Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2021 Apr 16;89(5):e00730-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00730-20

Loss of Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Signaling Promotes IL-22-Dependent Host Defenses against Acute Clostridioides difficile Infection

Emily S Cribas a, Joshua E Denny a, Jeffrey R Maslanka a, Michael C Abt a,
Editor: Nancy E Freitagb
PMCID: PMC8091099  PMID: 33649048

Infection with the bacterial pathogen Clostridioides difficile causes severe damage to the intestinal epithelium that elicits a robust inflammatory response. Markers of intestinal inflammation accurately predict clinical disease severity.

KEYWORDS: Clostridioides difficile, Clostridium difficile, gut inflammation, host-pathogen interactions, intestinal immunity, mucosal immunity

ABSTRACT

Infection with the bacterial pathogen Clostridioides difficile causes severe damage to the intestinal epithelium that elicits a robust inflammatory response. Markers of intestinal inflammation accurately predict clinical disease, however, the extent to which host-derived proinflammatory mediators drive pathogenesis versus promote host protective mechanisms remains elusive. In this report, we employed Il10−/− mice as a model of spontaneous colitis to examine the impact of constitutive intestinal immune activation, independent of infection, on C. difficile disease pathogenesis. Upon C. difficile challenge, Il10−/− mice exhibited significantly decreased morbidity and mortality compared to littermate Il10 heterozygote (Il10HET) control mice, despite a comparable C. difficile burden, innate immune response, and microbiota composition following infection. Similarly, antibody-mediated blockade of interleukin-10 (IL-10) signaling in wild-type C57BL/6 mice conveyed a survival advantage if initiated 3 weeks prior to infection. In contrast, no advantage was observed if blockade was initiated on the day of infection, suggesting that the constitutive activation of inflammatory defense pathways prior to infection mediated host protection. IL-22, a cytokine critical in mounting a protective response against C. difficile infection, was elevated in the intestine of uninfected, antibiotic-treated Il10−/− mice, and genetic ablation of the IL-22 signaling pathway in Il10−/− mice negated the survival advantage following C. difficile challenge. Collectively, these data demonstrate that constitutive loss of IL-10 signaling, via genetic ablation or antibody blockade, enhances IL-22-dependent host defense mechanisms to limit C. difficile pathogenesis.

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile is a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States. High recurrence rates, increases in community-acquired infections, and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains render C. difficile an urgent threat to our public health system (15). The manifestation of C. difficile infection is highly variable, ranging from asymptomatic colonization, diarrhea, and pseudomembranous colitis to severe cases of toxic megacolon and death (6). Disease severity is shaped by the host immune response, and patients on immunosuppressants or with autoimmune disorders are more susceptible to severe disease (79). Taken together, there is a need to study the host immune response to C. difficile infection to develop new therapies.

Upon intestinal colonization, C. difficile produces toxins that disrupt epithelial barrier integrity and result in the translocation of commensal bacteria into submucosal tissues. Impaired barrier integrity leads to downstream induction of a multifaceted, robust inflammatory response (10, 11). The innate immune response is essential for protection against C. difficile infection. Mice deficient in pathogen recognition receptor signaling pathways or innate immune cells exhibit increased bacterial translocation, damage to the epithelial barrier, and increased mortality following C. difficile infection (1216). Conversely, proinflammatory mediators can simultaneously exacerbate tissue damage and promote C. difficile expansion to hinder recovery (1618). In support of these animal studies, elevated fecal and serum proinflammatory cytokine levels are associated with increased disease severity in patients (1921). Together, these findings highlight the complexity of the host response and demonstrate the need to fundamentally understand the timing and context of intestinal inflammation as a driver of C. difficile pathogenesis. To begin to address the contribution of the host proinflammatory immune response to promoting disease severity during C. difficile infection, elevated expression of intestinal inflammatory mediators was established in mice a priori C. difficile challenge, and the disease severity following subsequent infection was investigated.

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a broad immunoregulatory cytokine that negatively regulates commensal bacteria-driven immune activation at steady state (2224). Intestinal expression of IL-10 is critical for maintaining intestinal homeostasis, as mice deficient in the Il10 gene develop microbiota-dependent spontaneous colitis characterized by chronic activation of inflammatory mediators that are also associated with C. difficile pathogenesis (2527). Thus, Il10−/− mice, a widely used model of intestinal immune dysregulation, offer the opportunity to decouple intestinal inflammation from infection to study the causative nature of inflammatory mediators in C. difficile pathogenesis (28).

In this report, we demonstrate that preexisting intestinal immune activation, e.g., expression of proinflammatory cytokines driven by loss of IL-10 signaling, reduces susceptibility to C. difficile infection. Host protective immunity was independent of changes in C. difficile burden, toxin production, and the microbiota. The protective capacity of IL-10-deficient immune activation was dependent on IL-22 production enhancing early host defenses against C. difficile infection.

RESULTS

IL-10 deficiency decreases susceptibility to acute C. difficile infection.

At steady state, IL-10 maintains intestinal homeostasis by negatively regulating commensal bacterium-driven expression of proinflammatory cytokines. In the context of C. difficile infection, many of these proinflammatory cytokines correlate with increased disease severity. However, it is unclear whether the inflammatory profile associated with infection emerges following C. difficile-mediated tissue damage or if it proactively drives pathology and worsens disease (20, 21). To address this question, intestinal inflammation was induced independently of C. difficile infection using the murine Il10−/− spontaneous colitis model, and the impact of constitutive inflammation on C. difficile disease severity was examined. Cohoused Il10−/− and littermate Il10 heterozygous mice (Il10HET) were treated with a broad-spectrum antibiotic cocktail in their drinking water to induce susceptibility to C. difficile and mimic the microbiota dysbiosis observed in patients at high risk for contracting C. difficile. Antibiotic-treated Il10HET mice exhibited peak disease severity within 48 hours of infection, as measured by a disease score based on weight loss, body temperature, diarrhea, and lethargy (Fig. 1A), and approximately 75% mortality rate (Fig. 1B). In contrast, Il10−/− mice experienced reduced disease severity at 2 days postinfection (p.i.) (Fig. 1A) and were less likely to succumb to acute C. difficile infection than Il10HET mice (Fig. 1B).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Genetic ablation of Il10 results in reduced susceptibility to C. difficile infection. Antibiotic-treated Il10−/− and Il10HET mice were inoculated with approximately 400 spores of C. difficile (VPI 10463 strain) and monitored daily for disease. (A) Disease score and (B) survival following infection. Data shown are a combination of five independent experiments (Il10−/−, n = 23; Il10HET, n = 25). (C) C. difficile burden in fecal pellets at day 1 p.i. (D) C. difficile burden and (E) C. difficile toxin levels in the cecal content at day 2 p.i. **, P < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated by a log-rank test.

Il10−/− mice challenged with pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Citrobacter rodentium, Toxoplasma gondii, or Candida albicans all display improved pathogen clearance via enhanced phagocytic mechanisms by innate immune cells (2933). Thus, C. difficile burden was measured at days 1 and 2 p.i. No difference in C. difficile burden was observed in the cecal content of Il10HET and Il10−/− mice at days 1 (Fig. 1C) and 2 p.i. (Fig. 1D). Further, C. difficile toxin activity in the cecal content of Il10HET and Il10−/− mice was similar at day 2 p.i., as measured by an in vitro cell-rounding assay (Fig. 1E). Together, these data indicate that loss of IL-10 augments host immunity following C. difficile infection but does not alter the establishment of infection or production of toxins, the primary virulence factors of C. difficile.

Intestinal inflammation and the subsequent onset of spontaneous colitis in Il10−/− mice vary between vivaria and are dependent on the microbiota (25, 26). For example, Helicobacter species are well-known colitogenic triggers in Il10−/− mice (34, 35). Prior to cohousing, we confirmed the presence of Helicobacter spp. in the feces of our Il10−/− mice colony but not vendor-purchased C57BL/6 mice (Fig. S1A). To test the rigor of the observed enhanced survival phenotype in C. difficile-infected Il10−/− mice, wild-type C57BL/6 and Helicobacter-positive Il10−/− mice were cohoused and infected with C. difficile at an independent animal facility. In agreement with our studies in Il10HET mice, Il10−/− mice exhibited improved survival (Fig. S1B) compared to cohoused C57BL/6 mice following C. difficile infection despite no difference in C. difficile burden (Fig. S1C) or toxin production (Fig. S1D) at days 2 and 4 p.i. These complementary experiments demonstrate the robustness of this phenotype.

Enhanced protection in Il10−/− mice is not driven by a distinct microbiota composition.

The composition of the microbiota impacts C. difficile pathogenesis through multiple direct and indirect mechanisms (36); therefore, cohoused littermate mice were used to normalize for this variable. To test the null hypothesis that the microbiota composition between Il10HET and Il10−/− mice was indistinguishable, bacterial 16S rRNA marker gene profiling was conducted on cecal content from Il10HET and Il10−/− mice collected at day 2 after C. difficile or mock infection. Microbial community alpha diversity was not different between uninfected or infected Il10HET and Il10−/− mice (Fig. 2A). Comparison of 16S rRNA bacterial community profiles between Il10HET and Il10−/− mice by relative bacterial abundance revealed a bloom of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) identified as C. difficile in both Il10HET and Il10−/− infected mice compared to uninfected mice; however, the relative abundance composition between infected groups was similar (Fig. 2B). Beta diversity comparisons between samples by unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Fig. 2C), unweighted UniFrac distances (Fig. 2D), or permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analysis (Table S1) did not support rejecting the null hypothesis that there was no microbial community level difference between Il10HET and Il10−/− mice on day 2 following mock infection or C. difficile infection. A linear regression model was used to identify individual ASVs that correlate with Il10HET and Il10−/− phenotypes. The linear model readily detected C. difficile as significantly enriched in infected mice compared to uninfected mice but failed to identify an ASV significantly different between the microbiota of infected Il10HET and Il10−/− mice (Fig. S2A and B).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

C. difficile-infected Il10−/− mice and Il10HET mice exhibit a similar microbiota composition. Antibiotic-treated uninfected and C. difficile-infected Il10−/− mice and Il10HET mice were sacrificed at day 2 p.i., and cecal content was processed for 16s rRNA bacterial gene profiling. (A) Microbial alpha diversity as determined by the Shannon diversity index. (B) Relative abundance of top 15 bacterial ASVs. Bar plot is displayed at the genus level, except for orange bars that represent an ASV aligning to C. difficile. (C) Dendrogram representation of intestinal microbial communities using unsupervised hierarchical clustering of unweighted UniFrac distances to identify similarities between samples. (D) Unweighted UniFrac principal coordinate analysis plot of 16S bacterial rRNA ASVs.

In a validation cohort, 16S rRNA marker gene profiling was conducted on fecal pellets collected from C57BL/6 and Il10−/− mice prior to cohousing (day −64 p.i.), throughout cohousing, at the start of antibiotic treatment (day −6 p.i.), and on the day of infection (day 0 p.i.). Prior to cohousing, Il10−/− mice exhibit a distinct microbiota (Fig. S3A, Table S2). Cohousing shifted the microbiota of C57BL/6 mice to resemble the microbiota of Il10−/− mice, as determined by unweighted UniFrac distance analysis (Fig. S3A), relative bacterial genus abundance (Fig. S3B), unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Fig. S3C), and PERMANOVA analysis (Table S2). Antibiotic treatment between day −6 and 0 p.i. significantly reduced the alpha diversity (Fig. S3D) and shifted the microbiota of both C57BL/6 and Il10−/− mice, but no difference between groups was observed (Table S2). To identify specific ASVs that were differentially abundant between cohoused C57BL/6 and Il10−/− mice, a linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) comparison was conducted. Several ASVs were differentially abundant within the microbiota of C57BL/6 and Il10−/− mice prior to cohousing (Fig. S3E). However, following cohousing and antibiotic treatment, none of these differentially abundant ASVs remained (Fig. S3E). Together, these microbial profiling data support the conclusion that the differential outcome observed in antibiotic-treated IL-10-sufficient and -deficient hosts following C. difficile infection cannot be explained by community-level differences in the microbiota.

Il10−/− and Il10HET mice exhibit comparable induction of innate immunity following C. difficile infection.

No differences in C. difficile colonization, toxin production, or microbiota composition were observed between infected Il10HET and Il10−/− mice to account for enhanced protection in Il10−/− mice; therefore, potential immune-mediated mechanisms were assessed. Induction of IL-10 is an effective strategy employed by some enteric pathogens to dampen the host immune response to infection (29, 30, 3739). C. difficile-derived flagellin, surface layer proteins, and toxin (TcdB) all can induce macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells to produce IL-10 in vitro (4042). Indeed, C57BL/6 mice infected with C. difficile have elevated IL-10 protein in the cecal tissue at day 2 p.i. (Fig. 3A). The broad immunosuppressive functions of IL-10 include inhibiting granulocyte infiltration into mucosal tissue and limiting expression of type 1 and type 17 cytokines, components of the immune response that promote protective immunity following C. difficile infection (4347).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Il10−/− and Il10HET mice exhibit a comparable induction of the innate immune response following acute C. difficile infection. (A) IL-10 protein levels in the cecal tissue homogenates of antibiotic-treated uninfected and day 2 p.i. C57BL/6 mice. (B to H) Il10−/− and Il10HET mice were inoculated with approximately 400 spores of C. difficile (VPI 10463 strain) or mock infected and sacrificed 2 days later. (B) LCN-2 protein levels in the cecal supernatants. (C to E) Large intestine lamina propria cells were harvested and assessed by flow cytometry for (C) neutrophil (CD11b+, Ly6G+) (D) monocyte (CD11b+, Ly6C+, Ly6G) (E) and eosinophil (SSCHi, CD11b+, Siglec-F+) recruitment. (F and G) Fold induction of (F) Ifng and Il22 and (G) IFN-γ and IL-22 effector molecules (Nos2 and Reg3g) in the colon at day 2 p.i. relative to uninfected Il10HET mice and normalized to Hprt. (H) IFN-γ, IL-22 and (I) type 2-associated cytokine protein levels in the cecal tissue homogenate. Data shown are a combination of two independent experiments (uninfected Il10−/−, n = 7; uninfected Il10HET, n = 6; day 2 infected Il10−/−, n = 8; uninfected Il10HET, n = 7). Data shown are means ± SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test.

First, protein levels of lipocalin-2 (LCN-2), an established marker of intestinal inflammation (48), were measured in the cecal content of antibiotic-treated uninfected and day 2 p.i. Il10−/− and Il10HET mice (48). LCN-2 levels increased to approximately the same concentration in both groups by day 2 p.i. (Fig. 3B). Next, to thoroughly assess the quality of the innate immune response to acute C. difficile infection, Il10−/− and Il10HET mice were sacrificed at day 2 p.i., and recruitment of innate immune cells and induction of proinflammatory cytokines were assessed. Both infected Il10HET and Il10−/− mice exhibited a robust induction of the innate immune response compared to antibiotic-treated, uninfected, control mice (Fig. 3). No statistically significant differences in the frequency (Fig. S4A to C) or total numbers of infiltrating neutrophils (Fig. 3C), monocytes (Fig. 3D), or eosinophils (Fig. 3E) were observed between Il10−/− and Il10HET mice at day 2 p.i. Il10−/− and Il10HET mice at day 2 p.i. exhibited comparably elevated gene expression of Ifng and Il22 (Fig. 3F) as well as downstream host defense genes Nos2 and Reg3g in the colon (Fig. 3G). Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and IL-22 protein concentrations in cecal tissue homogenates were also comparable (Fig. 3H). Type 2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-13, and IL-33), associated with eosinophil activation and protection during C. difficile infection (15, 47, 49), were not significantly different in the cecum of Il10−/− and Il10HET mice at day 2 p.i. (Fig. 3I). Finally, no differences in proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17a, IL-27, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) reported to modulate C. difficile pathogenesis (16, 5054) or chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2, and CCL2) involved in neutrophil and monocyte recruitment were observed in the cecal tissue homogenates of Il10−/− and Il10HET mice at day 2 p.i. (Fig. S4D and E). Collectively, these data indicate the magnitude or quality of the innate immune response in Il10−/− mice following C. difficile infection is not driving the attenuated disease phenotype.

Loss of IL-10 signaling prior to C. difficile infection drives immune activation in the intestine and augments protective immunity.

In contrast to the comparable immune responses observed in C. difficile-infected Il10−/− and Il10HET mice, antibiotic-treated, uninfected Il10−/− mice at day 2 after mock infection had higher levels of LCN-2 in the cecal content (Fig. 3B) and increased expression of IL-22- and IFN-γ-dependent effector molecules (Fig. 3F) in the large intestine than antibiotic-treated, uninfected Il10HET mice. Moreover, antibiotic-treated Il10−/− mice at day 0 p.i. displayed elevated immune activation in the large intestine compared to Il10HET mice, as determined by increased frequency (Fig. 4A) and total numbers (Fig. 4B) of infiltrating neutrophils in the large intestine as well as elevated expression of proinflammatory immune defense genes (Il22, Ifng, Reg3g, and Nos2) (Fig. 4C), in agreement with previous reports (55, 56). These results support the hypothesis that preexisting immune activation, not the magnitude of the immune response following infection, confers protective immunity in Il10−/− mice.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Loss of IL-10 signaling enhances intestinal immune activation prior to infection and decreases susceptibility to acute C. difficile infection. Antibiotic-treated uninfected and Il10−/− mice and Il10HET mice were sacrificed on the day of infection (prior to inoculation). (A) Frequency of neutrophils and monocytes in the large intestine lamina propria. FACS plots were gated on live, CD45+, non-T, non-B cells, Siglec-Fneg, CD11b+ cells. (B) Total number of neutrophils and monocytes in the large intestine lamina propria. Data are a combination representative of two independent experiments. Il10−/−, n = 8; Il10HET, n = 9. (C) Fold induction of type 1- and type 17-associated effector molecules in the colon of antibiotic-treated, uninfected Il10−/−mice relative to antibiotic-treated, uninfected Il10HET mice and normalized to Hprt. Data are a combination representative of three independent experiments. Il10−/−, n = 12; Il10HET, n = 13. Data shown are means ± SEM. (D) C57BL/6 mice were cohoused with Il10−/− mice for 2 weeks and then were administered anti-IL10R1 or isotype control (rat IgG1) by i.p. injection weekly for 3 weeks prior to infection or received a single dose of anti-IL10R1 on the day of C. difficile infection and assessed for survival following infection. Data are a combination of two independent experiments (n = 8 per group). *, P < 0.05. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test or a log-rank test.

To determine whether the loss of IL-10 signaling prior to infection and subsequent immune activation augments protection following C. difficile infection, IL-10 signaling was selectively blocked in C57BL/6 mice starting either 3 weeks prior to infection or on the day of infection, and survival was assessed. Antibody-mediated blockade of the IL-10-specific receptor IL-10R1 (αIL10R1) administered once a week for at least 3 weeks abrogates IL-10 signaling and replicates the intestinal inflammation observed in germ line Il10−/− mice (57). C57BL/6 mice that received weekly αIL10R1 treatment starting 3 weeks prior to infection exhibited survival comparable to that of Il10−/− mice and significantly improved survival compared to C57BL/6 mice administered αIL10R1 at day 0 p.i. (Fig. 4D). These data support the hypothesis that IL-10 inhibits basal activation of intestinal immune defense genes prior to infection, thereby rendering the host more susceptible to C. difficile infection.

IL-22 is critical for host defense against C. difficile infection in Il10−/− mice.

Inhibition of IL-10 signaling limits C. difficile pathogenesis only if initiated several weeks prior to infection (Fig. 4D). Further, Il10 deficiency leads to enhanced colonic il22 and ifng expression in uninfected mice (Fig. 4C). Both IL-22 and IFN-γ are critical in mounting a protective innate immune response during acute C. difficile infection (13, 14, 58). These observations suggest immune activation prior to infection promotes improved survival in Il10−/− mice. To determine the relative contribution of these cytokine pathways to host protection in Il10−/− mice, Il22 or Tbx21 (the gene that encodes T-bet, a master transcription factor that regulates IFN-γ production) was genetically ablated in Il10−/− mice. Following C. difficile infection, Il10.Tbx21 double knockout (dKO) mice exhibited survival comparable to that of Il10−/− mice, suggesting the IFN-γ pathway was dispensable for protection in Il10−/− mice (Fig. 5A). In contrast, Il10.Il22 dKO mice were acutely susceptible to C. difficile infection (Fig. 5A). To confirm the dependence of IL-22 signaling for host protection in an IL-10-deficient setting, cohoused C57BL/6 or Il10HET mice and Il10−/−, Il22−/−, Il10.Il22 dKO, and Il10r2−/− mice (IL-10R2 is the shared receptor subunit necessary for both IL-10 and IL-22 signaling) were pretreated with antibiotics and infected with C. difficile. Genetic ablation of IL-22 signaling in an IL-10-deficient setting (Il10.Il22 dKO and Il10r2−/− mice) led to significantly increased disease morbidity at day 2 p.i. (Fig. 5B) and mortality compared to Il10−/− mice (Fig. 5C). Collectively, these data support the conclusion that loss of IL-10 signaling leads to activation of IL-22-dependent host defense mechanisms that limit C. difficile pathogenesis.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

IL-22 signaling is required for protection against C. difficile infection in Il10−/− mice. (A) Cohoused Il10−/−, Il10.Il22 dKO, and Il10.Tbx21 dKO mice were pretreated with antibiotics and inoculated with approximately 400 spores of C. difficile (VPI 10463 strain) and assessed for survival following infection. Survival curve is a combination of three independent experiments. Il10−/−, n = 7; Il10.Il22 dKO, n = 12; Il10.Tbx21 dKO, n = 14. (B) Disease severity at day 2 p.i. (C) Survival curve of cohoused C57BL/6 or Il10HET (wild-type, WT), Il10−/−, Il10r2−/−, Il10−/−, Il22−/−, and Il10.Il22 dKO mice following C. difficile infection. Data shown are a combination of four independent experiments (WT, n = 12; Il10−/−, n = 14; Il10r2−/−, n = 14 Il22−/−, n = 16; Il10.Il22 dKO, n = 12). *, P < 0.05. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test or a log-rank test.

DISCUSSION

C. difficile infection induces a robust innate inflammatory response that has been extensively studied in the context of pathogenesis. Here, we employed Il10−/− mice to decouple constitutive intestinal inflammation from C. difficile infection-induced inflammation and determine their respective roles in pathogen defense. Collectively, our data support the conclusion that the absence of IL-10 signaling elevates host defenses prior to infection, leading to reduced C. difficile pathogenesis in an IL-22-dependent manner. These results implicate a novel and deleterious role for IL-10 in dampening the IL-22 response during enteric C. difficile infection.

Previous work by Kim et al. assessed IL-10 in the context of C. difficile infection and observed more severe disease in C. difficile-infected Il10−/− mice than in cohoused C57BL/6 mice at day 7 p.i. (59). Notably, intestinal inflammation of the Il10−/− mice prior to infection was not increased compared to that of C57BL/6 mice in this study, suggesting immune defense mechanisms were not elevated in the Il10−/− cohort at the time of infection. The microbiota composition, such as Helicobacter colonization status, of the Il10−/− mice used by Kim and colleagues was not reported but could explain this lack of inflammation prior to infection. The Kim et al. study examined recovery from a mild form of C. difficile disease (10 to 15% weight loss; 100% survival in C57BL/6 mice) induced by infection with vegetative C. difficile cells (59). In contrast, the data in this report investigate the role of preexisting immune activation induced by loss of IL-10 during the acute response to a severe form of C. difficile disease (20 to 30% weight loss; 25 to 50% survival in C57BL/6 mice). Severe infection in this study was induced with C. difficile spores that mimic the natural form of exposure in the hospitalized patient population (60, 61). Together, these studies support a model where basal immune activation prior to infection can limit severe acute pathogenesis. However, prolonged Il10 deficiency during a milder form of disease tips the balance toward inflammation-driven tissue immunopathology.

Despite the protective capacity of intestinal inflammation reported in this study in the context of Il10 deficiency, expression of proinflammatory molecules does not uniformly limit C. difficile disease. Notably, Il10−/− mice are also a widely used model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a well-appreciated risk factor for C. difficile disease (8, 62). Due to its multifactorial nature, however, clinical reports that link IBD to C. difficile are not able to differentiate what features of IBD drive increased C. difficile disease severity (62). Research investigating the connection between IBD and C. difficile has employed mice treated with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), a model of chemically induced colitis, to disentangle the role of proinflammatory immune components in pathogenesis. DSS-treated mice exhibit increased susceptibility to C. difficile infection (63), and Saleh et al. demonstrated that IL-17 competent CD4+ TH17 cells activated by DSS colitis were sufficient to increase susceptibility to C. difficile infection in non-DSS-treated mice (16). This work identifies induction of IL-17 during IBD as an inflammatory pathway that promotes C. difficile disease.

In the context of the C. difficile infection, the IL-23/IL-22/IL-17 axis has a nuanced role in pathogenesis. Genetic ablation of IL-23, a cytokine upstream of IL-17, protects mice from severe C. difficile infection (17), while mice deficient in IL-22, which is also directly downstream of IL-23, are acutely susceptible to infection (13, 64). Further, wild-type mice that receive rIL-22 treatment prior to C. difficile challenge are protected from severe infection (13). Altogether, these observations, along with the results presented here, support a protective role for elevated IL-22 production. At the same time, induction of the IL-23 proinflammatory axis in the absence of IL-22, or in favor of IL-17 production, could drive more severe disease. Multiple IL-22-dependent mechanisms that mediate protection against C. difficile infection have been described. Hasegawa et al. demonstrated the induction of complement proteins via IL-22 signaling on hepatocytes is required to limit non-C. difficile bacterial translocation during severe C. difficile infection (13). In addition to this systemic role for IL-22, a more recent study demonstrated a role for IL-22 signaling in modulation of intestinal epithelial glycosylation to enable growth of bacterial consumers of succinate, a crucial metabolite for C. difficile growth (65). IL-22 also acts on intestinal epithelial cells to induce expression of genes that encode antimicrobial peptides, including RegIIIγ, lipocalin-2, and calprotectin (6668), that limit damage of adherent or mucosa-associated commensal bacteria to the epithelium (66, 67), the latter of which has been associated with host protection against C. difficile (69). In support of this, Gunesekera et al. showed that Il10−/− mice exhibited enriched expression of these same IL-22-dependent antimicrobial genes, all of which were uniquely lost in Il10.Il22 dKO mice (55). Thus, elevated IL-22 expression at the time of C. difficile infection, as observed in Il10−/− mice, positions the host to limit toxin-mediated destruction of the epithelial barrier.

Immune activation in il10 -deficient hosts disrupts homeostasis at steady state but is also beneficial in the context of an acute C. difficile infection by elevating baseline defense mechanisms prior to infection. This concept of immunological tuning prior to infection has been previously observed with commensal bacteria providing tonic signaling to maintain antiviral defenses in a poised state of readiness to rapidly respond upon viral infection (7072). Thus, the trade-off of constitutive intestinal il10 expression is diminished basal activation of immune defense genes and, therefore, a decreased capacity of the host to respond to pathogen challenge. Understanding the dynamics of this biological balancing act could help develop therapies that selectively or transiently target the protective components of immune activation in at-risk patients while avoiding deleterious side effects of prolonged inflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice.

Four- to 6-week-old wild-type C57BL/6J, Il10−/−, Tbx21−/−, and Il10rb−/− mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Il22−/− mice were provided by R. Flavell (Yale University). All knockout mouse strains were derived on a C57BL/6 background. All mice were bred and maintained in autoclaved cages under specific pathogen free conditions at the University of Pennsylvania. All experiments with cohoused C57BL/6 and Il10−/− mice were done at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Il10Il22 dKO and Il10.Tbx21 dKO mice were generated by breeding Il10−/− mice with Il22−/− and Tbx21−/− mice, respectively. The presence of Helicobacter spp., a bacterial genus sufficient to trigger early onset of intestinal inflammation in Il10−/− mice, was confirmed by PCR in the feces of all breeder Il10−/− mice and Il10−/−-derived mouse strains (34, 35, 73). Our Helicobacter species-positive Il10−/− mice began to display overt signs of colitis at around 3 to 4 months of age. Therefore, 10- to 14-week-old Il10−/− mice were used in our studies. At this age, Il10−/− mice exhibit increased expression of inflammatory immune genes in the intestine but do not yet display clinical manifestations of spontaneous colitis. Sex- and age-matched control mice were used in all experiments according to institutional guidelines for animal care. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Antibiotic pretreatment, C. difficile infection, and mouse monitoring.

Mice were cohoused for 3 weeks prior to antibiotic treatment and then supplemented with metronidazole (0.25 g/liter), neomycin (Sigma) (0.25 g/liter), and vancomycin (Novaplus) (0.25 g/liter) in drinking water for 3 days. One day following cessation of antibiotic water, mice received 200 mg of clindamycin (Sigma) by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. Twenty-four hours later, mice received approximately 400 C. difficile spores (VPI 10463 strain, ATCC 43255) via oral gavage. For antibody-mediated blockade experiments, mice received 1 mg of αIL10R1 antibody (clone 1B1.3A; Bio X Cell) or mouse IgG1 isotype control (clone MOPC-21; Bio X Cell) i.p. weekly starting either 3 weeks before infection or on the day of infection. After infection, mice were monitored and scored for disease severity by four parameters: weight loss (>95% of initial weight, 0; 95% to 90% initial weight, 1; 90% to 80% initial weight, 2; <80%, 3), surface body temperature (>32°C, 0; 32°C to 30.5°C, 1; 30.5°C to 29°C, 2; <29°C, 3), diarrhea severity (formed pellets, 0; loose pellets, 1; liquid discharge, 2; no pellets/caked to fur, 3), morbidity (score of 1 for each symptoms with a maximum score of 3; ruffled fur, hunched back, lethargy, and ocular discharge). Mice that exhibited severe disease, defined as a surface body temperature below 29.5°C or weight loss in excess of 30%, were humanely euthanized by CO2 displacement.

C. difficile quantification.

Fecal pellets or cecal content were resuspended in deoxygenated phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and 10-fold serial dilutions were plated anaerobically at 37°C on brain heart infusion agar supplemented with yeast extract, l-cysteine, d-cycloserine, cefoxitin, and taurocholic acid (CCBHIS-TA). CFU were enumerated 24 h later. Prior to infection, fecal samples from mice were cultured overnight in CCBHIS-TA liquid broth and then serially diluted and grown for 24 h on CCBHIS-TA plates to ensure that mice did not harbor endogenous C. difficile in their microbiota. Supernatants from the cecal or fecal content were obtained after centrifugation for cytotoxicity assays and LCN-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Bethyl Labs).

C. difficile toxin cytotoxicity assay.

Vero cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1 × 104 cells/well and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cecal or fecal supernatants were added in 10-fold dilutions to the Vero cells (100 μl/well) and incubated overnight prior to removal, rinsing with PBS, and replacement with fresh media. The presence of C. difficile toxins A and B was confirmed by neutralization with antitoxin antisera (Techlab, Blacksburg, VA). The data are expressed as the log10 reciprocal value of the last dilution where cell rounding was observed. Cell morphological changes were observed after 18 h using a Nikon inverted microscope. The cytopathic effect was determined as rounded cells compared to the negative-control wells.

16S rRNA sequencing.

Cecal content was collected from uninfected mice and mice infected with C. difficile at 2 days p.i. DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract power microbiome kit DNA/RNA kit (catalog no. 27500-4-EP; Qiagen) and used for rRNA sequencing and Helicobacter species PCR. Genus-specific PCR was conducted on purified bacterial DNA from feces of Il10−/− breeder mice, and the V4-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified from each sample using the dual indexing sequencing strategy as described previously (74). Sequencing was done on the Illumina MiSeq platform. The V4-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced and demultiplexed using the fqgrep tool. Data were imported into QIIME2 (v. 2020.2) (75) and denoised using the DADA2 plugin (76). For data in Fig. S3 in the supplemental material, the fqgrep tool (https://github.com/indraniel/fqgrep) was used to demultiplex the sequences, followed by denoising using the DADA2 (v. 1.14.1) (76) implementation in R (v. 3.6.3) (77). Due to quality issues on the reverse reads, only the forward reads were used for denoising. Data sets were taxonomically classified in QIIME2 using the q2-feature-classifier (78) classify-sklearn naive Bayes classifier with a newly generated classifier against Greengenes 13_8 99% operational taxonomic unit (OTU) sequences (79). Phylogenetic trees were generated using mafft (80) and the q2-phylogeny plugin (81). Data were then imported into R for further analyses with phyloseq (v. 1.30.0) (82) and visualization with ggplot2 (v. 3.3.0) (83). Unweighted UniFrac (84) dissimilarity was calculated to generate principal coordinate analysis plots and for creating dendrograms using the hclust function (stats package in R core, v. 3.6.3). Finally, a linear model was built using the lm() and padjust() functions (stats package, v. 3.6.3) as well as the Tidyverse package (v. 1.3.0) (85).

Isolation of lamina propria cells and flow cytometry.

Single-cell suspensions were obtained from the large intestine lamina propria compartment by longitudinally cutting the large intestine and washing out its contents in PBS. Intestinal tissues were incubated at 37°C under gentle agitation in stripping buffer (PBS, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 4% fetal calf serum, 10 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin) for 10 min to remove epithelial cells and then for another 20 min to remove intraepithelial lymphocytes. The tissue was digested with collagenase IV at 1.5 mg/ml (500 U/ml) and DNase (20 μg/ml) in complete medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin, 50 μg/ml gentamicin, 10 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 20 μg/ml l-glutamine) for 30 min at 37°C under gentle agitation. Supernatants containing the lamina propria fraction were passed through a 100-μm cell strainer and then a 40-μm cell strainer. After counting, cells were plated at 106 cells per well in 96-well round-bottom plates and washed twice in PBS before incubating with a cell viability dye for 20 min at room temperature (Invitrogen AQUA dye). After Fc blockade (anti-mouse CD16/32 clone 2.4G2; BD Biosciences), cells were stained using a standard flow cytometric staining protocol with fluorescently conjugated antibodies specific to CD3ε, CD5, CD19, CD45, major histocompatibility complex class II, Siglec-F, Ly-6G, Ly6C, CD11b, and CD11c. Stained cells were kept in fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) buffer at 4°C until run. Samples were acquired on an LSR-II flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson). Data were analyzed using FlowJo version 9.9.6 software. Cell populations were calculated from total cells per colon as a percentage of live CD45+ cells.

Cytokine and chemokine quantification.

Cecal tissue was homogenized in tissue extraction buffer with protease inhibitors for 1 min by bead beating with steel beads. Homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min, and supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C. Supernatants containing protein were analyzed by mouse multiplex Luminex assay (Invitrogen) at the Human Immunology Core at University of Pennsylvania. Concentrations are displayed as nanogram of analyte per gram of cecal tissue.

Tissue RNA isolation, cDNA preparation, and qRT-PCR.

RNA was isolated from proximal colon tissue using mechanical homogenization and TRIzol isolation (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated using QuantiTect reverse transcriptase (Qiagen). Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed on cDNA using either TaqMan primers and probes or QuantiTect primers in combination with TaqMan PCR master mix (ABI) or SYBR green chemistry, and reactions were run on a RT-PCR system (QuantiStudio 6 Flex; Applied Biosystems). Gene expression is displayed as fold increase over antibiotic-pretreated, uninfected control mice and was normalized to the Hprt gene.

Statistical analysis.

Results represent means ± standard errors of the means (SEM). Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t test and log-rank test for survival curve. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism GraphPad software v6.0 (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00730-20-s0001.pdf (558.7KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00730-20-s0002.pdf (273.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00730-20-s0003.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 4
Supplemental file 5
IAI.00730-20-s0005.pdf (400.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 6
IAI.00730-20-s0006.pdf (43.1KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the members of the Abt laboratory for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank L. Mattei of the Penn CHOP Microbiome Core and L. Lang of the Lucille Castori Center for Microbes, Inflammation and Cancer for technical expertise in high-throughput sequencing and E. Pamer for mice strains. Finally, we thank L. Zhao and R. Shimol of the Penn Human Immunology Core for technical expertise with Luminex assays.

This research was supported by the NIH (R00 AI125786 to M.C.A. and T32 AI141393 to E.S.C.).

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, Farley MM, Holzbauer SM, Meek JI, Phipps EC, Wilson LE, Winston LG, Cohen JA, Limbago BM, Fridkin SK, Gerding DN, McDonald LC. 2015. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 372:825–834. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ofori E, Ramai D, Dhawan M, Mustafa F, Gasperino J, Reddy M. 2018. Community-acquired Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, ribotype, risk factors, hospital and intensive care unit outcomes, and current and emerging therapies. J Hosp Infect 99:436–442. 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.CDC. 2019. Clostridioides difficile. CDC’s 2019 antibiotic resistant threats report. CDC, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guh AY, Mu Y, Winston LG, Johnston H, Olson D, Farley MM, Wilson LE, Holzbauer SM, Phipps EC, Dumyati GK, Beldavs ZG, Kainer MA, Karlsson M, Gerding DN, McDonald LC, Emerging Infections Program Clostridioides difficile Infection Working Group. 2020. Trends in U.S. burden of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes. N Engl J Med 382:1320–1330. 10.1056/NEJMoa1910215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collins J, Robinson C, Danhof H, Knetsch CW, Van Leeuwen HC, Lawley TD, Auchtung JM, Britton RA. 2018. Dietary trehalose enhances virulence of epidemic Clostridium difficile. Nature 553:291–294. 10.1038/nature25178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brown AWW, Wilson RB. 2018. Clostridium difficile colitis and zoonotic origins—a narrative review. Gastroenterol Rep 6:157–166. 10.1093/gastro/goy016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khanafer N, Barbut F, Eckert C, Perraud M, Demont C, Luxemburger C, Vanhems P. 2016. Factors predictive of severe Clostridium difficile infection depend on the definition used. Anaerobe 37:43–48. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG. 2008. Excess hospitalisation burden associated with Clostridium difficile in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 57:205–210. 10.1136/gut.2007.128231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sun X, Hirota SA. 2015. The roles of host and pathogen factors and the innate immune response in the pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile infection. Mol Immunol 63:193–202. 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Buonomo EL, Petri WA. 2016. The microbiota and immune response during Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 41:79–84. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Péchiné S, Collignon A. 2016. Immune responses induced by Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 41:68–78. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hasegawa M, Yamazaki T, Kamada N, Tawaratsumida K, Kim Y-G, Nunez G, Inohara N. 2011. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 1 mediates recognition of Clostridium difficile and induces neutrophil recruitment and protection against the pathogen. J Immunol 186:4872–4880. 10.4049/jimmunol.1003761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hasegawa M, Yada S, Liu MZ, Kamada N, Muñoz-Planillo R, Do N, Núñez G, Inohara N. 2014. Interleukin-22 regulates the complement system to promote resistance against pathobionts after pathogen-induced intestinal damage. Immunity 41:620–632. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abt MC, Lewis BB, Caballero S, Xiong H, Carter RA, Susac B, Ling L, Leiner I, Pamer EG. 2015. Innate immune defenses mediated by two ILC subsets are critical for protection against acute Clostridium difficile infection. Cell Host Microbe 18:27–37. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frisbee AL, Saleh MM, Young MK, Leslie JL, Simpson ME, Abhyankar MM, Cowardin CA, Ma JZ, Pramoonjago P, Turner SD, Liou AP, Buonomo EL, Petri WA. 2019. IL-33 drives group 2 innate lymphoid cell-mediated protection during Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Commun 10:2712. 10.1038/s41467-019-10733-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saleh MM, Frisbee AL, Leslie JL, Scully KW, Abhyankar MM, Petri WA, Saleh MM, Frisbee AL, Leslie JL, Buonomo EL, Cowardin CA, Ma JZ. 2019. Colitis-induced Th17 cells increase the risk for severe subsequent Clostridium difficile infection. Cell Host Microbe 2019:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Buonomo EL, Madan R, Pramoonjago P, Li L, Okusa MD, Petri WA. 2013. Role of interleukin 23 signaling in Clostridium difficile colitis. J Infect Dis 208:917–920. 10.1093/infdis/jit277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jose S, Mukherjee A, Abhyankar MM, Leng L, Bucala R, Sharma D, Madan R. 2018. Neutralization of macrophage migration inhibitory factor improves host survival after Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 53:56–63. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Steiner TS, Flores CA, Pizarro TT, Guerrant RL. 1997. Fecal lactoferrin, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-8 are elevated in patients with severe Clostridium difficile colitis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 4:719–722. 10.1128/CDLI.4.6.719-722.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yu H, Chen K, Sun Y, Carter M, Garey KW, Savidge TC, Devaraj S, Tessier ME. 2017. Cytokines are markers of the Clostridium difficile-induced inflammatory response and predict disease severity. Clin Vaccine Immunol 24:e00037-17. 10.1128/CVI.00037-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.El Feghaly RE, Stauber JL, Deych E, Gonzalez C, Tarr PI, Haslam DB. 2013. Markers of intestinal inflammation, not bacterial burden, correlate with clinical outcomes in Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 56:1713–1721. 10.1093/cid/cit147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ouyang W, Rutz S, Crellin NK, Valdez PA, Hymowitz SG. 2011. Regulation and functions of the IL-10 family of cytokines in inflammation and disease. Annu Rev Immunol 29:71–109. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fillatreau S, O’Garra A. 2014. Interleukin-10 in health and disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 380:i–viii. 10.1007/978-3-662-43492-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shouval DS, Ouahed J, Biswas A, Goettel JA, Horwitz BH, Klein C, Muise AM, Snapper SB. 2014. Interleukin 10 receptor signaling: master regulator of intestinal mucosal homeostasis in mice and humans. Adv Immunol 122:177–210. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800267-4.00005-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kühn R, Löhler J, Rennick D, Rajewsky K, Müller W. 1993. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 75:263–274. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80068-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sellon RK, Tonkonogy S, Schultz M, Dieleman LA, Grenther W, Balish ED, Rennick DM, Sartor RB. 1998. Resident enteric bacteria are necessary for development of spontaneous colitis and immune system activation in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Infect Immun 66:5224–5231. 10.1128/IAI.66.11.5224-5231.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kullberg MC, Jankovic D, Feng CG, Hue S, Gorelick PL, McKenzie BS, Cua DJ, Powrie F, Cheever AW, Maloy KJ, Sher A. 2006. IL-23 plays a key role in Helicobacter hepaticus-induced T cell–dependent colitis. J Exp Med 203:2485–2494. 10.1084/jem.20061082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Keubler LM, Buettner M, Häger C, Bleich A. 2015. A multihit model: colitis lessons from the interleukin-10-deficient mouse. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21:1967–1975. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vazquez-Torres A, Jones-Carson J, Wagner RD, Warner T, Balish E. 1999. Early resistance of interleukin-10 knockout mice to acute systemic candidiasis. Infect Immun 67:670–674. 10.1128/IAI.67.2.670-674.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sewnath ME, Olszyna DP, Birjmohun R, ten Kate FJW, Gouma DJ, van der Poll T. 2001. Il-10-deficient mice demonstrate multiple organ failure and increased mortality during Escherichia coli peritonitis despite an accelerated bacterial clearance. J Immunol 166:6323–6331. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.10.6323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arai T, Hiromatsu K, Nishimura H, Kimura Y, Kobayashi N, Ishida H, Nimura Y, Yoshikai Y. 1995. Effects of in vivo administration of anti-IL-10 monoclonal antibody on the host defence mechanism against murine Salmonella infection. Immunology 85:381–388. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Villegas EN, Wille U, Craig L, Linsley PS, Rennick DM, Peach R, Hunter CA. 2000. Blockade of costimulation prevents infection-induced immunopathology in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Infect Immun 68:2837–2844. 10.1128/iai.68.5.2837-2844.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dann SM, Le C, Choudhury BK, Liu H, Saldarriaga O, Hanson EM, Cong Y, Eckmann L. 2014. Attenuation of intestinal inflammation in interleukin-10-deficient mice infected with Citrobacter rodentium. Infect Immun 82:1949–1958. 10.1128/IAI.00066-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kullberg MC, Ward JM, Gorelick PL, Caspar P, Hieny S, Cheever A, Jankovic D, Sher A. 1998. Helicobacter hepaticus triggers colitis in specific-pathogen-free interleukin-10 (IL-10)-deficient mice through an IL-12-and gamma interferon-dependent mechanism. Infect Immun 66:5157–5166. 10.1128/IAI.66.11.5157-5166.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nagalingam NA, Robinson CJ, Bergin IL, Eaton KA, Huffnagle GB, Young VB. 2013. The effects of intestinal microbial community structure on disease manifestation in Il-10−/− mice infected with Helicobacter hepaticus. Microbiome 1:15–15. 10.1186/2049-2618-1-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leber A, Viladomiu M, Hontecillas R, Abedi V, Philipson C, Hoops S, Howard B, Bassaganya-Riera J. 2015. Systems modeling of interactions between mucosal immunity and the gut microbiome during Clostridium difficile infection. PLoS One 10:e0134849-19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0134849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peñaloza HF, Schultz BM, Nieto PA, Salazar GA, Suazo I, Gonzalez PA, Riedel CA, Alvarez-Lobos MM, Kalergis AM, Bueno SM. 2016. Opposing roles of IL-10 in acute bacterial infection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 32:17–30. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grainger JR, Wohlfert EA, Fuss IJ, Bouladoux N, Askenase MH, Legrand F, Koo LY, Brenchley JM, Fraser IDC, Belkaid Y. 2013. Inflammatory monocytes regulate pathologic responses to commensals during acute gastrointestinal infection. Nat Med 19:713–721. 10.1038/nm.3189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brooks DG, Trifilo MJ, Edelmann KH, Teyton L, Mcgavern DB, Oldstone MBA. 2006. Interleukin-10 determines viral clearance or persistence in vivo. Nat Med 12:1301–1309. 10.1038/nm1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ryan A, Lynch M, Smith SM, Amu S, Nel HJ, McCoy CE, Dowling JK, Draper E, O'Reilly V, McCarthy C, O'Brien J, Ní Eidhin D, O'Connell MJ, Keogh B, Morton CO, Rogers TR, Fallon PG, O'Neill LA, Kelleher D, Loscher CE. 2011. A role for TLR4 in Clostridium difficile infection and the recognition of surface layer proteins. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002076. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jafari NV, Kuehne SA, Bryant CE, Elawad M, Wren BW, Minton NP, Allan E, Bajaj-Elliott M. 2013. Clostridium difficile modulates host innate immunity via toxin-independent and dependent mechanism(s). PLoS One 8:e69846-10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lynch M, Walsh TA, Marszalowska I, Webb AE, Mac Aogain M, Rogers TR, Windle H, Kelleher D, O'Connell MJ, Loscher CE. 2017. Surface layer proteins from virulent Clostridium difficile ribotypes exhibit signatures of positive selection with consequences for innate immune response. BMC Evol Biol 17:90. 10.1186/s12862-017-0937-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rutz S, Ouyang W, Rutz S, Ouyang W. 2016. Regulation of cytokine gene expression in immunity and diseases. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Snapper SB, McInnis CM, Conaway EA, de Oliveira DC, Horwitz BH. 2017. Inhibition of inflammatory gene transcription by IL-10 is associated with rapid suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced enhancer activation. J Immunol 198:2906–2915. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Abt MC, McKenney PT, Pamer EG. 2016. Clostridium difficile colitis: pathogenesis and host defence. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:609–620. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jarchum I, Liu M, Shi C, Equinda M, Pamer EG. 2012. Critical role for MyD88-mediated neutrophil recruitment during Clostridium difficile colitis. Infect Immun 80:2989–2996. 10.1128/IAI.00448-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Buonomo EL, Cowardin CA, Wilson MG, Saleh MM, Pramoonjago P, Petri WA. 2016. Microbiota-regulated IL-25 increases eosinophil number to provide protection during Clostridium difficile infection. Cell Rep 16:432–443. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chassaing B, Srinivasan G, Delgado MA, Young AN, Gewirtz AT, Vijay-Kumar M. 2012. Fecal lipocalin 2, a sensitive and broadly dynamic non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. PLoS One 7:e44328-10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Donlan AN, Simpson ME, Petri WA. 2020. Type 2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 reduce severe outcomes from Clostridiodes difficile infection. Anaerobe 66:102275–102299. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hasegawa M, Kamada N, Jiao Y, Liu MZ, Núñez G, Inohara N. 2012. Protective role of commensals against Clostridium difficile infection via an IL-1β–mediated positive-feedback loop. J Immunol 189:3085–3091. 10.4049/jimmunol.1200821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nakagawa T, Mori N, Kajiwara C, Kimura S, Akasaka Y, Ishii Y, Saji T, Tateda K. 2016. Endogenous IL-17 as a factor determining the severity of Clostridium difficile infection in mice. J Med Microbiol 65:821–827. 10.1099/jmm.0.000273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang L, Cao J, Li C, Zhang L. 2018. IL-27/IL-27 receptor signaling provides protection in Clostridium difficile-induced colitis. J Infect Dis 217:198–207. 10.1093/infdis/jix581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McDermott AJ, Frank CR, Falkowski NR, McDonald RA, Young VB, Huffnagle GB. 2014. Role of GM-CSF in the inflammatory cytokine network that regulates neutrophil influx into the colonic mucosa during Clostridium difficile infection in mice. Gut Microbes 5:476–484. 10.4161/gmic.29964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen YS, Chen IB, Pham G, Shao TY, Bangar H, Way SS, Haslam DB. 2020. IL-17-producing γδ T cells protect against Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Investig 130:2377–2390. 10.1172/JCI127242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gunasekera DC, Ma J, Vacharathit V, Shah P, Ramakrishnan A, Uprety P, Shen Z, Sheh A, Brayton CF, Whary MT, Fox JG, Bream JH. 2020. The development of colitis in Il10−/− mice is dependent on IL-22. Mucosal Immunol 13:493–506. 10.1038/s41385-019-0252-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jarry A, Bossard C, Bou-Hanna C, Masson D, Espaze E, Denis MG, Laboisse CL. 2008. Mucosal IL-10 and TGF-β play crucial roles in preventing LPS-driven, IFN-γ-mediated epithelial damage in human colon explants. J Clin Investig 118:1132–1142. 10.1172/JCI32140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bain CC, Oliphant CJ, Thomson CA, Kullberg MC, Mowat AM. 2018. Proinflammatory role of monocyte-derived CX3CR1int macrophages in Helicobacter hepaticus-induced colitis. Infect Immun 86:e00579-17. 10.1128/IAI.00579-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Young VB, Lutter R, Grasberger H, Huffnagle GB, Chang Y-M, El-Zaatari M, Franz M, Shreiner A, Zhang M, McDermott AJ, van der Sluijs KF, Kao JY, Kamada N. 2014. Tryptophan catabolism restricts IFN-γ–expressing neutrophils and Clostridium difficile immunopathology. J Immunol 193:807–816. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kim MN, Koh SJ, Kim JM, Im JP, Jung HC, Kim JS. 2014. Clostridium difficile infection aggravates colitis in interleukin 10-deficient mice. World J Gastroenterol 20:17084–17091. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vonberg R-P, Kuijper EJ, Wilcox MH, Barbut F, Tüll P, Gastmeier P, van den Broek PJ, Colville A, Coignard B, Daha T, Debast S, Duerden BI, van den Hof S, van der Kooi T, Maarleveld HJH, Nagy E, Notermans DW, O'Driscoll J, Patel B, Stone S, Wiuff C. 2008. Infection control measures to limit the spread of Clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:2–20. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Theriot CM, Koumpouras CC, Carlson PE, Bergin II, Aronoff DM, Young VB. 2011. Cefoperazone-treated mice as an experimental platform to assess differential virulence of Clostridium difficile strains. Gut Microbes 2:326–334. 10.4161/gmic.19142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang T, Lin QY, Fei JX, Zhang Y, Lin MY, Jiang SH, Wang P, Chen Y. 2016. Clostridium difficile infection worsen outcome of hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Sci Rep 6:29791. 10.1038/srep29791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhou F, Hamza T, Fleur AS, Zhang Y, Yu H, Chen K, Heath JE, Chen Y, Huang H, Feng H. 2018. Mice with inflammatory bowel disease are susceptible to Clostridium difficile infection with severe disease outcomes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 24:573–582. 10.1093/ibd/izx059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bernshtein B, Curato C, Ioannou M, Thaiss CA, Gross-Vered M, Kolesnikov M, Wang Q, David E, Chappell-Maor L, Harmelin A, Elinav E, Thakker P, Papayannopoulos V, Jung S. 2019. IL-23-producing IL-10Rα-deficient gut macrophages elicit an IL-22-driven proinflammatory epithelial cell response. Sci Immunol 4:eaau6571-15. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aau6571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nagao-Kitamoto H, Leslie JL, Kitamoto S, Jin C, Thomsson KA, Gillilland MG, Kuffa P, Goto Y, Jenq RR, Ishii C, Hirayama A, Seekatz AM, Martens EC, Eaton KA, Kao JY, Fukuda S, Higgins PDR, Karlsson NG, Young VB, Kamada N. 2020. Interleukin-22-mediated host glycosylation prevents Clostridioides difficile infection by modulating the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota. Nat Med 26:608–617. 10.1038/s41591-020-0764-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zheng Y, Valdez PA, Danilenko DM, Hu Y, Sa SM, Gong Q, Abbas AR, Modrusan Z, Ghilardi N, De Sauvage FJ, Ouyang W. 2008. Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat Med 14:282–289. 10.1038/nm1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Behnsen J, Jellbauer S, Wong CP, Edwards RA, George MD, Ouyang W, Raffatellu M. 2014. The cytokine IL-22 promotes pathogen colonization by suppressing related commensal bacteria. Immunity 40:262–273. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Couturier-Maillard A, Froux N, Piotet-Morin J, Michaudel C, Brault L, Le Bérichel J, Sénéchal A, Robinet P, Chenuet P, Jejou S, Dumoutier L, Renauld JC, Iovanna J, Huber S, Chamaillard M, Quesniaux V, Sokol H, Chamaillard M, Ryffel B. 2018. Interleukin-22-deficiency and microbiota contribute to the exacerbation of Toxoplasma gondii-induced intestinal inflammation article. Mucosal Immunol 11:1181–1190. 10.1038/s41385-018-0005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zackular JP, Moore JL, Jordan AT, Juttukonda LJ, Noto MJ, Nicholson MR, Crews JD, Semler MW, Zhang Y, Ware LB, Washington MK, Chazin WJ, Caprioli RM, Skaar EP. 2016. Dietary zinc alters the microbiota and decreases resistance to Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Med 22:1330–1334. 10.1038/nm.4174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Steed AL, Christophi GP, Kaiko GE, Sun L, Goodwin VM, Jain U, Esaulova E, Artyomov MN, Morales DJ, Holtzman MJ, Boon ACM, Lenschow DJ, Stappenbeck TS. 2017. The microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine protects from influenza through type I interferon. Science 357:498–502. 10.1126/science.aam5336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ganal SC, Sanos SL, Kallfass C, Oberle K, Johner C, Kirschning C, Lienenklaus S, Weiss S, Staeheli P, Aichele P, Diefenbach A. 2012. Priming of natural killer cells by nonmucosal mononuclear phagocytes requires instructive signals from commensal microbiota. Immunity 37:171–186. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Abt MC, Osborne LC, Monticelli LA, Doering TA, Alenghat T, Sonnenberg GF, Paley MA, Antenus M, Williams KL, Erikson J, Wherry EJ, Artis D. 2012. Commensal bacteria calibrate the activation threshold of innate antiviral immunity. Immunity 37:158–170. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fox JG, Dewhirst FE, Shen Z, Feng Y, Taylor NS, Paster BJ, Ericson RL, Lau CN, Correa P, Araya JC, Roa I. 1998. Hepatic Helicobacter species identified in bile and gallbladder tissue from Chileans with chronic cholecystitis. Gastroenterology 114:755–763. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70589-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. 2013. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the miseq illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120. 10.1128/AEM.01043-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bokulich NA, Dillon MR, Bolyen E, Kaehler BD, Huttley GA, Caporaso JG. 2018. Q2-sample-classifier: machine-learning tools for microbiome classification and regression. JOSS 3:934. 10.21105/joss.00934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, Desantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight R, Hugenholtz P. 2012. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 6:610–618. 10.1038/ismej.2011.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma KI, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066. 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e6217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2–Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–8235. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen T, Miller E, Bache S, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel D, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H. 2019. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Sci 4:1686. 10.21105/joss.01686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00730-20-s0001.pdf (558.7KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00730-20-s0002.pdf (273.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00730-20-s0003.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 4
Supplemental file 5
IAI.00730-20-s0005.pdf (400.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 6
IAI.00730-20-s0006.pdf (43.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES