Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Jan 24;128(4):499–508. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02299-y

Contemporary functional neuroanatomy and pathophysiology of dystonia

Norbert Brüggemann 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC8099808  PMID: 33486625

Abstract

Dystonia is a disabling movement disorder characterized by abnormal postures or patterned and repetitive movements due to co-contraction of muscles in proximity to muscles desired for a certain movement. Important and well-established pathophysiological concepts are the impairment of sensorimotor integration, a loss of inhibitory control on several levels of the central nervous system and changes in synaptic plasticity. These mechanisms collectively contribute to an impairment of the gating function of the basal ganglia which results in an insufficient suppression of noisy activity and an excessive activation of cortical areas. In addition to this traditional view, a plethora of animal, genetic, imaging and electrophysiological studies highlight the role of the (1) cerebellum, (2) the cerebello-thalamic connection and (3) the functional interplay between basal ganglia and the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of dystonia. Another emerging topic is the better understanding of the microarchitecture of the striatum and its implications for dystonia. The striosomes are of particular interest as they likely control the dopamine release via inhibitory striato-nigral projections. Striosomal dysfunction has been implicated in hyperkinetic movement disorders including dystonia. This review will provide a comprehensive overview about the current understanding of the functional neuroanatomy and pathophysiology of dystonia and aims to move the traditional view of a ‘basal ganglia disorder’ to a network perspective with a dynamic interplay between cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem and cerebellum.

Keywords: Dystonia, Pathophysiology, Cerebellum, Basal ganglia, Inhibition

Introduction

Dystonia belongs to the group of hyperkinetic movement disorders that is characterized by abnormal postures or patterned and repetitive movements due to sustained or intermittent muscle contractions (Albanese et al. 2013). The central problem in dystonia is the exaggerated activation of muscle groups that are required for the execution of a certain movement. The additional co-contraction of muscles in proximity to the muscles desired for a certain movement and the simultaneous activation of antagonistic muscles reinforce involuntary dystonic movements and postures and contribute to the loss of voluntary control over motor actions. Dystonia does, however, not only appear in the context of intended or goal-directed movements such as in focal hand dystonia or spasmodic dysphonia but may also occur at rest, e.g. in cervical dystonia. Dystonias can affect almost every part of the body. Focal dystonias are restricted to one body region, e.g. blepharospasm, cervical dystonia or focal hand dystonia. Dystonia of a single body region may, however, spread to other body parts and becomes then segmental, multifocal or generalized (Berman et al. 2020). The tendency for spread depends on the involved body region and appears to be highest for the eyes.

In isolated dystonias, previously referred to as primary dystonia, dystonia is the only movement disorder aside from accompanying tremor (Albanese et al. 2013). In contrast, combined dystonias present with additional movement disorders, mostly parkinsonism, myoclonus or chorea. Complex dystonias are a group of heterogeneous conditions where dystonia is only one feature in addition to other clinical manifestations.

The etiology of dystonias is heterogeneous and includes acquired, genetic and sporadic forms. The acquired forms result from injuries of critical neuronal structures, whereas genetic forms are associated with pathogenic mutations in dystonia-causing genes. Discoveries in these two etiologies have largely supported the understanding of the underlying functional neuroanatomy and pathophysiology of dystonias. The most common clinical constellation in dystonia, however, is the absence of neuronal lesions and disease-causing mutations. In these sporadic cases, complex gene–environment interactions are discussed to cause the disease. First genome-wide association studies revealed an association of sporadic dystonias with genetic risk factors (Mok et al. 2014; Lohmann et al. 2014) but the evidence is still limited.

This review will provide a comprehensive overview about the current understanding of the functional neuroanatomy and pathophysiology of dystonia. The article will discuss recent advances in dystonia genetics, evidence from animal models, lesional and histopathological studies in humans, structural and functional neuroimaging and relevant electrophysiological findings. The article focuses on the systems level and aims to move the traditional view of a ‘basal ganglia disorder’ (Krystkowiak et al. 1998) to a network perspective with a dynamic interplay between cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem and cerebellum.

The traditional view: disorganization of the sensorimotor system, impaired inhibition and maladaptive plasticity

Several abnormalities in the sensorimotor system are present in patients with dystonia arguing that an abnormal integration of sensory information is associated with the occurrence of dystonic symptoms. A good example to illustrate changes in sensorimotor integration is the presence of an alleviating maneuver (sensory trick) in the vast majority of patients with dystonia (Patel et al. 2014). Clinically relevant and overt sensory deficits are, however, usually not observed. One major challenge is that such abnormalities can be observed in other brain disorders as well and may thus not be causal but rather a consequence of dystonic muscle activity.

On a behavioral level, patients with dystonia exhibit an abnormal temporal discrimination (Hutchinson et al. 2013) associated with hyperactivity in the basal ganglia (Peller et al. 2006). This abnormality can also be found in a proportion of unaffected relatives which highlights that part of the genetic background is shared and associated with the underlying dystonic trait rather than the state. In keeping with this notion, the somatotopic representation in the sensorimotor cortex of dystonia patients is disorganized with overlapping receptive fields indicating impaired neuronal selectivity (Neychev et al. 2011). Another important concept in dystonia is the loss of inhibition on multiple levels of the central nervous system including cortex, basal ganglia, brainstem and spinal cord (Hallett 2011). Surround inhibition on the cortical and basal ganglia level is required to select an appropriate command to the motor cortex in order to execute a specific and intended movement and thus to implement goal-directed behavior. This ‘funneling’ or gating function of the basal ganglia is impaired in dystonia which results in an insufficient suppression of surrounding noisy activity, an excessive activation of cortical areas and subsequent co-contractions of muscle groups that otherwise should not be active (Sohn and Hallett 2004). The inhibitory deficit in dystonia is probably associated not only with decreased GABA levels in the basal ganglia but also the cerebellum (Levy and Hallett 2002; Gallea et al. 2018) although conflicting data were published (Herath et al. 2010).

A plethora of studies have found maladaptive plasticity in the striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical loop of dystonia patients using different non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (Mink 2018). Recent evidence suggested similar maladaptive changes in the cerebellum (Porcacchia et al. 2019). The intra- and inter-individual variability of plasticity response in both, patients and controls, however, underlines the complexity of this concept and highlights that several individual factors have a considerable influence.

Investigating carriers of mutations in dystonia-related genes

Several genes were identified to cause monogenic isolated dystonia. Four of these genes, TOR1A, THAP1, GNAL and ANO3, were independently replicated and validated (Domingo et al. 2020). The KMT2B gene occupies a special position as it is either associated with isolated dystonia or most commonly a more complex phenotype including microcephaly, intellectual and developmental delay and other movement disorders, e.g. chorea or myoclonus (Zech et al. 2019). Other genes still await their independent replication. The investigation of patients with dystonia including manifesting carriers (MCs) of mutations in dystonia-causing genes is strongly hampered by continuous dystonic movements. Likewise, microstructural changes of the white or gray brain matter in MCs could be rather a consequence than a primary event in the pathophysiology of dystonia. Investigations in non-dystonic extremities (Vo et al. 2015) have been conducted to circumvent the presence of continuous muscle activity-related neural activation. The major advantage of the monogenic dystonia forms is, however, that non-manifesting mutation carriers (NMCs) who are free of any confounding movement disorder can be studied as well.

In this context, the metabolic activity is increased in the striatum and cerebellum of TOR1A NMCs, whereas the metabolism is decreased in the putamen, thalamus, upper brain stem and cerebellum of THAP1 NMCs (Carbon and Eidelberg 2009; Carbon et al. 2004b). Interestingly, the reduction of putaminal activity was even more pronounced in manifesting THAP1 MCs (Carbon et al. 2004b). On the cortical level, an increased activity was present in the pre-SMA and parietal cortex of TOR1A and THAP1 MCs compared to NMCs indicating that cortical activity changes are associated with penetrance of the underlying mutation (Carbon et al. 2004b). Using a principal component analysis approach to identify a specific dystonia-related metabolic pattern (DYT-RP) revealed, not surprisingly, an increased DYT-RP expression in TOR1A and THAP1 MCs and a reduced expression in NMCs even when compared to controls. This highlights that adaptive changes occur in dystonia-related sensorimotor brain regions that prevent NMCs from manifesting the disease.

Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography demonstrated an abnormal structural integrity of the white matter not only in patients with TOR1A (Carbon et al. 2004a; Argyelan et al. 2009) and THAP1-related (Argyelan et al. 2009; Carbon et al. 2004a) dystonia but also in symptomatic carriers of variants in the yet unconfirmed COL6A3 gene (Jochim et al. 2018). Changes were observed in the subgyral white matter of the sensorimotor cortex (Carbon et al. 2004a) and the dorsal tegmentum of the pons adjacent to the superior cerebellar peduncle as well as in the ponto-cerebellar tract (Sako et al. 2015). One of the most intriguing findings was, however, a reduced integrity of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical fiber tracts which was present in TOR1A mutation carriers regardless of whether they were manifesting or not although the changes were more pronounced in MCs. These microstructural alterations were associated with increased motor activation responses arguing for a loss of inhibition on a cortical level due to a cerebellar dis- or hypo-connection (Argyelan et al. 2009). These findings are well in line with a dyt1 knock-in mutant mouse model where similar structural changes could be observed in the cerebello-thalamic, thalamo-cortical and thalamo-striatal tract in the absence of a motor phenotype (Ulug et al. 2011). The cerebellar disconnection hypothesis is corroborated by an increased metabolic activity in the cerebellum of MCs, NMCs and the dyt1 knock-in mutant mouse (Eidelberg et al. 1998; Ulug et al. 2011; Argyelan et al. 2009; Carbon et al. 2008; Odorfer et al. 2019; Sako et al. 2015) that is inversely correlated with the integrity of the cerebello-thalamic connection (Argyelan et al. 2009; Ulug et al. 2011). Conflicting findings were reported in myoclonus-dystonia due to SGCE mutations along with increased white matter volume in the area between the cerebellum and the thalamus (van der Meer et al. 2012). Further evidence for a crucial role of the cerebello-thalamic projection in the pathophysiology of dystonia comes from X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP), an inherited adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder with striking striatal and pallidal volume loss (Hanssen et al. 2018, 2019) and widespread pathology of the white matter (Bruggemann et al. 2016; Blood et al. 2018) due to a mutation in the TAF1 gene (Aneichyk et al. 2018; Westenberger et al. 2019). Imaging studies revealed additional atrophy in the associative part of cerebellum, whereas hypertrophic changes were observed in the sensorimotor part and the dorsal pontine tegmentum (Hanssen et al. 2018). In contrast to non-degenerative DYT-Tor1A, increased gray matter volumes probably indicate a compensatory mechanism that may counteract the pathological striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical circuit in XDP.

The microstructure of the striatum and its implications in the pathophysiology of dystonia

The striatal microstructure comprises two neurochemically defined compartments, the striosome and the matrix. Histopathological studies across species including mice, rats, monkeys and humans consistently demonstrate that the striosome occupies 10–15% of the entire striatal volume (Johnston et al. 1990; Crittenden and Graybiel 2011; Desban et al. 1993). Striosome and matrix are distributed across the striatum in a patchy fashion; however, the density of striosomes appears to follow a caudo-rostral gradient with the rostral striatum being considered striosome-rich and the dorsolateral putamen mainly comprising matrix (Johnston et al. 1990; Desban et al. 1993). However, data on the distribution of striosomes in the dorsolateral putamen in humans is lacking (Holt et al. 1997). Striosomal neurons receive synaptic input from the prelimbic cortex and are the origin of GABAergic striatonigral projections that form bouquet-like arborizations with dopamine-containing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) (McGregor et al. 2019; Crittenden et al. 2016; Matsushima and Graybiel 2020). This suggests that the dopaminergic tone in the SNc is controlled by this striosome-derived striatonigral pathway. Dopaminergic neurons in turn project to the striatum via the nigrostriatal pathway with most of the fibers targeting the dorsolateral putamen. As a consequence, impairment of inhibitory striatonigral projections due to striosomal dysfunction may result in nigral disinhibition and presumed overactivity of dopaminergic nigrostriatal projections. Dopamine excess in the dorsolateral putamen with a predominance of matrix neurons could give rise to an imbalance of the direct and indirect pathway (Fig. 1). Matrix neurons express dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, innervate the globus pallidus externus, internus and the SN pars reticulata and are thus directly rendering the direct (excitatory) and indirect (inhibitory) cortico-subcortical pathways (Lanciego et al. 2012). Accordingly, dopaminergic dysregulation has been associated with dystonia in a dyt1 dystonia animal model (Ip et al. 2016). Striosomal dysfunction has also been implicated in early stages of Huntington’s disease (Hedreen and Folstein 1995), and imbalance between striosomal and matrix function are discussed as potential disease mechanisms in human dystonia and Levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (Henry et al. 2003; Sato et al. 2008). Moreover, post-mortem investigations of brains of deceased XDP patients revealed extensive striatal atrophy with a consistent loss of striosomes in the early phase of XDP, whereas degeneration of the matrix is additionally present in later disease stages (Goto et al. 2005) (Fig. 1). This is in line with gradual putaminal neurodegeneration including severe and more advanced neurodegeneration in the anteromedial, striosome-enriched part compared to the matrix-enriched dorsolateral putamen during the dystonic phase of the disease (Hanssen et al. 2019). In Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD, Segawa syndrome), an inherited neurometabolic disorder with a clinical presentation of combined dystonia-parkinsonism, mutations in different genes of the pteridine and catecholamine pathway result in striatal dopamine deficiency and dystonia. In a DRD mouse model, major depletion of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) was present in the striatum along with a dystonic phenotype (Sato et al. 2008). In regions with residual TH labeling the TH loss was more pronounced in the striosomes compared to matrix linking striosomal pathology and dopamine depletion to deficient GABAergic inhibition of the striatonigral pathway with a subsequent shift towards the direct pathway in the matrix where TH activity was relatively preserved. Further research is, however, warranted to clarify the role of striosome vs. matrix dysfunction in dystonia as an experimental blockade of striosomal projection neurons did not elicit involuntary hyperkinetic movements in rodents (Xiao et al. 2020) although locomotor performance was more variable and habitual behaviors were disrupted (Nadel et al. 2020).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Proposed functional alterations in X-linked dystonia parkinsonism over the disease course due to progressive striatal neurodegeneration. In the physiological state, neurons of the striosomes (S) send inhibitory GABAergic projections to dopamine-containing neurons of the SNc. The SNc innervates D1 and D2 receptor containing matrix (M) neurons and thus differentially modulates the balance between the direct and indirect pathway. Predominant degeneration of the striosomes results in a postulated SNc disinhibition in the early phase of XDP. Dopaminergic dysregulation shifts the balance between both pathways towards the direct pathway which results in impaired surround inhibition and facilitates dystonia. The degeneration of matrix neurons in later disease stages leads to MSA-like parkinsonism due to reduced postsynaptic dopamine receptor density. S striosomes, M matrix, SNc substantia nigra pars compacta, D1 dopamine D1 receptor, D2 dopamine D2 receptor, GABA gamma aminobutyric acid, MSA multiple system atrophy

The role of the cerebellum

Strong evidence for a causal role of the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of dystonia results from animal models (Bologna and Berardelli 2018). Several manipulations have been conducted to investigate the contribution of the cerebellum to dystonia. Microinjections of the glutamate agonist kainic acid and the application of sodium pump blockers in the cerebellum induced dystonia-like behaviors in rodents (Alvarez-Fischer et al. 2012; Calderon et al. 2011; Neychev et al. 2008). In keeping, RNA-mediated knockdown of the α3-containing sodium pumps led to a phenotype of dystonia-parkinsonism (Fremont et al. 2015) which corresponds to the human disease of rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism caused by mutations in the gene encoding the α3-subunit of the sodium–potassium pump (Brashear et al. 2007). Dystonia could also be provoked in a number of genetic rodent models including the dt mouse (LeDoux et al. 1998; Oltmans et al. 1984) and the tottering mouse harboring a mutation in the CACNA1A gene (Neychev et al. 2008). On the other hand, structural cerebellar abnormalities were identified in Dyt1 ΔGAG knock-in mice (Zhang et al. 2011; Song et al. 2014; Vanni et al. 2015) as well as in a Purkinje cell-specific Dyt1 knockout (Zhang et al. 2011; Vanni et al. 2015) and THAP1 knock-in (Ruiz et al. 2015) as well as knock-out mouse models (Frederick et al. 2019).

Several reports of patients with cerebellar lesions due to ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (O’Rourke et al. 2006; Waln and LeDoux 2010; Bana et al. 2015) or a cerebellar mass (Alarcon et al. 2001) have long been associated with dystonia. Lesion network mapping in 25 patients with secondary cervical dystonia found that dystonia-associated lesions had a heterogeneous localization including cerebellum, brainstem and basal ganglia. They were, however, all part of a single functionally connected brain network with positive connectivity to the cerebellum and negative connectivity to the somatosensory cortex (Corp et al. 2019).

Dystonia is also a frequent clinical feature in neurodegenerative diseases of the cerebellum. Among the autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), dystonic signs can most frequently be observed in SCA type 3 (Kuo et al. 2017; Rossi et al. 2014). In late-onset forms of autosomal recessive ataxia teleangiectasia, dystonia can be the presenting clinical manifestation even in the absence of ataxia and teleangiectasias thus mimicking isolated generalized dystonia (Necpal et al. 2018; Saunders-Pullman et al. 2012; Meissner et al. 2013). Over the disease course, dystonia occurs in almost 90% of patients with ataxia teleangiectasia but also chorea as another hyperkinetic movement disorder can be frequently observed (Levy and Lang 2018). The response of dystonia to levodopa in single cases with ataxia teleangiectasia suggests an involvement of the cerebellar dopaminergic system in the etiology of dystonia (Charlesworth et al. 2013; Thompson et al. 2014).

Cerebellum–basal ganglia crosstalk

The traditional view on neural network organization encompasses distinct striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways that convergently project to distinct thalamic nuclei and are only integrated at the neocortical level.

This view has been challenged by the evidence of direct anatomical connections between basal ganglia and cerebellum in animals (Bostan et al. 2010; Hoshi et al. 2005) and humans (Milardi et al. 2016) (Fig. 2). Transneuronal transport of Rabies viruses demonstrated disynaptic pathways between the dentate nucleus and the striatum (Hoshi et al. 2005), as well as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and cerebellar cortex (Bostan et al. 2010) in brains of Macaque monkeys. The connections were shown to be dense and to affect both, motor and non-motor domains of the basal ganglia and the corresponding regions in the cerebellum. The presence of connections between STN and cerebellar cortex was confirmed in humans using diffusion tensor imaging (Milardi et al. 2016; Pelzer et al. 2013). Connections were also found between the dentate nucleus and both, the SN and pallidum, highlighting that reciprocal connections between both circuits exist and that cerebellar output may have a direct impact on basal ganglia functions and operations. Different animal models collectively confirmed an important functional relationship between basal ganglia and cerebellum (Neychev et al. 2008; Rauschenberger et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2014). The cerebellum was able to modulate striatal activity with a short latency via a disynaptic connection in mice (Chen et al. 2014). The animals developed dystonia in case of aberrant cerebello-striatal information flow. The occurrence of dystonic signs was thus dependent on the influence of both circuits which supports the hypothesis that dystonia results from a disruption of an integrated basal ganglia-cerebellar network rather than due to an isolated impairment of one of the structures (Neychev et al. 2008). This is in keeping with recent tractography studies showing differences in the anatomical connection between the pallidum and brainstem/cerebellum in cervical dystonia (Blood et al. 2012). In addition, recent fMRI studies in healthy subjects demonstrated a relationship between increased coupling of the putamen and the cerebellum with the primary motor cortex and movement speed (Pool et al. 2013) and striato-cerebellar interactions during encoding of a motor sequence task (Tzvi et al. 2015). In dystonia, functional MRI studies revealed co-existing impairments of striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuits (Filip et al. 2017; Rothkirch et al. 2018). The close interaction of the cortico-basal ganglia and the cerebello-thalamic pathway was furthermore supported by the observation that patients with essential tremor and thalamic DBS had more beneficial DBS outcome when a specific cluster within the cerebello-thalamo-cortical tract was targeted (Al-Fatly et al. 2019). Moreover, patients following thalamotomy showed an increased coupling between the frontal eye field and the cerebellum (Tuleasca et al. 2018) and pallido-cerebellar oscillatory connectivity has been linked to dystonia severity in patients who underwent pallidal deep brain stimulation (Neumann et al. 2015).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of brain structures involved in the pathogenesis of dystonia. Panel (a) shows the traditional view of distinct (striato-)pallido-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways that convergently project to distinct thalamic nuclei and are only integrated at the neocortical level. Panel (b) shows the newly identified disynaptic anatomical connections (red arrows) linking the subthalamic nucleus with the cerebellar cortex via the pons and the dentate nucleus with the striatum via the thalamus. The contemporary model integrating the new connections (red arrows) is shown in panel (c). CC cerebellar cortex, CER cerebellum, CTX cortex, DN dentate nucleus, GPe globus pallidus externus, GPi globus pallidus internus, STN subthalamic nucleus, TH thalamus

Evidence for a link between the cerebellum and the striatum on the neurotransmitter level derives from the observation that the activation of cerebellar and striatal glutamate receptors, specifically AMPA receptors, induced dystonia in animal models whereas AMPA antagonists reversed this effect and improved dystonia (Fan et al. 2012; Sander and Richter 2007). In the cerebellum, the effects were most likely exerted by the modulation of Purkinje cells which are the only efferents of the cerebellar cortex. The glutamatergic actions within the cerebellum could be related to the observed cerebellar overactivity in human and animal imaging studies although it is not clear whether the increased cerebellar outflow is disease-related or compensatory in nature. It also remains elusive whether the reciprocal connections between cerebellum and basal ganglia are affected by AMPA-mediated changes of the glutamatergic tone. The antidystonic effect of AMPA receptor antagonists is also in keeping with an increased expression of AMPA receptor subunits in reprogrammed neurons from patients with X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism who show a severe striatal atrophy (Capetian et al. 2018). Therefore, modulation of AMPA receptors could indicate an interaction of the cerebellum and basal ganglia independent of their structural connectivity.

Conclusions and outlook

The clinical key feature of dystonia is an insufficient suppression of undesired movements either during rest or during the execution of a certain task. New evidence suggests that striosomal dysfunction could result in dysregulated dopamine release in the substantia nigra causing an imbalance between the direct and indirect pathway that is associated with impaired inhibition and the occurrence of dystonic movements. This hypothesis, however, has to be proven in future studies. Furthermore, dystonia can no longer be regarded a disorder of the basal ganglia. Recent evidence indicates that the cerebellum is likewise involved in the pathogenesis and that strong interactions between the basal ganglia and the cerebellum are present not only under physiological conditions but also in dystonia (Fig. 2). Disynaptic connections appear to be the anatomical basis for the short latency crosstalk between the cerebellum and basal ganglia. The interplay between basal ganglia and cerebellum highlights that the cerebellum is a potential treatment target for dystonia (Tewari et al. 2017). An unmet need in dystonia research is the uncertainty whether these new concepts apply to all or only a subgroup of dystonias (Tomic et al. 2020). Other poorly understood aspects are the insufficient mapping of non-motor signs and the changes in non-motor-related circuits due to dystonia.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, literature search and drafting: NB.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 2488 to NB).

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Alarcon F, Tolosa E, Munoz E. Focal limb dystonia in a patient with a cerebellar mass. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(7):1125–1127. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.7.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Jinnah HA, Klein C, Lang AE, Mink JW, Teller JK. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013;28(7):863–873. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Fatly B, Ewert S, Kubler D, Kroneberg D, Horn A, Kuhn AA. Connectivity profile of thalamic deep brain stimulation to effectively treat essential tremor. Brain. 2019;142(10):3086–3098. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez-Fischer D, Grundmann M, Lu L, Samans B, Fritsch B, Moller JC, Schaefer MK, Hartmann A, Oertel WH, Bandmann O. Prolonged generalized dystonia after chronic cerebellar application of kainic acid. Brain Res. 2012;1464:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aneichyk T, Hendriks WT, Yadav R, Shin D, Gao D, Vaine CA, Collins RL, Domingo A, Currall B, Stortchevoi A, Multhaupt-Buell T, Penney EB, Cruz L, Dhakal J, Brand H, Hanscom C, Antolik C, Dy M, Ragavendran A, Underwood J, Cantsilieris S, Munson KM, Eichler EE, Acuna P, Go C, Jamora RDG, Rosales RL, Church DM, Williams SR, Garcia S, Klein C, Muller U, Wilhelmsen KC, Timmers HTM, Sapir Y, Wainger BJ, Henderson D, Ito N, Weisenfeld N, Jaffe D, Sharma N, Breakefield XO, Ozelius LJ, Bragg DC, Talkowski ME. Dissecting the causal mechanism of x-linked dystonia-parkinsonism by integrating genome and transcriptome assembly. Cell. 2018;172(5):897–909. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Argyelan M, Carbon M, Niethammer M, Ulug AM, Voss HU, Bressman SB, Dhawan V, Eidelberg D. Cerebellothalamocortical connectivity regulates penetrance in dystonia. J Neurosci. 2009;29(31):9740–9747. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2300-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bana C, Nascimbene C, Vanotti A, Zardoni M, Mariani C, Osio M. A case of masticatory dystonia following cerebellar haemorrhage. Cerebellum. 2015;14(6):723–727. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0655-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berman BD, Groth CL, Sillau SH, Pirio Richardson S, Norris SA, Junker J, Bruggemann N, Agarwal P, Barbano RL, Espay AJ, Vizcarra JA, Klein C, Baumer T, Loens S, Reich SG, Vidailhet M, Bonnet C, Roze E, Jinnah HA, Perlmutter JS. Risk of spread in adult-onset isolated focal dystonia: a prospective international cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(3):314–320. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blood AJ, Kuster JK, Woodman SC, Kirlic N, Makhlouf ML, Multhaupt-Buell TJ, Makris N, Parent M, Sudarsky LR, Sjalander G, Breiter H, Breiter HC, Sharma N. Evidence for altered basal ganglia-brainstem connections in cervical dystonia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e31654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blood AJ, Waugh JL, Munte TF, Heldmann M, Domingo A, Klein C, Breiter HC, Lee LV, Rosales RL, Bruggemann N. Increased insula-putamen connectivity in X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;17:835–846. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bologna M, Berardelli A. The cerebellum and dystonia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:259–272. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64189-2.00017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(18):8452–8456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000496107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brashear A, Dobyns WB, de Carvalho AP, Borg M, Frijns CJ, Gollamudi S, Green A, Guimaraes J, Haake BC, Klein C, Linazasoro G, Munchau A, Raymond D, Riley D, Saunders-Pullman R, Tijssen MA, Webb D, Zaremba J, Bressman SB, Ozelius LJ. The phenotypic spectrum of rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism (RDP) and mutations in the ATP1A3 gene. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 3):828–835. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bruggemann N, Heldmann M, Klein C, Domingo A, Rasche D, Tronnier V, Rosales RL, Jamora RD, Lee LV, Munte TF. Neuroanatomical changes extend beyond striatal atrophy in X-linked dystonia parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;31:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Calderon DP, Fremont R, Kraenzlin F, Khodakhah K. The neural substrates of rapid-onset Dystonia-Parkinsonism. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(3):357–365. doi: 10.1038/nn.2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Capetian P, Stanslowsky N, Bernhardi E, Grutz K, Domingo A, Bruggemann N, Naujock M, Seibler P, Klein C, Wegner F. Altered glutamate response and calcium dynamics in iPSC-derived striatal neurons from XDP patients. Exp Neurol. 2018;308:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carbon M, Eidelberg D. Abnormal structure-function relationships in hereditary dystonia. Neuroscience. 2009;164(1):220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carbon M, Kingsley PB, Su S, Smith GS, Spetsieris P, Bressman S, Eidelberg D. Microstructural white matter changes in carriers of the DYT1 gene mutation. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(2):283–286. doi: 10.1002/ana.20177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Carbon M, Su S, Dhawan V, Raymond D, Bressman S, Eidelberg D. Regional metabolism in primary torsion dystonia: effects of penetrance and genotype. Neurology. 2004;62(8):1384–1390. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000120541.97467.fe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Carbon M, Ghilardi MF, Argyelan M, Dhawan V, Bressman SB, Eidelberg D. Increased cerebellar activation during sequence learning in DYT1 carriers: an equiperformance study. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 1):146–154. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Charlesworth G, Mohire MD, Schneider SA, Stamelou M, Wood NW, Bhatia KP. Ataxia telangiectasia presenting as dopa-responsive cervical dystonia. Neurology. 2013;81(13):1148–1151. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a55fa2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen CH, Fremont R, Arteaga-Bracho EE, Khodakhah K. Short latency cerebellar modulation of the basal ganglia. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(12):1767–1775. doi: 10.1038/nn.3868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Corp DT, Joutsa J, Darby RR, Delnooz CCS, van de Warrenburg BPC, Cooke D, Prudente CN, Ren J, Reich MM, Batla A, Bhatia KP, Jinnah HA, Liu H, Fox MD. Network localization of cervical dystonia based on causal brain lesions. Brain. 2019;142(6):1660–1674. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crittenden JR, Graybiel AM. Basal Ganglia disorders associated with imbalances in the striatal striosome and matrix compartments. Front Neuroanat. 2011;5:59. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2011.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Crittenden JR, Tillberg PW, Riad MH, Shima Y, Gerfen CR, Curry J, Housman DE, Nelson SB, Boyden ES, Graybiel AM. Striosome-dendron bouquets highlight a unique striatonigral circuit targeting dopamine-containing neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(40):11318–11323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613337113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Desban M, Kemel ML, Glowinski J, Gauchy C. Spatial organization of patch and matrix compartments in the rat striatum. Neuroscience. 1993;57(3):661–671. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Domingo A, Yadav R, Ozelius LJ. Isolated dystonia: clinical and genetic updates. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00702-020-02268-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Eidelberg D, Moeller JR, Antonini A, Kazumata K, Nakamura T, Dhawan V, Spetsieris P, deLeon D, Bressman SB, Fahn S. Functional brain networks in DYT1 dystonia. Ann Neurol. 1998;44(3):303–312. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan X, Hughes KE, Jinnah HA, Hess EJ. Selective and sustained alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor activation in cerebellum induces dystonia in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;340(3):733–741. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.190082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Filip P, Gallea C, Lehericy S, Bertasi E, Popa T, Marecek R, Lungu OV, Kasparek T, Vanicek J, Bares M. Disruption in cerebellar and basal ganglia networks during a visuospatial task in cervical dystonia. Mov Disord. 2017;32(5):757–768. doi: 10.1002/mds.26930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Frederick NM, Shah PV, Didonna A, Langley MR, Kanthasamy AG, Opal P. Loss of the dystonia gene Thap1 leads to transcriptional deficits that converge on common pathogenic pathways in dystonic syndromes. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(8):1343–1356. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fremont R, Tewari A, Khodakhah K. Aberrant Purkinje cell activity is the cause of dystonia in a shRNA-based mouse model of Rapid Onset Dystonia-Parkinsonism. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;82:200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gallea C, Herath P, Voon V, Lerner A, Ostuni J, Saad Z, Thada S, Solomon J, Horovitz SG, Hallett M. Loss of inhibition in sensorimotor networks in focal hand dystonia. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;17:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Goto S, Lee LV, Munoz EL, Tooyama I, Tamiya G, Makino S, Ando S, Dantes MB, Yamada K, Matsumoto S, Shimazu H, Kuratsu J, Hirano A, Kaji R. Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia in X-linked recessive dystonia-parkinsonism. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(1):7–17. doi: 10.1002/ana.20513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hallett M. Neurophysiology of dystonia: the role of inhibition. Neurobiol Dis. 2011;42(2):177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hanssen H, Heldmann M, Prasuhn J, Tronnier V, Rasche D, Diesta CC, Domingo A, Rosales RL, Jamora RD, Klein C, Munte TF, Bruggemann N. Basal ganglia and cerebellar pathology in X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism. Brain. 2018;141(10):2995–3008. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hanssen H, Prasuhn J, Heldmann M, Diesta CC, Domingo A, Gottlich M, Blood AJ, Rosales RL, Jamora RDG, Munte TF, Klein C, Bruggemann N. Imaging gradual neurodegeneration in a basal ganglia model disease. Ann Neurol. 2019;86(4):517–526. doi: 10.1002/ana.25566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hedreen JC, Folstein SE. Early loss of neostriatal striosome neurons in Huntington’s disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1995;54(1):105–120. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199501000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Henry B, Duty S, Fox SH, Crossman AR, Brotchie JM. Increased striatal pre-proenkephalin B expression is associated with dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2003;183(2):458–468. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00064-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Herath P, Gallea C, van der Veen JW, Horovitz SG, Hallett M. In vivo neurochemistry of primary focal hand dystonia: a magnetic resonance spectroscopic neurometabolite profiling study at 3T. Mov Disord. 2010;25(16):2800–2808. doi: 10.1002/mds.23306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Holt DJ, Graybiel AM, Saper CB. Neurochemical architecture of the human striatum. J Comp Neurol. 1997;384(1):1–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970721)384:1<1::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoshi E, Tremblay L, Feger J, Carras PL, Strick PL. The cerebellum communicates with the basal ganglia. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1491–1493. doi: 10.1038/nn1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hutchinson M, Kimmich O, Molloy A, Whelan R, Molloy F, Lynch T, Healy DG, Walsh C, Edwards MJ, Ozelius L, Reilly RB, O'Riordan S. The endophenotype and the phenotype: temporal discrimination and adult-onset dystonia. Mov Disord. 2013;28(13):1766–1774. doi: 10.1002/mds.25676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ip CW, Isaias IU, Kusche-Tekin BB, Klein D, Groh J, O'Leary A, Knorr S, Higuchi T, Koprich JB, Brotchie JM, Toyka KV, Reif A, Volkmann J. Tor1a+/− mice develop dystonia-like movements via a striatal dopaminergic dysregulation triggered by peripheral nerve injury. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0375-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jochim A, Li Y, Zech M, Lam D, Gross N, Koch K, Zimmer C, Winkelmann J, Haslinger B. Microstructural white matter abnormalities in patients with COL6A3 mutations (DYT27 dystonia) Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;46:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Johnston JG, Gerfen CR, Haber SN, van der Kooy D. Mechanisms of striatal pattern formation: conservation of mammalian compartmentalization. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1990;57(1):93–102. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(90)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Krystkowiak P, Martinat P, Defebvre L, Pruvo JP, Leys D, Destee A. Dystonia after striatopallidal and thalamic stroke: clinicoradiological correlations and pathophysiological mechanisms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;65(5):703–708. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuo PH, Gan SR, Wang J, Lo RY, Figueroa KP, Tomishon D, Pulst SM, Perlman S, Wilmot G, Gomez CM, Schmahmann JD, Paulson H, Shakkottai VG, Ying SH, Zesiewicz T, Bushara K, Geschwind MD, Xia G, Subramony SH, Ashizawa T, Kuo SH. Dystonia and ataxia progression in spinocerebellar ataxias. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;45:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lanciego JL, Luquin N, Obeso JA. Functional neuroanatomy of the basal ganglia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(12):a009621. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. LeDoux MS, Hurst DC, Lorden JF. Single-unit activity of cerebellar nuclear cells in the awake genetically dystonic rat. Neuroscience. 1998;86(2):533–545. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Levy LM, Hallett M. Impaired brain GABA in focal dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2002;51(1):93–101. doi: 10.1002/ana.10073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Levy A, Lang AE. Ataxia-telangiectasia: a review of movement disorders, clinical features, and genotype correlations. Mov Disord. 2018;33(8):1238–1247. doi: 10.1002/mds.27319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lohmann K, Schmidt A, Schillert A, Winkler S, Albanese A, Baas F, Bentivoglio AR, Borngraber F, Bruggemann N, Defazio G, Del Sorbo F, Deuschl G, Edwards MJ, Gasser T, Gomez-Garre P, Graf J, Groen JL, Grunewald A, Hagenah J, Hemmelmann C, Jabusch HC, Kaji R, Kasten M, Kawakami H, Kostic VS, Liguori M, Mir P, Munchau A, Ricchiuti F, Schreiber S, Siegesmund K, Svetel M, Tijssen MA, Valente EM, Westenberger A, Zeuner KE, Zittel S, Altenmuller E, Ziegler A, Klein C. Genome-wide association study in musician’s dystonia: a risk variant at the arylsulfatase G locus? Mov Disord. 2014;29(7):921–927. doi: 10.1002/mds.25791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Matsushima A, Graybiel AM. Combinatorial developmental controls on striatonigral circuits. Cell Rep. 2020;31(11):107778. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. McGregor MM, McKinsey GL, Girasole AE, Bair-Marshall CJ, Rubenstein JLR, Nelson AB. Functionally distinct connectivity of developmentally targeted striosome neurons. Cell Rep. 2019;29(6):1419–1428. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Meissner WG, Fernet M, Couturier J, Hall J, Lauge A, Henry P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Tison F. Isolated generalized dystonia in biallelic missense mutations of the ATM gene. Mov Disord. 2013;28(13):1897–1899. doi: 10.1002/mds.25487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Milardi D, Arrigo A, Anastasi G, Cacciola A, Marino S, Mormina E, Calamuneri A, Bruschetta D, Cutroneo G, Trimarchi F, Quartarone A. Extensive direct subcortical cerebellum-basal ganglia connections in human brain as revealed by constrained spherical deconvolution tractography. Front Neuroanat. 2016;10:29. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mink JW. Basal ganglia mechanisms in action selection, plasticity, and dystonia. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22(2):225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mok KY, Schneider SA, Trabzuni D, Stamelou M, Edwards M, Kasperaviciute D, Pickering-Brown S, Silverdale M, Hardy J, Bhatia KP. Genomewide association study in cervical dystonia demonstrates possible association with sodium leak channel. Mov Disord. 2014;29(2):245–251. doi: 10.1002/mds.25732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nadel JA, Pawelko SS, Copes-Finke D, Neidhart M, Howard CD. Lesion of striatal patches disrupts habitual behaviors and increases behavioral variability. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0224715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Necpal J, Zech M, Skorvanek M, Havrankova P, Fecikova A, Winkelmann J, Jech R. Ataxia telangiectasia gene mutation in isolated segmental dystonia without ataxia and telangiectasia. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018;5(1):89–91. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Neumann WJ, Jha A, Bock A, Huebl J, Horn A, Schneider GH, Sander TH, Litvak V, Kuhn AA. Cortico-pallidal oscillatory connectivity in patients with dystonia. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 7):1894–1906. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Neychev VK, Fan X, Mitev VI, Hess EJ, Jinnah HA. The basal ganglia and cerebellum interact in the expression of dystonic movement. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 9):2499–2509. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Neychev VK, Gross RE, Lehericy S, Hess EJ, Jinnah HA. The functional neuroanatomy of dystonia. Neurobiol Dis. 2011;42(2):185–201. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Odorfer TM, Homola GA, Reich MM, Volkmann J, Zeller D. Increased finger-tapping related cerebellar activation in cervical dystonia, enhanced by transcranial stimulation: an indicator of compensation? Front Neurol. 2019;10:231. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Oltmans GA, Beales M, Lorden JF, Gordon JH. Alterations in cerebellar glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) activity in a genetic model of torsion dystonia (rat) Exp Neurol. 1984;85(1):216–222. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(84)90175-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. O'Rourke K, O'Riordan S, Gallagher J, Hutchinson M. Paroxysmal torticollis and blepharospasm following bilateral cerebellar infarction. J Neurol. 2006;253(12):1644–1645. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0202-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Patel N, Hanfelt J, Marsh L, Jankovic J, members of the Dystonia C Alleviating manoeuvres (sensory tricks) in cervical dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(8):882–884. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Peller M, Zeuner KE, Munchau A, Quartarone A, Weiss M, Knutzen A, Hallett M, Deuschl G, Siebner HR. The basal ganglia are hyperactive during the discrimination of tactile stimuli in writer's cramp. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 10):2697–2708. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pelzer EA, Hintzen A, Goldau M, von Cramon DY, Timmermann L, Tittgemeyer M. Cerebellar networks with basal ganglia: feasibility for tracking cerebello-pallidal and subthalamo-cerebellar projections in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;38(8):3106–3114. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pool EM, Rehme AK, Fink GR, Eickhoff SB, Grefkes C. Network dynamics engaged in the modulation of motor behavior in healthy subjects. NeuroImage. 2013;82:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Porcacchia P, Alvarez de Toledo P, Rodriguez-Baena A, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Palomar FJ, Vargas-Gonzalez L, Jesus S, Koch G, Mir P. Abnormal cerebellar connectivity and plasticity in isolated cervical dystonia. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0211367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rauschenberger L, Knorr S, Al-Zuraiqi Y, Tovote P, Volkmann J, Ip CW. Striatal dopaminergic dysregulation and dystonia-like movements induced by sensorimotor stress in a pharmacological mouse model of rapid-onset dystonia-parkinsonism. Exp Neurol. 2020;323:113109. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rossi M, Perez-Lloret S, Cerquetti D, Merello M. Movement disorders in autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: a systematic review. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014;1(3):154–160. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rothkirch I, Granert O, Knutzen A, Wolff S, Govert F, Pedersen A, Zeuner KE, Witt K. Dynamic causal modeling revealed dysfunctional effective connectivity in both, the cortico-basal-ganglia and the cerebello-cortical motor network in writers' cramp. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;18:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ruiz M, Perez-Garcia G, Ortiz-Virumbrales M, Meneret A, Morant A, Kottwitz J, Fuchs T, Bonet J, Gonzalez-Alegre P, Hof PR, Ozelius LJ, Ehrlich ME. Abnormalities of motor function, transcription and cerebellar structure in mouse models of THAP1 dystonia. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(25):7159–7170. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sako W, Fujita K, Vo A, Rucker JC, Rizzo JR, Niethammer M, Carbon M, Bressman SB, Ulug AM, Eidelberg D. The visual perception of natural motion: abnormal task-related neural activity in DYT1 dystonia. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 12):3598–3609. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sander SE, Richter A. Effects of intrastriatal injections of glutamate receptor antagonists on the severity of paroxysmal dystonia in the dtsz mutant. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;563(1–3):102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.01.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sato K, Sumi-Ichinose C, Kaji R, Ikemoto K, Nomura T, Nagatsu I, Ichinose H, Ito M, Sako W, Nagahiro S, Graybiel AM, Goto S. Differential involvement of striosome and matrix dopamine systems in a transgenic model of dopa-responsive dystonia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(34):12551–12556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806065105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Saunders-Pullman R, Raymond D, Stoessl AJ, Hobson D, Nakamura K, Pullman S, Lefton D, Okun MS, Uitti R, Sachdev R, Stanley K, San Luciano M, Hagenah J, Gatti R, Ozelius LJ, Bressman SB. Variant ataxia-telangiectasia presenting as primary-appearing dystonia in Canadian Mennonites. Neurology. 2012;78(9):649–657. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182494d51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sohn YH, Hallett M. Surround inhibition in human motor system. Exp Brain Res. 2004;158(4):397–404. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1909-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Song CH, Bernhard D, Hess EJ, Jinnah HA. Subtle microstructural changes of the cerebellum in a knock-in mouse model of DYT1 dystonia. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;62:372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Tewari A, Fremont R, Khodakhah K. It's not just the basal ganglia: cerebellum as a target for dystonia therapeutics. Mov Disord. 2017;32(11):1537–1545. doi: 10.1002/mds.27123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Thompson S, Iyer A, Byrd P, Taylor M, Spinty S. Dopa-responsive dystonia and chorea as a presenting feature in ataxia-telangiectasia. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014;1(3):249–251. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tomic A, Agosta F, Sarasso E, Svetel M, Kresojevic N, Fontana A, Canu E, Petrovic I, Kostic VS, Filippi M. Brain structural changes in focal dystonia-what about task specificity? A multimodal MRI study. Mov Disord. 2020 doi: 10.1002/mds.28304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tuleasca C, Najdenovska E, Regis J, Witjas T, Girard N, Champoudry J, Faouzi M, Thiran JP, Cuadra MB, Levivier M, Van De Ville D. Clinical response to Vim's thalamic stereotactic radiosurgery for essential tremor is associated with distinctive functional connectivity patterns. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018;160(3):611–624. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3456-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tzvi E, Stoldt A, Witt K, Kramer UM. Striatal-cerebellar networks mediate consolidation in a motor sequence learning task: an fMRI study using dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2015;122:52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ulug AM, Vo A, Argyelan M, Tanabe L, Schiffer WK, Dewey S, Dauer WT, Eidelberg D. Cerebellothalamocortical pathway abnormalities in torsinA DYT1 knock-in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(16):6638–6643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016445108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. van der Meer JN, Beukers RJ, van der Salm SM, Caan MW, Tijssen MA, Nederveen AJ. White matter abnormalities in gene-positive myoclonus-dystonia. Mov Disord. 2012;27(13):1666–1672. doi: 10.1002/mds.25128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Vanni V, Puglisi F, Bonsi P, Ponterio G, Maltese M, Pisani A, Mandolesi G. Cerebellar synaptogenesis is compromised in mouse models of DYT1 dystonia. Exp Neurol. 2015;271:457–467. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Vo A, Sako W, Niethammer M, Carbon M, Bressman SB, Ulug AM, Eidelberg D. Thalamocortical connectivity correlates with phenotypic variability in dystonia. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(9):3086–3094. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Waln O, LeDoux MS. Delayed-onset oromandibular dystonia after a cerebellar hemorrhagic stroke. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16(9):623–625. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Westenberger A, Reyes CJ, Saranza G, Dobricic V, Hanssen H, Domingo A, Laabs BH, Schaake S, Pozojevic J, Rakovic A, Grutz K, Begemann K, Walter U, Dressler D, Bauer P, Rolfs A, Munchau A, Kaiser FJ, Ozelius LJ, Jamora RD, Rosales RL, Diesta CCE, Lohmann K, Konig IR, Bruggemann N, Klein C. A hexanucleotide repeat modifies expressivity of X-linked dystonia parkinsonism. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(6):812–822. doi: 10.1002/ana.25488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Xiao X, Deng H, Furlan A, Yang T, Zhang X, Hwang GR, Tucciarone J, Wu P, He M, Palaniswamy R, Ramakrishnan C, Ritola K, Hantman A, Deisseroth K, Osten P, Huang ZJ, Li B. A genetically defined compartmentalized striatal direct pathway for negative reinforcement. Cell. 2020;183(1):211–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zech M, Lam DD, Winkelmann J. Update on KMT2B-related dystonia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19(11):92. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-1007-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang L, Yokoi F, Jin YH, DeAndrade MP, Hashimoto K, Standaert DG, Li Y. Altered dendritic morphology of Purkinje cells in Dyt1 DeltaGAG knock-in and purkinje cell-specific Dyt1 conditional knockout mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e18357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Neural Transmission are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES