Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2021 May 31;7(5):e07118. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07118

Chemical profile of Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters, and Juglans regia L. and Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris used against oral diseases: in vitro analysis between polyphenolic content and aqueous extraction optimization

Hazim Harouak 1,, Jamal Ibijbijen 1, Laila Nassiri 1
PMCID: PMC8180621  PMID: 34136692

Abstract

Objective

Optimization of aqueous extraction to extract the maximum amount of polyphenolic compounds that are used to treat oral disorders.

Methods

Using revelation tests for phytochemical screening, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent for total phenols, catechin standard for total flavonoids, acidified vanillin for total condensed tannins, and PCA analysis to detect different correlations between plants and between employed extractions.

Results

The highest (p < 0.0001); total flavonoides (195,80 ± 2,91 mg CE/g d.e) was obtained from decocted extract of Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris, total phenolic (167,71 ± 12,52 mg GAE/g d.e) and total condensed tannins (250,44 ± 10,18 mg CE/g d.e) was obtained respectively from soxhlet extract and infused extract of Tetraclinis articulata L. whereas; The correlation analysis using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was positive between infusion and decoction, between total flavonoids and total phenols which is not correlated with total condensed tannins.

Conclusion

Juglans regia L. bark contain a higher level of polyphenolic constituents than leaves, Decoction extraction of Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris leaf recommended to increase the yield of polychenolic extracts, condensed tannins of Tetraclinis articulata L. are degradable in high temperature.

Keywords: Juglans regia L., Europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris, Tetraclinis articulata L., Total polyphenolic compounds, Optimization of aqueous extraction, PCA analysis


Juglans regia L., europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris, Tetraclinis articulata L., Total polyphenolic compounds, Optimization of aqueous extraction, PCA analysis

Highlights

  • Walnut barks are richer in polyphenolic compounds than leaves.

  • Barbary Thuya leaf is richer in degradable condensed tannins at high temperatures.

  • Wild olive leaf is richer in flavonoids (195.80 mg EC/g of dry decocted extract).

  • Condensed tannins are uncorrelated with phenols and flavonoids.

  • Flavonoids are the major polyphenolic constituents.

1. Introduction

Among the best preventive means against infectious and degenerative disorders, the biological activity of polyphenolic compounds (Petti and Scully, 2009).

Flavanone such as pinocembrin or pinostrobin and chalcones like 2,4 dihydroxychalcone or 2,4-dihydroxy-3-methoxychalcone, are among the polyphenolic compounds which showing a good antimicrobial activity (Ávila et al., 2008; Batovska et al., 2009), flavonols named izalpinin, rhamoncitrin and galangin, have revealed a fungicidal activity against Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum and Microsporum gypsum (Agüero et al., 2010).

In dentisetry, Polyphenols have the ability to inhibit the formation of mixed biofilms on orthodontic surfaces (Farkash et al., 2019), Flavonols of the flavonoid family have been shown to have a positive effect against gram-positive bacteria such as (Staphylococcus aureus, Actinomyces naeslundii and Lactobacillus acidophilus), gram-negative bacteria as (Prevotella oralis, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella melaninogenica), and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Cushnie et al., 2007), Luteolin, also known as a flavonic component of perilla seed (Perilla frutescens Britton var. Japonica Hara) showed the strongest antimicrobial effect among other phenolic compounds against cariogenic streptococci and Porodyromonas gingivalis (Yamamoto and Ogawa, 2002).

It has also been reported that tannins obtained from the bark of Phyllanthus columnaris inhibited the growth of all oral pathogens tested (Othman et al., 2019).

Tetraclinis articulata L. (Cupressaceae), locally called "Al'Araar" or "Azouka" in tachlhit, is among the most popular herbs, widely used in folk medicine (Montanari, 2014), is a herbaceous plant originally from the southwest of the Mediterranean, mainly from Maghreb vegetation, given its richness in essential oils that give it many biological activities it is therefore considered among the most widely used aromatic and medicinal plants in the world (Polunin and Huxley, 1967; Nicolás et al., 2004).

Olea europaea L., belonging to the Oleaceae family, it is among the oldest cultivated trees in the world and is a typical crop of the Mediterranean area (Scognamiglio et al., 2012).

The subsp. europaea var. sylvestris of Oleaster, is widely found along the coastal and semi-coastal areas of Mediterranean and is evergreen, this vegetation is mainly composed of sclerophyllous shrub formations that can tolerate the arid conditions that characterize the Mediterranean region (Baratta and Barbera, 1981; de Graaff and Eppink, 1999).

Juglans regia L. (family Juglandaceae) The Persian or common walnut is the world's most widely distributed deciduous tree species found mainly in temperate zones and is being cultivated commercially in the western and southern of America, in central and southern of Europe and in Asia (Anonimous, 1999).

The traditional use of these three trees (Juglans regia L., Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris and Tetraclinis articulata L.) against oral affections has been reported (Harouak et al., 2018).

Our study aims to evaluate the polyphenol content of the trees studied and to compare it in terms of the aqueous extraction used.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant materials

Species leaves (Figure 1) and walnut barks were collected during the flowering season from with a code that has been assigned to each species:

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Species pictures (A: J. regia L.; B: O. europaea L. var. Sylvestris; C: T. articulata (Vahl) Masters).

34°03′52.9″N 5°30′09.5″W in 23/06/2019 for Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris “OE” (MICSOLENV-OE/N°06);

33°52′10.8″N 5°32′35.3″W in 07/07/2019 for Juglans regia L. “JR” (MICSOLENV-JR/N°07);

33°52′39.4″N 5°54′54.9″W in 03/05/2019 for Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters “TA” (MICSOLENV-TA/N°15);

In our laboratory greenhouse; the plants were air-dried at room temperature and then passed through a 0.5 mm sieve in a mill; our samples were then stored in plastic bags in a dark and dry condition.

2.2. Moisture content

The high moisture content is closely related to the degradation of phytochemicals, moreover it is a challenge for storage and transport; therefore, and as an important first step in the process of retention of phytochemicals and subsequent processing, the removal of moisture by drying is mandatory (Wojdyło et al., 2014; Tran et al., 2020).

The water content of our plant material has been expressed as a percentage (%) according to the following formula Eq. (1) (Mohammadpour et al., 2019):

MC (%) = (M1 - M2)∗100/M1 (1)

with: MC: moisture content given in percentage (%); M1: sample weight in grams after harvesting (fresh matter); M2: sample weight in grams after drying (dry matter) (Mohammadpour et al., 2019).

2.3. Extraction method

Aqueous extracts were prepared, 10% of each sample in distilled water Using infusion, decoction and Soxhlet techniques, after the obtained mixtures were filtered with Wathman filter paper and the recovered filtrate was evaporated in the oven at 45 degrees Celsius.

Infusion: to the boiling distilled water the vegetable material is added, then the mixture is left under stirring for 15 min.

Decoction: the plant material with distilled water and heated under stirring until it boils, then the mixture is left to stand under stirring for 15 min.

Soxhlet technique: the extraction is done 4 h (12 cycles) in a Soxhlet apparatus for each sample.

The percentage of extraction yields was determined by the following formula Eq. (2) (Alara et al., 2018).

% Extracts Yields = (We∗100)/Wt (2)

where We is the extract weight of plant sample (w) and Wt is the weight of dried plant sample.

2.4. Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis of collected data was carried out to highlight the significant differences between the yields of the three kinds of extraction used and investigated species, through the use of GraphPad prism 8.2.263 software, by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), then Tukey test to detect the degree of significance, this significance is taken at the probability of ∗p < 0.05 for a significant difference, ∗∗p < 0.01 for moderately significant difference, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for a highly significant difference, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 for a very highly significant difference (a high value of F means that something is significant, while a small value of p means that all results are significant, the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected from p < 0.05).

2.5. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA is a component analysis, it creates factors in the form of principal axes which are linearly related to the initial variables, which are independently of each others and hierarchically ordered, these axes are the "expression of general processes directing the distribution of several phenomena which are correlated with each other" (Béguin and Pumain, 2000), this technique transforms variables linked to each other (correlated) into new variables decorrelated from each other. These newly created variables are termed "principal components", or main axes.

To highlight different correlations between the variables (dosed polyphenolic compounds) and extraction types between the individuals (studied plants); the projection of the variables in F1 and F2 plan, were obtained using XLSTAT 2016 (18.02.01).

2.6. Phytochemical screening

The extracted samples were screened phytochemically to detect the presence of tannins using iron chloride, flavonoids following cyanidine reaction, terpenoids using Liebermann Burchard reaction, alkaloids according to Dragendorff and Mayer reagent, reducing sugar based on Fehling reagent (Karumi et al., 2004).

The revelation of saponins was observed in a test tube containing the extract with distilled water, the mixture was stirred for 20 s and left to stand for 15 min, the appearance of a persistent moss (more than 1 cm in height) means the presence of saponosides (Bruneton, 2009).

2.7. Determination of polyhenolic content

2.7.1. Total phenols

The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined according to the procedure reported by Slinkard and Singleton (1977).

In test tubes for each extract (concentration of 1 mg/ml in distilled water), 100 μl were added to 4.5 ml of D.W (distilled water) and then to 100 μl of Ciocalteu-Folin reactive. This combination was then left for 3 min at ambient temperature, and then 300 μl of Na2C03 (2% in water) has been added. After 1h30 of incubation in a dark chamber at ambient temperature, the absorbance was recorded with a spectrophotometer (UV-2005) at 760 nm against a blank containing distilled water. Under similar operating procedures, a calibration curve was performed by gallic acid (standard phenolic compound) from 100 to 1000 μg/ml; the results were presented in mg gallic acid equivalent (AGE)/1 g dry extract and the analysis was expressed as a mean of three replicates ± the standard deviation.

2.7.2. Total flavonoids

To evaluate the total flavonoid concentration (TFC), we employed the approach described by (Zilic et al., 2011). A solution composed of (500 μl) of each extract (1 mg/ml) and 75 μl of NaNO2 (5%) was prepared. After 6 min, 150 μl of an AlCl3 solution (10%) was added, then the whole was left to stand at room temperature for 5 min, then 500 μl of NaOH (1M) was added and the total volume of tubes is then completed to 2.5 ml by adding distilled water.

At 510 nm and against a blank with distilled water as extraction solvent, we measured the absorbance. With same operating conditions, a calibration curve was traced using catechin as flavonoid standard reference (50–500 μg/ml); results were expressed in mg catechin equivalent (CE)/1g dry extract and the analysis was expressed as a mean of three replicates ± the standard deviation.

2.7.3. Total condensed tannins

Based on the method outlined by (Broadhurst and Jones, 1978), the condensed tannin concentration using acidified vanillin was determined as follows; 0.5 ml from each sample (1 mg/ml) was mixed with 1.5 ml of vanillin reagent (4%, w/v, vanillin in methanol). After passing through the vortex, 750 μl of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added. After a second shaking of the vortex, the mixture was left in the dark at 20 °C for 15 min. The absorbance was taken at 500 nm, using a distilled water blank as extraction solvent. Under the same operating conditions, a calibration curve was plotted using catechin as the reference condensed tannin (100–1000 μg/ml); the results were expressed in mg catechin equivalent (CE)/1 g of dry extract and the mean of the analysis was calculated over three replicates ±standard deviation.

TPC, TFC and TCT was obtained using the following relation Eq. (3):

(c∗V)/m (3)

with c: is the concentration of TPC, TFC or TCT from the equation of calibration curve (Figure 2), V: is the total volume of solvent (distilled water) used in the test (ml), and m represents the weight of the dried sample used (g) (Alara et al., 2018).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Calibration curves of gallic acid (fig A: total phenols) and catechin (fig B: total flavonoids and fig C: total condensed tannins).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Moisture content

Watter content ranged between 35.02 and 59.74% (Table 1), walnut leaves are those that contain more water which is due to its larger morphology, in fact the climatological difference at the time of harvest allows the change of temperature which is the only variable that determines the concentration of water in the air in the internal intercellular spaces; in fact when the leaf receives radiation, its temperature rises, which increases the concentration of water in these leaves (Jones, 1990), that concentration can affect phytochemical content of species; in fact it was reported that the essential oil content of Eucalyptus citriodora leaves dried in the shade for one week is 1.70% against 1.14% for fresh leaves (Singh et al., 1977), the increase of this content during drying period suggests the continuity and acceleration of the biosynthesis of these phytochemicals compounds after harvesting the plant (Silou et al., 2002).

Table 1.

Moisture content percentage.

Species Juglans regia L. leaves Juglans regia L. barks Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters
Moisture Content (%) 59,74 49,74 35,02 45,71

Plants generally react to environmental aggressions by producing polyphenols and especially flavonoids, which are a means of defense of the plant species against these aggressions. Moreover, the phenolic compounds of a given species depend on several factors; intrinsic (genetic) and extrinsic (environmental) (Young et al., 1997; Carpenter and Smith, 1975).

Natural drying after harvest period is a free method of conservation, effective and which respects the environment, Indeed, this technique does not generate waste or polluting discharges. In addition, it allows plants to preserve their active principles, to improve the quality of the products by avoiding their contamination, to lower their weight in view to facilitate their transport, to multiply their use and increase their lifetime (Aghfir et al., 2007; Ankila, 2007).

3.2. Extractions yield

The yields found (Figure 3) reveals that the wild olive tree is the plant that gives more yield compared to the 2 other plants, walnut leaves give more yield in aqueous extraction than bark, the comparison in terms of extraction type favors extraction by Soxhlet in a significant way (p < 0.05) except in case of walnut bark or infusion is the profitable extraction.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Yield extractions percentage, Values sharing same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05), JRL = Juglans regia L. leaves; JRB = Juglans regia L. barks; OES = Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris; TA = Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters.

Walnut yields were less than some aqueous extracts of 5 cultivars (Juglans regia L.) green husks which are very similar in different varieties of walnut, from 31.63 to 33.69% (Oliveira et al., 2008), but it was higher than Leaf yield of ethanol:water (4:6) extract which was 20.1% (Almeida et al., 2008) and bark yield of infused extract 11.8 % (Amirou et al., 2018).

Our yields of T. articulata are less than those found by organic solvent extraction such as methanolic extraction 17.64 % (Dane et al., 2016) or by ethanol (60%) obtained at 240 min (Bensebia et al., 2021).

However; our pilot plant in terms of yield Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris was very profitable compared to another study of the crude extract which gave only a maximum yield which did not exceed 6,94% (Ghania et al., 2014).

The Soxhlet in our study that extracts more which is also called continuous hot extraction is the most efficient technique for extracting vegetable oil (Teixeira et al., 2018) This type of extraction that maintains a relatively high extraction temperature with the heat of distillation flask (Tandon and Rane, 2008), it is therefore well applied, due to its high performance compared to other conventional extraction methods (Luque de Castro and García-Ayuso, 1998).

Therefore, the performance of any type of extraction depends on many parameters: extraction temperature, time, type of solvent and volume used (Chew et al., 2011; Costa et al., 2012).

According to this approach our yields can be explained by the pressure, the high temperature and the total exhaustion of vegetable matter, which is the case of Soxhlet extraction.

3.3. Phytochemical screening

Most of the secondary metabolites were detected by phytochemical screening; all samples contain combined tannins, flavonoids, terpenoids, reducing and antracenic compounds, while alkaloids are absent for studied simple; but Juglans regia reveals more flavonoids compounds than Tetraclinis articulata and Olea europaea var. Sylvestris, Free anthracenes and coumarins are only detected in Walnut leaf (Table 2).

Table 2.

Phytochemical screening results.

Compounds Species
Juglans regia L. leaves Juglans regia L. barks Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris
Tannins Tannins
Catechic tannins
Gallic tannins
+++
+++
0
+++
+++
0
++
+
0
+++
++
0
Alkaloids 0 0 0 0
Flavonic Compounds Anthocyanins
Flavones
Flavanones
Flavanols and Flavanonols
Genines
Leucoanthocyans
Catechols
++
0
0
+++
+++
0
+++
+
0
0
0
++
0
+++
0
0
0
0
0
0
+++
0
0
0
0
0
0
++
Terpenoids Sterols and Triterpenes
Saponosides
++
++
++
+
+++
+++
+++
+++
Reducing Compounds Reducing Compounds
Mucilages
Oses and holosides
Cyanogenetic compounds
++
0
0
0
+++
++
+
+
+++
+++
+++
0
+++
0
0
+
Anthracene derivatives Free anthracenes +++ 0 0 0
Combined Anthracenic:
C-heterosides
O-heterosides

+
++

+
++

+
+++

+
0
Coumarins ++ 0 0 0

+++: Very positive reaction; + +: Moderately positive reaction; +: Weakly positive reaction; 0: Total absence.

A phytochemical study of: Tetraclinis articulata essential oil shows the presence of terpene hydrocarbons which represent 23.6% and oxygenated terpenes 28.3% (Fatiha et al., 2015), Olea Europaea leaf from Algeria revealed the presence of certain active substances such as flavonoids, saponins and steroids (Nora et al., 2012).

The comparison of our secondary metabolites in walnut shows that leaf are richer in flavoindes contrary to the bark which is richer in reducing compound, Other research reveals the presence in walnut leaves of tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, cardiac glycosides, proteins and steroids (Shah et al., 2013); caffeic acid, essential fatty acids, paracomaric acid and ascorbic acid. The main flavonoids present in the nut leaves are quercetin galactoside and pantocidal derivatives of quercetin, quercetin arabinoside, quercetin xyloside and quercetin rhamnoside (Mohammadi et al., 2012), bark contains reducing sugars, amino acids, flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins and phenols, steroids, saponins (NirmlaDevi et al., 2011).

Indeed; the observed difference can be explained by the fact that the synthesis of secondary metabolites in the same species is affected by many factors, like internal genetics evolution as regulated genes and/or enzymes, or by external environmental influences like light, temperature, water, salinity, etc. (Li et al., 2020).

3.4. Quantitative distribution of polyphenols

3.4.1. Total phenolic content (as presented in Figure 4.A)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mean concentrations of polyphenolic components in JRL = Juglans regia L. leaves; JRB = Juglans regia L. barks; OES =: Olea europaea L. var. Sylvestris; TA = Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters (fig A: Phe = Phenols, fig B: Flav = Flavonoids, fig C: CTa = Condensed tannins; I=Infusion, D = Decoction and S=Soxhlet extracts), Values with same characters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).

The interaction between studied samples and extraction type is considered extremely significant with:

F = 30.32. DFn = 6, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001; also, the difference is also extremely significant between plants F = 88.22. DFn = 3, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001; same difference is showed between the types of extraction concerning content of total phenols F = 18.87. DFn = 2, DFd = 24, the P < 0.0001.

Studied samples contain a phenol content values not significant (p > 0.05) between plants and between extracts following Tukey's multiple comparison; except Soxhlet extract of Tetraclinis articulata which is very highly significant (p < 0.0001) more richer in those compounds than other two extraction type.

The finding results of our phenol concentration for walnut are highest compared to others who have found for 5 cultivars (Juglans regia L.) green husks; from 32.61 mg/g in cv. Mellanaise to 74.08 mg/g in cv. Franquette of gallic acid equivalent (Oliveira et al., 2008), but lower than some other research who found in ethanol/water (40%/60%) leaf extract 270 ± 3 mg GAE/g of lyophilised extract (Almeida et al., 2008), or to the macerated acetone extract (327.972 ± 0.06 μgEAG/mgE) (Boulfia et al., 2020).

While our aqueous extract contains high phenolic quantum which exceeds 150 mg/g extract compared to the fractions of T. articulata; ethyl acetate which contains 93.1 mg/g of extract, aqueous extract (21.2 mg/g of extract) and butanol (43.87 mg/g of extract) (Rached et al., 2018) or the one obtained with 60% ethanol (TPC (95.28 mg EAG/g)) for an extraction time of 210 min (Bensebia et al., 2021).

Also our olive leaf contain more phenol content compare to others (Talhaoui et al., 2014) who found 30 phenolic compounds represents a concentration from 52.12 to 60.64 mg/kg.

Phenol content differs from one study to another depending on the extraction type; it should be noted that many authors agree that, in order to improve both the solute solubility and diffusion coefficient, it is necessary to increase the extraction temperature and time; this procedure can degrade certain quantities of phenolic compounds (Yilmaz and Toledo, 2006; Pinelo et al., 2005).

3.4.2. Total flavonoids content (as presented in Figure 4.B)

The interaction between plants and extraction type is considered extremely significant with: F = 112.37. DFn = 6, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001; also, the difference between plants, as well as between the extraction types is extremely significant, respectively with: F = 1975.98. DFn = 3, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001, and: F = 351.31. DFn = 2, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001.

The quantity of total flavonoids reveals values ranging from significant (p < 0.05) to extremely significant (p < 0.0001) between plants and between extracts, OES is the species which contains more flavonoids compared to other studied species which contain on average the same quantity of these interesting compounds, extraction type is very remarkable in TA which the Soxhlet extract has a greater content of flavonoids very highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The yields of Soxhlet extraction of flavonoids were higher than those of infusion or decoction in the present study, this may be explained by the fact that the increased temperature accelerates mass transfer and improves the extraction yield (Wang et al., 2008), This could be the reason why the flavonoid yield was significantly increased when the temperature was changed from of 40–60 °C and with increasing pressure to a certain value (Bimakr et al., 2011).

3.4.3. Total condensed tannins content (as presented in Figure 4.C)

The interaction between plants and used extraction is considered very highly significant with: F = 44.50. DFn = 6, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001; also, between plants as well as between the types of extraction, the difference is extremely significant with, respectively: F = 1756.11. DFn = 3, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001, and: F = 27.85. DFn = 2, DFd = 24, the P value is <0.0001.

Tetraclinis articulate is the plant which contain more condensed tannins extracted by infusion with a very highly significant (p < 0.0001) compared to other extraction type and other studied species.

Juglans regia bark are rich in these compounds compared to leaf.

Thus, it should be pointed out that the tannin content can be influenced by the location where the plants were grown (Antonelli-Ushirobira et al., 2004).

3.5. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

The PCA aimed to reduce the size of collected data into a smaller number of components in order to examine the grouping in quantity of phenolic compounds according to the different extraction types and studied plants.

The F1 axis represents (52.97%) and F2 (42.88%) of information; On the correlation circle (Figure 5), the variables are well presented on the F1 and F2 plane which explains 95.85% of the variability.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Correlation circle of variables (Phe: Phenols, Flav: Flavonoids, CTa: Condensed tannins, I: infusion, D: Decoction, S: Soxhlet).

FlavD and FlavI are not correlated with PheS, also FlavS isn't correlated with CTaI; CTaS are strongly positively correlated with CTaD which is correlated positively with CTaI and PheS; FlavD, FlavI, FlavS, PheI and PheD are also correlated positively; The positive correlation between flavonoids and total phenols can be explained by the reason that flavonoids are the majority phenolic compounds; which is confirmed by the relationship related phenolic compounds with flavonoids content (Maisuthisakul et al., 2008).

Indeed, Oleaster var. Sylvestris tree is richer in flavonoides extracted by decoction and Soxhlet, Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters contain the higher quantity of condensed tannins in his infused extract and Juglans regia L. bark contain greater amounts of polyphenolic components than leafs (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Projection of individuals on the factorial plane (F1 x F2).

4. Conclusion

To increase the content of polyphenolic compounds in the aqueous extracts of a given plant, it is necessary and recommended to take into consideration the plant used, its studied parts, the extraction conditions such as temperature, time and pressure.

In our study, it was clear that the bark of J. regia is richer in these compounds than leaves, the extraction by Soxhlet is more profitable at the level of T. articulata, while the decoction of O. europaea L. var. sylvestris leaves is the type of extraction that gave more polyphenolic compounds.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Hazim Harouak: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Jamal Ibijbijen: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Laila Nassiri: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.

Declaration of interests statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

References

  1. Aghfir M., Kouhila M., Jamali A., Mohamed L.A. Vol. 2007. JITH; Enstimac: 2007. p. 5. (Séchage solaire convectif pour la conservation des feuilles de romarin (Rosmarinus officinalis)). [Google Scholar]
  2. Agüero M.B., Gonzalez M., Lima B., Svetaz L., Sanchez M., Zacchino S. Argentinean propolis from Zuccagnia punctata Cav.(Caesalpinieae) exudates: phytochemical characterization and antifungal activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58(1):194–201. doi: 10.1021/jf902991t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alara O.R., Abdurahman N.H., Ukaegbu C.I. Soxhlet extraction of phenolic compounds from Vernonia cinerea leaves and its antioxidant activity. J. Appl. Res. Med. Arom. Plants. 2018;11:12–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Almeida I.F., Fernandes E., Lima J.L., Costa P.C., Bahia M.F. Walnut (Juglans regia) leaf extracts are strong scavengers of pro-oxidant reactive species. Food Chem. 2008;106(3):1014–1020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amirou A., Bnouham M., Legssyer A., Ziyyat A., Aziz M., Berrabah M., Mekhfi H. Vitro and Ex Vivo Experiments. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018. Effects of Juglans regia root bark extract on platelet aggregation, bleeding time, and plasmatic coagulation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ankila O. Techniques de séchage des plantes développées par le PSE/Maroc à Marrakech. In: Benjillali B., Ettalibi M., Ismaili-Alaoui M.M., et Zrira S., editors. Actes du colloque Plantes aromatiques et médicinales et leurs huiles essentielles. 2007. pp. 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anonimous . Instituto Nacional de Estatı´stica; Portugal: 1999. Recenseamento Geral Agrı´cola. [Google Scholar]
  8. Antonelli-Ushirobira T.M., Yamaguti E., Uhemura L.M., De Mello J.C.P. Controle de qualidade de amostras de Paullinia cupana HBK var. sorbilis (Mart.) Ducke. Acta Farm. Bonaerense. 2004;23:383–386. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ávila H.P., Smânia E.D.F.A., Delle Monache F., Júnior A.S. Structure–activity relationship of antibacterial chalcones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008;16(22):9790–9794. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.09.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baratta B., Barbera G. La forma di allevamento nell’olivicoltura di Pantelleria. Frutticoltura. 1981;12:43–45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Batovska D., Parushev S., Stamboliyska B., Tsvetkova I., Ninova M., Najdenski H. Examination of growth inhibitory properties of synthetic chalcones for which antibacterial activity was predicted. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44(5):2211–2218. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Béguin M., Pumain D. Colin, coll. Cursus; Paris: 2000. La représentation des données géographiques. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bensebia B., Bensebia O., Belloumi G., Mostefai S.K. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of ethanolic extracts from the leaves of Tetraclinis articulate (Vahl) Masters. In: Trache D., Benaliouche F., Mekki A., editors. Materials Research and Applications. Materials Horizons: from Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer; Singapore: 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bimakr M., Rahman R.A., Taip F.S., Ganjloo A., Salleh L.M., Selamat J., Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of major bioactive flavonoid compounds from spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) leaves. Food Bioprod. Process. 2011;89(1):67–72. [Google Scholar]
  15. Boulfia M., Lamchouri F., Toufik H. Chemical analysis, phenolic content, and antioxidant activities of aqueous and organic Moroccan Juglans regia L. Bark extracts. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2020;16(9):1328–1339. [Google Scholar]
  16. Broadhurst R.B., Jones W.T. Analysis of condensed tannins using acidified vanillin. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1978;29(9):788–794. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruneton J. 4ème édition. Lavoisier; Paris: 2009. Pharmacognosie, Phytochimie, Plantes Médicinales. [Google Scholar]
  18. Carpenter S.B., Smith N.D. Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hardwoods. Can. J. Bot. 1975;53(11):1153–1156. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chew K.K., Ng S.Y., Thoo Y.Y., Khoo M.Z., Wan Aida W.M., Ho C.W. Effect of ethanol concentration, extraction time and extraction temperature on the recovery of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Centella asiatica extracts. Int. Food Res. J. 2011;18:571–578. [Google Scholar]
  20. Costa P., Goncalves S., Valentao P., Andrade P.B., Coelho N., Romano A. Thymus lotocephalus wild plants and in vitro cultures produce different profiles of phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2012;135:1253–1260. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cushnie T.P.T., Hamilton V.E.S., Chapman D.G., Taylor P.W., Lamb A.J. Aggregation of Staphylococcus aureus following treatment with the antibacterial flavonol galangin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;103(5):1562–1567. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dane Y., Mouhouche F., Canela-Garayoa R., Delpino-Rius A. Phytochemical analysis of methanolic extracts of artemisia absinthium L. 1753 (asteraceae), Juniperus phoenicea L., and Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Mast, 1892 (cupressaceae) and evaluation of their biological activity for stored grain protection. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 2016;41(6):2147–2158. [Google Scholar]
  23. de Graaff J., Eppink L.A.A.J. Olive oil production and soil conservation in southern Spain, in relation to EU subsidy policies. Land Use Pol. 1999;16(4):259–267. [Google Scholar]
  24. Farkash Y., Feldman M., Ginsburg I., Steinberg D., Shalish M. Polyphenols inhibit Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Dent. J. 2019;7(2):42. doi: 10.3390/dj7020042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fatiha L., Hachemi B., Zineb B. Essential oil composition of Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl.) Masters. Leaves from Algeria. Int. J. Herb. Med. 2015;2(6 Part A):31–33. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghania T., Amina D., Nesrine A., Fz K. 2014. Utilisation des Triterpènes de Mentha piperita, Capsicum frutescens et Olea europaea en tant que phytoinsecticides contre le Criquet pèlerin Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål, 1775). Actes du 4ème Meeting International, Revue des Régions Arides - Numéro Spécial - n° 35. [Google Scholar]
  27. Harouak H., Falaki K., Bouiamrine E.H., Ibijbijen J., Nassiri L. Diversity of medicinal plants used on oral disease in the city of Meknes, Morocco. J. Med. Plants Stud. 2018;6(5):117–122. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones H.G. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1990. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. [Google Scholar]
  29. Karumi Y., Onyeyili P.A., Ogugbuaja V. Identification of active principles of M. balsamina (Balsam Apple) leaf extract. J. Med. Sci. 2004;4:179–182. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li Y., Kong D., Fu Y., Sussman M.R., Wu H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020;148:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luque de Castro M.D., García-Ayuso L.E. Soxhlet extraction of solid materials: an outdated technique with a promising innovative future. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1998;369:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  32. Maisuthisakul P., Pasuk S., Ritthiruangdej P. Relationship between antioxidant properties and chemical composition of some Thai plants. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008;21(3):229–240. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mohammadi J., Mirzaie A., Azizi A., Roozbehi A., Delaviz H. The effects of hydroalcoholic extract of Juglans regia leaf on histological changes of Langerhans islet in diabetic rats model. Int. Sportmed J. (ISMJ) 2012;15(4):293–302. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mohammadpour H., Sadrameli S.M., Eslami F., Asoodeh A. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of Moringa peregrina oil with response surface methodology and comparison with Soxhlet method. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019;131:106–116. [Google Scholar]
  35. Montanari B. Aromatic, medicinal plants and vulnerability of traditional herbal knowledge in a Berber community of the high atlas mountains of Morocco. Plant Divers Resour. 2014;36:388–402. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nicolás M.J., Esteve M.A., Palazón J.A., López J.J. Modelo sobre las preferencias de hábitat a escala local de Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters en una población del límite septentrional de su área de distribución. An. Biol. 2004;26:157–167. [Google Scholar]
  37. NirmlaDevi T., Apraj V., Bhagwat A., Mallya R., Sawant L., Pandita N. Pharmacognostic and phytochemical investigation of Juglans regia Linn. bark. Phcog. J. 2011;3(25):39–43. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nora N.B., Hamid K., Snouci M., Boumedien M., Abdellah M. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening of Olea europaea leaves from Algeria. Open Conf. Proc. J. 2012;3(1) [Google Scholar]
  39. Oliveira I., Sousa A., Ferreira I.C., Bento A., Estevinho L., Pereira J.A. Total phenols, antioxidant potential and antimicrobial activity of walnut (Juglans regia L.) green husks. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46(7):2326–2331. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Othman T.A.M., Hanafiah R.M., Nam N.A., Mohd-Said S., Adnan S.N.A. Chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial properties of phyllanthus columnaris stem bark tannins against oral pathogens. J. Int. Dent. Med. Res. 2019;12(3):848–853. [Google Scholar]
  41. Petti S., Scully C. Polyphenols, oral health and disease: a review. J. Dent. 2009;37(6):413–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pinelo Manuel, Monica Rubilar, María Jerez, Jorge Sineiro, Núnez María José. Effect of solvent, temperature, and solvent-to-solid ratio on the total phenolic content and antiradical activity of extracts from different components of grape pomace. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53(6):2111–2117. doi: 10.1021/jf0488110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Polunin O., Huxley A. 1967. Fleurs du bassin méditerranéenne, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rached W., Zeghada F.Z., Bennaceur M., Barros L., Calhelha R.C., Heleno S., Phytochemical analysis and assessment of antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic properties of Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018;112:460–466. [Google Scholar]
  45. Scognamiglio M., D'Abrosca B., Pacifico S., Fiumano V., De Luca P.F., Monaco P., Fiorentino A. Polyphenol characterization and antioxidant evaluation of Olea europaea varieties cultivated in Cilento National Park (Italy) Food Res. Int. 2012;46(1):294–303. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shah T.I., Ganesh N., Akthar S. Preliminary phytochemical evaluation and antibacterial potential of different leaf extracts of Juglana regia: a Ubiquitous Dry Fruit from Kashmir-India. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2013;19:93–96. [Google Scholar]
  47. Silou T., Taty-Loumbou F., Chalchat J.C. Etude de l'effet du séchage solaire sur le rendement et la composition chimique des huiles essentielles extraites des feuilles d'Eucalyptus citriodora. Annales des falsifications, de l'expertise chimique et toxicologique. 2002;95(960):287–301. [Google Scholar]
  48. Singh A., Singh S.R., Duve R.N., Vithalbha C.L., Drysdale P. The distillation and properties of Eucalyptus citriodora oil. Fiji Agric. J. 1977;39:33–38. [Google Scholar]
  49. Slinkard K., Singleton V.L. Total phenolic analyses: automation and comparison with manual method. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977;28:49–55. [Google Scholar]
  50. Talhaoui N., Gómez-Caravaca A.M., Leon L., De la Rosa R., Segura-Carretero A., Fernandez-Gutierrez A. Determination of phenolic compounds of ‘Sikitita’olive leaves by HPLC-DAD-TOF-MS. Comparison with its parents ‘Arbequina’and ‘Picual’olive leaves. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014;58(1):28–34. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tandon S., Rane S. 2008. Decoction and Hot Continuous Extraction Techniques. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants; p. 93. [Google Scholar]
  52. Teixeira G.L., Ghazani S.M., Corazza M.L., Marangoni A.G., Ribani R.H. Assessment of subcritical propane, supercritical CO2 and Soxhlet extraction of oil from sapucaia (Lecythis pisonis) nuts. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2018;133(1):122–132. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tran T.M.K., Kirkman T., Nguyen M., Van Vuong Q. Effects of drying on physical properties, phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Robusta wet coffee pulp (Coffea canephora) Heliyon. 2020;6(7) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang L., Yang B., Du X., Yi C. Optimisation of supercritical fluid extraction of flavonoids from Pueraria lobata. Food Chem. 2008;108(2):737–741. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wojdyło A., Figiel A., Lech K., Nowicka P., Oszmiański J. Effect of convective and vacuum–microwave drying on the bioactive compounds, color, and antioxidant capacity of sour cherries. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014;7(3):829–841. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yamamoto H., Ogawa T. Antimicrobial activity of perilla seed polyphenols against oral pathogenic bacteria. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002;66(4):921–924. doi: 10.1271/bbb.66.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yilmaz Yusuf, Toledo Romeo T. Oxygen radical absorbance capacities of grape/wine industry byproducts and effect of solvent type on extraction of grape seed polyphenols. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006;19(1):41–48. [Google Scholar]
  58. Young A.J., Phillip D., Savill J. Carotenoids in higher plant photosynthesis. In: Pessaraki M., editor. Handbook of Photosynthesis. Marcel DekkerInc.; New York: 1997. pp. 575–596. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zilic S., Hadzi-Taskovic´ Sukalovic´ V., Dodig D., Maksimovic´ V., Maksimovic M., Basic´ Z. Antioxidant activity of small grain cereals caused by phenolics and lipid soluble Antioxidants. J. Cereal. Sci. 2011;54:417–424. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES