Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Genetics logoLink to Frontiers in Genetics
. 2021 May 28;12:650500. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.650500

Genome-Wide Identification of MATE Gene Family in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and Expression Analysis in Heavy Metal Stress

Yun Huang 1, Guandi He 2,3,4, Weijun Tian 1, Dandan Li 1, Lulu Meng 1, Danxia Wu 1, Tengbing He 1,5,*
PMCID: PMC8196238  PMID: 34127928

Abstract

A genome-wide identification and expression analysis of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) gene family in potato was carried out to explore the response of MATE proteins to heavy meta stress. In this study, we identified 64 MATE genes from potato genome, which are located on 12 chromosomes, and are divided into I–IV subfamilies based on phylogenetic analysis. According to their order of appearance on the chromosomes, they were named from StMATE1–64. Subcellular location prediction showed that 98% of them are located on the plasma membrane as transporters. Synteny analysis showed that five pairs of collinearity gene pairs belonged to members of subfamily I and subfamily II had two pairs indicating that the duplication is of great significance to the evolution of genes in subfamilies I and II. Gene exon–intron structures and motif composition are more similar in the same subfamily. Every StMATE gene contained at least one cis-acting element associated with regulation of hormone transport. The relative expression levels of eight StMATE genes were significantly upregulated under Cu2+ stress compared with the non-stress condition (0 h). After Cd2+ stress for 24 h, the expression levels of StMATE33 in leaf tissue were significantly increased, indicating its crucial role in the process of Cd2+ stress. Additionally, StMATE18/60/40/33/5 were significantly induced by Cu2+ stress, while StMATE59 (II) was significantly induced by Ni2+ stress. Our study initially explores the biological functions of StMATE genes in the regulation of heavy metal stress, further providing a theoretical basis for studying the subsequent molecular mechanisms in detail.

Keywords: potato, heavy metals, MATE genes, phylogenetic relationship, expression analysis

Introduction

Various types of abiotic stresses, especially heavy metal pollution, which is also the main environmental problem, restrict plant growth (Mustafa and Komatsu, 2016). Unfortunately, plants absorb heavy metals along with essential elements from the soil; this caused them to evolve different strategies to deal with the detrimental accumulation of heavy metals. For example, heavy metal ATPase (HMA), multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE), yellow stripe-like (YSL), and metal tolerance proteins (MTP) families are constitutively overexpressed transmembrane transport proteins that drive the uptake of heavy metals, transport them to the leaves to finally be sequestered in the vacuoles or cell walls (Rascio and Navari-Izzo, 2011). MATE transporters are ubiquitously distributed in plants (Omote et al., 2006) and are involved in a diverse array of functions encompassing secondary metabolite transport, xenobiotic detoxification, disease resistance, and aluminum tolerance (Upadhyay et al., 2019). In 1998, the first MATE protein, Norm, was cloned from the chromosomal DNA of Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Morita et al., 1998). Consequent experiments suggested that Norm gene belongs to the efflux protein gene and has a multidrug efflux function. Notably, most characterized MATE transporters seem to only export compounds with positive charges (Lu, 2016).

The members of the MATE family are reported to be directly or indirectly involved in the transit processes of disease resistance, aluminum detoxification, toxic metal efflux, secondary metabolites, and plant hormones. As a result, specific functions of some MATE genes in Arabidopsis have already been characterized. For instance, AtDTX1 not only participates in the efflux of alkaloids, antibiotics, and other toxic compounds but also detoxifies Cd2+, a heavy metal (Li et al., 2002). AtALF5 (AtDTX19) is reported to have similar functions as AtDTX1 (Diener and Fink, 2001). It is very well known that ADS1 can regulate plant disease resistance by encoding the MATE transporter (Sun et al., 2011). Interestingly, MATE protein also regulates the overall development of plants by controlling the phytohormone transfer. For example, AtDTX50 can efflux ABA (Zhang et al., 2014), and both AtFRD3 (AtDTX43) (Durrett et al., 2007) and OsERDL1 (Yokosho et al., 2009) show citric acid activity and can transport metallic iron. Moreover, salicylic acid depends on EDS5 to transmit the signals for disease resistance (Nawrath et al., 2002). TT12 (AtDTX41), the first MATE protein known to transport flavonoids, can also mediate the transport of anthocyanin cyanidin-3-O-glucoside in the presence of Mg-ATP (Marinova et al., 2007). On the other hand, AtDTX18 can enhance plant defense against pathogens by transporting hydroxycinnamic acid amide (Dobritzsch et al., 2016). The function of MATE proteins in other plants has also been characterized, and it is known that SbMATE (Sivaguru et al., 2013), ZmMATE1 and ZmMATE2 (Maron et al., 2010), and OsFRDL4 (Yokosho et al., 2011) all participate in the detoxification process of aluminum. Additionally, OsMATE2 regulates the accumulation of arsenic in rice and tobacco (Das et al., 2018). Both NtMATE1 and NtMATE2 transport alkaloids to the vacuole, thus reducing their toxicity (Shoji et al., 2009). Alfalfa MtMATE67 can enhance symbiotic nitrogen fixation by mediating citrate transport into the symbiotic plastid (Kryvoruchko et al., 2018). In addition, a study has shown that the overexpression of cotton MATE gene can regulate the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus minimizing the effects of various oxidative stresses (Lu et al., 2019).

Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion protein has been widely studied in several plants, such as rice (Oryza sativa) (Tiwari et al., 2014), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) (Wang et al., 2016), soybean (Liu et al., 2016), flax (Lu, 2016), upland cotton (Xu et al., 2019), tomato (Santos et al., 2017), maize (Zhu et al., 2016), alfalfa (Min et al., 2019), Vitis vinifera (Gomez et al., 2009), blueberry (Chen et al., 2015), etc. The functions of some of the MATE genes have been characterized, and all of these indicate that the MATE gene family plays an important role in plant growth, development, and stress resistance. The potato, an edible tuber, is the fourth most important food crop in the world. Many gene families have been identified and analyzed in potato, such as MYB gene family (Sun et al., 2019), StGRAS (Wang et al., 2019), heat shock proteins20 (Hsp20) (Zhao et al., 2018), HMA (He et al., 2020), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) (He et al., 2021), and so on. Recently, Li et al. (2019) and Chen Q. et al. (2020) conducted a preliminary identification of the MATE gene family in potatoes. However, the research on the response of MATE protein to heavy metals in potato is rare.

Soil contamination by heavy metals is a growing problem to human and animal health. To unearth the MATE gene in potato that responds to heavy metal stress, we set out to identify and analyze the MATE gene family in a potato type, Cloud S. tuberosum 505. Our study focused on MATE gene structure, chromosomal localization, phylogenetic relationship, analysis of cis-acting element, and expression level analysis following exposure to heavy metal stress.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Treatments

Cloud S. tuberosum 505 was selected as the test species, and potted planting was carried out in the Institute of New Rural Development of Guizhou University. At 21 days of seedling growth, potato plants with the same growth were selected and exposed to five heavy metals, namely, Cd2+(CdCl2), Cu2+(C4H6CuO4⋅H2O), Pb2+[Pb(CH3COO)2⋅3H2O], Ni2+[Ni(NO3)2⋅6H2O], and Zn2+(ZnCl2) at a concentration of 100 mg/kg as in a previous study (Tian et al., 2021). All of them are analytical reagents. Prepare five heavy metal solutions (Cd2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+) with a concentration of 100 mg/kg, and then soaking the soil with liquid solutions of metals. The roots, stems, and leaves of the seedlings were collected when treatment for 6, 12, and 24 h, place them into the foam box containing liquid nitrogen straightaway, finally laying in −80°C ultralow-temperature refrigerator.

Identification and Analysis of MATE Gene Family

Downloading the genome annotation and protein files of O. sativa, S. tuberosum, and A. thaliana1 and the matrix file of hidden Markov model (HMM) of MATE gene family2. Then, we retrieve MATE gene family information from potato protein sequence database by the HMM search program of HMMER (v3.1) in a Linux system. Here, 1.2e-28 is set as “E-value” to obtain a reliable MATE domain, and multiple sequence alignment was carried out by ClustalW (v2.1). On the basis of the multiple sequence alignment, the specific MATE domain HMM of potato was constructed using the HMM build program of HMMER. HMM search was then again performed to retrieve the sequences with E-value (<0.001) in the protein file to obtain candidate MATE gene sequences. SMART3, CDD4, and PFAM5 were used to test the candidate protein sequences of potato MATE genes, and verification of the MATE domain was performed. Here, 64 MATE genes in total were identified in potato. The molecular weight, theoretical pI, number of amino acids, instability index (II), and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) were all estimated with ExPASy6. The subcellular location prediction of StMATE proteins was determined with Plant-mPLoc7.

Chromosome Distribution and Synteny Analysis

We obtained the position information of the MATE genes of potato on the chromosome by Linux system and then mapped the MATE genes on their chromosomal location by using MapChart8. The genes were named StMATE1–64 according to the sequence of their appearance on the chromosome. In addition, we used MCScanX (Wang et al., 2012) to construct the gene synteny landscape.

Phylogenetic Analysis

The MATE proteins identified in S. tuberosum (64), A. thaliana (56) (Wang et al., 2016), and O. sativa (45) (Li et al., 2002) were all aligned using the MEGA X (v10.0.2) with their default parameters. The tree of phylogenetic relationship was inferred by the NJ (neighbor-joining) method of MEGA X (v10.0.2), while the value of bootstraps was set to 1,000 to evaluate the reliability of internal branches. Additionally, Evolview9 was used to visualize the phylogenetic tree.

Transmembrane Helices, Gene Structure, and Motif Analysis

Using MEME (v4.12.0) to extract MATE domains and search for 20 conservative motifs. We used TBtools (v1.0692), as previously mentioned (Chen C. et al., 2020) was for gene structure analysis and motif visualization. Protter10 is used to predict protein topology.

Promoter Analysis

Promoter sequence analysis was performed in Plantcare11. Briefly, the 2,000-bp sequence upstream of the ATG start codon of the MATE gene family was taken as promoter sequence. Cis-acting elements that are not related to heavy metal stress were removed, and TBtools was used to draw and visualize the elements.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

To analyze the expression patterns of MATE genes of potato under different heavy metal stresses, we selected eight StMATE genes for Cd2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+ stress treatment. The selection of eight genes is based on collinearity analysis of MATE genes in rice, potato, and Arabidopsis (Table 1), preliminarily determined StMATE33-PGSC0003DMT400078371 (collinearity with Arabidopsis and rice MATE genes). Then, according to the cis-acting elements (cis-acting regulatory element involved in the MeJA-responsiveness and cis-acting element involved in defense and stress responsiveness) contained in StMATE33, combined with cis-acting elements (Figure 6) and phylogenetic tree (Figure 4) analysis, the eight selected genes were finally determined for further research. We analyzed the relative expression levels of StMATE genes in different tissues (root, stem, and leaf) by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The eight selected StMATE genes are, respectively, StMATE33/40 (I), StMATE45/59 (II), StMATE5/61 (III), and StMATE18/60 (IV). Primer Premier 6 was used to design the qRT-PCR primers for the eight MATE genes (Table 2). Primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. A TRIzol kit was used to extract total RNA and convert it to cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instruction (StarScript II First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Mix) after the removal of gDNA. The synthesized cDNA was stored in the refrigerator (−80°C) until further use. Here, 2 × RealStar Green Fast Mixture was used to perform qRT-PCR in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and actin was used as the reference gene. The total volume of qRT-PCR reaction (20 μl), included 10 μl of 2 × RealStar Green Fast Mixture, 2 μl of cDNA template, 7 μl of ddH2O, and 1 μl of primers (0.5 μl each for forward and reverse primer) to a final concentration of 10 μM. The PCR reaction was carried out on a BIO-RAD CFX96 (Bio-Rad, United States) real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR instrument by a two-step method with the reaction parameters set as follows: 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 20 s. Three technical and three biological replicates were analyzed for each sample, and the analysis for qRT-PCR was calculated by the Ct comparison (2–ΔΔCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Cytoscape (v3.6.1) (Shannon et al., 2003) is used to establish and analyze the co-expression network of the eight StMATE genes.

TABLE 1.

Twenty-five collinear gene pairs of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) genes in Arabidopsis, potato, and rice.

Gene pairs Gene ID of potato Gene ID Gene pairs Gene ID of potato Gene ID
1 PGSC0003DMT400005437 AT5G65380 14 PGSC0003DMT400026353 AT4G25640
2 PGSC0003DMT400022543 AT3G21690 15 PGSC0003DMT400072250 AT3G03620
3 PGSC0003DMT400078371 AT1G71140 16 PGSC0003DMT400014431 AT1G73700
4 PGSC0003DMT400010077 AT4G22790 17 PGSC0003DMT400017707 AT1G51340
5 PGSC0003DMT400078714 AT1G66780 18 PGSC0003DMT400042439 AT1G61890
6 PGSC0003DMT400058542 AT4G23030 19 PGSC0003DMT400005437 Os08t0480000
7 PGSC0003DMT400043015 AT1G66780 20 PGSC0003DMT400078371 Os01t0684900
8 PGSC0003DMT400041642 AT5G10420 21 PGSC0003DMT400078714 Os01t0684900
9 PGSC0003DMT400029423 AT5G49130 22 PGSC0003DMT400037015 Os10t0523201
10 PGSC0003DMT400047906 AT1G12950 23 PGSC0003DMT400041642 Os08t0480000
11 PGSC0003DMT400015300 AT1G71140 24 PGSC0003DMT400026353 Os02t0821600
12 PGSC0003DMT400032971 AT1G11670 25 PGSC0003DMT400005431 Os03t0188100
13 PGSC0003DMT400065544 AT3G21690
Open in a new tab

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Analysis of cis-acting elements of StMATE genes. Cis-acting elements that existed in the 2,000-bp upstream region of StMATE genes were analyzed. Numbers 1–64 represent genes StMATE1–StMATE64, respectively; I, II, III, and IV represent the four subfamilies. Boxes with different colors at the bottom represent the cis-acting elements.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree of Arabidopsis, rice, and potato multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins. The picture represents the phylogenetic tree as constructed by the N-J (neighbor-joining) method where the number on the branch represented the bootstrap values. Subfamilies are marked in different colors, with each subfamily marked outside the circle as I, II, III, and IV. The red star, blue triangle, and green circle represented potato, rice, and Arabidopsis MATE proteins, respectively.

TABLE 2.

Primer design of eight genes.

Primer name Reverse primer (5′–3′) Forward primer (5′–3′)
Actin AGCCACCACTGAGCACAATGTTAC AGAGGTTCCGTTGCCCAGAGG
StMATE40 GCAGTACGCGCTACAAGACGAG TGTTGCCTCAAGGACTAGGTGGAG
StMATE33 GCGATGGGAATGCAAGCAATGAC ACTCTTTGCGGTCAGGCTTTCG
StMATE59 AGTGACCAACATCGTCCCATTTCC GGCTGGAATGATCTTCGGTGGAAC
StMATE45 GCCAAACGTCCCCTTAGGAAGAAG GAGTGCAGCATGTGTACGAGTAGC
StMATE5 CTTCTGCTGACATCGGTGGAATCC CTGCGTACATTTGCCGGTTTATGG
StMATE61 TGGCTTTCGTTGTCTCGTGGTTC GCTGCTGTGGGAATTTCGATTGC
StMATE18 CCAAACCCCACTCATAGCAACTCC ACTCTGCCTCTGACTTGTTGTGC
StMATE60 TCCAATCCCATCCGTCCATCTCC AGTTGCTATGGCTTCAGTGCTGAC
Open in a new tab

Results

Identification and Related Information of MATE Gene Family in Potato

A total of 64 MATE genes were identified by homology search and MATE domain analysis from potato genome, which were named StMATE1–64 based on their location on the chromosome. MATE proteins of potato encoded by 64 StMATE genes were sequence analyzed, and the proteins were found to be 186–551 aa long, with the maximum molecular weight as 60.28 KD, and their isoelectric points ranged from 5.29 to 9.44 (Supplementary Table 1). The results of subcellular localization prediction showed that MATE proteins of potato are well distributed in plasma membrane, chloroplast, vacuole, and mitochondria. Interestingly, 98% of them are located on the plasma membrane, and 9.4% are distributed in both chloroplast and plasma membrane. However, StMATE38 is specifically distributed across plasma membrane, vacuoles, and mitochondria.

Chromosome Distribution, Collinearity, and Synteny Analysis of MATE Genes in Potato

The 64 StMATE genes were distributed along the lengths of 12 chromosomes (Figure 1). We found 10 StMATE genes on chromosome 3 but only one (StMATE50) on chromosome 9. The result of synteny analysis of 64 StMATE genes demonstrated seven pairs of duplicated genes (Figure 2), namely, StMATE44/63, StMATE19/36, StMATE25/32, StMATE13/15, StMATE13/25, StMATE13/32, and StMATE13/9. Additionally, collinearity analysis showed that there are 18 pairs of collinearity genes of MATE gene family between potato and Arabidopsis but only seven pairs in potato and rice (Figure 3), gene IDs of 25 pairs of genes are shown in Table 1. It indicated that the collinearity between potato and Arabidopsis is more significant than that between potato and rice.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Chromosomal distribution of StMATE genes. The scale bar on the left represents the length (Mb) of the potato chromosomes and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) genes are marked on both the sides of the respective chromosome.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Syntenic relationships of StMATE genes. Potato chromosomes are shown in different colors. The putative orthologous multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) genes of potato are represented in red. The gene names are indicated inside of the diagram, while the chromosome numbers are shown outside the diagram.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Collinearity analysis of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) genes in rice, potato, and Arabidopsis. Chromosomes of Arabidopsis, potato, and rice are represented by yellow, blue, and orange bars, respectively; the chromosome label is next to the corresponding chromosome. The red curve indicates MATE genes with collinearity.

Phylogenic Analysis and Classification

A phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA-X (v10.0.2) for the 64 StMATE proteins, 45 OsMATE proteins, and 56 AtDTX proteins that showed up after performing multiple sequence alignments, their protein sequence data are shown as Supplementary Table 3. According to the topology of the N-J phylogenetic tree as shown previously (Wang et al., 2016), the MATE genes of potato, rice, and Arabidopsis could be divided into four major subfamilies, namely, I, II, III, and IV, containing 23, 27, 4, and 10 StMATE genes, respectively (Figure 4).

Transmembrane Helices, Exon–Intron Structure, and Motif Analysis of MATE Genes in Potato

The position information for the exons, intron, and untranslated region (UTR) on potato chromosomes was obtained through TBtools (v1.0692), which also helps construct the exon–intron structures and motif analysis diagram. The results of the gene structure analysis showed that genes in the same subfamily often had similar structures, but their intron lengths varied. Most members in subfamily I (21/23: 91.30%) had 5–7 exons, and the number of introns was similar to that of exon (Figure 5B), whereas 70.37% (19/27) MATE genes in subfamily II had 6–8 exons. The genes of subfamily III contained the greatest number of exons (10–13) among all. However, all the genes in subfamily IV either lacked introns or had less than three introns, StMATE18/35/37/48/49 had no introns at all, StMATE60 had three introns, and all other members had only one. Moreover, the numbers of motifs in StMATE genes in the same subfamily were highly similar (Figure 5A), with motifs in subfamily II being 8–15 in number. The minimum number of motifs for both I and IV was five, whereas the maximum number in I was 14 and in IV was 12. Subfamily III, however, contained only 2–5 motifs. The relevant information of 20 motifs is listed in Supplementary Table 2. Notably, we also analyzed the distribution of conserved motifs on the transmembrane helices (Figure 5D). StMATE33, StMATE59, StMATE5, and StMATE18 contain all motifs of their respective subfamily.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Analysis of motifs, transmembrane helices (TMs), and exon–intron structure of StMATE genes. The numbers 1–64 represent StMATE1–StMATE64. (A) Phylogenetic tree, the various subfamilies were numbered I, II, III, and IV. (B) Gene structures of StMATE genes, orange boxes, blue boxes, and lines represented exon, untranslated region (UTR), and introns, respectively. The lengths of the boxes and lines were scaled according to the gene length. (C) All motifs were identified by MEME (v4.12.0) according to the complete amino acid sequences. (D) Lineup of conserved motifs on the TMs. The transmembrane structure is marked with blue numbers, the conserved motif is indicated in different colors, and its related information is on the right.

Promoter Cis-Acting Analysis

Cis-acting elements are the sites for specific binding of transcription factors and thus play an important role in regulating genes responsible for the growth, differentiation, and development of organisms, including plants. We extracted a 2,000-bp sequence in the upstream region of every StMATE gene and used PlantCARE (see text footnote 11) to identify all the cis-acting elements in these StMATE genes. We obtained 13 cis-acting elements according to their functional annotations and found that 61.54% (8/13) of them were related to hormone response (Figure 6). Interestingly, only StMATE11, StMATE63 (II), and StMATE60 (IV) contained a cis-acting, MYB binding site involved in flavonoid biosynthesis gene regulation.

Expression Level Analysis of MATE Genes in Potato in Heavy Metal Stress

To further explore whether the expression levels of StMATE genes are affected by heavy metal stress, we selected a total of eight StMATE genes (two genes from each subfamily) after analyzing the phylogenetic tree and promoters and determined their relative expression levels by qRT-PCR in roots, stems, and leaves after Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, and Pb2+ treatment for 0, 6, 12, and 24 h. The expression level at 0 h of treatment was taken as 1 (Figure 7). The results of qRT-PCR analysis showed that, compared with control (0 h), in the same tissue, the time for StMATE genes to reach a higher expression level was similar, i.e., the time for most genes to reach the highest expression level in root, stem, and leaf tissues was 12, 6, and 24 h, respectively, under these five heavy metal stress conditions. In leaf tissues, however, in the case of Ni2+ stress, the time for the eight StMATE genes to reach the highest expression level was 6 h and for Zn2+ stress, it was 12 h. In leaf tissue, the expression levels of StMATE33 and StMATE40 (I) under Cd2+ stress were upregulated to 272.1 and 41.6 times, respectively, than that in the control, after a 24-h treatment (P > 0.01). The levels for them in stem tissues were increased to 36.8 and 1.2 times that of the control (6 h treatment), and the expression levels in the root tissues were 1.2 and 1.7 times that of the control for a 12-h treatment (not significant). Under Cu2+, Pb2+, and Ni2+ stress, the relative expression levels of StMATE33 and StMATE40 in each tissue were similar to that of Cd2+ treatment. For Zn2+ stress of 12 h, the expression levels of StMATE33 and StMATE40 in leaf tissues were 50.4 and 159.2 times, respectively, that of the control; in stem tissue, a Zn2+ treatment for 24 h increased the expression level of StMATE40 gene highly significantly to 360.3. Under Ni2+ stress conditions, the expression levels of StMATE45 and StMATE59 (II) were quite different, where StMATE45 showed lower expression levels in roots, stems, and leaves. On the contrary, the highest relative expression levels of StMATE59 in roots, stems, and leaves were 15.2, 17, and 114, respectively, which were extremely significantly upregulated. The results indicated that the expression levels of genes in the same subfamily could be significantly different even under the same stress conditions. In addition, the expression levels of StMATE45 and StMATE59 under different stresses in various tissues were similar to Ni2+ stress. StMATE5 and StMATE61 (III) showed a maximum response to Cu2+ stress compared with the other heavy metal stresses. Under Cu2+ stress treatment for 24 h, the relative expression levels of StMATE5 and StMATE61 in leaf tissue were up by 81.2 and 15.4 times, respectively, than that of the control. In the stem tissue, they were up only by 0.7 and 1.3 times that of the control with a 6-h treatment; in root tissue, however, after 12 h of Cu2+ stress treatment, the expression levels StMATE5 and StMATE61 were 1.4 and 6 times that of the control. Moreover, the expression levels of StMATE5 and StMATE61, under the other four heavy metal stress treatments, had a similar trend to Cu2+ stress. Finally, for StMATE18 and StMATE60 (IV) under a Zn2+ stress of 12 h, the gene expression levels in leaf tissue were 266.8 and 30.33 times higher, respectively. In the stem tissue, however, in a Zn2+ stress for 6 h, the gene expression levels increased 12.49 and 27.78 times, whereas in root tissues, under a Zn2+ stress of 12 h, the gene expression levels were found to be lower than the control. In the stem and leaf tissues, StMATE18 and StMATE60 had the highest expression levels after stress treatment for 6 h, while it was 24 h for the root tissue. For the other three heavy metal stress treatments, the time for StMATE18 and StMATE60 to reach higher expression levels in root, stem, and leaf tissues was 12, 6, and 24 h, respectively.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Open in a new tab

The relative expression levels of eight StMATE genes in response to the five heavy metals. The ordinate is the gene expression level; abscissa is the gene number. The height of the bar graphs represents the relative expression levels of the genes where the value of the expression is equal to the means (±SD) of three biological replicates. The gene names are shown on the x axis (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

All results of our study indicated that certain genes have a higher expression level in specific tissues and under specific stress conditions. For example, the expression levels of most of the eight StMATE genes in each tissue followed a trend of leaf > stem > root. However, under Pb2+ stress, the expression levels of StMATE33 and StMATE40 (I) showed a trend of root > leaf > stem. Additionally, the overall expression levels of StMATE33 and StMATE40 under Zn2+ treatment were stem > leaf > root. The results show that the response degree of the same gene to different treatments is different, and the expression levels are related to the organ type and the time of stress treatment.

Discussion

Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporters are widely present in plant cells, mainly membranes, and play an important role in the efflux of plant secondary metabolites and toxic compounds (Lu et al., 2018). In our present study, a total of 64 members of the potato MATE family were identified (Supplementary Table 1), and the results of their subcellular localization prediction showed that 98.44% of them too were in the plasma membrane. It reinforces that fact that MATE proteins are indeed membrane transporters, acting as gatekeepers for cells by regulating the inflow of useful substances and the exudation of the harmful ones (Upadhyay et al., 2019). Furthermore, they are distributed on 12 chromosomes in Cloud S. tuberosum (Figure 1) and comprise four major subfamilies (I–IV) based on their evolutionary relationships (Figure 4). These observations are consistent with the previous classification of MATE genes in rice and Arabidopsis (Wang et al., 2016).

Syntenic analysis showed that there are seven pairs of collinearity genes, and they predominantly amplify through gene duplication (Figure 2). Among them, five pairs of collinearity genes belong to subfamily I and two pairs belong to subfamily II. Our results also indicate that the fragment duplication also contributes to the evolution of genes in subfamilies I and II. The result showed that some StMATE genes can cause the amplification on different chromosomes through gene duplication. As protein functions are affected by their structures (Qin et al., 2019), we analyzed the gene structure and motifs for these genes and found that StMATE genes in the same subfamily had similar exon–intron structure and shared conserved motifs (Figure 5) as well. The loss and gain of introns might reflect the evolutionary trend of gene families (Rogozin et al., 2003), which can indicate that genes in the same evolutionary branch not only have similar gene structures but also have similar functions, such as most genes in subfamily IV completely lacked or had only one intron, indicating that their amplification might be happening differently from genes in other subfamilies.

Additionally, the result of motif analysis among the four (I–IV) subfamilies showed that all StMATE genes contain motif6, and the composition and number of conserved motifs in subfamilies I, II, and IV are quite similar (between 5 and 15). It is worth noting that each subfamily contains unique conservative motifs. For example, motif17 and motif19 exist in subfamily II and subfamily IV, respectively, while motif16 and motif20 are unique to subfamily III. Motif17 lines up with TM9 of StMATE59. Some amino acid residues of motif19 are arranged on TM4 of StMATE18, but motif20 is arranged on the outside of the membrane of StMATE5, and motif16 penetrates TM2–TM5 of StMATE5 (Figure 5D). The presence of conserved amino acid motifs helps in compartmentalization of proteins into subfamilies and may have significance to the function of the proteins within the family (Seo and Kim, 2018). Similar results were found for DTX/MATE protein in flax (Ali et al., 2020). As phytohormones are very crucial for MATE proteins to extrude heavy metal and transmit certain disease resistance signals (Serrano et al., 2013; Garcia-Oliveira et al., 2018; Tegli et al., 2020). We selected 13 cis-acting elements, based on their functional annotations, and found that 61.54% (8/13) of them were also related to hormone response (Figure 6). Interestingly, StMATE11 and StMATE63 (from subfamily II) contain cis elements for the MYB binding site, near genes involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis regulation. The results widely suggest that the two genes may be related to the transport of flavonoids.

As phylogenetic analysis of the genes can help to conjecture their function in a specific species (Pandey et al., 2016), we performed the same analysis (Figure 4) on the 64 StMATE genes and discovered that they comprise four major subfamilies (I–IV). Some members of the subfamily I clustered together with AtDTX1 and may be involved in the synthesis of alkaloids, auxins, and the transportation of toxic compounds such as cadmium (Li et al., 2002). Other members of the lot gathered together with ALF5 (AtDTX19) and AtDTX18. The former transports tetramethylammonium (Diener and Fink, 2001), and the latter can enhance a plant’s resistance toward a disease (Dobritzsch et al., 2016). Members of subfamily II seem to have similar functions as TT12, i.e., to participate in the transport of flavonoids (Marinova et al., 2007), whereas genes in subfamily III gathered with genes such as FRD3 (AtDTX43) and EDS5 (AtDTX47), which are involved in transport of iron (Durrett et al., 2007; Pineau et al., 2012) and salicylic acid (Nawrath et al., 2002), respectively. Interestingly, the kinship of genes in subfamily III is relatively a closer one (bootstrap values >80). So, it can be speculated that proteins in this subfamily may function like FRD3 and EDS5. Ultimately, members of subfamily IV appeared in the same branch as AtDTX50 and thus may be involved in the efflux of ABA (Zhang et al., 2014).

The results of qRT-PCR analysis indicate that the eight selected StMATE genes were expressed in root, stem, and leaf tissues under five heavy metal stress conditions. Quite notably, in the same tissue, genes of the same subfamily have similar expression levels if undergoing the same stress conditions. It is consistent with the results of gene structure and motif analysis (Figure 5), which also indicates a similar structure and function for genes in the same subfamily. In addition, under all stress conditions, the overall expression level of genes in each tissue follows a trend of leaf > stem > root. However, in different plant tissues, genes from different subfamilies respond to stresses with variant degrees. For example, the expression levels of StMATE33 under Cd2+ stress for 24 h were increased to the highest amount 272.1 compared to unstressed controls (0 h); under Cu2+ and Zn2+ stress conditions, StMATE40 is extremely significantly upregulated. Moreover, StMATE33 and StMATE40 are in the same subfamily as AtDTX1 is in the phylogenetic tree (subfamily I). In Arabidopsis, AtDTX1 can participate in the transportation of toxic compounds such as alkaloids, phytohormones, and cadmium (Kuroda and Tsuchiya, 2009). Therefore, we speculate that StMATE33 may be playing a crucial role in the responses toward Cd2+ stress in Cloud S. tuberosum. Quite consistently, the expression level of StMATE40 was also significantly induced by Cu2+ and Zn2+. This result could be attributed to the fact that the three metals have similar structures, while zinc (atomic number 30) and copper (atomic number 29) are in adjacent periods as well in the periodic table (Supanchaiyamat and Hunt, 2019). Compared with the control, Ni2+ stress significantly increased the expression levels of StMATE59 (subfamily II), while StMATE18 and StMATE60 (subfamily IV) were significantly upregulated under Cu2+ stress. Most importantly, we can get more useful information from Figure 8. Under Cu2+ stress, the expression levels of StMATE18/60/40/33/5 were all significantly upregulated, and the expression levels of StMATE18/40 were significantly upregulated under Zn2+ stress. Differently, only the expression of StMATE33 was extremely significantly upregulated under Cd2+ stress. The results indicate that there may be a synergistic effect between StMATE18/60/40/33/5 under Cu2+ stress conditions, and StMATE33 is very important for cadmium detoxification. Copper and zinc are important components of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ceruloplasmin, which are important in many metabolic processes and enzyme systems (Airede, 1993). Based on this, we speculate that StMATE18/60/40/33/5 are very important for the growth of plants.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Open in a new tab

Analysis of co-expression network of StMATE genes. The thicker the line between metals and genes indicates the higher expression of the gene under the metal stress condition.

Chen et al. (2015) found that VcMATE1 and VcMATE4 are in the same evolutionary branch as AtDTX1 and speculated that they play an important role in the transportation of alkaloids and the efflux of xenobiotics or toxic cations. LuDTX71 and LuDTX73 genes can enhance plant tolerance to Cd, cold, and salt stress (Ali et al., 2020). These results, combined with our research results, strongly support that the StMATE genes may be involved in the detoxification of cadmium ions. In particular, the expression level of CaMATE01/28 is upregulated under hormone stress conditions, and phylogenic analysis indicated that they are in the same evolutionary branch as AtDTX1 (Chen Q. et al., 2020). It indicates that hormone cis-acting elements are essential for the MATE gene family to respond to adversity stress. And MATE transporters can improve the ability to adapt to adversity by promoting the efflux of phytohormone (Zhang et al., 2014; Yokosho et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017).

On the whole, we have identified 64 StMATE genes from the potato genome, divided them into four major subfamilies, and analyzed the expression levels of eight StMATE genes in heavy metal conditions. Analysis of qRT-PCR revealed the significant changes in expression levels of eight StMATE genes under five heavy metal stresses. In particular, Cu2+ stress quite significantly upregulated the expression levels of most genes. However, the levels of StMATE33 (I) were quite abundantly induced by Cd2+, and StMATE18/60/40/33/5 were significantly upregulated under Cu2+ stress, while StMATE59 (II) was significantly induced by Ni2+ stress. Our detailed findings lay down the initial paths to help researchers in building future projects that would uncover the molecular mechanisms of StMATE genes, in response to heavy metals stress, in the commercially important food crop Cloud S. tuberosum.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

TH and YH conceived the idea of the experiments. YH, DL, LM, and WT carried out the experiments. YH, DL, GH, and WT analyzed the data. YH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. This work was supported by the Program Foundation of Institute for Scientific Research of Karst Area of NSFC-GZGOV (U1612442), Guizhou Science and Technology Agency Fund for Basic-condition Platform (2019-5701), as well as Construction Program of Biology First-Class Discipline in Guizhou (GNYL2017009).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.650500/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (15.6KB, XLSX)
Click here for additional data file. (3.7MB, XLSX)
Click here for additional data file. (62.8KB, XLSX)

References

  1. Airede A. K. (1993). Copper, zinc and superoxide dismutase activities in premature infants: a review. East Afr. Med. J. 70 441–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali E., Saand M. A., Khan A. R., Shah J. M., Feng S., Ming C., et al. (2020). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of detoxification efflux carriers (DTX) genes family under abiotic stresses in flax. Physiol. Plant 171 483–501. 10.1111/ppl.13105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H. R., Frank M. H., He Y., et al. (2020). TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13 1194–1202. 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen L., Liu Y., Liu H., Kang L., Geng J., Gai Y., et al. (2015). Identification and expression analysis of MATE genes involved in flavonoid transport in blueberry plants. PLoS One 10:e118578. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Q., Wang L., Liu D., Ma S., Dai Y., Zhang Z., et al. (2020). Identification and expression of the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) gene family in Capsicum annuum and Solanum tuberosum. Plants 9:1448. 10.3390/plants9111448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Das N., Bhattacharya S., Bhattacharyya S., Maiti M. K. (2018). Expression of rice MATE family transporter OsMATE2 modulates arsenic accumulation in tobacco and rice. Plant. Mol. Biol. 98 101–120. 10.1007/s11103-018-0766-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diener A. C., Fink G. G. R. (2001). Arabidopsis ALF5, a multidrug efflux transporter gene family member, confers resistance to toxins. Plant Cell 13 1625–1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dobritzsch M., Lubken T., Eschen-Lippold L., Gorzolka K., Blum E., Matern A., et al. (2016). MATE transporter-dependent export of hydroxycinnamic acid amides. Plant Cell 28 583–596. 10.1105/tpc.15.00706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Durrett T. P., Gassmann W., Rogers E. E. (2007). The FRD3-mediated efflux of citrate into the root vasculature is necessary for efficient iron translocation. Plant Physiol. 144 197–205. 10.1104/pp.107.097162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garcia-Oliveira A. L., Benito C., Guedes-Pinto H., Martins-Lopes P. (2018). Molecular cloning of TaMATE2 homoeologues potentially related to aluminium tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biol. 20 817–824. 10.1111/plb.12864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gomez C., Terrier N., Torregrosa L., Vialet S., Fournier-Level A., Verriès C., et al. (2009). Grapevine MATE-type proteins act as vacuolar H+-dependent acylated anthocyanin transporters. Plant Physiol. 150 402–415. 10.1104/pp.109.135624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. He G., Qin L., Tian W., Meng L., He T., Zhao D., et al. (2020). Heavy metal Transporters-Associated proteins in Solanum tuberosum: genome-wide identification, comprehensive gene feature, evolution and expression analysis. Genes 11:1269. 10.3390/genes11111269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. He G., Tian W., Qin L., Meng L., Wu D., Huang Y., et al. (2021). Identification of novel heavy metal detoxification proteins in Solanum tuberosum: insights to improve food security protection from metal ion stress. Sci. Total Environ. 779:146197. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kryvoruchko I. S., Routray P., Sinharoy S., Torresjerez I., Finney L. A., Nakashima J., et al. (2018). An iron-activated citrate transporter, MtMATE67, is required for symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol. 176:1538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuroda T., Tsuchiya T. (2009). Multidrug efflux transporters in the MATE family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794 763–768. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li L., He Z., Pandey G. K., Tsuchiya T., Luan S. (2002). Functional cloning and characterization of a plant efflux carrier for multidrug and heavy metal detoxification. J. Biol. Chem. 277 5360–5368. 10.1074/jbc.M108777200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li Y., He H., He L. F. (2019). Genome-wide analysis of the MATE gene family in potato. Mol. Biol. Rep. 46 403–414. 10.1007/s11033-018-4487-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu J., Li Y., Wang W., Gai J., Li Y. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of MATE transporters and expression patterns of a subgroup of MATE genes in response to aluminum toxicity in soybean. BMC Genom. 17:223. 10.1186/s12864-016-2559-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu M. (2016). Structures of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporters and their mechanistic implications. Channels 10 88–100. 10.1080/19336950.2015.1106654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu P., Magwanga R. O., Guo X., Kirungu J. N., Lu H., Cai X., et al. (2018). Genome-Wide analysis of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family in Gossypium raimondii and Gossypium arboreum and its expression analysis under salt, cadmium, and drought stress. G3 8 2483–2500. 10.1534/g3.118.200232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu P., Magwanga R. O., Kirungu J. N., Hu Y., Dong Q., Li Y., et al. (2019). Overexpression of cotton a DTX/MATE gene enhances drought, salt, and cold stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 10:299. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marinova K., Pourcel L., Weder B., Schwarz M., Barron D., Yang M., et al. (2007). The Arabidopsis MATE transporter TT12 acts as a vacuolar flavonoid/H+ -antiporter active in proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells of the seed coat. Plant Cell 19 2023–2038. 10.1105/tpc.106.046029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maron L. G., Pineros M. A., Guimaraes C. T., Magalhaes J. V., Pleiman J. K., Mao C., et al. (2010). Two functionally distinct members of the MATE (multi-drug and toxic compound extrusion) family of transporters potentially underlie two major aluminum tolerance QTLs in maize. Plant J. 61 728–740. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04103.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Min X., Jin X., Liu W., Wei X., Zhang Z., Ndayambaza B., et al. (2019). Transcriptome-wide characterization and functional analysis of MATE transporters in response to aluminum toxicity in Medicago sativa L. Peer J. 7:e6302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Morita Y., Kodama K., Shiota S., Mine T., Kataoka A., Mizushima T., et al. (1998). NorM, a putative multidrug efflux protein, of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its homolog in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 1778–1782. 10.1128/AAC.42.7.1778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mustafa G., Komatsu S. (2016). Toxicity of heavy metals and metal-containing nanoparticles on plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1864 932–944. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nawrath C., Heck S., Parinthawong N., Métraux J. P. (2002). EDS5, an essential component of salicylic acid-dependent signaling for disease resistance in Arabidopsis, is a member of the MATE transporter family. Plant Cell 14 275–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Omote H., Hiasa M., Matsumoto T., Otsuka M., Moriyama Y. (2006). The MATE proteins as fundamental transporters of metabolic and xenobiotic organic cations. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 27 587–593. 10.1016/j.tips.2006.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pandey A., Misra P., Alok A., Kaur N., Sharma S., Lakhwani D., et al. (2016). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of homeodomain leucine zipper subfamily IV (HDZ IV) gene family from Musa accuminata. Front. Plant Sci. 7:20. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pineau C., Loubet S., Lefoulon C., Chalies C., Fizames C., Lacombe B., et al. (2012). Natural variation at the FRD3 MATE transporter locus reveals cross-talk between Fe homeostasis and Zn tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 8:e1003120. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qin M., Luo W., Zheng Y., Guan H., Xie X. (2019). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the PHD-finger gene family in Solanum tuberosum. PLoS One 14:e226964. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rascio N., Navari-Izzo F. (2011). Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci. 180 169–181. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rogozin I. B., Wolf Y. I., Sorokin A. V., Mirkin B. G., Koonin E. V. (2003). Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive, lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution. Curr. Biol. 13 1512–1517. 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00558-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Santos A., Chaves-Silva S., Yang L., Maia L., Chalfun-Junior A., Sinharoy S., et al. (2017). Global analysis of the MATE gene family of metabolite transporters in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 17:185. 10.1186/s12870-017-1115-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Seo M. H., Kim P. M. (2018). The present and the future of motif-mediated protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 50 162–170. 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Serrano M., Wang B., Aryal B., Garcion C., Abou-Mansour E., Heck S., et al. (2013). Export of salicylic acid from the chloroplast requires the multidrug and toxin extrusion-like transporter EDS5. Plant Physiol. 162 1815–1821. 10.1104/pp.113.218156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N. S., Wang J. T., Ramage D., et al. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13 2498–2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shoji T., Inai K., Yazaki Y., Sato Y., Takase H., Goto Y., et al. (2009). Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion-type transporters implicated in vacuolar sequestration of nicotine in tobacco roots. Plant Physiol. 149 708–718. 10.1104/pp.108.132811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sivaguru M., Liu J., Kochian L. V. (2013). Targeted expression of SbMATE in the root distal transition zone is responsible for sorghum aluminum resistance. Plant J. 76 297–307. 10.1111/tpj.12290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sun W., Ma Z., Chen H., Liu M. (2019). MYB gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum l.): genome-wide identification of hormone-responsive reveals their potential functions in growth and development. Intern. J. Mol. Sci. 20:4847. 10.3390/ijms20194847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun X., Gilroy E. M., Chini A., Nurmberg P. L., Hein I., Lacomme H., et al. (2011). ADS1 encodes a MATE-transporter that negatively regulates plant disease resistance. New Phytol. 192 471–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Supanchaiyamat N., Hunt A. J. (2019). Conservation of critical elements of the periodic table. Chemsuschem 12 397–403. 10.1002/cssc.201802556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tegli S., Bini L., Calamai S., Cerboneschi M., Biancalani C. (2020). A MATE transporter is involved in pathogenicity and IAA homeostasis in the hyperplastic plant pathogen Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. Nerii. Microorganisms 8:156. 10.3390/microorganisms8020156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tian W., He G., Qin L., Li D., Meng L., Huang Y., et al. (2021). Genome-wide analysis of the NRAMP gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum): identification, expression analysis and response to five heavy metals stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208:111661. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tiwari M., Sharma D., Singh M., Tripathi R. D., Trivedi P. K. (2014). Expression of OsMATE1 and OsMATE2 alters development, stress responses and pathogen susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 4:3964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Upadhyay N., Kar D., Deepak M. B., Nanda S., Rahiman R., Panchakshari N., et al. (2019). The multitasking abilities of MATE transporters in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 70 4643–4656. 10.1093/jxb/erz246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang J., Hou Q., Li P., Yang L., Sun X., Bhagavatula L., et al. (2017). Diverse functions of multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) transporters in citric acid efflux and metal homeostasis in Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 90 79–95. 10.1111/tpj.13471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang L., Bei X., Gao J., Li Y., Yan Y., Hu Y. (2016). The similar and different evolutionary trends of MATE family occurred between rice and Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 16:207. 10.1186/s12870-016-0895-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang S., Zhang N., Zhu X., Yang J., Li S., Che Y., et al. (2019). Identification and expression analysis of StGRAS gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Comput. Biol. Chem. 80 195–205. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2019.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang Y., Tang H., Debarry J. D., Tan X., Li J., Wang X., et al. (2012). MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e49. 10.1093/nar/gkr1293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu L., Shen Z. L., Chen W., Si G. Y., Meng Y., Guo N., et al. (2019). Phylogenetic analysis of upland cotton MATE gene family reveals a conserved subfamily involved in transport of proanthocyanidins. Mol. Biol. Rep. 46 161–175. 10.1007/s11033-018-4457-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yokosho K., Yamaji N., Fujii-Kashino M., Ma J. F. (2016). Retrotransposon-Mediated aluminum tolerance through enhanced expression of the citrate transporter OsFRDL4. Plant Physiol. 172 2327–2336. 10.1104/pp.16.01214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yokosho K., Yamaji N., Ma J. F. (2011). An Al-inducible MATE gene is involved in external detoxification of Al in rice. Plant J. 68 1061–1069. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04757.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yokosho K., Yamaji N., Ueno D., Mitani N., Ma J. F. (2009). OsFRDL1 is a citrate transporter required for efficient translocation of iron in rice. Plant Physiol. 149 297–305. 10.1104/pp.108.128132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang H., Zhu H., Pan Y., Yu Y., Luan S., Li L., et al. (2014). A DTX/MATE-type transporter facilitates abscisic acid efflux and modulates ABA sensitivity and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 7 1522–1532. 10.1093/mp/ssu063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao P., Wang D., Wang R., Kong N., Zhang C., Yang C., et al. (2018). Genome-wide analysis of the potato Hsp20 gene family: identification, genomic organization and expression profiles in response to heat stress. BMC Genom. 19:61. 10.1186/s12864-018-4443-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhu H., Wu J., Jiang Y., Jin J., Zhou W., Wang Y., et al. (2016). Genomewide analysis of MATE-type gene family in maize reveals microsynteny and their expression patterns under aluminum treatment. J. Genet. 95 691–704. 10.1007/s12041-016-0686-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (15.6KB, XLSX)
Click here for additional data file. (3.7MB, XLSX)
Click here for additional data file. (62.8KB, XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Articles from Frontiers in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES