Skip to main content
Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine logoLink to Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
. 2021 Jun 1;21(3):207–217. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.3.207

Pre-anesthetic clinic internship: new teaching method of pre-anesthesia evaluation for undergraduates

Shao-Hua Zheng 1, Xiao-Peng Mei 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8187021  PMID: 34136642

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to observe the effect of internship in a pre-anesthetic clinic on the teaching quality of pre-anesthesia evaluation for undergraduates.

Methods

A total of 120 undergraduates from July 2017 to July 2018 in the anesthesia department of our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group (n = 60) and traditional teaching group (n = 60). The knowledge in the pre-anesthesia evaluation teaching chapters was evaluated between the two groups of undergraduates.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographic information between the two groups. The scores in the case analysis and theoretical knowledge test in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group were significantly higher than those in the traditional teaching group. In addition, the students' satisfaction with the curriculum design was significantly higher in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group than in the traditional teaching group.

Conclusion

Pre-anesthetic clinic internships can improve the quality of pre-anesthesia assessment teaching for undergraduates.

Keywords: Preanesthetic Clinic, Preanesthetic Evaluation, Undergraduate

INTRODUCTION

Anesthesiology belongs to the second-level clinical discipline. Undergraduates have fewer practice teaching hours, but with the course content increasingly professional. The teaching content includes pre-anesthesia evaluation, anesthesia methods, anesthesia management, and postoperative analgesia. Pre-anesthesia assessment is a comprehensive assessment of patients before anesthesia to determine whether they can withstand the challenge of anesthesia and related risk assessment. It is the basis for selecting anesthesia methods, formulating anesthesia plans, and optimizing anesthesia risk management and postoperative analgesia. A detailed pre-anesthesia assessment can minimize the risks associated with anesthesia surgery [1].

In pre-anesthesia evaluation, many interdisciplinary fields are involved, including cardiology, pulmonology, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurology, and pediatrics [2]. It is a great challenge for interns to master complex content in a short time. Outpatient anesthesia clinics are a new type of outpatient clinics that have become increasingly popular in recent years. The main tasks of outpatient anesthesia clinics are to obtain patients' health information via various methods, select necessary preoperative auxiliary examinations, rationally adjust the treatment plan, determine the necessary consultation of related disciplines, formulate the relevant treatment plan around the surgical period of anesthesia, and make patients understand anesthesia work and risks [3].

To date, no report has indicated anesthesia clinics as part of undergraduate internship teaching plans. This study aimed to innovatively introduce anesthesia clinic internships into undergraduate anesthesia internship teaching, evaluate the effect and importance of anesthesia clinic internships on clinical practice, and provide a new alternative method to improve clinical practice.

METHODS

1. General information

A total of 120 undergraduates (fifth grade) from July 2017 to July 2018 in the anesthesia department of our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group (n = 60) and traditional teaching group (n = 60). The data of all 120 students were entered into the EXCEL form according to the order of the student ID number. Each ID generated a random number between 1000 and 9999. Thereafter, all the students were arranged again according to the generated random number from small to large to obtain a new order. In the new order, the students were assigned to the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group with an odd number or to the traditional teaching group with an even number. The randomized grouping was then completed. There were 33 women and 27 men in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group, with an average age of 21.52 ± 0.57 (range, 20 to 25) years. Meanwhile, there were 32 women and 28 men in the traditional teaching group, with an average age of 22.13 ± 0.86 (range, 20 to 26) years. There were no significant differences in age or sex between the two groups. This research received ethical approval (2021-208) from the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Xi'an Jiaotong University. The need for consent was waived according to our university regulations. It is a teaching reform program that was confirmed by our university.

2. Methods

All interns in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group received PowerPoint presentations in the first 2-h class during the 6-h study of the course of pre-anesthesia evaluation. Video teaching of pre-anesthesia evaluation was conducted in the second 2-h class. Thereafter, the workflow of the anesthesia clinic and pre-anesthesia clinic evaluation sheet were provided to each student as after-class homework to familiarize themselves with the process and content of pre-anesthesia evaluation. In the last 2-h class, the students were arranged to practice in the pre-anesthetic clinic, while learning how to evaluate patients before surgery, preparing preoperative examinations, arranging consultation in related disciplines, and making detailed preoperative evaluation by synthesizing the results of various examinations and consultations.

In the traditional teaching group, all interns received PowerPoint presentations in the first 4-h class during the 6-h study of the course of pre-anesthesia evaluation. Thereafter, video teaching of pre-anesthesia evaluation was conducted in the second 2-h class. Therein, they learned how to evaluate patients before anesthesia, prepare preoperative examinations, arrange consultation of related subjects, and make detailed preoperative evaluations by synthesizing the results of various examinations and consultations.

All interns participated in the examination after 6 h of the clinical practice teaching pre-anesthesia assessment course. The examination included a case analysis (Appendix 1) and an assessment of theoretical knowledge (Appendix 2). After the examination, the scores in the two examinations of all interns were counted. A questionnaire (Appendix 3) was used to follow up the feedback of the two groups on the satisfaction with the curriculum design, and the results were analyzed and compared.

3. Statistical analysis

All measurement data were expressed as means ± standard deviations. The scores in the theoretical knowledge test and case analysis of the two groups were analyzed using the t-test. Counting data were analyzed using the chi-square test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at P-values of < 0.05.

RESULTS

The female-to-male sex ratio of the students was 33 : 27 in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group and 32 : 28 in the traditional teaching group. The average age of the students in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group was 21.5 ± 2.6 years, and that of the students in the traditional teaching group was 22.1 ± 2.9 years. There were no significant differences in age or sex between the two groups. The results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Sex and age composition of the two groups of students.

Group P C
Sex (female/male) 33 : 27 32 : 28
Age (years) 21.5 ± 2.6 22.1 ± 2.9

P, pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group; C, traditional teaching group.

The scores in the theoretical knowledge test were 43.39 ± 6.39 in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group and 35.17 ± 4.56 in the traditional teaching group. The scores of the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the scores in the case analysis were 45.16 ± 7.78 in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group and 30.57 ± 8.27 in the traditional teaching group. The scores of the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group (P < 0.05). The results are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. The scores in the theoretical knowledge test and case analysis of the two groups of students are shown. The scores in the theoretical knowledge test of the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group. Meanwhile, the scores in the case analysis of the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group. #P < 0.05 compared to the traditional teaching group.

Fig. 1

The questionnaire results indicated that 85% and only 47% of the students in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group and traditional teaching group showed interest in learning, respectively. Among the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group and traditional teaching group, 93% and only 45% of the students were willing to participate actively in the study of anesthesia assessment, respectively; 83% and only 40% believed that they could combine theoretical knowledge with clinical practice, respectively; and 95% and only 62% admitted that they could master the core knowledge of pre-anesthesia evaluation, respectively. All the results of the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group (P < 0.05). The results are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Differences in the teaching effect between the two groups.

Group P C
Learning interest 51 (85) 28 (47)
Learning activity 56 (93) 27 (45)
Ability to combine theory with practice 50 (83) 24 (40)
Core knowledge acquirement 57 (95) 37 (62)

The data are presented as n (%). P, pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group; C, traditional teaching group.

DISCUSSION

Pre-anesthesia assessment is used to evaluate whether patients could afford the risk of surgery and anesthesia before surgery. It is the basis of anesthesia method selection, anesthesia planning, anesthesia risk management, and postoperative analgesia optimization. Detailed pre-anesthesia assessments can minimize the risks associated with anesthesia and surgery [4].

Clinically, not all patients are suitable for anesthesia, and it is common for patients to die owing to improper anesthesia treatment each year [5]. For elderly patients, especially those with cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases, pre-anesthesia assessment is necessary, as it not only improves the safety of anesthesia but also optimizes the process and shortens the duration of hospitalization [6]. Therefore, pre-anesthetic clinic internships could better allow undergraduate students to learn how to evaluate patients before surgery and anesthesia.

Pre-anesthetic clinics are a new type of outpatient clinics that have become increasingly popular in recent years. In addition to routine anesthesia evaluation for endoscopic diagnosis and contraception, pre-anesthetic clinics are mainly aimed at evaluating patients categorized under ASA levels 1 to 2 and patients whose conditions require elective surgery levels 1 to 2, including healthy young patients, patients needing hernia repair, patients with breast mass and thyroid nodules, and patients undergoing gynecological surgery or small head and neck surgery [7]. However, there are no reports on the usefulness of pre-anesthetic clinics for student education. Thus, our study compared the effects between traditional and pre-anesthetic clinic internships on undergraduate students' education. The pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group was able to obtain patients' health information via various methods, select the necessary preoperative auxiliary examinations, rationally adjust the treatment plan, determine the necessary consultation of related disciplines, formulate the anesthesia-related treatment plan during the surgical period, and make the patients understand the work and risk of anesthesia through communication in the pre-anesthetic clinic [8,9]; this improved the students' ability to make more appropriate decisions on patient evaluation. In addition, the pre-anesthetic clinic internship group was able to prescribe necessary preoperative examinations and consultations conducted in the pre-anesthetic clinic to effectively avoid delays or cancelations of surgery. This not only shortened the hospitalization period and saved medical expenses but also saved medical resources for hospitals and yielded a win-win situation between hospitals and patients [2,10]; this also enhanced their interest and activity in learning and practicing. Moreover, the pre-anesthetic clinic internship group was able to understand the patients' condition and the difficulty of anesthesia treatment to not only make more appropriate decisions and better preparations before surgery but also maximize patient safety [11]. Our research innovatively introduced pre-anesthetic clinic internships into undergraduate clinical practice teaching. The results showed that compared with the traditional teaching method, the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching method can stimulate students' interest in learning, improve their enthusiasm for learning, increase their knowledge mastery rate and degree of understanding, and enable them to have a deeper understanding of the relationship between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. Compared with abstract traditional teaching methods, the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching method can enable students to apply the knowledge learned in the classroom to clinical practice better. Students can learn to obtain patients' medical history and clinical data from attending physicians or chief physicians by talking with the patients in a pre-anesthetic clinic internship and grasp the anesthesia interview conversation to establish clinical logical thinking.

Compared with the traditional teaching method, the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching method can improve students' learning interest and enthusiasm better. Many students will have more questions on professional knowledge after the pre-anesthetic clinic internship and choose to review their basic theoretical knowledge after class. We also observed that in the final examination after the internship, the students in the pre-anesthetic clinic internship teaching group scored higher in the case analysis and theoretical knowledge test than did those in the traditional teaching group. This shows that the introduction of pre-anesthetic clinic internships into undergraduate anesthesia internship teaching can improve students' understanding and mastery of pre-anesthesia assessment.

In summary, pre-anesthetic clinic internships can improve students' interest and enthusiasm in learning and enhance their knowledge and understanding. Therefore, it is of significance to promote the introduction of pre-anesthetic clinic internships into undergraduate anesthesia internship teaching.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the entire faculty from our department, the students who participated in our study, and Dr. Jerome Staal from the Menzies Research Institute, Tasmania, Australia, who provided critical scientific opinions and help in English.

Appendix 1

Case analysis

graphic file with name jdapm-21-207-a001.jpg

Appendix 2

Theoretical knowledge test

graphic file with name jdapm-21-207-a002.jpg

Appendix 3

Questionnaire

graphic file with name jdapm-21-207-a003.jpg

Footnotes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS:
  • Shao-Hua Zheng: Investigation.
  • Xiao-Peng Mei: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing — original draft.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: Both authors have no conflicting interests to declare.

FUNDING: This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30901400 and 81270016) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2018JM7101) for the design of the study; the Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (XJTU1AF-CRF-2018-018) for the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data of the study; and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (xjj2017128/0816-1191329727) and the Foundation of Chinese Medical Association (220160900005, CSDE012017120009) for the writing of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Tobias JD. Preoperative anesthesia evaluation. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27:67–74. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.James JP, Thampi SM. Time spent by patients in a pre-anaesthetic clinic and the factors affecting it: An audit from a tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:16–22. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_368_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Emanuel A, Macpherseon R. The anaesthetic pre-admission clinic is effective in minimising surgical cancellation rates. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41:90–94. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O'Connor DB, Cotter M, Treacy O, Owens T, McShane A, Mehigan D, et al. An anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic reduces pre-operative inpatient stay in patients requiring major vascular surgery. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180:649–653. doi: 10.1007/s11845-011-0703-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cooke M, Cuddy MA, Farr B, Moore PA. Cerebrovascular accident under anesthesia during dental surgery. Anesth Prog. 2014;61:73–77. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-61.2.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roberts S, Spain B, Hicks C, London J, Tay S. Telemedicine in the Northern Territory: an assessment of patient perceptions in the preoperative anaesthetic clinic. Aust J Rural Health. 2015;23:136–141. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lieblich S. Preoperative evaluation and patient selection for office-based oral surgery anesthesia. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018;30:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hawes RH, Andrzejowski JC, Goodhart IM, Berthoud MC, Wiles MD. An evaluation of factors influencing the assessment time in a nurse practitioner-led anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:273–279. doi: 10.1111/anae.13340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Almeshari M, Khalifa M, El-Metwally A, Househ M, Alanazi A. Quality and accuracy of electronic pre-anesthesia evaluation forms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;160:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silvay G, Zafirova Z. Ten years experiences with preoperative evaluation clinic for day admission cardiac and major vascular surgical patients: model for “Perioperative anesthesia and surgical home”. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;20:120–132. doi: 10.1177/1089253215619236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Randmaa M, Swenne CL, Mårtensson G, Högberg H, Engström M. Implementing situation-backgroundassessment-recommendation in an anaesthetic clinic and subsequent information retention among receivers: a prospective interventional study of postoperative handovers. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:172–178. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine are provided here courtesy of Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES