Skip to main content
Micromachines logoLink to Micromachines
. 2021 May 27;12(6):619. doi: 10.3390/mi12060619

Switchable and Dual-Tunable Multilayered Terahertz Absorber Based on Patterned Graphene and Vanadium Dioxide

Hongyao Liu 1,2, Panpan Wang 1, Jiali Wu 1, Xin Yan 1,*, Xueguang Yuan 1, Yangan Zhang 1, Xia Zhang 1
Editor: Shideh Kabiri Ameri
PMCID: PMC8226437  PMID: 34072164

Abstract

In this paper, a switchable and dual-tunable terahertz absorber based on patterned graphene and vanadium dioxide is proposed and analyzed. By controlling the Fermi level of graphene and the temperature of vanadium dioxide, the device’s function can be switched and its absorbing properties can be tuned. When the vanadium dioxide is in an insulator state, the device can be switched from near-total reflection (>97%) to ultra-broadband absorption (4.5–10.61 THz) as the Fermi level of graphene changes from 0 to 0.8 eV. When the vanadium dioxide is changed to a metal state, the device can act as a single-band absorber (when the Fermi level of graphene is 0 eV) and a dual-band absorber with peaks of 4.16 THz and 7.3 THz (when the Fermi level of graphene is 0.8 eV). Additionally, the absorber is polarization-insensitive and can maintain a stable high-absorption performance within a 55° incidence angle. The multilayered structure shows great potential for switchable and tunable high-performance terahertz devices.

Keywords: multilayered, switchable, dual-tunable, terahertz, patterned graphene, phase-change material vanadium dioxide

1. Introduction

The efficient absorption of incident waves in terahertz (THz) bands is of significance for a wide range of applications such as imaging, food quality control, communication, spectroscopy, and sensing devices [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Metamaterial THz technology has been widely used and investigated in absorbers [7,8,9,10,11]. Graphene is considered one of the most promising metamaterials for tunable THz absorbers since its conductivity can be easily changed either by manipulating the Fermi energy through chemical doping or by applying a gate voltage [12,13,14,15]. Owing to its distinctive electromagnetic and optical properties, graphene is widely considered one of the most effective and promising metamaterials for designing tunable THz absorbers. Different broadband absorbers made of graphene with patterned disks and ribbons have been widely studied [7,16,17,18,19]. Multilayer structure graphene-based absorbers and dual-band absorbers have also been proposed and analyzed [1,20,21,22,23,24]. However, the tunability of graphene absorbers is still limited since, in practice, the Fermi energy level can only be tuned within a small range of 0–0.9 eV [25,26]. Moreover, most of the absorbers exhibit a single and unswitchable function that cannot meet various applications.

An efficient approach for realizing switchable and tunable terahertz absorbers is to combine other materials with graphene. This achieves switchable functionality and provides extra tunability. Vanadium dioxide (VO2) is an important phase change material that represents an insulator-to-metal transition. Its conductivity can be increased by four to five orders of magnitude under light, thermal approaches, and external stimuli [27,28]. When its temperature exceeds the temperature required for phase transition (68 °C), a sharp change in conductivity occurs until a conductivity of 2 × 105 S/m is attained. This phase change leads to a reversible transition of infrared light from transmission to reflection [29,30]. VO2 can undergo remarkable changes in its electromagnetic characteristics and can also be applied in tunable broadband THz absorber designs [31,32]. In this work, we designed a multilayered THz absorber based on the combination of patterned graphene and VO2. By controlling the Fermi levels of graphene and the temperature of VO2, the device’s function can be switched and its absorbing properties can be tuned. When VO2 is in an insulator state, the device can be switched from near-total reflection (>97%) to ultra-broadband absorption 6.11 THz (4.5–10.61 THz) as the Fermi level of graphene changes from 0 to 0.8 eV. When VO2 is transmitted to a metallic state, the device can act as a single-band absorber with an absorption band of 0.84 THz (when the Fermi energy level of graphene is 0 eV) and a dual-band absorber with absorption peaks of 4.16 THz and 7.3 THz (when the Fermi energy level of graphene is 0.8 eV). Moreover, the absorber is polarization-insensitive and can maintain a stable high-absorption performance within a 60° incidence angle. In this work, the absorption mechanism is analyzed first with an impedance matching concept [33] and then investigated by electric field distribution. Our results indicate that the device shows great potential for switchable and tunable terahertz applications.

2. Materials and Model

2.1. Patterned Graphene

As a 2D material, the surface impedance of graphene is characterized by Kubo’s formula [34]:

σg(f,μc,τ,Τ)=je2(2πfjτ1)π2[1(2πfjτ1)20ε(fd(ε)εfd(ε)ε)dε0fd(ε)fd(ε)(2πfjτ1)24(ε/)2dε (1)

where fd(ε)=[exp(εμcKBT)+1]1 is the Fermi–Dirac distribution, and μc and τ are the chemical potential and the relaxation time of graphene, respectively. , KB, and T are the reduced Planck constant, the Boltzmann constant, and the temperature in Kelvin, respectively. In addition, the surface conductivity of graphene can be divided into two parts: σg=σintra+σinter, where σinter is the inter-band conductivity and σintra is the intra-band conductivity. Compared with σintra, the inter-band conductivity (σinter) in the terahertz band can be safely neglected based on the Pauli exclusion principle. Finally, the surface conductivity of graphene can be approximated to be a Drude model [35]:

σg(f,μc,τ,Τ)σintra(f,μc,τ,Τ)=e2μcπ2j(2πf+jτ1) (2)

The surface conductivity of graphene can change by controlling its chemical potential. The relation of μc and bias voltage (Vg) can be expressed by the following approximate form [36]:

μc=vFπε0εhvgeh (3)

where εh is the permittivity of the dielectric layer, ε0 is the permittivity of the vacuum, vg is the bias voltage, e is the electron charge, and vF is the Fermi velocity. The surface impedance (Zg) of the graphene can be written as follows [37]:

Zg=1σg (4)

In our simulations, we assumed a relaxation time of τ=0.1 ps and a temperature of T=300 K. The finite element method was used to investigate the absorption performance of the proposed absorber in the frequency range of 1 to 11 THz. We numerically calculated the real and imaginary parts of the surface impedance of the graphene film with different chemical energies. The results are shown in Figure 1. The real part remains constant with an increase in the frequency, whereas the imaginary part increases monotonously as the frequency increases. It can also be observed that the real and imaginary parts of the surface impedance decrease as the chemical potential of graphene increases. Tuning can be achieved by controlling the gate voltage using an ion-gel top configuration [38]. This changes the surface impedance of the patterned graphene. Therefore, a tunable absorber is achievable.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Surface impedance versus frequency of patterned graphene.

2.2. Phase-Change Material VO2

Within THz range, the relative permittivity of VO2 can be described by the Drude model [39]:

εVO2(ω)=εωP2(σVO2)ω2+iγω (5)
ωP2(σVO2)=σVO2σ0ωP2(σ0) (6)

where ε is the infinite frequency permittivity with a numerical value of 12, γ=5.75×1013 s−1 expresses the damping frequency, and ω is the angular frequency of the incident wave. Additionally, σ0=3×105 S/m and ωp(σ0)=1.4×1015 rad/s. The conductivity of VO2 spans several orders of magnitude when it is changed from an insulator state to a metallic state by thermal and electrical stimuli [40]. As VO2 is difficult to control during its transition, two stable states of VO2 were taken into consideration for investigating the absorber. For the conductivity of VO2 (σVO2) in Equation (6), we considered values of 10 S/m and 2×105 S/m for the insulator state and metallic state, respectively [30,41]. A sharp increase in conductivity makes the impedance of an absorber mismatched with the free space impedance of some frequencies, and the absorption can be changed by this transition.

2.3. Model Design

Figure 2a shows a schematic view of the proposed structure for this paper. The dual-tunable THz absorber is composed of two graphene film layers and one VO2-gold based layer, sandwiched between a SiO2 layer with a relative permittivity of 2.25 [42]. Each layer can be fabricated by stacking a chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-grown patterned-graphene on the dielectric spacer (SiO2) which is supported by a back plate. The thicknesses of the SiO2 layers are h1, h2, and h3 from bottom to top, respectively. Here, the dielectric layers act as resonance absorption spaces. The bottom of the structure is a gold mirror with a thickness of d5 = 0.2 μm. This gold mirror is thick enough to block the propagation of electromagnetic waves and reflect the energy reduced in graphene. Absorption is strengthened by this part of the gold mirror. The first layer is an ultra-thin patterned graphene film, formed by subtracting four rectangular films from a disk with a radius of 2.7 μm. The width of the interval between these different parts is d1. For the second layer, eight rectangular films with a side length of l1 and interval width d2 were subtracted from a square patterned graphene. The third layer consists of a crossed-shaped VO2 with four gold parts in the corners of the square. The square has a thickness of d4, and the side length of the outsider square is l1 and the side length of the hollow part is l4. The absorption of the different layers affects each other, which enhances overall absorption and expands bandwidth. The electric field of the patterned graphene design is concentrated to the edge because of the local surface plasmon resonance that contributes to the absorption. Narrow intervals added to the designed pattern can increase the edge of the graphene and can enhance its absorption. Moreover, the whole structure is symmetrical to ensure that the absorber is insensitive to polarizations and incident angles within a large range. The parameters of the absorber proposed are introduced below. Figure 2b displays an ion-gel gate device for tuning the chemical level of the graphene [43]. Additionally, an important factor in the VO2’s transition is temperature. It can be tuned using electrifying and terahertz radiation. Adulteration is sometimes used to change the transition temperature in order to suit practical working conditions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) A schematic view of the graphene–VO2 based absorber and a top view of each layer. (b) Instructure of the ion-gel gate device that controls the chemical potential of the graphene. Here, S = source and D = drain.

The initial chemical potential of the graphene is assumed as μc = 0.8 eV. VO2 is in an insulator state with a conductivity of 10 S/m. Both the finite element method and ANSYS HFSS are applied to analyze the absorption characteristics of the absorber. A THz wave is applied perpendicular to the upper graphene surface. The periodic boundary conditions are used for the x-direction and the y-direction, and the Floquet ports are set in the z-direction. The absorption of the absorber can be calculated as follows:

A(f)=1R(f)T(f) (7)

where R(f)=|S11(f)|2 is the reflection and T(f)=|S21(f)|2 is the transmission. The S parameters are obtained from ANSYS HFSS. Due to the ground gold mirror, the T(f) is zero and the expression of the absorption can be simplified as follows:

A(f)=1R(f) (8)

Therefore, a relatively high absorption can be obtained when the reflection efficiency is close to zero. Furthermore, the equivalent input impedance (Zin) should match the free space impedance (Zo). The size of the patterned graphene and VO2–gold layers and the thickness of the dielectric layers can affect the input impedance of the whole structure. To facilitate simulation work, the selection and optimization of the proposed structure parameters were conducted by using the Optimetrics function in ANSYS HFSS. The parameters proposed in Figure 2a are listed in Table 1 for an intuitive view. These parameters make the impedance of the structure match the free space within the high absorption range.

Table 1.

Parameters of the proposed structure (μm).

Parameter Size Parameters Size Parameter Size
d 1 0.18 d 5 0.2 l 1 1.05
d 2 0.26 l 1 5.4 h 1 2.15
d 3 0.5 l 2 5.25 h 2 2
d 4 0.5 l 3 1.8 h 3 2.5

3. Results and Discussion

In this section, both the broadband absorption of the proposed structure and the absorptions of different parts of the structure are displayed and analyzed in Figure 3a,b, respectively. The TE incident wave is chosen. Under the simulation conditions set above, the whole structure shows an absorption of over 90% in the frequency range of 4.5–10.61 THz (6.11 THz bandwidth), which is wider than most of the existing broadband THz absorbers proposed. Additionally, the chemical energy of the two graphene layers is set to 0.8 eV, thereby making it more convenient to realize in the experiment. The central frequency (fc) is 7.56 THz, and the fractional bandwidth is 80.87%. It can be concluded that the real part of the impedance is close to 1 and that the imaginary part is close to 0, which demonstrates that the impedance of the absorber matches the free space. To further discuss the function of multilayered structures in achieving broadband absorption, the absorption curves of both single-layer and multi-layer structures are displayed in Figure 3b. Two graphene layers with different patterns appear to have two distinctive ranges of absorption over 90%. With only one layer of patterned graphene, an absorption of over 90% is relatively narrow. When two layers of patterned graphene act together, the bandwidth has an obvious broadening. The simulated results indicate that a multilayer structure can broaden the absorption range of the absorber.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) The absorption curves and normalized impedances of the absorber when μc = 0.8 eV and VO2 is in an insulator state. (b) The absorption curves of different parts of the absorber: the black line represents the absorber with three layers; the blue-green line represents the absorber with two top layers; the blue line represents the absorber with the second layer; and the red line represents the absorber with the top layer.

In order to further disclose the mechanism of the absorber, electric field distributions of the absorber have been plotted. The frequencies corresponding to the absorption peaks of the curves plotted in Figure 3a are listed in Table 2 to make browsing the information more intuitive.

Table 2.

Absorption peaks in broadband absorption.

μc and VO2 State Absorption Peaks and Corresponding Frequencies
0.8 eV Insulator Peak I Peak II Peak III
4.91 THz 100% 6.86 THz 98.50% 9.85 THz 96.35%

In order to further discuss the mechanism of the broadband absorption mode of the absorber, the electric field distributions from both an x-y perspective and y-z perspective are given in Figure 4. In the left of Figure 4, the electric field distribution is observed from an x-y perspective with different frequencies of 4.91 THz, 6.86 THz, and 9.85 THz, respectively. The upper half represents the distribution of the top circle layer, while the lower half represents the electric field distribution in the second graphene layer. In general, we found that the electric field primarily concentrates near the edges of graphene with all resonant frequencies, which indicates that local electric resonance occurs in these areas. Electric dipole resonance is also activated at the edges of the graphene layer [44]. As shown in the top graphene layer, when the simulation resonant frequency increases, edges with the peak value electric field intensity are decreased while other parts of graphene tend to have an increase in the electric field intensity. The electric field intensity becomes more dispersed and covers the entire graphene, which can be explained as a result of the local surface plasmon resonance of graphene being excited by the incident THz wave [45]. In the second graphene layer, the electric field distribution has a trend of decreasing first and then increasing with increasing simulated frequency. Similar to the results in the top layer, the peak value of the electric field at the edge of graphene decreases and an increase occurs in other parts of the graphene layer. The incident wave excites carriers and induces tangential electric fields on both the top graphene layer and the second graphene layer.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The x-y perspective and y-z perspective of electric field distribution when μc = 0.8 eV and VO2 is in an insulator state at absorption peaks of 4.91 THz, 6.86 THz, and 9.85 THz.

The electric field intensity distributions in the y-z plane of the absorber at each peak frequency are plotted in the right side of Figure 4. By comparing the electric field intensity of different parts, the important part for incident wave absorption at each resonant frequency can be distinguished. In principle, the energy consumption and optical loss in materials can be represented by the following equation:

A(λ)=2πcλε"V|El|2dV (9)

where ε is the imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity, V is the volume of the material, V is the electric field inside the material, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The electric field is trapped in graphene layers, in the VO2 layer, and in the SiO2 dielectric layers. However, the absorption effect of the dielectric layers is less effective than other parts, corresponding to electric distribution. This can be explained by Equation (9); the imaginary parts of graphene and VO2 permittivity are larger than the dielectric layers within the THz range. In resonant frequencies of 4.91 THz and 6.86 THz, energy consumption mainly occurs in the top and second graphene layers. As the resonant frequency rises to 9.85 THz, the energy consumption of the VO2 layer is strengthened since the electric field intensity increased.

The switchable function of the THz absorber is achieved by tuning both the Fermi energy level and the phase transition property of the VO2. The structure acts as a broadband THz absorber when μc is 0.8 eV and VO2 is in an insulator state and as a dual-band absorber when μc is 0.8 eV and VO2 is in a metallic state. Additionally, when the voltage applied to the graphene layers is set to 0, the device acts as a single-band absorber when the VO2 is in a metallic state and as a broadband reflector when the VO2 is in an insulator state. The reflectivity is greater than 97% because the transmission coefficient of the absorber is 0 and the absorption is less than 0.03. As shown in Figure 5a, the dual-band absorption has absorption peaks of 4.16 THz and 7.3 THz and the single-band absorption has an absorption band of 4.81–5.65 (0.84 THz). The simulated results show that the switchable working characteristics of the structure can be controlled and changed significantly.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Broadband absorption of an absorber with 0.8 eV Fermi energy levels and insulator VO2 states, dual-band absorption with 0.8 eV Fermi energy and metallic VO2 state, and single-band absorption with 0 eV and metallic absorption (TE and TM polarization). (b) Absorption with the Fermi energy level 0 eV and VO2 insulator state (TE and TM polarization).

It is of great importance to design absorbers equipped with polarization insensitivity and tolerance within a wide incident angle (θ) range. In this section, absorptions of the proposed absorber are plotted in contour maps to analyze their insensitivities in both the incident angles and polarization angles. In Figure 6, three switchable absorption modes of the absorber (broadband absorber, dual-band absorber, and single- and narrow-band absorber) are discussed with respect to different polarization angles φ and incident angles θ. In Figure 6a,d,g, the absorption spectra of the broadband, dual-band, and single narrow band are shown with different polarization φ. From our results, it can be concluded that the absorber is polarization-insensitive. This can be ascribed to the asymmetrical design of the structure. For broadband absorption, spectra with TE and TM polarized waves are represented in Figure 6b,c, respectively. Three absorption peaks in this absorption mode can keep the absorption over 80% up to a 55° incident angle for the TE mode and up to a 60° incident angle for the TM mode. As shown in Figure 6e,f, for the TE polarized incident wave, the two absorption peaks of the dual-band absorber can keep absorption over 80% up to an incident angle of 60°. The dual-band absorber can maintain stable absorption up to 65° for the TM mode, and the absorption peaks tend to have a blue shift with an increasing incident angle. In Figure 6h,i, the absorption spectra of relatively narrow and single-band absorbers with TE and TM modes are displayed, respectively. Both of these absorbers can keep the absorption peak over 80% up to an incident angle of 65°. Great tolerance for incident angle is obtained by the subwavelength structure, which can facilitate the match between the structure and the wave from free space. Overall, the switchable THz absorber proposed in this work possesses an incident angle insensitivity and a polarization insensitivity in different absorption modes.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Absorption spectra with different polarization angles (φ) and incident angles (θ) and frequency of the incident wave from 0 to 12 THz: (ac) broadband absorption when μc = 0.8 eV and VO2 is in an insulator state; (df) dual-band absorption when μc = 0.8 eV and VO2 is in a metallic state; (gi) single-band and relatively narrow absorption when μc = 0 eV and VO2 is in a metallic state.

Finally, we discuss the tunable function for the broadband absorber of Fermi energy level of the graphene and the relaxation time τ. In practical situations, different energy levels (μc) for two graphene layers are hard to implement. Therefore, the Fermi energy was set the same for each graphene layer. In Figure 7a, the values of μc are set to 0.2 eV, 0.5 eV, and 0.8 eV, respectively. Because the relaxation time is in direct proportion to the chemical potential μc, the following expression is given: τ=μμcevF2 . Here, μ is the electron mobility decided by the quality of the graphene and is fixed on 1250 cm2/Vs. Therefore, the relaxation time in Figure 7a is 0.025 ps, 0.0625 ps, and 0.1 ps for 0.2 eV, 0.5 eV, and 0.8 eV, respectively. Here, the VO2 is in an insulator state. The absorption curves of both TE and TM polarized waves are then calculated. The results indicate that the structure proposed can support different polarized incident waves. As μc increases, the absorption increases gradually and absorption peaks start to appear. Additionally, the quantity of the absorption peaks increases and the broadband absorption appears. The relationship between the Fermi energy μc and the conductivity of graphene is introduced in Section 2.1. The higher the value of μc, the greater the surface impedance of the graphene. This change leads to an increase in absorption. Moreover, the relationship between central frequency (fc) and consecutive Fermi energy levels varies within a range of 0.75 eV–0.85 eV. Tuning μc in the range of 0.8 eV ± 0.05 eV, the fc of the broadband absorber can be tuned linearly. It can be concluded that the graphene also plays an important role in controlling the structure. The relaxation time (τ) of the patterned graphene is investigated because it can be changed by the quality of the graphene [46].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) Absorptions with different polarizations; Fermi energy levels (μc) of 0.2 eV, 0.5 eV, and 0.8 eV; and τ=μμcevF2. (b) Central frequencies with consecutive Fermi energy levels from 0.75 eV to 0.85 eV.

In order to compare our absorber with other absorbers in the references, we listed the main properties of broadband absorbers in Table 3. Compared with other structures, the hybrid absorber exhibits both a significantly larger bandwidth and a higher fractional bandwidth with a small number of layers, showing great potential for miniaturized broadband THz applications.

Table 3.

Comparison of important properties of THz absorbers.

References Absorption Bandwidth (THz) 1 Material Layers Stable Incident Angle Polarization Insensitivity
[19] 2.76 (2.14–4.90) Graphene 1 Up to 60° Insensitive
[11] 3.7 (1.95–5.65) Gold 1 Up to 20° Insensitive
[1] 0.76 (4.80–5.56) Graphene 3 Up to 60° Insensitive
[18] 2.2 (0.6–2.8) Graphene 3 Up to 60° Insensitive
[22] 3.5 (6.98–9.1) Graphene 3 Up to 60° Insensitive
This work 6.11 (4.5–10.61) Graphene and VO2 (0.8 eV insulator state) 3 TE up to 55°
TM up to 60°
Insensitive
0.83 (3.78–4.61)
1.19 (6.75–7.94)
Graphene and VO2 (0.8 eV metallic state) 3 TE up to 60°
TM up to 65°
Insensitive
0.84 (4.81–5.65) Graphene and VO2 (0 eV metallic state) 3 TE up to 65°
TM up to 65°
Insensitive

1 Bandwidth of absorption over 90%.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a switchable, dual-tunable THz absorber based on patterned graphene and phase-change VO2 was proposed and investigated. When VO2 was in an insulator state, the device could be switched from near-total reflection (>97%) to high absorption over a wide frequency range (4.5–10.61 THz) as the Fermi level of graphene changed from 0 to 0.8 eV. When VO2 was transmitted to a metal state, the device acted as a single-band absorber with absorption band 0.84 THz (when the Fermi energy level of graphene is 0 eV). When VO2 was in a metal state and the Fermi energy level of graphene was tuned to 0.8 eV, the device acted as a dual-band absorber with bands of 3.78–4.61 THz and 6.75–7.94 THz. The absorber was polarization-insensitive and could maintain a stable high absorption performance within a 55° incidence angle. Moreover, the broadband structure could maintain a stable absorption within a τ change of ±50%. With respect to the large absorption bandwidth, flexible tunability, and switchable functionality, the device is promising for various terahertz applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and P.W.; methodology, H.L., P.W. and J.W.; software, H.L., J.W. and X.Y. (Xueguang Yuan); writing—original draft preparation, H.L. and P.W.; writing—review and editing, H.L. and X.Y. (Xin Yan); supervision, X.Y. (Xin Yan), Y.Z. and X.Z.; project administration, X.Y. (Xin Yan) and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Innovation Fund for College Students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), China (IPOC2020ZZ01 and IPOC2019ZT07), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61774021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Cai Y.J., Xu K.D. Tunable broadband terahertz absorber based on multilayer graphene-sandwiched plasmonic structure. Opt. Express. 2018;26:31693–31705. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.031693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Federici J., Moeller L. Review of terahertz and sub terahertz wireless communications. J. Appl. Phys. 2010;107:6. doi: 10.1063/1.3386413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Watts C.M., Liu X., Padilla W.J. Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers. Adv. Mater. 2012;24:OP98–OP120. doi: 10.1002/adma.201200674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo C., Zhang J., Liu K., Yuan X., Qin S., Zhu Z. Graphene-based perfect absorption structures in the visible to terahertz band and their optoelectronics applications. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:1033. doi: 10.3390/nano8121033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jiang S., Li J.Y., Li J.Z., Zhang G.Z., Lin H., Yi F. Genetic optimization of plasmonic metamaterial absorber towards dual-band infrared imaging polarimetry. Opt. Express. 2020;28:22617–22629. doi: 10.1364/OE.397868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abbas A., Ali M., Ali F. Ultra high-sensitivity and tunable dual-band perfect absorber as a plasmonic sensor. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020;127:106201. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y., Feng Y., Zhu B., Zhao J., Jiang T. Graphene based tunable metamaterial absorber and polarization modulation in terahertz frequency. Opt. Express. 2014;22:22743–22752. doi: 10.1364/OE.22.022743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen H.T. Interference theory of metamaterial perfect absorbers. Opt. Express. 2012;20:7165–7172. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.007165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cui Y., He Y., Jin Y., Ding F., Yang L., Ye Y., Zhong S., Lin Y., He S. Plasmonic and metamaterial structures as electromagnetic absorbers. Laser Photonics Rev. 2014;8:495–520. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201400026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhu J., Ma Z., Sun W., Ding F., He Q., Zhou L., Ma Y. Ultra-broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105:021102. doi: 10.1063/1.4890521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meng W., Lv J., Zhang L., Que L., Zhou Y., Jiang Y. An ultra-broadband and polarization-independent metamaterial absorber with bandwidth of 3.7 THz. Opt. Commun. 2018;431:255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2018.08.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Geim A.K., Novoselov S.K. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007;6:183–191. doi: 10.1038/nmat1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou Q., Liu P., Bian L., Liu H., Liu C., Chen G. Controlling enhanced absorption in graphene metamaterial. Opt. Commun. 2018;413:310–316. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.12.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yan J., Zhang Y., Kim P., Pinczuk A. Electric field effect tuning of electron-phonon coupling in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:166802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.166802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bonaccorso F., Sun Z., Hasan T., Ferrari A.C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics. 2010;4:611–622. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye L., Zeng F., Zhang Y., Xu X., Yang X., Liu Q.H. Frequency-reconfigurable wide-angle terahertz absorbers using single- and double-layer decussate graphene ribbon arrays. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:834. doi: 10.3390/nano8100834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen P. and Alu., A. Terahertz metamaterial devices based on graphene nanostructures. IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol. 2013;3:748–756. doi: 10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2285629. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Biabanifard S., Biabanifard M., Asgari S., Asadi S., Yagub M.C.E. Tunable ultra-wideband terahertz absorber based on graphene disks and ribbons. Opt. Commun. 2018;427:418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2018.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Du X., Yan F., Wang W., Tan S., Zhang L., Bai Z., Zhou H., Hou Y. A polarization- and angle-insensitive broadband tunable metamaterial absorber using patterned graphene resonators in the terahertz band. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020;132:106513. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang M.L., Cheng Y.Z., Cheng Z.Z., Chen H.R., Mao X.S., Gong R.Z. Based on graphene tunable dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber with wide-angle. Opt. Commun. 2018;415:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2018.01.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang B.X., Wang G.Z., Wang L.L. Design of a novel dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber. Plasmonics. 2016;11:523–530. doi: 10.1007/s11468-015-0076-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pan F., Fei L., Guang J., Fei S., Dong L., Jian Q. A broadband metamaterial absorber based on multi-layer graphene in the terahertz region. Opt. Commun. 2018;417:62–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qi L., Liu C., Ali S., Syed M. A broad dual-band switchable graphene-based terahertz metamaterial absorber. Carbon. 2019;153:179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu Z., Wu D., Liu Y., Liu C., Yu Z., Yu L., Ye H. Design of a Tunable Ultra-Broadband Terahertz Absorber Based on Multiple Layers of Graphene Ribbons. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018;13:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2552-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Q., Li X., Hossain M.M., Xue Y., Zhang J., Song J., Liu J., Turner M.D., Fan S., Bao Q., et al. Graphene surface plasmons at the near-infrared optical regime. Sci. Rep. 2015;4:6559. doi: 10.1038/srep06559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xu W., Zhu Z.H., Liu K., Zhang J.F., Yuan X.D., Lu Q.S., Qin S.Q. Toward integrated electrically controllable directional coupling based on dielectric loaded graphene plasmonic waveguide. Opt. Lett. 2015;40:1603–1606. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.001603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jepsen P.U., Fischer B.M., Thoman A., Helm H., Suh J.Y., Lopez R., Haglund R.F.J. Metal-insulator phase transition in a VO2 thin film observed with terahertz spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;74:205103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.205103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wen Q.-Y., Zhang H.-W., Yang Q.-H., Xie Y.-S., Chen K., Liu Y.-L. Terahertz metamaterials with VO2 cut-wires for thermal tunability. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010;97:021111. doi: 10.1063/1.3463466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zang X., Cheng S., Lin C., Zhu Y., Zhuang S. Ultra-broadband terahertz absorption by exciting the orthogonal diffraction in dumbbell-shaped gratings. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8901. doi: 10.1038/srep08901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang T., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Cao M. Dual-controlled switchable broadband terahertz absorber based on a graphene-vanadium dioxide metamaterial. Opt. Mater. Express. 2020;10:369–386. doi: 10.1364/OME.383008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Song Z., Wang K., Li J., Liu Q. Broadband tunable terahertz absorber based on vanadium dioxide metamaterials. Opt. Express. 2018;26:7148–7154. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.007148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu H., Wang Z.H., Li L., Fan Y.X., Tao Z. Vanadium dioxide-assisted broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5751. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42293-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Khavasi A. Design of ultra-broadband graphene absorber using circuit theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 2015;32:1941–1946. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.32.001941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hanson G.W. Dyadic Green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 2008;103:064302. doi: 10.1063/1.2891452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xiao S., Wang T., Liu T., Yan X., Li Z., Xu C. Active modulation of electromagnetically induced transparency analogue in terahertz hybrid metal-graphene metamaterials. Carbon. 2018;126:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang Y., Feng Y., Jiang T., Cao J., Zhao J., Zhu B. Tunable broadband polarization rotator in terahertz frequency based on graphene metamaterial. Carbon. 2018;133:170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mishra R., Panwar R., Singh D. Equivalent Circuit Model for the Design of Frequency-Selective, Terahertz-Band, Graphene-Based Metamaterial Absorbers. IEEE Mag. Lett. 2018;9:1–5. doi: 10.1109/LMAG.2018.2878946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hu H., Zhai F., Hu D., Li Z., Bai B., Yang X., Dai Q. Broadly tunable graphene plasmons using anion-gel top gate with low control voltage. Nanoscale. 2015;7:19493–19500. doi: 10.1039/C5NR05175D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Song Z., Deng Y., Zhou Y., Liu Z. Terahertz toroidal metamaterial with tunable properties. Opt. Express. 2019;27:5792–5797. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.005792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang C., Zhou G., Wu J., Tang Y., Wen Q., Li S., Han J., Jin B., Chen J., Wu P. Active Control of Terahertz Waves Using Vanadium-Dioxide-Embedded Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019;11:054016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.054016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu M., Xu Q., Chen X., Plum E., Li H., Zhang X., Zhang C., Zou C., Han J., Zhang W. Temperature-Controlled Asymmetric Transmission of Electromagnetic Waves. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:4097. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40791-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lim W.X., Singh R. Universal behaviour of high-Q Fano resonances in metamaterials: Terahertz to near-infrared regime. Nano Converg. 2018;5:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s40580-018-0137-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen C.-F., Park C.-H., Boudouris B.W., Horng J., Geng B., Girit C., Zettl A., Crommie M.F., Segalman R., Louie S.G., et al. Controlling inelastic light scattering quantum pathways in graphene. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;471:617–620. doi: 10.1038/nature09866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Guo H., Liu N., Fu L., Meyrath T.P., Zentgraf T., Schweizer H., Giessen H. Resonance hybridization in double split-ring resonator metamaterials. Opt. Express. 2007;15:12095–12101. doi: 10.1364/OE.15.012095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vakil A., Engheta N. Transformation Optics Using Graphene. Science. 2011;332:1291–1294. doi: 10.1126/science.1202691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Arsanjani A., Biabanifard M., Abrishamian M.S. A novel analytical method for designing a multi-band, polarization-insensitive and wide angle graphene-based THz absorber. Superlattices Microstruct. 2019;128:157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2019.01.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Micromachines are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES