Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2021 Jun 9;22:425. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07733-9

Characterization of nucleic acids from extracellular vesicle-enriched human sweat

Geneviève Bart 1, Daniel Fischer 2, Anatoliy Samoylenko 1, Artem Zhyvolozhnyi 1, Pavlo Stehantsev 1, Ilkka Miinalainen 1, Mika Kaakinen 1, Tuomas Nurmi 1, Prateek Singh 1,3, Susanna Kosamo 1, Lauri Rannaste 4, Sirja Viitala 2, Jussi Hiltunen 4, Seppo J Vainio 1,
PMCID: PMC8188706  PMID: 34103018

Abstract

Background

The human sweat is a mixture of secretions from three types of glands: eccrine, apocrine, and sebaceous. Eccrine glands open directly on the skin surface and produce high amounts of water-based fluid in response to heat, emotion, and physical activity, whereas the other glands produce oily fluids and waxy sebum. While most body fluids have been shown to contain nucleic acids, both as ribonucleoprotein complexes and associated with extracellular vesicles (EVs), these have not been investigated in sweat. In this study we aimed to explore and characterize the nucleic acids associated with sweat particles.

Results

We used next generation sequencing (NGS) to characterize DNA and RNA in pooled and individual samples of EV-enriched sweat collected from volunteers performing rigorous exercise. In all sequenced samples, we identified DNA originating from all human chromosomes, but only the mitochondrial chromosome was highly represented with 100% coverage. Most of the DNA mapped to unannotated regions of the human genome with some regions highly represented in all samples. Approximately 5 % of the reads were found to map to other genomes: including bacteria (83%), archaea (3%), and virus (13%), identified bacteria species were consistent with those commonly colonizing the human upper body and arm skin. Small RNA-seq from EV-enriched pooled sweat RNA resulted in 74% of the trimmed reads mapped to the human genome, with 29% corresponding to unannotated regions. Over 70% of the RNA reads mapping to an annotated region were tRNA, while misc. RNA (18,5%), protein coding RNA (5%) and miRNA (1,85%) were much less represented. RNA-seq from individually processed EV-enriched sweat collection generally resulted in fewer percentage of reads mapping to the human genome (7–45%), with 50–60% of those reads mapping to unannotated region of the genome and 30–55% being tRNAs, and lower percentage of reads being rRNA, LincRNA, misc. RNA, and protein coding RNA.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrates that sweat, as all other body fluids, contains a wealth of nucleic acids, including DNA and RNA of human and microbial origin, opening a possibility to investigate sweat as a source for biomarkers for specific health parameters.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07733-9.

Keywords: Extracellular vesicles (EV), Sweat, Genomics, Transcriptomics, Exercise, Microbiome, Metagenomics, Skin

Background

Sweat is a biofluid continuously produced by skin glands for secretion to the body surface. Unlike urine, which accumulates in the bladder over time, and is flushed out only when the bladder is emptied, sweat is released continuously, from less than 1 pL/minute in resting conditions to several nL/minute per gland during exercise [1], and could therefore be collected non-invasively for analysis. In addition to changes in the sweat release rate, the composition of sweat is altered by physical activity and presence of health conditions. Detection of specific metabolites, ions, hormones, peptides, cytokines, and glucose in sweat has potential diagnostic value. Glucose levels in sweat reflect changes in the blood glucose level, and this observation has led to development of non-invasive glucose monitoring methods [24]. The sweat proteome has been shown to be different between healthy subjects and people with schizophrenia [5], and between healthy people and patients with active tuberculosis [6]. The presence of viral particles in sweat has also been reported, consisting mostly in infectious viruses such as papilloma or polyoma virus and bacteriophages [7], but other infective viruses like Hepatitis C virus have also been detected [8]. Sweat analysis for forensic purposes has also been reported [9, 10], but while saliva is routinely used for genotyping, no genetic tests based on sweat nucleic acids have been published beyond finding specific markers to distinguish sweat from other biofluids [11].

In addition to ions and macromolecules, biofluids carry insoluble particles containing nucleic acids, including lipid droplets [12], ribonucleoprotein complexes, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and whole cells. Systematic studies of sweat EV cargo are difficult, because of the mixtures of environmental contaminants on the skin surface, and because most of the collection methods interfere with the normal sweating process [13]. Sweat contains several types of EVs: apoptotic bodies from holocrine secretion of sebaceous glands [14], large membrane vesicles from axillary apocrine glands [15], and 100-200 nm EVs with CD63, CD9 and CD81 tetraspanins [16, 17].

Sweat secretion is qualitatively and quantitatively affected by stimuli such as heat, exercise, emotions, and health status. We recently reported differential sweat EV miRNA secretion in relation to specific exercise [17], supporting the notion that exercise-induced sweat could be used as a source of biomarkers for sport practice.

Both cell free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular RNA (exRNA) have shown great promise as biomarkers (Reviewed in [18]), therefore our aim was to characterize the nucleic acids associated with sweat EVs. Because our study design was exploratory, our goal was to obtain large quantities of starting material for inventory from the study subjects, and we initially pooled sweat from 13 individuals for nucleic acid analysis. We subsequently also extracted DNA and RNA from sweat of individual collection for analysis. We found human DNA fragments mapping to all chromosomes, but most of the DNA originated from unannotated regions of the human genome. Non-human DNA was found to be derived from skin microbiota, mainly bacteria, but also archaea and viruses. EV-associated RNA species contained a high proportion of tRNA, rRNA and miscRNA, and also approximately 89 miRNA and more than 500 mRNA species. In addition, our NGS data shows the presence of RNA of microbial, fungal and viral origin.

To our knowledge, this is the first published study characterizing EV-associated nucleic acids in exercise induced human sweat.

Results

Sweat collection and processing

We collected sweat from people undergoing vigorous biking exercise. We first collected 1,4 l of sweat from 13 volunteers of both gender aged from 26 to 56 years at the time of collection, amounts of individual collections were not recorded, the sweat was stored at − 20 °C and mixed after thawing for processing to DNA and RNA for sequencing (Fig. 1, left side). We collected sweat for RNA from 25 individuals during a 30 min biking exercise, with the amount of sweat collected from each individual ranging from 6 to 175 ml (Table 1), these collections were processed individually to NGS (Fig. 1), or EV characterization.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Workflow. Description of the workflow: left side preparation of EV-enriched sweat DNA. Middle preparation of EV-enriched Sweat RNA from pool for small RNA-seq. Right preparation of EV-enriched sweat RNA from individuals

Table 1.

Sample Information. Gender, age, sweat volume, and library assignment for each sample

graphic file with name 12864_2021_7733_Tab1_HTML.jpg

DNA isolation and NGS library preparation

We used DNA from the pooled sample and from three individual collections for whole genome sequencing. The total amount of double stranded DNA recovered was small with a range of 3 to 11 ng total DNA. We chose to make pair-ended libraries with a small genome library kit from Illumina. We were able to get between 10 and 20 M reads per sample. Alignment of the reads to the human genome (GRch38) showed small coverage with some clear hot spots where high number of reads from all samples were detected (Fig. 2A). Coverage on each chromosome (10–30%) appeared to be dependent of sequencing depth, with the notable exception of the mitochondrial chromosome, which was entirely covered in all samples (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

DNA sequencing results. A: distribution of reads on each chromosome B: coverage for each chromosome. Individual sample indicated by color

DNA sequencing analysis

The DNA sequencing reads could be assigned to three categories: annotated, unannotated and unmapped. The pooled sample produced the lowest number of reads (Fig. 3A), consisting of 3 categories: annotated (3,8%), unannotated and unmapped (10%) with the larger number aligning with unannotated regions of the human genome (86,2%). Samples from individuals had very similar distribution of reads: 2,3% of reads not aligning to the human genome and 4,5% aligning to annotated region of the human genome, while the largest category (93,1%) corresponded to unannotated region of the human genome (Fig. 3A). The distribution of annotated reads into different biotypes (Fig. 3B) was similar across all 4 samples, the most abundant being protein coding genes (73–75%), followed by LincRNA (6,5–8%), processed pseudogene (4,5-5,3%) and antisense RNA (4–4,5%). The coverage of the protein coding genes was very small, except for those encoded by the mitochondrial chromosome.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

DNA sequencing results. A: number of reads per category (annotated, unannotated, unmapped) B: percentage of read per biotype

Sweat particle characterization

The presence of high amount of mitochondrial DNA suggested the presence of organelles in addition to EVs in the samples. To determine if this was the case, thin sections of filtered (0,8 μm before concentration, 0,45 μm after) sweat pellets were made from individually processed samples and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 4A). We found vesicular structures of varying sizes and appearances in the individual samples, including some with clear double membranes, indicating presence of EVs. Most vesicles were in the 100 nm range, but some individual samples were richer in smaller and/or larger EVs. We were unable to detect any recognizable mitochondria (Fig. 4A), but bacteria were occasionally detected when 0,45 μm filtration was omitted (data not shown).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Sweat particles. Visual characterization of sweat particles. Panels A: TEM, thin sections of plastic embedded pelleted sweat from 4 donors number corresponding to sequencing library (Table 1). B: TEM, negative staining of ExoEasy isolated sweat EVs, C: NTA analysis of Exoeasy EVs, D: TEM, Immunostaining of isolated sweat EVs, E: western blot, protein from Exoeasy sweat preparations were stained with anti-CD63 antibody (ab193349). Full size western blot with region selected marked is shown as supplementary Fig. 6

We chose ExoRNEasy kit to directly purify RNA from concentrated sweat to capture a more diverse selection of EVs [19]. Concentrated individual sweat samples prepared with ExoEasy had variable amounts of well-defined double membrane EVs of 50 to 200 nm sizes (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Figure 3). Image of negative control (instead of sweat, glove was filled with PBS, which was subsequently processed like volunteer sample) is also shown in Supplemental figure 3. NTA analysis of ExoEasy sweat samples showed 1 peak at around 100 nm and much smaller peaks for 200 and 300 nm (Fig. 4C, supplementary Figure 4). Immuno- transmission electron microscopy detected the presence of typical EV markers: CD63 and CD9 in individual sweat EVs and other markers like Glypican1 (Fig. 4D). Presence of CD63 was confirmed by western blotting, while staining for Argonaute 2 and GM130 were negative (Fig. 4E, Supplementary Figure 5). No CD63 was detected in flowthrough from ExoEasy columns and in negative control from gloves (Supplementary Figure 5). Average particle /ml of sweat was 475,000 but a wide range was observed (35000–1 million particle /ml) with number of particles per μg of protein being in the range of 0,3–6*109 particles/μg protein (n = 4). We have submitted all relevant data of our experiments to the EV-TRACK knowledgebase (EV-TRACK ID: EV210083) [20].

EV-enriched sweat RNA analysis

We used the remaining ultracentrifugation pellets from pooled sweat to extract RNA from EV-enriched sweat fraction using ExoRNEasy kit (Fig. 1). Profiling of extracted RNA on bioanalyzer picoChip (Agilent) showed only small RNA with sizes ranging from 20 to 200 bp with no obvious 18 or 28 s ribosomal RNA (Fig. 5A), subsequently Small RNA protocol was used for the sequencing on Ion Torrent PGM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A total of 652,280 trimmed reads were used for alignment to the human genome using Bowtie 1. Reads fell into 3 categories: annotated (44,6%, tRNA reads were included in this category), unannotated 29,6% and unmapped 24,7% (Fig. 5B). Over 70% of the annotated human reads were identified as tRNA, 18,5% as miscRNA, 5% mRNA and 1,85% miRNA (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Sweat smallRNA-seq from pooled sample. A: bioanalyzer profile of sweat Exoeasy RNA, B: read distribution, C: biotype distribution of annotated reads

miRNA from pooled EV-enriched sweat

66 miRNAs with read count 10 or higher were identified (Table 2). miR26a-5p was the miRNA with the most reads, followed by miR200c-3p, miRLet7A and miR148a-3p (Fig. 6A). We selected 6 miRNAs for testing by qPCR from most abundant (miR26a-5p/692 reads) to low (miR320b/10 reads) on 14 individual samples of sweat RNA (10 were subsequently used for RNA sequencing and 4 additional ones were not, Table 1) and compared their level relative to each other, inside each sample. All the miRNAs were detected in all the samples except one, where miR193–3p, was undetectable. In most cases miR21 -5p and miR24-3p were the highest, not miR26a-5p (Fig. 6B).

Table 2.

Sweat miRNA pooled samples. miRNA with read count 10 or above

graphic file with name 12864_2021_7733_Tab2_HTML.jpg

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

EV-enriched sweat /associated miRNA. A: most represented miRNA (minimum read count > 100) in pooled sweat sample. B: Comparison of specific miRNA level in individual samples. Last 4 samples were not sequenced

RNA-seq from individual volunteers

We then prepared RNA from individual sweat collections, from 6 females and 14 males (Table 1) replacing ultracentrifugation by concentration with Centricon Plus-70 columns (Millipore) with a 100 K kDa cut-off. Bioanalyzer (Agilent) RNA profiles of all samples were similar to each other but yields were highly variable (supplementary Figure 1) and below what can be accurately quantified. We selected higher size fragments (145-200 bp) than recommended by the library kit manufacturer (New England Biolab) to limit the number of empty reads and characterize larger RNA species, including protein coding RNA, as a result very few miRNA reads were identified.

After quality trimming, number of reads per sample ranged from 650,000 to 3,4 million (Fig. 7A) with a high number of unmapped reads. As the number of annotated reads per sample were low, we analyzed them together. The distribution into biotypes showed over 50% identified as tRNA, 28% as rRNA and LincRNA, miscRNA and protein coding between 8 and 3% (Fig. 7B). Excluding tRNA and rRNA the top 10 genes identified include 6 miscRNAs with RNY1, RNY4, and RNY4P10 being the most represented, 3 LincRNA, 1 non-coding RNA, 1 snoRNA (SNORD20) (Fig. 8A). As MIR6087 is no longer considered a miRNA, it was omitted from the figure.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

RNA-seq from individual EV-enriched sweat sample. A: Distribution of reads from each library in categories, B: distribution of annotated reads in biotypes (average from all 20 samples)

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Distribution of RNA biotypes (pooled data). A: Data were pooled for analysis most abundant RNAs (tRNA and rRNA we removed from analysis), B: most abundant SnRNA subtypes, C: most abundant SnoRNAs, D: most abundant misc_RNA, E: most abundant unprocessed pseudogenes

Although the function of small nuclear RNA is to participate in mRNA splicing in the nucleus, these small RNA species are abundant in EV-enriched sweat. In Fig. 8B the seven most abundant snRNAs represent each between 12 and 15% of snRNAs identified, all seven represented in B are detected in at least 19 samples (supplementary Table I) and they belong to U1 and U5 families.

The snoRNA’s main characterized role is the modification of rRNA, 11 of them are found in significant amounts in EV-enriched sweat, the most abundant type found is box C/D, which guides the 2′-O-methylation of rRNA SNORD20 represent over 40% of the total, SNORD90 and SNORD69 (targeting 28 s rRNA) around 20%, SNORD63 and SNORD101 6%, SNORD100 4% (Fig. 8C). SNORD20, SNORD69 and SNORD63 were identified in at least 19 of the 20 samples (Supplementary Table I). Another type of RNA modifying small RNA closely related to snoRNA and located in Cajal bodies (small organelles of the nucleolus of proliferative cells) has 2 well represented members in sweat: scRNA11 and scaRNA4. RNY1 represent over 60% of misc-RNA biotype’s reads, RNY4 represents 16%, RNY4P10 14% and RNY4P7 2% (Fig. 8D).

Unprocessed pseudogenes (Fig. 8E) are created by duplication of existing genes and retain intron-exon structure, in this biotype, EIF1P5 is overrepresented with 53% of the reads mapping to it, while GGTLC4P represent 11% and AP004607.5 8%, the remaining unprocessed pseudogenes are mitochondrial genes inserted in nuclear chromosomes and they represent less than 7% each. Processed pseudogenes, which arise by retrotransposition and are therefore inserted in the genome without intronic sequences were also identified. Top 1% of reads from RNA-seq included 86 processed pseudogenes.

Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) are small noncoding RNA first identified in the germline. They are short: 24-30 bp and their first identified function was to silence transposons. They have since been also identified in other cells and body fluids and may have potential as biomarkers. Only a very small percentage of the reads of each sample can be identified as piRNAs, but 5 piRNAs were identified in all 20 samples, and 6 in 19 samples (Supplementary Figure 2). Another 1000 piRNAs were sporadically detected in 3 or less samples. Other non-coding RNA usually associated with EVs like Vault RNA were also identified in the majority of the samples (Supplementary Table 1).

Sweat mRNA

The most abundant mRNAs in sweat are encoded by the mitochondrial genome, followed by a mitochondrial transcript encoded by a nuclear gene, MTRNR2L6 (Fig. 9A). Comparison with a recent report of the transcriptome and proteome of human eccrine gland shows that 85% of mRNAs found in EV-enriched sweat overlap with mRNA from sweat eccrine gland, with only 14.4% unique to EV-enriched sweat (Fig. 9B).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

EV-enriched Sweat mRNA (pooled data). A: most represented mRNA, B: overlap between human eccrine gland transcriptome and EV-enriched sweat mRNA, C: enriched biological processes in EV-enriched sweat mRNA, D: enriched cellular components, based on GO annotations, colors represent log10 p-value representation using Revigo

For enrichment analysis of GO annotation we selected transcript with FPKM values bigger than 25, most of the transcript encode either translation related proteins, nucleic acid binding protein or focal adhesion protein. Biological Processes involve energy metabolism, protein synthesis and nucleic acid binding (Fig. 9C), the most represented cell components are ribosomal (Fig. 9D). In addition to the abundant mRNA species (Table 3), 6675 additional gene products were detectable in 1–3 samples with FPKM value bigger than 0.

Table 3.

mRNA with highest FPKM IN RNA-SEQ (pooled data from individual). mRNA, including mitochondrial mRNA most represented in sweat, with chromosome location and ensemble gene ID

graphic file with name 12864_2021_7733_Tab3_HTML.jpg

Because the reads for mRNA could be detected on several exons and alignment with STAR showed that some of these reads were spliced, we checked the presence of spliced mRNA in EV-enriched sweat by RT-PCR with primers designed for amplification across splice junctions. The most abundant and largely distributed in most of the samples was (ferritin light chain) FTL mRNA, FTL gene has 4 exons, and using primers designed to amplify mRNA of the last 2 exons (3 and 4), we were able to amplify cDNA from several samples (Fig. 10A). YWHAE gene spans across 7 exons, on a total DNA length of 55 kb, with a reverse PCR primer spanning exon 6 and 7 together and forward primer on exon 5 we amplified a fragment of the expected size in 2 out of 3 samples (Fig. 10B, supplementary Figure 7). We were able to amplify several other mRNA at least across one splice junction indicating that even if the RNA is fragmented it is processed (supplementary figure 7).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

spliced mRNA are detectable in EV-enriched sweat. A: Ferritin Light Chain Gene, PCR primers localization (arrows) with RT-PCR amplified DNA visualized on 2% agarose gel, B: 14–3-3 Protein Epsilon gene with PCR primers spanning exon5,6 and 7, below product on agarose gels showing amplification across the 3 exons in 2 out of 3 tested samples. The full size gels with region selected marked are shown in supplemental Fig. 7

Metagenomic nucleic acid

Microbial DNA and RNA

DNA-seq had 5–9% of unmapped reads, and to determine their origin, the reads were assembled and aligned against the metagenome and the main taxonomical orders were identified. In addition to bacterial DNA, there was a small proportion of virus and archaeal DNA. Dominant bacterial orders were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria followed by equal proportion of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (Fig. 11), a distribution typical of skin microbiota.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Sweat Metagenomics. Most represented bacterial orders in RNA sequencing (outer circle) and DNA sequencing (inner circle)

RNA-seq produced much higher amounts of unmapped reads, and metagenomic analysis attributed the highest proportion of them to bacteria, but fungi and virus could also be identified. The distribution of the main bacterial orders was relatively similar to what we observe for DNA, except for a larger proportion of Firmicutes than Bacteroidetes (Fig. 11), again a distribution consistent with the skin microbiome.

A fraction of the sequences identified corresponded to microbial protein coding genes. We retrieved the protein IDs with GO annotations from UniProt database, then counted the GO annotations. The cell component annotations showed mostly integral components of membrane and cytoplasm for both DNA and RNA sequencing. DNA sequencing included also at least 20 protein coding genes with annotations for cell, ribosome and integral component of plasma membrane, while RNA-seq included periplasmic space linked mRNA (Fig. 12A). The molecular functions of protein coding genes identified in both DNA-seq and RNA-seq were predominantly ATP binding, DNA binding and metal ion binding (Fig. 12B).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

bacterial GO annotations. Most represented GO annotation in bacterial genes identified A: most represented cell component. B: most represented molecular function with total count number indicated

Viral DNA

We found 2 types of viral DNA, from human virus: papilloma, polyoma, herpes virus and from bacteriophages infecting the bacteria from the skin. Viral sequences represent 13% of the total identified, with papilloma sequences representing 24% of viral sequences, polyomavirus represent 5% and herpes 2%. Only a portion of the DNA identified encodes identified protein, but from papillomavirus 6 protein coding genes can be identified (out of a total of 8), capsid protein major L1 and Minor L2, replication protein E1, regulatory protein E2, and protein E4 and E6. From polyoma viruses, and Merkel cell polyoma virus, Small T antigen and capsid protein Vp1 (total encoded by viral genome: 5–9 protein) were identified and from human Cytomegalovirus, only uncharacterized protein UL126 (more than 165 protein coding genes). The gene encoded are capsid protein, regulatory and replication protein from papilloma virus and capsid and small T antigen from polyomavirus (Table 4).

Table 4.

Human virus genes identified in sweat DNA

Protein names Gene names Organism Length
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Gammapapillomavirus 9 521
Major capsid protein L1 L1 gp7 Human papillomavirus type 209 507
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus 514
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Gammapapillomavirus 9 513
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus 204 508
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus 202 528
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 200 514
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 49 509
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Gammapapillomavirus 22 517
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Gammapapillomavirus 12 507
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 94 532
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 8 514
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 48 513
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus 110 506
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Betapapillomavirus 2 508
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus 174 507
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 168 523
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Gammapapillomavirus 16 516
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 137 516
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Gammapapillomavirus sp. 517
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus 138 514
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 37 507
Major capsid protein L1 L1 Human papillomavirus type 94 532
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus 120 519
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Betapapillomavirus 1 520
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 168 520
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Gammapapillomavirus 16 507
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus 202 498
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 94 459
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Betapapillomavirus 2 522
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 195 516
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 37 534
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Gammapapillomavirus sp. 518
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Gammapapillomavirus 24 525
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus 204 503
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 uncultured Papillomavirus 521
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Gammapapillomavirus 12 521
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Gammapapillomavirus 22 517
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus 510
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 200 502
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Betapapillomavirus 2 529
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 48 502
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus 110 537
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 gp6 Human papillomavirus type 209 519
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Gammapapillomavirus 9 506
Minor capsid protein L2 L2 Human papillomavirus type 8 518
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus type 94 148
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus type 168 139
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus type 8 155
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus 202 143
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus 140
Protein E6 E6 Betapapillomavirus 2 141
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus type 94 148
Protein E6 E6 Human papillomavirus type 137 142
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus 157 400
Regulatory protein E2 E2 HpV115gp4 Human papillomavirus type 115 481
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus type 94 378
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus 204 388
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus KC5 395
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus 110 454
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Betapapillomavirus 2 459
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus type 200 401
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus 398
Regulatory protein E2 E2 Human papillomavirus type 48 396
E4 E4 Human papillomavirus type 168 160
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 202 605
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Gammapapillomavirus 22 601
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 157 601
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Betapapillomavirus 1 620
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 94 681
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Gammapapillomavirus 9 600
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Gammapapillomavirus sp. 610
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Gammapapillomavirus sp. 604
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Betapapillomavirus 2 605
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 48 593
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 200 598
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 23 607
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 138 616
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 204 615
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Betapapillomavirus 2 605
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 601
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 22 608
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 168 600
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 116 602
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 gp3 Human papillomavirus type 209 607
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 137 610
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 600
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 49 609
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus type 37 609
Replication protein E1 (EC 3.6.4.12) (ATP-dependent helicase E1) E1 Human papillomavirus 610
Small T antigen MW polyomavirus 206
Small T antigen Merkel cell polyomavirus 186
ST (Small T antigen) Human polyomavirus 7 193
Capsid protein VP1 VP1 MW polyomavirus 403
VP1 VP1 Human polyomavirus 7 380
Uncharacterized protein UL126 UL126 Human cytomegalovirus (strain AD169) (HHV-5) (Human herpesvirus 5) 134

Bacterial phages are represented by a variety of genes, 96 are uncharacterized, 274 genes encode phage structural protein and enzymes (Table 5), which molecular functions include mainly DNA binding, helicase, hydrolase and endonuclease. Most components of the phage genome are represented (Table 5).

Table 5.

Bacteriophages identified in sweat DNA

Protein names Gene names Organism Length
aGPT-Pplase2 domain-containing protein 3 ZEMANAR_3 Mycobacterium phage Zemanar 324
Amidase ami Propionibacterium phage PAS10 287
AP2/ERF domain-containing protein AB9_137 Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_B9 262
ATP-dependent helicase 71 SEA_CATERPILLAR_71 Arthrobacter phage Caterpillar 411
ATP-dependent RNA helicase Pseudoalteromonas phage H103 599
ATPase_AAA_core domain-containing protein BCP78_0083 Bacillus phage BCP78 358
Baseplate J-like protein 39 SEA_COLUCCI_39 Arthrobacter phage Colucci 373
Beta_helix domain-containing protein Eldridge_088 Bacillus phage Eldridge 510
Capsid & capsid maturation protease 13 SEA_CATERPILLAR_13 Arthrobacter phage Caterpillar 717
Capsid and capsid maturation protease 13 SEA_MEDIUMFRY_13 Arthrobacter phage MediumFry 717
Capsid and scaffold protein Propionibacterium phage PA1–14 186
Capsid maturation protease 5 SEA_COLUCCI_5 Arthrobacter phage Colucci 649
Capsid maturation protease SEA_C3PO_14 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 442
Capsid protein Staphylococcus phage phiIPLA-C1C 291
Cas4 family exonuclease SEA_NATOSALEDA_55 Rhodococcus phage Natosaleda 268
CMP deaminase SEA_WEASELS2_199 Rhodococcus phage Weasels2 118
Collagen-like protein PHL308M00_19 Propionibacterium phage PHL308M00 268
Collagen-like protein PHL150M00_19 Propionibacterium phage PHL150M00 268
DNA encapsidation protein P9AB12kb_p002 Pectobacterium phage DU_PP_III 363
DNA helicase 52 SEA_HOTFRIES_52 Streptomyces phage HotFries 390
DNA helicase 93 PBI_COUNT_93 Microbacterium phage Count 435
DNA helicase SEA_LUCKYBARNES_64 Brevibacterium phage LuckyBarnes 445
DNA helicase SEA_MEAK_33 Propionibacterium phage MEAK 317
DNA methylase 65 SEA_MOOMOO_65 Mycobacterium phage MooMoo 542
DNA methylase 61 SEA_NERUJAY_61 Mycobacterium phage Nerujay 365
DNA methylase SLPG_00003 Salicola phage CGphi29 328
DNA methylase FLORINDA_85 Mycobacterium phage Florinda 482
DNA methylase 43 GALAXY_43 Arthrobacter phage Galaxy 439
DNA methylase SEA_YASSJOHNNY_96 Mycobacterium phage YassJohnny 187
DNA methylase SEA_MURICA_102 Mycobacterium phage Murica 602
DNA methylase 61 PBI_SMEAGOL_61 Mycobacterium phage Smeagol 356
DNA methylase 60 PBI_MUSEUM_60 Mycobacterium virus Museum 465
DNA polymerae/primase NIKTSON_56 Arthrobacter phage Niktson 1314
DNA polymerase P9AB12kb_p001 Pectobacterium phage DU_PP_III 690
DNA polymerase I SEA_LUCKYBARNES_45 Brevibacterium phage LuckyBarnes 621
DNA polymerase III alpha subunit SEA_DARWIN_47 Corynebacterium phage Darwin 1097
DNA polymerase III alpha subunit SEA_C3PO_43 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 1097
DNA polymerase/primase 54 SEA_CATERPILLAR_54 Arthrobacter phage Caterpillar 1309
DNA primase SEA_LUCKYBARNES_63 Brevibacterium phage LuckyBarnes 804
DNA primase 31 P141_31 Propionibacterium phage P14 133
DNA primase Salvo_71 Xylella phage Salvo 833
DNA primase Iz_58 Brucella phage Iz 496
DNA primase/polymerase SEA_C3PO_38 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 847
DNA primase/polymerase 58 SEA_NIGHTMARE_58 Arthrobacter phage Nightmare 1312
DNA single strand annealing protein Erf uvFWCGRAMDCOMC203_065 Freshwater phage uvFW-CGR-AMD-COM-C203 226
Endolysin 20 P11_20 Propionibacterium phage P1.1 284
Endonuclease 45 SEA_THESTRAL_45 Streptomyces phage Thestral 400
Endonuclease VII 18 SEA_PHISTORY_18 Gordonia phage Phistory 342
Exonuclease WIZZO_26 Propionibacterium phage Wizzo 348
Exonuclease MRAK_36 Propionibacterium phage MrAK 313
Exonuclease Pseudoalteromonas phage H103 292
Gp008 Pepy6gene008 Rhodococcus phage ReqiPepy6 118
Gp067 Pepy6gene067 Rhodococcus phage ReqiPepy6 226
Gp069 Poco6gene069 Rhodococcus phage ReqiPoco6 297
Gp077 Pepy6gene077 Rhodococcus phage ReqiPepy6 193
Gp14 PaP-PAS50_gp14 Propionibacterium phage PAS50 921
Gp16 Propionibacterium phage PA6 385
Gp48 PaP-PAD20_gp48 Propionibacterium phage PAD20 100
H_lectin domain-containing protein PHL055N00_17 Propionibacterium phage PHL055N00 276
Head protein Actinomyces virus Av1 455
Head-to-tail adaptor 14 SEA_KYKAR_14 Mycobacterium phage Kykar 125
Head-to-tail connector 12 BARRETLEMON_12 Arthrobacter phage BarretLemon 155
Head-to-tail connector protein SEA_LILBANDIT_8 Propionibacterium phage LilBandit 115
Helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain protein 132 PBI_COUNT_132 Microbacterium phage Count 927
Helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain protein 78 SEA_LIBERTYBELL_78 Streptomyces phage LibertyBell 910
Helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain protein PROCRASS1_25 Propionibacterium phage Procrass1 106
Helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain protein 76 PBI_CAMILLE_76 Microbacterium phage Camille 925
Helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain protein 90 SEA_RAINYDAI_90 Streptomyces phage Rainydai 891
Helix-turn-helix DNA binding protein 94 SEA_KEANEYLIN_94 Arthrobacter phage KeaneyLin 891
HNH endonuclease SEA_SCAP1_2 Streptomyces phage Scap1 135
HNH endonuclease SEA_ATTOOMI_53 Streptomyces phage Attoomi 101
HNH endonuclease SKKY_47 Propionibacterium phage SKKY 100
HNH endonuclease 65 SEA_PHAYONCE_65 Mycobacterium phage Phayonce 196
HNH endonuclease Rhodococcus phage RRH1 91
HNH homing endonuclease Staphylococcus phage phiIPLA-C1C 269
Holin MRAK_21 Propionibacterium phage MrAK 133
Homing HNH endonuclase endo IDF_12 Enterococcus phage Idefix 167
HTH DNA binding protein 58 SEA_BARTHOLOMEW_58 Mycobacterium phage Bartholomew 331
J domain-containing protein 75 SEA_FINCH_75 Rhodococcus phage Finch 194
Lower collar protein Staphylococcus phage St 134 282
LysM domain protein 18 JAWNSKI_18 Arthrobacter phage Jawnski 221
Major capsid protein 9 MARTHA_9 Arthrobacter phage Martha 295
Major capsid protein gp79 E3_0790 Rhodococcus phage E3 333
Major capsid subunit 8 JAWNSKI_8 Arthrobacter phage Jawnski 297
Major head protein PHL141N00_06 Propionibacterium phage PHL141N00 315
Major head protein mjh Propionibacterium phage PAD21 314
Major head protein PHL082M00_06 Propionibacterium phage PHL082M00 323
Major tail protein 16 GORDON_16 Arthrobacter phage Gordon 290
Major tail protein SEA_DRPARKER_11 Propionibacterium phage DrParker 213
Major tail protein 14 SEA_RAINYDAI_14 Streptomyces phage Rainydai 294
Major tail protein LAUCHELLY_11 Propionibacterium phage Lauchelly 212
Major tail protein SEA_C3PO_23 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 220
Major tail sheath 18 PRINCESSTRINA_18 Arthrobacter phage PrincessTrina 482
MazG-like nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase 41 PBI_PAJAZA_41 Microbacterium phage Pajaza 249
Membrane protein 7 PBI_HYPERION_7 Microbacterium phage Hyperion 238
Membrane protein 26 PBI_POUSHOU_26 Corynebacterium phage Poushou 152
Minor tail protein SEA_SUPERNOVA_15 Propionibacterium phage Supernova 313
Minor tail protein SEA_FRANZY_22 Arthrobacter phage Franzy 618
Minor tail protein SEA_TIMINATOR_21 Arthrobacter phage Timinator 446
Minor tail protein SEA_AQUARIUS_17 Propionibacterium phage Aquarius 272
Minor tail protein MRAK_17 Propionibacterium phage MrAK 272
Minor tail protein SEA_QUEENBEY_16 Propionibacterium phage QueenBey 385
Minor tail subunit PHL301M00_15 Propionibacterium phage PHL301M00 322
N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase domain-containing protein Propionibacterium phage pa33 286
N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase domain-containing protein Propionibacterium phage pa28 285
Nuclease SEA_LUCKYBARNES_47 Brevibacterium phage LuckyBarnes 400
p55.1 Xanthomonas virus Xop411 189
PDDEXK_1 domain-containing protein GMA2_62 Gordonia phage GMA2 331
PDDEXK_1 domain-containing protein 36 P101A_36 Propionibacterium phage P101A 315
Pentapeptide repeat protein SEP1_136 Staphylococcus phage phiIBB-SEP1 209
Peptidoglycan hydrolase SEA_BRENT_19 Arthrobacter phage Brent 448
phage terminase, large subunit g04 Yersinia phage fEV-1 462
POLAc domain-containing protein GMA2_66 Gordonia phage GMA2 594
Portal 3 P141_3 Propionibacterium phage P14 441
Portal protein SEA_DRGREY_12 Streptomyces phage DrGrey 450
Portal protein 4 SEA_COLUCCI_4 Arthrobacter phage Colucci 476
Portal protein KEIKI_3 Propionibacterium phage Keiki 441
Portal protein SEA_DRPARKER_3 Propionibacterium phage DrParker 441
Portal protein PHL092M00_03 Propionibacterium phage PHL092M00 441
Portal protein ArV1_002 Arthrobacter phage vB_ArtM-ArV1 476
Prim-Pol domain-containing protein Pseudoalteromonas phage H103 761
Putative amidase PHL060L00_20 Propionibacterium phage PHL060L00 288
Putative bifunctional DNA primase/polymerase M22_064 Idiomarinaceae phage Phi1M2–2 754
Putative bifunctional DNA primase/polymerase S708_57 Brucella phage S708 780
Putative capsid 6 P1001_6 Propionibacterium phage P100_1 314
Putative dCTP deaminase PhAPEC7_24 Escherichia phage vB_EcoP_PhAPEC7 168
Putative DNA helicase GMA2_64 Gordonia phage GMA2 654
Putative DNA helicase PHL111M01_33 Propionibacterium phage PHL111M01 317
Putative DNA helicase PAC5_34 Propionibacterium phage PAC5 287
Putative DNA methyltransferase 55 BRUJITA_55 Mycobacterium virus Brujita 216
Putative DNA primase Propionibacterium phage PacnesP1 241
Putative DNA primase PHL111M01_30 Propionibacterium phage PHL111M01 223
Putative DNA primase PHL085N00_30 Propionibacterium phage PHL085N00 241
Putative DNA primase PHL111M01_31 Propionibacterium phage PHL111M01 133
Putative endolysin PHL179M00_20 Propionibacterium phage PHL179M00 296
Putative exonuclease 7S3_41 uncultured Caudovirales phage 281
Putative helicase Tb_ORF45 Brucella phage Tb 577
Putative major head protein PHL037M02_06 Propionibacterium phage PHL037M02 316
Putative major tail protein GMA2_25 Gordonia phage GMA2 139
Putative membrane protein Twillingate_011 Staphylococcus phage Twillingate 41
Putative phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphohydrolase SmphiM6_41 Sinorhizobium phage phiM6 129
Putative portal 3 P100D_3 Propionibacterium phage P100D 441
Putative portal protein PAC4_3 Propionibacterium phage PAC4 406
Putative protease PHL025M00_16 Propionibacterium phage PHL025M00 385
Putative protease PHL082M03_16 Propionibacterium phage PHL082M03 385
Putative recA-like NTPase vBEcoSSa179w3YLVW_00039 Escherichia phage vB_EcoS Sa179lw 274
Putative recA-like NTPase Sf11_gp7 Shigella phage Sf11 SMD-2017 276
Putative sigma factor PHL082M03_23 Propionibacterium phage PHL082M03 130
Putative structural protein GMA2_16 Gordonia phage GMA2 554
Putative structural protein GMA2_9 Gordonia phage GMA2 584
Putative tape measure 14 P104A_14 Propionibacterium phage P104A 921
Putative tape measure 14 ATCC29399BT_14 Propionibacterium phage ATCC29399B_T 921
Putative tape measure protein PHL112N00_14 Propionibacterium phage PHL112N00 921
Putative terminase GMA2_1 Gordonia phage GMA2 559
Putative terminase PHL111M01_02 Propionibacterium phage PHL111M01 503
Putative terminase large subunit 2 P104A_2 Propionibacterium phage P104A 503
Putative terminase large subunit ABP12_00064 Acinetobacter phage WCHABP12 433
Putative type III restriction endonuclease p11sa141_49 Brucella phage 11sa_141 141
Putative VRR-DNA nuclease M22_057 Idiomarinaceae phage Phi1M2–2 136
Twillingate_149 Staphylococcus phage Twillingate 409
Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase large subunit (EC 1.17.4.1) vBPaeSS218_00016 Pseudomonas phage vB_PaeS_S218 607
Ribonucleotide reductase SEA_C3PO_3 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 171
Ribonucleotide reductase SEA_DARWIN_74 Corynebacterium phage Darwin 648
Ribonucleotide reductase large subunit phiAbaA1_082 Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_phiAbaA1 968
Ribonucleotide reductase large subunit (EC 1.17.4.1) SEP1_061 Staphylococcus phage phiIBB-SEP1 705
RIIA-like protein 153 SEA_ANNADREAMY_153 Streptomyces phage Annadreamy 639
RIIB-like protein 164 SEA_COMRADE_164 Streptomyces phage Comrade 336
RIIB-like protein SEA_MILDRED21_228 Streptomyces phage Mildred21 326
RNA-binding protein Streptomyces phage BRock 523
Scaffold protein PHL179M00_05 Propionibacterium phage PHL179M00 184
Scaffolding protein SEA_LILBANDIT_5 Propionibacterium phage LilBandit 184
Scaffolding protein MOYASHI_5 Propionibacterium phage Moyashi 184
Secreted transglycosylase Quidividi_034 Staphylococcus phage Quidividi 220
SF4 helicase domain-containing protein Propionibacterium phage pa28 287
Structural protein Pepy6gene012 Rhodococcus phage ReqiPepy6 115
Structural protein AB9_053 Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_B9 178
Tail assembly chaperone SEA_C3PO_27 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 273
Tail assembly chaperone AB9_056 Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_B9 131
Tail assembly chaperone SEA_LEVIOSA_13 Propionibacterium phage Leviosa 227
Tail length tape-measure protein Propionibacterium phage pa33 921
Tail length tape-measure protein Propionibacterium phage pa63 921
Tail lysin SEP1_028 Staphylococcus phage phiIBB-SEP1 1401
Tail lysozyme 30 TAEYOUNG_30 Arthrobacter phage TaeYoung 110
Tail protein 32 BARRETLEMON_32 Arthrobacter phage BarretLemon 427
Tail protein 19 JAWNSKI_19 Arthrobacter phage Jawnski 448
Tail protein Moraxella phage Mcat20 1460
Tail protein Staphylococcus phage phiIPLA-C1C 1151
Tail protein 27 PRINCESSTRINA_27 Arthrobacter phage PrincessTrina 645
Tail protein 35 KELLEZIO_35 Arthrobacter phage KellEzio 1704
Tail protein vB_RpoS-V16_51 Ruegeria phage vB_RpoS-V16 1614
Tail protein Actinomyces virus Av1 731
Tail sheath 14 JAWNSKI_14 Arthrobacter phage Jawnski 482
Tail sheath 15 MARTHA_15 Arthrobacter phage Martha 482
Tail sheath protein AB9_051 Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_B9 381
Tail sheath protein SEA_CHOCOLAT_18 Arthrobacter phage Chocolat 482
Tail spike protein CPT_Mater149 Bacillus phage Mater 663
Tail spike protein Eldridge_087 Bacillus phage Eldridge 663
Tail-like protein Shpa_19 Paracoccus phage Shpa 1072
Tape measure protein PHL141N00_14 Propionibacterium phage PHL141N00 921
Tape measure protein PHL067M09_14 Propionibacterium phage PHL067M09 921
Tape measure protein SEA_LUCY_14 Arthrobacter phage Lucy 853
Tape measure protein PROCRASS1_14 Propionibacterium phage Procrass1 921
Tape measure protein NIKTSON_26 Arthrobacter phage Niktson 1529
Tape measure protein AB9_058 Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_B9 681
Tape measure protein 22 SEA_CHEESY_22 Arthrobacter phage Cheesy 1492
Tape measure protein Gsput1_18 Gordonia phage Gsput1 1431
Tape measure protein PHL082M02_14 Propionibacterium phage PHL082M02 921
Tape measure protein KEIKI_14 Propionibacterium phage Keiki 921
Tape measure protein 17 SEA_FROKOSTDAME_17 Gordonia phage Frokostdame 1824
Tapemeasure protein SEA_AQUARIUS_14 Propionibacterium phage Aquarius 921
Terminase PHL009M11_02 Propionibacterium phage PHL009M11 503
Terminase large subunit 6 SEA_HOTFRIES_6 Streptomyces phage HotFries 581
Terminase large subunit SEA_TIMINATOR_2 Arthrobacter phage Timinator 489
Terminase large subunit BiPBO1_02 Brucella phage BiPBO1 562
Terminase large subunit KEIKI_2 Propionibacterium phage Keiki 503
Terminase large subunit 8 CIRCUM_8 Arthrobacter phage Circum 584
Terminase large subunit MRAK_2 Propionibacterium phage MrAK 503
Terminase small subunit BiPBO1_01 Brucella phage BiPBO1 133
Terminase small subunit 3 SEA_MEMENTOMORI_3 Microbacterium phage MementoMori 194
Terminase small subunit SEA_C3PO_1 Corynebacterium phage C3PO 174
Thioredoxin SEA_DARWIN_54 Corynebacterium phage Darwin 98
Thymidylate synthase SEA_ZION_9 Corynebacterium phage Zion 257
Thymidylate synthase SEA_LUCKYBARNES_41 Brevibacterium phage LuckyBarnes 517
Thymidylate synthase CB7_206 Pectobacterium phage vB_PatM_CB7 226
Thymidylate synthase 109 PBI_COUNT_109 Microbacterium phage Count 232
Toprim domain-containing protein 30 P100D_30 Propionibacterium phage P100D 223
Transposase SEP1_056 Staphylococcus phage phiIBB-SEP1 369
Tryptophan synthase beta superfamily protein 2 SEA_ALANGRANT_2 Mycobacterium phage AlanGrant 289

Discussion

The skin is usually considered a hostile environment for nucleic acids, particularly RNA, because of the presence of nucleases, but inside EVs or other types of complexes, nucleic acids are likely to be protected. EVs have now been found in most biofluids, including sweat [16, 17], but proper inventory of sweat nucleic acids is still needed to determine the potential usefulness of sweat for nucleic acid biomarker discovery.

The most covered DNA and the most represented mRNA in the sweat samples were from mitochondrial origin. Mitochondria have been shown to be released by cells during oxidative stress [21], and to be transported in EVs [22], but we could not detect any intact mitochondria by TEM in our preparations. Mitochondrial protein have been reported in melanoma EVs [23] so we can speculate that the mitochondrial DNA in our samples was a result of mitophagy, which is a normal part of the skin’s aging process [24, 25]; Alternatively, in context of the skin, mitochondria may also be transported out of melanocyte during melanosome release, as the two organelles are tightly bound during melanogenesis [26].

On the other hand, total nuclear DNA is more sparsely represented with very few counts from coding genes while some unannotated regions are highly over-represented in all four samples, indicating that these sequences may not be randomly secreted. DNA as EV cargo is still controversial [27], as in most cases it is not protected from DNAse and might be just sticking to the EV surface, although there are exceptions like giant oncosomes [28], or physiological process to protect cells from activation of DNA-damage-response and cell cycle arrest or apoptosis [29] and parasite like plasmodium use DNA-loaded EVs to prime host cells for infection [30].

It is unclear how the characterized sweat DNA is associated with sweat EVs, but it is very likely that some of it is associated with apoptotic bodies resulting from sebum secretion collected by the flow of sweat during exercise, which is consistent with the presence of nucleic acids from bacteria typical of the sebaceous glands, such as Propionibacterium (Cutibacterium) acnes and their associated bacteriophages.

Small RNA sequencing with small sample quantity is challenging, resulting in a large proportion of unmapped reads. EVs have been shown to have RNA both on their surfaces and inside, but most reports show that the larger RNA species (larger than 200 bp) are absent altogether. Best studied EV-associated RNAs are miRNAs. Even though we did not use RNAse, obtaining detectable amount of RNA proved challenging. Even with a small RNA protocol, our samples were mostly tRNAs and miscRNA with a small representation of miRNAs. We were nevertheless able to confirm the presence of even the lowest represented miRNA in most samples tested using qPCR. Based on our list of miRNA we were able to identify miR21-5p and miR26a-5p as regulated by exercise [17].

Using an unbiased sequencing approach with individual samples confirmed the predominance of tRNA, rRNA and miscRNA observed in many other EV RNA studies [31]. It was more surprising to identify more than 500 protein coding RNA detectable in at least 9 samples and to find that some of them are spanning several spliced introns. Previously published reports point to several explanations for the presence of mRNA. The mRNA exist in co-purified protein complexes [31] or bound to secreted ribosomes [32], which partly protect the mRNA from degradation. It was also interesting to see that a large proportion of the EV-enriched sweat mRNAs are common to the transcriptome of the human eccrine gland [33]. GO analysis mostly shows enrichment in ribosomal components and translation but no clear cellular origin as most of the mRNAs identified tend to be ubiquitously expressed. While it is possible that EV-enriched sweat indeed contain full length functional mRNAs it is more likely reflecting the functional status of the cells that release EVs to sweat, without any particular function of its own.

Of further interest is the presence of microbiome derived particles. The most abundant phyla identified by NGS analysis were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, which are usually found on human arms, hands, and axilla. Proteobacteria are dominant on face and torso [34]. City scale metagenomics studies like the one performed in New York city underground system revealed a lot of information about underground users and their skin microbiome and highlighted that each individual sheds genetic information from their skin, both from their own genome and from their own microbiome, which can be retrieved for analysis [35]. Our data is consistent with that large-scale study result, and the conclusion that the human DNA collected in these metagenomics studies is most likely derived from human sweat.

Further studies are needed to determine if any of the RNAs found in our study are of clinical value, SNPs in some mRNA identified are associated with known diseases and could be further studied. For example, CALM2, which mRNA was identified in all the samples, has SNPs associated with cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death of young people after exercise [36]. Larger scale studies could determine if it is possible to identify clinically associated variants from sweat RNA. Other abundant misc. RNAs such as RNY1,3 and 4 are also considered to have diagnostic potential for inflammatory diseases [37] and cancer [38].

Study limitations

Sweat as a biofluid presents many challenges, and the most important ones in the frame of this study are that the human skin is exposed to the environment, and it is an ecosystem where many organisms live. Skin secretions, including sweat, are metabolised by skin microbes, and the skin microbes secrete their own products, including outer membrane vesicles. The non-human nucleic acids we identified originated primarily from the skin microbiota, but also possibly from clothing and working surfaces, or from the collection material. Distinguishing contaminant nucleic acids in human sweat is especially challenging, since contaminants introduced in the process of sample handling are also mainly derived from human skin secretions. RNA extraction columns have been shown to contain contaminant RNA, and a small RNA sequencing data set available from data repository also show the presence of these contaminating RNAs [39]. Capturing total EVs from biofluids is still not possible by standard methods, and the choice of approach taken here therefore represents a trade-off between quantity/diversity and purity. The ExoRNEasy kit captures EVs on a filter and then proceeds directly to on-filter lysis for RNA isolation. For a biofluid like sweat, in which the EV quantity depends on individual factors and also ambient temperature, hydration status and length and intensity of exercise, capturing particles appeared to be a good choice for comparing heavy and light sweat producers. But as humans are constantly secreting a small quantity of eccrine sweat, alternative methods of collection might be more appropriate for biomarker development, including for sport-associated studies.

In line with MISEV2018 recommendations [40] and because we are aware that our type of preparation is not of high purity, we have used the term sweat particles, or EV-enriched preparation in this report. We are describing preparation methods in detail in the method section and have submitted the study to EV-track (EV-TRACK ID: EV210083), EV-metric 14% for the DNA preparation and 50% for the RNA study.

Conclusions

Our data shows that that sweat particles are a good source of nucleic acid as has been reported for other biofluids. As the skin surface offers a site for non-invasive and real-time sample collection our study opens the path for future sweat EV biomarkers discovery.

Methods

Volunteers

Adult volunteers were recruited among persons of different ethnic background residing in Northern Finland in Oulu area (Table 1). Volunteers were given information about the study and provided limited health and fitness self-assessment in a form and informed consent. Ethical permission (EETTMK:110/2015) was granted by the ethical committee of Oulu University medical School according to the Finnish Medical Research Act (488/1999). Volunteers were asked to avoid using soap and perfume for 24 h before the exercise and to shower with water only for 15 min immediately before exercise to remove dust and other environmental contaminant residues from the skin. These studies were performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki on research involving humans. The study protocol named RUBY was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District in Oulu under Study Diary Number 110/2015. Participants in the study were given information about the study and signed informed consent forms approved by the ethics committee.

Pooled sweat processing and nucleic acid analysis

We first collected large amount of sweat from 13 people of both genders aged 26 to 56 years, during a 40 min biking exercise (Fig. 1). Collected sweat was kept at -20 degrees until processing. After thawing, pooled sweat was filtered on 0,45 μm Milipore PES filters, then centrifuged for 2 h at 108000 x g in an Avanti J-30I centrifuge (Beckman) using JA30–50 rotor. Pellets were resuspended in 1 ml PBS without CaCl2 and MgCl2 pH 7, and 200 μl were used for DNA extraction (corresponding to approximately 80 ml of sweat) with QIAamp blood DNA mini-kit by Qiagen [41], (Fig. 1 left) remaining sample was used for RNA extraction. Concentration was measured using Qubits DNA HS assay kit (ThermoFisher). For buffer exchange and concentration Zymo DNA & Clean-5 columns (Zymo Research) were used with modified protocol (5 volume of binding buffer and elution with 56 °C pre-heated H2O). Samples from 3 individual donors (Table 1 top panel) were prepared in similar way. One ng of DNA was used for PE library construction using Nextera XT library preparation kit (Illumina) according to manufacturer instructions. Libraries were run on NextSeq550 sequencer (Illumina) with 151 cycles in Biocenter Oulu sequencing core facility.

The remaining sample corresponding to 80% of the original sweat volume were used for RNA extraction with an ExoRNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Total RNA concentration was measured with Qubits RNA HS and profiled on Bioanalyzer 6000 Pico chips (Agilent). Pooled EV-enriched sweat RNA-seq RNA library was made using Ion Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 (Thermo Scientific) following instructions for small RNA libraries. In this case, purification beads were included in kit and used to remove adapter dimers. Final libraries were checked on a Bioanalyzer with High Sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent). Sequencing of libraries was done with Ion PGM Hi-Q OT2 Template (200 bp protocol), Ion PGM Hi-Q Sequencing Kit and Ion PGM 318 chip kits (Thermo Scientific).

Individual sweat collection and processing for nucleic acid processing and analysis

Sweat was collected from the upper body, arms and torso using plastic raincoat (Transpen Oy, Kerava, FI) and disposable gloves VETbasic (15,364, Kerbl, Buchbach, Germany). If volunteers sweated heavily from their head, dripping sweat was collected in the head cover of the coat and pooled with the rest. Volunteers used exercise bike (ProSpinner spinning bike, Karhu) indoors for 30 min (Fig. 1 right). After exercise sweat was collected by cutting tip of gloves and cutting insert in ventral area to pipet fluid with sterile disposable pipet. Sweat was passed through 40 μm strainer, then through 0,8 μm filter (Millipore). If not immediately processed for nucleic acid extraction, filtered sweat was stored at -20oC in sterile Falcon tubes.

Filtered sweat was concentrated on Centricon Plus-70 centrifugal filter (100 k cut-off), according to instructions by manufacturer. Concentrated sweat RNA was extracted using exoRNeasy kit (Qiagen).

RNA-seq libraries were made using NEBNext Small RNA kit (New England Biolabs). After 16 cycles of PCR amplification, Libraries were checked with Bioanalyzer using DNA 1000 chips (Agilent). Before size selection on pippin blue (Thermo Fisher) libraries were mixed in 2 pools according to DNA yield. Size selection was set to collect fragment from 145 bp–200 bp. Size selected Pools were amplified an additional 5 cycles, purified wit PCR clean-up kit (Qiagen) and quantified by KAPA PCR kit (Roche). After dilution adjusting for library number in each pool, they were loaded on NextSeq550 (Illumina) and run 51 cycles.

Bioinformatics analysis

DNA

DNA fastQ files were checked with FastQC [42], merged using PEAR [43], merged and unmerged reads were aligned with BWA [44] against human genome HG38. Ensembl 94 annotation was used to intersect reads with functional elements. Coverage percentages for each chromosome was calculated as length of mapped reads per chromosome divided by length of chromosome.

RNA

Reads from different lanes were first merged into single fastq files and a QC was performed [42]. Then, low quality bases and adapter sequences were trimmed with trimmomatic [45] followed by another QC with FastQC. Trimmed reads were then mapped with Bowtie [46] against GtRNAdb high confidence tRNA sequences [47] and reads that map against tRNA sequences were also filtered out. The remaining reads were then mapped again with Bowtie against the human genome HG38, and further processed wit Cufflinks [48] and Cuffmerge to prepare a joint annotation file that contains then both known and novel genes. This annotation file as well as an annotation file for miRNAs from miRBase [49, 50] and Human piRNA sequence v2.0 from piRBase [51] was then used to quantify the expression with cufflinks and featureCounts [52]. For quantification, only exonic counts were taken into account. Alignment with STAR (Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference ([53]) was done using Chipster at https://chipster.csc.fi/ [54].

Reads that could not be mapped against the HG38 genome were then de-novo assembled to contig level using MEGAHIT [55]. These contigs were then blasted against the NR database with DIAMOND [56], and for the identified proteins the corresponding IDs were extracted. Further, with Kraken [57] a taxonomic identification for the unmapped reads was performed and the results were visualized using Krona [58].

GO analysis

List of genes with FPKM values 25 or over were put into geneontology.org for enrichment analysis ( [59], the gene ontology consortium 2019) using Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing and GO annotation with enrichment value 4 or over were visualized using REVIGO [60], dispensable GO terms were omitted.

miRNA QPCR

1,5 ng of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using miRCURY LNA RT-PCR kit (Qiagen).

Following LNA primers were used for QPCR using SYBR Green III master mix (Agilent) miRCURY LNA miRNA QPCR Assay: miR24-3p (YP00204260), miR99a-5p (YP00204521), miR193 (YP00204226), miR-21-5p (MS00009079), miR-26a-5p (MS00029239), miR320b (MIMAT0005792), U6 snRNA (X59362).

RT-PCR

cDNA was made from 5 ng of RNA using VILO or Maxima H- first strand cDNA synthesis kit with DS DNAse (Thermo Fisher). After 1/2 dilution cDNA was amplified using AmpliTaq Gold and specific primers:

Gene forward primer reverse primer
14–3-3 Protein Epsilon (YWHAE) ACAGAACTTCCACCAACGCA ATTCTGCTCTTCACCGTCACC
Ferritin Light Chain (FTL) GGACCCCCATCTCTGTGACT AGTCGTGCTTGAGAGTGAGC

PCR conditions: 95oC 5 min, 60oC 20s,72oC 20s, 95oC20s, 40 cycles. Products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel, stained with midori green and photographed. PCR products were purified using Qiagen minElute columns (Qiagen) and sequenced in Biocenter Oulu sequencing core facility using capillary sequencing with BigDyeTERminator v1.1 cycle sequencing (ABI) and ABI3500xL Genetic Analyzer.

Electron microscopy

The immunoelectron microscopy was performed using biotinylated anti-CD9 antibody as a primary antibody at a 1:10 dilution. Vesicles were deposited on a Formvar carbonated grid (glow-discharged). The grids were incubated in blocking serum (1% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBS). Afterwards, the grids were incubated for 20 mins with the primary anti-CD9 antibody (Miltenyi Biotec), followed by the secondary anti-biotin antibody for 20 min and finally the protein A-gold complex (PAG 10 nm) for 20 min. Samples after immunonegative staining as well as after negative staining with 2% uranyl acetate were examined using a Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and images were captured with a charge-coupled device camera (Quemesa, Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GMBH, Münster, Germany). Anti-CD63 antibody for immuno-TEM was used at dilution 1:50 (Abcam ab193349) and polyclonal anti-Glypican 1 antibody (PA5–28055, ThermoFisher) at dilution 1:100.

For preparing plastic sections concentrated sweat was filtered on 0.45 um Minisart filter (Sartorius), then sweat EVs were stained with CellVue Claret Far Fluorescent Cell Linker Midi Kit (MIDCLARET-1KT) according to manufacturer’s instructions. After staining, samples were centrifuged for 4–6 h at 120 K rpm k-factor = 16 at 4 °C Beckman TLA 120.2). Supernatants were removed, pellets fixed and plastic embedded in Biocenter Oulu electron microscopy core facility. Thin sections were observed with Tecnai G2 Spirit electron microscope.

Western blotting

EV samples were diluted in 5 X Laemmli loading buffer and proteins were separated on 10% SDS PAGE gel, then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Anti-CD63 (Abcam Ab193349; 1:500 and Santa Cruz H-193, sc-15,362; 1:1000 dilutions), GM130 (Cell Signaling Technology, #12480; 1:1000) and Ago2 (Abcam ab32381; 1:1000) antibodies were used for detection.

Nanoparticle tracking analysis

Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was performed using a NanoSight NS300 (NanoSight Ltd., Amesbury, UK) equipped with a 405 nm laser. At least three 40 s videos were recorded of each sample with camera level and detection threshold set up at 13. Temperature was monitored throughout the measurements. Videos recorded for each sample were analyzed with NTA software version 3.1. (build 3.1.46) to determine the concentration and size of measured particles with corresponding standard error. For analysis, auto settings were used for blur, minimum track length and minimum expected particle size. Double distilled H2O was used to dilute the starting material.

Supplementary Information

12864_2021_7733_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Bioanalyzer profile of RNA from individual samples of EV-enriched sweat. RNA analysis profiles for all subjects 1 ul of RNA was run on Agilent pico600 chips. Supplementary Figure 2. piRNA in individual samples. piRNA percentages in 20 individual samples, below table with normalized value for each sample. Supplementary Figure 3. TEM images, negative staining of EV-enriched sweat. Negative control image (PBS wash of collection glove processed as sweat samples), images of ExoEasy processed sweat from 4 different volunteers. Supplementary Figure 4. Nanoparticle Tracking analysis from Exoeasy prepared sweat, summary of 5 different isolations. Supplementary Figure 5. Western blots with protein from negative control (collection glove washed in PBS and processed with exoEasy as sweat), unbound material from ExoEasy column (flowthrough), ExoEasy eluted fraction (EV-enriched), and concentrated sweat (cut-off 100 kDa), were stained with anti-CD63 antibody (EV marker) and antibodies against non-EV markers Ago2 and GM130. A: membrane B: the same membrane probed with anti-CD63 antibdy. Fluorescent images were inverted, contrast and brightness adjusted to make bands visible. C: the same membrane probed with anti-Ago2 antibody. D: membrane E: the same membrane probed with anti-GM130 antibody. Supplementary Figure 6. Western blot, whole membrane from Fig. 4E. EV-enriched (ExoEasy isolation) sweat samples from three individuals were loaded (marked 2, 3, and 32). Region cropped is marked by the black frame. Original fluorescence image was inverted, then brightness and contrast were increased to make bands more visible. Supplementary Figure 7. Whole 2% agarose gel images for Fig. 10. Individual samples’ RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified with primers designed to amplify mRNA across exon-exon junctions. FTL band was cropped form each individual gel, cropped image is marked in blue box, YWHAE band was cropped from individual gels as indicated by red boxes.

12864_2021_7733_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (81.9KB, xlsx)

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1. Transcripts identified in at least 18 samples.

12864_2021_7733_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (47.6KB, xlsx)

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 2. Comparison of top 1% RNA identified in Illumina and Ion Torrent.

Acknowledgements

We thank Hannu Kaikkonen and Prof. Raija Korpelainen form Oulu Deaconess Institute Sport Clinic for their invaluable help in setting up the sweat collection method for this project, Marko Suokas and docent Katri Pylkäs (BCO sequencing core facility), Hannele Härkman, Paula Haipus, Getnet Midekassa, Muhammad Umair Anwar, Emma Karjalainen, Johanna Kekolahti-Liias, Meeri Otsukka, Leena Keskitalo. Abishek Sharma for recruiting volunteers. NGS was done at Biocenter Oulu, Sequencing core facility. CSC – IT Center for Science, Finland and CSC – TIETEEN TIETOTEKNIIKAN KESKUS OY/IT Center for Science LTD for computational resources. We are grateful to the volunteers who donated sweat.

Abbreviations

EV

Extracellular vesicle

NGS

Next-generation sequencing

TEM

Transmission electron microscopy

FPKM

Fragments per kilobase per million reads mapped

STAR

Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference

RT-PCR

Reverse transcription polymerase reaction

qPCR

quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Authors’ contributions

Study design (GB, JH, SV1), experimental design (GB, AS), sweat collection and processing (GB, AS, PS, AZ, TN, PS4), EV preparation (GB, TN, LR, PS, PS4, PS1, AZ), DNA and RNA preparation (GB, PS1), library preparation and RNA analysis (GB), bioinformatics (GB, DF, SV2), imaging (AS, IM, MK), data analysis and manuscript writing (GB, SK, LR, AS, SV1). All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

These studies were supported by the following research grants: Centre of Excellence grant (2012–2017 251314), the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013; grant FP7-HEALTH-F5), HILLA, Business Finland (BioRealHealth), Academy of Finland Biofuture2025, and European Union Regional Development Fund (Printocent10). Part of the infrastructure was supported by the Academy of Finland Research Infrastructure Grant (PII-FIRI, Grant no. 32020).

Availability of data and materials

The RNA and DNA data described in this paper will be available from the European Nucleotide Archive (EMBL-EBI) under accession number PRJEB40112 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

These studies were performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki on research involving humans. The study protocol named RUBY was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District in Oulu under Study Diary Number 110/2015.

Participants in the study were given information about the study and signed informed consent forms approved by the ethics committee.

Consent for publication

No pictures of individuals or other identifying material were recorded in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Chen X, Gasecka P, Formanek F, Galey J-B, Rigneault H. In vivo single human sweat gland activity monitoring using coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering and two-photon excited autofluorescence microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(4):803–812. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cui Y, Duan W, Jin Y, Wo F, Xi F, Wu J. Ratiometric fluorescent Nanohybrid for noninvasive and visual monitoring of sweat glucose. ACS Sens. 2020;5(7):2096–2105. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c00718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee H, Song C, Hong YS, Kim MS, Cho HR, Kang T, Shin K, Choi SH, Hyeon T, Kim DH. Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with multistage transdermal drug delivery module. Sci Adv. 2017;3(3):e1601314. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moyer J, Wilson D, Finkelshtein I, Wong B, Potts R. Correlation between sweat glucose and blood glucose in subjects with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(5):398–402. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raiszadeh MM, Ross MM, Russo PS, Schaepper MA, Zhou W, Deng J, Ng D, Dickson A, Dickson C, Strom M, Osorio C, Soeprono T, Wulfkuhle JD, Petricoin EF, Liotta LA, Kirsch WM. Proteomic analysis of eccrine sweat: implications for the discovery of schizophrenia biomarker proteins. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(4):2127–2139. doi: 10.1021/pr2007957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adewole OO, Erhabor GE, Adewole TO. Ojo AO, Oshokoya H, Wolfe LM, et al. Proteomic profiling of eccrine sweat reveals its potential as a diagnostic biofluid for active tuberculosis. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2016;10(5):547–553. doi: 10.1002/prca.201500071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(3):143–155. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ortiz-Movilla N, Lázaro P, Rodríguez-Iñigo E, Bartolomé J, Longo I, Lecona M, Pardo M, Carreño V. Hepatitis C virus replicates in sweat glands and is released into sweat in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Med Virol. 2002;68(4):529–536. doi: 10.1002/jmv.10238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Akutsu T, Watanabe K, Takamura A, Sakurada K. Evaluation of skin- or sweat-characteristic mRNAs for inferring the human origin of touched contact traces. Leg Med Tokyo Jpn. 2018;33:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hair ME, Mathis AI, Brunelle EK, Halámková L, Halámek J. Metabolite Biometrics for the Differentiation of Individuals. Anal Chem. 2018;90(8):5322–5328. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hulstaert E, Morlion A, Cobos FA, Verniers K, Nuytens J, Eynde EV, et al. Charting extracellular transcriptomes in The Human Biofluid RNA Atlas. bioRxiv. 2020;4:823369. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang C, Liu P. The lipid droplet: a conserved cellular organelle. Protein Cell. 2017;8(11):796–800. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0467-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baker LB. Physiology of sweat gland function: the roles of sweating and sweat composition in human health. Temperature. 2019;6(3):211–259. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2019.1632145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fischer H, Fumicz J, Rossiter H, Napirei M, Buchberger M, Tschachler E, Eckhart L. Holocrine secretion of sebum is a unique DNase2-dependent mode of programmed cell death. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(3):587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schaumburg-Lever G, Lever WF. Secretion from human apocrine glands: an Electron microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol. 1975;64(1):38–41. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12540893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu C-X, Liu Z-F. Proteomic profiling of sweat exosome suggests its involvement in skin immunity. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Karvinen SM, Sievänen TO, Karppinen JE, Hautasaari PT, Bart G, Samoylenko A, et al. MicroRNAs in extracellular vesicles in sweat change in response to endurance exercise. Front Physiol. 2020;11:676. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li J, Guan X, Fan Z, Ching L-M, Li Y, Wang X, Cao WM, Liu DX. Non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of breast Cancer. Cancers. 2020;12(10):2767. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Enderle D, Spiel A, Coticchia CM, Berghoff E, Mueller R, Schlumpberger M, et al. Characterization of RNA from Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles Isolated by a Novel Spin Column-Based Method. Bouma GJ, editor. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0136133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.EV-TRACK Consortium. Van Deun J, Mestdagh P, Agostinis P, Akay Ö, Anand S, et al. EV-TRACK: transparent reporting and centralizing knowledge in extracellular vesicle research. Nat Methods. 2017;14(3):228–232. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hayakawa K, Esposito E, Wang X, Terasaki Y, Liu Y, Xing C, et al. Transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons after stroke. Nature. 2016;535(7613):551–555. doi: 10.1038/nature18928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hough KP, Trevor JL, Strenkowski JG, Wang Y, Chacko BK, Tousif S, Chanda D, Steele C, Antony VB, Dokland T, Ouyang X, Zhang J, Duncan SR, Thannickal VJ, Darley-Usmar VM, Deshane JS. Exosomal transfer of mitochondria from airway myeloid-derived regulatory cells to T cells. Redox Biol. 2018;18:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jang SC, Crescitelli R, Cvjetkovic A, Belgrano V, Olofsson Bagge R, Sundfeldt K, Ochiya T, Kalluri R, Lötvall J. Mitochondrial protein enriched extracellular vesicles discovered in human melanoma tissues can be detected in patient plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2019;8(1):1635420. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2019.1635420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guescini M, Genedani S, Stocchi V, Agnati LF. Astrocytes and Glioblastoma cells release exosomes carrying mtDNA. J Neural Transm Vienna Austria. 2010;117(1):1–4. doi: 10.1007/s00702-009-0288-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sreedhar A, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Singh KK. Mitochondria in skin health, aging, and disease. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(6):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2649-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Daniele T, Hurbain I, Vago R, Casari G, Raposo G, Tacchetti C, Schiaffino MV. Mitochondria and Melanosomes establish physical contacts modulated by Mfn2 and involved in organelle biogenesis. Curr Biol. 2014;24(4):393–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lázaro-Ibáñez E, Lässer C, Shelke GV, Crescitelli R, Jang SC, Cvjetkovic A, García-Rodríguez A, Lötvall J. DNA analysis of low- and high-density fractions defines heterogeneous subpopulations of small extracellular vesicles based on their DNA cargo and topology. J Extracell Vesicles. 2019;8(1):1656993. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2019.1656993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vagner T, Spinelli C, Minciacchi VR, Balaj L, Zandian M, Conley A, Zijlstra A, Freeman MR, Demichelis F, de S, Posadas EM, Tanaka H, di Vizio D. Large extracellular vesicles carry most of the tumour DNA circulating in prostate cancer patient plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1505403. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1505403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Takahashi A, Okada R, Nagao K, Kawamata Y, Hanyu A, Yoshimoto S, et al. Exosomes maintain cellular homeostasis by excreting harmful DNA from cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15287. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sisquella X, Ofir-Birin Y, Pimentel MA, Cheng L, Abou Karam P, Sampaio NG, et al. Malaria parasite DNA-harbouring vesicles activate cytosolic immune sensors. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1985. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02083-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wei Z, Batagov AO, Schinelli S, Wang J, Wang Y, El Fatimy R, et al. Coding and noncoding landscape of extracellular RNA released by human glioma stem cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1145. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01196-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tosar JP, Segovia M, Castellano M, Gámbaro F, Akiyama Y, Fagúndez P, et al. Fragmentation of extracellular ribosomes and tRNAs hshapes the extracellular RNAome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(22):12874-88. 10.1093/nar/gkaa674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Na CH, Sharma N, Madugundu AK, Chen R, Aksit MA, Rosson GD, Cutting GR, Pandey A. Integrated Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of human Eccrine sweat glands identifies missing and novel proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP. 2019;18(7):1382–1395. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(4):244–253. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Afshinnekoo E, Meydan C, Chowdhury S, Jaroudi D, Boyer C, Bernstein N, Maritz JM, Reeves D, Gandara J, Chhangawala S, Ahsanuddin S, Simmons A, Nessel T, Sundaresh B, Pereira E, Jorgensen E, Kolokotronis SO, Kirchberger N, Garcia I, Gandara D, Dhanraj S, Nawrin T, Saletore Y, Alexander N, Vijay P, Hénaff EM, Zumbo P, Walsh M, O’Mullan GD, Tighe S, Dudley JT, Dunaif A, Ennis S, O’Halloran E, Magalhaes TR, Boone B, Jones AL, Muth TR, Paolantonio KS, Alter E, Schadt EE, Garbarino J, Prill RJ, Carlton JM, Levy S, Mason CE. Geospatial resolution of human and bacterial diversity with City-scale Metagenomics. Cell Syst. 2015;1(1):72–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Anderson JH, Tester DJ, Will ML, Ackerman MJ. Whole-exome molecular autopsy after exertion-related sudden unexplained death in the young. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016;9(3):259–265. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Driedonks TAP, Mol S, de Bruin S, Peters A-L, Zhang X, Lindenbergh MFS, et al. Y-RNA subtype ratios in plasma extracellular vesicles are cell type- specific and are candidate biomarkers for inflammatory diseases. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9(1):1764213. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1764213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gulìa C, Signore F, Gaffi M, Gigli S, Votino R, Nucciotti R, et al. Y RNA: an overview of their role as potential biomarkers and molecular targets in human cancers. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(5):1238. 10.3390/cancers12051238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Heintz-Buschart A, Yusuf D, Kaysen A, Etheridge A, Fritz JV, May P, de Beaufort C, Upadhyaya BB, Ghosal A, Galas DJ, Wilmes P. Small RNA profiling of low biomass samples: identification and removal of contaminants. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0522-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T, Archer F, Atkin-Smith GK, Ayre DC, Bach JM, Bachurski D, Baharvand H, Balaj L, Baldacchino S, Bauer NN, Baxter AA, Bebawy M, Beckham C, Bedina Zavec A, Benmoussa A, Berardi AC, Bergese P, Bielska E, Blenkiron C, Bobis-Wozowicz S, Boilard E, Boireau W, Bongiovanni A, Borràs FE, Bosch S, Boulanger CM, Breakefield X, Breglio AM, Brennan MÁ, Brigstock DR, Brisson A, Broekman MLD, Bromberg JF, Bryl-Górecka P, Buch S, Buck AH, Burger D, Busatto S, Buschmann D, Bussolati B, Buzás EI, Byrd JB, Camussi G, Carter DRF, Caruso S, Chamley LW, Chang YT, Chen C, Chen S, Cheng L, Chin AR, Clayton A, Clerici SP, Cocks A, Cocucci E, Coffey RJ, Cordeiro-da-Silva A, Couch Y, Coumans FAW, Coyle B, Crescitelli R, Criado MF, D’Souza-Schorey C, Das S, Datta Chaudhuri A, de Candia P, de Santana Junior EF, de Wever O, del Portillo HA, Demaret T, Deville S, Devitt A, Dhondt B, di Vizio D, Dieterich LC, Dolo V, Dominguez Rubio AP, Dominici M, Dourado MR, Driedonks TAP, Duarte FV, Duncan HM, Eichenberger RM, Ekström K, el Andaloussi S, Elie-Caille C, Erdbrügger U, Falcón-Pérez JM, Fatima F, Fish JE, Flores-Bellver M, Försönits A, Frelet-Barrand A, Fricke F, Fuhrmann G, Gabrielsson S, Gámez-Valero A, Gardiner C, Gärtner K, Gaudin R, Gho YS, Giebel B, Gilbert C, Gimona M, Giusti I, Goberdhan DCI, Görgens A, Gorski SM, Greening DW, Gross JC, Gualerzi A, Gupta GN, Gustafson D, Handberg A, Haraszti RA, Harrison P, Hegyesi H, Hendrix A, Hill AF, Hochberg FH, Hoffmann KF, Holder B, Holthofer H, Hosseinkhani B, Hu G, Huang Y, Huber V, Hunt S, Ibrahim AGE, Ikezu T, Inal JM, Isin M, Ivanova A, Jackson HK, Jacobsen S, Jay SM, Jayachandran M, Jenster G, Jiang L, Johnson SM, Jones JC, Jong A, Jovanovic-Talisman T, Jung S, Kalluri R, Kano SI, Kaur S, Kawamura Y, Keller ET, Khamari D, Khomyakova E, Khvorova A, Kierulf P, Kim KP, Kislinger T, Klingeborn M, Klinke DJ, II, Kornek M, Kosanović MM, Kovács ÁF, Krämer-Albers EM, Krasemann S, Krause M, Kurochkin IV, Kusuma GD, Kuypers S, Laitinen S, Langevin SM, Languino LR, Lannigan J, Lässer C, Laurent LC, Lavieu G, Lázaro-Ibáñez E, le Lay S, Lee MS, Lee YXF, Lemos DS, Lenassi M, Leszczynska A, Li ITS, Liao K, Libregts SF, Ligeti E, Lim R, Lim SK, Linē A, Linnemannstöns K, Llorente A, Lombard CA, Lorenowicz MJ, Lörincz ÁM, Lötvall J, Lovett J, Lowry MC, Loyer X, Lu Q, Lukomska B, Lunavat TR, Maas SLN, Malhi H, Marcilla A, Mariani J, Mariscal J, Martens-Uzunova ES, Martin-Jaular L, Martinez MC, Martins VR, Mathieu M, Mathivanan S, Maugeri M, McGinnis LK, McVey MJ, Meckes DG, Jr, Meehan KL, Mertens I, Minciacchi VR, Möller A, Møller Jørgensen M, Morales-Kastresana A, Morhayim J, Mullier F, Muraca M, Musante L, Mussack V, Muth DC, Myburgh KH, Najrana T, Nawaz M, Nazarenko I, Nejsum P, Neri C, Neri T, Nieuwland R, Nimrichter L, Nolan JP, Nolte-’t Hoen ENM, Noren Hooten N, O’Driscoll L, O’Grady T, O’Loghlen A, Ochiya T, Olivier M, Ortiz A, Ortiz LA, Osteikoetxea X, Østergaard O, Ostrowski M, Park J, Pegtel DM, Peinado H, Perut F, Pfaffl MW, Phinney DG, Pieters BCH, Pink RC, Pisetsky DS, Pogge von Strandmann E, Polakovicova I, Poon IKH, Powell BH, Prada I, Pulliam L, Quesenberry P, Radeghieri A, Raffai RL, Raimondo S, Rak J, Ramirez MI, Raposo G, Rayyan MS, Regev-Rudzki N, Ricklefs FL, Robbins PD, Roberts DD, Rodrigues SC, Rohde E, Rome S, Rouschop KMA, Rughetti A, Russell AE, Saá P, Sahoo S, Salas-Huenuleo E, Sánchez C, Saugstad JA, Saul MJ, Schiffelers RM, Schneider R, Schøyen TH, Scott A, Shahaj E, Sharma S, Shatnyeva O, Shekari F, Shelke GV, Shetty AK, Shiba K, Siljander PRM, Silva AM, Skowronek A, Snyder OL, II, Soares RP, Sódar BW, Soekmadji C, Sotillo J, Stahl PD, Stoorvogel W, Stott SL, Strasser EF, Swift S, Tahara H, Tewari M, Timms K, Tiwari S, Tixeira R, Tkach M, Toh WS, Tomasini R, Torrecilhas AC, Tosar JP, Toxavidis V, Urbanelli L, Vader P, van Balkom BWM, van der Grein SG, van Deun J, van Herwijnen MJC, van Keuren-Jensen K, van Niel G, van Royen ME, van Wijnen AJ, Vasconcelos MH, Vechetti IJ, Jr, Veit TD, Vella LJ, Velot É, Verweij FJ, Vestad B, Viñas JL, Visnovitz T, Vukman KV, Wahlgren J, Watson DC, Wauben MHM, Weaver A, Webber JP, Weber V, Wehman AM, Weiss DJ, Welsh JA, Wendt S, Wheelock AM, Wiener Z, Witte L, Wolfram J, Xagorari A, Xander P, Xu J, Yan X, Yáñez-Mó M, Yin H, Yuana Y, Zappulli V, Zarubova J, Žėkas V, Zhang JY, Zhao Z, Zheng L, Zheutlin AR, Zickler AM, Zimmermann P, Zivkovic AM, Zocco D, Zuba-Surma EK. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guescini M, Guidolin D, Vallorani L, Casadei L, Gioacchini AM, Tibollo P, Battistelli M, Falcieri E, Battistin L, Agnati LF, Stocchi V. C2C12 myoblasts release micro-vesicles containing mtDNA and proteins involved in signal transduction. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(12):1977–1984. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wingett SW, Andrews S. FastQ Screen: A tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Research. 2018;7:1338. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15931.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, Stamatakis A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina paired-end reAd mergeR. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2014;30(5):614–620. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chan PP, Lowe TM. GtRNAdb: a database of transfer RNA genes detected in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D93–D97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–515. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(90001):D140–D144. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D155–D162. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang J, Zhang P, Lu Y, Li Y, Zheng Y, Kan Y, Chen R, He S. piRBase: a comprehensive database of piRNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D175–D180. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2014;30(7):923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kallio MA, Tuimala JT, Hupponen T, Klemelä P, Gentile M, Scheinin I, Koski M, Käki J, Korpelainen EI. Chipster: user-friendly analysis software for microarray and other high-throughput data. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):507. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li D, Luo R, Liu C-M, Leung C-M, Ting H-F, Sadakane K, et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods San Diego Calif. 2016;102:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15(3):R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a web browser. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12(1):385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. Gibas C, editor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e21800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12864_2021_7733_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Bioanalyzer profile of RNA from individual samples of EV-enriched sweat. RNA analysis profiles for all subjects 1 ul of RNA was run on Agilent pico600 chips. Supplementary Figure 2. piRNA in individual samples. piRNA percentages in 20 individual samples, below table with normalized value for each sample. Supplementary Figure 3. TEM images, negative staining of EV-enriched sweat. Negative control image (PBS wash of collection glove processed as sweat samples), images of ExoEasy processed sweat from 4 different volunteers. Supplementary Figure 4. Nanoparticle Tracking analysis from Exoeasy prepared sweat, summary of 5 different isolations. Supplementary Figure 5. Western blots with protein from negative control (collection glove washed in PBS and processed with exoEasy as sweat), unbound material from ExoEasy column (flowthrough), ExoEasy eluted fraction (EV-enriched), and concentrated sweat (cut-off 100 kDa), were stained with anti-CD63 antibody (EV marker) and antibodies against non-EV markers Ago2 and GM130. A: membrane B: the same membrane probed with anti-CD63 antibdy. Fluorescent images were inverted, contrast and brightness adjusted to make bands visible. C: the same membrane probed with anti-Ago2 antibody. D: membrane E: the same membrane probed with anti-GM130 antibody. Supplementary Figure 6. Western blot, whole membrane from Fig. 4E. EV-enriched (ExoEasy isolation) sweat samples from three individuals were loaded (marked 2, 3, and 32). Region cropped is marked by the black frame. Original fluorescence image was inverted, then brightness and contrast were increased to make bands more visible. Supplementary Figure 7. Whole 2% agarose gel images for Fig. 10. Individual samples’ RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified with primers designed to amplify mRNA across exon-exon junctions. FTL band was cropped form each individual gel, cropped image is marked in blue box, YWHAE band was cropped from individual gels as indicated by red boxes.

12864_2021_7733_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (81.9KB, xlsx)

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1. Transcripts identified in at least 18 samples.

12864_2021_7733_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (47.6KB, xlsx)

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 2. Comparison of top 1% RNA identified in Illumina and Ion Torrent.

Data Availability Statement

The RNA and DNA data described in this paper will be available from the European Nucleotide Archive (EMBL-EBI) under accession number PRJEB40112 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home.


Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES