants were asked about age at menarche (in 1976), parity (from 1976 to 1996), oral contraceptive (OC) use (from 1976 to 1984), menopausal status, age at menopause, and type of menopause (from 1976 to 2004, after which all subjects were postmenopausal). Weight, smoking status, physical activity, history of recent physical examination, aspirin or other NSAID use, and history of cancer were assessed in 1976 and updated every 2 years thereafter. We determined body mass index (BMI) from measurements of height provided by participants in 1976 and from measurements of weight updated every 2 years. Dietary information was first obtained in 1980 using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and every 4 years thereafter. Based on this information, we calculated Alternative Healthy Eating Index–2010 scores, as a measure of overall diet quality (22). Cigarette and alcohol use, dietary intake, physical activity, and menopausal status in this cohort have been validated previously. We used cumulative measures of covariates when appropriate.

Statistical analysis

We restricted the analysis to participants who returned the 2008, 2012, or 2014 questionnaires (n = 71,110). Women who reported a diagnosis of diverticulitis or its complications (n = 1,853), gastrointestinal cancer (n = 290), or IBD (n = 463) at or prior to baseline in 1990 were excluded from the analysis. In addition, we excluded study participants who reported diverticulitis prior to menopause (n = 113) and those who at baseline had missing information on our outcome of interest (n = 479). After these exclusions, there were 45,977 women in our baseline study population. Participants that had not undergone menopause or did not provide information on hormone use at baseline (n = 22,048) were excluded from entry at baseline, but were able to enter the analysis when they became menopausal and/or reported data on hormone use, provided they did not report diverticulitis prior to that date. Overall, 65,367 participants contributed to the final analysis. For each participant, person-time was calculated from the moment of inclusion in the study until the date of incident diverticulitis, death, loss to follow-up, or the end of follow-up (June 2014), whichever came first. We censored women who reported a new diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer or IBD at the date of diagnosis. We updated and used the most recent information for all exposures.

Cox proportional hazards models were applied to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To control for confounding by age, calendar time, and any possible 2-way interactions between these 2 timescales, we stratified the analysis jointly by age in years at the start of follow-up and calendar time of the current questionnaire cycle. Proportional hazards assumption was tested by including the product term between exposure variable and age and testing significance using the Wald test. No deviation from the proportional hazards assumption was detected.

Consistent with prior studies on risk factors for diverticulitis (6,1116,23), we chose a priori the following potential confounding variables to include in our multivariable model: age at menarche, age at menopause, time since menopause, parity, OC use, type of menopause, vigorous physical activity, alcohol intake, smoking, regular use of aspirin or other NSAIDs, BMI, caloric intake, dietary fiber and red meat intake, and Alternative Healthy Eating Index score. We tested the hypothesis of whether current or past MHT use was associated with the risk of diverticulitis in the overall cohort. We also performed several sensitivity analyses, such as (i) the association of MHT with the risk of diverticulitis restricting follow-up from 2008 to 2014 to ensure that cases were ascertained prospectively, (ii) the association of MHT with diverticulitis in the subgroup of participants who reported having ever undergone endoscopy, and (iii) the association of MHT with diverticulitis that required surgery. Tests for interaction were performed by including the cross-product term between ever hormone use and the stratified variable into the model, and testing the statistical significance using the Wald test. We tested for linear trends across categories by assigning the median value for the sample to each category and modeling this as a continuous variable.

Finally, we also considered the possibility that the association of MHT with diverticulitis may be mediated, at least partially, by diverticulosis, defined as any diverticular disease that did not result in bleeding and that did not require antibiotics, hospitalization, or surgery. Hence, we conducted a multivariable logistic regression to estimate the risk of diverticulosis among ever MHT users in a cross-sectional analysis of 61,839 participants answering the 2012 questionnaire, which specifically ascertained diverticulitis as well as diverticulosis. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Over the 24 years, encompassing 1,297,165 person-years of follow-up, we documented 5,425 incident cases of diverticulitis. At the midpoint of the study, ever hormone users were more likely to have undergone surgical or radiological menopause, become menopausal earlier, and used more NSAIDs and OCs compared to those who never received MHT. The remaining characteristics at the study midpoint did not differ substantially among never, past, or current hormone users (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of postmenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study according to hormone use at the midpointa of follow-up

Never user (n = 14,305) Current user (n = 29,263) Past user (n = 16,308)
Age, yrb 65.5 (6.8) 63.4 (6.4) 66.3 (6.7)
Whites, % 97.2 97.8 97.2
Age at menarche, yr 12.5(1.5) 12.5(1.4) 12.5(1.4)
Age at first birth, yr 29.7(17.9) 30.0 (18.9) 29.7 (18.4)
Age at menopause, yr 50.8 (3.6) 49.4 (4.7) 49.4 (4.6)
Natural menopause, % 75.0 48.7 59.0
Past use of OC, % 45.7 59.0 54.4
Parity
 No children, % 6.5 7.7 7.5
 One child, % 6.5 6.6 6.8
 Two children, % 26.4 29.8 28.0
 Three or more children, % 60.6 56.0 57.7
BMI, kg/m2
 <22.5, % 17.5 21.8 19.0
 22.5–24.9, % 19.5 24.1 22.3
 25.0–27.4, % 20.7 21.6 21.0
 27.5–29.9, % 14.2 13.0 14.3
 30.0–34.9, % 17.5 14.0 15.4
 ≥35, % 10.5 5.5 8.1
Alcohol, g/d 5(9) 5(9) 5(9)
Past smoker, % 43.0 47.6 46.3
Current smoker, % 10.3 6.8 9.4
Aspirin use, % 40.5 43.02 42.0
Other NSAID use, % 23.3 29.0 27.3
Total energy intake, kcal/d 1,745 (553) 1,742 (528) 1,744 (545)
Protein intake, g/d 73 (10) 74 (10) 74 (10)
Fiber intake, g/d 18(5) 18(4) 18(4)
Alternate Healthy Eating Index score 45 (9) 46 (9) 46 (9)
Cardiovascular diseases, % 7.92 8.96 9.18

Values are means (SD) or percentages and are standardized to the age distribution of the study population. Values of polytomous variables may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

BMI, body mass index; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; OC, oral contraceptive.

a

In the year 2000.

b

Value is not age-adjusted.

We observed an increased risk of diverticulitis among women who had ever used MHT (Table 2). After adjusting for lifestyle and dietary risk factors, compared to women who never received MHT, the multivariate HRs for diverticulitis were 1.28 (95% CI 1.18–1.39) among current users and 1.35 (95% CI 1.25–1.45) among past users. This association was observed for estrogen only (multivariate HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.20–1.41) and combined estrogen plus progesterone (multivariate HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.21–1.42) (see Table, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/AJG/A9). The risk of diverticulitis did not vary with the duration of MHT (Table 3). Furthermore, the risk associated with ever use of MHT was only slightly attenuated 10 years after discontinuation of MHT (Table 4; P-trend = 0.32).

Table 2.

Current or past hormone use and risk of diverticulitis

Never hormone use Current hormone use Past hormone use
No. of cases 1,102 1,673 2,650
Person-years 342,572 430,068 524,524
Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) Reference 1.29 (1.19–1.39) 1.38 (1.28–1.48)
Multivariate,a HR (95% CI) Reference 1.28 (1.18–1.39) 1.35 (1.25–1.45)

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

a

Adjusted for age, vigorous activity, alcohol intake, smoking, aspirin use, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, body mass index and calorie intake, age at menarche, parity, age at menopause, time since menopause, type of menopause, past use of oral contraceptives, dietary intake of fiber and red meat, and Alternative Healthy Eating Index score.

Table 3.

Duration of hormone use and risk of diverticulitis

Never hormone use 1–5 yr 6–10 yr >10 yr
No. of cases 1,102 1,472 1,055 1,796
Person-years 342,572 355,609 246,414 352,569
Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) Reference 1.34 (1.24–1.45) 1.29 (1.19–1.41) 1.36 (1.26–1.47)
Multivariate,a HR (95% CI) Reference 1.33 (1.23–1.44) 1.29 (1.18–1.41) 1.33 (1.22–1.44)

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

a

Adjusted for age, vigorous activity, alcohol intake, smoking, aspirin use, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, body mass index and calorie intake, age at menarche, parity, age at menopause, time since menopause, type of menopause, past use of oral contraceptives, dietary intake of fiber and red meat, and Alternative Healthy Eating Index score.

Table 4.

Time since discontinuation of hormone use and risk of diverticulitisa

Never hormone use 1–5 yr 6–10 yr >10 yr
No. of cases 1,102 1,048 694 629
Person-years 342,572 208,250 146,051 118,808
Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) Ref 1.36 (1.25–1.49) 1.36 (1.23–1.50) 1.35 (1.22–1.49)
Multivariate,b HR (95% CI) Ref 1.36 (1.24–1.49) 1.35 (1.22–1.49) 1.30 (1.17–1.44)

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

a

Only among past users.

b

Adjusted for age, vigorous activity, alcohol intake, smoking, aspirin use, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, body mass index and calorie intake, age at menarche, parity, age at menopause, time since menopause, type of menopause, past use of oral contraceptives, dietary intake of fiber and red meat, and Alternative Healthy Eating Index score.

In stratified analyses, the association of hormone use with the risk of diverticulitis was not modified by categories of age, dietary fiber intake, BMI, and past OC use (all P-interaction >0.11; Table 5). However, whereas the risk of diverticulitis appeared increased in both strata of smoking (never vs ever), the increase in risk of diverticulitis associated with MHT appeared more pronounced among those who never smoked (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.27–1.58) than ever smokers (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.14–1.37; Table 5).

Table 5.

Stratified analysis

No. of cases Never hormone use Ever hormone usea P-interaction
Age ≤70 yr 3,454 Reference 1.29 (1.19–1.41) 0.36
Age >70 yr 1,971 Reference 1.37 (1.22–1.54)
Ever smoker 3,129 Reference 1.25 (1.14–1.37) 0.04
Never smoker 2,267 Reference 1.42 (1.27–1.58)
BMI <25 2,109 Reference 1.37 (1.22–1.54) 0.36
BMI ≥25 3,315 Reference 1.27 (1.17–1.39)
Natural menopause 2,860 Reference 1.36 (1.25–1.48) 0.33
Surgery/radiation 2,565 Reference 1.24 (1.10–1.40)
Ever OC use 2,526 Reference 1.40 (1.26–1.55) 0.16
Never OC use 2,899 Reference 1.26 (1.15–1.38)
Fiber intake, <18 g/d 2,478 Reference 1.28 (1.17–1.41) 0.11
Fiber intake, >18 g/d 2,947 Reference 1.38 (1.24–1.53)

BMI, body mass index; OC, oral contraceptive.

a

HR (95% confidence interval) for age, vigorous activity, alcohol intake, smoking, aspirin use, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, BMI and calorie intake, age at menarche, parity, age at menopause, time since menopause, type of menopause, past use of OCs, dietary intake of fiber and red meat, and Alternative Healthy Eating Index score. The strata variable is omitted from the multivariable model.

When we restricted our analysis to participants at risk for developing diverticulitis from 2008 to 2014 (n = 55,118), we observed a similar association between current and past MHT use and risk of diverticulitis (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.17–1.83 and HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.31–1.79, respectively, when compared to never use) (see Table, Supplementary Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/AJG/A10). In participants who had undergone flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or virtual colonoscopy, current and past MHT use was associated with the increased risk of diverticulitis (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.06–1.40 and HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.06–1.37, respectively, compared to never users). Likewise, current and past MHT use was significantly associated with diverticulitis that required surgery (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.07–1.71 and HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.15–1.74, respectively, compared to never users). Because some data suggest that cardiovascular diseases may also be a risk factor for diverticulitis, we further adjusted for it in the multivariable model, and the results were not substantially altered: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.23–1.41) when comparing ever MHT users with never users. Finally, in a cross-sectional analysis of participants who returned the 2012 questionnaire, we observed a significant association between ever MHT use and uncomplicated diverticulosis (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.23–1.39).

DISCUSSION

In this large prospective cohort study, we observed an association between MHT and increased risk of diverticulitis after adjusting for other known or suspected risk factors for diverticulitis. The risk was increased for both estrogen and estrogen plus progesterone users. We found MHT use was also associated with an increase in the risk of diverticulitis that required surgical treatment.

Prior data examining the association between MHT and diverticulitis are scant. In a study primarily focused on dietary factors, ever use of MHT was included as a potential confounder and was significantly associated with the risk of diverticulitis (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09–1.54) (17), comparable to our findings. However, detailed information on MHT, such as type or duration of use, was not available in this study, and MHT use was assessed at one time point and analyzed as a fixed covariate. The prospective, biennial assessment of MHT in our study, on the other hand, enabled us to extend these preliminary findings in several important ways. We were able to account for changes in MHT use over time, distinguish between current and past use, assess duration of use, and perform a number of sensitivity analyses. Even though the effect estimate observed in our study was modest, if our findings are corroborated by other future studies, diverticulitis may be an additional potential adverse effect that should be weighed carefully by prescribers and patients considering MHT (24).

Our results have biological plausibility. Previous studies, including an analysis in the Nurses’ Health Study, have shown that MHT is associated with the increased risk for a number of inflammatory diseases, including IBD (21,25). The presence of chronic inflammation in asymptomatic patients with diverticula even in areas not involved by the condition, a Crohn-like inflammation in patients with diverticulitis, the cyclical nature of symptoms/exacerbations, and other clinical or histological similarities suggest that diverticulitis and IBD may share some similar biological mechanisms involving intestinal inflammation and the gut microbiota (2634). While diverticulitis is most commonly thought to be associated with microperforation due to either ischemic or traumatic damage from fecalith obstruction (35,36), this theory is not proved, and growing data suggest that microbiota may also play a significant role in the onset of diverticulitis (3234,37). Indeed, the influence of other risk factors for diverticulitis such as diet, physical activity and obesity may, in part, be mediated by alterations in the gut microbiota (5,12,38). Some Authors have speculated that local quantitative and qualitative changes in gut microbes could potentially induce inflammatory and/or neuromuscular changes (39). This hypothesis is corroborated by a recent study that suggests that microbiota and metabolome changes are related to inflammation and gut neuromotor dysfunction, potentially resulting in diverticular disease establishment and/or consolidation (31). Estrogen has a number of effects on the gut microbiome (4044), as well as colonic mucosa, including increasing intestinal permeability (45,46), all factors that may predispose to diverticulitis. Similar factors may also be responsible for the gender differences observed in immune-mediated diseases (4750). However, at present the association between the microbiota and diverticulitis is inconclusive, and we cannot ascertain whether altered microbiota may be the cause or the effect. Future studies therefore may serve to explore potential mechanisms that underlie the association between altered microbiota and diverticulitis.

We observed that the increase in the risk of diverticulitis was consistent among women with a prior colonoscopy, indicating that ascertainment bias did not play a significant role in our findings. We did observe that the association of MHT with risk persisted even after discontinuation of MHT. It is possible that MHT displays a so-called legacy effect, a memory of a treatment that produces effects long after cessation (51,52), or that the association is partly mediated through the development of diverticulosis. In support of this hypothesis, we found a significant positive association between MHT and uncomplicated diverticulosis at a cross-sectional analysis of our cohort. These mechanisms may also explain, at least in part, why we did not observe a dose-related effect. Even though much of this evidence is still preliminary, taken together it suggests that MHT may have both long- and short-term effects on the onset of diverticulitis. Further understanding of such mechanisms could potentially lead to elucidation of new targets for interventions that may modulate disease incidence and/or activity.

Our study has several strengths. First, the prospective study design allowed the acquisition of detailed information on many important potential confounders independently of disease status, thus minimizing the potential for recall and selection bias. Second, our analysis included 65,367 women with 5,425 incident cases, allowing a more comprehensive analysis of the association. Third, our endpoint, which was ascertained via questionnaire and validated in a subset of our population through medical record review by physicians blinded to the exposure information, represents the broad clinical spectrum of diverticulitis cases. This contrasts with prior studies that often relied on administrative data which are prone to misclassification and/or were limited to severe cases managed in the inpatient setting (2,19,20). Fourth, we modeled MHT using time-varying exposures to account for changes in hormone use over time and minimize exposure misclassification. Finally, participants in our study are nurses, increasing the validity of self-reported medical and risk factor information and minimizing potential confounding associated with variability in access to care.

We also acknowledge several limitations. First, as an observational study, we cannot rule out the possibility of unmeasured residual confounding or noncausal association. However, we adjusted for many known potential confounding factors, and multivariate adjustment did not significantly alter our age-adjusted ezinment of diverticulitis was based on self-reported and recalled information. However, the validity of self-reported diverticulitis has been confirmed in this cohort. Third, we cannot completely rule out secular effects due to a decrease in the use of MHT and an increase in the incidence of diverticulitis over time. However, in our analysis we have accounted for different periods of time. Fourth, based on our available data, we could not finely distinguish between symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease and asymptomatic diverticulosis. However, we could observe the association of MHT with other, more common clinically significant manifestations of the disease, namely diverticulitis requiring antibiotics, hospitalization, or surgery. Finally, although the homogeneity of healthcare access and socioeconomic status of our population helps minimize confounding and enhances internal validity, the results may not be generalizable to other populations. However, the overall prevalence of diverticulitis and other risk factors in our population is consistent with that of the broader population of US women (5,53,54).

In conclusion, in this prospective cohort study, we observed that MHT is associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis. This potential adverse effect of MHT should be considered by prescribers and patients considering MHT particularly those at increased risk for diverticulitis. Additional studies are needed to better understand the potential mechanisms underlying this association. Further understanding of these mechanisms could inform new targets for prevention and treatment.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 2

Study Highlights.

WHAT IS KNOWN

  • Menopausal hormone therapy has been associated with IBD.

  • No study has evaluated the association between MHT and diverticulitis.

WHAT IS NEW HERE

  • Menopausal hormone therapy is associated with increased risk of diverticulitis.

  • Diverticulitis might be added to the list of potential adverse effects that should be weighed carefully by prescribers and patients considering MHT.

  • These results could help to shed light on the biological mechanisms underlying the development of diverticulitis.

  • Further understanding of these mechanisms could inform new targets for prevention and treatment.

Financial support:

This work was supported by the following grants: R01 DK101495, K24 DK 098311, and UM1 CA186107 from the National Institutes of Health. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analyses, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be constituted to represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Guarantors of the article: Lisa L. Strate, MD, MPH and Andrew T. Chan, MD, MPH.

Potential competing interests: Andrew T. Chan, MD, MPH, previously has served as a consultant for Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer, and Aralez Pharmaceuticals. This study was not funded by Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer, or Aralez Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: DISCLAIMER

Publisher's Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kang JY, Hoare J, Tinto A, et al. Diverticular disease of the colon—on the rise: A study of hospital admissions in England between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:1189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wheat CL, Strate LL. Trends in hospitalization for diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding in the United States from 2000 to 2010. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:96–103.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bharucha AE, Parthasarathy G, Ditah I, et al. Temporal trends in the incidence and natural history of diverticulitis: A population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1589–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015;149: 1731–41.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Strate LL, Modi R, Cohen E, et al. Diverticular disease as a chronic illness: Evolving epidemiologic and clinical insights. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1486–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu P-H, Cao Y, Keeley BR, et al. Adherence to a healthy lifestyle is associated with a lower risk of diverticulitis among men. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:1868–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hjern F, Wolk A, Håkansson N. Smoking and the risk of diverticular disease in women. Br J Surg 2011;98:997–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Humes DJ, Ludvigsson JF, Jarvholm B. Smoking and the risk of hospitalization for symptomatic diverticular disease: A population-based cohort study from Sweden. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:110–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, et al. A prospective study of alcohol, smoking, caffeine, and the risk of symptomatic diverticular disease in men. Ann Epidemiol 1995;5:221–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hjern F, Wolk A, Håkansson N. Obesity, physical inactivity, and colonic diverticular disease requiring hospitalization in women: A prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:296–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Strate LL, Liu YL, Aldoori WH, et al. Physical activity decreases diverticular complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:1221–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Strate LL, Liu YL, Aldoori WH, et al. Obesity increases the risks of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Gastroenterology 2009;136: 115–22.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ma W, Jovani M, Liu PH, et al. Association Between obesity and weight change and risk of diverticulitis in women. Gastroenterology 2018. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016508518303664. Accessed April 1, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Strate LL, Liu YL, Huang ES, et al. Use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases risk for diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Gastroenterology 2011;140:1427–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Strate LL, Keeley BR, Cao Y, et al. Western dietary pattern increases, and prudent dietary pattern decreases, risk of incident diverticulitis in a prospective cohort study. Gastroenterology 2017; 152:1023–30.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Strate LL, Liu YL, Syngal S, et al. Nut, corn, and popcorn consumption and the incidence of diverticular disease. JAMA 2008;300:907–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Crowe FL, Appleby PN, Allen NE, et al. Diet and risk of diverticular disease in Oxford cohort of European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): Prospective study of British vegetarians and non-vegetarians. BMJ 2011;343:d4131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Razik R, Nguyen GC. Diverticular disease: Changing epidemiology and management. Drugs Aging 2015;32:349–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Etzioni DA, Mack TM, Beart RW, et al. Diverticulitis in the United States: 1998–2005: Changing patterns of disease and treatment. Ann Surg 2009; 249:210–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nguyen GC, Sam J, Anand N. Epidemiological trends and geographic variation in hospital admissions for diverticulitis in the United States. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1600–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khalili H, Higuchi LM, Ananthakrishnan AN, et al. Hormone therapy increases risk of ulcerative colitis but not Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2012;143:1199–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chiuve SE, Fung TT, Rimm EB, et al. Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease. J Nutr 2012;142:1009–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cao Y, Strate LL, Keeley BR, et al. Meat intake and risk of diverticulitis among men. Gut 2018;67:466–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.US Preventive Services Task Force, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Barry MJ, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2017;318:2224–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Khalili H, Higuchi LM, Ananthakrishnan AN, et al. Oral contraceptives, reproductive factors and risk of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2013;62: 1153–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gledhill A, Dixon MF. Crohn’s-like reaction in diverticular disease. Gut 1998;42:392–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lamps LW, Knapple WL. Diverticular disease-associated segmental colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:27–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mulhall AM, Mahid SS, Petras RE, et al. Diverticular disease associated with inflammatory bowel disease-like colitis: A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1072–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daniels L, Budding AE, de Korte N, et al. Fecal microbiome analysis as a diagnostic test for diverticulitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33:1927–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gueimonde M, Ouwehand A, Huhtinen H, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the bifidobacterial microbiota in the colonic mucosa of patients with colorectal cancer, diverticulitis and inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:3985–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barbara G, Scaioli E, Barbaro MR, et al. Gut microbiota, metabolome and immune signatures in patients with uncomplicated diverticular disease. Gut 2017;66:1252–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Daniels L, Philipszoon LE, Boermeester MA. A hypothesis: Important role for gut microbiota in the etiopathogenesis of diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:539–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Floch MH. A hypothesis: Is diverticulitis a type of inflammatory bowel disease? J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40(Suppl 3):S121–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Turco F, Andreozzi P, Palumbo I, et al. Bacterial stimuli activate nitric oxide colonic mucosal production in diverticular disease. Protective effects of L. casei DG® (Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-1572). United European Gastroenterol J 2017;5:715–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Humes DJ, Spiller RC. Review article: The pathogenesis and management of acute colonic diverticulitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014;39:359–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jacobs DO. Clinical practice: Diverticulitis. N Engl J Med 2007;357: 2057–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spiller RC. Changing views on diverticular disease: Impact of aging, obesity, diet, and microbiota. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;27: 305–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Korzenik JR. Case closed? Diverticulitis: Epidemiology and fiber. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40(Suppl 3):S112–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peery AF, Barrett PR, Park D, et al. A high-fiber diet does not protect against asymptomatic diverticulosis. Gastroenterology 2012;142: 266–72.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen KL, Madak-Erdogan Z. Estrogen and microbiota crosstalk: Should we pay attention? Trends Endocrinol Metab 2016;27: 752–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Benedek G, Zhang J, Nguyen H, et al. Estrogen protection against EAE modulates the microbiota and mucosal-associated regulatory cells. J Neuroimmunol 2017;310:51–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stanisavljević S, Lukić J, Soković S, et al. Correlation of gut microbiota composition with resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in rats. Front Microbiol 2016;7:2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang G, Xu J, Lefever DE, et al. Genistein prevention of hyperglycemia and improvement of glucose tolerance in adult non-obese diabetic mice are associated with alterations of gut microbiome and immune homeostasis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2017;332:138–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baker JM, Al-Nakkash L, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Estrogen-gut microbiome axis: Physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas 2017;103:45–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Looijer-van Langen M, Hotte N, Dieleman LA, et al. Estrogen receptor-b signaling modulates epithelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2011;300:G621–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Braniste V, Jouault A, Gaultier E, et al. Impact of oral bisphenol A at reference doses on intestinal barrier function and sex differences after perinatal exposure in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:448–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Straub RH. The complex role of estrogens in inflammation. Endocr Rev 2007;28:521–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yurkovetskiy L, Burrows M, Khan AA, et al. Gender bias in autoimmunity is influenced by microbiota. Immunity 2013;39:400–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gomez A, Luckey D, Taneja V. The gut microbiome in autoimmunity: Sex matters. Clin Immunol 2015;159:154–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Markle JGM, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science 2013;339:1084–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chalmers J, Cooper ME. UKPDS and the legacy effect. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1618–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sarna L, Bialous SA, Jun HJ, et al. Smoking trends in the Nurses’ Health Study (1976–2003). Nurs Res 2008;57:374–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van Dam RM, Li T, Spiegelman D, et al. Combined impact of lifestyle factors on mortality: Prospective cohort study in US women. BMJ 2008; 337:a1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 2

RESOURCES