Abstract
Vegfc/Vegfr3 signaling is critical for lymphangiogenesis, the sprouting of lymphatic vessels. In zebrafish, cells sprouting from the posterior cardinal vein can either form lymphatic precursor cells or contribute to intersegmental vein formation. Both, the Vegfc-dependent differential induction of Prox1a in sprouting cells as well as a Notch-mediated pre-pattern within intersegmental vessels have been associated with the regulation of secondary sprout behavior. However, how exactly a differential lymphatic versus venous sprout cell behavior is achieved is not fully understood. Here, we characterize a zebrafish mutant in the adaptor protein Grb2b, and demonstrate through genetic interaction studies that Grb2b acts within the Vegfr3 pathway. Mutant embryos exhibit phenotypes that are consistent with reduced Vegfr3 signaling outputs prior to the sprouting of endothelial cells from the vein. During secondary sprouting stages, loss of grb2b leads to defective cell behaviors resulting in a loss of parachordal lymphangioblasts, while only partially affecting the number of intersegmental veins. A second GRB2 zebrafish ortholog, grb2a, contributes to the development of lymphatic structures in the meninges and in the head, but not in the trunk. Our results illustrate an essential role of Grb2b in vivo for cell migration to the horizontal myoseptum and for the correct formation of the lymphatic vasculature, while being less critically required in intersegmental vein formation. Thus, there appear to be higher requirements for Grb2b and therefore Vegfr3 downstream signaling levels in lymphatic versus vein precursor-generating sprouts.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10456-021-09774-w.
Keywords: Lymphangiogenesis, Angiogenesis, Development, Zebrafish, Vasculature, VEGFR3
Introduction
The lymphatic vasculature is a vital organ system that covers different functions in the vertebrate body, such as trafficking of immune cells, maintenance of fluid homeostasis and absorption of dietary fat. Malfunctioning of lymphatic vessels can cause pathological conditions, such as lymphedema or inflammation [1, 2]. Lymphangiogenesis is largely dependent on the vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3, also termed FLT4) signaling pathway. Briefly, the secreted ligand VEGFC is produced as a pre-pro-protein and it is activated by proteolytical cleavage at both C and N terminus. Furin/PC5, collagen and calcium-binding EGF domain 1 (CCBE1) and two different members of the A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) protein family, ADAMTS3 and ADAMTS14, are central players in this cleavage process [3–6]. Once proteolytically activated, a VEGFC dimer binds with high affinity to its receptor VEGFR3, triggering intracellular downstream signaling events in endothelial cells. As functional or structural impairments of the lymphatic system result in pathological conditions in humans, understanding how the lymphatic vasculature develops and which genes are essential for its functionality is extremely important. At the cellular level, the system is best understood in mice [7] and zebrafish (Danio rerio) [8]. In zebrafish, at around 32–36 h post-fertilization (hpf), cells sprout from the posterior cardinal vein (PCV) and exhibit either one of two different behaviors: Half of the cells will connect to an arterial intersegmental vessel (aISV), remodeling it into a venous intersegmental vessel (vISV). Consequently, zebrafish embryos develop arteries and veins in a 1:1 ratio within the trunk [9]. The other half migrates to the horizontal myoseptum (HM) to constitute a pool of lymphatic precursor cells, so-called parachordal lymphangioblasts (PLs). Later, these cells migrate either ventrally or dorsally forming the thoracic duct (TD) and the dorsal longitudinal lymphatic vessel (DLLV), respectively, the two major lymphatic vessels in the trunk which are completed at 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) [1, 8].
The distinguishing features between venous and lymphatic sprouts, which both depend on active Vegfc signaling [4, 6, 10], have been a matter of contention for considerable time [11–13]. More recently, the Vegfc-dependent upregulation of Prox1a expression in 65% of secondary sprouts has been associated with a lymphatic cell behavior, suggesting that the decision whether to generate an intersegmental vein or a lymphatic precursor cell would be made at the level of the nascent secondary sprouts [13]. A different study, however, indicated that the balanced number of intersegmental arteries and veins is determined by a Notch-mediated pre-patterning within intersegmental vessels and by flow-dependent endothelial cell migration [14]. Primary ISVs would be pre-specified to become either arteries or veins already before the onset of secondary sprouting, suggesting that the decision whether a secondary sprout shows a ‘venous’ or ‘lymphatic’ cell behavior at a given position in the embryo is governed by the Notch levels in the nearby ISV [14]. Despite the apparent tight interdependency of artery-vein balance and lymphatic development, the molecular pathways controlling and regulating these different cell fate decisions have not been fully elucidated yet.
The importance of the Vegfc/Vegfr3 signaling pathway during secondary sprouting is evidenced by various mutant scenarios [4, 6, 10, 15]. Mutants have been analyzed for genes/proteins that affect Vegfc processing, and various allelic variations of Vegfr3 have been analyzed [4, 10, 16], but it is less clear through which specific downstream signaling components Vegfr3 exerts its effect. In principle, two main effector branches have been considered and analyzed in vitro, namely the serine/threonine kinases AKT and ERK/MAPK. Mutants for these downstream effector genes have thus far not been investigated in vivo. In the present study, we analyze the role of growth factor receptor-bound protein 2b (Grb2b) during lymphatic development in the zebrafish and its involvement in lympho-venous sprout formation in the trunk. GRB2 constitutes an adaptor protein that acts downstream not only of VEGFR3, but of different tyrosine kinase receptors [17]. It contains two Src homology 3 (SH3) and one Src homology 2 (SH2) domain [17]. The SH2 domain binds to phosphorylated tyrosine kinase receptors [17], whereas the SH3 domains are both needed for a stable interaction with proline-rich proteins, such as Sos [18, 19]. Here, we demonstrate that this adaptor protein, which has been shown to bind to VEGFR3 in vitro [20], is essential for normal endothelial cell migration in the zebrafish trunk and that it has differential effects on venous versus lymphatic endothelial cell behavior.
Materials and methods
Zebrafish husbandry and strains
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) strains were maintained under standard husbandry conditions, according to FELASA recommendations [21]. Animal experiments have been performed according to guidelines of the animal ethics committees at the University of Münster, Germany. Embryonic developmental stages were determined as previously described [22]. Transgenic lines used in this work are: Tg(flt4:mCitrine)hu7135 [11], Tg(flt1enh:tdTomato)hu5333 [23], Tg(fli1a:eGFP)y1 [24], Tg(fli1a:nEGFP)y7 [25], Tg(shh:vegfc-IRES-mTurquoise)hu10933 [4], Tg(flt4:Gal4FF)hu9236 [11], Tg(UAS:GFP)nkuasgfp1a [26].
Transgenesis
For the endothelial-specific rescue, the Tg(UAS:grb2b-P2A-RFP)mu406 was generated. Briefly, a 5xUAS:RFP-polyA cassette was inserted into the miniTol2 vector via a NotI restriction site. Subsequently, a zebrafish codon-optimized P2A sequence with a 5′ flanking KpnI restriction site was added directly upstream of the RFP coding sequence. In an additional step, the grb2b cDNA was inserted into the vector via the KpnI restriction site, using NEBuilder (New England BioLabs). 25 pg of the final construct together with 25 pg of Tol2 mRNA were injected into one-cell-stage embryos from an outcross of tabula rasa carriers with flt4:Gal4FF; UAS:GFP transgenic fish.
Genome editing
CRISPR-mediated genome editing for the generation of grb2b and grb2a mutants was performed as described [27]. The respective sgRNA target sites in grb2b (exon 2) was 5′- GATGAGCTGAGTTTTAAACG-3′, and in grb2a (exon 4) 5′-TGGGAAGATTCCCCGTGCAAA-3’.
Morpholino (MO) injections
vegfr3 ATG MO (5′-CTCTTCATTTCCAGGTTTCAAGTCC-3′) was injected at 0.15 ng/embryo, the plcγ-1 splicing MO (5′- ATTAGCATAGGGAACTTACTTTCG-3′) at 10 ng/embryo, and the dll4 splicing MO (5′-TGATCTCTGATTGCTTACGTTCTTC-3) at 4 ng/embryo.
Genotyping
grb2b and grb2a were genotyped by KASPar. Primers used for tabula rasa: forward wt: 5′-AGAACTAAACGGCAAAGACGGTTTCAt-3′, forward mut: 5′-AGAACTAAACGGCAAAGACGGTTTCAa-3′; common reverse: 5′-GGTTGTGGTGGCTGAAGTTAAGCATC-3′. Primers used for grb2bmu404: forward wt: 5′-ACTGCAGATGATGAGCTGAGTTTTAa-3′, forward mut: 5′-ACTGCAGATGATGAGCTGAGTTTTAc-3′, common reverse: 5′-AACAAACATTAAATAACCATGACTTACCTTCA-3′. Primers used for grb2amu405: forward wt: 5′-TGGTTTTATGGGAAGATTCCCCGTGc-3′, forward mut: 5′-TGGTTTTATGGGAAGATTCCCCGTGg-3′, common reverse: 5′-AAGAAAAGCTCCATCGTGCCTCTGTT-3′. shh:zfvegfc was genotyped by PCR: forward: 5′-GCAGTTGCGTTCAGCGGGTAGTGT-3′, reverse: 5′-GCTGATGTATGAAGTGCTGATGTT-3’.
Antibodies
The following antibodies and reagents were used: Prox1 rabbit mAb (1:500, AngioBio Co #11-002), phospho-ERK1/2 antibody XP rabbit mAb (1:250, Cell signaling #4370), anti-GFP chicken polyclonal (1:400, ab13970), goat α-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:1000, Life Technologies), Tyramide-FITC/Cy3 (1:50, NEL744001KT, Perkin Elmer), Alexa-488 goat anti-chicken (1:200, Invitrogen, A11039).
Immunohistochemistry
Embryos at 32hpf from a grb2bmu404 in-cross were fixed overnight and stained with either α-pErk and α-GFP, or with α-Prox1 and α-GFP according to a previously described protocol [4]. For Prox1 staining, the following modifications were used: after acetone treatment, embryos were treated with Proteinase K for 20 min at 37 °C. The embryos were imaged (lateral views) and pERK/Prox1 positive cells were quantified in the posterior cardinal vein by scoring co-expression of flt4:mCitrine detected by α-GFP in green and α-pERK/α-Prox1 in red across an area of 9 somites in the trunk.
In situ hybridizations
Anti-sense RNA probes for grb2b and grb2a were generated by PCR from cDNA. Several different probes were tested for each gene which yielded similar staining results. Primers used were: grb2b_Ex2-4 For: 5′-ATGGAGGCCATTGCCAAGTATGA-3′; grb2b_Ex2-4 (T3 promoter) Rev: 5′-cattaaccctcactaaagggaaGCTGAACATCATTACCAAACTTGACAGAC-3′; grb2b_5′UTR For: 5′-AAGCGTGGATTCTGCGTTCA-3′; grb2b_5′UTR (T3 promoter) Rev: 5′-cattaaccctcactaaagggaaATTCAGCCAAACGGACACCA; grb2b_3′UTR For: 5′-CTGTGAAATCCAAAGCAGCA-3′; grb2b_3′UTR (T3 promoter) Rev: 5′-cattaaccctcactaaagggaaAAAAGAAGCCAAAAGCAGCA-3′; and grb2a_Ex2-4 For: 5′-ATGGAGGCAATAGCTAAATATGACTTCAAAG-3′; grb2a_Ex2-4 (T3 promoter) Rev: 5′-cattaaccctcactaaagggaaTTCCAAATTTAACAGAGAGCGAGAAGTCT-3′; grb2a_Ex5-6 For: 5′-AAAGTTTTACGGGACGGAGCTGG-3′; grb2a_Ex5-6 (T3 promoter) Rev: 5′-cattaaccctcactaaagggaaGTTACATGTTTTGATTGACAGGTGTGACA-3′; grb2a_5′UTR For: TCACTGCGAGACTACAAGGC; grb2a_5′UTR (T3 promoter) Rev: cattaaccctcactaaagggaaTCTTTGTCTGCTTGCCGTCA; grb2a_3′UTR For: CTGCATAAAGCACCTGTGGA; grb2a_3′UTR (T3 promoter) Rev: cattaaccctcactaaagggaaAGCTCCATCAAAAGCAAAGC. Probes were transcribed with T3 RNA polymerase and hybridizations were carried out on TL embryos as described before [28].
Results
Identification of a zebrafish grb2b mutant allele: the tabula rasa phenotype
In a forward genetic screen for mutations affecting the formation of the lymphatic vasculature in the zebrafish trunk, the tabula rasa mutant was isolated, in which the formation of the lymphatic vasculature was impaired, while exhibiting no overt phenotypes in other tissues at 5dpf. Embryos were scored for the presence of a TD in 10 consecutive segments within the trunk (above the yolk extension) at 5dpf. Phenotypes were divided into five categories, containing either TD fragments within 0, 1–4, 5–7, 8–9, or 10 segments. Most tabula rasa mutant embryos did not develop a TD at all, or showed only few fragments (in 1–4 segments). In only a small portion, an almost complete (in 8–9 segments) or a complete (in 10 segments) TD was present (Fig. 1c–e). Analysis of PLs at the HM at 48hpf revealed that the number of lymphatic precursor cells was strongly reduced in mutant embryos (Fig. 1a, b, f), whereas the aISVs/vISVs ratio was increased (Fig. 1g). Although the number of vISVs was significantly decreased compared to siblings, mutant embryos still exhibited on average 10 veins per embryo at 48hpf.
Genetic mapping based on whole-genome sequencing data from pooled mutant and sibling DNA [29] linked the causative mutation to chromosome 3 (Supplementary Fig. S1a). Subsequent analysis of the genomic candidate region revealed a missense mutation in the coding region of grb2b (Supplementary Fig. S1b), leading to an amino acid exchange at position 48 (exon 3) of the Grb2b protein (Fig. 1h). The amino acid exchange affects a highly conserved isoleucine within the first SH3 domain of the protein [30]. In order to show that the identified mutation within grb2b was causative for the lymphatic defects, grb2b mRNA was injected into embryos from a tabula rasa in-cross and embryos were analyzed at 5dpf. After injection of wild-type grb2b mRNA, the majority of mutant embryos indeed developed a TD (Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). In addition, we generated an independent grb2b allele, employing the CRISPR/Cas9 system. This allele, grb2bmu404, harbors a 2 bp deletion at the beginning of exon 2, resulting in a predicted premature stop codon at amino acid position 29 (Fig. 1i). Complementation assays between grb2bmu404 and tabula rasa confirmed that tabula rasa represents a grb2b allele, as trans-heterozygous embryos failed to form lymphatic structures in the trunk at 5dpf (Fig. 1j, k). Further analysis of grb2bmu404 mutant embryos demonstrated that this early stop allele completely recapitulated the tabula rasa mutant phenotype, causing equally strong defects in lymphatic development and in the ratio of arterial and venous ISVs (Supplementary Fig. S3a–c). We therefore conclude that tabula rasa represents a loss-of-function allele of the grb2b gene that impairs lymphatic development in the zebrafish trunk.
Endothelial-specific expression of Grb2b rescues the tabula rasa lymphatic phenotype
In order to analyze in which tissue grb2b is expressed, in situ hybridization was performed on 32hpf old embryos, revealing grb2b expression in the majority of tissues during venous sprouting stages, with increased expression levels in the central nervous system and part of the pronephros (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. S4a–d). We therefore wanted to assess in which cells/tissues Grb2b activity is required for normal lymphatic development to occur and performed tissue-specific rescue experiments. To this end, we generated a construct containing the wild-type grb2b cDNA under control of a 5xUAS element. In order to highlight cells expressing the construct, a self-cleaving P2A peptide [31] followed by an RFP reporter cassette was added to the construct (Fig. 2b). We established a stable Tg(UAS:grb2b-P2A-RFP) transgenic line in a flt4:Gal4FF; UAS:GFP; tabula rasa+/− background, which enabled us to drive the expression of Grb2b specifically in endothelial cells (as shown by RFP expression) (Fig. 2c-dʺ). While tabula rasa mutants lacking the rescue construct (GFP+, RFP−) showed a strong impairment of TD formation (88% of tabula rasa mutants completely lacked a TD), mutants expressing the construct (GFP+, RFP+) displayed a markedly milder phenotype: the majority of embryos (63%) developed a full TD, and only in a minority (37%) the TD was present in fewer segments or not formed at all (Fig. 2e, f). Hence, functional Grb2b within endothelial cells is sufficient to rescue the tabula rasa lymphatic phenotype and to enable normal lymphatic development.
grb2a is dispensable for lymphatic formation in the zebrafish trunk
Due to genome duplication, two zebrafish orthologs for GRB2 exist: grb2a and grb2b. As grb2a and grb2b genes and proteins share 79% and 94% identities, respectively, we wanted to address a possible involvement of grb2a in lymphatic development. First, an in situ hybridization for grb2a on 32hpf embryos was performed, and as for grb2b, grb2a was also found to be widely expressed in different tissues (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. S4e–h). Second, a grb2a mutant allele was generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. This allele, grb2amu405, contains a 5 bp deletion, leading to a frameshift and a predicted premature stop codon at the N-terminal part of the SH2 domain (Fig. 3b). Subsequent analysis of homozygous grb2amu405 mutants did not reveal any lymphatic defects at 5dpf, as assessed by TD analysis (Fig. 3c). Additionally, we analyzed a grb2amu405; grb2bmu404 double heterozygous in-cross to check for possible lymphatic defects in the different allelic combinations. At 48hpf, the number of PLs was significantly decreased only in embryos homozygous mutant for grb2b, independent of the number of wild-type grb2a copies (Fig. 3d). Accordingly, an impairment of TD formation was only observed when embryos lacked both copies of grb2b. We further noticed a weak lymphatic phenotype in embryos heterozygous for grb2b, but again this was independent of grb2a (Fig. 3e). In order to check whether Grb2a could in principle functionally replace Grb2b during lymphangiogenesis, wild-type grb2a mRNA was injected into eggs from a grb2bmu404 heterozygous in-cross. We found that providing excess grb2a mRNA ubiquitously was indeed sufficient to restore lymphatic structures in grb2bmu404 mutant embryos at 5dpf (Supplementary Fig. S5a-d). Given that Grb2a is able to functionally replace Grb2b in this over-expression setup, the grb2b mutant phenotype suggests that grb2a is normally not expressed, or not expressed in sufficiently high levels, in endothelial cells to affect lymphatic development. Taken together, grb2b appears to be the main player involved in lymphatic development, and, while Grb2a can compensate for Grb2b when over-expressed, it is not essential for lymphangiogenesis in the zebrafish trunk.
We additionally analyzed lymphatic structures in regions different from the trunk, such as the facial lymphatic system (FL) and the brain lymphatic endothelial cells (BLECs) in the meninges [32–35]. The development of these structures was analyzed in embryos from a grb2amu405; grb2bmu404 double heterozygous in-cross. Embryos missing both copies of grb2b showed only a partial loss of FLs and BLECs structures. However, this phenotype was exacerbated when an additional copy of grb2a was missing, resulting in the absence of the respective lymphatic structures (Supplementary Fig. S6a–h). These results indicate that, although being dispensable for the development of the trunk lymphatics, Grb2a is required for the formation of lymphatic structures in the head.
Grb2b is part of the Vegfc/Vegfr3 signaling axis
Previous in vitro data suggested that GRB2 constitutes a downstream effector of different tyrosine kinase receptors, including VEGFR3 [20, 36]. To establish a connection between Grb2b and the Vegfc/Vegfr3 signaling pathway in vivo, we first assessed a genetic interaction between grb2b and Vegfc signaling, making use of a previously published in vivo Vegfc activity assay. In this setup, forced expression of zebrafish Vegfc from the floorplate through a shh enhancer results in hyper-sprouting of venous endothelial cells, which is suppressed in mutant situations that impact Vegfc activity [6, 37]. When full-length Vegfc was expressed from the floorplate in wild-type and heterozygous grb2bmu404 embryos, a pronounced venous hyper-branching phenotype was evident at 48hpf (Supplementary Fig. S7a, b). In homozygous grb2bmu404 mutants, however, this dominant phenotype was strongly suppressed, which is in line with the notion that Grb2b represents a major downstream effector of Vegfc signaling (Supplementary Fig. S7).
Furthermore, we tested for a genetic interaction with Vegfr3 directly by injecting a sub-critical dose of a vegfr3-targeting morpholino (MO) into a grb2bmu404 outcross. Embryos were subsequently analyzed for formation of PLs at the horizontal myoseptum at 48hpf. At the injected concentration of the vegfr3 MO, the number of lymphatic precursor cells was not altered when compared to un-injected wild-type embryos, indicating that the knockdown was not efficient enough to cause lymphatic defects on its own (Fig. 4a, b, e). However, grb2bmu404 heterozygous embryos injected with the same dose of vegfr3 MO showed a significant decrease in the number of PLs compared to un-injected grb2bmu404 heterozygous embryos (Fig. 4c–e). This result therefore establishes a genetic interaction between grb2b and vegfr3, revealing for the first time that Grb2b acts within the Vegfr3 pathway in vivo.
grb2b mutants show a decrease in endothelial cell numbers expressing Prox1 and pERK in the PCV
Since Grb2b appears to act downstream of Vegfc/Vegfr3, we checked grb2b mutants for early Vegfc-related phenotypes that could contribute to the loss of PLs at 48hpf. It was previously reported that bi-potential precursor cells in the PCV divide asymmetrically at around 32hpf, giving rise to a cell with high Prox1a expression levels (Prox1ahigh), which has a high likelihood of developing into a PL cell, and a daughter cell with low amounts of Prox1a (Prox1alow), which remains in the PCV. Importantly, the induction of Prox1a expression in these venous endothelial cells seems to depend on Vegfc signaling levels [13]. To examine if Prox1a expression was altered in grb2b mutants, Prox1 antibody staining was performed and showed a slight, but significant decrease in the number of Prox1-positive endothelial cells in the PCV of grb2bmu404 mutants (Fig. 5a–c), consistent with a reduced Vegfc signaling output in the absence of Grb2b. Along the same lines, we also addressed the levels of activated ERK in grb2b mutants, as different in vitro studies have demonstrated that VEGFC/VEGFR3 signaling can activate ERK1/2 [16, 38] via GRB2 [20]. Antibody staining against pERK revealed significantly reduced numbers of pERK+ endothelial cells in the PCV of mutants compared to both wild-type and heterozygous siblings at 32hpf (Fig. 5d-f). Taken together, these results are in line with the notion that Grb2b acts downstream of Vegfc/Vegfr3 and up-stream of ERK1/2, and that the signaling output of the pathway is reduced in the absence of this critical adaptor protein.
Prior to the induction of Prox1a, the PCV undergoes a polarization event leading to a higher number of nuclei on the dorsal half of the PCV [13]. We therefore assessed whether this PCV polarization is also affected in grb2b mutant embryos even prior to the onset of secondary sprouting. Quantification of the number of nuclei in the PCV at 32hpf using the transgenic line fli1a:nEGFP demonstrated that polarization of the PCV was defective in grb2bmu404 mutants, as, unlike in the wild-type and heterozygous situation, more nuclei were present on the ventral than on the dorsal side of the vessel (Fig. 5h–j). Consequently, we also found an increase of pERK+ endothelial cells in the ventral half of the PCV when compared to the sibling situation (Fig. 5g). The total number of nuclei did not differ among the three genotypes, suggesting that the defect is not caused by aberrant endothelial proliferation (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate an impairment in the polarization of the PCV prior to sprouting, which likely contributes to the strong lymphatic defects seen in grb2b mutants at 48hpf.
Secondary sprouting is defective in grb2b mutants
In order to better understand the grb2b phenotype, we performed time-lapse imaging between 30 and 48hpf to examine the initial phase of lympho-venous sprouting and migration in more detail and to address the question whether additional defects during this phase might impact the formation of PLs and vISVs (Fig. 6a–fʹʺ). We followed the sprouting activity at a total of 8 positions per embryo (four consecutive segments, bilateral) and grouped the observed cell behaviors into five categories: (A) no sprouting activity, (B) minor sprouting activity (only extension of cell protrusions but no egression from the PCV), (C) major sprout activity (cell emerging from the PCV, but not forming either a vISV or a PL), (D) sprout remodeling an artery into a vein, and (E) sprout giving rise to a PL (Fig. 6g). In wild-type and grb2b heterozygous cases, most positions gave rise to secondary sprouts that either formed vISVs (42.5% in wt and 22.7% in het; category D) or PL cells (55% in wt and 39.1% in het; category E). In grb2b mutant embryos, however, 54.4% of the analyzed positions did not show detectable sprouting activity (category A), while in 39.1% of the cases only a reduced sprouting activity (categories B + C) was evident. In addition, we found at 6% of the imaged positions a sprout that successfully remodeled an ISV (category D) while only one out of 184 quantified positions gave rise to a sprout that migrated to the HM to form a PL (0.5%, category E). Therefore, the overall number of sprouts formed in grb2b mutants was found to be reduced. Thus, a lack of Grb2b activity strongly impairs the sprouting and migration capacity of venous endothelial cells.
As intersegmental arteries play a role in vein formation in the wild-type situation [14], we wanted to investigate the sprouting behavior in grb2b mutants in the absence of arteries. Injection of a phospholipase C gamma-1 (plcγ-1) morpholino (MO) [39] resulted in the absence of intersegmental vessels in both tabula rasa mutants and siblings (Fig. 7a–d). In this set-up, the number of sprouts emerging from the PCV was quantified at 48hpf. The analysis revealed a drastic decrease of sprouts in homozygous grb2b mutants compared to siblings, suggesting that in the absence of intersegmental arteries almost no stable sprouts could be established.
Since grb2b mutants predominantly gave rise to smaller and more transient sprouts, we investigated in more detail their capacity of reaching an ISV to form an intersegmental vein. It was recently shown that the specification of intersegmental arteries and veins is already predetermined in a Notch-mediated fashion within intersegmental vessels before the onset of secondary sprouting [14]. ISVs with high Notch activity are pre-specified to give rise to an artery, while ISVs with low Notch signaling are specified to become intersegmental veins. In consequence, knockdown of the Notch ligand Dll4 results in an increase of veins at the expense of arteries [40], since under these conditions Notch activation in all ISVs is reduced. In order to assess a situation in which almost all intersegmental vessels would be predetermined to give rise to intersegmental veins, we injected a dll4 MO into an in-cross of grb2bmu404 heterozygotes. Embryos were imaged at 2.5dpf to allow quantification of aISVs and vISVs. As expected, injection of dll4 MO into wild-type embryos resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of vISVs with very few remaining aISV. In grb2b mutant embryos, significantly, knock-down of dll4 also led to a strong increase in the number of vISVs as 86.3% of all ISVs were successfully remodeled into a vein (on average, only 2 aISVs out of 14 quantified ISVs remained) (Fig. 8a-c). In addition to this robust rescue of vein formation as such, we noticed the appearance of cellular protrusions stemming from ISVs and extending towards the HM in all dll4 morphant situations. These aberrant protrusions were of variable length and seemed to be connected to the respective ISV even at 3dpf (Fig. 8d–e'). Furthermore, they were often positive for the arterial marker flt1:tdTomato (Fig. 8d, e). We therefore concluded that these structures are likely a secondary effect of hyper-sprouting ISVs upon dll4 knock-down and hence we did not consider them as a rescue in PL formation, a notion which is supported by previous work that reported a strong reduction in the number of PL cells in dll4 morphants [41]. Taken together, these results suggest that, in principle, grb2b mutant venous sprouts are capable of forming veins, but that this step is suppressed by wild-type Dll4 signalling levels.
Discussion
The essential role of the Vegfr3 pathway for lymphangiogenesis is conserved among vertebrates. While work in the past few years has provided a good understanding of the extracellular proteins that aid in producing processed and biologically active Vegfc protein, and in the functionality of different Vegfr3 domains, our insights into the intracellular events upon Vegfr3 activation are comparatively limited. Here, we characterize a mutant in the zebrafish grb2b gene. In contrast to other mutants affecting the Vegfc/Vegfr3 signaling axis (which usually affect venous and lymphatic sprouting equally strong), grb2b mutants lack lymphatic structures while forming some veins, allowing to distinguish between the effect of low Vegfr3 signaling activity on venous versus lymphatic cells in zebrafish.
The mutant discovered in the forward genetic screen harbors a point mutation in the grb2b gene, leading to a predicted amino acid change at position 48. From the crystal structure analysis of the human GRB2 protein, several residues in the first SH3 domain, including Phe47 and Pro49, were found to be important for the protein–protein interaction site [30]. Considering that all three amino acids in position 47, 48 and 49 are conserved in human, mouse and zebrafish, the mutation in the tabula rasa allele is therefore likely to interfere with the binding of downstream ligands (such as Sos). An additional grb2b loss-of function allele, grb2bmu404, does not show any significant phenotypic difference to the tabula rasa allele, thus indicating that the tabula rasa allele also represents a loss-of-function situation. GRB2 is known to be expressed in many tissues in human and mice [17], a finding that is reciprocated in zebrafish. Murine embryos that lack Grb2 die very early, at E4.5, because of a failure in endoderm differentiation [42]. Surprisingly, given the many tyrosine kinase receptors with which Grb2 is assumed to interact, grb2b zebrafish mutants are viable up to 5dpf and they do not show any other overt phenotypical defect except for vascular development. A possible explanation could be maternal contribution, and indeed, grb2b is both zygotically and maternally expressed [43]. Maternally provided mRNAs could compensate for zygotic grb2b loss-of-function in different tissues, allowing fish embryos to survive the first few days. Moreover, the likewise widely expressed Grb2a could contribute to survival by compensating in tissues other than endothelial cells in the trunk. Indeed, grb2a/grb2b homozygous mutants are not viable at 4dpf, indicating a role of Grb2a in the early larva outside the vascular system. In addition, Grb2a is able to partially compensate for Grb2b loss-of-function in FLs and BLECs, as these structures are developing later then the lymphatics in the trunk and therefore are probably less dependent on maternal contribution. Finally, the fact that grb2b mutants show a stronger phenotype in the lymphatics in the trunk compared to the head is in accordance with previous data, showing that an impairment of a specific region of the tyrosine kinase domain of Vegfr3, leading to a decrease in ERK signaling, is affecting TD, but not FLs formation [16]. The exceptional situation that a critical Vegfr3 pathway component is required in ECs, but appears to be dispensable in (most) other tissues, allowed the study of the role of this particular adaptor protein in venous sprouting and lymphangiogenesis.
From in vitro data, GRB2 has been suggested to be part of the VEGFC/VEGFR3 signaling pathway [20]. GRB2 was shown to directly bind VEGFR3 protein via protein blotting analysis from HUVEC (human umbilical vein endothelial cell) extracts [20], but an in vivo demonstration of Grb2 acting in concert with VEGFR3 had been missing. By injecting carefully titrated amounts of vegfr3 MOs, we provide such demonstration: simultaneous lowering of Vegfr3 activity leads to an exacerbation of the lymphatic phenotype in grb2b heterozygous embryos, while no effect is noticed in wild-type embryos.
Members of the Vegfc/Vegfr3 pathway have been previously analyzed in zebrafish. Mutants in vegfc, ccbe1 and adamts3; adamts14 all lack lymphatics structures (PLs and TD), and vISVs fail to develop at 48hpf [4, 6, 10]. Significantly, and in contrast to the above genes, embryos deficient of Grb2b are also missing lymphatic vessels, but they retain a considerable number of veins. This unique characteristic is likely explained by the presence of additional pathways downstream of Vegfc/Vegfr3, the most likely one being PI3K/Akt [38, 44], which is Grb2b independent and presumably still active in endothelial cells that retain a certain protrusive and proliferative activity in grb2b mutants. Based on in vitro data, the MEK/ERK pathway is known to be activated downstream of VEGFR3 homodimers, leading to cell proliferation and migration [44]. In mice, ERK signaling was shown to be linked to lymphatic development [45]. It regulates SOX18 and PROX1 expression in endothelial cells in the vein leading to lymphatic commitment [45]. Moreover, abnormalities in the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway result in developmental disorders in human, including lymphedema [45, 46]. In zebrafish, ERK was shown to be the essential downstream effector of Vegfr3 signaling for differentiation and sprouting of future lymphatic endothelial cells in the trunk [16]. Here, we show that grb2b mutants have a decreased number of pERK+ endothelial cells at 32hpf and that most of them are located in the ventral side of the PCV. Grb2b is therefore needed as an upstream moderator of these downstream signaling events for a balanced activation of the MEK/ERK cascade, which leads to a correct migration of endothelial cells within the vein prior to sprouting.
The main reason why grb2b mutants lack lymphatics appears to be a defect in secondary sprouting. In the absence of Grb2b, sprouts fail to emerge from the PCV in 54.5% of cases, and in 39% of cases only thin filopodia or bigger sprouts form, but without generating a functional outcome such as vein or PL formation. Previous work suggested that after the PCV undergoes a ventral-to-dorsal polarization, Prox1a expressing cells divide asymmetrically within the PCV, giving rise to one cell with high Prox1a expression levels that is subsequently sprouting from the vein and gives rise to a PL cell in the vast majority of cases [13]. grb2b mutant embryos show a 27% decrease in Prox1+ cells in the PCV and polarization is defective at 32hpf, as endothelial cells are equally distributed within the PCV, while the total number of nuclei is unchanged. These data suggest an impairment in cell re-arrangement rather than proliferation. Moreover, the decrease in Prox1 expression in grb2b mutants correlates with a similar phenotype in Vegfc and Vegfr3 morphants [13], supporting the notion that Grb2b acts within this pathway and is likewise involved in Prox1 induction. However, the 27% decrease in Prox1 expression is unlikely to account for the almost complete lack of PLs and for the increase in aISV/vISV ratio, and therefore other events must be influenced by Grb2b.
Recently, it was postulated that an ISV-intrinsic pre-pattern, rather than a specification event within secondary sprouts themselves, has a critical influence on sprout behavior and ultimately cell fate decision [14]. Endothelial cells from the PCV migrate out to form a connection with an aISV and then either detach again in order to migrate to the HM, or they build a stable, lumenized connection and remodel the artery into a vein. This process depends on Notch signaling levels within the aISVs [14], with low arterial Dll4 levels allowing vein formation, while high levels ultimately favor PL formation. We extend this model and demonstrate that different levels of Grb2b activity (and therefore presumably different levels of Vegfc signaling) are required for venous and lymphatic sprout behavior. In the absence of Grb2b, embryos are unable to form PLs, but a fraction of venous sprouts makes physical connections to nearby arteries, leading to the formation of several veins (6%) (Fig. 9a, b). Our interpretation is that sprouts giving rise to vISVs do not have to move away from the PCV completely, and those secondary sprouts that manage to establish critical connectivity to Dll4-low aISVs will have, in some cases, the ability to establish a stable connection and to generate a vein. In grb2b mutants, alternative Vegfr3 downstream pathways (e.g., PI3K signaling) are apparently sufficient to provide enough signaling input to allow this step to happen. In the absence of any ISVs that secondary sprouts could connect to (plcγ-1 morphants), grb2b mutants fail to form persistent sprouts, suggesting that the connection to an ISV is required to stabilize the venous sprouts in the absence of Grb2b (Fig. 9c).
Lymphatic sprouts, however, which connect to a Dll4-high aISV, would have to migrate out of the PCV in order to reach the HM, and for this step Grb2b activity is more critically required. Indeed, a role for GRB2 in cell migration has been suggested based on in vitro data [47]. After inducing angiogenesis in HUVECs, cells showed an increased migratory behavior, which could be suppressed by a GRB2 antagonist [47]. The observation of a complete failure in PL formation, even when arteries are present and while some veins are being formed, points at a higher requirement for Grb2b in future PL cells versus venous sprouts.
In the absence of Notch signaling, in otherwise wild-type embryos, most aISVs are converted into veins most likely due to the lack of a repulsive force or the presence of an attractive force within ISVs (Fig. 9d) [41]. If both Grb2b and Notch signaling are missing, almost all cells that manage to sprout from the PCV are able to remodel aISVs: upon dll4 knockdown, grb2b mutants developed veins in 85% of the observed cases (Fig. 9d). Here we see a partial rescue of the number of sprouts, which is in line with the notion that the reduced Vegfr3 signaling levels in grb2b mutants might only be permissive for the generation of sprouts that are able to connect to a nearby ISV but not for sprouts that have to migrate all the way up to the horizontal myoseptum to give rise to a PL cell.
In conclusion, we have shown a severe impairment of the lymphatic vasculature due to a loss-of-function mutation in the grb2b gene. Grb2b is not only needed for the formation of lymphatic precursor cells, but also for the correct sprouting of endothelial cells in the PCV. Alternative Vegfr3 downstream signaling pathways enable a fraction of venous sprouts to form veins in grb2b mutants, but apparently higher levels of Vegfr3 signaling outputs are required in PLs. Whether higher Grb2b activity in future PLs is an intrinsic property of lymphatic sprouts, or whether it is a feature depending on interaction with pre-patterned aISVs remains to be determined.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank Terhi Karpanen and the Hubrecht screen team for participating in the initial screen.
Author contributions
C.M., A.v.I. and S.S.-M. conceived and designed experiments. C.M. and A.v.I. performed experiments and analyzed data. S.S.-M., A.v.I. and C.M. wrote the paper. E.W.M. analyzed whole genome sequencing data.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.. This work was supported by CRC1348 (A.v.I.; S.S.-M.) and Cells in Motion Cluster of Excellence (Münster).
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Mauri C, Wang G, Schulte-Merker S. From fish embryos to human patients: lymphangiogenesis in development and disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2018;53:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alitalo K. The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1371–1380. doi: 10.1038/nm.2545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Joukov V, Sorsa T, Kumar V, Jeltsch M, Claesson-Welsh L, Cao Y, Saksela O, Kalkkinen N, Alitalo K. Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C. EMBO J. 1997;16(13):3898–3911. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Le Guen L, Karpanen T, Schulte D, Harris NC, Koltowska K, Roukens G, Bower NI, van Impel A, Stacker SA, Achen MG, Schulte-Merker S, Hogan BM. Ccbe1 regulates Vegfc-mediated induction of Vegfr3 signaling during embryonic lymphangiogenesis. Development. 2014;141(6):1239–1249. doi: 10.1242/dev.100495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jeltsch M, Jha SK, Tvorogov D, Anisimov A, Leppanen VM, Holopainen T, Kivela R, Ortega S, Karpanen T, Alitalo K. CCBE1 enhances lymphangiogenesis via A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin motifs-3-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor-C activation. Circulation. 2014;129(19):1962–1971. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang G, Muhl L, Padberg Y, Dupont L, Peterson-Maduro J, Stehling M, le Noble F, Colige A, Betsholtz C, Schulte-Merker S, van Impel A. Specific fibroblast subpopulations and neuronal structures provide local sources of Vegfc-processing components during zebrafish lymphangiogenesis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2724. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16552-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hagerling R, Pollmann C, Andreas M, Schmidt C, Nurmi H, Adams RH, Alitalo K, Andresen V, Schulte-Merker S, Kiefer F. A novel multistep mechanism for initial lymphangiogenesis in mouse embryos based on ultramicroscopy. EMBO J. 2013;32(5):629–644. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hogan BM, Schulte-Merker S. How to plumb a Pisces: understanding vascular development and disease using zebrafish embryos. Dev Cell. 2017;42(6):567–583. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bussmann J, Bos FL, Urasaki A, Kawakami K, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S. Arteries provide essential guidance cues for lymphatic endothelial cells in the zebrafish trunk. Development. 2010;137(16):2653–2657. doi: 10.1242/dev.048207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hogan BM, Herpers R, Witte M, Helotera H, Alitalo K, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S. Vegfc/Flt4 signalling is suppressed by Dll4 in developing zebrafish intersegmental arteries. Development. 2009;136(23):4001–4009. doi: 10.1242/dev.039990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van Impel A, Zhao Z, Hermkens DM, Roukens MG, Fischer JC, Peterson-Maduro J, Duckers H, Ober EA, Ingham PW, Schulte-Merker S. Divergence of zebrafish and mouse lymphatic cell fate specification pathways. Development. 2014;141(6):1228–1238. doi: 10.1242/dev.105031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tao S, Witte M, Bryson-Richardson RJ, Currie PD, Hogan BM, Schulte-Merker S. Zebrafish prox1b mutants develop a lymphatic vasculature, and prox1b does not specifically mark lymphatic endothelial cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koltowska K, Lagendijk AK, Pichol-Thievend C, Fischer JC, Francois M, Ober EA, Yap AS, Hogan BM. Vegfc regulates bipotential precursor division and Prox1 expression to promote lymphatic identity in zebrafish. Cell Rep. 2015;13(9):1828–1841. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Geudens I, Coxam B, Alt S, Gebala V, Vion AC, Meier K, Rosa A, Gerhardt H. Artery-vein specification in the zebrafish trunk is pre-patterned by heterogeneous Notch activity and balanced by flow-mediated fine-tuning. Development. 2019 doi: 10.1242/dev.181024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hogan BM, Bos FL, Bussmann J, Witte M, Chi NC, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S. Ccbe1 is required for embryonic lymphangiogenesis and venous sprouting. Nat Genet. 2009;41(4):396–398. doi: 10.1038/ng.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shin M, Male I, Beane TJ, Villefranc JA, Kok FO, Zhu LJ, Lawson ND. Vegfc acts through ERK to induce sprouting and differentiation of trunk lymphatic progenitors. Development. 2016;143(20):3785–3795. doi: 10.1242/dev.137901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lowenstein EJ, Daly RJ, Batzer AG, Li W, Margolis B, Lammers R, Ullrich A, Skolnik EY, Bar-Sagi D, Schlessinger J. The SH2 and SH3 domain-containing protein GRB2 links receptor tyrosine kinases to ras signaling. Cell. 1992;70(3):431–442. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90167-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ren R, Mayer BJ, Cicchetti P, Baltimore D. Identification of a ten-amino acid proline-rich SH3 binding site. Science (New York, NY) 1993;259(5098):1157–1161. doi: 10.1126/science.8438166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chardin P, Camonis JH, Gale NW, van Aelst L, Schlessinger J, Wigler MH, Bar-Sagi D. Human Sos1: a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras that binds to GRB2. Science (New York, NY) 1993;260(5112):1338–1343. doi: 10.1126/science.8493579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Salameh A, Galvagni F, Bardelli M, Bussolino F, Oliviero S. Direct recruitment of CRK and GRB2 to VEGFR-3 induces proliferation, migration, and survival of endothelial cells through the activation of ERK, AKT, and JNK pathways. Blood. 2005;106(10):3423–3431. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alestrom P, D'Angelo L, Midtlyng PJ, Schorderet DF, Schulte-Merker S, Sohm F, Warner S. Zebrafish: housing and husbandry recommendations. Lab Anim. 2019 doi: 10.1177/0023677219869037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bussmann J, Schulte-Merker S. Rapid BAC selection for tol2-mediated transgenesis in zebrafish. Development. 2011;138(19):4327–4332. doi: 10.1242/dev.068080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2002;248(2):307–318. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roman BL, Pham VN, Lawson ND, Kulik M, Childs S, Lekven AC, Garrity DM, Moon RT, Fishman MC, Lechleider RJ, Weinstein BM. Disruption of acvrl1 increases endothelial cell number in zebrafish cranial vessels. Development. 2002;129(12):3009–3019. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.12.3009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Asakawa K, Suster ML, Mizusawa K, Nagayoshi S, Kotani T, Urasaki A, Kishimoto Y, Hibi M, Kawakami K. Genetic dissection of neural circuits by Tol2 transposon-mediated Gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(4):1255–1260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704963105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gagnon JA, Valen E, Thyme SB, Huang P, Akhmetova L, Pauli A, Montague TG, Zimmerman S, Richter C, Schier AF. Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e98186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schulte-Merker S. Looking at embryos. In: Nusslein-Volhard C, editor. Zebrafish: a practical approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mackay EW, Schulte-Merker S. A statistical approach to mutation detection in zebrafish with next-generation sequencing. J Appl Ichthyol. 2014;30(4):696–700. doi: 10.1111/jai.12528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guruprasad L, Dhanaraj V, Timm D, Blundell TL, Gout I, Waterfield MD. The crystal structure of the N-terminal SH3 domain of Grb2. J Mol Biol. 1995;248(4):856–866. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim JH, Lee SR, Li LH, Park HJ, Park JH, Lee KY, Kim MK, Shin BA, Choi SY. High cleavage efficiency of a 2A peptide derived from porcine teschovirus-1 in human cell lines, zebrafish and mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bower NI, Koltowska K, Pichol-Thievend C, Virshup I, Paterson S, Lagendijk AK, Wang W, Lindsey BW, Bent SJ, Baek S, Rondon-Galeano M, Hurley DG, Mochizuki N, Simons C, Francois M, Wells CA, Kaslin J, Hogan BM. Mural lymphatic endothelial cells regulate meningeal angiogenesis in the zebrafish. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(6):774–783. doi: 10.1038/nn.4558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Okuda KS, Astin JW, Misa JP, Flores MV, Crosier KE, Crosier PS. lyve1 expression reveals novel lymphatic vessels and new mechanisms for lymphatic vessel development in zebrafish. Development. 2012;139(13):2381–2391. doi: 10.1242/dev.077701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van Lessen M, Shibata-Germanos S, van Impel A, Hawkins TA, Rihel J, Schulte-Merker S. Intracellular uptake of macromolecules by brain lymphatic endothelial cells during zebrafish embryonic development. eLife. 2017 doi: 10.7554/eLife.25932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Venero Galanternik M, Castranova D, Gore AV, Blewett NH, Jung HM, Stratman AN, Kirby MR, Iben J, Miller MF, Kawakami K, Maraia RJ, Weinstein BM. A novel perivascular cell population in the zebrafish brain. eLife. 2017 doi: 10.7554/eLife.24369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fournier E, Dubreuil P, Birnbaum D, Borg JP. Mutation at tyrosine residue 1337 abrogates ligand-dependent transforming capacity of the FLT4 receptor. Oncogene. 1995;11(5):921–931. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gordon K, Schulte D, Brice G, Simpson MA, Roukens MG, van Impel A, Connell F, Kalidas K, Jeffery S, Mortimer PS, Mansour S, Schulte-Merker S, Ostergaard P. Mutation in vascular endothelial growth factor-C, a ligand for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3, is associated with autosomal dominant milroy-like primary lymphedema. Circ Res. 2013;112(6):956–960. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Makinen T, Veikkola T, Mustjoki S, Karpanen T, Catimel B, Nice EC, Wise L, Mercer A, Kowalski H, Kerjaschki D, Stacker SA, Achen MG, Alitalo K. Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF-C/D receptor VEGFR-3. EMBO J. 2001;20(17):4762–4773. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lawson ND, Mugford JW, Diamond BA, Weinstein BM. phospholipase C gamma-1 is required downstream of vascular endothelial growth factor during arterial development. Genes Dev. 2003;17(11):1346–1351. doi: 10.1101/gad.1072203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Leslie JD, Ariza-McNaughton L, Bermange AL, McAdow R, Johnson SL, Lewis J. Endothelial signalling by the Notch ligand Delta-like 4 restricts angiogenesis. Development. 2007;134(5):839–844. doi: 10.1242/dev.003244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Geudens I, Herpers R, Hermans K, Segura I, Ruiz de Almodovar C, Bussmann J, De Smet F, Vandevelde W, Hogan BM, Siekmann A, Claes F, Moore JC, Pistocchi AS, Loges S, Mazzone M, Mariggi G, Fo B, Cotelli F, Kerjaschki D, Noël A, Foidart J-M, Gerhardt H, Ny A, Langenberg T, Lawson ND, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S, Carmeliet P, Dewerchin M. Role of Delta-like-4/Notch in the formation and wiring of the lymphatic network in zebrafish. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(9):1695–1702. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.110.203034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cheng AM, Saxton TM, Sakai R, Kulkarni S, Mbamalu G, Vogel W, Tortorice CG, Cardiff RD, Cross JC, Muller WJ, Pawson T. Mammalian Grb2 regulates multiple steps in embryonic development and malignant transformation. Cell. 1998;95(6):793–803. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81702-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Harvey SA, Sealy I, Kettleborough R, Fenyes F, White R, Stemple D, Smith JC. Identification of the zebrafish maternal and paternal transcriptomes. Development. 2013;140(13):2703–2710. doi: 10.1242/dev.095091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Deng Y, Zhang X, Simons M. Molecular controls of lymphatic VEGFR3 signaling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(2):421–429. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Deng Y, Atri D, Eichmann A, Simons M. Endothelial ERK signaling controls lymphatic fate specification. J Clin Investig. 2013;123(3):1202–1215. doi: 10.1172/JCI63034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tidyman WE, Rauen KA. The RASopathies: developmental syndromes of Ras/MAPK pathway dysregulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(3):230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Soriano JV, Liu N, Gao Y, Yao ZJ, Ishibashi T, Underhill C, Burke TR, Jr, Bottaro DP. Inhibition of angiogenesis by growth factor receptor bound protein 2-Src homology 2 domain bound antagonists. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3(10):1289–1299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Not applicable.