Abstract
Purpose
Defining a standard norm is critical in nutritional cognitive-behavioral interventions. These norms can be derived from a statistical or value-based point of view. Religion and subsequent cultural values can have significant effects on social behaviors, especially on eating habits. In this study, the authors quantify the presence of religio-cultural nutritional behavior norms in Abrahamic scriptures.
Methods
Qualitative content analysis and descriptive analysis were applied to these texts to provide a better understanding of the subject.
Results
The extracted norms were categorized into nine main behavioral domains, and most of the observed value-based norms were in agreement with previous experimental researches.
Conclusion
There is strong emphasis on nutritional habits in value-based religio-cultural sources. The use of these norms in later policies and practices is advised. This approach can lead to healthier nutritional choices and a decrease in non-communicable diseases.
Keywords: Nutrition, Behavior modification, Value-based intervention, Religio-cultural behavior
Introduction
Behavioral studies are among the essential methods of obesity and nutritional disorders research. Most of the non-communicable diseases (NDC) are the direct result of the adaptation of high-risk nutritional habits, high-calorie intake, excessive fast food consumption, lack of vegetables and fruits in the daily diet, irregular meal patterns, immoderate use of carbonated beverages, et cetera [1, 2]. Furthermore, as the most critical cognitive outcome in humans, behavior has been subjected to many interventions by cognitive scientists for behavior modification and social norms development [3]. In this sense, normative behavior adaptation can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate cognition functions.
By exploring the previous literature in this regard, it can be understood that before designing a behavioral intervention, there should be a clear understanding of what is considered as a standard behavior in eating patterns and what differences might be presented between observed and normative behaviors. Then and only then, a successful habitual modification can be proposed. Among different definitions for norms, physiologic, social, and statistical, one can consider a place for value-based norms too. In this method, normative behavior is defined based on society’s values and beliefs and not statistics like the most frequent occurrence [4, 5]. In this view, it is possible that a normative behavior is based on a shared social value, mainly cultural and religious values, even if it is not widely adopted in society. The effect of culture and religions on food consumption patterns [6, 7] is well established, so it is not unexpected to see some of the most mentioned value-based norms in scriptures concerns nutritional and eating habits [8]. Many value-based norms are present in scriptures with practical, easy to understand language for the majority of people [9].
In the present article, the authors try to categorize value-based normative nutritional habits found in Abrahamic scriptures: The New and Old Testaments (Bible and Torah), The Quran, and Ḥadīth, to investigate whether they can be used in dietary and nutritional habits research.
Methods
The authors used Mohsenian-Rads book [10] to determine value-based nutritional norms in primary scriptures. He used in-depth qualitative content analysis to remove and then re-establish context, categorized, and finally compilate these texts into eight propositional categories.
Furthermore, the authors applied qualitative content analysis on two well-known encyclopedias of Ḥadīth; the encyclopedia of medical Ḥadīth [11], and Mafatih al-Hayat [12]. The meaning units were labeled based on the open coding process; the texts were then revisited to prevent duplications and to ensure the importance of extracted units; the meaning units condensed afterward; main and sub-themes and categories were identified, and finally, a latent analysis along with a respondent validation was conducted as an attempt to compilate meanings from the text.
Subsequently, the authors organized related propositions into two main groups: eating behavior and food content. The behavioral statements were then divided into nine domains; low-calorie intake, mindful eating, meal adjustment, food/nutrition safety, dining companion, inhibition/abstinence, drinking, Halal/Kosher food, and postprandial behaviors, by an expert panel. Two other expert investigators reviewed this process to ensure the validity of the method, and they achieved the same consensus results. To form a better insight from the data, a descriptive analysis was then applied to the data.
Results
Nutritional propositions, aside from the Eucharist, were accounted for 3% of all propositions in scriptures. Below is a descriptive summary of these terms’ frequency in each one of the studied materials (Table 1).
Table 1.
Nutritional propositions in different scriptures
| Book | Number of nutritional propositions | Number of nutritional behavior propositions |
|---|---|---|
| Quran | 76 (1.7% in total) | 31 (14 prescriptional and 12 prohibitional) |
| New Testament | 36 (1.3% in total) | 14 (3 prescriptional and 11 prohibitional) |
| Old Testament | 204 (6.5% in total) | 2 (0 prescriptional and 2 prohibitional) |
There were an additional 43 prescriptional and 37 prohibitional propositions for eating habits found in Ḥadīth resources.
In total, mindful eating terms (20.3%), and postprandial behaviors (5.0%) were the most and least frequent prescriptional statements in scriptures, respectively. Moreover, the highest and lowest frequency of prohibitional terms were for drinking(19.0%) and meal adjustment (0.0%) (Table 2).
Table 2.
behavioral propositions frequency in scriptures and Ḥadīth
| Behavioral domains | Prescriptional phrases frequency (%) | Prohibitional phrases frequency(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Low-calorie intake | 6 (10.1) | 10 (15.8) |
| Mindful eating | 12 (20.3) | 7 (11.1) |
| Meal adjustment | 5 (8.4) | 0 (0) |
| Food/nutrition safety | 8 (13.5) | 7 (11.1) |
| Dining companion | 7 (11.8) | 8 (12.6) |
| Inhibition and abstinence | 8 (13.5) | 9 (14.2) |
| Drinking | 2 (3.3) | 12 (19) |
| Halal and Kosher food | 8 (13.5) | 9(14.2) |
| Postprandial behaviors | 3 (5) | 1 (1.5) |
| Total | 59 (100) | 63 (100) |
What follows is the accounted prescription concepts extracted from the scriptures and Ḥadīth divided into the nine behavioral categories (Table 3).
Table 3.
behavioral prescriptions in scriptures and Ḥadīth
| Domains of behavior | Behavioral prescriptions |
|---|---|
| Low-calorie intake | Low food intake |
| Light food and liquid consumption | |
| Moderate eating | |
| Starvation | |
| Fasting | |
| Conditional allowance of eating prohibited food | |
| Mindful eating | Performing Wudu before and after meals |
| Taking off shoes before eating | |
| Starting meals with God’s name (Grace) | |
| God’s name remembrance with each bite of food | |
| Saying God’s name for all kinds of food | |
| Eat with the right hand | |
| Eat what is set before you | |
| Taking food in smaller portions | |
| Chewing food properly | |
| Slow eating | |
| Eating with hand and fingers | |
| Eating foods crumbs | |
| Meals adjustment | Eating in the morning and at night and nothing in between |
| Eating early meals, breakfast, etc. | |
| Having dinner | |
| Having dinner after sunset | |
| Eating after the morning pray | |
| Food and nutrition safety | Wholesome eating that benefits the body |
| Washing hands before and after eating | |
| Eating before the food gets cold | |
| Have salt before each meal | |
| Eating clean/Halal food | |
| Eating form the clean offerings of God | |
| Eating from God’s blessed creations | |
| Eating from what God allows | |
| Eating companion | Eat together |
| Accept invitations to drink and eat | |
| Allowance of eating from the food in houses of close family or siblings | |
| Allowance of eating from the food in the houses that you have a key to | |
| Allowance of eating alone or together | |
| Eating with happiness and devotion | |
| Allowance of eating with none-believers without considering the Halal/Kosher status. | |
| Inhibition and abstinence | Avoid getting full when eating |
| Filling utmost half one’s stomach | |
| Eat form everything, but avoid overindulging | |
| Avoid eating harmful foods | |
| Practicing abstinence is better than treatment | |
| Leaving the table, when you still have an appetite for the food | |
| Starting the meal with the lightest food and commensurately | |
| Eating seasonally | |
| Drinking | Drinking in three sips |
| Drinking water while standing up | |
| Clean and Hala food | Eating Halal/Kosher food |
| Eating and drinking from what God provided. | |
| Eating only from clean/Halal food | |
| Eatinng the food of those who follow an Abarahamic religion | |
| Eating Dhabihah | |
| Eating from what God has provided you which is clean | |
| Eating from God’s gits | |
| Knowing that your faith will allow you to eat any food you want | |
| Postprandial behaviors | Finishing meal with salt |
| Touching face after the meal is finished with cleaned hand | |
| Lying on the back after eating and placing the right foot to be on the left |
Below are the accounted prohibitions concepts extracted from the scriptures and Ḥadīth divided into the nine behavioral categories (Table 4).
Table 4.
behavioral prohibitions in scriptures and Ḥadīth
| Domains of behavior | Behavioral prohibitions |
|---|---|
| Low-calorie intake | Filling the stomach to the fullest |
| Overeating | |
| Eating more than what the body needs | |
| Eating excessively | |
| Burping that caused by overeating | |
| Eating after getting full | |
| Eating when you are not hungry | |
| Eating and drinking extravagantly | |
| Keeping away from overeating | |
| Mindful eating | Eating with the left hand |
| Eating while walking | |
| Eating in bazaar | |
| Eating while leaning on something | |
| Eating with doubt about the status of the meal | |
| Eating while being Jonub | |
| Eating form what’s not in front of you | |
| Meal adjustment | – |
| Food and nutrition safety | Prohibiting Hala food from yourself |
| Taking clean/Halal food as an unclean one | |
| Eating from prohibited food | |
| Blowing on the foods and liquids | |
| Taking scorching food | |
| Drinking and eating from gold, silver, and copper tableware | |
| Eating together | Eating alone |
| Withdrawing food from others | |
| Condemning those who will eat any kind of food | |
| Eating forbidden food that can make others uncomfortable | |
| Causing others disturbance while eating | |
| Letting your food cause slander | |
| Allowing others to complain about your eating | |
| Allowing others to complain about your drinking | |
| Inhibition and abstinence | Eating different kinds of food in a meal |
| Gorging on food | |
| Eating more than you intended | |
| Eating without appetite | |
| Eating all that you like | |
| Avoid what God made lawful to you to consume | |
| Overeating on Halal/clean food. | |
| Overeating that anger’s God | |
| Forbidding comestibles for other thankful believers | |
| Drinking | Blowing in beverages |
| Drinking water with one sip | |
| Drinking scorching liquids | |
| Drinking in the middle of the food | |
| Drinking after eating meat | |
| Drinking after eating greasy food | |
| Drinking from the broken edge or the handler side | |
| Drinking cold water after eating hot food | |
| Drinking too much water | |
| Drinking cold water in a shower | |
| Drinking from plates | |
| Drinking while standing at night | |
| Halal and clean food | Eating none Dhabihah meat |
| Not eating food because God’s name was used in their preparation | |
| Eating food that God’s name was not used in their preparation | |
| Forbidding Halal/clean food that God provided | |
| Eating foods that a name other than God was used while preparing them | |
| Eating in polytheists’ temple | |
| Eating any creatures without considering if it is permissible | |
| Eating unclean (non-halal) animals that spoil the spirit | |
| Postprandial behaviors | Sleeping after Eating |
Discussion
This study has shown that there is s strong emphasis on nutritional habits in value-based religio-cultural sources, just like experimental behavioral investigations. As mentioned, dietary behavior propositions build roughly 3% of overall statements in scriptures. In the Old Testament, it goes as high as 6.5% of all propositions. This clearly shows the importance of these behaviors in these religions.
Many of the nine domains in this value-based study fall in line with previous experimental studies; In some of these experiments, limiting calorie intake is an essential step toward a decrease in NCD such as diabetes, cardiovascular, and cancers [13]; e.g., Das and her colleges have identified one of the factors that can decelerate aging process in various tissues as calorie restriction [14]. This a good indication that just how much these relatively small interventions can have meaningful results.
Mindful eating is another vital strategy in behavioral interventions that can affect hormonal inhibition of the hunger pathway [15]. Similarly, we can see that 20.3% of our reported value-based propositions are in the mindful eating domain. While the effect of meal adjustments, e.g., the impact of breakfast in increasing the cognitive functions in different age groups, or the Lopez study in which he demonstrated a connection between late dinner and glucose tolerance, are still ambiguous, these studies are getting more attention in the nutritional investigations [16–19].
Food and nutrition safety is yet another critical topic, especially for policy and public health decision-makers. Howbeit the religio-cultural proposed approach in this domain mostly concerns the individuals; these exceptional values can grantee the public’s food security if they get accepted by society [20–22].
Some studies suggest that food companionship, especially eating with family, can positively affect eating behavior modifications, prevention of gastrointestinal disorders, and obesity [23, 24]. Some even considered this approach to elevate society’s mental health status [25]. These findings agree with our extracted value-based approach that it is better to eat in groups, like with family, than alone.
Inhibitory control education among children can result in a healthier food choice on their part [26]; moreover, there is a relationship between impaired executive function and eating disorders [27]. Combined with the value-based propositions, we can see how an inhibitory attitude can lead to more positive eating behavior [28].
The proposed religio-cultural norms for drinking habits are mainly prohibitory ones. In fact, the most frequent prohibitional phrases about nutrition in scriptures are about drinking (12%). Although some research on body water homeostasis and the effect of low water consumption had been done in the past, the behavioral aspect of drinking, like time and the drink properties, has been neglected [29, 30]. We believe more research in this area can expand our understanding of these less attended domains.
Exhortation to use clean food (Halal/Kosher) while possessing small variation is emphasized in all scriptures. Studies on clean eating, which experienced an acceleration in recent years chiefly because of food industry interest, are inconclusive [31, 32]. So a more throughout research in this area can be beneficial for practitioners and the food industry.
Postprandial behaviors can be another entry point for behavior modification, e.g., postprandial sleep positions have been associated with gastroesophageal reflux [33], but more research on this subject is advisable.
It is important to note that these value-based norms are actionable, easy to understand concepts with simplified language that can be integrated into communities’ lifestyle. Three points should be considered in this study. First, the oversimplification of examples to illustrate an idea, while they can arouse some superficial conflicts with experimental studies, will not change the proposition’s underlying concept. Second, the validity of sources can play huge roles in these researches; if there is no consensus on a source validity, it is best practice to avoid using it. Lastly, an object meaning could have changed dramatically through history; for example, while salt was regarded as a scarce commodity with significant economic burdens in the past [34], the same implications do not hold for the current state of this good. Hence the proposed use of salt before each meal might not be in conflict with scientific experiments.
Conclusion
In this study, we tried to explore religio-cultural values that take nutritional behaviors into account. We reached nine main domains that addressed this subject and investigated their use in recent researches. The results show a meaningful overlap between the religio-cultural norms and other experimental findings. Combined with our previous knowledge about the effect of religion on culture and subsequently on society, we believe utilizing these norms in practice can result in better behavior intervention acceptance, healthier nutritional choices, and a decrease in NCDs. This method seems feasible, especially in countries that tend to be more religious. On another note, we suggest expanding this study by investigating other religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Messrs. Jalal Farzami, Dr. Hamid-Reza Mostafid, and Ali Movahhedi for their kind cooperation in ensuring the accuracy of statistical analysis and scripture selection.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Ata Pourabbasi, Email: atapoura@gmail.com.
Amin Akbari Ahangar, Email: akbari@protonmail.com.
Sarah Nouriyengejeh, Email: noorisarah87@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Baird J, et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: a Lifecourse approach to the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Healthcare. 2017;5(1):14. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.P. Malambo, A. P. Kengne, A. De Villiers, E. V. Lambert, and T. Puoane, "Built environment, selected risk factors and major cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review," PLoS One, 11, 11. Public Library of Science, 2016, 10.1371/journal.pone.0166846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Pourabbasi A, Larijani B. COGNITOMICS: a new approach for the evaluation of the relationship between diseases and cognition to be designed based on normal behavioral tendencies in real life, a conceptual framework. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16(1) BioMed Central Ltd. 10.1186/s40200-017-0301-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms: research article. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(5):429–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Magolda P, Ebben K. Students serving Christ: understanding the role of student subcultures on a college campus. Anthropol Educ Q. 38WileyAmerican Anthropological Association:138–58. 10.2307/25166613.
- 6.Shipman D, Durmus B. The effect of culture on food consumption; a case of special religious days in Turkey. J Food Res. 2017;6(2):92. doi: 10.5539/jfr.v6n2p92. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ngongalah L, Rankin J, Rapley T, Odeniyi A, Akhter Z, Heslehurst N. Dietary and physical activity behaviours in African migrant women living in high income countries: a systematic review and framework synthesis. Nutrients. 2018;10(8) MDPI AG. 10.3390/nu10081017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Sabaté J. Religion, diet and research. Br J Nutr. 2004;92(2):199–201. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pakeeza S, Chishti AA. Role of religion in understanding norms and values. Int J Asian Soc Sci. 2012;2(10):1851–1857. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mohsenian Rad M. Norms in the Three Holy Books of The Torah, The Evangel and The Quran, 1st ed. Qom: University of Religions and Denominations; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mohammadi Rayshahri M. Encyclopedia of medical Ḥadīth. Qom: Dar al-Hadith; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Javadi-Amoli A. Mafatih Al-Hayat. Qom: Asra; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Most J, Tosti V, Redman LM, Fontana L. Calorie restriction in humans: an update. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Das SK, Balasubramanian P, Weerasekara YK. Nutrition modulation of human aging: the calorie restriction paradigm. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;455:148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miller CK, Kristeller JL, Headings A, Nagaraja H. Comparison of a mindful eating intervention to a diabetes self-management intervention among adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Behav. 2014;41(2):145–154. doi: 10.1177/1090198113493092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoyland A, Dye L, Lawton CL. A systematic review of the effect of breakfast on the cognitive performance of children and adolescents. Nutr Res Rev. 2009;22(2):220–243. doi: 10.1017/S0954422409990175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lopez-Minguez J, Saxena R, Bandín C, Scheer FA, Garaulet M. Late dinner impairs glucose tolerance in MTNR1B risk allele carriers: a randomized, cross-over study. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(4):1133–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Edefonti V, Bravi F, Ferraroni M. Breakfast and behavior in morning tasks: facts or fads? J Affect Disord. 2017;224:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adolphus K, Bellissimo N, Lawton CL, Ford NA, Rains TM, Totosy de Zepetnek J, et al. Methodological challenges in studies examining the effects of breakfast on cognitive performance and appetite in children and adolescents. Adv Nutr An Int Rev J. 2017;8(1):184S–196S. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nyarugwe SP, et al. An intercontinental analysis of food safety culture in view of food safety governance and national values. Food Control. 2020;111. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107075.
- 21.Landrigan PJ, et al. The lancet commission on pollution and health. Lancet. 2018;391(10119):462–512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Augusto PE. Challenges, trends and opportunities in food processing. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2020;35:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Larson N, MacLehose R, Fulkerson JA, Berge JM, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D. Eating breakfast and dinner together as a family: associations with Sociodemographic characteristics and implications for diet quality and weight status. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(12):1601–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ishikawa M, et al. 'Eating together' is associated with food behaviors and demographic factors of older Japanese people who live alone. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(6):662–672. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0805-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yiengprugsawan V, Banwell C, Takeda W, Dixon J, Seubsman SA, Sleigh AC. Health, happiness and eating together: what can a large Thai cohort study tell us? Global J Health Sci. 2015;7(4):270–277. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Porter L, Bailey-Jones C, Priudokaite G, Allen S, Wood K, Stiles K, Parvin O, Javaid M, Verbruggen F, Lawrence NS. From cookies to carrots; the effect of inhibitory control training on children's snack selections. Appetite. 2018;124:111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eneva KT, Arlt JM, Yiu A, Murray SM, Chen EY. Assessment of executive functioning in binge-eating disorder independent of weight status. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(8):942–951. doi: 10.1002/eat.22738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dohle S, Diel K, Hofmann W. Executive functions and the self-regulation of eating behavior: a review. Appetite. 2018;124:4–9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cohen ZD, Kim TT, Van HL, Dekker JJM, Driessen E. A demonstration of a multi-method variable selection approach for treatment selection: recommending cognitive–behavioral versus psychodynamic therapy for mild to moderate adult depression. Psychother Res. 2020;30(2):137–150. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1563312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goodman AB, Blanck HM, Sherry B, Park S, Nebeling L, Yaroch AL. Behaviors and attitudes associated with low drinking water intake among us adults, food attitudes and behaviors survey, 2007. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10(4):1–10. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakyinsige K, Man YBC, Sazili AQ. Halal authenticity issues in meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 2012;91(3):207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Premanandh J, Bin Salem S. Progress and challenges associated with halal authentication of consumer packaged goods. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97(14):4672–4678. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Khoury RM, Camacho-Lobato L. Influence of spontaneous sleep positions on nighttime recumbent reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(8):2069–2073. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kurlansky M. Salt: a world history. New York: Penguin Books; 2003.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
